Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0275813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275813

Effects of abscisic acid on growth and selenium uptake in medicinal plant Perilla frutescens

Renyan Liao 1,*
Editor: Mayank Gururani2
PMCID: PMC9543941  PMID: 36206244

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of abscisic acid (ABA) on growth and selenium (Se) absorption of the medicinal plant, Perilla frutescens. A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different ABA concentrations (0, 1, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) on the physiological characteristics and Se absorption capacity of P. frutescens. Application of 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L ABA increased the shoot biomass of P. frutescens, and only 5 and 10 μmol/L ABA increased the root biomass. Application of 5, 10, and 20 μmol/L ABA increased the contents of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoid), superoxide dismutase activity, peroxidase activity, and soluble protein content of P. frutescens, and decreased the malondialdehyde content in P. frutescens. Only 5 and 10 μmol/L ABA used in the present study increased the catalase activity of P. frutescens. For the Se uptake, only 5 μmol/L ABA increased the Se content, Se extraction and Se bioconcentration factor of both roots and shoots. The findings of the present study indicate that 5 and 10 μmol/L ABA promotes the growth of P. frutescens, whereas 5 μmol/L ABA enhances the Se accumulation capacity in P. frutescens.

Introduction

Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element for human growth and development. It plays an important role in preventing diseases, improving health and slowing down aging [1, 2]. Findings from a previous survey showed that the daily Se intake per capita in China was lower relative to the standard recommended by the World Health Organization [3]. One of the main sources of Se in human body is plant based diet [4]. Absorption of Se by plants is a safe, economic and effective way to convert Se in the soil into organic Se [5]. Therefore, several studies are exploring Se enrichment in plants.

Abscisic acid (ABA) was initially considered an inhibitory plant hormone [6]. However, recent studies show that ABA widely regulates growth and development processes of plants, such as seed germination, flowering and stomatal opening and closing [7, 8]. Moreover, it plays an important role in abiotic stress response in plants [9]. Studies report that appropriate concentrations of ABA can improve adaptation of plants to drought conditions [10], low temperature [11], and saline alkali conditions [12]. In addition, ABA affects absorption of elements or ions by plants. Application of appropriate concentrations of ABA regulates absorption of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium ions by Toona sinensis and alfalfa, thus modulating their ion balance [13, 14]. Furthermore, ABA within a certain concentration range can reduce cadmium content in the shoots of rice [15] and Brassica campestris [16]. Notably, ABA improves cadmium absorption by some accumulator and hyperaccumulator plants such as Stellaria media and Solanum photeinocarpum [8, 17]. These results indicate that ABA modulates absorption of elements from the soil by plants.

Perilla frutescens is an annual herb of Labiatae family. It is widely distributed in China. It is a traditional medicinal and edible plant [18, 19], rich in fiber, carotene and mineral elements, and has great nutritional value [20]. A previous study reported that P. frutescens has strong Se accumulation ability from soil [21]. However, the accumulation rate is lower compared with that of other Se hyperaccumulators such as Cardamine hupingshanensis [22] and Cardamine enshiensis [23]. Therefore, the present study sought to explore the effects of ABA on growth and Se absorption characteristics of P. frutescens to improve its Se accumulation ability. The aim of this study was to explore the most effective ABA concentrations in promoting growth and Se uptake of P. frutescens, to provide a basis for P. frutescens production development.

Materials and methods

Materials

P. frutescens seeds were collected from fields around the Ya’an Polytechnic College, located in Yucheng District, Ya’an City, Sichuan Province, China, in October 2020. Seeds were air-dried and stored at 4°C. Inceptisol soil samples (purple soil according to the Genetic Soil Classification of China) were collected from the farmland fields around Ya’an Polytechnic College in February 2021. Basic properties of the soil samples were as follows: pH value, 7.71; organic matter content, 13.45 g/kg; alkaline nitrogen content, 102.35 mg/kg; available phosphorus content, 68.45 mg/kg; available potassium content, 48.49 mg/kg; and total Se content, 0.02 mg/kg.

Experimental design

Pot experiments were conducted at Ya’an Polytechnic College from February 2021 to May 2021. Air-dried, crushed and sieved (5 mm) soil samples (3.0 kg) were placed in a plastic pot of 15 cm × 18 cm (height × diameter) in February 2021. Na2SeO3 solution was added to the soil samples and mixed thoroughly to achieve a final Se concentration at 5 mg/kg [21]. Soil moisture was maintained at 80% of the field capacity for four weeks. Whole and undamaged P. frutescens seeds were selected and placed in an incubator for germination. Four uniform seedlings were transplanted into each pot, after the plants attained three pairs of expanded true leaves. Seedlings were then watered every day to maintain the soil moisture content at 80% of the field capacity until the plants were harvested. Gradient concentrations of ABA solution [0 (the control), 1, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L] were sprayed on the leaves and stems of plants a week after transplantation. Spraying criteria were based on a layer of small water droplets uniformly attached to the leaves during each phase of spraying (about 15 mL solution for each pot). Each treatment was conducted in triplicates. ABA solution [0 (the control), 1, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L] further sprayed a week later after the first spraying phase.

Mature leaves of each plant (the fourth pair of leaves from the top) were collected a month after the first application of ABA. These leaf samples were used to determine content of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid), antioxidant enzyme [superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT)] activity, soluble protein content, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content. Leaf samples were weighed (0.200 g) and soaked in ethanol and acetone at a volume ratio of 1:1 for extraction. A spectrophotometer was then used to measure the absorbance and the content of photosynthetic pigments was determined [24]. Extraction of enzyme solution was performed at 4°C. Fresh leave tissues (1.0 g) were homogenized in 6 mL of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and centrifuged. The supernatant was used for determination of enzyme activity, soluble protein content, and MDA content. SOD activity was determined through nitroblue tetrazolium photoreduction method, POD activity was determined following guaiacol colorimetric method, CAT activity was determined through UV spectrophotometry method, Soluble protein content was determined by Coomassie brilliant blue staining method, and MDA content was determined according to thiobarbital acid described previously [24]. Then the whole plant was harvested, washed with deionized water and dried at 75°C to a constant weight. Biomass (dry weight) of roots, stems, and leaves was determined by electronic balance (precision 0.01g). Dried plant tissues were ground, and were for determination of Se content. Plant samples (0.5 g) were digested with HNO3/HClO4 (4:1, v/v) and Se content determined using ICP spectrometer (iCAP 6300, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Other parameters related to biomass and Se content were determined as follows: shoot biomass = stem biomass + leaf biomass; root/shoot ratio = root biomass/shoot biomass; Se content in shoots = (Se content in stems × stem biomass + Se content in leaves × leaf biomass)/ shoot biomass; Se translocation factor (TF) = Se content in shoots/ Se content in roots [25]; Se extraction = Se content in plant × plant biomass [26]; Se translocation amount factor (TAF) = Se extraction by shoots/Se extraction by roots [27]; Se bioconcentration factor (BCF) = Se content in plant/ Se concentration in soil [25].

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 17.0 software. Differences between groups were determined by one-way ANOVA. The Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was conducted at 95% confidence level. A regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between ABA concentration and biomass, Se content or Se extraction. The relationships among all items were analyzed by Pearson correlation.

Results

Biomass of P. frutescens

The findings showed that use of 1 and 20 μmol/L ABA had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on the root biomass of P. frutescens compared with the control. Administration of 5 and 10 μmol/L ABA significantly increased the root biomass compared with the control (Table 1). Administration of 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L ABA increased the stem, leaf and shoot biomass of P. frutescens, whereas 1 μmol/L ABA had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on the stem, leaf and shoot biomass compared with the control. Administration of ABA at 5 μmol/L, increased the root, stem, leaf and shoot biomass of P. frutescens by 14.52%, 24.88%, 11.50%, and 17.20%, respectively, compared with those of the control. Regression analysis showed that the root biomass had a quadratic polynomial regression relationship with ABA concentration (x: ABA concentration; y: root biomass; y = -0.002x2 + 0.050x + 2.447, R2 = 0.444, P = 0.030), and shoot biomass also had a quadratic polynomial regression relationship with ABA concentration (x: ABA concentration; y: shoot biomass; y = -0.006x2 + 0.134x + 5.091, R2 = 0.684, P = 0.000). Comparison of the effect of ABA treatment on the root/shoot ratio of P. frutescens showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) among the different ABA treatments.

Table 1. Biomass of P. frutescens.

ABA Roots Stems Leaves Shoots Root/shoot ratio
(μmol/L) (g/plant) (g/plant) (g/plant) (g/plant)
0 2.41±0.13c 2.13±0.02d 2.87±0.11c 5.00±0.12c 0.483±0.031a
1 2.48±0.03bc 2.24±0.11cd 2.97±0.02bc 5.21±0.09bc 0.477±0.011a
5 2.76±0.16a 2.66±0.10a 3.20±0.11a 5.86±0.21a 0.470±0.029a
10 2.63±0.13ab 2.47±0.01b 3.17±0.04a 5.64±0.03a 0.466±0.023a
20 2.53±0.02bc 2.31±0.01c 3.09±0.12ab 5.41±0.13b 0.469±0.009a

Different lowercase letters within a column indicate significant differences based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (P < 0.05). Shoot biomass = stem biomass + leaf biomass, root/shoot ratio = root biomass/shoot biomass.

Photosynthetic pigment content of P. frutescens

Treatment with 1, 5, 10, and 20 μmol/L ABA significantly increased the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid in P. frutescens compared with the control (Table 2). Administration of 5 μmol/L ABA increased the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents by 21.45%, 28.00%, 22.97%, and 16.48%, respectively relative to those of the control. Administration of 1, 5, 10, and 20 μmol/L ABA exhibited no significant (P > 0.05) difference in chlorophyll a/b compared with the control.

Table 2. Photosynthetic pigment content in P. frutescens.

ABA Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll b Total chlorophyll Chlorophyll Carotenoid
(μmol/L) (mg/g) (mg/g) (mg/g) a/b (mg/g)
0 3.31±0.09c 1.00±0.02d 4.31±0.11d 3.31±0.10ab 0.704±0.010c
1 3.57±0.08b 1.06±0.03c 4.63±0.10c 3.37±0.11a 0.725±0.022c
5 4.02±0.13a 1.28±0.03a 5.30±0.16a 3.14±0.12b 0.820±0.015a
10 3.92±0.10a 1.25±0.04a 5.17±0.13a 3.13±0.10b 0.787±0.026ab
20 3.72±0.12b 1.20±0.02b 4.92±0.13b 3.11±0.11b 0.771±0.027b

Different lowercase letters within a column indicate significant differences based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (P < 0.05).

Antioxidant enzyme activity, soluble protein content, and MDA content of P. frutescens

Administration of the various concentrations of ABA increased the SOD activity of P. frutescens compared with the control (Table 3). Treatment with 1 μmol/L ABA had no significant (P > 0.05) effects on the POD activity and soluble protein content of P. frutescens compared with the control, while use of 5, 10, and 20 μmol/L ABA increased. Treatment with 1 and 20 μmol/L ABA had no significant (P > 0.05) effects on the CAT activity of P. frutescens compared with the control, while use of 5 and 10 μmol/L ABA increased. Administration of the various concentrations of ABA decreased the MDA content in P. frutescens compared with the control.

Table 3. Antioxidant enzyme activity, soluble protein content, and MDA content of P. frutescens.

ABA SOD activity POD activity CAT activity Soluble protein MDA content
(μmol/L) (U/g) (U/g/min) (U/g/min) content (mg/g) (μmol/kg)
0 152.17±3.74d 119.44±3.70d 6.09±0.23c 37.18±1.22c 7.11±0.14a
1 182.92±2.80c 122.35±9.85d 6.17±0.22bc 37.96±0.88c 6.72±0.24b
5 242.38±5.29a 276.07±11.93a 6.84±0.18a 47.39±1.83a 5.85±0.12c
10 213.84±9.96b 188.19±7.61b 6.44±0.11b 45.77±1.76ab 5.65±0.19c
20 209.64±7.48b 168.54±7.04c 6.31±0.01bc 43.77±1.51b 6.43±0.16b

Different lowercase letters within a column indicate significant differences based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (P < 0.05). SOD: Superoxide dismutase; POD: Peroxidase; CAT: Catalase; MDA: Malondialdehyde.

Se content in P. frutescens

Administration of 5 μmol/L ABA increased Se content in roots and shoots of P. frutescens by 16.10% and 11.30%, respectively, compared with the control. On the contrary, 10 and 20 μmol/L ABA decreased the Se contents in roots and shoots (Table 4). Notably, administration of 1 μmol/L ABA increased the Se contents in roots and had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on the Se contents in shoots compared with the control. Treatment with 1 and 5 μmol/L ABA increased the Se contents in stems of P. frutescens relative to the control, whereas use of 10 and 20 μmol/L ABA had no significant effect (P > 0.05) or decreased. Analysis of Se content in leaves showed that 1 and 5 μmol/L ABA had no significant effects (P > 0.05), whereas treatment with 10 and 20 μmol/L ABA decreased the Se content in leaves. Regression analysis showed that the root Se content had a linear regression relationship with ABA concentration (x: ABA concentration; y: root Se content; y = -0.810x + 65.175, R2 = 0.559, P = 0.001), and the shoot Se content also had a linear regression relationship with ABA concentration (x: ABA concentration; y: shoot Se content; y = -0.362x + 24.413, R2 = 0.721, P = 0.000). The results showed no significant (P > 0.05) differences in the TF of P. frutescens among the different concentrations of ABA.

Table 4. Se content in P. frutescens.

ABA Roots Stems Leaves Shoots TF
(μmol/L) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
0 60.44±1.31c 16.07±0.49c 27.71±1.19a 22.75±0.96b 0.376±0.018a
1 64.52±1.28b 17.94±0.86b 28.94±1.54a 24.20±1.10ab 0.375±0.020a
5 70.17±3.79a 20.17±0.45a 29.61±0.82a 25.32±0.64a 0.362±0.021a
10 52.68±0.93d 16.29±0.50c 22.49±1.28b 19.77±0.91c 0.376±0.021a
20 48.91±1.65e 14.14±0.63d 19.12±0.73c 17.00±0.20d 0.348±0.011a

Different lowercase letters within a column indicate significant differences based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (P < 0.05). Se content in shoots = (Se content in stems × stem biomass + Se content in leaves × leaf biomass)/ shoot biomass, Se translocation factor (TF) = Se content in shoots/ Se content in roots.

BCF of P. frutescens

Administration of 1 and 5 μmol/L ABA increased the root and stem BCFs of P. frutescens relative to the control, whereas other ABA concentrations showed no significant (P > 0.05) effect or decreased (Table 5). The results showed that 1 and 5 μmol/L ABA had no significant (P > 0.05) effects on the leaf BCF compared with the control, whereas use of 10 and 20 μmol/L ABA decreased. Treatment with 5 μmol/L ABA increased the shoot BCF compared with the control, whereas other ABA concentrations had no significant (P > 0.05) effect or decreased.

Table 5. BCF of P. frutescens.

ABA Root BCF Stem BCF Leaf BCF Shoot BCF
(μmol/L)
0 12.09±0.26c 3.21±0.10c 5.54±0.24a 4.55±0.19b
1 12.90±0.26b 3.59±0.17b 5.79±0.31a 4.84±0.22ab
5 14.03±0.76a 4.03±0.09a 5.92±0.16a 5.07±0.13a
10 10.54±0.19d 3.26±0.10c 4.50±0.26b 3.95±0.18c
20 9.78±0.33d 2.83±0.13d 3.82±0.15c 3.40±0.04d

Different lowercase letters within a column indicate significant differences based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (P < 0.05). Se bioconcentration factor (BCF) = Se content in plant/ Se concentration in soil.

Se extraction by P. frutescens

The findings showed that 1 and 5 μmol/L ABA increased the Se extraction by roots of P. frutescens by 9.95%, and 32.43%, respectively, relative to the control, whereas other ABA concentrations had no effect (P > 0.05) significant or decreased (Table 6). Administration of 1, 5, and 10 μmol/L ABA increased the Se extraction by stems relative to the control, whereas use of 20μmol/L ABA showed no significant (P > 0.05) effect. Notably, only 5 μmol/L ABA increased the Se extractions by leaves and shoots by 19.30% and 30.59%, respectively, whereas other ABA concentrations had no significant (P > 0.05) effect or decreased. Regression analysis showed that the root Se extraction had a linear regression relationship with ABA concentration (x: ABA concentration; y: root Se extraction; y = -1.853x + 165.674, R2 = 0.320, P = 0.028), and the shoot Se extraction also had a linear regression relationship with ABA concentration (x: ABA concentration; y: shoot Se extraction; y = -1.648x + 130.249, R2 = 0.381, P = 0.014). The results showed no significant (P > 0.05) differences in the TAF of P. frutescens among the different ABA concentrations.

Table 6. Se extraction by P. frutescens.

ABA Roots Stems Leaves Shoots TAF
(μmol/L) (μg/plant) (μg/plant) (μg/plant) (μg/plant)
0 145.79±4.71c 34.28±1.37c 79.50±6.30bc 113.78±7.61bc 0.781±0.062a
1 160.30±5.28b 40.32±3.99b 85.82±4.05b 126.14±8.04b 0.788±0.061a
5 193.07±2.52a 53.74±3.27a 94.84±5.79a 148.58±9.06a 0.769±0.037a
10 138.60±8.67c 40.25±1.31b 71.26±3.23c 111.52±4.54c 0.807±0.057a
20 123.89±4.20d 32.70±1.36c 59.20±4.61d 91.90±3.24d 0.742±0.020a

Different lowercase letters within a column indicate significant differences based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (P < 0.05). Se extraction = Se content in plant × plant biomass, Se translocation amount factor (TAF) = Se extraction by shoots/Se extraction by roots.

Correlation analyses

Both the root biomass and shoot biomass showed a highly significant (P < 0.01) positive correlation with the chlorophyll a content, chlorophyll b content, total chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, POD activity, SOD activity, CAT activity, and soluble protein content, while showed a highly significant (P < 0.01) negative correlation with the MDA content (Table 7). Both the root Se content and shoot Se content had no significant (P ≥ 0.05) correlation with the indicators of biomass, photosynthetic pigment content, antioxidant enzyme activity, soluble protein content, and MDA content. Both the root Se extraction and shoot Se extraction showed a highly significant (P < 0.01) positive correlation with the root Se content and shoot Se content. The root Se extraction showed a significant (0.05 > P ≥ 0.01) positive correlation with the root biomass, POD activity, and CAT activity, while the shoot Se extraction showed a significant (0.05 > P ≥ 0.01) positive correlation with the POD activity and CAT activity.

Table 7. Correlations among biomass, Se content, Se extraction, photosynthetic pigment content, antioxidant enzyme activity, soluble protein content, and MDA content.

Items Root biomass Shoot biomass Chlorophyll a content Chlorophyll b content Total chlorophyll content Carotenoid content POD activity SOD activity CAT activity Soluble protein content MDA content Root Se content Shoot Se content Root Se extraction Shoot Se extraction
Root biomass 1
Shoot biomass 0.759** 1
Chlorophyll a content 0.785** 0.884** 1
Chlorophyll b content 0.754** 0.901** 0.917** 1
Total chlorophyll content 0.744** 0.919** 0.936** 0.979** 1
Carotenoid content 0.726** 0.834** 0.870** 0.944** 0.930** 1
POD activity 0.718** 0.890** 0.831** 0.845** 0.844** 0.863** 1
SOD activity 0.762** 0.915** 0.921** 0.938** 0.929** 0.888** 0.895** 1
CAT activity 0.732** 0.823** 0.787** 0.772** 0.806** 0.744** 0.876** 0.821** 1
Soluble protein content 0.744** 0.901** 0.899** 0.940** 0.902** 0.840** 0.860** 0.939** 0.798** 1
MDA content -0.676** -0.857** -0.877** -0.850** -0.832** -0.747** -0.761** -0.839** -0.682** -0.868** 1
Root Se content 0.170 0.162 0.023 -0.088 0.020 0.077 0.337 0.096 0.304 -0.093 0.061 1
Shoot Se content 0.170 0.105 -0.019 -0.187 -0.072 -0.059 0.205 0.001 0.255 -0.127 0.095 0.933** 1
Root Se extraction 0.537* 0.440 0.333 0.224 0.313 0.354 0.580* 0.387 0.558* 0.219 -0.212 0.922** 0.862** 1
Shoot Se extraction 0.448 0.482 0.326 0.189 0.296 0.274 0.535* 0.363 0.555* 0.245 -0.242 0.888** 0.921** 0.935** 1

**: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*: Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). N = 15. SOD: Superoxide dismutase; POD: Peroxidase; CAT: Catalase; MDA: Malondialdehyde.

Discussion

Biomass is an important index for determining plant growth. The most direct effect of adversity on plants is to inhibit growth and reduce biomass [28]. ABA promotes the growth of pepper plants under salt stress by increasing the plant height and biomass [29]. Moreover, ABA increases Foeniculum vulgare plant height under cadmium stress [30]. Notably, ABA increases the biomass of the potential cadmium hyperaccumulator Solanum photeinocarpum under cadmium contaminated soil conditions [8], whereas it decreases the biomass of the cadmium hyperaccumulator Bidens pilosa [31]. These findings indicate that ABA has different effects on the growth of various plant species. In the present study, administration of 5 and 10 μmol/L ABA increased the biomass of P. frutescens, whereas 1 μmol/L ABA had no significant effect, which is consistent with findings from previous studies [8, 32]. In addition, regression analysis showed that the ABA concentration had a quadratic polynomial regression relationship with the root biomass and shoot biomass of P. frutescens. These results indicate that ABA promotes the growth of P. frutescens by improving the resistance to soil Se stress [8, 21].

ABA is a hormone involved in regulating senescence of plants. Exogenous ABA accelerates leaf yellowing and chlorophyll degradation by inducing up-regulation of senescence-related genes, thus inducing the senescence of Capsicum annuum leaves under dark culture in vitro [33]. ABA is an important stress hormone in plants that inhibits the production of chlorophyll in perennial Lolium perenne under normal growth, but upregulates the chlorophyll content under drought stress [34]. Moreover, ABA application increases the chlorophyll content in leaves of sweet potato under water stress [35]. Exogenous ABA increases the photosynthetic pigment content in Lycium barbarum under NaCl stress, mainly the carotenoid content [36]. Application of 5, 10, and 20 μmol/L ABA in the current study increased chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents in P. frutescens, whereas 1 μmol/L ABA had no significant effect on all of the photosynthetic pigment contents. These results are consistent with results from previous studies [3436], indicating that ABA increases the photosynthetic pigment content in P. frutescens.

The antioxidant system in plants provides sufficient protection against the reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage under normal physiological conditions. Notably, increase in levels of ROS caused by adversity leads to imbalance of physiological metabolism in plants [37]. Exogenous ABA promotes activities of antioxidant enzymes (CAT, SOD, POD) in wheat to varying degrees, with the most significant effect observed on SOD [38]. In the present study, application of exogenous ABA increased the SOD and POD activities of P. frutescens to some extent, which can be attributed to upregulation of the expression of antioxidant enzyme genes such as Mn-SOD and peroxidase genes by ABA [39]. Notably, only 5 and 10 μmol/L ABA increased the CAT activity of P. frutescens, whereas 1 and 20 μmol/L ABA had no significant effect. This indicates that the effect of ABA on expression of different antioxidant enzyme genes may be different or multi-layered [40]. Soluble protein content plays an important osmoregulatory role in plant cells. It plays a key role in maintaining the structure and function of cells under stress conditions, as well as plays a stabilizing and protective role on the structure and function of biological macromolecules [38]. In the current study, 5, 10 and 20 μmol/L ABA increased the soluble protein content in P. frutescens, whereas 1 μmol/L ABA had no significant effect, which is consistent with findings from a previous study [41]. This indicates that ABA induces formation of soluble proteins in P. frutescens. MDA is one of the products of membrane lipid peroxidation. It combines with proteins in the cell membrane resulting in cross-linking and polymerization of protein molecules [42] and accelerates degradation of chlorophyll [43]. MDA content is an important sign of stress damage to plants [44]. In the present study, ABA decreased the MDA content in P. frutescens, indicating that ABA effectively reduced membrane lipid peroxidation in P. frutescens and alleviated damage of the cell membrane. These findings indicate that ABA may improve resistance of P. frutescens to soil Se stress by increasing the antioxidant enzyme activity and reducing the membrane lipid peroxidation.

Absorption of Se by plants mainly depends on the environmental conditions, soil factors and the type of plants [45]. Selenite can be directly used by plants [46]. In the present study, 5 μmol/L ABA increased all of the Se content, BCF, and Se extraction of P. frutescens, whereas 1, 10, and 20 μmol/L ABA decreased or had no significant effect. These results are similar to the results on the effects of ABA on cadmium content and cadmium accumulation in Bidens pilosa reported previously [31]. In addition, regression analysis showed that the ABA concentration had a linear regression relationship with the root Se content, shoot Se content, root Se extraction, and shoot Se extraction of P. frutescens. Correlation analyses also showed the Se extraction had significant correlation with the POD activity, CAT activity, and Se content. This implies that only the appropriate concentration (5 μmol/L) of ABA could promote the Se uptake and accumulation in P. frutescens, and the antioxidant enzyme activity could play an important role in the Se uptake and accumulation. However, the Se absorption mechanism of P. frutescens should be explored further. In the current study, use of different concentrations of ABA had no significant effects on TF and TAF of P. frutescens, indicating that ABA could not affect the Se transportation from roots to shoots of P. frutescens. The main reason may be that most of the selenite is converted to organic Se compounds and remains in plant roots. Therefore, only low amounts of Se are transported to plant shoots [47, 48].

Conclusions

Application of 5 and 10 μmol/L ABA promoted the growth of P. frutescens as indicated by increase in biomass and photosynthetic pigment content. In addition, these concentrations of ABA improved the resistance of P. frutescens against ROS by increasing the SOD, POD activity and soluble protein content, with 5 μmol/L ABA showing the most significant effect. Administration of 5 μmol/L ABA increased Se content, Se accumulation and BCF of P. frutescens. This implies that 5 μmol/L ABA can be used to promote the growth of P. frutescens as well as the Se uptake and accumulation in P. frutescens.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(XLS)

Abbreviations

ABA

Abscisic acid

BCF

Bioconcentration factor

CAT

Catalase

MDA

Malondialdehyde

POD

Peroxidase

Se

Selenium

SOD

Superoxide dismutase

TAF

Translocation accumulation factor

TF

Translocation facto

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Hamilton SJ Review of selenium toxicity in the aquatic food chain. Science of the Total Environment. 2004;326(1–3):1–31. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tapiero H, Townsend DM, Tew KD. The antioxidant role of selenium and seleno-compounds. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2003;57(3–4):134–144. doi: 10.1016/s0753-3322(03)00035-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wen MX, Wu SH, Wang P, Huang B. Effect of foliar selenium supplement on selenium content in Citrus. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences. 2021;62(4):774–776, 783. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yu SW, Chen HY, Zhen XQ, Fan TY, Ma DG, Yan C, et al. Progress of genetic research on selenium content in rice. Crops. 2010;26(2):6–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li YG, Dong YX, Zhen J, Xie HS, Song MY. The transport and transformation of selenium in the soil-paddy plant system affected by geological factors. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration. 2007;31(1):77–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu QL, Mao SF, Qin ZH. Total synthesis research of abscisic acid. Chemistry Bulletin. 2004;67(10): 729–736. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang YP, Li L, Ye TT, Lu YM, Chen X, Wu Y. The inhibitory effect of ABA on floral transition is mediated by ABI5 in Arabidops. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2013;64(2):675–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang J, Lin LJ, Luo L, Liao MA, Lv XL, Wang ZH, et al. The effects of abscisic acid (ABA) addition on cadmium accumulation of two ecotypes of Solanum photeinocarpum. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2016;188(3):182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:571. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang Y, Ma F, Li M, Liang D, Zou J. Physiological responses of kiwifruit plants to exogenous ABA under drought conditions. Plant Growth Regulation. 2011;64(1):63–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Karimi R, Ershadi A, Rezaei Nejad A, Khanizadeh S. Abscisic acid alleviates the deleterious effects of cold stress on ‘Sultana’ grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) plants by improving the anti-oxidant activity and photosynthetic capacity of leaves. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 2016;91(4): 386–395. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li B, Liu HJ, Lin H, Li H, Yang Z. Effects of ABA on soda saline-alkali osmotic regulation and oxidative damage of alfalfa seedlings. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science). 2019;34(4):689–694. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao XM, Ou C, Zhang YL, Yang LM, Xu M, Wang QQ, et al. Effects of abscisic acid on ion absorption and photosynthesis of Toona sinensis seedlings under salt stress. Journal of Northeast Forestry University. 2020;48(8): 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li B, Wu TT, Fang ZJ, Li H, Yang Z. Effects of ABA on mineral elements in vegetative organs of alfalfa seedlings under mixed soda salt-alkaline stress. Acta Agrestia Sinica. 2019;27(6): 331–337. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rubio MI, Escrig I, Martínez-Cortina C, López-Benet FJ, Sanz A. Cadmium and nickel accumulation in rice plants. Effects on mineral nutrition and possible interactions of abscisic and gibberellic acids. Plant Growth Regulation. 1994;14(2): 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Qian HS, Chen YH, Wang GP, Shen ZG. Cadmium accumulation and effect of exogenous abscisic acid on cadmium accumulation in cadmium treated Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis L. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University. 2008;31(4): 61–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ma QQ, Liu CY, Shi J, Lin LJ, Liao MA. Effects of spraying abscisic acid on growth and cadmium accumulation in accumulator plant Stellaria media. Chinese Journal of Soil Science. 2016;47(4): 992–997. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu SN, Chen N, Zheng XY, Xiao QT, Wang DF, Wang YJ, et al. Effects of planting density, fertilization and planting methods on lead accumulation ability of Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science). 2020;49(3): 399–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tan ML, Yan MF, Wang L, Wang LJ, Yan XC. Research progress on Perilla frutescens. Chinese Journal of Oil Crops Sciences. 2012;34(2): 225–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang MF, Guo L, Zhen J, Jiang Y. Research advance of Perilla frutescens. China Food Additives. 2007;18(4): 85–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liao RY. Selenium accumulation characteristics of Perilla frutescens. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2018;199(4):20–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yuan LX, Zhu YY, Lin ZQ, Banuelos G, Li W, Yin XB. A novel selenocystine-accumulating plant in selenium-mine drainage area in Enshi, China. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(6): e65615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cui L, Zhao J, Chen J, Zhang W, Gao Y, Li Ba, et al. Translocation and transformation of selenium in hyperaccumulator plant Cardamine enshiensis from Enshi, Hubei, China. Plant and Soil. 2018;425: 577–588. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hao ZB, Cang J, Xu Z. Plant physiology experiment. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rastmanesh F, Moore F, Keshavarzi B. Speciation and phytoavailability of heavy metals in contaminated soils in Sarcheshmeh area, Kerman Province, Iran. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2010;85(5): 515–519. doi: 10.1007/s00128-010-0149-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang XF, Xia HP, Li ZA, Zhuang P, Gao B. Potential of four forage grasses in remediation of Cd and Zn contaminated soils. Bioresource Technology. 2010;101(6): 2063–2066. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nie FH. New comprehensions of hyperaccumulator. Ecological Environment. 2005;14(1): 136–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qiao L, Sheng DF, Deng Y. Effect of Cu, Zn, Fe and Pb pollution on the fresh weight and chlorophyll content of cabbage seedling. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences. 2010;37(2): 34–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tang RS, Huang YH, Tang XH, Zhong Y, Yu YZ, Tong HY. Effects of microorganism-sourced ABA on the growth and some physiological indexes of pepper seedling under salt stress. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2009;25(4): 856–860. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen MW, Lai B, Xiao YH, He JM. Effect of ABA on fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) growth and cadmium accumulation under cadmium stress. Journal of Shaoguan University. 2019;40(3): 67–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu L, Ma QQ, Lin LJ, Tang Y, Wang J, Lv XL, et al. Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on cadmium accumulation in two ecotypes of hyperaccumulator Bidens pilosa. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 2017;36(6): 1643–1649. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li Y, Yu XJ, Zhao YS, Wang L, Peng Z. Effects of seed soaking with salicylic acid and abscisic acid on seed germination and seedling growth of Medicago ruthenica at low temperature. Acta Agrestia Sinica. 2021;29(1): 174–181. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xiao HJ, Liu KK, Ma YB, Gong ZH. Physiological and biochemical changes during leaf senescence under the regulation of exogenous ABA in Capsicum annuum L. Journal of Henan Agricultural University. 2019;53(3): 357–364. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu Z, Ren J, Tian Y, Mi N. Effects of exogenous ABA on photosynthetic characteristics of Lolium perenne under drought stress. Acta Agrestia Sinica. 2019;27(5): 1243–1249. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li H, Xie BT, Feng XY, Wang BQ, Dong SX. Effects of exogenous ABA on physiological characteristics of seedlings under water stress in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam). Shandong Agricultural Sciences. 2021;53(1): 32–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mao GL, Xu X, Xie YJ. Effects of exogenous ABA on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence induction characteristics of Lycium barbarum seedlings under NaCl stress. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences. 2005;33(6): 111–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang BS. Biological free radicals and membrane damage of plants. Plant Physiology Communications. 1988;38(2): 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li XM, Chen Q, Wang LL, Hao L. Effects of abscisic acid on photosynthesis and antioxidant enzymes in wheat seedling. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Natural Science). 2006;24(2): 221–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Guo WL, Chen RG, Gong ZH, Yin YX, Ahmed SS, He YM. Exogenous abscisic acid increases antioxidant enzymes and related gene expression in pepper (Capsicum annuum) leaves subjected to chilling stress. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2012;11(4): 4063–4080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu SC, Ding HD, Lu R, Shi B, Ma FF. Study on effects of ABA in antioxidant defense of plant cells. Journal of China Agricultural University. 2008;13(2): 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Si QY, Zhang KY, Gong N, Wang DJ. Influence of abscisic acid on expression of soluble protein in Anoectochilus roxburghii. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences. 2011;39(2): 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huff A. Peroxides-catalysed oxidation of chlorophyll by hydrogen peroxide. Phytochemistry. 1982;21(2): 261–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Upham BL, Jahnke LS. Photooxidative reactions in chloroplast thylakoids: Evidence for a Fenton-type reaction promoted by superoxide or ascorbate. Photosynthesis Research. 1986;8(3): 235–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Alexieva V, Sergiev I, Mapelli S, Karanov E. The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2001;24(12): 1337–1344. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen SC, Sun GX, Chen Z, Chen FL, Zhu YG. Progress on selenium metabolism and interaction with heavy metals in higher plants. Plant Physiology Journal. 2014;50(5): 612–624. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Guignardi Z, Schiavon M. Biochemistry of plant selenium uptake and metabolism. Springer International Publishing, New York, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li HF, McGrath SP, Zhao FJ. Selenium uptake, translocation and speciation in wheat supplied with selenate or selenite. New Phytologist. 2008;178(1): 92–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02343.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Keskinen R, Turakainen M, Hartikainen H. Plant availability of soil selenate additions and selenium distribution within wheat and ryegrass. Plant and Soil. 2010;333(1–2): 301–313. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mayank Gururani

23 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-20189Effects of abscisic acid on growth and selenium uptake in medicinal plant Perilla frutescensPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liao,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 29th August 2022. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Well-designed and carried out research work has yielded beautiful and even useful and timely results for practice. Its main goals (see 2 p./26-27.) were achieved by the work. In addition, it has been demonstrated that „ABA may improve resistance of P. frutescens to soil Se stress by increasing antioxidant enzyme activity and reducing membrane lipid peroxidation.”

MS uses a relatively large number of abbreviations (ABA, SOD, POD, CAT, MDA, TF, TAF, BCF). Each of them receives an explanation at the first time of their application, but in different parts of the MS. Therefore, it may be suggested to create an Abbreviations chapter after the Keywords chapter, before the Introduction chapter. The inscriptions in Table 3 and Table 7 do not include explanations of abbreviations.

Ad 2 p. 27:

Please clarify the following thought/sentence: "to provide a basis for P. frutescens production. (production development ?, ?).

Letter and character errors:

ad 2nd p./ 24 (Corrected by Liao, 2018)

ad 2nd p./ 24 (Correct: Thlaspi arvense)

ad 12 p./ 5.

ad 13 p./ 16.

give. p. 13/ 13.

ad 14 p./ 7.

The Latin phrase Per capita (ad 1 p./29), as a text in a foreign language, is recommended to be highlighted, written in italics.

Literature:

It is recommended to distinguish between the two Li et al., 2019 citations (for example: a, with b notations)

They are included in the literature, but there is no citation in the text for the following two articles: Liu et al., 2009; Yi et al., 2020

Guignardi et Schiavon (2017): place of publication? (Cham?)

Latin name to highlight: p. 12 / 19.; 13. p./ 2 (chinensis)

Shao et al. citation does not seem complete.

Twice-featured citation: Wang et al., 2016.

Zhang et al. (2021) citation correct? In internet searches, the reviewer could not find it.

Reviewer #2: The tasks set correspond to the objectives of the study. The presented data allow us to assess the reliability of the work. The study was conducted qualitatively, but I think that such a result is expected. Concentrations of ABA can enhance the adaptation of plants to drought by inhibiting growth processes. Therefore, the authors did not receive a significant increase in growth characteristics. It would be interesting to consider the mechanism affecting the absorption of selenium. The research is interesting, but its significance is small. The work can be published because it may be of interest to young scientists.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Dr. Oksana Belous, Head of the Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry of the Subtropical Scientific Center (Sochi, Russia)

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0275813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275813.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


10 Sep 2022

Reviewers' comments:

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Well-designed and carried out research work has yielded beautiful and even useful and timely results for practice. Its main goals (see 2 p./26-27.) were achieved by the work. In addition, it has been demonstrated that „ABA may improve resistance of P. frutescens to soil Se stress by increasing antioxidant enzyme activity and reducing membrane lipid peroxidation.”

Thank you for your reviewing.

MS uses a relatively large number of abbreviations (ABA, SOD, POD, CAT, MDA, TF, TAF, BCF). Each of them receives an explanation at the first time of their application, but in different parts of the MS. Therefore, it may be suggested to create an Abbreviations chapter after the Keywords chapter, before the Introduction chapter. The inscriptions in Table 3 and Table 7 do not include explanations of abbreviations.

We have added the Abbreviations section, and the abbreviations are also added in Table 3 and Table 7.

Ad 2 p. 27:

Please clarify the following thought/sentence: "to provide a basis for P. frutescens production. (production development ?, ?).

It should be production development. We have revised.

Letter and character errors:

ad 2nd p./ 24 (Corrected by Liao, 2018)

ad 2nd p./ 24 (Correct: Thlaspi arvense)

ad 12 p./ 5.

ad 13 p./ 16.

give. p. 13/ 13.

ad 14 p./ 7.

We have revised.

The Latin phrase Per capita (ad 1 p./29), as a text in a foreign language, is recommended to be highlighted, written in italics.

We have revised.

Literature:

It is recommended to distinguish between the two Li et al., 2019 citations (for example: a, with b notations)

We have revised.

They are included in the literature, but there is no citation in the text for the following two articles: Liu et al., 2009; Yi et al., 2020

We have deleted them.

Guignardi et Schiavon (2017): place of publication? (Cham?)

New York, USA. We have added.

Latin name to highlight: p. 12 / 19.; 13. p./ 2 (chinensis)

We have revised.

Shao et al. citation does not seem complete.

It may be the wrong citation. We have replaced by “Cui L, Zhao J, Chen J, Zhang W, Gao Y, Li Ba, Li YF (2018) Translocation and transformation of selenium in hyperaccumulator plant Cardamine enshiensis from Enshi, Hubei, China. Plant and Soil 425: 577-588. ”

Twice-featured citation: Wang et al., 2016.

We have deleted onr.

Zhang et al. (2021) citation correct? In internet searches, the reviewer could not find it.

It may be the wrong citation. We have replaced by “Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J (2016) Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:571.”

Reviewer #2: The tasks set correspond to the objectives of the study. The presented data allow us to assess the reliability of the work. The study was conducted qualitatively, but I think that such a result is expected. Concentrations of ABA can enhance the adaptation of plants to drought by inhibiting growth processes. Therefore, the authors did not receive a significant increase in growth characteristics. It would be interesting to consider the mechanism affecting the absorption of selenium. The research is interesting, but its significance is small. The work can be published because it may be of interest to young scientists.

Thank you for your reviewing.

Attachment

Submitted filename: review.doc

Decision Letter 1

Mayank Gururani

26 Sep 2022

Effects of abscisic acid on growth and selenium uptake in medicinal plant Perilla frutescens

PONE-D-22-20189R1

Dear Dr. Liao,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author is to be thanked for accepting all the criticisms and suggestions of the reviewers.

The reviewer checked the changes indicated in the author's answer and found them to be in order.

These, including the new references, significantly increase the quality of the manuscript.

Some further minor formal errors:

- ad p. 11/19: correctly Arabidopsis.

-there is a space before the page numbers or there is no space (not uniform).

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Mayank Gururani

28 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-20189R1

Effects of abscisic acid on growth and selenium uptake in medicinal plant Perilla frutescens

Dear Dr. Liao:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES