Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nursing Open logoLink to Nursing Open
. 2022 Sep 29;10(3):1461–1470. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1396

Perceived professional benefits and associated factors among nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A cross‐sectional study

Xiaomin Wang 1, Feifei Chen 2, Pengfei Dai 3, Xingfeng Lin 2, Lei Qi 4,✉
PMCID: PMC9538648  PMID: 36176012

Abstract

Aims

To examine the perceived professional benefits (PPB) and associated factors among nurses during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic in China.

Design

Cross‐sectional study.

Methods

Using the snowball sampling method, 492 nurses (478 females, 14 males) were recruited. Data were collected using an online survey, including participants' socio‐demographic and working characteristics, psychological distress related to the COVID‐19 pandemic, dealing with professional frustration, professional self‐reflection and PPB from 1–30 April 2020.

Results

Nurses experienced high levels of PPB. In linear regression analysis, self‐perceived concerns about COVID‐19, emotional shock caused by it, risk perception towards their occupations, dealing with professional frustration and professional self‐reflection were positively associated with PPB among nurses. These factors explained 84% variance in PPB.

Conclusions

This study highlighted that although the nurses experienced psychological distress, they gained high PPB during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Additionally, to facilitate nurses' efforts to achieve professional growth, more educational resources and opportunities for engaging in reflective practices could be provided.

Keywords: coronavirus, nurses, perceived professional benefits, professional identity, psychological distress, severe acute respiratory syndrome‐related coronavirus

1. INTRODUCTION

Globally, the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) has severely threatened public health. With the increasing number of confirmed patients of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), as well as a shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) at the early stage of the COVID‐19 pandemic, numerous healthcare workers suffered great losses as a result of SARS‐CoV‐2 infections, especially nurses, who had close contact with suspected or confirmed patients with COVID‐19. According to the International Council of Nurses statistics, 1,500 nurses have died from COVID‐19 in 44 countries (International Council of Nurses, 2020). In addition, physical burden (e.g., high workload, performing tasks with PPE) and psychological distress (e.g., anxiety, fear, concerns of being infected or infecting families) owing to the COVID‐19 pandemic enhanced the turnover intentions among nurses (Cai et al., 2020; Nie et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020). A study which was focused on frontline nurses in hospital settings demonstrated that COVID‐19's perceived threat to their personal health increased turnover intentions among nurses who treated COVID‐19 patients (Cole et al., 2021; Lavoie‐Tremblay et al., 2022). Consequently, the outbreak of COVID‐19 might result in some nurses re‐evaluating their occupation and career choices, thereby translating into high risks of workplace productivity losses.

1.1. Background

Nurses' perceived professional benefits (PPB) were defined as ‘the benefits and gains nurses perceived from their jobs, which can promote personal development’ (Hu & Liu, 2013, P.1). Previous studies have revealed that social support, psychological capital (e.g., hope, optimism) and supportive working environments were positively associated with PPB within the nursing occupation (Zhou et al., 2018). Furthermore, while working with COVID‐19 patients, nurses experienced PPB (e.g., improved public perception of nurses, confidence, social support, financial rewards and reputation certificates). Additionally, PPB acted as a facilitator in enhancing nurses' intent to continue working during the COVID‐19 pandemic (Liu et al., 2021). In a recent study, PPB was also mentioned in the recommendations to increase nurses' willingness to participate in caring for COVID‐19 patients (Wu et al., 2020).

Although nurses' experience of caring for patients during the current pandemic might have been challenging, there is evidence that individuals could also perceive positive changes through such experiences (Eftekhar et al., 2020; Galehdar et al., 2020; Tan et al., 2020). PPB, as one form of such positive changes, involves the process of obtaining growth from adversity (Affleck et al., 1987). In a qualitative study where 14 frontline nurses participated in a COVID‐19 rescue task, Sheng et al. (2020) identified ‘unexpected professional benefits,’ such as personal and professional growth (e.g., increased confidence, feelings of being valued, improvement of infectious intensive care and self‐protection skills) as well as honorary rewards (e.g., improvement of social image), which strengthened nurses' confidence in combatting the pandemic and enhanced their perceptions of their occupation.

Professional frustration refers to a subjective psychological sentiment as a response to events or experiences at work (Fox & Spector, 1999). As revealed by relevant studies, nurses experienced increased frustration due to the high levels of moral distress, anxiety, stress and the insufficient human resources and PPE available in practice, during the COVID‐19 pandemic (Catania et al., 2020; Tu et al., 2020). Experiencing professional frustration would prevent nurses from gaining extensive exposure to clinical practice, decrease their satisfaction with their nursing role, and thereby, impede their development of professional knowledge and skills (Keuter et al., 2000). Alternatively, nurses with active coping strategies in dealing with professional frustration during the pandemic may perceive it as a positive experience and experience low stress levels; thus, they may effectively fulfil their role and responsibility as nurses. Therefore, it can be assumed that active coping strategies in dealing with professional frustration will promote personal and professional growth among nurses.

Self‐reflection, as a model of reflective practices, was highlighted in nursing education and clinical practice in the context of the COVID‐19 crisis (Brindley, 2020; Grech, 2020). It was reported that self‐reflecting on experiences of caring for COVID‐19 patients enabled nurses to learn from their experiences and increased their self‐awareness towards the nursing role and their responsibility as nursing professionals (Chamboredon et al., 2020). Through self‐reflection, nurses gained practical experience of essential nursing skills in caring for patients, with and without COVID‐19, such as ensuring standard precautions against COVID‐19, which improved their performance and thus, enhanced their professional growth (Sun et al., 2020). Furthermore, self‐reflection on volunteering during COVID‐19 inspired a sense of pride and professional value of being a nurse (Nanavaty, 2020). This contributed to a positive identification with the nursing profession as well as enhanced self‐esteem, which promoted the retention of nurses in the profession.

The theory of growth through adversity has long been recognized in psychological literature (Park et al., 1996). According to the theory of growth amidst adversity, stressful events might lead to personal growth and positive changes, such as PPB. During the pandemic, nurses were exposed to numerous stressful events, such as the threat of COVID‐19, psychological and physical burden related to the disease, a shortage in the nursing workforce, and high workloads (Murat et al., 2021). Nurses have the potential to obtain professional benefits by overcoming these difficulties through developing the capacity to manage frustration and partaking in self‐reflection to restructure their self‐understanding of their profession and achieve growth (Danielis et al., 2021). Thereby, the present study aimed to examine the PPBs and associated factors among nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. This would contribute to an understanding of nurses' PPBs and help retain the nursing workforce during adversities and emergency events.

2. METHODS

2.1. Design and recruitment of participants

A cross‐sectional design was adopted by referring to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) (von Elm et al., 2007; see the checklist in Supplementary File 1). At the time of the study, healthcare workers were dispatched to different cities to care for the COVID‐19 patients. Nurses may have different experiences due to the incidence of COVID‐19 infections in different cities. To include more nurses from other cities and increase the generalizability of the results, the snowball sampling technique was used to recruit participants during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Participants who fulfilled the following criteria were recruited: registered nurses, having at least 1 year of work experience, and currently employed in public hospitals, worked in all wards. Nurses who worked in departments other than wards (e.g. clinics) were excluded.

For calculations, the G*Power 3.1.9.2 program with a medium effect size of .15, a significance level (α) of .05, statistical power (1 – β) of .95 was used, and for multiple linear regression using the F‐test, 15 independent variables and a minimum sample size of 199 participants were required.

2.2. Data collection

Between 8 December 2019—when the first case of COVID‐19 was confirmed in Wuhan City, China—and 30 April 2020—when the COVID‐19 outbreak was still an epidemic and under control—there were 82,874 confirmed cases and 4,633 deaths. Data were collected using an online questionnaire from 1–30 April 2020. The questionnaire was in Chinese and was created through an online survey platform (‘Survey Star’, Changsha Ranxing Science and Technology). First, the main investigator contacted and explained the study's purpose to the administrators of nursing departments at five tertiary hospitals by email in Jinan City, Shandong Province. After the administrators granted permission, the questionnaire was first disseminated through WeChat (the most used chat application in China) to nurse administration groups, and they were encouraged to share it with their nurses. The electronic questionnaire link in the WeChat app IP could be used once only. Of the 550 responses obtained, 492 were included for final analysis after exclusion of the ones with missing data. The effective response rate was 89.45%.

2.3. Measures

The nurses' perceived professional benefits questionnaire (NPPBQ), which was developed in mainland China by Hu and Liu (2013), was used to assess nurses' PPB. The questionnaire had 33 items with five dimensions: positive occupational perception; good nurse–patient relationship; recognition from family, relatives and friends; sense of belonging to a team and self‐growth. The questionnaire was scored on a five‐point Likert scale (ranging from strongly disagree = 0 to strongly agree = 5). Higher scores indicated higher PPB. The NPPBQ has a good reliability and validity (Hu et al., 2020). In this study, Cronbach's α of the total NPPBQ was .97.

Dealing with professional frustration (six items) and professional self‐reflection (three items) were adopted from the professional identity scale, which was developed in a Chinese language (Mandarin) by Liu, Hao, and Liu et al. (2011). Items were scored on a five‐point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = complete inconformity to 5 = complete conformity). Higher scores indicated a higher ability of dealing with professional frustration and self‐reflection. The reported Cronbach's α coefficients varied from .72 to .94. In this study, the Cronbach's α coefficients varied from .96 to .98.

Participants' socio‐demographic variables included age, sex, educational levels, number of working years, department, marital status and number of children (if any). Working characteristics in the hospital during the COVID‐19 pandemic were assessed with two questions: ‘Have you ever taken care of severe/critical patients before the outbreak of COVID‐19?’ and ‘Were you dispatched to Wuhan city for the rescue task during the COVID‐19 pandemic?’ which required a ‘yes’ (=1) or ‘no’ (=0) response. Four items adapted from previous studies (Hong et al., 2020; Si et al., 2020) were used to assess the psychological impact of the current pandemic on nurses. Self‐perceived anxiety was assessed with one item: ‘To what extent did you feel anxious when COVID‐19 occurred?’, with a response on a five‐point Likert scale (ranging from ‘not at all’=1 to ‘very much’ = 5). Self‐perceived concerns were assessed with one item, ‘To what extent did you worry about you or your family being infected with SARS‐CoV‐2?’ with a response on a five‐point Likert scale (ranging from ‘not at all’ = 1 to ‘very much’ = 5). Self‐perceived emotional shock was assessed with the item: ‘To what extent did you feel emotionally shocked by the COVID‐19 pandemic?’, with a response on a five‐point Likert scale (ranging from ‘not at all’ = 1 to ‘very much’ = 5). Risk perception towards occupation was assessed with the item: ‘To what extent did you perceive the risk towards your occupation when the COVID‐19 occurred?’ with a response on a five‐point Likert scale (ranging from ‘not at all’ = 1 to ‘very much’ = 5).

2.4. Ethical considerations

The study was reviewed and approved by an appropriate hospital research ethics committee [KYLL–2020 (LW)–042]. Electronic informed consent was obtained from potential participants before they completed the online questionnaire. Anonymity and confidentiality were ensured.

2.5. Data analysis

The IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were conducted to examine the normality and homoscedasticity of the study variables. All the data met the assumption of normality. The correlation between professional identity and PPB was assessed through bivariate Pearson correlation. Furthermore, stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to explore the associated factors of PPB. All variables were treated as continuous variables. The variance inflation factor ranged from 1.02–7.82 (i.e. lower than the standard of 10), and the Durbin Watson statistic was 1.90 (close to 2.00), indicating no issues regarding multicollinearity and autocorrelations. Furthermore, a p value <.05 (two tailed) was considered as statistically significant.

2.6. Study rigour

All the measures used in this study had good reliability and validity (Hu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2021). The research proposal was reviewed by two senior nursing researchers before the study began, to ensure the rigour of the measures throughout the study.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Participants' socio‐demographic characteristics

Table 1 shows the demographic variables of the participants. Most of the participants were female (478, 97.15%), with mean age of 32.29 years (SD = 6.13 years), with an undergraduate degree (411, 83.54%), with mean work years of 23.42, in the internal medicine department (168, 34.15%), and with children (339, 68.90%).

TABLE 1.

Participants' characteristics (N = 492)

N % M SD Minimum Maximum
Age 32.29 6.13 21 54
Sex
Male 14 2.85
Female 478 97.15
Educational level
College degree 64 13.01
Undergraduate 411 83.54
Graduate or above 17 3.45
Years of experience 23.42 6.86 1 33
Department
Gynaecology and Obstetrics 10 2.03
Surgery 118 23.98
Internal medicine 168 34.15
Paediatrics 42 8.54
Emergency and ICU 49 9.96
Others 105 21.34
Marital status
Married 388 78.86
Single/divorced 104 21.14
Have a child/children
Yes 339 68.90
No 153 31.10
Have you ever taken care of severe/critical patients before the outbreak of COVID–19?
Yes 383 77.85
No 109 22.15
Were you dispatched to Wuhan city for the rescue task?
Yes 74 15.04
No 418 84.96
Self‐perceived anxiety
Not at all 49 9.96
A little 119 24.19
Somewhat 187 38.01
A lot 82 16.66
Very much 55 11.18
Self‐perceived concern
Not at all 6 1.22
A little 44 8.94
Somewhat 41 8.33
A lot 131 26.63
Very much 270 54.88
Self‐perceived emotional shock
Not at all 7 1.42
A little 50 10.17
Somewhat 200 40.65
A lot 142 28.86
Very much 93 18.90
Risk perception towards occupation
Not at all 0 ‐
A little 2 .41
Somewhat 55 11.18
A lot 209 42.28
Very much 226 45.93
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: M, mean; SD, standard deviation.

Regarding working characteristics, 77.85% had previous critical care experience before the outbreak of COVID‐19 and 74 participants were voluntarily dispatched to Wuhan city for the rescue task.

Of the participants, 187 (38.01%) felt somewhat anxious when COVID‐19 occurred, 270 (54.88%) felt very worried that they or their family would be infected, 200 (40.65%) experienced somewhat of an emotional shock and 226 (45.93%) perceived a high level of risk towards their occupation as nurses.

3.2. Correlation between professional identity and PPB

Table 2 presents the results for the bivariate correlations between professional identity and PPB among nurses. It was found that dealing with both, professional frustration and professional self‐reflection, had significant correlations with the total score and subscales of PPB (p < .01).

TABLE 2.

Correlation between professional identity and PPB

Variables M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  1. PPB total score

 3.96 .55 1
  • 2

    Positive occupation perception

 3.63 .76 .80** 1
  • 3

    Good nurse–patient relationship

 4.09 .60 .87** .66** 1
  • 4

    Recognition from family, relatives, and friends

 3.99 .91 .32** .23** .22** 1
  • 5

    Sense of belonging to a team

 3.97 .65 .88** .75** .85** .26** 1
  • 6

    Self‐growth

 4.12 .56 .87** .67** .93** .27** .87** 1
  • 7

    Dealing with professional frustration

 3.86 .67 .81** .89** .74** .24** .79** .75** 1
  • 8

    Professional self‐ reflection

 3.88 .69 .77** .86** .70** .23** .75** .71** .90** 1
Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: PPB, perceived professional benefits.

**

p < .01.

The overall mean score of PPB was 3.96 (SD = .55) on a 5‐point Likert scale. Among the subscales, ‘Self‐growth’ (mean = 4.12, SD = .56) obtained the highest values, suggesting that nurses experienced self‐growth during the pandemic. Whereas ‘positive occupation perception’ (mean = 3.63, SD = .76) obtained the least values, indicating a negative perception of the nursing profession among nurses.

3.3. Multiple linear regression analysis of PPB

The results of the multiple linear regression analysis of PPB are shown in Table 3, which examined the explanatory variables of PPB. According to a previous study, age and the number of working years were associated with PPB (Zhan et al., 2020). Therefore, age and working years were considered as control variables and were entered into the regression model first, followed by other statistically significant factors, such as previous critical care experience before the outbreak of COVID‐19, being dispatched to Wuhan city for the rescue task, psychological impact of COVID‐19, dealing with professional frustration and professional self‐reflection. The results showed that self‐perceived concerns, emotional shock, risk perception towards their occupation, dealing with professional frustration and professional self‐reflection were significantly associated with PPB among nurses. These factors accounted for 84% of the variance in PPB (F = 285.23, R 2  = .84, ΔR 2  = .84, p < .01). Of these factors, self‐perceived concerns (β = .41, p < .01) and dealing with professional frustration (β = .55, p < .01) were the main explanatory variables of PPB.

TABLE 3.

Multiple linear regression of variables explaining perceived professional benefits among nurses

Variables Step 1 Step 2
Unstandardized coefficient Standardized coefficient t Unstandardized coefficient Standardized coefficient t
B SE β B SE β
Age −.02 .01 −.18 −1.46 −.01 .01 −.03 −.66
Years of experience −.02 .01 −.22 −1.77 −.06
Have you ever taken care of severe/critical patients before the outbreak of COVID‐19? −.01 .01 −1.27
Yes Ref
No .04 .02 .03 1.48
Were you dispatched to Wuhan city for the rescue task
Yes Ref
No −.05 .03 −.03 −1.60
Self‐perceived anxiety −.01 .01 −.02 .54
Self‐perceived concern .22 .01 .41 20.51**
Self‐perceived emotional shock .04 .01 .05 2.50*
Risk perception towards occupation .03 .02 .04 2.13*
Dealing with professional frustration .45 .03 .55 13.29**
Professional self‐reflection .15 .03 .19 4.46**
R 2 .01 .84
Adjusted R 2 .01 .84
F 1.69 259.08**
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: Ref, reference; SE, standard error.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

4. DISCUSSION

This study indicated that nurses had a medium to high score for PPB at work during the outbreak of COVID‐19 in mainland China. Nurses were shown to have experienced self‐growth, and the highest PPB that they experienced is consistent with that of Sun et al. (2020), who found that social respect and support, and close connection with colleagues and patients contributed to the development of confidence and self‐growth.

Among the factors associated with PPB, nurses without previous critical care experience received a higher score on PPB than those with it. In addition, nurses who participated in the rescue task tended to have higher PPB than those who did not. During this pandemic, the updated national/local guidelines and innovative practice strategies were introduced into nursing practice, for example, viral nucleic acid testing specifications, infection prevention and control measures and management measures for patients with suspected symptoms. The acquisition of professional knowledge enhanced nurses' capability of coping with adversity and challenges during the pandemic. Additionally, nurses have their own learning needs within the context of the pandemic (Sun et al., 2020). Peiró et al. (2020), who studied education needs among 403 nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Spain, reported that communication and relationship skills; team work, organization and management skills and technical or professional skills were in high demand among nurses. This demand is also an important driving force for nurses to expand their professional knowledge and skills, thereby promoting their professional growth.

Regarding the psychological impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on nurses, the results showed that self‐perceived concerns, emotional shock and risk perceptions towards their occupation were positively related to PPB. Nurses with higher fear of infection during the stressful pandemic tended to make increased efforts to obtain infectious disease‐related professional knowledge and skills to protect themselves and others from being infected (Peiró et al., 2020). Consequently, more experience of the nurses in dealing with the infectious disease resulted in more positive reactions to COVID‐19‐related emergencies. Although nurses were fearful of being infected with the virus, they felt a ‘sense of duty’ to care for patients with COVID‐19 and accepted the reality of occupational risks associated with being a nurse (Schroeder et al., 2020), which prompted them to deliver appropriate care for patients by following established protocols and improving their performance. Similar to the findings of Sun et al. (2020), nurses experienced growth in the context of adapting to the pressure of the pandemic, partly because of their appreciation for life and the support they received from patients, colleagues and society, in dealing with the pandemic. Therefore, inspiring nurses to find the benefits and meanings from their adverse experiences during the pandemic may play a positive role in embracing the challenges of future emergencies.

In addition, dealing with professional frustration was positively associated with PPB. The results indicated that the more capable nurses were in managing their frustration at work, the more the PPB increased. Regarding coping strategies towards professional frustration among nurses, culturing resilience, acceptance, self‐distraction, social support, physical exercise, meditation and psychological counselling were reported (Pedrosa et al., 2020). As illustrated, when a successful coping style is adopted, nurses can increase their capacity for self‐control over their stressors, which leads to improved professional skills. Furthermore, increased experience can ameliorate the complexity of tasks that nurses undertake during the pandemic and enhance their confidence to deal with professional frustration related to the infectious disease. Thus, timely identification of nurses' professional frustration and interventions to reduce their feelings of frustration in the workplace was emphasized as vital among hospital managers.

The results of this study demonstrated that professional self‐reflection ability was positively associated with PPB. That is, self‐reflection was helpful for nurses in gaining insight into the self and their situation, which led to professional improvements in practice. In a qualitative study by Liu et al. (2020), nurses reflected on their personal clinical experience, identified their inadequate knowledge and training in relation to the challenges posed by the pandemic (e.g. how to communicate with patients), and intended to strengthen those in the future. Additionally, nursing teams from different countries summarized their experiences to better facilitate the management of patients under the context of COVID‐19 by reflecting on their nursing practices (Anders & Lam, 2021; Fernandez et al., 2020). The benefits of reflection extend beyond improving nursing care delivery as reflections on previous experiences can increase nurses' reflective capacity and cultivate resilience (Brindley, 2020). Therefore, hospital managers should encourage reflection among nurses to sustain their professional development. In addition, the development of self‐reflective abilities is encouraged among nurses to enable them to adapt to challenging environments, such as the pandemic.

4.1. Limitations

Several limitations to this study need to be acknowledged. First, it does not allow conclusions regarding causality, owing to its cross‐sectional design. Second, the snowball sampling may have limited the generalizability of the results. Third, the non‐inclusion of nurses who resigned, took a leave of absence or requested for early retirement during the early stages of the epidemic may have affected the results. Lastly, psychological impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on nurses may vary across regions and depend on the time during which the data were collected. Thus, to better understand the relationships between psychological impact, dealing with professional frustration, professional self‐reflection and PPB among nurses, random or stratified sampling and a longitudinal study design are necessary in future studies.

5. CONCLUSION

The findings from this study demonstrated that nurses gained high PPB during the COVID‐19 pandemic, although they experienced psychological distress. Self‐perceived concerns, emotional shock, risk perception towards occupation, dealing with professional frustration and professional self‐reflection were associated with PPB among nurses.

5.1. Relevance to clinical practice

Nurses are under considerable pressure to manage the COVID‐19 outbreak response, which produced professional frustration, and led to serious physical and psychological problems. As shown in this study, working experiences in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic offered stimulation for professional development among nurses, which can be considered as a positive outcome of the pandemic. Furthermore, these results have important implications for research and practice. Further research exploring the mechanism underlying the psychological impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic, risk perception towards occupation, and professional identity during the COVID‐19 pandemic, can deepen our understanding of PPB among nurses. Active acquisition of COVID‐19‐related professional knowledge, such as preventative measures, may help strengthen PPB among nurses, thereby, minimizing the negative effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Moreover, hospital managers should be aware of the potential for positive changes in nurses after engaging in emergencies, and should provide more resources to meet nurses' educational needs, greater psychosocial support, more strategies to cope with professional frustration, and opportunities for engaging in reflective practices to facilitate nurses' efforts to achieve professional growth.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

XW, PD, FC, XL and LQ: Made substantial contributions to conception and design. XW and FC: Drafted the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content. PD and LQ: Were responsible for acquisition of the data, its analysis and interpretation. XW, PD, FC, XL and LQ: Were accountable for the accuracy and integrity of any part of the study. XW, PD, FC, XL and LQ: Gave final approval for the study to be published.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The Institutional Review Boards of the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University approved the study [KYLL–2020 (LW)–042].

Supporting information

Supplementary File 1

Click here for additional data file. (60.7KB, doc)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Not applicable.

Wang, X. , Chen, F. , Dai, P. , Lin, X. , & Qi, L. (2023). Perceived professional benefits and associated factors among nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A cross‐sectional study. Nursing Open, 10, 1461–1470. 10.1002/nop2.1396

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  1. Affleck, G. , Tennen, H. , Croog, S. , & Levine, S. (1987). Causal attribution, perceived benefits, and morbidity after a heart attack: An 8‐year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 29–35. 10.1037//0022-006x.55.1.29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anders, R. L. , & Lam, S. C. (2021). COVID‐19 experience in mainland China: Nursing lessons for The United States of America. Nursing Forum, 56(2), 439–443. 10.1111/nuf.12546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brindley, J. (2020). Reflecting on nursing practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing [Great Britain]: 1987). Advance online publication. 10.7748/ns.2020.e11569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cai, Z. , Cui, Q. , Liu, Z. , Li, J. , Gong, X. , Liu, J. , Wan, Z. , Yuan, X. , Li, X. , Chen, C. , & Wang, G. (2020). Nurses endured high risks of psychological problems under the epidemic of COVID‐19 in a longitudinal study in Wuhan China. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 131, 132–137. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.09.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Catania, G. , Zanini, M. , Hayter, M. , Timmins, F. , Dasso, N. , Ottonello, G. , Aleo, G. , Sasso, L. , & Bagnasco, A. (2020). Lessons from Italian front‐line nurses' experiences during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study. Journal of Nursing Management, 29, 404–411. 10.1111/jonm.13194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chamboredon, P. , Roman, C. , & Colson, S. (2020). COVID‐19 pandemic in France: Health emergency experiences from the field. International Nursing Review, 67(3), 326–333. 10.1111/inr.12604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cole, A. , Ali, H. , Ahmed, A. , Hamasha, M. , & Jordan, S. (2021). Identifying patterns of turnover intention among Alabama frontline nurses in hospital settings during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 14, 1783–1794. 10.2147/JMDH.S308397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Danielis, M. , Peressoni, L. , Piani, T. , Colaetta, T. , Mesaglio, M. , Mattiussi, E. , & Palese, A. (2021). Nurses' experiences of being recruited and transferred to a new sub‐intensive care unit devoted to COVID‐19 patients. Journal of Nursing Management., 29, 1149–1158. 10.1111/jonm.13253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eftekhar, A. M. , Naserbakht, M. , Bernstein, C. , Alazmani‐Noodeh, F. , Hakimi, H. , & Ranjbar, H. (2020). Healthcare providers experience of working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A qualitative study. American Journal of Infection Control, 49(5), 547–554. 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fernandez, R. , Lord, H. , Halcomb, E. , Moxham, L. , Middleton, R. , Alananzeh, I. , & Ellwood, L. (2020). Implications for COVID‐19: A systematic review of nurses' experiences of working in acute care hospital settings during a respiratory pandemic. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 111, 103637. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox, S. , & Spector, P. E. (1999). A model of work frustration‐aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 915–931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Galehdar, N. , Kamran, A. , Toulabi, T. , & Heydari, H. (2020). Exploring nurses' experiences of psychological distress during care of patients with COVID‐19: A qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 489. 10.1186/s12888-020-02898-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grech, J. (2020). Critical self‐reflection for nurse educators: Now more than ever! Teaching and Learning in Nursing: Official Journal of the National Organization for Associate Degree Nursing, 16, 89–91. 10.1016/j.teln.2020.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hong, S. , Ai, M. , Xu, X. , Wang, W. , Chen, J. , Zhang, Q. , Wang, L. , & Kuang, L. (2020). Immediate psychological impact on nurses working at 42 government‐designated hospitals during COVID‐19 outbreak in China: A cross‐sectional study. Nursing Outlook, 69, 6–12. 10.1016/j.outlook.2020.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu, J. , & Liu, X. (2013). The preparation of nurses' occupational benefit questionnaire and its reliability and validity test. Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 30(22), 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu, Y. , Hu, J. , Li, L. , Zhao, B. , Liu, X. , & Li, F. (2020). Development and preliminary validation of a brief nurses' perceived professional benefit questionnaire (NPPBQ). BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 18. 10.1186/s12874-020-0908-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. International Council of Nurses . (2020). https://www.icn.ch/news/icn‐confirms‐1500‐nurses‐have‐died‐covid‐19‐44‐countries‐and‐estimates‐healthcare‐worker‐covid
  18. Keuter, K. , Byrne, E. , Voell, J. , & Larson, E. (2000). Nurses' job satisfaction and organizational climate in a dynamic work environment. Applied Nursing Research: ANR, 13(1), 46–49. 10.1016/s0897-1897(00)80018-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lavoie‐Tremblay, M. , Gélinas, C. , Aubé, T. , Tchouaket, E. , Tremblay, D. , Gagnon, M. P. , & Côté, J. (2022). Influence of caring for COVID‐19 patients on nurse's turnover, work satisfaction and quality of care. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(1), 33–43. 10.1111/jonm.13462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, L. , Hao, Y. , & Liu, X. (2011). Development of professional identity scale for nurses. Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 28(2A), 18–20. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, Q. , Luo, D. , Haase, J. E. , Guo, Q. , Wang, X. Q. , Liu, S. , Xia, L. , Liu, Z. , Yang, J. , & Yang, B. X. (2020). The experiences of health‐care providers during the COVID‐19 crisis in China: A qualitative study. The Lancet Global Health, 8(6), e790–e798. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30204-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, X. , Ju, X. , & Liu, X. (2021). The relationship between resilience and intent to stay among Chinese nurses to support Wuhan in managing COVID‐19: The serial mediation effect of post‐traumatic growth and perceived professional benefits. Nursing Open, 8(5), 2866–2876. 10.1002/nop2.874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Murat, M. , Köse, S. , & Savaşer, S. (2021). Determination of stress, depression and burnout levels of front‐line nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(2), 533–543. 10.1111/inm.12818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nanavaty, J. (2020). Volunteerism during COVID‐19. Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.), 37(5), 797–798. 10.1111/phn.12765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nie, A. , Su, X. , Zhang, S. , Guan, W. , & Li, J. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID‐19 outbreak on frontline nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29, 4217–4226. 10.1111/jocn.15454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Park, C. L. , Cohen, L. H. , & Murch, R. L. (1996). Assessment and prediction of stress‐related growth. Journal of Personality, 64(1), 71–105. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00815.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pedrosa, A. L. , Bitencourt, L. , Fróes, A. , Cazumbá, M. , Campos, R. , de Brito, S. , & AC, S. E. S. (2020). Emotional, behavioral, and psychological impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566212. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peiró, T. , Lorente, L. , & Vera, M. (2020). The COVID‐19 crisis: Skills that are paramount to build into nursing programs for future global health crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6532. 10.3390/ijerph17186532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schroeder, K. , Norful, A. A. , Travers, J. , & Aliyu, S. (2020). Nursing perspectives on care delivery during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 2, 100006. 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sheng, Q. , Zhang, X. , Wang, X. , & Cai, C. (2020). The influence of experiences of involvement in the COVID‐19 rescue task on the professional identity among Chinese nurses: A qualitative study. Journal of Nursing Management, 28, 1662–1669. 10.1111/jonm.13122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Si, M. Y. , Su, X. Y. , Jiang, Y. , Wang, W. J. , Gu, X. F. , Ma, L. , Li, J. , Zhang, S. K. , Ren, Z. F. , Ren, R. , Liu, Y. L. , & Qiao, Y. L. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID‐19 on medical care workers in China. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 9(1), 113. 10.1186/s40249-020-00724-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun, N. , Wei, L. , Shi, S. , Jiao, D. , Song, R. , Ma, L. , Wang, H. , Wang, C. , Wang, Z. , You, Y. , Liu, S. , & Wang, H. (2020). A qualitative study on the psychological experience of caregivers of COVID‐19 patients. American Journal of Infection Control, 48(6), 592–598. 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.03.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tan, R. , Yu, T. , Luo, K. , Teng, F. , Liu, Y. , Luo, J. , & Hu, D. (2020). Experiences of clinical first‐line nurses treating patients with COVID‐19: A qualitative study. Journal of Nursing Management, 28, 1381–1390. 10.1111/jonm.13095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tu, Z. H. , He, J. W. , & Zhou, N. (2020). Sleep quality and mood symptoms in conscripted frontline nurse in Wuhan, China during COVID‐19 outbreak: A cross‐sectional study. Medicine, 99(26), e20769. 10.1097/MD.0000000000020769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. von Elm, E. , Altman, D. G. , Egger, M. , Pocock, S. J. , Gøtzsche, P. C. , Vandenbroucke, J. P. , & Initiative, S. T. R. O. B. E. (2007). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu, B. , Zhao, Y. , Xu, D. , Wang, Y. , Niu, N. , Zhang, M. , Zhi, X. , Zhu, P. , & Meng, A. (2020). Factors associated with nurses' willingness to participate in care of patients with COVID‐19: A survey in China. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(7), 1704–1712. 10.1111/jonm.13126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhan, T. , Li, H. , & Ding, X. (2020). Can social support enhance sense of coherence and perceived professional benefits among Chinese registered nurses? A mediation model. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(3), 488–494. 10.1111/jonm.12931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang, Y. D. , Gao, Y. Q. , Tang, Y. , & Li, Y. H. (2021). The role of workplace social capital on the relationship between perceived stress and professional identity among clinical nurses during the COVID‐19 outbreak. Japan Journal of Nursing Science: JJNS, 18(1), e12376. 10.1111/jjns.12376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhou, H. , Zhu, Y. , Zhang, X. , Peng, J. , Li, Q. , Wang, X. , Wang, L. , Cai, X. , & Lan, L. (2018). Psychological capital and perceived professional benefits: Testing the mediating role of perceived nursing work environment among Chinese nurses. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 56(4), 38–47. 10.3928/02793695-20171128-01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1

Click here for additional data file. (60.7KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Articles from Nursing Open are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES