Abstract
Traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment options remain limited and are hampered by our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms, including the inflammatory response observed in the brain. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been shown to activate an innate inflammatory response by acting as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP). Here, we show raised circulating cell-free (ccf) mtDNA levels in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum within 48 h of brain injury. CSF ccf-mtDNA levels correlated with clinical severity and the interleukin-6 cytokine response. These findings support the use of ccf-mtDNA as a biomarker after acute brain injury linked to the inflammatory disease mechanism.
Keywords: acute brain injury, brain inflammation, DAMP, mitochondrial DNA, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury
Introduction
Acute brain injury, encompassing both traumatic brain injury (TBI) and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), is a leading cause of death and disability. There are estimated to be ∼50 million cases of TBI and 5 million cases of aSAH (accounting for ∼5% of all strokes) occurring annually worldwide.1,2 Although our understanding of the mechanisms of cellular injury and death after physical and ischaemic insult remains incomplete, mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in the propagation of secondary injury through oxidative stress, calcium dysregulation, and by activating apoptosis.3
Mitochondria contain their own genome (mitochondrial DNA; mtDNA), which codes for 13 essential proteins involved in oxidative energy metabolism. When released from organelles and cells, mtDNA contributes to damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and raised plasma levels of circulating cell-free mtDNA (ccf-mtDNA) are associated with organ dysfunction after systemic trauma.4,5 An early neuroinflammatory response is evident after acute brain injury, demonstrated by the release of cytokine mediators, such as Interleukin-6 (IL-6), within hours of injury.6 However, the links between serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of ccf-mtDNA after acute brain injury, and their relationship to an early inflammatory response, have not been systematically examined. We hypothesized that levels of ccf-mtDNA in both CSF and serum would be raised after acute brain injury and correlate with the neuroinflammatory response.
Methods
Subjects
Patients with severe TBI or aSAH requiring admission to the Neuro-Critical Care Unit at Cambridge University Hospitals (CUH) were recruited within 48 h of injury. Serum was extracted from blood samples taken from an arterial line. Next, 5 mL of CSF was extracted as a fresh, clean sample from the external ventricular drain when present. All samples of serum and CSF (when available) were obtained within 48 h of injury. This study was approved by the NHS Health Research Authority and the CUH institutional ethics board.
Control CSF and serum samples were obtained from patients undergoing investigation for normal pressure hydrocephalus or idiopathic intracranial hypertension. These patients underwent lumbar drain or lumbar infusion studies, requiring a lumbar puncture and removal of CSF as part of standard clinical investigations. All control patients consented to use of their CSF and serum for research purposes as part of the CUH Neurosurgical Biobank.
All CSF samples were centrifuged within 15 min of collection at 2000g for 10 min at 4°C with the supernatant stored in cryovials at −80 oC. Blood samples were collected into tubes (serum gel, 3.9 mL; Sarstedt AG & Co. KG, Nümbrecht, Germany), gently inverted three times and left to clot for 30 min. Tubes were then centrifuged at 2000g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then stored at −80°C.
Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record system, with the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) as the best responses at the point of first presentation to a clinician.
Mitochondrial DNA copy number and interleukin-6 measurements
Quantification of ccf-mtDNA was performed in triplicate by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction amplification of the mitochondrial genes, MTND1 and MTND4, using the Bio-Rad QX100 Digital Droplet PCR platform (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). For serum samples, DNA was first extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). CSF samples were loaded directly, without DNA extraction. The absolute mtDNA copy number is expressed in copies per microliter, derived as the mean of ND1 and ND4 values. Cases and control samples were randomly assigned to each run. IL-6 concentration was measured in duplicate, directly from both serum and CSF samples, using the Human IL-6 ELISA kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism (Version 9; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) and R statistical language software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Statistical significance testing was carried out using data appropriate tests (detailed in the text), with significance level set at p < 0.05.
Results
Twenty-five acute brain injury (15 TBI and 10 aSAH) and 10 control patients were recruited. Mean age (±SD [standard deviation]) in the cohorts was 52.6 (±16.8), 64.8 (±9.3), and 66.9 (±14.6) years for TBI, aSAH, and control groups, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis' test, p = 0.067). Median initial GCS score was lower in the TBI compared with aSAH cohort (6 vs. 10, respectively), which did not reach significance (Mann-Whitney's U test, p = 0.16). Demographic data for the cohort are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
TBI (n = 15) | aSAH (n = 10) | Control (n = 10) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years), mean ± SD | 52.6 ± 16.8 | 64.8 ± 9.3 | 66.9 ± 14.6 | 0.067 |
Male [%] | 9 [60] | 4 [40] | 8 [80] | 0.036 |
Admission GCS, median [range] | 6 [4–14] | 10 [4–14] | N/A | 0.071 |
Motor score, median [range] | 3 [1–6] | 5 [2–6] | N/A | 0.1 |
Injury Severity Score, median [range] | 21 [16–29] | N/A | N/A | N/A |
TBI, traumatic brain injury; aSAH, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; SD, standard deviation; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; N/A, not applicable.
Serum samples were collected from all brain injury and control patients. CSF was available and collected from all aSAH patients, 5 TBI, and all control patients. Median time of sampling (± interquartile range) was 24 (±26) and 26 h (±19) after injury for the TBI and aSAH cohorts, respectively (Mann-Whitney's U test, p = 0.88).
Acute brain injury patients demonstrate raised circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA levels in both cerebrospinal fluid and serum
In the TBI cohort, ccf-mtDNA copy number was significantly raised compared to controls in both serum (Mann-Whitney's U test, p < 0.0001) and CSF (p = 0.0007). Similarly, in the aSAH cohort, ccf-mtDNA copy number was raised compared to controls in both serum (p = 0.0015) and CSF (p < 0.0001). Between the two acute brain injury cohorts, there was a higher ccf-mtDNA mean copy number in TBI compared with SAH in both serum (p = 0.0009) and CSF (p = 0.04; Fig. 1A,B).
Circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA copy number in cerebrospinal fluid correlates to the severity of brain injury
Initial GCS score correlated with ccf-mtDNA copy number in CSF (Spearman, ρ = −0.74, p = 0.0025), but not serum (Spearman, ρ = −0.17, p = 0.43; Fig. 1C,D). There was no correlation between ccf-mtDNA and Injury Severity Score for TBI patients, in either CSF (Spearman, ρ = −0.20, p = 0.78) or serum (Spearman, ρ = −0.25, p = 0.35).
Interleukin-6 concentration in cerebrospinal fluid correlates with circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA level
There was no detectable IL-6 in either serum or CSF of control patients. Mean concentration of IL-6 in CSF was raised compared to controls for both the TBI (699.3 pg/mL; Mann-Whitney's U test, p = 0.0003) and aSAH (428.9 pg/mL; p < 0.0001) cohorts (Fig. 2A). Mean serum concentrations (±SD) of IL-6 were comparably low for TBI (36.9 ± 44.4 pg/mL) and SAH (6.0 ± 9.0 pg/mL) cohorts (Mann-Whitney's U test, p = 0.08). CSF concentration of IL-6 correlated with CSF ccf-mtDNA copy number (Spearman, ρ = 0.66, p = 0.009; Fig. 2B).
Discussion
We demonstrate that ccf-mtDNA is raised in both serum and CSF after acute brain injury, and that CSF levels correlate with both severity of injury and an inflammatory cytokine response. This presents ccf-mtDNA as a plausible biomarker of acute brain injury, with potential important implications for our mechanistic understanding of the role of mitochondria in acute brain injury and neuroinflammation.
It is notable that, although both serum and CSF ccf-mtDNA levels are higher in TBI compared to aSAH, it is only CSF levels that correlate with the initial GCS. This correlation has also been shown in a cohort of pediatric TBI patients.7 Given that there is considered to be a more widespread burden of cellular injury in TBI compared to aSAH, and with the assumption that CSF offers more of a “real-time” and local reflection of the milieu of the brain compared to serum, these results together suggest that CSF ccf-mtDNA levels reflect the burden of central nervous system injury. Further investigation is necessary to explore whether this is an active process where mtDNA is released from intact cells or a passive reflection of cell death.
In either scenario, the presence of raised ccf-mtDNA in the central nervous system in the context of injury is of interest. mtDNA, unlike nuclear DNA, contains unmethylated CpG sequences—a pattern common to bacterial DNA—which act as a DAMP.8,9 These stimulate an innate immune response and proinflammatory cytokine release through a variety pattern recognition receptors, for instance Toll-like receptor 9 and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase, which are known to be expressed in neurons and glia.10–12 Further, IL-6 has been specifically implicated as downstream to both intra- and extracellular mtDNA-induced inflammatory response, including in the context of a genetic variant of Parkinson's disease (PRKN-PINK) characterized by mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired mitophagy.13,14
After acute brain injury, there is ample evidence of a significant neuroinflammatory response, with IL-6 implicated as a prototypical cytokine released within hours of injury.15 However, the mechanism for this response is poorly understood, and this is highlighted by the failure of numerous clinical trials for broad “anti-inflammatory” agents (e.g., corticosteroids) in these cohorts.15 In concordance with previous studies, we demonstrate an acute IL-6 cytokine response in brain injury patients that is isolated to the CSF and reflects the severity of injury.6 We found that this response is highly correlated to the ccf-mtDNA copy number in CSF. This finding, alongside existing in vitro evidence of mtDNA inducing IL-6 production, suggests a role for ccf-mtDNA as an initiator of neuroinflammation after acute brain injury.13,14 mtDNA thus presents as both a potential biomarker for the process of neuroinflammation and a target for investigating how this process is initiated. mtDNA, or its specific downstream inflammatory effectors, may also present new avenues for therapeutic intervention, as has already been explored pre-clinically, using nucleic acid scavenging polymers.5
One limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size, which was insufficiently powered to stratify patients by demographic parameters, such as age or sex, or pre-morbid conditions. As such, we have not attempted to draw any conclusions with regard to prognostication or association to long-term outcome, but these warrant future exploration in larger longitudinal studies, with more frequent sampling, alongside further measures of injury severity such as imaging scores. We highlight also that our control cohort was drawn from patient groups undergoing investigation for neurological diseases, but we found that both serum and CSF copy number values of ccf-mtDNA of control subjects in this study resemble previous healthy subject findings.16,17
In summary, we demonstrate ccf-mtDNA as a potential molecular marker of acute brain injury with CSF levels reflecting severity of brain injury and correlating with an inflammatory cytokine response. These findings open a new avenue for investigating the mechanism and treatment of neuroinflammation after acute brain insults.
Supplementary Material
Abbreviations Used
- aSAH
aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
- ccf-mtDNA
circulating cell-free mtDNA
- CSF
cerebrospinal fluid
- CUH
Cambridge University Hospitals
- DAMPs
damage-associated molecular patterns
- GCS
Glasgow Coma Scale
- IL-6
interleukin-6
- mtDNA
mitochondrial DNA
- SD
standard deviation
- TBI
traumatic brain injury
Funding Information
P.F.C. is a Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellow (212219/Z/18/Z), and a UK NIHR Senior Investigator, who receives support from the Medical Research Council Mitochondrial Biology Unit (MC_UU_00015/9), the Medical Research Council (MRC) International Centre for Genomic Medicine in Neuromuscular Disease (MR/S005021/1), the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2018-408), an MRC research grant (MR/S035699/1), and an Alzheimer's Society Project Grant (AS-PG-18b-022). This research was supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Supplementary Material
Cite this article as: Kayhanian S, Glynos A, Mair R, et al. Cell-free mitochondrial DNA in acute brain injury. Neurotrauma Reports 2022:3(1):415–420. doi: 10.1089/neur.2022.0032.
References
- 1. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:987–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Etminan N, Chang HS, Hackenberg K, et al. Worldwide incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage according to region, time period, blood pressure, and smoking prevalence in the population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:588–597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Balog J, Mehta SL, Vemuganti R. Mitochondrial fission and fusion in secondary brain damage after CNS insults. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36:2022–2033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature 2010;464:104–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Aswani A, Manson J, Itagaki K. et al. Scavenging circulating mitochondrial DNA as a potential therapeutic option for multiple organ dysfunction in trauma hemorrhage. Front Immunol 2018;9:891;doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Woodcock T, Morganti-Kossmann C. The role of markers of inflammation in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol 2013;4:18;doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Walko TD, Bola RA, Hong JD, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid mitochondrial DNA: a novel DAMP in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Shock 2014;41:499–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. West AP, Shadel GS. Mitochondrial DNA in innate immune responses and inflammatory pathology. Nat Rev Immunol 2017;17:363–375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Regner A, Meirelles LDS, Ikuta N, et al. Prognostic utility of circulating nucleic acids in acute brain injuries. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018;18:925–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Riley JS, Tait SW. Mitochondrial DNA in inflammation and immunity. EMBO Rep. 2020;21:e49799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kigerl KA, de Rivero Vaccari JP, Dietrich WD, et al. Pattern recognition receptors and central nervous system repair. Exp Neurol 2014;258:5–16; doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Decout A, Katz JD, Venkatraman S, et al. The cGAS–STING pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev.Immunol 2021;21:548–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dib B, Lin H, Maidana DE, et al. Mitochondrial DNA has a pro-inflammatory role in AMD. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015;1853(11 Pt A):2897–2906; doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.08.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Borsche M, König IR, Delcambre S, et al. Mitochondrial damage-associated inflammation highlights biomarkers in PRKN/PINK1 parkinsonism. Brain 2020;143:3041–3051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Thelin EP, Tajsic T, Zeiler FA, et al. Monitoring the neuroinflammatory response following acute brain injury. Front Neurol 2017;8:351;doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Varhaug KN, Vedeler CA, Myhr KM, et al. Increased levels of cell-free mitochondrial DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. Mitochondrion 2017;34:32–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pyle A, Brennan R, Kurzawa-Akanbi M, et al. Reduced cerebrospinal fluid mitochondrial DNA is a biomarker for early-stage Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol 2015;78:1000–1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.