Abstract
The compact smooth muscle 10S myosin II is a type of a monomer with folded tail and the heads bending back to interact with each other. This inactivated form is associated with regulatory and enzymatic activities affecting myosin processivity with actin filaments as well as ATPase activity. Phosphorylation by RLC can however, shuttle myosin from the inhibited 10S state to an activated 6S state, dictating the equilibrium. Multiple studies contributed by TEM have provided insights in the structural understanding of the 10S form. However, it is only recently that the true potential of Cryo-EM in deciphering the intramolecular interactions of 10S myosin state has been realized. This has led to an influx of new revelations on the 10S inactivation, unfolding mechanism and association in various diseases. This study reviews the gradual development in the structural interpretation of 10S species from TEM to Cryo-EM era. Furthermore, we discuss the utility of Cryo-EM in future myosin 10S studies and its contribution to human health.
Keywords: Smooth muscle myosin-II, Myosin, Cryo-electron microscopy, Structural biology, High resolution studies, Molecular motor
Introduction
Myosin II is a conventional molecular motor protein that moves actively along the actin filament through a force driven by ATP hydrolysis (Geeves and Holmes 1999). A myriad of studies have reported multifaceted roles of myosin in both muscles and non-muscles (Conti and Adelstein 2008; Vicente-Manzanares et al. 2009; Ma and Adelstein 2014; Shutova and Svitkina 2018). Typically, myosin molecule possesses two identical heavy chains, a pair of essential light chains (ELCs) and a pair of regulatory light chains (RLCs) as seen in Fig. 1. The amino-terminal of each heavy chain encompasses a globular head domain that harbours the ATP and actin binding sites and a neck domain where the light chains reside. The carboxy-terminal is primarily a long alpha-helical coiled-coil tail domain which is associated with dimerization (Rayment et al. 1993). In smooth muscles, this tail helps myosin molecules associate together to form side-polar filaments and perform various functions (Craig and Woodhead 2006). Studies of proteolytic digestion of myosin molecule show 2 major subfragments: Heavy meromyosin (HMM) spanning myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and myosin subfragment 2 (S2) and light meromyosin (LMM) including the tail backbone.
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of a typical smooth muscle myosin II molecule. Myosin II is composed of two heavy chains (HCs), two essential light chains (ELCs) and two regulatory light chains (RLCs) to form a 520 kDa protein. The N-terminal forms the globular heads and C-terminal extends as a long α-helical coiled-coil tail
Myosin II monomers can exist in two different conformations based on their sedimentation coefficients – an open 6S conformation and a closed 10S conformation (Suzuki et al. 1978). The closed 10S conformers were found to be present in both smooth muscle and non-muscle systems (Trybus et al. 1982; Milton et al. 2011). Myosin in the 10S conformation is inactive and forms weak interaction with actin (Olney et al. 1996). Structurally, the 10S conformation involves an equidistant, three segmented tail folding where the heads lean back on to the tail to associate with each other (Trybus et al. 1982; Burgess et al. 2007; Jung et al. 2008b). This interaction, while being very specific, occurs in an asymmetric fashion and is highly conserved across species (Wendt et al. 2001; Jung et al. 2008a). Within the twin head interaction, by-products of ATP turnover are sequestered affecting the ATPase activity (Cross et al. 1986; Cross et al. 1988; Ankrett et al. 1991). As a consequence, myosin monomers cannot unfold to polymerize into filaments nor can they interact with actin, achieving a total shut off state. Conversely, RLC phosphorylation at Ser19 residue destabilizes the 10S molecule causing the tail to unfold (Craig et al. 1983; Trybus and Lowey 1984). This creates a shift in the dynamics from 10S monomers to the extended 6S molecules facilitating filament assembly. At molecular level, RLC phosphorylation in smooth muscles occurs through Ca2+/calmodulin dependent myosin light chain kinase which is exclusively tissue specific (Sellers 1991).
The functional significance of the 10S regulation traces back to the origin of animals with head-head and head-tail interactions conserved all throughout (Lee et al. 2018). This shut-off state plays a pivotal role in maintaining the energy equilibrium when myosin activity is not in demand for muscle as well as non-muscle (Cross 1988). Much of these findings was possible with significant development in the electron microscopic approaches. Electron microscopy has played a defining role in understanding the structure and function of myosin over the last six decades (Hanson and Huxley 1953; Huxley 1957).
Preliminary developments in the structural biology of myosin II
Contribution of structure determining techniques like metal shadowing and negative staining - TEM as well as X-ray diffraction has led to phenomenal growth in the field of myosin biology. Early TEM studies documented 10S as a dimer (Suzuki et al. 1978) which later was found to be a monomer (Trybus et al. 1982). Addition of ATP in stoichiometric amount, depolymerized the smooth muscle filaments to give inactivated monomers (Suzuki et al. 1978; Suzuki et al. 1982). When observed with rotary shadowing, 10S monomers were predominantly found under low salt concentration in a folded conformation (Trybus et al. 1982). The arrangement of the tail was in such a manner that it folded as a 510 Å hairpin loop with the two heads leaning over (Suzuki et al. 1982). The heads went on to interact with each other in an asymmetric manner to perturb their activities. This association, also termed as the interacting-heads motif or IHM is due to intramolecular interaction occurring at both, “blocked” and “free” heads. The inhibition occurs so that each head is responsible for hampering the other head’s activity. As a result, actin binding ability of the blocked head and ATPase activity of the free head is affected causing a total switch off. While the first report of IHM was performed on smooth muscle HMM through X-ray diffraction (Wendt et al. 2001), evolutionary analysis revealed myosin 10S to be conserved since the origin of animals (Lee et al. 2018). These studies clearly indicated IHM as a structurally important feature in the functionality of 10S myosin.
Another striking feature of the 10S monomer is the propensity of the tail to fold at two particular locations to give three segments of equivalent length (Trybus et al. 1982; Wendt et al. 2001; Burgess et al. 2007). Each segment spanned a region of its own, running between and around the two heads generating head-tail interactions (Jung et al. 2008b). Primitive TEM approaches including metal shadowing feared the possibility of structural rearrangements (Trybus and Lowey 1984), however adapting cross-linkers like glutaraldehyde in small concentrations proved beneficial in negative staining TEM (Jung et al. 2011). The cross-linking mechanism was non-specific and provided stability to the compact structures. Moreover, technical advances in CCD cameras and image processing software made it feasible to understand the stereospecific interactions occurring within the monomer. Nevertheless, myosin 10S structures provided by TEM with single particle analysis reached a maximum resolution limit of ~ 20 A°.
Revolution in myosin structural studies through Cryo-Electron microscopy
For many years, battle over atomic resolution model of proteins remained in the favour of X-ray crystallography, only until Dubochet and his colleagues established Cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) (Dubochet et al. 1988). Their pioneering work led to a dramatic change in the way biological samples could be applied for electron microscopic examination. The procedure involved vitrification, which enabled samples to be embedded in a thin layer of aqueous solution followed by rapid plunge-freezing in liquid ethane, capturing the sample in its native state. Cryo-EM paved the way for modern TEM with crucial developments in detection cameras and Low-dose electron exposure. This caused relatively lower radiation damage to biological samples and eliminated the need to prepare high concentration sample for crystallization. Interdisciplinary approach using Cryo-EM with advanced computational tools gave momentum to 3D structural determination reaching near atomic resolution. Looking at the phenomenal progress, Nobel prize in Chemistry was granted to Jacques Dubochet, Richard Henderson and Joachim Frank together in 2017 (Cressey and Callaway 2017) for developing Cryo-EM.
Recently, Cryo-EM reports on 10S have articulated crucial insights on the activation, regulation of Myosin 10S (Scarff et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2020). Some of the major findings disclosed were comparable with regions previously discovered by X-ray crystallography. With Cryo-EM, it was now possible to understand the intricacies of the 10S molecules with high resolution. Moreover, these studies served as the base to delve deeper in to the different types of molecular interactions that made up the 10S state. Some of the striking features included: The tail showing great degree of flexibility in 10S molecule, with multiple head and tail interactions. These interactions formed the basis of stability of the molecule affecting the ATP binding moiety of the free head and the actin binding region in both heads. The probable mechanism for destabilization of the shut-down 10S form was emphasized on RLC phosphorylation. Since the structural densities corresponding to the RLC of both free and blocked head were disproportional, RLC interactions lead to different consequences. Depression in the ATPase activity of the blocked head was well defined with the predicted interaction between tail segment (Segment 2) and the blocked head (Yang et al. 2020).
Application of muscle structural studies in human health using Cryo-EM
During the last few years, Cryo-EM has set a new benchmark in the field of structural biology. A series of new revelations in myosin structural biology have been witnessed, which weren’t fully achieved before. For example, some interactions observed in the 10S structure propose similarity with the regions associated with disease causing mutations in smooth muscle and non-muscle myosin (Wendt et al. 2001; Scarff et al. 2020). Given that 10S is a highly conserved structure across multiple species, it is imperative to establish a better understanding in role 10S plays in multiple diseases. Interpretation from such interactions can provide leads on the mutations associated with cardiomyopathy.
Conclusion and future perspectives
The functional and structural understanding of the 10S myosin II over last six decades has been summarized in Fig. 2. At present, Cryo-EM has offered remarkable upgrade in the field of myosin structural biology since the advent of conventional EM. Having said this, looking at the current developments made, it is likely that many trivial questions will be answered in the future. Clarity on the overall unfolding mechanism including the sequential order of the unfolding along with intermediate steps taking place at sub-molecular state will continue to be of focus in future. It is expected that research in the upcoming decades could transform from an in vitro to a more in vivo approach for real time application.
Fig. 2.
Conclusive illustration of the timeline for major events in the development of smooth muscle myosin 10S structural investigations
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- 6S
Sedimentation coefficients of 6
- 10S
Sedimentation coefficients of 10
- ATP
Adenosine 5′-triphosphate
- ATPase
Adenosine Tri-phosphatase
- kDa
kiloDalton
- Da
Dalton
- SMM
Smooth muscle myosin
- MLCK
Myosin Light Chain Kinase
- ELC
Essential Light Chain
- RLC
Regulatory Light Chain
- Ca2+
Calcium cation
- TEM
Transmission Electron Microscopy
- EM
Electron microscopy (generalized for TEM here)
- S1
myosin subfragment 1
- S2
myosin subfragment 2
- HMM
Heavy meromyosin
- LMM
Light meromyosin
- X-ray
X-radiation
- Å
Angstrom
- IHM
interacting-heads motif
- CCD
Charge-couple device
- Cryo-EM
Cryo-electron microscopy
- 3D
Three-Dimensional
- myr
million year
Authors’ contributions
A.V.B. and H.S.J. reviewed the publication and wrote paper. H.S.J. supervised the whole project and performed the editing of the paper. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (2021R1A2C1009404 to HSJ) and the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) National Research Facilities &Equipment Center (NFEC) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Education) (2019R1A6C1010006).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Declarations
Competing interests
No potential competing interest relevant to this article was reported.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Ankrett RJ, Rowe AJ, Cross RA, Kendrick-Jones J, Bagshaw CR. A folded (10 S) conformer of myosin from a striated muscle and its implications for regulation of ATPase activity. J. Mol. Biol. 1991;217:323–335. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90546-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgess SA, Yu S, Walker ML, Hawkins RJ, Chalovich JM, Knight PJ. Structures of smooth muscle myosin and heavy Meromyosin in the folded, shutdown state. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;372:1165–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conti MA, Adelstein RS. Nonmuscle myosin II moves in new directions. J. Cell Sci. 2008;121:11–18. doi: 10.1242/jcs.007112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craig R, Smith R, Kendrick-Jones J. Light-chain phosphorylation controls the conformation of vertebrate non-muscle and smooth muscle myosin molecules. Nature. 1983;302:436–439. doi: 10.1038/302436a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craig R, Woodhead JL. Structure and function of myosin filaments. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2006;16:204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cressey D, Callaway E. Cryo-electron microscopy wins chemistry Nobel. Nature. 2017;550:167–167. doi: 10.1038/nature.2017.22738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cross RA. What is 10S myosin for? J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 1988;9:108–110. doi: 10.1007/BF01682153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cross RA, Cross KE, Sobieszek A. ATP-linked monomer-polymer equilibrium of smooth muscle myosin: The free folded monomer traps ADP.Pi. EMBO J. 1986;5:2637–2641. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04545.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cross RA, Jackson AP, Citi S, Kendrick-Jones J, Bagshaw CR. Active site trapping of nucleotide by smooth and non-muscle myosins. J. Mol. Biol. 1988;203:173–181. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90100-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubochet J, Adrian M, Chang JJ, Homo JC, Lepault J, McDowall AW, Schultz P. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1988;21:129–228. doi: 10.1017/S0033583500004297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geeves MA, Holmes KC. Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999;68:687–728. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson J, Huxley HE. Structural basis of the Cross-striations in muscle. Nature. 1953;172:530–532. doi: 10.1038/172530b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huxley AF. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1957;7:255–318. doi: 10.1016/S0096-4174(18)30128-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jung HS, Billington N, Thirumurugan K, Salzameda B, Cremo CR, Chalovich JM, Chantler PD, Knight PJ. Role of the tail in the regulated state of myosin 2. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;408:863–878. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jung HS, Burgess SA, Billington N, Colegrave M, Patel H, Chalovich JM, Chantler PD, Knight PJ. Conservation of the regulated structure of folded myosin 2 in species separated by at least 600 million years of independent evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008;105:6022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707846105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jung HS, Komatsu S, Ikebe M, Craig R. Head–Head and Head–Tail Interaction: A General Mechanism for Switching Off Myosin II Activity in Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:3234–3242. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-02-0206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee KH, Sulbarán G, Yang S, Mun JY, Alamo L, Pinto A, Sato O, Ikebe M, Liu X, Korn ED, Sarsoza F, Bernstein SI, Padrón R, Craig R. Interacting-heads motif has been conserved as a mechanism of myosin II inhibition since before the origin of animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115:E1991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715247115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma X, Adelstein RS. The role of vertebrate nonmuscle myosin II in development and human disease. BioArchitecture. 2014;4:88–102. doi: 10.4161/bioa.29766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milton DL, Schneck AN, Ziech DA, Ba M, Facemyer KC, Halayko AJ, Baker JE, Gerthoffer WT, Cremo CR. Direct evidence for functional smooth muscle myosin II in the 10S self-inhibited monomeric conformation in airway smooth muscle cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011;108:1421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011784108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olney JJ, Sellers JR, Cremo CR. Structure and function of the 10 S conformation of smooth muscle myosin *. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:20375–20384. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rayment I, Rypniewski WR, Schmidt-Bäse K, Smith R, Tomchick DR, Benning MM, Winkelmann DA, Wesenberg G, Holden HM. Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. Science. 1993;261:50–58. doi: 10.1126/science.8316857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scarff CA, Carrington G, Casas-Mao D, Chalovich JM, Knight PJ, Ranson NA, Peckham M. Structure of the shutdown state of myosin-2. Nature. 2020;588:515–520. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2990-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sellers JR. Regulation of cytoplasmic and smooth muscle myosin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1991;3:98–104. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(91)90171-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shutova MS, Svitkina TM. Common and Specific Functions of Nonmuscle Myosin II Paralogs in Cells. Biochem. (Mosc) 2018;83:1459–1468. doi: 10.1134/S0006297918120040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki H, Kamata T, Onishi H, Watanabe S. Adenosine triphosphate-induced reversible change in the conformation of chicken gizzard myosin and heavy Meromyosin1. J Biochem. 1982;91:1699–1705. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a133861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki H, Onishi H, Takahashi K, Watanabe S. Structure and function of chicken gizzard Myosin1. J Biochem. 1978;84:1529–1542. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a132278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trybus KM, Huiatt TW, Lowey S. A bent monomeric conformation of myosin from smooth muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1982;79:6151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.20.6151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trybus KM, Lowey S. Conformational states of smooth muscle myosin. Effects of light chain phosphorylation and ionic strength. J. Biol. Chem. 1984;259:8564–8571. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)39767-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vicente-Manzanares M, Ma X, Adelstein RS, Horwitz AR. Non-muscle myosin II takes Centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009;10:778–790. doi: 10.1038/nrm2786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wendt T, Taylor D, Trybus KM, Taylor K. Three-dimensional image reconstruction of dephosphorylated smooth muscle heavy meromyosin reveals asymmetry in the interaction between myosin heads and placement of subfragment 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001;98:4361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071051098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang S, Tiwari P, Lee KH, Sato O, Ikebe M, Padrón R, Craig R. Cryo-EM structure of the inhibited (10S) form of myosin II. Nature. 2020;588:521–525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-3007-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


