Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2001 Dec;183(24):7213–7223. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7213-7223.2001

Complex Regulatory Network Controls Initial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation in Escherichia coli via Regulation of the csgD Gene

Claire Prigent-Combaret 1,, Eva Brombacher 2, Olivier Vidal 1,, Arnaud Ambert 1, Philippe Lejeune 1, Paolo Landini 2, Corinne Dorel 1,*
PMCID: PMC95571  PMID: 11717281

Abstract

The Escherichia coli OmpR/EnvZ two-component regulatory system, which senses environmental osmolarity, also regulates biofilm formation. Up mutations in the ompR gene, such as the ompR234 mutation, stimulate laboratory strains of E. coli to grow as a biofilm community rather than in a planktonic state. In this report, we show that the OmpR234 protein promotes biofilm formation by binding the csgD promoter region and stimulating its transcription. The csgD gene encodes the transcription regulator CsgD, which in turn activates transcription of the csgBA operon encoding curli, extracellular structures involved in bacterial adhesion. Consistent with the role of the ompR gene as part of an osmolarity-sensing regulatory system, we also show that the formation of biofilm by E. coli is inhibited by increasing osmolarity in the growth medium. The ompR234 mutation counteracts adhesion inhibition by high medium osmolarity; we provide evidence that the ompR234 mutation promotes biofilm formation by strongly increasing the initial adhesion of bacteria to an abiotic surface. This increase in initial adhesion is stationary phase dependent, but it is negatively regulated by the stationary-phase-specific sigma factor RpoS. We propose that this negative regulation takes place via rpoS-dependent transcription of the transcription regulator cpxR; cpxR-mediated repression of csgB and csgD promoters is also triggered by osmolarity and by curli overproduction, in a feedback regulation loop.


In natural environments, bacteria are often found as sessile communities known as biofilms. Biofilms are defined as matrix-enclosed communities of microorganisms tightly interacting with each other and, in most cases, supported by an abiotic surface (7). Biofilms can become hundreds of micrometers in depth and display complex structural and functional architecture (8, 28, 40). Bacteria growing as a biofilm develop significant phenotypical, biochemical, and morphological differences from their planktonic counterparts. In particular, cells growing in biofilm are extremely resistant to treatment with biocides and to prolonged antibiotic therapy in human infections (16, 23). This different biochemical and phenotypical behavior reflects different patterns of gene expression compared with planktonic cells (39, 41). Such reprogramming of gene expression is likely to be due to changes in environmental physicochemical conditions and to involve two-component systems such as EnvZ/OmpR (41) and CpxA/CpxR (15).

In previous reports we described the isolation of a mutant from a continuous culture of Escherichia coli K-12 that is more efficient in biofilm formation. Using both genetic analysis and electron microscopy observations, we showed that this increased efficiency was due to augmented production of curli (40, 50). The genes necessary for curli production are clustered in the csgBA and csgDEFG operons, which encode the curli subunits and regulate their transcription and transport, respectively. The csgBA and csgDEFG operons appear to be expressed in environmental and clinical isolates of E. coli, as well as in Salmonella strains, in which the homologous genes are called agfBA and agfDEFG.

However, some E. coli K-12 laboratory strains do not express curli, although functional copies of the genes are still present (5, 19, 35). The reason for this different behavior in E. coli K-12 strains is not yet fully understood. Curli fibers are highly conserved between Salmonella species as well as in E. coli with respect to curlin amino acid sequence, genetic organization, and operon regulation (6, 44). Curlin, the product of csgA, is the major component of curli, while CsgB acts as a nucleator which primes the polymerization of curlin on the cell surface (20). The first gene of the csgDEFG operon encodes the CsgD protein, a putative transcription factor belonging to the luxR family and required for the transcription of csgBA (19). The csgEFG genes encode three curlin assembly factors, probably involved in export of the curli subunits (19).

Curli biogenesis is subject to tight and complex regulation: in E. coli K-12 and in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, they are only produced at temperatures below 30°C, at low osmolarity, and in stationary phase (19, 30, 35). The stationary-phase-induced transcription of genes required for curli biogenesis is dependent on the ς factor RpoS (35). However, in the absence of the H-NS histone-like protein, transcription from the csgDEFG promoter becomes independent of RpoS (3), suggesting that H-NS might selectively repress ς70-dependent transcription of csgD. The two-component systems OmpR/EnvZ (44, 50) and CpxA/CpxR are also implicated in the regulation of curli biogenesis (15). The OmpR/EnvZ system constitutes a signal transduction pathway that senses external osmolarity and regulates the transcription of several genes, including the porin-encoding genes ompF and ompC (38). There is genetic evidence that curli-encoding genes are members of the OmpR regulon (44, 50), but the existence of direct transcriptional control has never been demonstrated.

In this report we show that curli biosynthesis is subject to a complex regulatory network: the OmpR protein positively regulates curli expression by binding the csgDEFG promoter region at position −49.5 relative to the transcriptional start site and by activating its transcription. However, csgDEFG and csgBA expression is also subject to negative regulation by the rpoS gene. Negative control by rpoS appears to be mediated by direct interaction between the CpxR protein and both the csgD and csgB promoters. The CpxRA pathway is induced in response to damage of envelope proteins, such as during exposure to elevated pH (10, 33), and to alteration of the inner membrane lipid composition (11, 31). Activation of the Cpx pathway results in the production of factors involved in protein folding and degradation, such as the two peptidyl-prolyl-isomerases PpiA (9) and PpiD (12), DsbA, and the protease DegP (9). However, CpxR also represses motility and chemotaxis genes (14) and is involved in regulation of P pili (26), indicating that the Cpx pathway could play a role in other cellular processes as well. We propose a new model that integrates the complex regulatory networks controlling curli biogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media.

The E. coli strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. Media used were Luria-Bertani broth (LB), minimal M63 medium supplemented with glucose (0.2%) (32), and M63/2, a low-osmolarity medium obtained by twofold dilution of the M63 medium and supplementation with glucose (0.2%). Congo red indicator plates were prepared as described by Hammar et al. (19); on these plates, curli-producing bacteria form red colonies, whereas non-curli-producing cells produce white colonies.

TABLE 1.

E. coli K-12 strains and plasmids used

Strain or plasmid Descriptiona Source or reference
E. coli
 EB1.3 MG1655 rpoS::Tn10 This study
 EB2.16 PHL628 rpoS::Tn10 This study
 MG1655 λ F prototroph Laboratory collection
 MV2792 rpoS::Tn10 51
 PHL628 MG1655 malA-kan ompR234 50
 PHL694 NM522 ompR331::Tn10 This study
 PHL744 MC4100 malT54::Tn10 ompR234 50
 PHL818 MG1655 malT54::Tn10 ompR234 This study
 PHL849 MG1655 csgA::uidA-kan This study
 PHL852 MC4100 malT54::Tn10 ompR234 csgA::uidA-kan 15
 PHL856 PHL849 malT54::Tn10 This study
 PHL857 PHL849 malT54::Tn10 ompR234 This study
 PHL858 PHL849 ompR331::Tn10 This study
 PHL881 E. coli isolated from percutaneous transhepatic catheter, 71-year-old female patient (HH97496195), ompR+ 50
 PHL885 E. coli isolated from urethral catheter, 64-year-old female patient (HH97531012), ompR+ 50
 PHL906 BL21 pCal-n-CpxR This study
 PHL1017 PHL694 pKKompR234 (Apr) This study
 PHL1018 PHL694 pKKompR (Apr) This study
 PHL1043 M15 pREP4 (Kmr) pQEompR234 (Apr) This study
 PHL1044 M15 pREP4 (Kmr) pQEompR (Apr) This study
 PHL1087 PHL818 csgD::uidA-kan This study
 PHL1088 MG1655 csgD::uidA-kan This study
 PHL1089 PHL1088 ompR331::Tn10 This study
 PHL1099 PHL858 pCP994 (Apr) This study
 PHL1112 PHL858 pKK233-2 (Apr) This study
 PHL1114 MG1655 ompR331::Tn10 pCP994 (Apr) This study
PHL11152 TR50 malA-kan ompR234 This study
 TK821 MC4100 ompR331::Tn10 18
 TR50 MC4100 λR588 cpxP-lacZ 42
Plasmids
 pCSG4 pUC19 with a 3.5-kb HindIII fragment containing intergenic region between csgDEFG and csgBA and part of csgBA operon 35
 pCP994 pKK233-2 (2a) with 697-bp fragment containing csgD ORF 41
 pKKompR pKK233-2 (2a) with 864-bp fragment containing ompR ORF This study
 pKKompR234 pKK233-2 (2a) with 864-bp fragment containing ompR234 ORF This study
 pCal-n-CpxR pCal-n- (Stratagene) with 700-bp fragment containing cpxR ORF This study
 pBC csg pBC KS vector with 3.6-kb SacI/SalI fragment containing csgDEFG and csgBA operons This study
 pBC csgD::uidA-kan Insertion of 3.8-kb SmaI fragment containing uidA-kan cassette inserted in unique EcoRV site of pBCcsg present in csgD gene This study
a

The gene sequence for ompR of medical isolates HH97531012 and HH97496195 was amplified by using primers p1 (5′-CGGGTAACCAGGGGCGTTTT-3′) and p2 (5′-CTTCGTACGCGAAAGCTTTATTAAACTG-3′) and directely sequenced by Genome Express. 

Genetic methods.

Phage P1 transductions were carried out as described by Miller (32). The ompR234 mutation was transferred by using its genetic linkage (50% cotransduction) with malA, followed by screening of adherent transductants in 24-well microtitration plates. Transduction of the rpoS::Tn10 allele was obtained by selection on tetracycline plates and verification of the loss of catalase activity (29).

Enzyme assays.

β-Glucuronidase specific activity in toluene-treated samples was measured by spectrophotometrically monitoring the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl-β-d-glucuronide into p-nitrophenol at 405 nm (4). Specific activity was expressed as units per milligram of protein, where 1 U corresponds to 1 nmol of product liberated per min (40). β-Galactosidase activity was measured by following the degradation of o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactoside into o-nitrophenol, which absorbs at 420 nm (32). Specific activity was expressed as nanomoles of product liberated per minute per milligram (dry weight) of bacteria. A minimum of four independent assays were performed, and the results were averaged to obtain the indicated activities. Error bars indicate the standard deviation.

Adhesion and biofilm formation assays.

Determination of biofilm thickness in microtiter plates was carried out as described by Dorel et al. (15). The ratio between surface-attached and unattached bacteria was estimated by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). At least three independent assays were performed and averages were calculated. To determine initial attachment to a solid surface, we used the sand column method described by Simoni et al. (48). Bacteria were grown in the appropriate medium, harvested, washed, and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to an A280 of 1.0 (corresponding to ca. 5 × 108 bacteria); however, the adhesion properties of bacteria in the sand column assay depend strictly on the growth medium used (48) (data not shown). The suspension was loaded onto a fine sea sand grain column (9 g of sand). The bacterial concentration in the fractions collected at the column outlet was determined spectrophotometrically and used to calculate the percentage of attaching bacteria. The accuracy of spectrophotometric measurements was confirmed by direct plate counts (data not shown). Microscopic analysis of the column sand grains shows that bacteria attach as single cells in the conditions used in our experiments and that the cell sizes of the different strains are comparable (data not shown).

Construction of a csgD::uidA fusion.

To obtain a csgD::uidA chromosomal fusion, a 3,642-bp DNA fragment corresponding to the whole csg region was amplified by PCR from MG1655 chromosomal DNA as the template and by using primers C1 (5′-CGA ATA ATC TTG CGG TCG ACA AGC AGG-3′) and C2 (5′-GAA AGT GCC GCA AGG AGC TCT AAC G-3′), which contain, respectively, SalI and SacI restriction sites (italic sequences). The PCR fragment digested with SalI and SacI was cloned into the corresponding sites of the vector pBC (Stratagene) to give pBCcsg. The 3.8-kb SmaI fragment containing a uidA-kan cassette (pN496) (25) was cloned into the unique EcoRV site of the csgD gene carried by pBCcsg, producing pBCcsgD::uidA. The correct csgD::uidA orientation was confirmed by restriction digestion.

Integration of the plasmid into the chromosome was obtained by marker exchange mutagenesis, as described by Roeder and Collmer (43), followed by P1 transduction into the curli-producing strain PHL744. Transductants were selected for their inability to produce curli (white colonies on Congo red indicator [CFA] plates) and kanamycin resistance. β-Glucuronidase (the product of the uidA gene) specific activity was measured as described above.

Primer extension analysis of transcript.

Total RNA was isolated from E. coli cells grown to an OD600 of 0.2 (2.5 × 109 CFU/ml) or 1 (1010 CFU/ml) in M9/glucose medium at 28°C, as described by Sambrook et al. (47). For csgB transcript analysis, we used the 5′-CCCAGGCGCACCCAGTATTGTT-3′ primer, which anneals to the coding strand between 117 and 139 nucleotides downstream of the csgB gene transcription start. The sequence of the primer used for csgD transcript analysis was 5′-AAGATTTAGTGATCAACAATAATG-3′, annealing to nucleotides +181 to +203 of csgD. The primers were labeled with the fluorescent dye IRD-800 at the 5′ end. Extension products were run on a sequencing gel and densitometrically analyzed in a 4000L automated sequencer (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, Neb.).

Overproduction and purification of the OmpR and OmpR234 proteins.

The coding regions of OmpR and OmpR234 were amplified by PCR from chromosomal DNA of, respectively, MG1655 and MG1655 ompR234 strains and by using the primers R1 (5′-AGTACAAACCATGGAAGAGAACTAC-3′) and R2 (5′-CTTCGTACGCGAAAGCTTTATTAAACTG-3′) carrying, respectively, an NcoI and an HindIII site (italic sequences). The presence of an NaeI cutting site in the ompR234 but not in the ompR amplified fragment (50) was checked. The 864-bp NcoI-HindIII fragments were then subcloned in the NcoI and HindIII unique sites of the plasmid cloning vector pKK233-2. The resulting plasmids, pKKompR and pKKompR234, contain fusions of the ompR and ompR234 start codons with the ATG start codon of the strong regulated trc promoter, placing ompR and ompR234 under the transcriptional and translational regulatory signals of the trc promoter.

Plasmids pKKompR234 and pKKompR were introduced by transformation into strain PHL694, which carries a chromosomal ompR null mutation (see Table 1). Three hours after isopropylthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction, cells were harvested and suspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Crude protein extracts were obtained by disrupting bacteria at 138,000 kPa in a French pressure cell (Aminco). OmpR and OmpR234 proteins were purified by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) on DEAE-cellulose column chromatography as described by Jo et al. (27). The purification of the OmpR protein yielded protein of 85% purity, as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Protein concentrations were determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay kit.

Overproduction and purification of the CBP-CpxR protein.

To construct the plasmid producing the calmodulin binding peptide (CBP)-CpxR fusion protein, a 700-bp region corresponding to the CpxR open reading frame was amplified by PCR using E. coli MC4100 genomic DNA as the template with primers cpx+ (5′-TATTTAAACCATGGATAAAATC-3′) and cpxrev (5′-CTATCATGAAGCTTAAACCATC-3′) carrying, respectively, an NcoI and an HindIII site. The amplified DNA was digested with NcoI and HindIII and subcloned into the corresponding restriction sites of pCAL-n (Stratagene), generating pCAL-n-cpxR, which was subsequently introduced into the BL21 strain. The pCAL vectors use the T7 lac promoter configuration and contain a copy of the lacI gene. On induction with 1 mM IPTG, the lacUV5 promoter was derepressed, allowing overexpression of T7 RNA polymerase and expression of the T7-promoted cpxR gene. Crude protein extracts were obtained as described above and incubated overnight with calmodulin affinity resin in CaCl2 binding buffer, according to the instruction manual (Stratagene). Washes and elution were performed as recommended by the manufacturer.

Gel retardation assay.

DNA probes containing either the csgDEFG promoter region (−128 to +12) or the same region with deletions of the putative OmpR- and CpxR-binding sites, were obtained by PCR amplification from pCSG4. For the wild-type promoter, PCR amplification was performed by using primers D1 (5′-CCAAATGTACAAGCTTTCTATCATTTC-3′) and D2 (5′-GGATTACATCTGATTTCAATCTAGCC-3′). For the promoter with a deletion of the putative OmpR binding site, a 119-bp fragment was amplified using two primers, D1 and D3 (5′-GGATTACATCTGATTTCAATCTAGCCATTACAAATCTTAAATCAAGTGTTCTCGTTATATTAAAATG-3′). The D3 primer sequence is identical to the sequence of D2 for its first 25 bases and then contains a 20-bp deletion corresponding to the putative OmpR binding site (Fig. 1). The sequence of the deleted operator was checked by automated sequencing using D1 primer (Genome Express France). A DNA probe containing the csgB promoter region was obtained by PCR amplification from pCSG4 using D4 (5′-CTGTCTGAAGCTTTTTGATAGCGGAAAACGG-3′) and D5 (5′-CACCCTGGACCTGGTCGTACATTTAA-3′) primers. All three operator fragments were digested with HindIII and then 32P-labeled by the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Representation of the csgD-csgBA intergenic region in E. coli strain MG1655 (AE000205). The position of the transcriptional start site is indicated by the small arrow. The −10 and −35 regions are underlined. The putative OmpR binding site is boxed. The perfect CpxR recognition consensus sequence is encircled with a bold line, whereas the consensus sequence with a 1-bp mismatch is encircled with a thin line. The consensus mismatch is indicated by a solid circle. Primers D1, D2, and D3 used for amplification of the wild-type csgD promoter and of the promoter with deletions of the OmpR and CpxR boxes are indicated by the big arrows. The positions of primers D4 and D5, used for amplification of the wild-type csgB promoter, are indicated.

Binding reactions were carried out in 20 μl of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)–50 mM KCl–1 mM DTT–1 mM EDTA–5% glycerol–6 μg of bovine serum albumin–1 μg of poly(dI-dC). To allow the phosphorylation of regulator proteins, 20 mM acetylphosphate was added to the reaction mixture when necessary. KCl was replaced by NaCl in CpxR binding assays. After addition of the DNA probe (30,000 cpm, corresponding to 1 nmol of DNA) and of various amounts of purified proteins, the reaction mixtures were incubated for 30 min at 30°C, then loaded onto a 7% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel (ratio of acrylamide to bisacrylamide, 80:1). Electrophoresis was carried out in 25 mM Tris-borate–0.5 M EDTA–2.5% glycerol.

RESULTS

OmpR protein promotes curli production by activation of csgD promoter.

As shown in a previous report, the presence of the ompR234 allele favors biofilm formation by stimulating the expression of the csgBA operon and the production of curli (50). However, it is not clear if OmpR234 activates csgBA by binding to the csgB promoter or in an indirect fashion. Regulation of the csgBA operon is fairly complex and involves the transcription activator CsgD, the product of the first gene in the csgDEFG operon (3, 44). In order to establish whether CsgD alone is sufficient for csgB activation, we overexpressed the CsgD protein in an OmpR strain.

Overexpression of CsgD resulted in stimulation of csgBA expression, suggesting that OmpR is required for activation of the csgD but not the csgBA promoter (Table 2). The presence of a possible OmpR binding site in the agfD promoter region of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium that is almost identical to the csgD promoter sequence of E. coli has already been suggested by Römling et al. (44). The putative OmpR binding site is an imperfect direct repeat sequence centered at −49.5 relative to the transcriptional start site of csgD (Fig. 1). This sequence, 5′-GTTACATTTA/GTTACATGTT-3′, closely resembles the consensus for OmpR binding sites proposed by Harlocker et al. (21), and its location would be consistent with possible OmpR-RNA polymerase interactions at the csgD promoter.

TABLE 2.

Expression level of csgA-uidA fusion in an ompR mutant but csgD+++ genetic contexta

Genetic context Mean β-glucuronidase sp act (U/mg of protein) ± SD
Low osmolarity (147 mosM) High osmolarity (686 mosM)
ompR csgD 30.0 ± 4.5 3.2 ± 0.3
ompR csgD+++ 75,088 ± 2,708 39,925 ± 194
a

Specific β-glucuronidase activities of the csgA::uidA-kan fusion were measured on different genetic backgrounds in liquid cultures of strains PHL1099 (csgA-uidA ompR csgD+++) and PHL1112 (csgA-uidA ompR csgD), at low and high medium osmolarity, as described in Materials and Methods. 

To determine if this sequence functions as a binding site for the OmpR protein, we assayed binding of the FPLC-purified OmpR and OmpR234 proteins to DNA fragments containing the transcriptional regulatory region of csgD. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed using the wild-type csgD promoter region (−118 to +12) and the promoter region with a deletion of the putative OmpR binding site. Gel retardation assays shown in Fig. 2A and 2B clearly demonstrate that both OmpR and OmpR234 can bind wild-type csgD but fail to interact with the promoter region with a deletion of the putative OmpR box (Fig. 2C). From these experiments we conclude that the OmpR protein interacts directly with and activates transcription from the csgD promoter by binding to a 20-bp region centered at −49.5. Identical concentrations of OmpR failed to retard a DNA fragment encompassing the csgB promoter (−173 to +88; data not shown), strongly suggesting that the csgD promoter is the main target for OmpR regulation. Similar results were obtained in bandshift assays with purified His6-OmpR and His6-OmpR234 proteins (data not shown).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of the csgD promoter region with OmpR-P. (A and B) Increasing amounts of FPLC-purified OmpR (A) and OmpR234 (B) protein were incubated with the wild-type csgD promoter (D1D2): no protein (lane 1), 730 nM (lane 2), 1.8 μM (lane 3), and 3.6 μM (lane 4) OmpR protein; lane 5, the same as lane 4 with a 40-fold excess of competing unlabeled D1D2 DNA. C, OmpR-DNA (A) or OmpR234-DNA (B) complex. (C) Specific binding to the 20-bp F1-box centered at position −49.5; the deleted (D1D3) operator was used as the probe in this experiment.

ompR234 mutation allows biofilm formation at high osmolarity by transcriptional enhancement of both csg operons.

Expression of the csgD promoter in E. coli and of agfD in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium is negatively affected by high osmolarity, consistent with a role of the envZ/ompR system in their regulation (35, 44). We tested the effects of the osmotic conditions in the growth medium on biofilm formation and on csgDEFG and csgBA expression levels. Osmolarity variations were achieved by adding increasing amounts of osmolytes such as NaCl (Fig. 3) and sucrose (data not shown) to low-osmolarity minimal M63/2 medium. The results of increased medium osmolarity on biofilm formation, measured as crystal violet staining and from OD600 measurement of cells attached to microtiter plates, are shown in Figure 3.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Negative effect of osmolarity on biofilm development in microtiter plates. The osmolarity of minimal M63/2 medium supplemented with glucose at different NaCl concentrations was measured with a Fiske OS/220 osmometer. Biofilm visualization by crystal violet staining was performed as previously described (15, 50). The thickness of the biofilm was quantified as follows. For each well, two washes were pooled with the initial supernatant and are referred to as swimming cells; the biofilm was recovered in 1 ml of M63 by scraping and pipetting up and down. The numbers of surface-attached and swimming bacteria were estimated from the OD600 to give the adherence percentage corresponding to each osmolarity condition and each bacterial strain. The total growth in each well reached 1.5 OD600 U except in the presence of 0.3 M NaCl. In this particular condition, only 1.2 OD600 U could be attained. The formation of biofilm was inhibited by increasing NaCl concentrations in MG1655 (wild-type ompR and ompR234) and clinical strains. Similar trends were seen when sucrose was used as an osmotic agent (data not shown). Whatever osmolarity cells encounter, knocking out the csgA gene in MG1655 or in medical isolates results in a nonadherent phenotype (40) (data not shown).

The formation of biofilm was inhibited by increasing osmolyte concentrations in both MG1655 (ompR+) and MG1655 (ompR234) strains. While biofilm formation was inhibited in MG1655 ompR234 at 0.3 M NaCl, 0.05 M NaCl was sufficient to significantly affect MG1655 biofilm formation (Fig. 3). Addition of the nonionic osmolyte sucrose to M63/2 medium supplemented with glucose (2 g/liter) gave similar results: biofilm formation in MG1655 was inhibited at 4.7% sucrose (289 mosM), while inhibition of MG1655 ompR234 biofilm occurred at 16.5% sucrose (827 mosM) (data not shown). This suggests that osmolarity, and not the ionic strength of the medium, is responsible for the loss of bacterial adhesion.

The expression of the csgBA and the csgDEFG operons was also negatively affected by increasing NaCl (Fig. 4) and sucrose (data not shown) concentrations. These observations suggest that loss of the ability to form a biofilm at high osmolarity is due to inhibition of csgBA transcription and consequent reduced curli production. In the ompR234 strain, curli biosynthesis is still tightly osmoregulated, but OmpR234 is able to counteract the negative effects of high osmolarity, allowing growth as a biofilm at higher osmolyte concentrations. Increased osmolyte concentrations also affect the ability of clinical isolates of E. coli (PHL881 and PHL885) to form biofilms (Fig. 3). This observation shows that the osmoregulation of adherence properties appears to be widely conserved in both laboratory and medical strains of E. coli. Therefore, osmolarity seems to be a key factor for biofilm formation in E. coli, as is the case in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (44).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

Negative effect of high medium osmolarity on transcription of the curli genes. (A) csgA::uidA gene fusion. (B) csgD::uidA gene fusion. The transcriptional level of each fusion was compared in wild-type ompR (open squares), ompR234 (solid squares), and ompR::Tn10 (open circles) backgrounds. Increasing amounts of NaCl were added to minimal M63/2 medium supplemented with glucose, as in Fig. 3. Bacterial growth was similar in all enzymatic assays (1.5 OD600 U) except in the presence of 0.3 M NaCl. In this particular condition, only 1.2 OD600 U could be attained. Results are means and standard deviations from four independent β-glucuronidase assays. The compilation of data regarding adherence (Fig. 3) and expression of the csgA::uidA fusion (this figure) suggests that adherence does not occur below a transcriptional threshold of 800 U/mg of protein.

ompR234 mutation increases initial adhesion to solid substrates in a stationary-phase-dependent but rpoS-independent manner.

The formation of biofilm takes place in several steps, which include initial attachment to a solid surface, formation of a microcolony, and differentiation into a complex structure (7). To test if the ompR234 mutation affects initial adhesion, we used the sand column system described by Simoni et al. (48), which provides a simple and direct method to measure attachment. Cells grown overnight in minimal medium were loaded onto sand columns after being washed and resuspended in PBS. As shown in Fig. 5, for strain MG1655 (wild-type ompR) grown to the stationary phase, only around 30% of the cells attached to the column. This shows that strain MG1655 has a weak ability to adhere to sand grains. In sharp contrast, for the otherwise isogenic strain MG1655 ompR234, more than 70% of the cells adhered to the sand grains.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

Adhesion experiments in sand columns. The percentage of attaching bacteria was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were grown in M9/glucose and harvested either in the exponential phase (OD600 of 0.2, corresponding to circa 2.5 × 109 CFU/ml) or in the stationary phase (OD600 of 1.0, corresponding to circa 1010 CFU/ml). Cells were resuspended in PBS to a final OD280 of 1, corresponding to 2 × 109 CFU/ml, and the same number of cells were loaded in each experiment. For each experiment, seven measurements were taken. Data shown are the averages of four independent experiments. WT, wild type.

This difference in initial adhesion between the two strains was only detected upon entry into the stationary phase. Thus, we inactivated the rpoS gene, encoding ςS, the stationary-phase-induced alternative ς factor of RNA polymerase, in both MG1655 and MG1655 ompR234. The newly produced EB1.3 (rpoS) and EB2.16 (rpoS ompR234) strains were tested for adhesion to sand columns. Inactivation of the rpoS gene did not significantly affect the ability to adhere for either ompR234 or wild-type ompR strains (Fig. 5). The lack of effects following rpoS inactivation was surprising, since rpoS is a positive regulator of the curli operons in some E. coli strains and in Salmonella (3). Thus, we tested the effects of rpoS inactivation on csgDEFG and csgBA transcription by primer extension experiments.

As shown in Fig. 6, rpoS inactivation stimulated both csgD and csgBA transcription in the stationary phase (Fig. 6, lane 4). Expression of the csgBA operon was detected in the stationary but not in the exponential phase, consistent with the results obtained in the adhesion experiments (Fig. 5). In contrast, higher levels of csgD transcription were detected in the exponential phase, earlier than the transcription from its target promoter csgBA, suggesting that CsgD might be subjected to posttranscriptional regulation and might possibly regulate its own expression. Experiments with luciferase reporter genes under the control of either the csgB or the csgD promoter confirmed the results of primer extension experiments (E. Brombacher and P. Landini, unpublished data). Our results show that ςS is not required for transcriptional induction of csgB and csgD promoters and suggest that Eς70 is preferably used upon entry into the stationary phase in the ompR234 strain.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6

Primer extension from csgD and csgBA mRNAs. The experiments were performed with 10 μg of total RNA. Lane 1, wild-type (MG1655). Lane 2, ompR234 (PHL628). Lane 3, rpoS (EB1.3). Lane 4, ompR234 rpoS (EB2.16). Cells were grown in M9/glucose and harvested either in the exponential phase (OD600 = 0.2, corresponding to circa 2.5 × 109 CFU/ml) or in the stationary phase (after 16 to 18 h of growth; OD600 > 1, corresponding to 1010 CFU/ml). The sizes of the transcripts from both csgD and csgB, determined using a sequencing ladder from plasmid pUC19 as a molecular weight marker, were consistent with the previously proposed start sites (44).

Negative regulation of curli operon by transcription regulator CpxR.

In a previous paper, we have shown that the two-component regulatory system CpxA/CpxR negatively affects csgBA expression (15). Both the csgD and csgBA promoters display sequences with high similarity to the proposed binding site for CpxR (36). To investigate the possibility of a direct role of CpxR in curli regulation, we purified CpxR and assayed its specific DNA binding to the csgD and the csgB promoter regions. Indeed, CpxR binds specifically to both the csgD and the csgB promoters (Fig. 7), showing that CpxR is directly involved in the downregulation of curli expression.

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7

Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of the csgD and csgB promoter regions with CBP-CpxR. Mobility shift assays were performed with pure CBP-CpxR and 32P-end-labeled csgD (left) and csgB (right) promoter fragments. (A) pcsgD. D1D2 probe without protein (lane 1); D1D2 probe with 300 nM CBP-CpxR (lane 2); same as lane 2 but challenged with unrelated binding site (100-fold excess of calf thymus DNA, lane 3); same as lane 2 but with a 40-fold excess of unlabeled competing D1D2 DNA (lane 4). ΔpcsgD. D1D3 probe without protein (lane 5) and with 300 nM CBP-CpxR (lane 6). (B) pcsgB. D4D5 probe without protein (lane 7); D4D5 probe with 300 nM CBP-CpxR (lane 8); same as lane 8 but challenged with 100-fold excess of calf thymus DNA unrelated binding site (lane 9); same as lane 8 but with a 40-fold excess of competing unlabeled D4D5 DNA (lane 10). Arrows C, CBP-CpxR-DNA complex.

Since the cpxR promoter has been shown to be controlled by the rpoS gene (14), it is possible that CpxR could mediate the negative regulation of the csg genes in an rpoS-dependent fashion. However, the Cpx pathway could also be directly activated by curli accumulation. To investigate this possibility, the ompR234 mutation was introduced by transduction into an MC4100 strain carrying a cpxP-lacZ fusion specifically activated by CpxR (10). Curli are indeed overexpressed in the ompR234 mutant strains (40, 50). The cpxP-lacZ fusion was shown to be 2.5-fold more highly expressed in the ompR234 background (Fig. 8A). Moreover, the MC4100 ompR234 strain carrying a cpxP-lacZ fusion (PHL1152) was transformed either with pCSG4 –a high copy number plasmid carrying the csgBA gene- or with the control vector pUC19. The cpxP-lacZ fusion was shown to be 2-fold more highly expressed when curlin was overproduced both in rich and minimum media (Fig. 8A). Therefore, curli overproduction appears to activate the Cpx pathway. Moreover, the cpxP-lacZ fusion showed a 2- to 5-fold induction when bacteria encountered high-osmolarity conditions in the presence of NaCl or sucrose (Fig. 8B). As estimated from the cpxP fusion induction, the Cpx pathway is therefore likely to be activated by high osmolarity.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8

cpxP-lacZ transcription is induced by curli overproduction (A) and high osmolarity (B). (A) β-Galactosidase activities were determined for strains TR50 (MC4100 λRS88[cpxP-lacZ]) (lane 1) and PHL1152 (MC4100 λRS88[cpxP-lacZ]) (lanes 2, 3, and 4). (A) β-Galactosidase activities of strains transformed either with pUC19 (control for pCSG4, lane 3) or pCSG4 (overexpresses curlin, lane 4). All strains were grown in Luria broth at 30°C. Bacterial growth was similar in all enzymatic assays (1.5 OD600 U). Similar results were obtained in minimal M63 medium supplemented with glucose. (B) β-Galactosidase activities were determined for the PHL1152 strain in the presence of increasing amounts of osmolytes (NaCl and sucrose) added to minimal M63/2 medium supplemented with glucose. The total growth in each culture reached 1.5 OD600 U except in the presence of 0.3 M NaCl. In this particular condition, only 1.2 OD600 U could be attained.

Altogether, our results suggest that the transcriptional activation of curli synthesis focuses on the csgD promoter, as described in the model shown in Fig. 9. Curli production at low osmolarity results from activation of csgDEFG transcription by OmpR, with OmpR234 being a more efficient activator than OmpR. In response to the Cpx pathway activation, via RpoS, high osmolarity, curlin accumulation, or a combination of these factors, transcription of the two csg operons is repressed.

FIG. 9.

FIG. 9

Model of the regulatory network controlling biofilm formation in E. coli. Curli production at low osmolarity results from transcriptional activation of the csgD promoter by OmpR and OmpR234, OmpR234 appearing to be a much more efficient activator than OmpR. In response to Cpx pathway activation via either RpoS, high osmolarity, curlin accumulation, or a combination of these factors, transcription of the two csg operons is repressed. The different controls are indicated by arrows for positive controls or by a line with a bar for negative controls.

DISCUSSION

The genetic organization and transcriptional regulation of curli-related operons csgBA and csgDEFG are highly conserved in E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strains (44). Expression of these genes responds to different environmental signals and is positively regulated by ompR and rpoS (44). However, in strains MC4100 and MG1655 of E. coli, the expression of the csgBA genes is negligible despite the presence of functional ompR and rpoS genes. In a previous report, we showed that a G-to-T mutation in the ompR gene (ompR234 mutation), corresponding to a leucine-to-arginine substitution at position 43 of the OmpR protein, resulted in an increase in the expression of curli (50). In this paper, we have shown that increased curli production is mediated by OmpR234-dependent stimulation of transcription of the csgDEFG operon (Table 2). Increased production of the CsgD transcription activator results in activation of the csgBA operon; when CsgD is expressed independently of OmpR, the latter becomes dispensable for activation of the csgB promoter (Table 2).

Both genetic and biochemical evidence shows that OmpR binds to an imperfect direct repeat (5′-GTTACATTTA/GTTACATGTT-3′) centered at position −49.5 relative to the transcriptional start site of the csgD promoter (Table 2 and Fig. 1 and 2). This sequence is very similar to the consensus for OmpR binding sites proposed by several groups (21, 22, 37). In vitro binding experiments show that both the OmpR wild-type and OmpR234 mutant proteins can recognize this sequence, although OmpR234 displays a slightly higher binding affinity than the wild-type protein, which might be enough to improve activation of csgD transcription. The OmpR234 protein might be better able to counteract the negative regulation of csgD by the CpxR protein (15) (Fig. 7A), either by competing for the same binding site or by inducing structural changes in the csgD promoter region. Alternatively, the leucine-to-arginine substitution in the OmpR234 protein (L43R) might improve its interaction with RNA polymerase.

The observation that, unlike the situation in other E. coli strains and in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (2, 44), the rpoS gene is no longer necessary for csgD transcription in the ompR234 strain (Fig. 6) might suggest that the L43R substitution results in a better interaction of OmpR with ς70 RNA polymerase. Interestingly, a single-nucleotide substitution in the putative binding site for OmpR in the S. enterica serovar Typhimurium agfD promoter region also makes agfD transcription rpoS independent (45).

The ompR gene is part of the ompR/envZ two-component regulatory system that senses osmolarity; thus, we investigated the possibility that biofilm formation might be regulated by osmolarity via the ompR/envZ pathway. Increasing NaCl or sucrose concentrations in the growth medium resulted in the inhibition of biofilm formation and decreased in vivo expression of the csgDEFG and csgBA operons, as measured with csgD::uidA and csgA::uidA chromosomal fusions (Fig. 3 and 4). Inhibition by NaCl or sucrose was observed in laboratory strains as well as in clinical isolates (Fig. 3), suggesting that osmolarity regulation of biofilm formation is broadly conserved in E. coli strains. Inhibition of curli production in the MG1655 strain PHL565 was observed at NaCl concentrations lower than those present in commonly used growth media (Fig. 3 and 4), providing an explanation for the previously reported lack of curli expression in laboratory strains (6, 19, 34).

Increasing osmolarity of the growth environment activates the sensor protein EnvZ and leads to increased phosphorylation of OmpR, resulting in enhancement of its DNA-binding ability (1, 13, 17, 24, 46). However, increased phosphorylation of OmpR results in activation of transcription only at certain promoters, such as ompC, while other genes, such as ompF, are downregulated. Repression of ompF transcription is due to the binding of phosphorylated OmpR (OmpR-P) to multiple binding sites, with the consequent inhibition of RNA polymerase binding to the ompF promoter (49). This mechanism might also apply to the regulation of csgD, although we were not able to identify multiple binding sites for OmpR (Fig. 1). It is possible that the negative regulation of csgD expression at high osmolarity is mediated by CpxR, since high osmolarity does indeed activate the Cpx pathway (Fig. 9). Control of cpxR expression by osmolarity would be consistent with the observation that increased osmolarity also results in a further decrease in the basal levels of csgBA transcription in a csgD mutant strain (Table 2).

Adhesion experiments using sand columns strongly suggest that the stage of biofilm formation positively affected by the ompR234 mutation is the initial adhesion to a solid surface (Fig. 5). Initial adhesion experiments also showed that the ompR234 mutation stimulates adhesion only in stationary-phase cells (Fig. 5), consistent with the simultaneous increase in csgB expression (Fig. 6). However, this stationary-phase-specific effect is not mediated by the master regulator RpoS, which, on the contrary, appears to negatively regulate csgBA expression in an ompR234 strain (Fig. 6).

We propose that negative regulation of csgB transcription by rpoS is due to rpoS-dependent transcription of cpxR (14). Interestingly, the CpxR protein binds both csgD and csgBA promoter regions, where it acts as a repressor (Fig. 7) (15). Lack of cpxR transcription in the rpoS-deficient strain would allow increased csgB transcription in the stationary phase. Our observations reiterate the importance of different regulatory networks in the regulation of the curli operon in E. coli and suggest that the CpxRA pathway plays a major role in the expression of virulence factors such as curli (this report) and P pili (26). The extreme complexity of the regulation mechanisms is likely to reflect the importance of finely tuning the expression of adhesion genes for survival of the bacterium in different environments.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Sylvie Reverchon for critical reading of the manuscript, Valérie Gaubiac and Véronique Ramos for technical help, and also Valérie James for English corrections. We thank T. Silhavy for the gift of strains.

This work was partly supported by research grant 3100-058871 from the Swiss National Science Foundation and by a grant from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Réseau “Infections Nosocomiales”).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aiba H. Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli crp gene: CRP is a transcriptional repressor for its own gene. Cell. 1983;32:141–149. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90504-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allen-Vercoe E, Collighan R, Woodward M J. The variant rpoS allele of S. enteritidis strain 27655R does not affect virulence in a chick model nor constitutive curliation but does generate a cold-sensitive phenotype. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998;167:245–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2a.Amann E, Brosius J. ‘ATG vectors’ for regulated high-level expression of cloned genes in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1985;40:183–190. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arnqvist A, Olsen A, Normark S. Sigma S-dependent growth-phase induction of the csgBA promoter in Escherichia coli can be achieved in vivo by sigma 70 in the absence of the nucleoid-associated protein H-NS. Mol Microbiol. 1994;13:1021–1032. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bardonnet N, Blanco C. uidA antibiotic resistance cassettes for insertion mutagenesis, gene fusion and genetic constructions. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992;93:243–248. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90469-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Collinson S K, Emody L, Muller K H, Trust T J, Kay W W. Purification and characterization of thin, aggregative fimbriae from Salmonella enteritidis. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:4773–4781. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.15.4773-4781.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Collinson S K, Clouthier S C, Doran J L, Banser P A, Kay W W. Salmonella enteritidis agfBAC operon encoding thin, aggregative fimbriae. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:662–667. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.3.662-667.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Costerton J W, Cheng K J, Geesey G G, Ladd T I, Nickel J C, Dasgupta M, Marrie T J. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1987;41:435–464. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Costerton J W, Lewandowski Z, DeBeer D, Caldwell D, Korber D, James G. Biofilms, the customized microniche. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:2137–2142. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.8.2137-2142.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Danese P N, Silhavy T J. The sigma(E) and the Cpx signal transduction systems control the synthesis of periplasmic protein-folding enzymes in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1183–1193. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.9.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Danese P N, Silhavy T J. CpxP, a stress-combative member of the Cpx regulon. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:831–839. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.4.831-839.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Danese P N, Oliver G R, Bar K, Bowman G D, Rick P D, Silhavy T J. Accumulation of the enterobacterial common antigen lipid II biosynthetic intermediate stimulates degP transcription in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:5875–5884. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.22.5875-5884.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dartigalongue C, Raina S. A new heat-shock gene, ppiD, encodes a peptidyl-prolyl isomerase required for folding of outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1998;17:3968–3980. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.3968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Delgado J, Forst S, Harlocker S, Inouye M. Identification of a phosphorylation site and functional analysis of conserved aspartic acid residues of OmpR, a transcriptional activator for ompF and ompC in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1993;10:1037–1047. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00974.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.De Wulf P, Kwon O, Lin E C. The CpxRA signal transduction system of Escherichia coli: growth-related autoactivation and control of unanticipated target operons. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:6772–6778. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.21.6772-6778.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dorel C, Vidal O, Prigent-Combaret C, Vallet I, Lejeune P. Involvement of the Cpx signal transduction pathway of E. coli in biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;178:169–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Finlay B B, Falkow S S. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:136–169. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.2.136-169.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Forst S, Delgado J, Rampersaud A, Inouye M. In vivo phosphorylation of OmpR, the transcription activator of the ompF and ompC genes in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:3473–3477. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.6.3473-3477.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garrett S, Taylor R K, Silhavy T J. Isolation and characterization of chain-terminating nonsense mutations in a porin regulator gene, envZ. J Bacteriol. 1983;156:62–69. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.1.62-69.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hammar M, Arnqvist A, Bian Z, Olsen A, Normark S. Expression of two csg operons is required for production of fibronectin- and congo red-binding curli polymers in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18:661–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_18040661.x.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hammar M, Bian Z, Normark S. Nucleator-dependent intercellular assembly of adhesive curli organelles in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:6562–6566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harlocker S L, Bergstrom L, Inouye M. Tandem binding of six OmpR proteins to the ompF upstream regulatory sequence of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26849–26856. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.26849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Harrison-McMonagle, Denissova N, Martinez-Hackert E, Ebright R H, Stock A M. Orientation of OmpR monomers within an OmpR:DNA complex determined by DNA affinity cleaving. J Mol Biol. 1999;285:555–566. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoyle B D, Costerton J W. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: the role of biofilms. Prog Drug Res. 1991;37:91–105. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7139-6_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang K J, Lan C Y, Igo M M. Phosphorylation stimulates the cooperative DNA-binding properties of the transcription factor OmpR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:2828–2832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.2828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat N, Dominguez H, Robert-Baudouy J. Environmental conditions affect the transcription of the pectinase genes of Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:7807–7818. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.23.7807-7818.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hung D L, Raivio T L, Jones C H, Silhavy T J, Hultgren S J. Cpx signaling pathway monitors biogenesis and affects assembly and expression of P pili. EMBO J. 2001;20:1508–1518. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.7.1508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jo Y L, Nara F, Ichihara S, Mizuno T, Mizushima S. Purification and characterization of the OmpR protein, a positive regulator involved in osmoregulatory expression of the ompF and ompC genes in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:15253–15256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lawrence J R, Korber D R, Hoyle B D, Costerton J W, Caldwell D E. Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:6558–6567. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.20.6558-6567.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Loewen P C. Isolation of catalase-deficient Escherichia coli mutants and genetic mapping of katE, a locus that affects catalase activity. J Bacteriol. 1984;157:622–626. doi: 10.1128/jb.157.2.622-626.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maurer J J, Brown T P, Steffens W L, Thayer S G. The occurrence of ambient temperature-regulated adhesins, curli, and the temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin tsh among avian Escherichia coli. Avian Dis. 1998;42:106–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mileykovskaya E, Dowhan W. The Cpx two-component signal transduction pathway is activated in Escherichia coli mutant strains lacking phosphatidylethanolamine. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:1029–1034. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.4.1029-1034.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miller J H. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nakayama S, Watanabe H. Identification of cpxR as a positive regulator essential for expression of the Shigella sonnei virF gene. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:3522–3528. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.14.3522-3528.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Olsen A, Jonsson A, Normark S. Fibronectin binding mediated by a novel class of surface organelles on Escherichia coli. Nature. 1989;338:652–655. doi: 10.1038/338652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Olsen A, Arnqvist A, Hammar M, Sukupolvi S, Normark S. The RpoS sigma factor relieves H-NS-mediated transcriptional repression of csgA, the subunit gene of fibronectin-binding curli in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1993;7:523–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pogliano J, Lynch A S, Belin D, Lin E C, Beckwith J. Regulation of Escherichia coli cell envelope proteins involved in protein folding and degradation by the Cpx two-component system. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1169–1182. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.9.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pratt L A, Silhavy T J. Identification of base pairs important for OmpR-DNA interaction. Mol Microbiol. 1995;17:565–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17030565.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pratt L A, Silhavy T J. Porin regulation of Escherichia coli, In: Hoch J A, Silhavy T J, editors. Two-component signal transduction. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1995. pp. 105–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Prigent-Combaret C, Lejeune P. Monitoring gene expression in biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 1999;310:56–79. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)10006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Prigent-Combaret C, Prensier G, Le Thi T T, Vidal O, Lejeune P, Dorel C. Developmental pathway for biofilm formation in curli-producing Escherichia coli strains: role of flagella, curli, and colanic acid. Environ Microbiol. 2000;2:450–464. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Prigent-Combaret C, Vidal O, Dorel C, Lejeune P. Abiotic surface sensing and biofilm-dependent regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:5993–6002. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.19.5993-6002.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Raivio T L, Silhavy T J. Transduction of envelope stress in Escherichia coli by the Cpx two-component system. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:7724–7733. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.24.7724-7733.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Roeder D L, Collmer A. Marker-exchange mutagenesis of pectate lyase isozyme gene in Erwinia chrysanthemi. J Bacteriol. 1985;164:51–56. doi: 10.1128/jb.164.1.51-56.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Romling U, Bian Z, Hammar M, Sierralta W D, Normark S. Curli fibers are highly conserved between Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli with respect to operon structure and regulation. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:722–731. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.3.722-731.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Romling U, Sierralta W D, Eriksson K, Normark S. Multicellular and aggregative behaviour of Salmonella typhimurium strains is controlled by mutations in the agfD promoter. Mol Microbiol. 1998;28:249–264. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Russo F D, Silhavy T J. EnvZ controls the concentration of phosphorylated OmpR to mediate osmoregulation of the porin genes. J Mol Biol. 1991;222:567–580. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90497-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Simoni S, Harms H, Bosma T N P, Zehnder A J B. Population heterogeneity affects transport of bacteria through sand column at low flow rates. Environ Sci Technol. 1998;32:2100–2105. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Slauch J M, Silhavy T J. Genetic analysis of the switch that controls porin gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12. J Mol Biol. 1989;210:281–292. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90330-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Vidal O, Longin R, Prigent-Combaret C, Dorel C, Hooreman M, Lejeune P. Isolation of an Escherichia coli K-12 mutant strain able to form biofilms on inert surfaces: involvement of a new ompR allele that increases curli expression. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:2442–2449. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.9.2442-2449.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Volkert M R, Hajec L I, Matijasevic Z, Fang F C, Prince R. Induction of the Escherichia coli aidB gene under oxygen-limiting conditions requires a functional rpoS (katF) gene. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:7638–7645. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.24.7638-7645.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES