Abstract
Background:
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating event with a complicated recovery. Through the use of an interdisciplinary team a comprehensive care plan was developed, utilizing all available best practices, to prevent secondary complications. Previous work has shown the benefit of single system protocols or interventions. This study aimed to assess changes in outcomes after implementation of a comprehensive protocol.
Material and Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study performed at an ACS Level I trauma center. It was based on data abstract from the institutions trauma registry over a 10 year period. Patients with quadriplegia after a traumatic injury were included. Data on hospital outcomes and complications was collected and compared before and after the use of the Spinal cord injury protocol.
Results:
58 patients were evaluated. Overall, there was a reduction in complications after the implementation, with significant reductions in pneumonia (47% vs 16%; P = .02) and decubitus ulcers (47% to 11%; P = .005). ICU length of stay decreased by 7 days and hospital length of stay decreased 13 days. There was no difference in mortality. Hospital costs also decreased a mean of $42,000.
Conclusions:
A comprehensive SCI protocol can reduce secondary complications in quadriplegic patients. This study found significant decreases in pneumonia and decubitus ulcer rates after implementation of the protocol. Lengths of stay and cost were also significantly reduced. Future research using comprehensive SCI protocols is needed to further assess its effects on outcomes for this specific patient population. Similar centers should consider adoption of comprehensive SCI protocols.
Keywords: trauma, surgical quality, ICU, orthopaedic
Introduction
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating injury that occurs throughout the world, with an annual incidence of 15 to 40 cases per million.1 In the United States, over 1 million patients live with a SCI, and more than 12 000 new cases occur every year.2 Traffic accidents remain the primary cause of SCI. Unfortunately, SCIs are more common among young adults, with two-thirds of new SCI injuries occurring in individuals less than 30 years of age. Despite advances in trauma and critical care, mortality after SCI remains high—an estimated one-third of individuals die before reaching the hospital, and upwards of 10% die during their hospital stay because of predictable complications from these injuries.1
Patients with an acute SCI experience physiological changes affecting nearly all organ systems. Respiratory complications are the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in acute SCI, and can be predicted based on the level of neurologic impairment, associated injuries, and preinjury medical conditions.3 Gastrointestinal complications, such as neurogenic bowel dysfunction, are also a major source of morbidity and are commonly rated among the top priorities for patients with SCI.4 Other important bodily systems significantly affected after an acute SCI can include cardiovascular, neurologic, genitourinary, integumentary, and hematologic.5
Since the first 72 hours post-injury are the most critical, it is important to identify these physiological changes as soon as possible. After initial life-saving interventions and spinal stabilization are complete, the care of the spinal cord injured individual focuses on preventing secondary complications.6 A reactionary strategy, one that treats these complications after they occur, leads to increased morbidity and in-hospital mortalities. Because many of the complications are predictable, early preventive measures are crucial during the patient’s time on the intensive care unit (ICU).7 Through the use of an interdisciplinary care team, a comprehensive care plan can be followed to prevent these secondary complications. Our facility developed a comprehensive SCI protocol based on available data and best practices. This study aimed to assess outcomes before and after utilization of the SCI protocol in traumatic quadriplegic SCI. The authors hypothesized that by proactively addressing each organ system, and potential complications, a significant decrease in morbidity would be demonstrated.
Methods
SCI Protocol Development and Implementation
A multidisciplinary workgroup of providers and nurses were selected to develop the SCI protocol in 2015. Once the protocol was established, an educational program was implemented for the care team. Providers utilizing the protocol including nursing, physical and occupational therapy, nutritionists, respiratory therapists, and physicians were educated on the new protocol by our trauma nurse clinician (Figure 1 and Supplementary Digital Content). To ensure continuity during hospitalization, providers in both the intensive care unit and surgical step down and floor were educated. Education was provided both at the bedside, through inter-departmental meetings, and in larger group lecturers by the physician and nursing champions. Paper and electronic copies of the protocol were available to all providers. Order sets in the electronic medical record were developed and implemented in order to promote adherence to the protocol, thus aiming to decrease variation in provider practice. The protocol was implemented into standard practice in January 2016. A trauma nurse clinician was also assigned to track performance improvement data on the protocol’s deployment.
Figure 1.

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) management.
Data and Analysis
In this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from our institution’s Trauma Registry from January 1, 2010 until December 31, 2019 assessing both pre- and post-implementation of the SCI protocol. Patients admitted after January 1, 2016 were considered in the post-period. The Trauma Registry collects data in our academic, ACS verified, Level 1 Trauma Center, which is a regional referral center for adult trauma patients. There are 6 Trauma Registrars that are dedicated to the Trauma Program. Data is abstracted according to the National Trauma Data Bank data rules and Trauma Quality Improvement Program process measures. Data is entered on a daily basis from patient identification for the entire admission to discharge, both concurrently and retrospectively.
Patients with documented quadriplegia secondary to a blunt or penetrating traumatic mechanism and on the adult trauma service were identified. Information regarding patients’ age, sex, mechanism of injury, level of spinal cord injury, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and mortality (during index admission, 3-month, 6-month) rates were assessed. Additional data points collected included pneumonia and urinary tract infection (UTI) rates, frequency of return to the ICU, time to tracheostomy, frequency of physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) consultation, frequency of nurse-directed out of bed (OOB) activity, pressure ulcer frequency, and injury severity scores (ISS). Patients were excluded from data collection and analysis if they were less than 17 years old, pregnant, incarcerated, or had a documented epidural abscess, central cord syndrome, or iatrogenic spinal cord injury.
Statistical analysis was conducted with the Chi Square Test, and Fisher’s Exact Test used to analyze categorical variables with smaller sample sizes, while Student’s T-test was utilized for continuous data. Due to the poor ISS matching between groups, regression analysis was utilized to assess the impact of ISS on outcomes. This study was reviewed and approved by our university’s institutional review board.
Results
From 2010 to 2019 a total of 57 patients with quadriplegia and admitted to the trauma service were identified through the Trauma Registry. In both cohorts (pre- and post-implementation), most patients were male (74%) and involved in a motor vehicle crash (MVC; 53% vs 47%, P = .8). The mean age of patient presentation prior to implementation of the protocol was 44 (IQR 20) years old, this was increased to 54 (IQR 33) old post-implementation (P = .04). There was however a significant decrease in mean ISS across the study, from 40 to 27 (P < .001). Cervical SCI levels were similar across the study period. (Table 1)
Table 1.
Demographics, Level, and Mechanisms of Injury.
| Demographics | Pre (n = 19) | Post (n = 38) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age (mean) | 44 | 54 | .04 |
| Male | 14 (74%) | 28 (74%) | 1 |
| ISS (mean) | 40 | 27 | <.001 |
| Smoker | 4 (21%) | 12 (31%) | 0.4 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1 (5%) | 8 (21%) | .12 |
| Injury level | |||
| C1-3 | 5 (26%) | 5 (13%) | .22 |
| C4-T1 | 14 (74%) | 33 (87%) | |
| Mechanism of injury | |||
| MVC | 10 (53%) | 18 (47%) | .56 |
| Fall | 6 (32%) | 12 (32%) | |
| Diving accident | 1 (5%) | 0 (0%) | |
| BCC | 1 (5%) | 1 (3%) | |
| ATV | 0 (0%) | 3 (8%) | |
| Assault | 1 (5%) | 2 (5%) | |
| GSW | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | |
ISS, injury severity score; MVC, motor vehicle collision; BCC, bicycle crash; ATV, all-terrain vehicle; GSW, gunshot wound.
Overall, there was a reduction in complications and a significant reduction in patients experiencing any complication (Table 2). The largest impact was seen with a significant decrease in pneumonia rates (47% vs 16%; P = .02) and decubitus ulcers (47% to 11%; P = .005). UTIs, PE/DVTs, cardiac arrests, and unplanned ICU visits also decreased across the study period. Unplanned intubation rates saw a non-significant increase, from 21% to 26% (P = .75). Mean ICU LOS of stay decreased by 7 days and hospital LOS decreased by 13 days. Mean duration to tracheostomy was 7 days in both groups. Regression analysis found no correlation between ISS difference and ICU LOS (P = .28), HLOS (P = .58), pneumonia rate (P = .23), or decubitus ulcers (P = .11).
Table 2.
Complications and Hospital Outcomes.
| Pre (n = 19) | Post (n = 38) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Pneumonia | 9 (47%) | 6 (16%) | .02 |
| Urinary tract infection | 6 (32%) | 6 (16%) | .19 |
| Deep vein thrombosis | 4 (21%) | 5 (13%) | .46 |
| Pulmonary embolism | 2 (11%) | 0 (0%) | 0.1 |
| Unplanned ICU admission | 4 (21%) | 3 (8%) | 0.2 |
| Unplanned intubation | 4 (21%) | 10 (26%) | .75 |
| Cardiac arrest | 6 (32%) | 9 (24%) | .54 |
| Decubitus ulcer | 9 (47%) | 4 (11%) | .005 |
| Any complication | 17 (89%) | 20 (52%) | .006 |
| ICU LOS (mean days) | 21 | 14 | 0.1 |
| HLOS (mean days) | 37 | 24 | .08 |
| Tracheostomy | 14 (73%) | 19 (50%) | .09 |
ICU LOS, intensive care unit length of stay; HLOS, hospital length of stay.
Physical therapy significantly improved post-implementation. Patients received on average daily PT post protocol, compared to every 2.5 days pre protocol. Nurse initiated daily out of bed activity increased from 68% to 95% of patients. Patients were also out of bed twice as many times daily in the post protocol analysis (Table 3).
Table 3.
Physical Therapy and Time Out of Bed.
| Pre (n = 19) | Post (n = 38) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Hospital day of first PT | 2 | 2 |
| PT frequency (mean days) | 2.5 | 1 |
| Nurse initiated daily OOB | 13 (68%) | 36 (95%) |
| Frequency OOB (mean #/day) | 2 | 4 |
PT, physical therapy; OOB, out of bed.
The majority of patients were discharged to a rehabilitation facility in both groups (58% vs 45%, respectively). However, there was an increase in patients being discharged to a long-term acute care hospital (LTACH; 11% to 21%) and skilled nursing facilities (SNF; 11% to 13%). In-hospital mortality increased from 5% to 16% of patients, while 90-day and 6-month mortality rates both decreased (5% to 3%; 11% to 5%). Mortality and discharge disposition were not statistically different between groups. Total hospital costs were over $42,000 less on average in the post-protocol group ($380,784 vs $338,067, P = .53) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Discharge Disposition and Morality.
| Pre (n = 19) | Post (n = 38) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Discharge disposition | |||
| Home | 2 (11%) | 2 (5%) | 0.6 |
| SNF | 2 (11%) | 5 (13%) | |
| Rehab | 11 (58%) | 17 (45%) | |
| LTACH | 2 (11%) | 8 (21%) | |
| Mortality | |||
| In hospital | 1 (5%) | 6 (16%) | 0.6 |
| 90 day | 1 (5%) | 1 (3%) | |
| 6 month | 2 (11%) | 2 (5%) | |
SNF, skilled nursing facility; LTACH, long term acute care hospital.
Discussion
This study demonstrated a significant improvement in complications and activity related outcomes among patients with quadriplegia with a comprehensive SCI protocol. While other studies have assessed individual aspects of these patients’ care, the present study assessed an all-inclusive protocol designed to prevent secondary complications. There were a number of beneficial outcomes, including notable decreases in pneumonia and decubitus ulcer rates—outcomes of two organ systems that are high risk for complication and can lead to significant morbidity.8
Respiratory complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute SCI.8,9 Pulmonary complications seen after acute quadriplegia progressively increase over the first 5 days, with respiratory failure most commonly occurring 3 to 5 days after injury.3 Aggressive management of secretions is of utmost importance in caring for a patient with SCI to prevent mucous plugs, atelectasis, and pneumonia.10,11 Eighty percent of deaths in patients hospitalized with cervical SCI are secondary to pulmonary dysfunction, with pneumonia the cause in 50% of the cases.3 Pneumonia development has also been shown to be correlated with long term need for respiratory support.12 In our study, pneumonia rates significantly decreased from 47% to 16% among patients, which is a notably lower rate than seen in prior literature. This reduction in pneumonia rate may account for the large reduction in hospital and ICU length of stay. Attention to pulmonary toilet and daily forced vital capacity (FVC) measurement are critical portions of this SCI protocol. FVC has been shown to decrease after spinal cord injury.13,14 Extrapolating from chest trauma data, FVC measurement provides objective data on which decisions on pulmonary care can be made, and high risk patients can be identified.15
Decubitus ulcers are also a common integumentary complication after SCI that can lead to significant morbidity/mortality, as well as prolonged hospitalization.2,16 A recent analysis of these injuries identified a high rate (43%) of post-operative complications.17 This study saw a significant decrease in decubitus ulcers across the study period, from 47% prior to implementation of the SCI protocol to 11% post-implementation. This decrease in preventable complication may have contributed to reduction in total cost.
This study demonstrated a significant improvement in physical therapy and nurse initiated out of bed activities. With a multidisciplinary approach, patients were out of bed 4 times daily, and had daily PT sessions. The number of times a patient was out of bed doubled with increased nursing driven activity session. Multiple authors have demonstrated the importance for long term outcomes of increased PT interventions and time out of bed during inpatient admission.18–20
This study has all of the usual limitation of a retrospective review. Furthermore, data was collected from a single site, meaning results may not be generalizable to other settings. Our study is also limited in its size and power, however do avoid larger differences in practice patterns we did not collect data earlier than 2010. Lastly, our study did not follow long-term outcomes of these patients after hospital discharge beyond 6-month mortality; thus, we were unable to determine any longer term benefits of implementing the SCI protocol.
Conclusion
A comprehensive SCI protocol can reduce secondary complications in quadriplegic patients. This study found significant decreases in pneumonia and decubitus ulcer rates after implementation of the protocol. Hospital and ICU LOS were also reduced by 13 days and 7 days, respectively. Future research using comprehensive SCI protocols is needed to further assess its effects on outcomes for this specific patient population. Similar centers should consider adoption of comprehensive SCI protocols.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 5U54GM104942-05. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This study was presented as a poster at the TQIP Annual Conference in 2019 in Dallas, Texas.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
- 1.Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26(24S): S2–S12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hachem LD, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: From point of injury to rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017. Nov 2;40(6):665–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Berlly M, Shem K. Respiratory management during the first five days after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007; 30:309–318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krassioukov A, Eng JJ, Eng JJ, Claxton G, Sakakibara BM, Shum S. Neurogenic bowel management after spinal cord injury: A systematic review of the evidence. Spinal Cord; 2010;48:718–733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eckert MJ, Martin MJ. Trauma: Spinal cord injury [Internet], 97. Surgical Clinics of North America. W.B. Saunders; 2017:1031–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(4):403–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.El Masri YWS. Traumatic spinal injury and spinal cord injury: point for active physiological conservative management as compared to surgical management. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018. Dec 22;4(1):14–A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sezer N, Akkuş Uğurlu FG. Chronic complications of spinal cord injury. World J Orthoped. 2015. Jan 18;6(1):24–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Garshick E, Kelley A, Cohen SA, Garrison A, Tun CG, Gagnon D, et al. A prospective assessment of mortality in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005. Jul 15;43(7):408–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zakrasek EC, Nielson JL, Kosarchuk JJ, Crew JD, Ferguson AR, McKenna SL. Pulmonary outcomes following specialized respiratory management for acute cervical spinal cord injury: A retrospective analysis. Spinal Cord. 2017. Jun 21;55(6):559–565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jackson AB, Groomes TE. Incidence of respiratory complications following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994. Mar 1;75(3):270–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jaja BNR, Jiang F, Badhiwala JH, et al. Association of pneumonia, wound infection, and sepsis with clinical outcomes after acute traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2019. Nov 1;36(21):3044–3050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Linn WS, Spungen AM, Gong H Jr, Adkins RH, Bauman WA, Waters RL. Forced vital capacity in two large outpatient populations with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2001. May 6;39(5):263–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jain NB, Brown R, Tun CG, Gagnon D, Garshick E. Determinants of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC in chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006. Oct 1;87(10):1327–1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Warner R, Knollinger P, Hobbs G, Lilly C, Grabo D, Wilson A. Forced vital capacity less than 1: A mark for high-risk patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(2):271–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Groah SL, Schladen M, Pineda CG, Hsieh CH. Prevention of pressure ulcers among people with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. PM R 2015. Jun 1;7(6):613–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lindqvist EK, Sommar P, Stenius M, Lagergren JF. Complications after pressure ulcer surgery – a study of 118 operations in spinal cord injured patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020. Jun;54(3):145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Teeter L, Gassaway J, Taylor S, et al. Relationship of physical therapy inpatient rehabilitation interventions and patient characteristics to outcomes following spinal cord injury: The SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012. Nov 19;35(6):503–526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Whiteneck G, Gassaway J, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, Kreider SE. Relationship of patient characteristics and rehabilitation services to outcomes following spinal cord injury: The SCIRehab Project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012. Nov 19;35(6):484–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rintala DH, Willems EP, Halstead LS. Spinal cord injury: The relationship between time out of bed and significant events. Rehabil Nurs. 1986. May 6;11(3):15–18.3638744 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
