Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2022 Sep 26:2022.09.22.22280247. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2022.09.22.22280247

Abatacept for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized with Moderate or Severe Covid-19

Emily R Ko, Kevin J Anstrom, Reynold A Panettieri, Anne M Lachiewicz, Martin Maillo, Jane A O’Halloran, Cynthia Boucher, P Brian Smith, Matthew W McCarthy, Patricia Segura Nunez, Sabina Mendivil Tuchia de Tai, Akram Khan, Alfredo J Mena Lora, Matthias Salathe, Eyal Kedar, Gerardo Capo, Daniel Rodríguez Gonzalez, Thomas F Patterson, Christopher Palma, Horacio Ariza, Maria Patelli Lima, John Blamoun, Esteban C Nannini, Eduardo Sprinz, Analia Mykietiuk, Jennifer P Wang, Luis Parra-Rodriguez, Tatyana Der, Kate Willsey, Daniel K Benjamin, Jun Wen, Pearl Zakroysky, Susan Halabi, Adam Silverstein, Steven E McNulty, Sean M O’Brien, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, Sandra Butler, Jane Atkinson, Stacey J Adam, Soju Chang, Michael A Maldonado, Michael Proscham, Lisa LaVange, Samuel A Bozzette, William G Powderly; the ACTIV-1 IM study group members
PMCID: PMC9536071  PMID: 36203544

Abstract

Background

We investigated whether abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, provides additional benefit when added to standard-of-care for patients hospitalized with Covid-19.

Methods

We conducted a master protocol to investigate immunomodulators for potential benefit treating patients hospitalized with Covid-19 and report results for abatacept. Intravenous abatacept (one-time dose 10 mg/kg, maximum dose 1000 mg) plus standard of care (SOC) was compared with shared placebo plus SOC. Primary outcome was time-to-recovery by day 28. Key secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality.

Results

Between October 16, 2020 and December 31, 2021, a total of 1019 participants received study treatment (509 abatacept; 510 shared placebo), constituting the modified intention-to-treat cohort. Participants had a mean age 54.8 (SD 14.6) years, 60.5% were male, 44.2% Hispanic/Latino and 13.7% Black. No statistically significant difference for the primary endpoint of time-to-recovery was found with a recovery-rate-ratio of 1.14 (95% CI 1.00–1.29; p=0.057) compared with placebo. We observed a substantial improvement in 28-day all-cause mortality with abatacept versus placebo (11.0% vs. 15.1%; odds ratio [OR] 0.62 [95% CI 0.41– 0.94]), leading to 38% lower odds of dying. Improvement in mortality occurred for participants requiring oxygen/noninvasive ventilation at randomization. Subgroup analysis identified the strongest effect in those with baseline C-reactive protein >75mg/L. We found no statistically significant differences in adverse events, with safety composite index slightly favoring abatacept. Rates of secondary infections were similar (16.1% for abatacept; 14.3% for placebo).

Conclusions

Addition of single-dose intravenous abatacept to standard-of-care demonstrated no statistically significant change in time-to-recovery, but improved 28-day mortality.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04593940 ).

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES