Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Oct 12;17(10):e0275185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275185

Physical activity mitigates the link between adverse childhood experiences and depression among U.S. adults

Michael F Royer 1,*, Christopher Wharton 1
Editor: Catalina Castaño2
PMCID: PMC9555628  PMID: 36223342

Abstract

Background

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) include potentially traumatic exposures to neglect, abuse, and household problems involving substance abuse, mental illness, divorce, incarceration, and death. Past study findings suggest ACEs contribute to depression, while physical activity alleviates depression. Little is known about the link between ACEs and physical activity as it relates to depression among U.S. adults. This research had a primary objective of determining the role of physical activity within the link between ACEs and depression. The significance of this study involves examining physical activity as a form of behavioral medicine.

Methods

Data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were fit to Pearson chi-square and multivariable logistic regression models to examine the links between ACEs and depression, ACEs and physical activity, and physical activity and depression among U.S. adults ages 18-and-older (n = 117,204) from 21 states and the District of Columbia, while also determining whether physical activity attenuates the association between ACEs and depression.

Results

Findings from chi-square analyses indicated that ACEs are related to physical activity (χ2 = 19.4, df = 1; p<0.01) and depression (χ2 = 6,841.6, df = 1; p<0.0001). Regression findings suggest ACEs were linked to depression (AOR = 1.050; 95% CI = 1.049, 1.051). ACEs and physical activity (AOR = 0.994; 95% CI = 0.992, 0.995) and physical activity and depression (AOR = 0.927; 95% CI = 0.922, 0.932) were both inversely related. Physical activity mitigated the link between ACEs and depression (AOR = 0.995; 95% CI = 0.993, 0.996).

Conclusions

This research addressed a critical knowledge gap concerning how ACEs and physical activity contribute to depression outcomes among U.S. adults. Findings suggest physical activity mitigates the effect of ACEs on depression. Future studies should apply physical activity interventions to alleviate depression among U.S. adults with high ACEs.

Background

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are potentially traumatic occurrences that happen during childhood from ages 0 to 17 [1,2]. The ACEs survey assesses childhood exposures to unique types of neglect, abuse, and household problems involving substance abuse, mental health, divorce, incarceration, suicide, and death [1]. Unhealthy coping behaviors are mechanisms of ACEs that lead to the onset of disease [3].

High ACEs are significantly linked to several harmful health behaviors consisting of physical inactivity [4], alcohol abuse [5], smoking [6], drug abuse [7], and attempted suicide [8]. Given the harmful nature of these coping mechanisms, ACEs are associated with an increased risk of chronic disease and premature death [9]. Chronic diseases associated with high ACEs include obesity [10], diabetes [11], heart disease [12], and cancer [13]. Mental health problems related to high ACEs include low life satisfaction [14], personality disorders [15], anxiety [14], and depression [16].

Depression is a common but serious mood disorder causing severe symptoms (e.g., feeling sad, hopeless, irritable, disinterested and/or tired) that affect feelings, thoughts, and activities of daily living [17]. Approximately 7.8 percent (19.4 million) of U.S. adults experienced depression at some point in 2019 [18]. In the U.S., depression rates are highest among females, individuals of two or more races, and adults aged 18–25 years old [18]. The number of ACEs a person encounters significantly predicts their risk for depression in adulthood [1921]. Individuals experiencing depression are more prone to engage in behaviors that are harmful to their health [22]. Some unhealthy behaviors associated with depression include disordered eating behaviors [23,24], low fruit and vegetable intake [25], physical inactivity [26], smartphone addiction [27], smoking [28], and the abuse of alcohol and other drugs [29,30]. Individuals living with depression are at an increased risk of comorbidities and chronic diseases [31]. Depression is a risk factor for poor sleep quality [32], obesity [33], heart disease [34], cancer [35], and suicide [36]. It is also noteworthy that a dose-response relationship exists between ACEs score and depression, as the risk for depression increases with each additional ACE [19,20,37].

There is an urgent need to identify protective factors that can effectively mitigate the impact of ACEs on depression later in life. A known protective factor against the effect of ACEs on depression is perceived social support, as adults with high ACEs and moderate-to-strong perceived social support have significantly lower odds of depression compared those with low perceived social support [38]. Emotional support has also been shown to protect against the deleterious effects of ACEs on depression [39]. Additionally, adults with ≥4 ACEs that grew up with an adult who fostered a sense of protection and safety have a lower likelihood of reporting mental health problems [40]. Depression research among individuals with high ACEs could benefit from including measures of physical activity, given the role physical activity can play in alleviating depression among adults [41]. To achieve optimal health benefits, adults should partake in at least 150-to-300 minutes of moderate-intensity (e.g., brisk walking, yard work) physical activity each week [42]. Engaging in routine physical activity is an effective approach to prevent poor health outcomes including obesity [43], hypertension [44], diabetes [45], heart disease [46], and cancer [47]. Regular physical activity benefits brain and cognitive health [48], promotes high-quality sleep [49], minimizes negative stress [50], and protects against anxiety and depression [41,51].

The original ACEs study highlighted physical inactivity as a risk factor for morbidity and mortality, but did not examine the relationship between ACEs and physical activity [4]. Uncertainty remains concerning the link between ACEs and physical activity, as research findings from an array of studies offer contradicting evidence [52]. For example, results from a multi-country study among young adults in eastern and central Europe reported greater odds of physical inactivity among young-adults with ≥4 ACEs compared to those with no ACEs [8]. Outcomes from a study among U.S. adults also yielded findings showing lower physical activity among individuals with ACEs compared to those with no ACEs [53]. Contrarily, research findings from studies conducted among adults in the U.S. state of Hawaii [54], England [55], Saudi Arabia [56], and the U.K. [13,57] suggest a non-significant relationship between ACEs and physical activity. Since physical activity has been shown to alleviate depression [41], there is a need to determine the extent to which physical activity mitigates the relationship between ACEs and depression among U.S. adults, as few studies have focused on this unique issue. A cross-sectional study among European adults ages 50-and-older produced results showing physical activity attenuated the link between ACEs and depression [58]. A longitudinal study in the U.S. yielded findings suggesting participation in team sports during adolescence attenuated the effect of ACEs on depressive symptoms later in life [59].

Study aims and hypotheses

No studies in the U.S. have examined the protective nature of physical activity as it relates to the link between ACEs and depression. Therefore, the primary aims of this study were to address a knowledge gap concerning the link between ACEs and physical activity among U.S. adults, and whether physical activity protects against ACEs increasing the odds of depression. The research hypotheses for this study included: (1) an inverse relationship will exist between ACEs score and physical activity, and (2) physical activity will attenuate a positive association between ACEs and depression. Study findings derived from this research could be integral in informing future interventions to prevent depression among adults with high ACEs.

Methods

Participant sample

Data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [60] were used for a study examining cross-sectional relationships among the primary variables of ACEs, physical activity, and depression. The 2020 BRFSS represents the most recently available data of an annual cross-sectional study of U.S. adults (n = 401,958) that is conducted by the CDC. Each year, the CDC partners with health agencies from all U.S. states and territories to conduct the BRFSS by surveying a representative sample of adults and assessing a variety of social conditions, health behaviors, and the disease histories.

Fewer than half of U.S. states and no U.S. territories collected ACEs data for the 2020 BRFSS; as such, the sample for this study included U.S. adults providing complete data for variables of interest (n = 117,204) from the District of Columbia (DC) and the following 21 states: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Adults of all ages (18+ years) were included in our sample to best evaluate the relationship between ACEs, physical activity, and depression across the U.S. adult lifespan.

Measures

In the 2020 BRFSS, ACEs were measured using an 11-item ACEs survey capturing self-reported childhood exposures to unique types of neglect, abuse, and family problems involving substance abuse, mental health, divorce, incarceration, suicide, and death. Total ACEs score represented the primary predictor variable in this study. The 2020 BRFSS data for ACEs were separated by each of the 11 individual items. Individual ACEs items cover various types of childhood adversity; some of which include substance abuse in the home (“Did you live with anyone who used illegal drugs or who abused prescription medications?”), witnessing domestic violence (“How often did adults in your home ever slap, hit, kick, punch or beat each other up?”), physical abuse (“How often did an adult physically hurt you in any way?”), psychological abuse (“How often did an adult in your home ever swear at you, insult you, or put you down?”), and sexual abuse (“How often did anyone at least 5 years older than you touch you sexually?”). Researchers created an interval variable for the full ACEs score (0–11) by summing the total affirmative (once, more than once) responses for each of the 11 items.

Physical activity was measured in BRFSS 2020 with one item asking respondents if they engaged in physical activity or exercise during the past 30 days outside of any activity related to their job (no = 0, yes = 1). For this study, physical activity was separately modeled as a predictor of depression and an outcome of ACEs. Depression was also measured in BRFSS 2020 with one item in by asking respondents if they had ever been diagnosed with a depressive disorder including dysthymia, minor depression, depression, or major depression (no = 0, yes = 1). For this study, depression was treated as the primary outcome variable. Both physical activity and depression were dichotomous variables.

Covariates included variables from the 2020 BRFSS data for age group (18–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and 65+ years), sex (female, male), race/ethnicity (American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, White, multiple races, and other), and income (<$15k, $15–24.9k, 25–34.9k, 35–49.9k, ≥$50k, and unsure). Information on the validity of the primary study variable measures of ACEs, physical activity, and depression has been previously reported [61]. Listwise deletion was used to remove cases with missing data on the primary variables of ACEs, physical activity, and depression, which reduced the sample size from n = 401,958 to n = 117,204.

Statistical analysis

RStudio [62] packages including ‘stats’, ‘glm’, and ‘lmer’ were used to analyze the study data. Due to the sample clustering by state, intraclass correlations (ICC) were calculated using unconditional random intercept models to test the extent to which clustering altered the study outcomes of interest. An ICC of >0.05 would have justified the use of a mixed-effects multilevel model [63], but fixed-effects general linear models (GLM) using multivariable logistic regression were sufficient for estimating accurate effect size coefficients for our primary variables of interest [64]. An additional analysis was run using a dichotomous variable for missingness to test if participants excluded from study due to missing data (n = 284,754) were systematically different in their characteristics from participants included in the study with complete data (n = 117,204).

Pearson’s chi-square tests were conducted to analyze the relationship between having ≥4 ACEs and either physical activity, depression, or the covariates. Regression models were fitted for predictors (ACEs or physical activity) and outcomes (physical activity or depression) while adjusting for all covariates. An ACEs-Physical Activity interaction term was tested to determine whether physical activity attenuated the relationship between ACEs and depression [65]. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were computed by exponentiating the unstandardized beta coefficients for the effect of a predictor on an outcome [66]. Statistical analyses estimated the links between ACEs and depression, ACEs and physical activity, and physical activity and depression. An interaction effect of ACEs-and-physical activity on depression was tested to determine if physical activity protects against ACEs increasing the odds of depression. AOR’s were produced for predictors in each model. Participant characteristics were modeled as covariates in all analyses.

Results

The study sample consisted of adults (n = 117,204) ages 18-and-older from 21 U.S. states and DC (Table 1). Characteristics for participants included in the study differed in sex, age group, race/ethnicity, and income (p<0.0001) compared to excluded participants. Clustering by state did not alter study outcomes for physical activity (ICC = 0.01) nor depression (ICC = 0.005). Mean participant age was 55.3 years (SD 17.7). Most adults were 65+ years old (37.3%), female (54.8%), White (75.2%), and reported an income of ≥$50,000.

Table 1. Participant characteristics and Descriptives by Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) among U.S. Adults (n = 117,204).

Characteristics (M, SD)a Total (%) <4 ACEs (%) ≥4 ACEs (%) χ2
Sample size (%) 117,204 (100) 97,314 (83) 19,890 (17)
Sex 312.7*
Female 64,238 (54.8) 52,205 (53.6) 12,033 (60.5)
Male 52,966 (45.2) 45,109 (46.4) 7,857 (39.5)
Age in years (M = 55.3, SD = 17.7) 4,485.9*
18–24 7,190 (6.1) 5,321 (5.5) 1,869 (9.4)
25–34 11,977 (10.2) 8,625 (8.9) 3,352 (16.9)
35–44 14,957 (12.8) 11,323 (11.6) 3,634 (18.3)
45–54 17,050 (14.5) 13,450 (13.8) 3,600 (18.1)
55–64 22,338 (19.1) 18,587 (19.1) 3,751 (18.8)
65+ 43,692 (37.3) 40,008 (41.1) 3,684 (18.5)
Race/Ethnicity 997.8*
American Indian/Alaska Native 2,311 (2) 1,638 (1.7) 673 (3.4)
Asian 3,177 (2.7) 2,949 (3) 228 (1.2)
Black 10,158 (8.7) 8,435 (8.7) 1,723 (8.7)
Hispanic 8,991 (7.7) 7,095 (7.3) 1,896 (9.5)
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 700 (0.6) 532 (0.5) 168 (0.8)
White 88,203 (75.2) 74,027 (76.1) 14,176 (71.3)
Multiple Races 2,844 (2.4) 1,988 (2) 856 (4.3)
Other 820 (0.7) 650 (0.7) 170 (0.8)
Income 1,359.1*
<$15,000 7,838 (6.7) 5,723 (5.9) 2,115 (10.6)
$15,000 –$24,999 15,020 (12.8) 11,691 (12) 3,329 (16.7)
$25,000 –$34,999 9,862 (8.4) 7,946 (8.2) 1,916 (9.6)
$35,000 –$49,999 13,926 (11.9) 11,472 (11.8) 2,454 (12.3)
≥$50,000 52,291 (44.6) 44,376 (45.6) 7,915 (39.9)
Don’t Know 18,267 (15.6) 16,106 (16.5) 2,161 (10.9)
Physical Activity in past 30 days 19.4*
No 28,535 (24.3) 23,449 (24.1) 5,086 (25.6)
Yes 88,669 (75.7) 73,865 (75.9) 14,804 (74.4)
Depression 6,841.6*
No 95,540 (81.5) 83,453
Yes 21,664 (19.5) 13,861

aMean, Standard Deviation.

*p<0.01.

A majority of adults had a total of <4 ACEs (83%), engaged in physical activity (75.7%), and had never been diagnosed with depression (81.5%). Results from the chi-square analyses (Table 1) indicated that having ≥4 ACEs is related to physical activity (χ2 = 19.4, df = 1; p<0.01), depression (χ2 = 6,841.6, df = 1; p<0.0001), sex (χ2 = 312.7, df = 1; p<0.0001), age (χ2 = 4,485.9, df = 5; p<0.0001), race/ethnicity (χ2 = 997.8, df = 7; p<0.0001), and income (χ2 = 1,359.1, df = 5; p<0.0001).

Across all sampled U.S. adults, findings from the multivariable regression models (Table 2) showed ACEs increased the odds of depression (AOR = 1.050; 95% CI = 1.049, 1.051), as the percentage of depressed U.S. adults increased by 5% for each additional ACE (p<0.001).

Table 2. Statistical models and results for the Associations between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), physical activity, and depression among U.S. adults (n = 117,204).

Modela AORb 95% CIc p-value
Model 1 ACEs→Depression 1.05 1.049, 1.051 p<0.001
Model 2 ACEs→Physical Activity 0.994 0.992, 0.995 p<0.001
Model 3 Physical Activity→Depression 0.927 0.922, 0.932 p<0.001
Model 4 ACEs×Physical Activity→Depression 0.995 0.993, 0.996 p<0.001

aAll multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and income.

bAdjusted Odds Ratio.

c95% confidence interval.

ACEs were inversely associated with physical activity (AOR = 0.994; 95% CI = 0.992, 0.995); with the percentage of U.S. adults engaging in physical activity dropping 1% for each additional ACE (p = <0.001). Physical activity was inversely associated with depression (AOR = 0.927; 95% CI = 0.922, 0.932), which highlights the odds for depression were roughly 7% lower for U.S. adults reporting physical activity (p<0.001).

Results from an additional analysis with the ACEs-Physical Activity interaction term (Fig 1) indicate the odds of ACEs being linked to depression are lower among adults reporting physical activity in the past 30 days (AOR = 0.995; 95% CI = 0.993, 0.996) compared to those not reporting physical activity, as physical activity reduced the odds of ACEs contributing to depression (p<0.001).

Fig 1. Interaction plot demonstrating physical activity attenuating the relationship between ACEs and depression among U.S. adults (n = 117,204).

Fig 1

aModel displayed in figure adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and income.

Discussion

Nearly one-fifth of the U.S. adults included in this study sample had ≥4 ACEs. Disparities in unhealthy behavior and chronic disease persist among individuals with ≥4 ACEs compared to those with <4 ACEs [52]. Individuals with ≥4 ACEs are at a much greater risk of premature mortality due to the increased risk of developing various diseases [67]. The numerous U.S. adults with ≥4 ACEs are at a disadvantage concerning their life health trajectories.

Findings from this study support existing research evidence concerning ACEs increasing the likelihood of depression [16,1921,37]. Previous research exploring the mechanisms of ACEs have determined resilience [68,69], self-esteem [70,71], mindfulness [72], stress [69,73,74], inflammation [75], intimate partner violence [73], and physical activity [58] play significant roles in the relationship between ACEs and depression. Results of this study alongside previous findings could be useful in helping inform intervention designs to prevent depression among adults with high ACEs.

Outcomes in this study involving physical activity provide important evidence to address general uncertainty about the link between ACEs and physical activity. Contradictory results have been accumulated from past studies examining the extent to which ACEs are related to physical activity [52]. The two previous studies in the U.S. that assessed ACEs and physical activity produced discordant findings: one study used BRFSS data collected in 2009–2012 from 14 states and yielded findings suggesting a significant link between ACEs and physical activity [53], while the other study used BRFSS data collected in 2010 from the state of Hawaii and produced non-significant findings for the relationship between ACEs and physical activity [54]. BRFSS data for this study were collected in 2020 from 22 U.S. states, and results reported here offer an expansion of the knowledge base by emphasizing how each additional ACE significantly reduces the likelihood of U.S. adults engaging in physical activity.

The findings in this study also filled a critical knowledge gap concerning the extent to which physical activity protects against ACEs increasing the probability of depression among U.S. adults. The only other study to analyze this relationship was conducted among adults ages 50-and-older from several European countries, and also determined that physical activity provided significant protection against the effect of ACEs on depression [58]. Past intervention studies have detected a dose-response relationship by using physical activity to treat depression, as depressive symptoms decreased as physical activity increased [76]. Results from meta-analyses detailing effects of physical activity on depression in both observational and intervention studies reported moderate-to-large negative effects of physical activity on depression symptoms [77,78], which underscores the possibility of physical activity being a promising approach to alleviate increased rates of depression among adults with high ACEs. Our study findings revealed that ACEs decreased the likelihood of physical activity, while also suggesting physical activity decreased the likelihood of depression. Moreover, these findings suggest physical activity reduced the probability of ACEs contributing to depression.

A strength of this study pertains to the large sample size, as it was possible to accurately estimate cross-sectional effects for the primary variables of interest among a representative sample of U.S. adults. Another strength is the use of the Kaiser-CDC measure for ACEs, which is considered the gold-standard measure of ACEs. Another key strength includes how these study findings help to address a knowledge gap concerning the link between ACEs, physical activity, and depression.

This study had several limitations. One limitation concerns the preexisting nature of the data and the researchers’ lack of control over the instruments used to measure primary variables. In particular, measures for depression and physical activity were limited in their comprehensiveness. The depression measure used only one item that focused on a past diagnosis of depression and did not evaluate current depressive symptoms. The physical activity measure also used just one item that asked about engaging in physical activity in the past 30 days, which does not provide sufficient information for daily or weekly physical activity levels to determine whether participants are meeting the recommended level of regular physical activity. Another limitation of this study was the absence of a pharmacologic treatment variable to statistically adjust for any confounding effects of prescription drug use on depression outcomes. All measures were limited in their recall bias, as some respondents to the BRFSS 2020 survey may have had trouble accurately recollecting important information concerning ACEs occurrences, physical activity frequency, and depression diagnoses. An additional limitation includes the cross-sectional nature of this study, as researchers could not establish temporal relationships using multiple timepoints for each variable to determine the extent to which ACEs change the odds of physical activity and depression over time. A detail that could be perceived as a limitation involves the small, yet statistically significant odds ratios reported in the results. The dichotomous nature of the physical activity and depression variables contain floor and ceiling boundaries for the effect size that limits their maximum change in odds to ±1. It is necessary to highlight that the BRFSS 2020 data for physical activity and depression were collected as dichotomous outcomes which requires researcher to examine percentage changes in yes/no proportions (0–100%) and not larger coefficients from a broader continuous scale when conducting odds ratio analyses. Lastly, another limitation involved how systematic error was introduced in excluding participants with missing data on ACEs, physical activity, and/or depression, as regression analyses determined characteristics of included participants differed from excluded participants.

Despite these limitations, evidence from this study has the potential to inform future longitudinal research examining the extent to which physical activity partially mediates the effect of ACEs on depression among adults. Such research could eventually inform intervention studies testing the effectiveness of a physical activity treatment in preventing depression among U.S. adults with high ACEs. Physical activity interventions have been shown to successfully alleviate depression among adults [79]. The evidence from this study and past studies [16,1921,37] demonstrate ACEs increase the odds of depression. It is necessary to apply a physical activity intervention among adults with high ACEs to examine the extent to which increased physical activity changes depression outcomes over time. Such research would provide important insight detailing potentially useful approaches for preventing depression among at-risk adults with high ACEs.

Conclusions

ACEs pose serious risks to U.S. adults for increased odds of depression and reduced odds of physical activity. Findings from this study provide insight related to the potential for physical activity as an effective approach to lower the likelihood of depression among vulnerable adults with high ACEs. Future studies should longitudinally test physical activity as a mediator within the effect of ACEs on depression, which could ultimately lead to testing physical activity interventions as an approach to prevent depression among adults with high ACEs. Physical activity seems to be a promising approach for alleviating the heightened depression levels of adults with high ACEs.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. David MacKinnon for providing guidance on the research methodology and statistical analyses, while also providing useful feedback on the manuscript.

Data Availability

The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2020.html, https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2020/files/LLCP2020XPT.zip).

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). What are adverse childhood experiences? Violence Prevention—Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences. 2022;https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/fastfact.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fviolenceprevention%2Facestudy%2Ffastfact.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About the CDC-Kaiser ACE Study. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/about.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Felitti VJ. Adverse childhood experiences and adult health. Academic Pediatrics. 2009;9(3):131. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. American journal of preventive medicine. 1998;14(4):245–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leung JPK, Britton A, Bell S. Adverse childhood experiences and alcohol consumption in midlife and early old-age. Alcohol and alcoholism. 2016;51(3):331–338. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ford ES, Anda RF, Edwards VJ, Perry GS, Zhao G, Li C, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and smoking status in five states. Preventive medicine. 2011;53(3):188–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, Walker JD, Whitfield C, Perry BD, et al. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience. 2006;256(3):174–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bellis MA, Hughes K, Leckenby N, Jones L, Baban A, Kachaeva M, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and associations with health-harming behaviours in young adults: surveys in eight eastern European countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2014;92:641–655. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.129247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brown DW, Anda RF, Tiemeier H, Felitti VJ, Edwards VJ, Croft JB, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of premature mortality. American journal of preventive medicine. 2009;37(5):389–396. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Williamson DF, Thompson TJ, Anda RF, Dietz WH, Felitti V. Body weight and obesity in adults and self-reported abuse in childhood. International journal of obesity. 2002;26(8):1075–1082. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilbert LK, Breiding MJ, Merrick MT, Thompson WW, Ford DC, Dhingra SS, et al. Childhood adversity and adult chronic disease: an update from ten states and the District of Columbia, 2010. American journal of preventive medicine. 2015;48(3):345–349. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wade R Jr, Cronholm PF, Fein JA, Forke CM, Davis MB, Harkins-Schwarz M, et al. Household and community-level adverse childhood experiences and adult health outcomes in a diverse urban population. Child abuse & neglect. 2016;52:135–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ford K, Butler N, Hughes K, Quigg Z, Bellis MA, Barker P. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in Hertfordshire, Luton and Northamptonshire. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University. 2016; May. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mersky J, Topitzes J, Reynolds AJ. Impacts of adverse childhood experiences on health, mental health, and substance use in early adulthood: A cohort study of an urban, minority sample in the US. Child abuse & neglect. 2013;37(11):917–925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Raposo SM, Mackenzie CS, Henriksen CA, Afifi TO. Time does not heal all wounds: older adults who experienced childhood adversities have higher odds of mood, anxiety, and personality disorders. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2014;22(11):1241–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.LaNoue M, Graeber D, De Hernandez BU, Warner TD, Helitzer DL. Direct and indirect effects of childhood adversity on adult depression. Community Mental Health Journal. 2012;48(2):187–192. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9369-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Depression. National Institutes of Health—U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/depression#part_2254. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Major Depression. National Institute of Health—U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Anda RF, Whitfield CL, Felitti VJ, Chapman D, Edwards VJ, Dube SR, et al. Adverse childhood experiences, alcoholic parents, and later risk of alcoholism and depression. Psychiatric services. 2002;53(8):1001–1009. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.8.1001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chapman DP, Whitfield CL, Felitti VJ, Dube SR, Edwards VJ, Anda RF. Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of depressive disorders in adulthood. Journal of affective disorders. 2004;82(2):217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Danese A, Moffitt TE, Harrington H, Milne BJ, Polanczyk G, Pariante CM, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and adult risk factors for age-related disease: depression, inflammation, and clustering of metabolic risk markers. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2009;163(12):1135–1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Strulik H. An economic theory of depression and its impact on health behavior and longevity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2019;158:269–287. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liechty JM, Lee MJ. Longitudinal predictors of dieting and disordered eating among young adults in the US. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2013;46(8):790–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.van Strien T, Konttinen H, Homberg JR, Engels RC, Winkens LH. Emotional eating as a mediator between depression and weight gain. Appetite. 2016;100:216–224. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Payne ME, Steck SE, George RR, Steffens DC. Fruit, vegetable, and antioxidant intakes are lower in older adults with depression. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2012;112(12):2022–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.08.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Achttien R, van Lieshout J, Wensing M, van der Sanden MN, Staal JB. Symptoms of depression are associated with physical inactivity but not modified by gender or the presence of a cardiovascular disease; a cross-sectional study. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2019;19(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Matar Boumosleh J, Jaalouk D. Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in university students-A cross sectional study. PloS one. 2017;12(8):e0182239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kang E-J, Lee J-H. A longitudinal study on the causal association between smoking and depression. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2010;43(3):193–204. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.3.193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boden JM, Fergusson DM. Alcohol and depression. Addiction. 2011;106(5):906–914. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03351.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zullig KJ, Divin AL. The association between non-medical prescription drug use, depressive symptoms, and suicidality among college students. Addictive behaviors. 2012;37(8):890–899. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. The Lancet. 2007;370(9590):851–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Riemann D, Krone LB, Wulff K, Nissen C. Sleep, insomnia, and depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45(1):74–89. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0411-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Luppino FS, de Wit LM, Bouvy PF, Stijnen T, Cuijpers P, Penninx BW, et al. Overweight, obesity, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Archives of general psychiatry. 2010;67(3):220–229. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Carney RM, Freedland KE. Depression and coronary heart disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2017;14(3):145–155. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jia Y, Li F, Liu Y, Zhao J, Leng M, Chen L. Depression and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health. 2017;149:138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Coryell W, Young EA. Clinical predictors of suicide in primary major depressive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2005;66(4):412–417. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Merrick MT, Ports KA, Ford DC, Afifi TO, Gershoff ET, Grogan-Kaylor A. Unpacking the impact of adverse childhood experiences on adult mental health. Child abuse & neglect. 2017;69:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Von Cheong E, Sinnott C, Dahly D, Kearney PM. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and later-life depression: perceived social support as a potential protective factor. BMJ open. 2017;7(9):e013228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brinker J, Cheruvu VK. Social and emotional support as a protective factor against current depression among individuals with adverse childhood experiences. Preventive medicine reports. 2017;5:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Crouch E, Radcliff E, Strompolis M, Srivastav A. Safe, stable, and nurtured: Protective factors against poor physical and mental health outcomes following exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma. 2019;12(2):165–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rebar AL, Stanton R, Geard D, Short C, Duncan MJ, Vandelanotte C. A meta-meta-analysis of the effect of physical activity on depression and anxiety in non-clinical adult populations. Health psychology review. 2015;9(3):366–378. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1022901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. Jama. 2018;320(19):2020–2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lakka T, Bouchard C. Physical activity, obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Atherosclerosis: Diet and Drugs. 2005:137–163. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27661-0_4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Diaz KM, Shimbo D. Physical activity and the prevention of hypertension. Current hypertension reports. 2013;15(6):659–668. doi: 10.1007/s11906-013-0386-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, Riddell MC, Dunstan DW, Dempsey PC, et al. Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes care. 2016;39(11):2065–2079. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding EL, Kohl HW III, Haskell W, Lee I-M. Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2011;124(7):789–795. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kushi LH, Doyle C, McCullough M, Rock CL, Demark‐Wahnefried W, Bandera EV, et al. American Cancer Society Guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2012;62(1):30–67. doi: 10.3322/caac.20140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, Ballard RM, Bloodgood B, Conroy DE, et al. Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: a review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2019;51(6):1242. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kredlow MA, Capozzoli MC, Hearon BA, Calkins AW, Otto MW. The effects of physical activity on sleep: a meta-analytic review. Journal of behavioral medicine. 2015;38(3):427–449. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9617-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schultchen D, Reichenberger J, Mittl T, Weh TR, Smyth JM, Blechert J, et al. Bidirectional relationship of stress and affect with physical activity and healthy eating. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2019;24(2):315–333. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schuch FB, Stubbs B, Meyer J, Heissel A, Zech P, Vancampfort D, et al. Physical activity protects from incident anxiety: A meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies. Depression and anxiety. 2019;36(9):846–858. doi: 10.1002/da.22915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, Sethi D, Butchart A, Mikton C, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(8):e356–e366. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Monnat SM, Chandler RF. Long‐term physical health consequences of adverse childhood experiences. The Sociological Quarterly. 2015;56(4):723–752. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ye D, Reyes-Salvail F. Adverse childhood experiences among Hawai ‘i adults: findings from the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. Hawai’i Journal of Medicine & Public Health. 2014;73(6):181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bellis MA, Hughes K, Leckenby N, Perkins C, Lowey H. National household survey of adverse childhood experiences and their relationship with resilience to health-harming behaviors in England. BMC medicine. 2014;12(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Almuneef M, Qayad M, Aleissa M, Albuhairan F. Adverse childhood experiences, chronic diseases, and risky health behaviors in Saudi Arabian adults: a pilot study. Child abuse & neglect. 2014;38(11):1787–1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bellis MA, Lowey H, Leckenby N, Hughes K, Harrison D. Adverse childhood experiences: retrospective study to determine their impact on adult health behaviours and health outcomes in a UK population. Journal of public health. 2014;36(1):81–91. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Boisgontier MP, Orsholits D, von Arx M, Sieber S, Miller MW, Courvoisier D, et al. Adverse childhood experiences, depressive symptoms, functional dependence, and physical activity: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2020;17(8):790–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Easterlin MC, Chung PJ, Leng M, Dudovitz R. Association of team sports participation with long-term mental health outcomes among individuals exposed to adverse childhood experiences. JAMA pediatrics. 2019;173(7):681–688. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data.
  • 61.Pierannunzi C, Hu SS, Balluz L. A systematic review of publications assessing reliability and validity of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2004–2011. BMC medical research methodology. 2013;13(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Team RStudio. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC. http://www.rstudio.com/. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hox JJ, Moerbeek M, Van de Schoot R. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.McNeish D, Kelley K. Fixed effects models versus mixed effects models for clustered data: Reviewing the approaches, disentangling the differences, and making recommendations. Psychological Methods. 2019;24(1):20. doi: 10.1037/met0000182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fairchild AJ, MacKinnon DP. A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Prevention science. 2009;10(2):87–99. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0109-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. vol 398. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bellis MA, Hughes K, Leckenby N, Hardcastle K, Perkins C, Lowey H. Measuring mortality and the burden of adult disease associated with adverse childhood experiences in England: a national survey. Journal of public health. 2015;37(3):445–454. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Howell KH, Miller-Graff LE, Schaefer LM, Scrafford KE. Relational resilience as a potential mediator between adverse childhood experiences and prenatal depression. Journal of health psychology. 2020;25(4):545–557. doi: 10.1177/1359105317723450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kelifa MO, Yang Y, Herbert C, He Q, Wang P. Psychological resilience and current stressful events as potential mediators between adverse childhood experiences and depression among college students in Eritrea. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2020;106:104480. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kim Y, Lee H, Park A. Patterns of adverse childhood experiences and depressive symptoms: self-esteem as a mediating mechanism. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2021:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02129-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chen S-S, He Y, Xie G-D, Chen L-R, Zhang T-T, Yuan M-Y, et al. Relationships among adverse childhood experience patterns, psychological resilience, self-esteem and depressive symptoms in Chinese adolescents: A serial multiple mediation model. Preventive Medicine. 2022;154:106902. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McKeen H, Hook M, Podduturi P, Beitzell E, Jones A, Liss M. Mindfulness as a mediator and moderator in the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and depression. Current Psychology. 2021:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02003-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mersky JP, Janczewski CE. Adverse childhood experiences and postpartum depression in home visiting programs: prevalence, association, and mediating mechanisms. Maternal and child health journal. 2018;22(7):1051–1058. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2488-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bravo LG, Nagy GA, Stafford AM, McCabe BE, Gonzalez-Guarda RM. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Depressive Symptoms among Young Adult Hispanic Immigrants: Moderating and Mediating Effects of Distinct Facets of Acculturation Stress. Issues in mental health nursing. 2021:1–11. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1972190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Iob E, Lacey R, Steptoe A. Adverse childhood experiences and depressive symptoms in later life: longitudinal mediation effects of inflammation. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020;90:97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dunn AL, Trivedi MH, Kampert JB, Clark CG, Chambliss HO. Exercise treatment for depression: efficacy and dose response. American journal of preventive medicine. 2005;28(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Craft LL, Landers DM. The effect of exercise on clinical depression and depression resulting from mental illness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1998;20(4):339–357. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lawlor DA, Hopker SW. The effectiveness of exercise as an intervention in the management of depression: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj. 2001;322(7289):763. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Conn VS. Depressive symptom outcomes of physical activity interventions: meta-analysis findings. Annals of behavioral Medicine. 2010;39(2):128–138. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9172-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Catalina Castaño

24 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-17743Physical activity mitigates the link between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Depression among U.S. adultsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Royer,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

 Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 08 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Catalina Castaño, M.D, MSc

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document. You should list all authors and all affiliations as per our author instructions and clearly indicate the corresponding author.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments: 

Your article is significant because it addresses the importance of non-medical interventions in preventing mental health pathology. Your paper is well written, but I agree with Reviewer Nº1 that the abstract should be rewritten under his suggestions, focusing on the results. 

Overall I agree with the reviewer's suggestion; I think that background, methods and results are sound and wouldn´t make significant changes. Still, I have the same question as reviewer Nº2: Was pharmacologic treatment (previous or ongoing) a survey variable? Did they undergo or were under therapy? I think you should address that issue under discussion or limitations.

 [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear Authors,

Thank you for your excellent effort to publish your research work, it is an important study. Here are some comments and suggestions for you.

Starting from keywords, you are listed many words and decrease to four to six words, and use only relevant words.

In the abstract, you did not write the main objective and significance of the study which is very important to write in the background under the abstract. In addition, you took the content of the abstract directly from the body part of your research. But, it should be paraphrased or other similar words.

Introduction is good. But, in the methodology, the sampling techniques and procedures did not clearly state. so, make it clear. The result, discussion, and conclusion are good. But, state them in a short and precise way.

Reviewer #2: The article is relevant and highlights observable facts in all disciplines of medicine that have been minimized or "denied" by clinics that relegate such observations. It suggests that due to possible difficulties of culture and researchers, which historically tends to normalize damage to the health of minors in neglectful or violent and vulnerable environments. In this order of ideas, the contribution of this article gives us excellent support on how epidemiology is a good way of working for health and prevention. It was a pleasure to read and observe this collaborative work of the epidemiological surveillance centers of so many states that corroborates what is in our daily clinical practice with a methodological and statistical clarity of great help for future developments and treatments; with an n that gives an excellent value to the research for its diversity of populations in a single study. Adverse childhood experiences, depression, and exercise show new directions in holistic medicine and collaborative research. Each one is a subject as a variable with higher risk factors for many diseases and higher mortality. If we study it together and understand how each works to increase or decrease healthy living, we can help people in a better way. The limitations are well established and explained, with the suggestion of prospective longitudinal studies in the future. Literature is appropriate and fair. I suggest adding new chapter studies with a representative in vivo sample (as a gold standard) will reinforce the results. It does recommend adding an evaluation of the subjects by the clinician to know the reliable or specific depression diagnostic instruments.

Question: How many people are taking medicine during the survey? Or the exercise? It is a posible confusional variable? Are the authors looking for it?

Evidence recommend being careful with this vital variable if working around depressive people and looking to probe any therapy. It is an ethical and methodologic mandatory issue. Please clarify.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Beshir Mammiyo

Reviewer #2: Yes: ADELINA ALCORTA-GARZA

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 12;17(10):e0275185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275185.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


25 Aug 2022

Editor Comments:

1. Was pharmacologic treatment (previous or ongoing) a survey variable? Did they undergo or were under therapy? I think you should address that issue under discussion or limitations.

Response 1:

Thank you for emphasizing this consideration. The only data for pharmacologic treatment included within the BRFSS dataset was for individuals with a history of cancer or hepatitis B. Please see lines 233-235 of the Discussion section for mention of the lack of a pharmacologic treatment variable as a study limitation.

Reviewer 1 Comments:

1. Starting from keywords, you are listed many words and decrease to four to six words, and use only relevant words.

Response 1:

Thank you for this feedback. I have now decreased the number of keywords to five key words.

2. In the abstract, you did not write the main objective and significance of the study which is very important to write in the background under the abstract.

Response 2:

Thank you for this suggestion. Please see the modifications made to the Abstract, which now includes mention of the study objective and significance.

3. In addition, you took the content of the abstract directly from the body part of your research. But, it should be paraphrased or other similar words.

Response 3:

Edits have now been made to the Abstract in an effort to make the abstract unique from similar content in the main manuscript text.

4. Introduction is good. But, in the methodology, the sampling techniques and procedures did not clearly state. so, make it clear. The result, discussion, and conclusion are good. But, state them in a short and precise way.

Response 4:

Please refer to lines 73-87 concerning the sampling techniques and procedures. Since the BRFSS is an archival dataset, sampling approaches were restricted to including/excluding participant data from the full BRFSS dataset according to whether the state health agency collected data for ACEs, physical activity, and/or depression. Lines 115-117 detail the listwise deletion approach used to remove missing data, which determined the final sample size for our study.

Reviewer 2 Comments:

1. I suggest adding new chapter studies with a representative in vivo sample (as a gold standard) will reinforce the results.

Response 1:

Thank you for this suggestion. Lines 208-216 highlight the only known studies (some in vivo, some not) that have previously examined the links between ACEs and depression, ACEs and physical activity, and physical activity and depression. Lines 208-210 specifically discuss the only known study assessing the role of physical activity within the link between ACEs and depression.

2. It does recommend adding an evaluation of the subjects by the clinician to know the reliable or specific depression diagnostic instruments.

Response 2:

This is certainly an important consideration. Unfortunately, the BRFSS resource page on CDC.gov does not contain information for the specific depression diagnostic instruments used to inform the depression-related items used for the 2020 BRFSS. Please see lines 226-233 in the discussion detailing the limitations of the one-item instrument used to measure both depression and physical activity.

3. Question: How many people are taking medicine during the survey? Or the exercise? It is a posible confusional variable? Are the authors looking for it?

Response 3:

Thank you for bringing attention to this important detail. The only data for participants taking medicine during the survey that is included within the BRFSS dataset is for individuals with a history of cancer or hepatitis B. Please see lines 233-235 of the Discussion section for mention of the lack of a pharmacologic treatment variable as a study limitation.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers - PONE-D-22-17743.docx

Decision Letter 1

Catalina Castaño

12 Sep 2022

Physical activity mitigates the link between adverse childhood experiences and depression among U.S. adults

PONE-D-22-17743R1

Dear Dr. Royer,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Catalina Castaño, M.D, MSc

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: It was already commented and all comments were addressed. It is presented with a good fashion and the tittle is sound able

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Mammiyo Beshir

**********

Acceptance letter

Catalina Castaño

14 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-17743R1

Physical activity mitigates the link between adverse childhood experiences and depression among U.S. adults.

Dear Dr. Royer:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Catalina Castaño

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers - PONE-D-22-17743.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2020.html, https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2020/files/LLCP2020XPT.zip).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES