Abstract
Background
Facial skin is a particularly complex environment made of different skin types such as sebaceous (forehead) and dry (cheeks). The skin microbiota composition on different facial sites has not yet been addressed.
Methods
We conducted a 4‐week‐long, single‐centre, randomized and placebo‐controlled clinical study involving 23 Caucasian females. We assessed both bacterial composition on five different facial areas and the microbiome modulatory effects resulting from the topical application of a plant extract (Epilobium fleischeri). Skin microbiome samples were collected before and after 4 weeks of product application. Microbiota profiling was performed via 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and relative abundance data were used to calculate differentials via a multinomial regression model.
Results
Via ‘reference frames’, we observed shifts in microbial composition after 4 weeks of twice‐daily product application and identify certain microbiota species, which were positively associated with the application of the product containing the Epilobium fleischeri extract. Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Micrococcus yunnanensis appeared to be significantly enriched in the final microbiota composition of the active treatment group.
Conclusion
Facial skin was found to be colonized by an heterogenous microbiota, and the Epilobium fleischeri extract had a modulatory effect on commensal bacteria on the different facial sites.
Keywords: claim substantiation, Epilobium fleischeri, microbiota, reference frames, skin care, skin microbiome
Visualization of log‐ratio between S.epidermidis/S.capitis via facial color mapping.

Résumé
Contexte
la peau du visage est un environnement particulièrement complexe où l’on trouve des peaux de plusieurs types, par exemple grasse (sur le front) et sèche (sur les joues). La composition du microbiote cutané sur différentes zones du visage n’a pas encore été abordée.
Méthodes
nous avons mené une étude clinique de 4 semaines monocentrique, randomisée et contrôlée par placebo sur 23 femmes de type caucasien. Nous avons évalué à la fois la composition bactérienne sur cinq zones différentes du visage et les effets modulateurs du microbiome résultant de l’application topique d’un extrait de plante (Epilobium fleischeri). Des échantillons de microbiome cutané ont été prélevés avant et après 4 semaines d’application du produit. Un profilage du microbiote a été mené par séquençage du gène de l’ARNr 16S, des données d’abondance relative ont été utilisées pour calculer les différentiels via un modèle de régression multinomiale.
Résultats
nos cadres de référence nous ont permis d’observer des changements de composition microbienne après 4 semaines d’application deux fois par jour du produit et nous avons identifié certaines espèces de microbiote qui ont été positivement associées à l’application du produit contenant l’extrait d’Epilobium fleischeri. Les taux de Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus epidermidis et Micrococcus yunnanensis semblaient significativement plus élevés dans la composition finale du microbiote du groupe de traitement actif.
Conclusion
la peau du visage s’est avérée colonisée par un microbiote hétérogène, et l’extrait d’Epilobium fleischeri a eu un effet modulateur sur les bactéries commensales des différentes zones du visage.
INTRODUCTION
In context with the recent rise of interest in understanding the role of skin microbiome on skin health, we intended to investigate the microbiota composition of different facial skin sites. The skin microbiome composition is known to vary considerably across body sites and even between individuals [1, 2, 3]. Facial skin is heterogeneous and includes areas with high sebum content (the T‐zone: forehead, nose and chin) and dry areas where sebum secretion is lower (cheeks). Therefore, it appears evident that facial skin provides different niches for microbial colonization. Some studies on facial microbiome have already been performed; however, to the best of our knowledge, none looked at the microbial composition of different facial sites [4, 5]. Here, we sought to investigate that and to link microbiota compositional information to the variable sebaceous environments in the face as an example of host–microbe interaction. Moreover, we sought to find out more on the microbial shifts induced after facial application of a cosmetic formulation containing Epilobium fleischeri extract, a skin care active ingredient known for its sebum‐regulating properties.
Epilobium fleischeri is a rare Alpine species of the Onagraceae family likely to grow in moraines and alluviums close to glaciers. Traditional uses of extracts from various Epilobium species are known among others also to treat skin infection. The extracts are known for their anti‐proliferative and anti‐inflammatory properties mostly due to their rich content in various flavonoids, such as quercitrin, isoquercitrin, myricitrin and isomyricitrin, and in particular the ellagitannin and oenothein B [6]. Moreover, it has been shown that oenothein B is a potent inhibitor of 5α‐reductase, an enzyme representing a key target in sebaceous glands known to be involved in the regulation of sebum production. Epilobium fleischeri extract has been identified for the high content of oenothein B, and for this reason, the extract finds application in skin care products with sebum‐regulating properties [7].
In addition, with the outbreak of the COVID‐19 pandemic, our investigations on facial skin microbiome were further supported by the more emerging need to protect skin from new type of adverse effects, such as skin irritation as well as non‐inflammatory (whiteheads and blackheads) and inflammatory acne (papules and pustules), resulting from the widespread use of personal protective equipment (i.e., facial masks). The occlusive microenvironment (change in pH, temperature and humidity) generated by mask‐wearing and textile‐skin friction is thought to lead to microbiome dysbiosis, a microbial imbalance, which is more and more associated with various dermatological conditions [8, 9, 10]. Recently, the term ‘maskne’ was coined in order to collectively refer to mask‐wearing‐associated skin disorders [11]. The rising demand for keeping healthy skin conditions certainly includes that investigations on the composition of the skin microbiota and on its functionality are conducted. Our study, therefore, provides interesting insights into the facial skin microbiota composition on different facial sites, aiming at increasing our overall knowledge on the topic and assessing the microbial modulating effects of topical application of a formulation containing the sebum‐regulating Epilobium fleischeri extract.
Objectives
The objectives of this clinical study are (1) to investigate the composition of the facial skin microbiota at five different facial sites and (2) to assess the microbial modulating effects resulting from the topical application of a formulation containing the sebum‐regulating Epilobium fleischeri extract.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test formulations
We used a base leave‐on formulation (placebo) and an active leave‐on formulation (treatment) consisting of the base formulation plus 3% Epilobium flesicheri extract (commercial product ALPAFLOR® ALP‐SEBUM CB, DSM Nutritional Products). Base and active formulations are outlined in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Formulations used in the clinical study
| INCI Name | Base formulation (Placebo) | Active formulation |
|---|---|---|
| % | % | |
| ACRYLATES/C10‐30 ALKYL ACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| AQUA | Add to 100 | |
| PHENOXYETHANOL, ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| GLYCERIN, AQUA, CITRIC ACID, POTASSIUM SORBATE, EPILOBIUM FLEISCHERI FLOWER / LEAF / STEM EXTRACT | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| AQUA, SODIUM HYDROXIDE | Add up to pH 5.5 | |
Clinical study design
A placebo‐controlled, single‐blind and randomized clinical study was conducted at the Skin Test Institute in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Study participants gave their informed consent to participate in the study, and the general principles of the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines were applied. The study was approved by the Reading Independent Ethics Committee, Woodley (UK). Adverse effects were recorded.
Twenty‐three healthy Caucasian female volunteers aged between 18 and 40 (average age was 33.7 ± 9.8 years) with hyperseborrheic skin were enrolled in the study. Volunteers were encouraged to refrain from any topical application on their face, apart from the test products, throughout the whole study duration. Acclimatization at the test institute was performed for about 30 min before any measurements or sampling were performed.
The study included a pre‐conditioning phase lasting 5 days during which the study participants were refrained from using any sebo‐regulating product on their face. This is to prevent any possible interference of previously used cosmetics with the skin biophysical measurements. During this time, period the study participants were provided with a gentle cleanser to be used for cleansing their face. The pre‐conditioning phase was followed by the application phase, which lasted 4 weeks during which the products were applied on the face twice daily by the volunteers at home, previous training by the investigator, according to the randomization plan.
No product was applied on the face on the morning of the final skin assessments. A facial cloth soaked with lukewarm water was used to gently cleanse the skin. Ultimately, the skin was allowed to air‐dry.
Porphyrins
Full face images were taken using the imaging system ColorFace® under UV light mode at 365 nm to visualize orange fluorescence caused by porphyrins. Fluorescence was quantified via digital image analysis. UV images were examined at baseline (t = 0), and only those volunteers showing orange fluorescence at baseline were selected for the quantification and comparison of the change between baseline and end of the treatment (4 weeks). The number of subjects with visible porphyrin fluorescence was five for the active group and nine for the placebo group. The region of interest for the porphyrin evaluation was limited to the nasolabial area in which most of the fluorescence was observed.
Non‐inflammatory lesions
The evaluation of non‐inflammatory lesions (‘black heads’ and ‘white heads’) was performed manually by a trained expert doing visual identification and counting on the ColorFace® high‐resolution images directly. Inflammatory lesions (pustules and papules) were also assessed but were excluded from the final evaluation due to their not significant presence (0–3) in most of the volunteers. Hyperpigmentation, scars, nevi or other irregularities were excluded from the evaluation.
Skin microbiome sampling
Skin Microbiome of the stratum corneum was collected via swabbing by trained personnel who ensured that the same number of strokes and consistent pressure onto the skin was applied throughout the entire sampling procedure. Five sampling areas of 4 cm2 each were defined on the face of each study participant. (1) forehead, (2) nose, (3) front cheek, (4) lateral cheek and (5) chin were chosen as sampling areas as representative of different facial sites with different skin features (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

Five microbiome sampling areas on the face. A, forehead; B, nose; C, front cheek; D, lateral cheek; E, chin
16S rRNA gene sequencing and predicted metagenomics
DNA extracted for qPCR was used for sequencing as previously described [46]. In brief, the V3‐V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the 341F (5′‐CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG‐3′) and the 785R (5′‐GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC‐3′) primers appended with Illumina adaptor sequences. The amplicons were sequenced on Illumina's MiSeq platform with paired‐end 300 bp reads. Initial quality assessment was based on data passing the Illumina Chastity filtering. Subsequently, reads containing PhiX control signal were removed using an in‐house filtering protocol. In addition, reads containing (partial) adapters were clipped (up to a minimum read length of 50 bp). The second quality assessment was based on the remaining reads using the FASTQC quality control tool version 0.11.5. Paired‐end sequence reads were collapsed into so‐called pseudoreads using sequence overlap with USEARCH version 9.2 [47]. These pseudoreads were collapsed into 97% OTUs. Classification of these pseudoreads was performed based on the results of alignment with SNAP version 1.0.23 [48] against the RDP database [49]. Taxonomic calls were based on a rank‐specific identity threshold of Species 99%, Genus 97%, Family 95%, Order 90%, Class 85% and Phylum at 80%.
PICRUSt2 was used to reconstruct metagenomes [50]. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were generated using DADA2 [50,51]. Forward and reverse read were trimmed to remove the first 10 bp, truncated to 250 bp length and with a maximum expected error of 1. Reads were merged with a maximum mismatch of 3 in the overlapping region. ASV's were the fed through PICRUSt2 using default parameters to produce a predicted metagenome of E.C's and MetaCyc pathways [52].
Data filtering and analysis
As previously described in our former publication [46], for presentation of taxonomy and alpha/beta diversity metrics, singletons were removed from OTU level data and then collapsed based upon taxonomic classification. Alpha and beta diversity were evaluated using Shannon's metric and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (scikit‐bio v0.5.6).
Co‐occurrence filtering methods were applied to establish shifts in the most common microbiota. A threshold of 75% was used to establish core microbiota across all participants to increase sensitivity [53]. We built the statistical model testing for differences between the study groups using Songbird [12]. Differentials were calculated according to the formula: Treatment[T.active] to indicate association of the features (OTUs) with samples obtained from the facial skin of participants using the active formulation, using placebo‐valued samples as a reference. The reference value is used as the denominator in the log‐fold change computation of differentials. In that way, for Treatment [T.active], OTUs with the most negative differential ranking values will be more associated with placebo‐valued samples, whereas the features with the most positive differential ranking values will be more associated with active‐valued samples. When analysing Songbird differentials, the top 10% of features associated with the active treatment were selected and then evaluated. The bottom 10% of features have been used as reference frames to infer changes in the microbial composition.
Facial colour mapping
Colour maps were generated by combining the mean 3D images and the median values of bacteria pairs' log‐ratios for each study group. An algorithm was developed which automatically detects skin pixels and interpolates a value for each of them superimposing the log‐ratio data on the images. This results in full and continuous 3D colour maps. A gradient of blue colour was assigned to indicate higher log‐ratio values (0 < log‐ratio <2), whereas a gradient of red colour was assigned to indicate low and negative log‐ratio values (−2 < log‐ratio <0). The changes projected onto a 3D face allow for the identification and visualization of the facial sites in which the microbial shift occurred.
RESULTS
Relative abundance and diversity
As expected, Cutibacterium acnes resulted to be the most abundant taxa with a relative abundance ranging from 90% in the forehead, down to 75% in the lateral cheek. The second most abundant bacterium was Staphylococcus epidermidis followed by Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii which showed its higher relative abundance on the forehead, front and lateral cheek. Less abundant, but in the top 10 microbiota, members are Staphylococcus capitis, which is known to be present on facial skin and on the scalp, and Micrococcus yunnanensis (Figure 2). Bray–Curtis dissimilarity of the samples showed intermixed samples based on family‐level comparison (Figure S1). While there was a broader dispersion of Placebo samples, the treatment group and placebo were not distinctly different.
FIGURE 2.

10 largest contributors to the relative abundance excluding C. acnes for all the different facial sites for the placebo/active groups at baseline (t0) and at 4 weeks (t2). A, forehead; B, nose; C, front cheek; D, lateral cheek; E, chin
Microbial alpha diversity before and after product application has been assessed via the Chao1 index (Figure 3). Major differences were observed between the two groups. Being the Chao 1 index an abundance‐based estimator of species richness, it appeared evident that the group applying the active formulation resulted having an overall increased species richness after 4 weeks of product application in all the facial sites of interest as compared to baseline (t0).
FIGURE 3.

Alpha diversity analysis using Chao1 index for placebo and active groups. Data show Chao1 index at baseline (t0) and after 4 weeks of products application (t2). The only site to show significant changes in the Chao1 index was the lateral cheek of the active treatment group (p = 0.006)
In contrast, this increase in species richness was not observed in the group applying the placebo formulation. However, it is worth to consider that the placebo group resulted entering the clinical study (t0) with a with higher Chao 1 index values as compared to the active group. Shannon index showed not to be particularly affected by any of the products (Figure S2).
Reference frames and differential ranking
We used Songbird to calculate differentials, meaning logarithmic fold changes of taxa abundances between two conditions (placebo and active) as well as the ‘reference frames’ approach to infer compositional changes resulting from the application of the active formulation [12]. We built the statistical model testing for differences between the study groups; therefore, Songbird calculated differentials based on the formula: Treatment[T.active]. The resulting differentials indicate the association with samples obtained from the facial skin of participants using the active formulation using placebo‐valued samples as a reference. The reference value is used as the denominator in the log‐fold change computation of differentials. In that way, for Treatment[T.active], the features (microorganisms) with the most negative differential ranking values will be more associated with placebo‐valued samples, whereas the features with the most positive differential ranking values will be more associated with active‐valued samples. The top 10% features identified in the differential ranking were used to describe the effect of the treatment for all the five facial skin sites considered (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Top 10% OTUs in the differential rankings produced by songbird and visualized via Qurro for the placebo and active groups after the 4 weeks‐long treatment phase. The box plots represent differences in the log‐ratios of the top 10% taxa between the groups after 4 weeks of products application, with the bottom 10% OTUs taken as ‘reference frames’
An increase in the natural log‐ratio was observed in all facial sites in the group applying the active formulation as compared to placebo. Therefore, the data showed a clear shift of the core skin microbiota, which was associated with the presence of the Epilobium fleischeri extract in the product. By looking at the differential ranking graphs, we could identify key taxa, which were positively associated with the active formulation and taxa, which showed to be negatively associated. Staphylococcus capitis consistently resulted having a low ranking in all the facial sites as compared to the other taxa. In contrast, Micrococcus yunnanensis often ranked higher than most of the other community members. We therefore looked at log‐ratios to examine shifts in the facial skin microbial composition (Figure 5). These were also made visible via a facial colour mapping approach (Figure 6).
FIGURE 5.

Log‐ratio of several taxa identified from the differential ranking analysis. Box plots illustrating the natural log‐ratio of (a) S. hominis/S. capitis; (b) S. epidermidis/S. capitis; (c) M. yunannensis/S. capitis; (d) C. kroppenstedtii/M. yunannensis; (e) C. tuberculostearicum/M. yunannensis; across the placebo and active groups. Statistical significance has been calculated via Welch's t‐test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001)
FIGURE 6.

Visualization of log‐ratio between S. epidermidis/S. capitis via facial colour mapping. The colour maps show log‐ratio increase in S. epidermidis/S. capitis after 4‐week treatment with the placebo (left) and with the product (right). Colour code (−2 to 2) is shown on the scale on the right‐hand column. (A, B, C, D, E were the facial sampling areas)
As the extract containing the ellagitannin oenoethin B within the skin active is expected to be inhibitory, we focused on the negatively associated pathways produced from Songbird (Table 2). The negative Songbird associations of reconstructed pathways from PICRUSt2 contained several MetaCyc pathways referring to n‐acetylneuraminate degradation (GLCMANNANAUT‐PWY and P441‐PWY), mandelate degradation (PWY‐1501 and PWY‐6957), hexitol fermentation (P461‐PWY and HEXITOLDEGSUPER‐PWY) and tryptophan degradation (NADSYN‐PWY and PWY‐5651). N‐acetylneuraminate degradation was positively associated with all facial sampling sites except the forehead, as did hexitol degradation. Mandelate degradation had a negative association with all facial sites except for the forehead. The mandelate and N‐acetylneuraminate degradation pathways were mixed in their association with time, whereas hexitol degradation showed a negative association with time. Tryptophan degradation is also connected with NAD biosynthesis and was only positively associated with the chin.
TABLE 2.
Songbird output values for pathways related to N‐acetylneuraminate degradation, mandelate degradation, hexitol degradation and tryptophan degradation
| MetaCyc Pathway | Time | Site [T.B] | Site [T.C] | Site [T.D] | Site [T.E] | Treatment [T.active] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N‐ acetylneuraminate degradation | GLCMANNANAUT‐PWY | 0.036 | 0.997 | 0.743 | 0.148 | 0.491 | −0.627 |
| P441‐PWY | −0.048 | 0.729 | 0.609 | 0.195 | 0.468 | −0.480 | |
| Mandelate degradation | PWY‐1501 | 0.549 | −2.535 | −0.815 | −2.273 | 0.258 | −2.646 |
| PWY‐6957 | 0.755 | −3.295 | −0.578 | −2.154 | 0.271 | −2.704 | |
| Hexitol Degradation | HEXITOLDEGSUPER‐PWY | −0.173 | 0.406 | 0.231 | 0.033 | 0.153 | −0.440 |
| P461‐PWY | −0.239 | 0.191 | 0.041 | −0.026 | −0.097 | −0.476 | |
| Tryptophan | NADSYN‐PWY | −0.0142 | −1.299 | −0.551 | −0.478 | 0.117 | 1.533 |
| PWY‐5651 | −0.139 | −1.381 | −0.584 | −0.549 | 0.262 | 1.677 |
Porphyrins and non‐inflammatory lesions assessment
We assessed orange fluorescence emission on facial images acquired at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment for both groups to get a measure of the amount of porphyrins (Figure 7). It could be easily observed an overall significant reduction in porphyrins after 28 days in the cohort applying the Epilobium fleischeri extract. In contrast, a strong tendency of increased porphyrin levels could be observed in the cohort applying the placebo.
FIGURE 7.

Porphyrins assessment. Left, detail of volunteer n.6 (27 y.o), left profile, with ROI and segmented porphyrins at D0 and D28. Right, fluorescence quantification indicating a significant reduction in the active group after 28 days
The presence of non‐inflammatory lesions, such as white and black heads, was also assessed in the two different cohorts. Following the 28 days of product application, the number of lesions per subject was significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the active group. The magnitude of the effect was of 47% less non‐inflammatory lesions in the active group, whereas in the placebo group, only a slight but not significant reduction was observed (Figure 8).
FIGURE 8.

Number of non‐inflammatory lesions identified per subject. Shown are mean values +SEM. *p < 0.01 (paired t‐test)
DISCUSSION
Excess sebum production on facial skin represents a concern for many people as it results in a shiny and greasy skin appearance. Consumers are therefore constantly looking at effective cosmetic skin care solutions, which could help in reducing the unwanted overproduction of sebum [13].
In this study, we looked at the effects of an Epilobium fleischeri extract on facial skin in addition to its already known strong sebum‐regulating properties. Our attention was focused on the improvement of the overall skin phenotype and how this is reflected in the microbiota composition of different facial sites. We intentionally enrolled study participants with oily skin and excess sebum production in order to have a population with acne‐prone skin represented and to assess to which extent the active formulation could help improving this common skin phenotype and to be able to map microbial changes in response to the product application.
Taxonomic profiling showed C. acnes being the most abundant species by far across all the investigated facial sites followed by S. epidermidis. The abundance of C. acnes is known to vary with age and sex in healthy individuals and to be characterized by a steep increase during puberty, remaining stable until old age, then decrease again in association with the reduction in sebum production of aged skin [14]. We found that the C. acnes was not particularly associated with neither the active nor the placebo formulation use. C. acnes is a renowned lipophilic skin commensal with beneficial protective effect in healthy skin. By metabolizing sebum into free fatty acids, the bacterium can prevent the colonization of skin by pathogenic microbes and inhibit biofilm formation [15, 16]. C. acnes abundance and strain diversity are reduced in certain skin diseases, including acne, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis [17, 18, 19]. In particular, specific subgroups (phylotype IA1) are associated with acne and are thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Such strains are known to produce larger levels of virulence factors, such as porphyrins than other healthy phylotypes [20, 21, 22]. Interestingly, here, we could observe a significant decrease in porphyrins on the skin of volunteers which were applying the product containing the Epilobium fleischeri extract. Such evidence would suggest that the natural extract supported a healthier skin phenotype by reducing the secretion of porphyrins by potentially acne‐associated C.acnes strains, even though the overall abundance of C. acnes species has not been particularly modulated as compared to other taxa.
In addition to that, we could identify microbial shifts and infer microbiota compositional changes resulting from the twice‐daily and 4‐week long application of the active formulation containing the Epilobium fleischeri extract. Certain microbiota species, such as Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus yunnanensis, resulted positively associated with the use of the active product. These three bacterial taxa are known skin commensals providing several beneficial properties for healthy‐looking skin, such as the secretion of antimicrobial peptides by S. epidermidis and S. hominis.[23, 24, 25] M. yunnanensis belongs to the Micrococcus luteus group as both are phenotypically and genotypically closely related [26]. This species is known to be able to withstand high levels of UV radiation and to produce carotenoids providing important antioxidant and antibacterial activities [27, 28]. These bacteria resulted to be significantly enriched in the final microbiota composition after 4 weeks of active product use as compared to the placebo. S. capitis, a traditionally considered commensal, is among the many coagulase‐negative staphylococci (CoNS) species which are now recognized as opportunistic human pathogens. In recent years, the genome of S. capitis isolates has been studied in order to identify genes which are predicted to be important for S. capitis virulence [29]. C. kroppenstedtii is a Gram‐positive lipophilic bacterium, which is known to be enriched on the skin of rosacea affected patients and increased levels are typically observed in clinical cases of skin redness [30, 31, 32]. Despite being a commonly observed commensal species, several studies associated C. tuberculostearicum with disease state, including inflammatory breast disease, sinusitis and surgical site infection [33, 34, 35]. Furthermore, it has been proposed that C. tuberculostearicum could be able to initiate and perpetuate chronic inflammatory skin diseases via activation of the canonical NF‐κB pathway [36]. In summary, our study showed that different facial sites are colonized by different proportions of bacteria, with C. acnes being the most abundant, but present in different proportions depending on the biophysical features of the facial skin location, that is sebaceous area vs dry areas (e.g., forehead vs lateral cheek). Four‐week‐long topical application of a natural Epilobium fleischeri extract rich in oenothein B did not impact the natural skin microbial diversity, but increased microbial richness, as shown by the Chao1 index. It was even more interesting to observe the significant microbiota modulating properties of the extract over a series of beneficial facial skin commensals, such as S. epidermidis, S. hominis and M. yunnanensis, providing a beneficial enrichment of these microorganisms in the final microbial composition, while depleting it from opportunistic bacteria such as S. capitis, C. kroppenstedtii and C. tuberculostearicum.
Analysing the pathways predicted from PICRUSt2 using Songbird, three trends were apparent: N‐acetylneuraminate degradation, mandelate degradation and hexitol degradation were negatively associated with the active treatment. N‐acetylneuraminate degradation, otherwise known by the enzyme neuraminidase, has been implicated in viral diseases like influenza and in bacterial respiratory infections [37]. Literature also suggests that these bacterial neuraminidases may be implicated in seborrheic eczema [38]. Given the significance of neuraminidases, research into inhibition of these enzymes has produced several ellagitannins [39], it suggests the ellagitannin in our active treatment can act in a similar manner but follow‐up studies should confirm. The inhibitory effect may also be impacting mandelate degradation. As mandelic acid has been reported to be beneficial in treating acne and hyperpigmentation, the degradation could have adverse effects on the skin quality such as viscoelasticity [40]. Mandelic acid may also help reverse the skin ageing process [41]. Wójcik et al. also reported increased sebum secretion in the U‐zone, but the mandelic peel had no effect in the T‐zone [41]. The treatment active may be acting synergistically with mandelic acid by preventing the degradation of this valuable skin compound. Lastly, the treatment active appears to have an additional inhibitory effect on hexitol degradation. While several hexitols could be the target of such degradation, mannitol has the most relevance to skincare [42]. Taieb et al. suggest that mannitol in combination with hyaluronic acid can improve skin hydration and elasticity. Additionally, mannitol fermentation by Staphylococcus aureus is required to provide protection from natural skin antimicrobial activity [43]. While the mechanism for inhibition is unknown, preventing degradation again may contribute to synergistic effects of applied mannitol by preventing the microbial removal of this valuable compound. The treatment active may also have implications in reducing S. aureus by the circuitous manipulation of its ability to metabolize mannitol and allow it to succumb to the natural antimicrobial activity of the skin. Lastly, tryptophan degradation appears to be feeding microbial metabolism as evidenced by the connection to NAD biosynthesis. Increased tryptophan degradation is also representative of healthy skin when compared to subjects with atopic dermatitis and lesioned skin from with hidradenitis suppurativa [44, 45]. Geunin‐Macé et al. suggest that the metabolism of tryptophan to indoles may reduce inflammation and this may be connected to the effect we see with reduced porphyrins in the active treatment. The tryptophan degradation effect, in addition to the inhibition of the other pathways, suggests that the active treatment is actively manipulating the microbial community at the metabolic level in a manner that appears to promote healthy skin.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
D.I. conceptualized and designed the clinical efficacy study. J.C. applied ‘reference frames’ methodology and software programming for the next‐generation sequencing data analysis. R.S., J.C. and D.I. contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the microbiome data. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript, have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
All authors are employees of DSM and receive regular salaries from the company. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest exist.
Supporting information
Figure S1‐S2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank BaseClear BV (Leiden, Netherlands) who performed the DNA extraction and the 16S rRNA sequencing.
Sfriso R, Claypool J, Roche M, Imfeld D. 5‐α reductase inhibition by Epilobioum fleischeri extract modulates facial microbiota structure. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2022;44:440–452. doi: 10.1111/ics.12777
Funding information
This study was funded by DSM Nutritional Products. R.S, J.C. and D.I. are employees of DSM Nutritional Products and receive regular salaries from the company. The ingredient Epilobium flesicheri extract mentioned in this manuscript is marketed by DSM Nutritional Products under the trade name ALPAFLOR® ALP‐SEBUM CB
D.I., R.S. and J.C are all employees of DSM Nutritional Products.
Contributor Information
Riccardo Sfriso, Email: riccardo.sfriso@dsm.com.
Dominik Imfeld, Email: Dominik.Imfeld@dsm.com.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data will be available under NCBI bioproject PRJNA778761.
REFERENCES
- 1. Grice EA, Kong HH, Conlan S, Deming CB, Davis J, Young AC, et al. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science. 2009;324:1190–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1171700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science. 2009;326:1694–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1177486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Costello EK, Berg‐Lyons D, Gonzalez A, Stombaugh J, et al. Moving pictures of the human microbiome. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R50. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lee HJ, Jeong SE, Lee S, Kim S, Han H, Jeon CO. Effects of cosmetics on the skin microbiome of facial cheeks with different hydration levels. Microbiology. 2018;7:e00557. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hillebrand GG, Dimitriu P, Malik K, Park Y, Qu D, Mohn WW, et al. Temporal variation of the facial skin microbiome: a 2‐year longitudinal study in healthy adults. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147:50s–61s. doi: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ducrey B, Marston A, Gohring S, Hartmann RW, Hostettmann K. Inhibition of 5 alpha‐reductase and aromatase by the ellagitannins oenothein a and oenothein B from Epilobium species. Planta Med. 1997;63:111–4. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Maiz D. Oily skin: brilliant actives for matte skin. Parfums Cosmetiques Actualites. 2008;199:60–6. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Teo WL. The “Maskne” microbiome ‐ pathophysiology and therapeutics. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60:799–809. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sfriso R, Egert M, Gempeler M, Voegeli R, Campiche R. Revealing the secret life of skin ‐ with the microbiome you never walk alone. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2020;42:116–26. doi: 10.1111/ics.12594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Dréno B, Araviiskaia E, Berardesca E, Gontijo G, Sanchez Viera M, Xiang LF, et al. Microbiome in healthy skin, update for dermatologists. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:2038–47. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Teo WL. Diagnostic and management considerations for “maskne” in the era of COVID‐19. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:520–1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Morton JT, Marotz C, Washburne A, Silverman J, Zaramela LS, Edlund A, et al. Establishing microbial composition measurement standards with reference frames. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2719. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10656-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Endly DC, Miller RA. Oily skin: a review of treatment options. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017;10:49–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ, Mills OH, Kligman AM. Age‐related changes in the resident bacterial flora of the human face. J Invest Dermatol. 1975;65:379–81. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12607630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Nakamura K, O'Neill AM, Williams MR, Cau L, Nakatsuji T, Horswill AR, et al. Short chain fatty acids produced by Cutibacterium acnes inhibit biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:21237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77790-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Marples RR, Downing DT, Kligman AM. Control of free fatty acids in human surface lipids by Corynebacterium acnes. J Invest Dermatol. 1971;56:127–31. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12260695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kong HH, Oh J, Deming C, Conlan S, Grice EA, Beatson MA, et al. Temporal shifts in the skin microbiome associated with disease flares and treatment in children with atopic dermatitis. Genome Res. 2012;22:850–9. doi: 10.1101/gr.131029.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gao Z, Tseng CH, Strober BE, Pei Z, Blaser MJ. Substantial alterations of the cutaneous bacterial biota in psoriatic lesions. PloS one. 2008;3:e2719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rozas M, Hart de Ruijter A, Fabrega MJ, Zorgani A, Guell M, Paetzold B, et al. From dysbiosis to healthy skin: major contributions of Cutibacterium acnes to skin homeostasis. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1–3. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Spittaels K‐J, van Uytfanghe K, Zouboulis CC, Stove C, Crabbé A, Coenye T. Porphyrins produced by acneic Cutibacterium acnes strains activate the inflammasome by inducing K+ leakage. iScience. 2021;24:102575. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Johnson T, Kang D, Barnard E, Li H. Strain‐level differences in porphyrin production and regulation in propionibacterium acnes elucidate disease associations. mSphere. 2016;1(1). doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00023-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Xu H, Li H. Acne, the skin microbiome, and antibiotic treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019;20:335–44. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-00417-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nakatsuji T, Chen TH, Narala S, Chun KA, Two AM, Yun T, et al. Antimicrobials from human skin commensal bacteria protect against Staphylococcus aureus and are deficient in atopic dermatitis. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaah4680. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liu Y, Liu Y, du Z, Zhang L, Chen J, Shen Z, et al. Skin microbiota analysis‐inspired development of novel anti‐infectives. Microbiome. 2020;8:85. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00866-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kim PI, Sohng JK, Sung C, Joo HS, Kim EM, Yamaguchi T, et al. Characterization and structure identification of an antimicrobial peptide, hominicin, produced by Staphylococcus hominis MBBL 2‐9. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;399:133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Huang CH, Wang CL, Liou JS, Lee AY, Blom J, Huang L, et al. Reclassification of micrococcus aloeverae and Micrococcus yunnanensis as later heterotypic synonyms of Micrococcus luteus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:3512–8. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mohana D, Thippeswamy S, Abhishek R. Antioxidant, antibacterial, and ultraviolet‐protective properties of carotenoids isolated from micrococcus spp. Radiation Protection and Environment. 2013;36:168–74. doi: 10.4103/0972-0464.142394 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Patra V, Byrne SN, Wolf P. The skin microbiome: is it affected by UV‐induced immune suppression? Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1235. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cameron D, Hassan KA, Elbourne LD, Tuck KL, Paulsen IT, Peleg AY, et al. Insights on virulence from the complete genome of Staphylococcus capitis. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:980. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Rainer BM, Thompson KG, Antonescu C, Florea L, Mongodin EF, Bui J, et al. Characterization and analysis of the skin microbiota in rosacea: a case‐control study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21:139–47. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00471-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Filaire E, Vialleix C, Cadoret JP, Guénard S, Muller C, Dreux‐Zigha A, et al. Characterization of reactive and sensitive skin microbiota: effect of Halymenia durvillei (HD) extract treatment. Cosmetics. 2019;6:69. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Fyhrquist N, Muirhead G, Prast‐Nielsen S, Jeanmougin M, Olah P, Skoog T, et al. Microbe‐host interplay in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4703. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12253-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Paviour S, Musaad S, Roberts S, Taylor G, Taylor S, Shore K, et al. Corynebacterium species isolated from patients with mastitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:1434–40. doi: 10.1086/344463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Abreu NA, Nagalingam NA, Song Y, Roediger FC, Pletcher SD, Goldberg AN, et al. Sinus microbiome diversity depletion and Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum enrichment mediates rhinosinusitis. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:151ra124. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Tampakis A, Tampaki EC, Kontzoglou K, Patsouris E, Kouraklis G, Lardinois D. Postoperative deep wound dehiscence of thoracotomy with isolation of Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum: surgical site infection or colonization? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21:5264–7. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201711_13850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Altonsy MO, Kurwa HA, Lauzon GJ, Amrein M, Gerber AN, Almishri W, et al. Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum, a human skin colonizer, induces the canonical nuclear factor‐κB inflammatory signaling pathway in human skin cells. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2020;8:62–79. doi: 10.1002/iid3.284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Soong G, Muir A, Gomez MI, Waks J, Reddy B, Planet P, et al. Bacterial neuraminidase facilitates mucosal infection by participating in biofilm production. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:2297–305. doi: 10.1172/jci27920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Höffler U, Gloor M, von Nicolai H. Neuraminidase production by Propionibacterium acnes‐strains isolated from patients with acne vulgaris, seborrheic eczema and healthy subjects. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1981;250:122–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Quosdorf S, Schuetz A, Kolodziej H. Different inhibitory potencies of oseltamivir carboxylate, zanamivir, and several tannins on bacterial and viral neuraminidases as assessed in a cell‐free fluorescence‐based enzyme inhibition assay. Molecules. 2017;22:1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wójcik A, Kubiak M, Rotsztejn H. Influence of azelaic and mandelic acid peels on sebum secretion in ageing women. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2013;30:140–5. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2013.35614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Taieb M, Gay C, Sebban S, Secnazi P. Hyaluronic acid plus mannitol treatment for improved skin hydration and elasticity. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012;11:87–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00608.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kenny JG, Moran J, Kolar SL, Ulanov A, Li Z, Shaw LN, et al. Mannitol utilisation is required for protection of Staphylococcus aureus from human skin antimicrobial fatty acids. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e67698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Guenin‐Macé L, Morel JD, Doisne JM, Schiavo A, Boulet L, Mayau V, et al. Dysregulation of tryptophan catabolism at the host‐skin microbiota interface in hidradenitis suppurativa. JCI Insight. 2020;5:20. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.140598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Yu J, Luo Y, Zhu Z, Zhou Y, Sun L, Gao J, et al. A tryptophan metabolite of the skin microbiota attenuates inflammation in patients with atopic dermatitis through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143:2108–19.e2112. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sfriso R, Claypool J. Microbial Reference Frames Reveal Distinct Shifts in the Skin Microbiota after Cleansing. Microorganisms, 2020;8(11):1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zaharia M, Bolosky WJ, Curtis K, Fox A, Patterson D, Shenker S, Stoica I, Karp RM, Sittler T. Faster and More Accurate Sequence Alignment with SNAP. ArXiv, 2011. 10.48550/arXiv.1111.5572 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, et al. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(Database issue):D633–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):685–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker‐gene data analysis. ISME J. 2017;11(12):2639–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Caspi R, Billington R, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, Midford PE, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes ‐ a 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D445–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Berry D, Widder S. Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co‐occurrence networks. Front Microbiol. 2014;20(5):219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1‐S2
Data Availability Statement
The data will be available under NCBI bioproject PRJNA778761.
