Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Neurology logoLink to Frontiers in Neurology
. 2022 Sep 29;13:1038298. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1038298

Corrigendum: Assessment of cerebral and cerebellar white matter microstructure in spinocerebellar ataxias 1, 2, 3, and 6 using diffusion MRI

Young Woo Park 1,*, James M Joers 1, Bin Guo 2, Diane Hutter 1, Khalaf Bushara 3, Isaac M Adanyeguh 1, Lynn E Eberly 1,2, Gülin Öz 1, Christophe Lenglet 1,*
PMCID: PMC9559733  PMID: 36247785

In the published article there was an error in the reference list as published. The reference list was submitted in the incorrect order. The revised reference list appears below.

The authors apologize for the above-mentioned errors and state that it does not affect the conclusions of the article in any way. The original version of this article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Ruano L, Melo C, Silva MC, Coutinho P. The global epidemiology of hereditary ataxia and spastic paraplegia: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Neuroepidemiology. (2014) 42:174–83. 10.1159/000358801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sullivan R, Yau WY, O'Connor E, Houlden H. Spinocerebellar ataxia: an update. J Neurol. (2019) 266:533–44. 10.1007/s00415-018-9076-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schols L, Amoiridis G, Buttner T, Przuntek H, Epplen JT, Riess O. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia: phenotypic differences in genetically defined subtypes? Ann Neurol. (1997) 42:924–32. 10.1002/ana.410420615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seidel K, Siswanto S, Brunt ER, den Dunnen W, Korf HW, Rub U. Brain pathology of spinocerebellar ataxias. Acta Neuropathol. (2012) 124:1–21. 10.1007/s00401-012-1000-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rub U, Schols L, Paulson H, Auburger G, Kermer P, Jen JC, et al. Clinical features, neurogenetics and neuropathology of the polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias type 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Prog Neurobiol. (2013) 104:38–66. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Orr HT, Chung MY, Banfi S, Kwiatkowski TJ Jr, Servadio A, Beaudet AL, et al. Expansion of an unstable trinucleotide CAG repeat in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. Nat Genet. (1993) 4:221–6. 10.1038/ng0793-221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rub U, Burk K, Timmann D, den Dunnen W, Seidel K, Farrag K, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1): new pathoanatomical and clinico-pathological insights. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. (2012) 38:665–80. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2012.01259.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Armstrong J, Bonaventura I, Rojo A, Gonzalez G, Corral J, Nadal N, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) with white matter involvement. Neurosci Lett. (2005) 381:247–51. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.02.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Riess O, Rub U, Pastore A, Bauer P, Schols L. SCA3: neurological features, pathogenesis and animal models. Cerebellum. (2008) 7:125–37. 10.1007/s12311-008-0013-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ishikawa K, Watanabe M, Yoshizawa K, Fujita T, Iwamoto H, Yoshizawa T, et al. Clinical, neuropathological, and molecular study in two families with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1999) 67:86–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ginestroni A, Della Nave R, Tessa C, Giannelli M, De Grandis D, Plasmati R, et al. Brain structural damage in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1: a VBM study. J Neurol. (2008) 255:1153–8. 10.1007/s00415-008-0860-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jung BC, Choi SI, Du AX, Cuzzocreo JL, Ying HS, Landman BA, et al. MRI shows a region-specific pattern of atrophy in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Cerebellum. (2012) 11:272–9. 10.1007/s12311-011-0308-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rezende TJR, de Paiva JLR, Martinez ARM, Lopes-Cendes I, Pedroso JL, Barsottini OGP, et al. Structural signature of SCA3: from presymptomatic to late disease stages. Ann Neurol. (2018) 84:401–8. 10.1002/ana.25297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reetz K, Costa AS, Mirzazade S, Lehmann A, Juzek A, Rakowicz M, et al. Genotype-specific patterns of atrophy progression are more sensitive than clinical decline in SCA1, SCA3 and SCA6. Brain. (2013) 136:905–17. 10.1093/brain/aws369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oz G, Iltis I, Hutter D, Thomas W, Bushara KO, Gomez CM. Distinct neurochemical profiles of spinocerebellar ataxias 1, 2, 6, and cerebellar multiple system atrophy. Cerebellum. (2011) 10:208–17. 10.1007/s12311-010-0213-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adanyeguh IM, Henry PG, Nguyen TM, Rinaldi D, Jauffret C, Valabregue R, et al. In vivo neurometabolic profiling in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 7. Movement Disord. (2015) 30:662–70. 10.1002/mds.26181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Joers JM, Deelchand DK, Lyu T, Emir UE, Hutter D, Gomez CM, et al. Neurochemical abnormalities in premanifest and early spinocerebellar ataxias. Ann Neurol. (2018) 83:816–29. 10.1002/ana.25212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martins CR, Martinez ARM, Vasconcelos IF, de Rezende TJR, Casseb RF, Pedroso JL, et al. Structural signature in SCA1: clinical correlates, determinants and natural history. J Neurol. (2018) 265:2949–59. 10.1007/s00415-018-9087-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Deelchand DK, Joers JM, Ravishankar A, Lyu T, Emir UE, Hutter D, et al. Sensitivity of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to progression of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. Mov Disord Clin Pract. (2019) 6:549–58. 10.1002/mdc3.12804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mandelli ML, De Simone T, Minati L, Bruzzone MG, Mariotti C, Fancellu R, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of spinocerebellar ataxias types 1 and 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2007) 28:1996–2000. 10.3174/ajnr.A0716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Della Nave R, Ginestroni A, Tessa C, Salvatore E, De Grandis D, Plasmati R, et al. Brain white matter damage in SCA1 and SCA2. An in vivo study using voxel-based morphometry, histogram analysis of mean diffusivity and tract-based spatial statistics. Neuroimage. (2008) 43:10–9. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Prakash N, Hageman N, Hua X, Toga AW, Perlman SL, Salamon N. Patterns of fractional anisotropy changes in white matter of cerebellar peduncles distinguish spinocerebellar ataxia-1 from multiple system atrophy and other ataxia syndromes. Neuroimage. (2009) 47 (Suppl. 2):T72–81. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alcauter S, Barrios FA, Diaz R, Fernandez-Ruiz J. Gray and white matter alterations in spinocerebellar ataxia type 7: an in vivo DTI and VBM study. Neuroimage. (2011) 55:1–7. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kang JS, Klein JC, Baudrexel S, Deichmann R, Nolte D, Hilker R. White matter damage is related to ataxia severity in SCA3. J Neurol. (2014) 261:291–9. 10.1007/s00415-013-7186-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Adanyeguh IM, Perlbarg V, Henry PG, Rinaldi D, Petit E, Valabregue R, et al. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: imaging biomarkers with high effect sizes. Neuroimage Clin. (2018) 19:858–67. 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Froeling M, Pullens P, Leemans A. DTI analysis methods: region of interest analysis. In:Van Hecke W, Emsell L, and Sunaert S, editors. Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Practical Handbook. New York, NY: Springer New York; (2016). p. 175–82. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3118-7_9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Falcon MI, Gomez CM, Chen EE, Shereen A, Solodkin A. Early cerebellar network shifting in spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Cereb Cortex. (2016) 26:3205–18. 10.1093/cercor/bhv154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage. (2006) 31:1487–505. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tournier JD, Smith R, Raffelt D, Tabbara R, Dhollander T, Pietsch M, et al. MRtrix3: a fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. Neuroimage. (2019) 202:116137. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mascalchi M, Toschi N, Giannelli M, Ginestroni A, Della Nave R, Nicolai E, et al. Progression of microstructural damage in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: a longitudinal DTI study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2015) 36:1096–01. 10.3174/ajnr.A4343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mascalchi M, Marzi C, Giannelli M, Ciulli S, Bianchi A, Ginestroni A, et al. Histogram analysis of DTI-derived indices reveals pontocerebellar degeneration and its progression in SCA2. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:200258. 10.1371/journal.pone.0200258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schmitz-Hubsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. (2006) 66:1717–20. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maas RP, van Gaalen J, Klockgether T, van de Warrenburg BP. The preclinical stage of spinocerebellar ataxias. Neurology. (2015) 85:96–103. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.du Montcel ST, Durr A, Rakowicz M, Nanetti L, Charles P, Sulek A, et al. Prediction of the age at onset in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3 and 6. J Med Genet. (2014) 51:479–86. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-102200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Subramony SH, May W, Lynch D, Gomez C, Fischbeck K, Hallett M, et al. Measuring Friedreich ataxia: interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale. Neurology. (2005) 64:1261–2. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000156802.15466.79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Patel M, Isaacs CJ, Seyer L, Brigatti K, Gelbard S, Strawser C, et al. Progression of Friedreich ataxia: quantitative characterization over 5 years. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. (2016) 3:684–94. 10.1002/acn3.332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. Fsl. Neuroimage. (2012) 62:782–90. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hua K, Zhang J, Wakana S, Jiang H, Li X, Reich DS, et al. Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification. Neuroimage. (2008) 39:336–47. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Keihaninejad S, Zhang H, Ryan NS, Malone IB, Modat M, Cardoso MJ, et al. An unbiased longitudinal analysis framework for tracking white matter changes using diffusion tensor imaging with application to Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. (2013) 72:153–63. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang H, Avants BB, Yushkevich PA, Woo JH, Wang S, McCluskey LF, et al. High-dimensional spatial normalization of diffusion tensor images improves the detection of white matter differences: an example study using amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2007) 26:1585–97. 10.1109/TMI.2007.906784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Park YW, Joers JM, Hutter D, Bushara KO, Oz G, Lenglet C. Improved sensitivity to longitudinal changes with advanced DTI analysis in a rare neurodegenerative disease. In: ISMRM 27th Annual Meeting and Exhibition. Montreal, QC (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Raffelt DA, Tournier JD, Smith RE, Vaughan DN, Jackson G, Ridgway GR, et al. Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage. (2017) 144 (Pt A):58–73. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schulz JB, Borkert J, Wolf S, Schmitz-Hubsch T, Rakowicz M, Mariotti C, et al. Visualization, quantification and correlation of brain atrophy with clinical symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 3 and 6. Neuroimage. (2010) 49:158–68. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Diedrichsen J. A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum. Neuroimage. (2006) 33:127–38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Romero JE, Coupe P, Giraud R, Ta VT, Fonov V, Park MTM, et al. CERES: a new cerebellum lobule segmentation method. Neuroimage. (2017) 147:916–24. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kinnunen KM, Greenwood R, Powell JH, Leech R, Hawkins PC, Bonnelle V, et al. White matter damage and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury. Brain. (2011) 134 (Pt 2):449–63. 10.1093/brain/awq347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Della Nave R, Ginestroni A, Diciotti S, Salvatore E, Soricelli A, Mascalchi M. Axial diffusivity is increased in the degenerating superior cerebellar peduncles of Friedreich's ataxia. Neuroradiology. (2011) 53:367–72. 10.1007/s00234-010-0807-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Neurology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES