Skip to main content
Materials logoLink to Materials
. 2022 Oct 6;15(19):6940. doi: 10.3390/ma15196940

Low Temperature Transient Liquid Phase Bonding of Alumina Ceramics with the Bi2O3-ZnO Interlayer

Maria Stosz 1,2, Sathya Narayanasamy 1,*, Thomas Graule 1, Dariusz Kata 2, Gurdial Blugan 1,*
Editor: Dinesh Agrawal
PMCID: PMC9571489  PMID: 36234279

Abstract

Alumina ceramics were joined by a transient liquid phase (TLP) bonding method at relatively lower temperatures, using mixed powders of Bi2O3 and ZnO with different weight ratios as interlayers between the ceramic components. Bonding was achieved at 750 °C for several of the prepared interlayer mixtures, which makes the applied approach attractive due to the relatively lower joining temperature and potentially low fabrication costs. Measurements by SEM and EDX were used to study the microstructure and chemical analysis of the obtained joints. It also allowed us to investigate the diffusion mechanism occurring in the systems, which resulted in the hypothesis that Zn2+/ZnO diffuses through the ceramics. XRD and Raman spectra were acquired to examine the reaction products that formed during the thermal treatment. The results showed that both ZnO and Bi2O3 react with each other as well as with alumina to form spinel and other products.

Keywords: joining, interlayer, bonding, transient-liquid-phase bonding, joining of ceramics, low-temperature joining

1. Introduction

Ceramic materials are known for their very specific properties. They usually have good durability, and they are often thermally resistant [1,2,3,4]. However, in many cases, the manufacturing of ceramics is challenging. It requires using high processing temperatures and it consists of several stages, which additionally makes the fabrication a time-consuming process. Hence, the whole process generates significant costs and leads to complications. Due to the application of multiple steps during the manufacturing process, defects like cracks and pores are extremely hard to avoid. Furthermore, preparing parts with a complicated shape is difficult [5,6]. Therefore, it is very important to develop new techniques for manufacturing ceramic materials to make the process more affordable. One of the approaches involves creating simpler and smaller components at first and then joining them together by using an interlayer made of a similar/different material. The joining processes are carried out at a higher temperature and often under high pressure [7,8]. The transient liquid phase (TLP) bonding method is nowadays gaining more and more attention among brazing and diffusion bonding techniques [9,10,11,12]. TLP owes its popularity to the lower process temperatures and generally higher fracture strengths of the obtained joints [13,14,15].

TLP bonding is also known as diffusion brazing or isothermal solidification [16]. An interlayer is inserted between the two substrates that need to be joined. During the joining process, a thin liquid phase forms at the contact point between the ceramic surface and the interlayer. Similar to brazing, the ability to wet the ceramic components with the liquid composition should be significant [17,18,19]. There are two main possible paths to achieve the liquid phase during joining. In the first one, the joining temperature is in the same range as the melting point of the interlayer material. The second approach involves the formation of eutectic products between the interlayer and the base material, typically at a temperature that is lower than the melting point of the interlayer [20]. During the TLP bonding process, the ceramic parts are joined until the liquid phase becomes isothermally solidified [21].

Alumina is used more frequently for research purposes as one of the most popular oxide ceramic material due to its thermal, electrical and mechanical properties [22,23]. It is widely used in many fields and finding new techniques for fabricating complicated parts in a simple and economical way is very important. Bulk alumina was previously joined by TLP bonding, mostly by applying metallic interlayers [24,25,26,27]. Among oxide interlayers, B2O3 and Bi2O3 were used to join ceramics at a relatively lower temperature [28,29]. B2O3 has a low melting point and forms compounds with alumina during joining at temperatures above 700 °C [28]. In this study, Bi2O3 was chosen for the low value of its melting point and proven reaction with alumina to form sillenite-type phases [29,30,31]. Joining of alumina ceramics with Bi2O3 was achieved in the literature at 850 °C and above [29]. However, this material has one disadvantage. Its linear coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) is 14 × 10−6 K−1, which is significantly higher than that of alumina (around 7 × 10−6 K−1) [32]. This difference can create stresses during the cooling phase of the system consisting of alumina and Bi2O3 after thermal treatment, which can lead to a lower quality of bonding. To overcome this issue, ZnO was introduced to the Bi2O3 interlayer. The linear coefficient of thermal expansion of ZnO is 4.8 × 10−6 K−1 [33]. Therefore, it could be possible that the thermal stresses in a well-mixed Bi2O3-ZnO system with alumina could be lower than a system with only Bi2O3 and alumina. Moreover, it is known in the literature that ZnO reacts with alumina, forming a spinel phase [34,35]. It can be suggested that adding it to the reaction system could improve the strength of joints. Furthermore, its phase diagram with Bi2O3 shows that the addition of even a small quantity of ZnO reduces the temperature of the liquid phase formation in the Bi2O3-ZnO system to 738 °C [36]. Hence, the bonding process based on the TLP mechanism might be possible at a lower temperature, which is an added benefit for systems requiring lower assembly/joining temperatures due to other temperature-sensitive components.

2. Materials and Methods

Bonding experiments were performed using alumina discs (purity 99.7%, density 99.5%) with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 1 mm. The linear coefficient of thermal expansion of the used material at room temperature is equal to 7.2 × 10−6 K−1. Their surfaces were cleaned ultrasonically for 15 min in acetone and in ethanol. Then they were dried in air. Bi2O3 powder with a purity of 99.995% and average size of 10 μm, and ZnO powder with a purity of 99.999% from Alfa Aesar by Thermo Fisher (Kendel, Germany) GmbH, were used as components of interlayers. Different compositions of powders, ranging from 0 to 30% weight of ZnO (Table 1), were mixed with acetone to form a slurry and then deposited on the alumina disks surfaces. The compositions were chosen based on the Bi2O3-ZnO phase diagram to examine most of the different zones present on it [36]. After the evaporation of the solvent, clean ceramic components were placed on top of the coated disks to form a sandwiched structure. Joining experiments were performed in the resistance furnace (PYROTEC Brennofenbau GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany) at temperatures ranging from 700 to 760 °C, with a heating and cooling rate equal to 60 °C/h. No additional pressure was applied, and the dwell time of experiments were either 2 or 3 h.

Table 1.

Details and results of conducted joining experiments.

Interlayer Temperature [°C] Dwell Time [h] Result
Bi2O3 700 2 No bonding
Bi2O3-5% ZnO 700 2 No bonding
Bi2O3-10% ZnO 700 2 No bonding
Bi2O3-15% ZnO 700 2 No bonding
Bi2O3 725 3 No bonding
Bi2O3-5% ZnO 725 3 No bonding
Bi2O3-10% ZnO 725 3 No bonding
Bi2O3-15% ZnO 725 3 No bonding
Bi2O3 750 3 Weak bonding
Bi2O3-0.5% ZnO 750 3 Weak bonding
Bi2O3-2% ZnO 750 3 Weak bonding
Bi2O3-5% ZnO 750 3 Strong bonding *
Bi2O3-10% ZnO 750 3 Strong bonding *
Bi2O3-15% ZnO 750 3 Strong bonding *
Bi2O3-20% ZnO 750 3 Strong bonding *
Bi2O3-25% ZnO 750 3 Strong bonding *
Bi2O3-30% ZnO 750 3 Weak bonding
Bi2O3-0.5% ZnO 760 3 Weak bonding
Bi2O3-2% ZnO 760 3 Weak bonding

* Interlayers were selected for further investigation.

Bonded samples with a stronger durability were covered in resin and polished to an appropriate depth to examine the cross-sections of the joined ceramics. Measurements by SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) and EDX (Energy Dispersive X-ray) techniques (Tescan Vega 3 SEM microscope, Germany) were used to perform the microstructure and chemical analysis. SEM analyses, were performed at 10 V and EDX analyses were performed at 15 V. Besides, light microscopy (SteREO Discovery.V20 from ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) was also used to obtain the micrographs of the joined samples.

For compositions with 10, 15 and 25% weight of ZnO, additional experiments were performed. The temperature of the pressureless sintering was 750 °C. Instead of using a sandwich structure, the Bi2O3-ZnO mixtures were applied on the surface of the alumina discs and sintered. The remaining parameters were the same as the above-mentioned experiments. Obtained samples were used to examine the changes occurring during the thermal treatment. Raman spectra of samples were measured (Raman microscope alpha300 R with UHTS300S_VIS laser of wavelength 532 nm from WITec GmbH, Ulm, Germany) and the spectra were obtained using a Zeiss EC Epiplan-Neofluar Dic 100x/0.9 objective from ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany. These samples were also examined by using an XRD method (X-ray diffractometer apparatus: PANalytical X’Pert Pro MPD with Cu kα from Malvern Panalytical Ltd, UK), where the resulting spectra were analyzed by using X’Pert HighScore Plus software (version 2.0a (2.0.1) produced by PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands).

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 presents the different interlayers used, along with the joining temperatures and associated dwell times. Table 1 also informs the reader whether each interlayer was able to successfully bond the ceramic discs under the given conditions. The joined ceramic discs were characterized as either weak bonding or strong bonding depending on an assessment based on the application of low force by hand to try and break the joint. If the ceramic discs fell apart easily under the influence of a low force, such cases are referred to as weak bonding. If the ceramics visually appeared to be satisfactorily joined by the interlayer and also withstood the application of low forces, such cases are referred to as strong bonding.

The strong joints were obtained for interlayers with 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25% weight of ZnO sintered at 750 °C. The systems after bonding at 750 °C with interlayers consisting of 5, 10 and 15% weight of ZnO are presented in Figure 1. A shiny, yellowish precipitate accumulated on the edges of the samples. The ceramic plates adhere to each other well and there is no visible gap between them.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Light microscope images of bonded alumina samples after pressureless treatment in 750 °C with: (a) Bi2O3-5% ZnO interlayer, (b) Bi2O3-10% ZnO interlayer, (c) Bi2O3-15% ZnO interlayer.

The cross-section analysis of samples with 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25% weight of zinc oxide was performed by using SEM. The obtained results are presented in Figure 2. As it can be seen, the interlayers with 10, 15 and 25% weight of ZnO have the best quality among the presented figures (Figure 2c–f,i,j). They are uniform and there are no visible holes in the Bi2O3-ZnO phase. For the composition with 25% weight amount of ZnO (Figure 2j), cracks through the interlayer are noticeable. In the rest of the cross-sections, where the interlayers contain 5 and 20% weight of ZnO, gaps can be noticed (Figure 2a,b,g,h). The lowest integrity of the joint can be assigned to the mixture with 20% weight of ZnO (Figure 2g,h). The system has a lot of free spaces between alumina discs, which were filled with resin during the sample preparation. The interlayer with 5% of ZnO (Figure 2a,b) can be characterized by the appearance of several gaps at different places along the joint. Based on the integrity of the obtained joints, compositions with 5 and 20% weight of ZnO were excluded from the further examinations.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

SEM cross-section images of obtained joints after thermal treatment at 750 °C with the different compositions of the interlayers: (a,b) Bi2O3-5% of ZnO, (c,d) Bi2O3-10% of ZnO, (e,f) Bi2O3-15% of ZnO, (g,h) Bi2O3-20% of ZnO and (i,j) Bi2O3-25% of ZnO.

EDX analyses of sample cross-sections with a ZnO weight of 10, 15 and 25% were performed to examine the diffusion mechanism occurring during the bonding (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). In each image, two phases can be distinguished in the interlayer: a matrix with a lighter color and a precipitate marked with a darker color. The results show that Zn is the component that is mainly present in the precipitate and Bi is not. It can also be seen that Zn is the component which moved from the interlayer to the ceramic. It seems that the migration of Bi and Al atoms is not evident.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

SEM-EDX analysis of the alumina bonded with Bi2O3-10% ZnO interlayer at 750 °C.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SEM-EDX analysis of the alumina bonded with Bi2O3-15% ZnO interlayer at 750 °C.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

SEM-EDX analysis of the alumina bonded with Bi2O3-25% ZnO interlayer at 750 °C.

To further investigate the reactions occurring during the experiments, micro-Raman analysis was performed on samples coated with mixtures of Bi2O3 and 10, 15 and 25% weight of ZnO and sintered at 750 °C. The results are presented in Figure 6a. As can be seen, the obtained spectra are very similar to each other with minor differences in the normalized peak intensities at 167 cm−1, 440 cm−1, and 529 cm−1. The Raman spectra of the raw materials Bi2O3 and ZnO are also presented in Figure 6b,c respectively. Phase changes have clearly occurred while sintering at 750 °C and, based on the literature, Bi38ZnO58 could be the reaction product [37].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Raman spectra of samples; (a) alumina coated with mixtures of Bi2O3 and ZnO and sintered at 750 °C. The vertical drop lines are the peaks associated with the phase Bi38ZnO58 [37]; (b) the Bi2O3 raw material used (before sintering); (c) the ZnO raw material used (before sintering).

The ceramic surfaces coated with the interlayer and sintered at 750 °C were examined by XRD as well to investigate further the bonding reactions that occur. The peaks were matched to phases using the Highscore plus software (Figure 7). The XRD spectra of Bi38ZnO58 and Bi24Al2O39 are very similar, with differences mostly in peak intensities at the 2θ values. As a result, some of the peaks were assigned to both phases. In the samples with more ZnO (i.e., samples with 15% and 25% ZnO), the Bi38ZnO58 peak had the highest intensity. Meanwhile, in the sample with only 10% ZnO, the peak assigned to the Bi24Al2O39 phase had the highest intensity. The XRD pattern also detects the presence of alumina and ZnO. ZnAl2O4 seems to be scarcely present; however, the presence of this phase might be masked by the predominant peak intensities associated with the Bi38ZnO58/Bi24Al2O39 phases. Moreover, these spectra were acquired on the surface of the applied interlayer, which was not in contact with alumina. Therefore, it is possible that there was less interaction between the alumina and the part of the interlayer that was analyzed by XRD and Raman. The chemical compositions of the three interlayers after thermal treatment are quite similar to each other. Besides the detected starting materials ZnO, Bi2O3 and Al2O3, the results show the presence of Bi38ZnO58 and Bi24Al2O39. Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that different concentrations of ZnO result in differences in the relative peak intensities of the three interlayers. The spectrum of ceramic coated with Bi2O3 and 25% weight of ZnO has peaks that can be assigned to ZnAl2O4.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

XRD spectra of alumina coated with mixtures of Bi2O3 and ZnO and fired at 750 °C.

To facilitate the comparison with the phase diagram given in the literature, weight percentage of ZnO was recalculated into the molar percentage [36]. Based on the obtained results, the bonding compositions range can be marked in the phase diagram between Bi2O3 and ZnO (Figure 8). As it can be seen on the phase diagram (Figure 8), the formation of liquid is necessary to obtain a durable joint. The liquid formation was proven by observed flowing of the melted phase and wetting of the edges of the samples. After the experiments, a shiny precipitate accumulated all around the samples (Figure 1). Without the presence of the liquid, the adherence between components was not achieved. However, the liquid phase does not guarantee a strong bond between alumina. Satisfactory results were not achieved for the composition with a lower amount of ZnO (10.5% molar (2% of weight)). Only higher concentrations of ZnO gave a good joint (with 23.2% molar (5% weight)). Additionally, it can be noticed that the formation of a second phase is an important factor. The phase diagram shows (Figure 8) that the formation of γ-Bi2O3 and Bi38ZnO58 results only in weak bonding, while the presence of unreacted ZnO helps to achieve a strong joint. Based on that, the reactivity between ZnO and alumina can be suspected, which influences in a significant way the durability of joints. The only exception was noticed for the interlayer with 30% weight of ZnO. The composition has both unreacted ZnO and a liquid phase at the joining temperature, but only a weak joint was achieved. This suggests that there is probably an upper limit of ZnO content that can inhibit the joining process. This is probably because of the low amount of liquid formation that occurs during heating.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Phase diagram of Bi2O3-ZnO system; the circles in the phase diagram indicate the tested interlayer compositions and joining temperatures. Red circles indicate no bonding, yellow circles indicate weak bonding and green circles indicate strong bonding (Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [36]. 2004, Springer Nature).

Based on the cross-section analysis of the bond with 20% weight of ZnO (Figure 2g,h), the joints have sufficient strength to hold the ceramics together under the application of a low force, even without a continuous interlayer. Probably, the mixture of Bi2O3 and ZnO creates a very strong bond with alumina. A discontinuous interlayer suggests that the wettability/adhesion of Bi2O3-ZnO system on alumina, in that case, is not sufficient. Based on the trend observed in our results (Figure 2), it is possible that the wettability of the interlayer does not have a simple linear relationship with the amount of ZnO introduced in the system. However, it was not systematically checked. It requires a separate study. Additionally, the joint with 5% weight of ZnO was also unsatisfactory (Figure 2a,b). By comparing this result with the phase diagram between components of the interlayer, it can be said that having two phases during heating—liquid and solid—is necessary to obtain a fine joint.

The EDX analysis of the sample cross-sections (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5) show a matrix and a precipitate formation during the thermal treatment. Based on the obtained results, most likely, the particles can be assigned to ZnO, which did not interact with Bi2O3 and alumina during the thermal treatment. It proves the presence of two phases at elevated temperature: ZnO and liquid. Moreover, taking also the phase diagram between Bi2O3 and ZnO under consideration, a conclusion about the chemical composition of the matrix can be made: it is likely that bismuth zinc oxide, Bi38ZnO58, is formed [36]. Besides, it can be said that Zn is a diffusing component in the system. However, previous works with the use of just Bi2O3 as the interlayer showed that Bi is the component which diffuses [29]. It means that by adding another substance, which changes the chemical composition, the bonding mechanism also changes. This can be explained based on the dimensions of the atom. Bi has a rather significant atomic radius (160 pm). Zn, with a smaller atomic radius (135 pm), can move more easily between the crystal lattice of alumina [38]. The ability of the diffusion of ZnO into Al2O3 lattice was proven before, during a solid-state reaction between the components resulting in spinel formation [39]. Moreover, Bi atoms are probably more involved in forming Bi38ZnO58 and Bi24Al2O39.

The similarity between the Raman spectra of samples coated with mixtures of Bi2O3 and 10, 15 and 25% weight of ZnO (Figure 6) suggests that during the thermal treatment similar processes have taken place in every applied interlayer. Moreover, almost every peak can be matched to the ones coming from the literature spectra of sillenite-type crystals such as Bi38ZnO58 [37]. Bi38ZnO58 is a possible reaction product that forms during the bonding process. The positions of the obtained peaks, along with the literature values, are shown in Table 2. It proves the hypothesis from EDX analysis that this compound is one of the phases that forms during the joining of the alumina ceramic. In the Raman spectra, the most intensive peaks are from the Bi-O vibrations occurring in every system. As a result, the peaks of Bi24Al2O39 could be masked. The Raman spectra could also cover the peaks coming from e.g., spinel formation, which is expected to occur at a lower rate.

Table 2.

Peak positions from Raman spectra of coated alumina samples with the literature values.

Compositions with Bi2O3 and: Literature Spectra of Bi38ZnO58 [37] [cm−1]
10% of ZnO [cm−1] 15% of ZnO [cm−1] 25% of ZnO [cm−1]
56.4
81 81 81 83.0
93.2
125 125 125 126.7
141 141 141 141.3
167 167 167 166.0
203 203 203 209.2
255 255 255 256.8
314 314 314 310.7
381 381 381 376.5
440 440 440 434.2
529 529 529 526.1
631 631 631 621.5

Based on XRD results (Figure 7), it can be assumed that the occurring reactions are similar in all examined coated samples. By interaction with Bi2O3, ZnO formed the expected compound, Bi38ZnO58, which proves the previous conclusion. Additionally, the spectrum of coating with 25% weight of Zn also shows the presence of spinel ZnAl2O4, which is a product of the reaction between ZnO and alumina ceramic. It proves, that by adding ZnO into the system, the interaction between this compound and alumina can occur and influence the bonding strength. The lack of ZnAl2O4 peaks in the other two spectra can be caused by a smaller amount of spinel. The ZnO content is lower, which can influence the product formation. However, as it can be seen, not all of ZnO bonded with Bi2O3 and alumina but still can be clearly found in the bonding system. Hence, applying longer dwell time can decrease the amount of unreacted zinc oxide after the thermal treatment and increase the bonding strength. The presence of the bismuth aluminum oxide shows that not only ZnO is the reactive component, but that Bi2O3 also reacts with alumina, which was noticed during previous bonding experiments with this compound [29]. The metastable phase Bi24Al2O39 forms, which was proven to be a product of the reaction between Bi2O3 and Al2O3 [31]. The reactions occurring during the bonding process can be summarized with equations presented below:

19 Bi2O3+ ZnO  Bi38ZnO58
ZnO+ Al2O3  ZnAl2O4
12 Bi2O3+ Al2O3  Bi24Al2O39

4. Conclusions

In this work, bonding between alumina was achieved by applying mixtures of Bi2O3 and ZnO as interlayers. The bonding was achieved by transient liquid phase bonding and by pressureless thermal treatment at a relatively low temperature of 750 °C. Based on the phase diagram between Bi2O3 and ZnO, the temperature can be probably decreased to 738 °C, which is the liquid formation temperature in the examined system.

Mixtures of Bi2O3 with 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25% weight of zinc oxide gave bonding results between alumina ceramics. The bonding ability is strictly connected with the liquid formation during the thermal treatment. However, the presence of unreacted Bi2O3 and ZnO influences the bonding properties of the mixtures. By adding a sufficient amount of ZnO, the obtained joints are durable and have satisfactory integrity. The quality of the joint was best in the case of 10, 15 and 25% weight of ZnO.

In the system, not only Bi2O3 reacts with the alumina ceramic, as proven in previous research. ZnO interacts with alumina as well, forming ZnAl2O4 spinel. Most probably, this reaction increases the strength of the bonds. Moreover, Zn is the component, which diffuses into the ceramic.

Further research should focus on optimizing the thermal process. It was proven that not all ZnO reacts, and therefore, increasing time of the thermal treatment can influence the strength and the stability of joints. Additionally, the interlayer structure might influence the bonding process. Most likely, different results will be obtained by applying the components layer by layer. Besides, the influence of Bi38ZnO58 on the interlayers and bonding is unknown. It is possible that replacing Bi2O3 with a different oxide that does not react with ZnO can increase the spinel formation.

Acknowledgments

The project was funded by Innosuisse. The authors are grateful to Laura Conti from Empa’s Laboratory for High Performance Ceramics for the XRD measurements and to Rico Muff for training to use the Raman spectroscopy measurement.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N. and G.B.; methodology, S.N. and G.B.; validation, T.G., D.K. and G.B.; formal analysis, M.S.; investigation, M.S and S.N.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.; writing—review and editing, S.N., G.B., T.G. and D.K.; supervision, G.B., T.G. and D.K.; project administration, G.B.; funding acquisition, G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article. Raw untreated Raman and XRD spectra are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by Innosuisse—Swiss Innovation Agency, application number 42449.1 IP-ENG.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Zhang X.-P., Ouyang J.-H., Wang Y.-J., Liu Z.-G., Wang Y. Microstructure and High-Temperature Mechanical Properties of ZrO2-Al2O3-SiC Ceramics. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2015;24:3615–3621. doi: 10.1007/s11665-015-1650-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Piconi C., Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1–25. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jansen S., Winnubst A., He Y., Verweij H., van der Varst P., de With G. Effects of grain size and ceria addition on ageing behaviour and tribological properties of Y-TZP ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1998;18:557–563. doi: 10.1016/S0955-2219(97)00153-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cho S.-J., Hockey B.J., Lawn B.R., Bennison S.J. Grain-Size and R-Curve Effects in the Abrasive Wear of Alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1989;72:1249–1252. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb09718.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lakhdar Y., Tuck C., Binner J., Terry A., Goodridge R. Additive manufacturing of advanced ceramic materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021;116:100736. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Klocke F. Modern approaches for the production of ceramic components. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1997;17:457–465. doi: 10.1016/S0955-2219(96)00163-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nicholas M.G. Material Aspects of Ceramic-Ceramic and Ceramic-Metal Bonding. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherland: 1990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gauthier M.M. Joining of Ceramics. In: Gauthier M.M., editor. Engineered Materials Handbook Desk. ASM International; Novelty, OH, USA: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin C.-M., Hsins T.-P. Facilitating low-temperature diffusion bonding between oxygen-free Al2O3 ceramic and pure Cu through inclusion of 0.8 La (wt.%) to Ti pre-metallized interlayer: Microstructural evolution, metallurgical reactions, and mechanical properties. Surfaces Interfaces. 2020;21:100738. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100738. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sayyedain S.S., Salimijazi H.R., Toroghinejad M.R., Karimzadeh F. Microstructure and mechanical properties of transient liquid phase bonding of Al2O3p/Al nanocomposite using copper interlayer. Mater. Des. 2014;53:275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hanson W.B., Ironside K.I., Fernie J.A. Active metal brazing of zirconia. Acta Mater. 2000;48:4673–4676. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00256-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hosseinabadi N., Sarraf-Mamoory R., Hadian A.M. Diffusion bonding of alumina using interlayer of mixed hydride nano powders. Ceram. Int. 2014;40:3011–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shalz M.L., Dalgleish B.J., Tomsia A.P., Glaeser A.M. Ceramic joining. J. Mater. Sci. 1993;28:1673–1684. doi: 10.1007/BF00363367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shalz M.L., Dalgleish B.J., Tomsia A.P., Cannon R.M., Glaeser A.M. Ceramic joining III bonding of alumina via Cu/Nb/Cu interlayers. J. Mater. Sci. 1994;29:3678–3690. doi: 10.1007/BF00357335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weyrich N., Leinenbach C. Low temperature TLP bonding of Al2O3–ceramics using eutectic Au–(Ge, Si) alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 2013;48:7115–7124. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7526-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lo P.-L., Chang L.-S., Lu Y.-F. High strength alumina joints via transient liquid phase bonding. Ceram. Int. 2009;35:3091–3095. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2009.04.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Passerone A., Muolo M.L. Joining Technology in Metal-Ceramic Systems. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2000;15:631–648. doi: 10.1080/10426910008913010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Glaeser A. The use of transient FGM interlayers for joining advanced ceramics. Compos. Part B Eng. 1997;28:71–84. doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(97)00039-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Locatelli M., Dalgleish B., Nakashima K., Tomsia A., Glaeser A. New approaches to joining ceramics for high-temperature applications. Ceram. Int. 1997;23:313–322. doi: 10.1016/S0272-8842(96)00024-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang Y., Chen Y., Yu D., Sun D., Li H. A review paper on effect of the welding process of ceramics and metals. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020;9:16214–16236. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cook G.O., III, Sorensen C.D. Overview of transient liquid phase and partial transient liquid phase bonding. J. Mater. Sci. 2011;46:5305–5323. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5561-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang X., Zhao J., Cui E., Sun Z., Yu H. Grain growth kinetics and grain refinement mechanism in Al2O3/WC/TiC/graphene ceramic composite. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021;41:1391–1398. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ben-Nissan B., Choi A.H., Cordingley R. 10—Alumina ceramics. In: Kokubo T., editor. Bioceramics and Their Clinical Applications. Woodhead Publishing; Sawston, UK: 2008. pp. 223–242. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shalz M.L., Dalgleish B.J., Tomsia A.P., Glaeser A.M. Ceramic joining II partial transient liquid-phase bonding of alumina via Cu/Ni/Cu multilayer interlayers. J. Mater. Sci. 1994;29:3200–3208. doi: 10.1007/BF00356663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alonso-Santos J., Téllez-Arias M.G., Bedolla E., Lemus-Ruiz J. Microstructural Behavior during Bonding of Alumina to Niobium by Liquid State Diffusion. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2013;755:171–177. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.755.171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hong S.M., Bartlow C.C., Reynolds T.B., McKeown J.T., Glaeser A.M. Ultrarapid Transient-liquid-phase Bonding of Al2O3 Ceramics. Adv. Mater. 2008;20:4799–4803. doi: 10.1002/adma.200801550. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lemus-Ruiz J., Guevara-Laureano A.O., Zarate-Medina J., Arellano-Lara A., Ceja-Cárdenas L. Interface behavior of Al2O3/Ti joints produced by liquid state bonding. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2015;98:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chang L.-S., Huang C.-F. Transient liquid phase bonding of alumina to alumina via boron oxide interlayer. Ceram. Int. 2004;30:2121–2127. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2003.11.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dehkordi O.B., Hadian A. Effect of time and temperature on TLP bonding of alumina using a bismuth oxide interlayer. Pt BCeram. Int. 2016;42:1705–1712. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Betsch R.J., White W.B. Vibrational spectra of bismuth oxide and the sillenite-structure bismuth oxide derivatives. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Spectrosc. 1978;34:505–514. doi: 10.1016/0584-8539(78)80047-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Neiman A.Y., Tanskaya A.V., Tsipis E., Fyodorova L.M., Antonov B.D. Effect of size factor on mechanism of interaction between Al2O3 and Bi2O3 and conductivity of composite on their basis. Nanotechnol. Russ. 2011;6:218–226. doi: 10.1134/S1995078011020133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yashima M., Ishimura D., Ohoyama K. Temperature Dependence of Lattice Parameters and Anisotropic Thermal Expansion of Bismuth Oxide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2005;88:2332–2335. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00432.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Singh M., Singh M. Thermal Expansion in Zinc Oxide Nanomaterials. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Res. 2013;1:27–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bi Z., Zhang R., Wang X., Gu S., Shen B., Shi Y., Liu Z., Zheng Y. Synthesis of Zinc Aluminate Spinel Film through the Solid-Phase Reaction between Zinc Oxide Film and α-Alumina Substrate. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2003;86:2059–2062. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03609.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rauwel E., Nilsen O., Rauwel P., Walmsley J.C., Frogner H.B., Rytter E., Fjellvåg H. Oxide Coating of Alumina Nanoporous Structure Using ALD to Produce Highly Porous Spinel. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2012;18:315–325. doi: 10.1002/cvde.201207005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guha J.P., Kunej Š., Suvorov D. Phase equilibrium relations in the binary system Bi2O3-ZnO. J. Mater. Sci. 2004;39:911–918. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012921.62765.05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Egorysheva A., Burkov V.I., Gorelik V.S., Kargin Y.F., Chervyakov A.V. Raman scattering in sillenite-type crystals. Crystallogr. Rep. 2001;46:461–467. doi: 10.1134/1.1376478. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Slater J.C. Atomic Radii in Crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 1964;41:3199–3204. doi: 10.1063/1.1725697. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Branson L.D. Kinetics and Mechanism of the Reaction between Zinc Oxide and Aluminum Oxide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1965;48:591–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb14679.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article. Raw untreated Raman and XRD spectra are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Materials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES