Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0275337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275337

Low grade intravascular hemolysis associates with peripheral nerve injury in type 2 diabetes

Sylvain Le Jeune 1,2, Sihem Sadoudi 1, Dominique Charue 1, Salwa Abid 1, Jean-Michel Guigner 3, Dominique Helley 1,4, Hélène Bihan 5, Camille Baudry 6, Hélène Lelong 7, Tristan Mirault 1,8, Eric Vicaut 1,9, Robin Dhote 2, Jean-Jacques Mourad 10, Chantal M Boulanger 1, Olivier P Blanc-Brude 1,*
Editor: Alok Raghav11
PMCID: PMC9576093  PMID: 36251660

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) induces hyperglycemia, alters hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell (RBC) deformability and impairs hemorheology. The question remains whether RBC breakdown and intravascular hemolysis (IVH) occur in T2D patients. We characterized RBC-degradation products and vesiculation in a case-control study of 109 T2D patients and 65 control subjects. We quantified heme-related absorbance by spectrophotometry and circulating extracellular vesicles (EV) by flow cytometry and electron microscopy. Heme-related absorbance was increased in T2D vs. control plasma (+57%) and further elevated in obese T2D plasma (+27%). However, large CD235a+ EV were not increased in T2D plasma. EV from T2D plasma, or shed by isolated T2D RBC, were notably smaller in diameter (-27%) and carried heme-related absorbance. In T2D plasma, higher heme-related absorbance (+30%) was associated to peripheral sensory neuropathy, and no other vascular complication. In vitro, T2D RBC-derived EV triggered endothelial stress and thrombin activation in a phosphatidylserine- and heme-dependent fashion. We concluded that T2D was associated with low-grade IVH. Plasma absorbance may constitute a novel biomarker of peripheral neuropathy in T2D, while flow cytometry focusing on large EV may be maladapted to characterize RBC EV in T2D. Moreover, therapeutics limiting IVH or neutralizing RBC breakdown products might bolster vasculoprotection in T2D.

Introduction

The number of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has more than doubled worldwide in the past 30 years and continues to increase exponentially. Five million deaths were attributed to T2D in 2017 [1]. The health burden is largely due to cardiovascular diseases and microvascular complications associated to T2D, fostered by poor glycemic control. However, hyperglycemia alone, independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, does not explain more than 25% of the excess risk in T2D [2], suggesting the involvement of other pathophysiological processes.

Questions were raised whether red blood cell (RBC) exert a pathological role in T2D. An array of studies reported glyco-oxidative alterations of RBC membranes, increased RBC osmotic fragility, reduced lifespan and degraded hemorheological properties in T2D, as reviewed by Turpin, Pernow and colleagues [3, 4]. RBC remodeled during T2D can compromise endothelial vasodilation in vitro via increased arginase activity, ROS and peroxynitrite production [57]. They can also modify the morphology of cultured endothelium [8]. The rigidity of T2D RBC was associated to nephropathy [9] and observed during retinopathy [10]. However, the independent impact of T2D RBC on the vasculature remains difficult to assess in patients, and the question remains, whether T2D promotes RBC destruction within the circulation, a phenomenon termed intravascular hemolysis (IVH).

In clinical practice, IVH is identified by indirect biomarkers including anemia, reticulocytosis, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and bilirubin levels, and low haptoglobin levels, sometimes combined with hemoglobinuria. These indirect markers are modulated by inflammation independently of IVH and lack sensitivity. Most, like hemoglobinuria, are ignored until they become conspicuous. Indirect markers of IVH are rarely monitored in T2D patients.

In cell biology, IVH is considered as a leak of RBC contents into plasma (Heme-containing hemoglobin (Hb), globin-free heme, oxidized forms of heme) and membrane fragmentation, with extracellular vesicles (EV) shedding. These moieties can combine into heme-loaded EV during IVH [3, 11, 12]. Several flow cytometry (FACS) studies reported elevated plasma levels of circulating large EV in T2D and metabolic syndrome patients, primarily shed by platelets, monocyte and endothelial cells [13]. Large RBC-derived EV were also increased up to 4-fold in studies comparing obese T2D patients to obese or lean, non-T2D controls [1416], or lean T2D patients to healthy subjects [1719]. However, they were unchanged in another study of T2D patients vs. controls [20], or in T2D vs. non-T2D patients with moderate/high cardiovascular risk [21]. Besides, T2D is associated to increased heme-oxygenase-1 activity and reduced bilirubin plasma levels [22, 23]. These data are difficult to reconciliate. Consequently, RBC breakdown products are hardly ever considered in clinical practice, whereas many data support a possible link between IVH and vasculopathy.

In plasma, cell-free Hb and heme scavenge NO [24], stimulate pro-oxidant, cytotoxic and inflammatory reactions in the vascular endothelium and compromise vasodilatation [25, 26]. Intravenous administration of Hb provokes vascular damage [27] and cell-free Hb can be linked to vascular complications during IVH [24, 27]. Plasma Hb and heme constitute relevant hallmarks of IVH. Their measurement in biofluids can be implemented using the unique spectrophotometric characteristics of heme, with absorbance peaks at 398 and 575 nm (Soret bands) [12, 2832]. The levels of plasma Hb and heme have never been accurately reported in T2D. We aimed to 1/ establish whether IVH occurs in T2D, by comparing Soret band-related absorbance and FACS quantification of EV in the plasma of T2D vs. control patients; and 2/ investigate these biomarkers as potential indicators of vascular injury.

Materials and methods

T2D cohort ‘Diabelyse’

‘Diabelyse’ was a biological collection registered with the national French ministry of health (n°DC-2011-1480). We included 109 adult T2D patients in the diabetology unit of Avicenne Hospital. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment data were collected, including cardiovascular risk factors, micro- and macrovascular complications (S1 Table). 65 non-diabetic control volunteers were enrolled in Centre d’Examens de Santé (Bobigny) and Vascular Medicine Units of Avicenne, Hôtel-Dieu and European Georges Pompidou Hospitals. Eligibility criteria (Supporting information) were recorded and samples anonymized. We performed a case-control study nested in the biological collection. We obtained ethical approval from committee CPP-IDF-VII on 01/02/2012. The non-diabetic group included subjects with cardiovascular risk factors, mainly hypertension (HTN) (56%) and dyslipidemia (34%), in order to better illustrate the relative effect of T2D. We identified subgroups of patients with obesity, HTN and dyslipidemia. Informed written consents were obtained from all participants. The study design, within the biological collection, did not include patient matching. Blood was collected on citrated tubes according to MISEV-2018 guidelines [33]. Platelet-free plasma was prepared by double centrifugation within 4h and stored at -80°C (Supporting information).

Circulating biomarkers of IVH

Cell-free heme was quantified by spectrophotometry, using its spectral characteristics and Soret band absorbance, main and secondary peaks, as reviewed by Alayash et al. [34, 35]. We selected a wavelength corresponding to heme (398 nm; total) and protein-coordinated heme (575 nm), ie. heme coordinated to its major partner in RBC to form Hb [28, 36]. We subtracted background values at 650 nm, a wavelength at which Hb and its degradation products do not absorb light. This technique detects protein-free and protein-bound heme, and limits any contribution of turbidity [12, 3032]. We did not attempt to specify the different forms of ferrous, ferryl and deoxy-Hb which are all expected to contribute to Abs575 [34]. The spectral characteristics of Hb may be shared with other hemoproteins, but few other than Hb are abundant enough in the circulation to contribute to Soret band absorbance in large proportions. 67 T2D vs. 36 control plasma were depleted of EV by ultracentrifugation (20500-g, 4h) to estimate EV-associated Hb and heme [12].

Flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy

We adhered to MISEV-2018 guidelines and used a panel of specific techniques to characterize EV [33]. We measured circulating RBC membrane fragments or large EV (microvesicles), by FACS after double-labeling with anti-CD235a (RBC-specific glycophorin-A; Becton Dickinson) and phosphatidylserine (PS)-binding annexin-V (Roche Diagnostics), as we published previously [12, 31, 32]. FACS was performed in runs of 30 samples including patient groups and controls. We analyzed plasma EV and RBC-EVs released in vitro using cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (CryoTEM; n = 6–8). Carbon membrane grids (Quantifoil Micro Tools, Germany) were loaded with 10 μl of EV, blotted and snap-frozen in liquid ethane. Plasma EV were concentrated 10-fold by UC (25000-g, 4h), while RBC supernatants were analyzed neat. Vitreous ice films were placed in a cooled Gatan 626 cryoholder, inserted into a LaB6 JEOL JEM2100 (JEOL, Japan) cryomicroscope operating at 200 kV, with a JEOL Minimum Dose System. Images were recorded at -180°C with an ultrascan 1000 CCD camera (Gatan, USA). EV were identified as circular objects with 40–3000 nm diameters and electron-dense phospholipid bilayers. Objects without these characteristics, like lipoproteins and chylomicrons were ignored. 200 to 550 EV were measured individually across 30–100 frames, using Image-J software (National Institutes of Health, USA). Size distributions of RBC-derived EV were confirmed by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) using a Nanosight LM14 (Malvern, France).

Cell culture and vesiculation in vitro

RBC were sorted on Granulosep® (Eurobio) density gradients (700-g, 30 min at RT) (leukocytes, granulocytes, platelets removed) and adjusted with PBS to 40% hematocrit (equivalent). Vesiculation was stimulated by adding Ca2+ (5 mM) and ionophore A23187 (2 μM) [12]. Alternatively, RBC (1 mL) were placed into a Dounce homogenizer and 50 strokes were applied to create shear stress. RBC were pelleted by bench-top centrifugation and supernatants collected. CryoTEM and NTA analyses of EV shed by RBC in vitro were performed in intact supernatants, concentration proved unnecessary.

For functional studies, large RBC EV were pelleted by UC and quantified by FACS and NTA as above. Human umbilical cord endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers were cultured to confluency and treated with RBC EV. Some EV were preincubated for 1h with recombinant hemopexin (1 μM) or annexin-A5 (10 μg/mL). HUVEC were pre-treated with DPI (10 μM), Ro-31-8220 (1 μM), or Gö-6976 (1 μM). RBC EV (25–1000 x10e5 EV/mL) were applied onto HUVEC cultures for 2h. Radical oxygen species production was evaluated with 5-(and 6-)carboxy-29,79-difluoro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (H2DFF-DA) for 30 minutes [12].

To reveal differences in EV surface properties, we used a Calibrated Automated Thrombogram® platform (Diagnostica Stago, USA) and measured the thrombin-activating potential of RBC-derived EV. This enzymatic activity is dependent on surface charge, phosphatidylserine and Ca2+-dependent recruitment of serine proteases. Exogenous artifices were eliminated from routine hospital protocols in order to reveal EV-supported reactions. Only RBC-derived EV (10e9 EV/mL) were added to control plasma depleted of endogenous EV (25000-g, 4h). Synthetic phospholipids or recombinant tissue factor were excluded.

Laboratory parameters in ‘Diabelyse’

Patient laboratory data were gathered in standard follow-up procedures by the biology platforms of AP-HP Hospitals and CPAM [37], including RBC-related parameters (hemoglobinemia, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular Hb concentration (MCH) and indirect markers of IVH (aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), LDH, Bilirubin and iron. Other blood data helped characterize T2D status, including fasting glycemia, HbA1c and C-peptide levels. Dyslipidemia was defined by the presence of one of four criteria: Triglyceride levels >1.5g/L, LDL-cholesterol >1g/L (T2D patients) or >1.3g/L (controls), HDL-cholesterol <0.4g/L, lipid-lowering therapy. We used the LDL-cholesterol threshold of 1g/L, recommended in 2011 ESC-EAS guidelines [38]. LDL-cholesterol levels were >0.55g/l in 94% of our T2D patients. Therefore, the 2011 ESC-EAS guidelines were more discriminative than the LDL-cholesterol threshold target proposed for T2D patients in 2019 ESC-EAS guidelines [39].

Micro- and macrovascular injury in ‘Diabelyse’

The presence of micro- and macrovascular injury [40] was screened across T2D patients. Nephropathy was evaluated by measuring albuminuria, proteinuria and creatininuria in random urine samples, and estimating glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation after determination of plasma creatinine levels. Nephropathy was defined as urinary albumin-creatinin ratios ≥20 mg/g and/or stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Retinopathy was detected by trained ophthalmologists via fundoscopy, and graded using the classification tables of Société Francophone du Diabète (SFD). Peripheral sensory neuropathy was assessed clinically by the presence of suggestive symptoms (DN4 questionnaire), a vibration perception threshold of 25V or more, and/or the inability to feel a 10-g monofilament applied by a trained diabetologist. History of macrovascular damage, namely cerebrovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) was reported. CVD was defined as a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. CHD was defined as a history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary artery angioplasty or bypass. PAD was defined as clinical signs combined with pathological findings on duplex ultrasound or computed tomography in lower limbs, or as a history of lower limb angioplasty or surgical revascularization.

Statistics

Continuous variables are expressed as median (25th–75th percentile) for population description, or mean +standard error of the mean for in vitro experiments (Prism software v9.1.2). Categorical variables were described as percentages. T2D patients and controls baseline data were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test, or Fisher’s exact test, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with adjustment for age, sex, obesity, dyslipidemia and HTN status. Biomarker distributions before and after ultracentrifugation were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Correlations between biomarker levels and conventional clinical or biological parameters were tested by Spearman test. Biomarkers levels in specific T2D patient subgroups were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Potential association of log-transformed plasma absorbance with cardiovascular risk factors, vascular complications and treatments in T2D patients were assessed using multivariate logistic regressions adjusted for age and sex. Missing data were considered as negligible (<9%), except for MCV (31%), MCHC (31%), fasting glycemia (66%). Only a few datapoints could be collected for bilirubin (7%) and LDH (6%) levels. Missing data were not imputed. Statistical analyses were two-sided and performed with the R software v3.6.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results

We quantified direct biomarkers of IVH in 109 T2D patients, focusing on RBC contents (Hb, heme) and membranes (EV).

Heme-related absorbance levels (Abs398) were increased by 57% in T2D patients vs. controls (0.508 vs. 0.324, p<0.001 respectively) (Fig 1A) and Hb-related absorbance (Abs575) levels by 60% (0.040 vs. 0.025, p = 0.003 respectively) (Fig 1B) in univariate analyses. Abs398 remained associated to T2D after baseline biological data were adjusted for age, sex and the presence of obesity, HTN and dyslipidemia (p = 0.020), criteria which differed slightly in T2D patients from controls (S1 Table).

Fig 1. Intravascular hemolysis in patients with type 2 diabetes vs. control subjects.

Fig 1

We quantified direct biomarkers of intravascular hemolysis (IVH) in 109 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) vs. 65 non-T2D control subjects, focusing on RBC contents and extracellular vesicles (EV). RBC contents and RBC membrane EV were quantified in platelet-free plasma of control (Blue) vs. T2D patients (Red). Heme-related absorbance was measured at Soret band peaks at 398 nm (A) and 575 nm (B). Circulating large EV were measured by flow-assisted cell sorting after labeling of surface PS with fluorescent annexin-A5 (C) or a RBC-specific anti-CD235a (glycophorin-A) antibody (D). EV from platelet-free plasma were analyzed by cryogenic, transmission electron microscopy (E). EV were identified as objects between 40 and 1200 nm in diameter, with electron-dense membranes and circularity. EV diameters were extracted and presented as size-distribution by 100 nm increments, or as average size (F). Absorbance associated to EV was deduced from signals remaining after depleting EV by ultracentrifugation (25000 g, 4 h) (G-H). (*) p<0.05 vs. Controls.

Large EV were quantified in plasma by conventional flow cytometry (FACS), after labeling surface PS and RBC-specific CD235a (Fig 1C and 1D). EV levels, RBC-derived or PS+, did not differ between T2D and controls (p>0.05), but measurements were more dispersed in T2D vs. controls.

We characterized EV from T2D and control plasma by CryoTEM to avoid potential artifacts due to dyslipidemia in T2D patients. EV were identified as circular objects between 40 and 3000 nm in diameter, with electron-dense membranes (Fig 1E and 1F). Lipoproteins and other objects which displayed no extracellular membrane were ignored. Less than 0.5% EV were observed above 1200 nm. EV were 17% smaller in T2D vs. control plasma (158+/-4 vs. 189+/-6 nm; p = 0.011), with a higher prevalence of small EV below 100 nm (21.3% in T2D vs. 13.4% in controls).

We assessed the proportion of EV-bound vs. ‘free’ heme-related absorbance in plasma. We repeated measurements in intact plasma and plasma depleted of EV by ultracentrifugation. Abs398 was reduced by 41% in EV-depleted control plasma and by 54% in EV-depleted T2D plasma (p = 0.72 vs. controls) (Fig 1G). Abs575 was reduced by 53% in controls and 62% in T2D (p = 0.32 vs. controls) (Fig 1H).

Next, we aimed to characterize differences in the phenotype and function of EV released by RBC from control and T2D patients in vitro. RBC were subjected to Ca2+ influx or shear stress and supernatants were analyzed by CryoTEM (Fig 2A–2E). EV from T2D RBC were 12% smaller in diameter than control EV after Ca2+ influx (154+/-2 vs. 175+/-3 nm; p<0.004), and 37% smaller after shear stress (136+/-2 vs. 217+/-8 nm; p<0.002). There was a higher prevalence of small EV shed by T2D RBC after Ca2+ influx (15.6% vs. 8.8% for controls) and shear stress (49.5% vs. 19.5% for controls). NTA confirmed CryoTEM results obtained on RBC-derived EV (Fig 2F–2H), with 8% to 20% reduction in the diameters of EV derived from T2D RBC. NTA analysis also revealed that Ca2+ influx triggered 50 to 100-fold more EV than shear stress in all RBC (p<0.05). T2D RBC released 3-fold more EV than control RBC after sudden Ca2+ influx (p<0.002) (Fig 2H).

Fig 2. RBC from patients with type 2 diabetes release abnormal EV.

Fig 2

Purified RBC from control (Blue) or obese T2D (Red) patient blood (n = 4) were stressed by sudden addition of Ca2+ ionophore (A23187) (A, C, F), or application of shear stress (Dounce homogenizer strokes) (B, D, G). Supernatants were collected and analyzed by cryogenic, transmission electron microscopy (CryoTEM) (A-E), or nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) (F-H). EV size distributions were computed in categories of 100 nm increment (C, D), and considered ‘small’ below 100 nm in diameter (interrupted bars). Average EV sizes were compared according to parental RBC (Controls, T2D) and type of vesiculation (E, H). EV size distributions (F, G) and concentrations were assessed by NTA (H). T2D RBC-derived EV were 12% to 37% smaller in diameter than control EV, with a 2-fold increase in the prevalence of small EV (<100 nm). NTA also showed that T2D RBC stimulated by Ca2+ influx shed 3-fold more EV than control RBC. In general, Ca2+ influx triggered 50 to 300-fold more EV than shear stress. (*) p<0.05 vs. Controls.

We ultracentrifuged Ca2+ influx-stimulated RBC supernatants, removing over 85% to 95% EV by NTA (Fig 3A). In these supernatants, Abs398 and Abs575 measurements suggested that hemoglobin release was primarily EV-independent. However, 5% to 20% of Abs398 and Abs575 remained associated to RBC EV (Fig 3B and 3C).

Fig 3. EV from T2D RBC carry heme, stimulate oxidative stress and support thrombin generation.

Fig 3

EV shed by T2D RBC after Ca2+ influx were characterized. EV removed from RBC supernatants by ultracentrifugation were quantified by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) (A), and the drop in heme-related absorbance at 398 nm and 575 nm by spectrophotometry (B-C). RBC EV (up to 10e8 EV/mL) were applied to cultured endothelial cells (HUVEC). Radical oxygen species production was quantified by fluorescent probe after 1 hour, in the presence of heme-antagonist hemopexin (Hpx), PS-neutralizing annexin-A5, NADPH oxidase inhibitor diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPI), or the protein kinase-C inhibitors Ro-31-8220 and Gö-6976 (D-E). RBC-derived EV triggered endothelial ROS production in a dose-dependent fashion, above 10e7 EV/mL. We used thrombin activation (CAT assay) to detect the ability of EV to support PS-mediated reactions. To focus on EV surface PS, we added control or T2 diabetic RBC EV (10e9 EV/mL) to EV-depleted, platelet-free control plasma, and implemented CAT without synthetic phospholipids (F-I). Alternatively, we used platelet-free with endogenous EV, supplemented with hemopexin (Hpx) or annexin-A5 (J-K). We show curves of thrombin generation over 60 minutes (F,H,J) and maximum peak values (G,I,K). Thrombin generation was increased and accelerated in T2D vs. control plasma, in an annexin-A5-dependent fashion. (*) p<0.05 vs. Controls. (#) p<0.05 vs T2D EV.

RBC-derived EV stimulated by Ca2+ influx were applied to human endothelial cultures (HUVEC) for 2h (25 to 1000 10e5 EV/mL) and we measured ROS production. EV from T2D RBC triggered ROS accumulation (p<0.05; Fig 3D). This was inhibited by heme-neutralizing hemopexin and PS-neutralizing annexin-A5, and sensitive to protein kinase C inhibitors (Ro-31-8220 and Gö-6976) (Fig 3E).

To further demonstrate differences in the nature of EV from control and T2D RBC, we used the thrombin generation assay, which depends on the ability of membrane to recruit coagulation cascade factors. We compared thrombin generation potentials of EV from T2D or control RBC stimulated by Ca2+ influx in vitro. EV were added (10e9 EV/mL) to platelet-free and EV-depleted control plasma. Thrombin activation was triggered by recalcification (only). T2D EV supported accelerated thrombin activation than control EV, with a 2-fold increase in peak value (Fig 3F and 3G). T2D EV were partly inhibited by hemopexin and fully blocked by annexin-A5 (Fig 3H and 3I). In platelet-free plasma (ie. including endogenous EV), thrombin activation was accelerated and peak values were increased 2-fold in T2D vs. control plasma. But thrombin generation in T2D plasma could be fully inhibited by annexin-A5 and partly by hemopexin (Fig 3J and 3K).

Next, we assessed the association of our IVH biomarkers with clinical data and vascular injury in T2D patients, identifying groups with obesity, HTN and dyslipidemia. Clinical laboratory data revealed a 3.4% drop in RBC volume (MCV) in T2D, overall (85.3 vs. 82.9 mm3, p = 0.027), using multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, obesity, HTN and dyslipidemia (S1 Table). RBC volume was negatively correlated with HbA1c across the cohort (r = -0.31, p = 0.004) and among T2D patients (r = -0.33 p = 0.032). We found no association of T2D with biomarkers like RBC counts, hemoglobinemia, hematocrit, AST, ALT, LDH or iron levels. T2D associated with lower bilirubin levels vs. control patients, despite the few data collected (5.5 vs. 8.5 μmol/l, p = 0.036).

In T2D, we found no correlation of plasma Abs398 and Abs575 levels with HbA1c (Fig 4A and 4E), fasting glycemia, C-peptide levels or T2D duration (Table 1). However, Abs398 and Abs575 were 27% and 31% higher in obese vs. non-obese T2D patients, respectively (OR = 4.8; p = 0.041 and OR = 4.6; p = 0.017) (Fig 4B and 4F; Table 2), and positively associated to the total daily dose of insulin (r = 0.25, p = 0.014 and r = 0.29, p = 0.010) (Table 1).

Fig 4. Association of direct biomarkers of IVH with vascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes.

Fig 4

We crossed our direct IVH biomarkers with clinical data. We investigated the association of plasma absorbance at 398 nm (A-D, I-L) and 575 nm (E-H, M-P) with subgroups of patients with T2D. First, we assessed the correlation of Abs398 and Abs575 with glycated hemoglobin (Hb1Ac) levels (r = -0.12 and -0.11, respectively. p>0.2 for both). Next, we assessed their association with obesity, dyslipidemia and hypertension (HTN) (A-H). Abs398 and Abs575 were significantly increased in obese vs. non-obese patients with T2D. Finally, we assessed their association with peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy or macroangiopathy (I-P). (*) p<0.05 vs. Controls (#) p = 0.051 vs Controls. (see Table 2 for adjusted logistic regressions using Log-transformed absorbances).

Table 1. Correlations between IVH markers and baseline data in T2D patients after adjustment for age and sex.

Abs398nm Abs575nm
n R p n R p
Age 109 0.016 0.810 108 0.006 0.685
BMI 107 0.149 0.167 106 0.228 0.051
HbA1c -0.122 0.289 105 -0.114 0.220
T2D duration 108 0.024 0.514 107 0.021 0.857
Insulin units/day 65 0.252 0.014 * 64 0.295 0.010 *
C peptid 102 0.246 0.080 101 0.206 0.071
Fasting glycemia 37 0.178 0.145 37 0.061 0.900
eGFR (CKD EPI) 107 -0.102 0.346 106 -0.075 0.623
SBP 105 -0.045 0.743 104 0.018 0.726
DBP 105 -0.113 0.117 104 0.056 0.738
Heart rate 103 0.175 0.649 102 0.082 0.944
RBC 109 0.022 0.541 108 0.042 0.787
Hemoglobin 109 -0.003 0.448 108 -0.015 0.811
Hematocrit 109 -0.035 0.697 108 -0.001 0.812
MCV 75 -0.124 0.252 74 -0.038 0.798
MCHC 75 0.102 0.363 74 -0.038 0.921
Leukocytes 109 0.073 0.797 108 0.044 0.812
Neutrophils 107 0.097 0.627 106 0.066 0.922
CRP 108 0.249 0.272 107 0.128 0.818
Platelets 109 0.117 0.333 108 0.101 0.928
AST 105 0.063 0.851 105 -0.065 0.174
ALT 109 0.102 0.273 108 0.116 0.322
Iron (Serum) 103 0.010 0.900 102 0.047 0.567
Bilirubin 8 -0.090 0.518 8 -0.160 0.601
LDH 7 -0.310 0.144 7 -0.286 0.046 *

*p<0.05; all statistics are adjusted for age and sex (Age adjusted for sex only)

Data for bilirubin and LDH were only collected for 7% patients. BMI, body mass index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CRP, C reactive protein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RBC, red blood cells; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Table 2. Associations between IVH biomarkers and cardiovascular risk factors, or micro- and macrovascular complications in T2D patients: Odds Ratios and their 95% confidence intervals after adjustment for age and sex.

Abs398 Abs575
No Yes n OR (logAbs398) p No Yes n OR (logAbs575) p
Male sex 0.519 (0.336–0.713) 0.505 (0.377–0.725) 109 1.6 (0.27;10.11) 0.609 0.043 (0.025–0.056) 0.039 (0.024–0.054) 108 0.80 (0.17;3.75) 0.771
Hypertension 0.542 (0.405–0.716) 0.507 (0.34–0.709) 108 0.52 (0.04;5.47) 0.594 0.043 (0.032–0.056) 0.039 (0.023–0.055) 107 1.01 (0.12;7.98) 0.995
Dyslipidemia 0.540 (0.652;0.308) 0.507 (0.342–0.711) 108 2.04 (0.19;21.04) 0.546 0.044 (0.025–0.053) 0.039 (0.024–0.056) 107 1.59 (0.20;12.24) 0.654
Obesity 0.450 (0.341–0.617) 0.571 (0.357–0.791) 107 4.82 (0.59;42.52) 0.041 * 0.036 (0.024–0.049) 0.047 (0.03–0.059) 106 4.62 (0.76;31) 0.017 *
Tobacco use 0.540 (0.339–0.714) 0.411 (0.381–0.504) 108 0.32 (0.01;8.11) 0.483 0.041 (0.024–0.056) 0.034 (0.024–0.044) 107 0.45 (0.03;6.65) 0.553
Microangiopathy 0.610 (0.359–0.708) 0.507 (0.343–0.735) 108 0.41 (0.05;3.12) 0.400 0.047 (0.030–0.056) 0.039 (0.023–0.056) 107 0.49 (0.08;2.77) 0.428
Neuropathy 0.478 (0.334–0.699) 0.617 (0.404–0.808) 106 5.54 (1.01;40.12) 0.040 * 0.038 (0.022–0.050) 0.049 (0.031–0.057) 105 5.10 (1.01;29.7) 0.042 *
Nephropathy 0.610 (0.326–0.719) 0.466 (0.345–0.517) 107 0.58 (0.08;3.88) 0.576 0.045 (0.024–0.057) 0.039 (0.024–0.053) 106 0.81 (0.15;4.26) 0.806
Microalbuminuria 0.53 (0.332–0.735) 0.465 (0.394–0.589) 102 1.02 (0.13;8.39) 0.988 0.043 (0.023–0.057) 0.039 (0.029–0.048) 101 1.19 (0.20;7.42) 0.849
Proteinuria 0.61 (0.338–0.808) 0.451 (0.347–0.589) 101 0.295 (0.04;1.98) 0.215 0.047 (0.027–0.059) 0.038 (0.023–0.051) 100 0.46 (0.09;2.31) 0.348
eGFR <60mL/min 0.504 (0.341–0.544) 0.526 (0.369–0.726) 107 1.63 (0.19;14.69) 0.654 0.039 (0.024–0.055) 0.044 (0.026–0.058) 106 2.29 (0.37;15.57) 0.378
Retinopathy 0.549 (0.386–0.702) 0.526 (0.344–0.791) 104 0.61 (0.09–3.89) 0.605 0.043 (0.030–0.055) 0.039 (0.022–0.057) 103 0.522 (0.10;2.55) 0.427
Maculopathy 0.543 (0.383–0.733) 0.463 (0.395–0.572) 99 0.44 (0.02;10.34) 0.599 0.042 (0.027–0.056) 0.039 (0.032–0.056) 98 1.18 (0.09;19.6) 0.902
Laser for retinopathy 0.541 (0.344–0.715) 0.485 (0.414–0.769) 104 2.20 (0.25;23.21) 0.491 0.042 (0.024–0.056) 0.039 (0.031–0.057) 103 2.11 (0.31;16.88) 0.456
Cardiovascular disease 0.537 (0.369–0.712) 0.401 (0.306–0.682) 108 0.37 (0.03;4.17) 0.418 0.04 (0.026–0.056) 0.026 (0.021–0.054) 107 0.33 (0.04;2.69) 0.296
Coronary heart disease 0.526 (0.342–0.711) 0.401 (0.264–0.583) 108 0.18 (0;5.06) 0.301 0.04 (0.025–0.056) 0.027 (0.019–0.052) 107 0.25 (0;4.57) 0.342
Stroke 0.513 (0.342–0.711) 0.444 (0.308–0.653) 108 0.28 (0–8.62) 0.451 0.040 (0.025–0.056) 0.037 (0.024–0.058) 107 0.54 (0.03;10.38) 0.665
Peripheral arterial disease 0.526 (0.347–0.714) 0.38 (0.325–0.516) 108 0.01 (0–5.1) 0.292 0.04 (0.025–0.056) 0.029 (0.02–0.045) 107 1.85 (0;3.62) 0.271

*p<0.05; all statistics are adjusted for age and sex (Sex adjusted for age only). Data are median (25th–75th percentiles). Obesity, BMI≥30kg/m2; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Abs398 and Abs575 were not associated with RBC counts, hemoglobinemia, hematocrit, bilirubin, AST, ALT, LDH and iron levels, or inflammation (Leukocyte counts, CRP) (Tables 1 and 2), nor correlated to dyslipidemia or HTN (Fig 4C, 4D, 4G and 4H), lipid-lowering or antihypertensive medication (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 3. Associations between IVH markers and treatments in T2D patients: Odds Ratios and their 95% confidence intervals after adjustment for age and sex.

Abs398 Abs575
No Yes n OR (logAbs398) p No Yes n OR (logAbs575) p
Insulin 0.497 (0.341–0.706) 0.534 (0.364–0.744) 107 1.67 (0.25;11) 0.592 0.040 (0.026–0.053) 0.041 (0.024–0.058) 106 1.75 (0.34;9.05) 0.498
Metformin 0.543 (0.37–0.812) 0.504 (0.342–0.706) 107 0.47 (0.06;3.55) 0.474 0.039 (0.024–0.069) 0.040 (0.025–0.054) 106 0.47 (0.08;2.68) 0.409
Sulfonylurea 0.526 (0.351–0.808) 0.490 (0.343–0.652) 107 0.38 (0.06;2.34) 0.298 0.039 (0.023–0.061) 0.041 (0.026–0.053) 106 0.73 (0.15;3.53) 0.696
DPP-4 inhibitor 0.563 (0.369–0.791) 0.452 (0.28–0.543) 107 0.14 (0.02;1.10) 0.064 0.047 (0.028–0.057) 0.032 (0.017–0.044) 106 0.14 (0.02;0.8) 0.030 *
GLP-1 analog 0.526 (0.341–0.714) 0.463 (0.398–0.713) 107 0.736 (0.03;19.84) 0.848 0.04 (0.024–0.056) 0.039 (0.030–0.055) 106 1.03 (0.06;21.62) 0.986
ACEi 0.541 (0.397–0.721) 0.384 (0.307–0.641) 107 0.23 (0.03;1.77) 0.160 0.042 (0.026–0.057) 0.031 (0.022–0.051) 106 0.23 (0.04;1.35) 0.104
ARB 0.497 (0.309–0.709) 0.543 (0.405–0.725) 107 4.18 (0.52;38.61) 0.189 0.039 (0.022–0.054) 0.047 (0.031–0.057) 106 6.01 (0.93;46.64) 0.070
Diuretic 0.505 (0.344–0.707) 0.519 (0.333–0.713) 107 1.08 (0.16;7.17) 0.939 0.04 (0.023–0.053) 0.039 (0.024–0.058) 106 1.84 (0.36;10.03) 0.467
Calcium Chanel Blocker 0.537 (0.353–0.710) 0.461 (0.336–0.732) 107 0.61 (0.09;4.07) 0.608 0.04 (0.025–0.56) 0.039 (0.023–0.056) 106 0.58 (0.11;3.04) 0.516
Anti-platelet agent 0.504 (0.349–0.656) 0.598 (0.329–0.821) 107 2.44 (0.30;22.08) 0.412 0.039 (0.025–0.052) 0.048 (0.022–0.067) 106 1.54 (0.02–10.23) 0.647
Aspirin 0.504 (0.342–0.654) 0.627 (0.337–0.822) 107 4.40 (0.54;42.14) 0.179 0.039 (0.025–0.053) 0.049 (0.023–0.067) 106 2.56 (0.41;17.82) 0.322
Lipid lowering therapy 0.485 (0.372–0.645) 0.534 (0.336–0.809) 107 1.99 (0.28:14.36) 0.491 0.04 (0.03–0.053) 0.039 (0.023–0.056) 106 1.07 (0.19;6.02) 0.934
Statin 0.464 (0.359–0.631) 0.542 (0.337–0.809) 107 2.78 (0.42;19.25) 0.291 0.039 (0.029–0.053) 0.040 (0.023–0.057) 106 1.44 (0.27;7.63) 0.665

*p<0.05; all statistics are adjusted for age and sex. Data are median (25th–75th percentiles)

DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP1, Glucagon-like peptide-1; ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker.

We tested potential association of IVH biomarkers with overt micro- or macrovascular damage in T2D. Abs398 levels (OR = 5.5; p = 0.040) and Abs575 levels (OR = 5.1; p = 0.042) were increased in T2D patients suffering from peripheral sensory neuropathy, by 29% and 32% respectively (Fig 4I and 4M; Table 2). This unique association remained significant after adjustment for factors classically involved in the pathogenesis of T2D neuropathy, such as HbA1c, T2D duration, age and sex (S2 Table). Abs398 or Abs575 were unrelated to nephropathy, retinopathy or macrovascular injury (p>0.3) (Fig 4J–4L and 4N–4P; Table 2).

Finally, circulating levels of PS+ and CD235a+ large EV were not statistically elevated in T2D, and large EV did not correlate with the circulating levels of HbA1c (R = -0.384; p>0.055 after adjustment for age and sex). PS+ and CD235a+ large EV were not associated with dyslipidemia, HTN or obesity as cardiovascular risk factors, nor with vascular damage in T2D patients (S3 Table).

Discussion

We demonstrated for the first time that T2D associates with IVH, and described new circulating biomarkers of peripheral sensory neuropathy. IVH measurements in T2D plasma formed a complex picture: Previous reports of elevated levels of large, RBC-derived EV, analyzed by FACS, remain conflicting. Here, a possible increase in large RBC-derived EV levels detected by FACS in T2D patient vs. control plasma did not reach significance.

Conversely, RBC volume (MCV) was reduced by 3.4% in T2D, reflecting either RBC dehydration or EV shedding. Reduced MCV was combined with an abnormal leak of heme into the T2D circulation (about 50% above controls, and about 30% higher in obese vs. non-obese T2D patients). The reduced RBC volume was inversely correlated with circulating HbA1c levels, while heme-related absorbance in plasma was positively correlated to daily insulin requirements. In summary, RBC injury and RBC leakage into the circulation imply that RBC breakdown occurs in T2D, that T2D patients suffer from underestimated, low grade IVH, and that the phenomenon may be linked to glycemia. However, we found no link between heme-related absorbance and glycemia, c-peptide levels, or T2D duration. We concluded that RBC damage and IVH can emerge once T2D is established, but RBC and Hb glycation alone may not be sufficient to cause IVH.

In T2D plasma, depleting 80% to 95% EV by centrifugation reduced heme-related absorbance by 50%, a proportion similar to hemolytic disorders [12]. In stressed RBC supernatants, the proportion of EV-associated, heme-related absorbance was close to 20%. Moreover, EV from T2D RBC triggered ROS production in human endothelial cultures and enhanced thrombin activation in a heme- and PS–mediated fashion. This demonstrated that EV released by T2D RBC differ from those shed by control RBC in volume, cargo (pro-oxidant Hb and heme degradation products) and membrane surface properties. RBC-derived EV may thus enhance vascular degeneration and inflammation in T2D, as they do in hemolytic diseases [12, 31]. RBC-derived EV may also favor coagulopathy in T2D, an aspect that deserves a dedicated study.

In vitro, RBC isolated from T2D patients shed about 3-fold more EV than control RBC under similar stimulation (sudden Ca2+ influx or shear stress), echoing previous reports that RBC from obese T2D patients release more EV than other RBC [1417]. CryoTEM and NTA studies also showed that EV produced by isolated T2D RBC were 20% to 40% smaller in diameter than control EV. Circulating EV were also about 20% smaller in T2D patients vs. control plasma. This implies that the smaller size of T2D EV resulted from acquired modifications of parent blood cells, modulating vesiculation and EV characteristics. RBC glycation may weaken T2D RBC integrity and translate into EV shedding. However, an additional stimulus linked to obesity, like inflammation, oxidative stress or shear stress, may synergize with RBC remodeling to trigger vesiculation and IVH in T2D [41].

CryoTEM and NTA revealed that the prevalence of small EV below 100 nm was increased by 60% to 100% in T2D. Van der Pol, Nieuwland and colleagues [42] established that conventional FACS technology can only detect EV accurately above 300–600 nm in diameter. Hence, a drop from 190 nm to 158 nm in average EV diameter, with twice more EV of small size (80 nm average), invisible by FACS, must impact EV quantification in T2D. Furthermore, routine evaluation of plasma EV by FACS remains challenging for clinical biology platforms, regarding equipment availability and procedure standardization [11, 33, 42]. The phenotype of T2D EV highlights the weakness of conventional FACS, supports the need for multiple approaches to characterize EV, and reduces the relevance of conventional FACS to develop plasma EV as biomarkers in cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, cryoTEM is low-throughput, qualitative only, and maladapted to patient screening, but it proved irreplaceable to unravel the smaller size of EV in T2D.

Very few circulating biomarkers apart from glycated Hb (HbA1c) and advanced glycation endproducts (AGE) [43] can help stratify T2D patients at risk of microvascular injury in clinical practice. Current clinical tests used to detect early vascular complications in T2D require expertise, they are costly and sometimes unavailable. Our new, direct biomarkers of IVH, like plasma heme-related absorbance, may be more practical and less costly to screen for T2D microangiopathy. In our T2D cohort, heme-related absorbance was not a general marker of vascular complication, it was specifically associated with peripheral sensory neuropathy. This might relate to a higher sensitivity of peripheral neurons to IVH products, or to unique characteristics of the vascular bed and hemorheology in the lower leg. However, peripheral neuropathy is a multifactorial complication, which may integrate microvascular injury and nerve inflammation.

Diabelyse was a cross-sectional, observational study with 174 patients. Larger, multicentric, prospective studies with higher statistical power are now needed to clarify the association of heme-related absorbance with microvascular complications in T2D, and their relevance to stratify T2D patients at risk of developing peripheral neuropathy. Neuropathy remains a major debilitating complication of T2D, with risk of foot injury, neuropathic pain and autonomic failure, in millions of patients with T2D across the world [44]. Absorbance is technically simple to measure, spectrophotometers are widely available and standardization is straightforward. Heme-related absorbance may ultimately, represent a first line method to screen patients susceptible to neuropathy for an earlier diagnostic. Patients with high levels of heme-related absorbance may eventually be prioritized for neuroprotective prophylaxis and therapeutics. Anti-hemolysis therapies, such as heme-chelating recombinant hemopexin or EV-neutralizing annexin-A5 may also be tested to treat T2D patients with low-grade IVH or established neuropathy.

Limited regenerative anemia was previously reported in T2D, independent of iron stores, inflammation, or renal dysfunction [45, 46]. Here, a slight trend for hemolytic anemia in T2D patients was too mild to emerge from routine hospital analyses based on indirect biomarkers of hemolysis (AST, iron, bilirubin and LDH), known to be impacted by the many metabolic modifications that prevail in T2D. For instance, plasma bilirubin levels may rise with IVH, but bilirubin is known to decrease in T2D [47, 48], which we confirmed despite the very few datapoints collected. Lower circulating bilirubin levels in T2D were previously attributed to a decreased HO-1 expression in the late stage of T2D, limiting heme catabolism [48]. Heme-derived degradation species displaying Soret band absorbance may be comparatively enriched in T2D and obese T2D plasma. This makes plasma spectrophotometry a candidate for a cost-efficient, reproducible and high-throughput biomarker.

The pathological consequences of IVH are mainly due to the production and actions of oxidized Hb forms. After release in the bloodstream, Hb oxidates and generates different products, including metHb, ferrylHb and covalently crosslinked Hb forms. MetHb mainly issues from the reaction between oxy-Hb and NO, or Hb auto-oxidation. FerrylHb is a transient compound produced by Hb or metHb oxidation by peroxides (hydrogen peroxide or lipid hydroperoxides). FerrylHb can oxidize aminoacids residues near b-globin chains, leading to the production of globin-derived radicals, which enhance covently crosslinked Hb multimerization [49].

These products of Hb oxidation can stimulate specific pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory actions on the vascular endothelium, with functional consequences. MetHb triggers the endothelial production of interleukin-6 and -8. FerrylHb can trigger endothelial activation especially through Nuclear Factor-kappa B (NFkB) pathway. Globin-derived radicals activate endothelial interleukin-1ß production via the NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome [49]. In addition, oxidized forms of Hb shed their prosthetic heme more readily. Some suppose that protein-free heme could trigger specific oxidative reactions in the bloodstream, like hydroxyl radical formation through Fenton reaction or lipid peroxidation [49]. However, opportunities for heme to maintain itself in a ‘free’ state are unlikely and would be extremely brief. The odds are that heme will rapidly be exchanged and interact with proteins present in plasma at high concentrations, like lipoproteins, hemopexin or albumin.

It would be advantageous to know which forms of oxidized Hb and derivatives prevail in T2D plasma in order to imagine therapeutic strategies for their neutralization. Future studies could attempt to distinguish Hb oxidation products in T2D, possibly via absorbance spectroscopy with spectral deconvolution techniques [26, 50] or via reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) [34] and quantify their relative proportions.

Conclusions

Low grade IVH occurs in T2D complicated with obesity, and in non-obese patients with T2D to a lesser extent. T2D RBC have a greater potential to release heme-loaded EV of abnormally small size. Circulating EV in T2D plasma also display an abnormal small size, making classical FACS less appropriate to develop RBC-derived EV as biomarkers in T2D. Plasma levels of heme-related absorbance were independently associated with a specific microvascular complication, peripheral sensory neuropathy. Spectrophotometric markers of IVH might eventually help stratify the risk of peripheral nerve damage during T2D, and identify patients who could benefit from earlier prophylaxis and IVH-targeted personalized therapy.

Supporting information

S1 File. Supplementary materials & methods.

Reagents and assays, T2D cohort ‘Diabelyse’, Inclusion parameters, Non-inclusion parameters, Blood sample collection, Flow cytometry for extracellular vesicles.

(DOCX)

S2 File

(PDF)

S3 File

(DOCX)

S4 File

(PDF)

S1 Table. Baseline clinical and biological characteristics of patients included in the Diabelyse study.

The table lists the clinical data that were significantly associated with T2D in cohort Diabelyse, in univariate and multivariate analyses. Those included classical traits of T2D like high Hb1Ac, high fasting glycemia, lower bilirubin and higher leukocyte levels, but also our plasma marker of IVH, Abs398 (related to heme). In mutivariate analyses$, Abs575 was not significant, suggesting that Abs398 may be a more robust biomarker. The average RBC volume was also reduced in T2D. Data are median (25th–75th percentiles) or n (%). *P<0.05. $ After adjustment for age, sex, obesity, dyslipidemia and HTN status. Data for bilirubin and LDH were only collected for 7% patients. BMI, body mass index; Obesity, BMI ≥30kg/m2; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; RBC, red blood cells; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CRP, C reactive protein.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Variables associated to Diabetic Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy.

The table reveals that only two independent variables were significantly associated to Diabetic Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy in cohort Diabelyse, namely Abs398 and Abs575. In contrast, other parameters related to RBC did not, including RBC counts, serum iron, plasma bilirubin, or classical risk factors. Data are median (25th–75th percentiles) or n (%). *p<0.05. $ after adjustment with factors classically involved in the pathogenesis of neuropathy in T2D: HbA1C, T2D duration, age and sex. Data for bilirubin and LDH were only collected for 7% patients. Obesity, BMI≥30kg/m2; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; RBC, red blood cells; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CRP, C reactive protein.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Associations of PS+ and CD235a+ large EV with cardiovascular risk factors, or micro- and macrovascular complications in T2D patients.

The table reveals that the levels of PS+ CD235+ EV were not significantly associated to any of the markers of vascular injury in T2D cohort Diabelyse (all OR >0.98; all p>0.065). Data are median (25th–75th percentiles), or Odds Ratios and their 95% confidence intervals after adjustment for age and sex. Obesity, BMI≥30kg/m2; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. PS, phosphatidylserine; EV, extracellular vesicles; CD235 is also glycophorin-235.

(DOCX)

S1 Checklist. STROBE statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.

(DOCX)

S2 Checklist. Plos one clinical studies checklist.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

Project ‘RépaDia’ of the Fondation de France to OBB, Project ‘BiFace’ of the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale to OBB, Project ‘Cardannex’ of Inserm Transfert to OBB. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. avr 2018;138:271–81. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pyörälä K, Laakso M, Uusitupa M. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: an epidemiologic view. Diabetes Metab Rev. avr 1987;3(2):463–524. doi: 10.1002/dmr.5610030206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Turpin C, Catan A, Meilhac O, Bourdon E, Canonne-Hergaux F, Rondeau P. Erythrocytes: Central Actors in Multiple Scenes of Atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 29 mai 2021;22(11):5843. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pernow J, Mahdi A, Yang J, Zhou Z. Red blood cell dysfunction: a new player in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 1 sept 2019;115(11):1596–605. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhou Z, Mahdi A, Tratsiakovich Y, Zahorán S, Kövamees O, Nordin F, et al. Erythrocytes From Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Induce Endothelial Dysfunction Via Arginase I. J Am Coll Cardiol. août 2018;72(7):769–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mahdi A, Tengbom J, Alvarsson M, Wernly B, Zhou Z, Pernow J. Red Blood Cell Peroxynitrite Causes Endothelial Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus via Arginase. Cells. 16 juill 2020;9(7):1712. doi: 10.3390/cells9071712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Turpin C, Catan A, Guerin-Dubourg A, Debussche X, Bravo SB, Álvarez E, et al. Enhanced oxidative stress and damage in glycated erythrocytes. Song P, éditeur. PLOS ONE. 6 juill 2020;15(7):e0235335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu SF, Noren Hooten N, Freeman DW, Mode NA, Zonderman AB, Evans MK. Extracellular vesicles in diabetes mellitus induce alterations in endothelial cell morphology and migration. J Transl Med. déc 2020;18(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02398-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brown CD, Ghali HS, Zhao Z, Thomas LL, Friedman ELIA. Association of reduced red blood cell deformability and diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. janv 2005;67(1):295–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Agrawal R, Smart T, Nobre-Cardoso J, Richards C, Bhatnagar R, Tufail A, et al. Assessment of red blood cell deformability in type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy by dual optical tweezers stretching technique. Sci Rep. mai 2016;6(1):15873. doi: 10.1038/srep15873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ridger VC, Boulanger CM, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Badimon L, Blanc-Brude O, Bochaton-Piallat ML, et al. Microvesicles in vascular homeostasis and diseases. Position Paper of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology. Thromb Haemost. 28 juin 2017;117(7):1296–316. doi: 10.1160/TH16-12-0943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Camus SM, De Moraes JA, Bonnin P, Abbyad P, Le Jeune S, Lionnet F, et al. Circulating cell membrane microparticles transfer heme to endothelial cells and trigger vasoocclusions in sickle cell disease. Blood. 11 juin 2015;125(24):3805–14. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-589283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leroyer AS, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM. Microparticles and type 2 diabetes. 2008;6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Agouni A, Lagrue-Lak-Hal AH, Ducluzeau PH, Mostefai HA, Draunet-Busson C, Leftheriotis G, et al. Endothelial Dysfunction Caused by Circulating Microparticles from Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Am J Pathol. oct 2008;173(4):1210–9. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alkhatatbeh MJ, Enjeti AK, Acharya S, Thorne RF, Lincz LF. The origin of circulating CD36 in type 2 diabetes. Nutr Diabetes. févr 2013;3(2):e59–e59. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2013.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Freeman DW, Noren Hooten N, Eitan E, Green J, Mode NA, Bodogai M, et al. Altered Extracellular Vesicle Concentration, Cargo, and Function in Diabetes. Diabetes. nov 2018;67(11):2377–88. doi: 10.2337/db17-1308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Su Y, Chen J, Dong Z, Zhang Y, Ma R, Kou J, et al. Procoagulant Activity of Blood and Endothelial Cells via Phosphatidylserine Exposure and Microparticle Delivery in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;45(6):2411–20. doi: 10.1159/000488228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu M, Xie R, Zhang Y, Liang H, Hou L, Yu C, et al. Phosphatidylserine on microparticles and associated cells contributes to the hypercoagulable state in diabetic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1 déc 2018;33(12):2115–27. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gkaliagkousi E, Nikolaidou B, Gavriilaki E, Lazaridis A, Yiannaki E, Anyfanti P, et al. Increased erythrocyte- and platelet-derived microvesicles in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diab Vasc Dis Res. sept 2019;16(5):458–65. doi: 10.1177/1479164119844691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Diamant M, Nieuwland R, Pablo RF, Sturk A, Smit JWA, Radder JK. Elevated Numbers of Tissue-Factor Exposing Microparticles Correlate With Components of the Metabolic Syndrome in Uncomplicated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Circulation. 5 nov 2002;106(19):2442–7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036596.59665.c6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chiva-Blanch G, Suades R, Padró T, Vilahur G, Peña E, Ybarra J, et al. Microparticle Shedding by Erythrocytes, Monocytes and Vascular Smooth Muscular Cells Is Reduced by Aspirin in Diabetic Patients. Rev Esp Cardiol Engl Ed. juill 2016;69(7):672–80. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.12.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ohnaka K, Kono S, Inoguchi T, Yin G, Morita M, Adachi M, et al. Inverse associations of serum bilirubin with high sensitivity C-reactive protein, glycated hemoglobin, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and elderly Japanese men and women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. avr 2010;88(1):103–10. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bao W, Song F, Li X, Rong S, Yang W, Zhang M, et al. Plasma heme oxygenase-1 concentration is elevated in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PloS One. 25 août 2010;5(8):e12371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reiter CD, Wang X, Tanus-Santos JE, Hogg N, Cannon RO, Schechter AN, et al. Cell-free hemoglobin limits nitric oxide bioavailability in sickle-cell disease. Nat Med. déc 2002;8(12):1383–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1202-799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wagener FA, Eggert A, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ, Verhofstad A, Abraham NG, et al. Heme is a potent inducer of inflammation in mice and is counteracted by heme oxygenase. Blood. 15 sept 2001;98(6):1802–11. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.6.1802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Donadee C, Raat NJH, Kanias T, Tejero J, Lee JS, Kelley EE, et al. Nitric Oxide Scavenging by Red Blood Cell Microparticles and Cell-Free Hemoglobin as a Mechanism for the Red Cell Storage Lesion. Circulation. 26 juill 2011;124(4):465–76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.008698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rother RP, Bell L, Hillmen P, Gladwin MT. The clinical sequelae of intravascular hemolysis and extracellular plasma hemoglobin: a novel mechanism of human disease. JAMA. 6 avr 2005;293(13):1653–62. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.13.1653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.North JA, Rein D, Tappel AL. Multicomponent analysis of heme protein spectra in biological materials. Anal Biochem. 1 janv 1996;233(1):115–23. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Billings FT, Ball SK, Roberts LJ, Pretorius M. Postoperative acute kidney injury is associated with hemoglobinemia and an enhanced oxidative stress response. Free Radic Biol Med. 1 juin 2011;50(11):1480–7. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.02.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Feng C, Naik BI, Xin W, Ma JZ, Scalzo DC, Thammishetti S, et al. Haptoglobin 2–2 Phenotype Is Associated With Increased Acute Kidney Injury After Elective Cardiac Surgery in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. J Am Heart Assoc [Internet]. 11 oct 2017. [cité 30 mars 2021];6(10). Disponible sur: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.006565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Merle NS, Grunenwald A, Rajaratnam H, Gnemmi V, Frimat M, Figueres ML, et al. Intravascular hemolysis activates complement via cell-free heme and heme-loaded microvesicles. JCI Insight. 21 juin 2018;3(12):96910. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.96910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hariri G, Bourcier S, Marjanovic Z, Joffre J, Lemarié J, Lavillegrand JR, et al. Exploring the microvascular impact of red blood cell transfusion in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Lond Engl. 30 août 2019;23(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2572-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Meng F, Alayash AI. Determination of extinction coefficients of human hemoglobin in various redox states. Anal Biochem. 15 mars 2017;521:11–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2017.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kassa T, Jana S, Meng F, Alayash AI. Differential heme release from various hemoglobin redox states and the upregulation of cellular heme oxygenase-1. FEBS Open Bio. sept 2016;6(9):876–84. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen H, Tappel AL, Boyle RC. Oxidation of heme proteins as a measure of oxidative damage to liver tissue slices. Free Radic Biol Med. mai 1993;14(5):509–17. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(93)90108-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Roulot D, Roudot-Thoraval F, NKontchou G, Kouacou N, Costes JL, Elourimi G, et al. Concomitant screening for liver fibrosis and steatosis in French type 2 diabetic patients using Fibroscan. Liver Int Off J Int Assoc Study Liver. déc 2017;37(12):1897–906. doi: 10.1111/liv.13481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, Graham I, Taskinen MR, et al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. juill 2011;32(14):1769–818. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 1 janv 2020;41(1):111–88. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.American Diabetes Association. 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 1 janv 2020;43(Supplement_1):S111–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cazzola R, Rondanelli M, Russo-Volpe S, Ferrari E, Cestaro B. Decreased membrane fluidity and altered susceptibility to peroxidation and lipid composition in overweight and obese female erythrocytes. J Lipid Res. oct 2004;45(10):1846–51. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M300509-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.van der Pol E, Sturk A, van Leeuwen T, Nieuwland R, Coumans F, ISTH-SSC-VB Working group. Standardization of extracellular vesicle measurements by flow cytometry through vesicle diameter approximation. J Thromb Haemost JTH. juin 2018;16(6):1236–45. doi: 10.1111/jth.14009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rhee SY, Kim YS. The Role of Advanced Glycation End Products in Diabetic Vascular Complications. Diabetes Metab J. 2018;42(3):188. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2017.0105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pop-Busui R, Boulton AJM, Feldman EL, Bril V, Freeman R, Malik RA, et al. Diabetic Neuropathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 1 janv 2017;40(1):136–54. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Thomas MC, MacIsaac RJ, Tsalamandris C, Power D, Jerums G. Unrecognized Anemia in Patients With Diabetes: A cross-sectional survey. Diabetes Care. 1 avr 2003;26(4):1164–9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Craig KJ, Williams JD, Riley SG, Smith H, Owens DR, Worthing D, et al. Anemia and Diabetes in the Absence of Nephropathy. Diabetes Care. 1 mai 2005;28(5):1118–23. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Oda E, Kawai R. Bilirubin is negatively associated with hemoglobin a(1c) independently of other cardiovascular risk factors in apparently healthy Japanese men and women. Circ J Off J Jpn Circ Soc. 2011;75(1):190–5. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chung JO, Cho DH, Chung DJ, Chung MY. The Duration of Diabetes is Inversely Associated with the Physiological Serum Bilirubin Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Intern Med. 2015;54(2):141–6. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bozza MT, Jeney V. Pro-inflammatory Actions of Heme and Other Hemoglobin-Derived DAMPs. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1323. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Huang Z, Louderback JG, Goyal M, Azizi F, King SB, Kim-Shapiro DB. Nitric oxide binding to oxygenated hemoglobin under physiological conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 19 déc 2001;1568(3):252–60. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(01)00227-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alok Raghav

1 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-13587Low Grade Intravascular Hemolysis Associates with Peripheral Nerve Injury in Type 2 DiabetesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. BLANC-BRUDE,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 15 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alok Raghav, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

3. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“Project ‘RépaDia’ of the Fondation de France to OBB, Project ‘BiFace’ of the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale to OBB, project ‘Cardannex’ of Inserm Transfert to OBB.”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript is well written and authors have focused on important topic of peripheral nerve injury in type 2 diabetes patients. The authors have concluded T2D was associated with low-grade IVH. Plasma absorbance may constitute a novel biomarker of peripheral neuropathy in T2D, while flow cytometry focusing on large EV may be maladapted to characterize RBC EV in T2D. Moreover, therapeutics limiting IVH or neutralizing RBC breakdown products might bolster

vasculoprotection in T2D. Spectrophotometric markers of IVH might eventually help stratify the risk of peripheral nerve damage during T2D, and identify patients who could benefit from earlier prophylaxis and IVH-targeted personalized therapy. The findings made by the authors are novel and scientifically sound.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript Sylvain Le Jeune et al. investigated whether Type2 diabetes (T2D) promotes intravascular hemolysis (IVH). Spectrophotometric analysis of T2D plasma revealed that low grade IVH occurs in T2D, especially in T2D obese patients. They found that red blood cells (RBCs) from T2D patients have a greater potential to release heme-loaded extracellular vesicles (EVs). Circulating EVs in T2D plasma are smaller than EVs from control subjects. Because of abnormal small size of EVs, classical FACS is less appropriate to measure them in T2D plasma. They found that heme-related absorbance of T2D plasma is independently associated with peripheral sensory neuropathy, a specific microvascular complication of T2D. The authors showed that T2D RBC-derived EV triggers production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in endothelial cells and thrombin activation in a phosphatidylserine- and heme-dependent manner.

T2D is a global health burden with huge impact. It is long known that T2D modifies hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell (RBC) deformability and impairs hemorheology. RBC lysis is an etiopathogenic factor in many hemolytic diseases, mainly due to the pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory actions of hemoglobin oxidation and break-down products. But the involvement of RBC lysis and Hb-derived species in T2D remained mainly unexplored.

Therefore this study is highly relevant, well-designed and provide new information.

I have only one concern: in the methods the authors write the following: „We did not attempt to specify the different forms of ferrous, ferryl and deoxy-Hb which are all expected to contribute to Abs575.” Pathological consequences of IVH are maily due to the production and actions of oxidized Hb forms. I am missing the description of Hb oxidation, and the specific pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory actions of the different products (metHb, ferrylHb, covalently crosslinked Hb forms, free heme). I understand that measuring the concentration of these products are quite challenging and it was not the goal of the current work, but this should be discussed properly to encourage further work in this field.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Viktória Jeney

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0275337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275337.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


13 Sep 2022

First, we’d like to thank the reviewers for their very positive appreciation of the manuscript.

In the 1st round of revision, the editors recommended some style modifications, some clarifications, and one of Reviewer #2 had a single request, for added discussion on a specific topic. All points were addressed and responses are provided below in extenso:

Journal / Editors requirements

1. File naming:

We ensured that the manuscript sticks more closely to the PLOS ONE style, and modified some of the section, figure and table titles accordingly, the captions and citing styles, throughout the document.

2. Participant consent:

We provide the mentioned additional details regarding participant consent. We checked that the phrase ‘written consent’ is indeed present in extenso in the text. We regrouped two sentences into one more definitive statement. Please, see Page 4 in last paragraph.

3. Data not shown:

We have removed the phrase ‘data not shown’ from the manuscript. On one hand, we inserted actual data in text (Page 12, top paragraph, as below). On the other hand, we inserted a new table (S3 Table) gathering all the statistics linked to the absence of association of circulating levels of vesicles with vascular injury markers in T2D patients, to show the actual data. Please see Results, Page 12:

“Finally, circulating levels of PS+ and CD235a+ large EV were not statistically elevated in T2D, and large EV did not correlate with the circulating levels of HbA1c (R = -0.384; p>0.055 after adjustment for age and sex). PS+ and CD235a+ large EV were not associated with dyslipidemia, HTN or obesity as cardiovascular risk factors, nor with vascular damage in T2D patients (S3 Table).”

Please, see S3 Table in Supporting Information, and the matching legend page 21.

4. Financial disclosure:

We improved our financial disclosure statement by replacing our sentence « The funders had no bearing on the conduct of the study », with the proposed phrase below on page 20 at paragraph ‘Funding’:

« The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. »

5. Captions for your Supporting Information files:

We improved the captions for Supporting Information. This includes titles of the different sections, and expanded captions for the 2 tables. Please, see page 21 at end of manuscript.

Submission:

The Figure files were uploaded to the PACE digital diagnostic tool and seemed appropriate.

Reviewer comments and requirements

Reviewer #2 quote: [,,,] I have only one concern: in the methods the authors write the following: « We did not attempt to specify the different forms of ferrous, ferryl and deoxy-Hb which are all expected to contribute to Abs575. »

Pathological consequences of IVH are mainly due to the production and actions of oxidized Hb forms. I am missing the description of Hb oxidation, and the specific pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory actions of the different products (metHb, ferrylHb, covalently crosslinked Hb forms, free heme). I understand that measuring the concentration of these products are quite challenging and it was not the goal of the current work, but this should be discussed properly to encourage further work in this field.

We addressed this concern by incrementing the discussion as suggested, beyond the notions already introduced. We inserted a new paragraph discussing more specifically the different forms of Hb oxidation products, and listing their specific effects on blood vessels. Please, see l3 last paragraphs of the discussion; page 18 (bottom) and 19 (top), as well as the additional, recent reference by [Bozza et al, Front Immunology, 2020] necessary to support the description of Hb oxidation (Reference #49 Bozza).

We also added a paragraph pointing at the future possibilities of quantifying the relative Hb degradation products specifically.

“ These products of Hb oxidation can stimulate specific pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory actions on the vascular endothelium, with functional consequences. MetHb triggers the endothelial production of interleukin-6 and -8. FerrylHb can trigger endothelial activation especially through Nuclear Factor-kappa B (NF�B) pathway. Globin-derived radicals activate endothelial interleukin-1ß production via the NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome (49). In addition, oxidized forms of Hb shed their prosthetic heme more readily. Some suppose that protein-free heme could trigger specific oxidative reactions in the bloodstream, like hydroxyl radical formation through Fenton reaction or lipid peroxidation (49). However, opportunities for heme to maintain itself in a ‘free’ state are unlikely and would be extremely brief. The odds are that heme will rapidly be exchanged and interact with proteins present in plasma at high concentrations, like lipoproteins, hemopexin or albumin.

It would be advantageous to know which forms of oxidized Hb and derivatives prevail in T2D plasma in order to imagine therapeutic strategies for their neutralization. Future studies could attempt to distinguish Hb oxidation products in T2D, possibly via absorbance spectroscopy with spectral deconvolution techniques (26,50) or via reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) (34) and quantify their relative proportions. ”

In conclusion, we are glad that you found our findings relevant, and hope that the new format and additions make the manuscript suitable for publication in PLOS One.

With our best regards,

Olivier Blanc-Brude, Ph.D.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Hemolysis in T2D (LeJeune-Blanc-Brude)- Response Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Alok Raghav

14 Sep 2022

Low Grade Intravascular Hemolysis Associates with Peripheral Nerve Injury in Type 2 Diabetes

PONE-D-22-13587R1

Dear Dr. BLANC-BRUDE,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alok Raghav, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Alok Raghav

26 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-13587R1

Low Grade Intravascular Hemolysis Associates with Peripheral Nerve Injury in Type 2 Diabetes

Dear Dr. Blanc-Brude:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Alok Raghav

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Supplementary materials & methods.

    Reagents and assays, T2D cohort ‘Diabelyse’, Inclusion parameters, Non-inclusion parameters, Blood sample collection, Flow cytometry for extracellular vesicles.

    (DOCX)

    S2 File

    (PDF)

    S3 File

    (DOCX)

    S4 File

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. Baseline clinical and biological characteristics of patients included in the Diabelyse study.

    The table lists the clinical data that were significantly associated with T2D in cohort Diabelyse, in univariate and multivariate analyses. Those included classical traits of T2D like high Hb1Ac, high fasting glycemia, lower bilirubin and higher leukocyte levels, but also our plasma marker of IVH, Abs398 (related to heme). In mutivariate analyses$, Abs575 was not significant, suggesting that Abs398 may be a more robust biomarker. The average RBC volume was also reduced in T2D. Data are median (25th–75th percentiles) or n (%). *P<0.05. $ After adjustment for age, sex, obesity, dyslipidemia and HTN status. Data for bilirubin and LDH were only collected for 7% patients. BMI, body mass index; Obesity, BMI ≥30kg/m2; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; RBC, red blood cells; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CRP, C reactive protein.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Variables associated to Diabetic Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy.

    The table reveals that only two independent variables were significantly associated to Diabetic Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy in cohort Diabelyse, namely Abs398 and Abs575. In contrast, other parameters related to RBC did not, including RBC counts, serum iron, plasma bilirubin, or classical risk factors. Data are median (25th–75th percentiles) or n (%). *p<0.05. $ after adjustment with factors classically involved in the pathogenesis of neuropathy in T2D: HbA1C, T2D duration, age and sex. Data for bilirubin and LDH were only collected for 7% patients. Obesity, BMI≥30kg/m2; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; RBC, red blood cells; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CRP, C reactive protein.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Associations of PS+ and CD235a+ large EV with cardiovascular risk factors, or micro- and macrovascular complications in T2D patients.

    The table reveals that the levels of PS+ CD235+ EV were not significantly associated to any of the markers of vascular injury in T2D cohort Diabelyse (all OR >0.98; all p>0.065). Data are median (25th–75th percentiles), or Odds Ratios and their 95% confidence intervals after adjustment for age and sex. Obesity, BMI≥30kg/m2; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. PS, phosphatidylserine; EV, extracellular vesicles; CD235 is also glycophorin-235.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Checklist. STROBE statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Checklist. Plos one clinical studies checklist.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Hemolysis in T2D (LeJeune-Blanc-Brude)- Response Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES