Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2022 Sep 27;11(19):2536. doi: 10.3390/plants11192536

Impact of Edaphic and Climatic Factors on Thymus pulegioides Essential Oil Composition and Potential Prevalence of Chemotypes

Vaida Vaičiulytė 1, Kristina Ložienė 1,*, Ričardas Taraškevičius 2
Editor: Barbara Sgorbini
PMCID: PMC9573226  PMID: 36235402

Abstract

Intraspecific chemical polymorphism is characteristic of essential oil bearing Thymus pulegioides (Lamiaceae). Soil chemical composition and climatic conditions can influence not only quantitative and qualitative composition of essential oils, but also on prevalence of different chemotypes in space. The purpose of study was to determine the impact of edaphic and climatic factors on T. pulegioides essential oil composition and potential chemotypes prevalence. It were investigated 131 habitats of T. pulegioides in all ten climatic sub-districts of Lithuania. Essential oils were isolated by hydrodistillation and analysed by GC-FID and GC-MS. The content of humus was estimated by oxidation method, the content of mobile potassium (K2O) and mobile phosphorus (P2O5)—flame photometry using 0.2 M HCl solution, the soil pH—electrometrically and 15 elements of soil—by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence. The meteorological data (temperature, rainfall, photosynthetically active solar radiation and sunshine duration) were obtained from the meteorological bulletins. Results showed that humus in soil positively, manganese and cobalt—negatively influenced on the essential oil accumulation in T. pulegioides. Carvacrol was the most common compound in the essential oil of T. pulegioides; higher amounts of sulphur and mobile phosphorus, lower amounts of sodium in soil, higher rainfall in blooming period are favourable for this compound and for potential prevalence of carvacrol chemotype. Geraniol was frequent in the eastern and the central part of Lithuania, where the temperature in vegetation season is higher, and in soils characterised by higher and lower amounts of sodium and chlorine, respectively. Thymol, linalool and α-terpinyl acetate were rare. Edaphic and climatic conditions can differently influence on essential oil yield and chemical composition of species as well as on potential prevalence of different chemotypes of same species in space.

Keywords: large thyme, essential oils, geraniol, carvacrol, thymol, α-terpinyl acetate, linalool, soil chemistry, climatic conditions

1. Introduction

The large thyme (Thymus pulegioides L., Lamiaceae) is medical, aromatic, essential oil bearing plant, distributed in all territory of Europe [1]. The main volatile compounds of T. pulegioides are thymol, carvacrol, geraniol, linalool, α-terpinyl acetate, fenchone, and cis-sabinene hydrate. These compounds can amount significant percentages in essential oils (as well as determinate chemotypes of T. pulegioides) [2,3,4], are biologically active and have a fairly wide range of application. The monoterpenic phenol thymol together with isomer carvacrol have wide spectrum of antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, therefore, are widely used in pharmaceutical and food industries [5,6,7,8,9]. The acyclic monoterpene alcohols geraniol and linalool are widely used in cosmetics, perfumery for their intense aroma and as the insect repellents [10,11,12]. The α-terpinyl acetate has antibacterial properties [13,14].

Composition of essential oils of species of genus Thymus is determined by genetical factors but it also can be influenced by temperature, amount of precipitation, sunshine duration, soil chemical composition, altitude above the sea level and other environmental factors [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Same environmental factors can unequally effect on different volatile compounds. For example, cultivation of phenolic and non-phenolic chemotypes of large thyme in some locality showed that higher temperature in April–July stimulates essential oil and geraniol accumulation, meanwhile higher photosynthetically active solar radiation inhibites geraniol accumulation in plants of geraniol chemotype, photosynthetically active solar radiation stimulates and higher temperature inhibites essential oil accumulation in plants of carvacrol chemotype, higher temperature in April–July stimulates essential oil accumulated in linalool chemotype of T. pulegioides [22]. Therefore, very likely that same environmental factors could impact different effect on distribution of different chemotypes in space.

The edaphic and climatic conditions in the territory of Lithuania are different. The marine climate is more pronounced in the western part, while the continental climate in the eastern part of Lithuania; therefore climatic sub-districts distinguished in Lithuania differ by the average annual temperature, the amount of precipitation per year, the duration of snow preservation [23]. Higher amounts of humus, mobile phosphorus, mobile potassium and many micro-elements are characteristic of soils in the central part of Lithuania, higher soil acidity—characteristic of the western part of Lithuania [24,25]. Therefore, these differences of climatic and edaphic factors in the territory of Lithuania can affect not only the quantitative and qualitative composition of essential oils of T. pulegioides, but also different prevalence of T. pulegioides chemotypes in space. As was mentioned above, essential oils extracted from different T. pulegioides chemotypes characterized by different properties and are used in different practices. Raw material of T. pulegioides different chemotypes can be both grown in culture and harvested in natural habitats. Therefore, knowledges of effect of edaphic and climatic conditions on prevalence of T. pulegiodes chemotypes could be useful both for cultivation of different chemotypes and collection of raw material of different chemotypes in the natural habitats. The purpose of study was to determine the influence of edaphic and climatic factors on T. pulegioides essential oil composition and chemotypes prevalence.

2. Results

2.1. Analysis of Composition of Thymus pulegioides Essential Oils and Classification of Thymus pulegioides Habitats According to Main Chemical Compounds of Essential Oils

Quantitative analysis of essential oils of T. pulegioides raw materials, collected from 131 habitats in all territory of Lithuania, showed that mean amount of essential oil was 0.61 ± 0.21% and varied from 0.20% in habitat no. 45 (Kruopiai, Mūša-Nevėžis sub-climatic district) to 1.32% in habitat no. 121 (Bardėnai, the Nemunas Lowland climatic sub-district) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution of investigated Thymus pulegioides habitats in Lithuania. Numbers of habitats of climatic sub-district: Aukštaitija: 1–4, 7–23; Dzūkija: 5, 6, 24–31, 66–75; Mūša-Nevėžis: 32–65, 83–85, 101, 105, 106; the Nemunas Lowland: 80–82, 91–100, 102–104, 117–122; Sūduva: 76–79; Venta: 86–90; Žemaičiai: 107–116, 123–127, 129, 130; Pajūris: 128; Pajūris Lowland: 131.

In the essential oils of T. pulegioides has been identified 55 chemical compounds. Nineteen chemical compounds exceeded 4% in the essential oils of T. pulegioides. Carvacrol was abundant and the most frequent chemical compound (17.66 ± 9.43%) in the essential oils of T. pulegioides. This chemical compound was detected in plant material collected from all investigated habitats, except habitat no. 64 (Padubysys, Mūša-Nevėžis climatic sub-district). The variation of this phenol was the lowest (CV = 53%) in comparison with other analysed chemical compounds of essential oils. The percentage of thymol (carvacrol isomer) was 5.5 times lower compared to carvacrol, though this compound was established even in ¾ of investigated habitats. The mean percentage of γ-terpinene (precursor of thymol and carvacrol) was similar to percentage of carvacrol, meanwhile the mean percentage of other precursor p-cymene was lower compared with γ-terpinene. The mean percentage of geraniol in essential oils of T. pulegioides was 2.7 times lower than mean percentage of carvacrol (Table 1). Linalool was established in most habitats, but amounted about 1% of essential oils often. α-Terpinyl acetate was established only in 1/3 of investigated habitats. The mean percentages of linalool and α-terpinyl acetate amounted less than 2% of essential oil but the variation of amounts of these compounds was the highest compared with other chemical compounds (Table 1). However, the max percentage of linalool and α-terpinyl acetate was 1.2–1.4 time higher than the max percentage of carvacrol and geraniol.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of chemical compounds (the percentage of which exceeded for leastways in one habitat) of essential oils of Thymus pulegioides in investigated habitats (N = 131).

Chemical Compound Retention Index Min–Max, % Mean ± SD, % CV, %
Calculated Literature [26]
Carvacrol 1308 1298 0.00–48.00 17.66 ± 9.43 53
Thymol 1298 1289 0.00–31.00 3.17 ± 5.11 162
p-Cymene 1029 1020 0.14–38.49 11.81 ± 8.21 70
γ-Terpinene 1053 1054 0.00–42.60 16.90 ± 8.83 52
Geraniol 1237 1249 0.00–39.87 6.57 ± 8.70 132
Geranial 1272 1264 0.00–6.57 1.13 ± 1.44 127
Nerol 1235 1227 0.00–20.57 3.66 ± 4.90 134
Neral 1242 1235 0.00–34.92 3.05 ± 4.73 155
Linalool 1104 1095 0.00–57.75 1.66 ± 6.59 397
α-Terpinyl acetate 1355 1346 0.00–57.50 1.48 ± 6.96 470
Thymol methyl ether 1241 1232 0.00–5.79 0.83 ± 1.14 470
Carvacrol methyl ether 1251 1241 0.00–9.17 3.97 ± 2.22 56
Myrcene 997 988 0.00–4.19 1.48 ± 6.96 39
β-Caryophyllene 1426 1417 0.69–13.66 5.52 ± 1.82 33
β-Bisabolene 1513 1505 0.00–6.66 3.02 ± 1.15 38
Caryophyllene oxside 1591 1582 0.00–5.01 1.16 ± 0.73 63
α-Terpinene 1022 1014 0.00–4.85 1.64 ± 0.85 52
Borneol 1173 1165 0.00–4.65 0.56 ± 0.53 95
Cis-β-Guaiene 1500 1492 0.00–7.14 1.65 ± 0.89 39

Four clusters of T. pulegioides habitats were distinguished by cluster analysis according to percentage of above-mentioned main compounds of chemotypes of T. pulegioides and their precursors (Figure 2). Cluster 1′ (34 habitats) distinguished habitats with the highest percentages of geraniol and biogenetically related compounds (geranial, nerol and neral). Geraniol in the habitats of this cluster was 6–8 times, geranial—4–10 times, nerol—4–13 times and neral—4–15 times higher than in the habitats of other three clusters (Table 2, Figure 2). There variation of geraniol, geranial, nerol and neral percentages between habitats was less in cluster 1′ than in other clusters (Table 2). Tukey’s post-hoc demonstrated that cluster 1′ significantly (p < 0.05) differed from other clusters by the amounts of geraniol, geranial, nerol and neral. The highest geraniol percentage was found in habitat no. 69 (Kruonis) belonging to Dzūkija climatic sub-district (Figure 1 and Figure 2. Thymol dominated in the essential oils of T. pulegioides samples collected in habitats of cluster 2′. Amounts of thymol in essential oils of T. pulegioides were 4–7 times higher in habitats of this cluster in comparison with other clusters. The variation of thymol and thymol methyl ether between habitats of this cluster was the lowest (Table 2). The highest amount of thymol was in habitat no. 128 (Palanga, Pajūris climatic sub-district) (Figure 1 and Figure 3). Tukey’s post-hoc showed significant differences between cluster 2′ and other clusters according to percentage of thymol and thymol methyl ether (p < 0.05). In cluster 2′ merged only 17 habitats. Clusters 3′ and 4′ characterised by high amount of carvacrol. Tukey’s post-hoc showed that habitats of cluster 3′ significantly (p < 0.05) differed from other clusters by the amount of carvacrol and γ-terpinene in the essential oil of T. pulegioides. The highest amount of carvacrol was established in habitat no. 31 (Puvočiai, Dzūkija climatic sub-district), where it reached 48.00% in essential oil (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Meanwhile the amount of carvacrol was about 10% lower in cluster 4′ than in cluster 3′, there percentage of precursor p-cymene was 2 times higher than in cluster 3′. The highest amount of p-cymene was established in habitat no. 48 (Liberiškės, Mūša–Nevėžis climatic sub-district) of cluster 4′ (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Tukey’s post-hoc showed that cluster 4′ significantly (p < 0.05) different from cluster 1′ by the amount of p-cymene. Habitats no. 11, no. 34, no. 39, no. 99, no. 100 and no. 106 were not assigned for any cluster and were analysed separately (Figure 2). α-Terpinyl acetate was dominated in habitats no. 34, no. 39 and no. 99, linalool—in habitats no. 106 and no. 100.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Two dimensional dendrogram of Thymus pulegioides habitats by chemotypes determining the main chemical compounds of essential oils.

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of essential oils and percentages of main chemical compounds of chemotypes (carvacrol, thymol, geraniol, linalool, α-terpinyl acetate) and their precursors and biogenetically related compounds in distinguished clusters of Thymus pulegioides habitats and habitats no. 11, no. 34, no. 39, no. 99, no. 100 and no. 106.

Cluster or Habitat Number. Amount of Essential Oil, % Carvacrol, % Thymol, % p-Cymene, % γ-Terpinene, % Carvacrol Methyl Ether, % Thymol Methyl
Ether, %
Geraniol, % Geranial, % Nerol, % Neral, % Linalool % α-Terpinyl
Acetate, %
Cluster 1′
(N = 34)
Mean 0.55 11.24 1.55 4.94 8.86 2.04 0.37 18.56 3.09 9.92 8.63 2.05 4.94
SD 0.21 5.51 2.46 3.85 6.36 0.99 0.51 8.90 1.44 5.40 6.18 4.94 2.01
Min 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.12 0.00 3.48 0.32 0.88 0.65 0.00 0.00
Max 1.21 24.28 10.28 12.60 23.85 3.67 2.02 39.87 6.57 20.57 34.92 22.94 9.84
CV, % 38 49 159 78 72 49 138 48 47 54 72 241 41
Cluster 2′
(N = 17)
Mean 0.64 13.38 12.10 17.61 16.59 4.42 3.19 2.39 0.40 1.43 1.02 0.36 0.27
SD 0.12 4.12 7.48 7.27 6.59 1.55 1.33 2.85 0.46 1.73 1.35 0.10 0.53
Min 0.83 7.09 4.50 5.20 0.81 2.23 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00
Max 0.65 21.31 31.00 29.55 30.64 6.50 5.79 10.04 1.45 5.66 4.23 0.51 1.84
CV, % 19 31 62 41 40 35 42 119 115 121 132 28 196
Cluster 3′
(N = 45)
Mean 0.68 26.11 2.09 9.44 23.78 3.89 0.55 1.89 0.29 0.75 0.56 0.56 0.07
SD 0.22 8.75 2.96 4.41 6.40 1.99 0.63 2.21 0.40 1.13 0.90 0.75 0.24
Min 0.23 12.10 0.00 1.23 11.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 1.32 48.00 11.11 20.00 42.60 9.06 2.21 7.80 1.40 5.29 4.16 4.41 1.35
CV, % 32 34 142 47 27 51 115 117 138 151 161 134 343
Cluster 4′
(N = 28)
Mean 0.57 17.89 1.56 20.66 17.49 6.25 0.54 2.94 0.72 2.72 2.06 0.35 0.34
SD 0.22 5.38 1.72 7.17 5.96 1.40 0.51 2.66 0.60 2.59 1.97 0.22 1.01
Min 0.20 8.19 0.00 5.73 4.40 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00
Max 1.03 27.10 6.36 38.49 29.47 9.17 2.27 10.04 1.88 9.34 7.18 1.23 4.33
CV, % 39 30 111 35 34 22 94 90 83 95 96 63 297
Habitat no. 11 Amount 0.39 13.58 2.38 20.99 11.68 6.94 1.46 1.67 0.17 0.65 0.09 14.25 2.34
Habitat no. 34 Amount 1.02 5.65 1.32 6.82 5.87 1.72 0.40 2.92 0.56 1.87 1.43 0.35 43.56
Habitat no. 39 Amount 0.53 5.65 0.00 20.70 6.44 5.77 0.05 2.08 0.12 0.07 0.00 6.51 30.77
Habitat no. 99 Amount 0.54 0.06 0.00 0.14 0.48 0.04 0.02 12.35 1.12 3.52 2.81 0.29 57.50
Habitat no. 106 Amount 0.77 6.39 0.00 5.38 5.85 1.88 0.53 6.36 1.32 4.78 3.87 40.37 3.99
Habitat no. 100 Amount 0.53 3.48 0.27 1.31 1.57 0.58 0.00 4.01 0.38 1.01 0.90 57.75 6.01

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of amount of essential oil in Thymus pulegioides habitats in different Lithuania climatic sub-districts. Explication: A—Aukštaitija climatic sub-district, D—Dzūkija, M-N—Mūša Nevėžis, NL—the Nemunas Lowland, S—Sūduva, V—Venta, Z—Žemaičiai, P—Pajūris, PL—Pajūris Lowland. The statistical significances between climatic sub-districts has not been established.

2.2. Soil Chemistry and Its Effect on Composition of Thymus pulegioides Essential Oils

The soil pH varied from slightly acid (pH = 5.1) to medium alkaline (pH = 8.3) in investigated T. pulegioides habitats, however neutral or slightly alkaline values were the most common. The mean values of soil pH were similar in all four clusters (Table 3). The mean amount of humus in soils of clusters was 2.5–2.8%, the mean amount of mobile potassium and phosphorus—100–135 mg/kg (Table 3); such values of mobile phosphorus and potassium are considered as medium [25]. Silicon was characterised by the largest amount and the lowest variation of amount in the soils of clusters of T. pulegioides habitats in comparison with other investigated 14 chemical elements of soil. Amounts of cobalt and copper were the lowest in soils of investigated habitats (Table 4).

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics of pHKCl, humus, mobile potassium (K2O), mobile phosphorus (P2O5) in distinguished clusters of Thymus pulegioides habitats and habitats no. 11, no. 34, no. 39, no. 99, no. 100 and no. 106.

pHKCl Humus, % K2O, mg/kg P2O5, mg/kg
N = 131 Mean ± SD 7.37 ± 0.57 2.70 ± 1.09 121.90 ± 63.97 127.28 ± 95.16
Min–Max 5.1–8.3 0.9–7.2 35.00–368.00 22.00–680.00
CV, % 8 40 52 74
Cluster 1′
(N = 34)
Mean ± SD 7.46 ± 0.56 2.47 ± 0.97 113.21 ± 46.38 123.41 ± 84.07
Min–Max 6.0–8.2 1.0–5.2 44.00–236.00 24.00–411.00
CV, % 8 39 41 68
Cluster 2′
(N = 17)
Mean ± SD 7.27 ± 0.40 2.57 ± 0.99 99.29 ± 36.06 118.35 ± 106.07
Min–Max 5.1–8.1 1.0–4.4 44.00–149.00 23.00–424.00
CV, % 6 38 36 90
Cluster 3′
(N = 45)
Mean ± SD 7.40 ± 0.53 2.72 ± 0.99 125.89 ± 67.93 135.36 ± 80.27
Min–Max 5.1–8.3 1.0–4.7 35.00–350.00 25.00–457.00
CV, % 7 36 54 59
Cluster 4′
(N = 28)
Mean ± SD 7.34 ± 0.62 2.78 ± 1.40 132.21 ± 72.57 117.61 ± 125.45
Min–Max 5.9–8.2 0.9–7.2 50.00–356.00 22.00–680.00
CV, % 8 50 55.0 107.0
Habitat no. 11 Amount 6.9 4.0 215.0 81.0
Habitat no. 34 Amount 7.6 3.9 163.0 186.0
Habitat no. 39 Amount 8.0 1.4 79.0 65.0
Habitat no. 99 Amount 7.4 5.0 368.00 313.0
Habitat no. 100 Amount 6.1 2.0 64.0 45.0
Habitat no. 106 Amount 7.6 2. 4 87.0 177.0

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics of chemical elements of soil in distinguished clusters of Thymus pulegioides habitats and habitats no. 11, no. 34, no. 39, no. 99, no. 100 and no. 106.

Cluster or Habitat Number Al Ca Cu Fe K Mg Mn Na P S Si Ti Zn Co Cl
N = 131 Mean 26,505.50 24,315.50 8.15 11,808.30 17,743.70 7191.4 350.50 5894.30 477.90 226.1 380,643.1 1652.8 40.10 4.1 385.30
SD 10,151.59 15,759.48 3.64 5436.02 3856.66 4685.60 159.17 1096.45 484.86 134.31 39,914.34 817.53 13.72 2.39 207.4
Min 11,450 1894 2.6 4489 11,007 627 150 3055 106 15 278,411 436 20 0.4 83
Max 73,099 64,606 20.1 34,261 31,381 19,095 1501 9114 4997 657 450,223 4547 95 10.8 1862
CV, % 38 38 45 46 22 65 45 19 101 59 10 49 34 58 54
Cluster 1′
(N = 34)
Mean 24,751.20 24,038.20 8.01 11,086.50 17,676.0 7439.00 364.1 6175.70 438.20 208.80 380,739.20 1725.80 38.70 4.30 321.9
SD 7303.22 16,944.48 3.41 4628.63 3230.52 5354.14 164.8 1120.90 301.35 141.88 38,176.68 853.25 14.53 2.08 96.15
Min 12,122 3121 3.8 4649 11,924 1134 168 4282 113 15 278,411 436 20 0.4 135
Max 48,441 57,963 20.1 30,803 27,362 19,095 1090 9114 1876 657 435,162 3972 89 8.8 506
CV, % 30 70 43 42 18 72 45 18 69 46 10 49 38 48 30
Cluster 2′
(N = 17)
Mean 24,082.04 23,161.10 7.17 10,241.46 16,418.63 5984.63 342.63 6019.8 665.9 185.5 390,674.6 1355.7 35.8 3.80 403.2
SD 7278.88 14,648.68 3.31 3744.89 2825.31 4213.87 104.07 1043.34 1130.87 136.64 36,630.22 536.97 9.67 2.21 126.64
Min 11,450 2766 3.4 5213 11,531 803 197 4576 106 30 336,270 517 22 0.4 83
Max 41,763 41,793 13.8 18,489 22,014 15,052 558 8074 4997 556 450,223 2337 52 8.4 587
CV, % 30 63 46 37 17 70 30 17 170 74 9 40 27 58 31
Cluster 3′
(N = 7)
Mean 25,709.90 27,069.38 7.89 11,690.32 17,401.04 7771.16 344.70 5827.50 444,5 257.30 376,922.30 1601.77 38.49 3.73 428.35
SD 9883.03 14,518.34 3.61 5396.30 4055.52 4972.84 198.20 948.68 200.24 130.56 37,250.70 830.40 9.48 2.67 289.67
Min 14,228 1894 2.60 4489 11,007 627 150 3440 149 63 299,097 589 24 0.4 168
Max 59,507 53,962 17.3 26,044 27,337 18,841 1501 7854 1014 628 449,804 3477 60 10.7 1863
CV, % 38 54 46 46 23 64 55 16 45 51 10 52 25 72 68
Cluster 4′
(N = 28)
Mean 30,550.66 22,911.60 8.76 13,536.78 18,696.45 7039.30 355.15 5661.37 395.18 199.21 390,312.90 1777.20 42.20 4.80 356.5
SD 14,993.53 17,213.48 4.17 7147.57 4820.92 4310.13 130.08 1240.65 189.48 124.36 37,649.37 937.97 16.52 2.6 114.24
Min 11,450 2176 20.0 5263 11,395 710 197 3055 128 17 313,391 477 21 0.9 129
Max 73,099 64,606 3.5 34,961 31,381 18,587 791 7908 964 488 442,443 4547 82 10.8 559
CV, % 49 75 48 53 26 61 37 22 48 62 10 53 39 54 32
Habitat no. 11 Amount 38,652 9196 10 17,544 22,736 6598 348 5453 434 302 380,454 2170 42 5.5 400
Habitat no. 34 Amount 28,422 22,692 9 12,828 20,796 6967 377 5439 540 292 376,059 1865 41 2.9 541
Habitat no. 39 Amount 14,669 56,164 7 6607 12,782 11,473 239 6239 212 96 357,185 493 25 2.8 523
Habitat no. 99 Amount 26,867 36,441 15 15,269 19,967 10,414 396 3367 2331 415 331,517 2203 69 4.2 498
Habitat no. 100 Amount 20,319 3788 3 6304 15,705 1490 201 6776 187 76 432,282 1025 27 2.1 142
Habitat no. 106 Amount 22,644 8964 6 10,211 17,308 3309 263 6347 315 164 407,441 1528 53 3.3 195

The results showed that the quantitative composition of essential oils of T. pulegioides investigated samples (N = 131) positively correlated with the amount of humus and negatively with amounts of cobalt and manganese in soil (p < 0.05) (Table 5). For example, the lowest percentage of essential oil in T. pulegioides and the highest amount of manganese in soil was in cluster 1′ of T. pulegioides habitats; the lowest amount of essential oil and the highest amount of cobalt in soil was in the habitats of the cluster 3′ (Table 2 and Table 4). The percentage of carvacrol in essential oils positively (p < 0.05) correlated with the amount of mobile phosphorus and sulphur but negatively with amount of natrium in soil; the percentage of γ-terpinene also correlated positively (p < 0.05) with amount of mobile phosphorus in soil. The highest mean percentages of carvacrol, γ-terpinene in T. pulegioides essential oils as well as amounts of mobile phosphorus and sulphur in soils were established in habitats of cluster 3′ (Table 2 and Table 4). Percentages of geraniol and biogenetically related compounds (geranial, nerol and neral) in essential oils (p < 0.05) positively correlated with amount of natrium and negatively with amounts of chlorine and sulphur (except geraniol) in soils. The highest percentages of geraniol, geranial, nerol and neral in essential oils and the highest and the lowest mean amounts of natrium and chlorine in soil, respectively, were established in T. pulegioides habitats belonging to cluster 1′ (Table 2 and Table 4). Also, geraniol and geranial in essential oils correlated negatively (p < 0.05) with amount of humus, meanwhile amounts of nerol and neral—negatively with amount of calcium in soil (Table 5). There the amounts of geraniol and biogenetically related compounds in essential oils were the highest, the amount of humus—the lowest in T. pulegioides habitats of cluster 1′ (Table 2 and Table 3).

Table 5.

Spearman’s rank correlations between chemical characteristics (amount of essential oil and percentages of main chemical compounds) of essential oil of Thymus pulegioides and some topsoil characteristics (humus, soil pH, mobile potassium (K2O) mobile phosphorus (P2O5) and 15 chemical elements. Chemotypes define chemical compounds, precursors, biogenetically related compounds and statistically significant correlation coefficients are bold.

Chemical Characteristics Humus, % pHKCl K2O, mg/kg P2O5, mg/kg Chemical Elements, mg/kg
Al Ca Cu Fe K Mg Mn Na P Co S Si Ti Zn Cl
Amount of essential oil (%) 0.18 0.14 0.02 0.15 −0.16 0.13 −0.09 −0.16 −0.14 −0.02 −0.22 −0.06 0.08 −0.32 0.00 0.04 −0.12 −0.04 −0.02
Carvacrol 0.10 0.01 −0.08 0.18 0.08 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.09 0.14 −0.03 −0.20 0.07 −0.08 0.27 −0.16 0.13 0.08 0.00
Thymol 0.04 −0.14 0.15 0.12 −0.01 −0.05 −0.11 −0.08 −0.07 −0.07 −0.03 −0.04 0.16 −0.06 −0.12 0.12 −0.13 −0.12 0.10
p-Cymene −0.12 0.02 0.01 −0.16 0.00 0.06 −0.02 −0.02 −0.03 −0.05 −0.10 −0.07 −0.18 0.02 −0.20 0.00 −0.11 −0.10 0.13
γ-Terpinene 0.07 −0.04 0.01 0.23 −0.06 0.04 −0.10 −0.11 −0.12 −0.15 −0.12 0.08 0.02 −0.14 0.13 0.02 −0.09 −0.04 −0.06
Geraniol −0.19 0.05 −0.02 0.04 −0.13 −0.10 −0.12 −0.11 −0.05 −0.09 −0.02 0.18 0.04 0.07 −0.16 0.14 0.02 0.08 −0.22
Geranial −0.20 0.03 −0.03 −0.02 −0.11 −0.13 −0.12 −0.12 −0.04 −0.10 0.00 0.19 −0.06 0.14 −0.23 0.17 −0.02 −0.09 −0.20
Nerol −0.16 −0.05 −0.05 −0.06 −0.10 −0.22 −0.10 −0.12 −0.04 −0.16 0.03 0.22 0.06 0.15 −0.25 0.23 −0.03 −0.01 −0.20
Neral −0.17 −0.05 −0.03 −0.05 −0.09 −0.19 0.10 0.11 −0.03 −0.14 0.03 0.19 0.06 0.15 −0.24 0.20 −0.02 −0.09 −0.20
Linalool 0.03 −0.03 0.05 0.16 −0.01 0.02 0.08 0.01 −0.02 0.04 −0.06 0.14 0.06 −0.04 0.08 −0.02 −0.06 −0.02 0.09
α-Terpinyl acetate −0.10 0.00 0.08 0.14 0.09 0.07 −0.11 −0.07 −0.09 0.03 −0.03 0.12 −0.01 0.08 −0.01 −0.04 −0.09 −0.04 0.06
Myrcene −0.04 −0.05 −0.01 −0.05 −0.12 0.08 −0.14 −0.10 −0.22 −0.02 −0.05 0.01 0.01 −0.10 0.06 0.02 −0.18 −0.08 0.04
Thymol methyl ether −0.04 0.07 −0.13 −0.01 0.00 0.05 −0.13 −0.03 −0.09 −0.08 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.04 −0.08 0.11 −0.09 −0.06 0.07
Carvacrol methyl ether 0.06 0.04 0.07 −0.12 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.00 −0.09 0.01 −0.01 −0.06 −0.04 −0.01 −0.04 0.09
β-Caryophyllene 0.13 0.05 0.09 0.05 0.18 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.16 −0.16 0.17 0.14 0.16 −0.11 0.20 0.16 0.10
β-Bisabolene 0.08 0.05 −0.05 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.04 0.19 −0.15 0.13 0.16 0.07 0.06 0.15 0.13 0.12
Caryophyllene oxide −0.22 0.03 0.03 −0.24 0.00 −0.11 −0.04 −0.01 0.03 −0.01 −0.03 0.05 −0.19 0.22 −0.33 0.12 −0.01 −0.15 0.07

Chemical composition of soil can affect not only percentages of chemotype defined chemical compounds but also percentages of other chemical compounds in essential oils of T. pulegioides, for example, percentage β-caryophyllene positively (p < 0.05) correlated with amounts of aluminium, copper, iron, potassium, phosphorus, meanwhile percentage of myrcene—negatively (p < 0.05) with amounts of potassium and titanium in soils (Table 5).

2.3. Climatic Conditions of Lithuania and Their Effect on Composition of Thymus pulegioides Essential Oils

There are four climatic districts with 10 climatic sub-districs in the territory of Lithuania: Pajūris (Kuršių Nerija, Pajūris and Pajūris Lowland climatic sub-district), Žemaitija height (Žemaičiai and Venta climatic sub-district), Middle of Lithuania (Mūša-Nevėžis and the Nemumas Lowland climatic sub-district), heights of Lithuania Southeast (Aukštaitija, Dzūkija and Sūduva climatic sub-district). These climatic sub-districts differ by temperature, rainfall, sunshine duration, photosynthetically active solar radiation (Table 6). The one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) showed that Lithuania climatic sub-districts differ by the sum of temperature and sum of sunshine duration in April–July. Tukey’s post-hoc test showed that the Nemunas Lowland climatic sub-district differs from Žemaičiai, Venta and Pajūris climatic sub-districts by the sum of temperature in April–July. The Nemunas Lowland climatic sub-district distinguishe by the highest, meanwhile Venta, Žemaičiai and Pajūris climatic sub-districts—by lower sum temperature in April–July. Tukey’s post-hoc test also showed that Dzūkija climatic sub-district differs from Žemaičiai, Pajūris and Pajūris Lowland climatic sub-districts by the sum of sunshine duration in April–July. The sum of sunshine duration was the lowest in Dzūkija climatic-subdistrict, meanwhile this climatic factor was higher in Žemaičiai, Pajūris and Pajūris Lowland climatic sub-districts. Rainfall was the most variable climatic factor in Lithuania (Table 6).

Table 6.

Descriptive statistics of temperature (T), rainfall (R), sunshine duration (SS) and photosynthetically active solar radiation (PAR) in Lithuania climatic sub-districts in 2006–2016. Climatic sub-districts marking: Aukštaitija—A, Dzūkija—D, Mūša-Nevėžis—M-N, the Nemunas Lowland—NL, Venta—V, Sūduva—S, Žemaičiai—Z, Pajūris Lowland—PL, Pajūris—P. In Venta climatic sub-district temperature data are in 2012–2016; rainfall data—2008 and 2013–2016; in Aukštaitija climatic sub-district PAR data are in 2013–2016, in Mūša-Nevėžis and Venta climatic sub-districts PAR data are 2008–2016. The lines in the table means that data were not observed.

Lithuania Climatic Sub-District
A D M-N NL V S Z PL P
Tjune, °C Mean ± SD 16.3 ± 1.39 16.4 ± 1.26 16.1 ± 1.42 16.4 ± 1.31 15.1 ±1.67 16.3 ± 1.26 15.4 ± 1.41 15.9 ± 1.34 15.5 ± 1.34
Min–max 14.4–18.4 14.5–18.1 14.3–18.4 14.8–18.4 13.8–17.5 14.5–17.8 13.6–17.5 14.1–17.6 13.3–17.5
CV, % 9 8 9 8 11 8 9 8 9
Tjuly, °C Mean ± SD 18.8 ± 1.62 18.9 ± 1.36 18.9 ± 1.54 19.1 ± 1.47 17.8 ± 1.21 18.9 ± 1.36 18.2 ± 1.62 18.8 ± 1.52 18.8 ± 1.33
Min–max 16.9–22.0 17.2–21.7 16.9–21.8 17.1–21.7 16.2–19.6 17.2–21.2 16.0–20.9 16.8–21.1 16.8–21.1
CV, % 9 7 8 8 7 7 9 8 7
T∑april–july, °C Mean ± SD 55.4 ± 2.86 55.8 ± 2.45 55.20 ± 2.68 56.60 ± 2.33 51.60 ± 3.24 56.10 ± 2.13 52.40 ± 2.51 54.60 ± 2.50 52.90 ± 2.02
Min–max 50.2–59.9 51.3–60.0 49.7–58.7 51.7–59.4 46.5–54.0 51.5–58.7 46.4–54.8 48.8–57.9 48.2–55.8
CV, % 5 4 5 4 6 4 5 5 4
Rjune, mm Mean ± SD 64.4 ± 39.90 72.6 ± 40.27 64.4 ± 31.77 68.7 ± 28.87 52.9 ± 22.92 75.9 ± 29.26 63.4 ± 24.96 57.2 ± 22.36 49.2 ± 17.37
Min–max 20.2–131.4 11.5–136.2 17.9–131.1 17.8–114.9 30.2–83.3 19.0–121.5 28.7–118.0 12.6–92.2 23.5–79.2
CV, % 62 55 49 42 43 39 39 39 35
Rjuly, mm Mean ± SD 94.8 ± 28.37 102.1 ± 41.97 94.7 ± 33.50 92.00 ± 35.56 62.40 ± 31.50 114.80 ± 50.26 100.10 ± 49.10 99.23 ± 70.61 87.4 ± 50.5
Min–max 52.4–135.0 24.8–165.0 35.3–141.0 44.3–166.0 30.1–165.0 26.8–192.1 21.6–180.7 16.9–286.0 11.0–193.7
CV, % 30 41 36 39 50 44 49 71 58
R∑Aptil–july, mm Mean ± SD 259.34 ± 59.38 283.00 ± 63.30 250.80 ± 63.51 249.00 ± 63.47 229.40 ± 72.78 292.10 ± 87.88 245.90 ± 64.15 234.59 ± 91.50 214.20 ± 66.76
Min–max 166.2–386.8 207.1–388.1 134.8–338.8 149.9–324.8 121.3–275.5 151.2–464.5 125.8–345.9 102.0–454.9 89.3–333.0
CV, % 23 22 25 25 32 30 26 39 32
SDjune, h Mean ± SD 264.9 ± 48.86 254.4 ± 52.99 266.8 ± 45.59 272.0 ± 55.18 282.1 ± 56.18 282.8 ± 42.19 287.1 ± 49.73 295.3 ± 26.26
Min–max 180.1–319.3 168.3–321.3 184.8–322.1 192.4–364.2 181.8–364.2 207.3–341.7 217.6–353.4 258.2–334.9
CV, % 18 21 17 20 20 15 23 9
SDjuly, h Mean ± SD 264.1 ± 49.92 249.9 ± 50.02 272.1 ± 49.94 269.3 ± 52.71 273.4 ± 52.13 284.5 ± 49.52 282.5 ± 72.77 284.2 ± 52.37
Min–max 177.4–343.5 176.8–342.3 199.3–361.3 186.5–395.5 199.9–341.7 222.90–373.10 171.6–396.0 192.6–356.1
CV, % 19 20 18 20 19 17 26 18
SD∑april–july, h Mean ± SD 1007.8 ± 102.93 945.8 ± 59.31 1012.4 ± 77.47 1022.6 ± 91.81 1056.6 ± 86.56 1064.0 ± 82.92 1080.2 ± 49.73 1096.3 ± 77.31
Min–max 877.8–1246.5 848.7–1070.9 870.7–1149.9 895.8–1173.1 976.8–1264.2 959.8–1205.6 851.9–396.0 1008.7–122.8
CV, % 10 6 8 9 8 8 5 7
PARjune, MJ/m2 Mean ± SD 334.7 ± 31.16 309.9 ± 43.78 323.7 ± 36.63 307.5 ± 31.94 331.5 ± 25.44
Min–max 289.9 –358.3 217.7–346.5 261.1–369.8 264.0–339.4 291.5–371.8
CV, % 9 14 11 10 8
PARjuly, MJ/m2 Mean ± SD 299.3 ± 40.47 314.00 ± 22.59 312.80 ± 28.41 306.40 ± 32.93 319.30 ± 38.48
Min–max 247.3–345.9 280.0–354.3 270.8–359.8 249.8–348.8 244.1– 369.7
CV, % 14 7 9 11 12
PAR∑april–july, MJ/m2 Mean ± SD 1154.3 ± 32.07 1167.0 ± 27.05 1173.5 ± 33.84 1138.8 ± 61.00 1175.0 ± 105.32
Min–max 1117.4–1182.5 1118.5–1202.7 1106.4–1218.2 1009.00–1214.0 909.7–1264.9
CV, % 3 2 3 5 9

T. pulegioides growing in the habitats of Pajūris climatic sub-district accumulated the highest amounts, growing in the habitats of Venta climatic sub-district—the lowest amounts of essential oil (Figure 3). However, the habitats of climatic sub-districts did not differ significantly according to amounts of essential oil in T. pulegioides (F = 1.45, p > 0.05).

Carvacrol dominated in seven sub-districts of Lithuania (Table 7). The one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test demonstrated that the habitats of T. pulegioides in Aukštaitija and Sūduva climatic sub-districts significantly (p < 0.05) differed by the percentage of carvacrol in the essential oil; the lowest and the highest mean percentages of carvacrol were established in Aukštaitija and Sūduva sub-districts, respectively (Table 7, Figure 4).

Table 7.

Descriptive statistics of the main chemical compounds in Thymus pulegioides essential oils in different sub-districts of Lithuania. * denote statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences, ** denote statistically significant differences between habitats of Aukštaitija and the Nemunas Lowland climatic sub-districts by amount of nerol.

Lithuania Climatic Sub-District
Chemical Compound Aukštaitija Dzūkija Mūša-Nevėžis Nemunas Lowland Venta Sudūva Žemaičiai
Carvacrol Mean ± SD, % 14.02 ± 6.01 * 19.78 ± 11.31 15.17 ± 7.98 19.32 ± 10.39 21.84 ± 14.52 27.73 ± 9.55 * 20.92 ± 7.94
Min–max, % 4.79–29.30 5.30–48.00 0.00–32.26 0.00–40.36 11.02–43.95 17.37–39.95 10.94–43.27
CV, % 43 57 53 54 66 34 38
Thymol Mean± SD, % 4.74 ± 3.45 * 1.25 ± 1.69 3.70 ± 6.12 0.64 ± 1.39 * 0.37 ± 0.45 0.43 ± 0.67 4.52 ± 3.94
Min–max, % 0.20–10.94 0.00–5.77 0.00–27.86 0.00–5.73 0.00–1.10 0.00–1.22 0.08–11.64
CV, % 73 135 165 217 122 156 87
p-Cymene Mean ± SD, % 17.12 ± 7.81 * 10.67 ± 6.97 12.12 ± 9.58 * 10.10 ± 8.18 0.99 ± 0.41 * 9.68 ± 1.23 11.59 ± 4.43
Min–max, % 3.29–29.93 1.00–28.87 0.39–38.49 0.14–22.60 0.57–1.53 8.32–11.15 5.07–21.35
CV, % 46 65 79 81 41 13 38
γ-Terpinene Mean ± SD, % 12.97 ± 4.45 * 16.78 ± 9.46 15.53 ± 9.80 * 18.93 ± 7.74 10.75 ± 5.40 * 20.08 ± 2.96 23.92 ± 7.83 *
Min–max, % 2.67–21.87 1.69–29.67 0.00–40.10 0.48–27.61 4.78–17.53 17.89–24.29 9.76–42.60
CV, % 34 56 63 41 50 12 33
Carvacrol methyl ether Mean ± SD, % 4.08 ± 1.65 3.33 ± 2.36 3.92 ± 2.29 3.47 ± 2.17 2.56 ± 2.07 4.19 ± 1.30 5.83 ± 2.02
Min–max, % 1.00–6.04 0.00–8.56 0.12–9.26 0.00–7.99 0.00–5.70 2.60–5.73 1.18–9.17
CV, % 40 71 58 63 81 31 35
Thymol
methyl ether
Mean ± SD, % 1.63 ± 1.34 0.41 ± 0.52 0.66 ± 1.03 0.46 ± 0.53 0.18 ± 0.10 0.48 ± 0.60 1.21 ± 1.29
Min–max, % 0.12–4.92 0.00–2.05 0.00–5.66 0.00–2.21 0.00–0.23 0.08–1.37 0.00–4.14
CV, % 82 127 156 115 56 125 106
Gėraniol Mean ± SD, % 6.93 ± 6.20 8.33 ± 10.10 8.43 ± 10.12 3.95 ± 5.57 15.91 ± 15.63 * 3.68 ± 6.68 1.48 ± 2.52 *
Min–max, % 0.60–24.72 0.09–39.87 0.00–34.74 0.00–18.82 0.00–36.32 0.00–13.67 0.00–7.54
CV, % 112 120 120 141 98 182 142
Geranialis Mean ± SD, % 1.39 ± 1.26 1.68 ± 1.87 1.37 ± 1.63 * 0.52 ± 0.68 1.93 ± 1.88 0.51 ± 0.93 0.41 ± 0.65 *
Min–max, % 0.10–4.71 0.00–5.03 0.00–6.57 0.00–2.15 0.00–4.28 0.00–1.89 0.00–1.88
CV, % 91 111 119 131 97 182 159
Nerol Mean ± SD, % 5.75 ± 5.27 *,** 5.73 ± 7.18 * 4.02 ± 4.66 1.50 ± 2.25 ** 5.19 ± 5.24 * 1.28 ± 2.23 1.09 ± 1.63
Min–max, % 0.51–17.17 0.00–20.57 0.00–16.71 0.00–8.78 0.00–12.40 0.00–4.78 0.00–5.39
CV, % 92 125 116 150 101 182 150
Neral Mean ± SD 4.35 ± 4.11 4.32 ± 5.53 3.97 ± 6.21 * 1.15 ± 1.74 4.10 ± 4.18 1.00 ± 1.89 0.75 ± 1.27 *
Min–max 0.09–13.37 0.00–15.46 0.00–34.92 0.00–6.61 0.00–9.87 0.00–3.84 0.00–3.95
CV, % 94 128 156 151 102 189 169
Linalool Mean ± SD 0.99 ± 3.13 0.74 ± 1.37 2.45 ± 8.14 4.35 ± 12.93 0.41 ± 0.40 0.36 ± 0.10 0.29 ± 0.15
Min–max 0.00–14.25 0.17–6.46 0.16–40.37 0.10–57.75 0.00–1.08 0.25–0.49 0.00–0.50
CV, % 316 185 332 297 98 28 52
α-Terpinyl acetate Mean ± SD, % 0.48 ± 0.45 0.56 ± 1.18 2.20 ± 6.84 2.90 ± 12.26 0.00 0.01 ± 0.02 0.004 ± 0.01
Min–max, % 0.19–2.34 0.00–4.33 0.00–43.56 0.10–57.50 0.00 0.00–0.04 0.00–0.05
CV, % 94 211 311 423 0.00 200 250
Myrcene Mean ± SD, % 1.44 ± 0.42 1.70 ± 0.88 1.29 ± 0.52 1.38 ± 0.47 0.95 ± 0.48 1.41 ± 0.19 1.52 ± 0.35
Min–max, % 0.93–2.74 0.62–4.19 0.00–2.33 0.54–2.44 0.39–2.68 1.14–1.60 0.73–1.96
CV, % 29 52 40 34 51 13 23
β-Caryophyllene Mean ± SD 4.99 ± 1.23 4.88 ± 1.00 5.47 ± 1.80 5.70 ± 2.10 6.02 ± 1.46 6.00 ± 1.39 6.48 ± 2.82
Min–max 2.58–6.94 2.83–648 2.22–9.42 0.69–12.10 4.08–7.67 4.64–7.34 2.45–13.66
CV, % 25 20 33 37 51 23 44
β-Bisabolene Mean ± SD 3.05 ± 1.20 2.98 ± 0.96 2.73 ± 1.11 * 2.72 ± 0.80 2.97 ± 0.89 3.81 ± 1.26 3.76 ± 1.43 *
Min–max 1.57–5.63 1.57–4.78 0.00–5.27 1.23–4.77 1.97–4.24 2.50–5.08 1.60–6.60
CV, % 39 32 42 31 30 33 38
Caryophyllene oxide Mean ± SD, % 1.73 ± 0.45 * 1.34 ± 1.15 1.19 ± 0.67 * 0.84 ± 0.39 * 2.97 ± 0.89 0.68 ± 0.20 0.79 ± 0.47 *
Min–max, % 0.68–2.74 0.44–5.01 0.00–3.45 0.25–1.72 1.97–4.24 0.50–0.97 0.00–1.72
CV, % 26 86 56 46 75 29 38
α-Terpinene Mean ± SD, % 1.33 ± 0.52 * 1.50 ± 0.85 * 1.47 ± 0.81 * 1.89 ± 0.91 0.99 ± 0.41 * 1.76 ± 0.27 2.39 ± 0.95 *
Min–max, % 0.23–2.59 0.00–2.48 0.00–2.95 0.04–3.86 0.57–1.56 1.60–2.16 1.16–4.85
CV, % 39 57 55 48 41 29 40
Borneol Mean ± SD 0.58 ± 0.33 0.66 ± 0.98 0.47 ± 0.34 0.39 ± 0.32 0.46 ± 0.29 0.64 ± 0.27 0.69 ± 0.53
Min–max 0.00–1.20 0.00–4.65 0.00–2.95 0.04–1.21 0.00–0.79 0.46–1.04 0.00–2.19
CV, % 57 148 72 82 63 42 77
Cis-β-Guaiene Mean ± SD 1.14 ± 0.38 * 1.52 ± 0.61 1.54 ± 0.74 * 2.21 ± 1.43 * 1.88 ± 0.86 2.00 ± 0.57 1.78 ± 0.81
Min–max 0.52–1.98 0.68–2.96 0.00–3.18 0.59–7.14 0.67–286 1.45–2.54 0.00–3.06
CV, % 33 40 48 65 46 29 46

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Distribution of the amount of carvacrol in the essential oils of Thymus pulegioides habitats in different climatic sub-districts of Lithuania. Explication: A—Aukštaitija climatic sub-district, D—Dzūkija, M-N—Mūša Nevėžis, NL—the Nemunas Lowland, S—Sūduva, V—Venta, Z—Žemaičiai. * denote statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences.

The one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test demonstrated that T. pulegioides habitats in Aukštaitija (with fixed the highest percentage of thymol in the essential oil) and in the Nemunas Lowland (with the lowest percentage of thymol) climatic sub-districts significantly (p < 0.05) differed by the percentage of thymol in the essential oil (Table 7, Figure 5). The percentage of thymol and thymol methyl ether had high variation: the highest variation of thymol and thymol methyl ether was in the Nemunas Lowland and Mūša-Nevėžis climatic sub-district, respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Distribution of the percentage of thymol in the essential oils of Thymus pulegioides habitats in different climatic sub-districts of Lithuania. Explication: A—Aukštaitija climatic sub-district, D—Dzūkija, M-N—Mūša Nevėžis, NL—the Nemunas Lowland, S—Sūduva, V—Venta, Z—Žemaičiai. * denote statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences.

The variation of percentage of carvacrol and carvacrol methyl ether was lower in comparison with above mentioned chemical compounds (Table 7). T. pulegioides habitats of Venta climatic sub-district characterized by the lowest percentages of p-cymene and γ-terpinene and significantly (p < 0.05) differed from habitats in Aukštaitija and Mūša-Nevėžis climatic sub-districts according to percentages of these precursors in essential oil. The mean percentage of p-cymene in habitats of Venta climatic sub-district did not reach even 1%. The lowest percentage of γ-terpinene also was established in Venta climatic sub-district. T. pulegioides habitats of Žemaičiai climatic sub-district significantly (p < 0.05) differed from Venta, Aukštaitija and Mūša-Nevėžis climatic sub-districts according to the percentage of γ-terpinene in the essential oil of T. pulegioides (Table 7).

The highest mean percentages of geraniol and geranial were established in Venta climatic sub-district, the highest of nerol and neral—in Aukštaitija climatic sub-district; meanwhile the lowest percentages of these geraniol chemotype characterising chemical compounds were established in samples of plant raw material collected in Žemaičiai climatic sub-district. The one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test demonstrated that T. pulegioides habitats in Žemaičiai and Venta climatic sub-districts significantly (p < 0.05) differed by percentage of geraniol, the habitats in Mūša-Nevėžis and Žemaičiai climatic sub-districts—by percentages of geranial and neral. T. pulegioides habitats in Venta climatic sub-district significantly (p < 0.05) differed from habitats in Dzūkija and Aukštaitija climatic-subdistricts by percentage of nerol; habitats in Aukštaitija climatic sub-district differed significantly (p < 0.05) from habitats in the Nemunas Lowland climatic sub-district also by percentage of this chemical compound (Table 7, Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Figure 6

Distribution of the amount of geraniol (a), geranial (b), nerol (c), neral (d) in the essential oils of Thymus pulegioides habitats in different climatic sub-districts of Lithuania. Explication: A—Aukštaitija climatic sub-district, D—Dzūkija, M-N—Mūša Nevėžis, NL—the Nemunas Lowland, S—Sūduva, V—Venta, Z—Žemaičiai. * denote statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences. ** denote statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between habitats of Aukštaitija and the Nemunas Lowland climatic sub-districts by amount of nerol.

Significant differences of percentages of linalool and α-terpinyl acetate (these chemical compounds define T. pulegioides linalool and α-terpinyl acetate chemotypes, respectively) were not established between T. pulegioides habitats of different climatic sub-districts (Table 7). T. pulegioides habitats in the different climatic sub-district differed also by chemical compounds of essential oil what non define chemotypes, for example, by percentage of β-bisabolene, caryophyllene oxide, α-terpinene, cis-β-guaiene (Table 7).

2.4. Influence of Edaphic and Climatic Factors on Prevalention of Geraniol and Carvacrol Chemotypes of T. pulegioides

The redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that the studied edaphic and climatic factors could explain the prevalence of 17% of carvacrol and geraniol chemotypes-determining compounds of T. pulegioides (Figure 7). Thymol, linalool and α-terpinyl acetate chemotype-determining compounds were not included in this analysis since the influence of edaphic and climatic factors on the prevalence of these compounds was not established. It can be assumed that genetic factors have greater influence on the prevalence of carvacrol and geraniol chemotypes of T. pulegioides. Edaphic factors had a stronger influence on the prevalence of T. pulegioides carvacrol and geraniol chemotypes (edaphic factors explain 9% prevalence, climatic conditions 8% prevalence of carvacrol and geraniol chemotypes) than climatic conditions. This analysis also confirmed that higher content of sulphur and mobile phosphorus (P2O5) in the soil had positive, whereas that of sodium had a negative influence on the prevalence of T. pulegioides carvacrol chemotype, and that geraniol chemotype can be detected more often with higher content of natrium, less frequently with higher content of chlorine in the soil. The positive relationship between the content of geraniol and the total temperature in July and April–July, the prevalention of T. pulegioides geraniol chemotype is positively influenced by a higher temperature. The positive relationship between carvacrol, p-cymene and γ-terpinene and rainfall in July were detected also (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Dependence of the amounts of Thymus pulegioides geraniol and carvacrol chemotype-determining compounds in essential oils on edaphic and climatic factors (redundancy analysis).

3. Discussion

Chemotypes of genus Thymus are determinated genetically, but chemical composition of soil, climatic conditions, altitude can influence quantitative and qualitative composition of essential oils [15,18]. Edaphic and climatic conditions in the territory of Lithuania are not equal. The central territory of Lithuania characteristic by higher amounts of humus, mobile phosphorus, mobile potassium, calcium, and magnesium in soil, the western part of Lithuania—by more natrium and iron in soils and higher soil acidity [24,25]. The marine climate is more pronounced in the western, meanwhile the continental climate—in the eastern part of Lithuania, therefore the climatic sub-districts, distinguished in Lithuania, differ by the average annual temperature, the precipitation per year, the duration of snow preservation [23]. The one-way analysis of climatic conditions in 2006–2016 period also showed that climatic sub-districts differ significantly by sum temperature and sum sunshine duration in April–July: the highest sunshine duration was in the west of Lithuania (Žemaičiai, Pajūris and Pajūris Lowland climatic sub-districts), the highest sum temperature—in the Nemunas Lowland climatic sub-district of the central territory of Lithuania (Table 6). Therefore, differences of edaphic and climatic conditions in Lithuania can influence the composition of essential oils of there growing T. pulegioides, as well as the distribution of T. pulegioides chemotypes in space.

Studies demonstrated that all territory of Lithuania is suitable for T. pulegioides, and the amount of essential oil in habitats of T. pulegioides varied from 0.20% to 1.32%. Literature data suggest that amount of essential oils of T. pulegioides growing in other European countries also can vary in the wide ranges: in Romania amount of essential oil varied from 0.7% to 1.1% [27], in Croatia—from 0.6% to 1.31% [11], in Portugal—1.8%, [28], in Kosovo—1.58% [29]. The analysis showed that higher amount of humus in soil positively, higher amounts of manganese and cobalt—negatively influenced the amount of essential oil in raw material collected in habitats of T. pulegioides (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5). Humus is the main component of soil organic matter that improves the fertility, physical, chemical and biological features of soil, the process of uptake of the macro- and microelements, as well as the water regime, reduces abiotic stress [30], therefore, all this can promote not only the growth of plants, but also the accumulation of secondary metabolites in them. For example, essential oil yield of Lavandula latifolia (Lamiaceae) was higher in soils, in which was more organic matter [31].

Carvacrol was the most abundant and frequent chemical compound and was found in investigated essential oils samples of T. pulegioides collected in all habitats (except one habitat only). It allows us to assume that T. pulegioides carvacrol chemotype is dominating chemotype in all territory of Lithuania. After analysing of essential oil samples, a low prevalence of carvacrol isomer thymol was determined in Lithuania: the cluster analysis showed that it was dominated only in 17 habitats of T. pulegioides (Table 2, Figure 2). Therefore, the thymol chemotype of T. pulegioides is rarer in Lithuania compared to the carvacrol chemotype. Previous investigations of T. pulegioides in Vilnius district (Lithuania) also showed the domination of carvacrol chemotype in habitats [32,33,34,35]. However, both phenolic (carvacrol and thymol) chemotypes of T. pulegioides (and other species of genus Thymus) are very frequent and/or dominant in Europe: for example, the carvacrol chemotype dominated in Romania (carvacrol amounted from 50.5% to 62.6% of essential oil) [27], the thymol chemotype—in investigated regions of Portugal and Italy [1,28], both phenolic chemotypes—in Norway and Yugoslavia [36,37]. Percentage of carvacrol correlated positively (p < 0.05) with the amount of mobile phosphorus (this relationship was also characteristic of carvacrol precursor γ-terpinene) and sulphur but negatively (p < 0.05) with the amount of natrium in soil (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5, Figure 6). Previous studies also indicated that the increase of sulphur in soil can positively influence the accumulation of carvacrol in T. pulegioides and Thymus pannonicus [38,39], as well as in Sarureja montana (Lamiaceae) [40]. Therefore, very likely that the carvacrol chemotype of T. pulegioides may be more common in soils with the high amount of mobile phosphorus, as well as with higher and lower amount of sulphur and natrium, respectively. Also, carvacrol dominated in essential oils samples collected in T. pulegioides habitats of Sūduva climatic sub-district where was the most precipitation in June and July (in the blooming period of T. pulegioides) (Table 6), which may indicate a greater preference of carvacrol chemotype for wetter climate. However, literature data about a relationship of amount of carvacrol with humidity are different: was established that lower amount of moisture reduces the amount of carvacrol in Thymus numidicus [41] but increases in T. vulgaris [18,42]. The largest percentage of thymol was established in Aukštaitija climatic sub-district, i.e., in the eastern part of Lithuania (Table 7), where the temperature in January is the lowest compared with other climatic sub-districts of country [23]. Therefore, the thymol chemotype of T. pulegioides may be more adapted to the continental climate. Literature data also suggest that the individuals of thymol chemotype are more resistant to the cold [43,44].

Geraniol, though the percentage of which was 2.7 times lower than the percentage of carvacrol, was the second common chemical compound in the investigated samples of essential oils of T. pulegioides (Table 1). Assuming that the geraniol chemotype was prevailing in the habitats, in which geraniol was the main chemical compound of essential oils, this chemotype could dominate in ¼ of investigated habitats of T. pulegioides (Table 2, Figure 3). Results showed that geraniol was more common in the eastern and the central Lithuania with the more continental climate because there temperature in January is lower [23], the sum temperature in April–July higher (except Sūduva climatic sub-district) compared to other parts of Lithuania (Table 6). Previous studies also showed the positive effect of temperature on geraniol percentage in Thymus pulegioides plants of geraniol chemotype [22]. Individuals of T. vulgaris geraniol chemotype were also more tolerant to low temperature and temperature fluctuation in winter [42,43,44,45]. All these facts may explain the greater attachment of the geraniol chemotype to a continental climate. Percentage of geraniol also was higher in the essential oil samples collected from habitats, in soils of which was found higher amount of natrium and lower amount of humus, sulphur and chlorine (Figure 6). Therefore, geraniol chemotype of T. pulegioides may be less demanding on soil fertility. Although, geraniol in Rosa damascene, in the flower essential oil of which this monoterpene alcohol is one of main compounds, correlated positively with silt, negatively—with sand in soil [46].

Linalool and α-terpinyl acetate were established in the samples of essential oils from the most T. pulegioides habitats, but on average they constituted less than 2% of essential oils (Table 1). Therefore, linalool and α-terpinyl acetate chemotypes are not common in the territory of Lithuania. The cluster analysis showed that α-terpinyl acetate was dominated only in three habitats of T. pulegioides and linalool—in two habitats (Table 2, Figure 2). There is evidence that the linalool chemotype of T. pulegioides dominates in some one habitats in Poland and Slovakia [2,47], α-terpinyl acetate—in habitats of subalpine locations in France [4]. Found max percentages of linalool and α-terpinyl acetate were 1.2–1.4 time higher than the max percentages of carvacrol and geraniol (Table 1), i.e., habitats with the domination of linalool or α-terpinyl acetate chemotypes are very rare. Therefore, it was not possible to determine a potential attachment of linalool and α-terpinyl acetate chemotypes of T. pulegioides to some climatic conditions or chemical composition of soil.

Edaphic and climatic conditions can differently influence not only on essential oil yield and chemical composition of species: study showed that these environmental factors may effect on the prevalence of different chemotypes of same species in space.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

One hundred and thirty-one different habitats of T. pulegioides were investigated in Lithuania (Figure 7). The study of the habitats was carried out in all climatic sub-districts of Lithuania: in Aukštaitija climatic sub-district were studied 21 habitats of T. pulegioides, in Dzūkija—20, in Mūša-Nevėžis—40, in the Nemunas Lowland—22, in Sūduva—4, in Venta—5, and in Žemaičiai climatic sub-district—17 habitats. One T. pulegioides habitat was found and investigated in Pajūris and Pajūris Lowland climatic sub-districts.

The aerial parts of T. pulegioides were collected for plant raw material in full flowering period (in July). The plant raw material was collected in each habitat in the following way: same selected weight of aerial part of T. pulegioides was cut from each individual plant growing in the habitat and theses all aerial parts mixed (therefore, one mix (sample) represented one investigated habitat); the weight of plant raw material was selected depending on habitat abundance and/or size of individual plants in the habitat: 10 g from each T. pulegioides individual plant was cut in abundant and big habitats, 30–50 g from each T. pulegioides individual plant—in small habitats. The plant raw material collected from each habitat was dried separately at room temperature.

4.2. Isolation and Investigation of Essential Oils

The essential oil from each plant raw material sample (as was mentioned above, one sample represented one habitat) was isolated separately by hydrodistillation in at least three replicates in the Clevenger apparatus [48]; each hydrodistillation was carried out two hours. All distillation replicates of essential oils, extracted from a single plant raw material sample, were pooled into a single vial (therefore, one essential oil sample represented one habitat).

Essential oils solutions of 1% were prepared in the mixture of diethyl ether and n-pentane (1:1) for further investigations. The identification of the main compounds of essential oils was based on an GC-2010 Plus instrument equipped (Shimadzu) with a GC-QP 2010 Plus (Shimadzu) series mass selective detector in the electron impact ionisation mode at 70 eV. Separation of compounds was performed on fused silica (100% dimethyl polysiloxane) column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 µm film thickness) (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA), splitless injection; helium as carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.6 mL/min, injector and detector temperatures 250 °C. GC oven temperature was programmed as follows: initial temperature of 50 °C (isothermal for 7 min) was increased to 250 °C at the rate of 4 °C/min to (isothermal for 5 min) and further increased at the rate of 30 °C/min to 300 °C, the final temperature kept for 2 min. Identification of the investigated compounds was based on the comparison of retention indices (RIs) [48], computer mass spectra library (NBS75K) and analytical standards of these (Sigma-Aldrich, Praha, Czech Republic). The retention indices were determined relative to the retention times of a series of n-alkanes (C7–C30) with linear interpolation. The quantitative analysis of main compounds was carried out using a FOCUS GC (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) gas chromatograph with a flame ionisation detector (FID) on the silica capillary column TR-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm film thickness) (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) under the same chromatographic conditions. The percentage of the investigated compounds were recalculated according to the areas of the FID chromatographic peaks assuming that all constituents of the essential oil comprise 100%.

4.3. Collection and Investigation of Soil

Each sample of topsoil was prepared in the following way: 5–9 subsamples (subject to the area of the habitat; each subsample ~100 g) were taken from the depth of 10–15 cm (from plant rhizosphere) by the envelope principle with the distance of 1 m from the central point of habitat and mixed (homogenized).The content of humus in the samples of topsoil was estimated by oxidation method, using potassium bichromate and sulphur acid solution, the content of mobile potassium (K2O) and mobile phosphorus (P2O5)—by flame photometry using 0.2 M HCl solution, the soil pH—electrometrically using 1 M KCl solution. The elements of soil (Al, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, Co, S, Si, Ti, Zn, Cl) were estimated the by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis (EDXRF equipment SPECTRO SCEPOS).

4.4. Analysis of Meteorological Data

The meteorological data (temperature (°C), rainfall (mm), photosynthetically active solar radiation (PAR) (Mj/m2) and sunshine duration (h)) were obtained from the meteorological bulletins (2006–2016) of the nearest station of meteorology of the Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service under the Ministry of Environment. The photosynthetically active solar radiation was calculated by multiplying the total solar radiation a factor of 0.52 [23]. For the analysis we used the mean values of these factors (June, July is a period of T. pulegioides blooming and ΣApril–July is a period from the beginning of vegetation to flowering) obtained in 2006–2016. The meteorological data were analyzed in nineteen meteorological stations: Biržai, Dotnuva, Dūkštas, Kaunas, Klaipėda, Kybartai, Laukuva, Lazdijai, Nida, Panevežys, Raseiniai, Šiauliai, Šilutė, Telšiai, Ukmergė, Varėna, Vilnius and Mažeikiai. The averages of the above-mentioned meteorological factors were calculated in case several meteorological stations belonged to one climatic sub-district.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The calculation of means, standard deviations (SD), coefficients of variation (CV), determination of minimum and maximum values was carried out. Cluster analysis by Ward’s method was performed by grouping T. pulegioides habitats based on chemotype-determining compounds (carvacrol, thymol, p-cymene, γ-terpinene, carvacrol methyl ether, thymol methyl ether, geraniol, geranial, nerol, neral, linalool and α-terpinyl acetate). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (r) were used for analysis of influence for soil chemical composition on T. pulegioides essential oil yield and composition. One-way ANOVA analysis was used for accession if T. pulegioides habitats in climatic sub-districts differ according to quantitative and qualitative composition of essential oils and prevalence of chemotypes. One-way ANOVA analysis also was used for accession if Lithuanian climatic sub-districts differ according to temperature, rainfall, photosynthetically active solar radiation and sunshine duration. Tukey’s post-hoc criterion was used for accession of differences between T. pulegioides habitats in different climatic sub-districts or between Lithuanian climatic sub-districts. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed to find out what part of chemotype-determining compounds could be explained by the environmental factors (edaphic and climatic) and what (edaphic or climatic factors) had greater influence on the prevalence of these chemical compounds.

5. Conclusions

Carvacrol was the most abundant and frequent and geraniol was the second chemical compound in the essential oil of T. pulegioides growing wild in Lithuania. T. pulegioides carvacrol chemotype can be more common with higher amounts of mobile phosphorus and sulphur, lower amount of natrium in soils and wetter climatic condition. T. pulegioides geraniol chemotype can be more common with higher amount of natrium, lower amounts of chlorine and sulphur in soils and higher temperature in vegetation period. It was not determined a potential attachment of linalool and α-terpinyl acetate chemotypes of T. pulegioides to some climatic conditions or chemical composition of soil.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V. and K.L.; methodology, V.V., K.L. and R.T.; software, V.V. and K.L.; validation, V.V.; formal analysis, V.V., K.L. and R.T.; investigation, K.L. and V.V.; resources, V.V. and K.L.; data curation, V.V.; K.L. and R.T., writing—original draft preparation; K.L. and R.T., writing—review and editing; V.V. and K.L., visualization; K.L., supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Figure 1 was published in article Ložienė, K.; Vaičiulytė, V. Geraniol and carvacrol in essential oil bearing Thymus pulegioides: distribution in natural habitats and phytotoxin effect. Molecules. 2022, 27(3): art no. 986.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research has no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.De Martino L., Bruno M., Formisano K., De Feo V., Napolitano F., Rosselli S., Senatore F. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils from two species of Thymus growing wild in southern Italy. Molecules. 2009;14:4614–4624. doi: 10.3390/molecules14114614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mártonfi P. Polymorfism of essential oil of Thymus pulegioides subc. chamaedrys in Slovakia . J. Essent. Oil. Res. 1992;4:173–179. doi: 10.1080/10412905.1992.9698039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grendhal E., Ehlers B.K., Keefover–Ring K. A new cis sabinene hydrate chemotype detectecd in large Thyme (Thymus pulegioides L.) growing wild in Denmark. J. Essent. Oil. Res. 2008;20:40–41. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2008.9699417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Michet A., Chalchar C.J., Figueredo G., Thebaud G., Billy F., Petel G. Chemotypes in the volatiles of wild thyme (Thymus pulegioides L.) J. Essent Oil. Res. 2008;20:101–103. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2008.9699964. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yanishlieva N.V., Marinova E.M., Gordon M.H., Raneva V.G. Antioxidant activity and mechanism of action of thymol and carvacrol in two lipid systems. Food Chem. 1999;64:59–66. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00086-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dorman H.J.D., Deans S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000;88:308–316. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00969.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pina–Vaz C., Gonsalves Rodrigues A., Pinto A., Costa-de-Oliveira S., Tavares C., Salgueiro L., Cavaleiro C., Gonsalves M.J., Martinez-de-Oliveira J. Antifungal activity of Thymus pils and their major compounds. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. 2004;18:73–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.00886.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ložienė K., Venskutonis P.R., Šipailienė A., Labokas J. Radical scavenging and antibactrial properties of extracts from different T. pulegioides chemotypes L. Food Chem. 2007;103:546–559. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.08.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pirbalouti G.A., Barani M., Hamedi B., Kachousei M.A., Karimi A. Environment effect on diversity in quality and quantity of essential oil of different wild populations of Kerman thyme. Genetika. 2013;45:441–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mumcouglu K.Y., Galun R., Bach U., Miller J., Magdassi S. Repellency of essential oils and their components to the human body louse, Pediculus humanus humanus. Entomol. Exp. Apllicata. 1996;78:309–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1996.tb00795.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Radonic A., Mastelic J. Essential oil and glycosidically bound volatiles of Thymus pulegioides L. growing wild in Croatia. Croat. Chem. Acta. 2008;81:599–606. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beier R.C., Byrd J.A., Kubena L.F., Hume M.E., McReynolds J.L., Anderson R.C., Nisbet D.J. Evaluation of linalool, a natural antimicrobial and insecticidal essential oil from basil: Effects on poultry. J. Poult. Sci. 2013;93:267–272. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hugh T., Tan W. Herbs and Spices of Thailand. Cavendish; Singapore: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zouaghi N., Belllel C., Cavaleiro C., Nadjemi B., Yousfi M. Identification of volatile compounds, antimicrobial properties and antioxidant activity from leaves, cones and steams of Cupressus sempervirens from Algeria. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2015;9:83–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vernet P., Gouyon P.H., Valdeyron G. Genetic control of the oil content in Thymus vulgaris L.: A case of polymorphism in a biosynthetic chain. Genetica. 1986;69:227–231. doi: 10.1007/BF00133526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tarayre M., Thompson J.D. The population genetic structure of the gynodioecious Thymus vulgaris (Labiateae) in southern France. J. Evol. Biol. 1997;10:157–174. doi: 10.1007/s000360050016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sangwan N.S., Farooqi A.H.A., Shabih F., Sangwan R.S. Regulation of essential oil production in plant. Plant Growth Regul. 2001;34:3–21. doi: 10.1023/A:1013386921596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thompson J., Chalchat J.C., Michet A., Linhart I.B., Ehlers B. Qualitative and quantitative variation in monoterpene co-occurence and composition in the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris chemotypes. J. Ecol. 2003;29:859–880. doi: 10.1023/a:1022927615442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kaya D.A., Arslan M., Rusu L.K. Effects of harvesting hour on essential oil content and composition of Thymus vulgaris. Farmacia. 2013;61:1194–1203. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nurzynska-Wierdak R. Does mineral fertilization modify essential oil content and chemical composition in medical plants. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus. 2013;12:3–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Farhat M.B., Jordan M.J., Chaouch-Hamada R., Landoulsi A., Sotomayor J.A. Phenophase effects of sage (Salvia officinalis) yield and composition of essential oil. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants. 2016;3:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2016.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vaičiulytė V., Ložienė K. Metabolomic analysis and effects of metereological factors on phenolic and non phenolic chemotypes of Thymus pulegioides L. cultured in the same locality. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015;77:491–498. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bukantis A. Lietuvos Klimatas. Vilnius Universitetas; Vilnius, Lithuania: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Buivydaitė V.V. Soil Survey and Available Soil Date in Lihuania. Vol. 9. Europian Soil Bureau; Akademija-Kaunas, Lithuana: 2001. pp. 211–223. Research Report. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liekis A. Soils of Lithuania. Lithuania Science; Vilnius, Lithuania: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adams R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectometry. 4th ed. Allured Publishing Corp.; Carol Stream, IL, USA: 2007. pp. 104–550. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pavel M., Ristic M., Stevic T. Essential oils of Thymus pulegioides and Thymus glabrescens from Romania: Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2010;75:27–34. doi: 10.2298/JSC1001027P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pinto E., Pina-Vaz C., Salgueiro L., Concalves M.J., Costa-de- Oliveira S., Cavaleiro C., Palmaeira A., Rodrigues A., Martinez-de-Oliveira J. Antifungal activity of the essential oil of Thymus pulegioides on Candida, Aspergillus and dermophyte species. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006;55:1367–1373. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46443-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ibrahimi M.H., Papajani V., Zelikovic S.C., Matevski V. Essential oil analysis of two Thymus spp. growing wild in Kosowo. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants. 2014;17:832–837. doi: 10.1080/0972060X.2014.884773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tejada M., Garcia C., Gonzalez J.C. Use of organic admendent as a strategy of saline soil remediation: Influence of physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006;38:1413–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.10.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fernandes-Sestelo M., Carrillo M. Environmental effects on yield and composition of essential oil in Wild populations of Spike Lavander (Lanvandula latifolia Medik.) Agriculture. 2020;10:626. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10120626. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ložienė K. Morphological characteristics and essential oil analysis of Thymus pulegioides in the habitat of hilly landscape of Vilnius vicinities. Litnuanian Young Bot. Res. 1997;1:141–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mockutė D., Bernotienė G. The main citral-geraniol and carvacrol chemotypes of essential oil of Thymus pulegioides L. growing wild in Vilnius district (Lithuania) J. Agric. Food. Chem. 1999;47:3787–3790. doi: 10.1021/jf980987c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mockutė D., Bernotienė G. The α-terpinyl acetate chemotype of essential oil of Thymus pulegioides L. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2001;29:69–73. doi: 10.1016/S0305-1978(00)00026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mockutė D., Bernotienė G. Chemical composition of the essential oils and the odour of Thymus pulegioides L. growing wild in Vilnius. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005;17:415–418. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2005.9698948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stahl-Biskup E. Das ätherische Öl norwegischer Thymian Arten; II. Thymus pulegioides. Planta Med. 1986;3:233–235. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-969132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kustrak D., Martinis Z., Kuftinec J., Blazevic N. Composition of essential oils of some Thymus and Thymbra species. Flav. Frag. J. 1990;5:227–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vaičiulytė V., Ložienė K., Taraškevičius R., Butkienė R. Variation of essential oil composition of Thymus pulegioides in relation with soil chemistry. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017;95:422–433. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pluhár Z.S., Szabó E., Balassa Á., Kricskovics O., Bíró Z., Pintér A., Gimesi A., Puhalák K., Héthelyi É. The role of environmental factors in the occurrence of different indigenous thyme (Thymus) taxa in the Carpathian Basin; Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on Essential Oils; Budapest, Hungary. 4–7 September 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Said Ahl-Al H., Wahby M.S. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus application on herb and esssential oil composition of Satureja montana carvacrol chemotype. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2016;8:119–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hadef Y., Kaloustian J., Chefrour A., Mikail C., Abou L., Giodani R., Nicolay A., Portugal H. Chemical composition and variability of the essential oil Thymus numidicus Poir. from Algeria. Acta Bot. Gall. 2007;154:265–274. doi: 10.1080/12538078.2007.10516056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thompson J.D., Gauthier P., Amiot J., Ehlers B.K., Collin C., Fossat J., Barrios V., Arnaud-Miramont F., Keeforver-Ring K., Linhart Y.B. Ongoing adaption to mediterranenan climate extremes in chemically polimorphic plant. Ecol. Monogr. 2007;77:421–439. doi: 10.1890/06-1973.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gouyon P.H., Vernet P., Guillerm J.L., Valdeyron G. Polymorphisms and environment: The adaptive value of the oil polymorphisms in Thymus vulgaris L. Heredity. 1986;57:59–66. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1986.87. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thompson J.D. Population structure and the spatialdynamics of genetic polymorphism in thyme. In: Stahl-Biskup E., Saez F., editors. Thyme: The Genus Thymus. Francis; London, UK: 2002. pp. 44–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Amiot J., Salmon Y., Collin C., Thompson J.D. Differential resistance to freezing and spatial distribution in achemically polymorphic plant Thymus vulgaris. Ecol. Lett. 2005;8:370–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00728.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ghavam M. Relationship of irrigation water and soil physical and chemical characteristics with yield, chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Damaska rose essential oil. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0249363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kowal T., Krupinska A. Antibacterial activity of essentila oil from Thymus pulegioides L. Herba Pol. 1979;25:303–310. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  • 48.European Pharmacopoeia. 6th ed. Vol. 1 Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare of the Council of Europe (EDQM); Strasbourg, France: 2008. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Figure 1 was published in article Ložienė, K.; Vaičiulytė, V. Geraniol and carvacrol in essential oil bearing Thymus pulegioides: distribution in natural habitats and phytotoxin effect. Molecules. 2022, 27(3): art no. 986.


Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES