Abstract
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a small vessel disease associated with cortical microbleeds and lobar intracerebral haemorrhage due to amyloid-β deposition in the walls of leptomeningeal and cortical arterioles. The mechanisms of cerebral amyloid angiopathy–related haemorrhage remain largely unknown. Recent work has demonstrated that ruptured blood vessels have limited (or no) amyloid-β at the site of bleeding and evidence of local vascular remodelling. We hypothesized that blood–brain barrier leakage and perivascular inflammation may be involved in this remodelling process. This study examined cortical arterioles at various stages of cerebral amyloid angiopathy–related vascular pathology (without evidence of microhaemorrhage) in autopsy tissue from seven cases with definite cerebral amyloid angiopathy. We included temporo-occipital sections with microbleeds guided by ex vivo MRI from two cases with severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy and systematically sampled occipital sections from five consecutive cases with varying cerebral amyloid angiopathy severity. Haematoxylin and eosin stains and immunohistochemistry against amyloid-β, fibrin(ogen), smooth muscle actin, reactive astrocytes (glial fibrillary acidic protein) and activated microglia (cluster of differentiation 68) were performed. Arterioles were graded using a previously proposed scale of individual vessel cerebral amyloid angiopathy severity, and a blinded assessment for blood–brain barrier leakage, smooth muscle actin and perivascular inflammation was performed. Blood–brain barrier leakage and smooth muscle actin loss were observed in significantly more vessels with mild amyloid-β deposition (Grade 1 vessels; P = 0.044 and P = 0.012, respectively) as compared to vessels with no amyloid-β (Grade 0), and blood–brain barrier leakage was observed in 100% of vessels with evidence of vessel remodelling (Grades 3 and 4). Perivascular inflammation in the form of reactive astrocytes and activated microglia was observed predominantly surrounding arterioles at later stages of vessel pathology (Grades 2–4) and consistently around vessels with the same morphological features as ruptured vessel segments (Grade 4). These findings suggest a role for blood–brain barrier leakage and perivascular inflammation leading to arteriolar remodelling and haemorrhage in cerebral amyloid angiopathy, with early blood–brain barrier leakage as a potential trigger for subsequent perivascular inflammation.
Keywords: cerebral amyloid angiopathy, microbleeds, perivascular inflammation, blood–brain barrier leakage
Kozberg et al. examined blood–brain barrier leakage and perivascular inflammation at the individual vessel level in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. They report blood–brain barrier leakage at early stages of vascular pathology, a potential trigger for perivascular inflammation and vascular remodelling leading to haemorrhage.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is characterized by the deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the walls of cortical and leptomeningeal arterioles in the brain.1 CAA is a leading cause of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in the elderly and is also associated with smaller haemorrhagic lesions including lobar cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and cortical superficial siderosis (cSS).2
The mechanisms leading to haemorrhage in CAA remain largely unknown. Direct damage from Aβ deposition has been hypothesized to lead to vessel fragility and rupture; however, recent work examining CMBs has demonstrated decreased or no Aβ as well as vessel remodelling in the form of fibrinoid necrosis at the site of vessel rupture.3,4 These remodelled arterioles have evidence of blood–brain barrier (BBB) leakage in the form of fibrin positivity in vessel walls and surrounding tissue. A recent study reported a positive association between the percentage of fibrin-positive vessels and the number of CMBs in CAA.5 Additionally, the presence of remodelled vessels with decreased Aβ and fibrinoid necrosis is strongly associated with symptomatic ICH risk.6 These associations with haemorrhage are in fact stronger than the associations between Aβ deposition and haemorrhage,5 suggesting that other pathophysiological mechanisms besides Aβ deposition alone play a role in the cascade of events leading up to haemorrhage in CAA.
A subset of patients with CAA develops spontaneous episodes of focal, severe inflammation leading to clinical symptoms including subacute cognitive decline, focal neurological deficits, headaches and seizures. These episodes are termed CAA-related inflammation (CAA-ri).7–9 In these cases, regions of inflammation have an increased CMB burden, suggesting that active inflammation may contribute to haemorrhage.10 Additionally, Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography imaging studies suggest that CAA-ri may involve Aβ removal from the brain and anti-Aβ autoantibodies have been identified in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with active CAA-ri.11,12 Anti-Aβ immunotherapies for Alzheimer’s disease, which rely on immune-mediated Aβ removal from the brain, are associated with adverse events termed amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs).13 These events involve both local inflammation with vasogenic oedema (ARIA-E) and haemorrhage (ARIA-H), and CAA has been proposed as an important contributing factor in the development of ARIA.13,14 Similar to episodes of CAA-ri, haemorrhages (including CMBs and cSS) in ARIA-H typically colocalize with regions of inflammation and oedema.13
We hypothesize that vascular remodelling and subsequent CMBs in sporadic CAA may be in part driven by local inflammation, in a more subtle way than in CAA-ri or ARIA. To further understand the relationships between BBB leakage, perivascular inflammation and vessel wall integrity in vessels at risk for haemorrhage, we investigated each at the level of individual unruptured arterioles. We performed a detailed neuropathological evaluation of serial sections of post-mortem brain tissue from patients with definite CAA, aided by ex vivo MRI. Cortical arterioles were graded using the Greenberg and Vonsattel score of vascular CAA severity15 and assessed for markers of BBB leakage, reactive astrocytes, activated microglia and contractile smooth muscle cell integrity.
Materials and methods
Post-mortem MRI acquisition and analysis
Seven intact formalin-fixed human brain hemispheres were received through an ongoing brain donation programme at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). These CAA cases were patients diagnosed with possible or probable CAA during life, and diagnosis was confirmed through medical records and available clinical MRI or CT during life, as well as upon autopsy (see Table 1). Study approval was received from the MGH institutional review board and informed consent was obtained from the next of kin or another legal representative prior to autopsy.
Table 1.
Case # | Sex | Age at death (years) | Cause of death | Cortical CAA Burden scorea | MRI CMBs countb | ABC scorec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Targeted cases | ||||||
1 | M | 70 | ICH | 9 | 261 | A3B3C1 |
2 | F | 79 | ICH | 8 | 204 | A3B3C2 |
Consecutive cases | ||||||
3 | M | 67 | ICH | 12 | 168 | A3B1C2 |
4 | M | 76 | Unknown | 11 | 31 | A3B3C3 |
5 | F | 78 | Unknown | 7 | 17 | A3B2C1 |
6 | M | 86 | Unknown | 10 | 9 | A3B3C3 |
7 | M | 85 | Unknown | 12 | 49 | A3B3C3 |
ARIA-E case | ||||||
8 | F | 74 | Pulmonary embolism | Not assessed | Not available | A3B3C3 |
CAA severity was evaluated on Aβ-stained sections from predefined regions of frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital cortices using a 4-point scale (0, absent; 1, scant Aβ deposition; 2, some circumferential Aβ; 3, widespread circumferential Aβ) following proposed consensus criteria.16 Scores from the four areas were added to form a cumulative CAA severity score. bTotal number of CMBs across each sampled hemisphere was assessed on ex vivo 3T MRI by an experienced rater (S.J.v.V.).3cABC scores were taken from routine neuropathological examination reports and reflect the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association score for Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes.17
High-resolution ex vivo 3T MRI was utilized to detect CMBs. Each hemisphere was prepared and scanned as previously described.3 Briefly, the hemispheres were packed in a plastic bag filled with periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde fixative and vacuum sealed to remove air bubbles. The hemispheres were scanned overnight using a 32-channel head coil and a whole-body 3T MRI scanner (MAGNETOM Trio; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). The protocol included a T2-weighted turbo-spin echo (TSE) sequence (resolution = 500 × 500 × 500 μm3) and a T2*-weighted gradient-echo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence (resolution = 500 × 500 × 500 μm3). CMBs were counted on T2*-weighted gradient-echo sequences by an experienced rater (S.J.V.V.). These lesions were defined as homogenous ovoid or round foci of low signal intensity. As ex vivo T2*-weighted scans are susceptible to air bubble artefacts, which can lead to false identification of CMBs, T2-weighted TSE scans were also used for comparison to help differentiate between CMBs and any remaining air bubbles.
For the targeted CAA case group, regions with high CMB burden were subsequently sampled as previously described.3 Briefly, each sample was submerged in Fomblin (Solvay Solexis, Thorofare, NJ, USA) in a 50 mL falcon tube. They were then scanned overnight using a custom-built solenoid coil and whole-body 7T MRI scanner (MAGNETOM; Siemens Healthineers). The protocol included a T2-weighted TSE sequence (resolution = 100 × 100 × 100 μm3) and a FLASH sequence (resolution = 75 × 75 × 75 μm3).3
ARIA case
In addition to the abovementioned cases, one case who enrolled in the first clinical trial of active Aβ immunization for AD (AN1792; Elan Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and had documented ARIA-E during life was included as a positive control for inflammation and Aβ removal.18 This case provided consent for brain donation and ethical approval was obtained though the Southampton and South West Hampshire Local Research Ethics Committees (REC reference 075/03/w). One occipital slab was scanned with ex vivo 7T MRI and sections were sampled from a region with possible ARIA-H as described elsewhere.19 Serial sections were cut and stained as described below. Two haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections were screened for Grade 4 vessels.
Tissue sampling
As mentioned above, for the targeted CAA case group, two cases with severe CAA were selected and temporo-occipital regions with high CMB burden were identified on 3T MRI, sampled and additionally scanned at 7T MRI prior to sectioning.3 For the five consecutive CAA cases, samples were taken from a prespecified regions of the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes as previously described.3 All samples were subsequently dehydrated, embedded in paraffin and cut into 6 μm thick serial sections with a microtome. For each sample, H&E staining was performed using standard histology protocols. Bright field immunohistochemistry against Aβ (mouse, catalog # M0872; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA; 1:200), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (rabbit, catalog # G9269; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA; 1:1000), cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68; mouse, catalog # M0814; Agilent Technologies; 1:500), smooth muscle actin (SMA; mouse, catalog # M0851; Agilent Technologies; 1:250) and fibrin(ogen) (rabbit, catalog # A0080; Agilent Technologies; 1:500) was performed. The protocol for CD68 was implemented on a fully automated stainer (Bond Rx, Leica), and all other stains were performed manually following a standardized immunohistochemistry protocol.
Double fluorescent immunohistochemistry was performed against fibrin(ogen) (rabbit, catalog # A0080; Agilent Technologies; 1:500) and GFAP (mouse, catolog # G3893; Sigma; 1:1000) following a standardized protocol. Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:500, Abcam catalog # ab150077) and 594 (1:500, Invitrogen catalog # A11005) IgG (H + L) cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies were used to tag fibrin(ogen) and GFAP, respectively.
Negative controls were performed for all stains listed above by omitting the primary antibody which showed no immunopositivity.
Histopathological image analysis
Digital bright field and fluorescent microscopic images of the sections were obtained with the NanoZoomer Digital Pathology-HT scanner (C9600-12; Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) using a 20x objective. The viewing platform NDP-View (v2.7.25) was used to analyse the digital images.
From each case, 1–2 sections were assessed, and cortical vessels were selected for analysis based on Aβ stains alone (blinded to other stains). Vessels were selected based on approximate vessel grade, with up to ∼20 vessels of each grade in each section as described below. Cortical vessels ≥20 μm in diameter were selected (to exclude capillaries) and all leptomeningeal vessels were excluded. Vessels associated with CMBs (defined as presence of perivascular haemosiderin deposits) were also excluded from analysis.
Vessels were then independently graded using adjacent Aβ and H&E-stained sections by two trained raters (M.G.K. and I.Y.). The Greenberg and Vonsattel scale was used as follows: Grade 0—no Aβ deposition; Grade 1—patchy Aβ deposition, otherwise normal-appearing vessel wall; Grade 2—circumferential Aβ deposition; Grade 3—>50% splitting of the vessel wall, also known as ‘vessel-in-vessel’ or ‘lumen within lumen’ appearance; Grade 4—thickened vessel wall, evidence of fibrinoid necrosis defined as vessel walls with eosinophilic infiltrate with disrupted cytoarchitecture (Fig. 1).15 Inter-rater reliability was almost perfect (kappa = 0.93) and final vessel grades were determined in a consensus meeting. SMA stains were also used to eliminate veins from further analysis. Deidentified vessels were rated as arterioles versus venules by two independent raters (M.G.K. and I.Y.). When SMA stains demonstrated a lack of contractile smooth muscle cells, H&E stains were additionally used to assess vessel wall thickness and vessel lumen diameter to differentiate between arterioles and venules. Inter-rater reliability was substantial (kappa = 0.71) and final vessel classifications were also determined in a consensus meeting.
Vessel walls were classified as fibrin positive or negative by two independent raters blinded to all other stains (M.G.K. and I.Y.). Vessels were rated as positive when clear immunoreactivity against fibrin was apparent within the vessel wall, but not when immunoreactivity was only apparent within the lumen as previously described.5 Inter-rater reliability was excellent (kappa = 0.81) and final vessel fibrin ratings were determined at a consensus meeting. Vessels were additionally rated for SMA coverage using SMA stains with a scoring scale as follows: (3) complete SMA coverage, (2) circumferential SMA but incomplete vessel wall thickness, (1) non-circumferential and (0) no SMA coverage. Each vessel was rated by two independent raters (M.G.K. and I.Y.), blinded to all other stains with excellent inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.81); final scores were determined in a consensus meeting.
Sholl analysis was performed to assess local inflammatory and BBB leakage markers surrounding the selected vessels. Each vessel was identified on fibrin, GFAP and CD68 stains, exported at a standardized magnification, and then covered by an opaque mask in Paint v21H1. At least 1 week thereafter, analysis was performed on deidentified images using a previously developed in-house interface in MeVisLab.4 Each vessel was outlined, and markers were manually placed on cells that stained positive for fibrin, GFAP and CD68, respectively, by a trained grader (I.Y.). Positive cells within 50 μm of the pial surface were excluded. The tissue surrounding each vessel was divided into 10 adjacent concentric shells measuring 50 μm in width each. For each shell, the density of positive cells was calculated in MeVisLab. To determine inter-rater reliability, two vessels were selected at random from a consecutive case and the densities of fibrin-, GFAP- and CD68-positive cells were calculated in the innermost shell by two experienced raters (I.Y. and M.G.K.). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85, demonstrating good reliability.
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests were performed comparing the numbers of reactive astrocytes, activated microglia and fibrin-positive cells surrounding individual vessels in the targeted cases using Kruskal–Wallis tests with post hoc pairwise comparisons using Mann–Whitney U-tests with P-value adjustment (Bonferroni). These tests were performed assuming vessel independence, a limitation of this portion of the analysis.
In the consecutive cases, for the analysis of BBB leakage and smooth muscle cell scores as well as reactive astrocytes and activated microglia in the innermost shells, Friedman χ2 tests were performed with post hoc pairwise comparisons using Conover’s test with P-value adjustment (Benjamini–Hochberg). A simple linear regression was performed to assess the association between CMBs and Grades 3 and 4 vessels.
All P-values are two-tailed and a threshold of α < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. Analyses were performed in Prism 9 and R.
Data availability
Histopathological image analysis data for each individual vessel (including Vonsattel grade, fibrin and SMA ratings and Sholl analyses) are included in the Supplementary Tables. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Results
We hypothesized that by selecting regions from cases with severe CAA and multiple CMBs, we would enrich our samples with advanced grade vessels. Therefore, we used ex vivo MRI of brains from two cases (one female/one male) with confirmed severe CAA to select regions with a high microbleed burden (Table 1). We then performed serial sectioning and histopathology of these regions (Fig. 1, see Materials and methods for further details), as reported previously.3 These cases are referred to as targeted CAA cases. Within selected sections (total number of sections = 3), vessels were rated from Grades 0 to 4 (see Materials and methods, Fig. 1A), using a previously validated scale shown to correlate with bleed propensity.6 Both Grades 3 and 4 vessels demonstrate evidence of vascular remodelling. Grade 3 vessels have circumferential ‘cracking’ of the vessel wall, while Grade 4 vessels closely resemble the rupture site of vessels associated with microbleeds (Fig. 1B), including features of decreased Aβ coverage and vessel wall remodelling.3
Tracing Grade 4 vessels through serial sectioning
All Grade 4 vessels identified in sections from these targeted CAA cases (n = 12 Grade 4 vessels in two cases) were manually traced along their course through serial sectioning. All Grade 4 vessels that could be traced were observed to ‘transition’ into Grade 2 segments (11/12 vessels; one vessel could not be reliably traced), suggesting that lower grade vessels may progress locally to more advanced vessel pathologies (Fig. 1D). Notably Grade 2 vessels have circumferential Aβ deposition while Grade 4 vessels have minimal to no Aβ, suggesting inhomogeneous initial deposition of Aβ and/or Aβ removal as vessels progress to Grade 4.
BBB leakage observed at all vessel grades
Evidence of BBB leakage in the form of fibrin positivity in the wall of arterioles was observed in all vessel grades in targeted CAA cases, and the per cent of vessels with BBB leakage increased with higher vessel grades from 18.8% in Grade 0 to 100% in Grade 4 vessels (Fig. 2). Of note, the per cent of Grade 0 vessels (no Aβ deposition) with evidence of BBB leakage is similar to previously published findings of per cent fibrin positivity in control brain tissue.5 By Grade 2, over 90% of vessels identified were fibrin-positive, which was consistent across both targeted cases. Additionally, fibrin-positive cells were observed surrounding higher grade vessels with grade-dependent differences in the number of fibrin-positive cells up to ∼400 μm from each vessel (Supplementary Fig. 1A). The density of fibrin-positive cells in the innermost shell surrounding each vessel (1–50 µm from the vessel edge) increased significantly with vessel grade (Supplementary Fig. 1B; Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.0001). The finding of fibrin-positive perivascular cells suggests fibrin(ogen) extravasation from arterioles and subsequent cellular uptake. These cells appeared to be predominantly reactive astrocytes (Supplementary Fig. 1C).
Perivascular inflammation observed predominantly in advanced grade vessels
Perivascular inflammation, quantified as the density of reactive astrocytes (GFAP-positive) and activated microglia (CD68-positive) in shells surrounding each vessel, was observed to increase with increasing vessel grade. These effects were local and predominantly observed in the immediate perivascular area (Fig. 3C). Grade-dependent differences in the number of GFAP- and CD68-positive cells were observed up to ∼250–300 μm from each vessel. Focusing on the innermost shell surrounding each vessel (1–50 µm from the vessel edge), the density of GFAP- and CD68-positive cells increased significantly with vessel grade (Fig. 3D; Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.0001 for both GFAP- and CD68-positive cells). Of note, all Grade 4 vessels studied had evidence of perivascular inflammatory cells.
Remodelled blood vessels are associated with higher numbers of microbleeds
To assess the relationship between CMB burden and remodelled vessels, we analysed sections from five additional CAA cases with varying degrees of CAA severity. We selected the five most recent brain donations in our MGH autopsy cohort and therefore refer to these as ‘consecutive’ CAA cases. All Grades 3 and 4 vessels were counted in individual sections taken from four standardized regions (frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital) across each hemisphere (total of four sections and one hemisphere per case analysed). We found a strong linear relationship between the number of Grades 3 and 4 vessels in these four standardized sections and the number of CMBs found on ex vivo MRI of that same hemisphere (Fig. 4A; simple linear regression, R2 = 0.928, P-value = 0.0083).
Grade 4 vessels were only observed in two of these cases in parietal sections (Cases 3 and 7), consistent with prior reports that Grade 4 vessels are associated with regions and cases with higher haemorrhagic burden.15
BBB leakage and perivascular inflammation observed in consecutive CAA cases
To determine if our findings of BBB leakage and perivascular inflammation observed in targeted CAA cases are also observed in CAA cases with varying degrees of CAA severity, we performed a similar analysis to that performed in targeted CAA cases in individual occipital sections from five consecutive cases (one female/four males, Table 1). Similar to the targeted CAA cases, we observed BBB leakage at all vessel grades and found that the per cent of fibrin-positive vessels was significantly higher with higher vessel grade [Fig. 4A; Friedman χ2 (d.f. = 3) = 10.357, P = 0.016 with a large estimated effect size (Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) = 0.69)]. Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences between vessel Grades 0 and 1 (P = 0.044), 0 and 2 (P = 0.0032), 0 and 3 (P = 0.0020) and 1 and 3 (P = 0.044).
Additionally, the density of reactive astrocytes surrounding each vessel was observed to increase with vessel grade, and these effects were most prominent in the innermost shell surrounding each vessel (Supplementary Fig. 2). In the innermost shell surrounding each vessel, there were statistically significant differences across vessel grade [Friedman χ2 (d.f. = 3) = 9.81, P = 0.020] with a large estimated effect size (Kendall’s W = 0.65). Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences between vessel Grades 0 and 2 (P = 0.005), 0 and 3 (P = 0.010), 1 and 2 (P = 0.010) and 1 and 3 (P = 0.049). When comparing the density of CD68-positive cells in the innermost shell across vessel grades in the five consecutive CAA cases, there was no statistically significant difference [Friedman χ2 (d.f. = 3) = 1.56, P = 0.669] and the estimated effect size was small (Kendall’s W = 0.1). Of note, there was more variability in CD68-positive cell density across consecutive cases than in the targeted CAA cases (particularly with respect to the Grade 3 vessels). Additionally, there were limited numbers of Grade 3 vessels observed in the consecutive cases. For reference, representative Grade 3 vessels from each studied case are displayed in Supplementary Fig. 3.
Grade 4 vessel identified in confirmed ARIA-E case
A Grade 4 vessel with similar findings (no Aβ deposition, evidence of BBB leakage and perivascular inflammation) was identified in a case with Alzheimer’s disease who received active immunization (AN1792; Elan Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and developed ARIA-E during life (Fig. 5),18 suggesting potential shared vascular pathophysiology. Of note, Aβ was observed in the otherwise normal-appearing wall of this vessel remote from the site of remodelling.
Contractile smooth muscle cell loss is observed at lower vessel grades
Because the loss of contractile smooth muscle cells may be part of the remodelling process as vessels progress from lower to more advanced grades, we assessed SMA across vessel grades in both targeted and consecutive CAA cases (Fig. 6). We developed a smooth muscle cell grading system to assess coverage (see Materials and methods, Fig. 6B). We observed overall lower SMA coverage with increasing vessel grade, starting at Grade 1 (Fig. 6C). These decreases in coverage were statistically significant across vessel grade [Friedman χ2 (d.f. = 3) = 15.514, P = 0.0014] with a large, estimated effect size (Kendall’s W = 0.74). Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences in smooth muscle cell score between Grades 0 and 1 (P = 0.012), 0 and 2 (P = 2.6E − 6), 0 and 3 (P = 8.7E − 5), 1 and 2 (P = 0.00036) and 1 and 3 (P = 0.024). Interestingly, slightly higher SMA coverage was observed in Grade 3 compared with Grade 2 vessels (P = 0.047).
Discussion
Through a detailed histopathological analysis of cases with CAA, this study demonstrated that advanced grade vessels are consistently associated with BBB leakage and perivascular inflammation. Additionally, higher numbers of remodelled advanced grade vessels (Grades 3 and 4) are associated with a higher CMB burden. Vessels with remodelling in the form of fibrinoid necrosis, i.e. Grade 4 vessels, closely resemble vessel segments associated with CMBs in recent studies3 and have previously been associated with lobar ICH.6,15 Grade 4 vessels were predominantly observed in targeted brain tissue, consistent with prior findings that these vessels are relatively rare and specific to cases and regions with higher haemorrhage burden.15
This study further investigated vascular remodelling in CAA through the assessment of vessels with varying grades of CAA pathology and found that both BBB leakage and the loss of contractile smooth muscle cells occurred already by vessel Grade 1. As such, these significant changes were observed even in Grade 1 vessels which have only patchy Aβ deposition with otherwise ‘normal’ appearing vessel walls on H&E. In fact, there appears to be little change in the percentage of vessels with evidence of BBB leakage or contractile smooth muscle cell coverage between Grades 2, 3 and 4, with the exception that Grade 3 vessels have significantly more contractile smooth muscle cell coverage than Grade 2 vessels. The difference between Grades 2 and 3 vessels may indicate Grade 3 vessels may follow a different path to vessel remodelling with more contractile smooth muscle cell preservation (and/or angiogenesis) in Grade 3 vessels than Grades 2 and 4 vessels. Prior work has shown increased matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression in Grades 2–4 vessels,20 a potential contributor to the early development of BBB leakage. The finding of early contractile smooth muscle cell loss is consistent with prior studies that have demonstrated impairments in vascular reactivity (which relies on smooth muscle cell contractility) in patients with a form of hereditary CAA (hereditary cerebral haemorrhage with amyloidosis-Dutch type) prior to the development of symptomatic haemorrhage or cognitive changes.21
By comparison, we observed that perivascular inflammation occurs predominantly surrounding advanced grade vessels, most consistently and markedly surrounding Grade 4 vessels (Fig. 6D), but also occurring to a lesser extent around lower grade vessels. Both reactive astrocytes and activated microglia were observed, and numbers of perivascular reactive astrocytes were more consistently observed to increase with higher vessel grades. Reactive astrocytes were observed to have a stronger spatial relationship to the vessels studied, and other factors affecting brain inflammation may have affected the numbers of activated microglia observed leading to increased variability. Notably, Grade 3 remodelled vessels had more variable levels of associated perivascular inflammation in consecutive cases, but this analysis is limited by the relatively low numbers of Grade 3 vessels that were observed in the consecutive cases. Inflammation may not in all cases be an essential driver of the vessel ‘cracking’ form of vascular remodelling. One possibility is that compensatory processes which may partially preserve vessel integrity/function, such as angiogenesis, may lead to a Grade 3 ‘vessel-in-vessel’ appearance. Prior work has demonstrated increased angiogenic factors such as VEGF and upregulation of pro-angiogenic genes in Alzheimer’s disease,22–24 and pathological angiogenesis may play an important role in vascular remodelling in CAA.25 Of note, the amount of adaptive angiogenesis in CAA and Alzheimer’s disease is likely limited; overall impairments in angiogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease have been reported and Aβ itself may have an antiangiogenic effect.26,27
The interactions between BBB leakage and perivascular inflammation in CAA and Alzheimer’s disease are complex and likely bidirectional. Aβ is a known trigger for both local inflammation28–30 and BBB leakage.31 Chronic inflammation leads to BBB leakage and conversely BBB leakage triggers perivascular inflammation,31–34 and recent work has suggested that fibrinogen itself is a trigger for microglial activation.35 Notably, other components of the neurovascular unit including pericytes and oligodendrocytes are also affected by fibrinogen deposition,16 and these may be important contributors to microvascular dysfunction in CAA. Our data suggest that, at the level of single-vessel segments, BBB leakage appears to occur at an earlier stage of CAA pathology than perivascular inflammation as measured by the presence of activated microglia and reactive astrocytes. These results suggest that early BBB leakage in CAA may in fact be a driver of perivascular inflammation.
The close association between Grades 2 and 4 vessel segments observed through individual vessel tracing suggests that Grade 2 vessel segments may progress directly to Grade 4. However, Grade 4 vessel segments have significantly less Aβ within their vessel walls than Grade 2 vessel segments. This potential loss or removal of vascular Aβ may in part relate to the observed perivascular inflammation. Prior studies have shown the capacity of reactive astrocytes and activated microglia to internalize and degrade Aβ.17 While the inflammation observed in these cases appears to be largely limited to innate immune responses, there may be shared mechanisms with the conditions CAA-ri and ARIA in which inflammation has been linked to both local Aβ removal and haemorrhage,11–14 supported by evidence of a Grade 4 vessel observed in a single section in a case with known ARIA-E during life.
This study has several limitations. First, the nature of ex vivo studies is inherently cross-sectional. As such, we are unable to truly track the sequence of events that occurred in the brain tissue and may even ‘miss’ important events affecting the fate of a vessel. Further studies, including those using animal models of CAA, are necessary to further delineate these events. Additionally, this study examined a limited number of markers of BBB leakage and neuroinflammation with a focus on demonstrating that both BBB leakage and perivascular inflammation occur consistently in CAA. While fibrin(ogen) staining of the vessel wall is indicative of BBB leakage, future work dedicated to exploring the microarchitecture of vessel walls affected by CAA with a focus on direct assessment of the presence of tight junctions and other cell types that modulate the BBB may yield important insights. Likewise, exploration of additional markers of neuroinflammation may further delineate potential mechanisms. Finally, the sample size of this study was small, included predominantly male subjects, and consisted of autopsy cases from a select group of individuals who chose to donate their brains; therefore, these findings may not be generalizable to the larger population of CAA patients.
Conclusions
These cross-sectional neuropathological findings in cases with CAA suggest that BBB leakage and contractile smooth muscle cell loss may precede vascular remodelling (in the form of vessel wall splitting and fibrinoid necrosis) in individual cortical arterioles affected by CAA. The finding of perivascular inflammation around high-grade vessels suggests that this pathway may be in part mediated by inflammation and that BBB leakage may be an important trigger for perivascular inflammation and possible Aβ removal. BBB leakage and perivascular inflammation therefore represent potential future therapeutic targets for haemorrhage prevention in CAA.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Drs Nicoll and Boche for providing the brain tissue of the ARIA case and Dr Frosch for consulting on this project.
Abbreviations
- Aβ =
amyloid-β
- ARIA =
amyloid-related imaging abnormalities; BBB = blood–brain barrier
- CAA =
cerebral amyloid angiopathy
- CAA-ri =
CAA-related inflammation
- CD68 =
cluster of differentiation 68
- CMBs =
cerebral microbleeds
- cSS =
cortical superficial siderosis
- GFAP =
glial fibrillary acidic protein
- H&E =
haematoxylin and eosin
- ICH =
intracerebral haemorrhage
- SMA =
smooth muscle actin
Contributor Information
Mariel G Kozberg, MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA; J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Irvin Yi, Department of Economics, Harvard College, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Whitney M Freeze, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZD, The Netherlands; Department of Neuropsychology and Psychiatry, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Corinne A Auger, MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Ashley A Scherlek, MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Steven M Greenberg, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Susanne J van Veluw, MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA; J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZD, The Netherlands.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R00 AG059893 to S.J.v.V.), the American Heart Association/Bugher Foundation [814728 to S.J.v.V. and 812095 to the centre network (PI: Jonathan Rosand)], The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Veni 016.196.021 to S.J.v.V.), the Andrew David Heitman Foundation (Young Investigator Career Development Award to M.G.K.) and the BrightFocus Foundation (A2021007F to W.M.F.).
Competing interests
The van Veluw Laboratory receives research funding from Therini Bio, Inc. in the form of a sponsored research agreement.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at Brain Communications online.
References
- 1. Greenberg SM, Bacskai BJ, Hernandez-Guillamon M, Pruzin J, Sperling R, van Veluw SJ. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer disease one peptide, two pathways. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(1):30–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rosand J, Eckman MH, Knudsen KA, Singer DE, Greenberg SM. The effect of warfarin and intensity of anticoagulation on outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(8):880–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. van Veluw SJ, Scherlek AA, Freeze WM, et al. . Different microvascular alterations underlie microbleeds and microinfarcts. Ann Neurol. 2019;86(1):279–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. van Veluw SJ, Kuijf HJ, Charidimou A, et al. . Reduced vascular amyloid burden at microhemorrhage sites in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133(3):409–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Freeze WM, Bacskai BJ, Frosch MP, et al. . Blood-brain barrier leakage and microvascular lesions in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Stroke. 2019;50(2):328–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Vonsattel JPG, Myers RH, Tessa Hedley-Whyte E, Ropper AH, Bird ED, Richardson EP. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy without and with cerebral hemorrhages: A comparative histological study. Ann Neurol. 1991;30(5):637–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chung KK, Anderson NE, Hutchinson D, Synek B, Barber PA. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy related inflammation: Three case reports and a review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(1):20–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Auriel E, Charidimou A, Edip Gurol M, et al. . Validation of clinicoradiological criteria for the diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(2):197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Regenhardt RW, Thon JM, Das AS, et al. . Association between immunosuppressive treatment and outcomes of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(10):1261–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. DiFrancesco JC, Touat M, Caulo M, et al. . Recurrence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation: A report of two cases from the iCAβ international network. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;46(4):1071–1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Carmona-Iragui M, Fernández-Arcos A, Alcolea D, et al. . Cerebrospinal fluid anti-amyloid-beta; autoantibodies and amyloid PET in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;50(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Piazza F, Greenberg SM, Savoiardo M, et al. . Anti-amyloid β autoantibodies in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation: Implications for amyloid-modifying therapies. Ann Neurol. 2013;73(4):449–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sperling RA, Jack CR, Black SE, et al. . Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: Recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(4):367–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Boche D, Denham N, Holmes C, Nicoll JAR. Neuropathology after active Aβ42 immunotherapy: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;120(3):369–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Greenberg SM, Vonsattel J-PG. Diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Sensitivity and specificity of cortical biopsy. Stroke. 1997;28(7):1418–1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Montagne A, Nikolakopoulou AM, Zhao Z, et al. . Pericyte degeneration causes white matter dysfunction in the mouse central nervous system. Nat Med. 2018;24(3):326–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 17. Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, et al. . Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2018;14(4):388–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Nicoll JAR, Wilkinson D, Holmes C, Steart P, Markham H, Weller RO. Neuropathology of human Alzheimer disease after immunization with amyloid-β peptide: A case report. Nat Med. 2003;9(4):448–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Scherlek AA, Kozberg MG, Nicoll JAR, et al. . Histopathological correlates of haemorrhagic lesions on ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging in immunized Alzheimer’s disease cases. Brain Commun. 2022;4(1):1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hernandez-Guillamon M, Martinez-Saez E, Delgado P, et al. . MMP-2/MMP-9 plasma level and brain expression in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-associated hemorrhagic stroke. Brain Pathol. 2012;22(2):133–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. van Opstal AM, van Rooden S, van Harten T, et al. . Cerebrovascular function in pre-symptomatic and symptomatic individuals with hereditary cerebral amyloid angiopathy: A case- control study. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(2):115–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pogue AI, Lukiw WJ. Angiogenic signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport. 2004;15(9):1507–1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Tarkowski E, Issa R, Sjögren M, et al. . Increased intrathecal levels of the angiogenic factors VEGF and TGF-β in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23(2):237–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jantaratnotai N, Schwab C, Ryu JK, McGeer PL, G McLarnon J. Converging perturbed microvasculature and microglial clusters characterize Alzheimer disease brain. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010;7(7):625–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jefferies WA, Price KA, Biron KE, Fenninger F, Pfeifer CG, Dickstein DL. Adjusting the compass: New insights into the role of angiogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013;5(6):64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Pimentel-Coelho PM, Rivest S. The early contribution of cerebrovascular factors to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;35(12):1917–1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Donnini S, Solito R, Cetti E, et al. . Aβ peptides accelerate the senescence of endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo, impairing angiogenesis. FASEB J. 2010;24(7):2385–2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kinney JW, Bemiller SM, Murtishaw AS, Leisgang AM, Salazar AM, Lamb BT. Inflammation as a central mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2018;4:575–590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ahmad MH, Fatima M, Mondal AC. Influence of microglia and astrocyte activation in the neuroinflammatory pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: Rational insights for the therapeutic approaches. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;59:6–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hampel H, Caraci F, Cuello AC, et al. . A path toward precision medicine for neuroinflammatory mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Immunol. 2020;11:456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Liebner S, Dijkhuizen RM, Reiss Y, Plate KH, Agalliu D, Constantin G. Functional morphology of the blood–brain barrier in health and disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;135(3):311–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zenaro E, Piacentino G, Constantin G. The blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;107:41–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Petersen MA, Ryu JK, Akassoglou K. Fibrinogen in neurological diseases: Mechanisms, imaging and therapeutics. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(5):283–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Paul J, Strickland S, Melchor JP. Fibrin deposition accelerates neurovascular damage and neuroinflammation in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J Exp Med. 2007;204(8):1999–2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Merlini M, Rafalski VA, Rios Coronado PE, et al. . Fibrinogen induces microglia-mediated spine elimination and cognitive impairment in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Neuron. 2019;101(6):1099–1108.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Histopathological image analysis data for each individual vessel (including Vonsattel grade, fibrin and SMA ratings and Sholl analyses) are included in the Supplementary Tables. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.