In the original article, there was an error. In Table 2 the units shown for chlorides (Cl) are not correct. To solve this problem, we include the Table transforming the units to those of the rest of the elements.
Table 2.
Leaf area index (LAI) and leaf nutritional status in leaf blades from Vitis vinifera (L.) cv. Tempranillo grafted onto M1, M4 and 1103-Paulsen (1P) rootstocks subjected to different water quality (C; control and S; saline irrigation) on DOY 233 of 2019 in Valencia, Spain.
| Factors | Treatment | LAI (m2 m-2) | N (g 100g-1) | Cl (g 100g-1) | Ca (g 100g-1) | K (g 100g-1) | Na (g 100g-1) | Mg (g 100g-1) | K/Ca | K/Na |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 1P | 1.8 | 2.26b | 0.75a | 2.01a | 0.73 | 0.003a | 0.41ab | 0.37b | 353.0b |
| M1 | 1.8 | 2.12ab | 1.35b | 2.36b | 0.65 | 0.004b | 0.39a | 0.28a | 185.5a | |
| M4 | 1.9 | 2.07a | 1.24b | 1.94a | 0.66 | 0.003a | 0.46b | 0.35ab | 260.8ab | |
| WQ | Control | 2.0b | 2.15 | 0.67a | 1.93a | 0.74b | 0.003 | 0.40a | 0.40 | 287.7a |
| Saline | 1.7a | 2.15 | 1.54b | 2.28b | 0.61a | 0.003 | 0.44b | 0.44 | 245.1b | |
| Interaction R × WQ |
1P C | 1.8 | 2.33 | 0.54 | 1.9 | 0.77 | 0.004abc | 0.40 | 0.42 | 313.7 |
| 1P S | 1.8 | 2.19 | 0.94 | 2.1 | 0.68 | 0.002a | 0.42 | 0.32 | 392.3 | |
| M1 C | 2.1 | 2.08 | 0.79 | 2.2 | 0.72 | 0.004bc | 0.36 | 0.33 | 235.3 | |
| M1 S | 1.5 | 2.16 | 1.89 | 2.5 | 0.59 | 0.005c | 0.43 | 0.24 | 135.6 | |
| M4 C | 2.0 | 2.04 | 0.68 | 1.7 | 0.74 | 0.003ab | 0.44 | 0.44 | 314.2 | |
| M4 S | 1.8 | 2.10 | 1.79 | 2.2 | 0.58 | 0.003abc | 0.48 | 0.27 | 207.3 | |
| Rootstock | 0.89 | 0.04 | <0.01 | <0.001 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
| Water Quality | 0.03 | 0.99 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.01 | 0.98 | 0.04 | <0.001 | 0.42 | |
| R × WQ | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 0.61 | 0.49 | 0.27 | |
Data are averages of 6, 9 and 3 determinations per rootstock, water quality and rootstock per water quality respectively. For each parameter, letters denote significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05 (Duncan test). The statistical significance effect of the rootstock (R), water quality (WQ) and their interaction are also indicated by means of the p-values from the ANOVAs. Significance of effects in bold denotes statistically significant differences at p < 0.05.
A correction has been made to Table 2 :
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.