Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2022 Jul 14;554:111723. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2022.111723

Associations of plasma miRNAs with waist circumference and insulin resistance among women with polycystic ovary syndrome – Pilot Study

Pandora L Wander a,b, Daniel A Enquobahrie c, Theo K Bammler d, James W MacDonald d, Sengkeo Srinouanprachanh d, Thanmai Kaleru e, Dori Khakpour e, Subbulaxmi Trikudanathan e
PMCID: PMC9552972  NIHMSID: NIHMS1837945  PMID: 35843386

Abstract

Background:

Insulin resistance (IR) and central obesity are common in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but pathomechanisms for IR in PCOS are not established. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are non-invasive biomarkers of epigenetic regulation that may contribute to the pathogenesis of IR and central adiposity in PCOS.

Methods:

We conducted a pilot study to examine associations of circulating miRNAs with IR and central adiposity among women with PCOS (n=11) using high-throughput miRNA sequencing. We fit generalized linear models examining associations of waist circumference and HOMA-IR with plasma miRNAs. We used false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted cutoff p<0.1 to correct for multiple testing. We used miRDB’s Gene Ontology (GO) tool to identify predicted pathways for top hits.

Results:

Mean age and BMI of participants were 27.9 years and 32.5 kg/m2, respectively. Lower levels of miR-1294 were associated with higher waist circumference (β = −0.10, FDR=0.095). While no miRNAs were associated with HOMA-IR at our FDR cut off <0.1, 11 miRNAs were associated with waist circumference and 14 miRNAs with HOMA-IR at unadjusted p<0.01, including members of the highly conserved miR-17/92 cluster and miR-1294 (β = −0.10, p<0.001). The GO analysis of miR-1294 identified 54 overrepresented pathways, including “negative regulation of insulin receptor signaling” (FDR=0.019), and 6 underrepresented pathways.

Conclusions

Plasma miR-1294 along with members of the miR-17/92 cluster and miRNAs involved in insulin signaling may be associated with central obesity and insulin resistance in PCOS. Larger studies among women with and without PCOS are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords: PCOS, waist circumference, insulin resistance, biomarkers, microRNAs

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in reproductive-age women1. Insulin resistance (IR) affects roughly 60% of women with PCOS2 and frequently co-occurs with central obesity3. Diabetic female mice exposed to high levels of androgens have decreased skeletal muscle glucose uptake due to decreased activation of serine/threonine-specific protein kinase AKT and decreased GLUT4 expression4, suggesting that skeletal muscle IR in PCOS may be mediated at least in part by androgens. A definitive study of IR-related changes in gene expression in women with PCOS would require the collection of relevant tissue samples such as skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and ovary, which is not feasible in large-scale clinical studies. Therefore, identification of circulating factors that contribute to IR in PCOS is an important next step in understanding its pathogenesis. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of post-transcriptional epigenetic regulators of gene expression, may have value in this setting because they participate in inter-organ crosstalk, have potential as therapeutic targets, and can be readily measured in the cell-free circulation1. Ubiquitous in tissues and in cell-free body fluids, miRNAs are short non-coding RNAs that pair to the 3′ untranslated region of messenger RNAs leading to translational repression or a decrease in transcript stability5,6. We7,8 and many others911 have identified alterations in circulating miRNAs that precede development of diabetes and may contribute to skeletal muscle insulin resistance12,13. For example, lower levels of miRNAs such as miR-17 and miR-20a/b have been detected in men and women who subsequently develop type 2 diabetes compared to controls7. Although women with PCOS may have unique mechanisms contributing to IR, previous studies examining IR-related miRNAs using plasma or serum from women with PCOS have used PCR or TaqMan low-density arrays for miRNA profiling14,15, limiting discovery of novel miRNA-IR associations in this population. In this preliminary study, we hypothesized that plasma miRNAs, including novel miRNAs identified by next-generation miRNA sequencing, would be related to IR and central obesity in a clinic population of women with PCOS.

Methods

Study setting and population

Participants were recruited from the University of Washington Endocrinology Clinic and the Diabetes Institute, Seattle, WA. Eligible participants were women ≥18 years old without diabetes who fulfilled the Rotterdam Criteria for PCOS1618 as determined by an endocrinologist (ST) (n=11). The study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Washington, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Data collection

Data and sample collection were done at the University of Washington Endocrinology Clinic and the Diabetes Institute, Seattle, WA. Waist circumference (inches) was measured at least twice at the smallest circumference of the torso by trained examiners. Blood specimens were drawn at enrollment by trained phlebotomists after participants were asked to fast overnight. Plasma or serum glucose and serum insulin were assayed as part of clinical care using the facilities’ standard protocols. The homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as (fasting plasma insulin [mU/l] * fasting plasma glucose [mmol/l])/22.519. Plasma for miRNA was isolated and stored at −80 degrees C.

Pre-processing, extraction, and profiling of plasma miRNAs

Thawed samples were spun at 3000g for 5 minutes to completely clear plasma of cells. Small RNAs were extracted from 400 μL plasma aliquots using the Qiagen miRCURY RNA Biofluids Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Woburn, MA). Integrity, purity and quantity of purified miRNA was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer capillary electrophoresis system (Agilent Technologies Inc, Palo Alto, CA) and a Qubit microRNA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The Qiagen QIAseq miRNA NGS Library Kit was used for library preparation. MiRNAs were sequenced using an Illumina sequencer.

Statistical analyses

Selected participant characteristics were summarized using mean/SD for continuous variables and n/percent for categorical variables. We excluded two samples with very low unique molecular index (UMI) depth (73K and 115K, respectively), resulting in a final sample size of n=11 participants. One sample had an unexpectedly high UMI count (14 million UMI reads), but the remainder were between 1 million and 3 million reads. Prior to fitting the linear models, we excluded miRNA transcripts with very low counts because these may represent unexpressed miRNA transcripts and are unreliable due to the low signal to noise ratio. We used a simple heuristic, selecting those miRNA transcripts with a mean log counts/million (logCPM) > 2.5, based on our experience that the distribution of the mean logCPM is bimodal and the assumption that the first mode represents primarily unexpressed transcripts. There were 546 transcripts with a mean logCPM > 2.5 that were then carried forward in our analysis. We used Qiagen’s Gene Globe software to process the FASTQ files, which identifies the UMI barcodes and then summarizes UMI counts/transcript for 2084 small non-coding mRNA transcripts (1970 miRNA and 114 piRNA transcripts). All quality control measures indicated that the 10 samples used were of comparable quality.

We fit generalized linear models and tested for differences using a quasi-likelihood F-test. We used the Bioconductor sva package to estimate surrogate variables intended to account for unobserved variability. The surrogate variables did not appreciably affect the model fit, so we chose to continue with unadjusted models. For the primary analysis, miRNAs with a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p-value <0.1 were considered significant. We also examined miRNA associations that were significant at α<0.01. Analyses were conducted in R version 4.1.0. Because the explanatory variables are continuous, the reported coefficient (β) is the log2 slope of the fitted regression line and can be interpreted as the log2 change in expression for every 1-inch increase in waist circumference (or unit increase in HOMA-IR). As an example, a β of −0.1 indicates a log2 reduction in miR level of 0.1 for every 1-inch increase in waist circumference or, alternatively, a −1 log2 change in miR level for every 10-inch increase in waist circumference, indicating that level of the miR is reduced by two-fold for every 10-inch increase in waist circumference. To identify predicted gene targets in silico, we used the miRDB tool (http://mirdb.org/20. We analyzed all miRs with an FDR<0.1 and also the top 10 most statistically significant miRs (α<0.01) (Table 2). miRDB calculates a target score for each target (50–100). The higher the score, the higher the confidence that the prediction is real. A predicted target with a score > 80 is most likely to be real. Therefore, we used a prediction score > 80 to identify targets. We also used miRDB’s Target Ontology (GO) tool to identify predicted pathways for top miR hits (FDR<0.1).

Table 2.

Plasma microRNAs associated with waist circumference and/or HOMA-IR in women with PCOS (p<0.01), n=11

miRNA β logCPM F PValue FDR
WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE
hsa-miR-1294 −0.1 5.323 26.228 <0.001 0.095*
hsa-miR-4732-5p −0.098 6.472 12.899 0.003 0.266
hsa-miR-451a −0.145 14.439 12.709 0.003 0.266
hsa-miR-486-5p −0.08 15.531 12.409 0.004 0.266
hsa-miR-16-5p −0.082 18.619 12.335 0.004 0.266
hsa-miR-15a-3p −0.252 3.548 12.195 0.004 0.266
hsa-miR-451b −0.146 8.121 11.083 0.005 0.266
hsa-miR-326 0.121 6.865 11.061 0.005 0.266
hsa-miR-4732-3p −0.094 6.474 10.605 0.006 0.266
hsa-miR-1180-3p −0.077 6.079 9.487 0.008 0.266
hsa-miR-339-5p 0.111 8.241 9.219 0.009 0.266
HOMA-IR
hsa-miR-486-5p −0.57 15.531 17.481 0.001 0.338
hsa-miR-503-5p −0.413 5.94 12.114 0.004 0.338
hsa-miR-16-5p −0.543 18.619 11.963 0.004 0.338
hsa-miR-132-3p 0.327 5.939 11.909 0.004 0.338
hsa-miR-4732-5p −0.638 6.472 11.662 0.005 0.338
hsa-miR-363-3p −0.584 9.45 11.506 0.005 0.338
hsa-miR-25-3p −0.378 12.89 10.925 0.006 0.338
hsa-miR-451a −0.809 14.439 10.483 0.006 0.338
hsa-miR-20b-5p −0.43 8.156 10.469 0.006 0.338
hsa-miR-15a-5p −0.455 10.22 10.092 0.007 0.338
hsa-miR-4732-3p −0.606 6.474 9.806 0.008 0.338
hsa-miR-92a-3p −0.313 14.765 9.731 0.008 0.338
hsa-miR-144-3p −0.852 10.199 9.681 0.008 0.338
hsa-miR-7-5p −0.371 8.986 9.518 0.009 0.338

Results

Selected cohort characteristics are shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows log2 slope (β) values, log CPM, unadjusted p-values, and FDR-adjusted p-values for plasma miRNAs that are associated (FDR<0.1) with waist circumference and/or HOMA-IR. Lower levels of miR-1294 were associated with higher waist circumference (β = −0.10, FDR=0.095). No miRNAs were associated with HOMA-IR at FDR<0.1. At α<0.01, higher levels of 2 miRNAs were associated with higher waist circumference: miR-326 (β = 0.12, p=0.005) and miR-339–5p (β = 0.11, p=0.009). Lower levels of 9 miRNAs were associated with higher waist circumference, including miR-1294 (β = −0.10, p<0.001), miR-4732–5p (β = −0.10, p=0.003), miR-451a (β = −0.15, p=0.003), miR-486–5p (β = −0.08, p=0.004), miR-16–5p (β = −0.08, p=0.004), and miR-15a-3p (β = −0.25, p=0.004). Higher levels of one miRNA (miR-132–3p) were associated with higher HOMA-IR (β = 0.33, p=0.004). Lower levels of 13 miRNAs were associated with higher HOMA-IR, including miR-486–5p (β = −0.57, p=0.001), miR-503–5p (β = −0.41, p=0.004), miR16–5p (β = −0.54, p=0.004), miR-4732–5p (β = −0.64, p=0.005), miR-363–3p (β = −0.58, p=0.005), and miR-25–3p (β = −0.38, p=0.006). Scatter plots of the top miRNAs associated with waist circumference and HOMA-IR are shown in Fig. 1. Pathways identified in the GO analysis of miR-1294 included “negative regulation of insulin receptor signaling” (FDR-adjusted p=0.019, Supplementary Tables 14) and “protein localization to phagophore assembly site” (FDR-adjusted p=0.045).

Table 1.

Characteristics of women presenting with polycystic ovary syndrome, February 2019–November 2020, n=11

Age, years (SD) 27.9 (4.4)
Reports White race (vs. non-White race), %y (n) 45% 5
Reports Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (vs. no) Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity), %y (n) 18% 2
Oligo- or anovulation, %y (n) 91% 10
Clinical signs of hyperandrogenism, %y (n) 82% 9
Polycystic ovaries by ultrasound, %y (n) 64% 7
Mean body mass index, kg/m2 (SD) 32.5 (15.3)
Mean waist circumference, inches (SD) 36.4 (10.1)
Mean fasting glucose, mg/dL (SD) 90 (7.5)
Mean fasting insulin, uIU/mL (SD) 9.8 (6.9)
Mean HOMA-IR (SD) 2.2 (1.5)
Mean OGTT 120-minute glucose, mg/dL (SD) 107.2 (32.6)
Mean OGTT 120-minute insulin, uIU/mL (SD) 76.1 (76.7)
Mean total testosterone, ng/dL (SD) 0.6 (0.3)
Mean free testosterone, ng/dL (SD) 12.0 (7.5)
Mean sex hormone binding globulin, nmol/L (SD) 40.1 (27.4)

OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; SD: standard deviation

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Scatter plots of top six miRNAs associated with (A) waist circumference and (B) HOMA-IR

Conclusions

In this preliminary study, lower levels of miR-1294 were associated with higher waist circumference among women with PCOS (FDR<0.1). Further, 11 miRNAs were potentially associated with waist circumference and 14 miRNAs were potentially associated with HOMA-IR (unadjusted p<0.01). To our knowledge this is the first analysis to identify an association of miR-1294 with central adiposity (and possibly HOMA-IR) among women with PCOS.

Two previous studies have examined associations of HOMA-IR and/or a measure of central adiposity with circulating miRNAs in PCOS. In an analysis by Sorenson et al, serum miR-20a-5p, miR-361–5p, and miR-1225–3p were associated with HOMA-IR among women with PCOS, although only the association with miR-1225–3p remained after adjustment for age and BMI14. There was no overlap with the individual miRNAs identified in the current study, but both analyses identified miRNAs that are members of the miR-17/92 cluster (e.g., miR-20a-5p, miR-92a) or one of its paralogues (e.g., miR-20b-5p, miR-25)21. MiRNAs in these clusters are highly conserved and regulate genes critical to cell death (e.g., PTEN, BCL2L11) and proliferation (e.g., TGFBRII)21, among other critical processes. Murri et al. identified a profile of serum miRNAs that were associated with HOMA-IR or waist-to-hip ratio in women with PCOS15, but there was no overlap with the findings in the current study. Reasons for these differences may reflect differences in race/ethnicity, in clinical characteristics of the participants, or in experimental methods, or limited statistical power in the current analysis.

One factor that may have contributed to the differences in miRNAs identified between this analysis and previous reports is the use of next-generation miRNA sequencing rather than TaqMan arrays or PCR. Each of these methods has relative merits22. The major benefit conferred from the use of miR-seq in comparison to these other methods in this setting is the potential for discovery of novel miRNAs23. This is especially important when examining disease-miR associations in a population in which unique mechanisms may contribute to the development of disease, such as insulin resistance in women with PCOS. Used in this way, miR-seq has facilitated discovery of novel miR-disease associations in neurodegenerative disease24, lymphoma25, and other conditions. On the other hand, low power is a recognized limitation that may contribute to bias in small miR-seq studies26, therefore adequately powered miRNA discovery and validation studies are needed to follow up the current findings.

Eleven of the miRNAs potentially associated with waist circumference and/or HOMA-IR in the current study (miR-4732–5p, miR-451a, miR-486–5p, miR-15a, miR-451b, miR-1180–3p, miR-503–5p, miR-363–3p, miR-25–3p, miR-144–3p, and miR-7–5p) were also associated with incident diabetes after 5–10 years in a study we previously conducted among middle-aged Japanese Americans27. In that analysis, mean age was 51 years, compared to 28 years in the current study. About half the participants were male. The overlap in findings suggests that these miRNAs may contribute to IR in a variety of populations, not just women with PCOS. In vitro studies are needed to characterize the roles of these miRs in target tissues including skeletal muscle and beta cell.

We found that lower levels of circulating miR-1294 were associated with higher waist circumference and may be associated with IR as well. This miRNA is downregulated as part of a competing endogenous RNA network in follicular fluid from women with PCOS and may help suppress estradiol production28. In addition, overrepresented pathways in the gene ontology analysis for miR-1294 include “negative regulation of insulin receptor signaling.” Insulin activates two major signaling pathways, the RAS-MAPK pathway and the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI(3)K)-AKT pathway, which is thought to be the key pathway by which insulin controls metabolic processes29. It is possible that this miRNA may contribute to the pathogenesis of insulin resistance among women with PCOS; however, replication studies with larger sample sizes and functional analyses are needed to improve understanding of the pathophysiologic role of this miRNA in IR among women with PCOS.

Strengths of the study include the use of fasting values for insulin, glucose, and miRNAs; as well as the anthropometric measurements performed by trained examiners. Limitations include the small sample size, lack of a comparison population without PCOS, cross-sectional design, as well as lack of validation of identified miRNAs.

In conclusion, miR-1294 along with members of the miR-17/92 cluster and miRNAs involved in insulin signaling are associated with central obesity and insulin resistance in PCOS. Better understanding of mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of IR in PCOS may facilitate development of novel therapies. Larger studies among women with and without PCOS are needed to validate the findings.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures

Funding

The project was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K08103945 and P30035816). VA Puget Sound provided support for Dr. Wander in this research. The funders had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Footnotes

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dumesic DA, Oberfield SE, Stener-Victorin E, Marshall JC, Laven JS, Legro RS. Scientific Statement on the Diagnostic Criteria, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Molecular Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(5):487–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.DeUgarte CM, Bartolucci AA, Azziz R. Prevalence of insulin resistance in the polycystic ovary syndrome using the homeostasis model assessment. Fertility and sterility. 2005;83(5):1454–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mu L, Zhao Y, Lai Y, Li R, Qiao J. Insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction and the relationship with cardio-metabolic disorders among women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clinical endocrinology. 2018;89(6):779–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Inada A, Fujii NL, Inada O, Higaki Y, Furuichi Y, Nabeshima YI. Effects of 17beta-Estradiol and Androgen on Glucose Metabolism in Skeletal Muscle. Endocrinology. 2016;157(12):4691–4705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mirra P, Nigro C, Prevenzano I, et al. The Destiny of Glucose from a MicroRNA Perspective. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Michels KB. The promises and challenges of epigenetic epidemiology. Experimental gerontology. 2010;45(4):297–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wander PL, Enquobahrie D, Bammler TK, et al. Short Report: Circulating microRNAs are associated with incident diabetes over 10 years in Japanese Americans. Nature Scientific Reports. 2020;10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wander PL, Boyko EJ, Hevner K, et al. Circulating early- and mid-pregnancy microRNAs and risk of gestational diabetes. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2017;132:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guay C, Roggli E, Nesca V, Jacovetti C, Regazzi R. Diabetes mellitus, a microRNA-related disease? Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine. 2011;157(4):253–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zampetaki A, Kiechl S, Drozdov I, et al. Plasma microRNA profiling reveals loss of endothelial miR-126 and other microRNAs in type 2 diabetes. Circulation research. 2010;107(6):810–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jimenez-Lucena R, Camargo A, Alcala-Diaz JF, et al. A plasma circulating miRNAs profile predicts type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: from the CORDIOPREV study. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(12):168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xiao D, Zhou T, Fu Y, et al. MicroRNA-17 impairs glucose metabolism in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle via repressing glucose transporter 4 expression. European journal of pharmacology. 2018;838:170–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Katayama M, Wiklander OPB, Fritz T, et al. Circulating Exosomal miR-20b-5p Is Elevated in Type 2 Diabetes and Could Impair Insulin Action in Human Skeletal Muscle. Diabetes. 2019;68(3):515–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sorensen AE, Udesen PB, Maciag G, et al. Hyperandrogenism and Metabolic Syndrome Are Associated With Changes in Serum-Derived microRNAs in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019;6:242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Murri M, Insenser M, Fernandez-Duran E, San-Millan JL, Luque-Ramirez M, Escobar-Morreale HF. Non-targeted profiling of circulating microRNAs in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): effects of obesity and sex hormones. Metabolism: clinical and experimental. 2018;86:49–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Legro RS, Arslanian SA, Ehrmann DA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2013;98(12):4565–4592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rotterdam EA-SPCWG. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and sterility. 2004;81(1):19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thessaloniki EA-SPCWG. Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(3):462–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(6):1487–1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen Y, Wang X. miRDB: an online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucleic acids research. 2020;48(D1):D127–D131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mogilyansky E, Rigoutsos I. The miR-17/92 cluster: a comprehensive update on its genomics, genetics, functions and increasingly important and numerous roles in health and disease. Cell death and differentiation. 2013;20(12):1603–1614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Precazzini F, Detassis S, Imperatori AS, Denti MA, Campomenosi P. Measurements Methods for the Development of MicroRNA-Based Tests for Cancer Diagnosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Potla P, Ali SA, Kapoor M. A bioinformatics approach to microRNA-sequencing analysis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open. 2021;3(1):100131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wake C, Labadorf A, Dumitriu A, et al. Novel microRNA discovery using small RNA sequencing in post-mortem human brain. BMC genomics. 2016;17(1):776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jima DD, Zhang J, Jacobs C, et al. Deep sequencing of the small RNA transcriptome of normal and malignant human B cells identifies hundreds of novel microRNAs. Blood. 2010;116(23):e118–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kok MGM, de Ronde MWJ, Moerland PD, Ruijter JM, Creemers EE, Pinto-Sietsma SJ. Small sample sizes in high-throughput miRNA screens: A common pitfall for the identification of miRNA biomarkers. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2018;15:1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wander PL, Enquobahrie DA, Bammler TK, et al. Short Report: Circulating microRNAs are associated with incident diabetes over 10 years in Japanese Americans. Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):6509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang X, Wu B, Chen M, et al. Depletion of exosomal circLDLR in follicle fluid derepresses miR-1294 function and inhibits estradiol production via CYP19A1 in polycystic ovary syndrome. Aging. 2020;12(15):15414–15435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saltiel AR. Insulin signaling in health and disease. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2021;131(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary figures

RESOURCES