Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry logoLink to International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
. 2022 Sep 29;2022:4640927. doi: 10.1155/2022/4640927

Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study

Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa 1, Dejene Beyene 1, Million Ebba 1,✉, Goshu Kenea 2
PMCID: PMC9536971  PMID: 36211813

Abstract

Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process (MOAEC). The Moringa Oleifera, EC process, and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process are effective mechanisms for the removal of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), phosphate, TSS (Total Suspended Solids), and color from surface water. Different operating parameters such as pH (5–11), the dosage of coagulant (0.2–0.5 g), contact time or reaction time (20–50 minutes), current (0.2–0.5 A), and settling time (5–20 minutes) were considered. The maximum removal efficiency using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process was COD (85.48%), BOD (78.50%), TDS (84.5%), phosphate (95.70%), TSS (93.90%), color (94.50%), and COD (90.50%), BOD (87%), TDS (97.50%), phosphate (89.10%), TSS (95.80%), and color (96.15%), respectively. Similarly, with the application of MOAEC, 91.47%, 89.35%, 97.0%, 90.20%, 9.10%, and 95.70% of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were removed, respectively. The EC process and MOAEC were more effective in the removal of COD, BOD, TDS, TSS, and color than using MO. More phosphate was removed using MO than the EC process and MOAEC. Additionally, the effects of different operating parameters were studied on the removal efficiency.

1. Introduction

As a human being in this global village, “water” is one of the most important needs [1, 2], and for all living things and activities, as well as for preserving the environment and its resources, water is vitally important [3–5]. Most of Earth's surface is covered by water, which covers more than two-thirds of the planet's surface, but most of it is salty and useless [6]. In addition to this, the world's water resources could also be contaminated due to a variety of natural and man-made factors [7, 8]. Urbanization [9–12], industrialization [10, 11, 13, 14], agricultural, [13–15] surface runoff, and sediment transport [2] are some of the factors considered in the deterioration of the parameters of water quality.

On a global scale, at least four billion people do not have access to clean drinking water, or they believe that it is unsafe to drink [16]. World, continent, and country-level human health are directly affected by drinking water quality [17]. Many countries, especially those in developing countries, have poor water quality, which has led to several waterborne diseases [4, 11, 18, 19].

Diverse water treatment technologies have been created in response to the alarming condition of water shortages to assure the creation of an appropriate water supply and quality to fulfill the demand and preserve the availability of clean water resources. These technologies can generally be divided into three groups: physical, chemical, and biological processes [20]. Without significantly altering the chemical or biological properties of the treated water, physical treatment unit operations solely rely on the physical separation of contaminants from water/wastewater [21]. Chemical treatments are known as additive procedures because additional chemicals are needed for them to interact with the intended pollutants and remove them, and the fundamental objective of biological unit procedures, which use microorganisms for the biodegradation of pollutants in water/wastewater, is to lower the organic content and nutrients in the water/wastewater [21].

Whatever type of water treatment process is used, it must be considered in a variety of situations, including the effectiveness of the technology, ease of implementation, environmental friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and skilled manpower required to run the technology.

Electrocoagulation (EC) is an electrochemical process for water and wastewater treatment that is based on electrochemically dissolving cationic metallic species in situ by oxidizing a sacrificial anode only with the application of electric current [22]. By using electrical energy to dissolve the metals from the electrode surface and destabilize colloidal suspensions, electrocoagulation causes pollutants to flocculate and float [23]. In comparison to traditional treatment methods, the electrocoagulation (EC) process is a promising and fairly environmentally friendly technology for the removal of contaminants from water and wastewater due to its ease of installation and operation; no need for chemical addition; relatively low operation; and maintenance cost; low sludge production; and high removal efficiency of pollutants [24]. Some studies were conducted on water treatment utilizing the electrocoagulation process under different operating parameters for the removal of arsenic [25, 26], fluoride [25], bromide [27, 28], sulfate [29], chromium [30], copper [31], and selenium [32].

Metal-based coagulants are the most often used chemical to support the flocculation-coagulation processes in the treatment of water and wastewater and they function admirably in the treatment of numerous water and wastewater kinds with distinct properties [33]. However, to attain green technology and sustainable processes, some researchers suggest using plant-based coagulants as an alternative to the widely used metal-based coagulant [34–38].

Natural coagulants used for water and wastewater treatment have numerous advantages [39], such as being eco-friendly; the flocculation technique is more cost-effective and efficient; it is a cheap and simple approach for developing nations; it does not affect water taste; it does not cause health problems; and the small amount of sludge that is precipitated is biodegradable and safe for human health and the environment.

Moringa oleifera is a type of natural coagulant used for the treatment of water and wastewater. An investigation was conducted into the water and wastewater treatment for the elimination of color, COD, BOD, dissolved oxygen, TSS, TDS, and turbidity [36, 39, 40]. In this study, the application of electrocoagulation and Moringa Oleifera on surface water treatment for the removal of color, TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), and phosphate was discussed separately.

Additionally, the removal efficiency of color, TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), and phosphate using Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation was studied. Furthermore, different factors that influence the removal efficiency of color, TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), and phosphate were discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Surface water supply was collected from the Awetu River, Jimma Zone, and Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Surface water was collected using the grab sampling technique for sampling, and was then kept in a refrigerator (4°C) to prevent changes in the quality of water. The materials used for this study were a beaker, magnetic stirrer (model RHB2), desiccator, drying oven, filter paper, COD reactor (Hatch 45600-02), COD digester, COD kit, BOD incubator, DO meter, electrode (Al-Al), DC-power supply (WYJ-o-15 V/5 A), spectrophotometer (model 6700), vacuum pump, vacuum hood, heaters, conical flasks, pH meter, standard flasks, Erlenmeyer flasks, measuring cylinder, plastic bottles, burettes, thermometer, funnel, suction flask, wash bottle, porcelain dish, weighing balance (model Pw-124), weighing balance (model Pw-124), filtration apparatus, graduated cylinder, turbidity meter (Wag-WT3020), pH meter (pH 3310), and ultraviolet (UV) lamp (model PUV-1022).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Experimental Procedure for Electrocoagulation Process

An experimental investigation was conducted at standard room pressure and temperature. As shown in Figure 1, an electrocoagulation process was used in a 1-liter glass beaker as an electrocoagulation cell. An aluminum electrode was used that has a dimension of 6 cm, 13 cm, and 0.2 cm for length, width, and thickness respectively. An effective surface area of the electrode was adjusted to 55 cm2 throughout the experiments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Electrocoagulation process experimental setup.

Once the water sample was added to the electrocoagulation cell, the EC cell was placed on a magnetic stirrer. A magnetic stirrer bar also placed inside the EC contains water samples that mix water samples based on the seed of the magnetic stirrer. An aluminum electrode was connected to an anode and cathode and then inserted into the electrocoagulation cell containing the water sample. The distance between electrodes was adjusted to 2 cm. Then, electrodes from the anode and cathode are connected to a DC-power supply with electrical wires. By adjusting all operating parameters (reaction time, pH, and current), the removal percentages of color, turbidity, TDS, COD, and phosphate were evaluated.

2.2.2. Experimental Procedure Using Moringa Oleifera

Moringa Oleifera seed powder was collected from a locally available market and its powder preparation was based on an experimental procedure. Moringa Oleifera seeds are first dried with sunlight to remove the moisture content. Mortar, pan, sieve, paper, and oven-dry were the instruments used for the preparation of Moringa Oleifera seed powder. Once the husks were removed from the Moringa Oleifera seeds, they were placed in a mortar and crushed, and then they were placed in an oven to dry with the using pan at 105°C for 7 hours [36]. Then, using a jar test, different water characteristics (% color, % turbidity, % TDS, % COD, and % phosphate) were evaluated after adjusting the dosage of Moringa Oleifera seed powder, pH, settling time, and contact time as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Jar test.

2.2.3. Experimental Procedure of Moringa Oleifera Assisted EC Process

One of the practical methods for expanding the use and proving the efficacy of natural coagulants is to combine them with other treatment technologies, much like how traditional inorganic coagulants are combined with other processes. A relatively novel method for enhancing the overall performance of an integrated system is the use of natural coagulant (Moringa Oleifera seed) in conjunction with the EC process.

Some research was conducted in keeping one factor and evaluating the removal of different parameters from water, and investigating the effects of each factor separately [22, 36, 41] However, in this study, based on the adjusted values of factors either for the electrocoagulation process or Moringa Oleifera an experiment was conducted just uniformly with the increase of each factor without keeping one factor constant.

Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process was performed similarly to the EC process as shown in Figure 1. But a different dosage of Moringa Oleifera seed powder (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 g) was added to the EC setup shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Analysis

Different empirical formulas were used for the analysis of surface water characteristics based on the initial and final concentrations of pollutants. The removal efficiencies of color [22], phosphate [42], TDS [43], COD [36, 44], and BOD [44] were calculated using equations ((1)–(5)).

%Color  Removal= Absi−AbsfAbsi∗100, (1)

where, Absi and Absf are initial and final absorbance.

%Phosphate  Removal= Ci−CtCi∗100, (2)

where, Ci and Ct are initial and final phosphate registered at different times.

%TDS Removal= Co−CfCo∗100, (3)

where, Co and Cf are initial and final concentration of TDS respectively.

%COD Removal= CODi−CODfCODi∗100, (4)

where, CODi and CODf are initial and final concentration of COD.

%BOD  Removal= BODi−BODfBODi∗100, (5)

where, BODi and BODf are the initial and final BOD measured at different time.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Removal Efficiency COD, BOD, TDS, Phosphate, TSS, and Color

The removal efficiency was evaluated for COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color from water using Moringa Oleifera as a coagulant, electrocoagulation process, and Moringa Oleifera-assisted electrocoagulation process. While using Moringa Oleifera seed powder, coagulant dosage (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 g), pH (5, 7, 9, and 11), contact time (20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes) and settling time (5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes) are considered as operating parameters on the removal efficiency. During the electrocoagulation process, the pH of surface water and contact time or reaction time is fixed to be the same as in the treatment process using the Moringa Oleifera process. However, the electric current applied was adjusted to 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 A.

At pH 5, the removal efficiency of COD (78.30%), BOD (70%), TDS (81.20%), phosphate (85%), TSS (87.50%), color (89%), and COD (80%), BOD (81%), TDS (94.20%), phosphate (81.20%), TSS (87%), and color (92.80%) using Moringa Oleifera and electrocoagulation processes, respectively. In this case, the dosage of Moringa Oleifera was 0.2 g at 20 minutes of contact time and 5 minutes of settling time. But the removal efficiency was achieved at 20 minutes of reaction time and 0.2 A of current with the electrocoagulation process. The removal percentages of TSS and phosphate were higher using Moringa Oleifera than in the electrocoagulation process, but the removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, and color using electrocoagulation was higher than using Moringa Oleifera as a coagulant at pH 5.

Increasing the pH to 7 results in the increasing removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color using both the Moringa Oleifera and electrocoagulation processes. The removal percentages of COD (79.20%), BOD (74.30%), TDS (83.10%), phosphate (89.50%), TSS (91%), and color (92.70%) were removed with a dosage of 0.3 g of Moringa Oleifera at 30 minutes of contact time and 10 minutes of settling time. Similarly, using the EC process, when the reaction time was 30 minutes and the current applied was 0.3 A, the removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were 87.30%, 83.10%, 83.10%, and 95.70%, 84.90%, 90.90%, and 94.50%, respectively. So, at pH 7, the higher removal efficiency was achieved for phosphate and TSS using Moringa Oleifera, and more COD, BOD, TDS, and color were also removed using the EC process.

When pH was 9, the removal efficiency of pollutants was increased, similar to at pH 5 and 7. The removal percentages of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were increased to 81.89%, 76.90%, 83.52%, 93.28%, 92.50%, and 93%, respectively, using Moringa Oleifera. Similarly, with the application of the electrocoagulation process, the better removal efficiency was achieved for COD (89%), BOD (85.70%), TDS (93.50%), TSS (96.40%), and color (95.78%) compared to using Moringa Oleifera. However, in the case of phosphate removal, using Moringa Oleifera was better than utilizing the electrocoagulation process.

Another experiment was also conducted at pH 11 using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process. In both cases, good removal percentages of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were achieved with the consideration of influencing parameters. Using Moringa Oleifera seed powder of 0.5 g, 50 minutes of contact time, and 20 minutes of settling time, 95.70% of phosphate and 94.50% of color were removed from surface water. The removal percentages for COD, BOD, TDS, and TSS were also good, even if they were not enough compared to using the EC process. Applying the EC process at pH 11, by increasing the current to 0.5 A and reaction time to 50 minutes, maximum removal efficiency of COD (90.50%), BOD (87%), TDS (97.50%), TSS (95.80%), and color (96.15%) compared to using Moringa Oleifera for COD (85.48%), BOD (78.50%), TDS (84.50%), TSS (93.90%), and color (94.50%).

Moringa Oleifera was found to have a high percentage of phosphate removed compared to the EC process at different influencing parameters. Similarly, at pH, 5, 7, 9, and 11, the EC process was effective in the removal of COD, BOD, TDS, and color relative to Moringa Oleifera seed powder.

Additional experiments were also conducted on the removal degree of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TDS, and color from surface water using the Moringa Oleifera enhanced electrocoagulation process. The investigation was conducted at pH (5, 7, 9, and 11), current (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 A), the dosage of Moringa Oleifera (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 g), and reaction time of (20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes). Any water sample that contains more electric conductivity that undergoes an electrocoagulation process and better removal efficiency is enhanced. Sometimes, when water sample electric conductivity was lower, different types ofsupporting electrolytic such as Na2SO4, KCl, NaCl, and NaHCO3 will be added to achieve better removal efficiency [45]. To increase electrolytic conductivity and prevent the formation of an oxide layer, minimize the ohmic drop, and therefore increase power density, a supportive electrolyte is added [45]. Regarding the relationship between pH and electrical conductivity, Electrical conductivity is a nonspecific measurement of the concentration of both positively and negatively charged ions in a sample, whereas pH measures a particular hydrogen ion. Hence, water contains more ions, indicating higher electrical conductivity, whether it may be in acidic or basic conditions. In this study, the electrical conductivity of water was not measured, and it directly focused on the pH, current, and Moringa Oleifera powder.

When pH was 5, 7, 9, and 11, the removal percentages of COD were 83.50%, 86.50%, 87.90%, and 91.47% at 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 A, respectively. This was achieved at reaction times of electrocoagulation processes of 20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes. In this case, the removal of COD is better than using the Moringa Oleifera assisted EC process than using the EC process and Moringa Oleifera.

Similarly, the removal percentage of BOD was 79.50%, 82.90%, 85.20%, and 89.35% at pH 5, 7, 9, and 11, respectively. These results were achieved at reaction times of 20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes and with 02, 0.3, 04, and 0.5 A of current. When the pH was 11, the current was 0.5 A, the dosage of Moringa Oleifera was 0.5 g, and the reaction time was 50 minutes. Moringa Oleifera assisted EC process removed COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color up to 91.47%, 89.35%, 97.60%, 90.20%, 96.10%, and 95.70%, respectively.

In terms of general removal degree, the Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process removes a higher percentage of COD, BOD, and TSS than the EC process and Moringa Oleifera alone. However, the highest removal percentages of phosphate were obtained using Moringa Oleifera, as well as for TDS and color, utilizing the EC process.

Generally, the application of Moringa Oleifera, electrocoagulation process, and Moringa Oleifera assisted EC process was effective for the removal of pollutants from surface water with consideration of different influencing parameters.

3.2. Influences of Operating Parameters

3.2.1. Effects of pH

The major operating parameter in water treatment using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process is pH. The pH of the water was adjusted to 5, 7, 9, and 11 using NaOH and H2SO4. Increasing pH, using Moringa Oleifera, resulted in the increasing removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color. The concentration of hydrogen ions can have an impact on the effectiveness of pollutant removal (pH level). The higher removal percentage of pollutants is related to the high generation of hydrogen ions in water under acidic, neutral, or basic conditions. So, by increasing the pH of water from 5 to 11, the removal percentage of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color increases using Moringa Oleifera. However, according to [36], increasing the pH to 9 increased the removal efficiency of pollutants, and further increasing the pH resulted in the reduction of pollutants. Similarly, while using the EC process and Moringa Oleifera, the removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color was increased as pH increased from 5 to 7, from 7 to 9, and then from 9 to 11. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the removal efficiency of COD and BOD using Moringa Oleifera (MO), electrocoagulation process (EC), and Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process (MOAEC) increases as pH increases, respectively. This is due to the creation of hydrogen gas and the accumulation of hydroxide following the reduction of water in the cathode [46].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effects of pH on COD (a) and BOD (b) removal efficiency using Moringa Oleifera (MO), electrocoagulation (EC), and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC (MOAEC).

3.2.2. Effects of Dosage

The quantity of Moringa Oleifera powder added was also another factor affecting the removal of pollutants from water. In this study, the dosage of Moringa Oleifera powder was fixed at 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 g as shown in Figure 4. Using only Moringa Oleifera, the removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color was increased as the dosage was increased. Similarly, the removal percentages of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were increased as the dosage of Moringa Oleifera was increased from 0.2 to 0.3 g, 0.3 to 0.4 g, and from 0.4 to 0.5 g using Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation as shown in Figure 4. As illustrated in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), the removal percentages of TDS, and TSS, and the removal percentages of phosphate and color increase as the dosage of Moringa Oleifera increases respectively. The removal efficiency of the pollutants was increased by increasing the Moringa Oleifera dosage until an optimum dosage was required [47]. Increased dosages of Moringa Oleifera, over and above what is necessary for best results, may be obtained because of the saturation of the polymer bridge site since Moringa Oleifera seeds are known to have a cationic character [47]. This may be caused by the reversal of a charge that resulted in the rise of residual turbidity as a result of the destabilized particles being restored to their original state [47].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effects of dosage on TDS and TSS removal efficiency (a) and phosphate and color removal efficiency (b) using Moringa Oleifera (MO) and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process (MOAEC).

3.2.3. Effects of Contact Time

The major factor influencing water treatment using Moringa Oleifera is contact time. It is a time when a coagulant reacts with a pollutant once it is added to water using the jar test. It is also considered as reaction time in the case of an electrocoagulation process. The investigation was conducted by adjusting the contact time or reaction time to 20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes for Moringa Oleifera using a jar test and Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process as shown in Figure 5. The removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color was good at lower reaction times or contact times (20 and 30 minutes), and by increasing the contact or reaction time to 40 minutes, the removal efficiency achieved was greater than the lower election time in both the Moringa Oleifera using jar test and the Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process, as shown in Figure 3. As shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), the removal efficiency of TSS and color increased as the reaction or contact time increased, respectively. Further increasing the reaction time or contact time to 50 minutes, a higher removal degree of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color was achieved. This is due to the probability of the particle formed reacting with a pollutant while the contact time is increased.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effects of time on removal efficiency of TSS (a) and color (b) using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process (MOAEC).

3.2.4. Effects of Settling Time

After the coagulation-flocculation process takes place using the jar test, the sample of water must be settled to evaluate the removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDs, phosphate, TSS, and color. The settling time was adjusted to 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes as shown in Figure 6. After 5 minutes of settling time, the removal of those parameters was good, and by increasing the settling time to 10 minutes, the removal efficiency was increased, as shown in Figure 6. Further increasing the settling time to 15 minutes, and then, to 20 minutes, the removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color was increased. Increasing the settling time increased the removal of% COD, % BOD, and% TDS (Figure 6(a)) and% phosphate, % TSS, and% color (Figure 6(b)). The increase in settling time results in the increase of pollutants from the water. This may be due to the Moringa Oleifera (coagulant) attracting the pollutants in the water and settling at the bottom of the testing beaker while increasing the settling time.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Effects of settling time on COD, BOD, and TDS removal efficiency (a) and phosphate, TSS, and color removal efficiency (b) using Moringa Oleifera (MO).

3.2.5. Effects of Current

Current is a major factor in the electrocoagulation process that refers to the amount of electric current applied in amperes to an electrocoagulation cell or reactor. The driving force behind electrochemical reactions is the applied electric current that pertains to the oxygen discharge at the anode and the development of hydrogen at the cathode [48]. In this study, the current for the EC process was fixed to 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 A to evaluate the removal efficacy of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color with the combination of other operating parameters as shown in Figure 7. The removal efficiency changes when the amount of electric current used during the electrocoagulation process is altered. When 0.2 and 0.3 A were applied to the EC reactor, the removal percentages of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color achieved were good. By increasing the current to 0.4 A, more removal efficiency was achieved than at 0.2 and 0.3 A. While further current was applied, more removal percentages were achieved. Figures 7(a)–7(c), illustrate, that the removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were increased as the current was increased. The production of hydroxide flocs and bubble density increased when the current values were raised, accelerating the removal of contaminants from water or wastewater [49].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Effects of current on COD and BOD removal efficiency (a), TDS and TSS removal efficiency (b), and phosphate and color removal efficiency (c) using EC process and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process (MOAEC).

The good removal of contaminants from the water was achieved while the electric current was a progressive increase [22]. This can be observed that the rate of coagulant and bubble generation is determined by the applied current, and this can improve the effectiveness of pollutant removal [22].

4. Conclusions

Water treatment is a crucial task needed before a water supply for different purposes. The treatment technology and process must be effective while being selected from different perspectives. Moringa Oleifera seed is a natural coagulant that is used for the treatment of water and has numerous advantages relative to synthetic coagulants. Followed by the coagulation-flocculation process, Moringa Oleifera seed powder can remove pollutants from surface water. Dosage of Moringa Oleifera seed powder, pH, contact time, and settling time are the main factors considered to evaluate the removal of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), phosphate, TSS (Total Suspended Solids), and color, and the study showed that it was an effective process. Similarly, the EC process is also another simple technology for the treatment of water only with the application of electric current using sacrificial electrodes. With an electric current applied, pH, and reaction time as operating parameters, the EC process was effective in the elimination of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color from surface water.

Additionally, the Moringa Oleifera-assisted electrocoagulation (MOAEC) process is performed by the addition of Moringa Oleifera seed powder to the EC process. The study showed that the MOAEC process is effective in the removal efficiency of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color from surface water. Generally, Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera-assisted electrocoagulation process were all found to be effective methods for removing color, TSS, TDS, BOD, COD, and phosphate from surface water.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Dendukuri S. C., Asadi S. Estimation of water quality index by weighted arithmetic water quality index method: a model study. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology . 2017;8(4) [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gopal V., Shanmugasundaram A., Nithya B., Magesh N. S., Jayaprakash M. Water quality of the Uppanar estuary, Southern India: implications on the level of dissolved nutrients and trace elements. Marine Pollution Bulletin . 2018;130:279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ahmed S., Madan R., Amarah B. A. A., Naushad M. water quality assessment of shallow aquifer based on canadian council of ministers of the environment index and its impact on irrigation of Mathura district, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of King Saud University Science . 2019;32(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ebba M. Application of electrocoagulation for the removal of color from institutional wastewater: analysis with response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques . 2021;9:470–479. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Uddin M. G., Nash S., Olbert A. I. A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecological Indicators . 2021;122 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218.107218 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dinka M. O. Water Challenges an Urbanizing World . London, UK: IntechOpen; 2018. Safe drinking water: concepts, benefits, principles and standards. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Soltani A. A., Oukil A., Boutaghane H., Bermad A., Boulassel M. R. A new methodology for assessing water quality, based on data envelopment analysis: application to Algerian dams. Ecological Indicators . 2021;121 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106952.106952 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu S., Ryu D., Webb J. A., et al. Characterisation of spatial variability in water quality in the Great Barrier Reef catchments using multivariate statistical analysis. Marine Pollution Bulletin . 2018;137:137–151. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Giri S., Singh A. K. Assessment of surface water quality using heavy metal pollution index in Subarnarekha river, India. Water Quality, Exposure and Health . 2014;5(4):173–182. doi: 10.1007/s12403-013-0106-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mahapatra S. S., Sahu M., Patel R. K., Panda B. N. Prediction of water quality using principal component analysis. Water Quality, Exposure and Health . 2012;4(2):93–104. doi: 10.1007/s12403-012-0068-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rezaie-Balf M., Attar N. F., Mohammadzadeh A., et al. Physicochemical parameters data assimilation for efficient improvement of water quality index prediction: comparative assessment of a noise suppression hybridization approach. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2020;271 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122576.122576 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Deepa S., Venkateswaran S. Appraisal of groundwater quality in upper Manimuktha sub basin, Vellar river, Tamil Nadu, India by using water quality index (WQI) and multivariate statistical techniques. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. . 2018;4(3):1165–1180. doi: 10.1007/s40808-018-0468-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gibrilla A., Bam E. K. P., Adomako D., et al. Seasonal evaluation of raw, treated and distributed water quality from the Barekese dam (river offin) in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Water Quality, Exposure and Health . 2011;3(3-4):157–174. doi: 10.1007/s12403-011-0053-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hussein N., Ajeet J. Evaluation of water quality of Al-Gharraf river using the water quality index (WQI) Modeling Earth Systems and Environment . 2020;6 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chaudhary J. K. ScienceDirect a comparative study of fuzzy logic and WQI for groundwater a comparative study of fuzzy logic and WQI for groundwater quality assessment quality assessment. Procedia Computer Science . 2020;171:1194–1203. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Biswas A. K., Tortajada C. Water quality management: a globally neglected issue. International Journal of Water Resources Development . 2019;35(6):913–916. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2019.1670506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kelly E. R., Cronk R., Kumpel E., Howard G., Bartram J. How we assess water safety: a critical review of sanitary inspection and water quality analysis. Science of the Total Environment . 2020;718 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137237.137237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abtahi M., Golchinpour N., Yaghmaeian K., et al. A modified drinking water quality index (DWQI) for assessing drinking source water quality in rural communities of Khuzestan Province, Iran. Ecological Indicators . 2015;53:283–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li P., Wu J. Drinking water quality and public health. Exposure and Health . 2019;11(2):73–79. doi: 10.1007/s12403-019-00299-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ang W. L., Mohammad A. W. State of the art and sustainability of natural coagulants in water and wastewater treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2020;262 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121267.121267 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moussa D. T., El-Naas M. H., Nasser M., Al-Marri M. J. A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: potentials and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management . 2017;186:24–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ebba M., Asaithambi P., Alemayehu E. Investigation on operating parameters and cost using an electrocoagulation process for wastewater treatment. Applied Water Science . 2021;11:p. 175. doi: 10.1007/s13201-021-01517-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Syam Babu D., Vijay K., Nidheesh P. V., Suresh Kumar M. Performance of continuous aerated iron electrocoagulation process for arsenite removal from simulated groundwater and management of arsenic-iron sludge. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments . 2021b;47 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101476.101476 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Goren A. Y., Kobya M., Oncel M. S. Arsenite removal from groundwater by aerated electrocoagulation reactor with Al ball electrodes: human health risk assessment. Chemosphere . 2020;251 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126363.126363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.López-Guzmán M., Alarcón-Herrera M. T., Irigoyen-Campuzano J. R., Torres-Castañón L. A., Reynoso-Cuevas L. Simultaneous removal of fluoride and arsenic from well water by electrocoagulation. Science of the Total Environment . 2019;678:181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Syam Babu D., Nidheesh P. V., Suresh Kumar M. Arsenite removal from aqueous solution by aerated iron electrocoagulation process. Separation Science and Technology . 2021a;56(1):184–193. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2019.1708932. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.A Al-Raad A., Hanafiah M. M., Naje A. S., et al. Treatment of saline water using electrocoagulation with combined electrical connection of electrodes. Processes . 2019;7(5):p. 242. doi: 10.3390/pr7050242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li Y., Wu J., Yong T., Fei Y., Qi J. Investigation of bromide removal and bromate minimization of membrane capacitive deionization for drinking water treatment. Chemosphere . 2021;280 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130857.130857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Goren A. Y., Kobya M. Arsenic removal from groundwater using an aerated electrocoagulation reactor with 3D Al electrodes in the presence of anions. Chemosphere . 2021;263 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128253.128253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang Z., Shen Q., Xue J., et al. 3D hierarchically porous NiO/NF electrode for the removal of chromium(VI) from wastewater by electrocoagulation. Chemical Engineering Journal . 2020;402 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126151.126151 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim T., Kim T.-K., Zoh K.-D. Removal mechanism of heavy metal (Cu, Ni, Zn, and Cr) in the presence of cyanide during electrocoagulation using Fe and Al electrodes. Journal of Water Process Engineering . 2020;33 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101109.101109 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hansen H. K., Peña S. F., Gutiérrez C., Lazo A., Lazo P., Ottosen L. M. Selenium removal from petroleum refinery wastewater using an electrocoagulation technique. Journal of Hazardous Materials . 2019;364:78–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.09.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ahmad A., Kurniawan S. B., Ahmad J., et al. Dosage-based application versus ratio-based approach for metal-and plant-based coagulants in wastewater treatment: merits, limitations, and applicability. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2022;334 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130245.130245 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Alam M. W., Pandey P., Khan F., Souayeh B., Farhan M. Study to investigate the potential of combined extract of leaves and seeds of moringa oleifera in groundwater purification. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2020;17(20):7468–7513. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Camacho F. P., Sousa V. S., Bergamasco R., Ribau Teixeira M. The use of Moringa oleifera as a natural coagulant in surface water treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal . 2017;313:226–237. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Desta W. M., Bote M. E. Wastewater treatment using a natural coagulant (Moringa oleifera seeds): optimization through response surface methodology. Heliyon . 2021;7(11) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08451.e08451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gandiwa B. I., Moyo L. B., Ncube S., Mamvura T. A., Mguni L. L., Hlabangana N. Optimisation of using a blend of plant based natural and synthetic coagulants for water treatment: (Moringa Oleifera-Cactus opuntia-alum blend) South African Journal of Chemical Engineering . 2020;34:158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.sajce.2020.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Scholes A., Adenike K., Aderonke O. Heliyon Efficacy of a natural coagulant protein from Moringa oleifera (Lam) seeds in treatment of Opa reservoir water, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Heliyon . 2020;6 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03335.e03335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Prabhakaran G., Manikandan M., Boopathi M. Treatment of textile effluents by using natural coagulants. Materials Today Proceedings . 2020;33:3000–3004. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shan T. C., Matar M. Al, Makky E. A., Ali E. N. The use of Moringa oleifera seed as a natural coagulant for wastewater treatment and heavy metals removal. Applied Water Science . 2017;7(3):1369–1376. doi: 10.1007/s13201-016-0499-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Varkey A. J. Purification of river water using Moringa Oleifera seed and copper for point-of-use household application. Scientific African . 2020;8 doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00364.e00364 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sun S., Gao M., Wang Y., et al. Phosphate removal via biological process coupling with hydroxyapatite crystallization in alternating anaerobic/aerobic biofilter reactor. Bioresource Technology . 2021;326 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124728.124728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Das D., Varghese L. R., Das N. Enhanced TDS removal using cyclodextrinated, sulfonated and aminated forms of bead-membrane duo nanobiocomposite via sophorolipid mediated complexation. Desalination . 2015;360:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Soto M. F., Diaz C. A., Zapata A. M., Higuita J. C. BOD and COD removal in vinasses from sugarcane alcoholic distillation by Chlorella vulgaris: environmental evaluation. Biochemical Engineering Journal . 2021;176 doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108191.108191 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nidheesh P. V., Khan F. M., Kadier A., Akansha J., Bote M. E., Mousazadeh M. Removal of nutrients and other emerging inorganic contaminants from water and wastewater by electrocoagulation process. Chemosphere . 2022;307 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135756.135756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bener S., Bulca Ö., Palas B., Tekin G., Atalay S., Ersöz G. Electrocoagulation process for the treatment of real textile wastewater: effect of operative conditions on the organic carbon removal and kinetic study. Process Safety and Environmental Protection . 2019;129:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ueda Yamaguchi N., Cusioli L. F., Quesada H. B., et al. A review of Moringa oleifera seeds in water treatment: trends and future challenges. Process Safety and Environmental Protection . 2021;147:405–420. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.09.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yazici Guvenc S., Dincer K., Varank G. Performance of electrocoagulation and electro-fenton processes for treatment of nanofiltration concentrate of biologically stabilized landfill leachate. Journal of Water Process Engineering . 2019;31 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100863.100863 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bote M. E., Desta W. M. Removal of turbidity from domestic wastewater using electrocoagulation: optimization with response surface methodology. Chemistry Africa . 2022;5(1):123–134. doi: 10.1007/s42250-021-00303-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Articles from International Journal of Analytical Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES