Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Jun 1;24(4):e13866. doi: 10.1111/tid.13866

Economic and clinical burden associated with respiratory viral infections after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in the United States

Michael G Ison 1,, Francisco M Marty 2, Nelson Chao 3, Seung Hyun Moon 4, Zhiji Zhang 5, Aastha Chandak 5
PMCID: PMC9542538  PMID: 35598293

Abstract

Background

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo‐HCT) recipients are at increased risk for respiratory viral infections (RVIs), which invoke substantial morbidity and mortality. Limited effective antiviral options and drug resistance often hamper successful RVI treatment, creating additional burden for patients and the health care system.

Methods

Using an open‐source health care claims database, we examined differences in clinical outcomes, health resource utilization, and total reimbursements during the 1‐year period following allo‐HCT in patients with and without any RVI infection (respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, parainfluenza virus, and human metapneumovirus). RVIs were diagnosed at any time ≤1 year after allo‐HCT and identified by International Classification of Disease codes. Analyses were stratified by the presence or absence of acute or chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD).

Results

The study included 13 363 allo‐HCT patients, 1368 (10.2%) of whom had a diagnostic code for any RVI. A higher proportion of patients with any RVI had pneumonia ≤1 year after allo‐HCT compared to patients without any RVI, with or without GVHD. Patients with any RVI had higher all‐cause mortality risk, longer length of post‐allo‐HCT hospital stay, higher readmission rate, and higher number of hospital days after allo‐HCT compared to patients without the infection (all < .05). Total unadjusted median reimbursements were higher for those with any RVI and each specific RVI assessed than those without the specific infection, with or without GVHD.

Conclusion

Allo‐HCT patients with RVIs had significantly worse clinical outcomes and increased health resource utilization and reimbursements during the year following allo‐HCT, with or without GVHD.

graphic file with name TID-24-e13866-g005.jpg

Keywords: allogeneic HCT, clinical burden, health care burden, respiratory viral infection


   

graphic file with name TID-24-e13866-g005.jpg


Abbreviations

allo‐HCT

allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

DRG

Decision Resource Group

GVHD

graft‐versus‐host disease

hMPV

human metapneumovirus

HR

hazard ratio

ICD

International Classification of Diseases

LOS

length of stay

LRTI

lower respiratory tract infection

PIV

parainfluenza virus

RSV

respiratory syncytial virus

RVI

respiratory viral infection

URTI

upper respiratory tract infection

1. INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo‐HCT) recipients are at an increased risk for respiratory viral infections (RVIs), 1 with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) being the most common cause of RVI in this population (incidence of up to 50%), followed by influenza (up to 40%), parainfluenza virus (PIV; up to 27%), and human metapneumovirus (hMPV; up to 11%). 2 RVIs are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in HCT recipients, often related to the progression from an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) to a lower RTI (LRTI). 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 As with other types of infections, RVIs occur more frequently after allo‐HCT than after autologous HCT, 11 , 12 owing to delayed immune reconstitution 13 and lack of humoral and T‐cell–mediated immunity. 1 , 14 , 15 In addition to increased frequency, mortality associated with RVIs is higher after allo‐HCT than after autologous HCT. 16 A limited number of effective antivirals and the emergence of drug resistance, likely due to prolonged viral shedding in the setting of antiviral monotherapy, often hamper successful treatment of RVIs. 1 , 17 , 18 In order to better understand the clinical and economic impact of RVIs in allo‐HCT recipients, this retrospective observational study utilized real‐world claims database to compare clinical outcomes, health resource utilization, and health care reimbursement in allo‐HCT recipients with and without RVIs, including RSV, influenza, PIV, and hMPV.

2. METHODS

Patients who underwent allo‐HCT between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017 were identified from an open‐source claims database obtained from the Decision Resource Group (DRG) Real‐World Evidence Data Repository (now part of Clarivate). Data were available from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2018 to ensure that all patients have at least 1‐year period prior to index procedure and 1‐year period after index procedure for follow‐up. The DRG Real‐World Evidence Data Repository is built upon an aggregation of pharmacy and medical billing clearinghouse claims that are updated daily from vendors. DRG Real‐World Evidence Data Repository covers numerous commercial and government health plans and tracks more than 300 million longitudinal patient lives. The open‐source nature of the database allows patients to be tracked as they change payers.

Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of an RVI, defined as having ≥1 International Classification of Diseases (ICD‐9 or ICD‐10) diagnosis code for RSV, influenza, PIV, or hMPV at any time point for 1 year after allo‐HCT. First (index) allo‐HCT was identified through an ICD‐9 or ICD‐10 procedure code, a Current Procedural Terminology code, or a Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code. For patients who had multiple allo‐HCTs during this period, only data from the first were included in the study to avoid double counting. Patients who underwent allo‐HCT in an outpatient setting were excluded in order to maintain a homogeneous cohort, as few patients undergo allo‐HCT in an outpatient setting and those that do tend to have different practice patterns. The baseline period was defined as the 1‐year prior to index allo‐HCT; patients were followed for 1 year after the procedure.

Clinical outcomes included presence of pneumonia and time to all‐cause mortality. Health resource utilization outcomes included overall hospital length of stay (LOS) for the index hospitalization and hospital readmissions, and readmission rate. Total health care reimbursement was also evaluated. Since adjudicated reimbursed claims information is not available for all submitted claims in an open‐source claims database, the available overlapping submitted and reimbursed claims—a 20% overlap in the study cohort—were used to calculate the reimbursement‐to‐charge ratio. This ratio was calculated as 0.425 and applied to the submitted charges to generate the reimbursement amount for the study cohort. These reimbursed amounts were then winsorized at the first and 99th percentiles to adjust for outliers in each group. Further, the total reimbursed amounts were identified in the 1‐year follow‐up period after allo‐HCT and were presented as 2019 US dollars (using the medical care component of the consumer price index).

2.1. Statistical analysis

For all study outcomes, patients were stratified by presence/absence of any RVI, as well as each type of RVI (RSV, influenza, PIV, and hMPV). Separate analyses were reported for those with acute or chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) versus those without. Chi‐square test or Fisher exact test was applied to statistically compare pneumonia and all‐cause mortality rates. Time to all‐cause mortality was evaluated using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Variables included baseline covariates of age at index hospitalization, underlying disease, stem cell source, and number of comorbidities; time‐varying covariates included RVI and GVHD based on their dates of diagnosis. Variables with < .10 were retained in the final multivariate model.

We describe total health care reimbursement amounts, with adjusted reimbursement for patients with and without RVI estimated through a generalized linear model fitted with a negative binomial distribution. Adjustment covariates included age, health plan type, underlying disease, stem cell source, GVHD during follow‐up, interaction between presence of RVIs and GVHD, total reimbursements during the baseline period, and follow‐up time. As with time to all‐cause mortality, variables with < .10 were retained in the final adjusted model. Observed‐margin least square means and 95% CIs were extracted as adjusted reimbursements stratified by the presence or absence of any GVHD after transplant. All statistical tests were two sided and at 5% level of significance. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 or later.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Study population

A total of 17 520 patients with first allo‐HCT procedure codes between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017, and no prior allo‐HCT procedures in the 1‐year prior, were identified within the database. Those without a corresponding allo‐HCT hospitalization (n = 2933) and who underwent index allo‐HCT in an outpatient setting (n = 1224) were excluded, leaving a total of 13 363 eligible for inclusion in the final study cohort (Figure S1). This final cohort represented approximately 22% of allo‐HCT recipients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research during that period. A total of 1368 (10%) patients were diagnosed with an RVI within the first year after allo‐HCT, including 687 (5%) with influenza, 578 (4%) with RSV, 181 (1%) with hMPV, and 166 (1%) with PIV. The average standard deviation time to first RVI infection after allo‐HCT was 161.2 (109.1) days; 226 patients were diagnosed with ≥2 RVIs during the year after transplantation. The average follow‐up time after allo‐HCT was 323.5 days for all patients, 337.4 days for patients diagnosed with an RVI, and 321.9 days for patients without an RVI diagnosis.

Demographic and transplantation characteristics of the patient population can be seen in Table S1. Mean ages of patients were 44 and 47 years in the group with and without infection, respectively; the majority were male and had malignant disease, peripheral blood as the stem cell source, and ≥1 comorbidity.

3.2. Clinical outcomes

A significantly higher proportion of patients with any RVI experienced pneumonia within the first year following allo‐HCT compared to those with no RVI, irrespective of presence of GVHD (< .0001; Figure 1). Similar significant findings were seen for each RVI evaluated (< .0001 for all comparisons).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Occurrence of pneumonia in the first year after allo‐HCT for patients with and without a specific RVI stratified by GVHD status. All comparisons: < .0001. allo‐HCT, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant; GVHD, graft‐versus‐host disease; hMPV, human metapneumovirus; PIV, parainfluenza virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; RVI, respiratory viral infection

In an adjusted analysis, patients with any RVI had a significantly higher risk of all‐cause mortality than those without an RVI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4–1.9; < .0001; Figure 2). Presence of GVHD was associated with a significantly higher risk of all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6–1.9; < .0001), as was increasing age ≥35 years (< .01), cord blood stem cell source (= .0003), and increasing number of comorbidities (< .001).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Cox proportional hazards model for time to all‐cause mortality for patients with and without RVIs. CI, confidence interval; GVHD, graft‐versus‐host disease; ref, reference; RVI, respiratory viral infection

3.3. Health resource utilization

Patients with any RVI had significantly higher health resource utilization (overall LOS, hospital readmission rate) compared to those with no RVI (< .0001 for all comparisons; Figure 3). Significant findings were also seen for each RVI evaluated (all p ≤ .0002 for overall LOS and < .0001 for readmission rate).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Health resource utilization within 1 year of undergoing allo‐HCT for patients with and without RVIs. Readmission rate defined as number of hospital readmissions after the index hospitalization/(number of days of follow‐up/365). For each comparison, patients without the specific infection could have a different double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid infection other than the one being examined. RSV, influenza, PIV, and hMPV. allo‐HCT, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant; hMPV, human metapneumovirus; LOS, length of stay; PIV, parainfluenza virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; RVI, respiratory viral infection

3.4. Health care reimbursement

Patients with any RVI had significantly higher total health care reimbursement (unadjusted) within the first year after allo‐HCT compared to those with no RVI ($353 251 versus $220 856 USD, respectively; < .0001; Table S2). Similar results were found for presence versus absence of each RVI analyzed (< .0001 for all comparisons). Significant findings for total health care reimbursement (adjusted) were observed irrespective of presence of GVHD (< .0001 for all comparisons of patients with GVHD; < .01 for all comparisons of patients without GVHD; Figure 4).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Total adjusted health care reimbursement in the first year after allo‐HCT for patients with and without an RVI stratified by GVHD status (2019 USD). Estimates adjusted for age, health insurance plan type, underlying disease, stem cell source, number of comorbidities, total reimbursements at baseline, GVHD during follow‐up, interaction between presence of RVIs and GVHD, and follow‐up time. allo‐HCT, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant; GVHD, graft‐versus‐host disease; hMPV, human metapneumovirus; PIV, parainfluenza virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; RVI, respiratory viral infection

4. DISCUSSION

This retrospective observational database study confirmed that patients with RVIs demonstrated significantly higher morbidity (i.e., pneumonia) and mortality, irrespective of GVHD presence. Health resource utilization, specifically overall hospital LOS and readmission rate, was also significantly higher in those with RVIs. Consistent with these findings, total health care reimbursement was significantly higher for patients undergoing allo‐HCT with an RVI compared to those without, with significantly higher total reimbursement found for all RVIs evaluated (RSV, influenza, PIV, and hMPV).

Our findings of increased morbidity and mortality, health resource utilization, and reimbursed costs in allo‐HCT recipients with RVIs are consistent with previous reports. Consistent with the literature, patients with PIV had the highest rate of pneumonia. 19 Given this information, it is not surprising that we found that PIV was associated with the longest hospital LOS. Interestingly, prior studies have noted that influenza has a longer hospital LOS. 20 , 21 PIV could have had the longest LOS in our study owing to the availability of antiviral therapy for influenza but not PIV. In terms of total health care reimbursement, we found that hMPV had the highest reimbursement, followed by PIV, RSV, and influenza. Prior studies found a similar hierarchy of economic burden, which again is likely explained by severity of disease and availability of antiviral therapy for influenza. 20

Because of the potentially serious consequences of RVI following allo‐HCT and the risk of progression from URTI to LRTI, early detection is extremely important. 1 , 19 However, even with early detection, a dearth of available antiviral agents and the limited efficacy and potential toxicity of the majority of these agents highlight the need for additional antiviral options, as well as other preventative and treatment strategies. In addition to improving patient outcomes, these strategies could potentially reduce resource utilization and health care cost, which is especially true of preventative therapies that could be applied to the highest risk population.

Limitations of the current study are related to the use of administrative claims data, including the potential that coding limitations could have affected the accuracy of clinical outcomes, identification of the severity of GVHD, and that some events may not have been entered into the database, including events that occur outside of the hospital. Claims database studies may often be limited by changes in patient health plans. This limitation may not be an issue for our study, as the claims database continued to track patients despite changing payers. We also acknowledge that our study only includes 13 363 of the >48 000 allo‐HCTs performed in the United States from 2012 through 2017, and some of this difference could be attributed to these limitations of the database. An additional limitation of an open‐source claims database is that the total reimbursed amount must be calculated for all submitted charges using a reimbursement‐to‐charge ratio obtained from the available submitted and reimbursed claims information. Exclusion of patients who underwent procedures in an outpatient setting may also have impacted our findings.

In conclusion, our study found that allo‐HCT patients with an RVI had worse clinical outcomes and a significantly higher burden on the health care system in terms of health resource utilization and total reimbursement. The adjusted analyses showed that mortality and total reimbursement were higher for allo‐HCT patients with an RVI, regardless of the presence of GVHD. Antivirals and other strategies may improve patient outcomes and reduce health resource utilization and costs after allo‐HCT.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Michael G. Ison reports research support, paid to Northwestern University, from GlaxoSmithKline and Pulmocide; is a paid consultant for Adagio, ADMA Biologics, AlloVir, Cidara, Genentech, Roche, Janssen, Shionogi, Takeda, and Viracor Eurofins; is a paid member of DSMBs for AlloVir, CSL Behring, Janssen, Merck, Sequiris, Talaris, and Takeda; and receives royalties from UpToDate. Seung Hyun Moon is an employee of AlloVir and reports equity in AlloVir. Zhiji Zhang and Aastha Chandak are employed by an organization that received funding to conduct this study. Other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Supporting information

Supporting Information

Graphical Abstract

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Dr Francisco Marty for his contributions to the design and data collection for this study prior to his passing. This project represents a contracted effort by Certara with AlloVir. Medical writing assistance and revision of the manuscript under the direction of the authors was provided by PRECISIONscientia and compensated by AlloVir.

Ison MG, Marty FM, Chao N, Moon SH, Zhang Z, Chandak A. Economic and clinical burden associated with respiratory viral infections after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in the United States. Transpl Infect Dis. 2022;24:e13866. 10.1111/tid.13866

REFERENCES

  • 1. Pochon C, Voigt S. Respiratory virus infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3294. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fontana L, Strasfeld L. Respiratory virus infections of the stem cell transplant recipient and the hematologic malignancy patient. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33(2):523‐544. 10.1016/j.idc.2019.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chemaly RF, Ghosh S, Bodey GP, et al. Respiratory viral infections in adults with hematologic malignancies and human stem cell transplantation recipients: a retrospective study at a major cancer center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2006;85(5):278‐287. 10.1097/01.md.0000232560.22098.4e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chemaly RF, Hanmod SS, Rathod DB, et al. The characteristics and outcomes of parainfluenza virus infections in 200 patients with leukemia or recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;119(12):2738‐2745. 10.1182/blood-2011-08-371112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chemaly RF, Rathod DB, Couch R. Respiratory viruses. In: Safdar A, ed. Principles and Practice of Cancer Infectious Diseases. Humana Press; 2011:371. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. D'Angelo CR, Kocherginsky M, Pisano J, et al. Incidence and predictors of respiratory viral infections by multiplex PCR in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients 50 years and older including geriatric assessment. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57(8):1807‐1813. 10.3109/10428194.2015.1113279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Paulsen GC, Danziger‐Isakov L. Respiratory viral infections in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Chest Med. 2017;38(4):707‐726. 10.1016/j.ccm.2017.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Renaud C, Campbell AP. Changing epidemiology of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and solid organ transplant recipients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24(4):333‐343. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283480440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Mulanovich VE, Ariza‐Heredia EJ, Chemaly RF. Management of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Am J Blood Res. 2012;2(4):203‐218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Whimbey E, Englund JA, Couch RB. Community respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer. Am J Med. 1997;102(3A):10‐18. 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)80004-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ljungman P, Ward KN, Crooks BN, et al. Respiratory virus infections after stem cell transplantation: a prospective study from the infectious diseases working party of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28(5):479‐484. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pereira MR, Pouch SM, Scully B. Infections in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In: Safdar A, ed. Principles and Practice of Transplant Infectious Diseases. Springer; 2019:209‐226. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mehta RS, Rezvani K. Immune reconstitution post allogeneic transplant and the impact of immune recovery on the risk of infection. Virulence. 2016;7(8):901‐916. 10.1080/21505594.2016.1208866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kohlmeier JE, Woodland DL. Immunity to respiratory viruses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:61‐82. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schmidt ME, Varga SM. The CD8 T cell response to respiratory virus infections. Front Immunol. 2018;9:678. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sim SA, Leung VKY, Ritchie D, Slavin MA, Sullivan SG, Teh BW. Viral respiratory tract infections in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients in the era of molecular testing. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(7):1490‐1496. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Chemaly RF, Shah DP, Boeckh MJ. Management of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(5):S344‐S351. 10.1093/cid/ciu623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ison MG, Hayden FG, Hay AJ, et al. Influenza polymerase inhibitor resistance: assessment of the current state of the art ‐ a report of the isirv antiviral group. Antiviral Res. 2021;194:105158. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2021.105158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ison MG, Hirsch HH. Community‐acquired respiratory viruses in transplant patients: diversity, impact, unmet clinical needs. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(4):e00042‐00019. 10.1128/CMR.00042-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ghantoji SS, Shah DP, Lairson DR, et al. The economic and clinical burden of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients: a cost comparison study across 19 major cancer centers in the US. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;. 22:S53. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ghantoji SS, Karanth S, El Haddad L, Park A, Lairson D, Chemaly RF. Clinical and economic burden of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: the MD Anderson experience. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(1):S319‐S319. 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.748 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Graphical Abstract


Articles from Transplant Infectious Disease are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES