Skip to main content
Sexual Medicine logoLink to Sexual Medicine
. 2022 Sep 7;10(5):100562. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2022.100562

The Role of the “Anti-Inflammatory” Couple for the Management of Hyperuricemia With Deposition

Andrea Sansone 1, Yacov Reisman 2, Suada Meto 3, Susanna Dolci 4, Emmanuele A Jannini 1,
PMCID: PMC9537271  PMID: 36087454

Abstract

Introduction

Gout is the most prevalent inflammatory crystal arthropathy worldwide and is a chronic disease requiring strict, lifelong adherence to drug therapy and healthy lifestyles. Gout has a heavy burden on the patient's sexual health, owing to the associated inflammatory status, long-term complications, and chronic pain; however, the effects of gout also extend to the partner's sexual health.

Aims

We aimed to investigate how the presence of a partner could influence the complex interaction between risk factors for sexual dysfunctions in gout in order to define novel strategies to improve sexual health and disease management.

Methods

Clinical and experimental data on the role of the couple in chronic diseases, as well as on the association between gout and sexual health, were searched through Pubmed.

Main outcome measures

Evidence from studies describing how the presence of a couple and leveraging sexual health can improve management and clinical outcomes for chronic diseases.

Results

Treatment adherence can improve the sexual health of gout patients and their partners; likewise, by leveraging sexual health, it would be possible to promote better health-seeking behaviors, ultimately improving gout management.

Clinical implications

Promoting awareness of the sexual health relevance of gout can potentially be a pivotal strategy to improve disease management and prevent the progression of sexual dysfunctions from subclinical to overt forms.

Strengths and limitations

Identifying a bidirectional association between sexual health and disease management paves the way for improved disease control and can potentially prevent the development of sexual dysfunctions in couples affected by gout. However, the relevance of the couple has not been adequately addressed in gout management, and most evidence comes from other chronic diseases.

Conclusion

Improving gout management results in better sexual health, and vice-versa promoting better sexual health can improve disease control for gout. The presence of a partner improves the behavioral well-being of gout patients, with beneficial effects on both sexual health and gout management.

Sansone A, Reisman Y, Meto S, et al. The Role of the “Anti-Inflammatory” Couple for the Management of Hyperuricemia With Deposition. Sex Med 2022;10:100562.

INTRODUCTION

Gout, the clinical representation of hyperuricemia with deposition, is the most prevalent inflammatory crystal arthropathy worldwide.1 Recent studies suggest an increasing trend for this condition,2, 3, 4 with an estimated prevalence of 3–4% in Europe and the USA, over 6% in some Oceanic-Pacific ethnic groups.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 The expanding presence of risk factors in the western population, such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, and dietary changes, has been advocated as one of the plausible reasons for this trend. However, gout is not a recent disease. It was historically known as “the disease of kings” or the “rich men's disease”, as in the past, only wealthy individuals could afford a “rich” diet heavy in meat.10 To the present date, being this disease more easily found in marginal lifestyles adopting trash food, alcohol abuse, and lacking physical activity, it cannot be consistently considered a disease of the elites. Undoubtedly, changes in socioeconomic milieu may have had a profound impact on its prevalence: between 1990 and 2017, the rates of gout both globally and in China were increasing, but with a significantly larger extent for males in China than globally.11 This was proportional to the adoption of Western lifestyles, mirrored by an increased average body mass index.

Gout is a typical non-communicable chronic disease (NCD), generated by important genetic and predisposing factors, but also associated with socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender) and the behaviors mentioned above, and not rarely comorbid with other NCDs (metabolic, renal and cardiovascular diseases, etc.).12 Gout is a chronic condition potentially leading to decreased mobility, persistent pain, and impaired quality of life.10 Several studies have provided evidence of how gout can impair health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).13, 14, 15 This impairment may be due to its disease-specific features such as excruciatingly painful attacks, their frequency and the number of joints involved, pain in between attacks, long-term joint damage due to accumulation of tophi, or, when the untreated disease progresses to more severe forms, to the amputation. A US veterans study found that gout was associated with poorer HR-QoL, functional limitation, higher mortality, and increased primary care visits and inpatient utilization.16 Hence, gout is not only a metabolic disease but has important psychosocial aspects that may dramatically affect its impact and final clinical outcome.

Although only recently considered as a part of the general one, sexual health could be regarded as a marker of the psychosocial milieu associated with NCDs in general and of gout in particular and, at the same time, a marker of the consequences of gout itself.17 Not only do the underlying shared risk factors (such as aging, sedentary lifestyle, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and hypertension) potentially contribute to an impaired sexual life, but also gout itself can potentially have devastating effects on the patient's ability to have intercourse.17 In the present narrative review, we aim to focus on aspects of hyperuricemia with deposition that should be considered in order to increase awareness of the potential risks for sexual health, not only in the affected patients but also in their partners. We also aim to discuss literature suggesting that the involvement of the couple in the clinical management of gout can potentially improve patient care and prevent, or delay, the onset of sexual dysfunctions; at the same time, promoting sexual health in such patients can be a crucial strategy to improve clinical outcomes and disease management. This paper will therefore start with a “primer” on gout pathophysiology before moving to the actual burden of gout on the couple, to the beneficial and adverse effects of a partner (or loss thereof) on compliance to gout therapy, to the consequences of gout on sexual health as well as on the general and sexual quality of life and, finally, to the potential strategies involving sexual health to promote better lifestyles.

Literature Search Strategy

Peer‐reviewed publications were identified through a PubMed search using the search terms “sexual dysfunction”, “erectile dysfunction”, “premature ejaculation”, “gout”, “chronic disease”, “couple”, and “hyperuricemia”. The search was completed in May 2022 and was limited to articles published in English. Relevant articles were identified based upon the expertise and clinical experience of the authors. Additional papers were retrieved by reviewing references from cited works.

Gout: a brief primer.

Gout is a disease resulting from the deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in target organs and tissues, which occurs when the concentration of serum uric acid (UA) increases over the 6.8 mg/dl solubility threshold. Several environmental factors can also affect the actual threshold for the deposition of MSU crystals, including temperature and pH.18,19 Not all individuals with hyperuricemia develop crystal deposition or the consequent acute inflammatory response20; additional factors, such as genetics, underlying inflammatory background, or pre-existing fiber damage, can potentially affect the mechanisms leading to the progression from silent hyperuricemia to asymptomatic crystal deposition, and subsequently to acute gout flares and chronic gouty arthritis.21 In fact, the prevalence of hyperuricemia in the US population is more than 3.5 times higher than that of gout, proving that the presence of elevated serum UA is not enough to result in the development of the disease.

Gout is also characterized by a relapsing-remitting course, with extended times of silent hyperuricemia interspersed with intermittent episodes of acute crystal-associated inflammatory arthritis.10 During these periods of “intercritical gout”, the MSU crystals persist in the target organs and tissues: the inflammatory response is toned down, but chemokines persist, suggesting that low-grade inflammation is still present following the resolution of the acute phase.22 Moreover, there is growing experimental evidence that supports a relationship between high concentrations of UA and endothelial dysfunction,23,24 a typical target of a number of chronic inflammations.

The main goals of the medical treatment of gout include minimizing the inflammation and pain of an acute gout attack, and preventing future gout flares by lowering serum UA levels. Xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs), including allopurinol and febuxostat, are first-line agents for the prevention of acute attacks. Uricosuric agents are an appropriate adjunctive therapy or second-line agent when XOIs are contraindicated or poorly tolerated.25 Recently, several third-line agents (e.g., pegloticase) have become available for the treatment of refractory gout.25

Despite a good pharmacological efficacy and tolerability, as in the majority of the chronic treatments for NCDs,26,27 treatment adherence is remarkably poor for gout patients,28,29 even worse than in other chronic diseases.30 This can be possibly due to the relapsing-remitting course of the disease, which might give some patients the false belief of being from disease, despite being in one of the intercritical periods. Another possible explanation for the poor treatment adherence lies in the possible combination of lacking “tangible” effects and the presence of side effects. Anti-hypertensive drugs are a paramount example of this mechanism26: hypertension, by itself, can often be asymptomatic, whereas side effects from several antihypertensive treatments are frequent and can impair QoL.31 Education and behavioral interventions have often been considered among the possible strategies available to clinicians to improve this negative scenario,26,32 but with limited efficacy.

Gout, the “Third Wheel” in the Couple: Issues and Challenges

Gout is almost twice as prevalent in men than in women9 and, as with the majority of NCDs, is strictly associated with other unmodifiable factors, such as genetics and age, with prevalence steadily increasing in elderly individuals.10 However, modifiable factors also play a major role. A recent study demonstrated that, compared to age-matched controls, male gout patients are significantly more likely to be overweight or obese, to have diabetes and hypertension, and to have more health-risk behaviors, such as binge-drinking, previous use of tobacco products, and sedentary lifestyle.33 Interestingly, all the mentioned aspects are well-known major risk factors for sexual dysfunction, particularly erectile dysfunction (ED).34 While research on the relationship between female gout and female sexual dysfunction is still in its infancy,35 the epidemiology and risk factors make, in principle, gout a condition primarily affecting male sexual function. However, it would be reductive to consider only the affected patient as an individual whose sexual health has been impaired by gout: indeed, the partner is also facing, indirectly, the burden of the disease. For the sake of simplicity, let's consider a heterosexual couple in which the male partner is affected by gout, and the female partner is relatively healthy. The first gout flare, being a sudden event with few (if any) premonitory signs, is potentially a source of concern and anxiety for both members of the couple – even more if the flare occurs at the wrong time, e.g., during celebration times (when flare-triggering, purine-containing foods and beverages are likely to abound). The resulting distress is expected to affect the couple – or, rather, the “dyad” – before diagnosis and in the subsequent weeks of uncertainty following treatment onset. Anxiety is a powerful trigger for sexual dysfunction in men36, 37, 38 and women,39, 40, 41 and can therefore worsen the couple's sexual health. As such, it becomes clear that while gout is – in this case – affecting only half of the couple, both partners have to face the likely consequences in terms of intimacy.17

Following ULT initiation, lifestyle changes are also likely required to reduce the chances of relapse10 and, at the same time, can potentially be beneficial for the couple's sexual health.42 For example, the Mediterranean diet, rich in fiber, antioxidants, and mono-unsaturated fatty acids, can improve UA levels and reduce inflammatory status and oxidative stress.43 The same diet has improved erectile function.44,45 Likewise, physical exercise has beneficial effects on gout46 as well on male and female sexual health and function,47,48 possibly also mediated by its effect on body weight and inflammatory status45: the effects of physical exercise on the endocrine milieu can promote a favorable anti-inflammatory profile, increasing levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-10) and reducing levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β,49,50 positively acting on both gout and sexual health. In fact, to simplify, gout produces chronic and acute inflammation, both major pathogenetic mechanisms of sexual dysfunction.51 Also, for this reason, Park and coll. correctly proposed that all gout patients should be assessed for ED.52 This tenable advice is fortified by the concept that the couple's sexual health could act as an “anti-inflammatory” mechanism positively affecting gout itself and its inflammatory consequences with respect to the adherence to both lifestyle changes and the prescribed pharmacological treatments.

May the Marital Life Modify Therapeutical Compliance and Adherence?

Compliance and adherence to lifestyle changes in gout are often poor due to limited awareness of purine-rich foods and beverages53 or to the physical disability limiting physical exercise during gout flares and chronic arthropathy.54 Additionally, during intercritical periods, the perception of having “overcome” the disease can also be a further reason for poor treatment adherence: treatment compliance (including strict and careful observance of the prescribed lifestyle changes) is usually higher for acute rather than chronic diseases,26 and is particularly low for gout.55 The presence of a partner can be beneficial in these regards. In fact, according to the “theory of social causation”,56 being married is accompanied by better health behaviors and greater attention to individual well-being. This becomes even more pronounced for gout, as the preventive effects are more likely to occur in men than in women.56 In several chronic lifestyle-related diseases, such as the many NCDs, the presence of a partner can increase adherence to prevention and treatment, with married couples having better compliance.57, 58, 59, 60, 61 The shared responsibilities improve treatment outcomes and adherence to therapy, as proven in chronic conditions.62, 63, 64 Positive partners act, in fact, as “reminders” for treatment continuation and can motivate their significant others to maintain healthy behaviors, as proven by the lower cardiovascular risk and mortality associated with marital status.65, 66, 67 Surprisingly, the potential role of the partner has not been adequately addressed by studies investigating treatment adherence in gout.29 In a vicious circle, gout impairs sexual health, which can in turn progressively worsen self-care, and leads to partner distancing, resulting in worse adherence to treatment which ultimately promotes the progression of both sexual dysfunctions and gout itself (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The vicious circle associating gout, sexual dysfunctions, and treatment adherence.

Effects of Partner Loss and Distancing on Sex-Gout Outcomes

On the contrary, conflicts in the couple are likely to affect treatment compliance negatively,68 and the loss of a partner is associated with worse health outcomes.65 Several reasons for the preventive effects of the couple have been hypothesized: marriage is associated with a shorter delay in seeking medical treatment, and the presence of a partner also results in better economic, behavioral, mental, and emotional well-being.65,69 The emotional distress due to partner loss can influence the inflammatory phenotype driving depression pathogenesis70: the same inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1, whose concentration is also regulated by testosterone levels,50 are involved in the immune response occurring in gout flares. Therefore, losing a partner has adverse effects from both a behavioral and a biochemical point of view on the gouty inflammation and its management.

When extreme, this mechanism is well recognized as the “Widowhood effect”, i.e., the increased morbidity and the decreased male survival following the death of a spouse.71, 72, 73, 74 Elegantly, Corona et al. demonstrated that the absence of a partner or their lacking sexual interest in a patient with ED produces delayed referral to andrology clinics, late assessment of ED comorbidities, more risky behaviors, and, as a final consequence, more inflammation and more NCDs.75

It is worth mentioning, however, that the loss of a partner does not exclusively mean their passing. Negative effects on different health outcomes occur even following divorce.76 The association between sexual health and divorce is a complex one: while indeed sexual dysfunctions are a relatively frequent factor involved in marriage breakdown,77 it is also true that they might be consequences of a dysfunctional relationship,36,78,79 in which the “partner stress” (i.e., marital conflict68) can ease progression from subclinical80,81 to overt, clinically manifest sexual dysfunction.82 As stated, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1 are involved in the immune response to the loss of a partner. These cytokines also have a role in the development of sexual dysfunction, most notably ED,83,84 by inducing endothelial dysfunction and reducing nitric oxide availability. To an extent, this low-grade inflammation is mediated by several prothrombotic agents, which further contribute to worsening sexual health for both men and women.85,86,17 In summarizing: the inflammatory status prominently featured in gout is exacerbated by further “inflammatory” psycho-social factors, such as lack of partner's interest, partner loss, and consequent depression, which can worsen sexual health. All such determinants are mutually associated, and measures aimed at preserving sexual health can, by transforming the “inflammatory” couple into the “anti-inflammatory” one, be a key strategy to improve outcomes for all other underlying conditions.

Diagnosing and Curing the Couple's Gout-Related Sexual Dysfunctions

For all these reasons, we recommend exploring the couple's sexual life in all patients with gout. This could be easily done by well-validated psychometric tools, as reported in Table 1.87 In this perspective, it is crucial to make all possible efforts to explore not only each partner individually but also the couple as a unit. Based on the initial screening, sexual function could be investigated by focused physical examination and laboratory and instrumental tests aiming to identify the severity of the symptom (subclinical, mild, moderate, severe), to identify the comorbidity with other sexual dysfunctions, to find other comorbid NCDs and risk factors, and to ascertain the impact of the sexual symptom in the general QoL and in the mood of the couple itself.79

TABLE 1.

Diagnosing gout-related sexual dysfunctions of the couple

TOOL TYPE TARGET GENDER ADDRESSED SYMPTOMS AND FUNCTIONS REF
International Index of Erectile Function (IEEF) SRQ Male Erection; Orgasm; Desire; Intercourse satisfaction; Overall satisfaction 130
Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) Scr Male Erection (function) 131
Erection Hardness Score (EHS) Scr Male Erection (hardness) 132
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) SRQ Female Desire; Subjective Arousal; Lubrication; Orgasm; Satisfaction; Pain 133
Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6) Scr Female Screener for the presence of a female sexual dysfunction 134
Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) SRQ Female Questionnaire exploring the sexual distress induced by the partner's premature ejaculation 135
Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) SRQ Male Ejaculation 136
Masturbation Erection Index (MEI) SRQ Male Erection during self-erotism 137
Masturbatory Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (MPEDT) SRQ Male Ejaculation during self-erotism 138
Orgasmometer Scr Male Orgasm 139
Orgasmometer-F Scr Female Orgasm 140
Structured Interview on Erectile Dysfunction (SIEDY) Str Int Male in the couple Erection in the context of the couple 141
Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) SRQ Couple Quality of relationship as dyadic satisfaction; dyadic cohesion; dyadic consensus and affectional expression. 142

Psychometric well-validated and clinically sound tools for diagnosing couple's sexual health in gout. The majority of them are diagnostic tools designed for self-administration (self-reported questionnaire: SRQ), some are screeners (Scr), also validated for self-administration, to be used in large populations, and some others are designed as structured interviews (Str Int) driven by an interviewer. Note that the majority of the tools here listed have not be used yet in the gout setting. However, it would be advisable to adopt them in all couples experiencing NCDs in general and gout in particular as well to use them in future research on the impact of gout in the couple's sexual health. The majority of these diagnostic tools have been originally validated in the heterosexual setting, and this should be considered a major limit to be overcome by future research.

On these bases, a tailored therapy is always advised, starting from the transformation of vicious into virtuous lifestyles (i.e., smoking cessation, quitting illegal drugs, reducing alcohol dramatically, shifting to healthier diets, and increasing physical activity) and then addressing other possible needs (i.e., prescribing testosterone in hypogonadal patients or psychotherapies for subjects with psychopathological traits).

Prescription of the gold therapeutical standard for ED, i.e., type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE5Is), is highly advised in the subject with gout and inability or reduced capacity to obtain or maintain the erection in the presence of proper erotic stimuli.88 This therapy needs to be tailored to the couple's clinical profile.89,90 While PDE5Is do not display any particular warning concerning gout or relative therapies,91 some patients may be better prescribed with the PDE5I with the best safety profile, such as avanafil,92,93 others with the drug with the best vascular properties, such as sildenafil94, also in its newest orodispersible, intimacy sparing, pharmacological form,95,96 and others with the long-acting tadalafil either in the on-demand regimen, as used for the other PDE5Is, or in the low-dose, daily regimen, peculiar for this drug.97

Interestingly, a significant positive correlation has been found between PDE5I use and allopurinol, hydrochlorothiazide, nicotine, and alcohol use confirming that ED is a major problem in gout, hypertension, smoking, and drinking, respectively, but also indirectly suggesting the safety of the association of PDE5I with the mentioned drugs and substances in these real-life contexts.98

Both diagnosis and therapy of ED, or other couple's sexual symptoms, may have further advantages. Careful screening of sexual health gives the doctor “baseline” evidence, useful for the follow-up of the chronic disease itself. Although yet to be demonstrated, progressive improvement or worsening of the metabolic profile may be mirrored by parallel changes in sexual health. In diabetes, another metabolic NCD sharing many risk factors and comorbidities with gout, this relationship is very strong, and erectile function is to be considered an efficient biomarker of diabetic complications and glycemic control and vice-versa.99,100 Studies are needed to ascertain the same in gout.

Moreover, a successful therapy of gout-related sexual dysfunction may also produce unexpected advantages for the treatment of gout itself, as discussed in the following paragraphs.

Improving Gout Management by Leveraging Sexual Health

There is ample evidence suggesting that sexual health can benefit many conditions, from psychological distress101 to general health.102 From a broader point of view, it is generally assumed that sexual health is also a reliable hallmark of cardiovascular and metabolic health and a predictor of future cardiovascular mortality.103, 104, 105 While most people having sexual dysfunctions do not immediately seek sexual health advice and treatment,106, 107, 108 the sudden onset of ED can potentially be the proverbial “canary in the coal mine”,109 predicting future cardiovascular events.110 This is unsurprising, given that sexual dysfunctions (ED in particular) and cardiovascular diseases share the same modifiable risk factors, such as sedentary lifestyle, obesity, smoking, and dyslipidemia.111,34 However, gout also shares many of these risk factors, and different guidelines have advocated lifestyle modifications for its clinical management.10 Such changes in daily behaviors are often difficult to maintain for gout patients, resulting in poor adherence10: however, providing sexual consultations to gout patients, and explaining the extent to which these interventions can promote better sexual health, could possibly improve patient compliance. Additionally, as one partner's sexual health inevitably bears on the other’112s and lifestyle interventions generally involve the couple, it would be beneficial to involve both members of the couple in sexological consultations.113

A typical representation of this concept is provided by the smoking habit in the couple and how the couple may dramatically improve the attempt to quit tobacco. While the first cigarettes are frequently partner-driven, volitional processes to quit smoking or at least to adopt harm reductive strategies114 have been demonstrated to spill over to their partners positively.115,116 Hence, improved health behavior changes often occur in a dyadic context of romantic relationships.117 Therefore, by leveraging both the patient's and the partner's sexual health, it would be possible to promote better health-seeking behaviors, resulting in better gout management (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The fundamental role of the couple in the management of the gout-related sexual dysfunctions.

Sexual and General Quality of Life in Gout Patients

Last but not least, it is mandatory to consider the possible negative effects of gout on the psychological status of the affected individual and, by extent, on their family members, especially the partner.

Gout has a significant impact on patients’ lives. Beyond pain and functional limitations, it increases anxiety and depressive disorders and affects sexual function, sleep, social relationships, emotional health, and work.118 Patients may feel helpless and frustrated and tend to social isolation.119,120 Shame, embarrassment, and stigma may lead to minimization of the impact of the disease.119,120

Moreover, gout affects not only the patient's quality of life but also the partner's and other family members’. Dependency on the family members during flares or physical disability can be important.119

Sex is an essential contributor to QOL, and the sexual quality of life of gout patients is negatively affected,121 as expected based on the presence of both organic and non-organic risk factors. Therefore, the sexual health of the couple is endangered, owing to the association between the two partners’ sexual function.122, 123, 124 Promoting compliance to treatment, including drug therapy and better lifestyles, would thus be beneficial to the sexual health of the couple: making both partners actively involved in the clinical management of gout by leveraging sexual health can result in improved quality of life for the couple.

Finally, addressing the sexual life of the couple may also have positive effects. Gout, along with other rheumatological diseases, such as osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, and low back pain, is a major driver of the use of illegal drugs (cocaine, hallucinogen, amphetamine, or sedative/anxiolytic/hypnotic125) and alcohol.126 It is unclear how this figure precedes and may have a causal relationship or, on the contrary, may represent unmet needs or unsatisfied expectations of patients with rheumatic diseases. In any case, the same substances have a direct negative effect on the ability to obtain and maintain an erection, further reducing the level of the couple's sexual QoL (SQoL).127,128 The clinical management of the sexual symptom in the couple would bona fide increase the therapeutical alliance with the partner in reducing these dysfunctional abuses, and further motivate the patient to follow the correct prescriptions more carefully, thus reducing the use of illegal substances and the abuse of alcohol.

Conclusion: the Anti-Inflammatory Couple

Hyperuricemia with deposition is a subtle and multifaceted disease that, after long periods of (apparent) clinical silence, manifests itself in a violent and potentially devastating way affecting the general quality of life of the patient and his partner but also, and specifically, of the quality of sex life.

It is a typical clinical picture named in Italy as “the dog eating its own tail”, which can be idiomatically translated in English as: “it's a catch-22”. The patient with gout has impaired sexual life, and at the same time the subject with poor sexual health is much less motivated to adopt virtuous behaviors to prevent gout and to follow the long-term pharmacological therapy.

In this article, we aimed to prove the importance of sexual health as a powerful surrogate marker of the HR-QoL and of the couple as a powerful tool for prevention and for providing a solid reinforcement of motivation towards lifestyle improvement and for the correct use of drugs. In fact, romantic partners significantly influence their reciprocal health behaviors.

Patients seldom voluntarily mention sexual disorders to their clinicians, and unfortunately, many doctors are not educated in sexual medicine and therefore feel capable of interviewing neither the patient nor the partner about sexual symptoms.129 The patient perceives this lack of scientific and clinical interest in sexual function (biologically speaking, the most important of all) as a poor prognosis. When, on the contrary, the doctor motivates his patients to follow lifestyle changes or chronic therapies by suggesting that these can have very positive effects on sexual and marital life, therapeutic compliance is expected to improve and the patient, especially if not young, interprets the message of the doctor as a good prognosis. The patient perceives two positive signs: the first says that if the doctor is concerned about the sexual symptom, there is still a lot to do, and the second signal acts precisely as a formidable motivational element reinforced within, and by, the couple.

For the dog to really stop eating its tail, however, robust and direct scientific evidence correlating improved control of serum UA (e.g., with febuxostat) to a reduced prevalence of sexual symptoms is needed. This will further prove that the couple is considered a powerful and effective “anti-inflammatory” therapeutic target, which increases and amplifies the drugs’ efficacy with adoption of a virtuous lifestyle and better adherence to prescriptions. At present, specific studies aimed at addressing the relationship between gout and sexual dysfunction are still missing. Likewise, there is insufficient evidence on the impact of gout on the couple's quality of life. As gout shares many similarities with other chronic conditions, it can be assumed that a typical “phenotype” can affect sexual health outcomes for the couple. Still, more studies are needed to address this literature gap.

The bidirectional link between gout and sexual dysfunction, i.e., how gout can have negative consequences for sexual health and how acting on promoting healthy sexual life may improve clinical and therapeutical outcomes of gout, is, therefore, a promising new chapter of sexual medicine, in which research will continue more and more in the years to come.

Footnotes

Funding: This work was supported by Menarini International Operations Luxembourg S.A. All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations.

References

  • 1.Cox P, Gupta S, Zhao SS, et al. The incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41:1209–1219. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04876-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Park JS, Kang M, Song J-S, et al. Trends of Gout Prevalence in South Korea Based on Medical Utilization: A National Health Insurance Service Database (2002∼2015) J Rheumatic Diseases. 2020;27:174–181. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2020.27.3.174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kiadaliri AA, Englund M. Temporal trends and regional disparity in rheumatoid arthritis and gout hospitalizations in Sweden, 1998–2015. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37:825–830. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-3983-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lim SY, Lu N, Oza A, et al. Trends in Gout and Rheumatoid Arthritis Hospitalizations in the United States, 1993–2011. JAMA. 2016;315:2345–2347. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Winnard D, Wright C, Taylor WJ, et al. National prevalence of gout derived from administrative health data in Aotearoa New Zealand. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:901–909. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kuo C-F, Yu K-H, See L-C, et al. Risk of myocardial infarction among patients with gout: a nationwide population-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:111–117. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kuo C-F, Grainge MJ, Mallen C, et al. Rising burden of gout in the UK but continuing suboptimal management: a nationwide population study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:661–667. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuo C-F, Grainge MJ, See L-C, et al. Epidemiology and management of gout in Taiwan: a nationwide population study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:13. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0522-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen-Xu M, Yokose C, Rai SK, et al. Contemporary prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the united states and decadal trends: the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2007–2016. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:991–999. doi: 10.1002/art.40807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dalbeth N, Choi HK, Joosten LAB, et al. Gout. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:69. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0115-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tang YM, Zhang L, Zhu SZ, et al. Gout in China, 1990–2017: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Public Health. 2021;191:33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roddy E, Choi HK. Epidemiology of Gout. Rheumatic Dis Clin North Am. 2014;40:155–175. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chandratre P, Roddy E, Clarson L, et al. Health-related quality of life in gout: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:2031–2040. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Scirè CA, Manara M, Cimmino MA, et al. Gout impacts on function and health-related quality of life beyond associated risk factors and medical conditions: results from the KING observational study of the Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR) Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R101. doi: 10.1186/ar4281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chandratre P, Mallen C, Richardson J, et al. Health-related quality of life in gout in primary care: Baseline findings from a cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singh JA, Strand V. Gout is associated with more comorbidities, poorer health-related quality of life and higher healthcare utilisation in US veterans. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1310–1316. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.081604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sansone A, Reisman Y, Jannini EA. Relationship between hyperuricemia with deposition and sexual dysfunction in males and females. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s40618-021-01719-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chhana A, Lee G, Dalbeth N. Factors influencing the crystallization of monosodium urate: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015;16:296. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0762-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Loeb JN. The influence of temperature on the solubility of monosodium urate. Arthritis Rheumatism. 1972;15:189–192. doi: 10.1002/art.1780150209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang W-Z. Why does hyperuricemia not necessarily induce Gout? Biomolecules. 2021;11:280. doi: 10.3390/biom11020280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dalbeth N, Stamp L. Hyperuricaemia and gout: time for a new staging system? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1598–1600. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ragab G, Elshahaly M, Bardin T. Gout: An old disease in new perspective – A review. J Adv Res. 2017;8:495–511. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2017.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mercuro G, Vitale C, Cerquetani E, et al. Effect of hyperuricemia upon endothelial function in patients at increased cardiovascular risk. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:932–935. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maruhashi T, Hisatome I, Kihara Y, et al. Hyperuricemia and endothelial function: From molecular background to clinical perspectives. Atherosclerosis. 2018;278:226–231. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:29–42. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:487–497. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chan AHY, Horne R, Hankins M, et al. The medication adherence report scale: A measurement tool for eliciting patients’ reports of nonadherence. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86:1281–1288. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ho GH, Pillinger MH, Toprover M. Adherence to gout guidelines: where do we stand? Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2021;33:128–134. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Scheepers LEJM, van Onna M, Stehouwer CDA, et al. Medication adherence among patients with gout: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;47:689–702. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Briesacher BA, Andrade SE, Fouayzi H, et al. Comparison of drug adherence rates among patients with seven different medical conditions. Pharmacotherapy: 2008;28:437–443. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.4.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Al Khaja KAJ, Sequeira RP, Alkhaja AK, et al. Antihypertensive drugs and male sexual dysfunction: a review of adult hypertension guideline recommendations. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016;21:233–244. doi: 10.1177/1074248415598321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Haynes RB, Yao X, Degani A, et al. Interventions to enhance medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dehlin M, Scheepers L, Landgren A, et al. Lifestyle factors and comorbidities in gout patients compared to the general population in Western Sweden: results from a questionnaire study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2022:1–4. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2022.2035952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jannini EA. SM = SM: the interface of systems medicine and sexual medicine for facing non-communicable diseases in a gender-dependent manner. Sex Med Rev. 2017;5:349–364. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Carosa E, Sansone A, Jannini EA. Management of endocrine disease: Female sexual dysfunction for the endocrinologist. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020;182:R101. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yafi FA, Jenkins L, Albersen M, et al. Erectile dysfunction. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16003. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dewitte M, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, et al. A psychosocial approach to erectile dysfunction: position statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) Sex Med. 2021;9 doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Elterman DS, Bhattacharyya SK, Mafilios M, et al. The quality of life and economic burden of erectile dysfunction. RRU. 2021;13:79–86. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S283097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Laurent SM, Simons AD. Sexual dysfunction in depression and anxiety: Conceptualizing sexual dysfunction as part of an internalizing dimension. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:573–585. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kaplan HS. Anxiety and sexual dysfunction. J Clin Psychiatry. 1988;49:21–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Burri A, Spector T, Rahman Q. The etiological relationship between anxiety sensitivity, sexual distress, and female sexual dysfunction is partly genetically moderated. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1887–1896. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02710.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mollaioli D, Ciocca G, Limoncin E, et al. Lifestyles and sexuality in men and women: the gender perspective in sexual medicine. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020;18:10. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0557-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stamostergiou J, Theodoridis X, Ganochoriti V, et al. The role of the Mediterranean diet in hyperuricemia and gout. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2018;29:21–25. doi: 10.31138/mjr.29.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Esposito K, Giugliano F, Maiorino MI, et al. Dietary factors, mediterranean diet and erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2338–2345. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.La J, Roberts NH, Yafi FA. Diet and men's sexual health. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:54–68. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Williams PT. Effects of diet, physical activity and performance, and body weight on incident gout in ostensibly healthy, vigorously active men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1480–1487. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sansone A, Sansone M, Vaamonde D, et al. Sport, doping and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:114. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0435-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Cannarella R, et al. Sport, doping and female fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:108. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0437-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Maggio M, Basaria S, Ceda GP, et al. The relationship between testosterone and molecular markers of inflammation in older men. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28:116–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mohamad N-V, Wong SK, Wan Hasan WN, et al. The relationship between circulating testosterone and inflammatory cytokines in men. Aging Male. 2019;22:129–140. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2018.1482487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kaya-Sezginer E, Gur S. The inflammation network in the pathogenesis of erectile dysfunction: attractive potential therapeutic targets. CPD. 2020;26:3955–3972. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200424161018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Park K, Gupta NK, Olweny EO, et al. Beyond arthritis: understanding the influence of gout on erectile function: a systematic review. Urology. 2021;153:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Harrold LR, Mazor KM, Peterson D, et al. Patients’ knowledge and beliefs concerning gout and its treatment: a population based study. BMC Musculoskeletal Dis. 2012;13:180. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, Oude Voshaar MAH, et al. Experiences of gout-related disability from the patients’ perspective: a mixed methods study. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:1145–1154. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2400-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Reach G. Treatment adherence in patients with gout. Joint Bone Spine. 2011;78:456–459. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Molloy GJ, Stamatakis E, Randall G, et al. Marital status, gender and cardiovascular mortality: Behavioural, psychological distress and metabolic explanations. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:223–228. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lee CS, Tan JHM, Sankari U, et al. Assessing oral medication adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with polytherapy in a developed Asian community: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Reading SR, Black MH, Singer DE, et al. Risk factors for medication non-adherence among atrial fibrillation patients. BMC Cardiovascular Dis. 2019;19:38. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1019-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rosen RC, Seftel AD, Ruff DD, et al. A pilot study using a web survey to identify characteristics that influence hypogonadal men to initiate testosterone replacement therapy. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12:567–574. doi: 10.1177/1557988315625773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pan J, Hu B, Wu L, et al. The effect of social support on treatment adherence in hypertension in China. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;15:1953–1961. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S325793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Brown O, Newton-John TRO. The influence of the significant other on treatment adherence in chronic pain management: a qualitative analysis. Psychol Health. 2022;0:1–15. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2032058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gianotten WL. Sexual aspects of shared decision making and prehabilitation in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33:397–400. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-00404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Martire LM, Schulz R, Helgeson VS, et al. Review and meta-analysis of couple-oriented interventions for chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40:325–342. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9216-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Martire LM, Stephens MAP, Mogle J, et al. Daily spousal influence on physical activity in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Behav Med. 2013;45:213–223. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9442-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wong CW, Kwok CS, Narain A, et al. Marital status and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2018;104:1937–1948. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Schultz WM, Hayek SS, Samman Tahhan A, et al. Marital status and outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Manfredini R, De Giorgi A, Tiseo R, et al. Marital status, cardiovascular diseases, and cardiovascular risk factors: a review of the evidence. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017;26:624–632. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Molloy GJ, Perkins-Porras L, Strike PC, et al. Social networks and partner stress as predictors of adherence to medication, rehabilitation attendance, and quality of life following acute coronary syndrome. Health Psychol. 2008;27:52–58. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kravdal Ø, Wörn J, Reme B-A. Mental health benefits of cohabitation and marriage: A longitudinal analysis of Norwegian register data. Popul Stud (Camb) 2022:1–20. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2022.2063933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Slavich GM, Irwin MR. From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: a social signal transduction theory of depression. Psychol Bull. 2014;140:774–815. doi: 10.1037/a0035302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Helsing KJ, Szklo M, Comstock GW. Factors associated with mortality after widowhood. Am J Public Health. 1981;71:802–809. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.8.802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Umberson D. Family status and health behaviors: social control as a dimension of social integration. J Health Soc Behav. 1987;28:306–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Waite LJ. Does marriage matter? Demography. 1995;32:483–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dupre ME, Beck AN, Meadows SO. Marital trajectories and mortality among US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:546–555. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Corona G, Bandini E, Fisher A, et al. Psychobiological correlates of women's sexual interest as perceived by patients with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2174–2183. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01812.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bourassa KJ, Cornelius T, Birk JL. Bereavement is associated with reduced systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein before and after widowhood. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:925–929. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gravningen K, Mitchell KR, Wellings K, et al. Reported reasons for breakdown of marriage and cohabitation in Britain: Findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3) PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cabral PUL, Canário ACG, Spyrides MHC, et al. Determinants of sexual dysfunction among middle-aged women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;120:271–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mulhall JP, Giraldi A, Hackett G, et al. The 2018 revision to the process of care model for evaluation of erectile dysfunction. The J Sex Med. 2018;15:1280–1292. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Jannini EA, Lenzi A, Isidori A, et al. Subclinical erectile dysfunction: proposal for a novel taxonomic category in sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2006;3:787–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Colonnello E, Ciocca G, Limoncin E, et al. Redefining a sexual medicine paradigm: subclinical premature ejaculation as a new taxonomic entity. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18:115–127. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-00417-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Burgio G, Giammusso B, Calogero AE, et al. Evaluation of the mistakes in self-diagnosis of sexual dysfunctions in 11,000 male outpatients: a real-life study in an andrology clinic. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1679. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Carneiro FS, Webb RC, Tostes RC. Emerging role for TNF-α in erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3823–3834. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01762.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rodrigues FL, Fais RS, Tostes RC, et al. There is a link between erectile dysfunction and heart failure: it could be inflammation. Curr Drug Targets. 2015;16:442–450. doi: 10.2174/1389450116666150420145757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Vlachopoulos C, Rokkas K, Ioakeimidis N, et al. Inflammation, metabolic syndrome, erectile dysfunction, and coronary artery disease: common links. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1590–1600. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lorenz TK. Interactions between inflammation and female sexual desire and arousal function. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2019;11:287–299. doi: 10.1007/s11930-019-00218-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Corona G, Jannini EA, Maggi M. Inventories for male and female sexual dysfunctions. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:236–250. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:633–641. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Jannini EA, Sternbach N, Limoncin E, et al. Health-related characteristics and unmet needs of men with erectile dysfunction: a survey in five European countries. J Sex Med. 2014;11:40–50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Corona G, Maggi M, Jannini EA. EDEUS, a real-life study on the users of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors: prevalence, perceptions, and health care-seeking behavior among european men with a focus on 2nd-generation avanafil. Sex Med. 2018;6:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Schick P, Sager M, Wegner F, et al. Application of the gastroduo as an in vitro dissolution tool to simulate the gastric emptying of the postprandial stomach. Mol Pharm. 2019;16:4651–4660. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Corona G, Rastrelli G, Burri A, et al. The safety and efficacy of Avanafil, a new 2(nd) generation PDE5i: comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15:237–247. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2016.1130126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Corona G, Rastrell G, Burri A, et al. First-generation phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors dropout: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Androl. 2016;4:1002–1009. doi: 10.1111/andr.12255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Jannini EA, Isidori AM, Gravina GL, et al. The ENDOTRIAL study: a spontaneous, open-label, randomized, multicenter, crossover study on the efficacy of sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2547–2560. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Scaglione F, Donde S, Hassan TA, et al. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: pharmacology and clinical impact of the sildenafil citrate orodispersible tablet formulation. Clin Ther. 2017;39:370–377. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Jannini EA, Droupy S. Needs and expectations of patients with erectile dysfunction: an update on pharmacological innovations in phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition with focus on sildenafil. Sex Med. 2019;7:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2018.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Carosa E, Lombardo F, Martini P, et al. The therapeutic dilemma: how to use tadalafil. Int J Androl. 2005:74–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00590.x. 28 Suppl 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Shao X-T, Zhang P-Y, Liu S-Y, et al. Assessment of correlations between sildenafil use and comorbidities and lifestyle factors using wastewater-based epidemiology. Water Res. 2022;218 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sansone A, Mollaioli D, Ciocca G, et al. Sexual dysfunction in men and women with diabetes: a mirror of their complications? Curr Diabetes Rev. 2021 doi: 10.2174/1573399817666210309104740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hu WS, Lin CL. Using progression in adapted diabetes complications severity index score to predict erectile dysfunction in men affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus. Postgrad Med J. 2022 doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2022-141557. postgradmedj-2022-141557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Mollaioli D, Sansone A, Ciocca G, et al. Benefits of sexual activity on psychological, relational, and sexual health during the COVID-19 breakout. J Sex Med. 2021;18:35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Jannini EA, Fisher WA, Bitzer J, et al. Is sex just fun? How sexual activity improves health. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2640–2648. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Salonia A, Capogrosso P, Clementi MC, et al. Is erectile dysfunction a reliable indicator of general health status in men? Arab J Urol. 2013;11:203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Corona G, Rastrelli G, Isidori AM, et al. Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular risk: a review of current findings. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020;18:155–164. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1745632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Yannas D, Frizza F, Vignozzi L, et al. Erectile dysfunction is a hallmark of cardiovascular disease: unavoidable matter of fact or opportunity to improve men's health? J Clin Med. 2021;10:2221. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hinchliff S, Lewis R, Wellings K, et al. Pathways to help-seeking for sexual difficulties in older adults: qualitative findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3) Age Ageing. 2021;50:546–553. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Gott M, Hinchliff S. Barriers to seeking treatment for sexual problems in primary care: a qualitative study with older people. Fam Pract. 2003;20:690–695. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ezhova I, Savidge L, Bonnett C, et al. Barriers to older adults seeking sexual health advice and treatment: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;107 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Meldrum DR, Gambone JC, Morris MA, et al. The link between erectile and cardiovascular health: the canary in the coal mine. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:599–606. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Corona G, Forti G, Maggi M. Why can patients with erectile dysfunction be considered lucky? The association with testosterone deficiency and metabolic syndrome. Aging Male. 2008;11:193–199. doi: 10.1080/13685530802468497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Guay AT. ED2: erectile dysfunction = endothelial dysfunction. Endocrinol Metabolism Clini N Am. 2007;36:453–463. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2007.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Maseroli E, Fanni E, Mannucci E, et al. Which are the male factors associated with female sexual dysfunction (FSD)? Androl. 2016;4:911–920. doi: 10.1111/andr.12224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Dean J, Rubio-Aurioles E, McCabe M, et al. Integrating partners into erectile dysfunction treatment: improving the sexual experience for the couple. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:127–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sansone A, Limoncin E, Colonnello E, et al. Harm reduction in sexual medicine. Sex Med Rev. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Berli C, Ochsner S, Stadler G, et al. Volitional processes and daily smoking: examining inter- and intraindividual associations around a quit attempt. J Behav Med. 2015;38:306–317. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9598-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Berli C, Lüscher J, Luszczynska A, et al. Couples’ daily self-regulation: the health action process approach at the dyadic level. PLoS One. 2018;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Singh JA. The impact of gout on patient's lives: a study of African-American and Caucasian men and women with gout. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:R132. doi: 10.1186/ar4589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lindsay K, Gow P, Vanderpyl J, et al. The experience and impact of living with gout: a study of men with chronic gout using a qualitative grounded theory approach. J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;17:1–6. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e318204a8f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Seow LL, Jiao N, Wang W, et al. A qualitative study exploring perceptions of patients with gout. Clin Nurs Res. 2020;29:56–65. doi: 10.1177/1054773818769219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Singh JA. Gout and sexual function: patient perspective of how gout affects personal relationships and intimacy. BMC Rheumatol. 2019;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s41927-019-0056-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Corona G, Petrone L, Mannucci E, et al. Assessment of the relational factor in male patients consulting for sexual dysfunction: the concept of couple sexual dysfunction. J Androl. 2006;27:795–801. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.106.000638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Nelson CJ. The impact of male sexual dysfunction on the female partner. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2006;3:37–41. doi: 10.1007/s11930-006-0025-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Chew PY, Choy CL, Sidi H bin, et al. The association between female sexual dysfunction and sexual dysfunction in the male partner: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2021;18:99–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Singh JA. Time-trends in cocaine, hallucinogen, amphetamine, and sedative/anxiolytic/hypnotic use disorder hospitalizations in rheumatic diseases: a national time-trends study. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40:3007–3014. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05715-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Singh JA. Epidemiology and outcomes of alcohol use hospitalizations in people with gout, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, or low back pain: a national US Study. J Clin Rheumatol. 2022;28:e375–e380. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Labbate LA. Psychotropics and sexual dysfunction: the evidence and treatments. Adv Psychosom Med. 2008;29:107–130. doi: 10.1159/000126627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Valeiro C, Matos C, Scholl J, et al. Drug-induced sexual dysfunction: an analysis of reports to a national pharmacovigilance database. Drug Saf. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01174-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Jannini EA, Reisman Y. Medicine without sexual medicine is not medicine: An MJCSM and ESSM petition on sexual health to the political and university authorities. J Sex Med. 2019;16:943–945. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–830. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00238-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Ramanathan R, Mulhall J, Rao S, et al. Predictive correlation between the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM): implications for calculating a derived SHIM for clinical use. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1336–1344. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Mulhall J, Althof SE, Brock GB, et al. Erectile dysfunction: monitoring response to treatment in clinical practice–recommendations of an international study panel. J Sex Med. 2007;4:448–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26:191–208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Isidori AM, Pozza C, Esposito K, et al. Development and validation of a 6-item version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) as a diagnostic tool for female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1139–1146. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01635.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Limoncin E, Tomassetti M, Gravina GL, et al. Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress: standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress. J Urol. 2013;189:1830–1835. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Symonds T, Perelman MA, Althof S, et al. Development and validation of a premature ejaculation diagnostic tool. Eur Urol. 2007;52:565–573. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Limoncin E, Gravina GL, Lotti F, et al. The Masturbation Erection Index (MEI): validation of a new psychometric tool, derived from the six-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) and from the Erection Hardness Score (EHS), for measuring erectile function during masturbation. BJU Int. 2019;123:530–537. doi: 10.1111/bju.14560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Xi Y, Zhang H, Colonnello E, Limoncin E. The masturbatory premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (MPEDT): A novel psychometric tool to evaluate premature ejaculation during masturbation. Androl. 2022;10:333–339. doi: 10.1111/andr.13125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Limoncin E, Lotti F, Rossi M, et al. The impact of premature ejaculation on the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity: validation and standardisation of the `Orgasmometer. Androl. 2016;4:921–926. doi: 10.1111/andr.12220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Mollaioli D, Di Sante S, Limoncin E, et al. Validation of a visual analogue scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F. PLoS One. 2018;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Petrone L, Mannucci E, Corona G, et al. Structured interview on erectile dysfunction (SIEDY): a new, multidimensional instrument for quantification of pathogenetic issues on erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:210–220. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J MarriageFamily. 1976;38:15–28. doi: 10.2307/350547. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexual Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES