Abstract
Background
Gene silence via methylation of the CpG islands is cancer's most common epigenetic modification. Given the highly significant role of NIS in thyroid cancer (TC) differentiation, this cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the DNA methylation pattern in seven CpG islands (CpG1-7 including +846, +918, +929, +947, +953, +955, and +963, respectively) of the NIS promoter in patients diagnosed with papillary (PTC), follicular (FTC), and multinodular goiter (MNG). Additionally, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare our results with studies concerning methylation of the NIS gene promoter.
Methods
Thyroid specimens from 64 patients met the eligibility criteria, consisting of 28 PTC, 9 FTC, and 27 benign MNG cases. The mRNA of NIS was tested by qRT-PCR. The bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) technique was performed to evaluate the promoter methylation pattern of the NIS gene. Sequencing results were received in chromatograph, FASTA, SEQ, and pdf formats and were analyzed using Chromas. The methylation percentage at each position and for each sample was calculated by mC/(mC+C) formula for all examined CpGs; following that, the methylation percentage was also calculated at each CpG site. Besides, a literature search was conducted without restricting publication dates. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria after removing duplicates, unrelated articles, and reviews.
Results
NIS mRNA levels decreased in tumoral tissues of PTC (P = 0.04) and FTC (P = 0.03) patients compared to their matched non-tumoral ones. The methylation of NIS promoter was not common in PTC samples, but it was frequent in FTC (P < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in the methylation levels in the 4th(+ 947), 6th(+ 955), and 7th(+ 963) CpGs sites in the forward strand of NIS promoter between FTC and MNG tissues (76.34 ± 3.12 vs 40.43 ± 8.42, P = 0.004, 69.63 ± 3.03 vs 23.29 ± 6.84, P = 0.001 and 50.33 ± 5.65 vs 24 ± 6.89, P = 0.030, respectively). There was no significant correlation between the expression and methylation status of NIS in PTC and FTC tissues.
Conclusion
Perturbation in NIS promoter’s methylation individually may have a potential utility in differentiating MNG and FTC tissues. The absence of a distinct methylation pattern implies the importance of other epigenetic processes, which may alter the production of NIS mRNA. In addition, according to the reversibility of DNA methylation, it is anticipated that the design of particular targeted demethylation medicines will lead to a novel cancer therapeutic strategy.
Keywords: Papillary thyroid cancer, Follicular thyroid cancer, Multinodular goiter, DNA methylation, CpG islands, Epigenetics, Sodium/iodide symporter
Introduction
Thyroid cancers are the most common malignancies and represent approximately 95% of all endocrine tumors. The global incidence of thyroid cancer was estimated to be 586,000 cases in 2020, and nearly 43,646 patients were presumed to die from thyroid cancer [1]. Thyroid cancer comprises several subtypes with remarkably different biological characteristics. Among these subtypes, papillary and follicular thyroid cancers (PTC and FTC) are referred to as well-differentiated thyroid cancers (WDTCs), accounting for more than 90% of all thyroid malignancies [2]. WDTCs typically are well managed and represent a favorable prognosis; however, sometimes, patients progress toward poorly differentiated and more aggressive subtypes [3].
Nowadays, environmental factors, alongside genetic alterations, play a pivotal role in developing thyroid cancers [4, 5]. Ecological factors in regulating gene expression are known as epigenetic alterations [6–8]. Aberrant DNA methylation has been introduced as a major epigenetic event in tumorigenesis [9, 10]. Gene inactivation through hypermethylation of CpG islands located in promoter regions was described in many cancers, especially thyroid cancer, which correlated with progression and tumorigenesis [11].
Solute carrier family 5-member 5 (SLC5A5, also called NIS) gene is localized on chromosome 19 (19p13.11) and encodes an 80–90 kDa transmembrane glycoprotein that actively transports iodide from the bloodstream into the thyroid follicular cells [12, 13]. Indeed, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) can regulate NIS protein activity. In this process, a Na+/K+-ATPase pump generates a sodium gradient, transporting two Na+ to an I− as the first step in the thyroid hormones biosynthesis [14]. The role of NIS in thyroid cancer diagnosis and treatment is important since NIS primarily mediates radioactive iodine (RAI) accumulation. Accordingly, the reduced NIS mRNA levels and/or impairment in NIS plasma membrane trafficking are well-demonstrated factors showing poor prognosis in thyroid cancer [15]. However, the association between NIS and thyroid cancer is complex and poorly understood [13].
Traditionally, it has been argued that CpG islands exist within the promoter of the NIS gene. In this regard, several studies have demonstrated that this island is a methylation target, which could have a vital role in DNA methylation, causing the reduction of NIS mRNA expression in thyroid carcinomas [12, 16–20].
In molecular cancer medicine development history, epigenetics has been thought of as a critical factor. In essence, epigenetic alterations depend on different factors, including race, environmental changes, lifestyle, nutrition, and physical activity. As above-mentioned, there are several studies regarding NIS promoter’s methylation in thyroid cancers. However, no previous study has investigated changes in those factors in an Iranian population as epigenetic modifications are strongly linked with race. Therefore, according to the mentioned challenges, this study seeks to investigate the methylation degree of a large region of NIS promoter in a set of multinodular goiters (MNG) samples (as the benign samples), malignant thyroid tumors including PTC and FTC, and their surrounding non-tumor tissue samples to suggest a methylation region as a discriminatory biomarker for early diagnosis of thyroid nodules. In addition, a systematic review of the literature was completed to bring together studies regarding methylation of NIS gene promoter, to reach a general conclusion about the role of NIS promoter methylation in tumorigeneses, and to discuss with our results.
Methods and materials
Tissue samples
Patients who underwent surgical resection of thyroid tumor at Erfan and Atiyeh hospitals in Tehran, Iran, were selected from 2015 to 2016. The PTC, FTC, and MNG subjects were confirmed based on pathological evidence and clinical outcomes. Histological assessment was performed using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens serially sectioned into 4–5 μm thick slices. The cryosections were examined by an expert pathologist after hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining to verify normal and tumoral tissues. Overall, 64 patients met the eligibility criteria, consisting of 28 PTCs, 9 FTCs cases (tumoral tissues and the matched non-tumoral tissues from the same patients), and 27 benign cases (non-tumoral tissues from patients with MNG). Tissue samples were collected in RNase and DNase-free tubes, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at − 80 °C for further analysis. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Research Institute of Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR.SBMU.ENDOCRINE.REC.1395.216). Moreover, we conducted the current study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and RIES institutional guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Genomic DNA extraction
Genomic DNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions from the fresh frozen thyroid specimens using the FavorPrep Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Mini Kit, USA. In order to determine DNA quality, ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) absorbance ratios between 260 and 230 nm were determined, which were within acceptable parameters.
Design of primers
Met-primer online Software was used to design primers for hot-start PCR. These primers were designed for the promoter region of NIS gene (Table 1). In summary, 1000 nucleotides upstream of the start codon were selected from genome databases. Islands in the promoter were detected according to the specific inclusion criteria, including island size > 100, GC percent > 50.0, and obs/exp > 0.6, CpG. Finally, we found seven CpG sites for NIS promoter (CpG1-7 including +846, +918, +929, +947, +953, +955, and +963, respectively) and investigated methylation status in these sites (Fig. 1). This was the only upstream region in the characterized promoter that was CpG-rich. In order to evaluate the expression of NIS gene, primers for qRT-PCR were designed using GeneRunner software (version 4.0) and checked in NCBI Primer Blast.
Table 1.
The information of methylation and qRT-PCR primers
| Genes | Accession number | Sequence 5′ → 3′ | Start | Tm (°C) | Product size (bp) | No. CpG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methylation primers | ||||||
| NIS | NG_012930.1 | F:GTGATTAGGGGATTATAGTGTATGG | − 775 | 57.13 | 210 | 7 |
| R:TAAATTACAAATTTATTAAACTCCC | − 988 | 52.69 | ||||
| qRT-PCR primers | ||||||
| NIS | NM_000453.3 | F:CCCAGACCAGTACATGCCTC | – | 59.82 | 86 | – |
| R:TGTAAGCACAGGCCAGGAA | 58.85 | |||||
| Β-actin | NM_001101.5 | F:GATCAAGATCATTGCTCCTCCT | – | 57.65 | 108 | – |
| R:TACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCA | 58.43 | |||||
Tm temperature
Fig. 1.
Methylation status in NIS promoter. a The probable promoter sequence checked for the presence of the most frequent CpG islands for the NIS gene and suggested primers from the MethPrimer website. b Structure of the human NIS promoter gene and the selected seven CpG positions
Bisulfite modification and quantitative methylation detection (bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP))
According to the manufacturer's protocol, bisulfite conversion was performed using the EZ DNA Methylation-gold kit (Zymo Research, USA). The sodium bisulfite-treated genomic DNA was amplified by hot-start PCR with the TEMPase HotStar Master Mix kit (Amplicon, UK). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55–60 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 30 s, and the final elongation at 72 °C for 3 min. Direct DNA sequencing was used to determine the methylation pattern. The primers and purified PCR products were transferred to Kowsar Biotech Company (KBC, Iran, Tehran), using the power read DNA sequencing service. Sequencing results were received in chromatograph, FASTA, SEQ, and pdf formats and were analyzed using Chromas version 2.6.5. The methylation percentage at each position and for each sample was calculated by mC/(mC+C) formula for all examined CpGs; following that, the methylation percentage was also calculated at each CpG site.
Extraction of RNA and synthesis of cDNA
After histological control, total RNA was extracted from fresh snap-frozen tissue samples using the TRIzol reagent (Ambion, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following that, we used the Nanodrop spectrophotometer (ND-1000, Thermo Scientific, USA) to measure the 260/280 and 260/230 nm absorption ratios to assess the RNA quality, and the ratios were within an acceptable range. Finally, total RNA was reverse transcribed with the cDNA synthesis kit (Bio Fact, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol in a SENSOQUEST, Germany thermocycler.
qRT‐PCR
To evaluate the NIS expression, quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using the Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia). All experiments were performed duplicate for each sample in a total volume of 25 µl using the SYBR Green master mix (Bio Fact, Korea).
Statistical analysis
Graph Pad Prism 8.0.1 and SPSS version 20 was used for statistical analyses. Kolmogorov–Smirnov-Test was employed to test the normal distribution of the data. Non-normally distributed variables were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank test to assess paired comparisons and Mann–Whitney U test for unpaired comparisons. Methylation results are presented with mean and standard error measurements of the mean. The mRNA expression results are expressed with Median and interquartile (25th, 75th percentiles). For all comparisons, P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Relative quantitation of mRNA levels of NIS was performed by the comparative Ct method using the 2−ΔΔCT method [21]. The relationship between the expression and total methylation of NIS in tumoral tissues of PTC and FTC patients was examined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients.
Systematic literature search
The current systematic review was designed according to the latest version of the PRISMA checklist for systematic review [22]. A literature search by using the terms including “Thyroid Neoplasm” OR "Thyroid Carcinoma" OR "Thyroid Cancer" AND "DNA Methylations” OR “hypermethylation" OR "CpG Island" AND “sodium iodide symporter” OR "SLC5A5" was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The search was performed without restricting publication date. Only articles in English were evaluated. The search results were managed by EndNote version X7. Titles and abstracts were reviewed, and relevant studies were selected. Inclusion criteria were as follows: The study indicated methylation of the NIS gene promoter in differentiated thyroid cancer (PTC and FTC). Then the full-text versions of selected articles were retrieved. The unrelated studies, reviews, meta-analysis, whole-genome, and wide genome studies were excluded. However, the references of related reviews were checked to identify additional papers. The following characteristics were collected from included studies: authors, year of publication, sample size groups, methodology, methylation status, and potential clinical values.
Results
Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics
The mean ± SD of age in PTC, FTC, and MNG groups were 37.89 ± 12.17, 55 ± 18.15, and 48.67 ± 14.75 years, respectively (P = 0.001). The Mean ± SD of tumor sizes were 1.62 ± 0.96 and 3.26 ± 1.68 cm in PTC and FTC groups, respectively (P = 0.002). Blood vascular invasion and TNM stages were significantly different between PTC and FTC groups (P = 0.007 and P = 0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in the extracapsular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastasis between PTC and FTC patients (P = 0.057, P = 0.068, and P = 0.407, respectively). The demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients
| Parameters | PTC | FTC | MNG | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients number | 28 | 9 | 27 | 64 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 2 (7.1) | 4 (50) | 8 (29.6) | 14 (22.2) |
| Female | 26 (92.9) | 4 (50) | 19 (70.4) | 49 (77.8) |
| Age (years) | ||||
| < 45 | 21 (75) | 3 (37.5) | 8 (29.6) | 32 (50.8) |
| ≥ 45 | 7 (25) | 5 (62.5) | 19 (70.4) | 31 (49.2) |
| BRAF V600E mutation | ||||
| Positive | 12 (46.2) | 2 (22.2) | – | – |
| Negative | 14 (53.8) | 7 (77.8) | – | – |
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||
| < 2 | 13 (46.4) | 2 (25) | – | – |
| ≥ 2 | 15 (53.6) | 6 (75) | – | – |
| Extrathyroidal extension | ||||
| Positive | 4 (14.8) | 3 (42.9) | – | – |
| Negative | 23 (85.2) | 4 (57.1) | – | – |
| Extracapsular invasion | ||||
| Positive | 4 (14.8) | 3 (42.9) | – | – |
| Negative | 23 (85.2) | 4 (57.1) | – | – |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| Positive | 8 (29.6) | 1 (14.3) | – | – |
| Negative | 19 (70.4) | 6 (85.7) | – | – |
| Blood vascular invasion | ||||
| Positive | 4 (14.8) | 2 (71.4) | ||
| Negative | 23 (85.2) | 5 (28.6) | ||
| TNM stage (AJCC) | ||||
| I and II | 23 (82.1) | 4 (57.1) | – | – |
| III and IV | 5 (17.9) | 3 (42.9) | – | – |
PTC papillary thyroid cancer, FTC follicular thyroid cancer, MNG multinodular goiter, AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer
Analysis of NIS mRNA expression and its promoter methylation in PTC patients
The results showed that the NIS mRNA level was significantly reduced in PTC tumoral tissues compared to their matched non-tumoral tissues (0.45 vs 1.49, respectively, P = 0.04, Fig. 2a). There were no significant changes in the expression of NIS mRNA levels between PTC patients and MNG participants (0.84 vs 2.00, P = 0.76, Fig. 2b). The findings demonstrated no significant differences between total methylation status in PTC and the matched non-tumoral tissues (31.71 ± 4.54 vs 24.25 ± 4.39, P = 0.10, Fig. 2c). We also performed the analysis in each CpG site, and the differences were not significant in none of the CpG sites (Fig. 2d). In addition, no significant differences were observed in total methylation status (31.69 ± 4.56 vs 30.41 ± 4.24, P = 0.61, Fig. 2e), and none of the CpG sites between PTC and MNG tissues (Fig. 2f).
Fig. 2.
a NIS levels in PTC tissues compared to matched non-tumoral tissues. b NIS levels in PTC tissues compared to MNG tissues. Data are presented as median (CI 95%). c Total methylation of NIS promoter in PTC tissues compared to the methylation degree in matched non-tumoral tissues. d the methylation percentage of seven CpGs sites of NIS promoter in PTC tumoral compared to matched non-tumoral tissues. e total methylation percentage of NIS promoter in PTC tumoral compared to the MNG tissues. f the methylation percentage of seven CpGs sites of NIS promoter in PTC tumoral compared to MNG tissues. Data are presented as Mean ± 1SEM
Analysis of NIS mRNA expression and its promoter methylation in FTC patients
The NIS expression level was significantly reduced in FTC tumoral tissues compared to the matched non-tumoral tissues (0.53 vs 1.11, P = 0.03, Fig. 3a). There were marginally differences in the expression of NIS mRNA levels between FTC patients and MNG participants (0.69 vs 2.42, P = 0.07, Fig. 3b). Total methylation degree was substantially increased in FTC compared to the matched non-tumoral tissues (50.6 ± 2.67 vs 35.06 ± 6.83, P = 0.03, Fig. 3c). The methylation levels in FTC tumoral and the matched non-tumoral were found to be 69.63 ± 3.03 vs 43.92 ± 8.63 for the 6th (− 955) CpG site (P = 0.03) and 50.33 ± 5.65 vs 27.21 ± 7.68 for 7th (− 963) CpG site (P = 0.02) (Fig. 3d). However, total methylation levels of FTC tumoral tissues were considerably higher than MNG tissues (50.6 ± 2.68 vs 30.41 ± 4.24, P = 0.005, Fig. 3e). Further, significant differences were observed in the methylation levels in the 4th(− 947), 6th(− 955), and 7th(− 963) CpGs sites in the forward strand of NIS promoter between FTC tumoral and MNG tissues (76.34 ± 3.12 vs 40.43 ± 8.42, P = 0.004, 69.63 ± 3.03 vs 23.29 ± 6.84, P = 0.001 and 50.33 ± 5.65 vs 24 ± 6.89, P = 0.030, respectively, Fig. 3f).
Fig. 3.
a NIS levels in FTC tissues compared to matched non-tumoral tissues. b NIS levels in FTC tissues compared to MNG tissues. Data are presented as median (CI 95%). c Total methylation of NIS promoter in FTC tissues compared to the methylation degree in matched non-tumoral tissues. d The methylation levels in FTC tumoral and the matched non-tumoral of 6th (+ 955) CpG site and of 7th (+ 963) CpG site. e Total methylation percentage of NIS promoter in FTC tumoral compared to the MNG tissues. f The methylation degrees in the 4th (+ 947), 6th (+ 955), and 7th (+ 963) CpG sites in the forward strand of NIS promoter between FTC tumoral and MNG tissues. Data are presented as Mean ± 1SEM
Correlation between mRNA expression and total methylation
There was no significant correlation between NIS mRNA expression and methylation status in PTC (R2 = 0.23, P = 0.229), while a marginal significant correlation was observed in FTC (R2 = 0.27, P = 0.092) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
The correlation between the expression and total methylation of tumoral tissues of A PTC and B FTC patients for NIS genes
Systematic literature results
The literature search revealed 374 papers. After removing duplicates, 360 have remained. 348 studies were excluded based on inclusion criteria in the screening process, and the remaining related articles were selected to review the full-text paper. Finally, 9 studies met the eligibility criteria and were chosen to evaluate promoter methylation of differentiated thyroid cancer for NIS gene (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
PRISMA flowchart detailing the selection of publications for this systematic review
Discussion
Thyroid cancers are the most common endocrine malignancies, which comprise several subtypes; among them, PTC and FTC are referred to WDTCs, accounting for more than 90% of all thyroid malignancies [23]. It is well accepted that increased methylation may induce dedifferentiation and decrease the expression of thyroid tissue-specific genes. DNA methylations are heritable and reversible; it is speculated that target therapy may alter methylation status of these genes to achieve the goal of tumor treatment. In this regard, the present study was designed to determine the methylation status of NIS promotor in thyroid nodules.
NIS is a transmembrane glycoprotein mainly regulated by the TSH that mediates the active transport of iodide from the bloodstream into the follicular thyroid cells [24]. The CpG islands in the NIS gene promoter have been suggested as a methylation target in reducing gene expression [25]. This study showed that although the expression of NIS was significantly lower in PTC tumoral tissues compared to matched non-tumoral ones, the methylation status was not changed significantly in any of the CpG sites. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between the mRNA levels and methylation patterns in PTC tumoral lesions compared to the benign MNG group. Further, our results indicated that the mRNA level of NIS was significantly reduced in FTC tumoral tissues compared to both matched non-tumoral and benign MNG lesions. Besides, FTC tumoral tissues displayed significantly higher levels of NIS promoter methylation compared to non-tumoral and benign MNG tissues. These findings were consistent with the hyper-methylation of the 4th, 6th, and 7th CpG positions in the forward strand of the NIS promoter.
Our systematic research achieved nine studies that explored NIS gene promoter methylation status in normal and tumoral thyroid tissues and benign lesions (Table 3). Some studies emphasize an increase in NIS promoter methylation in malignant tissues, while others showed controversial results. In 1999, Venkataraman et al. [14] assessed the methylation of the NIS promoter in 100 bp upstream and downstream, extending to the first intron, of CpG-rich dinucleotides (named P, L, C regions) and its expression in PTC and FTC tumor tissues. Our results are in line with their findings, which showed that methylation in three regions was not associated with NIS loss in PTC tumors. A CpG rich segment of the coding region (region C) displayed heterogeneous methylation among PTC subjects without any correlation to hNIS mRNA expression. Similarly, FTC cases expressed NIS mRNA and had different methylation patterns between regions. Nevertheless, 5-azacytidine or sodium butyrate treatment of seven human thyroid carcinoma cell lines was found to restore NIS mRNA expression in four cell lines and iodide transport in two cell lines. In a study by Neuman et al. [26], a 42.8% (6/14) occurrence of NIS methylation was found in cold thyroid nodules (CTNs) without determining the type of thyroid cancer relative to non-methylation in their non-tumoral surrounding tissues. Consistent with our findings, they detected a significantly reduced NIS expression ranging from 3 to 68% compared to the corresponding surrounding tissues (ST) in 86% of the CTNs. Moreover, they did not observe significant correlation between NIS mRNA expression and the degree of methylation. In another study conducted by Smith et al. [27], increased methylation of NIS in 22% (7/13) of patients with PTC and 0% of the control group, including follicular adenomas (FA), goiters, and normal cases were observed. However, the author pointed out that the limited number of the study groups led to not concluding predictive value from the comparison. In our findings, methylation of the NIS gene was increased in all regions except the 5thCpG site in PTC tumoral tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues, while this elevation was not statistically significant. A pilot study by Stephen et al. in 2011 [28] showed NIS promoter was methylated in (7/13) of DTCs (without specifying PTC or FTC separately), (1/3) of hyperthyroid, and (1/5) of normal cases and suggested that aberrant methylation of NIS may be an early change in thyroid tumorigenesis regardless of cell type. By applying semi-quantitative (SQ) MSP, Galaro et al. [12] investigated the methylation levels of the NIS CpG island between nucleotide − 466 and + 246 from the ATG in fragmented regions. They showed that the 5′ upstream region of the CpG island had the highest methylation levels, decreasing toward the 3’ region (P1 < P2 < L < C, p < 0.05). Besides, similar degree of methylation was reported in PTC tumoral tissues (benign = 2.19 ± 0.50 AU, malignant = 1.92 ± 0.59 AU) and non-tumoral tissues (benign = 2.23 ± 0.58 AU, malignant = 2.20 ± 0.82 AU) and suggested that NIS promoter methylation is a common occurrence in benign and malignant tumors as well as in the surrounding tissues. In agreement with our result, no quantitative correlation was detected between methylation levels and mRNA expression in any of the groups. Later, Galaro et al. in 2014 [16] appraised two CpG islands; the first had been described by Venkataraman et al. [14], which was referred to as CpG-island1, and the second, the new NIS CpG-island2 with 14 CpG sites, comprised a sequence of 256 bp and located at − 2152/− 1887 relative to the ATG site. They found a novel distal enhancer regulating the mRNA expression of NIS through DNA methylation, then by using QBS-sequencing, indicating that the methylation degree of 66.1% in tumoral tissues (benign, 64.3%, and malignant, 69.6%), compared to 23.2% of none tumoral (NT) tissues (benign, 20.5%; malignant, 25.1%). In contrast to our result, a significant inverse correlation between NIS mRNA expression and the degree of CpG-island2 methylation in NT and T samples was observed. At the same year, Choi et al. (2014) [29], found more frequent NIS methylation, in six specific CpG sites in the promoter region (− 191 to + 73), in cases of BRAF V600E carrier PTC samples than surrounding normal (SN) tissues (normal 29% vs. cancer 58%). In particular, − 24 and − 26 CpG sites were highly methylated in BRAF V600E PTCs.
Table 3.
Characteristic collected from included studies
| Studies | Method | Studied groups | Methylation status | Potential Clinical Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT | BTLs | DTCs | ||||
| Venkataraman et al. (1999) | MSP | NT (5), PTC (16), FTC (2) | 2/5 | – | 8/18 | Chemical demethylation therapy |
| Neuman et al. (2004) | MSP | ST (14), CTN (14) | 0/14 | – | 6/14 | Could be a regulatory mechanism of NIS transcription |
| Smith et al. (2007) | MSP | Controls (FA (10), goiters (15), normal thyroids (2)), PTC (32) | 0 | 0 | 7/32 | Marker of virulence |
| Stephen et al. (2011) | MSP | NT (5), hyperthyroid (3), PTC (11), FTC (2) | 1/5 | 1/3 | 7/13 | Early event |
| Galrão et al. (2013) | SQ-MSP | BTLs (10), PTC (18), FTC (2) | – | 2.23 | 1.92 | Very frequent event |
| Galrão et al. (2014) | BSP | BTLs (10), PTC (18), FTC (2) | – | 23.2% | 66.1% | Early event |
| Choi et al. (2014) | BSP and MSP | NT (24), PTC (24) | 29% | – | 58% | Related to BRAF (V600E) mutation |
| Stephen et al. (2015) | QMSP | ANT (24), FTC-Hurthle (26), FTC-Classic (27) | > 0.0 | – | > 0.0 | Early changes in thyroid tumorigenesis regardless of cell type |
| Stephen et al. (2018) | QMSP | NT (71), FA (83), PTC (85), FTC (90) | 0.001(0.002) |
0.014 (0.041) |
PTC (0.009(0.027)) FTC (0.02(0.07)) |
– |
Methylation status of NIS gene promoter: MSP, SQ-MSP, BSP, and QMSP results were expressed as methylated/total samples, arbitrary unit (AU), percentage, and mean (SD), respectively
MSP methylation-specific PCR, SQ-MSP semi-quantitative MSP, QMSP quantitative MSP, BSP Bisulfite-sequencing PCR, ST surrounding tissue, CTN cold thyroid nodules, NT normal thyroid, FA follicular adenoma, BTLs benign thyroid lesions, TC thyroid cancer, FTC follicular thyroid cancer, PTC papillary thyroid cancer, DTC differentiated thyroid cancer, ANT adjacent normal tissue
According to the literature, methylation status of NIS gene in FTC tumoral tissues compared to matched non-tumoral and benign tissues is limited. In 2015, Stephen et al. [30] investigated the promoter methylation status of NIS gene related to thyroid cancers in a cohort of FTC compared to 26 Hurthle and 27 classic subtypes using the QMSP method. NIS gene was methylated (QMSP values > 0.0), but inversely to our findings, the methylation degrees were not statistically significant between different subtypes. They also reported frequent methylation of NIS in normal thyroid samples, hyperthyroid nodules, and thyroid cancers, suggesting this is a signal of early thyroid tumorigenesis, regardless of cell type. Eventually, in the following, Stephen et al. in 2018 [31] found significant differences in methylation levels of NIS promoter between FTC and normal thyroid groups. These findings imply that the NIS promoter hyper-methylation may result in a reduction of its expression in FTC. In contrast to Stephen's [30] findings, we detected a significant decrease in NIS expression and an increase in promoter methylation status in FTC samples compared to their matched non-tumorous and benign samples, with no association between mRNA and methylation levels.
There are conflicting reports about NIS methylation status, mRNA level, and the correlation between these two events in limited studies with restricted sample sizes. Several reasons may contribute to the inconsistent results, including the use of different methods, study groups, and population, as well as the different CpG island regions used in the studies. Nonetheless, the present findings in PTC subjects seem to be consistent with Smith et al. [27], Galaro et al. [12], and Stephen et al. [31] reports, which found no significant differential methylation of NIS promoter in PTCs tumors. Due to the methods used, some studies did not specify the area investigated and results were just reported as methylated and non-methylated, consequently comparing the results is quite challenging.
According to our study, promoter methylation of the NIS is not a common event in PTC tumors, their matched non-tumor, and MNG tissues; consequently, promoter methylation of NIS could not be a possible mechanism leading to reducing its expression. Maybe other regulatory mechanisms that affect this gene’s expression during neoplastic transformations are involved. However, there are many other CpG sites in the NIS gene promoter and the lack of methylation difference in this region cannot be generalized to the overall percentage of promoter methylation. In fact, the study of methylation of all CpG promoter sites of this gene will provide valuable information. As well as, based on the literature, methylation status is heterogeneous in various CpG regions of NIS gene promoter; whether it is the upstream or downstream of the start codon (ATG) of the gene, subsequently, further research is needed in this area.
There are no distinct patterns of methylation linked with transcriptional failure. This shows that thyroid nodule methylation is heterogeneous. The absence of a distinct methylation pattern also implies the importance of other epigenetic processes, which may alter the production of NIS mRNA levels. We underlined the need for additional research to understand the epigenetic mechanisms underlying the reduction of NIS mRNA expression, which could lead to developing novel treatments to enhance radioiodine uptake in thyroid carcinoma cells. These investigations can also contribute to a better comprehension of how epigenetic events influence gene expression. Additionally, it is anticipated that the design of targeted demethylation medicines, which may play a role in the redifferentiation of thyroid carcinomas, will lead to a novel cancer therapeutic strategy.
DNA methylation as an epigenetic modification has improved the understanding of thyroid carcinogenesis. Much effort has been made to investigate the potential of drugs that block this form of epigenetic alteration to stimulate the re-expression of silenced genes in diverse malignancies. Lately, thyroid cancer management has been approached with more personalized medicine to prevent the over-diagnosis and over-treatment of tumors [32]. In addition, hypermethylation of thyroid-specific genes such as NIS is associated with the failure of clinical radioiodine treatment in thyroid cancer, one of the most common methods for treating DTCs [14]. A decrease in NIS expression will lead to a decrease in response to the treatment. Therefore, not only the investigations of methylation patterns in the NIS gene can be effective in choosing the type of treatment, but also in the prognosis of patients, it is expected that individuals with higher levels of methylation will respond less to iodine therapy, which ultimately leads to the design the effective drugs by reducing the methylation of this gene. There is little evidence of the effectiveness of demethylating agents in thyroid cancer. In the most studies, these drugs have been tested on cancer cell lines and have yielded promising results, however, have not yet been translated into clinical practice. But it may be used as a solo agent or combined with other drugs for proper therapy [33].
The strengths of the present study include this being the first study that determined the promoter methylation status in the selected region of NIS, a functional gene, in an Iranian population diagnosed with thyroid nodules. In order to obtain reliable results, and to avoid false-positive results from non-quantitative methods such as MSP, we evaluated NIS promoter methylation with a quantitative methodology. However, there were several limitations to this cross-sectional study, including the small sample size of patients and the non-achievable clinicopathological information. Time and budget constraints limited us from examining more CpG sites of this gene. According to the limited number of studies, further investigations with larger sample size and other sites that may be concerned with epigenetic regulation of NIS expression are required to elucidate the role of these mechanisms in the progression of thyroid nodules, leading to finding novel diagnostic biomarkers and improving the effectiveness of therapies.
Conclusion
The present study provides additional evidence concerning NIS promoter methylation in thyroid nodules. Although we did not find significant differences regarding NIS methylation in PTC patients, the NIS mRNA expression was substantially decreased in PTC cases. While the methylation of this gene was increased in tumoral tissues compared to matched non-tumoral tissues and MNG one. Intriguing results were found for FTC cases about the methylation pattern of the sodium-iodide symporter in CpGs islands. These differences in aberrantly methylated CpGs between PTC and FTC subjects reflect a potentially interesting findings and provide the following insights for future research. One hypothesis that warrants further review is that promoter regions are methylated more frequently in FTC than in PTC in our study. This hypothesis cannot be confirmed with our modest number of cases, but it does raise questions that can be investigated further. The investigations can also contribute to a better understanding of how epigenetic events influence gene expression. It is anticipated that the design of targeted demethylation medicines, which may play a role in the dedifferentiation of thyroid carcinomas, will lead to a novel cancer therapeutic strategy.
Author contributions
MH, MZ participated in the study design. NA, SSH and SAF participated in the data collection. MSJ and SSH performed the statistical analysis. MZ, ZN and NA participated in the manuscript writing. RA, SHH and MH critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the data analysis, drafting, or revising the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This paper received no specific funding from a private or public institution.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Non-applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approve d by the Ethics Committee of the Research Institute of Endocrine Sciences of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR.SBMU.ENDOCRINE.REC.1395.216), and we conducted the current study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and RIES institutional guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Consent for publication
Non-applicable.
Competing interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Footnotes
Noman Arab is the co-first author.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Maryam Zarkesh, Email: zarkesh@endocrine.ac.ir, Email: maryamzarkesh@yahoo.com.
Noman Arab, Email: noman_arab71@yahoo.com.
Raziyeh Abooshahab, Email: ra_shahab@yahoo.com.
Shabnam Heydarzadeh, Email: sh.heydarzadeh@endocrine.ac.ir.
Sara Sheikholeslami, Email: sara.sheikholeslami@gmail.com.
Zahra Nozhat, Email: zahranozhat85@zstu.edu.cn, Email: zahranozhat@sbmu.ac.ir.
Marziyeh Salehi Jahromi, Email: Marziyeh.jahromi@rockets.utoledo.edu.
Seyed Ahmad Fanaei, Email: saf1345@gmail.com.
Mehdi Hedayati, Email: hedayati@endocrine.ac.ir, Email: hedayati47@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Zhu Y, Song Y, Xu G, Fan Z, Ren W. Causes of misdiagnoses by thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): our experience and a systematic review. Diagn Pathol. 2020;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0924-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines taskforce on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1167–1214. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hannallah J, Rose J, Guerrero MA. Comprehensive literature review: recent advances in diagnosing and managing patients with poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:317487. doi: 10.1155/2013/317487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Anand P, Kunnumakara AB, Sundaram C, Harikumar KB, Tharakan ST, Lai OS, et al. Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes. Pharm Res. 2008;25(9):2097–2116. doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9661-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nozhat Z, Hedayati M. PI3K/AKT pathway and its mediators in thyroid carcinomas. Mol Diagn Ther. 2016;20(1):13–26. doi: 10.1007/s40291-015-0175-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zarkesh M, Zadeh-Vakili A, Azizi F, Foroughi F, Akhavan MM, Hedayati M. Altered epigenetic mechanisms in thyroid cancer subtypes. Mol Diagn Ther. 2018;22(1):41–56. doi: 10.1007/s40291-017-0303-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zarkesh M, Zadeh-Vakili A, Azizi F, Fanaei SA, Foroughi F, Hedayati M. The association of BRAF V600E mutation with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression and clinicopathological features in papillary thyroid cancer. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;16(2):e56120. doi: 10.5812/ijem.56120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zarkesh M, Zadeh-Vakili A, Akbarzadeh M, Nozhat Z, Fanaei SA, Hedayati M, et al. BRAF V600E mutation and microRNAs are helpful in distinguishing papillary thyroid malignant lesions: tissues and fine needle aspiration cytology cases. Life Sci. 2019;223:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xing M. Gene methylation in thyroid tumorigenesis. Endocrinology. 2007;148(3):948–953. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Herman JG. Epigenetic changes in cancer and preneoplasia. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2005;70:329–333. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2005.70.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sproul D, Kitchen RR, Nestor CE, Dixon JM, Sims AH, Harrison DJ, et al. Tissue of origin determines cancer-associated CpG island promoter hypermethylation patterns. Genome Biol. 2012;13(10):R84. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Galrao A, Sodré A, Camargo R, Friguglietti C, Kulcsar M, Lima E, et al. Methylation levels of sodium–iodide symporter (NIS) promoter in benign and malignant thyroid tumors with reduced NIS expression. Endocrine. 2013;43(1):225–229. doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9779-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.de Morais RM, Sobrinho AB, de Souza Silva CM, de Oliveira JR, da Silva ICR, de Toledo Nóbrega O. The role of the NIS (SLC5A5) gene in papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review. Int J Endocrinol. 2018;2018:9128754. doi: 10.1155/2018/9128754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Venkataraman GM, Yatin M, Marcinek R, Ain KB. Restoration of iodide uptake in dedifferentiated thyroid carcinoma: relationship to human Na+/I− symporter gene methylation status1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(7):2449–2457. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.7.5815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De la Vieja A, Santisteban P. Role of iodide metabolism in physiology and cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018;25(4):R225–R245. doi: 10.1530/ERC-17-0515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Galrão AL, Camargo RY, Friguglietti CU, Moraes L, Cerutti JM, Serrano-Nascimento C, et al. Hypermethylation of a new distal sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) enhancer (NDE) is associated with reduced NIS expression in thyroid tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):E944–E952. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gaohong Z, Lijun X. Research progress of DNA methylation in thyroid cancer. In: Budak M, Yıldız M, editors. DNA methylation mechanism. London: IntechOpen; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ishida E, Nakamura M, Shimada K, Higuchi T, Takatsu K, Yane K, et al. DNA hypermethylation status of multiple genes in papillary thyroid carcinomas. Pathobiology. 2007;74(6):344–352. doi: 10.1159/000110028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Morari EC, Marcello MA, Guilhen ACT, Cunha LL, Latuff P, Soares FA, et al. Use of sodium iodide symporter expression in differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Clin Endocrinol. 2011;75(2):247–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang S, Liang J, Lin Y, Yao R. Differential expression of the Na+/I-symporter protein in thyroid cancer and adjacent normal and nodular goiter tissues. Oncol Lett. 2012;5(1):368–372. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lloyd R, Osamura R, Kloppel G, Rosai J. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs: WHO classification of tumours. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Portulano C, Paroder-Belenitsky M, Carrasco N. The Na+/I− symporter (NIS): mechanism and medical impact. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(1):106–149. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Caillou B, Troalen F, Baudin E, Talbot M, Filetti S, Schlumberger M, et al. Na+/I− symporter distribution in human thyroid tissues: an immunohistochemical study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(11):4102–6. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.11.5262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Neumann S, Schuchardt K, Reske A, Reske A, Emmrich P, Paschke R. Lack of correlation for sodium iodide symporter mRNA and protein expression and analysis of sodium iodide symporter promoter methylation in benign cold thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2004;14(2):99–111. doi: 10.1089/105072504322880337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Smith JA, Fan C-Y, Zou C, Bodenner D, Kokoska MS. Methylation status of genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(10):1006–11. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.10.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stephen JK, Chitale D, Narra V, Chen KM, Sawhney R, Worsham MJ. DNA methylation in thyroid tumorigenesis. Cancers. 2011;3(2):1732–1743. doi: 10.3390/cancers3021732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Choi YW, Kim H-J, Kim YH, Park SH, Chwae YJ, Lee J, et al. B-RafV600E inhibits sodium iodide symporter expression via regulation of DNA methyltransferase 1. Exp Mol Med. 2014;46(11):e120. doi: 10.1038/emm.2014.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stephen JK, Chen KM, Merritt J, Chitale D, Divine G, Worsham MJ. Methylation markers for early detection and differentiation of follicular thyroid cancer subtypes. Cancer Clin Oncol. 2015;4(2):1. doi: 10.5539/cco.v4n2p1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stephen J, Chen K-M, Merritt J, Chitale D, Divine G, Worsham MJ. Methylation markers differentiate thyroid cancer from benign nodules. J Endocrinol Invest. 2018;41(2):163–170. doi: 10.1007/s40618-017-0702-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dralle H, Machens A, Basa J, Fatourechi V, Franceschi S, Hay ID, et al. Follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1(1):15077. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zarkesh M, Taghaddosi M, Azizi F, Zadeh-Vakili A, Hedayati M. Importance of epigenetic changes in the thyroid cancer incidence and their therapeutic applications. Pathobiol Res. 2014;17(3):1–24. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Non-applicable.