Abstract
Introduction
Staphylococcus infection-associated glomerulonephritis (SAGN), is an autoimmune sequela of infection affecting a subset of infected patients without specific predictive factors, frequently presenting with acute nephritic syndrome and propensity for chronic kidney disease. We performed a comparative genotypic and phenotypic analysis of S. aureus isolates from patients that did and those that did not develop SAGN.
Methods
We had 22 culture-proven cases of SAGN from Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) from 2004 to 2016, 9 of 22 being blood cultures, with archived isolates. These, along with blood culture isolates from 12 patients with no clinical evidence of SAGN (between ages 40 to 80 years) over the same period were used for genotyping. For host demographic comparison, we used all available SAGN cases (n = 85, including those with positive cultures other than blood; and patients with kidney biopsies received from referring hospitals) and all OSUWMC patients with positive Staphylococcus cultures without glomerulonephritis (GN) (n = 23,496).
Results
Multiple sequence types (STs) suggesting strain diversity was seen in the GN isolates with mainly clonal complexes (CC) 5 and 59. Mutations in the agr operon were identified in significantly higher number of the GN isolates (83%) than non-GN isolates (16%). Significant differences in β-hemolysis and biofilm formation was also observed between the groups.
Conclusion
The functionality of these agr mutants remains to be seen, but the presently known effects of reduced agr function, namely increased surface adhesins, biofilm formation, and persistent bacteremia could be important microbial factors predisposing to SAGN and testing for them early during infection could help to predict its development.
Keywords: bacterial isolates, biofilm assay, hemolysis, MRSA, SAGN, whole genome sequencing
Graphical abstract
Since the 1960s, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged globally as a leading cause of healthcare and community-associated infections.1, 2, 3, 4 In a subset of patients with infection, autoimmune sequelae can develop, particularly SAGN or toxic-shock syndrome.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Our study focuses on characterizing microbial genotypes and host demographic characteristics in SAGN.
SAGN usually affects the middle age to elderly with associated comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, artificial heart valves, invasive central lines, other prosthetic and orthopedic devices, post-surgery or multiple trauma, or i.v. drug abuse.6, 7, 8, 9 Interestingly, the infection is usually extrarenal. Patients often require prolonged supportive care for acute kidney injury, and extended course of antibiotics (and in some cases surgical treatment for endocarditis or heart valvular abscess and infected limbs in patients with diabetes). Avoidance of immunosuppressive drugs is important despite presence of active GN, making SAGN a unique form of GN. The time period between onset of infection and onset or presentation of GN can be variable but without a definite infection-free latent period in between.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Interestingly, only a subset of patients with infection develop this complication, even among the elderly patients with comorbidities. Although, Staphylococcal enterotoxins and superantigens are thought to play a role in pathogenesis,5 there are no known predictive markers, particularly microbial factors.
This is a retrospective exploratory study done in 2 parts. The first part involves comparing host demographic features and selected laboratory parameters between patients with SAGN and S. aureus infected patients without SAGN. The second part involves genotyping and phenotyping of archived S. aureus blood culture isolates of patients that did and those that did not develop SAGN, to look for potential differences, using whole genome sequencing (WGS) and in vitro functional assays. The bacteriologic study was limited to archived isolates from blood culture specimens from our institution alone. Host demographic study was done on a much larger patient cohort, including those who had positive cultures other than blood and patients from multiple referring hospitals whose kidney biopsies were sent to OSUWMC for diagnosis.
Methods
Patient Demographics
Over a 13-year period (2004–2016), we identified a total of 85 cases from our biopsy database (Figure 1), with a definitive diagnosis of SAGN,7,8 according to diagnostic criteria described before.9 These included patients managed in our medical center, OSUWMC, and patients whose biopsies were received at OSUWMC Renal Pathology Division from multiple referring hospitals across the United States for diagnostic workup. As a comparison group, we identified patients from OSUWMC between 2008 to 2011, with positive Staphylococcus cultures, but no clinical evidence of SAGN, using OSUWMC Information Warehouse. We identified 23,496 unique patients with a total of 27,777 positive Staphylococcus culture results (mainly S. aureus and few S. epidermidis, including blood and/or other specimen types). Demographic parameters (age and sex) were statistically compared for this entire cohort of GN (n = 85) and non-GN (n = 23,496) patients. Spectrum of infections and host comorbidities have been extensively described in previous studies by our group and others, therefore not elaborated here.5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Figure 1.
Flowchart showing total number of patients with and without GN and those available for genotyping studies. GN, glomerulonephritis; SAGN, Staphylococcus infection-associated glomerulonephritis.
This study was approved by The Ohio State University Internal Review Board (IRB 2017H0081; IRB 2020H0557); (MTA 2021-1330; MTA 2017-2292).
Laboratory Parameters
Routinely tested laboratory parameters were retrospectively assessed to determine if these showed any significant differences between the GN and non-GN infected patients. These included serum creatinine, and total and differential white blood cell counts from 2 different time points, at the time of first microbiological culture and then 2 weeks following initial culture (ranged from 10 to 20 days). The 2-week cutoff was arbitrary, but it helped to capture the trends during the hospital stay. The parameters were also recorded on the day of the biopsy along with the timing of biopsy (Table 1). This data was available only on patients admitted and managed at OSUWMC (22 of 85; as indicated in Figure 1), and were retrieved by retrospective electronic chart review. For the comparison group, we retrieved similar data for 96 patients from the non-GN cohort, for whom laboratory data at the required time points was available (detailed data not shown, only statistical comparisons shown). To minimize bias, we selected patients between 40 and 70 years age group, including males and females, similar to the age prevalence among patients with SAGN (Supplementary Table S1). Low serum C3 is known to occur in a subset of patients with SAGN,6, 7, 8, 9 but these were not routinely tested in patients without GN, therefore not studied here.
Table 1.
Total and differential WBC counts and serum creatinine levels of in-house patients with SAGN (N = 22)
| On day of culture |
2 weeks post culture date |
On the day of the kidney biopsy |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total WBC count/ul | PMNs % | Lymphocytes % | Serum Creatinine mg/dl | Total WBC count/ul | PMNs % | Lymphocytes % | Serum Creatinine mg/dl | Timing of biopsy in relation to 2 wk interval | Total WBC count/ul | PMNs % | Lymphocytes % | Serum Creatinine mg/dl | |
| 1 | 10,000 | 73.5 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 3500 | 86.8 | 6.6 | 7.3 | after | 3400 | 60.9 | 20.6 | 2.1 |
| 2 | 19700 | 80.3 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 10800 | 65.1 | 21.6 | 1.5 | after | 6100 | 54.3 | 30.5 | 6.1 |
| 3 | 8100 | 74.9 | 12.3 | 1.2 | 7400 | 75.5 | 13.6 | 1.0 | after | 9600 | 75.7 | 12.2 | 3.4 |
| 4 | 8500 | 73.2 | 14.5 | 0.8 | 6900 | 82.8 | 8.9 | 0.6 | after | 15100 | 91.6 | 3.2 | 1.9 |
| 5 | 19000 | 87.5 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 9500 | 62.7 | 24.9 | 1.4 | after | 11400 | 80.3 | 8.4 | 2.0 |
| 6 | 11600 | 70.7 | 13.9 | 1.1 | 8000 | 74 | 17.9 | 2.1 | after | 6400 | 54.6 | 29.6 | 3.6 |
| 7 | 16000 | 89.1 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 24000 | 80.1 | 9.7 | 2.3 | after | 12800 | 81.1 | 6.6 | 3.2 |
| 8 | 8200 | 76 | 14 | 1.2 | 7200 | 75.8 | 13.7 | 1.1 | after | 9900 | 82.1 | 8.1 | 4.3 |
| 9 | 41400 | 81 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 9500 | 77.3 | 6.0 | 2.8 | after | 7700 | 77.3 | 6.0 | 2.6 |
| 10 | 8300 | 68.1 | 15.5 | 1.0 | 6000 | 63.4 | 18.9 | 1.3 | after | 6100 | 60.6 | 19.6 | 4.8 |
| 11 | 17,300 | 90.7 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 9700 | 69.6 | 16.0 | 4.1 | between | 10,000 | 83.9 | 7.7 | 4.0 |
| 12 | 8700 | 73.3 | 17.6 | 1.7 | 9400 | 67.9 | 22.1 | 1.9 | between | 8800 | 61.7 | 20.4 | 2.0 |
| 13 | 5400 | 53.9 | 28.1 | 3.6 | 3600 | 54.2 | 25.0 | 3.9 | between | 3700 | 40.2 | 31.9 | 3.6 |
| 14 | 15,400 | 84.1 | 8.0 | 0.6 | 32700 | 88.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | between | 30,400 | 93.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 15 | 17,900 | 77.7 | 13.0 | 0.9 | 7900 | 67.6 | 18.5 | 1.9 | between | 9600 | 77.4 | 12.7 | 2.2 |
| 16 | 5200 | 49 | 26.0 | 3.8 | 8700 | 64 | 18.6 | 5.8 | between | 7000 | 61.3 | 23.7 | 5.6 |
| 17 | 10800 | 76.9 | 12.2 | 9.5 | 8000 | 73.6 | 13.3 | 6.5 | between | 10300 | 76.2 | 12.2 | 6.0 |
| 18 | 8900 | 92 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 8500 | 77.2 | 11.8 | 3.9 | between | 10800 | 78.2 | 12.3 | 6.7 |
| 19 | 4200 | 51.5 | 31.4 | 4.6 | 5700 | 62.9 | 21.4 | 6.8 | between | 3900 | 62.9 | 21.4 | 6.9 |
| 20 | 12600 | 71.5 | 13.8 | 4.8 | 5400 | 42.5 | 32.1 | 4.0 | between | 6600 | 47.3 | 30.3 | 5.0 |
| 21 | 25830 | 76.7 | 10.6 | 1.5 | 12480 | 81.2 | 9.2 | 6.2 | between | 14130 | 78.5 | 8.1 | 6.6 |
| 22 | 15000 | 85.1 | 6.8 | 4.4 | 6200 | 74.4 | 9.5 | 1.8 | before | 6200 | 74.4 | 9.5 | 1.8 |
WBC, white blood cell; SAGN, Staphylococcus infection-associated glomerulonephritis.
Bacteriologic Study
As shown in Figure 1, 9 of the 22 OSUWMC patients with SAGN had positive blood cultures and per OSUMC protocol, their isolates had been preserved as glycerol stocks and were available for this study (SAGT-13–SAGT-21; Table 2). Wound, skin, or respiratory cultures are not routinely archived and were unavailable for the study. S. aureus blood culture isolates of 12 patients from the non-GN patient cohort were used as comparator group (SAGT-1–SAGT-12; Table 2). Criteria for the comparator group included absence of clinical features of GN (hematuria and proteinuria), similar spectrum of infections, patient age mainly in the 40 to 70 years group, and date of culture during the same years as the 9 GN isolates (2014–2016). The archived isolates were plated on blood agar and incubated for 24 hours. A second subculture was performed on day 2 on tube agar. After allowing growth for 24 hours, they were sent for genotyping studies, and a similar batch for in vitro functional assays. Two of the archived isolates (SAGT-15 and SAGT-19) unfortunately were not available for testing (disposed after a certain time period as per regulations of the Clinical Microbiology laboratory). One isolate (SAGT-16) developed contamination and was excluded, leaving 6 of 9 SAGN isolates for the genotypic and phenotypic analysis.
Table 2.
Cases with archived blood culture isolatessite of infection, other comorbidities, renal function, urinalysis findings at the time of culture (or kidney biopsy for patients with GN) and at follow-up
| S. aureus isolates | SAGN | WGS SeqName | Age | Sex | Race | DM type II | Type of infection | Other comorbidities | Blood culture | S. cr. at culture or biopsy | Urine protein | Urine RBCs per hpf | Follow-up S. cr. | Follow-up duration | Status at follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAGT-1 | Absent | AG21-0302 | 63 | M | C | Yes | Osteomyelitis | T9 paraplegia, neurogenic bladder | MRSA | 0.4 | Neg | 1 to 2 | 0.3 | 4 years | Deceased |
| SAGT-2 | Absent | AG21-0303 | 61 | M | C | No | Bacteremia | RLL NSCLC, right thoracotomy, chylothorax | MRSA | 0.7 | Neg | 1 to 2 | 1.03 | 7 years | Living |
| SAGT-3 | Absent | AG21-0304 | 64 | M | C | Yes | Mitral endocarditis | Valve abscess with perforation | MRSA | 1.3 | 30 mg/dL | 0 to 2 | 2.8 | <1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-4 | Absent | AG21-0305 | 69 | M | C | No | Cellulitis perineal | None | MRSA | 1.3 | Trace | 3 to 5 | 1.3 | <1 year | Living |
| SAGT-5 | Absent | AG21-0306 | 40 | F | C | Yes | Epidural abscess | IVDU, Hep C positive | MRSA | 0.4 | 30 mg/dL | Trace | 1.8 | 1 year | Living |
| SAGT-6 | Absent | AG21-0307 | 74 | M | C | No | Pneumonia | Esophageal stricture | MRSA | 1.2 | Neg | Absent | 0.9 | <1 year | Living |
| SAGT-7 | Absent | AG21-0308 | 49 | M | C | Yes | Pneumonia | MVA, cardiac arrest, acute encephalopathy | MRSA | 0.5 | Neg | 0 to 2 | 0.4 | <1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-8 | Absent | AG21-0309 | 68 | M | C | No | Pneumonia | Brain diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | MRSA | 0.5 | 30 mg/dL | 3 to 5 | 0.3 | <1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-9 | Absent | AG21-0310 | 48 | F | C | No | Bacteremia | AML, chemotherapy, neutropenia fever | MRSA | 1.4 | 100 mg/dL | 0 to 2 | 0.7 | 2 years | Deceased |
| SAGT-10 | Absent | AG21-0311 | 70 | M | C | No | Pneumonia | None | MSSA | 1.1 | Neg | 0 to 2 | 1.4 | <1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-11 | Absent | AG21-0312 | 52 | F | AA | No | Infected PICC line | Crohn’s on TPN, enterocutaneous fistulas | MSSA | 0.6 | Neg | 0 to 2 | 0.7 | 1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-12 | Absent | AG21-0313 | 30 | M | C | No | Osteomyelitis, psoas abscess | GSW, paraplegia, DVT with filter | MRSA | 0.4 | Neg | 0 to 2 | 0.7 | <1 year | Living |
| SAGT-13 | Present | AG21-034 | 60 | M | C | Yes | Pneumonia | Prosthetic knee joint, morbid obesity | MRSA | 6.1 | 100 mg/dL | >50 | 1.2 | 7 years | Living |
| SAGT-14 | Present | AG21-0315 | 50 | M | C | Yes | Sternal wound infection | None | MRSA | 6 | 14 g/g | >20 | 2 | <1 year | Living |
| SAGT-17 | Present | AG21-0316 | 49 | M | C | No | Tricuspid endocarditis | IVDU | MSSA | 6.7 | 300 mg/dL | >20 | 5.1 | 1 year | Living; dialysis |
| SAGT-18 | Present | AG21-0317 | 63 | M | C | Yes | Septic arthritis | Urothelial cancer, cystectomy | MRSA | 4.8 | 11.5 g/g | >20 | 3.8 | 1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-20 | Present | AG21-0318 | 61 | M | C | No | Oral periapical abscess | None | MSSA | 6.5 | 100 mg/dL | >20 | 0.7 | <1 year | Living |
| SAGT-21 | Present | AG21-0319 | 49 | M | C | No | Septic arthritis | Enterocutaneous fistula, cavitary lung lesions | MSSA | 1 | Trace | 20 | 0.8 | <1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-15 | Present | No WGS | 47 | M | C | No | Multiple wounds | MVA | MRSA | 1.9 | 1.2 g/g | >50 | 3.7 | <1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-16 | Present | No WGS | 25 | M | C | No | Mitral, aortic endocarditis | IVDU, Hep C, also grew Enterococcus faecalis | MRSA | 7.8 | 30 mg/dL | >20 | 0.8 | 1 year | Deceased |
| SAGT-19 | Present | No WGS | 39 | F | C | No | Tricuspid endocarditis | IVDU, multiple abscesses, Hep C | MRSA | 4.9 | 6.6 g/g | >20 | 4.8 | <1 year | Living; dialysis |
AG21, WGS sampling numbering; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; GSW, gunshot wound; Hep C, hepatitis C; hpf, high power field; IVDU, i.v. drug use; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; MVA, motor vehicle accident; S. Cr., serum creatinine; SAGT, staphylococcal isolates; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; WGS, whole genome sequencing.
Whole Genome Sequencing
WGS was performed at the Ohio Department of Agriculture which maintains an ISO 17025-accredited WGS program for bacteria isolates. GalaxyTrakr, a distributed analysis tool for WGS data was utilized to assess the quality, taxonomy, and possible contamination of each sample. The GalaxyTrakr MicroRunQC workflow was used to check WGS sequence quality, following the protocol available within the US Food and Drug Administration GenomeTrakr protocols.io workspace (https://www.protocols.io/view/assessing-sequence-quality-in-galaxytrakr-bdvfi63n)12, 13, 14, 15 (Supplementary Methods).
WGS Data Analysis
A total of 18 paired end sequences were available for the WGS study (SAGN n = 6; non-SAGN n = 12; Table 3). Prealignment quality control with Fastqc (quality control tool for high throughput sequencing data) showed no quality issues and no adapter content. We used Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC) to perform comprehensive genome analysis, including assembly, annotation, and phylogenetic tree generation. Assembly was performed using unicycler and annotation with rapid annotation using subsystem technology (Supplemental Methods).
Table 3.
Isolates mapped to sequence type, clonal complex and closest complete reference genomes after comprehensive genome analysis
| Isolates | Date of culture | SeqName | Species | SAGN | ST | CC | SCCmec | agr type | agr mutants/WT | Variant calls Staphylococcus aureus JE2 | Variant calls S. aureus N315 | Variant calls S. aureus AR475 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAGT-1 | 9/10/2013 | AG21-0302 | MRSA | Absent | 8 | 8 | IV | I | WT | 227 | 18,395 | 34,367 |
| SAGT-2 | 12/18/12 | AG21-0303 | MRSA | Absent | 105 | 5 | II | II | WT | 19260 | 1101 | 34,558 |
| SAGT-3 | 1/3/2015 | AG21-0304 | MRSA | Absent | 8 | 8 | IV | I | WT | 138 | 18,964 | 34,671 |
| SAGT-4 | 1/12/2015 | AG21-0305 | MRSA | Absent | 8 | 8 | IV | I | WT | 142 | 18,933 | 34,617 |
| SAGT-5 | 1/30/2015 | AG21-0306 | MRSA | Absent | 87 | 59 | Not available | I | WT | 34,680 | 34,853 | 157 |
| SAGT-6 | 3/20/2014 | AG21-0307 | MRSA | Absent | 8 | 8 | IV | I | WT | 94 | 18,948 | 34,645 |
| SAGT-7 | 1/21/2016 | AG21-0308 | MRSA | Absent | 8 | 8 | IV | I | WT | 163 | 18,951 | 34,679 |
| SAGT-8 | 2/2/2016 | AG21-0309 | MRSA | Absent | 8 | 8 | IV | I | WT | 137 | 18,925 | 34,629 |
| SAGT-9 | 2/12/2016 | AG21-0310 | MRSA | Absent | 105 | 5 | IV | II | WT | 19,389 | 1078 | 34,656 |
| SAGT-10 | 6/7/2015 | AG21-0311 | MSSA | Absent | 12 | 12 | Not available | II | agrC: T70I | 16,862 | 17,716 | 34,137 |
| SAGT-11 | 6/21/2015 | AG21-0312 | MSSA | Absent | 5 | 5 | Not available | II | agrC:T70I | 18,626 | 1023 | 34,083 |
| SAGT-12 | 1/23/2016 | AG21-0313 | MRSA | Absent | 87 | 59 | II | I | WT | 34,680 | 34537 | 251 |
| SAGT-13 | 1/1/2013 | AG21-0314 | MRSA | Present | 5 | 5 | Not available | II | agrB-agrA del | 18,823 | 1163 | 34,619 |
| SAGT-14 | 1/13/2012 | AG21-0315 | MRSA | Present | 5 | 5 | II | II | agrC:G337D | 19,638 | 720 | 34,802 |
| SAGT-17 | 8/30/2016 | AG21-0316 | MSSA | Present | 59 | 59 | Not available | I | agrC: 128-135del frameshift | 34,000 | 33,957 | 319 |
| SAGT-18 | 10/7/2016 | AG21-0317 | MRSA | Present | 105 | 5 | II | II | agrA: G68D | 18,875 | 912 | 34,214 |
| SAGT-20 | 4/27/2015 | AG21-0318 | MSSA | Present | 87 | 59 | Not available | I | WT | 34,622 | 34,480 | 239 |
| SAGT-21 | 9/4/2015 | AG21-0319 | MSSA | Present | unique unidentified | none | II | I | agrC V26G,P242I, D246A,F293I | 17,640 | 17,665 | 34,478 |
CC, clonal complex; GN, glomerulonephritis; JE2, N315, AR475, complete reference genomes; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; SAGN, Staphylococcus infection-associated glomerulonephritis; ST, sequence type; WT, wild-type.
SAGT-10 did not cluster with any known complete reference genome; SAGT-21 did not belong to any known ST.
Phylogenetic analysis was performed independently (by authors LC and AW) and isolate strains were classified based on the following: (i) STs and CC, and (ii) by matching the isolate strains to complete reference genomes.15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The closest reference genomes that matched were S. aureus JE2 (USA300), N315, and AR475. They did correspond exactly with the 3 CCs CC8, CC5 and CC59 respectively. Methods are described in the Supplementary Material. Pangenomic comparisons between the GN and non-GN samples was performed in the context of strain background only. The antimicrobial resistance genes were mined using AMRfinderPlus v3.10.5 whereas virulence genes were examined by Abricate v1.0.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) using the virulence factor database (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs).21 Antimicrobial resistance genes were identified by K-mer search or BLAST-like alignment tool from sources, including PATRIC, comprehensive antibiotic resistance database, and National database of antibiotic resistant organisms.22,23 Genes present in all samples were filtered out and heatmaps were create2.
In vitro Functional Assays
Biofilm formation and production of toxins,24, 25, 26, 27 predominantly the beta-barrel pore-forming toxins such as alpha (α) and gamma (γ) hemolysins are key virulence factors of S. aureus particularly in patients with prosthetic joints and implantable devices.26, 27, 28 Biofilm formation often leads to chronic wound infections with delayed wound healing.29 Biofilms also skew the host immune response to an anti-inflammatory state that allow prolonged persistence of bacteria in the host.30,31 We investigated the ability of the isolates for production of hemolysins and biofilms.
These assays were validated and performed as described below (and Supplementary Methods). Test isolates used (SAGN n = 6; non-GN n = 12) were same as for WGS. Control bacterial strains used are shown in Supplementary Table S2. All bacterial strains for the in vitro assays were grown in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) or Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA), with appropriate antibiotics (37 °C, liquid cultures shaken at 200 rpm), assay repeated 3 times.
Hemolysis Assay
To measure the β-hemolytic activity of the strains, overnight cultures from a single colony were diluted back and allowed to reach mid-log phase, normalized to optical density600 = 0.5, followed by centrifugation of the cultures. The pellet was resuspended in Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffer Saline (DPBS) and 5 μl of the resuspended culture was spotted onto a blood agar plate (5% v/v defibrinated sheep’s blood, 1.5% agar, 1% yeast extract, 1% tryptone, and 0.5% sodium chloride). The plates were incubated at 37 °C with 5% carbon dioxide for 18 hours. The β-hemolytic activity was determined by calculating the ratio between the diameters of the zone of hemolysis and the spotted colony.32,33
Biofilm Assay
Isolates were grown in Lysogeny Broth supplemented with 2% sodium chloride and 2% glucose. This medium showed consistent and reproducible results for quantifying S. aureus biofilms. Overnight cultures were diluted and grown to mid-log phase. In a 96-well flat-bottom plate, 150 μl of the normalized culture (optical density600 = 0.5) was seeded and incubated for 4 hours (37 °C, static). The supernatant containing planktonic (free-floating) bacteria was carefully aspirated and the biofilms were gently washed 3 times with 1× DPBS. Biofilm biomass was quantified using crystal violet assay with slight modifications.34 Briefly, the biofilms were stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 20 minutes at room temperature followed by 5 washes with DPBS. To elute crystal violet, 150 μl of 33% Glacial Acetic Acid was added and the plate was placed on a shaker for 20 minutes. The eluates were diluted 1:10 and optical density590 was measured in a microplate reader. As controls, we used transposon mutants for agrA and sarA that upregulates biofilm-associated proteins for attachment and proteases for biofilm dispersal, respectively. Thus, agrA::Tn produces a strong biofilm while sarA::Tn does not form a biofilm (Supplementary Table S2).35,36
Detection of Poly-N-Acetylglucosamine
Poly-N-acetyl-β-(1-6)-glucosamine (PNAG), encoded by the icaADBC operon is a component of Staphylococcal biofilms and another key virulence factor.37, 38, 39, 40 The reason for performing this assay was related to the glomerular IgA containing immune complex deposits seen in SAGN, similar to those seen in primary IgA nephropathy.6,7,41,42 We postulated that antibodies produced against Staphylococcal surface PNAG may cross-react with the exposed uncapped N-acetyl galactosamine residues in the hinge region of IgA molecules contributing to the pathogenic immune complexes. We investigated if isolates from patients with GN produced increased poly-N-acetylglucosamine.
Immunoblot was perfomed with slight modifications.43 Briefly, a lawn of an overnight culture from a single colony was grown on a TSA plate for 16 to 18 hours. The lawns were scraped and resuspended in 1 ml of DPBS. The resuspended cultures were normalized to an optical density600 of 30, centrifuged and resuspended in 100 μl of 0.5M EDTA (pH 8.0). They were boiled at 100 °C for 30 minutes with a brief vortex at the 15-minute mark. The boiled samples were centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 15 minutes. The supernatant was treated with Proteinase K (Ambion) at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml for 60 minutes at 65 °C, followed by deactivation for 5 minutes at 80 °C. On a nitrocellulose membrane, 2 μl of supernatant was spotted and allowed to air-dry for 10 minutes. The membrane was equilibrated in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris-hydrochloric acid, 150 mM sodium chloride [pH 7.4]) with 0.5% Tween 20, blocked with 5% milk for 60 minutes, and incubated overnight with anti-poly-N-acetylglucosamine antibody (gift by Dr. Rajendar Deora) at a 1:1000 dilution. Bound antibodies were probed with a 1:5000 diluted rabbit anti-goat horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and detected using Amersham ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagents. The detected signals were quantified using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD and Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin).
Multilocus Sequence Typing and Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis
These were performed at the Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, research laboratory of author MO (SAGN n = 6; non-SAGN n = 12) before beginning WGS.44, 45, 46, 47 Because they do not offer any additional information beyond that obtained by WGS, the results have been provided as Supplementary material (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2 and Supplementary Tables S3 and S4).
Results
Host Demographic Features
Patient age and sex comparisons are shown in Figure 2. Both groups showed a similar age trend, but for patients with GN the largest number of patients were in the 61 to 70 years age group, which was higher compared with the non- patients with GN (Figure 2a). Using a cutoff at 40 years of age showed significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2 P = 0.048). The male population was significantly larger in the GN group. (Figure 2b).
Figure 2.
(a) Age distribution by GN status. Overall distribution is similar for patients with and without glomerulonephritis, showing a higher prevalence of Staphylococcal infections in older adults. (b) Sex distribution by GN status. GN, glomerulonephritis.
Laboratory Parameters
The median serum creatinine values were higher among the patients with GN as compared with patients without GN at both time points but not statistically significant (Figure 3a). There was a 0.3 mg/dl increase in median serum creatinine level in the GN group, indicating a worsening renal function among these patients, but this was also not statistically significant. The timing of the kidney biopsy in relation to the microbiological cultures was variable as can be expected in a retrospective study (Table 1), because it depended on several factors such as the clinical condition of the patient, and severity of renal symptoms. In addition, the temporal association of GN development relative to the onset of infection can vary from patient to patient. SAGN can occur anytime during the course of the infection but is frequently concurrent and without a definite infection-free latent period in between.5, 6, 7 As a result, the timing of the kidney biopsy can also be variable relative to the timing of the microbial culture (as seen in our data; Table 1).
Figure 3.
Comparison of laboratory parameters between GN (n = 22) and non-GN (n = 96) groups. (a) The median serum creatinine values were higher in the patients with GN as compared with patients without GN at both time points. There was an increase in median serum creatinine level by 0.3 mg/dl in the GN group, indicating a worsening renal function in these patients, but these were not statistically significant. (b) Total white blood cell counts, (c) differential lymphocyte, and (d) differential neutrophil counts did not show significant differences between the 2 groups at either of the 2 time points. GN, glomerulonephritis.
Total white blood cell counts, and differential lymphocyte and neutrophil counts did not show significant differences between the groups at either of the 2 time points (Figure 3b–d). Days to blood culture clearance among the bacteremic patients (from first positive culture to first consecutive negative culture) showed a mean of 4 days for patients with GN and 3.4 days for non-GN (not statistically significant), so data is not shown.
WGS Reveals Multiple Strains in Both Groups
The isolates separated into multiple STs and CCs (Table 3). Among the 6 GN isolates, 3 belonged to CC5, 2 to CC59, and 1 isolate was a unique unidentified ST. In the non-GN control group, 6 clustered with CC8, 3 with CC5, 2 with CC59 and 1 with CC12. CC8 was not observed among the SAGN isolates, but this could be due to the small sample size. The CC assignments did correlate with the reference genome clustering as indicated by the variant calling (Table 3). Lower variant calls indicates greater similarity to the respective complete reference genome. The ST8 (CC8) non-GN isolates clustered with the JE2 reference genome. All 6 CC5 isolates clustered with N315, and CC59 isolates clustered with AR475. The single isolate (SAGT-10) from CC12 did not cluster with any known complete reference genome. Core SNP analysis showed that the 6 CC5 strains differed from each other with an average of 409 core SNPs (range: 78–718) and CC59 strains differed by an average of 228 core SNPs (range: 168–286), suggesting they are not the same strains, despite being within the same CC. These results suggest that the 6 GN isolates are heterogeneous and the infections in the patients with GN were not due to a clonal expansion of the same strain.
Mutations in agr Operon
Pan-genome analysis was performed for comparison of GN versus non-GN isolates, across similar CCs to avoid detecting lineage-specific differences (CC5 and CC59 respectively). CC8 isolates were compared with its own reference genome and the unidentified ST was compared with agr type I genome. One putative gene (aminoglycoside 3′ phosphotransferase, aph) was found to be present in the non-GN CC5 isolates but absent across the GN isolates.
SNP and InDel analysis showed mutations in the agr operon, detected mainly in the GN isolates (5 of 6) and only 2 of the 12 non-GN isolates. The agr mutations in each of the 5 GN isolates were mutually exclusive as follows: SAGT-13 (CC5) has 2848 base pair deletion encompassing agrB to agrA (agrBDCA); SAGT-17 (CC59) contains 7-base pair deletion in agrC, causing a frameshift and truncation of agrC; SAGT-14 carries single missense mutations in agrC (G337D) and SAGT-18 carries single missense mutation in agrA (G68D), both belonging to CC5; and SAGT-21 (unique unidentified ST) harbors multiple missense mutations in the agrC (V26G, P242I, D246A, and F293I). The 2 non-GN isolates share the same genetic changes (agrC: T70I). Details are shown in Table 3.
Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Genes Show Only Lineage-Specific Differences
No specific differences were seen between the GN and non-GN isolates when compared across similar CCs (Figure. 4a and b). The apparent differences were mainly lineage specific.
Figure 4.
(a) Antimicrobial resistance genes were identified by K-mer search or BLAT from sources, including PATRIC, CARD, and NDARO. Red indicates the gene was detectable in the sample, blue indicates no gene was detected. (b) Virulence factors were identified by BLAT from sources VFDB or Victors. Genes present in all samples were filtered out since they were not informative. Red indicates the gene was detectable in the sample, blue indicates no gene was detected. VFDB, virulence factor database.
In vitro Functional Assays
Reduced β-hemolytic Activity in GN Isolates
When compared with the wild-type strains, 5 of the 6 isolates from patients with GN (GN+) either exhibited a significant decrease or complete lack of β-hemolytic activity, which is also significantly different from the non-GN (GN−) isolates (Figure 5a). After obtaining WGS results on CC assignments of the isolates, comparison of GN + and GN- isolates within the respective CCs was also performed to eliminate strain-based lineage differences (Figure 5b). Grouped averages from the GN+ and GN- within each CC (CC5 and CC59) also showed significant difference (Figures 6a and b and 7a and b, respectively).
Figure 5.
Reduced hemolytic activity in isolates from patients with GN. (a) Staphyloccus aureus isolates were spotted on 5% sheep blood agar to measure a zone of clearing due to lysis of erythrocytes. The cleared zone was measured along with the diameter of the spotted S. aureus colony to calculate hemolysis activity. Results obtained are from 3 independent experiments performed in triplicates. The data are represented as box and whiskers plot indicating the minimum and maximum values of hemolysis activity. (One-way ANOVA analysis, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001). (b) Grouping averages of hemolytic activity of isolates from GN+ and GN- patients resulted in decreased hemolytic activity in isolates from GN+ patients compared with GN−. Each data point represents the average of results obtained from 3 independent experiment perfomed in triplicates. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (∗P < 0.05. Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction). ANOVA, analysis of variance; GN, glomerulonephritis.
Figure 6.
Comparative analyses on hemolysis, biofilm formation, and PNAG production between GN+ and GN− isolates within CC5 clonal complex. Data obtained from in vitro (a) hemolysis, (c) biofilm, and (e) PNAG production assays were grouped as isolates from GN- (gray) and GN+ (red) within CC5. The averages for each group were taken for comparison. On average, isolates from GN+ group within CC5 exhibited (b) decreased hemolytic activity and (d) increased biofilm production, while there was no significant difference in (f) PNAG production. Results represent an average of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicates. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (∗∗P < 0.01, P ∗∗∗<0.001. Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction). CC, clonal complex; GN, glomerulonephritis; ns, not significant; PNAG, Poly-N-acetyl-β-(1-6)-glucosamine; SAGN, Staphylococcus infection-associated glomerulonephritis.
Figure 7.
Comparative analyses on hemolysis, biofilm formation, and PNAG production between GN+ and GN− isolates within CC59 clonal complex. Data obtained from in vitro (a) hemolysis, (c) biofilm, and (e) PNAG production assays were grouped as isolates from GN- (gray) and GN+ (red) within CC5. The averages for each group were taken for comparison. On average, isolates from GN+ group within CC5 exhibited (b) decreased hemolytic activity, while there was no significant difference in (d) biofilm and (f) PNAG production. Results represent an average of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicates. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (∗∗P < 0.01. Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction). CC, clonal complex; GN, glomerulonephritis; ns, not significant; PNAG, Poly-N-acetyl-β-(1-6)-glucosamine; SAGN, Staphylococcus infection-associated glomerulonephritis.
Increased Biofilm Forming Capacity in GN Isolates From CC5
Overall, no striking difference in biofilm mass between isolates from GN+ and GN− groups was observed (Supplementary Figure S3). Comparisons within the respective CCs was also performed for better specificity. Significantly higher biofilm formation was observed in the GN+ isolates than the GN− group within CC5 (Figure 6c and d), but not so in isolates from CC59 (Figure 7c and d).
No Significant Differences in Poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG) production
Most isolates produced similar levels of PNAG as the WT USA300 (Supplementary Figure S4). Comparing GN+ and GN- isolates within CC5 and CC59 respectively, also did not show any significant differences (Figures 6e and f and 7e and f).
Discussion
Infection-related GN is an intriguing immunologic phenomenon characterized by the development of acute GN during or following the course of infection with pyogenic bacteria.9 MRSA-associated GN is becoming the leading cause (along with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus), especially in the western subcontinents. This is a pilot study investigating predominantly microbial characteristics that may predispose some patients with infection to develop SAGN.
Genotyping of archived blood culture isolates from bacteremic patients, admitted at our hospital over the years was retrospectively performed. The GN isolates clustered into multiple CCs. No specific nephritogenic strains were identified (in contrast to post-streptococcal GN).9 WGS revealed a higher incidence of agr mutations in the GN group (5 of 6 isolates, 83%) compared to the non-GN group (2 of 12, 16%). Many of the non-GN isolates were found to belong to CC8 (not seen among the GN isolates by WGS). This could be a bias of small sample size. The CC8 isolates, although appear to be similar (all agr type I), their time of collection was temporally far apart, and they were comparable to other isolates. In addition, the CC8 isolates were not included in the genomic comparison between the GN and non-GN isolates.
Agr quorum sensing is a pivotal mechanism controlling the vast armamentarium of virulence factors in S. aureus, ensuring appropriate expression and timely adaptation to changing microenvironments.31, 32, 33 It exerts its effect through RNAIII driven promoters P2 and P3 for downstream target gene regulation, including several virulence genes.48, 49, 50, 51, 52 The agr operon consists of 4 genes, namely agrB, agrD, agrA, and agrC.48 The functional implications of the agr mutations in our isolates need further confirmation, however the agr gene deletion and truncation mutations identified in 2 of the GN isolates are likely to cause defects in agr functionalities. Another mutation we found (AgrA:G68D) has been shown to be lacking agr activity and δ-hemolysin production.49 The overall decrease in β-hemolysis in the GN isolates and increased biofilm formation (demonstrated among the GN isolates of CC5) in our in vitro assays also correlates with the downstream effect of decreased agr activity in the GN isolates.26 The in vitro assays were performed and validated (by authors PR and DW), independent of the WGS results. We did not find significant differences in PNAG levels between the GN and non-GN isolates. Nevertheless, our hypothesis that antibodies produced against Staphylococcal surface PNAG may cross-react with the exposed uncapped N-acetyl galactosamine residues in the hinge region of IgA molecules contributing to the pathogenic immune complexes seen in SAGN needs to be investigated using a better experimental model.
A significant fraction of S. aureus bacteremia cases have previously been shown to be associated with mutations in 1 or more of the agr genes.53,54 Traber et al48 have demonstrated agr-defective mutants even in fresh clinical samples with a minimum of post-isolation manipulation, proving that these mutations do arise in vivo and not due to post-isolation handling in vitro. Historically, mutations in the agr operon predominantly found in agrC or agrA are typically found to be inactivating the autoactivation circuit and thereby reducing expression from RNAIII.52 These mutations were associated with decreased exotoxin production, but concomitant increase in surface-associated adhesin factors (such as fibronectin-binding proteins [FnbA, FnbB]) needed for initial attachment, conferring a survival advantage to the microbe in certain host niches, particularly while in the blood stream early in the course of infection when bacterial numbers are low.50,51,53 Lack of toxin production results in decreased host inflammatory responses and evasion from host defenses leading to enhanced survival in the blood stream. The agr quorum sensing system can also co-ordinate the switch from expression of surface-associated adhesin factors needed for initial attachment, to the expression of exotoxins produced when a high bacterial cell density is established in the host tissue.49 Other reported effects of reduced agr activity include increased expression of the immune evasion molecule Staphylococcal protein A (spa) and fnbA,54 and increased expression of superantigen-like proteins that modulate host immune functions.55, 56, 57 FnbA adhesin promotes invasion of and persistence of the bacteria within endothelial cells, important in deep-seated tissue infections (like endocarditis, osteomyelitis, visceral abscesses), reaching a niche beyond the reach of immune surveillance mechanisms, and some antibiotics like vancomycin which penetrates poorly within endothelial cells.34,40 Such tissue infections are common in patients with SAGN.1,6, 7, 8
Large systematic meta-analyses have shown dysfunctional agr to be associated with unfavorable outcomes in invasive MRSA infections.58 Our study cohort is too small to compare outcomes. Site and severity of infection, and promptness in initiating treatment probably also are likely to play an equally important role in outcomes. A study comparing S. aureus blood stream isolates from patients with persistent bacteremia (>7 days on adequate antibiotic treatment) and patients with resolved bacteremia (<4 days on adequate antibiotic treatment) showed more frequent defects in production of δ-lysin, a surrogate marker for agr locus dysfunction.51 In our study, days to blood culture clearance (from first positive culture to first consecutive negative culture) among the bacteremic patients showed a mean of 4 days for patients with GN and 3.4 days for non-GN (not statistically significant), and so data is not shown.
Among host factors, males stood out in our SAGN cohort. Advanced patient age appears to be a risk factor for S. aureus infections in general, but not specifically for SAGN. Routine laboratory parameters do not appear to be useful to predict development of SAGN, emphasizing the need for genomic markers.
The small sample size is the main pitfall of this study. Obtaining archived culture samples from human patients can present several challenges as follows: (i) The number of proven patients with SAGN in any single center is low; (ii) Patients with SAGN present at random, the disease is not recurrent and periodic planned patient encounters do not occur as in relapsing glomerulonephritides such as lupus nephritis; and (iii) Laboratory regulations, preclude storage of large number of isolates and also isolates from sites other than blood. Despite these limitations, this pilot study is a unique and a much-needed attempt at making some headway into this enigmatic kidney disease.
The much higher prevalence of agr mutations in our GN isolates compared with the non-GN isolates is the key finding in this study and provides useful insights, although further elucidation in terms of agr functionality is needed. Nevertheless, based on published work in this area of study, prolonged bacteremia, secondary seeding of infection, and chronicity of infection facilitated by reduced agr activity could be important factors predisposing to development of SAGN. Our findings have important implications in light of the considerable interest in development of therapeutic agr inhibitors as novel antivirulence drugs.59,60 Moreover, testing for agr mutations early in infection could potentially be useful to predict risk for SAGN. Larger multi-institutional studies are much needed.
Disclosure
All the authors declared no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge all our referring nephrologists for the biopsy cases included in study. Maciej Pietrzak, Department of Bioinformatics; Amy Lehman, Department of Biostatistics; Luke Handke PhD and Paul Fey PhD UNMC, Omaha for the Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis experiments; Katherine Shiplett for WGS experiments at Ohio Department of Agriculture, Ohio. Grant support: WGS work by Ohio Department of Agriculture supported by 5U19FD007087-02. (FASTQ data files uploaded to NCBI SRA and viewable in NCBI Pathogens browser); in vitro virulence assay work was supported by the NIH awards R01AI077628, R01AI134895, and R01AI143916 (DJW); multilocus sequence typing work supported by institutional funds of Southern Illinois University.
Footnotes
Supplementary Methods description
Figure S1. Burst diagram grouping the major sequence types identified on the MLST study, based on mutations in 7 genes.
Figure S2. Compilation of PFGE gels of the tested isolates.
Figure S3. Biofilm forming capacity does not show significant difference between GN+ and GN- isolates overall.
Figure S4. PNAG production by S. aureus does not differ significantly between GN+ and GN- isolates.
Table S1. Demographic profile of the GN and non -GN cohorts used for comparison of laboratory parameters.
Table S2. Control bacterial strains for in vitro functional assays.
Table S3. Primer list for seven genes used for MLST.
Table S4. MLST results showing amplified genes, sequencing data, and derived sequence types and clonal complexes of the GN and non -GN isolates using eBURST, a Web -implemented clustering algorithm (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/staphylococcus -aureus.
Contributor Information
Michael Olson, Email: molson39@siumed.edu.
Anjali A. Satoskar, Email: anjali.satoskar@osumc.edu.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Methods description.
Figure S1. Burst diagram grouping the major sequence types identified on the MLST study.
Figure S2. Compilation of PFGE gel of the tested isolates.
Figure S3. Biofilm forming capacity does not show significant difference between GN+ and GN- isolates overall.
Figure S4. PNAG production by S. aureus does not differ significantly between GN+ and GN- isolates.
Table S1. Demographic profile of the GN and non -GN cohorts used for comparison of laboratory parameters.
Table S2. Primer list for seven genes used for MLST.
Table S3. Control Bacterial strains for in vitro functional assays.
Table S4. MLST results showing amplified genes, sequencing data, and derived sequence types and clonal complexes of the GN and non -GN isolates using eBURST, a Web -implemented clustering algorithm (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/staphylococcus -aureus.
References
- 1.Lowy F.D. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:520–532. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199808203390806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee A.S., de Lencastre H., Garau J., et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18033. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gould I.M., Reilly J., Bunyan D., Walker A. Costs of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its control. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:1721–1728. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Graves S.F., Kobayashi S.D., DeLeo F.R. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus immune evasion and virulence. J Mol Med (Berl) 2010;88:109–114. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0573-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Koyama A., Kobayashi M., Yamaguchi N., et al. Glomerulonephritis associated with MRSA infection: a possible role of bacterial superantigen. Kidney Int. 1995;47:207–216. doi: 10.1038/ki.1995.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nasr S.H., Markowitz G.S., Whelan J.D., et al. IgA-dominant acute poststaphylococcal glomerulonephritis complicating diabetic nephropathy. Hum Pathol. 2003;34:1235–1241. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00424-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Satoskar A.A., Nadasdy G., Plaza J.A., et al. Staphylococcus infection-associated glomerulonephritis mimicking IgA nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:1179–1186. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01030306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Satoskar A.A., Suleiman S., Ayoub I., et al. Staphylococcus infection-associated GN - spectrum of IgA staining and prevalence of ANCA in a single-center cohort. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:39–49. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05070516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Satoskar A.A., Parikh S.V., Nadasdy T. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and outcomes of infection-associated glomerulonephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16:32–50. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0178-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kimber I., Nookala S., Davis C.C., et al. Toxic shock syndrome: characterization of human immune responses to TSST-1 and evidence for sensitivity thresholds. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol. 2013;134:49–63. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kohler P.L., Greenwood S.D., Nookala S., et al. Staphylococcus aureus isolates encode variant staphylococcal enterotoxin B proteins that are diverse in superantigenicity and lethality. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gangiredla J., Rand H., Benisatto D., et al. GalaxyTrakr: a distributed analysis tool for public health whole genome sequence data accessible to non-bioinformaticians. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:114. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07405-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wood D.E., Salzberg S.L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Low A.J., Koziol A.G., Manninger P.A., et al. ConFindr: rapid detection of intraspecies and cross-species contamination in bacterial whole-genome sequence data. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6995. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Souvorov A., Agarwala R., Lipman D.J. SKESA: strategic k-mer extension for scrupulous assemblies. Genome Biol. 2018;19:153. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1540-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arndt D., Grant J.R., Marcu A., et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marcais G., Delcher A.L., Phillippy A.M., et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Croucher N.J., Page A.J., Connor T.R., et al. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tonkin-Hill G., MacAlasdair N., Ruis C., et al. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol. 2020;21:180. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Feldgarden M., Brover V., Haft D.H., et al. Validating the AMRFinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00483-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li H., Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cingolani P., Platts A., Wang le L., et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 2012;6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Resch A., Rosenstein R., Nerz C., Götz F. Differential gene expression profiling of Staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2663–2676. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2663-2676.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Heilmann C., Schweitzer O., Gerke C., et al. Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol Microbiol. 1996;20:1083–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Speziale P., Pietrocola G., Foster T.J., Geoghegan J.A. Protein-based biofilm matrices in Staphylococci. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:171. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Reyes-Robles T., Torres V.J. Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;409:121–144. doi: 10.1007/82_2016_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oliveira D., Borges A., Simoes M. Staphylococcus aureus toxins and their molecular activity in infectious diseases. Toxins (Basel) 2018;10:252. doi: 10.3390/toxins10060252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Percival S.L., McCarty S.M., Lipsky B. Biofilms and wounds: an overview of the evidence. Adv Wound Care. 2015;4:373–381. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhao G., Usui M.L., Lippman S.I., et al. Biofilms and inflammation in chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care. 2013;2:389–399. doi: 10.1089/wound.2012.0381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hanke M.L., Kielian T. Deciphering mechanisms of staphylococcal biofilm evasion of host immunity. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:62. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Burnside K., Lembo A., de Los Reyes M., et al. Regulation of hemolysin expression and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus by a serine/threonine kinase and phosphatase. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shanks R.M., Stella N.A., Lahr R.M., et al. Serratamolide is a hemolytic factor produced by Serratia marcescens. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lade H., Park J.H., Chung S.H., et al. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates is differentially affected by glucose and sodium chloride supplemented culture media. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1853. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fey P.D., Endres J.L., Yajjala V.K., et al. A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes. mBio. 2013;4:e00537–00512. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00537-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dice B., Stoodley P., Buchinsky F., et al. Biofilm formation by ica-positive and ica-negative strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro. Biofouling. 2009;25:367–375. doi: 10.1080/08927010902803297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Weidenmaier C., Lee J.C. Structure and function of surface polysaccharides of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;409:57–93. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lin M.H., Shu J.C., Lin L.P., et al. Elucidating the crucial role of poly N-acetylglucosamine from Staphylococcus aureus in cellular adhesion and pathogenesis. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brooks J.L., Jefferson K.K. Phase variation of poly-N-acetylglucosamine expression in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kropec A., Maira-Litran T., Jefferson K.K., et al. Poly-N-acetylglucosamine production in Staphylococcus aureus is essential for virulence in murine models of systemic infection. Infect Immun. 2005;73:6868–6876. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.10.6868-6876.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Knoppova B., Reily C., Maillard N., et al. The origin and activities of IgA1-containing immune complexes in IgA nephropathy. Front Immunol. 2016;7:117. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pouria S., Barratt J. Secondary IgA nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. 2008;28:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2007.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cramton S.E., Gerke C., Schnell N.F., et al. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5427–5433. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.10.5427-5433.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kozitskaya S., Olson M.E., Fey P.D., et al. Clonal analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates carrying or lacking biofilm-mediating genes by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:4751–4757. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4751-4757.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van Belkum A., van Leeuwen W., Kaufmann M.E., et al. Assessment of resolution and intercenter reproducibility of results of genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragments: a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1653–1659. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.6.1653-1659.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sharma-Kuinkel B.K., Rude T.H., Fowler V.G., Jr. Pulse field gel electrophoresis. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1373:117–130. doi: 10.1007/7651_2014_191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kamboj M., McMillen T., Syed M., et al. Evaluation of a combined multilocus sequence typing and whole-genome sequencing two-step algorithm for routine typing of Clostridioides difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59:e01955–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01955-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Traber K.E., Lee E., Benson S., et al. agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Microbiol (Reading) 2008;154:2265–2274. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011874-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Huber C., Stamm I., Ziebuhr W., et al. Silence as a way of niche adaptation: mecC-MRSA with variations in the accessory gene regulator (agr) functionality express kaleidoscopic phenotypes. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14787. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71640-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Novick R.P. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:1429–1449. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fowler V.G., Jr., Sakoulas G., McIntyre L.M., et al. Persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection is associated with agr dysfunction and low-level in vitro resistance to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:1140–1149. doi: 10.1086/423145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shopsin B., Eaton C., Wasserman G.A., et al. Mutations in agr do not persist in natural populations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1593–1599. doi: 10.1086/656915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Painter K.L., Krishna A., Wigneshweraraj S., Edwards A.M. What role does the quorum-sensing accessory gene regulator system play during Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia? Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:676–685. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee S.O., Lee S., Lee J.E., et al. Dysfunctional accessory gene regulator (agr) as a prognostic factor in invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:20697. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77729-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Malachowa N., Whitney A.R., Kobayashi S.D., et al. Global changes in Staphylococcus aureus gene expression in human blood. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bestebroer J., van Kessel K.P., Azouagh H., et al. Staphylococcal SSL5 inhibits leukocyte activation by chemokines and anaphylatoxins. Blood. 2009;113:328–337. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-153882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sakoulas G., Eliopoulos G.M., Moellering R.C., Jr., et al. Accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in geographically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1492–1502. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1492-1502.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fernandez-Hidalgo N., Ribera A., Larrosa M.N., et al. Impact of Staphylococcus aureus phenotype and genotype on the clinical characteristics and outcome of infective endocarditis. A multicentre, longitudinal, prospective, observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:985–991. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Brown M.M., Kwiecinski J.M., Cruz L.M., et al. Novel peptide from commensal Staphylococcus simulans blocks methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing and protects host skin from damage. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e00172–20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00172-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yarwood J.M., Schlievert P.M. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus infections. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1620–1625. doi: 10.1172/JCI20442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








