Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC Mpox Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC Mpox Collection
. 2005 Jul 14;340(1):46–63. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.05.030

Virulence differences between monkeypox virus isolates from West Africa and the Congo basin

Nanhai Chen a,1, Guiyun Li b,1, M Kathryn Liszewski c, John P Atkinson c, Peter B Jahrling d, Zehua Feng a, Jill Schriewer a, Charles Buck e, Chunlin Wang f, Elliot J Lefkowitz f, Joseph J Esposito g, Tiara Harms g, Inger K Damon g, Rachel L Roper h, Chris Upton b, R Mark L Buller a,
PMCID: PMC9534023  PMID: 16023693

Abstract

Studies indicate that West African and Congo basin isolates of monkeypox virus (MPXV) are genetically distinct. Here, we show Congo basin MPXV-ZAI-V79 is more virulent for cynomolgus monkeys as compared to presumed West African MPXV-COP-58. This finding may explain the lack of case-fatalities in the U.S. 2003 monkeypox outbreak, which was caused by a West African virus. Virulence differences between West African and Congo basin MPXV are further supported by epidemiological analyses that observed a similar prevalence of antibodies in non-vaccinated humans in both regions, while >90% of reported cases occurred in the Congo basin, and no fatal cases were observed outside of this region. To determine the basis for this difference in virulence, we sequenced the genomes of one human West African isolate, and two presumed West African isolates and compared the sequences to Congo basin MPXV-ZAI-96-I-16. The analysis identified D10L, D14L, B10R, B14R, and B19R as possible virulence genes, with D14L (ortholog of vaccinia complement protein) as a leading candidate.

Keywords: Monkeypox, Genomic sequences, Genetic diversity, Virulence genes, Non-human primates

Introduction

MPXV causes a smallpox-like disease in humans and may threaten the population either as a zoonotic infection or through a criminal event. The case-fatality rate of human monkeypox in a 1980s prospective study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC former Zaire) was approximately 10% (Jezek and Fenner, 1988), compared to variola virus (VARV) smallpox, which ranged from >1% to about 15% in Africa and to approximately 30% in Asia (Fenner et al., 1988). Unlike smallpox, which had secondary attack rates ranging to 60%, human monkeypox during the 1980s prospective study was about 10%, with interhuman transmission rarely over two or three generations (Jezek et al., 1986). Recent retrospective studies suggest that disease incidence is increasing due to encroachment of humans into habitats of animal reservoirs for MPXV (Mukinda et al., 1997, Hutin et al., 2001). Also, the first outbreak in the Western hemisphere occurred in the U.S. Midwest from April to June of 2003 (Reed et al., 2004). MPXV entered the U.S. in a shipment of African rodents from Ghana (West Africa) destined for the pet trade. At a pet distribution center, prairie dogs became infected and in turn were responsible for 72 confirmed or suspected cases of human monkeypox. Unlike African outbreaks, the U.S. outbreak resulted in no fatalities and there was no documented human-to-human transmission (Reed et al., 2004). This less severe epizootic could be due to higher natural resistance of the U.S. population, a healthier patient population lacking background infections, and/or better supportive care for patients. There is, however, a significant possibility that this variability in pathogenicity is secondary to strain-specific differences in the virulence of the infecting virus.

The U.S. Midwest isolates belong to the West African MPXV group which is genetically distinct from Congo basin isolates as determined by restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) and DNA sequencing analysis of the hemagglutinin and TNFR genes (Mukinda et al., 1997, Esposito and Knight, 1985, Esposito and Fenner, 2001). Virulence differences between West African and Congo basin MPXV are supported by epidemiological analyses that observed a similar prevalence of antibodies in non-vaccinated humans in both regions (Jezek and Fenner, 1988), while >90% of reported cases occurred in the Congo basin, and no fatal cases were observed outside of this region (Esposito and Fenner, 2001). In this study, we formally compare the virulence of West African and Congo basin isolates of MPXV in cynomolgus monkeys, and use comparative genomics to identify and characterize predicted genes that may be responsible for virulence differences.

Results and discussion

Virulence of West African and Congo basin isolates of MPXV in non-human primates

We examined the virulence of MPXV-COP-58 (COP-58) and a Congo basin isolate MPXV-ZAI-V79 (ZAI-V79) by aerosol infection of cynomolgus monkeys with high and low doses of virus. MPXV-COP-58, although derived from a primate shipped from Singapore to Copenhagen which developed disease 62 days after arriving in Copenhagen, is presumed to be of West African origin by virtue of restriction enzyme profiles (Esposito and Knight, 1985), geographically-restricted primate anti-orthopoxvirus seroprevalences (Arita et al., 1972), and historic inferences (Fenner et al., 1989). This supposition is strengthened by the sequence analysis provided here. MPXV-COP-58 caused no deaths and little morbidity following aerosol challenge, whereas infections with the Congo basin isolate resulted in severe morbidity at the low dose and uniform mortality at the high dose (Table 1 ). These data further support the contention that the Congo basin isolates are more virulent for humans than those from West Africa.

Table 1.

Aerosol infection of cynomolgus monkeys with West and Congo basin isolates monkeypox virus

MPXV isolate Aerosol dose (PFU/monkey)a Morbidity (Day 7)b Mortality Mean day of death
COP-58 110 0/3 0/3
20,000 0/3c 0/3
ZAI-V79 90 2/3 0/3
50,000 3/3 3/3 10 ± 1
a

An aerosol route of challenge was used, as it is possibly the major route for a person-to-person transmission of MPXV. The aerosol challenge particle size was 1–3 μm.

b

Exanthem, enanthem, cough, depression.

c

Late enanthem ∼10 days.

Genome sequencing of West African isolates SL-V70, WRAIR-61, and COP-58

To identify the putative genetic basis of this difference in virulence, we needed to acquire the genomic sequences of West African isolates and compare them to those from MPXV-ZAI-96-I-16 (ZAI-96), the sole Congo basin group member whose genomic sequence is available in GenBank (Shchelkunov et al., 2001, Shchelkunov et al., 2002). Therefore, we sequenced the genomes of West African isolates SL-V70, WRAIR-61, and COP-58 and obtained contiguous consensus sequences of 198,756, 199,195, and 199,469 nucleotides, respectively. The genomes were resolved to an average 4.8-fold or greater redundancy (lowest coverage 2-fold); we did not sequence the palindromic hairpin terminal loop (∼80 bp) of each end of the genome. The first nucleotide of each genomic sequence of SL-V70, WRAIR-61, and COP-58 was equivalent to nucleotide 160, 155, and 149 of the genomic sequence of VACV-COP, respectively. This position was 25, 30, and 36 nucleotides, respectively, beyond the end of the first primer used to amplify the sequencing templates.

Genetic diversity between West African and Congo basin isolates

Based upon multiple nucleic acid sequence alignments of the core conserved genomic region of each orthopoxvirus (OPV) species, we determined the evolutionary relationships between these viruses which are shown in Fig. 1A. To further examine the relatedness of the MPXV isolates, we compared the genome of West African isolate SL-V70 with the genomes of the other MPXV isolates. We chose SL-V70 as the prototypic West African isolate because it was isolated from a case of human monkeypox in Sierra Leone (Foster et al., 1972). Fig. 1B is a graphic representation of the substitutions, insertions, and deletions (InDel) observed between the aligned genomes. SL-V70 is more closely related to isolates WRAIR-61 and COP-58 than to ZAI-96. There are no differences in the set of genes predicted for SL-V70, COP-58, and WRAIR-61, and examination of the minor sequence differences among them does not support any biological consequence for these changes (Table S1 in Appendix A). A similar comparative analysis between COP-58 and WRAIR-61 shows that they are more closely related to each other than to SL-V70, but are distinguished from each other by the number and position of minor repeat elements and a series of polyA/T tracts distributed along the genome; these differences may be useful for distinguishing closely related isolates in molecular epidemiological studies (Supporting online data in Appendix A). Fig. 1C summarizes percent difference values for individual paired comparisons. The SL-V70, COP-58, and WRAIR-61 isolates show 0.55–0.56% difference with ZAI-96 as compared to 0.01–0.07% nucleotide difference among themselves. For comparison, we observe the following OPV intraspecies nucleotide difference values: 0.2% VARV (major strains Bangladesh-1975 [BSH-75] and India-1967); 0.4% VARV (BSH-75, major strain and Garcia-1966, minor strain); 1.1% VACV (strains WR and COP); 0.4% ECTV (NAV and MOS isolates), and a 0.1% camelpox virus (M-96 and CMS isolates). An interspecies comparison of SL-V70 with ECTV-MOS, VACV-COP, VARV-BSH-75, and CPXV-BR yields <4.9% nucleotide difference. These intraspecies nucleotide difference values are reflected in the branch length differences of the evolutionary tree shown in Fig. 1A. This high level of identity among OPVs is consistent with the genes having a similar function in all OPV. In summary, there is significantly greater sequence diversity between the West African SL-V70 and Congo basin ZAI-96 isolates than between SL-V70 and the two other presumptive West African isolates (COP-58 and WRAIR-61) indicating that analyzed West and Congo basin isolates belong to separate clades; this confirms and extends the MPXV RFLP studies of others (Mukinda et al., 1997, Douglass et al., 1994, Esposito and Knight, 1985).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Genomic comparison of West African and Congo basin isolates of MPXV. (A) OPV phylogenetic predictions based upon the multiple nucleic acid sequence alignments of the core genomic region of each representative orthopoxvirus species, strain, or isolate. Bootstrap resampling confidence percentage based on 1000 replicates are displayed at each branch point. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of nucleotide changes. (B) CLUSTALW software was used to align the genomes of SL-V70, COP-58, WRAIR-61, and ZAI-96 and the alignment was manually optimized using Base-By-Base (Brodie et al., 2004). Each mismatched base was identified as a substitution (blue bar), deletion (red bar), or insertion (green bar) relative to a consensus; blue bars in all genomes indicate no consensus. InDels were counted as one mismatch regardless of size. The scale is such that several substitutions in close proximity may generate a single blue bar. (C) Summary of nucleotide difference comparisons: upper (grey) = gap number (segments) / total gap length; lower = number substitutions / number identical (non-gap) residues / percent difference (includes number of gaps).

Comparison of the West African SL-70 and Congo basin ZAI-96 genomes

The preceding data show that West African and Congo Basin MPXV isolates differ in virulence for cynomolgus monkeys, and that they are genetically distinct. To identify genes potentially responsible for the observed virulence difference, more extensive comparative analyses were carried out between West African SL-V70 and Congo basin ZAI-96. Within the SL-V70 genome, we predict 171 functional unique genes, 26 non-functional open reading frames (ORF) regions, and small vestiges of an additional 10 ORFs (Fig. 2 , Table 2, Table 3 ). The ZAI-96 genome is predicted to contain 173 unique genes (Table 2) and 16 truncated ORFs. SL-V70 and ZAI-96 share 170 unique orthologs that are on average more than 99.4% identical at the protein level. Comparisons of transcription regulatory sequences of SL-V70 and ZAI-96 ORFs revealed no major differences (Supporting online data in Appendix A).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Physical map of SL-V70. Predicted genes are numbered and shown as straight arrows; regions containing fragments of larger genes in other OPVs are shown with staggered arrows to represent frame changes and are labeled A–Z. Open arrowheads indicate an ORF split over 2 lines of the diagram. Scale is shown in kilobases. The thick line represents the ITR.

Table 2.

Predicted ORFs in SL-V70

SL-70a
ZAI-96 orthologb
Predicted motif/function
Name Lengthc Startd Stope Name Length Identical Identity (%)
1 246 1510 770 J1L 246 246 100.0 SecP/CC-Chemokine BP (C23L/B29R)f
2 349 2686 1637 J2L 348 345 98.9 SecP/TNF BP (crmB) (BR005/226)
3 590 4548 2776 J3L 587 581 99.2 Ankyrin/unknown (BR-006/225)
4 437 6008 4695 D1L 437 432 98.9 Ankyrin/unknown (BR-017)
5g 176 6653 6123 Unknown (BR-018)
6g 153 7863 7402 Unknown (C16L/B22R)
7 142 9076 9504 D3R 142 142 100.0 Growth factor (C11R)
8 242 11,081 11,809 D5R 242 240 99.2 RING finger/apoptosis (MOS-012)
9 126 12,392 12,012 D6L 126 126 100.0 SecP/IL-18 BP (BSH-D7L)
10 660 14,434 12,452 D7L 660 650 98.5 CHO Host range (BSH-D8L)
11 64 14,764 14,570 D8L 64 63 98.4 Retroviral pseudoprotease (BR-026)
12 630 16,803 14,911 D9L 630 626 99.4 Ankyrin (C9L)
13 167 17,964 17,461 D10L 150 147 98.0 Host range (C7L)
14 159 18,617 18,138 D11L 153 151 99.3 Unknown (C6L)
15 206 19,381 18,761 D12L 206 204 99.0 Unknown (C5L)
16 316 20,376 19,426 D13L 315 312 98.7 IL-1 receptor antagonist (C4L)
D14Lh 216 Inhibitor of complement enzymes (C3L)
17 214 21,561 20,917 D19L 214 213 99.5 Unknown (C1L)
18 117 21,960 21,607 P1L 117 117 100.0 Cytoplasmic P/virulence (N1L)
19 177 22,620 22,087 P2L 177 176 99.4 α-Amanitin sensitivity (N2L)
20 446 23,988 22,648 O1L 442 439 99.3 Ankyrin/unknown (M1L)
21 220 24,720 24,058 O2L 220 218 99.1 Unknown (M2L)
22 284 25,679 24,825 C1L 284 283 99.7 Ankyrin/host range (K1L)
23 374 27,422 26,298 C2L 375 373 99.5 Serpin (SPI-3)/unknown (K2L)
24 424 29,041 27,767 C4L 424 423 99.8 Phospholipase D-like/unknown (K4L)
25 276 29,899 29,069 C5L 276 274 99.3 MG lipase-like/unknown (BR045)
26 149 30,035 30,484 C6R 149 146 98.0 Unknown (K7R)
27 219 31,206 30,547 C7L 219 216 98.6 Apoptosis inhibitor (F1L)
28 151 31,673 31,218 C8L 151 151 100.0 dUTPase (F2L)
29 492 33,148 31,670 C9L 487 477 98.4 Kelch-like/unknown (F3L)
30 319 34,118 33,159 C10L 319 319 100.0 R. Reductase-small (F4L)
31 343 35,180 34,149 C11L 343 339 98.8 Major membrane protein (F5L)
32 73 35,358 35,137 C12L 73 73 100.0 Unknown (F6L)
33 74 35,598 35,374 C13L 74 74 100.0 Unknown (F7L)
34 64 35,944 35,750 C14L 64 64 100.0 Proline rich P/unknown (F8L)
35 212 36,639 36,001 C15L 212 212 100.0 Putative MP/unknown (F9L)
36 439 37,945 36,626 C16L 439 438 99.8 Ser/Thr kinase/morphogen (F10L)
37 354 39,032 37,968 C17L 354 353 99.7 Unknown (F11L)
38 635 40,983 39,076 C18L 635 630 99.2 IEV, actin tail, microtubule inter. (F12L)
39 372 42,144 41,026 C19L 372 370 99.5 Phospholipase/EEV (F13L)
40 73 42,383 42,162 C20L 73 73 100.0 Unknown (F14L)
41 158 43,131 42,655 C21L 158 158 100.0 Unknown (F15L)
42 231 43,833 43,138 C22L 231 231 100.0 MP/unknown (F16L)
43 101 43,896 44,201 C23R 101 101 100.0 IMV, DNA bound PP (F17R)
44 479 45,637 44,198 F1L 479 477 99.6 Poly(A) pol large (E1L)
45 737 47,847 45,634 F2L 737 736 99.9 Unknown (E2L)
46 153 48,432 47,971 F3L 153 153 100.0 PKR/OAS inhibitor (E3L)
47 259 49,377 48,598 F4L 259 257 99.2 RNA pol (RPO30) VITF-01 (E4L)
48 567 50,150 51,853 F5R 567 565 99.7 Unknown (E6R)
49 166 51,935 52,435 F6R 166 166 100.0 Myristyl MP/EEV (E7R)
50 273 52,539 53,360 F7R 273 272 99.6 ER-localized MP/unknown (E8R)
51 1006 56,387 53,367 F8L 1006 1002 99.6 DNA pol (E9L)
52 95 56,419 56,706 F9R 95 93 97.9 IMV, -S-S-bond PW (E10R)
53 129 57,090 56,701 F10L 129 129 100.0 IMV, core (E11L)
54 665 59,074 57,077 Q1L 665 663 99.7 MP/unknown (O1L)
55 108 59,447 59,121 Q2L 108 108 100.0 Glutaredoxin/unknown (O2L)
56 312 60,532 59,594 I1L 312 312 100.0 IMV, core, morphogen (I1L)
57 73 60,760 60,539 I2L 73 73 100.0 MP/unknown (I2L)
58 269 61,570 60,761 I3L 269 268 99.6 DNA-binding PP (I3L)
59 771 63,967 61,652 I4L 771 764 99.1 R. Reductase-large (I4L)
60 79 64,235 63,996 I5L 79 79 100.0 MP/IMV (I5L)
61 382 65,402 64,254 I6L 382 381 99.7 Telomere BP (I6L)
62 423 66,666 65,395 I7L 423 423 100.0 IMV, core, CP (I7L)
63 676 66,672 68,702 I8R 676 675 99.9 RNA helicase, NPH-II (I8R)
64 591 70,481 68,706 G1L 591 587 99.5 Metalloprotease (G1L)
65 220 70,807 71,469 G3R 220 220 100.0 VLTF (G2R)
66 111 70,813 70,478 G2L 111 111 100.0 SecP/unknown (G3L)
67 124 71,813 71,439 G4L 124 124 100.0 IMV, -S-S-bond PW (G4L)
68 434 71,816 73,120 G5R 434 431 99.3 Unknown (G5R)
69 63 73,129 73,320 G6R 63 63 100.0 RNA pol (RPO7) (G5.5R)
70 165 73,320 73,817 G7R 165 162 98.2 Unknown (G6R)
71 371 74,897 73,782 G8L 371 370 99.7 IMV, core, matrix (G7L)
72 260 74,928 75,710 G9R 260 260 100.0 VLTF-1 (G8R)
73 340 75,730 76,752 G10R 340 340 100.0 Myristyl MP/unknown (G9R)
74 250 76,753 77,505 M1R 250 250 100.0 Myristyl MP/IMV (L1R)
75 92 77,537 77,815 M2R 92 91 98.9 MP/unknown (L2R)
76 344 78,825 77,791 M3L 344 343 99.7 Unknown (L3L)
77 251 78,850 79,605 M4R 251 251 100.0 IMV, core, ssDNA binding (L4R)
78 128 79,615 80,001 M5R 128 128 100.0 MP/unknown (L5R)
79 152 79,958 80,416 L1R 152 151 99.3 MP/IMV, morphogen (J1R)
80 177 80,436 80,969 L2R 177 175 98.9 Thymidine kinase (J2R)
81 333 81,035 82,036 L3R 333 331 99.4 Poly(A) poly-small (VP39) (J3R)
82 185 81,951 82,508 L4R 185 185 100.0 RNA pol (RPO22) (J4R)
83 133 82,971 82,570 L5L 133 133 100.0 MP/unknown (J5L)
84 1286 83,078 86,938 L6R 1286 1278 99.4 RNA pol (RPO147) (J6R)
85 171 87,450 86,935 H1L 171 171 100.0 Tyr/Ser phosphatase/unknown (H1L)
86 189 87,464 88,033 H2R 189 188 99.5 MP/unknown (H2R)
87 324 89,011 88,037 H3L 324 322 99.4 MP/IMV (H3L)
88 795 91,399 89,012 H4L 795 791 99.5 RNA pol assoc P 94 (H4L)
89 210 91,584 92,216 H5R 213 208 97.7 VLTF-4 (H5R)
90 314 92,217 93,161 H6R 314 313 99.7 DNA topo type I (H6R)
91 144 93,199 93,633 H7R 146 143 99.3 MP/unknown (H7R)
92 845 93,677 96,214 E1R 845 843 99.8 Capping enzyme-large (D1R)
93 233 96,606 97,307 E3R 233 233 100.0 IMV, core (D3R)
94 146 96,613 96,173 E2L 146 146 100.0 IMV, core (D2L)
95 218 97,307 97,963 E4R 218 218 100.0 Uracil-DNA glycosylase (D4R)
96 785 97,995 100,352 E5R 785 784 99.9 N. triphosphat./DNA replication (D5R)
97 637 100,392 102,305 E6R 637 635 99.7 VETF-small (D6R)
98 161 102,332 102,817 E7R 161 161 100.0 RNA pol (RPO18) (D7R)
99 304 103,694 102,780 E8L 304 302 99.3 MP/IMV, attach (D8L)
100 213 103,736 104,377 E9R 213 213 100.0 MutT-like/unknown (D9R)
101 248 104,374 105,120 E10R 248 248 100.0 MutT-like/unknown (D10R)
102 631 107,016 105,121 E11L 631 627 99.4 NPH-I/IMV (D11L)
103 287 107,914 107,051 E12L 287 287 100.0 Capping enzyme-small (D12L)
104 551 109,600 107,945 E13L 551 548 99.5 IMV, morphogen, rif resist (D13L)
105 150 110,076 109,624 A1L 150 150 100.0 VLTF-2 (A1L)
106 224 110,771 110,097 A2L 224 223 99.6 VLTF-3 (A2L)
107 77 111,001 110,768 A3L 77 77 100.0 Thioredoxin/-S-S-bond PW (A2.5L)
108 644 112,950 111,016 A4L 644 644 100.0 IMV, core, precursor of p4b (A3L)
109 281 113,848 113,003 A5L 281 278 98.9 IMV, matrix, morphogen (A4L)
110 161 113,886 114,371 A6R 161 161 100.0 RNA pol (RPO19) (A5R)
111 372 115,486 114,368 A7L 372 372 100.0 Unknown (A6L)
112 710 117,642 115,510 A8L 710 709 99.9 VETF-large (A7L)
113 292 117,696 118,574 A9R 292 290 99.3 VITF-3-S (A8R)
114 112 118,893 118,555 A10L 100 99 88.4 MP/IMV, morphogen (A9L)
115 891 121,569 118,894 A11L 891 888 99.7 IMV, core, precursor of p4a (A10L)
116 318 121,584 122,540 A12R 318 318 100.0 MP/unknown (A11R)
117 190 123,114 122,542 A13L 190 190 100.0 IMV, core (A12L)
118 70 123,350 123,138 A14L 70 70 100.0 MP/IMV (A13L)
119 90 123,728 123,456 A15L 90 90 100.0 MP/IMV, morphogen (A14L)
120 53 123,906 123,745 A15.5L 53 53 100.0 MP/IMV, virulence (A14.5L)
121 94 124,180 123,896 A16L 94 94 100.0 Unknown (A15L)
122 377 125,297 124,164 A17L 377 374 99.2 Myristyl P/unknown (A16L)
123 204 125,914 125,300 A18L 204 203 99.5 MP/IMV, morphogen (A17L)
124 492 125,929 127,407 A19R 492 489 99.4 IMV, core, DNA helicase (A18R)
125 77 127,621 127,388 A20L 77 76 98.7 Unknown (A19L)
126 426 127,968 129,248 A22R 426 425 99.8 DNA pol processivity (A20R)
127 115 127,969 127,622 A21L 115 114 99.1 SecP/unknown (A21L)
128 187 129,178 129,741 A23R 187 187 100.0 Holiday junction resolvase (A22R)
129 382 129,761 130,909 A24R 382 381 99.7 VITF-3L (A23R)
130 1164 130,906 134,400 A25R 1164 1160 99.7 RNA pol (RPO132) (A24R)
131 506 139,626 138,106 A28L 520 501 96.4 MP/IMV, P4c IF (BSH A30L)
132 110 140,009 139,677 A29L 110 108 98.2 MP/IMV (A27L)
133 146 140,450 140,010 A30L 146 146 100.0 SecP TM/unknown (A28L)
134 305 141,368 140,451 A31L 305 301 98.7 RNA pol (RPO35) (A29L)
135 78 141,567 141,331 A32L 77 76 97.4 IMV, matrix, morphogen (A30L)
136 142 141,727 142,155 A33R 142 140 98.6 Unknown (A31R)
137 42 141,728 141,600 A32.5L 42 42 100.0 Unknown (A30.5L)
138 300 143,024 142,122 A34L 300 298 99.3 ATPase/DNA packaging (A32L)
139 181 143,052 143,597 A35R 181 180 99.5 MP/CEV, EEV (A33R)
140 168 143,602 144,108 A36R 168 167 99.4 MP/CEV, EEV (A34R)
141 176 144,152 144,682 A37R 176 175 99.4 Unknown (A35R)
142 228 144,728 145,414 A38R 212 208 98.1 MP/IEV (A36R)
143 268 145,466 146,272 A39R 268 264 98.5 Unknown (A37R)
144 277 147,357 146,524 A40L 277 275 99.3 MP, CD47-like/unknown (A38L)
145 221 148,758 148,093 A41L 221 219 99.1 SecP/virulence (A41L)
146 133 148,961 149,362 A42R 133 133 100.0 Profilin-like (A42R)
147 196 149,400 149,990 A43R 197 193 98.5 MP/unknown (A43R)
148 74 150,010 150,234 A44R 74 73 98.7 Unknown (MVA-156R)
149 346 151,370 150,330 A45L 346 345 99.7 Hydroxysteroid DH (A44L)
150 125 151,417 151,794 A46R 125 125 100.0 Superoxide dismutase-like (A45R)
151 240 151,784 152,506 A47R 240 239 99.6 Inhibits NF-κB activation (A46R)
152 204 153,459 154,073 A49R 204 203 99.5 Thymidylate kinase (A48R)
153 559 154,642 156,321 A50R 554 554 100.0 DNA ligase (A50R)
154 334 156,362 157,366 A51R 334 331 99.1 Unknown (A51R)
155 313 160,850 161,791 B2R 313 310 99.0 MP/CEV, EEV, HA (A56R)
156 303 162,553 163,464 B3R 299 299 100.0 Ser/Thr kinase/unknown (B1R)
157 505 163,520 165,037 B4R 503 500 99.4 Unknown (B2R/B3R)
158 564 165,226 166,920 B5R 561 559 99.1 Ankyrin/unknown (B4R)
159 317 167,024 167,977 B6R 317 316 99.7 MP/CEV, EEV (B5R)
160 176 168,049 168,579 B7R 176 174 98.9 MP/unknown (B6R)
161 182 168,617 169,165 B8R 182 180 98.9 ER P/virulence (B7R)
162 267 169,220 170,023 B9R 267 267 100.0 SecP/IFN-γ BP (B8R)
B10Rh 221 Virulence factor (BR-203)
163g,i 98 171,559 171,855 Unknown (COP-B11R)
164 282 171,921 172,769 B11R 282 280 99.3 Ser/Thr kinase/unknown (B12R)
165 344 172,869 173,903 B12R 344 343 99.7 Serpin (SPI-2)/apoptosis (BR-207)
166 149 174,030 174,479 B13R 149 146 98.0 MP/unknown (B15R)
B14Rh 326 IL-1β BP (BR-209)
167 352 176,361 177,419 B16R 352 351 99.7 IFN-α/β BP (B19R)
168 787 177,488 179,851 B17R 793 781 98.5 Ankyrin/unknown (BSH-B18R)
169 397 180,861 182,054 B19R 357 352 98.6 Serpin (SPI-1)/unknown (C12L)
170 190 182,226 182,798 B20R 190 187 98.4 MP/unknown (BR-218)
171 1880 183,055 188,697 B21R 1879 1861 99.0 MP/unknown (BSH B22R)
172 153 190,894 191,355 N1R 153 152 99.4 Unknown (B22R)
173 176 192,104 192,634 N3R 176 174 98.9 Unknown (BR-018)
174 437 192,749 194,062 N4R/D1L 437 432 98.9 Ankyrin/unknown (BR-017)
175 590 194,209 195,981 J1R 587 581 99.2 Ankyrin/unknown (BR-006/225)
176 349 196,071 197,120 J2R 348 345 98.9 SecP/TNF BP (crmB) (BR-005/226)
177 246 197,247 197,987 J3R 246 246 100.0 SecP/CC chemokine BP (C23L/B29R)

Abbreviations: SecP, secreted protein; BP, binding protein; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; P, protein; MG, monoglyceride lipase; R, ribonucleotide; inter, interaction; MP, membrane protein; IEV, intracellular enveloped virion; EEV, extracellular enveloped virion; PP, phosphoprotein; pol, polymerase; PKR, dsRNA-dependent protein kinase; OAS, 2′–5′ oligoadenylate synthetase; VITF, viral intermediate transcription factor; Myristyl P, myristylated protein; PW, pathway; IMV, intracellular mature virion; morphogen, morphogenesis; N triphosphat, nucleotide triphosphatase; CP, cysteine proteinase; VLTF, viral late transcription factor; topo, topoisomerase; VETF, viral early transcription factor; attach, attachment; rif resist, rifampicin resistance; IF, inclusion factor; TM, transmembrane; DH, dehydrogenase; HA, hemagglutinin.

Predictions: secreted proteins by SignalP V1.1; membrane proteins by TMpred.

a

DNA encoding remnants of CPXV-BR-001, -002, -063, -174, -216, -228, -229, and VACV-COP-C15L were present, but the residual coding sequences were not annotated.

b

ZAI-96 genome was reannotated as described in the Materials and methods section. This process removes ORFs that are vestiges of conserved ORFs present in other poxviruses or small predicted ORFs on the non-coding strand. We removed 16 fragmented ORFs that were previously annotated, including D2L, D4L, D15L, D16L, D17L, D18L, C3L, A26L, A27L, A48R, B1R, B15L, B18R, K1R, N2R, and R1R.

c

Length, number of aa in ORF.

d

Start, first nucleotide of start codon.

e

Stop, last nucleotide of stop codon.

f

Orthologus ORF in the VACV-COP, unless otherwise indicated (MOS, ECTV-MOS; BR, CPXV-Brighton Red; BSH, VARV-BSH; TIA, VACV-TIA; MVA, VACV-MVA, and ZAI, ZAI-96).

g

An ortholog not present in the corresponding region of ZAI-96.

h

An ortholog is not present in SL-V70.

i

SL-V70 ORF 163 is the single gene predicted in the SL-V70 isolate, and a number of other OPVs that is not annotated in ZAI-96. Orthologs of this predicted protein range in size from 72–106 due to a highly variable N-terminal region that contains different lengths of an Asp–Thr repeat. A single InDel, approximately one third into the ORF, induces a frameshift that results in an early termination codon in an otherwise complete ZAI-96 gene. Since a promoter has not been characterized for this predicted ORF, it is not possible to predict what polypeptides are likely to be made by the viruses of these two groups. Database searches with these predicted proteins failed to yield any significant matches to non-OPV proteins.

Table 3.

Fragmented ORFs of VL-V70 genome

Region Longest OPV ortholog Motif/putative function
A/Y CPXV-BR-016 (764aa) Ankyrin motif/unknown
B/Z CMLV-M96-006 (237aa) MAR assoc Pa/unknown
C CPXV-BR-020 (170aa) Unknown
D CPXV-BR-022 (331aa) IL-1 receptor antagonistb
E VACV-COP-C8L (184aa) Unknown
F CPXV-BR-035 (512aa) Kelch-like/unknown
G VACV-COP-K3L (88aa) IFN resistance
H CPXV-BR-071 (319aa) Virosome component
I CPXV-BR-158 (1284aa) A-type inclusion body
J CPXV-BR-176 (409aa) Semaphorin
K VACV-COP-A40R (168aa) Lectin/virulence
L CPXV-BR-185 (244aa) Unknown
M CPXV-BR-187 (162aa) Unknown
N CPXV-BR-190 (190aa) TLR signaling inhibitor
O CPXV-BR-191 (186aa) TNF binding protein
P CPXV-BR-193 (563aa) Kelch-like/unknown
Q CPXV-BR-195 (197aa) Guanylate kinase
R CPXV-BR-203 (225aa) Virulence factor
S CPXV-BR-204 (501aa) Kelch-like/unknown
T ECTV-MOS-163 (328aa) IL-1β binding protein
U CPXV-BR-210 (340aa) Unknown
V ECTV-MOS-167 (559aa) Kelch-like/unknown
W CPXV-BR-221 (320aa) TNF binding protein
X CPXV-GIR-K3R (167aa) TNF binding protein
a

N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-associated protein.

We identified 170 InDels of a combined length of 9629 nucleotides and 852 substitution mutations out of a total of 193,094 nucleotides when comparing aligned genomes of SL-V70 and ZAI-96. One hundred and forty-seven InDels and 192 substitutions are in intergenic regions and fragmented genes. Five InDels and 321 substitutions occur in 84 genes with functions thought to be essential for virus replication in standard tissue culture cell lines (e.g. functions mainly necessary for transcribing mRNA, replicating the genomic DNA, assembling infectious virions, etc.). These genes are highly conserved in all sequenced OPVs and mainly map to a central conserved region (Table 4 ; see footnote b for map location in SL-V70). A further 16 genes that encode similar functions map to the left and right terminal regions of the genome, and contain 63 substitutions and 4 InDels. Because SL-V70 and ZAI-79 show similar kinetics of replication and cell-to-cell spread in tissue culture (Fig. S1 in Appendix A), we think it less likely that mutations located in these genes are responsible for the virulence difference noted between COP-58 and ZAI-79 in Table 1.

Table 4.

Mutation in SL-V70 and ZAI-96a members of the Virulence Ortholog family

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

bFunctions thought to be essential for virus replication in standard tissue culture cell lines (e.g. functions mainly necessary for transcribing mRNA, replicating the genomic DNA, and assembling infectious virions, etc.) are highly conserved in all sequenced OPVs, and map to a central conserved region delineated in VACV-COP by gene F6L (position 38,015; in SL-V70 the ortholog is positioned at 35,132) to A25L (position 138,012; in SL-V70 the ortholog is positioned at 134,611). For each OPV, the remainder of the genome contains a mix of genes, some are specifically tailored to the biology of the individual virus in particular cell types or the reservoir host, and others encode functions conserved among OPVs that may be essential for optimal replication and spread in the host. These functions are collectively referred to as the Virulence Ortholog family. This set of genes is listed here minus genes that are or expected to be essential for virus replication in standard tissue culture lines.

cInDel is one deletion or insertion no matter how long of deletion/insertion.

dConservative aa changes among the aa that have the similar structure: small and non-polar (G, C, T, A, S), small and polar (E, D, N, Q), large and non-polar (V, I, M, F, L), or large and polar (K, H, R, W, Y).

eSL-V70 003, 013, 157, and 169 have an N-terminal extension. SL-V70 020 and 029 have C-terminal extensions. These positions show variability in other OPV orthologs.

fSL-V70 014 has 8 copies of repeat element GAT (Asp) near the C-terminus instead of the 3 copies noted in ZAI-96 D11L. The number of repeats varies among OPVs.

gZAI-96 D13L and SL-V70 016 share 1 InDel and 5 substitutions, with 2 proximal substitutions causing 1 aa change.

hZAI-96 D14L is completely absent from the corresponding region of the SL-V70 genome because of a DNA sequence deletion.

iThere are no mutations within the serpin reactive-site loop.

jIn SL-V70 029 has 2 InDels and 3 substitutions near the C-terminus that together not only cause a length change, but also 2 conservative, 3 non-conservative, and 1 silent aa changes.

kSL-V70 141 has 2 subs that cause one aa change.

lOne substitution located 5′ to the N-terminus of ZAI-96 B4R causes M→T change, and therefore cause 2-aa length change. Most OPV orthologs have an N-terminal protein structure similar to SL-V70 157.

mSL-V70 158 has 3 copies of an N-terminal AATTCTTCC repeat element instead of 2 copies found in ZAI-96. This results in a 3 aa extension near the N-terminus extension in ORF 158. The sequence of SL-V70 repeat element is conserved in most OPVs.

nThe DNA sequence of ZAI-96 B10R is conserved in SL-V70 genome; however, a 2-base deletion in the 5′ third of the SL-V70 ortholog causes a frame-shift, splitting this ortholog into 72 aa and 118 aa fragments with the latter fragment out-of-frame.

oDNA sequence of ZAI-96 B14R is conserved in SL-V70 genome; however, a 1-base insertion in SL-V70 near the N-terminus and another 4-base deletion in SL-V70 cause a frame-shift splitting this ortholog into 163 aa and 132 aa fragments.

pSL-V70 168 has 1.5 copies of an ATCTCA repeat element near the C-terminus instead of the 4.5 copies found in ZAI-96 B17R and all other analyzed OPVs.

qThe ortholog of surface glycoprotein in SL-V70 171 has 33 substitutions when compared to ZAI-96; 27 are 1-base substitutions, 3 are 2-base substitutions with one 2-base substitution causing 1 silent and a T→P aa change, and the 2 other 2-base substitutions causing S→L and E→N changes.

a

The positions of all mutations can be found in the on-line file MPXV.bbb that contains a multiple alignment of four complete MPXV genomes (SL-V70, ZAI-96, COP-58, and WRAIR-61) in Base-By-Base format with supplemental annotation.

The Virulence Ortholog family of genes

We hypothesize the observed virulence phenotype maps to a gene(s) in the terminal regions of the MPXV genome that is important for maximizing virus replication and/or spread within the tested non-human primate species. This group of 56 genes of known and unknown functions is collectively referred to as the Virulence Ortholog family, and includes 3 genes only present in ZAI-96 and 53 genes present in both SL-V70 and ZAI-96. There are 14 InDels and 276 substitutions in the 53 genes common to both isolates. These mutations are responsible for 61 conservative, 93 non-conservative, and 121 silent aa changes and changes in predicted lengths of 16 proteins that are mainly involved N- and C-terminal extensions (Table 4, see foot-notes). The mutational burden in each gene is proportional to length. Although the CPXV-BR-219 ortholog SL-V70 171 has 33 mutations over its 1879 aa length, this is 1.75 mutations per 100 aa that is identical to the 1.75 mutations per 100 aa noted for this group of genes as a whole. It is difficult to evaluate the effect of a mutation(s) on protein function without a detailed understanding of the relationship of protein structure to function, but we have examined in greater detail 5 genes based on a likelihood that their particular mutations may affect function (Table 4, grey highlight).

ZAI-96 D10L, the ortholog of SL-V70 013, encodes a host-range function necessary for optimal VACV and ECTV replication in certain tissue culture lines, but was not important for ECTV pathogenesis in the A strain of mouse (Chen et al., 1993, Gillard et al., 1985). SL-V70 013 has a 4 bp deletion starting 29 bp upstream of the predicted start codon. This mutation brings another upstream ATG in frame and suggests the possibility of an N-terminal extension to the SL-V70 protein that could affect function. This upstream ATG, however, is 5′ of a predicted promoter sequence immediately upstream of the putative initiator ATG that is conserved among OPV orthologs, so it is unknown whether there will be an N-terminal extension for SL-V70 as compared to ZAI-96. D14L encodes VCP-MPXV, an ortholog of VACV complement-binding protein (VCP; VACV-COP C3L). As compared to VCP-VACV, the VCP-MPXV gene has a single nucleotide deletion leading to a stop codon that terminates the predicted protein 13 aa into the fourth complement control protein (CCP) module also known as a short consensus repeat (Uvarova and Shchelkunov, 2001). All Congo basin MPXV isolates (CNG-8, ZAI-V70, ZAI-77, ZAI-96, and ZAI-V79) that were acquired over a 26-year period have an identical VCP-MPXV gene (Uvarova and Shchelkunov, 2001). This gene is completely absent from the genomes of the three West African viruses due to large DNA deletions. ZAI-96 B10R encodes a 221 aa protein in the myxoma virus M-T4 virulence factor family characterized by a C-terminal KDEL-like motif in a potential ER-anchoring domain; it has orthologs in a variety of poxviruses, but a frameshift mutation removes the C-terminal two-thirds of the predicted protein in SL-V70. In poxviruses, this protein is thought to play a role in abrogating apoptosis of infected cells (Barry et al., 1997, Hnatiuk et al., 1999). ORF B10R has orthologs in a variety of poxviruses, but a frameshift mutation removes the C-terminal two-thirds of the predicted protein in SL-V70. ZAI-96 B14R encodes for an IL-1 binding protein that is encoded by most OPVs. The role of this ortholog in pathogenesis may be dependent on the route of inoculation as one study found a vaccinia virus strain lacking the B14R ortholog showed less virulence by the intracranial route, while a second study using a similar mutant observed enhanced virulence by the intranasal route of infection (Spriggs et al., 1992, Alcami and Smith, 1992). This ortholog in SL-V70 is disrupted by two frameshifts. ZAI-96 B19R (SPI-1 gene) and SPI-1 orthologs of several OPVs contain an unusual tandem repeat of CATTATATA immediately upstream of the initiator ATG. SL-V70 169 has 7 copies of the repeat compared with 37, 27, 16 identical copies of the sequence in the WRAIR-61, COP-58, and ZAI-96 genomes, respectively. These repeats are positioned between the predicted promoter region and the initiating ATG codon of the SPI-1 genes; although there appears to be an in-frame ATG upstream of the ZAI-96 ortholog, our promoter prediction and primer extension data (Kettle et al., 1995, Kettle et al., 1997) indicate that the mRNA initiates 3′ of this ATG. It is not known, however, what effect the variable lengths of 5′ untranslated mRNA, containing these repeats will have (if any) on the level of SPI-1 protein production. Several other OPV genomes (CPXV, VARV, CMLV, and VACV-WR) possess a monomer of a similar sequence (CATTATTTA) that may be related to the ancestral sequence of the SL-V70 repeat. The SPI-1 gene also has a Val→Ala mutation at the P12 position of the reactive center loop that would not be expected to affect Serpin activity.

Members of the Virulence Ortholog family conserved in a Congo basin isolate of MPXV and VARV

Since human monkeypox caused by Congo basin isolates of MPXV is almost clinically indistinguishable from smallpox, we further compared genomic sequences of MPXV and VARV to determine if ZAI-96 D10L, D14L, B10R, B14R, and B19R genes are conserved in VARV (Shchelkunov et al., 1995). Because ZAI-96 D10L and B19R orthologs are conserved in both West African and Congo Basin isolates of MPXV as well as VARV-BSH-75 (Table 5 ), and the consequences of their genetic differences among the viruses are predicted to be minor, D10L and B19R are not considered leading candidate as a determinant of virulence for non-human primates and humans. The absence of orthologs of ZAI-96 B10R and B14R in West African isolates and VARV-BSH-75 also argues against a role of these genes in ZAI-96 virulence. Thus, the presence of VCP-MPXV orthologs in ZAI-96 and VARV-BSH-75, and its absence in three West African viruses, makes VCP-MPXV a leading candidate to explain the virulence difference between West African and Congo basin isolates. Further inspection of Table 5 indicates that 11 genes, which are lacking or truncated in VARV-BSH-75 or in the virulent ZAI-96 may not be essential for orthopoxvirus virulence in humans (grey highlight). And finally, all of the remaining virulence genes that are conserved in both VARV-BSH-75 and ZAI-96 may indicate a subgroup of OPV virulence genes important for human infections.

Table 5.

Presence of OPV Virulence Ortholog family members in monkeypox and variola viruses

graphic file with name fx2.jpg

aSee footnote b of Table 4.

bWe removed 29 fragmented ORFs that were previously annotated in VARV-BSH-75 genome, including A26L, A27L, A28L, A29L, A39L, A40R, A42R, A43R, A47L, C1L, C7L, D17L, D16L, D13L, D10L, D9L, D8L, D1L, B20R, B19R, B14L, B11R, B7R, B4L, B3L, B2L, E7L, O3L, and J6R. The reannotated VARV-BSH genome contains 162 ORFs. Our analysis suggests the VARV-BSH ORF D3L was likely not functional thus this ORFs was omitted from our reannotation. The original annotation was described by Massung et al. (1994). These updated annotations are available from the POCsdb (http://athena.bioc.uvic.ca).

cFragment.

dVCP-MPXV has a single nucleotide deletion leading to a stop codon that terminates the protein 13 aa into the fourth CCP module and 43 aa from the C terminus.

eGene is missing.

VCP-MPXV, a candidate MPXV virulence gene

The poxvirus inhibitors of complement enzymes, which include VCP-MPXV, mimic the biologic activity of complement regulatory proteins (CRPs) that interact with C3b and C4b to inhibit C3 and C5 convertases of the cascades (Liszewski et al., 1996). This prevents a variety of events downstream of complement activation including the deposition of large amounts of C3 fragments, the release of the anaphylactoid and chemotactic mediators (C3a and C5a), and the formation of the membrane attack complex (Isaacs et al., 1992, Kotwal and Moss, 1988, McKenzie et al., 1992, Sahu et al., 1998). Poxviral complement inhibitors consist entirely of a series of four repeating CCP domains; the CCPs are 30–40% identical to the human CRPs including membrane co-factor protein (MCP; CD46), C4b-binding protein, Factor H, and decay-accelerating factor (DAF; CD55) and contain the regulatory-sites for C3b and C4b (Herbert et al., 2002). Recently, Rosengard et al. (2002) demonstrated that the VARV ortholog, VCP-VARV, was nearly 100-fold and 6-fold more potent than VCP-VACV at inactivating C4b and C3b, respectively, a finding that was generally confirmed by others (Sfyroera et al., 2005). VCP-MPXV, however, is unique among OPV orthologs in that it has a truncated fourth CCP module (Fig. 3A). In spite of this truncation, one preliminary study using a sheep red blood cell hemolysis assay suggested that VCP-MPXV from a Congo basin isolate had some complement enzyme inhibitory activity (Smith et al., 2000). To more fully establish the role of VCP-MPXV as a possible virulence determinant for the Congo basin MPXV isolates, its inhibitory activity for human complement proteins was characterized.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

VCP-MPXV structure and function. (A) Amino acid alignment of VCP-VARV and VCP-MPXV without signal peptides illustrating amino acid differences and the premature termination of VCP-MPXV. (B) Western blot of non-reduced and reduced VCP-MPXV. Concentrated CHO supernatants containing VCP-MPXV were electrophoresed in a 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose and developed with 1:5000 rabbit anti-VCP-VACV antibody. (C) VCP-MPXV binds human C4b and C3b. A representative binding curve is shown. Ligands were coated onto microtiter plates followed by incubations with media or VCP-MPXV. Binding was detected with rabbit anti-VCP-VACV antibody (1:5000). VCP-MPXV was quantified in an ELISA (Materials and methods). (D) VCP-MPXV possesses cofactor activity for human C3b and C4b. Chemiluminescent cofactor assays were performed (with or without 10 ng VCP-MPXV), biotinylated human C3b and C4b and 100 ng of human factor I followed by Western blot analysis. Arrows denote some of the major cleavage fragments. Controls of VCP-MPXV without factor I did not show cleavage fragments (data not shown).

To ascertain if VCP-MPXV retained complement regulatory function, recombinant VCP-MPXV was expressed and purified. A Western blot demonstrated the predicted electrophoretic pattern including the faster relative mobility of the non-reduced form (Fig. 3B). In the functional assessments, VCP-MPXV retained regulatory activity for human C3b and C4b. It bound human C3b and C4b (Fig. 3C), and also demonstrated cofactor activity for both proteins (Fig. 3D) (Liszewski et al., 1998). The latter assay analyzes the ability of VCP-MPXV to serve as a cofactor for the serine protease factor I (human) to cleave and thereby inactivate C3b and C4b. The limited proteolytic cleavage fragments generated through VCP-MPXV's cofactor activity are similar in pattern to those generated by mammalian homologs (Rosengard et al., 2002). Indeed, two of these complement regulatory proteins CD55 and CD46, also possess four CCPs, but require the fourth CCP for complement regulatory function (Liszewski and Atkinson, 1998). Thus, it is somewhat surprisingly that VCP-MPXV, which lacks most of the fourth CCP, retains complement regulatory activity. These results, therefore, support VCP-MPXV as a candidate for a major MPXV virulence gene in non-human primates.

The lack of a VCP-MPXV ortholog could make MPXV virions and infected cells more susceptible to antibody and complement lysis, which could diminish virus spread, and lead to less severe disease. Consistent with this hypothesis, patients in the U.S. 2003 outbreak, as compared to those infected in the Congo basin, had significantly fewer skin lesions (Damon, unpublished data). Also, the lesions presented with a unique focal hemorrhagic necrosis, possibly due to uncontrolled complement-mediated tissue destruction at the site of infection (Reed et al., 2004). Increased local tissue destruction was also noted in experimental studies in mice with the CPXV mutants lacking a VCP-MPXV ortholog (Miller et al., 1995, Miller et al., 1997, Kotwal et al., 1998). Formal proof that VCP-MPXV is a virulence gene will require its deletion in a Congo basin MPXV isolate and pathogenesis studies in non-human primates.

Materials and methods

Viruses and cells

MPXV-SL-V70-I-266 (SL-V70) was obtained from the crusts of lesions from a single case in Sierra Leone in 1970 (Lourie et al., 1972). The virus was passaged twice in BSC-40 cells. The MPXV-WRAIR-7-61 (WRAIR-61) isolate was deposited with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, catalogue number VR-267 and NIH bei collection from which registered users can receive the virus) in May of 1962 by Major Stewart J. McConnell of WRAIR. WRAIR-61 was isolated from a female cynomolgus monkey, B-39, that was observed with a poxvirus-like infection 45 days following whole-body irradiation of 350 rads (McConnell et al., 1962). B-39 died 12 days after onset of disease. WRAIR-61 was isolated from tissue culture in monkey kidney cells, plaque-purified three times in rabbit kidney cells, and passaged a further eight more times in rabbit kidney cells prior to accession into the ATCC. At the ATCC, the virus was further passage twice in Vero cells. ZAI-V79-I-005 (ZAI-V79) was obtained from scab material of a severe case of human monkeypox in Zaire in 1979, and was passaged sequentially once in LLCMK2 cells, twice in BSC-40 cells, and two or three times in Vero cells (Zaucha et al., 2001). MPXV-COP-58 (COP-58) was isolated in 1958 from scrapings of several papules on an infected cynomolgus monkey from an outbreak of a vesicular eruptive disease in a primate holding facility (von Magnus et al., 1959). The virus was passaged an unknown number of times on the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick egg and in FL, LLCMK2, and BSC-40 cells. Vero, BSC-1, and BSC-40 cells were grown in Eagle's minimum essential medium (EMEM; Bio-Whittaker, Walkersville, MD) containing 10% fetal bovine sera (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 2 mM l-glutamine (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY), 100 U/ml of penicillin (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY), and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY). Virus plaque assays were carried out on BSC-1 cell monolayers as previously described (Chen et al., 1992). Comet assays were carried out as for the plaque assay except 1% carboxyl methyl cellulose was omitted from the overlay medium.

Monkey challenge experiment

Juvenile to adult, 1.6 to 4.7 kg, cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were challenged by small particle aerosol (mass median diameter of 1.2 μm) as described previously (Zaucha et al., 2001). The husbandry and experimental protocols were in accordance with Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The facilities were fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.

Purification of monkeypox virus genomic DNA and DNA sequencing

Five to eight monolayer cultures containing 2 × 107 Vero, BSC-40 or BSC-1 cells were infected with 0.1–5 pfu/cell of each MPXV isolate in 5 ml of EMEM. After ∼1 h at 37 °C, cultures were supplemented with a further 10 ml of prewarmed EMEM and incubated until maximum cytopathic effect was observed (∼36 h). MPXV genomic DNA was extracted from virions as described previously (Dhar et al., 2004, Chen et al., 2003).

The genomes of SL-V70, WRAIR-61, and COP-58 were sequenced as described previously for ectromelia virus except that sequencing primers for the sequences of the variable left and right-hand terminal regions were based on ZAI-96 (Chen et al., 2003). Sequencing primers were chosen approximately 450 bp apart on each strand to ensure adequate overlap of sequencing reads. Both strands of each fragment were sequenced and any gaps were closed by primer-walking. Sequencing reactions were carried out using CEQ 2000 Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing with Quick Start Kit (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA) and run on a CEQ 2000XL DNA Analysis System (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA).

Cloning and sequencing of heterogeneous regions in WRAIR-61

The genome contains four extended runs of dA or dT nucleotides that are heterogeneous in nature and therefore are refractory to sequencing using PCR derived template DNA. To resolve this problem, we cloned the heterogeneous amplicons containing these regions and sequenced approximately 10 clones for each region. These four regions were PCR-amplified using the following primers. MLEA: MLEA-5′ (5′-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCGTGTCTAGAAAAAAATGTGTGACC-3′) and MLEA-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGCATAGAACAGTGTCATCTATCG-3′); M1A: M1A-5′ (5′-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCGTTTAAGATAGTATATTCTCTAG-3′) and M1A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGCATGAGGACTCTACTTATTAG-3′); M18A: M18A-5′ (5′-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCGGAAAATACAAGTATAGATACAACG-3′) and M18A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGTACTCCGTATTCATACTCG-3′); M18B: M18B-5′ (5′-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCGGAACTAACTATTACCATGAATC-3′) and M18B-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGTGTCT AGAAAAAAATGTGTGACC-3′). The 5′ and 3′ primers for each region contained NotI and SmaI recognition sites (underlined), respectively. After digestion with NotI and SmaI, each region was cloned into similarly digested pKT1012-gpt. pKT1012-gpt was derived from pKT1012 (kindly provided by Dr. Kangla Tsung, University of California, San Francisco) by removal of the fragment containing E. coli guanine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (gpt) under the control of P7.5 early VACV promoter by digestion with NdeI and EcoRV, followed by Klenow-blunting and self-ligation. Eleven plasmid clones for the region MLEA, M1A, and M18B and 10 clones for the region M18A were selected and separately sequenced by primer walking.

Cloning and sequencing of heterogeneous regions in SL-V70

Four heterogeneous regions (MSLEA, MS1A, MS2A, and MS18A) of SL-V70 were PCR-amplified using the following primers. MSLEA: MSLEA-5′ (5′-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCGTGTCTAGAAAAAAATGTGTGACC-3′) and MSLEA-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGCATAGAACAGTGTCATCTATCG-3′); MS1A: MS1A-5′ (5′-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCGTACATCACTGTAAGCATGTCC-3′) and MS1A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGATATGTAGCACAGACCAATTTC-3′); MS2A: MS2A-5′ (5′-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCCTTTTATGTCAAGAAGGCACTGG-3′) and MS2A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGTATCCCAATTTACGAGCCCGTTAACAAG-3′); MS18A: MS18A-5′ (5′-ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCGGAACTAACTATTACCATGAATC-3′) and MS18A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGTGTCTAGAAAAAAATGTGTGACC-3′). The 5′ and 3′ primers for each region contained NotI and SmaI recognition sites (underlined), respectively. After digestion with NotI and SmaI, each region was cloned as described above. Eleven clones for the region MSLEA, 10 clones for the region MS1A, 8 clones for the region MS2A, and 12 clones for the region MS18A were selected, and their plasmid DNA inserts were sequenced.

Cloning and sequencing of heterogeneous regions in COP-58

Six heterogeneous regions (MCLEA, MC1A, MC15A, MC16A, MC18A, and MC18B) of the genome of COP-58 were PCR-amplified using the following primers. MCLEA: MCLEA-TOPO-5′ (5′-CACCGAATGCGGCCGCGTGTCTAGAAAAAAATGTGTGACC-3′) and MCLEA-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGCATAGAACAGTGTCATCTATCG-3′); MC1A: MC1A-TOPO-5′ (5′-CACCGAATGCGGCCGCGTTTAAGATAGTATATTCTCTAG-3′) and MC1A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGCATGAGGACTCTACTTATTAG-3′); MC15A: MC15A-TOPO-5′ (5′-CACCGAATGCGGCCGCGATGAAAATCTTTGGATGGTTGC-3′) and MC15A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGTAACCATCGTTAATTGGTCTTGC-3′); MC16A: MC16A-TOPO-5′ (5′-CACCGAATGCGGCCGCGAGTTCGGAAGTATGTCTGAC-3′) and MC16A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGTAATCGATATTGGTCGTGTAG-3′); MC18A: MC18A-TOPO-5′ (5′-CACCGAATGCGGCCGCGGAAAATACAAGTATAGATACAACG-3′) and MC18A-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGTACTCCGTATTCATACTCG-3′); MC18B: MC18B-TOPO-5′ (5′-CACCGAATGCGGCCGCGGAACTAACTATTACCATGAATC-3′) and MC18B-3′ (5′-TCCCCCGGGTGTCTAGAAAAAAATGTGTGACC-3′). Each PCR product was cloned into pcDNA3.1D/V5-His-TOPO using pcDNA3.1 Directional TOPO Expression Kit according to the manufacture's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California 92008). Fourteen clones for the region MCLEA, 12 clones for the region MC1A, 11 clones for the region MC15A, 12 clones for the region MC16A, 12 clones for the region MC18A, and 12 clones for the region MC18B were selected, and their plasmid DNA inserts were sequenced as described above.

DNA sequence analysis

Assembly of the raw sequence data from the chromatograms for WRAIR-61 was performed using the Staden software package on a Linux platform (Dear and Staden, 1991). Data were processed using Pregap4 (Ewing and Green, 1998) and a consensus sequence was assembled and edited using Gap4 (Bonfield and Staden, 1996, Bonfield et al., 1995). The raw sequence data for SL-V70 and COP-58 was assembled using ContigExpress in Vector NTI Suite 8 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). An ORF was defined as a continuous sequence that translated into a polypeptide initiated by a methionine residue and extended for 60 or more amino acids (aa) prior to a termination codon. Artemis software (Mural, 2000) and Poxvirus Orthologous Clusters database (POCsdb; (Ehlers et al., 2002) were used to detect and annotate ORFs. Early and late promoter sequences in genomes were identified using promoter sequence models based upon sequence alignments of experimentally-verified early and late vaccinia virus promoters (Wang and Lefkowitz, unpublished data). BLASTP (Altschul et al., 1997) was used to detect SL-V70 orthologs in other poxvirus genomes contained in the POCsdb. In addition, BLASTN, TBLASTN, and BLASTP searches were carried out at the NCBI website to annotate some ORFs. Viral Genome Organizer (VGO) software (Upton et al., 2000) and Nucleotide-Amino Acid Alignment Program (NAP) (Huang and Zhang, 1996) were used to compare nucleotide sequences of fragmented ORF regions against the corresponding predicted protein sequences of the longest Chordopoxvirus ortholog. To calculate the primary nucleic acid sequence identity shared between any two genomes, complete genomic sequence alignments of every possible pair-wise genomic combination of all available orthopoxvirus sequences were constructed using the alignment program LAGAN (Brudno et al., 2003). Percent identity was calculated using the following formula: 100 × (Number of identical residues) / [(Number of identical residues) + (Number of Mismatches) + (Number of InDels)]. An InDel was defined as a single insertion–deletion event independent of the length of the resultant gap. Poxvirus genomes used for comparison are available at www.poxvirus.org. The accession numbers are: NC_002520, Amsacta moorei entomopoxvirus; NC_005337, Bovine papular stomatitis virus; NC_003391, Camelpox virus, M-96; AY009089, Camelpox virus, CMS; NC_005309, Canarypox virus (ATCC VR-111); NC_003663, Cowpox virus, Brighton Red; X94255, Cowpox virus, GRI-90; NC_004105, Ectromelia virus, Moscow; NC_002188, Fowlpox virus; AJ581527, Fowlpox virus, HP-438 Munich; NC_003027, Lumpy skin disease virus, Neethling 2490; AF409137, Lumpy skin disease virus, Neethling Warmbaths LW; AF409138, Lumpy skin disease virus, Neethling vaccine LW 1959; NC_001993, Melanoplus sanguinipes entomopoxvirus; NC_001731, Molluscum contagiosum virus; NC_003310, Monkeypox virus, Zaire-96-I-16; NC_001132, Myxoma virus, Lausanne; NC_005336, Orf virus, OV-SA00; AY386263, Orf virus, OV-IA82; NC_001266, Rabbit fibroma virus; AY484669, Rabbitpox virus, Utrecht; AX754989, sequence 1 from Patent WO03006654; NC_004002, Sheeppox virus, TU-V02127; NC_003389, Swinepox virus, 17077-99; NC_001559, Vaccinia virus, strain Copenhagen; U94848, Modified vaccinia virus, strain Ankara; AY243312, Vaccinia virus, strain Western Reserve; L22579, Variola major virus, Bangladesh-1975; NC_001611, Variola major virus, India-1967; NC_005179, Yaba monkey tumor virus; NC_002642, Yaba-like disease virus; Y16780, Variola minor virus, Garcia-1966.

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

Sequence alignments were generated using a combination of the programs MAVID and Multi-LAGAN (Bray and Pachter, 2004, Brudno et al., 2003). Extensive hand editing was also used to optimize the alignment. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using an ∼138 kbp conserved central region of completely sequenced genomes of various orthopoxvirus species. The left end of the alignment extends from gene C7L of vaccinia virus strain Copenhagen (VACV-COP, position 18,805 of the genome) to A51R at the right end (position 157,688). Evolutionary relationships were solved using the Branch-and-Bound search method with maximum parsimony as the optimality criterion. Bootstrap resampling confidence values on 1000 replicates were also calculated using Branch-and-Bound with maximum parsimony. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of sequence changes along each branch. All evolutionary relationships were estimated using the program PAUP* version 4.0b10 (http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/).

Production and functional assessment of VCP-MPXV activity

The VCP-MPXV gene was PCR amplified using genomic DNA from Congo basin isolate MPXV-ZAI-V70-I-823 using the following primers: VCP-MPXV-5′ (5′-ATGAAGGTGGAGAGCGTGACGTTCCTGACATTGTTGG-3′) and VCP-MPXV-3′ (5′-TTAAGCCGCTAGAAGTTTTCCGTTTGATATAG-3′) and cloned into the pCR®-Blunt vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). A clone was isolated and the insert was shown by DNA sequencing to be identical to the VCP-MPXV gene of ZAI-96. The DNA was further subcloned into the EcoR1 site of plasmid pSG5 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). A construct also was prepared in pSG5 that added a cleavable (enterokinase: Asp–Asp–Asp–Asp–Lys) 6× histidine tag using the QuikChange® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with the following two complementary oligonucleotides each underlining the area of recognition (5′-CGGAAAACTTCTAGCGGCTGACGATGA CGATAAGCATCATCATCATCATCAT TAACCTGAATTCGGATCCAG-3′ and 5′-CTGGATCCGAATTCAGGTTAATGATGATGATGATGATGCTTATCGTCATCGTCAGCCGCTAGAAGTTTTCCG-3′). DNAs from the clones in pSG5 with the enterokinase/6× histidine tag (VCP-MPXV-EH) and without (VCP-MPXV) were expressed transiently in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and the supernatants concentrated. Tagged and untagged versions of VCP-MPXV had similar activity. VCP-MPXV-EH supernatants were purified on ProBond™ Resin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). VCP-MPXV protein concentrations were estimated in an ELISA assay. Briefly, the capture antibody (5A10, a cross reacting VCP-VARV mAb, gift of Ariella Rosengard) was coated at 5 μg/ml overnight at 4 °C and then blocked for 1 h at 37 °C (1% BSA and 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS). Dilutions of concentrated samples and VCP-VACV (as a standard) were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and then washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. Rabbit anti-VCP-VACV antiserum (1:5000; gift of Girish Kotwal) was applied for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing, horseradish peroxidase-coupled donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) was added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing, TMB substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL) was added and absorbance (630 nm) assessed in an ELISA reader. For Western blot assays, the supernatants or purified proteins were electrophoresed in non-reduced and reduced 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with 1:5000 rabbit anti-VCP-VACV antibody, followed by horseradish peroxidase goat anti-rabbit IgG and developed with ECL Plus (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). To characterize VCP-MPXV binding to human C4b and C3b, the ligands were coated onto microtiter plates (5 μg/ml in PBS) followed by incubations with media or VCP-MPXV. Binding was detected with rabbit anti-VCP-VACV antibody (1:5000) as described above. Chemiluminescent cofactor assays were performed in the presence or absence of 10 ng VCP-MPXV-EH, biotinylated human C3b and C4b and human factor I in 10 mM Tris pH 7.4 with 25 mM sodium chloride (Liszewski et al., 1998). Following 1 h incubation at 37 °C, samples were reduced, run on 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with avidin-horseradish peroxidase. Final signal development used ECL Plus.

Sequence availability

The genomic sequences have the following accession numbers in GenBank: WRAIR-61, AY603973; SL-V70, AY741551, and COP-58, AY753185.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded through four grants: NIAID/DARPA U01 AI48706 (E. J. L), NIAID/DARPA U01 AI48653-02 (R. M. L. B. and C.U.), Canadian NSERC grant OPG0155125-01 (C.U.), and NIAID U54 AI057160 to the Midwest Regional Center of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Research (MRCE; R.M.L.B., M.K.L. and J.P.A.). We would like to thank: Monica Allen for administrative assistance; Angelika Ehlers, Ryan Brodie, and Ross Gibbs for their work in developing the software tools used for analysis of this genome (www.poxvirus.org; www.virology.ca), and Scott Sammons, Christine Wylie, and Drew Lichtenstein for help with bioinformatic analyses and discussions.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.virol.2005.05.030.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplemental online data

Comparison of the protein coding regions of the genomes of isolates SL-V70, COP-58, and WRAIR-61.

mmc1.doc (40KB, doc)
Table S1

Comparison of nucleotide differences between SL-V70, COP-58, and WRAIR-61.

mmc2.doc (85.5KB, doc)

Fig. S1.

Fig. S1

Comparison of single-cycle replication yields of COP-58 and ZAI-V79. Monolayer cultures of BSC-1 cells were infected with COP-58 or ZAI-V79 at approximately 1 PFU/cell. At 1, 4, 12.5, 24, 34.5, and 46 h post-infection, 4 cultures were harvested for each virus. Cells were scrapped into the cultures supernatant, frozen and thawed 3 times, and infectivity was measured by plaque assay on BSC-1 monolayers. Plaque titers are presented as means with error bars indicating 1 standard deviation of the mean. The inset shows a typical COP-58 and ZAI-V79 plaque stained at 4 days post-infection.

References

  1. Alcami A., Smith G.L. A soluble receptor for interleukin-1 beta encoded by vaccinia virus: a novel mechanism of virus modulation of the host response to infection. Cell. 1992;71:153–167. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90274-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arita I., Gispen R., Kalter S.S., Wah L.T., Marennikova S.S., Netter R., Tagaya I. Outbreaks of monkeypox and serological surveys in nonhuman primates. Bull. World Health Organ. 1972;46:625–631. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry M., Hnatiuk S., Mossman K., Lee S.F., Boshkov L., McFadden G. The myxoma virus M-T4 gene encodes a novel RDEL-containing protein that is retained within the endoplasmic reticulum and is important for the productive infection of lymphocytes. Virology. 1997;239:360–377. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonfield J.K., Staden R. Experiment files and their application during large-scale sequencing projects. DNA Seq. 1996;6:109–117. doi: 10.3109/10425179609010197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonfield J.K., Smith K., Staden R. A new DNA sequence assembly program. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:4992–4999. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.24.4992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bray N., Pachter L. MAVID: constrained ancestral alignment of multiple sequences. Genome Res. 2004;14:693–699. doi: 10.1101/gr.1960404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brodie R., Smith A.J., Roper R.L., Tcherepanov V., Upton C. Base-By-Base: single nucleotide-level analysis of whole viral genome alignments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brudno M., Do C.B., Cooper G.M., Kim M.F., Davydov E., Green E.D., Sidow A., Batzoglou S. LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res. 2003;13:721–731. doi: 10.1101/gr.926603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen W., Drillien R., Spehner D., Buller R.M. Restricted replication of ectromelia virus in cell culture correlates with mutations in virus-encoded host range gene. Virology. 1992;187:433–442. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90445-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen W., Drillien R., Spehner D., Buller R.M. In vitro and in vivo study of the ectromelia virus homolog of the vaccinia virus K1L host range gene. Virology. 1993;196:682–693. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen N., Danila M.I., Feng Z., Buller R.M., Wang C., Han X., Lefkowitz E.J., Upton C. The genomic sequence of ectromelia virus, the causative agent of mousepox. Virology. 2003;317:165–186. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(03)00520-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dear S., Staden R. A sequence assembly and editing program for efficient management of large projects. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:3907–3911. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.14.3907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dhar A.D., Werchniak A.E., Li Y., Brennick J.B., Goldsmith C.S., Kline R., Damon I., Klaus S.N. Tanapox infection in a college student. N. Engl. J Med. 2004;350:361–366. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Douglass N.J., Richardson M., Dumbell K.R. Evidence for recent genetic variation in monkeypox viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1994;75:1303–1309. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-6-1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ehlers A., Osborne J., Slack S., Roper R.L., Upton C. Poxvirus orthologous clusters (POCs) Bioinformatics. 2002;18:1544–1545. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Esposito J.J., Fenner F. In: Fields Virology. Knipe D.M., Howley P.M., editors. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; New York: 2001. Poxvirus; pp. 2885–2921. [Google Scholar]
  18. Esposito J.J., Knight J.C. Orthopoxvirus DNA: a comparison of restriction profiles and maps. Virology. 1985;143:230–251. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90111-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ewing B., Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred: II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998;8:186–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fenner F., Henderson D.A., Arita I., Jezek Z., Ladnyj I.D. World Health Organization; Geneva: 1988. Smallpox and Its Eradication. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fenner F., Wittek R., Dumbell K.R. Academic Press; San Diego: 1989. The Orthopoxviruses. [Google Scholar]
  22. Foster S.O., Brink E.W., Hutchins D.L., Pifer J.M., Lourie B., Moser C.R., Cummings E.C., Kuteyi O.E., Eke R.E., Titus J.B., Smith E.A., Hicks J.W., Foege W.H. Human monkeypox. Bull. World Health Organ. 1972;46:569–576. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gillard S., Spehner D., Drillien R. Mapping of a vaccinia host range sequence by insertion into the viral thymidine kinase gene. J. Virol. 1985;53:316–318. doi: 10.1128/jvi.53.1.316-318.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Herbert A., O'leary J., Krych-Goldberg M., Atkinson J.P., Barlow P.N. Three-dimensional structure and flexibility of proteins of the RCA family—A progress report. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2002;30:990–996. doi: 10.1042/bst0300990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hnatiuk S., Barry M., Zeng W., Liu L., Lucas A., Percy D., McFadden G. Role of the C-terminal RDEL motif of the myxoma virus M-T4 protein in terms of apoptosis regulation and viral pathogenesis. Virology. 1999;263:290–306. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huang X., Zhang J. Methods for comparing a DNA sequence with a protein sequence. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1996;12:497–506. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.6.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hutin Y.J., Williams R.J., Malfait P., Pebody R., Loparev V.N., Ropp S.L., Rodriguez M., Knight J.C., Tshioko F.K., Khan A.S., Szczeniowski M.V., Esposito J.J. Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001;7:434–488. doi: 10.3201/eid0703.010311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Isaacs S.N., Kotwal G.J., Moss B. Vaccinia virus complement-control protein prevents antibody-dependent complement-enhanced neutralization of infectivity and contributes to virulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992;89:628–632. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.2.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jezek Z., Fenner F. vol. 17. Karger; 1988. (Human Monkeypox in Monographs in Virology). [Google Scholar]
  30. Jezek Z., Arita I., Mutombo M., Dunn C., Nakano J.H., Szczeniowski M. Four generations of probable person-to-person transmission of human monkeypox. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1986;123:1004–1012. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kettle S., Blake N.W., Law K.M., Smith G.L. Vaccinia virus serpins B13R (SPI-2) and B22R (SPI-1) encode M(r) 38.5 and 40K, intracellular polypeptides that do not affect virus virulence in a murine intranasal model. Virology. 1995;206:136–147. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(95)80028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kettle S., Alcami A., Khanna A., Ehret R., Jassoy C., Smith G.L. Vaccinia virus serpin B13R (SPI-2) inhibits interleukin-1beta-converting enzyme and protects virus-infected cells from TNF- and Fas-mediated apoptosis, but does not prevent IL-1beta-induced fever. J. Gen. Virol. 1997;78(Pt. 3):677–685. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-3-677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kluczyk A., Siemion I.Z., Szewczuk Z., Wieczorek Z. The immunosuppressive activity of peptide fragments of vaccinia virus C10L protein and a hypothesis on the role of this protein in the viral invasion. Peptides. 2002;23:823–834. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(02)00006-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kotwal G.J., Moss B. Vaccinia virus encodes a secretory polypeptide structurally related to complement control proteins. Nature. 1988;335:176–178. doi: 10.1038/335176a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kotwal G.J., Miller C.G., Justus D.E. The inflammation modulatory protein (IMP) of cowpox virus drastically diminishes the tissue damage by down-regulating cellular infiltration resulting from complement activation. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1998;185:39–46. doi: 10.1023/a:1006844624825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liszewski M.K., Atkinson J.P. In: The Complement System. Rother K., Till G.O., Hansch G.M., editors. Springer-Verlag; 1998. Membrane confactor protein (CD46) and decay accelerating factor (CD55) pp. 146–162. [Google Scholar]
  37. Liszewski M.K., Farries T.C., Lublin D.M., Rooney I.A., Atkinson J.P. Control of the complement system. Adv. Immunol. 1996;61:201–283. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60868-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Liszewski M.K., Leung M.K., Atkinson J.P. Membrane cofactor protein: importance of N- and O-glycosylation for complement regulatory function. J. Immunol. 1998;161:3711–3718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lourie B., Bingham P.G., Evans H.H., Foster S.O., Nakano J.H., Herrmann K.L. Human infection with monkeypox virus: laboratory investigation of six cases in West Africa. Bull. World Health Organ. 1972;46:633–639. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Massung R.F., Liu L.I., Qi J., Knight J.C., Yuran T.E., Kerlavage A.R., Parsons J.M., Venter J.C., Esposito J.J. Analysis of the complete genome of smallpox variola major virus strain Bangladesh-1975. Virology. 1994;201:215–240. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. McConnell S.J., Herman Y.F., Mattson D.E., Erickson L. Monkey pox disease in irradiated cynomologous monkeys. Nature. 1962;195:1128–1129. (9–15) [Google Scholar]
  42. McKenzie R., Kotwal G.J., Moss B., Hammer C.H., Frank M.M. Regulation of complement activity by vaccinia virus complement-control protein. J. Infect. Dis. 1992;166:1245–1250. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.6.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Miller C.G., Justus D.E., Jayaraman S., Kotwal G.J. Severe and prolonged inflammatory response to localized cowpox virus infection in footpads of C5-deficient mice: investigation of the role of host complement in poxvirus pathogenesis. Cell. Immunol. 1995;162:326–332. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1995.1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Miller C.G., Shchelkunov S.N., Kotwal G.J. The cowpox virus-encoded homolog of the vaccinia virus complement control protein is an inflammation modulatory protein. Virology. 1997;229:126–133. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.8396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Mukinda V.B., Mwema G., Kilundu M., Heymann D.L., Khan A.S., Esposito J.J. Re-emergence of human monkeypox in Zaire in 1996. Monkeypox Epidemiologic Working Group [letter] Lancet. 1997;349:1449–1450. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63725-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mural R.J. ARTEMIS: a tool for displaying and annotating DNA sequence. Brief. Bioinform. 2000;1:199–200. doi: 10.1093/bib/1.2.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Reed K.D., Melski J.W., Graham M.B., Regnery R.L., Sotir M.J., Wegner M.V., Kazmierczak J.J., Stratman E.J., Li Y., Fairley J.A., Swain G.R., Olson V.A., Sargent E.K., Kehl S.C., Frace M.A., Kline R., Foldy S.L., Davis J.P., Damon I.K. The detection of monkeypox in humans in the Western Hemisphere. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350:342–350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rosengard A.M., Liu Y., Nie Z., Jimenez R. Variola virus immune evasion design: expression of a highly efficient inhibitor of human complement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:8808–8813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.112220499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sahu A., Isaacs S.N., Soulika A.M., Lambris J.D. Interaction of vaccinia virus complement control protein with human complement proteins: factor I-mediated degradation of C3b to iC3b1 inactivates the alternative complement pathway. J. Immunol. 1998;160:5596–5604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sfyroera G., Katragadda M., Morikis D., Isaacs S.N., Lambris J.D. Electrostatic modeling predicts the activities of orthopoxvirus complement control proteins. J. Immunol. 2005;174:2143–2151. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shchelkunov S.N., Massung R.F., Esposito J.J. Comparison of the genome DNA sequences of Bangladesh-1975 and India-1967 variola viruses. Virus Res. 1995;36:107–118. doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(94)00113-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shchelkunov S.N., Totmenin A.V., Babkin I.V., Safronov P.F., Ryazankina O.I., Petrov N.A., Gutorov V.V., Uvarova E.A., Mikheev M.V., Sisler J.R., Esposito J.J., Jahrling P.B., Moss B., Sandakhchiev L.S. Human monkeypox and smallpox viruses: genomic comparison. FEBS Lett. 2001;509:66–70. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03144-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shchelkunov S.N., Totmenin A.V., Safronov P.F., Mikheev M.V., Gutorov V.V., Ryazankina O.I., Petrov N.A., Babkin I.V., Uvarova E.A., Sandakhchiev L.S., Sisler J.R., Esposito J.J., Damon I.K., Jahrling P.B., Moss B. Analysis of the monkeypox virus genome. Virology. 2002;297:172–194. doi: 10.1006/viro.2002.1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Smith S.A., Mullin N.P., Parkinson J., Shchelkunov S.N., Totmenin A.V., Loparev V.N., Srisatjaluk R., Reynolds D.N., Keeling K.L., Justus D.E., Barlow P.N., Kotwal G.J. Conserved surface-exposed K/R-X-K/R motifs and net positive charge on poxvirus complement control proteins serve as putative heparin binding sites and contribute to inhibition of molecular interactions with human endothelial cells: a novel mechanism for evasion of host defense. J. Virol. 2000;74:5659–5666. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.12.5659-5666.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Spriggs M.K., Hruby D.E., Maliszewski C.R., Pickup D.J., Sims J.E., Buller R.M., VanSlyke J. Vaccinia and cowpox viruses encode a novel secreted interleukin-1-binding protein. Cell. 1992;71:145–152. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90273-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Upton C., Hogg D., Perrin D., Boone M., Harris N.L. Viral genome organizer: a system for analyzing complete viral genomes. Virus Res. 2000;70:55–64. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(00)00210-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Uvarova E.A., Shchelkunov S.N. Species-specific differences in the structure of orthopoxvirus complement-binding protein. Virus Res. 2001;81:39–45. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1702(01)00332-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. von Magnus P., Andersen E.K., Petersen K.B., Birch-Andersen A. A pox-like disease in cynomolgus monkeys. Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. 1959;46:156–176. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zaucha G.M., Jahrling P.B., Geisbert T.W., Swearengen J.R., Hensley L. The pathology of experimental aerosolized monkeypox virus infection in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) Lab. Invest. 2001;81:1581–1600. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Further reading

  1. Davison A.J., Moss B. Structure of vaccinia virus late promoters. J. Mol. Biol. 1989;210:771–784. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90108-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Payne L.G. Significance of extracellular enveloped virus in the in vitro and in vivo dissemination of vaccinia. J. Gen. Virol. 1980;50:89–100. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-1-89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental online data

Comparison of the protein coding regions of the genomes of isolates SL-V70, COP-58, and WRAIR-61.

mmc1.doc (40KB, doc)
Table S1

Comparison of nucleotide differences between SL-V70, COP-58, and WRAIR-61.

mmc2.doc (85.5KB, doc)

Articles from Virology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES