Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Oct 12;195(2):1514–1540. doi: 10.1007/s12010-022-04183-1

Catalytic Antibodies: Design, Expression, and Their Applications in Medicine

Daqun Zhao 1, Jie Chen 1, Xiaoyue Hu 2, Shujun Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC9554387  PMID: 36222989

Abstract

Catalytic antibodies made it feasible to develop new catalysts, which had previously been the subject of research. Scientists have discovered natural antibodies that can hydrolyze substrates such as nucleic acids, proteins, and polysaccharides during decades of research, as well as several ways of producing antibodies with specialized characteristics and catalytic functions. These antibodies are widely used in chemistry, biology, and medicine. Catalytic antibodies can continue to play a role and even fully prevent the emergence of autoimmune disorders, especially in the field of infection and immunity, where the process of its occurrence and development often takes a long time. In this work, the development, design and evolution methodologies, and the expression systems and applications of catalytic antibodies, are discussed. Trial registration: not applicable.

Keywords: Catalytic Antibodies, Design and Evolution, Expression Systems, Infection and Immunity, COVID-19

Introduction

The catalytic antibody, also known as antibody-enzyme, is a type of immunoglobulin with catalytic ability, meaning it can not only bind to antigen but also catalyze certain reactions like an enzyme [14]. Pauling developed the transition state theory to explain the nature of enzyme catalysis in 1946, stating that an enzyme has catalytic activity when it can selectively bind and stable the transition state of a chemical reaction, lowering the reaction energy level [5]. Jencks hypothesized in 1969, based on the transition state theory, that if the antibody could bind to the transition state of the reaction, it could theoretically acquire catalytic characteristics [6]. Lerner [7] postulated in 1984 that the antibody generated by the transition state analogs(TSA) might have complementary confirmation to the analog. The antibody could cause catalysis by forcing the substrate to enter the transition state after binding [7]. According to this hypothesis, in the research of antibodies against a tetrahedral charged phosphate hapten, Schultz and Lerner [8, 9] discovered that they could selectively catalyze the hydrolysis of corresponding carbonate and carboxylic esters in 1986. The catalytic antibody is the name for this type of antibody [8, 9]. In 1989, Paul et al. [10, 11] identified autoantibodies from human serum that can hydrolyze vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), indicating that the research was progressing. For the first time, the study demonstrates that antibodies with catalytic activity can be produced in the body without the use of synthetic chemicals as vaccines. A huge number of catalytic antibodies were promptly extracted from patients with various autoimmune disorders as a result of this investigation [1219]. Patients with thyroiditis, multiple myeloma, and hemophilia, for example, have catalytic antibodies against thyroglobulin, prothrombin, and factor VIII (FVIII) [13, 16, 20, 21]. Patients with systemic autoimmune symptoms such as systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, or multiple sclerosis had catalytic antibodies with DNA and RNA hydrolysis activity isolated from their serum [12, 22, 23]. Catalytic antibodies with different activities have been found (summarized in Table 1). In addition, many approaches and tactics have been developed in order to obtain catalytic antibodies suited for a range of unique functions, particularly those that do not occur in nature [24].

Table 1.

Summary of spontaneously generated catalytic antibodies

Source Antibodies Activity References
Healthy human IgG Hydrolyze Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) Paul et al. (1989) [10]
Patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis Anti-Tg antibodies Hydrolyze thyroglobulin (Tg) Li et al. (1995) [13]
Patients with lymphoproliferative diseases IgG DNA-hydrolyzing activity Kozyr et al. (1998) [25]
Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE) and hepatitis B IgG RNA hydrolyzing activity Vlassov et al. (1998) [22]
Patients with multiple myeloma RHY Prothrombinase activity Thiagarajan et al. (2000) [16]
Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) IgG Catalyze DNA hydrolysis Baranovskii et al. (2001) [23]
Rabbit with thymomas IgG Creatine phosphokinase activity, Kakinuma et al. (2002) [26]
Patients with multiple sclerosis IgMs Amylolytic activity Ivanen et al. (2004) [27]
Urine of patients in different clinical stages of multiple myeloma Bence Jones proteins (BJPs) Chromozym TRY cleaving activity Matsuura et al. (2006) [15]
Patient with Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia IgM (Yvo) Proteolytic activity Ramasland et al. (2006) [28]
Patients with acquired hemophilia IgG FVIII-hydrolyzing activity Wootla et al. (2008) [18]
Patients with autoimmune (AI) diseases IgG DNase and RNase activities Krasnorutskii et al. (2008) [29]
Antiphospholipid syndrome(APS)patient IS6 mAb Prothrombinase activity Yang et al. (2010) [17]
Autoimmune-prone MRL/MpJ-lpr mice Polyclonal IgG DNase activity Kostrikina et al. (2011) [30]
Staphylococcus aureus infection IgG from non-infected humans Hydrolyzed S. aureus extracellular fibrinogen-binding protein (Efb) Brown et al. (2012) [31]
Blood serum of multiple myeloma and systemic lupus Erythematosis patients IgG Sialidase-like activity Kit et al. (2014) [32]
Healthy humans IgGs Peroxidase and oxidoreductase activities Tolmacheva et al. (2015) [33]
Serum of mice and humans IgM Hydrolyze Trypanosoma cruzi Tc24 protein Gunter et al. (2016) [34]
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) Antibodies (AB) Hydrolyze myelin basic protein (MBP) Frolov et al. (2017) [35]
Systemic lupus erythematosus patients IgG PFR-MCA hydrolysis activity Pradhan et al. (2018) [36]
Systemic lupus erythematosus patients NGTA2-Me-pro-Tr Trypsin-like activity Timofeeva et al. (2020) [37]
Human breast milk sIgA Ribonuclease activity Kompaneets et al. (2020) [38]
Multiple sclerosis (MS) IgGs Histone-hydrolyzing activity; myelin basic protein (MBP) hydrolysis activity Ermakov et al. (2021) [40]
Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection HuscFv Elastase activity Santajit et al. (2021) [41]
Mother's milk Immunoglobulin G(IgG) Histone-hydrolyzing activity; myelin basic protein (MBP) hydrolysis activity Kompaneets et al. (2021) [42]
Neuropsychiatric-systemic lupus erythematosus (NP-SLE) patients IgG DNase activity Ramesh et al. (2021) [43]

Catalytic Antibody Design and Evolution Strategy

Production of Catalytic Antibodies Based on Transition State Analogs

Traditional catalytic antibody preparation involves in vivo immunization followed by cell fusion. Enzyme catalysis is attributed to the complementarity between enzyme and transition state rather than the substrate of catalytic activity, according to the transition state theory of enzyme catalysis (Fig. 1) [9, 12, 4446]. A suitable and stable transition state analog is designed as a semi-antigen using the chemical molecular design method, and the desired catalytic antibody is tested using the hybridoma technique (Fig. 2A). The first catalytic antibodies were produced using alkaline hydrolysates of esters and carbonates. A negatively charged tetrahedral transition state is one of the hydrolysates of esters, which can be adequately imitated by phosphonates. After the hapten has been designed and manufactured, it binds to the carrier protein to create an antigen that is immunogenic enough [45]. The antibody produced by transition state theory binds to the transition state more strongly than the ground state of the substrate, resulting in a perfect catalytic antibody [45]. These transition state analogs have been utilized as haptens in the production of hydrolytic antibodies for a long time [4651]. And catalytic antibodies that can catalyze peroxy reaction [52], decarboxylation [5355], cyclization [5658], lactonization [59], bimolecular amide-bond formation, and even reactions that are not catalyzed by natural enzymes [50]. The design of the transition state analog determines whether or not the desired catalytic antibody can be generated using this procedure. Reaction immunity [12, 22, 23, 60], induction and transformation design [58], “latent transition state” semi-antigen design [21], and so on are some of the most common design methodologies.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Energy profiles for enzyme-catalyzed and uncatalyzed reactions. Chemical transformation proceeds through the high-energy transition state (S#) to make the products (P). In enzymatic reactions, an enzyme (E) strongly binds to the transition state to lower the activation energy (△GTS) and thus catalyze the reaction. But an enzyme binds to the ground state of the substrate (S) very weakly. Enzyme achieves efficient catalysis by maximizing the differential binding affinities between the transition state (KTS) and the substrate (KS). The ratio of KS to KTS is equal to the ratio of Kcat to Kuncat [44]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Different methods to generate catalytic antibodies. A. Based on known chemical reactions, stable transition state analogs are synthesized and used as haptens to immunize animals. Monoclonal antibodies with high affinity and good complementarity to the transition state are selected,thus enabling the acceleration of catalysis when incubated with the substrate [50, 61]. B. The antibody with catalytic function is obtained by recombining or replacing the catalytic domain fragment of the enzyme with the variable region of the antibody [50]. C. Generation of catalytic antibodies based on “idiotypic network theory” [50, 62]. D. Generation of catalytic antibodies by phage display technology [45, 63]

Production of Catalytic Antibodies by Genetic Engineering

Site-directed mutagenesis of the variable region of the antibody or the introduction of known catalytic amino acid residues into the antigen-binding site of the antibody can often yield the desired antibody with catalytic activity (Fig. 2B). Liu [64] combined antibody Jel42 with bacterial protein HPr, added glutamic acid to increase the nucleophilicity of nearby water molecules, lysine to increase the polarizability of water molecules, carbonyl and histidine to provide protons to convert amines into better-leaving groups, and changed the fourth residue to glycine to maintain the integrity of complementary determining region 3 of the heavy chain (CDRH3) at the binding interface. Finally, the bacterial protein HPr’s single-chain antibody (scFV) possesses protease activity [64]. By adding a histidine residue into the antibody Jel103, Fletcher et al. [65] were able to create catalytic antibodies with RNA-specific ribonuclease activity. Okochi et al. [66] produced antibodies with peptidase activity by adding mutations to generate catalytic triplets among the residues of Asp1, Ser27a, and the original His93. These findings suggest that novel ways for tailoring catalytic antibodies beyond the restrictions of existing vaccination methods may be possible [50].

Manipulation Based on the Idiotypic Network to Produce Catalytic Antibodies

Jerne [67] proposed the “idiotypic network theory” in 1974. According to this theory, animals are immunized with enzymes as antigens to produce monoclonal antibodies (called Ab1). The antigen-binding site of the antibody is complementary to the active site of the enzyme, and the antibody is then vaccinated against the antigen-binding site of Ab1 (the variable region of Ab1). Finally, the catalytic antibody (called Ab2) is obtained (Fig. 2C). Antibodies with amidase activity were produced using this method [68], which used lactamase as an antigen and used subtilisin and acetylcholinesterase as antigens, the researchers created catalytic antibodies with serine protease [69] and esterase activity [47]. Antibodies containing allicin and carboxypeptidase activity were also produced [21, 70, 71]. This approach has been used to create antibodies with various catalytic activities [4649, 62, 68, 69, 71, 72].

Production of Catalytic Antibodies by Phage Display Technology

Phage display technology can introduce the DNA sequence of a foreign protein or peptide into the right position of the phage’s coat protein structure gene as an in vitro selection system, allowing the foreign gene to be produced alongside the coat protein. At the same time, the foreign protein is displayed on the surface of the phage with the phage is reassembled, achieving the goal of antibody screening (Fig. 2D). Smith invented the technique in 1985 [73], which was later modified by McCafferty and his colleagues in 1990 [7476]. In comparison to the other three methods, phage display technology offers the following advantages: high speed, a relatively straightforward screening process, and the ability to display recombinant antibody fragments using libraries for human applications. Nishi’s team used transition state modeling technologies to create 6D9, a catalytic antibody with low catalytic activity. They then randomly altered 6D9 and showed a library of mutants on the phage before screening the catalytic antibody with 20 times higher activity [45, 62, 76]. By displaying the biased scFv produced from the spleen of mice previously immunized with cocaine phosphonate transition analog hapten, McKenzie et al. [77] were able to identify the antibody capable of binding and hydrolyzing cocaine. He then used site-directed mutagenesis to obtain the antibody with a three-fold increase in catalytic rate [75, 77]. To create catalytic antibodies, Li’s team combined the idiotypic network method with phage display technology, combining numerous methodologies [49].

Other Methods of Producing Catalytic Antibodies

In addition to the methods mentioned above, catalytic antibodies can also be obtained by screening electrophilic covalent reactive analogs (CRA) [50]. Paul’s team developed a monoclonal antibody against the HIV-1 gp120 coat protein and an scFv library against the amyloid β peptide generated from CRA-coupled gp120 as the immunogen [50, 78, 79]. In addition, normal or autoimmune mice immunized with ground state antigens could be examined for antibodies with expected catalytic activity [8085]. In addition, bioinformatics methods can help understand the specificity of catalytic antibodies to assist repeated tests in the laboratory, thus saving time and money. The related tools are applicable for autoimmune analysis of binding sites, prediction of binding activity and most likely motifs of antibody binding, and dynamics simulation of catalytic reaction [41, 48, 8688]. Luo designed the new catalytic ability into the antibody scFv2F3 by combining computational design and site-directed mutagenesis [89]. The resulting antibody enzyme Se-scFv2F3 showed high glutathione peroxidase activity, which was close to the natural enzyme activity. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that the designed catalytic triplet was very stable and the conformational flexibility caused by Tyr101 occurred mainly in the loop of complementary determination region 3. Docking studies showed that this loop facilitates the conformational transfer of Tyr54, Asn55, and Gly56 to stabilize substrate binding. Molecular dynamics free energy and molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area calculation estimated the pKa shifts of catalytic residues and the binding free energy of docking complexes, indicating that the dipole–dipole interaction between Trp29-Sec52-Gln72 leads to the change of free energy, which promotes the residual catalytic activity and substrate binding capacity [89].

In the above methods, catalytic antibodies are prepared based on transition state analogs, and the quality of the designed transition state analogues is the key to this method, and it is necessary to use transition state analogues as antigens or semi-antigens to immunize the host [22, 23, 60]. Genetic engineering techniques are usually used to design and introduce catalytic sequences or bases into antibodies [64, 65]. The “idiotypic network theory” method usually takes more time [68, 69]. However, It is usually possible to combine the above two or more methods to produce the required catalytic antibodies, assisted by bioinformatics analysis tools. Paul's team developed a platform for the preparation of catalytic antibodies (catabody) for age-related amyloid diseases [90]. First, electrophilic target analogues (ETA) were screened, and ETA mimics a high-energy covalent intermediate of the target protein, which recombines with the nucleophilic catalytic site. ETA capture the structure of specific covalent intermediates with their targets. Then the human antibody was produced by B cell library, and the catalytic antibody with a fast catalytic rate and no off-target reaction was screened by phage display, and finally, the cell lines producing therapeutic-grade CAT with different targets were isolated [90].

Catalytic Antibody Expression System

After the catalytic antibodies have been designed and modified using the methods described above, the catalytic antibodies must be produced with soluble and properly folded spatial structure before further research and application. As a result, it is crucial to select the appropriate expression system based on the characteristics of different catalytic antibodies, research goals, and application scenarios. The following are the three most often used catalytic antibody expression systems: prokaryotic expression system, eukaryotic expression system using yeast as host, and mammalian cell expression system.

Expression of Catalytic Antibodies in a Prokaryotic Expression System

Before catalytic antibodies are employed, they must be thoroughly examined, and the prokaryotic expression system offers the advantages of the fast growth of host cells, ease of operation, high yield, short production cycle, and low cost. It is frequently chosen as the method of expression for catalytic antibodies. In this technique, various catalytic antibodies have been effectively expressed (summarized in Table 2). The most common host is Escherichia coli, which can be expressed in cytoplasm or periplasm depending on the features of catalytic antibodies. The yield was rather high when expressed in the cytoplasm. However, because the catalytic antibody’s binding antigen region is usually derived from the variable domain of the antibody’s heavy chain or light chain (VH or VL), and the VH and VL domains are usually assembled in tandem during immunoglobulin folding, recombinant catalytic antibodies are often unstable and easy to aggregate [91, 92]. The crowded cytoplasmic environment allows molecules to interact easily, promoting antibody oligomerization and aggregation; also, the cytoplasmic redox environment prevents disulfide bonds from forming in the domain. Disulfide bonds play a crucial role in the stability of antibody structures [93, 94]. The catalytic antibodies cannot be folded appropriately during cytoplasmic expression because of the superposition of different circumstances, and they congregate to form inclusion bodies. Fortunately, there are several options for reversing this outcome. First, it might be expressed in terms of weekly quality. Periplasm is an oxidative environment that promotes the formation of disulfide bonds, and the type and quantities of proteins are modest, making it simple to create suitably folded catalytic antibodies. At the same time, due to the relatively small periplasmic space, catalytic antibody production is low. Second, catalytic antibodies are expressed on fusion lysozyme tags (Solubility-Enhancing Tags, SET). Using the properly folding of the lysolytic tag–enhanced protein and its fusion expression with the catalytic antibody, the active antibody can also be generated. A number of lysolytic tags have been discovered thus far, and researchers have successfully used tags like maltose-binding protein (MBP) [95, 96] and (FK506 binding protein) (KFBP) to obtain properly folded antibodies [97, 98]. There is also thioredoxin A (TrxA) [99], glutathione sulfhydryl transferase (GST) [100], NusA protein [101], small ubiquitin-like modified protein (SUMO) (102, GB1 [92], and other proteins [103]. Select the proper solubilization label for the label, then work with the appropriate carrier and host to achieve the soluble expression of the catalytic antibody. Third, by enhancing the cytoplasmic environment, soluble expression of antibody-enzyme can be obtained. The physical and chemical parameters of the cytoplasmic environment are directly related to the stability of the antibody, and the endogenous net charge of pH 7.4 in the cytoplasm impacts its aggregation tendency in the cytoplasm [104]. Furthermore, by increasing net negative charge, fusing highly negatively charged peptide tags with scFvs can improve their solubility [92, 105]. As a result, the researchers fused peptide tags with a high negative charge and low isoelectric point to produce hyper-stable production of catalytic antibody in the prokaryotic host cytoplasm [104].

Table 2.

Production of various catalytic antibodies using different expression systems [62]

Catalytic antibody fragment Expression system Activity Host References
Fab 1F7 EuK–Yeast Chorismate mutase S. cerevisia Bowdish et al. (1991) [106]
scFv D2.3 and D2.4 ProK–Peripl. way Ester hydrolysis E. coli Kim (1997) [107]
ProK–Cytopl. way Ester hydrolysis
41S-2-L Mamm.cell Cleavage of gp41 peptides Rabbits Hifumi et al. (2002) [81]
scFv 4B2 ProK–Cytopl. way

allylic isomerization and Kemp

elimination

E. coli Robin et al. (2003) [108]
EuK–Yeast P. pastoris
EuK–Yeast K. lactis
mAb 9A8 Mammalian ascites Acetylcholinesterase Franqueville et al. (2003) [109]
Fab BV04-01 EuK–Yeast DNA hydrolysis P. pastoris Kozyr et al. (2004) [110]
ECL2B-2 Mamm.cell

Cleaving a Chemokine Receptor CCR-5

Peptide

Mice Mitsuda et al. (2004) [84]
Fab 6D9 Transcription/translation system Ester hydrolysis

E. coli cell-free

expression system

Ali et al. (2005) [111]
A.17 ProK Amidase activities E. coli Reshetnyak et al. (2007) [112]
Ab2 6B8-E12 ProK Proteolytic activity E. coli Ponomarenko et al. (2007) [48]
scFv GNL 3A6 ProK Hydrolysis of cocaine E. coli BL21-Gold Mckenzie et al. (2007) [77]
EuK–Yeast E. coli Rosetta
UA15-L Mamm.cell Proteolytic activity Rabbits Hifumi,et al. (2008) [85]

Humanized

Ab A17

EuK–Mamm cells Hydrolysis of organo-phosphorus compounds) NSO-bcl2 Kurkova et al. (2009) [113]
HIV-1 gp120-specific IgG ProK Cleavaging gp120 E. coli Durova et al. (2009) [82]
ETNF-6-H Mamm.cell Protease activity Mice Hifumi et al. (2010) [80]
scFv 9G4H9 ProK–Peripl. way Cleavage of ß-lactam cycle E. coli Naya et al. (2012) [114]
VHHC10 ProK Alliinase activities E. coli Li et al. (2012) [49]
14D9 ProK Catalyses the highly enantioselective (> 99% ee) protonation of enol-ethers E. coli Marconi et al. (2014) [115]
2E6 Mamm.cell Hydrolyzed Aβ Mice Planque et al. (2015) [116]
3D8 ProK DNA-hydrolysing activity E. coli Lee et al. (2017) [117]
#7TR/#7GY ProK

Degrade both a fluorescence resonance energy transfer‐Aβ substrate and Aβ1‐40 full

peptide

E. coli Hifumi et al. (2019) [118]
H34 ProK Degrading the PD-1 E. coli Hifumi et al. (2020) [119]
T-CAN ProK Asparaginolytic Activity E. coli Maggi et al. (2021) [120]

ProK/EuK prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems respectively, Cytopl./Peripl cytoplasmic and periplasmic ways respectively, Mamm.cells mammalian cells, scFv single chain Fragment variable

Expression of Catalytic Antibodies in a Yeast Expression System

Although the prokaryotic expression system has many advantages, it is difficult for the prokaryotic expression system to apply to all catalytic antibodies. Because the prokaryotic host lacks the function of protein post-translational modification in eukaryotic cells, which is critical for maintaining the stability of some catalytic antibodies. Furthermore, catalytic antibodies may be harmful to bacterial hosts, an issue that can be efficiently avoided by isolating heterologous proteins from eukaryotic cells [62, 110]. In this case, using a yeast expression system to express catalytic antibodies is a good idea [121]. Pichia pastoris is considered to be the most commonly used [108]. Yeast can produce soluble and correctly folded heterologous proteins, and correct post-translational modification is essential to their function. The safety of the system is also ensured by the absence of endotoxins and oncogenes in yeast. And it is usually stable and allows a high level of expression [62, 122].

Expression of Catalytic Antibodies in Mammalian Cell Expression System

The mammalian cell expression system is a complex glycosylated protein expression system. Protein folding and post-translational modification are functions performed by mammalian cells. In terms of molecular structure, physical and chemical properties, and biological function, the produced recombinant protein is the most similar to the natural higher biological protein molecule and is more likely to have the same biological activity as natural protein. It is particularly popular in the development and manufacture of therapeutic recombinant catalytic antibody drugs [62, 90]. The mammalian cells commonly used for antibody production are Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells, as well as transgenic mice [62, 113]. In the preparation platform of catalytic antibodies for age-related amyloid diseases developed by Paul’s team, catalytic antibodies were produced through B cell library [90]. To summarize, each expression system has advantages and limitations, we should choose the appropriate expression system for the catalytic antibody to be expressed based on its properties and application situations.

Application of Catalytic Antibodies

Potential Application of Catalytic Antibodies in Clinical Oncology

Catalytic antibodies show remarkable potential as a new class of therapeutic molecules. They are widely used in biology and medicine (summarized in Table 3). Chemotherapy is a crucial treatment option for cancer patients. However, its success is limited due to the shortcomings such as insufficient drug concentration in the tumor site, systemic toxicity, and tumor cell drug resistance. Pre-enzymatic drug therapy is a promising avenue for improving tumor selectivity. Gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) and antibody-directed proenzyme therapy (ADEPT) are the two types of enzyme prodrug therapy that can deliver drugs to malignancies [123, 124]. Catalytic antibodies can be used as the window of the prodrug activation system in the latter, which has clear advantages: first, they can be chosen to catalyze reactions that endogenous enzymes cannot catalyze. Second, it has the potential to reduce the immunogenic response. Lerner’s team devised a novel ADEPT method based on the catalytic antibody 38C2, which targets anticancer drugs like camptothecin, doxorubicin, and etoposide. The tandem reverse aldehyde alcohol inverse Michael reaction catalyzed by 38C2 activates the low hazardous prodrugs of these drugs [125129]. The systemic toxicity of the etoposide prodrug was not found in the mouse neuroblastoma cell line NXS2 xenotransplantation model, where 38C2 was administered directly to the tumor site, and etoposide prodrug was delivered through systemic administration [130]. Simultaneously, researchers have developed several treatments based on various catalytic antibodies, including new esterase catalyzed antibody activated 5 fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FdU) prodrug therapy [131, 132] and catalytic antibody activated carbamate prodrug therapy with hydrolytic activity [133, 134]. Aldolase catalytic antibody treatment and cap catalytic antibody therapy based on an anti-idiotypic antibody approach are two examples of polymer-directed prodrug therapy [135139].

Table 3.

Application of catalytic antibodies

Application Antibodies Activity References
Addiction 3B9, 6A12 Hydrolyzes cocaine benzoyl ester Landry et al. (1993) [140]
Addiction 15A10 Cocaine esterase Briscoe et al. (2001) [141]
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) 41S-2-L Hydrolyze HIV-1 coat protein gp41 Hifumi et al. (2002) [81]
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) mAb YZ20 Hydrolyze HIV-1 coat protein gp120 Paul et al. (2003) [78]
Addiction TD1-10E8, TD1-36H10 Oxidative degradation of Nicotine Dickerson et al. (2004) [142]
Addiction 3F5, 3H9 Cocaine esterase Mckenzie et al. (2007) [77]
Helicobacter pylori infection UA15-L Degrade both UreB and the intact urease Hifumi et al. (2008) [85]
Catalytic antibody against cancers 84G3, 85H6, 90G8 Alliinase Goswami et al. (2009) [143]
Prodrug activation
Gene silencing 3D8-VL mRNA of HER2 hydrolysis Lee et al. (2010) [144]
Autoimmune inflammatory disorders ETNF-6-H Hydrolysis of TNF-α Hifumi et al. (2010) [80]
Alzheimer disease c23.5, polyclonal autoAb Proteolytic cleavage of β-amyloid peptide aggregates Paul et al. (2010) [145]
Catalytic antibody against coagulation factor Polyclonal antibodies Hydrolysis of FIX Wootla et al. (2011a) [146]
Rabies virus infection A18b Proteolytic activity Hifumi et al. (2011) [147]
Design new catalytic protein Se-scFv2F3 Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity Luo et al. (2013) [89]
Influenza 22F6 Amidase activity Hifumi et al. (2013) [148]
Alzheimer disease (AD) 2E6 Hydrolyze amyloid β peptides (Aβ) Nishiyama et al. (2014) [149]
Alzheimer disease IgVL5D3 Hydrolyze amyloid β peptides (Aβ) Kou et al. (2015) [150]
Avian influenza virus (H1N1) 3D8 scFv RNA-hydrolyzing activity Cho et al. (2015) [151]
Influenza infection 23D4 Peptidase and DNase activity Hifumi et al. (2015) [152]
Generate a bioactive chloramphenicol 6D9, 9C10, and 7C8 Hydrolyze nonbioactive chloramphenicol monoester derivative Oda et al. (2016) [153]
Potential prognosis marker IgG Hydrolyze proline-phenylalanine-arginine-methylcoumarin amide (PFR-MCA) Mahendra et al. (2016) [154]
Kemp elimination reaction D38N Kemp Eliminase Activity Lamba et al. (2017) [155]
Multiple sclerosis (MS) IGs Recognize and hydrolyse distinct epitopes within myelin basic protein (MBP) Lomakin et al. (2018) [156]
P-nitrobenzyl phosphonate transition-state analogue (TSA) 1 7B9 Hydrolyzes p-nitrobenzyl monoesters Miyamoto et al. (2018) [157]
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) TrkB-targeting DVD-ADCs h38C2 catalytic antibody Lin et al. (2021) [158]
COVID-19 Recombinant antibody Reporter enzyme Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) activity Fellouse et al. (2021) [159]
COVID-19 3D8 scFv Nucleic acid-hydrolyzing activity Lee et al. (2021) [160]

The Use of Inactivation of Addictive Drugs

Illegal psychoactive substances like cannabis, methamphetamine, cocaine, and smoking, can cause disease and even death, posing a public health risk [125, 142, 161, 162]. Despite scientific attempts, no effective drugs to prevent drug abuse have been discovered so far. One of the strategies is immunotherapy, which combines and neutralizes target drugs. The catalytic antibody is present in the cycle, and after delivery, the drug is converted into inactive metabolites, but the catalytic antibody remains in the cycle for the next catalytic turnover [77, 125, 163]. Cocaine can be hydrolyzed into non-psychoactive benzoic acid and methyl n-propylamine as benzoyl ester. Proteins that stimulate this response could be injected into cocaine addicts to aid in their recovery [125]. Several catalytic antibodies have been developed and thoroughly researched [77, 140, 164]. McKenzie identified catalytic antibodies 3F5 and 3H9 capable of binding and hydrolyzing cocaine by phage display from a biased single-chain antibodies library, which was produced in spleens of mice previously immunized with cocaine phosphonate transition analogue hapten, and increased the hydrolytic activity by three times [77]. Landry’s team produced antibodies 3B9 and 6A12 that catalyze the hydrolysis of cocaine benzoyl esters by cocaine's phosphonate monoester transition state analogs. Egonine methyl ester and benzoic acid produced by benzoyl esterolysis lack the stimulating activity of cocaine. Passive immunization with this catalytic antibody could treat dependence by blunting reinforcement [140]. Zhu analyzed the crystal structures of catalytic antibody 7A1 Fab′ and six complexes with substrate cocaine. Transition state analogue, products ecgonine methyl ester, and benzoic acid have been analyzed. The mechanism of catalytic hydrolysis of cocaine by the catalytic antibody 7A1 was elucidated [163].

Furthermore, tobacco addiction has been linked to a variety of cancers and cardiovascular diseases. As a result, it has gotten a lot of attention as immunological drug therapy for nicotine addiction. The researchers created antibodies that can oxidize nicotine in the presence of riboflavin and visible light by synthesizing hapten TD1 from normal nicotine and glutaric anhydride [142]. Catalytic antibodies provide an effective strategy for treating substance use disorders and overdose for drugs [142].

Application of Anti-Alzheimer Catalytic Antibody in the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis. Aggregates cause microglia to become inflammatory, create neurotoxic effects, and destroy the anatomical structure of the brain [116, 164]. A (1–42) (A42) deposits harm brain structures, whereas A A (1–40) (A40) accumulates in vessel walls, causing microvascular-related neuroinflammation and impaired blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity, which leads to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in almost all AD patients [116, 165]. Catalytic antibodies have the ability to break down antigens into soluble fragments without the assistance of inflammatory cells. According to Rangan et al. [166], AβP was hydrolyzed into neuropeptide vasoactive intestinal peptide by a cross-reactive light chain fragment of the antibody. According to another study, IgM human autoantibodies hydrolyze AβP [167]. According to studies, IgM activity in AD patients is considerably higher than in controls, and IgM with catalytic activity can inhibit the accumulation and toxicity of AβPin neuron culture in vitro [167]. The catalytic material for hydrolyzing AβP between His14 and Gln15 was isolated after the “covalent” single strand Fv was randomly selected from the phage display library [79, 116]. Researchers have also developed catalytic antibody 2E6 using a catalytic immunoglobulin V domain (IgV) derived from a human IgV library, which they utilize to break down and eliminate A without causing microglial activation or microhemorrhage [79].

In 2020, Planque et al. [90] developed an electrophilic target analogue based therapeutic grade catalytic antibody production platform. Researchers have developed catalytic antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and anti-aging based on this technology [90]. According to the studies, catalytic antibodies may permanently remove target cells, and their efficacy is far superior to that of ordinary antibodies. Without developing or maintaining systemic amyloid pathology, human IgM antibodies selectively eliminate misfolded but usually non-aggregative fragments of TTR. Similarly, catalytic antibodies in the body break down Aβ into non-toxic, non-aggregative fragments without developing or perpetuating Alzheimer’s disease [79, 116]. The catalytic antibody matrix complex is too short to activate inflammatory cells, whereas common antibodies create persistent immune complexes, which invariably cause inflammation. In mouse models, catalytic antibodies targeting brain Aβ were found to be effective [90, 116, 150].

It is believed that the utility of this catalytic antibody platform can be extended to a wide range of proteins involved in disease and aging damage to various organ systems, including protein targets involved in human susceptibility to microbial infections and autoimmune, nervous, cardiovascular, and oncological diseases [90]. Antibodies are made as needed from constitutive or immunogen-induced antibody libraries. In theory, the platform may manufacture catalytic antibodies to particularly every target protein using innate Darwinian immunity and acquired immunity triggered by immunogen [90].

Application of Catalytic Antibodies in the Field of Infection and Immunity

Septicemia

Septicemia is the most common cause of death in intensive care units, and it is caused by the toxic host’s systemic response to infection [36, 168]. With the widespread use of antibiotics, the incidence of septicemia caused by opportunistic pathogens has gradually increased in recent years, with the increase in drug-resistant strains, showing a trend of multidrug resistance [169, 170]. Selecting appropriate antibiotics based on the results of blood culture and drug sensitivity test is an effective method for the treatment of septicemia. but the results of bacterial culture cannot be obtained quickly. Antibiotics are usually selected based on clinical experience. The lack of pertinence is inevitable. Catalytic antibodies have been proposed to be involved in the removal of metabolic waste and the prevention of infection. It has been shown that high levels of catalytic antibodies are associated with a good prognosis of septicemia [36, 168]. IgG with serine protease-like hydrolysis activity is present in the plasma of the patients. The difference in IgG catalytic rate in patients with severe septicemia was higher than that in healthy blood donors, indicating that septicemia was related to the change of plasma hydrolyzed IgG level. The IgG catalytic rate of surviving patients was significantly higher than that of dead patients' IgG. Compared with patients with low hydrolysis rates, patients with high IgG-mediated hydrolysis rates had higher cumulative survival rates [168]. In addition, the IgG of three surviving patients hydrolyzed factor VIII, and one of them also hydrolyzed factor IX, suggesting that catalytic IgG may be involved in the control of diffuse microvascular thrombosis in some patients. Evidence that IgG-hydrolyzing antibodies may play a role in sepsis recovery [168]. Scientists predict that catalytic antibodies can reduce infection and inflammation in septicemia patients but that a lack of catalytic antibody response may accelerate the occurrence of the disease [36, 168]. It is a better potential way to treat septicemia.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Antibodies against foreign antigens and autoantigens are usually produced in patients with autoimmune diseases [36, 37]. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic and potentially fatal autoimmune disease characterize[ed by deterioration and remission. The common symptom of SLE is conjunctival tissue disorder [36]. SLE patients often have large amounts of DNA and anti-DNA antibodies in their blood [171, 172]. Both cellular and soluble inflammatory mediators are involved in the pathogenesis of lupus [173175]. SLE is marked by the presence of a series of IgG and IgM autoantibodies against one or more nuclear components, particularly double-stranded DNA. antibodies with catalytic properties against DNA or RNA are present in SLE [12, 176]. In the early 1990s, Gabipov’s team reported that autoantibodies purified from the sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseases could cleave phosphodiester bonds [12, 176, 177]. Polyclonal IgG antibodies purified from the sera of several SLE patients and hepatitis B patients showed RNA hydrolysis activity that differed from the weak RNAase type A activity of healthy donor IgG [22, 36]. However, these reports did not provide an indication of whether catalytic antibodies correlated with disease severity. Subsequently, Pradhan analyzed the hydrolytic activity of IgG from SLE patients in India and showed that the hydrolysis rate of PFRMCA by SLE IgG was also significantly higher than that of healthy donors. Catalytic antibody response may be part of the active disease process [36]. Therefore, the mechanism of origin of catalytic antibodies and the exact role of these antibodies in the pathogenesis of lupus should continue to be studied in a large number of SLE patients, to develop new biomarkers and treatment strategies for systemic lupus erythematosus [178, 179].

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

Some antibodies with different catalytic activities can be activated spontaneously by primary antigens and have primary antigen-like properties, such as the catalytic activity of idiotypic antibodies and/or anti-idiotypic antibodies [180]. They have the ability to degrade different peptides and proteins. For example, CD4 cells infected with HIV requires to bind the HIV surface glycoprotein gp120/gp41 to the CD4 receptor. Both Ig G and Ig M catalytic antibodies [78, 81, 180, 181] showed anti-gp120 polypeptidase activity. The catalytic antibody 41S-2-L developed by Hifumi was able to hydrolyze the glycoprotein gp41 and destroy non-autoantigen proteins by targeting them with immuno synthetic peptide antigens [81]. Long-term HIV infection was associated with a mild risk of catalytic secretory IgA (SIgA) of gp120 in patients who did not develop AIDS [181]. This activity was also found in the SIgA from non-HIV-positive patients, while RNA antibodies and anti-RNA antibodies have been found in the sera of numerous AIDS patients [182185]. These antibodies have phosphodiester bond cleavage activity, implying that they are catalytic antibodies that contribute to resistance to infection.

Catalytic Antibodies that Inhibit New Coronavirus Infection

At the end of 2019, a new coronavirus spread over the globe, causing a new type of pneumonia disease (COVID-19) with high transmission and fatality [186190]. A safe and effective vaccination is desperately needed, but development takes time. At the same time, very precise and effective antiviral therapies are required in the post-vaccine era. According to studies, SARS-CoV-2 enters host cells via contact between prickle glycoprotein and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission could be averted if this interaction could be blocked directly [190193]. Single-stranded variable fragment (scFv) is a catalytic antibody with broad-spectrum antiviral activity against DNA and RNA viruses due to its nucleic acid hydrolysis properties. Lee evaluated the antiviral activity of the scFv 3D8 against SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses in VeroE6 cell culture [160]. It was found that 3D8 inhibited the replication of SARS-CoV-2, human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43) and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV). The preventive and therapeutic effects of catalytic antibody 3D8 against SARS-CoV-2 in VeroE6 cells were demonstrated. Immunoblotting and plaque analysis showed that the nucleoprotein and infected particles of coronavirus decreased in the cells treated with 3D8 [160]. These data indicate that 3D8 has broad-spectrum antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses [160]. Therefore, it can be considered a potential antiviral strategy against SARS-CoV-2 and zoonotic coronavirus.

Summary and Prospect

A large number of naturally occurring catalytic antibodies have been identified and intensively studied. The emergence of catalytic antibodies has been described in a variety of pathological conditions, including the autoimmune and alloimmune response. The emergence and increased titers of catalytic antibodies may represent a general phenomenon of inflammatory responses. With advances in engineering technology and the aid of bioinformatics tools, scientists have developed antibodies with unique characteristics and catalytic properties. Catalytic antibodies can be used to destroy specific pathogens or tumor cells, remove autoimmune metabolites, protect normal cells from toxicity, and design catalysts suitable for passive immunotherapy of major diseases or stimulate catalytic immunity within the framework of preventive immunization. Although the reaction rates of catalytic antibodies are typically several orders of magnitude lower than that of typical enzymes, the concentration of catalytic antibodies in serum is much higher and can last for a long half-life. The combination of increased antibody concentration and longer action time can compensate for a low catalytic rate, especially in the case of chronic diseases or latent infections. where catalytic antibodies can play an important beneficial role in disease and immunity. Therefore, this paper summarizes the development, design, and evolution methodology of catalytic antibodies, as well as the expression system and application of catalytic antibodies.

However, catalytic antibody behaves as a double-edged sword. Naturally occurring catalytic antibodies are considered to play a pathogenic and beneficial role in a variety of autoimmune diseases. It is unclear whether the catalytic antibodies produced under pathological conditions play a pathogenic role or reflect the body's attempt to re-establish homeostasis in the body. The mechanism of origin of catalytic antibodies and the exact role of these antibodies in the pathogenesis of related diseases need to be studied in a large number of clinical trials. The fact that the stability of recombinant antibodies (including catalytic antibodies) is highly unpredictable in the physiological environment complicates the use of catalytic antibodies in research and clinical applications. Some problems still need to be further examined. However, catalytic antibodies are still considered promising tools for the treatment of human diseases due to the combination of high substrate/antigen specificity, enzyme-like turnover, relatively low catalytic efficiency, and high half-life.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southwest Medical University, the Department of Science and Technology of Luzhou, and the Department of Science and Technology in Sichuan Province.

Author Contribution

Daqun Zhao and Shujun Zhang decided to write the review article. Jjie Chen and Xiaoyue Hu performed the literature search and Shujun Zhang wrote the review article with the help of Daqun Zhao.

Funding

The research was supported by the College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (S20191 0729098), the Natural Science Foundation of Southwest Medical University (2019ZQN168), and the Natural Science Foundation of Luzhou (2019LZXNYDJ10).

Data Availability

Data and materials will be freely available in PubMed.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Green BS. Monoclonal antibodies as catalysts and templates for organic chemical reactions. Advances in Biotechnological Processes. 1989;11:359–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lerner RA, Tramontano A. Antibodies as enzymes. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 1987;12:427–430. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(87)90208-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tanaka F. Catalytic antibodies as designer proteases and esterases. Chemical Reviews. 2002;102:4885–4906. doi: 10.1021/cr010180a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Suzuki H. Recent advances in abzyme studies. Journal of Biochemistry. 1994;115:623–628. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pauling L. Molecular architecture and biological reactions. Chemical & Engineering News. 1946;24:1375–1377. doi: 10.1021/cen-v024n010.p1375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McDarland JT. Catalysis in chemistry and enzymology (Jencks, William P.) Journal of Chemical Education. 1970;47:A860–A862. doi: 10.1021/ed047pA860.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lerner RA. Antibodies of predetermined specificity in biology and medicine. Advances in Immunology. 1984;36:1–44. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60898-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pollack SJ, Jacobs JW, Schultz PG. Selective chemical catalysis by an antibody. Science. 1986;234:1570–1573. doi: 10.1126/science.3787262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tramontano A, Janda KD, Lerner RA. Catalytic antibodies. Science. 1986;234:1566–1570. doi: 10.1126/science.3787261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paul S, Volle DJ, Beach CM, Johnson DR, Powell MJ, Massey RJ. Catalytic hydrolysis of vasoactive intestinal peptide by human autoantibody. Science. 1989;244:1158–1162. doi: 10.1126/science.2727702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bowen A, Wear M, Casadevall A. Antibody-mediated catalysis in infection and immunity. Infection and Immunity. 2017;85:e00202–e217. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00202-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shuster AM, Gololobov GV, Kvashuk OA, Bogomolova AE, Smirnov IV, Gabibov AG. DNA hydrolyzing autoantibodies. Science. 1992;256:665–667. doi: 10.1126/science.1585181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li L, Paul S, Tyutyulkova S, Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri S. Catalytic activity of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies. The Journal of Immunology. 1995;154:3328–3332. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.154.7.3328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Paul S, Li L, Kalaga R, Wilkins-Stevens P, Stevens FJ, Solomon A. Natural catalytic antibodies: Peptide-hydrolyzing activities of bence jones proteins and VL fragment. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1995;270:15257–15261. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.25.15257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matsuura K, Ohara K, Munakata H, Hifumi E, Uda T. Pathogenicity of catalytic antibodies: Catalytic activity of Bence Jones proteins from myeloma patients with renal impairment can elicit cytotoxic effects. Biological Chemistry. 2006;387:543–548. doi: 10.1515/BC.2006.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thiagarajan P, Dannenbring R, Matsuura K, Tramontano A, Gololobov G, Paul S. Monoclonal antibody light chain with prothrombinase activity. Biochemistry. 2000;39:6459–6465. doi: 10.1021/bi992588w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang YH, Chang CJ, Chuang YH, Hsu HY, Chen PP, Chiang BL. Identification of anti-prothrombin antibodies in the anti-phospholipid syndrome that display the prothrombinase activity. Rheumatology. 2010;49:34–42. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wootla B, Dasgupta S, Dimitrov JD, Bayry J, Lévesque H, Borg JY, Borel-Derlon A, Rao DN, Friboulet A, Kaveri SV, Lacroix-Desmazes S. Factor VIII hydrolysis mediated by anti-factor VIII autoantibodies in acquired hemophilia. The Journal of Immunology. 2008;180:7714–7720. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.11.7714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ponomarenko NA, Durova OM, Vorobiev II, Belogurov AA, Kurkova IN, Petrenko AG, Telegin GB, Suchkov SV, Kiselev SL, Lagarkova MA, Govorun VM, Serebryakova MV, Avalle B, Tornatore P, Karavanov A, Morse HC, Thomas D, Friboulet A, Gabibov AG. Autoantibodies to myelin basic protein catalyze site-specific degradation of their antigen. PNAS. 2006;103:281–286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509849103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lacroix-Desmazes S, Moreau A, Bonnemain C, Stieltjes N, Pashov A, Sultan Y, Hoebeke J, Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV. Catalytic activity of antibodies against factor VIII in patients with hemophilia A. Nature Medicine. 1999;5:1044–1047. doi: 10.1038/12483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lacroix-Desmazes S, Wootla B, Delignat S, Dasgupta S, Nagaraja V, Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV. Pathophysiology of catalytic antibodies. Immunology Letters. 2006;103:3–7. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vlassov A, Florentz C, Helm M, Naumov V, Buneva V, Nevinsky G, Giegé R. Characterization and selectivity of catalytic antibodies from human serum with RNase activity. Nucleic Acids Research. 1998;26:5243–5250. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.23.5243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baranovskii AG, Ershova NA, Buneva VN, Kanyshkova TYG, Mogelnitskii AS, Doronin BM, Boiko AN, Gusev EI, Favorova OO, Nevinsky GA. Catalytic heterogeneity of polyclonal DNA-hydrolyzing antibodies from the sera of patients with multiple sclerosis. Immunology Letters. 2001;76:163–167. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(01)00185-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tramontano A. Immune recognition, antigen design, and catalytic antibody production. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1994;47:257–275. doi: 10.1007/BF02787939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kozyr AV, Kolesnikov AV, Aleksandrova ES, Sashchenko LP, Gnuchev NV, Favorov PV, Kotelnikov MA, Iakhnina EI, Astsaturov IA, Prokaeva TB, Alekberova ZS, Suchkov SV, Gabibov AG. Novel functional activities of anti-DNA autoantibodies from sera of patients with lymphoproliferative and autoimmune diseases. Appl Biochem Biotech. 1998;75:45–61. doi: 10.1007/BF02787708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kakinuma H, Fujii I, Nishi Y. Selective chemotherapeutic strategies using catalytic antibodies: A common pro-moiety for antibody-directed abzyme prodrug therapy. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2002;269:269–281. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00241-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ivanen DR, Kulminskaya AA, Shabalin KA, Isaeva-Ivanova LV, Ershova NA, Saveliev AN, Nevinsky GA, Neustroev KN. Catalytic properties of IgMs with amylolytic activity isolated from patients with multiple sclerosis. Medical Science Monitor. 2004;10:273–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ramsland PA, Terzyan SS, Cloud G, Bourne CR, Farrugia W, Tribbick G, Geysen HM, Moomaw CR, Slaughter CA, Edmundson AB. Crystal structure of a glycosylated Fab from an IgM cryoglobulin with properties of a natural proteolytic antibody. The Biochemical Journal. 2006;395:473–481. doi: 10.1042/BJ20051739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Krasnorutskii MA, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. Antibodies against pancreatic ribonuclease A hydrolyze RNA and DNA. International Immunology. 2008;20:1031–1040. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kostrikina IA, Kolesova ME, Orlovskaya IA, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. Diversity of DNA-hydrolyzing antibodies from the sera of autoimmune-prone MRL/MpJ-lpr mice. Journal of Molecular Recognition. 2011;24:557–569. doi: 10.1002/jmr.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brown EL, Nishiyama Y, Dunkle JW, Aggarwal S, Planque S, Watanabe K, Csencsits-Smith K, Bowden MG, Kaplan SL, Paul S. Constitutive production of catalytic antibodies to a Staphylococcus aureus virulence factor and effect of infection. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:9940–9951. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.330043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kit Y, Bilyy R, Korniy N, Tomin A, Chop'yak V, Tolstyak Y, Antonyuk V, Stoika R. Two-step chromatography purification of IgGs possessing sialidase activity from human blood serum. Biomedical Chromatography. 2015;29:328–332. doi: 10.1002/bmc.3283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tolmacheva AS, Blinova EA, Ermakov EA, Buneva VN, Vasilenko NL, Nevinsky GA. IgG abzymes with peroxidase and oxidoreductase activities from the sera of healthy humans. Journal of Molecular Recognition. 2015;28:565–580. doi: 10.1002/jmr.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gunter SM, Jones KM, Zhan B, Essigmann HT, Murray KO, Garcia MN, Gorchakov R, Bottazzi ME, Hotez PJ, Brown EL. Identification and Characterization of the Trypanosoma cruzi B-cell Superantigen Tc24. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2016;94:114–121. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Frolov MA, Likhvantseva VG, Kovelenova IV, Solomatina MV. Significance of anti-myelin basic protein antibodies for ocular hydrodynamic disturbances in primary open-angle glaucoma. Vestnik oftalmologii. 2017;133:37–43. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2017133337-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pradhan V, Pandit P, Surve P, Lecerf M, Rajadhyaksha A, Nadkar M, Khadilkar PV, Chougule DA, Naigaonkar AA, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Bayry J, Ghosh K, Kaveri SV. Catalytic antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. European Journal of Rheumatology. 2018;5:173–178. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2018.17194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Timofeeva AM, Nevinsky GA. Systemic lupus erythematosus: Possible localization of trypsin-like and metalloprotease active centers in the protein sequence of the monoclonal light chain (NGTA2-Me-pro-Tr) Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry. 2020;67:946–959. doi: 10.1002/bab.1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kompaneets IY, Ermakov EA, Sedykh SE, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. Secretory immunoglobulin A from human milk hydrolyzes microRNA. Journal of Dairy Science. 2020;103:6782–6797. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ermakov EA, Parshukova DA, Nevinsky GA, Buneva VN. Natural Catalytic IgGs Hydrolyzing Histones in Schizophrenia: Are They the Link between Humoral Immunity and Inflammation? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:7238. doi: 10.3390/ijms21197238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ermakov EA, Kabirova EM, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. IgGs-abzymes from the sera of patients with multiple sclerosis recognize and hydrolyze miRNAs. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22:2812. doi: 10.3390/ijms22062812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Santajit S, Kong-Ngoen T, Chongsa-Nguan M, Boonyuen U, Pumirat P, Sookrung N, Chaicumpa W, Indrawattana N. Human single-chain antibodies that neutralize elastolytic activity of pseudomonas aeruginosa LasB. Pathogens. 2021;10:765. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kompaneets IY, Sedykh SE, Buneva VN, Dmitrenok PS, Nevinsky GA. Secretory immunoglobulin A from human milk hydrolyzes 5 histones and myelin basic protein. Journal of Dairy Science. 2022;105:950–964. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ramesh R, Sundaresh A, Rajkumar RP, Negi VS, Vijayalakshmi MA, Krishnamoorthy R, Tamouza R, Leboyer M, Kamalanathan AS. DNA hydrolysing IgG catalytic antibodies: An emerging link between psychoses and autoimmunity. NPJ Schizophrenia. 2021;7:13. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00143-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fujii I, Tsumuraya T. Directed evolution of hydrolytic antibodies in phage-displayed combinatorial libraries. Chemistry Letters. 2014;43:272–280. doi: 10.1246/cl.131220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Takahashi N, Kakinuma H, Liu L, Nishi Y, Fujii I. In vitro abzyme evolution to optimize antibody recognition for catalysis. Nature Biotechnology. 2001;19:563–567. doi: 10.1038/89320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hu R, Xie GY, Zhang X, Guo ZQ, Jin S. Production and characterization of monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody exhibiting a catalytic activity similar to carboxypeptidase. A Journal of Biotechnology. 1998;61:109–115. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Izadyar L, Friboulet A, Remy MH, Roseto A, Thomas D. Monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies as functional internal images of enzyme active sites: Production of a catalytic antibody with a cholinesterase activity. PNAS. 1993;90:8876–8880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.8876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ponomarenko NA, Pillet D, Paon M, Vorobiev II, Smirnov IV, Adenier H, Avalle B, Kolesnikov AV, Kozyr AV, Thomas D, Gabibov AG, Friboulet A. Anti-idiotypic antibody mimics proteolytic function of parent antigen. Biochemistry. 2007;46:14598–14609. doi: 10.1021/bi7013954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li JW, Xia L, Su Y, Liu H, Xia X, Lu Q, Yang C, Reheman K. Molecular imprint of enzyme active site by camel nanobodies: Rapid and efficient approach to produce abzymes with alliinase activity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287:13713–13721. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.336370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mahendra A, Sharma M, Rao DN, Peyron I, Planchais C, Dimitrov JD, Kaveri SV, Lacroix-Desmazes S. Antibody-mediated catalysis: Induction and therapeutic relevance. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2013;12:648–652. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gramatikova SI, Christen P. Pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-dependent catalytic antibodies. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2000;83:183–190. doi: 10.1385/ABAB:83:1-3:183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ding L, Liu Z, Zhu Z, Luo G, Zhao D, Ni J. Biochemical characterization of selenium-containing catalytic antibody as a cytosolic glutathione peroxidase mimic. The Biochemical Journal. 1998;332(Pt 1):251–255. doi: 10.1042/bj3320251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Smiley JA, Benkovic SJ. Selection of catalytic antibodies for a biosynthetic reaction from a combinatorial cDNA library by complementation of an auxotrophic Escherichia coli: Antibodies for orotate decarboxylation. PNAS. 1994;91:8319–8323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.18.8319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Barbas CF, 3rd, Heine A, Zhong G, Hoffmann T, Gramatikova S, Björnestedt R, List B, Anderson J, Stura EA, Wilson IA, Lerner RA. Immune versus natural selection: Antibody aldolases with enzymic rates but broader scope. Science. 1997;278:2085–2092. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5346.2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hotta K, Lange H, Tantillo DJ, Houk KN, Hilvert D, Wilson IA. Catalysis of decarboxylation by a preorganized heterogeneous microenvironment: Crystal structures of abzyme 21D8. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2000;302:1213–1225. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Janda KD, Shevlin CG, Lerner RA. Antibody catalysis of a disfavored chemical transformation. Science. 1993;259:490–493. doi: 10.1126/science.8424171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li T, Janda KD, Ashley JA, Lerner RA. Antibody catalyzed cationic cyclization. Science. 1994;264:1289–1293. doi: 10.1126/science.8191282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wentworth P, Jr, Liu Y, Wentworth AD, Fan P, Foley MJ, Janda KD. A bait and switch hapten strategy generates catalytic antibodies for phosphodiester hydrolysis. PNAS. 1998;95:5971–5975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Napper AD, Benkovic SJ, Tramontano A, Lerner RA. A stereospecific cyclization catalyzed by an antibody. Science. 1987;237:1041–1043. doi: 10.1126/science.3616626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wirsching P, Ashley JA, Lo CH, Janda KD, Lerner RA. Reactive immunization. Science. 1995;270:1775–1782. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5243.1775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xu Y, Yamamoto N, Janda KD. Catalytic antibodies: Hapten design strategies and screening methods. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2004;12:5247–5268. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.03.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Padiolleau-Lefèvre S, Ben Naya R, Shahsavarian MA, Friboulet A, Avalle B. Catalytic antibodies and their applications in biotechnology: State of the art. Biotechnology Letters. 2014;36:1369–1379. doi: 10.1007/s10529-014-1503-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fujii I. Directed evolution of antibody molecules in phage-displayed combinatorial libraries. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2007;127:91–99. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.127.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu E, Prasad L, Delbaere LT, Waygood EB, Lee JS. Conversion of an antibody into an enzyme which cleaves the protein HPr. Molecular Immunology. 1998;35:1069–1077. doi: 10.1016/S0161-5890(98)00089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fletcher MC, Kuderova A, Cygler M, Lee JS. Creation of a ribonuclease abzyme through site-directed mutagenesis. Nature Biotechnology. 1998;16:1065–1067. doi: 10.1038/3519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Okochi N, Kato-Murai M, Kadonosono T, Ueda M. Design of a serine protease-like catalytic triad on an antibody light chain displayed on the yeast cell surface. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2007;77:597–603. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1197-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jerne NK. Towards a network theory of the immune system. Annual Immunology (Paris) 1974;125:373–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Avalle B, Thomas D, Friboulet A. Functional mimicry: Elicitation of a monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody hydrolizing beta-lactams. FASEB journal. 1998;12:1055–1060. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.12.11.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pillet D, Paon M, Vorobiev II, Gabibov AG, Thomas D, Friboulet A. Idiotypic network mimicry and antibody catalysis: Lessons for the elicitation of efficient anti-idiotypic protease antibodies. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2002;269:5–12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00221-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kit Y, Semenov DV, Nevinsky GA. Phosphorylation of different human milk proteins by human catalytic secretory immunoglobulin A. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology International. 1996;39:521–527. doi: 10.1080/15216549600201571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Paul S, Li L, Kalaga R, O'Dell J, Dannenbring RE, Jr, Swindells S, Hinrichs S, Caturegli P, Rose NR. Characterization of thyroglobulin-directed and polyreactive catalytic antibodies in autoimmune disease. The Journal of Immunology. 1997;159:1530–1536. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.159.3.1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Padiolleau-Lefèvre S, Débat H, Phichith D, Thomas D, Friboulet A, Avalle B. Expression of a functional scFv fragment of an anti-idiotypic antibody with a beta-lactam hydrolytic activity. Immunology Letters. 2006;103:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2005.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Smith GP. Filamentous fusion phage: Novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science. 1985;228:1315–1317. doi: 10.1126/science.4001944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mccafferty G, Dooley J. Involuntary outpatient commitment: An update. Mental and physical disability law reporter. 1990;14:277–287. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rahbarnia L, Farajnia S, Babaei H, Majidi J, Veisi K, Ahmadzadeh V, Akbari B. Evolution of phage display technology: From discovery to application. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2017;25:216–224. doi: 10.1080/1061186X.2016.1258570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Takahashi-Ando N, Kakinuma H, Fujii I, Nishi Y. Directed evolution governed by controlling the molecular recognition between an abzyme and its haptenic transition-state analog. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2004;294:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2004.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mckenzie KM, Mee JM, Rogers CJ, Hixon MS, Kaufmann GF, Janda KD. Identification and characterization of single chain anti-cocaine catalytic antibodies. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2007;365:722–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Paul S, Planque S, Zhou YX, Taguchi H, Bhatia G, Karle S, Hanson C, Nishiyama Y. Specific HIV gp120-cleaving antibodies induced by covalently reactive analog of gp120. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278:20429–20435. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300870200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Taguchi H, Planque S, Sapparapu G, Boivin S, Hara M, Nishiyama Y, Paul S. Exceptional amyloid beta peptide hydrolyzing activity of nonphysiological immunoglobulin variable domain scaffolds. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283:36724–36733. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806766200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hifumi E, Higashi K, Uda T. Catalytic digestion of human tumor necrosis factor-α by antibody heavy chain. The FEBS journal. 2010;277:3823–3832. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hifumi E, Mitsuda Y, Ohara K, Uda T. Targeted destruction of the HIV-1 coat protein gp41 by a catalytic antibody light chain. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2002;269:283–298. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00242-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Durova OM, Vorobiev II, Smirnov IV, Reshetnyak AV, Telegin GB, Shamborant OG, Orlova NA, Genkin DD, Bacon A, Ponomarenko NA, Friboulet A, Gabibov AG. Strategies for induction of catalytic antibodies toward HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120 in autoimmune prone mice. Molecular Immunology. 2009;47:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sun M, Gao QS, Li L, Paul S. Proteolytic activity of an antibody light chain. The Journal of Immunology. 1994;153:5121–5126. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.153.11.5121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mitsuda Y, Hifumi E, Tsuruhata K, Fujinami H, Yamamoto N, Uda T. Catalytic antibody light chain capable of cleaving a chemokine receptor CCR-5 peptide with a high reaction rate constant. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2004;86:217–225. doi: 10.1002/bit.20031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hifumi E, Morihara F, Hatiuchi K, Okuda T, Nishizono A, Uda T. Catalytic features and eradication ability of antibody light-chain UA15-L against Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283:899–907. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705674200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Pavlovic M, Cavallo M, Kats A, Kotlarchyk A, Zhuang H, Shoenfeld Y. From Pauling's abzyme concept to the new era of hydrolytic anti-DNA autoantibodies: A link to rational vaccine design? - A review. International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications. 2011;7:220–238. doi: 10.1504/IJBRA.2011.041735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ponomarenko MP, Ponomarenko JV, Frolov AS, Podkolodnaya OA, Vorobyev DG, Kolchanov NA, Overton GC. Oligonucleotide frequency matrices addressed to recognizing functional DNA sites. Bioinformatics. 1999;15:631–643. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.7.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Smirnov I, Carletti E, Kurkova I, Nachon F, Nicolet Y, Mitkevich VA, Débat H, Avalle B, Belogurov AA, Jr, Kuznetsov N, Reshetnyak A, Masson P, Tonevitsky AG, Ponomarenko N, Makarov AA, Friboulet A, Tramontano A, Gabibov A. Reactibodies generated by kinetic selection couple chemical reactivity with favorable protein dynamics. PNAS. 2011;108:15954–15959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108460108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Luo Q, Zhang C, Miao L, Zhang D, Bai Y, Hou C, Liu J, Yan F, Mu Y, Luo G. Triple mutated antibody scFv2F3 with high GPx activity: Insights from MD, docking, MDFE, and MM-PBSA simulation. Amino Acids. 2013;44:1009–1019. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1435-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Planque SA, Massey RJ, Paul S. Catalytic antibody (catabody) platform for age-associated amyloid disease: From Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to the verge of medical interventions. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2020;185:111188. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.111188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Dudgeon K, Famm K, Christ D. Sequence determinants of protein aggregation in human VH domains. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection. 2009;22:217–220. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzn059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kvam E, Sierks MR, Shoemaker CB, Messer A. Physico-chemical determinants of soluble intrabody expression in mammalian cell cytoplasm. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection. 2010;23:489–498. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzq022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Frisch C, Kolmar H, Schmidt A, Kleemann G, Reinhardt A, Pohl E, Usón I, Schneider TR, Fritz HJ. Contribution of the intramolecular disulfide bridge to the folding stability of REIv, the variable domain of a human immunoglobulin kappa light chain. Folding and Design. 1996;1:431–440. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00059-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wörn A, Plückthun A. An intrinsically stable antibody scFv fragment can tolerate the loss of both disulfide bonds and fold correctly. FEBS Letters. 1998;427:357–361. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00463-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Park S, Nguyen MQ, Ta HKK, Nguyen MT, Lee G, Kim CJ, Jang YJ, Choe H. Soluble cytoplasmic expression and purification of immunotoxin HER2(scFv)-PE24B as a maltose binding protein fusion. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22:6483. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Greenfield EA, DeCaprio J, Brahmandam M. Preparing GST-, His-, or MBP-fusion proteins from bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2020;2020:100024. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot100024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ideno A, Furutani M, Iba Y, Kurosawa Y, Maruyama T. FK506 binding protein from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii suppresses the aggregation of proteins in Escherichia coli. Applied and Environment Microbiology. 2002;68:464–469. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.464-469.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Maruyama T, Suzuki R, Furutani M. Archaeal peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerases (PPIases) update 2004. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2004;9:1680–1720. doi: 10.2741/1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Chen X, Shi J, Chen R, Wen Y, Shi Y, Zhu Z, Guo S, Li L. Molecular chaperones (TrxA, SUMO, Intein, and GST) mediating expression, purification, and antimicrobial activity assays of plectasin in Escherichia coli. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry. 2015;62:606–614. doi: 10.1002/bab.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Li H, Liu N, Wang WT, Wang JY, Gao WY. Cloning and characterization of GST fusion tag stabilized large subunit of Escherichia coli acetohydroxyacid synthase I. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2016;121:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Mishra V. Affinity tags for protein purification. Current Protein Peptide Science. 2020;21:821–830. doi: 10.2174/1389203721666200606220109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Panavas T, Sanders C, Butt TR. SUMO fusion technology for enhanced protein production in prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2009;497:303–317. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-566-4_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Esposito D, Chatterjee DK. Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2006;17:353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kabayama H, Takeuchi M, Tokushige N, Muramatsu SI, Kabayama M, Fukuda M, Yamada Y, Mikoshiba K. An ultra-stable cytoplasmic antibody engineered for in vivo applications. Nature Communications. 2020;11:336. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13654-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Joshi SN, Butler DC, Messer A. Fusion to a highly charged proteasomal retargeting sequence increases soluble cytoplasmic expression and efficacy of diverse anti-synuclein intrabodies. MAbs. 2012;4:686–693. doi: 10.4161/mabs.21696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bowdish K, Tang Y, Hicks JB, Hilvert D. Yeast expression of a catalytic antibody with chorismate mutase activity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1991;266:11901–11908. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)99043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kim SH, Schindler DG, Lindner AB, Tawfik DS, Eshhar Z. Expression and characterization of recombinant single-chain Fv and Fv fragments derived from a set of catalytic antibodies. Molecular Immunology. 1997;34:891–906. doi: 10.1016/S0161-5890(97)00096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Robin S, Petrov K, Dintinger T, Kujumdzieva A, Tellier C, Dion M. Comparison of three microbial hosts for the expression of an active catalytic scFv. Molecular Immunology. 2003;39:729–738. doi: 10.1016/S0161-5890(02)00253-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Franqueville E, Loutrari H, Mellou F, Stamatis H, Friboulet A, Kolisis FNJ. Reverse micelles, a system for antibody-catalysed reactions. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B Enzymatic. 2003;21:15–17. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1177(02)00130-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kozyr AV, Bobik TV, Ignatova AN, Kolesnikov AV. Production of DNA-hydrolyzing antibody BV04-01 Fab fragment in methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Molekuliarnaia Biologiia (Mosk) 2004;38:1067–1075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ali M, Suzuki H, Fukuba T, Jiang X, Nakano H, Yamane T. Improvements in the cell-free production of functional antibodies using cell extract from protease-deficient Escherichia coli mutant. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2005;99:181–186. doi: 10.1263/jbb.99.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Reshetnyak AV, Armentano MF, Ponomarenko NA, Vizzuso D, Durova OM, Ziganshin R, Serebryakova M, Govorun V, Gololobov G, Morse HC, 3rd, Friboulet A, Makker SP, Gabibov AG, Tramontano A. Routes to covalent catalysis by reactive selection for nascent protein nucleophiles. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:16175–16182. doi: 10.1021/ja076528m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kurkova IN, Reshetnyak AV, Durova OM, Knorre VD, Tramontano A, Friboulet A, Ponomarenko NA, Smirnov AJDB, Biophysics Antibodies-antidotes against organophosphorus compounds. Dokl Biochemistry Biophysics. 2009;425:94–97. doi: 10.1134/S1607672909020100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ben Naya R, Matti K, Guellier A, Matagne A, Boquet D, Thomas D, Friboulet A, Avalle B, Padiolleau-Lefèvre S. Efficient refolding of a recombinant abzyme : Structural and catalytic characterizations. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2013;97:7721–7731. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4600-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Marconi PL, Alvarez MA. The expression of the 14D9 catalytic antibody in suspended cells of Nicotiana tabacum cultures increased by the addition of protein stabilizers and by transference from Erlenmeyer flasks to a 2-L bioreactor. Biotechnology Progress. 2014;30:1185–1189. doi: 10.1002/btpr.1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Planque SA, Nishiyama Y, Sonoda S, Lin Y, Taguchi H, Hara M, Kolodziej S, Mitsuda Y, Gonzalez V, Sait HB, Fukuchi K, Massey RJ, Friedland RP, O'Nuallain B, Sigurdsson EM, Paul S. Specific amyloid β clearance by a catalytic antibody construct. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:10229–10241. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.641738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lee J, Kim M, Seo Y, Lee Y, Park H, Byun SJ, Kwon MH. The catalytic activity of a recombinant single chain variable fragment nucleic acid-hydrolysing antibody varies with fusion tag and expression host. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2017;633:110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2017.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hifumi E, Taguchi H, Toorisaka E, Uda T. New technologies to introduce a catalytic function into antibodies: A unique human catalytic antibody light chain showing degradation of β-amyloid molecule along with the peptidase activity. FASEB Bioadvance. 2019;1:93–104. doi: 10.1096/fba.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Hifumi E, Taguchi H, Nonaka T, Harada T, Uda T. Finding and characterizing a catalytic antibody light chain, H34, capable of degrading the PD-1 molecule. RSC Chemistry Biology. 2021;2:220–229. doi: 10.1039/D0CB00155D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Maggi M, Pessino G, Guardamagna I, Lonati L, Pulimeno C, Scotti C. A targeted catalytic nanobody (T-CAN) with asparaginolytic activity. Cancers. 2021;13:5637. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Yin J, Li G, Ren X, Herrler GJJOB. Select what you need: a comparative evaluation of the advantages and limitations of frequently used expression systems for foreign genes. Journal of Biotechnology. 2007;127:335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Andrade EV, Albuquerque FC, Moraes LM, Brígido MM, Santos-Silva MA. Single-chain Fv with Fc fragment of the human IgG1 tag: Construction, Pichia pastoris expression and antigen binding characterization. Journal of Biochemistry. 2000;128:891–895. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Chen Z, Patel JM, Noble PW, Garcia C, Hong Z, Hansen JE, Zhou J. A lupus anti-DNA autoantibody mediates autocatalytic, targeted delivery of nanoparticles to tumors. Oncotarget. 2016;7:59965–59975. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Shamis M, Lode HN, Shabat D. Bioactivation of self-immolative dendritic prodrugs by catalytic antibody 38C2. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126:1726–1731. doi: 10.1021/ja039052p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wójcik T, Kieć-Kononowicz K. Catalytic activity of certain antibodies as a potential tool for drug synthesis and for directed prodrug therapies. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2008;15:1606–1615. doi: 10.2174/092986708784911533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Shabat D, Rader C, List B, Lerner RA, Barbas CF. Multiple event activation of a generic prodrug trigger by antibody catalysis. PNAS. 1999;96:6925–6930. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Shabat D, Lode HN, Pertl U, Reisfeld RA, Rader C, Lerner RA, Barbas CF., 3rd In vivo activity in a catalytic antibody-prodrug system: Antibody catalyzed etoposide prodrug activation for selective chemotherapy. PNAS. 2001;98:7528–7533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.131187998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sinha SC, Das S, Li LS, Lerner RA, Barbas CF., 3rd Preparation of integrin alpha(v)beta3-targeting Ab 38C2 constructs. Nature Protocols. 2007;2:449–456. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Abraham S, Guo F, Li LS, Rader C, Liu C, Barbas CF, Lerner RA, Sinha SC. Synthesis of the next-generation therapeutic antibodies that combine cell targeting and antibody-catalyzed prodrug activation. PNAS. 2007;104:5584–5589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700223104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Nishi Y. Enzyme/abzyme prodrug activation systems: Potential use in clinical oncology. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2003;9:2113–2130. doi: 10.2174/1381612033454063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Campbell DA, Gong B, Kochersperger LM, Yonkovich S, Gallop MA, Schultz PG. Antibody-catalyzed prodrug activation. Journal American Chemistry Society. 1994;116:2165–2166. doi: 10.1021/ja00084a075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Santi DV, Mchenry CS, Sommer HJB. Mechanism of interaction of thymidylate synthetase with 5-fluorodeoxyuridylate. Biochemistry. 1974;13:471–481. doi: 10.1021/bi00700a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Wentworth P, Datta A, Blakey DJ. Toward antibody-directed "abzyme" prodrug therapy, ADAPT: Carbamate prodrug activation by a catalytic antibody and its in vitro application to human tumor cell killing. PNAS. 1996;93:799–803. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Vranken DLV, Panomitros D, Schultz PG. Catalysis of carbamate hydrolysis by an antibody. Tetrahedron Letters. 1994;35:3873–3876. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)76689-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K. Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori KTumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: A review. Journal of Controlled Release. 2000;65:271–284. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00248-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Satchi R, Connors TA, Duncan R. PDEPT: Polymer-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. I. HPMA copolymer-cathepsin B and PK1 as a model combination. British Journal of Cancer. 2001;85:1070–1076. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Satchi-Fainaro R, Wrasidlo W, Lode HN, Shabat D. Synthesis and characterization of a catalytic antibody-HPMA copolymer-conjugate as a tool for tumor selective prodrug activation. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2002;10:3023–3029. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00156-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Friboulet A, Izadyar L, Avalle B, Roseto A, Thomas D. Abzyme generation using an anti-idiotypic antibody as the “internal image" of an enzyme active site. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1994;47:229–237. doi: 10.1007/BF02787937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Friboulet A, Izadyar L, Avalle B, Roseto A, Thomas D. Antiidiotypic antibodies as functional internal images of enzyme-active sites. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1995;750:265–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb19963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Landry DW, Zhao K, Yang GXQ, Glickman M, Georgiadis TM. Antibody-catalyzed degradation of cocaine. Science. 1993;259:1899–1901. doi: 10.1126/science.8456315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Briscoe RJ, Jeanville PM, Cabrera C, Baird TJ, Woods JH, Landry DW. A catalytic antibody against cocaine attenuates cocaine’s cardiovascular effects in mice: A dose and time course analysis. International Immunopharmacology. 2001;1:1189–1198. doi: 10.1016/S1567-5769(01)00054-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Dickerson TJ, Yamamoto N, Janda KD. Antibody-catalyzed oxidative degradation of nicotine using riboflavin. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2004;12:4981–4987. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Goswami RK, Huang ZZ, Forsyth JS, Felding-Habermann B, Sinha SC. Multiple catalytic aldolase antibodies suitable for chemical programming. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2009;19:3821–3824. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.04.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Lee WR, Jang JY, Kim JS, Kwon MH, Kim YS. Gene silencing by cell-penetrating, sequence-selective and nucleic-acid hydrolyzing antibodies. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38:1596–1609. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Paul S, Planque S, Nishiyama Y. Immunological origin and functional properties of catalytic autoantibodies to amyloid beta peptide. Journal of Clinical Immunology. 2010;30(1):S43–49. doi: 10.1007/s10875-010-9414-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Wootla B, Christophe OD, Mahendra A, Dimitrov JD, Repessé Y, Ollivier V, Friboulet A, Borel-Derlon A, Levesque H, Borg JY, Andre S, Bayry J, Calvez T, Kaveri SV, Lacroix-Desmazes S. Proteolytic antibodies activate factor IX in patients with acquired hemophilia. Blood. 2011;117:2257–2264. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-296103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hifumi E, Honjo E, Fujimoto N, Arakawa M, Nishizono A, Uda T. Highly efficient method of preparing human catalytic antibody light chains and their biological characteristics. The FASEB Journal. 2012;26:1607–1615. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-195339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Hifumi E, Fujimoto N, Arakawa M, Saito E, Matsumoto S, Kobayashi N, Uda T. Biochemical features of a catalytic antibody light chain, 22F6, prepared from human lymphocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288:19558–19568. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.454579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Nishiyama Y, Taguchi H, Hara M, Planque SA, Mitsuda Y, Paul S. Metal-dependent amyloid β-degrading catalytic antibody construct. Journal of Biotechnology. 2014;180:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Kou J, Yang J, Lim JE, Pattanayak A, Song M, Planque S, Paul S, Fukuchi K. Catalytic immunoglobulin gene delivery in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: Prophylactic and therapeutic applications. Molecular Neurobiology. 2015;51:43–56. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8691-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Cho S, Youn HN, Hoang PM, Cho S, Kim KE, Kil EJ, Lee G, Cho MJ, Hong J, Byun SJ, Song CS, Lee S. Preventive activity against influenza (H1N1) virus by intranasally delivered RNA-hydrolyzing antibody in respiratory epithelial cells of mice. Viruses. 2015;7:5133–5144. doi: 10.3390/v7092863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Hifumi E, Arakawa M, Matsumoto S, Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Uda T. Biochemical features and antiviral activity of a monomeric catalytic antibody light-chain 23D4 against influenza A virus. The FASEB Journal. 2015;29:2347–2358. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-264275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Oda M, Tsumuraya T, Fujii I. Effects of substrate conformational strain on binding kinetics of catalytic antibodies. Biophys Physicobiol. 2016;13:135–138. doi: 10.2142/biophysico.13.0_135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Mahendra A, Peyron I, Thaunat O, Dollinger C, Gilardin L, Sharma M, Wootla B, Rao DN, Padiolleau-Lefevre S, Boquet D, More A, Varadarajan N, Kaveri SV, Legendre C, Lacroix-Desmazes S. Generation of Catalytic Antibodies Is an Intrinsic Property of an Individual's Immune System: A Study on a Large Cohort of Renal Transplant Patients. The Journal of Immunology. 2016;196:4075–4081. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1403005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Lamba V, Sanchez E, Fanning LR, Howe K, Alvarez MA, Herschlag D, Forconi M. Kemp eliminase activity of ketosteroid isomerase. Biochemistry. 2017;56:582–591. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Lomakin Y, Kudriaeva A, Kostin N, Terekhov S, Kaminskaya A, Chernov A, Zakharova M, Ivanova M, Simaniv T, Telegin G, Gabibov A, Belogurov A., Jr Diagnostics of autoimmune neurodegeneration using fluorescent probing. Science and Reports. 2018;8:12679. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30938-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Miyamoto N, Yoshimura M, Okubo Y, Suzuki-Nagata K, Tsumuraya T, Ito N, Fujii I. Structural basis of the broad substrate tolerance of the antibody 7B9-catalyzed hydrolysis of p-nitrobenzyl esters. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2018;26:1412–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Lin CW, Zheng T, Grande G, Nanna AR, Rader C, Lerner RA. A new immunochemical strategy for triple-negative breast cancer therapy. Science and Reports. 2021;11:14875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94230-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Fellouse FA, Miersch S, Chen C, Michnick SW. Structure-based design of a specific, homogeneous luminescence enzyme reporter assay for SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2021;433:166983. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Lee G, Budhathoki S, Lee GY, Oh KJ, Ham YK, Kim YJ, Lim YR, Hoang PT, Lee Y, Lim SW, Kim JM, Cho S, Kim TH, Song JW, Lee S, Kim WK. Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of 3D8, a nucleic acid-hydrolyzing single-chain variable fragment (scFv), targeting SARS-CoV-2 and multiple coronaviruses in vitro. Viruses. 2021;13:650. doi: 10.3390/v13040650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Lin M, Ellis B, Eubanks LM, Janda KD. pharmacokinetic approach to combat the synthetic cannabinoid PB-22. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2021;12:2573–2579. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Wenthur CJ, Cai X, Ellis BA, Janda KD. Augmenting the efficacy of anti-cocaine catalytic antibodies through chimeric hapten design and combinatorial vaccination. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2017;27:3666–3668. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Zhu X, Dickerson TJ, Rogers CJ, Kaufmann GF, Mee JM, McKenzie KM, Janda KD, Wilson IA. Complete reaction cycle of a cocaine catalytic antibody at atomic resolution. Structure. 2006;14:205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Haass C, Selkoe DJ. Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: Lessons from the Alzheimer’s amyloid beta-peptide. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8:101–112. doi: 10.1038/nrm2101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Jellinger KA. Alzheimer disease and cerebrovascular pathology: An update. Journal of Neural Transmission. 2002;109:813–836. doi: 10.1007/s007020200068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Rangan SK, Liu R, Brune D, Planque S, Paul S, Sierks MR. Degradation of beta-amyloid by proteolytic antibody light chains. Biochemistry. 2003;42:14328–14334. doi: 10.1021/bi035038d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Paul S, Nishiyama Y, Planque S, Karle S, Taguchi H, Hanson C, Weksler ME. Antibodies as defensive enzymes. Springer Seminars in Immunopathology. 2005;26:485–503. doi: 10.1007/s00281-004-0191-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Lacroix-Desmazes S, Bayry J, Kaveri SV, Hayon-Sonsino D, Thorenoor N, Charpentier J, Luyt CE, Mira JP, Nagaraja V, Kazatchkine MD, Dhainaut JF, Mallet VO. High levels of catalytic antibodies correlate with favorable outcome in sepsis. PNAS. 2005;102:4109–4113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500586102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Eltwisy HO, Twisy HO, Hafez MH, Sayed IM, El-Mokhtar MA. Clinical infections, antibiotic resistance, and pathogenesis of Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1130. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Shahsavarian MA, Chaaya N, Costa N, Boquet D, Atkinson A, Offmann B, Kaveri SV, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Friboulet A, Avalle B, Padiolleau-Lefèvre S. Multitarget selection of catalytic antibodies with β-lactamase activity using phage display. FEBS Journal. 2017;284:634–653. doi: 10.1111/febs.14012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Zouali M. B cell tolerance to self in systemic autoimmunity. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis. 2001;49:361–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Pisetsky DS. Immune response to DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus. IMAJ. 2001;3:850–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Tsokos GC, Lo MS, Costa Reis P, Sullivan KE. New insights into the immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2016;12:716–730. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Raymond W, Ostli-Eilertsen G, Griffiths S, Nossent J. IL-17A levels in systemic lupus erythematosus associated with inflammatory markers and lower rates of malignancy and heart damage: Evidence for a dual role. European Journal of Rheumatology. 2017;4:29–35. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2017.16059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Souyris M, Cenac C, Azar P, Daviaud D, Canivet A, Grunenwald S, Pienkowski C, Chaumeil J, Mejía JE, Guéry JC. TLR7 escapes X chromosome inactivation in immune cells. Science Immunology. 2018;3:eaap8855. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aap8855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Andrievskaya OA, Buneva VN, Baranovskii AG, Gal'vita AV, Benzo ES, Naumov VA, Nevinsky GA. Catalytic diversity of polyclonal RNA-hydrolyzing IgG antibodies from the sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunology Letters. 2002;81:191–198. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(02)00006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Gabibov AG, Gololobov GV, Makarevich OI, Schourov DV, Chernova EA, Yadav RP. DNA-hydrolyzing autoantibodies. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry. 1994;47:293–302. doi: 10.1007/BF02787941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Wu H, Zeng J, Yin J, Peng Q, Zhao M, Lu Q. Organ-specific biomarkers in lupus. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2017;16:391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Mok MY, Shoenfeld Y. Recent advances and current state of immunotherapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. 2016;16:927–939. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2016.1171840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Planque S, Mitsuda Y, Taguchi H, Salas M, Morris MK, Nishiyama Y, Kyle R, Okhuysen P, Escobar M, Hunter R, Sheppard HW, Hanson C, Paul S. Characterization of gp120 hydrolysis by IgA antibodies from humans without HIV infection. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 2007;23:1541–1554. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Planque S, Nishiyama Y, Taguchi H, Salas M, Hanson C, Paul S. Catalytic antibodies to HIV: Physiological role and potential clinical utility. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2008;7:473–479. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Blanco F, Kalsi J, Isenberg DA. Analysis of antibodies to RNA in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 1991;86:66–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1991.tb05775.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Sato T, Uchiumi T, Arakawa M, Kominami R. Serological association of lupus autoantibodies to a limited functional domain of 28S ribosomal RNA and to the ribosomal proteins bound to the domain. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 1994;98:35–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06603.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Hirokawa K, Takasaki Y, Takeuchi K, Kaneda K, Ikeda K, Hashimoto H. Anti-TS1-RNA: Characterization of novel antibodies against sequence-specific RNA by random RNA selection in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Journal of Rheumatology. 2002;29:931–937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Ikeda K, Takasaki Y, Hirokawa K, Takeuchi K, Hashimoto H. Clinical significance of antibodies to TS1-RNA in patients with mixed connective tissue disease. Journal of Rheumatology. 2003;30:998–1005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Szekely J, Mongkolprasert J, Jeayodae N, Senorit C, Chaimuti P, Swangphon P, Nanakorn N, Nualnoi T, Wongwitwichot P, Pengsakul T. Development, analytical, and clinical evaluation of rapid immunochromatographic antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 variants detection. Diagnostics. 2022;12:381. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Jeyanathan M, Afkhami S, Smaill F, Miller MS, Lichty BD, Xing Z. Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2020;20:615–632. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00434-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Sharma A, Tiwari S, Deb MK, Marty JL. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2): A global pandemic and treatment strategies. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2020;56:106054. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Bakouny Z, Hawley JE, Choueiri TK, Peters S, Rini BI, Warner JL, Painter CA. COVID-19 and cancer: Current challenges and perspectives. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:629–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Ju B, Zhang Q, Ge J, Wang R, Sun J, Ge X, Yu J, Shan S, Zhou B, Song S, Tang X, Yu J, Lan J, Yuan J, Wang H, Zhao J, Zhang S, Wang Y, Shi X, Liu L, Zhao J, Wang X, Zhang Z, Zhang L. Human neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature. 2020;584:115–119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2380-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Ke Z, Oton J, Qu K, Cortese M, Zila V, McKeane L, Nakane T, Zivanov J, Neufeldt CJ, Cerikan B, Lu JM, Peukes J, Xiong X, Kräusslich HG, Scheres SHW, Bartenschlager R, Briggs JAG. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature. 2020;588:498–502. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2665-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Shang J, Ye G, Shi K, Wan Y, Luo C, Aihara H, Geng Q, Auerbach A, Li F. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020;581:221–224. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Hanke L, Vidakovics Perez L, Sheward DJ, Das H, Schulte T, Moliner-Morro A, Corcoran M, Achour A, Karlsson Hedestam GB, Hällberg BM, Murrell B, McInerney GM. An alpaca nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by blocking receptor interaction. Nature Communications. 2020;11:4420. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18174-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data and materials will be freely available in PubMed.


Articles from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES