Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 30;11:e78772. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78772

Figure 5. Differences between inferred classes recapitulate expected trends in age and conservation and reveal surprising trends in lengths and expression.

(A) As expected, phastCons conservation scores vary by class. Scores near 0 indicate low conservation, while scores near 1 indicate high conservation. Note that fast-evolving and melanogaster-specific loci have dramatically lower conservation, whereas alternate-frame loci are very well conserved. (B) Despite not being included as a variable in latent class analysis (LCA), phyloP conservation scores also vary by class. Scores below 0 indicate potential fast evolution (acceleration), while scores above 0 indicate conservation. Note that the lowest scores predominantly occur in fast-evolving and melanogaster-specific loci and that alternate-frame loci remain the best conserved. (C) Distribution of phylostratigraphically inferred gene ages by inferred latent class. (D) Class variations in length are generally minimal, with the exception of general unannotated open reading frames (ORFs) being slightly longer than average, and fast-evolving and nonfunctional loci being shorter than average. (E) Maximum observed transcription across all FlyAtlas2 and modENCODE samples varies by class. (F) Tissue specificity (tau) calculated from FlyAtlas2 data shows that nonfunctional and fast-evolving loci are the most specific, with alternate-frame loci the least. (G) Developmental specificity (tau) calculated from modENCODE data similarly shows that nonfunctional and fast-evolving loci are the most specific, with alternate-frame loci the least.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Transcription of unannotated translated open reading frames (utORFs) in selected tissues.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Top panel: utORFs, separated by inferred latent class analysis (LCA) class. Mean TPMs across the given tissue in FlyAtlas2 are log10-transformed with a pseudocount of 1E-3. Horizontal line marks an expression threshold of TPM 0.1. Bottom panel: as top, but for, in order, annotated FlyBase genes, separated between those with names, those with ‘CG’ identifiers, and those with ‘CR’ identifiers, and all utORFs.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Differences between inferred classes for unannotated translated open reading frames (utORFs) with canonical start sites recapitulate expected trends.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

(A–G) Same as Figure 5 but examining utORFs with canonical start sites.