Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Sep 29:10.1002/alr.23089. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1002/alr.23089

The Omicron variant of SARS‐CoV‐2 and its effect on the olfactory system

Puya Dehgani‐Mobaraki 1,, Zara Patel 2, Asiya Kamber Zaidi 1, David Giannandrea 1, Claire Hopkins 3
PMCID: PMC9539397  PMID: 36103157

1.

Soon after the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic began to unfold, an altered sense of smell and taste was quickly identified as one of the most common yet unusual symptoms. Our previous 2020 correspondence reported typical nasal manifestations of other upper respiratory tract infections, such as rhinorrhea, to be uncommon in patients with COVID‐19. 1 This was followed by the addition of this symptom to the clinical profile to screen for COVID‐19 by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. 2 A novel SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.1.529 variant of concern, designated Omicron, was reported in November 2021, with initial cases reported from South Africa but with scientists quickly identifying the variant all across the globe. Compared to previous variants, Omicron has proven to have much higher transmissibility and infectivity but reduced tropism for the lower airway. 3

A study by Nicole Wolter et al. reported a significant reduction in disease severity and hospitalizations in patients infected by the Omicron variant, which has been born out in global data reported since that time, likely owing to the high frequency of mutations in the spike glycoprotein. 4 Although real‐time emerging data have confirmed a spike in the number of infections worldwide, a relatively lower rate of severe COVID‐19 has been observed, probably due to a combination of growing vaccination coverage, partial immunity from prior infection, and lower virulence of the virus itself.

Interestingly, the Omicron variant of SARS‐CoV‐2 appears to have a markedly different clinical profile than the previous variants. We report the results of 205 individuals (male: 66.3%, female: 33.7 %) who tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 with the Omicron variant through established genomic sequencing, from December 21, 2021 to January 10, 2022. Surprisingly, 68.8% had no altered sense of smell, 18% had only mild smell dysfunction, and 13.2% complained of complete anosmia. The impact on the self‐reported sense of taste was similar, with no symptoms in 66.8% of individuals, partial loss of taste in 21%, and complete loss in 10.2%.

In general, among the predominant symptoms, nasal congestion was the most common, reported by 62% (n = 127) patients, followed by rhinorrhea (57.5%, n = 118), fatigue (55.1%, n = 113), fever (53.6%, n = 110), malaise and/or myalgia (52.1%, n = 107), and cough (50.7%, n = 104) (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Clinical characteristics of 205 individuals (male: 66.3%, female: 33.7 %) who tested positive for the Omicron variant of SARS‐CoV‐2. (A) Predominant nasal symptoms. (B) Different types of olfactory disturbances experienced by the overall study group. (C) General clinical profile.

History of prior infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 was reported in 15.6% (n = 32) individuals. Within this smaller cohort, loss of sense of smell was seen at a lower rate than the overall study population, with a partial loss noted in 18.7% and a complete loss in 6.2% (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

The loss of smell and taste in the overall study population, and in patients with a history of prior infection with SARS‐CoV‐2, of patients who test positive for the Omicron variant

Overall study population (n = 205)
Loss of smell n (%)
Partial 37 18
Complete 27 13.2
None 141 66.8
Overall study population (n = 205)
Loss of taste n (%)
Partial 43 21
Complete 21 10.2
None 141 66.8
Patients with a history of prior infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 (n = 32)
Loss of smell Yes No Total
Partial 6 31 37
Complete 2 25 27
None 24 117 141
Patients with a history of prior infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 (n = 32)
Loss of taste Yes No Total
Partial 6 37 43
Complete 1 20 21
None 25 116 141

Our study findings support the decreased observation of isolated smell and taste loss with the Omicron variant in comparison with previous variants of SARS‐COV‐2, in accordance with the study findings by Menni et al. and Coelho DH et al. 5 , 6 Instead, Omicron appears to have lesser tropism for the lower airways, and predominant upper respiratory disease, including nasal congestion, sore throat, headache, fatigue, and cough, with clinical expressiveness that appears comparable to other coronaviruses such as OC‐43, making it much less distinguishable from other common upper respiratory infections. Highlighting the change in presentation of the Omicron variant is important, as continued overreliance on the loss of smell as a diagnostic marker will lead to most cases being overlooked. Although still present in 20% to 30% of patients, this relative sparing of the olfactory sense will lead to a significant reduction in the long‐term morbidity associated with COVID‐19 by decreasing the overall percentage of COVID‐19 patients who will suffer from long‐term severe olfactory loss.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study did not receive any funding.

How to Cite this Article:Dehgani‐Mobaraki P, Patel Z, Zaidi AK, Giannandrea D, Hopkins C. The Omicron variant of SARS‐CoV‐2 and its effect on the olfactory system. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022;1‐3. 10.1002/alr.23089

Institution where the work was done: Associazione Naso Sano, Umbria Regional Registry of volunteer activities, Italy

References

  • 1. Xydakis MS, Dehgani‐Mobaraki P, Holbrook EH, et al. Smell and taste dysfunction in patients with COVID‐19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(9):1015‐1016. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30293-0. Epub 2020 Apr 15. PMID: 32304629; PMCID: PMC7159875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019‐ncov/symptoms‐testing/symptoms.html
  • 3. Saxena SK, Kumar S, Ansari S, et al. Characterization of the novel SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of concern and its global perspective. J Med Virol. 2021. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27524. Dec 14. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34905235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wolter N, Jassat W, Walaza S, et al. Early assessment of the clinical severity of the SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant in South Africa: a data linkage study. Lancet. 2022(19). doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00017-4. S0140‐6736(22)00017‐4. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35065011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Menni C, Valdes AM, Polidori L, et al. Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 during periods of omicron and delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study. Lancet. 2022;399(10335):1618‐1624. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00327-0. Epub 2022 Apr 7. PMID: 35397851; PMCID: PMC8989396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Coelho DH, Reiter ER, French E, Costanzo RM. Decreasing incidence of chemosensory changes by COVID‐19 variant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022:1945998221097656. doi: 10.1177/01945998221097656. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35503739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES