Skip to main content
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics logoLink to CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
. 2022 Jul 13;28(11):1675–1688. doi: 10.1111/cns.13916

New hope for Parkinson's disease treatment: Targeting gut microbiota

Hong‐Xia Fan 1, Shuo Sheng 1, Feng Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC9532916  PMID: 35822696

Abstract

There might be more than 10 million confirmed cases of Parkinson's disease (PD) worldwide by 2040. However, the pathogenesis of PD is still unclear. Host health is closely related to gut microbiota, which are affected by factors such as age, diet, and exercise. Recent studies have found that gut microbiota may play key roles in the progression of a wide range of diseases, including PD. Changes in the abundance of gut bacteria, such as Helicobacter pylori, Enterococcus faecalis, and Desulfovibrio, might be involved in PD pathogenesis or interfere with PD therapy. Gut microbiota and the distal brain achieve action on each other through a gut‐brain axis composed of the nervous system, endocrine system, and immune system. Here, this review focused on the current understanding of the connection between Parkinson's disease and gut microbiota, to provide potential therapeutic targets for PD.

Keywords: Desulfovibrio, Enterococcus faecalis, gut microbiota, Parkinson's disease


We reviewed the relationship between Parkinson's disease and gut bacteria, especially Helicobacter pylori, Enterococcus faecalis, and Desulfovibrio. At the same time, three kinds of dialogue mechanisms between brain and gut are also discussed. Finally, three potential interventions for gut microbiota are discussed.

graphic file with name CNS-28-1675-g001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the common neurodegenerative diseases, with more than 10 million confirmed cases of PD estimated worldwide by 2040. 1 Tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia are typical clinical manifestations of PD. 2 Non‐motor symptoms include gastrointestinal dysfunction, such as constipation, sleep behavior disorder, depression, and cognitive impairment. 3 Importantly, non‐motor symptoms and motor symptoms might influence each other to aggravate PD severity, 4 thereby exacerbating the deterioration of quality of life and mentality in patients with PD.

The pathogenesis of PD is complex, which is mainly related to complex environmental factors. A large number of epidemiological studies indicated that the prevalence of PD was higher in people over 50 years old, and the incidence increased with age. 5 The prevalence of PD was higher in men than that in women at the same age. 6 However, there were significant differences in PD prevalence among different regions and races in different studies. 7 , 8 , 9 In addition, current evidence demonstrated that genetic factors were only associated with a small number of PD cases. 10 Moreover, PD was more affected by environmental factors, such as pesticide exposure and dairy intake. On the other hand, traumatic brain injury and β2‐adrenergic receptor antagonists were recognized to be risk factors that increased the probability of PD, while nicotine in tobacco, caffeine in coffee, tea, and anti‐inflammatory medication (non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, statins) intake had a negative correlation with the incidence of PD. 11 , 12 , 13

When PD patients showed obvious clinical symptoms, the dopaminergic (DA) neurons containing neuromelanin (NM) in the substantia nigra (SN) of midbrain were damaged. 14 The pathological features were the accumulation of iron in SN, loss of DA neurons in the ventrolateral and caudal layers, and the increased levels of extracellular NM. 15 Furthermore, NM interacted with excess Fe3+ 16 , 17 and then combined with α‐synuclein in the cytoplasm 18 to damage DA neurons by destroying Ca2+ 19 homeostasis or activating microglia. 20 , 21

Currently, several imaging techniques are used to evaluate PD. For example, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (diffusion, iron‐sensitive, and neuromelanin‐sensitive sequences) can detect the changes in the brain microstructure of PD patients. 15 , 22 PET imaging with 18F‐DOPA to quantitatively estimate nigrostriatal DA neurodegeneration. 23 SPECT imaging using radiolabeled tracers that bind dopamine transporter (DAT) ligands ([123I] FP‐CIT, [123I] β‐CIT, [99mTc]–TRODAT‐1) to determine DAT activity and help assess the integrity of the DA substantia nigra pathway. 24 Detection of early changes in the SN region by the above means could be used as a supplement method to the clinical diagnosis of PD. 25 In addition, PD can be distinguished from atypical PD by cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. 26 Symptoms of dementia may interfere with the diagnosis of PD, and DAT‐SPECT is used to discriminate between Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia. 25

In addition, the hyperthyroidism symptoms caused by L‐thyroxin partially overlap with PD symptoms, which may interfere with the diagnosis of PD. The loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra in PD was irreversible. Tremors and other motor disturbances occurred due to the damaged substantia nigra‐striatum dopamine projection pathway. 27 Administration of levodopa can only attenuate the symptoms of PD but not delay the development of PD. L‐thyroxin was used as a thyroid replacement therapy for hypothyroidism. However, excessive use of L‐thyroxin could lead to hyperthyroidism, 28 which increased the metabolic rate and caused symptoms, including sweating, anxiety, tachycardia, and tremors. 29 , 30 This can be blocked by discontinuing the use of L‐thyroxin or using β–blockers, such as propranolol, atenolol, and metoprolol. 31 Various animal studies indicated that L‐thyroxin‐induced hyperthyroidism resulted in the increased levels of malondialdehyde and glutathione in rat brain tissue, which further activated the oxidant and anti‐oxidant system. 32 , 33 However, excessive lipid peroxidation was thought to be a hallmark of most neurodegenerative diseases, such as PD. 34 In addition, the incidence of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism in L‐thyroxin‐treated PD patients was exhibited to be higher than that in the control group, and hyperthyroidism was also closely associated with higher PD risk. 35 , 36

Rapid advances in high‐throughput technology over the past 20 years have led to a great understanding of the number, composition, and function of intestinal bacteria. Homeostasis of intestinal bacteria is crucial for maintaining the health of the host. However, the gut flora is susceptible to changes in host age, diet, and exercise. 37 , 38 , 39 At present, a large number of studies have suggested that intestinal bacteria may be involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and PD. 40 , 41 , 42 Furthermore, changed intestinal microecology has also been observed in patients with diseases associated with PD, such as diabetes and colitis. 43 , 44 In‐depth understanding of the association between intestinal bacteria and PD may lead us to find potential therapeutic targets for PD in the gut, which is conducive to the development of treatments for PD.

2. INTERSECTION OF GUT MICROBIOTA AND PARKINSON'S DISEASE

There are currently approximately 1000 ubiquitous species in the human gut, reaching a total number of 3.8 × 1013. 45 , 46 Mammals have a complex symbiotic relationship with their gut microbiota. Host‐secreted microRNAs (miRNAs) are non‐coding RNA molecules that participate in transcription. Recent studies have found that miRNAs could conduct intercellular translocation through gap‐cell contact or exosome release, 47 and then enter bacterial cells and regulate growth behavior and bacterial gene transcripts. 48 For example, miRNA‐146A, (HSA)‐miRNA‐515‐5p, and HSA‐miRNA‐1226‐5p were verified to correlate with the abundance of Listeria, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Escherichia coli (E. coli), respectively. 49 , 50 In addition, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were presumed to have the highest potential target site of miRNA. Meanwhile, several miRNA‐targeted proteins (hsa‐miR‐3180‐5p, hsa‐miR‐132‐5p, and hsa‐miR‐3180‐5p) were involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and biofilm formation pathways of various pathogenic bacteria in the pathogenesis of PD. 47 In turn, bacterial infections, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), and Salmonella enterica, also regulated host miRNA expressions and thereby host immune function. 48 These results suggest that there might be crosstalk between host and symbiotic bacteria.

Additionally, another evidence confirmed the significant differences of gut microbiota between PD and healthy people. In detail, the intestinal microbiome richness (Observed and Chao 1) in PD patients was decreased compared with healthy controls by sequencing the V4 and V5 regions of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. The relative abundance of Clostridiales family XI and the genus Peptoniphilus was high in PD patients, while genera Faecalibacterium and Fusicatenibacter were decreased. 51 Interestingly, the intestinal microbiota of PD patients treated with drugs also differed from that in healthy controls. An apparent increase in the relative abundance of Peptoniphilus and Finegoldia genera in PD patients treated with levodopa was shown, while the relative abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae, the genera Peptoniphilus, Anaerococcus, the Eubacterium brachy group, Sellimonas, Bifidobacterium, and Enterococcus was increased in PD patients treated with entacapone. Moreover, the relative abundance of Enterococcaceae and Clostridiales family XI was increased in PD patients treated with levodopa or Entacapone, while Faecalibacterium and the Ruminococcus gauvreauii were decreased. 51

It should also be noted that human gut contains not only bacteria but also incompletely identified eukaryotes. Recently, the richness of eukaryotes (Observed, Shannon, and Simpson) was found to be reduced in PD patients by sequencing the V6 and V7 regions of the eukaryotes' 18S rRNA genes. Furtherly, the lower relative abundance of sequences affiliated with Aspergillus/Penicillium, Charophyta/Linum, unidentified Opisthokonta, and three genera of minor abundant zooflagellates in PD patients was discerned. At the same time, the abundance of Geotrichum was increased in PD patients treated with levodopa or Entacapone compared with healthy controls. 52

Currently, the intestinal inflammation was considered to be an important contributor in the development of PD. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were at a higher risk of PD occurrence. 53 Furthermore, PD patients had higher levels of calprotectin, a fecal marker of intestinal inflammation, as well as α1‐antitrypsin and zonulin, two fecal markers of intestinal permeability. 54 Intestinal flora appeared to be involved in the formation of a relevant pro‐inflammatory intestinal environment. The relative abundance of Peptoniphilus and Finegoldia, which could cause a variety of microbial infections and inflammation, increased in calprotectin‐positive PD patients. However, Faecalibacterium and Fusicatenibacter were found to have anti‐inflammatory effects and the relatively low abundance of these 2 bacteria in calprotectin‐positive PD patients. 51

Gut microbiota are involved in the metabolism and immune regulation of the host. Based on the critical role of metabolism and immunity in the development of PD, we summarized three intersections of PD pathogenesis and intestinal microbiota changes.

The growth of age is a natural change, which is accompanied by the development, maturation, and aging of the body's organs. Similarly, there is such a dynamic change process in gut microbiota. Studies have shown significant differences in the composition of gut microbiota among infants, adults, and the elderly. 55 , 56 The microbial community of healthy adults is heterogeneous, Firmicutes dominate, and the intestine has a stable microecology, while aging can disrupt this microecological balance and cause the reproduction of a large number of pathogenic bacteria. A recent study showed that PD patients had lower Simpson index and Equitability Index, suggesting dysregulation of gut microbiota in PD patients. 57 Observed a decreasing trend in the abundance of Firmicutes, while the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria increased in subjects over 70 years of age susceptible to PD. Many common pathogens have been found in Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes, such as E. coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Bacteroides fragilis, which could release lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as neurotoxins. 58 , 59 These neurotoxins may be rapidly or chronically released during aging and induced systemic inflammatory pathologies and Parkinson's disease. 60 , 61

The gut microbiota plays an active role in promoting the absorption and utilization of food. Due to the microbiota could induce glycosylation of small intestinal tissue factors and increase surface localization, the microbiota‐induced extravascular tissue factor protease‐activated receptor 1 signaling loop was considered to be a novel pathway that influenced vascular remodeling in the small intestine. 62 Thus, the increased villi vascularization in the small intestine would promote the oxygen cooperation of villi and change villi morphology, which might ultimately affect the nutrient absorption of food by the host. 63 In turn, the abundance of the gut microbiome fluctuates in response to food. Interestingly, different kinds of food could selectively affect the abundance, as well as metabolism of specific bacteria. For example, soybean intake was negatively associated with Prevotella and white bread intake increased Bifidobacterial abundance. 64 , 65 Further, dietary fiber and whole‐grain intake increase the abundance of related gut bacteria that produce short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs). 66 , 67 SCFAs is an important energy source for colonic epithelial cells and can enhance the integrity of the epithelial barrier. 68 Meanwhile, SCFAs are signal molecules that connect microbe and host, and their receptors are highly expressed in immune cells. In addition, some SCFAs can cross the blood–brain barrier, regulate the permeability of the blood–brain barrier, and restore the number of damaged microglia as well as their function and morphology. 69

Studies have shown that dietary fat was closely associated with the increased intestinal permeability. Tight junction protein and mucin constitute the apical junctional complex, which connects intestinal epithelial cells and forms an important barrier between host and environment. The intestinal barrier selectively controls the infiltration of nutrients and prevents the infiltration of pathogenic substances. 70 High‐fat diet (HFD) not only reduces the expression of intestinal tight junction protein, but also stimulates the intracellular protein kinase C signaling pathway to increase intestinal wall cell permeability. 71 , 72 In addition, dietary fat elicited the synthesis of hydrophobic bile acids (deoxycholic acid and deoxycholic acid), both of which stimulate EGFR‐mediated signaling and enhance ROS‐induced oxidative stress to further promote intestinal permeability. 73 , 74 , 75 At the same time, HFD was associated with a decrease in intestinal bacterial diversity, and HFD increased the relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae and decreased the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes. 76 , 77 Although both Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroidetes were gram‐negative bacteria, the lipid A structure of Enterobacteriaceae bound to members of the TLR4‐activated pathway better than the lipid A structure of Bacteroidetes. 77 , 78 Therefore, HFD‐mediated increased intestinal permeability could promote passive translocation of LPS or LPS‐containing gram‐negative bacteria, resulting in more LPS translocation into the blood circulation system to trigger systemic inflammation. 70

Exercise can produce changes in gut microbial composition and play an active role in energy homeostasis and microbiota regulation. 79 , 80 A recent clinical studies suggest that high‐intensity aerobic exercise improved PD symptoms and bimanual dexterity. 81 This may be because exercise increases the reproduction of SCFAs producing bacteria. Aerobic exercise has been found to increase the concentration of SCFAs in feces, and these short‐chain fatty acid levels decrease again after cessation of exercise. 82 Therefore, healthy microbiome composition and metabolism require appropriate and sustained exercise to maintain.

The above results suggest that a new protective intervention for PD can be developed by increasing the colonization of specific intestinal bacteria through a fiber‐rich diet and regular exercise.

3. GUT BACTERIA ASSOCIATED WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE

PD is characterized by degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the SN, formation of intracytoplasmic eosinophilic inclusions (Lewy bodies, mainly composed of abnormal deposition of α‐synuclein), destruction of the nigrostriatal pathway, and decreased dopamine content in the striatum. 83 Studies have found that α‐synuclein structures exist in the colon of patients with early PD and also α‐synuclein is deposited as early as before the clinical diagnosis of PD patients, 84 suggesting that the accumulation of intestinal α‐synuclein preceded the onset of PD, and PD may begin in the intestine. 85 At the same time, studies have found that gastrointestinal dysfunction in PD patients occurs many years earlier than PD, 86 suggesting a close link between intestinal diseases and PD. For example, a higher association between IBD and the risk of PD was presented. 87 , 88 Thus, the alterations of microbiota in PD 89 might exist in the bidirectional relationship of bacteria/PD, bacteria/gastrointestinal symptoms, and gastrointestinal symptoms/PD.

3.1. Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori is located in the intestinal epithelium, one of the common bacterial infections. Studies have found that PD patients had a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 A study showed a close association between H. pylori positivity and worse PD exercise severity. 94 In 102 PD patients, the degree of motor symptoms was heavier in H. pylori‐positive group than that in H. pylori‐negative group by assessing the clinical symptoms of the patients. In addition, the mean UPDRS‐III score was reduced after H. pylori eradication therapy. 95

Helicobacter pylori infection was highly associated with the duodenum, which is the main site of levodopa absorption. 96 One meta‐analysis found that PD patients with H. pylori infection had higher levodopa equivalent daily dose than those of patients without H. pylori infection. 97 Moreover, a prospective study exhibited that H. pylori eradication improved levodopa onset time, ‘ON’ duration, motor severity, and quality of life parameters. 98 H. pylori might utilize levodopa to promote its own growth, thus reducing the amount of oral levodopa used to treat PD‐related pathologies. 99 However, a recent randomized placebo‐controlled trial displayed that eradication of H. pylori did not improve the clinical outcome of PD. 100 The conflicting conclusions suggest that further studies are needed to demonstrate that H. pylori eradication has important therapeutic implications for PD patients.

3.2. Enterococcus faecalis

Levodopa is the drug used for dopamine replacement therapy in PD treatment regimens. Since levodopa is metabolized peripherally, it is combined with decarboxylase inhibitors to improve its utilization. Despite this, levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitors are ineffective in some PD patients, and their efficacy decreases over time of treatment, requiring frequent drug dose changes. 101 It was reported that fecal tyrosine decarboxylase (TyrDC) abundance was positively correlated with levodopa dose and levodopa levels in plasma were negatively correlated with the abundance of bacterial TyrDC genes in the jejunum of PD patients. 102 On the one hand, TyrDC was identified mainly in Enterococcus faecalis, which decarboxylated L‐tyrosine to tyramine, while tyrosine differed from levodopa by only one additional hydroxyl group. 103 On the other hand, genetic and biochemical experiments showed that TyrDC decarboxylated both levodopa and its preferred substrate tyrosine, which accounted for the variable efficacy of levodopa.

Recent studies confirmed that Enterococcus faecalis could decarboxylate both levodopa and tyrosine. Enterococcus faecalis and carbidopa did not affect each other's decarboxylated effects on levodopa. 101 Therefore, in PD patients with large numbers of Enterococcus faecalis, the serum peak concentration of levodopa will be reduced. Thus, the abundance of Enterococcus faecalis and its coding TyrDC can predict the interindividual differences in levodopa metabolism in complex human gut microbiome samples. Therefore, Enterococcus faecalis is also one of the factors affecting the bioavailability of Levodopa, and inhibition of Enterococcus faecalis may be one of the means to improve the bioavailability of Levodopa, which has the potential to treat PD.

3.3. Desulfovibrio

Sulfate‐reducing bacteria is a kind of anaerobic bacteria that obtains energy through dissimilated sulfate reduction, thus producing a large amount of sulfide. 104 Human isolates of sulfate‐reducing bacteria consist almost exclusively of Desulfovibrio (DSV) species. 105 , 106 DSV is associated with IBD and bacteremia infections. 104 , 107 Results from a case–control study showed that the relative abundance of Desulfovibrionaceae bacteria was increased in the microbiota of PD patients. 108

DSV has two properties that are closely related to PD pathogenesis. On the one hand, DSV could produce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) by dissimilatory sulfate reduction using sulfate as electron acceptor for respiration. 109 H2S has been involved in multiple signaling mechanisms under normal physiological conditions. 110 However, high dose of H2S gas exposure resulted in severe central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction and even death. 111 , 112 At the same time, H2S released mitochondrial cytochrome c into the cytoplasm, and the peroxidase activity of cytochrome c contributed to the formation of α‐synuclein free radicals, which triggers α‐synuclein oligomerization. 113 , 114 In addition, H2S could interfere with iron metabolism by increasing iron content in the cytoplasm. 115 , 116 Iron homeostasis is essential in CNS. Additional evidence indicated that iron could induce α‐synuclein fibrosis. 117 , 118 , 119 On the other hand, DSV is able to reduce ferric iron to ferrous iron by a periplasmic [FeFe]‐hydrogenase present in almost all DSV, thus producing magnetite (Fe3O4). 120 , 121 According to relevant studies, uncoated magnetite nanoparticles accelerated α‐synuclein aggregation. 122

Recent studies suggested a close association between DSV bacteria and PD. The number of DSV bacteria in stool samples from PD patients correlated with the severity of PD and higher numbers of DSV were found in PD samples and all stool samples from PD patients were positive for the DSV‐specific [FeFe] ‐hydrogenase gene. In addition, the statistical results also showed that the amount of DSV was higher in PD patients with constipation. 123 Constipation is one of the prodromal symptoms of PD, so the change of DSV content can be used as one of the indicators to predict the progression of PD.

3.4. Other bacteria

In addition to the above specific bacteria, the role of other bacteria on the pathogenesis of PD has also been verified. For example, Nocardia asteroides were found to induce parkinsonism‐like pathological symptoms in experimental mice as early as 1991. 124 Proteus mirabilis isolated from PD mice selectively damaged dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and striatum, and stimulated the accumulation of α‐synuclein in the brain and colon of PD model mice. 58 Citrobacter rodentium, a murine enteric pathogen that mimics human pathogenic E. coli infection, was found to reduce spontaneous motility and motility defects in open field chambers after Pink1−/− mice were exposed to Citrobacterum three times for more than 4 months. 125 Porphyromonas gingivalis was able to damage dopaminergic neurons and increase microglia activation in the SN of LRRK2 R1441G mutant mice with the mRNA expressions of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin‐1β increased and the protein levels of α‐synuclein and occludens‐1 decreased in the colon. 126 Cyanobacteria are associated with the pathogenesis of PD since they produce β‐N‐methylamino‐L‐alanine. 127 β‐N‐methylamino‐L‐alanine is a neurotoxin that lowers the levels of glutathione, a major antioxidant, by activating metabotropic glutamate receptors. 128 These studies show the contribution of different pathogenic bacteria to the progression of PD (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Effects of pathogens on the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease

Pathogens Effects Mechanism
Helicobacter pylori
  • Parkinsonism: differential age‐trend in Helicobacter pylori antibody 90

  • Helicobacter pylori eradication and levodopa absorption in patients with PD and motor fluctuations 91

  • Helicobacter pylori infection and motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease 92

  • Helicobacter pylori infection was related to a poor response to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease 97

Helicobacter pylori interferes with levodopa absorption.
Enterococcus faecalis
  • Gut bacterial tyrosine decarboxylases restrict levels of levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease 102

  • Discovery and inhibition of an interspecies gut bacterial pathway for levodopa metabolism 101

Enterococcus faecalis decarboxylates levodopa to dopamine in the gut.
Desulfovibrio
  • Gut microbiota in patients with Parkinson's disease in southern China 108

  • Desulfovibrio bacteria were associated with Parkinson's disease 123

Desulfovibrio Bacteria produce extracellular magnetite and H2S, both of which induce oligomerization and aggregation of α‐synuclein.
Nocardia asteroides
  • Levodopa‐responsive movement disorder caused by Nocardia asteroides localized in mouse brains 124

Nocardia asteroides induce the formation of Lewy body‐like hyaline inclusions.
Proteus mirabilis
  • Oral administration of Proteus mirabilis damaged dopaminergic neurons and motor functions in mice 58

Proteus mirabilis induces inflammation and stimulates α‐synuclein aggregation in the brain and colon.
Citrobacter rodentium
  • Characterization of the intestinal microbiota during Citrobacter rodentium infection in a mouse model of infection‐triggered Parkinson's disease 125

Citrobacter rodentium induces the presentation of mitochondrial antigens on MHC I of Pink1−/− mice and the subsequent formation of anti‐mitochondrial CD8+ T cells into the central nervous system.
Porphyromonas gingivalis
  • Oral P. gingivalis impaired gut permeability and mediated immune responses associated with neurodegeneration in LRRK2 R1441G mice 126

Porphyromonas gingivalis induced high expression of inflammatory factors and increased α‐synuclein in R1441G mice.
Cyanobacteria
  • Microbial β‐N‐methylamino‐L‐alanine (BMAA) and the pathway for Parkinson's Disease 127

BMAA produced by cyanobacteria may lead to protein misfolding and mitochondrial dysfunction.

In addition to the changes and effects of single bacteria, there have been many case–control studies focused on the changes of overall intestinal bacteria in PD patients recently, showing that the abundance of Prevotellaceae, Faecalibacterium, and Lachnospiraceae was lower in PD patients than in healthy controls. Meanwhile, a higher abundance level of Bifidobacteriaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Verrucomicrobiaceae, and Christensenellaceae was also found in patients with PD. 129 A large number of studies exhibiting these altered gut bacteria have also been found to correlate with the severity of PD development. The relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae was positively correlated with the severity of postural instability and gait difficulties and the number of bacteria in Enterobacteriaceae was much more in PD patients with predominant postural gait disorders than those in PD patients with predominant tremor. 89 Additionally, correlation analysis confirmed that the low counts of Bifidobacteria and Bacteroides fragilis were closely related to the deterioration of the UPDRS‐I scores within 2 years. 130 These findings suggest that gut microbiome in PD patients distinguished from healthy individuals, and these differences are highly correlated with the motor phenotype of PD.

4. COMMUNICATION BRIDGE OF GUT‐BRAIN AXIS

4.1. Nervous system

The classical Braak hypothesis thinks that the vagus is the conduit through which gut‐deposited α‐synuclein enters CNS. 131 This hypothesis was confirmed by vagotomy. Intestinal bacteria participate in the communication of the gut‐brain axis as an indispensable part of the gastrointestinal tract. This bidirectional communication involves multiple nervous systems and hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis. The large and complex enteric nervous system (ENS) is able to coordinate gastrointestinal behavior independent on CNS. 132 Gut has direct neural connections to brain through the vagus, and bacteria could stimulate afferent neurons in ENS. 133 The connections between ENS and CNS are made by vagal and pelvic nerves and sympathetic pathways. 134

The production of curli fimbriae, a common bacterial ingredient, is related to E. coli. 135 Various animal studies have demonstrated that exogenous α‐synuclein fibrils, whether derived from PD patients or produced in E. coli, are able to form Lewy body‐like inclusions that spread from the gastrointestinal tract through the vagus to the rat brain. 136

A large epidemiological study was conducted in Denmark, which selected 5339 patients who underwent vagotomy and 5870 patients who underwent highly selective vagotomy, and found that patients who underwent truncal had a reduced risk of PD compared with superselective vagotomy through 20 years of follow‐up. In addition, gut microbes could also exert beneficial effects on the brain by ascending through the vagus. One evidence indicated that vagotomy in mice blocked the effects of lactic acid bacteria, such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus, against anxiety‐related behaviors in mice. 137 Similarly, the anxiolytic effects of Bifidobacteria on mice also disappeared after vagotomy. 138

4.2. Immune system

In the communication of the brain‐gut axis, it is usually the nervous system, immune system, and endocrine system that cooperate to build a bridge between brain and gut communication. Innate immunity senses the presence of microorganisms through various pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that specifically recognize evolutionarily conserved molecular structures, called pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are widely expressed by a variety of infectious microorganisms (Innate immunity), and the other category is damage‐associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). 139 Toll‐like receptors (TLRs) expressed by enteroendocrine cells are one of the PRRs, and they are able to detect bacterial products and activate vagal afferents through a basal process called neuropod cell. 140

In addition to inducing brain deposition of α‐synuclein through curli produced by intestinal bacteria, animals exposed to curli to produce bacteria had more TLR2, interleukin‐6, and tumor necrosis factor expression in the brain. 141 Furthermore, curli has been confirmed to activate induced nitrogen monoxide synthase, 142 , 143 as well as nuclear factor‐kappa B (NF‐κB) signaling. 144 Extracellular misfolded fibrillar α‐synuclein released from neural cells or oligodendrocytes is recognized by microglial TLR2 (as a heterodimer with TLR 1) as a PAMP or DAMP, which in turn activates downstream pathways involving myeloid differentiation primary response 88 and NF‐κB, further triggering the production of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin‐1β, 145 , 146 and finally damaging dopaminergic neurons.

Due to dysbacteriosis of the intestinal flora and/or bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine, as well as higher intestinal barrier permeability, over‐stimulation of the innate immune system occurred. The decreased abundance of Prevotella might lead to decreased mucin synthesis, which was associated with increased intestinal permeability, resulting in exposure to bacterial antigens and endotoxin and then inducing excessive α‐synuclein expression in the colon and even in the brain. 147 , 148 Disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier could activate TLRs, which in turn activated downstream signaling pathways that promoted inflammation and oxidative stress in the gut and brain of PD patients.

Gut bacteria are capable of producing corresponding TLR ligands, such as LPS. As a pro‐inflammatory bacterial endotoxin derived from gut, LPS synthesis genes are verified to be higher in PD patients than those in normal controls. 149 LPS acts as a TLR4 ligand and translocation of LPS could induce upregulation of local and systemic inflammatory responses, as well as excretion of pro‐inflammatory mediators, and thus cause severe neurodegeneration. 150 Also, Enteric bacteria could produce other neurotoxic molecules (e.g., d‐lactate, ammonia) and neurotoxins (e.g., Clostridium tetani, botulinum, butyricum, baratii, etc.) and enter CNS via systemic or extrinsic afferent nerve fibers, leading to neuronal damage. 151 , 152

4.3. Endocrine system

Intestinal bacterial cells have the ability to generate a variety of neuroactive molecules, such as serotonin, catecholamines, glutamate, γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA), and SCFAs. 153 , 154 , 155 Lactic acid bacteria produced acetylcholine and GABA, while E. coli generated norepinephrine, 5‐hydroxytryptamine (5‐HT) and dopamine, and streptococci and enterococci produced 5‐HT. Activation of 5‐HT4 receptors induced maturation of ENS and modulated its adult function. 156 Binding of serotonin to 5‐HT receptors on microglia induced the release of cytokine‐bearing exosomes involved in the secretion of certain cytokines. 157 N‐Butyric acid produced by intestinal bacteria was involved in the regulation of energy homeostasis and stimulated adipocytes and induced the secretion of several neuropeptides, such as glucagon‐like peptide‐1. These neuropeptides could regulate insulin secretion, glucose and metabolism and food intake. 158 , 159

The HPA axis is a key neuroendocrine signaling system involved in physiological homeostasis and stress response, which regulates the physiological responses to stress, thereby driving the organisms to adapt their own behavior or environment to stress. 160 Environmental stress and elevated systemic inflammatory cytokines stimulated the pituitary gland to secrete adrenocorticotropic hormone via corticotropin‐releasing factor from the hypothalamus, which in turn led to the release of cortisol from the adrenal gland. Cortisol is a major stress hormone that affects different human organs, such as the brain. 161 Also, stress affected the growth of intestinal bacteria by enhancing the secretion of α‐defensin (an antimicrobial peptide) from Paneth cells. 162 Meantime, acute stress induced a 3‐day‐delayed increase in colonic paracellular permeability which involved mast cell degranulation and overproduction of interferon‐γ. Norepinephrine stimulated the proliferation of a variety of enteric pathogens, such as non‐pathogenic E. coli isolates and pathogenic E. coli 0157: H7: 3, as well as overgrowth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and increased virulence of Campylobacter jejuni. 163 , 164 , 165 , 166

In general, the brain‐gut axis is mainly communicated through the cross information of the body's nervous, immune, and endocrine systems. As shown in Figure 1, gut microbiota is involved in the reciprocal communication of the gut‐brain axis and thus the pathogenesis of PD through this communication pathway.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Gut microbiota were involved in PD pathogenesis through the gut‐brain axis. Within gut microbiota dysregulated, LPS and other neurotoxic molecules produced by the multiplication of pathogens penetrated the damaged gut barrier to contact immune cells and intestinal nerves. Cytokines secreted by immune cells then interacted with cortisol and participated in vagal communication between gut and brain. In addition, α‐synuclein thus produced by intestinal neurons was deposited in brain retrogradely through the vagus, activating glial cells and triggering neuroinflammation to damage dopaminergic neurons. At the same time, neurotoxic molecules could also penetrate the blood–brain barrier through the peripheral blood circulation into CNS to trigger dopaminergic neurodegeneration.

5. INTERVENTION TREATMENT OF GUT MICROBIOTA

5.1. Fecal microbiota transplantation

Fecal transplantation (FMT) is a procedure in which a healthy donor's stool is placed into the gastrointestinal tract of another patient to restore normal bacterial composition by altering the host's dysbiosis. At present, FMT has been most commonly used to study the treatment of Clostridium difficile. 167 In addition, FMT also appears to play a pivotal role in the interventional treatment of neurological disorders. For example, rapid improvement in AD symptoms was shown after FMT treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. 168 In depression animal studies, FMT could improve depression‐like behavior and reduce intestinal inflammation and mucosal destruction in rats by regulating intestinal bacteria. 169 Another recent clinical trial also indicated that after FMT treatment 11 PD patients presented an increase in Blautia and Prevotella and a dramatic decrease in Bacteroidetes abundance, improvement non‐motor symptom questionnaire, and constipation symptoms. 170 Based on the above studies, the potential to develop FMT as an emerging treatment might be able to increase the selectivity of treatments for neurological diseases, including PD.

However, it should be noted that conclusions based on animal studies are limited in supporting FMT treatment. The conclusions based on clinical trials also lack credibility since the sample size was too small to satisfy the optimal study design. In addition, if treatment of FMT continued to be developed, we should be alert to the possible side effects of FMT, such as abdominal pain and distension. 171 At the same time, after fecal transplantation is transformed into clinical practice, the volume and frequency of transplantation, microbial composition in feces, age of applicable patients, and type of applicable disease need to be further clarified.

5.2. Probiotic therapy

The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) states that probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host”. 172 , 173 In a clinical study, probiotics improved values of oxidative capacity as well as enhanced antioxidant responses in patients with IBD. 174 Oral probiotics improved functional gastrointestinal disease. 175 Most importantly, there were no significant side effects in the above clinical studies. Probiotics also played a beneficial role in PD‐associated diseases, such as diabetes and depression. Probiotics reduced the production of inflammatory factors and induced changes in microbial flora structure and increased the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms in diabetic rats. 176 In the treatment of depression, probiotics reduced chronic unpredictable mild stress‐induced depressive behavior of rats and increased the levels of norepinephrine and 5‐HT and inhibited the expression of adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone. 177 Consistent with this finding, in a clinical depression treatment trial, the symptoms of all clinical trial participants were improved with a significant correlation between Ruminococcus gnavus and depression. 178 Thus, the current findings could consider probiotic development as an adjunct to existing treatments.

The association between probiotics and neurodegenerative disorders has been well studied in recent years. A large number of basic studies showed that probiotics were able to improve the symptoms of PD animal models. In detail, probiotics restored mitochondrial function and energy metabolism in rat PD model, thereby producing a protective effect on dopaminergic neurons. 179 , 180 Moreover, clinical studies demonstrated that probiotic supplementation in PD patients improved gene expressions of inflammatory factors and constipation. 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 In addition, probiotic administration for 16 weeks reduced dyskinesia in gait patterns, balance function, and motor coordination in mice. 185 A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of 60 PD patients indicated that probiotics treatment for 12 weeks reduced UPDRS in PD patients. 186 Thus, probiotics hold potential benefits with improving the motor and non‐motor symptoms of PD, and the neuroprotective effects of probiotics as potentially developed treatments warrant further exploration.

5.3. Antibiotic intervention

To date, studies have found that the pathogenic bacteria damaged the intestinal barrier and thus induced PD. For example, H. pylori infection and excessive growth of small intestinal bacteria impaired intestinal balance and had potential connections with neurodegenerative diseases. An antibiotic intervention is any compound that kills or inhibits the growth of microorganisms at low concentrations. The use of antibiotics to inhibit the multiplication of harmful bacteria is considered to be one of the effective adjunctive treatments for PD. In a meta‐analysis, eradication of H. pylori improved the symptoms of PD. 187 Thus, eradication of H. pylori has been recommended for the potential combined therapeutic strategy during levodopa treatment of PD since it could improve drug bioavailability and reduce motor fluctuations.

An antibiotic mixture treatment for 14 days protected the striatum and signal‐to‐noise ratio from 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1, 2, 3, 6‐tetrahydropyridine‐induced mouse dopaminergic neurotoxicity, while this mixture reduced the diversity of host intestinal bacteria in mice and altered the composition of host intestinal microbiota at the genus and species levels. 188 Similar results showed that treatment with broad‐spectrum antibiotics (neomycin, 2 mg/mL; vancomycin 0.2 mg) attenuated 6‐hydroxydopamine‐induced dopaminergic neuronal loss in SN of rats and motor dysfunction and reduced expression of pro‐inflammatory mediators in the striatum. 189 At present, the neuroprotective effects of tetracycline, 190 minocycline 191 and rifampicin 192 have been well demonstrated.

In clinical trials, correction of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in PD patients with antibiotics improved gastrointestinal symptoms and motor fluctuations. 193 Although current clinical studies suggest that exposure to certain types of oral antibiotics appeared to be associated with an increased risk of PD. 194 , 195 However, in the same year another study found no significant association between antibiotic use and the incidence of PD. 196 Therefore, not only the conclusions from animal studies and human studies conflict, but also there are differences among the conclusions of human studies. The reasons for these controversial conclusions might be the subjects of case–control studies do not use antibiotics rationally to treat PD, and untargeted use and abuse of antibiotics play an active role in changing the composition of host intestinal bacteria and reducing the composition and diversity of host intestinal bacteria. Therefore, it is worth exploring more reasonable clinical studies in the future to clarify whether antibiotics generate neuroprotective potential.

6. CONCLUSION

So far, gut microbiota has been extensively studied for nearly two decades, but there are still new findings suggesting that the close association between gut microbiota and PD has not been fully illuminated. The future should not be limited to focusing only on the composition of gut microbiota, but rather on identifying important microbial genes. This could more accurately characterize bacteria from another perspective and is also more conducive to elucidating the involvement of gut microbes in PD pathogenesis, enhancing the potential of gut microbiota to predict PD and as a therapeutic target for PD.

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors read, revised and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors' work in this area is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82160690), Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province (No. ZK[2021]‐014), Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Ministry of Education (No. 2020‐39), special grant of academic new seedling cultivation and innovation exploration from Guizhou Science and Technology Department (Nos. [2018]5772‐036 and [2020]‐012) and Science and Technology Project of Zunyi city (No. [2021]286).

Fan H‐X, Sheng S, Zhang F. New hope for Parkinson's disease treatment: Targeting gut microbiota. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022;28:1675‐1688. doi: 10.1111/cns.13916

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Yang J, Guo Q, Zou X, et al. Correlation between head tremble and the severity of Parkinson's disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022;28(2):218‐225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tysnes OB, Storstein A. Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017;124(8):901‐905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P. Non‐motor features of Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(7):435‐450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Poletti M, Frosini D, Pagni C, et al. Mild cognitive impairment and cognitive‐motor relationships in newly diagnosed drug‐naive patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(6):601‐606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pringsheim T, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves TD. The prevalence of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Mov Disord. 2014;29(13):1583‐1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hirsch L, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves T, Pringsheim T. The incidence of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46(4):292‐300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Khan AU, Akram M, Daniyal M, Zainab R. Awareness and current knowledge of Parkinson's disease: a neurodegenerative disorder. Int J Neurosci. 2019;129(1):55‐93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Van Den Eeden SK, Tanner CM, Bernstein AL, et al. Incidence of Parkinson's disease: variation by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(11):1015‐1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wright Willis A, Evanoff BA, Lian M, Criswell SR, Racette BA. Geographic and ethnic variation in Parkinson disease: a population‐based study of US Medicare beneficiaries. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34(3):143‐151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Balestrino R, Schapira AHV. Parkinson disease. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(1):27‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bellou V, Belbasis L, Tzoulaki I, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. Environmental risk factors and Parkinson's disease: an umbrella review of meta‐analyses. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;23:1‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ascherio A, Schwarzschild MA. The epidemiology of Parkinson's disease: risk factors and prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1257‐1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Belvisi D, Pellicciari R, Fabbrini G, Tinazzi M, Berardelli A, Defazio G. Modifiable risk and protective factors in disease development, progression and clinical subtypes of Parkinson's disease: What do prospective studies suggest? Neurobiol Dis. 2020;134:104671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gaurav R, Yahia‐Cherif L, Pyatigorskaya N, et al. Longitudinal changes in neuromelanin MRI signal in Parkinson's Disease: a progression marker. Mov Disord. 2021;36(7):1592‐1602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lee JY, Martin‐Bastida A, Murueta‐Goyena A, et al. Multimodal brain and retinal imaging of dopaminergic degeneration in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2022;18(4):203‐220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Korzhevskii DE, Kirik OV, Guselnikova VV, Tsyba DL, Fedorova EA, Grigorev IP. Changes in cytoplasmic and extracellular neuromelanin in human substantia nigra with normal aging. Eur J Histochem. 2021;65(s1):3283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bertrand E, Lechowicz W, Szpak GM, Dymecki J. Current views on the mechanisms of dopaminergic neuron death of the nigrostriatal system in Parkinson's disease. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1997;31(2):295‐302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Xu S, Chan P. Interaction between Neuromelanin and Alpha‐Synuclein in Parkinson's Disease. Biomolecules. 2015;5(2):1122‐1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Stepień K, Zajdel A, Wilczok A, et al. Dopamine‐melanin protects against tyrosine nitration, tryptophan oxidation and Ca(2+)‐ATPase inactivation induced by peroxynitrite. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1523(2–3):189‐195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhang W, Zecca L, Wilson B, et al. Human neuromelanin: an endogenous microglial activator for dopaminergic neuron death. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2013;5(1):1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zhang W, Phillips K, Wielgus AR, et al. Neuromelanin activates microglia and induces degeneration of dopaminergic neurons: implications for progression of Parkinson's disease. Neurotox Res. 2011;19(1):63‐72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mahlknecht P, Krismer F, Poewe W, Seppi K. Meta‐analysis of dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging as a marker for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2017;32(4):619‐623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Leenders KL, Oertel WH. Parkinson's disease: clinical signs and symptoms, neural mechanisms, positron emission tomography, and therapeutic interventions. Neural Plast. 2001;8(1–2):99‐110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sharma S, Moon CS, Khogali A, et al. Biomarkers in Parkinson's disease (recent update). Neurochem Int. 2013;63(3):201‐229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kägi G, Bhatia KP, Tolosa E. The role of DAT‐SPECT in movement disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(1):5‐12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Heim B, Krismer F, De Marzi R, Seppi K. Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017;124(8):915‐964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Liu Z, Cheung HH. Stem cell‐based therapies for Parkinson disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(21):8060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chamorro‐Pareja N, Carrillo‐Martin I, Haehn DA, et al. Self‐reported allergy to thyroid replacement therapy: a multicenter retrospective chart review. Endocrine Pract. 2020;26(7):761‐767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kelley S. Endocrinology update: thyroid disorders. FP Essent. 2016;451:11‐16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hypothyroidism in adults. Levothyroxine if warranted by clinical and laboratory findings, not for simple TSH elevation. Prescrire Int. 2015;24(164):241‐244. 6, 245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bahn Chair RS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, et al. Hyperthyroidism and other causes of thyrotoxicosis: management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Thyroid. 2011;21(6):593‐646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mogulkoc R, Baltaci AK, Oztekin E, Sivrikaya A, Aydin L. Effects of hyperthyroidism induced by L‐thyroxin administration on lipid peroxidation in various rat tissues. Acta Biol Hung. 2006;57(2):157‐163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Bahtiyar N, Yoldas A, Abbak Y, Dariyerli N, Toplan S. Erythroid microRNA and oxidant status alterations in l‐thyroxine‐induced hyperthyroid rats: effects of selenium supplementation. Minerva Endocrinol. 2021;46(1):107‐115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Angelova PR, Esteras N, Abramov AY. Mitochondria and lipid peroxidation in the mechanism of neurodegeneration: finding ways for prevention. Med Res Rev. 2021;41(2):770‐784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kim JH, Lee HS, Ahn JH, et al. Association between thyroid diseases and Parkinson's disease: a nested case‐control study using a national health screening cohort. J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(1):211‐220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lin SR, Chen SF, Yang YC, Hsu CY, Shen YC. Association between hyperthyroidism and risk of incident in Parkinson's disease. Endocr Connect. 2021;10(1):13‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Odamaki T, Kato K, Sugahara H, et al. Age‐related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross‐sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Rejeski JJ, Wilson FM, Nagpal R, Yadav H, Weinberg RB. The impact of a mediterranean diet on the gut microbiome in healthy human subjects: a pilot study. Digestion. 2022;103(2):133‐140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jollet M, Nay K, Chopard A, et al. Does physical inactivity induce significant changes in human gut microbiota? New answers using the dry immersion hypoactivity model. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):3865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Yan Z, Yang F, Cao J, et al. Alterations of gut microbiota and metabolome with Parkinson's disease. Microb Pathog. 2021;160:105187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhao Y, Jaber V, Lukiw WJ. Gastrointestinal tract microbiome‐derived pro‐inflammatory neurotoxins in Alzheimer's disease. J Aging Sci. 2021;9(Suppl 5):002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nicholson K, Bjornevik K, Abu‐Ali G, et al. The human gut microbiota in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2021;22(3–4):186‐194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Zhang Z, Tian T, Chen Z, Liu L, Luo T, Dai J. Characteristics of the gut microbiome in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. PeerJ. 2021;9:e10952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Yuan X, Chen B, Duan Z, et al. Depression and anxiety in patients with active ulcerative colitis: crosstalk of gut microbiota, metabolomics and proteomics. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1987779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464(7285):59‐65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Lyte JM. Eating for 3.8 × 10(13): Examining the Impact of Diet and Nutrition on the Microbiota‐Gut‐Brain Axis Through the Lens of Microbial Endocrinology. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Hewel C, Kaiser J, Wierczeiko A, et al. Common miRNA patterns of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease and their putative impact on commensal gut microbiota. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Qin Y, Wade PA. Crosstalk between the microbiome and epigenome: messages from bugs. J Biochem. 2018;163(2):105‐112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Du CT, Gao W, Ma K, et al. MicroRNA‐146a deficiency protects against Listeria monocytogenes Infection by Modulating the Gut Microbiota. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4):993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Liu S, da Cunha AP, Rezende RM, et al. The host shapes the gut microbiota via fecal MicroRNA. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19(1):32‐43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Weis S, Schwiertz A, Unger MM, et al. Effect of Parkinson's disease and related medications on the composition of the fecal bacterial microbiota. NPJ Parkinson's Dis. 2019;5:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Weis S, Meisner A, Schwiertz A, et al. Association between Parkinson's disease and the faecal eukaryotic microbiota. NPJ Parkinson's Dis. 2021;7(1):101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. T B. Inflammatory bowel diseases and Parkinson's Disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2019;9(s2):S331‐s44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Schwiertz A, Spiegel J, Dillmann U, et al. Fecal markers of intestinal inflammation and intestinal permeability are elevated in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;50:104‐107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Conlon M, Bird A. The impact of diet and lifestyle on gut microbiota and human health. Nutrients. 2014;7(1):17‐44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Noora O, Hauke S, de Vos WM, Clara B. The function of our microbiota: who is out there and what do they do? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ji T, Huang H, Liu J, et al. Leveraging sequence‐based faecal microbial community survey data to identify alterations in gut microbiota among patients with Parkinson's disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;53(2):687‐696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Choi JG, Kim N, Ju IG, et al. Oral administration of Proteus mirabilis damages dopaminergic neurons and motor functions in mice. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Zhao Y, Lukiw WJ. Bacteroidetes Neurotoxins and Inflammatory Neurodegeneration. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(12):9100‐9107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Agrawal M, Ajazuddin TDK, Saraf S, Saraf S, Antimisiaris SG, et al. Recent advancements in liposomes targeting strategies to cross blood‐brain barrier (BBB) for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. J Control Soc. 2017;260:61‐77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Leshchyns'ka I, Sytnyk V. Synaptic cell adhesion molecules in Alzheimer's disease. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:6427537‐6427539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Reinhardt C, Bergentall M, Greiner TU, et al. Tissue factor and PAR1 promote microbiota‐induced intestinal vascular remodelling. Nature. 2012;483(7391):627‐631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Bäckhed F, Ding H, Wang T, et al. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(44):15718‐15723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Shah RD, Tang ZZ, Chen G, Huang S, Ferguson JF. Soy food intake associates with changes in the metabolome and reduced blood pressure in a gut microbiota dependent manner. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;30(9):1500‐1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Mano F, Ikeda K, Joo E, et al. The effect of white rice and white bread as staple foods on gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nutrients. 2018;10(9):1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Makki K, Deehan EC, Walter J, Bäckhed F. The Impact of Dietary Fiber on Gut Microbiota in Host Health and Disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(6):705‐715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Vanegas SM, Meydani M, Barnett JB, et al. Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6‐wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105(3):635‐650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ruiz L, Hidalgo C, Blanco‐Míguez A, Lourenço A, Sánchez B, Margolles A. Tackling probiotic and gut microbiota functionality through proteomics. J Proteomics. 2016;147:28‐39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Erny D, Hrabě de Angelis AL, Jaitin D, et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(7):965‐977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Rohr MW, Narasimhulu CA, Rudeski‐Rohr TA, Parthasarathy S. Negative effects of a high‐fat diet on intestinal permeability: a review. Adv Nut. 2020;11(1):77‐91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Cani PD, Bibiloni R, Knauf C, et al. Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia‐induced inflammation in high‐fat diet‐induced obesity and diabetes in mice. Diabetes. 2008;57(6):1470‐1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Usami M, Komurasaki T, Hanada A, Kinoshita K, Ohata A. Effect of gamma‐linolenic acid or docosahexaenoic acid on tight junction permeability in intestinal monolayer cells and their mechanism by protein kinase C activation and/or eicosanoid formation. Nutrition. 2003;19(2):150‐156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Stenman LK, Holma R, Korpela R. High‐fat‐induced intestinal permeability dysfunction associated with altered fecal bile acids. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(9):923‐929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Araki Y, Katoh T, Ogawa A, et al. Bile acid modulates transepithelial permeability via the generation of reactive oxygen species in the Caco‐2 cell line. Free Radic Biol Med. 2005;39(6):769‐780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Raimondi F, Santoro P, Barone MV, et al. Bile acids modulate tight junction structure and barrier function of Caco‐2 monolayers via EGFR activation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294(4):G906‐G913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Netto Candido TL, Bressan J, Alfenas RCG. Dysbiosis and metabolic endotoxemia induced by high‐fat diet. Nutricion hospitalaria. 2018;35(6):1432‐1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Yu T, Wang Y, Chen X, Xiong W, Tang Y, Lin L. Spirulina platensis alleviates chronic inflammation with modulation of gut microbiota and intestinal permeability in rats fed a high‐fat diet. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(15):8603‐8613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Neal MD, Leaphart C, Levy R, et al. Enterocyte TLR4 mediates phagocytosis and translocation of bacteria across the intestinal barrier. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2006;176(5):3070‐3079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Allen J, Mailing L, Cohrs J, et al. Exercise training‐induced modification of the gut microbiota persists after microbiota colonization and attenuates the response to chemically‐induced colitis in gnotobiotic mice. Gut microbes. 2018;9(2):115‐130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Lambert JE, Myslicki JP, Bomhof MR, Belke DD, Shearer J, Reimer RA. Exercise training modifies gut microbiota in normal and diabetic mice. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;40(7):749‐752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Jansen AE, Koop MM, Rosenfeldt AB, Alberts JL. High intensity aerobic exercise improves bimanual coordination of grasping forces in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021;87:13‐19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Allen J, Mailing L, Niemiro G, et al. Exercise alters gut microbiota composition and function in lean and obese humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(4):747‐757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Michel PP, Hirsch EC, Hunot S. Understanding dopaminergic cell death pathways in Parkinson disease. Neuron. 2016;90(4):675‐691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Shannon KM, Keshavarzian A, Dodiya HB, Jakate S, Kordower JH. Is alpha‐synuclein in the colon a biomarker for premotor Parkinson's disease? Evidence from 3 cases. Mov Disord. 2012;27(6):716‐719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Visanji N, Brooks P, Hazrati L, Lang A. The prion hypothesis in Parkinson's disease: Braak to the future. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2013;1:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Fasano A, Visanji NP, Liu LW, Lang AE, Pfeiffer RF. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(6):625‐639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Lin JC, Lin CS, Hsu CW, Lin CL, Kao CH. Association between Parkinson's disease and inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide Taiwanese retrospective cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(5):1049‐1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Zhu Y, Yuan M, Liu Y, et al. Association between inflammatory bowel diseases and Parkinson's disease: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neural Regen Res. 2022;17(2):344‐353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Scheperjans F, Aho V, Pereira PA, et al. Gut microbiota are related to Parkinson's disease and clinical phenotype. Mov Disord. 2015;30(3):350‐358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Dobbs R, Charlett A, Dobbs S, Weller C, Peterson D. Parkinsonism: differential age‐trend in Helicobacter pylori antibody. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(9):1199‐1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Pierantozzi M, Pietroiusti A, Brusa L, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication and l‐dopa absorption in patients with PD and motor fluctuations. Neurology. 2006;66(12):1824‐1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Lee W, Yoon W, Shin H, Jeon S, Rhee P. Helicobacter pylori infection and motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease. Mov Dis. 2008;23(12):1696‐1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Dobbs R, Charlett A, Dobbs S, et al. Leukocyte‐subset counts in idiopathic parkinsonism provide clues to a pathogenic pathway involving small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. A surveillance study. Gut pathogens. 2012;4(1):12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Tan A, Mahadeva S, Marras C, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with worse severity of Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(3):221‐225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Dardiotis E, Tsouris Z, Mentis A, et al. H. pylori and Parkinson's disease: Meta‐analyses including clinical severity. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;175:16‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Kunihiro S, Takashi N, Taeko H, Tadashi M, Eiichi N. Dosage form design for improvement of bioavailability of levodopa V: absorption and metabolism of levodopa in intestinal segments of dogs. Elsevier. 1981;70(10):1157‐1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Zhong R, Chen Q, Zhang X, Li M, Lin W. Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with a poor response to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Neurol. 2022;269(2):703‐711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Hashim H, Azmin S, Razlan H, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection improves levodopa action, clinical symptoms and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(11):e112330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Lyte M. Microbial endocrinology as a basis for improved L‐DOPA bioavailability in Parkinson's patients treated for Helicobacter pylori . Med Hypotheses. 2010;74(5):895‐897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Tan A, Lim S, Mahadeva S, et al. Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Parkinson's Disease: a Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trial. Mov Dis. 2020;35(12):2250‐2260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Maini Rekdal V, Bess E, Bisanz J, Turnbaugh P, Balskus E. Discovery and inhibition of an interspecies gut bacterial pathway for Levodopa metabolism. Science (New York, NY). 2019;364(6445):eaau6323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. van Kessel S, Frye A, El‐Gendy A, et al. Gut bacterial tyrosine decarboxylases restrict levels of levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Brüssow H. Parkinson disease, levodopa and the gut microbiota‐when microbiology meets pharmacology. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22(3):808‐812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Loubinoux J, Bronowicki J, Pereira I, Mougenel J, Faou A. Sulfate‐reducing bacteria in human feces and their association with inflammatory bowel diseases. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002;40(2):107‐112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Gibson GR, Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. Growth and activities of sulphate‐reducing bacteria in gut contents of healthy subjects and patients with ulcerative colitis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991;86(2):103‐112. [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Willis CL, Cummings JH, Neale G, Gibson GR. Nutritional Aspects of Dissimilatory Sulfate Reduction in the Human Large Intestine. Curr Microbiol. 1997;35(5):294‐298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Goldstein E, Citron D, Peraino V, Cross S. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans bacteremia and review of human Desulfovibrio infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(6):2752‐2754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Lin A, Zheng W, He Y, et al. Gut microbiota in patients with Parkinson's disease in southern China. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;53:82‐88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Carbonero F, Benefiel A, Alizadeh‐Ghamsari A, Gaskins H. Microbial pathways in colonic sulfur metabolism and links with health and disease. Front Physiol. 2012;3:448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Calvert J, Coetzee W, Lefer D. Novel insights into hydrogen sulfide–mediated cytoprotection. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010;12(10):1203‐1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Haouzi P, Sonobe T, Judenherc‐Haouzi A. Hydrogen sulfide intoxication induced brain injury and methylene blue. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;133:104474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Rumbeiha W, Whitley E, Anantharam P, Kim DS, Kanthasamy A. Acute hydrogen sulfide–induced neuropathology and neurological sequelae: challenges for translational neuroprotective research. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1378(1):5‐16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Kumar A, Ganini D, Mason R. Role of cytochrome c in α‐synuclein radical formation: implications of α‐synuclein in neuronal death in Maneb‐ and paraquat‐induced model of Parkinson's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11(1):70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Guo Z, Li C, Wang C, Xie Y, Wang A. CSE/H2S system protects mesenchymal stem cells from hypoxia and serum deprivation‐induced apoptosis via mitochondrial injury, endoplasmic reticulum stress and PI3K/Akt activation pathways. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(2):2128‐2134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Cassanelli S, Moulis J. Sulfide is an efficient iron releasing agent for mammalian ferritins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1547(1):174‐182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Hälldin J, Land T. Sulfide increases labile iron pool in RD4 cells. Biometals. 2008;21(2):127‐131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Uversky V, Li J, Fink A. Metal‐triggered structural transformations, aggregation, and fibrillation of human alpha‐synuclein. A possible molecular NK between Parkinson's disease and heavy metal exposure. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(47):44284‐44296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Golts N, Snyder H, Frasier M, Theisler C, Choi P, Wolozin B. Magnesium inhibits spontaneous and iron‐induced aggregation of alpha‐synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(18):16116‐16123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Kostka M, Högen T, Danzer K, et al. Single particle characterization of iron‐induced pore‐forming alpha‐synuclein oligomers. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(16):10992‐11003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Park H, Lin S, Voordouw G. Ferric iron reduction by Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough wild type and energy metabolism mutants. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008;93:79‐85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Pereira I, Ramos A, Grein F, Marques M, da Silva S, Venceslau S. A comparative genomic analysis of energy metabolism in sulfate reducing bacteria and archaea. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Joshi N, Basak S, Kundu S, De G, Mukhopadhyay A, Chattopadhyay K. Attenuation of the early events of α‐synuclein aggregation: a fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and laser scanning microscopy study in the presence of surface‐coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2015;31(4):1469‐1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Murros K, Huynh V, Takala T, Saris P. Desulfovibrio Bacteria Are Associated With Parkinson's Disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:652617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Kohbata S, Beaman B. L‐dopa‐responsive movement disorder caused by Nocardia asteroides localized in the brains of mice. Infect Immun. 1991;59(1):181‐191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Cannon T, Sinha A, Trudeau L, Maurice C, Gruenheid S. Citrobacter rodentiumCharacterization of the intestinal microbiota during infection in a mouse model of infection‐triggered Parkinson's disease. Gut Microbes. 2020;12(1):1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Feng Y, Wu Q, Peng Y, et al. Oral P. gingivalis impairs gut permeability and mediates immune responses associated with neurodegeneration in LRRK2 R1441G mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Nunes‐Costa D, Magalhães J, G‐Fernandes M, Cardoso S, Empadinhas N. Microbial BMAA and the pathway for Parkinson's disease neurodegeneration. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Doulberis M, Kotronis G, Thomann R, et al. Review: impact of helicobacter pylori on Alzheimer's disease: what do we know so far? Helicobacter. 2018;23(1). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Shen T, Yue Y, He T, et al. The Association Between the Gut Microbiota and Parkinson's Disease, a Meta‐Analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:636545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Minato T, Maeda T, Fujisawa Y, et al. Progression of Parkinson's disease is associated with gut dysbiosis: Two‐year follow‐up study. PloS one. 2017;12(11):e0187307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Ulusoy A, Rusconi R, Pérez‐Revuelta BI, et al. Caudo‐rostral brain spreading of α‐synuclein through vagal connections. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5(7):1119‐1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Rao M, Gershon M. The bowel and beyond: the enteric nervous system in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(9):517‐528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Forsythe P, Bienenstock J, Kunze W. Vagal pathways for microbiome‐brain‐gut axis communication. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;817:115‐133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Furness J, Callaghan B, Rivera L, Cho H. The enteric nervous system and gastrointestinal innervation: integrated local and central control. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;817:39‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Taglialegna A, Lasa I, Valle J. Amyloid structures as biofilm matrix scaffolds. J Bacteriol. 2016;198(19):2579‐2588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Holmqvist S, Chutna O, Bousset L, et al. Direct evidence of Parkinson pathology spread from the gastrointestinal tract to the brain in rats. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128(6):805‐820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(38):16050‐16055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Bercik P, Park A, Sinclair D, et al. The anxiolytic effect of Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 involves vagal pathways for gut‐brain communication. Neurogastroenterol Motility. 2011;23(12):1132‐1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen Recognition and Innate Immunity. Cell. 2006;124(4):783‐801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Kaelberer MM, Buchanan KL, Klein ME, et al. A gut‐brain neural circuit for nutrient sensory transduction. Science. 2018;361(6408):eaat5236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Chen S, Stribinskis V, Rane M, et al. Exposure to the functional bacterial amyloid protein curli enhances alpha‐synuclein aggregation in aged fischer 344 rats and caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Tükel C, Raffatellu M, Humphries A, et al. CsgA is a pathogen‐associated molecular pattern of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium that is recognized by Toll‐like receptor 2. Mol Microbiol. 2005;58(1):289‐304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Tükel C, Wilson R, Nishimori J, Pezeshki M, Chromy B, Bäumler A. Responses to amyloids of microbial and host origin are mediated through toll‐like receptor 2. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;6(1):45‐53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Tükel C, Nishimori J, Wilson R, et al. Toll‐like receptors 1 and 2 cooperatively mediate immune responses to curli, a common amyloid from enterobacterial biofilms. Cell Microbiol. 2010;12(10):1495‐1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Kim C, Ho D, Suk J, et al. Neuron‐released oligomeric α‐synuclein is an endogenous agonist of TLR2 for paracrine activation of microglia. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Daniele S, Béraud D, Davenport C, Cheng K, Yin H, Maguire‐Zeiss K. Activation of MyD88‐dependent TLR1/2 signaling by misfolded α‐synuclein, a protein linked to neurodegenerative disorders. Sci Signal. 2015;8(376):ra45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Mulak A, Bonaz B. Brain‐gut‐microbiota axis in Parkinson's disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(37):10609‐10620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Forsyth C, Shannon K, Kordower J, et al. Increased intestinal permeability correlates with sigmoid mucosa alpha‐synuclein staining and endotoxin exposure markers in early Parkinson's disease. PloS one. 2011;6(12):e28032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Keshavarzian A, Green S, Engen P, et al. Colonic bacterial composition in Parkinson's disease. Mov Dis. 2015;30(10):1351‐1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Caputi V, Giron M. Microbiome‐Gut‐Brain Axis and Toll‐Like Receptors in Parkinson's Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(6):1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Galland L. The gut microbiome and the brain. J Med Food. 2014;17(12):1261‐1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Yang NJ, Chiu IM. Bacterial Signaling to the Nervous System through Toxins and Metabolites. J Mol Biol. 2017;429(5):587‐605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Cryan J, Dinan T. Mind‐altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(10):701‐712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Foster J, McVey NK. Gut‐brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36(5):305‐312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Mazzoli R, Pessione E. The Neuro‐endocrinological Role of Microbial Glutamate and GABA Signaling. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Filipe DV, Estelle G, Louise MH, Gérard K, et al. Gut microbiota regulates maturation of the adult enteric nervous system via enteric serotonin networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(25):6458‐6463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Glebov K, Löchner M, Jabs R, et al. Serotonin stimulates secretion of exosomes from microglia cells. Glia. 2015;63(4):626‐634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M. Interactions between gut microbiota and host metabolism predisposing to obesity and diabetes. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:361‐380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Burcelin R, Cani P, Knauf C. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 and energy homeostasis. J Nutr. 2007;137:2534S‐2538S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Mulak A. An overview of the neuroendocrine system in Parkinson's disease: what is the impact on diagnosis and treatment? Expert Rev Neurother. 2020;20(2):127‐135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Marilia C, Annunziata S, Antonietta MM, Carola S. The gut‐brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28(2):203‐209. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Alonso C, Guilarte M, Vicario M, et al. Maladaptive intestinal epithelial responses to life stress may predispose healthy women to gut mucosal inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(1):163‐72.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Freestone P, Williams P, Haigh R, Maggs A, Neal C, Lyte M. Growth stimulation of intestinal commensal Escherichia coli by catecholamines: a possible contributory factor in trauma‐induced sepsis. Shock (Augusta, Ga). 2002;18(5):465‐470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Freestone P, Haigh R, Williams P, Lyte M. Involvement of enterobactin in norepinephrine‐mediated iron supply from transferrin to enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;222(1):39‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Alverdy J, Holbrook C, Rocha F, et al. Gut‐derived sepsis occurs when the right pathogen with the right virulence genes meets the right host: evidence for in vivo virulence expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):480‐489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Cogan TA, Thomas AO, Rees LEN, et al. Norepinephrine increases the pathogenic potential of Campylobacter jejuni. Gut. 2007;56(8):1060‐1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Yadav D, Khanna S. Clostridioides difficileSafety of fecal microbiota transplantation for infection focusing on pathobionts and SARS‐CoV‐2. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021;14:17562848211009694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Hazan S. Rapid improvement in Alzheimer's disease symptoms following fecal microbiota transplantation: a case report. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(6):300060520925930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Jingjing R, Ruining X, Li L, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation ameliorates gut microbiota imbalance and intestinal barrier damage in rats with stress‐induced depressive‐like behavior. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;53(11):3598‐3611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. XiaoYi K, XiaoHan Y, LiJuan X, et al. Evaluation of fecal microbiota transplantation in Parkinson's disease patients with constipation. Microb Cell Fact. 2021;20(1):98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Gough E, Shaikh H, Manges AR. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(10):994‐1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Gibson GR, Hutkins R, Sanders ME, et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(8):491‐502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506‐514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Andrea B, Luigi S, Stefania C, et al. Probiotics efficacy on oxidative stress values in inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized double‐blinded placebo‐controlled pilot study. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2019;19(3):373‐381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Harris L, Cash B, Moftah K, Franklin H. An open‐label, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel probiotic blend in patients with functional gastrointestinal symptoms. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;56:444‐451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Zeng Z, Guo X, Zhang J, Yuan Q, Chen S. Lactobacillus paracasei modulates the gut microbiota and improves inflammation in type 2 diabetic rats. Food Funct. 2021;12:6809‐6820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Li Q, Li L, Niu X, et al. Probiotics alleviate depressive behavior in chronic unpredictable mild stress rat models by remodeling intestinal flora. Neuroreport. 2021;32(8):686‐693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Chahwan B, Kwan S, Isik A, van Hemert S, Burke C, Roberts L. Gut feelings: a randomised, triple‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. 2019;253:317‐326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Nurrahma B, Tsao S, Wu C, et al. Probiotic supplementation facilitates recovery of 6‐OHDA‐induced motor deficit via improving mitochondrial function and energy metabolism. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:668775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Srivastav S, Neupane S, Bhurtel S, et al. Probiotics mixture increases butyrate, and subsequently rescues the nigral dopaminergic neurons from MPTP and rotenone‐induced neurotoxicity. J Nutr Biochem. 2019;69:73‐86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Borzabadi S, Oryan S, Eidi A, et al. The effects of probiotic supplementation on gene expression related to inflammation, insulin and lipid in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomized, double‐blind. PlaceboControlled Trial Arch Iran Med. 2018;21(7):289‐295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Ibrahim A, Ali RAR, Manaf MRA, et al. Multi‐strain probiotics (Hexbio) containing MCP BCMC strains improved constipation and gut motility in Parkinson's disease: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0244680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Tan AH, Lim SY, Chong KK, et al. Probiotics for constipation in Parkinson disease: a randomized placebo‐controlled study. Neurology. 2021;96(5):e772‐e782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Cassani E, Privitera G, Pezzoli G, et al. Use of probiotics for the treatment of constipation in Parkinson's disease patients. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2011;57(2):117‐121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Hsieh T‐H, Kuo C‐W, Hsieh K‐H, et al. Probiotics alleviate the progressive deterioration of motor functions in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. Brain Sci. 2020;10(4):206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Tamtaji OR, Taghizadeh M, Kakhaki RD, et al. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in people with Parkinson's disease: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(3):1031‐1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Bjarnason I, Bjarnason I, Charlett A, et al. Role of chronic infection and inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract in the etiology and pathogenesis of idiopathic parkinsonism. Part 2: response of facets of clinical idiopathic parkinsonism to Helicobacter pylori eradication. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled efficacy study. Helicobacter. 2005;10(4):276‐287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Pu Y, Chang L, Qu Y, Wang S, Zhang K, Hashimoto K. Antibiotic‐induced microbiome depletion protects against MPTP‐induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity in the brain. Aging. 2019;11(17):6915‐6929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Koutzoumis D, Vergara M, Pino J, et al. Alterations of the gut microbiota with antibiotics protects dopamine neuron loss and improve motor deficits in a pharmacological rodent model of Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 2020;325:113159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Bortolanza M, Nascimento G, Socias S, et al. Tetracycline repurposing in neurodegeneration: focus on Parkinson's disease. J Neural Trans. 2018;125(10):1403‐1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Cankaya S, Cankaya B, Kilic U, Kilic E, Yulug B. The therapeutic role of minocycline in Parkinson's disease. Drugs Context. 2019;8:212553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Burak Y, Lütfü H, Ertugrul K, Rüdiger SW. RIFAMPICIN: an antibiotic with brain protective function. Brain Res Bull. 2014;107:37‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Fasano A, Bove F, Gabrielli M, et al. The role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2013;28(9):1241‐1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Mertsalmi T, Pekkonen E, Scheperjans F. Antibiotic exposure and risk of Parkinson's disease in Finland: a nationwide case‐control study. Movement Disorders. 2020;35(3):431‐442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Ternák G, Kuti D, Kovács K. Dysbiosis in Parkinson's disease might be triggered by certain antibiotics. Med Hypotheses. 2020;137:109564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Palacios N, O'Reilly ÉJ, Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A. Long‐term use of antibiotics and risk of parkinson's disease in the nurses' health study. Parkinson's disease. 2020;2020:4038375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.


Articles from CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES