The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state and local health departments continue to investigate cases of monkeypox among persons in the United States who had contact with wild or exotic mammalian pets or with persons with monkeypox.1, 2, 3, 4 This report updates results of the epidemiologic investigation, provides information on the use of smallpox vaccine during the outbreak, and summarizes the animal tracing activities to identify the origin and subsequent distribution of infected animals.
Epidemiologic investigation
As of July 8, 2003, a total of 71 cases of monkeypox have been reported to the CDC from Wisconsin (39), Indiana (16), Illinois (12), Missouri (2), Kansas (1), and Ohio (1); these include 35 (49%) cases laboratory-confirmed at CDC and 36 (51%) suspect and probable cases under investigation by state and local health departments. Eleven cases were excluded from those reported previously because they met the exclusion criteria outlined in the updated national case definition, and 1 new case was added.1 The number of cases increased from May 15 through the week ending June 8 and declined subsequently; the date of onset for the last case was June 20. Of the 71 cases, 39 (55%) occurred among females; the median age was 28 years (range 1 to 51 years). Age data were unavailable for 1 patient. Among 69 patients for whom data were available, 18 (26%) were hospitalized; some patients were hospitalized for isolation precautions only. Two patients, both children, had serious clinical illness1, 2, 3, 4; both of these patients have recovered. The majority of patients were exposed to prairie dogs. Some patients were exposed in premises where prairie dogs were kept, and others were exposed to persons with monkeypox. No patients have been confirmed to have had exposure to persons with monkeypox as their only possible exposure.
Of the 35 laboratory-confirmed cases, 32 (91%) tested positive for monkeypox by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), culture, immunohistochemical testing (IHC), and/or electron microscopy in skin rash lesions; 2 tested positive by PCR and/or culture of an oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal swab; and 1 tested positive by PCR and culture of a lymph node aspirate. For laboratory-confirmed cases, onset of illness ranged from May 16 to June 20. The majority of patients reported a clinical illness that included rash (1 patient had a single, atypical plaque-like skin lesion) and fever (Table). The median incubation period∗ was 12 days (range 1 to 31 days).
Table.
Number and percentage of laboratory-confirmed monkeypox cases, by selected characteristics—United States, 2003.
| Characteristic | No. | (%)∗ |
|---|---|---|
| State | ||
| Illinois | 8 | (23) |
| Indiana | 7 | (20) |
| Kansas | 1 | (3) |
| Missouri | 2 | (6) |
| Wisconsin | 17 | (49) |
| Age group, y | ||
| 6–18 | 11 | (31) |
| 19–51 | 24 | (69) |
| Sex | ||
| Female | 18 | (51) |
| Male | 17 | (49) |
| Possible sources of monkeypox exposure | ||
| Prairie dog(s) | 14 | (40) |
| Prairie dog(s) and human case(s) | 14 | (40) |
| Premises housing prairie dogs | 6 | (17) |
| Premises housing prairie dog(s) and human case | 1 | (3) |
| Clinical features | ||
| Rash† | 34 | (97) |
| Fever | 29 | (85) |
| Respiratory symptoms‡ | 27 | (77) |
| Lymphadenopathy | 24 | (69) |
| Hospitalized§ | 16 | (46) |
| Previous smallpox vaccination∥ | 8 | (33) |
Totals might not add to 100 because of rounding.
Excludes 1 patient who had a single atypical, plaque-like skin lesion and no further lesions.
One or more of the following symptoms: cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, and nasal congestion.
Some persons were hospitalized for isolation precautions and not because of severe illness.
Information was available for 25 (71%) of the laboratory-confirmed cases.
Use of smallpox vaccine
To prevent transmission of monkeypox, 30 persons (28 adults and 2 children) in 6 states have received smallpox vaccine since June 13. Vaccine was administered pre-exposure to 7 persons (3 veterinarians, 2 laboratory workers, and 2 health care workers) and postexposure to 23 persons (10 health care workers, 7 household contacts, 3 laboratory workers, 1 public health veterinarian, 1 public health epidemiologist, and 1 work contact). No serious adverse events were reported after smallpox vaccination, and no requests for vaccinia immune globulin have been received. Among the 30 persons who received smallpox vaccine, 3 (10%) reported rash within 2 weeks of vaccination. One of the 3 was confirmed as having monkeypox; another person had 2 skin lesion specimens that tested negative for orthopoxvirus and varicella zoster virus at the state health laboratory; no specimens were obtained for the third person who reported a single, dime-sized, pruritic and erythematous skin lesion (not pustular) remote from the vaccination site that appeared 4 days after vaccination and faded within a week.
The outbreak described in this report highlights the public health threat posed by importation, for commercial purposes, of exotic pets into the United States. Epidemiologic and animal traceback investigations confirm that the first community-acquired human cases of monkeypox in the United States resulted from contact with infected prairie dogs that had been housed or transported with African rodents imported from Ghana.
Imported, exotic wild animals can carry nonindigenous, zoonotic pathogens, which can spread rapidly among indigenous susceptible animal populations in the United States, particularly when mixed together in close proximity. In addition, interspecies exchange of pathogens is possible because of close relations between humans and their pets. In this outbreak, the rapid and widespread distribution of monkeypox-infected and potentially infected imported wild animals to distributors and potential buyers in several settings (eg, pet stores, swap meets, wild animal trade centers) in the United States and to other countries enabled epizootic spread through multiple states before effective interventions could be implemented.
Public health strategies to control this outbreak, including the Food and Drug Administration–CDC joint order banning importation and prohibiting movement of the implicated animal species (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox/pdf/embargo.pdf), state-enacted measures to further restrict intrastate animal shipment and trade,4 premise quarantine, and animal euthanasia, appear to have been effective in reducing exposure of humans to infected animals, with few cases reported since its implementation on June 11. Additional control measures have included pre-exposure and postexposure vaccination of potentially exposed persons with smallpox vaccine.5
Laboratory tests have demonstrated the presence of monkeypox virus in several rodents from the original shipment from Ghana that died unexpectedly and did not exhibit characteristic signs of monkeypox in animals (eg, conjunctivitis, lymphadenopathy, skin lesions). For this reason, CDC guidance for premise quarantine and animal euthanasia (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox/quarantineremoval.htm) is based on the possibility that infected rodents from the April 9 shipment could be asymptomatic, shed virus, and potentially cause infection in other susceptible animals or humans. Although no human monkeypox cases have been associated with contact with rodents from the April 9 shipment, these animals are considered to pose a continued risk for infection for other animals and humans. Euthanasia, following American Veterinary Medical Association guidelines (http://www.avma.org/noah/members/policy/default.asp), is recommended for all rodents from the April 9 shipment and for any prairie dogs that were on the premises at the same time as any of the African rodents. In addition, mammals in facilities that housed a rodent from the April 9 shipment should be placed under quarantine for 6 weeks following the last date a rodent of concern was present. Efforts are underway to collect additional epidemiologic and laboratory data on both human and animal cases and their contacts, including animal handlers who might have been exposed to infected rodents.
Importation of exotic animals and indigenous, wild animals harvested for the commercial pet trade have been associated with previous outbreaks of infectious diseases in humans, including salmonella associated with reptiles (eg, lizards, snakes, turtles) and tularemia associated with prairie dogs6, 7; prairie dogs also have been documented to be infected with other human pathogens (eg, plague).8 The Institute of Medicine recently highlighted the role of international travel and commerce in the emergence of infectious diseases through the dissemination of pathogens and their vectors throughout the world.9 The CDC and other federal agencies, in collaboration with state and local health departments and professional organizations, are developing long-term strategies to coordinate the control of importation, exportation, interstate trade, and intrastate sale of exotic and native wild animals.10
Health care providers, veterinarians, and public health officials who suspect monkeypox in animals or humans should report such cases to their state and local health departments. State health departments should report suspect cases to the CDC, telephone 770-488-7100. An updated case definition with revised case exclusion criteria is available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox/index.htm. Rash illnesses suspected to be monkeypox should be confirmed by laboratory evaluation. Clinical specimens should be submitted for testing after consultation with the state and local health departments. Protocols for specimen collection, including completion of specimen submission forms, should follow CDC guidance available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox/diagspecimens.htm. Because information included in the specimen-submission and case-reporting forms is essential for accurate interpretation of laboratory results, these forms should be completed by state health departments. Preferred specimens for testing are those from skin lesions. Because smallpox vaccine might modify monkeypox disease, evaluation of any rash postvaccination in a person exposed to monkeypox should include laboratory testing for monkeypox virus.
Footnotes
Section Editors
David A. Talan, MD
Gregory J. Moran, MD
Olive View–UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA
Robert Pinner, MD
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Editor's note:This article is part of a regular series on emerging infections from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the EMERGEncy ID NET, an emergency department–based and CDC-collaborative surveillance network. Important infectious disease public health information with relevance to emergency physicians is reported. The goal of this series is to advance knowledge about communicable diseases in emergency medicine and foster cooperation between the front line of clinical medicine and public health agencies.
Defined as first possible exposure date to illness onset date; however, some persons reported intermittent or continuous exposure.
References
References
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Update: multistate outbreak of monkeypoxIllinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:616–618. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Update: multistate outbreak of monkeypoxIllinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:589–590. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Update: multistate outbreak of monkeypoxIllinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:561–564. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Multistate outbreak of monkeypoxIllinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:537–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hutin Y, Williams RJ, Malfait P, et al. Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996-1997. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:434–439. doi: 10.3201/eid0703.010311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Reptile-associated salmonellosisselected states, 1996-1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:1009–1013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outbreak of tularemia among commercially distributed prairie dogs, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:688–699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gage KL, Thomas RE, Montenieri JA. Proceedings of the 16th Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of California; Davis, CA: 1994. The role of predators in the ecology, epidemiology, and surveillance of plague in the United States; pp. 200–206. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Institute of Medicine . Microbial Threats to Health: Emergence, Detection, and Response, 2003. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2003. Available at: http://search.nap.edu/books/030908864X/html/index.html. Accessed September 2, 2003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Developing importation and exportation restrictions on exotic and native wildlife with potential adverse impact on public health. Position paper. Available at: http://www.cste.org/PS/2003pdfs/03-ID-13%20-%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed September 2, 2003.
