Skip to main content
Frontiers in Nutrition logoLink to Frontiers in Nutrition
. 2022 Sep 27;9:1028810. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1028810

Erratum: Effects of quercetin glycoside supplementation combined with low-intensity resistance training on muscle quantity and stiffness: A randomized, controlled trial

Frontiers Production Office1,*
PMCID: PMC9552930  PMID: 36238464

Due to a production error, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. In Table 2, the asterisk mark (*), indicating *p < 0.05 compared with the placebo group (Dunnett's test), is incorrectly shown in the row “SWV with the knee fully flexed,” subcategory “Placebo,” and column “Change (Δ 24 weeks).” The corrected Table 2 appears below.

Table 2.

Effects of the intervention on muscle quantity and stiffness in the PPS analysis.

Variable Group Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks Change (Δ 12 weeks) Change (Δ 24 weeks) Two-way ANOVA (group × time) P-value
MRI measurements
Thigh muscle CSA (cm2) Placebo 98.7 ± 17.4 102.0 ± 18.5 104.2 ± 19.2 3.3 ± 2.6 5.5 ± 3.6 0.915
Low-QG 102.7 ± 25.4 106.2 ± 25.8 109.0 ± 28.2 3.4 ± 2.4 6.3 ± 4.4
High-QG 101.0 ± 25.3 105.1 ± 26.9 107.3 ± 27.4 4.1 ± 2.6 6.3 ± 4.5
VL muscle CSA (cm2) Placebo 17.0 ± 3.6 17.6 ± 3.8 17.8 ± 3.9 0.6 ± 0.7 0.9 ± 0.9 0.635
Low-QG 18.3 ± 4.1 18.9 ± 4.2 19.5 ± 5.0 0.6 ± 0.8 1.2 ± 1.3
High-QG 17.7 ± 4.6 18.1 ± 4.6 18.5 ± 4.9 0.5 ± 0.7 0.8 ± 0.9
DXA measurements
Leg lean mass (kg) Placebo 13.2 ± 2.3 13.5 ± 2.5 13.6 ± 2.7 0.3 ± 0.4 0.3 ± 0.6 0.332
Low-QG 13.7 ± 3.8 14.1 ± 3.9 13.9 ± 3.9 0.5 ± 0.4 0.2 ± 0.4
High-QG 13.1 ± 3.4 13.3 ± 3.6 13.4 ± 3.5 0.2 ± 0.5 0.3 ± 0.3
Arm lean mass (kg) Placebo 4.1 ± 1.1 4.2 ± 1.1 4.2 ± 1.1 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.1 0.489
Low-QG 4.2 ± 1.4 4.2 ± 1.4 4.2 ± 1.4 0.0 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.2
High-QG 4.1 ± 1.3 4.1 ± 1.3 4.1 ± 1.2 0.1 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.1
Whole-body lean mass (kg) Placebo 40.0 ± 6.9 40.7 ± 6.9 40.8 ± 7.3 0.6 ± 0.6 0.8 ± 0.9 0.904
Low-QG 40.6 ± 9.9 41.4 ± 10.1 41.4 ± 10.3 0.7 ± 0.7 0.8 ± 1.0
High-QG 39.8 ± 9.4 40.3 ± 9.4 40.6 ± 9.1 0.5 ± 0.6 0.8 ± 1.0
SWE measurements of VL
SWV with the knee fully extended (m/s) Placebo 2.0 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.1 0.452
Low-QG 1.9 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.1
High-QG 2.0 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.1
SWV with the knee flexed at 90° (m/s) Placebo 3.0 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.2 −0.1 ± 0.2 −0.2 ± 0.2 0.811
Low-QG 2.9 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.1 −0.1 ± 0.2 −0.1 ± 0.2
High-QG 2.9 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.2 −0.2 ± 0.2 −0.2 ± 0.2
SWV with the knee fully flexed (m/s) Placebo 4.7 ± 0.6 4.6 ± 0.5 4.4 ± 0.4§§ −0.1 ± 0.3 −0.3 ± 0.4 0.023
Low-QG 5.0 ± 0.5 4.7 ± 0.6§§ 4.4 ± 0.4§§ −0.4 ± 0.3 −0.6 ± 0.3*
High-QG 5.0 ± 0.8 4.8 ± 0.8 4.4 ± 0.5§§ −0.2 ± 0.5 −0.6 ± 0.5*

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. For the placebo (n = 16), low-QG (n = 16), and high-QG (n = 16) groups on MRI, DXA, and SWE measurements, where one set of SWE measurements in the placebo group at 12 weeks was missing because of no visit, there were no significant differences among the groups at baseline (one-way ANOVA). *p < 0.05 compared with placebo group (Dunnett's test). §§p < 0.01 compared with values at baseline (Dunnett's test). QG, quercetin glycoside; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CSA, cross-sectional area; VL, vastus lateralis; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; SWE, shear wave elastography; and SWV, shear wave velocity.

The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original article has been updated.


Articles from Frontiers in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES