Abstract
Objective/Hypothesis
To investigate the clinical features, management strategies and outcomes for patients with metastatic primary skull base chordomas.
Study Design
Systematic review.
Methods
A systematic search through Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost (CINAHL) was conducted without restriction on dates. After study screening and full‐text assessment, two authors independently extracted all data using a pre‐established abstraction form.
Results
Forty cases were included from 38 studies. The average age (standard deviation [SD]) of the sample at presentation was 28.5 (23.3) and was equally distributed across genders. The average time (SD) between initial diagnosis to local recurrence was 40.1 (60.3) months. The average time (SD) from primary tumor detection to the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 55.2 (49.0) months. The most common subsite for metastatic spread were the lungs (32.5%). Of the 33 patients with data on outcomes, 48.5% were found to have expired by the time of publication. The median overall survival was estimated to be 84 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 62.3–105.7).
Conclusions
The most common subsites for metastatic spread of skull base chordoma were the lungs and bone. Overall survival for patients in the current cohort was a median of 84 months, with no significant differences noted when stratifying by the extent of surgery or the site of metastases.
Level of Evidence
3a
Keywords: chordoma, metastasis, rhinology, skull base, systematic review
1. INTRODUCTION
Chordomas are typically low‐grade neoplastic processes thought to arise from the notochord, making up 1–4% of all bone cancers. 1 , 2 Although chordomas were historically thought to arise most frequently in the sacrum, more recent literature has reported that the distribution is nearly equal between the sacrum (29.2%), mobile spine (32.8%), and skull base (32.0%). 3 Chordomas have high rates of recurrence and are locally aggressive. Additionally, many of these skull base lesions are in close proximity to several vital neurovascular structures, including the brainstem, internal carotid arteries, cavernous sinuses, and several cranial nerves. 4 , 5 For these reasons, chordomas present a unique challenge to the skull base community.
The frequency with which chordomas metastasize has been estimated to be anywhere between 3% and 48%. 6 However, these initial studies were conducted prior to 1980, and it is likely that the paucity of reported skull base lesions were a function of limitations in screening and technology. 7 , 8 There have been fewer investigations studying chordoma metastatic patterns in the 21st century, and these investigations have predominately examined neoplasms in the spine. 9 Additionally, outcome data on local recurrences, distant metastases and survival of metastatic skull base (SB) chordomas are also limited. Furthermore, practical guidelines for the surgical and oncologic management of metastatic SB chordoma have yet to be defined. For instance, it is still unclear whether patients with distant SB chordoma metastases should be treated with primary resection, surgical removal of the metastasis, directed radiotherapy, or limited to palliative therapies. The present study is a systematic review designed to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with SB chordoma that developed distant metastatic disease.
Following PICOS criteria (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, study design), the current research question was developed: Regarding patients with SB chordoma with distant metastases, does the extent of surgery or site of metastasis influence survival outcomes? This investigation also had a secondary goal of synthesizing additional data on corresponding clinical features and management strategies of SB chordomas.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Literature search and study screening
Author Kurtis Young conducted a systematic database search with no restrictions on years published across Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and CINAHL (EBSCOhost), following PRISMA guidelines. Several search phrases including, “skull base,” “chordoma” or “metastasis,” and several Boolean operators including “AND” or “OR” were combined in various permutations. This process and search parameters are fully described by Figure 1 and Appendix S1. The reference management software, Rayyan QCRI, was used to remove duplicates and to screen the initial group of studies. Authors Torbjoern Nielsen and Hannah Bulosan separately screened studies based on titles and abstracts through a blinded process. Author Kurtis Young reviewed and resolved all conflicts between the two aforementioned authors, and finalized all included studies through full‐text assessment. Inclusion criteria required that patients were diagnosed with primary skull base chordoma that subsequently metastasized either on presentation or throughout the course of the study. Additionally, included articles must have either been a case report, case series, or observational study with individual case data. Non‐English articles were excluded if they lacked an English language abstract or if that abstract did not have information on demographics, clinical presentation, and management/outcomes.
FIGURE 1.
PRISMA flow diagram for search and review strategy
2.2. Data extraction
Authors Torbjoern Nielsen and Hannah Bulosan independently extracted data from the included articles through an abstraction form that was created beforehand, and authors Kurtis Young and Christian T. Ogasawara independently verified all extracted data. Data on study ID (publication year and author names), baseline demographics (age and gender), clinical features (presenting symptoms, primary site, recurrence data, and metastatic details), management (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy), and outcomes (overall survival, causes of death) were extracted. Meta‐analysis was not performed due to the level of evidence of the included studies (IV‐V), as determined following the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine guidelines. 10
2.3. Data analysis
All analyses were performed utilizing SPSS software version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables. The intervals between SB chordoma onset and death (OS curve) were approximated through Kaplan–Meier curves, with significance being assessed through the log‐rank test. Calculations were deemed to be statistically significant using an α of 0.05.
3. RESULTS
The systematic database search initially yielded 214 titles, with 53 studies that were further screened through full‐text assessment. Here, five and three studies were excluded for not featuring patients with metastatic disease or primary skull base tumors, respectively. Additionally, there were several studies (5) that were excluded for insufficient information. Two titles were found to be journal supplements and were excluded. Finally, there were 38 studies included in this review, with a total of 40 included cases. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 Study dates ranged from 1949–2022, with 10 studies being published prior to the 21st century. There were 9, 15, and 4 studies that were published between 2000–2009, 2010–2019, and 2020 onwards, respectively.
3.1. Quality appraisal
All included studies were case reports or case series and were subsequently classified as level V or IV evidence, respectively. The overall quality of the cases included were deemed to be moderate to high, as further detailed in Appendix S2. All studies reported on demographic data (100.0%), surgical management (100.0%), and local recurrences and metastases (100.0%). The majority of included cases featured information on symptoms associated with the primary tumor (77.5%), but many of the remaining patients were initially treated at different institutions and had unavailable prior medical history. Regarding outcomes, most patients (82.5%) presented with follow‐up data.
3.2. Demographic information and clinical characteristics
The average age (SD) on diagnosis of the primary tumor was 25.5 (21.7) years. The cohort was evenly distributed across genders. These data are more completely depicted in Table 1. Of the 31 patients with data on the symptoms at the time of primary tumor presentation, the most common reported findings were headaches (38.7%), neck pain or rigidity (32.3%), dysphagia or pharyngeal mass (29.0%), and vision impairment (22.6%). Less common symptoms included nausea (9.7%), vomiting (9.7%), seizure/epilepsy (6.5%), and gait impairment (6.5%). Cranial nerve (CN) impairment was noted in 12 of the 31 patients, with isolated impairment of CN VI (25%) or CN II (25%) being the most common. Several patients presented with either CN XII (16.7%) or combined CN VI and VII (16.7%) palsies. An additional patient presented with CN IX and CN XII impairment. Finally, one patient presented with palsies of CN IX, CN X, CN XI, and CN XII. All other symptoms fully listed in Table 1. The average duration (SD) between symptom presentation and diagnosis of the primary tumor was 11.1 (17.5) months. Finally, eight of 40 cases were reported as initially misdiagnosed. Further data on primary tumor management are represented in Appendix S3.
TABLE 1.
Clinical data per the 40 cases with skull base chordoma
Author | Study year | Age (years) | Sex (M/F) | Presenting symptoms | Location primary | Surgery (primary) | Number of recurrences, treatment | Primary metastases, all metastases | Outcome, time from primary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agrawal et al. | 2008 | 32 | M | Neck pain/rigidity | Petrous bone | Subtotal resection |
3, P1: subtotal resection P2: subtotal resection P3: RT |
Lungs, M1: lungs | Dead, NA |
Agunbiade et al. | 2020 | 9 | M | Headache, nausea, vomiting, neck pain/rigidity, vision impairment, CN VI palsy, aniscoria, weight loss | Clivus | Unspecified resection | NA, NA | Lungs, M1: lungs | NA, NA |
Asano et al. | 2003 | 53 | M | Vision impairment, dysphagia/pharyngeal mass | Clivus | Unspecified resection |
2, P1: subtotal resection, GammaKnife P2: subtotal resection, RT |
Bone, M1: T4, T8, T9, lumbar vertebra | Alive, 132 |
Auger et al. | 1994 | 2 | M | Dysphagia/pharyngeal mass, CN VI, VII palsy, slurred speech, dysphagia, irritability, bloody nasal discharge | Clivus | None | NA, NA | Lungs, M1: lungs | Dead, 0.75 |
Aydin et al. | 2013 | 46 | F | NA | Clivus | Unspecified resection | NA, NA |
Bone, M1: T2, T3 M2: C1, C2 |
Alive, 150 |
Boyette et al. | 2008 | 60 | F | Headache | Clivus | Complete resection |
3, P1: total resection, RT P2: total resection P3: NA |
Soft tissue, M1: left retropharyngeal space | Dead, 69 |
Brooks et al. | 1981 | 1.42 | M | Dysphagia/pharyngeal mass, failure to thrive | Clivus | None | NA, NA | Lungs, M1: lungs | Dead, 7 |
Couldwell et al. | 1996 | 8 | F | Headache, nausea, vomiting, neck pain/rigidity, gait impairment, dysphagia/pharyngeal mass | Clivus, occipital condyle, left posterior fossa | Subtotal resection |
2, P1: total resection P2: total resection |
Soft tissue, M1: subcutaneous nodules in back, Abdomen | Alive, 28 |
Dahl et al. | 2017 | 0.17 | M | Seizure/epilepsy, developmental delay, decreased oral intake, macrocephaly | Clivus | Biopsy only | NA, NA | Soft tissue, M1: chest wall | NA, NA |
Figueiredo et al. | 2011 | 18 | M | NA | “Pineal mass” | Unspecified resection | 1, none | Soft tissue, M1: abdomen (mesogastrium) | Dead, NA |
Fischbein et al. | 2000 | 47 | M | Vision impairment | Clivus | Complete resection | 1, GammaKnife | Soft tissue, M1: subcutaneous mass right bridge of nose | Alive, 77 |
Fischbein et al. | 2000 | 47 | M | NA | Clivus | Subtotal resection | 0, NA | Soft tissue, M1: anterior nasal mass | Alive, 60 |
Fischbein et al. | 2000 | 33 | F | Headache, vision impairment | Clivus | Subtotal resection |
2, P1: subtotal resection P2: resection, RT |
Bone, M1: anterior ethmoid | Alive, 84 |
Goes et al. | 2015 | 52 | Not stated | NA | Clivus | Subtotal resection | 1, P1: resection, RT |
Soft tissue, M1: subcutaneous medial right neck M2: C4, C5 |
Alive, 48 |
Hines et al. | 2014 | 35 | F | NA | Clivus | Subtotal resection | 1, P1: nonoperative, medical management | Soft tissue, M1: left nasal cavity | NA, NA |
Iloreta et al. | 2014 | 47 | M | Upper back pain | Clivus to C5 | Complete resection | 1, P1: Resection, RT | Soft tissue, M1: anterior left neck incision site | NA, NA |
Jain et al. | 2013 | 30 | F | Headache, dysphagia/pharyngeal mass, dysarthria, sore throat | Skull base near foramen magnum to C1, C2 | None | NA, NA | Soft tissue, M1: nasopharynx | NA, NA |
Kaneko et al. | 1991 | 4 | F | Neck pain/rigidity, vision impairment, gait impairment, CN VI, VII palsy | Clivus | Subtotal resection | 1, P1: resection |
Disseminated, M1: dura mater M2: skull bone M3: lungs M4: liver M5: sternum M6: left humerus M7: vertebrae |
dead, 9 |
Kearns et al. | 2016 | 3 | M | Neck pain/rigidity | Edge of foramen magnum, clivus | Complete resection |
2, P1: total resection P2: chemotherapy (Imatinib followed by etoposide) |
Lungs, M1: lungs M2: subcutaneous tissue, neck at incision site |
Dead, 48 |
Kim et al. | 2018 | 32 | F | Dysphagia/pharyngeal mass | Clivus, right jugular tubercule, retropharyngeal space | Complete resection | 0, NA | Soft tissue, M1: heart | Dead, NA |
Krishnamurthy et al. | 2020 | 7 | M | Left hemiface swelling | Sella, clivus | Unspecified resection | NA, NA |
Bone, M1: left hemimandible M2: lungs M3: right mandible |
Dead, 4 |
Loehn et al. | 2009 | 33 | F | Headache, vision impairment | Spheno‐occipital | Unspecified resection | 1, P1: chemotherapy, RT, resection |
Soft tissue, M1: neck M2: mandible M3: lungs M4: vertebral column M5: axial skeleton |
Dead, 84 |
Lopez et al. | 2022 | 29 | M | Headache | Clivus | Subtotal resection | NA, NA |
Bone, M1: thoracic and lumbar spine M2: distal spinal cord and cauda equina nerve roots |
Alive, 26 |
Lountzis et al. | 2006 | 1.67 | Not stated | NA | Clivus | None | NA, NA |
Disseminated, M1: skin M2: spinal cord M3: lungs M4: heart M5: liver M6: kidneys M7: brain parenchyma |
Alive, 30 |
Maira et al. | 1996 | 80 | F | Vision impairment, CN VI palsy, pituitary endocrinopathy | Clivus, sphenoid sinus, sella (multiple primaries) | Complete resection | NA, NA | Bone, M1: lumbar spine | Alive, 18 |
Martin et al. | 2009 | 69 | M | NA | Clivus | Unspecified resection | 1, NA | Bone, M1: L4, L5, cauda equina | Alive, 144 |
Nor et al. | 2018 | 59 | F | Vision impairment, CN II palsy | Seller, supraseller | Complete resection | NA, NA |
Bone, M1: foramen magnum M2: posterior epidural space L4, L5 |
Alive, 11 |
Ogi et al. | 1995 | 24 | F | Headache, dysphagia/pharyngeal mass, CN IX, X, XI, XII palsy | Clivus | Subtotal resection | 1, NA |
Soft tissue, M1: skin M2: lungs, lymph nodes M3: pelvic cavity |
Dead, 42 |
Plese et al. | 1978 | 6 | F | Seizure/epilepsy, CN II palsy | Clivus | Subtotal resection | NA, NA | Soft tissue, M1: subarachnoid space brain and spinal cord | Dead, 0 |
Renard et al. | 2014 | 2 | F | Neck pain/rigidity, CN VI palsy | Clivus | Biopsy only | NA, NA | Bone, M1: right costovertebral gutter | Alive, 27 |
Rutkowski et al. | 2017 | 5 | M | Headache, neck pain/rigidity, dysphagia/pharyngeal mass, CN XII palsy, dyspnea, decline in appetite and oral intake, decreased gustatory sensation, speech hesitation, dysarthria | Clivus | Unspecified resection | NA, NA |
Lungs, M1: lungs M2: chest wall M3: calvaria M4: skin M5: chest wall |
Alive, 70 |
Schonegger et al. | 2005 | 51 | M | Difficulty breathing through nose | Clivus infiltrating sinus sphenoid | Complete resection |
3, P1: resection P2: resection P3: resection, RT, etoposide, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, isotretinoin, interferon‐alpha |
Lungs, M1: lungs M2: brain |
Alive, 108 |
Shakir et al. | 2016 | 68 | F | Headache, dysphagia/pharyngeal mass, CN XII palsy, imbalance, tongue weakness, imbalance | Foramen magnum | Subtotal resection | NA, NA | Soft tissue, M1: breast | NA, NA |
Sibley et al. | 1987 | 2 | F | Neck pain/rigidity, fever, irritability, anorexia | Spheno‐occipital ‐vertebral | None | NA, NA | Lungs, M1: lungs | Dead, 3 |
Uggowitzer et al. | 1999 | 22 | M | CN IX, XII palsy, hypoacusis, vertigo | Clivus | Subtotal resection | 1, NA |
Bone, M1: C4/5 intervertebral foramen M2: C5/6 intervertebral foramen M3: thoracic and lumbar spine |
Alive, 78 |
Uhr et al. | 1949 | 21 | M | Headache, nausea, vomiting, neck pain/rigidity, constipation, anorexia, diminished hearing, weight loss, weakness, fever, limb pain | Sella turcica | None | NA, NA | Lungs, M1: lungs | Dead, 6 |
van Lierop et al. | 2008 | 18 | F | NA | Clivus | Subtotal resection | NA, NA | Bone, M1: hard palate | Alive, 24 |
Yasue et al. | 2022 | 2 | F | Neck pain/rigidity, unable to move left upper limb, dyspnea | Clivus | Biopsy only | 1, P1: resection, RT |
Bone, M1: left upper arm M2: right iliac bone |
Dead, NA |
Zemmoura et al. | 2012 | 42 | M | Headache, vision impairment, CN II palsy | Clivus | Subtotal resection |
2, P1: resection P2: resection |
Bone, M1: maxilla | Dead, 84 |
Zener et al. | 2011 | 59 | F | Neck pain/rigidity | Clivus | Unspecified resection | NA, NA | Soft tissue, M1: left mid‐sternocleidomastoid region | NA, NA |
3.3. Metastatic and locally recurrent disease management
All of the cases included in this study developed metastatic disease, and 37.5% of the sample experienced distant spread to more than one metastatic site. The lungs were the most common subsite involved overall (32.5%) and were the most common subsite for isolated metastatic spread, accounting for 15% of the sample. There were 30 cases of bony metastases, with the most common sites being the lumbar (20.0%), thoracic (13.3%), and cervical spine (10%). The average time (SD) from primary tumor detection to the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 55.2 (49.0) months. Subsequently, the average time (SD) from the detection of first distant metastatic disease to additional distant metastases was 16.6 (13.8) months. The most common imaging modalities used in confirming these metastases were CT and MRI, as more completely depicted by Appendix S4. There were 29 cases where biopsy of the metastatic lesion was performed, confirming the diagnosis of metastatic SB chordoma. Treatment of metastatic disease was dependent on the location of the malignant spread, as detailed in Appendix S4.
Of the primary lesions that were initially surgically treated, 20 were found to have recurred at the primary site. While the majority of these patients reported a single recurrence (55.0%), there were several that presented with two (25.0%) or three (15.0%) separate recurrences. Of the 13 patients with data on the treatment of locally recurrent SB chordoma, the most common treatment modality was re‐excision (84.6%), and other management strategies (Appendix S5). The average time (SD) between the initial diagnosis to the first local recurrence was 40.1 (60.3) months. The average time (SD) between the first recurrence and second local recurrence was found to be 24.3 (6.1) months.
3.4. Survival outcomes
There were data on survival outcomes for 33 patients (82.5%), 17 of which were alive (51.5%) on follow‐up and 16 (48.5%) of which were reported to have expired. There were seven cases (17.5%) where no survival data were available. The causes of death were variable and are more clearly shown in Table 2. The average follow‐up time (SD) for patients reported as being alive was 65.6 (45.5) months after primary detection. The median overall survival since the diagnosis of the primary lesion was estimated to be 84 months (95% CI 62.3–105.7). The median overall survival lowers to 48 months (95% CI 23.7–72.3) from the diagnosis of metastatic disease. Differences in overall survival based on the extent of surgery (total versus sub‐total) were not of statistical significance. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences noted regarding overall survival across different metastatic sites. These survival data are better illustrated by the Kaplan–Meier curves featured in Figure 2.
TABLE 2.
Outcomes of metastatic skull base chordomas
Authors | Survival from primary detection (months) | Survival from metastasis detection (months) | Status | Cause of death? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fischbein et al. | 60 | 36 | Alive | NA |
Fischbein et al. | 77 | 28 | Alive | NA |
Goes et al. | 48 | 12 | Alive | NA |
Martin et al. | 144 | 0 | Alive | NA |
Uggowitzer et al. | 78 | 36 | Alive | NA |
Asano et al. | 132 | 0 | Alive | NA |
Couldwell et al. | 28 | 0 | Alive | NA |
Fischbein et al. | 84 | 84 | Alive | NA |
Schonegger et al. | 108 | 24 | Alive | NA |
Aydin et al. | 150 | 90 | Alive | NA |
Lopez et al. | 26 | 2 | Alive | NA |
Lountzis et al. | 30 | 30 | Alive | NA |
Maira et al. | 18 | ns | Alive | NA |
Nor et al. | 11 | 0 | Alive | NA |
Renard et al. | 27 | 9 | Alive | NA |
Rutkowski et al. | 70 | 15 | Alive | NA |
van Lierop et al. | 24 | 0 | Alive | NA |
Kim et al. | NA | NA | Dead | Tumor progression and heart failure |
Figueiredo et al. | NA | NA | Dead | NA |
Kaneko et al. | 9 | 0 | Dead | NA |
Loehn et al. | 84 | 36 | Dead | NA |
Ogi et al. | 42 | 30 | Dead | NA |
Yasue et al. | NA | NA | Dead | Meningitis |
Kearns et al. | 48 | 48 | Dead | Brainstem herniation |
Zemmoura et al. | 84 | 53 | Dead | Infection |
Agrawal et al. | ns | ns | Dead | Aspiration pneumonia |
Boyette et al. | 69 | 28 | Dead | Recurrence |
Auger et al. | 0.75 | 0.75 | Dead | Massive pulmonary embolism |
Brooks et al. | 7 | ns | Dead | NA |
Krishnamurthy et al. | 4 | 4 | Dead | NA |
Plese et al. | 0 | 0 | Dead | Hypovolemic shock |
Sibley et al. | 3 | 3 | Dead | NA |
Uhr et al. | 6 | 6 | Dead | Respiratory failure |
FIGURE 2.
Kaplan–Meier curves depicting overall survival in the (A) full cohort, (B) groups separated by the extent of surgery, and (C) groups separated by the site of primary metastasis
4. DISCUSSION
Although the primary objective of this systematic review was to examine the clinical features, management, and outcomes of metastatic SB chordoma, there are several key points to be made regarding the workup and treatment of the primary tumor. Diagnosing SB chordomas may be challenging secondary to the plethora of nonspecific symptoms on presentation, and diagnosis is often rendered at later stages after the tumor has already compressed or invaded adjacent structures. Indeed, even the most common symptoms including headache, neck pain or rigidity, and dysphagia were noted in <50% of cases and were nonspecific to SB chordoma. The insidious, slow‐growing nature of SB chordomas may be the reason why many patients do not initially present symptomatically, explaining why even the most common symptoms are detected relatively infrequently. Many patients with SB chordoma in the current study were initially misdiagnosed (20.0%), leading to longer intervals before diagnosis. In the current study, the time from initial symptom onset to diagnosis was an average of 11.1 months. While chordomas are slowly growing malignancies, earlier management is integral in promoting favorable patient prognoses and outcomes. 50
The main principles in primary SB chordoma management are local control and the prevention of distant metastatic spread. 51 Therefore, total macroscopic resection should be performed to reduce the chance for disease recurrence or metastases. 52 While only 31 cases received surgical management for their primary tumor, nearly 65% of these patients experienced local recurrence. In contrast, the literature state that the 5‐year recurrence rates ranged anywhere between 19% and 54%, and this was independent of surgical margin status or adjuvant radiotherapy. 51 This difference may be explained by the included metastasis‐bound SB chordomas potentially having more aggressive phenotypes when compared with a more general SB chordoma sample. However, the information on tumor size, histologic and mutational features were far too limited to confirm this hypothesis. There have been limited literature regarding prognosticators in chordoma recurrence, but Pallini et al. found that expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) was reliable in estimating tumor aggression. Additionally, the expression of brachyury and the loss of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling factor subunit (INI1), has been associated with poorly differentiated chordomas, which are also associated with poorer outcomes. In the current review, first‐time recurrences were most often re‐excised (84.6%). However, due to the rarity of SB chordomas, the data on treatment is scarce and no firm guidelines have been established on how to manage these chemoradiotherapy‐resistant recurrent lesions.
While chordomas have long been characterized as being radiotherapy resistant, survival benefits have been reported across several studies. 52 , 53 , 54 Although chordomas have been traditionally unresponsive to cytotoxic chemotherapy, newer targeted immunotherapeutic options, have shown promising results. 55 For instance, in patients with PDGFRβ‐positive chordomas, the first and second‐line therapies are tyrosine‐kinase (imatinib) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (erlotinib), respectively. 56 , 57 Additionally, the combination of cetuximab and gefitinib, both EGFR inhibitors, have demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of chordomas. 58 , 59 There have been modest data supporting the efficacy of lapatinib, a dual inhibitor for EGFR and erbB‐2/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu), in patients positive for HER2/neu expression. 60 Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, has demonstrated promising results when used in conjunction with erlotinib therapy, as VEGF levels have been found to be substantially in chordoma tissues. 61 , 62 The prognosis for poorly differentiated chordomas (PDC), characterized by the expression of brachyury and loss INI1, is significantly worse compared with their conventional counterparts, and treatment options for this condition are sparse. 63 While there has been a recent clinical trial has investigated the role of Tazemetostat in treating adolescents and adults with PDC, the majority of patients with this condition are typically pediatric. 64 Although there have been other trials investigating other target treatment molecules including nivolumab, these studies were limited by small samples. 63 Additional research on molecular markers, genomic aberrancies, and molecular targeted therapies are needed in the treatment of PDCs. However, the ability to conduct trials on prognostic biomarkers and new therapeutic agents may be challenging due to the rarity of this disease.
This systematic review marks the first attempt to gather and collate cases of metastatic primary SB chordoma, an entity that has been very rarely reported in the literature. SB chordomas are rare malignancies that often present with nonspecific and infrequent symptomatic patterns. Unfortunately, many patients were found to face significant delays in diagnosis, which may have contributed to the eventual development of metastatic disease. According to the present study, the most common subsite for metastatic spread were the lungs, which is concordant with the literature. 65 Similarly, many metastases were found along several segments of the spine, including the lumbar (6), thoracic (4), cervical (3), and other, unspecified vertebrae (4). In the current systematic review, the average time from diagnosis to the detection of distant metastases was found to be 55.2 months, which was similar to the median of 58.3 months reported in a retrospective study of metastatic chordomas by Young et al. 65 The present study found that the primary site of metastasis with the best prognosis to be the bone, although this result was outside of statistical significance (p = .08). On the contrary, Young et al. found the primary site with the worst prognosis to be the bone, with soft tissue and lung primary metastatic sites to have better survival outcomes. However, it should be noted that the sample (n = 219) these researchers used were predominately based in the sacrum (60.7%) and mobile spine (34.7%), with few primary tumors of the skull base (1.8%). 65 This variability may explain the discrepancies in distant metastatic sites between the current study and the investigation lead by these researchers. Larger, prospective trials are necessary to delineate the differences between the patterns of metastatic spread and survival outcomes between the skull base, mobile spine, and sacrum.
The prognosis for a general population of SB chordomas without predetermined metastatic involvement is generally better than that of this study. Unfortunately, most of the studies in the literature are limited by small sample sizes, secondary to the rare nature of this disease. In comparison to the findings of the current study, 65 the 5, 10, and 15‐year OS for a more general sample of 24 patients with SB chordomas were found to be 86%, 72%, and 72%. 66 In separate sample of 24 patients with clival chordomas, the 5‐ and 10‐year OS were found to be 69% and 60%, respectively. 52 In Chambers et al.'s study of 594 cases derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, the median overall survival of patients with cranial chordomas was found to be 9.2 years. It is important to note that this study found that the 5‐year OS for these patients significantly increased from different eras, with values of 48.5%, 73.5%, and 80.7% from 1975 to 1984, 1985 to 1994, and 1995 to 2004, respectively (p < .01). 67 In contrast, the current study estimated that the median OS for this cohort with primary SB chordomas that eventually developed metastatic disease to be lower at 7 years. Additionally, it is important to note that the current study also included cases up until 2022, which may lead to improved survival outcomes when compared with the investigation by Chambers et al. Nonetheless, further analysis and comparison with the current sample is precluded by available data on an uncommon subset of a rare condition. Further research is needed to determine the differences between the features of metastatic chordomas that lead to more aggressive behavior than when compared with more conventional types. More comprehensive data on properties including histologic grade, histologic subtype, tumor size, and molecular features are needed. 68
This systematic review had several limitations. First, the data were limited to case reports and small series, with nonsystematic reporting of the data. Additionally, since all cases featured SB chordomas that eventually metastasized, some data (including those on recurrences or the extent of surgery) may be inherently skewed. Furthermore, finer granularity data on the specific areas of clival involvement were not available in most of the included investigations, preventing additional analyses. Finally, the data pertaining to specific surgical approaches and adjuvant therapies were highly variable, precluding further subgroup analysis through the Kaplan–Meier method. However, this study is not without any strengths. These included a multiple author systematic database search strategy, study screening, and data extraction and synthesis. Additionally, this study identifies a specific area within the skull base field in need of further research. Most importantly, this is the first systematic review to investigate a rare subset of exceedingly aggressive skull base malignancies. Further multi‐institutional prospective research is needed to fully elucidate the clinical patterns and outcomes of this challenging skull base malignancy.
5. CONCLUSION
Pulmonary and spinal metastasis were the most common sites of metastatic spread of SB chordoma. Overall survival was a median of 84 months, but no significant differences in survival outcomes were noted when stratifying the sample by the extent of surgery or the site of metastases. Overall survival was found to be lower in the current metastatic subgroup compared with more general SB chordoma populations.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
APPENDIX S1 Search methodology
APPENDIX S2 Included cases with quality appraisal 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38
APPENDIX S3 Surgical management of primary skull base chordoma
APPENDIX S4 Further information on skull base chordoma metastases
APPENDIX S5 Further information on skull base chordoma recurrences
Young K, Nielsen T, Bulosan H, et al. Metastatic skull base chordoma: A systematic review. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 2022;7(5):1280‐1291. doi: 10.1002/lio2.906
REFERENCES
- 1. Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Mohyeldin A, Coumans JV, Kahle KT, Ferreira MJ. Chordoma: current concepts, management, and future directions. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(2):e69‐e76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70337-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Yakkioui Y, van Overbeeke JJ, Santegoeds R, van Engeland M, Temel Y. Chordoma: the entity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1846(2):655‐669. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. George B, Bresson D, Herman P, Froelich S. Chordomas: a review. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26(3):437‐452. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2015.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Goravalingappa R, Han JC, Mangiardi J, Levenson M. Endoscopic/microscopic approach to sphenopetroclival complex: an anatomical study. Skull Base Surg. 1999;9(1):33‐39. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wang SS, Li JF, Zhang SM, Jing JJ, Xue L. A virtual reality model of the clivus and surgical simulation via transoral or transnasal route. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(10):3270‐3279. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chambers PW, Schwinn CP. Chordoma. A clinicopathologic study of metastasis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979;72(5):765‐776. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/72.5.765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kikuchi M, Nakagawa T. Recent progress in endoscopic skull base surgery: functional preservation and multiportal approaches. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Prevedello DM, Doglietto F, Jane JA Jr, Jagannathan J, Han J, Laws ER Jr. History of endoscopic skull base surgery: its evolution and current reality. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(1):206‐213. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/07/0206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. McPherson CM, Suki D, McCutcheon IE, Gokaslan ZL, Rhines LD, Mendel E. Metastatic disease from spinal chordoma: a 10‐year experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(4):277‐280. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.4.277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence (background document). Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence
- 11. Agrawal A. Chondroid chordoma of petrous temporal bone with extensive recurrence and pulmonary metastases. J Cancer Res Therap. 2008;4(2):91‐92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Agunbiade S, Nada A, Bhimaniya S, Whitehead MT, Mahdi ES. Chordoma with lung metastases at initial presentation of a pediatric patient. Radiol Case Rep. 2020;15(4):382‐386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Asano S, Kawahara N, Kirino T, Asano S, Kawahara N, Kirino T. Intradural spinal seeding of a clival chordoma. Acta Neurochir. 2003;145(7):599‐603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Auger M, Raney B, Callender D, Eifel P, Ordóñez NG. Metastatic intracranial chordoma in a child with massive pulmonary tumor emboli. Pediatr Pathol. 1994;14(5):763‐770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Aydin AL, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Solaroglu I, Ozer AF. A case of chordoma invading multiple neuroaxial bones: report of ten years follow up. Turk Neurosurg. 2013;23(4):551‐556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Boyette J, Seibert J, Fan C, et al. The etiology of recurrent chordoma presenting as a neck mass: metastasis vs. surgical pathway seeding. Ear Nose Throat J. 2008;87(2):106‐109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kearns C, Kearns C. Fifty‐four‐month survival in a 3‐year‐old child presenting with an aggressive metastatic dedifferentiated clival chordoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2016216017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Couldwell W, Stillerman C, Rice D, et al. Malignant clival chordoma with postoperative cutaneous metastases. Skull Base Surg. 1996;6(1):61‐66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Figueiredo EG, Tavares WM, Welling L, Rosemberg S, Teixeira MJ. Ectopic pineal chordoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Goes R, van Overbeeke JJ. A vertebral extra dural chordoma at C5, possibly deriving from a clival chordoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hines J, Ashmead M, Stringer S, Hines JP, Ashmead MG, Stringer SP. Clival chordoma of the nasal septum secondary to surgical pathway seeding. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014;35(3):431‐434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Iloreta AM, Nyquist GG, Friedel M, Farrell C, Rosen MR, Evans JJ. Surgical pathway seeding of clivo‐cervical chordomas. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2014;75(2):e246‐e250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Jain B, Datta S, Roy S, Banerjee U. Skull base chordoma presenting as nasopharyngeal mass with lymph node metastasis. J Cytol. 2013;30(2):145‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schönegger K, Gelpi E, Prayer D, et al. Recurrent and metastatic clivus chordoma: systemic palliative therapy retards disease progression. 2005;16:1139‐1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kaneko Y, Sato Y, Iwaki T, et al. Chordoma in early‐childhood: a clinicopathological study. Neurosurgery. 1991;29(3):442‐446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kim JW, Hong CK, Cha YJ, Kim SH, Suh CO, Lee KS. Cardiac metastasis from clivus chordoma. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:103‐107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Krishnamurthy A. Mandibular metastasis as a presenting feature of a clival chordoma. 2020;16(2):668‐671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Brooks LJ, Afshani E, Hidalgo C, et al. Clivus chorodoma with pulmonary metastases appearing as failure to thrive. 1981;135:713‐715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Loehn B, Walvekar R, Harton A, et al. Mandibular metastasis from a skull base chordoma: report of a case with review of literature. Skull Base. 2009;19(5):363‐368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lopez O, Al Ashi A, Izquierdo‐Pretel G. Metastatic clivus chordoma: a case of a rare tumor in a 29‐year‐old African American male. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lountzis NI, Hogarty MD, Kim HJ, Junkins‐Hopkins JM. Cutaneous metastatic chordoma with concomitant tuberous sclerosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(2):S6‐S10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Maira G, Pallini R, Anile C, et al. Surgical treatment of clival chordomas: the transsphenoidal approach revisited. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(5):784‐792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Martin MP, Olson S. Intradural drop metastasis of a clival chordoma. 2009;16:1105‐1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Uhr N, Churg J. Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy; report of a case associated with a chordoma of the base of the skull and lymphangitic pulmonary metastases. Ann Intern Med. 1949;31(4):681‐691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Dahl NA, Luebbert T, Loi M, et al. Chordoma occurs in young children with tuberous sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2017;76:418‐423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Fischbein NJ, Kaplan MJ, Holliday RA, Dillon WP. Recurrence of clival chordoma along the surgical pathway. Am J Neuroradial. 2000;21:578‐583. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nor F, Desai V, Chew L, Nor FEM, Desai V, Chew LL. Clival chordoma with drop metastases. J Radiol. 2018;12(3):1‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ogi H, Kiryu H, Hori Y, Fukui M. Cutaneous metastasis of CNS chordoma. AmJ Dermatopathol. 1995;17(6):599‐602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Plese JP, Borges JM, Nudelman M, Lefèvre AB, Sallum J. Unusual subarachnoid metastasis of an intracranial chordoma in infancy. Childs Brain. 1978;4(4):251‐256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Renard C, Pissaloux D, Decouvelaere AV, Bourdeaut F, Ranchere D. Non‐rhabdoid pediatric SMARCB1‐deficient tumors: overlap between chordomas and malignant rhabdoid tumors? Cancer Genet. 2014;207(9):384‐389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Rutkowski M, Birk H, Wood M, et al. Metastatic clival chordoma: a case report of multiple extraneural metastases following resection and proton beam radiotherapy in a 5‐year old boy. J NeurosurgPediat. 2017;19(5):531‐537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Shakir S, Pelmus M, Florea A, et al. Synchronous metastatic skull base chordoma to the breast: case report and literature review. Curr Oncol. 2016;23(2):E154‐E157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Shimada A, Kurozumi K, Kanamitsu K, et al. Pediatric metastatic skull base chordoma with TP53 mutation: a CASE report and review of the literature. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22:449. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Sibley RK, Day DL, Dehner LP, Trueworthy RC. Metastasizing chordoma in early childhood: a pathological and immunohistochemical study with review of the literature. Pediatr Pathol. 1987;7(3):287‐301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Uggowitzer M, Kugler C, Groell R, et al. Drop metastases in a patient with a chondroid chordoma of the clivus. Neuroradiology. 1999;41(7):504‐507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. van Lierop AC, Fagan JJ, Taylor KL. Recurrent chordoma of the palate occurring in the surgical pathway: a case report. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2008;35(3):447‐450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Yasue S, Ozeki M, Endo S, et al. Poorly differentiated Chordoma of the Clivus with loss of SMARCB1 expression in a pediatric patient: a case report. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zemmoura I, Ben Ismail M, Travers N, Jan M, François P. Maxillary surgical seeding of a clival chordoma. Br J Neurosurg. 2012;26(1):102‐103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Zener R, Jacquet Y, Wong JW, Enepekides D, Higgins KM. A rare case of surgical pathway implantation of clival chordoma presenting as a neck mass. J Surg Case Rep. 2011;2011(1):3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Pillai S, Govender S. Sacral chordoma: a review of literature. J Orthop. 2018;15(2):679‐684. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Passer JZ, Alvarez‐Breckenridge C, Rhines L, DeMonte F, Tatsui C, Raza SM. Surgical Management of Skull Base and Spine Chordomas. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021;22(5):40. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00838-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Zhou Y, Hu B, Wu Z, Cheng H, Dai M, Zhang B. The clinical outcomes for chordomas in the cranial base and spine: a single center experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(23):e15980. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Dial BL, Kerr DL, Lazarides AL, et al. The role of radiotherapy for chordoma patients managed with surgery: analysis of the national cancer database. Spine (Phila pa 1976). 2020;45(12):E742‐E751. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Vasudevan HN, Raleigh DR, Johnson J, et al. Management of chordoma and chondrosarcoma with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Front Surg. 2017;4:35. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Meng T, Jin J, Jiang C, et al. Molecular targeted therapy in the treatment of chordoma: a systematic review. Front Oncol. 2019;9:30. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Singhal N, Kotasek D, Parnis FX. Response to erlotinib in a patient with treatment refractory chordoma. Anticancer Drugs. 2009;20(10):953‐955. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328330c7f0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Casali PG, Messina A, Stacchiotti S, et al. Imatinib mesylate in chordoma. Cancer. 2004;101(9):2086‐2097. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Linden O, Stenberg L, Kjellen E. Regression of cervical spinal cord compression in a patient with chordoma following treatment with cetuximab and gefitinib. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):158‐159. doi: 10.1080/02841860802266672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Hof H, Welzel T, Debus J. Effectiveness of cetuximab/gefitinib in the therapy of a sacral chordoma. Onkologie. 2006;29(12):572‐574. doi: 10.1159/000096283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Stacchiotti S, Tamborini E, Lo Vullo S, et al. Phase II study on lapatinib in advanced EGFR‐positive chordoma. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(7):1931‐1936. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Asklund T, Danfors T, Henriksson R. PET response and tumor stabilization under erlotinib and bevacizumab treatment of an intracranial lesion non‐invasively diagnosed as likely chordoma. Clin Neuropathol. 2011;30(5):242‐246. doi: 10.5414/np300371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Asklund T, Sandstrom M, Shahidi S, Riklund K, Henriksson R. Durable stabilization of three chordoma cases by bevacizumab and erlotinib. Acta Oncol. 2014;53(7):980‐984. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.878472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Williamson LM, Rive CM, Di Francesco D, et al. Clinical response to nivolumab in an INI1‐deficient pediatric chordoma correlates with immunogenic recognition of brachyury. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2021;5(1):103. doi: 10.1038/s41698-021-00238-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Gounder M, Schoffski P, Jones RL, et al. Tazemetostat in advanced epithelioid sarcoma with loss of INI1/SMARCB1: an international, open‐label, phase 2 basket study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(11):1423‐1432. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30451-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Young VA, Curtis KM, Temple HT, Eismont FJ, DeLaney TF, Hornicek FJ. Characteristics and patterns of metastatic disease from Chordoma. Sarcoma. 2015;2015:517657. doi: 10.1155/2015/517657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Tamura T, Sato T, Kishida Y, et al. Outcome of clival chordomas after skull base surgeries with mean follow‐up of 10 years. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2015;61(2):131‐140. doi: 10.5387/fms.2015-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Chambers KJ, Lin DT, Meier J, Remenschneider A, Herr M, Gray ST. Incidence and survival patterns of cranial chordoma in the United States. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(5):1097‐1102. doi: 10.1002/lary.24420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Shih AR, Cote GM, Chebib I, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of poorly differentiated chordoma. Mod Pathol. 2018;31(8):1237‐1245. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0002-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
APPENDIX S1 Search methodology
APPENDIX S2 Included cases with quality appraisal 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38
APPENDIX S3 Surgical management of primary skull base chordoma
APPENDIX S4 Further information on skull base chordoma metastases
APPENDIX S5 Further information on skull base chordoma recurrences