Abstract
Kidney stone is one of the most frequent urinary tract diseases, affecting 10% of the population and displaying a high recurrence rate. Kidney stones are the result of salt supersaturation, including calcium and oxalate. We have previously identified Esophageal cancer-related gene 4 (Ecrg4) as being modulated by hypercalciuria. Ecrg4 was initially described as a tumor suppressor gene in the esophagus. Lately, it was shown to be involved as well in apoptosis, cell senescence, cell migration, inflammation and cell responsiveness to chemotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, nothing is known about ECRG4’s function in the renal tissue and its relationship with calciuria. We hypothesized that the increased expression of Ecrg4 mRNA is triggered by hypercalciuria and might modulate intratubular calcium-oxalate precipitation. In this study, we have first (i) validated the increased Ecrg4 mRNA in several types of hypercalciuric mouse models, then (ii) described the Ecrg4 mRNA expression along the nephron and (iii) assessed ECRG4’s putative role in calcium oxalate nephropathy. For this, Ecrg4 KO mice were challenged with a kidney stone-inducing diet, rich in calcium and oxalate precursor. Taken together, our study demonstrates that Ecrg4’s expression is restricted mainly to the distal part of the nephron and that the Ecrg4 KO mice develop less signs of tubular obstruction and less calcium-oxalate deposits. This promotes Ecrg4 as a modulator of renal crystallization and may open the way to new therapeutic possibilities against calcium oxalate nephropathy.
Introduction
Prevalence of chronic kidney diseases and of kidney stones is constantly increasing [1]. In both conditions, supersaturation of calcium-oxalate salts and crystal formation may result either in obstruction of renal tubules or in stone formation. Thus, hypercalciuria and hyperoxaluria are two major risk factors for crystallogenesis in urine [2].
We have previously identified the Ecrg4 gene as upregulated in hypercalciuric mice. Highly conserved from fish to humans, Ecrg4 encodes a 148 amino acids precursor protein that can be processed into various peptides, without identified regulatory proteases [3]. Ecrg4 mRNA can be found in various tissues, such as brain, esophagus, heart and kidney, whereas, the protein ECRG4 was documented in the heart and adrenal gland [4]. The functions of ECRG4 and derived peptides are still largely unknown. It was first speculated that Ecrg4 might be a tumor suppressor gene, due to its decreased expression in esophageal cell carcinomas, while still detectable in the normal esophageal epithelia surrounding the tumor [5]. Yet, in vivo studies have extended the anti-tumoral role of Ecrg4 to glioma and to prostate, colorectal and breast cancer [6–8]. Further, Ecrg4’s overexpression was shown to affect apoptosis, cell senescence, cell migration, inflammation and cell responsiveness to chemotherapy [3]. Its activity depends on its cellular localization, secretion and processing, which argues for a non-traditional tumor suppressor action, and rather for a role close to a cytokine/chemokine. Downstream genes that were shown to be activated by Ecrg4 include Nfkb1, Nfkb2, P53 and Cox2 [3].
Ecrg4’s role in the kidney and especially in hypercalciuria is unknown. Due to its higher expression in a hypercalciuric mouse model, we hypothesized that Ecrg4 mRNA is triggered by hypercalciuria and might modulate kidney stone formation. In the present work, we first describe Ecrg4 mRNA expression in the kidney. Second, we show that Ecrg4 expression is increased in various hypercalciuric mouse models. Third, we assessed the potential role of Ecrg4 in kidney stone formation by challenging Ecrg4 KO and control mice with a diet inducing hypercalciuria and hyperoxaluria. We found substantial protection against calcium oxalate nephropathy in male mice devoid of Ecrg4. In total, this piece of data points towards Ecrg4 as a potential regulator of calciuria and stone formation.
Materials and methods
Animals
The State veterinarian Office (Office vétérinaire cantonal, Canton de Vaud, Switzerland) approved all animal studies (authorization numbers VD3261 and VD2987). All breeding and cohort colonies were hosted in our animal facility under approved protocols. Mice were housed four to five per cage, with free access to water and food (standard mouse diet #3800, KLIBA, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland), in a temperature and humidity-controlled room with an automatic 12/12-h light/dark cycle. Heterozygous Ecrg4 mice were purchased from the Mutant Mouse Regional Resource Center (B6;129S5-1500015O10Riktm1Lex/Mmucd). In this model, coding exon 1 of the RIKEN cDNA 1500015O10 gene was targeted by homologous recombination. Mice were backcrossed for 10 generations and heterozygous males and females were bred in order to obtain Ecrg4-/- (KO) mice. Littermates Ecrg4+/+ have been used as controls for all experiments. Kidney-specific sodium-calcium exchanger 1 (NCX1) Ncx1-knockout mice (Pax8-LC1-Cre NCX1fl/fl) were also used in the study (unpublished, manuscript in preparation). Claudin-2 (Cldn2) KO mice (B6; 129S5-Cldn2tm1Lex/Mmucd) were purchased from Mutant Mouse Regional Resource center.
Microdissection of nephron segments
Mice were deeply anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with Ketanarkon (Streuli Pharma AG, Uznach, Switzerland; 100 μg/g body weight) and Rompun (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany; 10 μg/g body weight), and the left kidney was perfused first with PBS, then with DMEM/F12 (1:1, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) supplemented with 40 mg/ml of Liberase Blendzyme 2 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Thin slices of the kidney were cut along the corticomedullary axis and incubated 40–60 min at 37°C in the same DMEM/F12/Liberase medium. Then, the kidney slices were transferred into DMEM/F12 (1:1) alone to stop the digestion, and the microdissection was performed under a magnifier in ice-cold 0.05%BSA/DMEM/F12. The proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), the thick ascending limb (TAL), distal convoluted tubule and cortical connecting tubule (DCT-CNT), and the cortical collecting duct (CD) were isolated based on their specific morphology.
RNA extraction and quantitative PCR
Microdissected tubules
Immediately after microdissection, tubules were subjected to RNA extraction using the RNeasy Micro Kit (# 74004, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer instructions.
Other tissues
RNA from kidneys of mice injected with 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D and PTH as previously described [9], was used to assess the Ecrg4 expression. Tissues were homogenized in TRIzol® Reagent solution (#15596026 Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA) followed by extraction with 1-bromo-3-chloropropane reagent (BCP, Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, USA) and isopropanol precipitation. RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed using PrimeScript RT reagent kit (#RR037B Takara Biotechnology, Otsu, Japan) according to manufacturer’s guidelines. TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (#4370074, Applied Biosystems, Warrington,UK) was used to detect Ecrg4 (Mm00470447_m1), together with Actb (Mm4351315_m1). Other genes were quantified using SYBR green PCR master Mix (#4367659, Applied Biosystems, Warrington,UK). The primers used are listed in Table 1. Primers were ordered from Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland). Quantitative real-time PCRs were carried out on an ABI PRISM 7500 equipment (Applied Biosystems, Warrington,UK). If the cycle threshold (CT) were >36, the expression was considered as null. The relative expression of the genes was calculated using the comparative 2−ΔΔCT method.
Table 1. Primers sequences.
| Atp2b4 F | CTT AAT GGA CCT GCG AAA GC | Atp2b4 R | ATC TGC AGG GTT CCC AGA TA |
| Aqp2 F | TTC GAG CTG CCT TCT ACG TG | Aqp2 R | GGA AGA GCT CCA CAG TCA CC |
| Actb F | GTC CAC CTT CCA GCA GAT GT | Actb R | AGT CCG CCT AGA AGC ACT TGC |
| Cyp24a1 F | GAA GAT GTG AGG AAT ATG CCC TAT TT | Cyp24a1 R | CCG AGT TGT GAA TGG CAC ACT |
| Cyp27b1 F | ATG TTT GCC TTT GCC CAG AG | Cyp27b1 R | GAC GGC ATA TCC TCC TCA GG |
| Calb1 F | ATT TCG ACG CTG ACG GAA GT | Calb1 R | GTG GGT AAG ACG TGA GCC A |
| Cldn2 F | AAG GTG CTG CTG AGG GTA GA | Cldn2 R | AGT GGC AGA GAT GGG ATT TG |
| Cldn14 F | ACC CTG CTC TGC TTA TCC | Cldn14 R | GCA CGG TTG TCC TTG TAG |
| Cldn16 F | CAAACGCTTTTGATGGGATTC | Cldn16 R | TTTGTGGGTCATCAGGTAGG |
| Casr F | CAC AGT TGC CTT GTG ATC CTC | Casr R | ATG CAG AGG TGT AGG GTG GT |
| Cox2 F | GCC TAC TAC AAG TGT TTC TTT TTG CA | Cox2 R | CAT TTT GTT TGA TTG TTC ACA CCA T |
| Nfkb1 F | GAA ATT CCT GAT CCA GAC AAA AAC | Nfkb1 R | ATC ACT TCA ATG GCC TCT GTG TAG |
| Nfkb2 F | CTG GTG GAC ACA TAC AGG AAG AC | Nfkb2 R | ATA GGC ACT GTC TTC TTT CAC CTC |
| Pvalb F | CAG CGC TGA GGA CAT CAA GA | Pvalb R | AGT CAG CGC CAC TTA GCT TT |
| Pthr1 F | CAG ACG ATG TCT TTA CCA AAG | Pthr1 R | TCC ACC CTT TGT CTG ACT CC |
| Slc9a3 F | CTT CAA ATG GCA CCA CGT CC | Slc9a3 R | AAT AGG GGG CAG CAG GTA GA |
| Slc8a1 F | AGA GCT CGA ATT CCA GAA CGA TG | Slc8a1 R | TTG GTT CCT CAA GCA CAA GGG AG |
| Trpv5 F | TCC TTT GTC CAG GAC TAC ATC CCT | Trpv5 R | TCA AAT GTC CCA GGG TGT TTC G |
| Vdr F | GGA TCT GTG GAG TGT GTG GAG ACC | Vdr R | CTT CAT CAT GCC AAT GTC CAC GCA G |
Metabolic and endocrine studies
Male and female mice aged 6 weeks were housed individually in metabolic cages (Tecniplast, Buguggiate, Italy) for 2 days in order to be habituated before baseline urine collection, with free access to water and food. After the habituation period, control and Ecrg4 KO mice were fed either the chow diet or the crystal forming diet CaOx (1.5% Calcium Chloride and 2% Hydroxyl-L-proline) for 8 days. Twenty-four hour urine collection was repeated on day 1 and day 8, by housing the mice in metabolic cages.
Urine sodium and potassium concentrations were determined by flame photometry (Instrumentation laboratory), while the urine creatinine, calcium and magnesium concentrations were measured in the Laboratoire Central de Chimie Clinique, Lausanne University Hospital (Lausanne, Switzerland). Urine osmolality was measured with an automated freezing point osmometer (Advanced model 2020 Multi-Sample Osmometer, Advanced Instruments, Norwood, USA) and the urine pH using a pH-meter (#6.0224.100, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). The Laboratoire Central de Chimie Clinique, Lausanne University Hospital (Lausanne, Switzerland), measured all the blood parameters unless otherwise specified. Creatinine concentration was measured using the enzymatic method.
For the dihydrotachysterol experiment, the chow diet of control male mice was supplemented with 1.5 mg/kg dihydrotachysterol (D9257, Merk, Kenilworth, USA) during 7 consecutive days.
Treatments with 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D or PTH were previously reported in [9]. In brief, male C57BL/6N mice aged 13 to 15 weeks received a subcutaneous injection of 2 μg/kg body weight 1,25(OH)2‐vitamin D3 (#D1530, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), dissolved in ethanol 1% and 99% of NaCl 0.9%. Control mice were injected with 1% (v/v) ethanol in NaCl 0.9%. The mice were dissected 6 hr after injection.
For the analysis of organs from PTH-treated animals, material harvested from a previous study was used [9]. In this study, male 12–13 weeks old C57BL/6N mice received a subcutaneous injection of 80 μg/kg body weight human PTH 1–34 (#P3796, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) dissolved in NaCl 0.9% or NaCl 0.9% alone as vehicle. Animals were dissected 2 hours after injection.
For the acute furosemide experiment, male C57BL/6N mice aged 12 weeks received a single intraperitoneal injection (Lasix, Sanofi-Aventis, Switzerland; 20mg/kg body weight) diluted in saline solution. The control group received an intraperitoneal injection of NaCl 0.9%. The mice were sacrificed after 15min, 30min, 60min or 240min and the kidneys were immediately harvested.
For the chronic furosemide experiment, male C57BL/6N mice aged 12 weeks received a daily intraperitoneal injection for 6 days of either furosemide diluted in saline solution (20mg/kg body weight), or saline solution for the control mice. The mice were sacrificed at day 7 and the kidneys were harvested.
Kidney histology and crystals
Left kidneys were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and 5μm sections were cut. Sections were then stained with Pizzolato and H&E. Images were taken on Leica DMi8 microscope. To determine the area of calcium oxalate crystals (stained in black by Pizzolato) over the kidney’s surface area, images were obtained at x10, and analyzed with ImageJ. The result was expressed as percentage of black area over the whole kidney area. Similarly, ImageJ software was used for the analysis of tubular dilatation on H&E-stained kidney sections. The investigator was blinded of the code when analysis were performed.
Western blot and immunostaining
Antibodies against ECRG4 used in the study were from the following sources: Santa Cruz Biotechnology (H-118, USA), Sigma Aldrich (HPA008546, St. Louis, USA), LS Bio (LS-C172856, Seattle, USA), Phoenix Pharmaceuticals (012–25, Mannheim, Germany) and actin (#A2066, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). For each of the antibodies, we have used dilutions in the range of 1:500 to 1:50. Each of the primary antibody was used for Western blot, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. Secondary antibodies used were Jackson Immuno Research Anti/Rabbit (111-035-003) or Anti-Mouse (115-035-003), AlexaFluor488 (1:2000 diluted in blocking buffer without BSA, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA).
Antibodies against PTHR1 (#sc-12722, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), TRPV5 (developed in house and validated in PMID: 24557712), CLDN2 (#32–5600, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA), PVALB, CASR (#MA1-934, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA) were used as 1:500 dilution.
For protein extraction, tissues were homogenized in RIPA buffer (Tris pH 7.2 50 mM, NaCl 150 mM, NP40 1%, SDS 0.1%, Na-deoxycholate 0.5% with proteases inhibitor), using TissueLyser (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Following the centrifugation (12,000 rpm for 15 min) and supernatants collection, total protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (#23227, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA). Protein separation was done on 10% and 13% respectively, SDS polyacrylamide gels and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman, Dassel, Germany). Detection was done by chemiluminescence (#34579, Super Signal West Pico, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA).
Immunohistochemistry
Organs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in Phosphate Buffer Solution and then embedded in paraffin before being cut as 5μm-thick sections. Sections were first hydrated gradually through decreasing concentrations of ethanol and then washed in deionized water. Antigen unmasking was done in 10mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0, for 1h at 96°C, followed by incubation in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min at room temperature, and by 1h in blocking buffer (NP-40 0.5%, BSA 2%, normal goat serum (NGS) 3% in PBS). Sections were incubated with primary antibodies for 1h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were washed in PBS three times for 5 min, followed by incubation with anti-mouse or anti-rabbit serum as appropriate for 30 min and developed in 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB substrate kit, #ab64238, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Lastly, they were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red Solution (6409-77-4, Merck, Kenilworth, USA).
Immunofluorescence
Deeply anesthetized mice were perfused via cardiac puncture with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Harvested organs were incubated in 30% sucrose in PBS for at least 24 h before being embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (#4583,Sakura Finetek, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) and cut as 7μm-thick sections. Sections were incubated 1 h with blocking buffer (NP-40 0.5%, BSA 2%, normal goat serum (NGS) 3% in PBS) at room temperature, followed by primary antibody incubation overnight at 4°C. After washing three times with PBS, sections were incubated 1 h at room temperature with secondary antibodies and then washed four times with PBS. The sections were then mounted using Fluoromount-G mounting medium (#0100–01, Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA). Fluorescent images were visualized using a laser scanning confocal microscope (SP5 AOBS Confocal Microscope, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
mCCD cell culture
Mouse cortical collecting duct cells (mCCD) [10] were grown in 6-well plates (#CLS3335, Corning, New York, USA) in growth medium DMEM/F12 1:1 Glutamax (#10565018, Gibco, Waltham, USA) supplemented with insulin (5 ug/ml), human apotransferrin (5 ug/ml), Na-selenate (60 nM), EGF (10 ng/ml), triiodothyronine (1 nM), dexamethasone (50 nM), 1% penicillin/strepromycin, and 2% FCS. Cells were grown to 100% confluence; medium was then exchanged for growth medium containing calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals (#C0350000, Merk, Kenilworth, USA) in a final concentration of 300 or 600 ug/ml; the same volume of PBS 1x was used as a control. Cells were treated over 16 hours, then washed three times with PBS 1x and RNA was isolated using TRIzol®.
Statistical analyses
Comparisons between groups were conducted using GraphPad Prism software (version 9.0.0). Results are presented, as means ± SD, unless otherwise stated. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t tests (2-tailed), one-way ANOVA, or two-way ANOVA, using Tukey correction for multiple comparison. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Ecrg4 is expressed in the kidney and along the distal part of the nephron
The expression of Ecrg4 mRNA in male kidney was analyzed and compared to other organs, including adrenal glands, brain, heart and esophagus. Ecrg4 mRNA was detected in all tissues tested (Fig 1A). Female kidney and heart tissues have an increased Ecrg4 expression compared to male mice (S1 Fig). Substantial efforts have been done to identify ECRG4 protein in the same tissues by Western blot or immunostaining. However, none of the antibodies showed specificity in the tested mouse tissues when compared to the same tissues obtained from Ecrg4 KO mice (S2–S7 Figs).
Fig 1. Ecrg4 is expressed in the kidney and along the distal part of the nephron.
(A) Ecrg4 mRNA expression in the indicated organs relative to Actb and to the expression in the esophagus (dotted line) in control male mice (n = 3). (B) Ecrg4 mRNA expression in microdissected renal tubular segments related to Actb and to the expression in the DCT-CNT segment (dotted line) in control male mice (n = 3). Data are shown as individual dots and mean ± SD. Stars indicate *p<0.05, calculated using t-test. PROX: proximal tubule; TAL: thick ascending limb; DCT-CNT: distal convoluted tubule and connecting tubule; CD: collecting duct.
After confirming the presence of Ecrg4 mRNA in extracts obtained from the whole kidney, we looked whether Ecrg4 expression was restricted to certain segmental parts of the nephron or if it was ubiquitous. We microdissected the tubular segments from the kidney of wildtype mice and found that Ecrg4’s presence was limited to the thick ascending limb (TAL), distal convoluted tubule/connecting tubule (DCT/CNT) and cortical collecting duct (CD) segments, while no expression was found in the proximal (PROX) tubule (Fig 1B).
Ecrg4 transcript is upregulated in hypercalciuric mouse models
We identified Ecrg4 as an upregulated gene in a RNA-sequencing screen of kidneys from mice devoid of the sodium-calcium exchanger NCX1 and which are hypercalciuric. We wondered whether Ecrg4 mRNA levels would be increased in other models of hypercalciuria. We analyzed Ecrg4’s expression, compared to control littermates in kidney from Ncx1-kidney-specific KO mice, Claudin-2 (Cldn2) KO mice and mice fed the vitamin D analog, dihydrotachysterol (DHTS). Ncx1-kidney-specific KO mice and Cldn2 KO mice are genetic mouse models of hypercalciuria due to a primary defect in renal tubular (respectively DCT and proximal tubule) calcium transport [11]. DHTS, the vitamin D analogue, is a pharmacological model due to increased intestinal absorption, plasma Ca2+ levels and urinary Ca2+ excretion [12]. Ecrg4 mRNA expression was substantially increased in these three chronic hypercalciuric mouse models, as depicted in Fig 2A. We also tested the effect of furosemide—which induces hypercalciuria by blocking calcium reabsorption in the thick ascending limb of Henle- for six consecutive days. No effect of furosemide on Ecrg4 mRNA level was observed. Considering a possible tubular adaptation to hypercalciuria in the case of chronic furosemide treatment, we checked for renal Ecrg4 mRNA expression after single furosemide treatment. Again, we did not find any change in Ecrg4’s expression after acute furosemide, compared to vehicle, up to 240 minutes after furosemide injection (Fig 2B). Hypercalciuria was however substantial only after 15min following the furosemide administration (S8 Fig).
Fig 2. Ecrg4 transcript is upregulated in several hypercalciuric mouse models.
(A) Ecrg4 mRNA expression (related to Actb and appropriate control mice for each condition, dotted line) was found increased in the kidneys of mice issued from several established hypercalciuric models (n = 4 males/condition), but not in mice exposed to chronic furosemide (injected with 20mg furosemide/kg body weight for 6 consecutive days). Ncx1 KO: Ncx1 KO mice. Cldn2 KO: Claudin-2 KO mice. DHTS: Dihydrotachysterol-treated mice (1,5mg/kg food) for 7 days. (B) Renal Ecrg4 expression after acute furosemide injection relative to renal expression of vehicle-injected male mice (dotted line). The mice were injected with 20mg furosemide/kg body weight and kidneys were harvested after 15, 30, 60 or 240min (n = 3–5 animals/group). (C) Renal Ecrg4 mRNA expression is not changed by the calcitropic hormones PTH or 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D. The kidneys were harvested 6h after calcitriol injection (n = 5), and 2h after PTH injection (n = 6). The dotted line at 1 represents renal Ecrg4 mRNA expression of vehicle-treated male mice. (D) Ecrg4’s regulation along the nephron of the hypercalciuric Ncx1 KO mouse model compared to control littermates (dotted line) (n = 3 males/condition). Data are shown as individual dots and mean ± SD. Stars indicate *p<0.05, calculated using t test and Dunnett’s multiple correction.
Next, we checked if renal Ecrg4’s expression was influenced by the calcitropic hormones 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D and PTH under acute stimulating conditions. No effect of these hormones on the renal Ecrg4 mRNA level was observed (Fig 2C).
After having observed a response of Ecrg4’s expression to chronically induced hypercalciuria, we wondered if the increase in gene expression was segment-specific or was concerning all tubular segment in which Ecrg4 was found to be expressed. We microdissected the renal tubules of the hypercalciuric kidney-specific Ncx1 KO mice and found that Ecrg4 is significantly increased in the TAL, DCT-CNT and CD but not in the proximal tubule compared to control littermates (Fig 2D).
In total, we found that Ecrg4 expression is increased in the kidneys of several chronic hypercalciuric mouse models and concerns all segments in which Ecrg4 was found to be expressed, namely TAL, DCT and CD.
Ecrg4 KO male mice, but not females, are resistant to induced hypercalciuria
In order to get more insights into the role of Ecrg4 in calcium handling by the kidney, we obtained Ecrg4 KO mice and backcrossed them in the C57BL/6 background (Fig 3A). No obvious phenotype (fertility, weight, size, behavior, macroscopic appearance and fur) was observed in KO mice compared to littermate controls. Similarly, no difference in the tested blood and urine parameters was observed (Tables 2 and 3).
Fig 3. Ecrg4 KO male mice are resistant to induced hypercalciuria.
(A) Ecrg4 mRNA expression in the kidney of Ecrg4 KO mice. P value was calculated using t-test. (B) Schematic representation of the experimental plan. Male mice were habituated in metabolic cages for 2 days. Then, control and Ecrg4 KO mice were exposed to either the regular chow diet or to a diet enriched in calcium (1.5%) and the oxalate precursor hydroxyproline (2%) (CaOx diet) for 8 days. The mice were housed individually in metabolic cages for urine collection at baseline, day 1 and day 8. (C) Increase in the urinary calcium-creatinine ratio in both control and Ecrg4 KO mice under CaOx diet. The ratios were calculated from the urine collected at baseline, day 1 and 8 under chow diet or CaOx diet. At 8 days of the CaOx diet, the Ecrg4 KO male mice had a significantly lower calcium-creatinine excretion compared to control mice. (D) Urinary sodium-creatinine ratio in both control and Ecrg4 KO male mice. (E) Urinary calcium/sodium ratio after 8 days of CaOx diet. Data are shown as individual points and mean ± SD (n = 4). For data B-D, p value was calculated using two-way ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. Stars indicate * p<0.05 between control and Ecrg4 KO mice; § indicates p<0.05 for comparison of control mice in the two different diets (chow vs. CaOx); # indicates p<0.05 of Ecrg4 KO mice in the two different diets (chow vs. CaOx).
Table 2. Plasma chemistry of control and Ecrg4 KO MALE mice after 8 days of CaOx diet or chow diet.
| Chow diet | CaOx diet | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | Control | Ecrg4 KO | Control | Ecrg4 KO |
| Ca2+, mM | 2,19±0,06 (4) | 2,21±0,01 (4) | 2,51±0,01 (4) § | 2,42±0,08 (4) |
| Na+, mM | 147,00±2,04 (4) | 150,00±0,70 (4) | 155,75±0,47 (4) § | 155,00±0,70 (4) # |
| K+, mM | 5,00±0,22 (4) | 5,07±0,15 (4) | 4,55±0,09 (4) | 5,12±0,25 (4) |
| PO43-, mM | 3,25±0,21 (4) | 3,02±0,14 (4) | 1,51±0,15 (4) § | 2,30±0,31 (4) |
| Creatinine, μM | 3,75±0,36 (4) | 5,15±0,95 (4) | 9,50±0,64 (4) § | 8,87±1,68 (4) |
| Ca FE, % | 0,07±0,01 (4) | 0,05±0,00 (4) | 2,48±0,23 (4) § | 1,33±0,31 (4) *# |
| Pi FE, % | 2,16±0,36 (4) | 3.84±0,53 (4) | 3,09±1.09 (4) | 2,61±2,08 (3) |
Data are means ± SEM (n). P values are calculated using one-way ANOVA test, with Tukey correction for multiple comparison.
* indicates p<0.05 between control and Ecrg4 KO mice;
§ indicates p<0.05 between the two diets for control mice;
# indicates p<0.05 between the two diets for Ecrg4 KO mice.
Table 3. Plasma chemistry of control and Ecrg4 KO FEMALE mice after 8 days of CaOx diet or chow diet.
| Chow diet | CaOx diet | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | Control | Ecrg4 KO | Control | Ecrg4 KO |
| Ca2+, mM | 2,28 ± 0,02 (5) | 2,13 ± 0,03 (4) | 2,49 ± 0,04 (4) | 2,36 ± 0,06 (7) # |
| Na+, mM | 149,00 ± 0,44 (5) | 150,00 ± 0,49 (5) | 151,00 ± 0,70 (4) | 151,20 ± 0,28 (5) |
| K+, mM | 4,40± 0,19 (5) | 4,00 ± 0,31 (5) | 4,47 ± 0,29 (4) | 4,08 ± 0,23 (5) |
| PO43-, mM | 2,76 ± 0,13 (5) | 3,02 ± 0,09 (5) | 2,72 ± 0,04 (4) | 2,70 ± 0,17 (7) |
| Creatinine, μM | 5,20 ± 0,58 (5) | 6,40 ± 0,40 (5) | 6,25 ± 0,47 (4) | 4,70 ± 0,60 (4) |
| Ca FE, % | 0,09 ± 0,01 (5) | 0,14 ± 0,01 (4) | 2,45 ± 0,31 (4) § | 2,50 ± 0,23 (4) # |
| Pi FE, % | 6,72 ± 2,36 (5) | 4,83 ± 0,54 (5) | 0,21 ± 0,02 (4) § | 0,16 ± 0,02 (4) |
Data are means ± SEM (n). P values are calculated using one-way ANOVA test, with Tukey correction for multiple comparison.
* indicates p<0.05 between control and Ecrg4 KO mice;
§ indicates p<0.05 between the two diets for control mice;
# indicates p<0.05 between the two diets for Ecrg4 KO mice.
To further test the hypothesis that Ecrg4 modulates calcium-oxalate crystal nephropathy, we fed the mice a diet enriched in calcium (1.5%) and in the oxalate precursor, hydroxyproline (2%), further referred to as the CaOx diet (Fig 3B). Ecrg4 KO male mice fed the CaOx diet had a significantly lower fractional excretion of calcium compared to control mice fed the same diet, despite comparable calcemia and blood creatinine values (Table 2). Such finding was not observed in females (Table 3). Under the CaOx diet, urinary calcium/creatinine ratio was increasing between baseline and day 8 (Fig 3C). Interestingly, after 8 days of treatment, urinary calcium excretion of Ecrg4 KO male mice was significantly lower compared to control male mice fed the same diet (Fig 3C). As differences of sodium excretion was observed between the groups under CaOx diet (Fig 3D), the urinary calcium/sodium ratio was calculated (Fig 3E) and showed that the lower calciuria observed in Ecrg4 KO mice is independent of sodium. Female data are provided in supplemental material, but did not show difference in renal calcium handling between Ecrg4 KO and controls (S9–S11 Figs). Altogether, this data shows that Ecrg4 KO male mice have lower fractional excretion and lower calciuria than controls while exposed to the CaOx diet.
Ecrg4 KO male mice, but not females, have less renal tubular obstruction under CaOx diet
Control male mice exposed to the CaOx crystal forming diet exhibited intraluminal crystal deposits, clearly detected by Pizzolato staining (Fig 4A) already after 8 days of treatment. The crystals were localized predominantly in the papilla, with fewer crystals observed in the kidney cortex or medulla.
Fig 4. Ecrg4 KO male mice have less renal tubular obstruction after 8 days of CaOx diet.
(A) Representative pictures of renal papilla stained by Pizzolato (left panels) or Hematoxylin-eosin (HE, right panels) at 20x magnification. Intraluminal crystals and tubular dilation are visible in control mice but not in Ecrg4 KO mice. Bars represent 100um. (B) HE staining of sections of the cortex of kidneys from control and Ecrg4 KO male mice kidneys, after 8 days of CaOx diet, at 20x magnification. Bars represent 100um. The black arrows indicate the intraluminal crystals (A), as well as the tubular dilatation (B) in the control mice. (C) Quantification of the CaOx crystals in kidney tissue expressed as percentage of crystal surface over the kidney section (n = 7). (D) Quantification of tubular dilation of the cortex expressed as percentage of surface dilated over the whole surface (5 sections/mouse; n = 7). Data are shown individually and as mean ± SD. P values are calculated using t-test.
In line with the observed decrease in calcium excretion, Ecrg4 KO male mice developed less intratubular deposits compared to control mice, with an important inter-individual variability (Fig 4C). Moreover, the tubules were significantly less dilated in Ecrg4 KO mice compared to control animals (Fig 4B and 4D). Of note, and as often observed in the field, females were completely resistant to crystal formation (S12 Fig). Overall, male mice devoid of Ecrg4 had less crystal deposits and less tubular dilation, indicative of less tubular plugging.
In order to get more insights into calcium handling by the kidneys of Ecrg4 KO mice, mRNA expression levels of genes involved in transepithelial calcium transport or its regulation were assessed. No change in Slc9A3, Pthr1, Cldn14, Cldn2, Cldn16, Atp2b4, Trpv5, Calb1, Slc8A1, Aqp2, Pvalb, Casr, Vdr was found between the kidneys of Ecrg4 KO and control mice exposed to the CaOx diet (S13 Fig). However, a marked increase of PTHR1 can be seen in the kidney tissue of Ecrg4 KO mice compared to controls (S14 Fig). In addition, genes involved in Ecrg4-dependent downstream pathways (Nfkb1, Nfkb2, P53 and Cox2) were unchanged, with the notable exception of P53, which was less expressed in the KO mice (S15A Fig).
Finally, we exposed mouse cortical collecting duct cells (mCCD) to different calcium oxalate crystal concentrations (0, 300 or 600 ug of crystal/ml) and Ecrg4 mRNA level was measured by qPCR (S15B Fig). We observed a dose-dependent decrease of Ecrg4 mRNA upon treatment with higher crystal concentrations, as well as a decrease in Nfkb1 expression when cells were exposed to the highest calcium oxalate crystal concentration (S15C Fig). No other change in the expression levels of the Ecrg4 downstream genes (Nfkb1, Nfkb2, P53 and Cox2) was observed.
Discussion
This study investigated the expression of Ecrg4 in the renal tissue, its regulation and its potential role in the development of kidney stones. We found expression of Ecrg4 along the distal tubules, showed upregulation of Ecrg4 mRNA expression in several chronic hypercalciuric mouse models and showed less signs of tubular obstruction in Ecrg4 KO mice fed a calcium-oxalate rich diet. This promotes Ecrg4 as a modulator of renal crystallization.
Ecrg4’s expression in renal tissue
We detected the presence of Ecrg4 mRNA in the distal segments of the nephron (TAL, DCT/CNT and CD), while the proximal tubule was negative for Ecrg4’s expression, in line with a recently published mouse single-cell RNA-seq analysis [13].
We spent substantial energy to detect and quantify ECRG4’s protein expression in the kidney and other organs (S2–S7 Figs), but were unsuccessful to detect any specific signal. This could be explained by the fact that the specificity of the commercial antibodies used in this study has been tested only a minima by the providing companies, usually only in cell lines overexpressing ECRG4, and were not validated in native tissues obtained from control and Ecrg4 KO mice. An alternative explanation for the lack of detection might be that ECRG4 is processed very quickly in vivo or that posttranslational modifications might prevent its detection. Indeed, the 148 amino acids full-length protein was shown to be cleaved into at least eight peptides of varying molecular weight, ranging from ~ 17 kDa to 2 kDa [14]. This process might render ECRG4’s detection difficult with antibodies developed against full-length ECRG4. We thus looked for alternative methods that could help us identify the ECRG4 protein. A mass spectrometry analysis was performed on various protein extracts, from heart, brain, and Ecrg4-transfected HEK cells (S1 and S2 Tables). However, the detection level of ECRG4 fragments was discouragingly low, even in the overexpressing HEK cell system. We thus concluded that the ECRG4 protein expression is too low to be identified by the available tools or that only fragments of ECRG4 should be looked for. We thus continued our study only by interpreting the mRNA level of expression of Ecrg4.
Ecrg4 is regulated in models of hypercalciuria
We have previously identified Ecrg4 as an mRNA upregulated in the hypercalciuric kidney-specific Ncx1 KO mouse model. Here, we confirmed that Ecrg4 expression is higher in the kidney of Ncx1 KO mice compared to controls in all tubular segments expressing Ecrg4. We looked whether this regulation was observed in other models of hypercalciuria. We used the hypercalciuric Cldn2 KO mouse model [11], lacking proximal tubule calcium reabsorption, and mice fed the vitamin D analog, DHTS, which causes hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria. In these two models, up to 2.5 times increase in renal Ecrg4 mRNA expression was observed compared to controls. By contrast, no change in the Ecrg4 level was found when mice were injected acutely or for six consecutive days with furosemide, a known inducer of calciuria. We speculate that this discrepancy might be due to the relative short term and transient hypercalciuria induced by furosemide compared to chronic and sustained hypercalciuria of the other models. Thus, we propose that Ecrg4’s increased expression is triggered only by chronic and sustained hypercalciuria.
The mechanism by which Ecrg4 is regulated by urine calcium remained undetermined. We explored whether the calcitropic hormones, PTH or 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D, might have a direct effect on Ecrg4’s expression. We did not observe any change in Ecrg4 renal expression after short term exposure to the two hormones. This might be due to the relative short stimulation time (2h for PTH and 6h for 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D), even if Cyp24a1 and Cyp27b1 transcript expression, used as controls, showed substantial increase after exposure to either of these hormones [9]. As previously noted, long-term exposure to the vitamin D analog, DHTS, induced a strong Ecrg4 upregulation.
Based on this piece of data, we conclude that Ecrg4 is regulated by long term exposure to sustained hypercalciuria, with no direct short-term effect of furosemide, PTH or 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D. The precise mechanism by which tubular calcium regulates Ecrg4 expression remains to be identified.
Loss of Ecrg4 protects against tubular calcifications in male mice
We used a diet rich in calcium and in the oxalate precursor, hydroxyproline, for 8 days to induce hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, and calcium-oxalate nephropathy. In agreement with previous studies [15], we showed that kidneys of male mice developed a CaOx crystal nephropathy, while females were resistant, despite similar high urinary calcium excretion. Of note, sex differences in stone formation have been observed in humans and were attributed to sex hormones [16–20]. These differences seem to be more pronounced in mice and will need further studies to be deciphered. On the same note, our results show a gender-specific difference in Ecrg4`s expression in the renal tissue, under control conditions (S1 Fig). Consistent with previously published evidences, increased Ecrg4 expression inhibits cell proliferation [21], which was found to account for renal crystal deposits in the setting of supersaturated urines [22, 23]. Further studies should assess if the difference in Ecrg4 levels is directly involved in the different outcome in calcium-oxalate nephropathy between male and female mice.
To our surprise, we found that male mice devoid of Ecrg4 and exposed to the CaOx diet had less tubular dilation and intra-renal calcifications. In these mice, we also found a preserved renal function, indicating that overall the mice were protected from tubular obstruction by calcium oxalate crystals. This protection could be due to the role of Ecrg4 in the kidney or in other organs. The whole body constitutive knockout mouse model we used did not allow us to discriminate between the two possibilities. However, some observations suggest that the loss of Ecrg4 may play a protective role by both renal and extra-renal effects. Hence, when exposed to the CaOx diet, control male mice had increased calcemia and calciuria compared to Ecrg4 KO male mice. This suggests that Ecrg4 KO mice adapt to the CaOx challenge by controlling their calcemia and calciuria by an unknown mechanism, potentially by decreasing their intestinal calcium absorption. Moreover, Ecrg4 KO mice displayed lower fractional excretion of calcium, indicative of a direct effect of ECRG4 on the tubular calcium reabsorption. In an attempt to understand the mechanisms by which Ecrg4 KO mice might have a different renal calcium handling, we analyzed the mRNA expression (S13 Fig), as well as protein level (S14 Fig) of several renal genes and proteins involved in calcium homeostasis. We found similar levels between KO and control mice for all the tested candidates, except for the PTHR1 which was significantly increased in the Ecrg4 KO mice. In these mice, this might indicate a possible adaptive mechanism to regulate calcium homeostasis that involves PTH/PTHR1 signaling pathway in the distal segment of the nephron.
Altogether, systemic as well as renal mechanisms could concur to alleviate crystal formation in Ecrg4 KO mice under enriched calcium and hydroxyproline diet.
As Ecrg4 is a tumor suppressor gene involved in the p53 and NFKB pathways [24–26], we wondered whether Ecrg4 might be involved in mediating inflammation or tubular cell renewal, explaining the attenuated damages seen in the kidneys of Ecrg4 KO mice. First, we found decreased expression of p53 mRNA in the kidneys of Ecrg4 KO mice (S15A Fig). This suggests that under the setting of CaOx diet challenge, male mice might have more cellular proliferative capacity to cope with crystal-induced injuries. Second, we found a down-regulation of the Nfkb1 gene in the mouse cortical collecting duct cell line (mCCD cells) exposed to calcium-oxalate monohydrate crystals (S15B and S15C Fig). In this system, the decrease of Nfkb1 expression might indicate that crystal-induced inflammation is reduced in the absence of Ecrg4. Indeed, it was previously shown that ECRG4 peptide induces the expression of proinflammatory factors via a variety of intracellular signaling pathways. For example, increased reactive oxygen species levels, activated NFkB signaling pathway and interaction with the innate immunity receptor complex TLR4/CD14/MD2 complex, was demonstrated upon ECRG4 binding to LOX-1, and other scavenger receptors, such as Sccarf1, Cd36 and Stabili-1 [27, 28]. Altogether, deletion of Ecrg4 might limit the defense mechanisms against crystal-induced injuries. However, how cells sense hypercalciuria and increase Ecrg4 expression still remains to be identified.
Strengths and limitations
We are not aware of any other study addressing the role of Ecrg4 in the kidney and showing that Ecrg4 is involved in renal calcium handling and in the risk of calcification. However, several limitations warrant mention. First, our evidence is mainly based on mRNA expression levels. As discussed previously, we were not able to detect ECRG4 full-length protein or fragments with the available anti-ECRG4 antibodies. Second, the mechanisms by which loss of Ecrg4 reduces tubular calcifications remain open. We observed lower calciuria in male mice under CaOx diet compared to controls, but whether this might be sufficient to decrease intratubular crystal formation or retention remains unsolved. Finally, further studies will need to examine whether the limited renal insufficiency and hypercalciuria in the Ecrg4 KO mice is rather time dependent, or if there is a long-term adaptation mechanism, which might involve some other organs than the kidney.
By showing that Ecrg4 is involved in urine calcium handling and crystal nephropathy, we hope to open new perspectives of research in the field.
Supporting information
Ecrg4 mRNA expression in the indicated organs relative to Actb (n = 2–3). Data are shown as individual dots and mean ± SD. Stars indicate *p<0.05, calculated using Student t-test.
(TIF)
The equivalent of 50ug of protein was loaded on 13% SDS gel. The LS-Bio antibody (diluted 1:500, #LS-C172856), the Phoenix antibody (diluted 1:300, #012–25), the Sigma antibody (diluted 1:500, #HPA008546) and the Santa Cruz antibody (diluted 1:500, # H-118) were used. Actin (diluted 1:500, #A2066) was used as loading control.
(TIF)
The equivalent of 50ug of protein was loaded on 13% SDS gel. The LS-Bio antibody (diluted 1:500, #LS-C172856), the Phoenix antibody (diluted 1:300, #012–25), the Sigma antibody (diluted 1:500, #HPA008546) and the Santa Cruz antibody (diluted 1:500, # H-118) were used. Actin (diluted 1:500, #A2066) was used as loading control.
(TIF)
100ug of protein was loaded on 13% SDS gel. The LS-Bio antibody (diluted 1:500, #LS-C172856), the Phoenix antibody (diluted 1:300, #012–25), the Sigma antibody (diluted 1:500, #HPA008546) and the Santa Cruz antibody (diluted 1:500, # H-118) were used. Actin (diluted 1:500, #A2066) was used as loading control.
(TIF)
30ug of protein was loaded on 13% SDS gel. The LS-Bio antibody (diluted 1:500, #LS-C172856), and the Santa Cruz antibody (diluted 1:500, # H-118) were used. Actin (diluted 1:500, #A2066) was used as loading control.
(TIF)
Scale bars represent 200um. The LS-Bio antibody (diluted 1:100, #LS-C172856), the Sigma antibody (diluted 1:100, #HPA008546) and the Santa Cruz antibody (diluted 1:100, # H-118) were used.
(TIF)
The Sigma antibody (diluted 1:50, #HPA008546) was used.
(TIF)
Mice were injected with 20mg/kg body weight furosemide or vehicle, and sacrificed after 15, 30, 60 and 240 min. P values are calculated using one-way ANOVA test, with Dunnett correction for multiple comparison. Each time point was compared to the vehicle. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Stars indicate * p<0.05.
(TIF)
(A) Increase in the urinary calcium-creatinine ratio in both control and Ecrg4 KO female mice upon CaOx diet. The ratios were calculated from the urine collected at baseline, and after 1 day and 8 days of exposure to either chow diet or the CaOx diet. (B) Urinary sodium-creatinine ratio in both control and Ecrg4 KO female mice. (C) Urinary calcium/sodium excretion at day 8 of the CaOx diet. Data are shown as mean ± SD. p value was calculated using two-way ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparison. Stars indicate * p<0.05 between the control and Ecrg4 KO, § indicates p<0.05 between the controls of different diets, # indicates p<0.05 between the Ecrg4 KO of different diets.
(TIF)
(A) Body weight, (B) food and (C) water intake parameters were measured over 24h period for males and females. At baseline, all mice were fed the chow diet and then exposed to either CaOx diet or chow diet (n = 4–5). Data are shown as mean ± SD. p value was calculated using two-way ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparison. Stars indicate * p<0.05 between the control and Ecrg4 KO, § indicates p<0.05 between the controls of different diets, # indicates p<0.05 between the Ecrg4 KO of different diets.
(TIF)
Urinary phosphate (A), potassium (B) excretion, osmolality (C) and pH (D). Mice were individually housed in metabolic cages, after exposure to chow or CaOx diet (n = 4–5). Data are shown as mean ± SD. p value was calculated using two-way ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparison. Stars indicate * p<0.05 between the control and Ecrg4 KO, § indicates p<0.05 between the controls of different diets, # indicates p<0.05 between the Ecrg4 KO of different diets.
(TIF)
Representative pictures of the Pizzolato staining of the (A) control and (B) Ecrg4 KO female mice kidneys, under the CaOx. No calcium oxalate crystals can be observed in either of the kidney samples. Scale bars represent 1mm.
(TIF)
Relative expression of several renal genes involved calcium handling following the CaOx diet in Ecrg4 KO mice is illustrated relative to Actb and to controls (1, dashed line) (n = 4). Data are shown as mean ± SD.
(TIF)
Western blot analysis of (A) CLDN2, TRPV5, PVALB, CASR proteins in male mice kidney tissue (n = 3). Mice were fed either the chow diet or challenged with the CaOx diet. Western blot analysis of (B) PTHR1 protein in control vs Ecrg4 KO male mice kidney tissue (n = 4–5). Mice were challenged with the CaOx diet. Quantities represented by the gel bands are expressed as intensity relative to β-Actin. Quantities represented by the gel bands are expressed as intensity relative to β-actin. All relative intensity results are presented as the means ± SD. Stars indicates * p<0.05. P values are calculated using two-way ANOVA test, with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparison (A) or Student t-test (B).
(TIF)
(A) The downstream genes that are activated upon ECRG4 signaling were quantified by qPCR in kidney extracts from control and Ecrg4 KO male mice. Stars indicates * p<0.05. P values are calculated using Student t-test (n = 4). (B) mCCD cells were incubated with CaOx monohydrate crystals for 16h. The Ecrg4 mRNA expression is shown as response to different crystals concentrations. (C) The downstream genes that are activated upon ECRG4 signaling were quantified in the mCCD cells upon calcium-oxalate monohydrate crystals incubation. Stars indicates * p<0.05. P values are calculated using one-way ANOVA comparing the mean of each CaOx crystal dosage (300 and 600 ug/ml CaOx) with the mean of the control column at 0 ug/ml CaOx crystal dosage (n = 3). Data are shown as mean ± SD.
(TIF)
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
(PDF)
(PDF)
(PDF)
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Manfredo Quadroni (The Lausanne Protein Analysis Facility) for help with the mass spectrometry analysis and interpretation, as well as for helpful discussions.
The excellent work by Jean-Christophe Stehle, from the Animal Pathology Platform is acknowledged.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the article and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, research grant 310030-182312 and by the special program NCCR Kidney.CH to OB.
References
- 1.Chen Z, Prosperi M, Bird VY. Prevalence of kidney stones in the USA: The National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey. Journal of Clinical Urology. 2019;12(4):296–302. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moor MB, Bonny O. Ways of calcium reabsorption in the kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;310(11):F1337–50. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00273.2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Qin X, Zhang P. ECRG4: a new potential target in precision medicine. Frontiers of medicine. 2019;13(5):540–6. doi: 10.1007/s11684-018-0637-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schmidt T, Samaras P, Frejno M, Gessulat S, Barnert M, Kienegger H, et al. ProteomicsDB. Nucleic Acids Research. 2017;46(D1):D1271–D81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yue C-M, Deng D-J, Bi M-X, Guo L-P, Lu S-H. Expression of ECRG4, a novel esophageal cancer-related gene, downregulated by CpG island hypermethylation in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(6):1174–8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i6.1174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Götze S, Feldhaus V, Traska T, Wolter M, Reifenberger G, Tannapfel A, et al. ECRG4 is a candidate tumor suppressor gene frequently hypermethylated in colorectal carcinoma and glioma. BMC Cancer. 2009;9(1):447. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sabatier R, Finetti P, Adelaide J, Guille A, Borg JP, Chaffanet M, et al. Down-regulation of ECRG4, a candidate tumor suppressor gene, in human breast cancer. PloS one. 2011;6(11):e27656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yue CM, Deng DJ, Bi MX, Guo LP, Lu SH. Expression of ECRG4, a novel esophageal cancer-related gene, downregulated by CpG island hypermethylation in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(6):1174–8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i6.1174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moor MB, Bonny O. Memo1 gene expression in kidney and bone is unaffected by dietary mineral load and calciotropic hormones. Physiol Rep. 2020;8(7):e14410. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gaeggeler HP, Gonzalez-Rodriguez E, Jaeger NF, Loffing-Cueni D, Norregaard R, Loffing J, et al. Mineralocorticoid versus glucocorticoid receptor occupancy mediating aldosterone-stimulated sodium transport in a novel renal cell line. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(4):878–91. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004121110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Curry JN, Saurette M, Askari M, Pei L, Filla MB, Beggs MR, et al. Claudin-2 deficiency associates with hypercalciuria in mice and human kidney stone disease. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2020;130(4):1948–60. doi: 10.1172/JCI127750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.van Megen WH, Tan R, Alexander RT, Dimke H. Differential activation of parathyroid and renal Ca2+-sensing receptors underlies the renal phenotype in autosomal dominant hypocalcemia 1. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.02.01.429170. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen L, Chou CL, Knepper MA. Targeted Single-Cell RNA-seq Identifies Minority Cell Types of Kidney Distal Nephron. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(4):886–96. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020101407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qin X, Zhang P. ECRG4: a new potential target in precision medicine. Frontiers of medicine. 2019;13(5):540–6. doi: 10.1007/s11684-018-0637-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khan SR, Glenton PA. Experimental induction of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis in mice. The Journal of urology. 2010;184(3):1189–96. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Scales CD Jr., Curtis LH, Norris RD, Springhart WP, Sur RL, Schulman KA, et al. Changing gender prevalence of stone disease. J Urol. 2007;177(3):979–82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schwille PO, Manoharan M, Schmiedl A. Is idiopathic recurrent calcium urolithiasis in males a cellular disease? Laboratory findings in plasma, urine and erythrocytes, emphasizing the absence and presence of stones, oxidative and mineral metabolism: an observational study. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(6):590–600. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fan J, Chandhoke PS, Grampsas SA. Role of sex hormones in experimental calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10 Suppl 14:S376–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yagisawa T, Ito F, Osaka Y, Amano H, Kobayashi C, Toma H. The influence of sex hormones on renal osteopontin expression and urinary constituents in experimental urolithiasis. J Urol. 2001;166(3):1078–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ko B, Bergsland K, Gillen DL, Evan AP, Clark DL, Baylock J, et al. Sex differences in proximal and distal nephron function contribute to the mechanism of idiopathic hypercalcuria in calcium stone formers. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2015;309(1):R85–R92. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00071.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liang X, Gao J, Wang Q, Hou S, Wu C. ECRG4 Represses Cell Proliferation and Invasiveness via NFIC/OGN/NF-κB Signaling Pathway in Bladder Cancer. Frontiers in Genetics. 2020;11. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lieske JC, Deganello S, Toback FG. Cell-crystal interactions and kidney stone formation. Nephron. 1999;81 Suppl 1:8–17. doi: 10.1159/000046293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bilbault H, Perez J, Huguet L, Vandermeersch S, Placier S, Tabibzadeh N, et al. Urothelium proliferation is a trigger for renal crystal deposits in a murine lithogenesis model. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):16319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34734-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li LW, Yu XY, Yang Y, Zhang CP, Guo LP, Lu SH. Expression of esophageal cancer related gene 4 (ECRG4), a novel tumor suppressor gene, in esophageal cancer and its inhibitory effect on the tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(7):1505–13. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Karin M, Cao Y, Greten FR, Li Z-W. NF-κB in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit. Nature reviews cancer. 2002;2(4):301–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pikarsky E, Porat RM, Stein I, Abramovitch R, Amit S, Kasem S, et al. NF-κB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature. 2004;431(7007):461–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dang X, Coimbra R, Mao L, Podvin S, Li X, Yu H, et al. Open reading frame mining identifies a TLR4 binding domain in the primary sequence of ECRG4. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2019;76(24):5027–39. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03159-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moriguchi T, Takeda S, Iwashita S, Enomoto K, Sawamura T, Koshimizu U, et al. Ecrg4 peptide is the ligand of multiple scavenger receptors. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):4048. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22440-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




