Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276136

Quality of cowpea seeds: A food security strategy in the tropical environment

Leticia de Aguila Moreno 1,#, Gustavo Roberto Fonseca de Oliveira 1,#, Thiago Barbosa Batista 1,#, João William Bossolani 1,, Karina Renostro Ducatti 1,, Cristiane Carvalho Guimarães 1,, Edvaldo Aparecido Amaral da Silva 1,*,#
Editor: Alessio Scarafoni2
PMCID: PMC9565620  PMID: 36240183

Abstract

What is the relation between seed quality and food security? Here we built a summary diagram that links the development stages of the seeds with their potential of providing grain yield. This idea was tested using cowpea as a model crop, grown in a tropical environment. Initially, seed quality attributes such as water content, dry weight, germination, vigor, and longevity were characterized during seed development. With this, we were able to elucidate at which point the late maturation phase and the acquisition of seed with superior physiological quality starts. From these data, the proposed summary diagram highlighted the seed quality as a technological basis for generating a more productive plant community. It also showed that only seeds with a high-quality profile have a better chance to establishment in an increasingly challenging agricultural environment. Overall, we bring the concept that cowpea seeds with superior quality besides being the essential input for tropical agriculture is also a strategy that can contribute food security.

Introduction

The cowpea plant (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) is a legume resilient to the adversities of the agricultural environment, being commonly cultivated in regions with high temperatures and water restriction [1]. The grains have several food uses, providing high-energy compounds that benefit human health and combat malnutrition [2, 3]. An adequate stock of cowpea is important for the subsistence of societies at nutritional risk, especially on the African continent, where these grains are consumed on a larger scale [4]. The exploration of factors which can improve the yield of cowpea plants is part of a broad food safety practice. Thus, investigating when cowpea seeds acquire maximum quality is an opportunity to collaborate with this purpose.

Seeds are one of the greatest assets of agricultural activity in the world. Their physiological quality defines both the establishment of the crop and its productivity [5, 6]. High-quality seeds are more capable of generating uniform seedlings that will give rise to individuals with ample productive potential and efficient use of the resources of the environment [7]. On the other hand, seeds with reduced quality will compromise the emergence of seedlings, and result in an uneven establishment in the field, which in turn will result in low yield [8, 9]. Faced with the context of climatic stress where cowpea is most produced, we pose the following question: when do cowpea seeds acquire maximum physiological quality? Thus, the time when cowpea seeds are harvested can increase the chances of high seedling establishment under wide environmental stresses, which is the case of where cowpea is normally cultivated.

The connection of the seed to the food production process starts from the expression of quality attributes acquired during its development [10]. These attributes establish a bridge to a new plant cycle in the field. In particular, germination, desiccation tolerance, vigor and longevity are acquired during the maturation and late maturation phases [11]. Interestingly, the moment of acquisition of these attributes varies among plant species [12], which makes its understanding specific for each crop of agricultural interest. In other legumes such as soybeans [13], Medicago truncatula [14] and peanuts [15], efforts have been made to understand the acquisition of physiological quality. This made it possible to determine when the seeds complete their development and acquire their maximum quality. In cowpea seeds, there is still a knowledge gap in the subject, which may limit the technological advances expected for its cultivation, especially in regions of the world commonly under severe climatic stresses.

The use of cowpea seeds with superior quality can be strategic for optimizing grain yields in regions that naturally have scarce resources for crop production. The purpose of this work was to characterize the acquisition of physiological quality of cowpea seeds and to propose a connection of this process with plant yield. Furthermore, we are creating a general idea that seed quality is a strategy for food security in tropical environments.

Material and methods

Plant material and local

The commercial cowpea seeds (cultivar BRS Guariba) were produced under field conditions from April to August during the crop season of the year 2015. The research was performed in an experimental area of the College of Agricultural Sciences, State University of São Paulo (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. All necessary approvals were obtained for the study, which met all relevant regulations.

Trial design

The development of cowpea seeds was monitored under tropical growing conditions. We characterized the maturation and late maturation phases of seeds based on days after anthesis (DAA). For this, attributes such as water content, dry weight, vigor, and longevity of seeds were measured over the time of seed development. This data allowed us to define the moment to harvest cowpea seeds with the highest quality. It also allowed the construction of a summary diagram with application to agricultural species propagated by orthodox seeds. In this diagram, we connected the phases of acquisition of physiological quality with the establishment of plants in the field and grain yield. The knowledge acquired in this work, added to that existing in the literature, brings the idea that enhancing the quality of cowpea seeds increases its relevance in food security strategies.

Characterization of the seed production area

The soil was characterized as an Oxisol [16]. The area was subjected to soil preparation (plowing and harrowing) and sowing fertilization (20 kg ha-1 of simple superphosphate [46% P2O5] and 20 kg ha-1 potassium chloride [K2O]) according to the chemical attributes of the soil collected from the 0.0 to 20.0 cm layer (pH CaCl2: 5.0; Organic matter: 23.0 g dm-3; P resin: 37.0 mg dm-3; S: 23 mg dm-3; Al3+: 0.0 mmolc dm-3; H+Al3+: 43.0 mmolc dm-3; K: 2.7 mmolc dm-3; Ca2+: 28.0 mmolc dm-3; Mg2+: 12 mmolc dm-3; sum of bases: 43.0 mmolc dm-3; CTC: 86 mmolc dm-3; base saturation: 50%).

Plant cultivation

The seeds were inoculated with Bradyrhizobium spp. (at a rate of 100 mL of inoculant per 100 kg of seed), and sowing was performed on April 18th, 2015, at a density of ~18 viable seeds m-1 at rows spaced 0.70 m apart. In addition, covering fertilization was done at 15 and 30 days after seedling emergence, using 20 kg ha-1 of N, in the form of ammonium sulfate. Seedling emergence occurred on April 23rd 2015 and the appearance of the first floral buds occurred on July 13th 2015. Seed harvesting was then started after that date (17 DAA: July 29th 2015) and ended on August 21st, 2015 (40 DAA). The experiment was conducted under dry conditions, without water supplementation throughout the crop cycle. The cycle lasted 120 days from sowing to final harvest. The average maximum and minimum temperatures during this period were 24° C and 15° C, respectively. Additionally, the average relative humidity (RH) was 74.3%, and the total rainfall was 286 mm (S1 Fig).

Characterization of seed maturity stages

The characterization of seed maturity stages was based on the work done for soybean [17] with modifications for cowpea seeds. Its flowers remain open only for a few hours in the morning, and when they close, they already initiate the development of the seed. Therefore, the flowering tag was made early in the morning (S2 Fig). Flowers were tagged at the day of opening, in order to track the development of the fruit and determine the number of days after anthesis (DAA). Fruits were collected manually from 17 DAA to 40 DAA. The seeds were extracted manually from the fruits and used immediately for analyses of dry weight, fresh weight, and water content, totaling five reproductive stages. According to germination pre-tests performed on different days after anthesis, it was found that the seeds were able to germinate only 28 DAA (S1 Table). Therefore, for the tests of germination, vigor, tolerance to desiccation and longevity only the seeds in the last five reproductive stages were used, that is, from 28 DAA to 40 DAA (at 3-day intervals).

Seed quality assessment

Water content

The water content of fresh (freshly harvested) seeds was determined by drying four repetitions of 10 seeds in an oven at 105° C constant for 24 hours [18]. The water content obtained was expressed as a degree of humidity on a wet basis.

Dry weight

For the determination of dry weight (DW), four repetitions of 10 fresh seeds were dried in an oven at 60° C for 72 hours. The DW results were expressed in milligrams per seed.

Germination capacity

The germination capacity of the seeds (fresh and non-dried seeds) was performed at 28, 31, 34, 37 and 40 DAA. Three replicates of 25 seeds from each maturation stage were placed on germination paper moistened with water equivalent to 2.5 times the weight of the paper, arranged in an upright position at a temperature of 20° C in a germinator. The radicle protrusion was evaluated 120 hours after test installation.

Desiccation tolerance

To determine the acquisition of desiccation tolerance, immediately after harvest the seeds were distributed in single layers on the surface of a wire mesh screen (10.5 x 10.5 x 1.8 cm) suspended over silica gel inside a plastic box (11.0 x 11.0 x 3.5 cm) at 20°C, to dry gradually until they reached a moisture content of 10% (wet basis) [19]. After this, the germination test was performed with three repetitions of 25 seeds each. Seeds with a radicle protrusion of at least 2 mm of length were considered desiccation tolerant (evaluated 120 hours after test installation).

Germanation rate

During the germination test (dried seeds), we also evaluated seed vigor by determining the germination rate (1/t50). The measurements of time required for 50% of the seeds to germinate (t50) were taken every 6 hours until 8 days. Seeds with a radicle protrusion of at least 2 mm of length were considered germinated. The results were analyzed using the curve adjustment of the Germinator software [20].

Seedling formation

In parallel, we also measured seed vigor by calculating the seedlings formation at five days after the beginning of the germination test. We considered normal seedlings those with well-developed essential structures, (aerial part, hypocotyl and radicle) [18].

Seed longevity

For the determination of longevity, 150 seeds for each moment analyzed (28, 31, 34, 37 and 40 DAA) were dried as previously described, and distributed in single layers on the surface of a wire mesh screen (10.5 x 10.5 x 1.8 cm) suspended over a NaCl saline solution (75% RH) inside a plastic accelerated ageing box (11.0 x 11.0 x 3.5 cm) at 35° C. The seeds with 28 DAA were removed from the plastic boxes at 3-day intervals and the germination test was performed. For the remaining DAA (31, 34, 37, and 40), the seeds were removed at 10-day intervals to perform the germination test describe above. For this analysis, a radicle up to 2 mm of length was considered as the criterion for germination. The storage data of seeds from 28, 31, 34, 37 and 40 DAA were fitted with sigmoid f = y0+a (1+e (-(x-x0)/b)), to determine the moment when the initial germination was reduced by half (p50), represented by its intersection with fitted sigmoid.

Duration of the maturation and late maturation stages

The percentage duration of the maturation and late maturation stages of cowpea seeds was calculated based on the proportion in days of each stage to the total development time of the seeds after DAA. Seeds began to be harvested at 28 DAA, which was considered the beginning of the maturation stage. Harvesting continued until 40 DAA, which was considered the end of the late maturation phase and the end of seed development.

Summary diagram

The summary diagram was designed from the observed results for water content, dry weight, desiccation tolerance, vigor (1/t50), and longevity (p50) during their maturation and late maturation (28, 31, 34, 37 and 40 DAA). The measuring of attributes of physiological quality made it possible to determine the moment of acquisition of maximum quality for future crop formation. Thus, we connected the seed developing stages with the grain yield of cowpea. The conclusion is that enhancing the quality of cowpea seeds creates opportunities for new food security strategies.

Statistical analysis

The experiment was carried out on a completely randomized design with five maturation stages (28, 31, 34, 37 and 40 DAA) as a source of variation with three replications for each stage (n = 15) with 20 seeds per replication. The data were transformed (Box Cox transformation) as necessary to meet the assumptions of the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The data obtained at each reproductive stage were subjected to ANOVA and the Tukey test at a significance level of 5%. The “ExpDes.pt” package of the R software was used to perform this analysis [21]. The seed quality parameters such as water content, dry weight, germination capacity, desiccation tolerance, germination rate and seedling formation were subjected to principal components analysis. For the respective analyses, One-way PERMANOVA [22] was used to group treatments by similarity (Bray-Curtis similarity index) to identify significance between the groups obtained according to the maturation stages at a significance level of 1% (software Canoco 5).

Results

Seed moisture at the beginning of development was high, where those with 28 DAA had a water content above 60% (Fig 1A). There was a decrease in moisture content during seed maturation (Table 1). The dry weight of the seeds started to increase from 7.3 mg/seed at 28 DAA to 12.01 mg/seed at 34 DAA (Table 1). The seeds capable of germinating at 28 DAA had a water content of 64% and, throughout development, this value decreased to 50% (34 DAA), until reaching 9% at the end of the late maturation phase (40 DAA) (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Physical and physiological changes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) seeds at 28, 31, 37 and 40 days after anthesis (DAA).

Fig 1

A: Water content and dry weight. B: germination capacity (fresh seeds) and desiccation tolerance (dried seeds). C: vigor expressed by germination rate (1/t50) and seedling formation (aerial part, hypocotyl and radicle well developed and healthy).

Table 1. Statistical analysis.

Information of the data evaluated in cowpea seeds (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) during maturation stages (28 to 40 DAA)*.

DAF WC 1 DW G DT 1/t50 SE
28 64.71 a 7.30 c 16.0 c 10.0 c 0.00 b 0.0 e
31 57.66 b 9.86 b 18.0 c 93.0 b 0.63 b 7.0 d
34 50.96 c 12.01 a 37.0 b 100.0 a 0.72 b 13.0 c
37 22.48 d 11.71 a 100.0 a 97.0 b 3.79 a 70.0 b
40 9.44 e 10.92 a 94.0 a 77.0 b 3.43 a 81.0 a
LSD 5.62 1.91 3.14 3.84 8.02 5.67
C.V.% 6.27 8.46 11.94 4.86 38.59 7.58
p value 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001

*WC: water content (%); DW: dry weight (mg/seed); G: germination capacity (radicle protrusion, %); DT: desiccation tolerance (radicle protrusion, %); 1/t50: germination rate (%); SE: seedling formation (5 days, %); p50: longevity seeds during maturation expressed in p50 (period in days when the viability of the seeds is reduced by 50% viability). * Averages followed by the same lower case letter in the column do not differ by Tukey test at 5% probability.

Germination capacity had not been yet acquired at 25 DAA (S1 Table). This capacity reached maximum potential at 37 DAA (Fig 1B). Therefore, our results confirmed that mass maturity can’t always be considered the moment when the seeds have superior physiological quality, since seed quality was still being acquired after the maximum accumulation of dry weight (34 DAA).

Seeds with less than 28 DAA were not able to germinate after drying (Fig 1B). This information indicates that they had not yet acquired desiccation tolerance (Table 1). At 28 DAA, the seeds began to acquire desiccation tolerance (11% of germination after drying), reaching a maximum value at 31 DAA, when they presented the highest germination (Fig 1B). In parallel, the results of vigor expressed by the germination rate (1/t50) showed that the seeds at 37 DAA. Concomitantly, the seedling formation increased from 28 DAA up to 40 DAA (Fig 1C). Although germination was already considered high at 31 DAA, the production of normal seedlings showed reduced values (7%). The maximum development of normal seedlings (seedling formation) occurred only at the 40th DAA, with 81% (Fig 1C).

In our study, while water content decreased, and desiccation tolerance was progressively acquired (Fig 1A and 1B). The ability of the seeds to remain viable during storage also increased (Fig 2A). During storage, seeds with 28 DAA did not tolerate more than 20 days of storage (Fig 2A). With 31 DAA, the cowpea seeds had already acquired greater storage capacity (44 days). As the seeds developed, the storage capacity increased, as can be seen in seeds with 34 DAA (98 days), 37 DAA (147 days) and 40 DAA (156 days) (Fig 2B). Thus, seed longevity was gradually acquired from 28 DAA to 40 DAA. In the beginning of the seed maturation phase, cowpea seeds (28 DAA) can not be stored for a long period. It is important to mention that the level of vigor increased concomitantly with the acquisition of longevity (Fig 1C).

Fig 2. Lifespan of the cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) seeds harvested at 28, 31, 34, 37 and 40 DAA.

Fig 2

A: Germination capacity after different periods of storage. B: acquisition of seed longevity expressed by p50 (period in days when the viability of the seeds is reduced by 50%).

From the principal component analysis (PCA), the distinction between the seed maturation stages was verified at 1% significance. The data set observed for seeds harvested 37 DAA and 40 DAA were grouped in the same quadrant, presenting the same trend (higher modulus of the vector) with the highest values obtained for p50 (longevity) and SE (vigor). Overall, cowpea seeds at late maturation stages showed the highest physiological quality (Fig 3). In addition, the late maturation stage was found to represent around 10% of the total developmental period of cowpea seeds (Fig 4). From the presented results, the summary diagram was built. It allowed connecting the physiological behavior of seeds with their likely performance in plant establishment in the field and grain yield. Overall, the constructed idea highlights that the use of cowpea seeds harvested at 37 DAA and 40 DAA (high quality seeds) provide a higher chance of generating a more productive plant community (Fig 5).

Fig 3. Principal component analysis (PCA).

Fig 3

The dotted circle indicates the variables that most correlated at 37 DAA and 40 DAA (superior seed quality: late maturation phase). WC: Water content; DW: Dry weight; G: Germination capacity; DT: Desiccation tolerance; 1/t50: germination rate; SE: seedling formation; p50: Longevity.

Fig 4. Phases of cowpea seed development.

Fig 4

The relation between the developing stages and the acquisition of seed physiological quality during maturation and late maturation.

Fig 5. Summary diagram for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) grain yield performance as a function of physiological seed quality at different maturation stages.

Fig 5

Discussion

Here we show the process of developing cowpea seeds to achieve maximum physiological quality in a tropical environment. We propose a summary diagram that highlights the acquisition of seeds with superior quality as a technological basis for the formation of plants with high yield. Overall, we bring the idea that harvesting high-performance seeds is a strategic part of food security programs.

We began our study by showing the physical changes during seed development. Cowpea plants generate seeds with reported orthodox behavior [23], as they start development (28 DAA) with high water content (70%) and gradually dehydrate with the advancing of the maturation phase (10%). The high moisture content in the early stages (28 DAA and 31 DAA) is known to support the division and expansion activities of embryonic cells [24]. Additionally, it allows the translocation of assimilates to the reserve tissues of the developing embryo [25]. As seed moisture content and metabolism are reduced (Fig 1A), the accumulation of reserve compounds is established and determines mass maturity (34 DAA). Interestingly, in cultivated species it has been shown that maximum seed filling (mass maturity) is a fundamental part of the development of leguminous seeds. However, it is not the end of their maturation process [12]. Here, we reinforce that those physical changes in cowpea seeds occur together with other events that support the acquisition of physiological quality attributes.

We found that the germination capacity of cowpea seeds was the first attribute to be acquired (Fig 1B). In species such as soybean [26] and Medicago truncatula [14], germination sensu stricto (radicle protrusion) still occurs under high water content. However, corroborating the behavior of these species, we found that this initial germination potential is incipient when the seeds are exposed to drying (Fig 1B). Also, as reserve compounds become part of the cotyledons, desiccation tolerance is installed, and the seeds resist intense water loss staying alive (Fig 1A and 1B). Studies have sought to elucidate the mechanisms that support this behavior in leguminous seeds associated with the accumulation of reserves such as LEA proteins [19], HSPs [27] and oligosaccharides [26] during the seed filling phase. The essential role of these compounds in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance ensures the survival of the seeds in the dry state [23]. In cowpea seeds, they mark the maturation phase and provide support for the progress for the complete acquisition of the seed physiological quality.

Cowpea seeds, once they acquired mass maturity, germination capacity and desiccation tolerance, continue to gather physiological competences associated with vigor (Fig 1C). Indeed, from 34 DAA (beginning of the late maturation stage) the seeds displayed a remarkable improvement in their ability to successfully install themselves in the agricultural environment. Noteworthy signs that determine the importance of seed vigor are seen in seedling performance [13], rapid germination [15] and superior potential to germinate after harvest and throughout the storage period (Fig 1B). Thinking about food production programs, harvesting cowpea seeds with maximum vigor can be strategic to expand the possibilities of success in the implantation of a future crop. This idea comes from the close relationship that seed vigor establishes with an adequate population of plants and increased grain yield [5, 9], even under climatic stresses [28]. In cowpea growing regions, having seeds with maximum physiological quality can mean a step forward in optimizing the supply of grains as a source of basic food for the population.

Considering logistics and scheduling for the effective use of cowpea seeds by farmers (seeds can be used months after the harvest), seed longevity is an essential part of food production programs. This attribute of physiological quality acquired at the end of development in late seed maturation (Fig 2B) is governed by mechanisms that minimize the deterioration process and extend shelf life in the dry state [12]. The formation of vitreous cytoplasm during seed drying [23] and the accumulation of compounds with antioxidant action in the maturation phase [26, 29] act as essential mechanisms of protection and repair. Both mechanisms delay deterioration reactions favoring maintenance of seed viability during storage [30] and preserve seed vigor [13]. By determining seed longevity by p50, information was obtained about their viability under stress conditions (35° C and 75% RH) that can easily occur in tropical regions. This reinforces the idea that the results presented here have a practical utility in post-harvest, especially in the agricultural context of nations lacking resources for proper seed storage. One may ask: what is the connection of this information to the reality of the cowpea production fields?

From the previous perspective, seed quality can play an essential role in food production and thus the livelihoods of communities around the world. The quality of cultivated species is the primary cause associated with mechanisms of plant life expression at the highest degree of sophistication. In our summary diagram, we express a probable result of the formation of the cowpea crop from seeds with different maturation stages and physiological quality levels (Fig 5). Supported by previous studies [5, 9, 28] we showed that grain yield starts from the high-performance of seeds capable of properly forming a more productive plant community. It is a fact that under stressful climatic conditions for plant cultivation, only the fittest living things (seeds) survive and multiply in the agricultural environment [31]. In this universal logic, only superior quality seeds have sufficient capacity to perpetuate the species in time, which in agricultural activity results in food. We present temporal fractions of cowpea seed development consistent with the behavior of documented orthodox species that govern the global food base. In regions inhabited by societies at constant nutritional risk, the use of seeds with superior quality can increase the supply of grains with high energy value. The main perspective of the proposed concept lies in its comprehensive applicability in agriculture and society.

Conclusions

High quality seeds are a global food security strategy. In the context of cowpea production, harvesting seeds at the late maturation phase means accessing seeds with high physiological quality and the highest potential for crop formation and grain yield. The practical effect of this process plays a key role in agriculture by contributing to food production. Our proposed summary diagram is an essential part of assertive planning to produce food in areas of frequent climatic stress. Therefore, seed quality is one of the indispensable factors for farmers to successfully grow agricultural species in tropical environments and essentially achieve food security and social sustainability.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Daily rainfall, maximum and minimum temperatures in the experimental farm of Botucatu, State of São Paulo-Brazil, during cowpea seed production (2015 crop season).

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Flower tagged and beginning of fruit development of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp).

A: Open flower; B: Flower after 2 days of pollination; C: Fruit in formation 9 days after anthesis.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Information of the data evaluated in cowpea seeds (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) during early maturation stages (17 to 25 DAA).

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Valeria Cristina Ratameiro Giandoni for her support during seed physiological analysis and to Mr. Roger Hutchings for the English review of the manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by: Coordenacão de aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (Financial Code 001) to L.A. Moreno, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (grant number 311526/2021) to E.A. Amaral da Silva. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Sindhu M, Kumar A, Yadav H, Chaudhary D, Jaiwal R, Jaiwal PK. Current advances and future directions in genetic enhancement of a climate resilient food legume crop, cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019;139: 429–453. doi: 10.1007/s11240-019-01695-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jayathilake C, Visvanathan R, Deen A, Bangamuwage R, Jayawardana BC, Nammi S, et al. Cowpea: an overview on its nutritional facts and health benefits. J Sci Food Agric. 2018;98: 4793–4806. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bessada SMF, Barreira JCM, Oliveira MBPP. Pulses and food security: Dietary protein, digestibility, bioactive and functional properties. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;93: 53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.08.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rawal V, Navarro DK. The global economy of pulses. Rawal V, Navarro DK, editors. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bagateli JR, Dörr CS, Schuch LOB, Meneghello GE. Productive performance of soybean plants originated from seed lots with increasing vigor levels. J Seed Sci. 2019;41: 151–159. doi: 10.1590/2317-1545v41n2199320 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Struker S, Carvalho IR, Szareski VJ, Barbosa MH, Souza VQ de, Conte GG, et al. Influence of seeds vigor in the attributes of soybean yield. Rev Ciências Agrárias. 2019;42: 111–120. doi: 10.19084/rca.16389 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caverzan A, Giacomin R, Müller M, Biazus C, Lângaro NC, Chavarria G. How does seed vigor affect soybean yield components? Agron J. 2018;110: 1318–1327. doi: 10.2134/agronj2017.11.0670 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abati J, Brzezinski CR, Salvador J, Foloni S, Zucareli C, Bassoi MC, et al. Seedling emergence and yield performance of wheat cultivars depending on seed vigor and sowing density função do vigor de sementes e densidades de semeadura. J Seed Sci. 2017;39: 58–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ebone LA, Caverzan A, Tagliari A, Chiomento JLT, Silveira DC, Chavarria G. Soybean seed vigor: Uniformity and growth as key factors to improve yield. Agronomy. 2020;10. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10040545 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ellis RH. Temporal patterns of seed quality development, decline, and timing of maximum quality during seed development and maturation. Seed Sci Res. 2019;29: 135–142. doi: 10.1017/S0960258519000102 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bewley JD., Bradford KJ., Hilhorst HWM., Nonogaki H. Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy. Springer. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leprince O, Pellizzaro A, Berriri S, Buitink J. Late seed maturation: Drying without dying. J Exp Bot. 2017;68: 827–841. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Basso DP, Hoshino-Bezerra AA, Sartori MMP, Buitink J, Leprince O, da Silva EAA. Late seed maturation improves the preservation of seedling emergence during storage in soybean. J Seed Sci. 2018;40: 185–192. doi: 10.1590/2317-1545v40n2191893 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Righetti K, Vu JL, Pelletier S, Vu BL, Glaab E, Lalanne D, et al. Inference of longevity-related genes from a robust coexpression network of seed maturation identifies regulators linking seed storability to biotic defense-related pathways. Plant Cell. 2015;27: 2692–2708. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Okada MH, Oliveira GRF de, Sartori MMP, Crusciol CAC, Nakagawa J, Amaral da Silva EA. Acquisition of the physiological quality of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds during maturation under the influence of the maternal environment. Coleman CE, editor. PLoS One. 2021;16: e0250293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.USDA. Illustrated Guide to Soil Taxonomy. 2015. doi: 10.2134/jae.1982.0003 [DOI]
  • 17.Ritchie SW, Hanway JJ, Thompson CE, Benson GO. How a soybean plant develops. Ames: Iowa State University of Science and Technology; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.ISTA. International Rules for Seed Analysis. International rules for seed testing. edn. Bassersdorf, Suíça: Zürischstr. 50, CH–8303 Bassersdorf; 2020.
  • 19.Chatelain E, Hundertmark M, Leprince O, Gall S Le, Satour P, Deligny-Penninck S, et al. Temporal profiling of the heat-stable proteome during late maturation of Medicago truncatula seeds identifies a restricted subset of late embryogenesis abundant proteins associated with longevity. Plant, Cell Environ. 2012;35: 1440–1455. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02501.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Joosen RVL, Kodde J, Willems LAJ, Ligterink W, Van Der Plas LHW, Hilhorst HWM. Germinator: A software package for high-throughput scoring and curve fitting of Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J. 2010;62: 148–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04116.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.R Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. In: Vienna, Austria. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anderson MJ. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA). Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Wiley; 2017. pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Buitink J, Leprince O. Intracellular glasses and seed survival in the dry state. Comptes Rendus—Biol. 2008;331: 788–795. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aldana AB, Fites RC, Pattee HE. Changes in nucleic acids, protein and ribonuclease activity during maturation of peanut seeds. Plant Cell Physiol. 1972;13: 515–521. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a074764 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Copeland LO, McDonald MB. Principles of Seed Science and Technology. 4ed. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lima JJP, Buitink J, Lalanne D, Rossi RF, Pelletier S, Da Silva EAA, et al. Molecular characterization of the acquisition of longevity during seed maturation in soybean. PLoS One. 2017;12: 1–25. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Verdier J, Lalanne D, Pelletier S, Torres-Jerez I, Righetti K, Bandyopadhyay K, et al. A regulatory network-based approach dissects late maturation processes related to the acquisition of desiccation tolerance and longevity of medicago truncatula seeds. Plant Physiol. 2013;163: 757–774. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.222380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Finch-Savage WE, Bassel GW. Seed vigour and crop establishment: Extending performance beyond adaptation. J Exp Bot. 2016;67: 567–591. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou W, Branch WD, Gilliam L, Marshall JA. Phytosterol composition of Arachis hypogaea seeds from different maturity classes. Molecules. 2019;24: 1–10. doi: 10.3390/molecules24010106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sano N, Rajjou L, North HM, Debeaujon I, Marion-Poll A, Seo M. Staying alive: Molecular aspects of seed longevity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57: 660–674. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reed RC, Bradford KJ, Khanday I. Seed germination and vigor: ensuring crop sustainability in a changing climate. Heredity (Edinb). 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41437-022-00497-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alessio Scarafoni

19 Jul 2022

PONE-D-22-16964Quality of cowpea seeds: A food security strategy in the tropical environmentPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Amaral da Silva,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 02 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alessio Scarafoni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

Additional Editor Comments:

Both reviewers raised numerous criticisms that must be resolved to reach the level required for the publication of the manuscript. I basically agree with them. The comments of the reviewer are very constructive and give some advice. I recommend the Authors to consider all of them with attention to improve the manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This paper describes a useful study to assess the development of seed quality features in cowpea seeds during their maturation. It will add to a growing body of work showing that the last stage of seed development after maximum dry weight accumulation is important for the acquisition of maximum vigor and longevity. The authors note that this is particularly critical in warm, humid climates, in which seed longevity is shortened during storage under ambient conditions, potentially affecting stand establishment and yield in the following season.

In their abstract, the authors state that they “built an original theoretical model that links the development stages of the seeds with their potential of providing grain yield.” When I originally read this, I expected some type of novel quantitative or predictive model based on and tested by their results. However, this model is a diagram illustrating the development of seed quality on the one hand and corresponding illustrations of expected plant growth from those seeds, which was not actually tested in this paper. Based on multiple papers cited by the authors, this is very likely to be the case, and is neither theoretical nor original. These issues are also discussed, for example, in classic texts such as D.B. Egli. 2017. Seed Biology and Yield of Grain Crops. 2nd Edition. CABI. Thus, I would remove those terms referring to such a model and simply refer to Figure 5 as a summary diagram relating their work specifically on cowpea to other work (e.g., refs 7, 9, 13, 15). However, the diagram needs to be modified a bit to be accurate. As the authors showed, the time to 50% germination is much longer in less mature seeds than in more mature seeds. This should be illustrated in Fig. 5 by shifting the upper illustration to the right, indicating the slower emergence and start to vegetative development compared to the more mature seeds. The illustrations of the growth stages could be crowded together more or perhaps a stage removed such that maturity occurs at the same time but the plants are smaller. The later emergence thus would result in a shortened growth period and reduced yield. This would be consistent with the illustrations in ref 9, which attribute the poorer growth of late emerging seedlings to the shading by plants that emerged earlier. This turns out to be the major effect of seed vigor on crop production, i.e., variability in emergence times and reduced plant populations, rather than reduced potential growth rate per se of the resulting plants. Earlier harvests would naturally increase variation in developmental maturity within the seed lot, in contrast to the situation here with tagged flowers harvested at specific times, so that the consequences illustrated in refs. 7, 9 of mixed quality lots would occur.

In addition to these primary recommendations, there are also a number of minor corrections and edits that should be done prior to publication as listed below.

1. Line 159: Figure 5 does not really resemble a Heatmap to me. The size and color of the circles do relate to the changes in the parameter values, although this is rather confusing with respect to t50. While it is correct that t50 decreases during maturity, this actually represents higher quality, rather than less, as the smaller circles and lighter color would seem to indicate. Instead, I would recommend using the germination rate, or 1/t50, which increases with seed quality and is actually normally distributed in a seed population (e.g., Hay et al. (2014) Seed Science Research 24, 165-186). This might also impact the PCA analysis, as it currently shows high t50 associated with immature seeds, which is correct, but it does not show low t50 being associated with later development, or higher quality. Using 1/t50 in these analyses would correct these issues.

2. Line 186: Stated here that germination capacity reached a maximum at 31 DAA, whereas it appears to be at least 34 or 37 DAA before the curve peaks.

3. Line 187-189: This statement contradicts the previous one, which said that germination capacity peaked at 31 DAA, yet here it says that seed quality continued to increase after maximum DW, which was at 34 DAA.

4. Line 192: This statement does not agree with the data in Fig. 1B, where germination after desiccation at 28 DAA was 0%, not 23% as stated in this text (I did not have access to supplemental data).

5. Line 198-199: It should be noted again here that the normal seedlings were in the early count of the germination test, not the final count. Delayed germination will reduce the percentage of normal seedlings in an early count, but may not affect the total number of normal seedlings after a longer imbibition time.

6. Line 201: Do you mean Fig. 1A and 1B here?

7. Line 202: Do you mean Fig. 2A here? There is no Fig. 2D.

8. Line 202-3: According to Methods, the seeds were previously dried before the aging test, and dried seeds did not germinate after drying at 28 DAA (Fig. 1B). How then is the initial germination percentage of 28 DAA seeds about 40% in Fig. 2A?

9. Lines 203-205: The storage times mentioned here are when the last seed died. In general, longevities are referred to with respect to a specific percentage, e.g., 50% or the p50. However, the p50 values cited in the following sentences (up to 178 days) do not correspond with the p50 values that would be derived from Fig. 2A. For example, the p50 in Fig 2B for 31 DAA is about 60, whereas in Fig 2A, the curve for 31 DAA would cross 50% at about 40 days. Something is not correct about how p50 values were estimated in 2B from the data in 2A. I hope that the germination capacity values were all based on the total seed population tested, and not only on the number of viable seeds. This may be the case, as Fig. 1B shows germination capacity of 31 DAA seeds being about 20% after drying, while the curve for 31 DAA seeds starts near 100% in Fig. 2B. In longevity studies, the percentage has to be the fraction of total seeds. If the developing seed population had not reached 50% germination capacity, then it is not possible to estimate p50 for direct comparison with more mature seeds. While it may not affect the overall results of the analysis, the PCA should be run again using corrected values for p50s.

10. Line 273: The temperature of aging is given as 35C in the Methods.

11. Line 278: Awkward phrasing. The last two sentences of this paragraph could likely be deleted.

12. Line 300: See comments above about “proposed theoretical model”, which is not original nor theoretical, and there is substantial prior data to support it. You can still make your concluding case and summarize your results in Fig. 5 without claiming that it is an original theoretical model.

Reviewer #2: To author:

The manuscript entitled "Quality of cowpea seeds: A food security strategy in the tropical environment" is a study that contributes to the area of production of quality of seeds. Although the topic is well studied in the literature some results presented in the study are relevant. Furthermore, the results presented support the study hypothesis. However, some clarifications are required that will contribute to the presentation manuscript, as follow in the report.

Major compulsory Revisions:

Page 9, line 77 to 82 – In the sentence “This data allowed us to define the moment to Harvest cowpea seeds with the highest quality. It also allowed the construction of a theoretical model with application to agricultural species propagated by orthodox seeds. In this model, we connected the phases of acquisition of physiological quality with the establishment of plants in the field and grain yield. The knowledge acquired in this work, added to that existing in the literature, brings the idea that enhancing the quality of cowpea seeds increases its relevance in food security strategies”, it must be included in the topic of discussion or excluded.

Page 11, line 120 to 163 – Authors should consider including subtopics to present “Seed quality assessment” (water content of fresh; germination capacity; determination of longevity; maturation and late maturation stages)

Page 18, line 295 to 303 – Authors must present a conclusion considering the evidence based on the results found in the study.

Some minor criticisms are included below:

Page 14, line 202 – Revise the indication “Fig 2D”.

Page 22, Table 1 – Adjust the indication “*”. Put in the final of title of the table.

“Table 1. Statistical Analysis. Information of the data evaluated for cowpea seeds (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) during maturation stages (28 to 40 DAA).*”

Page 22, Table 1 – Remove the indication “1”.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276136.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


26 Sep 2022

Manuscript Number: PONE-D-22-16964

Quality of cowpea seeds: A food security strategy in the tropical environment

Alessio Scarafoni PhD,

Academic Editor of PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Scarafoni,

We thank you and the reviewer for the corrections and suggestions made in the manuscript. Below, we provide our answers point-by-point to the comments and suggestions made.

With warm regards,

Amaral da Silva (corresponding author on behalf of co-authors)

Reviewer #1:

Answer: The term "theoretical model" has been duly corrected as suggested. Regarding the diagram, the germination rate was added in place of t50. We would like to point out that the images illustrate the cycle of a plant coming from seed with low quality (immature seed) and high physiological quality (mature seed) and not a plant stand. So, if we understand the suggestion, the diagram is adequate to illustrates the proposal of the work. If there are more to correct, we are at your disposal to improve the manuscript.

Detailed comments

1 and 2. Answer: As the reviewer suggested, Figures 1, 3, and 5 have been modified. Thanks.

2. Answer: The correction has been made (lines 206 and 207). Thanks.

3. Answer: The correction has been made (lines 201). Thanks.

4. Answer: The correction has been made (line 200). Thanks.

5. Answer: The evaluation of normal seedlings at five days made it possible to identify the capacity for complete formation of embryonic tissues early. Only the most vigorous seeds have this capacity. Therefore, we consider that for vigor evaluation, five days was enough to detect what we were looking for. We thank you for the suggestions and we are available for further discussion. Thanks.

6. Answer: Yes. The corrections have been made (line 216). Thank you very much.

7. Answer: Yes. The corrections have been made (line 217). Thanks.

8. Answer: Thank you very much for this observation. The data has been duly reviewed (Figs 1 and 2) and corrections made (lines 208 to 215).

9. Answer: All the suggested corrections have been made. Thank you very much (lines 216 to 227).

10. Answer: The correction has been made (line 290). Thanks.

11. Answer: The correction has been made (line 294). Thanks.

12. Answer: The correction has been made (Fig 5). Thanks.

Reviewer #2:

1. Answer: Based on the data obtained, the constructed diagram allowed us to raise the idea of the use of high quality seeds as a food security strategy. Therefore, we reinforce that the discussion of this topic is based on the last paragraph of the manuscript (lines 296 to 310).

2. Answer: The correction has been made. Thanks.

3. Answer: We started the conclusion based on the results of the study. Afterwards, we end with a general idea built on these scientific results. We emphasize that the conclusion is not only the concrete expression of the results, but a general interpretation of them with a broader scope. We propose that the seed is the link to food security and has the potential to be used by multi areas in science. Therefore, we consider that our conclusion is correct. However, we are happy to improve it if more corrections are necessary.

4. Answer: The correction has been made (line 218). Thanks.

5. Answer: The correction has been made (line 218). Thanks.

6. Answer: The correction has been made (line 218). Thanks.

7. Answer: The correction has been made (line 218). Thanks.

8. Answer: The correction has been made (line 218). Thanks.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer.doc

Decision Letter 1

Alessio Scarafoni

29 Sep 2022

Quality of cowpea seeds: A food security strategy in the tropical environment

PONE-D-22-16964R1

Dear Dr. Amaral da Silva,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alessio Scarafoni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The authors substantially revised the manuscript in accordance with the comments and recommendations of the reviewer. The answers to the comments and questions that both Reviewers raised have been clearly addressed and reported in the text and in the figures. The Authors made most of the changes that have been suggested. The rebuttals to a couple of points made by the authors are embraceable and are justified following responses and changes to other comments raised. Contradictions that occurred in the original version have been resolved. The text is now clearer and fluid and the significance of the findings is now expressed and commented. The readability for either expert in the field and for the general audience greatly improved.

I recommend the publication of the manuscript in its present form.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Alessio Scarafoni

5 Oct 2022

PONE-D-22-16964R1

Quality of cowpea seeds: A food security strategy in the tropical environment

Dear Dr. Amaral da Silva:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Alessio Scarafoni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Daily rainfall, maximum and minimum temperatures in the experimental farm of Botucatu, State of São Paulo-Brazil, during cowpea seed production (2015 crop season).

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. Flower tagged and beginning of fruit development of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp).

    A: Open flower; B: Flower after 2 days of pollination; C: Fruit in formation 9 days after anthesis.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. Information of the data evaluated in cowpea seeds (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) during early maturation stages (17 to 25 DAA).

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES