Abstract
Preexisting lung-restricted autoantibodies (LRAs) are associated with a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), although it remains unclear whether LRAs can drive its pathogenesis. In syngeneic murine left lung transplant recipients, preexisting LRAs worsened graft dysfunction, which was evident by impaired gas exchange, increased pulmonary edema, and activation of damage-associated pathways in lung epithelial cells. LRA-mediated injury was distinct from ischemia-reperfusion injury since deletion of donor nonclassical monocytes and host neutrophils could not prevent graft dysfunction in LRA-pretreated recipients. Whole LRA IgG molecules were necessary for lung injury, which was mediated by the classical and alternative complement pathways and reversed by complement inhibition. However, deletion of Fc receptors in donor macrophages or mannose-binding lectin in recipient mice failed to rescue lung function. LRA-mediated injury was localized to the transplanted lung and dependent on IL-1β–mediated permeabilization of pulmonary vascular endothelium, which allowed extravasation of antibodies. Genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of IL-1R in the donor lungs prevented LRA-induced graft injury. In humans, preexisting LRAs were an independent risk factor for severe PGD and could be treated with plasmapheresis and complement blockade. We conclude that preexisting LRAs can compound ischemia-reperfusion injury to worsen PGD for which complement inhibition may be effective.
Keywords: Transplantation
Keywords: Innate immunity, Organ transplantation
Introduction
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) affects over 50% of recipients following lung transplantation and has emerged as the principal risk factor for both short-term mortality as well as long-term graft loss from chronic rejection (1–4). Current empiric therapies to treat PGD are largely ineffective and have the attendant risks of immunosuppression. While ischemia-reperfusion injury remains its predominant cause, the highly variable incidence of PGD suggests additional etiologies for its pathogenesis. A significant percentage of patients undergoing lung transplantation have preexisting immunoglobulin G (subtype IgG2) autoantibodies against lung-restricted self-antigens collagen type V (COLV) and K-α1 tubulin (KAT) (5, 6). The presence of these lung-restricted autoantibodies (LRAs) in the recipients is associated with an increased risk of PGD following both human (6) and murine (5, 7–9) lung transplantation. However, the molecular events by which LRAs promote PGD and their relationship to transplant-inherent ischemia-reperfusion injury remain unknown. Understanding of the pathogenesis of PGD in recipients with underlying LRAs will enable the development of selective therapies to improve posttransplant outcomes.
Investigators have suggested a mechanism to explain the production of LRAs in patients with chronic lung diseases (10). The deletion of self-reactive T lymphocytes against lung self-antigens by the thymus is incomplete, and escaped self-reactive T lymphocytes are dynamically suppressed through peripheral regulatory T cells (11). Depletion of regulatory T cells in response to environmental challenge promotes the expansion of self-reactive T lymphocytes and development of LRAs (10). The lung self-antigens are nonpolymorphic and are normally sequestered from the immune system, as they serve as scaffolds for the structural proteins (12). However, during transplantation the self-antigens might be revealed as the structural proteins are cleaved, for example through the activation of matrix metalloproteinases, allowing the preexisting LRAs to bind and promote downstream immune activation (13). These self-antigens are extravascular but the increased vascular permeability that occurs during ischemia-reperfusion injury could allow extravasation of the LRAs (14). We found that LRAs compound ischemia-reperfusion injury through the activation of complement, resulting in severe PGD. Our findings reveal pathways through which LRAs mediate lung allograft injury that can be targeted clinically.
Results
Intact LRAs promote primary graft dysfunction.
LRAs belong to the IgG family of immunoglobulins (5, 6), which are composed of Fc and F(ab′)2 fragments. The F(ab′)2 fragment exhibits sequence variability and recognizes antigens, while the Fc fragment provides interaction sites for effector molecules such as complement and Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) (15). However, F(ab′)2 can also independently interact with FcγRs to mediate immunological effects (16). To determine the pathogenicity of LRAs, we injected IgG isotype, LRAs, or the cleaved F(ab′)2 fragment into recipient mice prior to transplantation. As expected, ischemia-reperfusion injury was inherent to this model and experienced by all animals, evident by decreased lung graft function in the recipients of IgG isotype control compared with naive lung (isotype PaO2/FiO2 ratio: 452.3 ± 63 mmHg; naive PaO2/FiO2 ratio: 621.9 ± 32 mmHg; P < 0.0001). Recipients injected with whole LRA IgG molecules showed significant worsening in lung graft function (PaO2/FiO2 ratio: 104.2 ± 41 mmHg; Figure 1A) as well as increased pulmonary edema (Figure 1B), while those injected with F(ab′)2 fragments demonstrated expected levels of lung graft dysfunction resulting from ischemia-reperfusion injury (Figure 1, A and B). There was increased neutrophil infiltration determined by flow cytometry in mice with whole LRA molecules (Figure 1C) along with capillaritis and inflammatory cells found on histological analysis (Figure 1, D and E). In addition, 2-photon imaging (Figure 1F, Supplemental Figure 1, and Supplemental Videos 1 and 2; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI157975DS1) showed increased LRA deposition in the allograft after lung transplantation. Unbiased transcriptomic analysis using single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) (Supplemental Figure 2) revealed activation of several damage-associated pathways (Figure 2A), including oxidative stress (reflected as increased expression of antioxidant proteins; Figure 2B) and complement (increased C3 expression; Figure 2C) in the epithelial cells during LRA-mediated lung graft injury.
Figure 1. Preexisting whole lung-restricted antibodies (LRAs) against self-antigens induce primary graft dysfunction after syngeneic murine lung transplantation.
Recipient mice received 150 μg each (i.v.) of isotype control, LRAs (anti–collagen type V plus anti–K-α1 tubulin), or LRA F(ab′)2 portion, 24 hours before and 1 hour after lung transplantation. (A) Twenty-four hours after transplantation, arterial blood oxygenation was analyzed after clamping the right hilum (n = 3–4). Lungs were also harvested for assessment of (B) pulmonary edema (n = 3–5) and (C) neutrophils (live CD45+SiglecF–CD11b+Ly6G+) (n = 3). (D) Histology showing capillaritis and alveolar edema in mice treated with LRAs but not isotype control antibodies. Scale bar: 20 μm. (E) Inflammatory cells (both polymorpho- and mononuclear) were counted in 10 high-power fields (×40) and averaged for each group. (F) Pictures from 2-photon microscopy showing LRA (magenta) deposition. Scale bar: 50 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD. PaO2/FiO2, arterial oxygen pressure. Graphs in A–C were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Graph in E was analyzed by unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 2. Differential expression analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data from isotype- or LRA-treated murine allograft after lung transplantation within epithelial cells.
(A) Functional enrichment analysis with GO Biological Processes was performed with the significantly upregulated genes in epithelial cells from LRA-treated compared with isotype-treated murine lung allograft. (B and C) Violin plots of expression for select genes significantly upregulated in epithelial cells from LRA-treated compared with isotype-treated murine lung allograft.
LRAs activate classical and alternative complement pathways to mediate lung graft injury.
Since F(ab′)2 could not induce PGD, we reasoned that the Fc region was necessary for the pathogenic effects of LRAs. Accordingly, we investigated whether LRA-mediated lung injury occurred through FcγR or complement activation (17). Donor lungs from Fcrγ–/– mice transplanted into syngeneic recipients pretreated with LRAs experienced severe lung injury, similar to those from wild-type donor lungs (Figure 3, A and B). We used these mice, as donors and not recipients as the predominant macrophages in the donor lungs at 24 hours are of donor origin (18). This led us to further hypothesize that LRAs activate complement to induce lung graft dysfunction.
Figure 3. LRAs activate complement pathway to mediate lung graft injury.
(A) WT or Fcrγ–/– recipients received 150 μg each (i.v.) of isotype control or LRAs (anti–collagen type V plus anti–K-α1 tubulin) 24 hours before and 1 hour after lung transplantation. Arterial blood oxygenation was analyzed after clamping the right hilum (n = 4). (B) Lungs treated as in A were also harvested for neutrophil quantification (live CD45+SiglecF–CD11b+Ly6G+) (n = 3). (C) WT or Fcrγ–/– recipient mice were treated as in A. Twenty-four hours after transplantation, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was obtained and C3 concentration measured by ELISA (n = 3–6). (D) WT or C3–/– recipient mice were treated as in A. Arterial blood oxygenation was analyzed after clamping the right hilum (n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophil recruitment into lungs in mice treated as in A (neutrophil gating: live CD45+SiglecF–CD11b+Ly6G+) (n = 3–5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. PaO2/FiO2, arterial oxygen pressure. Graphs were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; NS, not significant.
We first studied component C3, as it acts as a point of convergence for the different complement pathways. Indeed, C3 levels were elevated in the BAL of grafts from wild-type or Fcrγ–/– recipients pretreated with LRAs but not in those that received isotype control (Figure 3C). Moreover, genetic deletion of C3 in recipient mice resulted in nearly complete protection against LRA-induced lung graft dysfunction (Figure 3, D and E). Next, we determined the specific complement pathway activated by LRAs using genetic deletion and pharmacological inhibition. We transplanted wild-type donor lungs into C1q–/– (classical pathway), Mbl–/– (mannose-binding lectin, lectin pathway), or FBI-treated (factor B inhibitor, alternative pathway) recipients. Each of these recipients also received LRAs or isotype control antibodies prior to the transplant. Preexisting LRAs induced severe lung graft dysfunction in Mbl–/– mice, while the C1q–/– and FBI-treated recipients were protected (Figure 4, B and C). Furthermore, treatment of recipient mice with a pharmacological C1 inhibitor (C1INH) resulted in protection of the transplanted lungs from LRA-induced injury as well as associated increases in neutrophil recruitment (Figure 4, B and C). Immunohistochemistry confirmed complement C4d deposition, a marker of classical pathway activation, in the lung grafts of LRA-treated recipients (Figure 4D). All 3 complement pathways can induce the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC). MAC assembly requires the sequential and irreversible association of complement proteins C5b, C6, C7, C8, and C9 (19, 20). Immunohistochemical analysis showed MAC deposition in grafts from LRA-recipient mice (Figure 4E). Inhibiting activation of C5, and thus the generation of C5a and MAC, has shown great therapeutic benefit in complement-driven inflammatory diseases (21). Hence, we inhibited C5 by using a C5-blocking antibody and found prevention of LRA-induced graft dysfunction (Figure 4, B and C). Together, these data suggested that LRAs activate both the classical and alternative complement pathways to mediate lung graft injury.
Figure 4. LRAs activate classical and alternative complement pathways to mediate lung graft injury.
(A) Diagram depicting experiments shown in B and C. WT, C1q–/–, or Mbl–/– recipient mice received 150 μg each (i.v.) of isotype control or LRAs (anti–collagen type V plus anti–K-α1 tubulin) 24 hours before and 1 hour after lung transplantation (Ltx). For some experiments, WT recipient mice treated with antibodies as described received C1INH, LNP023 (Factor B inhibitor, FBI), or anti-C5 neutralizing antibody. (B) Arterial blood oxygenation from mice described in A was analyzed after clamping the right hilum (n = 3). (C) Quantification of neutrophil recruitment into lungs in mice treated as described in A (neutrophil gating: live CD45+SiglecF–CD11b+Ly6G+) (n = 3–5). (D and E) Immunocytochemistry for C4d (D) and C5b-9 (E) in allografts of LRA-treated mice (right) compared with isotype-treated mice (left). Data are presented as mean ± SD. PaO2/FiO2, arterial oxygen pressure. Graphs were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; NS, not significant. Scale bars: 20 μm and 10 μm (insets).
LRA-induced lung dysfunction is complementary but distinct from ischemia-reperfusion injury.
We have previously reported that ischemia-reperfusion injury is inherent to lung transplantation and is dependent on the influx of host neutrophils into the transplanted lung through retained donor-origin pulmonary intravascular nonclassical monocytes (22, 23). To determine whether LRAs can independently induce lung graft dysfunction, we used lungs from murine Nur77–/– (Nr4a1–/–) donors, which lack nonclassical monocytes and do not experience neutrophil-mediated ischemia-reperfusion injury, as we previously reported (23). We found that transplantation of nonclassical monocyte–deficient donor lungs into LRA-pretreated recipients resulted in severe lung graft dysfunction (Figure 5, B and C). Nevertheless, it was intriguing that lung grafts in the presence of donor nonclassical monocytes revealed increased neutrophil influx when LRAs were present in the recipients prior to transplantation (Figure 1C). To determine whether neutrophils contributed to the pathogenesis of LRA-induced lung graft injury, we depleted host neutrophils using anti-Ly6G antibodies, as previously described (18) (Supplemental Figure 3). Neutrophil depletion in mice with preexisting LRAs did not prevent posttransplant lung injury, as measured by pulmonary edema (Figure 5D and Supplemental Figure 3) and PaO2/FiO2 ratio (Figure 5E). Comparison of lung function between isotype and LRA (PaO2/FiO2 [mmHg] isotype: 372.6 ± 82 [n = 3]; LRA: 93.7 ± 23 [n = 4]; P < 0.001) and isotype-IgG-control and LRA-IgG-Ly6G (PaO2/FiO2 [mmHg] isotype: 434 ± 49 [n = 3]; LRA: 190 ± 44 [n = 3]; P < 0.01) showed no protection in graft injury. These data indicated that LRA-induced lung graft dysfunction is complementary to neutrophil-mediated ischemia-reperfusion injury and predominantly occurs through complement activation.
Figure 5. LRA-induced lung dysfunction is complementary to ischemia-reperfusion injury.
(A) Diagram depicting experiment shown in B and C. WT recipient mice received 150 μg each (i.v.) of isotype control or LRAs (anti–collagen type V plus anti–K-α1 tubulin) 24 hours before and 1 hour after lung transplantation (Ltx) using donor Nr4a1–/– mice. (B) Arterial blood oxygenation from mice described in A was analyzed after clamping the right hilum (n = 3). (C) Quantification of neutrophil recruitment into lungs in mice treated as described in A (neutrophil gating: live CD45+SiglecF–CD11b+Ly6G+) (n = 3–4). (D) WT recipient mice treated as in A were injected (i.p.) with isotype or anti-Ly6G antibody 24 hours before lung transplantation and harvested for determination of pulmonary edema 24 hours after transplantation (n = 3). (E) WT recipient mice treated as described in D. Arterial blood oxygenation was analyzed after clamping the right hilum (n = 3–4). Data are presented as mean ± SD. PaO2/FiO2, arterial oxygen pressure. Graphs were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; NS, not significant.
IL-1β is necessary for vascular endothelial permeabilization and extravasation of LRAs.
The native lung of the LRA-treated recipients showed no histological evidence of injury. Additionally, there was no increase in neutrophils in the native lungs of LRA-treated recipients (neutrophils/mg lung isotype: 1685 ± 760; LRA: 1445 ± 1008). Lung-restricted antigens are present in the interstitial space (12) and, hence, we next hypothesized that extravasation of LRAs into the interstitial space, which might uniquely occur in the transplanted lung graft, was necessary for the activation of complement. We have previously shown that IL-1β can increase pulmonary vascular permeability and allow cellular extravasation (24). Hence, we tested whether release of IL-1β within the transplanted lung was necessary to permit extravasation of circulating LRAs and gain access to the antigens. We first treated primary pulmonary endothelial cells in vitro with exogenous IL-1β (50 ng/mL) and found that it significantly increased endothelial permeability and the passage of LRAs through the barrier (Figure 6A). We then transplanted wild-type, IL-1R antagonist–treated (IL-1RA–treated), or Il1r–/– lungs into wild-type LRA-treated syngeneic recipients. Donor lungs treated with IL-1RA or those from Il1r–/– mice showed preserved lung graft function (Figure 6C), decreased neutrophil influx (Figure 6D), and no C4d deposition (Figure 6E). There was no difference in graft function among the isotype and LRA group treated with IL-1RA or when Il1r–/– donor lung was used (PaO2/FiO2 [mmHg] IL-1RA–isotype: 515.7 ± 24 [n = 3]; Il1r–/–-isotype: 412 ± 141 [n = 3]; IL-1RA–LRA: 368 ± 41 [n = 3]; Il1r–/–-LRA: 404 ± 154 [n = 4]). To further investigate the role of IL-1β, we injected wild-type mice with IL-1β or PBS, 8 hours prior to injecting LRAs, and determined LRA deposition and complement activation. We found retention of LRAs (Figure 6F) with IL-1β pretreatment in naive lungs, similar to lung allografts (Supplemental Figure 1), but it was not associated with C4d deposition (Figure 6G), indicating that IL-1β is necessary for the extravasation of LRAs but not sufficient to trigger LRA-mediated complement activation.
Figure 6. IL-1β is necessary to increase vascular endothelial permeability and extravasation of LRAs.
(A) Mouse primary lung microvascular endothelial cells were seeded at 200,000 cells per insert and cultured until confluent. Monolayers were incubated for 24 hours in the absence (control, CT) or presence of 50 ng/mL IL-1β in growth medium. FITC-antibody permeability testing was performed as described in the Methods. (B) Diagram depicting experiment shown in C and D. WT recipient mice received 150 μg each (i.v.) of isotype control or LRAs (anti–collagen type V plus anti–K-α1 tubulin) 24 hours before and 1 hour after lung transplantation (Ltx). Donor lungs were from Il1r–/– mice or WT mice treated with IL-1RA 24 hours before and 1 hour after lung transplant. (C) Arterial blood oxygenation from mice described in B was analyzed after clamping the right hilum (n = 3). (D) Quantification of neutrophil recruitment into lungs in mice treated as described in B (neutrophil gating: live CD45+SiglecF–CD11b+Ly6G+) (n = 3–5). (E–G) Immunohistochemistry for C4d (E and G) and LRAs (F) in allografts of LRA-treated wild-type mice (upper) compared with LRA-treated Il1r–/– mice (lower) (E) or in lungs from PBS- or IL-1β–treated mice (F and G). Data are presented as mean ± SD. PaO2/FiO2, arterial oxygen pressure. Graphs were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Scale bars: 20 μm.
Preexisting LRAs are an independent risk of human PGD.
We prospectively analyzed LRAs in 56 patients undergoing lung transplantation. The cumulative prevalence of detectable preexisting anti-COLV and anti-KAT antibodies was 14.3% in this cohort. The demographic profile of the patients is presented in Table 1. In the study cohort, 4 (7.1%) patients developed grade 3 PGD: 2 (25%) with and 2 (4.5%) without preexisting LRAs (P = 0.09; Supplemental Table 1). Logistic regression modeling revealed that only preexisting LRAs were an independent predictor of grade 3 PGD after lung transplantation (Supplemental Table 2 and Table 2). In patients with preexisting LRAs, apostreperfusion biopsy was performed at 60 minutes. Both patients with preexisting LRAs who developed grade 3 PGD revealed histological features reminiscent of acute antibody-mediated rejection with complement (C4d) deposition (Supplemental Figure 4). These patients were treated with the complement inhibitor eculizumab, along with plasma exchange, and experienced resolution of lung allograft dysfunction (Supplemental Figure 4).
Table 1. Characteristics of patients in study cohort.
Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis: predictors of postoperative primary graft dysfunction.
Discussion
Neutrophil-mediated ischemia-reperfusion injury is suggested to be the predominant cause of PGD (1, 25). However, it is evident that the syndrome of PGD includes etiologies other than ischemia-reperfusion injury. Preexisting LRAs are present in a significant proportion of patients undergoing lung transplantation and are strongly associated with an increased risk of PGD (6). Studies in which right and left lungs from single donors were transplanted into different recipients with or without autoantibodies have further suggested their role in the pathogenesis of PGD (26). However, the mechanistic pathways through which LRAs contribute to PGD remain unclear. Importantly, the relationship between LRA-induced graft dysfunction and classical pathways that contribute to transplant-inherent ischemia-reperfusion injury remains unknown. Our current study identifies clinically actionable pathways through which preexisting LRAs add to ischemia-reperfusion injury to worsen PGD. Given that the LRAs caused severe lung graft injury even when neutrophil-mediated ischemia-reperfusion injury was mitigated, we postulate that treatment of LRA-induced lung graft injury could result in amelioration of PGD and improvement in posttransplant outcomes.
The complement system is an essential part of the innate immune system that has been associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury and transplantation (27). Indeed, PGD has been associated with complement deposition, although whether these transplant recipients had preexisting LRAs is unknown (28). Additionally, while preexisting LRAs have also been associated with complement deposition in lung grafts, whether they can activate complement remains unclear (26). The classical complement pathway depends on the binding of C1q protein to antibody attached to antigen, activating C1r and C1s, which cleave C4 and C2. The lectin complement pathway is activated when mannose-binding lectin (MBL) interacts with carbohydrate motifs on pathogens. This results in the activation of MBL-associated proteases, which also cleave C4 and C2. Hence, both classical and lectin pathways form C3 convertase after cleaving C4 and C2 and initiate the downstream proteins. In contrast, the alternative pathway is activated by spontaneous hydrolysis of C3, in the presence of Factors B and D, leading to the eventual formation of the C3 and C5 convertase. In the alternative pathway, properdin plays an important role as it stabilizes the protein. All 3 pathways culminate in the formation of effector compounds (29). Since deletion of MBL did not alter the graft injury in LRA-pretreated mice, we conclude that the lectin pathway is not involved. However, C1q and Factor B inhibition prevented LRA-induced lung graft dysfunction, suggesting a role for classical and alternative complement pathways in this model. Our findings also explain the immunological mechanisms behind the reported detection of complement proteins in patients with PGD (30). However, the differences with our study might be related to our focus on LRAs, where IgG glycosylation might have a less relevant role than C1q binding to the Fc portion of IgG. It is also noteworthy that while LRAs might activate host cellular immunity and phagocytosis by binding FcγRs on target cells, those did not contribute to the LRA-mediated graft dysfunction since Fcrγ–/– donor lungs experienced similar injury to that of wild-type grafts. Our findings have immediate clinical implications since complement inhibitors are FDA approved and commercially available.
Unlike histocompatibility antigens, the cognate self-antigens for the LRAs are nonpolymorphic and conserved (31). Ischemia-reperfusion can reveal epitopes of self-antigens that typically serve as structural lung proteins (32), possibly through the activation of matrix metalloproteinases (5, 33–35). Exposure of the self-antigens can then promote the binding with LRAs (7). We have also previously shown that donor-origin nonclassical monocytes retained in the pulmonary vasculature initiate the pathogenesis of ischemia-reperfusion injury through the recruitment of recipient neutrophils (22, 23). Simultaneously, donor nonclassical monocytes activate donor alveolar macrophages, which secrete monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, necessary for the mobilization of classical monocytes from the recipient spleen (18, 24). Upon migration to the transplanted lung allograft, the recipient classical monocytes increase the pulmonary vasculature permeability through the release of IL-1β, allowing the neutrophils to extravasate and initiate the pathogenesis of ischemia-reperfusion injury (24). We found that increased endothelial permeability mediated by IL-1β was also necessary for the extravasation of LRAs into the extravascular space and initiation of LRA-induced lung graft injury. Nevertheless, LRAs caused lung injury even when donor nonclassical monocytes were depleted, which results in incomplete recruitment of recipient classical monocytes (18, 24). This may suggest alternative sources of IL-1β production or the ability of even low levels of IL-1β to cause sufficient endothelial permeability to allow LRA extravasation. Interestingly, administration of IL-1β into wild-type naive mice induced extravasation of LRAs into the lung interstitium without activating complement (Figure 6). It is known that the lung self-antigens, COLV and KAT, are normally sequestered, typically forming scaffolds for larger structural proteins such as collagen type I (36). As such, the immunogenic epitopes of these self-antigens are not accessible to the immune system or the extravasated antibodies in resting mice. When we administered IL-1β to permeabilize the vascular endothelium, the circulating LRAs extravasated into the interstitium but were unable to activate complement, as they did not bind to their cognate antigen. In contrast, during ischemia-reperfusion injury, there is activation of catalytic enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (37), which can cleave these self-antigens, enabling the formation of LRA-antigen immune complex and activation of complement. Hence, these findings suggest the need for both IL-1β and ischemia-reperfusion injury to activate the complement and induce C4d deposition (38, 39). Together, these data suggest that while the mechanisms of LRA-induced injury are distinct from ischemia-reperfusion injury, the molecular and immunological changes during ischemia-reperfusion are necessary for the pathogenicity of LRAs. Our findings also suggest inhibition of IL-1β or the IL-1β receptor as a therapy to prevent both ischemia-reperfusion and LRA-associated injury. Notably, canakinumab and anakinra, agents that block IL-1β and the IL-1β receptor, respectively, have relatively benign short-term safety profiles and have received FDA approval for other indications.
Our study has limitations. First, we cannot determine whether prophylaxis or desensitization against LRAs is beneficial in our model. Second, it is difficult to distinguish between antibody-mediated rejection and ischemia-reperfusion injury clinically based on histologic features alone. Histological features such as alveolar edema, neutrophil infiltration, and capillaritis can be observed in both ischemia-reperfusion injury as well as antibody-mediated rejection, although the presence of complement deposition may favor the former (6, 40–43). Future prospective studies, potentially including transcriptional profiling (Figure 2), are necessary to distinguish pathological and molecular features to better characterize these disease states and enable delivery of therapies in the correct clinical context. Recently, exosomes containing lung-restricted antigens have been detected during PGD in patients containing LRAs and could potentially be tested as a biomarker (44). Given the potential for complications associated with severe immunosuppression, prophylactic use of complement inhibitors in patients with LRAs is not scientifically justified. Instead, the approach in our center is to use histology and complement staining, when clinically feasible, to guide the use of complement inhibitors (45). Nevertheless, this should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Third, while we tested the known LRAs associated with PGD in patients and causally linked to lung graft injury in animal models, we acknowledge that it is unclear whether there are other immunogenic lung-specific antigens. Future studies incorporating contemporary techniques in proteomics and mass spectroscopy can potentially identify these proteins as well as their immunogenic epitopes. Fourth, while only 2 patients developed features reminiscent of antibody-mediated rejection, their response to treatment combined with our preclinical data provides the foundation for a prospective clinical trial. Fifth, while we found that neutrophils are recruited during LRA-induced lung injury above the expected levels during ischemia-reperfusion injury, the mechanisms remain unknown. Donor nonclassical monocytes play a dominant role in recruiting host neutrophils through the secretion of chemokines and it is possible that the LRA-antigen complex may enhance donor nonclassical monocytes by binding CD16.
In conclusion, we found that, in lung transplants, IL-1β increased pulmonary endothelial permeability to allow the extravasation of LRAs. Binding of LRAs to cognate self-antigens in the pulmonary interstitium and ischemia-reperfusion caused the activation of classical and alternative complement pathways, which contributed to the immunopathogenesis of PGD, independent of neutrophil-mediated ischemia-reperfusion injury. C5-inhibiting antibodies as well as Factor B inhibition mitigated LRA-associated lung graft dysfunction in humans and mice.
Methods
Mice and procedures
Male wild-type C57BL/6J (B6), Fcrγ–/–, Il1r–/–, C1qa–/–, C3–/–, Mbl–/–, and Nr4a–/– mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. IL-1RA (0.2 ng/g body weight i.v.; Sigma-Aldrich) was used for IL-1β–IL-1R antagonism. C1INH (0.4 U/g body weight, Berinert, CSL Behring) and LNP023 (Factor B inhibitor, 30 μg/g body weight, Adooq Bioscience) were injected i.v. in recipients 24 hours before and 1 hour after lung transplantation. IL-1β (10 μg/kg, i.v.; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was injected 8 hours prior to LRA injection. Neutrophils were depleted by using anti-Ly6G antibody (12.5 mg/kg body weight; Bio X Cell, clone 1A8). Complement C5 was inhibited by using a C5-blocking antibody (100 μg/mouse, 1 hour before lung transplant; provided by Alexion Pharmaceuticals). Control mice were treated with the same amounts of IgG isotype control antibody (Bio X Cell). All mice were maintained in a specific pathogen–free facility at the Center for Comparative Medicine at Northwestern University and used for the described experiments at the age of 9–14 weeks and between 24 and 28 g of body weight.
Mouse lung transplant.
Orthotropic murine left lung transplantation was performed as previously described (46). Briefly, donor mouse was anesthetized with a mixture of xylazine (10 mg/kg) and ketamine (100 mg/kg). Donor lungs were flushed through the pulmonary artery with 3 mL of saline solution and the heart-lung block was excised and kept in cooled (4°C) preservative solution. The bronchus, pulmonary vein, and artery were dissected and prepared for anastomosis. A customized cuff made with a Teflon intravenous catheter was applied to the vascular structures and fixated with a 10-0 nylon ligature. After placement of a microvessel clip on the bronchus to avoid airway infiltration with preservative solution, the graft was stored at 4°C for a period of 90 to 120 minutes of cold ischemic time prior to implantation. The recipient mouse received subcutaneous buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) 30 minutes prior to the thoracic surgical incision and every 6 hours as needed after the transplant procedure. The recipient mouse was intubated and a left-sided thoracotomy was performed within the third intercostal space. The recipient’s native lung was gently clamped and pulled out of the thoracic cavity. The space between the artery, the vein, and the bronchus was dissected separately. The artery and vein were temporarily occluded using 8-0 nylon ligatures. The anastomoses were completed by fixating each cuff with 10-0 nylon ligatures. The 8-0 ligatures were released (first vein, then artery) and the lung inflated. The chest incision was closed and recipients separated from the ventilator when spontaneous respiration resumed. No antibiotics or immunosuppressive agents were used postoperatively in any group. LRAs were administered i.v. in recipient mouse: 150 μg each (anti-COLV and anti-KAT) or 300 μg isotype rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific) 24 hours before and 1 hour after lung transplantation.
Antibodies against KAT and COLV
Rabbit polyclonal IgG antibodies against KAT and COLV were produced against KAT and COLV proteins as previously described (47). Purified antibodies were endotoxin free by limulus amebocyte lysate assay. F(ab′)2 fragments of IgG antibodies against KAT and COLV were prepared with a Pierce F(ab′)2 Preparation Kit, as described by the manufacturer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For 2-photon microscopy, anti-COLV antibody was conjugated to R-PE using a PE/R-Phycoerythrin Conjugation Kit - Lightning-Link (Abcam, ab102918).
Arterial blood gases
Arterial blood gases were measured using a fraction of inspired oxygen of 100% after the right pulmonary hilum was clamped for 5 minutes (8). Blood was collected by left ventricular puncture.
Wet to dry weight ratio
The transplanted left lung was harvested after reperfusion at defined time points, weighed, and then placed at 54°C until a stable dry weight was achieved. The ratio of wet weight to dry weight was then calculated as an indicator of pulmonary edema.
Flow cytometry
Mouse lung was digested and single-cell suspensions were prepared as previously described (46). Cell suspensions underwent red blood cell lysis using Pharm Lyse buffer (BD Biosciences). Live/dead staining was performed in protein-free solution (HBSS) using fixable viability dye eFluor 506 (eBioscience), followed by incubation with FcR-blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec). Antibodies utilized for murine cell staining included rat anti–mouse CD45–FITC (BioLegend, 30-F11), rat anti–mouse Ly6C–eFluor450 (eBiosciences, HK1.4), rat anti–mouse I-A/I-E–PerCPCy5.5 (BioLegend, M5/114.15.2), rat anti–mouse CD45–APC (BioLegend, 30-F11), rat anti–mouse Ly6G–Alexa Fluor 700 (BioLegend, 1A8), rat anti–mouse NK1.1–Alexa Fluor 700 (BD, PK136), rat anti–mouse CD11b–APCCy7 (BioLegend, M1/70), rat anti–mouse CD64–PE (BioLegend, X54-5/7.1), rat anti–mouse SiglecF–PECF594 (BD, E50-2440), and rat anti–mouse CD11c–PECy7 (BD, HL3). For neutrophil quantification, 123Count eBeads (Invitrogen) were added. Flow analysis of fixed samples was done on a BD FACSymphony A5-Laser Analyzer at the Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Core facility. Acquired data were analyzed with FlowJo v10.8 (FlowJo).
Histology
Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and analyzed blindly. Images were obtained on a Nikon Eclipse microscope or Olympus DP-71, and morphometric analysis was performed using Nikon Elements software. Analysis was performed on 10 different areas of the lungs, and at least 10 high-powered fields were analyzed in each area.
Single-cell RNA-seq
Single-cell suspensions from 24-hour posttransplant allografts from isotype- or LRA-treated mice were prepared as described previously (18). Allograft was removed and digested with 3 mL Dispase (Corning) with DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich), and gently teased using forceps into small (1–2 mm) fragments followed by incubation at room temperature with gentle agitation for 30 minutes. The resulting suspension (in DMEM + 5% FBS) was passed through a 70 μm cell strainer, erythrocytes were lysed, and filtered through 40 μm cell strainers. Cells were counted using AO/PI and Cellometer K2 (Nexcelom), and cell viability exceeded 90%. Single-cell 3′ RNA-seq libraries were prepared using Chromium Single Cell V2 Reagent Kit and Controller (10× Genomics). Libraries were assessed for quality (TapeStation 4200, Agilent) and then sequenced on a NextSeq 500 or HiSeq 4000 instrument (Illumina). Initial data processing was performed using the Cell Ranger version 6.0 pipeline (10× Genomics), and reads were mapped to mm10 version of the mouse genome, Ensemble build 105. Ambient RNA contamination was removed by the SoupX package (48). Doublets were evaluated by scrublet and removed (49). Downstream single-cell RNA-seq analysis was performed using Seurat Package version 4.0 following the standard workflow posted on the Satija lab website (https://satijalab.org/seurat/) (50). Cells with unique feature counts less than 200 or over 7500 were removed. Cells with RNA counts less than 400 or over 40,000 were removed. Cells having greater than 10% mitochondrial counts were removed. The data were normalized by the “LogNormalize” method and variable features were selected by “vst” method. Reciprocal principal component analysis was used for the data integration. Cell types were identified using both manual annotations based on positive markers from FindAllMarkers function in the Seurat pipeline and a supervised annotation tool, SingleR (51). The RNA-seq data can be found in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus repository (GEO GSE211501).
Two-photon intravital lung microscopy.
Two-photon intravital lung microscopy imaging was performed using a Nikon A1R-MP+ multiphoton microscope system with a Coherent Chameleon Vision titanium sapphire laser. As previously described (18), mice were anesthetized with an i.p. injection of ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), intubated orotracheally, and ventilated with room air at a rate of 120 breaths/minute with a tidal volume of 0.5 mL. A left thoracotomy was performed to expose the left lung, and the lung was imaged using a custom-built chamber maintained at 37°C. Vetbond was used to attach the lung tissue to the bottom of the cover glass without direct pressure on the exposed lung. For time-lapse imaging of location and extent of anti-COLV–PE deposition in lungs, we averaged 37 video-rate frames (0.5 seconds per slice) during the acquisition to match the ventilator rate and minimize movement artifacts. To visualize blood vessels, 25 μL of FITC-dextran (2 × 106 Da, 5 mg/mL, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 25 μL of PBS was injected i.v. 5 minutes prior to imaging. For each mouse, images of 512 × 512 μm in the x and y dimensions were acquired for 5 minutes prior to and for 15 minutes following injection of anti-COLV–PE (1 mg/kg i.v.) using a water immersion lens (Apo LWD 25× 1.10W DIC N2) at an excitation wavelength tuned at 1000 nm. Images were processed and analyzed using Nikon NIS-Elements NIS.ai and Bitplane Imaris software for background/fluorophore spillover subtraction and fluorescence quantification of deposited fluorophores. Data were transferred and plotted in GraphPad Prism 9.0 (Sun Microsystems) for analysis and creation of graphs.
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
The right pulmonary hilum was clamped, and left lung bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was obtained by instilling lung airways 2 times with 0.5 mL PBS. BALF was centrifuged and the supernatant was used for complement C3 determination.
ELISA
Mouse complement C3 ELISAs were performed using commercially available kits accordingly to the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam). To determine autoantibodies in patients’ serum, LABScreen autoantibody kits (LSAUT1-3, One Lambda) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Immunohistochemistry
Mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and lung tissues were excised and fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin. Paraffin-embedded sections were incubated with rabbit anti-C4d IgG (1:200, overnight at 4°C; Hycult Biotech, HP8033) or rabbit anti–C5b-9 IgG (Bioss Antibodies, bs-2673R) and then successively reacted with donkey anti–rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 488) (1:500, 1 hour at room temperature; Abcam, ab150073). For LRA deposition, paraffin-embedded sections were incubated directly with with donkey anti–rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 488) as above. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (MilliporeSigma). Confocal images were acquired using a Zeiss Axio Imager Z2 with ApoTome.2 microscope equipped with Axiocam 503 Mono, X-Cite 120 LED Boost System and Zen 2.3 software (Carl Zeiss).
In vitro endothelial cell permeability
Lung primary microvascular endothelial cells (Cell Biologics, C57-6011) were grown in phenol red–free endothelial cell medium (ScienCell), seeded in collagen-coated inserts, and permeability was determined using a vascular permeability assay kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Millipore). FITC-conjugated anti-COLV antibody, labeled using a FITC Conjugation Kit (Fast) - Lightning-Link (Abcam), was added to wells in the absence or presence of 50 ng/mL recombinant mouse IL-1β (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and fluorescence was red with a plate reader with filters appropriate for 485 nm and 535 nm excitation and emission, respectively.
Definition of primary graft dysfunction
Patients with no evidence of pulmonary edema on chest x-ray were considered grade 0. Absence of invasive mechanical ventilation was graded according to the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, using methods similar to those receiving mechanical ventilation. If PaO2 was not available for calculation of a PaO2/FiO2 ratio, then an oxygen saturation/FiO2 ratio was used for calculations. Grade 3: PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200. The worst PaO2/FiO2 ratio within 72 hours after lung transplantation was used. Use of extracorporeal lung support with bilateral pulmonary edema on chest x-ray image was considered grade 3.
Immunosuppressive therapy
All lung transplant recipients received standardized immunosuppressive therapy. Methylprednisolone 500 mg i.v. intraoperatively and basiliximab 20 mg i.v. intraoperatively and postoperative day (POD) 4 were given as induction immunosuppressive therapy.
Maintenance immunosuppression was conducted as follows: Prednisone 0.5 mg/kg p.o. daily from POD 1, mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg i.v. bid from POD 1, and tacrolimus 0.015 mg/kg total daily dose sublingual, targeting from 8 to 12 ng/mL.
Patients with LRAs that developed PGD underwent treatment for antibody-mediated rejection using i.v. methylprednisolone (1000 mg) for 3 days, and daily plasmapheresis for 3 days followed by i.v. immunoglobulin (1 mg/kg) and eculizumab (1200 mg, 900 mg, and 600 mg on days 1, 2, and 3).
Statistics
Murine.
Mouse data analysis was performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software). Results are expressed as mean ± SD and the n values for each data set are provided in the figure legends. Statistical significance was assessed by 2-tailed Student’s t test or 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Human.
Incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation was compared between the LRA-positive and LRA-negative groups. Continuous variables were compared using a 2-tailed Student’s t test and are reported as mean ± SD. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test and are reported as numbers (percentages). P values of less than 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant. A logistic regression model was used to derive odds ratios and 95% CIs. To build our models, we performed a univariate analysis and included all predictors if the test had a P value of 0.2 or less. To assess the overall goodness of fit, we used Gronnesby’s and Borgan’s tests. Statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). It is a modified version of R commander designed to add statistical functions frequently used in biostatistics.
Study approval
Murine.
All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IS00010493) at Northwestern University. Animals received humane care in compliance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, 2011) and the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care formulated by the National Society for Medical Research.
Human.
Patient data were collected retrospectively using the electronic medical records and stored in a database. A total of 56 adult patients undergoing lung transplantation at our institution were prospectively tested for antibodies. This study was approved by The Northwestern University Institutional Review Board (STU00207250). However, the need for patient consent for data collection was waived by the IRB as this was a retrospective study.
Author contributions
WY, EL, and DK contributed to conceptualization, study design, methodology, data collection, validation, formal analysis, and manuscript writing. EJC, FLNS, YY, NK, and CK contributed to formal analysis and methodology. QW, AY, and HS conducted experiments. XL, DAP, GRSB, and TM contributed to formal analysis, visualization, and manuscript writing. AB contributed to conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing, visualization, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grants HL145478, HL147290, and HL147575. DK is supported by NIH grants 1P01AI116501, R01HL094601, and R01HL151078, The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital. The Northwestern University Flow Cytometry Core Facility and Center for Advanced Microscopy/Nikon Imaging Center (CAM) are generously supported by NCI CCSG P30 CA060553, awarded to the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center. We thank Suchitra Swaminathan, director of the Flow Cytometry Core Facility, for providing professional technical assistance.
Version 1. 10/17/2022
Electronic publication
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: DK has a pending patent entitled “Compositions and methods for detecting CCR2 receptors” (application number 15/611,577) not directly relevant to this manuscript.
Copyright: © 2022, Yang et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2022;132(20):e157975.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI157975.
Contributor Information
Wenbin Yang, Email: wenbin-yang@northwestern.edu.
Emily Jeong Cerier, Email: emily.cerier@northwestern.edu.
Qiang Wu, Email: qiang.wu@northwestern.edu.
Yuanqing Yan, Email: yuanqing.yan@northwestern.edu.
Xianpeng Liu, Email: xianpeng.liu@northwestern.edu.
Anjana Yeldandi, Email: a-yeldandi@northwestern.edu.
Nigar Khurram, Email: nigar.khurram@nm.org.
Haiying Sun, Email: h-sun@northwestern.edu.
G.R. Scott Budinger, Email: s-budinger@northwestern.edu.
Daniel Kreisel, Email: kreiseld@wustl.edu.
Thalachallour Mohanakumar, Email: tm.kumar@dignityhealth.org.
Emilia Lecuona, Email: e-lecuona@northwestern.edu.
Ankit Bharat, Email: abharat@nm.org.
References
- 1.Christie JD, et al. Report of the ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction part I: introduction and methods. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24(10):1451–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bharat A, et al. Immunological link between primary graft dysfunction and chronic lung allograft rejection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(1):189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morrison MI, et al. Pathophysiology and classification of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(10):4084–4097. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wilkey BJ, Abrams BA. Mitigation of primary graft dysfunction in lung transplantation: current understanding and hopes for the future. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;24(1):54–66. doi: 10.1177/1089253219881980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Iwata T, et al. Anti-type V collagen humoral immunity in lung transplant primary graft dysfunction. J Immunol. 2008;181(8):5738–5747. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bharat A, et al. Antibodies to self-antigens predispose to primary lung allograft dysfunction and chronic rejection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(4):1094–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wilkes DS. Autoantibody formation in human and rat studies of chronic rejection and primary graft dysfunction. Semin Immunol. 2012;24(2):131–135. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bharat A, et al. Lung-restricted antibodies mediate primary graft dysfunction and prevent allotolerance after murine lung transplantation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2016;55(4):532–541. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0077OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zaffiri L, et al. Collagen type-V is a danger signal associated with primary graft dysfunction in lung transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2019;56:101224. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2019.101224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chiu S, et al. Lung injury combined with loss of regulatory T cells leads to de novo lung-restricted autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2016;197(1):51–57. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Legoux FP, et al. CD4+ T cell tolerance to tissue-restricted self antigens is mediated by antigen-specific regulatory T cells rather than deletion. Immunity. 2015;43(5):896–908. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iwata T, et al. Lung transplant ischemia reperfusion injury: metalloprotease inhibition down-regulates exposure of type V collagen, growth-related oncogene-induced neutrophil chemotaxis, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression. Transplantation. 2008;85(3):417–426. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31815e91b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haque MA, et al. Evidence for immune responses to a self-antigen in lung transplantation: role of type V collagen-specific T cells in the pathogenesis of lung allograft rejection. J Immunol. 2002;169(3):1542–1549. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.3.1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Akbarpour M, Bharat A. Lung injury and loss of regulatory T cells primes for lung-restricted autoimmunity. Crit Rev Immunol. 2017;37(1):23–37. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2017024944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yanaka S, et al. Biophysical characterization of dynamic structures of immunoglobulin G. Biophys Rev. 2020;12(3):637–645. doi: 10.1007/s12551-020-00698-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yogo R, et al. The Fab portion of immunoglobulin G contributes to its binding to Fcγ receptor III. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48323-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Karsten CM, Kohl J. The immunoglobulin, IgG Fc receptor and complement triangle in autoimmune diseases. Immunobiology. 2012;217(11):1067–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kurihara C, et al. Crosstalk between nonclassical monocytes and alveolar macrophages mediates transplant ischemia-reperfusion injury through classical monocyte recruitment. JCI Insight. 2021;6(6):e147282. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.147282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Serna M, et al. Structural basis of complement membrane attack complex formation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10587. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bayly-Jones C, et al. The mystery behind membrane insertion: a review of the complement membrane attack complex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017;372(1726):20160221. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reichhardt MP, et al. An inhibitor of complement C5 provides structural insights into activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(1):362–370. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909973116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li W, et al. Necroptosis triggers spatially restricted neutrophil-mediated vascular damage during lung ischemia reperfusion injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(10):e2111537119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111537119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zheng Z, et al. Donor pulmonary intravascular nonclassical monocytes recruit recipient neutrophils and mediate primary lung allograft dysfunction. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(394):eaal4508. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal4508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hsiao HM, et al. Spleen-derived classical monocytes mediate lung ischemia-reperfusion injury through IL-1β. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(7):2833–2847. doi: 10.1172/JCI98436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Porteous MK, et al. Primary graft dysfunction: lessons learned about the first 72 h after lung transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20(5):506–514. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fernandez R, et al. Humoral human lung allograft rejection by tissue-restricted non-HLA antibodies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(4):e339–e341. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Howard MC, et al. Complement in ischaemia-reperfusion injury and transplantation. Semin Immunopathol. 2021;43(6):789–797. doi: 10.1007/s00281-021-00896-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ngo C, et al. C4d detection and histological patterns in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation: a single-centre study. Histopathology. 2019;74(7):988–996. doi: 10.1111/his.13823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pouw RB, Ricklin D. Tipping the balance: intricate roles of the complement system in disease and therapy. Semin Immunopathol. 2021;43(6):757–771. doi: 10.1007/s00281-021-00892-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kulkarni HS, et al. Local complement activation is associated with primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. JCI Insight. 2020;5(17):e138358. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.138358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guerder S, et al. Differential processing of self-antigens by subsets of thymic stromal cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24(1):99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yoshida S, et al. Anti-type V collagen lymphocytes that express IL-17 and IL-23 induce rejection pathology in fresh and well-healed lung transplants. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(4):724–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Linsenmayer TF, et al. Type V collagen: molecular structure and fibrillar organization of the chicken alpha 1(V) NH2-terminal domain, a putative regulator of corneal fibrillogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1993;121(5):1181–1189. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.5.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zheng L, et al. Scar collagen deposition in the airways of allografts of lung transplant recipients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(6):2072–2077. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Burlingham WJ, et al. IL-17-dependent cellular immunity to collagen type V predisposes to obliterative bronchiolitis in human lung transplants. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(11):3498–3506. doi: 10.1172/JCI28031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Parra ER, et al. Interstitial and vascular type V collagen morphologic disorganization in usual interstitial pneumonia. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54(12):1315–1325. doi: 10.1369/jhc.6A6969.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Soccal PM, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition decreases ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(1):41–50. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Danobeitia JS, et al. The role of complement in the pathogenesis of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2014;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-7-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bongoni AK, et al. A potent truncated form of human soluble CR1 is protective in a mouse model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01423-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Levine DJ, et al. Antibody-mediated rejection of the lung: A consensus report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(4):397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Loupy A, Lefaucheur C. Antibody-mediated rejection of solid-organ allografts. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(12):1150–1160. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1802677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Roux A, et al. Banff Lung Report: current knowledge and future research perspectives for diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) Am J Transplant. 2019;19(1):21–31. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Calabrese F, et al. Alveolar septal widening as an “alert” signal to look into lung antibody-mediated rejection: a multicenter pilot study. Transplantation. 2019;103(11):2440–2447. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gunasekaran M, et al. Donor-derived exosomes with lung self-antigens in human lung allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(2):474–484. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Akbarpour M, et al. Clinical relevance of lung-restricted antibodies in lung transplantation. Hum Immunol. 2019;80(8):595–601. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Akbarpour M, et al. Residual endotoxin induces primary graft dysfunction through ischemia/reperfusion-primed alveolar macrophages. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(8):4456–4469. doi: 10.1172/JCI135838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Subramanian V, et al. Immune response to tissue-restricted self-antigens induces airway inflammation and fibrosis following murine lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(10):2359–2366. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Young MD, Behjati S. SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. Gigascience. 2020;9(12):giaa151. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wolock SL, et al. Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data. Cell Syst. 2019;8(4):281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Satija R, et al. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):495–502. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aran D, et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(2):163–172. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0276-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.