Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Apr 12;24(8):3307–3309. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16002

Multi‐host lifestyle in plant‐beneficial bacteria: an evolutionary advantage for survival and dispersal?

Miguel A Matilla 1,, Amalia Roca 2,
PMCID: PMC9541277  PMID: 35411622

Plants harbour a wide diversity of microorganisms that efficiently colonize different internal and external plant organs and compartments, including the phyllosphere (above‐ground plant surface), spermosphere (seeds and area surrounding seeds), endosphere (internal tissues) and rhizosphere (roots and soil in the vicinity of plant roots), establishing complex and dynamic interactions with the host plants (Trivedi et al., 2020). The plant microbiome plays major roles in the nutrition, growth and resistance against biotic and abiotic threats (Trivedi et al., 2020; Bakker and Berendsen, 2022; Yuan et al., 2022) and there is complex communication between microorganisms and their plant hosts (Berlanga‐Clavero et al., 2020; Rico‐Jiménez et al., 2022). Indeed, the secretion of a great variety of plant compounds directs the assembly of plant‐associated microbial communities and it has been proposed that plants produce a range of chemical signals to selectively recruit specific microorganisms in order to assemble protective microbiomes that enable them to cope with the imposed biotic and abiotic stresses (Rizaludin et al., 2021; Rolli et al., 2021; Trivedi et al., 2022). As a consequence of this selective pressure exerted by the plants, the microbial composition of the rhizosphere and the non‐rooted bulk soil differ – with the rhizosphere having a larger microbial abundance but lower diversity (Berlanga‐Clavero et al., 2020; Sokol et al., 2022).

Additionally, plants interact with higher organisms, including insects. The microbiome of a host insect is also critical for overcoming multiple stresses and plays key roles in insect metabolism, growth and defence (Engel et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2019). For example, specific phytotoxin‐degrading microbes present in the guts of insect herbivores confer resistance to these toxins, therefore allowing these herbivores to diversify and broaden the number of host plants (Itoh et al., 2018). Notably, an increasing amount of experimental data suggests a link between the microbiota of soils, plants and plant‐associated insects (Liu et al., 2019), which further reflects the complexity of interactions that occur in plant environments. In fact, a recent study revealed that monarch butterflies that feed on milkweed plants (Asclepias spp.) share a high percentage of bacterial taxa with the rhizosphere of the host plants (Hansen and Enders, 2022).

Currently, research on the transfer of microbial communities from plants to insects (and vice versa) remains almost exclusively restricted to plant pathogens and insect pests. For example, a hot topic in the recent years has been the ecology and virulence of Xylella fastidiosa – an important re‐emerging phytopathogen which is obligatorily transmitted to the host plant by xylem sap‐sucking insects (Sicard et al., 2018). However, research involving interactions between insects and beneficial plant‐associated bacteria remains poorly investigated. Notably, in a recent review published in Environmental Microbiology, Pronk and co‐workers (2022) critically analyse different examples of plant‐beneficial bacteria which successfully colonize co‐occurring insects. Contrary to what occurs with their plant hosts, plant‐beneficial bacteria can establish commensal, mutualistic or pathogenic interactions with their insect hosts. One of these examples involves biocontrol rhizosphere bacteria of the Pseudomonas protegens species, which can switch from a root‐ to an insect‐associated lifestyle (and vice versa). Pseudomonas protegens isolates were shown to invade and kill insects by producing multiple bioactive molecules and exoenzymes. It was also found that P. protegens strains can multiply at high levels in the insect corpse, as a prior step to rhizosphere re‐colonization. This host alternation would potentially allow beneficial plant‐associated bacteria to successfully disperse to other plants over long distances (Pronk et al., 2022). The dual lifestyle of plant‐ and insect‐associated bacteria was also analysed and discussed by Pronk et al. (2022) for strains belonging to the Bacillus, Burkholderia, Photorhabdus and Streptomyces genera. Remarkably, the authors present experimental data suggesting that not only bacterial metabolic versatility but also bacterial traits like motility, biofilm formation, iron uptake and the biosynthesis of bioactive secondary metabolites impact bacterial adaptation to a multi‐host lifestyle (Pronk et al., 2022). Current hypotheses indicate that beneficial plant‐associated bacteria use this multi‐host evolutionary strategy to ensure survival in highly changing environmental niches (e.g. phyllosphere, rhizosphere).

Current estimates indicate that 75% of leading crops worldwide and 87% of flowering plants depend on animal pollinators for reproduction (Liu et al., 2019; Parreño et al., 2022). Alarmingly, insect pollinator populations are severely declining as a result of the excessive use of agrochemicals, pathogens, the introduction of invasive species and climate change (Hertel et al., 2021; Parreño et al., 2022) – an issue that will seriously affect global crop productivity and our capacity to feed the world's growing population. The decline of pollinating insects populations has been also associated with changes in their gut microbiomes (Raymann and Moran, 2018). In this regard, nectar and pollen are a source of microbes for insect pollinators as high number of bacteria exist in floral nectar (up to 107 CFU mm−3) and pollen (104–107 CFU g−1) (Liu et al., 2019). In fact, a significant number of bacterial taxa have been identified as common to honeybee populations and flowers, including different fructophilic lactic bacteria (Liu et al., 2019; Crovadore et al., 2021) – a recently discovered group of heterofermentative bacteria that prefer fructose over glucose as a carbon source (Filannino et al., 2019). Yet, pollen and nectar often contain bioactive plant secondary metabolites (Schmitt et al., 2021) as well as agrochemicals that can alter the insect microbiome composition. As a means to understand the role of specific bacterial taxa on honeybee health, a recent report in Microbial Biotechnology explored the effects of different agrochemicals and plant secondary metabolites on planktonic and biofilm growth of fructophilic lactobacilli isolated from both the gut of honeybees and bee‐collected pollen (Tlais et al., 2022). The study found that the organophosphorus pesticides glyphosate and chlorpyrifos‐methyl completely inhibited planktonic growth of Apilactobacillus kunkeei strains, a fructophilic lactobacilli species that is a frequent inhabitant of honeybees, and drastically affected their abilities to form biofilms. On the other hand, neither the insecticide imidacloprid nor the plant secondary metabolites p‐coumaric acid and nicotine affected planktonic growth of A. kunkeei. Alternatively, p‐coumaric acid and nicotine had positive effects on the growth of sessile communities. Fructophilic lactobacilli form biofilms in honeybee hosts and previous studies revealed that organophosphorus pesticides have negative impacts on the honeybee microbiome (Motta and Moran, 2020). Tlais et al. (2022) found that biofilm‐forming A. kunkeei strains are more resistant to glyphosate and chlorpyrifos‐methyl, while further studies are required to determine whether these bacteria have beneficial effects on honeybees when exposed to agrochemicals.

Land plants and insects both originated ~475 million years ago (Raven and Wagner, 2021) and the interaction between flowering plants and pollinating insects represents an extraordinary example of co‐evolution. However, what nature has built over millions of years of evolution is in serious threat as a consequence of our human activities. The anthropogenic climate change is seriously affecting global diversity, including plants, insects and their associated microbiota (Parreño et al., 2022; Trivedi et al., 2022). This partly originates in the continued overuse of chemical pesticides and fertilizers in agriculture, which results in a severe decrease in the diversity of plants and soil microorganisms and the complexity of the interaction networks between plants and microbes (Molina‐Santiago and Matilla, 2020). For this reason, we need urgent solutions to alleviate the negative effects of our human activities, and a greater understanding of plant–microbe interactions will lay the groundwork for the development of novel microorganism‐based approaches aimed at promoting plant productivity and diversity. However, beneficial rhizosphere bacteria share many traits with insect symbionts. Hence, Pronk et al. (2022) emphasized that the use of specific rhizosphere bacteria as biopesticides and plant growth promoters should be re‐evaluated since they could potentially disperse to other ecological niches with undesirable effects or have negative impacts on plant‐beneficial insect populations (e.g. pollinators). Consequently, new insights into the ecology and mechanisms that drive the multi‐host lifestyle of beneficial plant‐associated bacteria will likely advance the development of sustainable biotechnological strategies to improve agricultural production.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported through a grant from the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation/Agencia Estatal de Investigación 10.13039/501100011033 (PID2019‐103972GA‐I00 to M.A.M.). A.R. was supported by the Ramon y Cajal R&D&i Programme (RYC2019‐026481‐I) from the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation/Agencia Estatal de Investigación/10.13039/501100011033 y FSE ‘El FSE invierte en tu futuro’.

[Correction added on 24 August 2022, after first online publication: The copyright line was changed]

Contributor Information

Miguel A. Matilla, Email: miguel.matilla@eez.csic.es.

Amalia Roca, Email: amaliaroca@ugr.es.

References

  1. Bakker, p.A.H.M. , and Berendsen, R.L. (2022) The soil‐borne ultimatum, microbial biotechnology and sustainable agriculture. Microb Biotechnol 15: 84–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlanga‐Clavero, M.V. , Molina‐Santiago, C. , de Vicente, A. , and Romero, D. (2020) More than words: the chemistry behind the interactions in the plant holobiont. Environ Microbiol 22: 4532–4544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crovadore, J. , Chablais, R. , Raffini, F. , Cochard, B. , Hänzi, M. , Gérard, F. , et al. (2021) Draft genome sequences of 3 strains of Apilactobacillus kunkeei isolated from the bee gut microbial community. Microbiol Resour Announc 10: e00088‐21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Engel, P. , Kwong, W.K. , McFrederick, Q. , Anderson, K.E. , Barribeau, S.M. , Chandler, J.A. , et al. (2016) The bee microbiome: impact on bee health and model for evolution and ecology of host‐microbe interactions. mBio 7: e02164‐02115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Filannino, P. , Di Cagno, R. , Tlais, A.Z.A. , Cantatore, V. , and Gobbetti, M. (2019) Fructose‐rich niches traced the evolution of lactic acid bacteria toward fructophilic species. Crit Rev Microbiol 45: 65–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hansen, T.E. , and Enders, L.S. (2022) Host plant species influences the composition of milkweed and monarch microbiomes. Front Microbiol 13: 840078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hertel, R. , Gibhardt, J. , Martienssen, M. , Kuhn, R. , and Commichau, F.M. (2021) Molecular mechanisms underlying glyphosate resistance in bacteria. Environ Microbiol 23: 2891–2905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Itoh, H. , Tago, K. , Hayatsu, M. , and Kikuchi, Y. (2018) Detoxifying symbiosis: microbe‐mediated detoxification of phytotoxins and pesticides in insects. Nat Prod Rep 35: 434–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, H. , Macdonald, C.A. , Cook, J. , Anderson, I.C. , and Singh, B.K. (2019) An ecological loop: host microbiomes across multitrophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 34: 1118–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Molina‐Santiago, C. , and Matilla, M.A. (2020) Chemical fertilization: a short‐term solution for plant productivity? Microb Biotechnol 13: 1311–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Motta, E.V.S. , and Moran, N.A. (2020) Impact of glyphosate on the honey bee gut microbiota: effects of intensity, duration, and timing of exposure. mSystems 5: e00268‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Parreño, M.A. , Alaux, C. , Brunet, J.‐L. , Buydens, L. , Filipiak, M. , Henry, M. , et al. (2022) Critical links between biodiversity and health in wild bee conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 37: 309–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pronk, L.J.U. , Bakker, p.A.H.M. , Keel, C. , Maurhofer, M. , and Flury, P. (2022) The secret life of plant‐beneficial rhizosphere bacteria: insects as alternative hosts. Environ Microbiol. (online ahead of print). 10.1111/1462-2920.15968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Raven, p.H. , and Wagner, D.L. (2021) Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118: e2002548117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Raymann, K. , and Moran, N.A. (2018) The role of the gut microbiome in health and disease of adult honey bee workers. Curr Opin Insect Sci 26: 97–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rico‐Jiménez, M. , Roca, A. , Krell, T. , and Matilla, M.A. (2022) A bacterial chemoreceptor that mediates chemotaxis to two different plant hormones. Environ Microbiol (online ahead of print). 10.1111/1462-2920.15920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rizaludin, M.S. , Stopnisek, N. , Raaijmakers, J.M. , and Garbeva, P. (2021) The chemistry of stress: understanding the “cry for help” of plant roots. Metabolites 11: 357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rolli, E. , Vergani, L. , Ghitti, E. , Patania, G. , Mapelli, F. , and Borin, S. (2021) “Cry‐for‐help” in contaminated soil: a dialogue among plants and soil microbiome to survive in hostile conditions. Environ Microbiol 23: 5690–5703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmitt, A. , Roy, R. , and Carter, C.J. (2021) Nectar antimicrobial compounds and their potential effects on pollinators. Curr Opin Insect Sci 44: 55–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sicard, A. , Zeilinger, A.R. , Vanhove, M. , Schartel, T.E. , Beal, D.J. , Daugherty, M.P. , and Almeida, R.p.P. (2018) Xylella fastidiosa: insights into an emerging plant pathogen. Annu Rev Phytopathol 56: 181–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sokol, N.W. , Slessarev, E. , Marschmann, G.L. , Nicolas, A. , Blazewicz, S.J. , Brodie, E.L. , et al. (2022) Life and death in the soil microbiome: how ecological processes influence biogeochemistry. Nat Rev Microbiol (online ahead of print). 10.1038/s41579-022-00695-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tlais, A.Z.A. , Polo, A. , Filannino, P. , Cantatore, V. , Gobbetti, M. , and Di Cagno, R. (2022) Biofilm formation as an extra gear for Apilactobacillus kunkeei to counter the theat of agrochemicals in honeybee crop. Microb Biotechnol (in press). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Trivedi, P. , Batista, B.D. , Bazany, K.E. , and Singh, B.K. (2022) Plant‐microbiome interactions under a changing world: responses, consequences and perspectives. New Phytol (online ahead of print). 10.1111/nph.18016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Trivedi, P. , Leach, J.E. , Tringe, S.G. , Sa, T. , and Singh, B.K. (2020) Plant‐microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol 18: 607–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yuan, W. , Ruan, S. , Qi, G. , Wang, R. , and Zhao, X. (2022) Plant growth‐promoting and antibacterial activities of cultivable bacteria alive in tobacco field against Ralstonia solanacearum . Environ Microbiol 24: 1411–1429. 10.1111/1462-2920.15868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES