
Keywords: cytokine, fibrosis, inflammation, macrophage, myocardial infarction
Abstract
The heart contains a population of resident macrophages that markedly expands following injury through recruitment of monocytes and through proliferation of macrophages. In myocardial infarction, macrophages have been implicated in both injurious and reparative responses. In coronary atherosclerotic lesions, macrophages have been implicated in disease progression and in the pathogenesis of plaque rupture. Following myocardial infarction, resident macrophages contribute to initiation and regulation of the inflammatory response. Phagocytosis and efferocytosis are major functions of macrophages during the inflammatory phase of infarct healing, and mediate phenotypic changes, leading to acquisition of an anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype. Infarct macrophages respond to changes in the cytokine content and extracellular matrix composition of their environment and secrete fibrogenic and angiogenic mediators, playing a central role in repair of the infarcted heart. Macrophages may also play a role in scar maturation and may contribute to chronic adverse remodeling of noninfarcted segments. Single cell studies have revealed a remarkable heterogeneity of macrophage populations in infarcted hearts; however, the relations between transcriptomic profiles and functional properties remain poorly defined. This review manuscript discusses the fate, mechanisms of expansion and activation, and role of macrophages in the infarcted heart. Considering their critical role in injury, repair, and remodeling, macrophages are important, but challenging, targets for therapeutic interventions in myocardial infarction.
INTRODUCTION
The term macrophage was introduced in the 19th century by the Russian scientist Ilya (Elie) Metchnikoff, one of the pioneers of modern immunology, to describe a specialized cell type involved in detection and phagocytic ingestion of microorganisms that invade the body (1). Over a century later, our understanding of the role of macrophages in homeostasis and disease has expanded. Macrophages have been identified in most tissues and were found to exhibit remarkable heterogeneity. In addition to their central involvement in phagocytosis of microbes and dead cells, macrophages have also been suggested to play a broad range of roles in development, homeostasis, and disease (2). Following injury, macrophage subsets have multiple functions, not only acting as professional phagocytes, but also serving as regulators of inflammation, fibroblast activation, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling.
In addition to cardiomyocytes, the contractile cells of the heart, the myocardium also contains large populations of vascular cells, fibroblasts and immune cells. Early descriptive studies have identified macrophages in normal human and rodent hearts (3, 4), and have documented their expansion following cardiac injury (5). Over the last twenty years, there has been an explosion in our understanding of the role of cardiac macrophages in homeostasis and disease. Important functions of normal cardiac resident macrophages have been revealed. Our knowledge on the origin and fate of macrophages in injured, healing, and remodeling hearts has been enriched. Key macrophage-activating molecular signals have been identified, and relations between the phenotypic transitions and functional roles of cardiac macrophages in cardiac repair and remodeling have been studied. This review manuscript deals with the role of macrophages in the most common form of myocardial injury, myocardial infarction. We discuss the mechanisms of expansion and activation of macrophages in the infarcted heart, and we identify macrophage-derived molecular signals involved in myocardial injury, repair, and remodeling. Finally, we discuss the challenges and opportunities of macrophage targeting in patients with myocardial infarction.
MACROPHAGES IN HEALTHY HEARTS
There are conflicting data on the abundance of myocardial macrophages in healthy mammalian hearts: some studies show a low density of cardiac macrophages (6, 7), whereas other investigations (8) suggest that large numbers of macrophages populate the myocardium. The conflicting findings likely reflect differences in the species, age, and genetic background of the subjects studied, but also different criteria and methodological approaches used for macrophage identification. Quantitative analyses in mouse and human hearts using flow cytometric and single cell transcriptomic approaches have produced more consistent results. In young adult mouse hearts, flow cytometry showed that leukocytes comprise ∼7%–10% of noncardiomyocytes; the majority of these cells were identified as macrophages (9, 10). On the other hand, single cell RNA-sequencing studies in human hearts obtained from 14 deceased organ donors (40–75 yr of age) suggested that macrophages represent <5% of ventricular myocardial cells (11).
Macrophages residing in normal hearts exhibit remarkable phenotypic and functional heterogeneity. In mice, distinct C-C chemokine receptor (CCR)2+ and CCR2− resident macrophage populations have been identified. CCR2− cells are derived from the primitive yolk sac and fetal monocyte progenitors, enter the heart during embryonic development, and their maintenance during adult life is not dependent on monocyte recruitment (12, 13). In contrast, CCR2+ resident macrophages are derived from hematopoietic progenitors, are recruited in the heart during the first weeks of life, and are replenished through recruitment of circulating monocytes. Studies in human hearts demonstrated similar CCR2+ and CCR2− macrophage subpopulations (14).
Several experimental studies have suggested important roles of myocardial macrophages in cardiac development and homeostasis (Table 1). In the developing heart, CCR2− macrophages have been implicated in remodeling of the primitive coronary plexus, a process required for coronary artery formation (15). On the other hand, macrophage-derived hyaluronan has been suggested to play an important role in formation of cardiac lymphatics (18). In addition to their involvement in cardiac development, macrophages have been suggested to play an important role in maintaining normal cardiac homeostasis and function. An elegant and intriguing study in mice suggested that resident macrophages serve to clear ejected mitochondria and other vesicular material secreted from cardiomyocytes, thus preventing extracellular accumulation of waste (16). The authors interpreted the findings as suggestive of a crucial role for macrophages in protecting the myocardium from systolic and diastolic dysfunction under homeostatic conditions. However, the observed effect of macrophage depletion on cardiac output was driven by changes in ventricular volumes, and not by any effects on ejection fraction, raising the possibility that the findings may be due to extracardiac effects of macrophage depletion. Unfortunately, the limited analysis of cardiac and vascular pathology performed in that study precludes definitive conclusions on the direct impact of macrophages in preserving cardiac structure and function. In another seminal study, macrophages were implicated in normal electrical conduction. Macrophage depletion experiments in mice suggested that myocardial macrophages may participate in conduction of the electrical impulse through the atrioventricular node (17). The significance of this mechanism in human homeostasis and disease is unclear.
Table 1.
Functions of cardiac macrophages in development and homeostasis of the mammalian heart
| Function/Process | Findings | Method of Documentation | Mechanism of Action | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coronary arteriogenesis | CCR2− macrophages are involved in coronary arteriogenesis | Studies in macrophage-deficient Csf1op/op mice and in CCR2−/− mice | The angiogenic effects of the macrophages were attributed to IGF secretion | (15) |
| Cardiomyocyte function | Cardiac macrophages are involved in preservation of metabolic stability and homeostatic function of cardiomyocytes | Macrophage depletion using the CD169DTR model | Homeostatic effects of macrophages were attributed to phagocytosis and removal of dysfunctional mitochondria ejected by cardiomyocytes | (16) |
| Electrical conduction | Resident cardiac macrophages facilitate conduction of the electrical impulse | Macrophage depletion using CD11bDTR and Csf1op/op mice, Macrophage-specific Cx43-deficient miceUsing the CX3CR1 Cre driver | Macrophages facilitate atrioventricular condition through coupling to conducting cardiomyocytes via connexin-43-containing gap junctions | (17) |
| Lymphangiogenesis | Cardiac macrophages interact with lymphatic capillaries and play a role in lymphatic vessel growth and patterning during development | Myeloid cell-deficient PU.1−/− mice , Macrophage depletion using a genetic diphtheria toxin-based model (Cx3cr1CreER/+;R26R-DTA mice) | Effects of macrophages were attributed to hyaluronan-dependent interactions with lymphatic endothelial cells | (18) |
CCR, C-C chemokine receptor; CSF1, colony stimulating factor 1; CX3CL, C-X3-C chemokine ligand.
MACROPHAGES IN MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Myocardial infarction is caused by sudden occlusion of a coronary artery, due to rupture or erosion of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Abundant macrophages accumulate in plaques and play a central role in all stages of atherosclerosis, from initiation and expansion of the lesions to formation of the necrotic core that leads to rupture (19, 20). Moreover, macrophages have also been implicated in regression of atherosclerotic plaques. The role of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques has been systematically discussed in several excellent reviews (21–25). Although design of therapies targeting macrophages in patients with acute myocardial infarction requires consideration of effects on plaque stability, our discussion will only focus on the functions and roles of macrophages in the infarcted myocardium.
Repair of the Infarcted Heart
The adult mammalian heart has negligible regenerative capacity and heals through formation of a collagen-based scar. Although the scar does not contribute to ventricular contraction, its formation plays a critical role in protecting the heart from catastrophic rupture. Moreover, a well-orchestrated reparative response prevents infarct expansion and attenuates adverse ventricular remodeling, a process associated with chamber dilation, progressive dysfunction and a high incidence of heart failure and arrhythmias. Thus, perturbations in the reparative response can lead to formation of a scar with low tensile strength, contributing to ventricular dilation and to the development of heart failure.
Repair of the infarcted heart can be divided into three distinct, but overlapping phases: the inflammatory phase, the proliferative phase and the maturation phase (26). Macrophages are central cellular effectors of the injurious and reparative cellular responses in the infarcted heart. During the early stages of injury, initiation of the postinfarction inflammatory response is dependent on macrophage activation. Induction of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines triggers recruitment of abundant monocyte-derived macrophages in the infarcted heart. Infiltrating macrophages serve as professional phagocytes, clearing the infarct from dead cells and matrix debris. Ingestion of apoptotic cells by macrophages stimulates anti-inflammatory cascades, leading to suppression of inflammation and transition to the proliferative phase, which is characterized by infiltration of the infarct with activated matrix-synthetic myofibroblasts. Infarct macrophages play an important role in fibroblast and myofibroblast activation and also promote angiogenesis, which is necessary for supply of oxygen and nutrients to the metabolically active granulation tissue. Deposition of an organized network of collagenous matrix in the infarct leads to the maturation phase, associated with matrix cross-linking and with reduction of the infarct macrophage population. As the infarct heals, the noninfarcted segments exhibit hypertrophy and are subjected to pressure and volume loads that may trigger macrophage activation and subsequent stimulation of a fibrogenic program. Macrophages undergo dramatic phenotypic transitions during the three phases of cardiac repair and critically regulate inflammation, repair, matrix remodeling, angiogenesis and fibrosis.
Macrophages during the Inflammatory Phase of Cardiac Repair
The role of macrophages in initiation of inflammation following myocardial infarction.
Prolonged ischemia induces irreversible injury in cardiomyocytes, leading to their death. In mammals, a 15–20 min interval of coronary occlusion is sufficient to cause death of the most vulnerable of cardiomyocytes in the subendocardium (27, 28). Prolonged ischemia stimulates a wavefront of necrosis that extends towards the subepicardium, ultimately leading to a transmural infarct after 4–5 h of coronary occlusion (29). Necrotic cells release a wide range of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) in the extracellular environment (such as HMGB1, HSPs and S100 proteins) (30–32); these mediators inform the surrounding cells of the injury, and activate downstream inflammatory and reparative cascades (33). All myocardial cells respond to these danger signals through activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLRs) (34, 35), and activate downstream proinflammatory cascades. Although resident cardiac mast cells (36), cardiomyocytes (37), and vascular endothelial cells (38) have also been implicated in activation of postinfarction inflammation, several lines of evidence support a critical role for resident macrophages. First, the CCR2+ subpopulation of cardiac macrophages was found to stimulate leukocyte influx in the infarcted heart through pathways involving the cytosolic adaptor protein myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MYD88) (39), a critical component of TLR- and IL-1-mediated responses. In contrast, CCR2− resident macrophages restrained inflammatory cell recruitment (39). Second, activation of interferon regulatory factor (IRF)3 in macrophages has been implicated in induction of inflammatory cytokines and downstream recruitment of leukocytes (40). Third, activation of the cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) in cardiac macrophages by phagocytosed cellular debris was found to activate IRF3, inducing inflammatory cytokine synthesis (41).
What is the fate of resident macrophages in the infarcted heart?
Studies investigating death of myocardial cells in response to an ischemic insult have traditionally focused exclusively on cardiomyocytes (42), ignoring the effects of ischemia on cell survival pathways in other cell types. Thus, our knowledge on the fate of resident cardiac macrophages following infarction is limited and is based predominantly on speculation. Parabiosis experiments suggested that resident cardiac macrophages disappear within 24 h after coronary occlusion; some descriptive data suggested that their depletion may be attributed, at least in part, to death (9). However, robust evidence supporting this notion is lacking. It is plausible to hypothesize that the fate of resident cardiac macrophages may be also dependent on the timing of reperfusion. Macrophages may be more resilient than cardiomyocytes to ischemic insults; thus, with early reperfusion a larger fraction of resident cardiac macrophages may survive. To what extent survival of resident reparative macrophages in reperfused infarcts may contribute to the beneficial actions of early reperfusion is unknown.
Dynamics of macrophage infiltration in the infarcted heart.
Depletion of resident macrophages during the inflammatory phase of infarct healing is accompanied by recruitment of an abundant population of circulating monocytes (9, 12, 43). In the cytokine-rich environment of the infarct, which contains large amounts of colony stimulating factor (CSF)-1 (43), a growth factor with a central role in macrophage expansion and differentiation (44), infiltrating monocytes differentiate into macrophages, thus replacing the resident macrophage population. Monocytes comprise 10% and 4% of human and mouse blood leukocytes respectively in the steady state (45, 46). Moreover, the spleen serves as a reservoir of monocytes that can be mobilized following injury to populate the damaged tissue (47). Following infarction, alarmins released from dead cells stimulate bone marrow-derived monocyte release and mobilize cells from the splenic reservoir, generating a large pool of activated cells available for recruitment to the site of injury. Two major monocyte types have been characterized in mice and in humans. Classical Ly6Chigh mouse monocytes correspond to the CD14+ CD16− human subpopulation and are recruited following infection or injury promoting inflammation. On the other hand, nonclassical Ly6Clo monocytes correspond to the CD14loCD16+ human cells and are also called patrolling monocytes, to reflect their homeostatic role in the normal vasculature (48, 49). The infarcted heart sequentially recruits both Ly6Chi and Ly6Clo monocytes (50). Ly6Chi monocytes infiltrate the infarct during the early inflammatory phase of cardiac repair and have been suggested to differentiate into Ly6Chi and Ly6Clo macrophages (51). Infiltration of Ly6Clo monocytes in the infarcted heart may play a reparative role, activating fibrogenic and angiogenic pathways (50).
It has been suggested that in addition to resident cardiac macrophages and recruited circulating monocyte-derived cells, GATA6+ pericardial macrophages may also infiltrate the infarcted heart, and may exert protective actions, preventing excessive fibrosis (52). This conclusion was based on in vivo experiments using cell transplantation approaches to generate bone marrow chimeras and delivery of fluorescent beads into the pericardial space to specifically label pericardial macrophages (52). However, the critical role of pericardial macrophages in cardiac repair has been challenged by recently published specific and rigorous genetic lineage tracing studies that demonstrated negligible infiltration of the infarcted heart with GATA6+ pericardial macrophages, and did not detect any effects of these cells in fibrotic remodeling of the heart (53).
Mediators involved in recruitment of monocytes in the infarcted myocardium.
Recruitment of monocytes in the infarct is driven by induction of adhesion molecules in the infarct microvasculature and by generation of chemotactic gradients that stimulate migration of the monocytes in the infarcted area (Table 2). Several members of the CC chemokine family are markedly upregulated in the infarcted myocardium and provide key directional signals for recruitment of monocytes into the infarct (88). The chemotactic actions of the chemokines are enhanced through binding to glycosaminoglycans expressed on the endothelial surface, or on the extracellular matrix (89). As monocytes are captured by activated endothelial cells, they roll on the endothelial surface through interactions involving the selectins, and “sense” the glycosaminoglycan-bound chemokines. This interaction stimulates monocyte integrin activation, triggering firm adhesion between the monocyte and the endothelial cell. These molecular steps are critical for migration of monocytes across the endothelial layer (90).
Table 2.
Chemotactic mediators involved in expansion/recruitment of macrophages in experimental models of myocardial infarction
| Mediator | Cellular Source | Effects on Macrophages | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC chemokines | |||
| CCL2 | Endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, T cells, monocyte/macrophages |
1) Recruits CCR2+ monocytes 2) Stimulates expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the infarct 3) Mediates phagocytic removal of dead cells 4) Promotes adverse remodeling without affecting acute infarct size |
(54–57, 58, 59) |
| CCR5 ligands (CCL3, CCL4, CCL5) | Although upregulation of CCR5 ligands has been documented in infarcts, their cellular localization has not been systematically studied | CCR5 mediates recruitment of regulatory T cells and monocytes with anti-inflammatory properties and may play a role in macrophage activation. These effects were suggested to attenuate adverse remodeling | (60, 61) |
| CCL5 | Platelets |
1) CCL5 has been implicated in recruitment of infarct macrophages 2) Platelet-derived CCL5 has been suggested to cooperate with neutrophil-derived HNP1 to attract macrophages in the infarct 3) CCL5 was reported to increase infarct size and accentuate adverse remodeling |
(62, 63) |
| CCL7 | B lymphocytes | CCL7 derived from B lymphocytes has been suggested to promote infiltration of the infarct with proinflammatory Ly6Chi monocytes. These effects accentuate adverse remodeling | (64, 65) |
| CCL21/CCR7 | Although upregulation of CCL21 and its receptor CCR7 have been documented in infarcts, cellular localization has not been systematically studied |
1) CCL21 has been implicated in recruitment of macrophages in the infarct 2) Proinflammatory effects of CCL21 were associated with worse postinfarction remodeling |
(66) |
| CCL25/CCR9 axis | CCL25 immunoreactivity was diffusely localized in the infarct. CCR9 was localized predominantly in macrophages and T cells |
1) CCR9 signaling was implicated in macrophage recruitment in the infarct 2) The proinflammatory effects of CCR9 were involved in adverse postinfarction remodeling |
(67) |
| CX3CL1 | |||
| CX3CL1/CX3CR1 | Cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells | CX3CL1 was implicated in recruitment of macrophages in the infarct. CX3CL1-mediated inflammation was implicated in dysfunction. Effects on cardiac repair have not been studied | (68, 69) |
| Cytokines | |||
| IL-1/IL1R1 axis | Endothelial cells, monocytes/macrophages |
1) IL-1α and IL-1β potently stimulate inflammatory macrophage infiltration in the infarct, either directly, or through induction of other chemoattractants. IL-1-mediated inflammation promotes adverse postinfarction remodeling 2) IL-1β was found to mobilize bone marrow leukocytes after infarction |
(70, 71, 72, 73, 74) |
| TNF-α | In the infarct, TNF-α has been localized in macrophages, mast cells and vascular cells. Cardiomyocytes have also been suggested to be an important source of TNF-α in infarcted and remodeling hearts | TNF-α may stimulate synthesis of monocyte chemoattractants and may also induce endothelial adhesion molecule expression | (75, 76, 36) |
| TGF-β | Expressed in a latent form in normal hearts, and activated in infarction. De novo synthesis of all 3 TGF-β isoforms is noted in infarcts and may be localized in macrophages, vascular cells, cardiomyocytes and platelets |
1) As a potent monocyte chemoattractant, TGF-β has been implicated in recruitment of monocytes in the infarct 2) The TGF-β/Smad3 cascade has been implicated in macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of dead cells, and in the transition of infarct macrophages to an anti-inflammatory phenotype. In contrast, Smad2 was not implicated in recruitment or activation of infarct macrophages |
(59, 77, 78) |
| GM-CSF | Fibroblasts |
1) GM-CSF has been implicated in recruitment of Ly6Chigh monocytes in the infarct through the induction of CCL2 production in Ly6Chigh monocytes and macrophages 2) GM-CSF stimulates the production of Ly6Chigh monocytes in the bone marrow. The proinflammatory effects of GM-CSF have been suggested to contribute to adverse postinfarction remodeling |
(79) |
| Lipid mediators | |||
| Prostaglandin E2 | Although upregulation of PGE2 has been documented in the infarct, cellular localization has not been systematically studied |
1) PGE2 signaling mediated through the EP2 receptor was implicated in recruitment of macrophages in the infarct. EP2 signaling was suggested to exert reparative functions that attenuate dysfunction after infarction 2) The EP3 receptor was found to mediate reparative angiogenic functions of PGE2 in infarct macrophages |
(80, 81, 82) |
| Leukotrienes | The cellular source of leukotrienes in the infarcted heart has not been systematically studied | 5-Lipoxygenase-mediated leukotriene synthesis was found to attenuate infiltration of the infarct with proinflammatory macrophages. Whether this effect involves direct actions on macrophages is not known | (83) |
| Complement | |||
| C5a/C5a receptor | Although C5a receptors are upregulated in the ischemic region after reperfusion, the cellular source of C5a has not been studied | 1) C5a signaling was implicated in macrophage recruitment in the infarct. The effects of C5a were suggested to increase infarct size | (84, 85) |
| Regenerating islet-derived proteins | |||
| Reg3b | Cardiomyocytes |
1) Reg3b has been implicated in initial recruitment of monocytes in the infarct 2) Reg3b may selectively stimulate recruitment of MHC-IIhi Ly6Clo and MHC-IIlo Ly6Clo macrophages in the infarct. These effects were suggested to promote cardiac healing, improving myocardial function after infarction |
(86, 87) |
C5a, complement component 5a; CCL, C-C chemokine ligand; CCR, C-C chemokine receptor; CSF, colony stimulating factor; CX3CL, C-X3-C chemokine ligand; IL, interleukin; TGF, transforming growth factor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Expression of C-C chemokine ligand (CCL) 2/Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1, the best-studied CC chemokine in heart disease, is markedly upregulated in endothelial cells and leukocytes infiltrating the infarct (58, 91–94) and triggers recruitment of CCR2+ monocytes that serve a central role in clearance of the infarct from dead cells, but also contribute to adverse ventricular remodeling (54, 55, 95–98).
Although several other CC chemokines (including CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL7, and CCL21) are also upregulated in the infarcted myocardium (88), their role in recruitment, expansion, and/or activation of macrophages is less convincingly documented. CCL5 has been suggested to contribute to the inflammatory injury in experimental models of nonreperfused infarction (62, 99). It has been suggested that formation of heteromers comprised of platelet-derived CCL5 and neutrophil-borne human neutrophil peptide 1 (HNP1) stimulate monocyte recruitment through interactions with chemokine receptors (63). Actions involving CCR1, a chemokine receptor that binds to several CC chemokines, or CCR9, the receptor for CCL25, have also been implicated in monocyte recruitment in the infarcted myocardium (67, 100).
Considering the heterogeneity of monocytes, which is determined at least in part by their chemokine receptor expression profile, some members of the CC chemokine family may exhibit selectivity by recruiting specific subsets of monocytes. For example, experiments using a genetic loss-of-function model suggested that CCR5, one of the receptors for the CC chemokines CCL3, CCL4 and CCL5, may be inhibit inflammation by recruiting anti-inflammatory monocyte subsets and regulatory T cells (60).
CXC chemokines on the other hand, predominantly act as chemoattractants for neutrophils and lymphocytes. Thus, any effects of CXC chemokines on macrophage recruitment and activation are likely to be indirect, reflecting actions on other cell types. The CX3C chemokine C-X3-C chemokine ligand (CX3CL) 1, also known as fractalkine, promotes migration of cells expressing its receptor C-X3-C chemokine receptor (CX3CR) 1. CX3CR1-expressing monocytes and macrophages are abundant in the infarcted myocardium (50, 101); their recruitment may require upregulation of CX3CL1 in the infarct zone (68, 69).
The proinflammatory cytokines Interleukin (IL)-1, Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, and IL-6 also contribute to infiltration of the infarcted myocardium with macrophages. Genetic disruption of the type 1 IL-1 receptor (IL-1RI), the only signaling receptor for IL-1α and IL-1β, markedly attenuated macrophage recruitment in the infarcted myocardium, without affecting scar size, suggesting a central role of IL-1 signaling in mediating the macrophage-driven inflammatory response (71). Several mechanisms may mediate the effects of IL-1 on recruitment of macrophages in the infarct. First, IL-1 potently stimulates CC chemokine synthesis in several different cell types (72, 102) thus inducing expression of monocyte chemoattractants in the infarct. Second, IL-1 enhances monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells by inducing integrin expression and activation in monocytes, while upregulating synthesis of adhesion molecules in the endothelium (103, 104). Third, IL-1 may upregulate expression of proteases in macrophages, thus enhancing their migratory capacity (105). Fourth, IL-1 also acts on the bone marrow, accentuating generation and release of monocytes (73). In comparison to the very extensive evidence on the role of IL-1 signaling cascades in recruitment of infarct macrophages, the data on the role of TNF-α and IL-6 are much more limited. Studies using genetic models demonstrated contrasting effects of TNF receptor (TNFR)1 versus TNFR2 signaling on recruitment of activated macrophages in the infarct. TNFR1-mediated infiltration of the infarcted myocardium with macrophages; in contrast, TNFR2 restrained macrophage recruitment (106). Whether these effects are due to direct actions of TNF receptors on macrophages or reflect epiphenomena has not been investigated. In vitro studies suggest that, in addition to its proinflammatory effects, TNF-α is also a central regulator of macrophage survival, promoting necroptosis and pyroptosis (107). The in vivo effects of IL-6 on macrophages are also complex, and likely reflect the balance between canonical (mediated through binding of the cytokine to cell surface IL-6 receptor/IL-6R) and trans signaling (involving binding to soluble IL-6R and subsequent activation of gp130 cascades in cells lacking surface IL-6R) (108). In a model of myocardial infarction, pharmacologic inhibition experiments demonstrated that IL-6 trans signaling may mediate macrophage infiltration (109).
Activation of the complement cascade has also been implicated in recruitment of monocytes in the infarcted myocardium (84, 110). Myocardial cell necrosis results in the release of subcellular membrane constituents capable of activating the complement cascade (111, 112). mRNA and proteins for all the components of the classical complement pathway are overexpressed in myocardial infarcts (113) and trigger monocyte chemotaxis, acting predominantly during the early phase of leukocyte infiltration (59). Complement-mediated monocyte recruitment may involve, at least in part, Complement component 5a (C5a)-stimulated induction of CC chemokine synthesis in microvascular endothelial cells (114). In addition to its chemotactic effects, activation of the C5a/C5a receptor (C5aR) axis in macrophages may also contribute to proinflammatory activation, by generating reactive oxygen species and by inducing and activating proinflammatory IL-1β (115).
The functional role of infarct macrophages during the inflammatory phase: phagocytosis and efferocytosis.
The best documented functions of macrophages during the inflammatory phase of infarct healing are phagocytosis, the clearance of necrotic cells and matrix fragments, and efferocytosis, the removal of apoptotic cells. In vivo studies demonstrating the presence of phagocytosed cells within infarct macrophages (116), and evidence showing that perturbed phagocytic functions of macrophages are associated with defective clearance of necrotic or apoptotic cardiomyocytes and neutrophils (54, 77, 116, 117) support the central role of the macrophages as professional phagocytes that remove dead cells from the infarcted heart. Some experimental evidence suggested that myofibroblasts may also exhibit phagocytic capacity (118), thus contributing to removal of dead cells from the infarct; however, the significance of this mechanism is unclear, as phagocytosis of dead cells in the healing infarct typically precedes myofibroblast conversion (94).
Effective phagocytosis requires activation of pathways that mediate recognition and engulfment of dying cells by the macrophages (Fig. 1), as well as expression of “don’t eat me” signals by live cells to prevent inappropriate removal of uninjured bystanders (119). In the infarcted myocardium, death of up to a billion cells poses a major challenge for the relatively small population of phagocytic macrophages located in the normal cardiac interstitium. Recruitment of abundant monocytes in response to the release of DAMPs provides a large pool of macrophages, capable of rapidly phagocytosing the dying cells in the infarct zone. Following transmigration to the area of the infarct, macrophages sense “find-me” signals released by dying cells, which direct the phagocyte to the site of cell death. Lysophospholipids (such as lysophosphatidylcholine and sphingosine-1-phosphate) and nucleotides [such as Adenosine Tri-Phosphate (ATP), Adenosine Mono-Phosphate (AMP), and Uridine Tri-Phosphate (UTP)] are the best characterized find-me signals; however, their potential role in guiding macrophages to the dying myocardial cells has not been studied. Once the macrophages have migrated to the site of cell death, they recognize “eat-me” signals expressed on the surface of the dying cells. The best characterized and most important of the “eat-me” molecules is phosphatidylserine (PtdSer). PtdSer is ubiquitously expressed by all cells, and is normally confined to the inner surface of the cell membrane. In apoptotic cells, PtdSer is externalized on the cell surface and is detected by the transmembrane receptors of the TIM (T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing molecule) and TAM [tyrosine-protein kinase receptor (TYRO) 3, AXL, and myeloid-epithelial-reproductive receptor tyrosine kinase (MerTK)] families, expressed on the macrophage membrane (119). Although TIM synthesis is restricted to specific macrophage subpopulations, MerTK exhibits broad expression in phagocytic macrophages in all tissues and has been implicated in efferocytosis in the infarct.
Figure 1.
Molecular signals involved in efferocytosis-mediated clearance of apoptotic cells by macrophages in the infarcted myocardium. Apoptotic cells expose “eat me” signals, such as phosphatidylserine on their surface. Macrophages detect phosphatidylserine through the TAM receptors (Tyro3, Axl, and MerTK), using activating ligands, such as GAS6/Protein S, which bind to phosphatidylserine. ADAM17 inhibits macrophage phagocytosis by cleaving the extracellular domain of MerTK. The soluble glycoprotein MFGE8 also contributes to phagocytosis, by binding to phosphatidylserine on the surface of dead cells and to macrophage αV integrin. Macrophage CD36 has been suggested to contributes to dead cell recognition through interactions with thrombospondin-1. In the infarct, CD47 expression by apoptotic cells has been suggested to interact with macrophage SIRPα, inhibiting phagocytosis. ADAM, a disintegrin and metalloprotease; MerTK, myeloid-epithelial-reproductive receptor tyrosine kinase; MFGE8, milk fat globule-EGF factor 8; TSP-1, thrombospondin 1.
Global and macrophage-specific loss-of-function studies demonstrated that MerTK mediates clearance of apoptotic cells from the infarct (116, 120). MerTK-dependent efferocytosis plays a central role in acquisition of an anti-inflammatory and reparative phenotype in infarct macrophages (121, 122). The extracellular domain of MerTK is cleaved by a disintegrin and metalloprotease (ADAM) 17 (123), a protease that is markedly induced in the infarcted myocardium (124), generating soluble Mer, and reducing the levels of functional MerTK on the macrophage surface. MerTK cleavage in the infarcted heart perturbs efferocytosis and accentuates adverse remodeling following myocardial infarction (120). On the other hand, the AXL receptor tyrosine kinase was found to exert proinflammatory actions, directing a switch to glycolytic metabolism and inducing IL-1β expression (125).
Much like the other members of the TAM family, MerTK does not bind directly to PtdSer, but interacts with activating ligands, such as GAS6 and PROS1, to recognize PtdSer and to mediate signaling (119). Through a similar bridging mechanism, the soluble glycoprotein milk fat globule-EGF factor 8 (MFGE8) can also contribute to macrophage-mediated efferocytosis in the infarcted heart (77, 121). MFGE8 promotes efferocytosis by bridging PtdSer on the apoptotic cell surface with macrophage αV integrins. The pattern recognition receptor CD36 may also be involved in recognition of apoptotic cells by macrophages through interactions with thrombospondin-1 (126). In the infarcted heart, myeloid cell expression of CD36 has been implicated in early phagocytosis of dying cardiomyocytes and in activation of a reparative program (127).
It has been suggested that clearance of apoptotic cells is regulated not only by molecules that promote efferocytosis, but also by protective “don’t eat me” signals, which mark healthy cells, and protect them from engulfment by the activated macrophages. Overexpression of the transmembrane protein CD47 has been proposed as a mechanism that may explain the resistance of leukemic progenitor cells to macrophage-mediated death (128). Whether induction of “don’t eat me” signals plays a role in protecting border zone cardiomyocytes from death has not been investigated. CD47 inhibition with neutralizing antibodies has been reported to exert beneficial actions in an infarction model by facilitating clearance of dead cells (129), suggesting a maladaptive role of this molecule in cardiac repair. However, the broad range of effects of CD47 on many different cell types (130) and the lack of data using cell-specific approaches preclude definitive conclusions.
Macrophages during the Proliferative Phase of Cardiac Repair
Proliferation contributes to macrophage expansion.
Phagocytosis of dying cells triggers acquisition of an anti-inflammatory phenotype by infarct macrophages, marking the end of the inflammatory phase of cardiac repair, and leading to the transition to the proliferative phase. Despite the reduced recruitment of monocytes, due to the downregulation of chemokines, the infarct macrophage population continues to expand through proliferation (43, 51, 131). Proliferation of infarct macrophages may involve myocardial induction of CSF-1 (43). Moreover, during the proliferative phase, infarct macrophages exhibit dramatic phenotypic changes and release a broad range of mediators that orchestrate repair, but may also be involved in the pathogenesis of maladaptive fibrosis.
During the proliferative phase, infarct macrophages acquire an anti-inflammatory, reparative and fibrogenic M2-like phenotype.
The M1/M2 macrophage polarization paradigm suggests that macrophages can acquire two polarized phenotypes: proinflammatory M1 cells or anti-inflammatory M2 cells with reparative and fibrogenic properties (132). Although infarct macrophages exhibit a range of nuanced phenotypes between these two extremes, identification of macrophages with M1-like or M2-like cytokine expression profiles has been very useful in understanding the temporal dynamics of the cellular response in myocardial inflammation and repair. Studies combining flow cytometry and gene expression analysis suggest that M1-like cells are prominent during the inflammatory phase of infarct repair, whereas M2-like macrophages dominate the proliferative phase (131, 133). This temporal sequence of M1 versusM2 cell expansion in the infarcted heart is also supported by single cell RNA-sequencing studies (134). During the peak of the proliferative phase of cardiac repair, the most prominent population of macrophages in the infarcted myocardium are M2-like cells that exhibit expression of genes encoding reparative proteins, such as Pdgfb and Igf1 (134). In contrast, the anti-inflammatory cytokine Il10 was only expressed in a small number of infarct macrophages. This finding is consistent with observations in a canine model of reperfused infarction, showing that IL-10 protein is predominantly expressed in T cells infiltrating the infarct, and only in a small subset of macrophages (135).
The mechanisms and signals involved in anti-inflammatory transition of infarct macrophages.
Several distinct cellular mechanisms have been implicated in anti-inflammatory transition and in acquisition of an M2-like reparative phenotype in infarct macrophages. First, as discussed in the previous section, efferocytosis potently stimulates expression of anti-inflammatory mediators by macrophages. Second, other immune cell types, including neutrophils and lymphocytes, have been implicated in regulation of the inflammatory profile of infarct macrophages; their effects may involve secreted anti-inflammatory mediators, or contact-dependent mechanisms. Neutrophils have been suggested to stimulate a reparative macrophage phenotype in healing infarcts through secretion of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and subsequent accentuation of efferocytosis (136). Recruitment of anti-inflammatory T cells (such as regulatory T cells/Tregs) (137) may also play a role in stimulating an anti-inflammatory and reparative macrophage phenotype (138) by secreting IL-10 (60, 139), or by exerting contact-mediated effects (139). Third, cytokine activation in the infarct microenvironment induces endogenous anti-inflammatory signals in infarct macrophages that restrain proinflammatory cascades. Upregulation of IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK)-M in infarct macrophages has been demonstrated to inhibit TLR- and IL-1-driven inflammatory activity, protecting the infarcted heart from adverse remodeling (140). Fourth, several different anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as transforming growth factor (TGF) -βs, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, are induced in the infarct and cooperate to suppress proinflammatory macrophage activation (141). TGF-β signaling cascades are activated in the infarcted heart, both through increased de novo synthesis (94) and activation of latent stores (142), and may play an important role in mediating the anti-inflammatory actions of macrophages (143–145). The anti-inflammatory effects of TGF-β on infarct macrophages were found to involve activation of Smad3, but not Smad2 signaling (77, 78). Fifth, the effects of secreted mediators on the phenotypic and functional profile of infarct macrophages may involve modulation of transcription factors of the IRF family (146). For example, IRF5 expression was found to be downregulated in infarct macrophages during the proliferative phase of cardiac repair and may play a central role in suppression of their proinflammatory activity (147). The endogenous signals responsible for de-activation of IRF-mediated pathways in the healing infarct have not been identified. Sixth, macrophage phenotype may be also regulated through release of extracellular vesicles (exosomes) containing miRNAs with pro- or anti-inflammatory properties (148). Most of the evidence implicating exosomes in regulation of infarct macrophage phenotype is derived from cell therapy studies. In these studies, infusion of a broad range of reparative cell types promotes cardioprotective, reparative, or anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotypes through exosome release (149, 150). Ischemic cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, and T cells are also capable of secreting miRNA-containing exosomes that may modulate macrophage phenotype; however, the relative significance of this endogenous mechanism has not been convincingly demonstrated.
Macrophages critically regulate cardiac repair.
Considering their central role in phagocytosis of dead cells and their involvement in activation and recruitment of reparative cells, such as fibroblasts and vascular cells, it is not surprising that macrophages are key regulators of postinfarction repair. Several experimental studies using liposomal clodronate administration to deplete monocytes and macrophages demonstrated a central protective role of macrophages in the healing infarct (Table 3). Macrophages are required for replacement of dead cardiomyocytes with granulation tissue and protect the infarcted heart from adverse remodeling (151, 153, 154). Whether the reparative functions of macrophages involve specific subsets is less convincingly demonstrated, due to the challenges in implementing strategies with subset-specific effects. Two different depletion strategies suggested an important role for M2-like macrophages in repair of the infarcted heart. Deletion of the adaptor protein tribbles homolog 1 (TRIB1), which is critically implicated in differentiation of M2-like macrophages (159), resulted in depletion of M2-like infarct macrophages, leading to defective repair, and a high incidence of cardiac rupture after myocardial infarction (160). Similar perturbations were noted in infarcted mice that received treatment with a CSF-1 receptor kinase inhibitor (161). Blockade of the effects of CSF-1 depleted M2 macrophages, disrupting repair and worsening adverse remodeling following infarction (161).
Table 3.
Studies investigating the effects of macrophages in myocardial infarction using depletion strategies
| Species/Strategy/Model of MI | Effects on Macrophage Population | Role of Macrophages | Mechanism | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse/liposomal clodronate depletion/cryoinjury | Infiltration of the injured heart with F4/80+ macrophages was reduced by ∼85% | Macrophages reduce mortality and protect from dilative remodeling following infarction | Protective effects of macrophages were attributed to clearance of cell debris and to activation of a reparative program, leading to myofibroblast infiltration and increased angiogenesis | (151) |
| Mouse/liposomal clodronate depletion/nonreperfused MI | CD11b+Ly6G− monocytes were reduced by 69% in the infarcted heart | Macrophages enhance postinfarct sympathetic nerve sprouting. Effects on myofibroblast infiltration are also suggested | The effects of macrophages on nerve sprouting are attributed to secretion of NGF | (152) |
| Mouse/liposomal clodronate depletion/ nonreperfused MI | Efficient macrophage depletion was achieved; however, quantitative data are not provided | Macrophages reduce mortality after infarction and protect from dilative remodeling | Not studied | (153) |
| Mouse/liposomal clodronate depletion/nonreperfused MI Mouse/genetic macrophage depletion using LysMCreDTR mice/nonreperfused MI |
In clodronate-treated mice, CD11b+Ly6G− monocytes were reduced by 81% No data are reported on the efficiency of depletion using the diphtheria toxin model |
Clodronate depletion experiments suggested that macrophages reduce mortality after infarction and protect from formation of LV thrombus. Genetic depletion only suggested effects on thrombus formation without effects on mortality | Protective effects of macrophages were attributed to clearance of cell debris and to activation of a reparative program, leading to replacement with granulation tissue | (154) |
| Mouse/liposomal clodronate depletion/nonreperfused MI | CD11b+Ly6G− monocytes were reduced by ∼50% in the infarcted heart | Macrophages in neonatal mouse hearts enhance cardiac regeneration | The regenerative effects of neonatal macrophages are mediated through stimulation of angiogenesis | (155) |
| Mouse/liposomal clodronate depletion/genetic model of cardiomyocyte death | CCR2− MHC-IIhigh embryonic-derived macrophages were reduced by ∼80% in the injured heart | Macrophages in neonatal mouse hearts enhance cardiac repair | CCR2− MHC-IIhigh embryonic-derived macrophages promote cardiac repair through cardiomyocyte proliferation and angiogenesis. stimulation of angiogenesis | (156) |
| Mouse/liposomal clodronate depletion/ reperfused MI | CD45+CD68+ macrophages were reduced by ∼77% in blood and by ∼71% in spleen | Macrophage depletion does not affect the infarct size and cardiac function 48 h after ischemia-reperfusion | Not studied | (149) |
| Mouse/liposomal clodronate depletion/nonreperfused MI | CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages were reduced by 44% in spleen and by 15.3% in the infarcted heart | Macrophages produce bioactive resolving mediators, such as lipoxygenase, and suppress inflammation | Not studied | (157) |
| Mouse /genetic depletion using CCR2DTR mice to deplete CCR2+ cells and CD169DTR mice to eliminate CCR2− resident macrophages/nonreperfused MI, reperfused MI, genetic model of cardiomyocyte death and heart transplantation that mimics ischemic injury | In CCR2DTR mice, 4 days after diphtheria toxin treatment, circulating CCR2+ cells and cardiac dendritic cells were repopulated, whereas CCR2+ cardiac resident macrophages remained depleted In CD169DTR mice, CCR2− cardiac resident macrophages were depleted |
CCR2+ cardiac resident macrophages increase proinflammatory leukocyte infiltration in the infarct and promote adverse remodeling. In contrast, CCR2− resident macrophages exert protective actions, attenuating adverse remodeling | CCR2+ cardiac resident macrophages increase monocyte recruitment through an MYD88-dependent pathway | (39) |
| Mouse/ Genetic depletion of resident macrophages using Cx3cr1CreER–YFP:R26 Td / DTR mice. Tamoxifen was discontinued for 6 wk to achieve selective depletion of resident cardiac macrophages /nonreperfused MI | Cardiac resident macrophages were selectively depleted | Resident cardiac macrophages protect the infarcted heart from adverse postinfarction remodeling | Not studied | (158) |
CCR, C-C chemokine receptor; CX3CR, C-X3-C chemokine receptor; MI, myocardial infraction; NGF, nerve growth factor.
Macrophage-derived mediators that negatively regulate inflammation.
A broad range of macrophage-derived secreted mediators have been implicated in the anti-inflammatory effects of M2-like macrophages in the infarcted heart. Induction of TGF-βs in infarcted hearts is dependent, at least in part, on macrophage infiltration; however, the relative significance of macrophage-derived TGF-βs (151) versus other cellular sources and preformed stores is unclear. IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13 are also upregulated in subpopulations of infarct macrophages (135, 162); however, considering the high levels of synthesis of these cytokines in T cells, the relative significance of macrophage-specific expression is unknown. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C has been recently identified as a macrophage-derived mediator with anti-inflammatory properties that may be induced on efferocytosis, suppressing the postinfarction inflammatory response (163). Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF1) is also highly expressed by M2-like infarct macrophages (134) and may act, at least in part, through anti-inflammatory actions (164). It should be emphasized that macrophage-derived IGF1 may exert a broad range of actions on myocardial cells that may include activation of a hypertrophic program in cardiomyocytes (165). Infarct macrophages can also suppress and resolve inflammation through secretion of specialized proresolving mediators (SPM), such as lipoxins, resolvins, protectins, and maresins (166, 167). However, the role of macrophage-derived endogenous SPMs in repair and remodeling of the infarcted heart has not been investigated.
Macrophages in regulation of fibroblast function.
Cardiac repair is dependent on timely fibroblast activation and conversion to myofibroblasts, the main matrix-producing cells in the infarcted heart (168, 169). Although the central role of macrophages in stimulating myofibroblast activation is strongly supported by macrophage depletion experiments (Table 3), the specific macrophage-derived mediators involved in the reparative fibrogenic actions are poorly understood. TGF-βs are highly expressed in infarct macrophages (54, 77) during the proliferative phase of cardiac repair and are potent activators of myofibroblast conversion and extracellular matrix protein synthesis (170). Other fibrogenic cytokines and growth factors upregulated in infarct macrophages, such as IL-6 (36), IL-4, IL-13, and platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs) (134, 171) may also contribute to macrophage-mediated fibroblast activation (Graphical abstract). Neuregulin 1, a member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family, is also upregulated in M2 macrophages infiltrating the infarct, and has been suggested to promote fibroblast expansion by attenuating their apoptotic death (172). Macrophages can also trigger fibroblast activation by producing proteins with matricellular properties, such as thrombospondin (TSP)-1 (173), secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine/SPARC (174), and osteopontin (175, 176). These secreted glycoproteins are minimally expressed in normal hearts, but enrich the extracellular matrix during the proliferative phase of infarct healing, and play an important role in stimulation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, by locally releasing bioactive cytokines and growth factors, and by binding to receptors on the surface of fibroblasts, thus transducing downstream activating cascades (177, 178). In addition to cytokine and growth factor-mediated effects, it has been suggested that infarct macrophages may also regulate fibroblast phenotype by producing exosomes enriched in miRNAs (179, 180). However, the profile and properties of the extracellular vesicles secreted by infarct macrophages has not been systematically studied.
Some studies have suggested that in addition to their paracrine fibrogenic actions, macrophages may produce significant amounts of collagens (181) or may even directly contribute to the expansion of myofibroblasts in the infarcted heart, by converting to fibroblasts (182). However, the evidence supporting this notion is weak. Robust lineage tracing studies accompanied by rigorous methodology for fibroblast identification have demonstrated negligible conversion of myeloid cells into fibroblasts in the infarcted heart (183, 184). Moreover, single cell RNA-sequencing studies showed negligible expression of collagen genes by infarct macrophages (134).
Macrophages as a source of matrix metalloproteinases.
The role of macrophages in reparative fibrosis following infarction is not limited to the expression of fibroblast-activating mediators. Macrophages may not secrete significant amounts of collagens but have profound effects on the composition of the matrix by producing and secreting proteases and anti-proteases that regulate matrix metabolism. Combined transcriptomic and proteomic studies have demonstrated that macrophages are a major cellular source for many different members of the MMP family in the infarct, including MMP2 (185), MMP7 (186), MMP10, MMP11, MMP12, MMP14, MMP16, MMP24, MMP25, MMP27, and MMP28 (187–190). Several of these proteases may have effects beyond their role in matrix degradation, regulating the levels of bioactive cytokines and chemokines, or processing proteins involved in cardiomyocyte contraction (191) and in electrical conduction (186). For example, MMP12, predominantly localized in infarct macrophages, has been suggested to play a role in resolution of postinfarction inflammation (188), presumably through inactivation of several distinct proinflammatory substrates (192).
Macrophages and infarct angiogenesis.
Formation of neovessels in the healing infarct plays an important role in repair of the infarcted myocardium by supplying oxygen and nutrients to the metabolically active wound (193). Moreover, angiogenesis in the border zone of the infarct may be required to meet the increased metabolic needs of viable cardiomyocytes that need to compensate for the lost contractile capacity of dead myocardium. Macrophages play a central regulatory role in the angiogenic response following myocardial infarction (Fig. 2). Several studies have demonstrated that macrophages are a major source of the potent angiogenic factor VEGF-A in the infarcted myocardium (77, 81, 194). Experiments using myeloid cell-specific knockout mice demonstrated the critical role of macrophage-derived VEGF-A in stimulating infarct angiogenesis, and in mediating repair of the infarcted heart (121). Moreover, macrophage-derived VEGF-C is involved in stimulation of lymphangiogenesis after myocardial infarction (163). Several pathways including efferocytosis (121), Smad-3 signaling (77), and activation of the Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)/EP3 axis (81) have been implicated in stimulation of an angiogenic phenotype in infarct macrophages. In addition to secretion of angiogenic growth factors, macrophages can also stimulate angiogenesis by producing matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), necessary to cleave and remodel the extracellular matrix, providing conduits for endothelial cells.
Figure 2.
Angiogenic effects of macrophages in the infarcted myocardium. Macrophages are crucial cellular effectors in infarct angiogenesis. Efferocytosis stimulates macrophage-derived release of growth factors, such as VEGF-A and VEGF-C, contributing to angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Annexin a1, TGF-β, and Prostaglandin E2 have also been suggested to promote VEGF-A release by macrophages. Macrophage-derived MMPs may also play an important role in neovessel formation. Moreover, macrophage subsets can serve as a major source of PDGF-BB, a growth factor involved in mural cell recruitment and vascular maturation. MMP, matrix metalloproteinases; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; TGF, transforming growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Macrophages in the Maturation Phase of Infarct Healing
Infarct maturation, the most enigmatic phase of cardiac repair, ultimately leads to formation of a mature scar, containing cross-linked collagen fibers. As the infarct matures, myofibroblasts convert to matrifibrocytes, a population of fibroblast like-cells that do not express α-SMA, but synthesize cartilage and tendon genes, and likely serve in maintaining the structural integrity of the mature scar (195). During the maturation phase of cardiac repair, the infarct microvasculature also undergoes dramatic changes, as neovessels acquire a mural cell coat (196, 197). Recruitment of mural cells by infarct microvessels involves activation of a platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) β-mediated pathway and contributes to scar stabilization, restraining inflammatory activity and hemorrhagic infiltration of the infarct (198).
The potential contribution of infarct macrophages to the cellular events leading to scar maturation has not been investigated. Experiments in a mouse model of infarction, using macrophage-specific antibodies and reporter mice showed that despite a reduction in macrophage density during the transition from the proliferative to the maturation phase, a significant population of macrophages remains in mature scars (101). The fate and functional role of these cells is unknown. Macrophages may be an important source of matrix-crosslinking enzymes, such as lysyl-oxidase (199) and transglutaminase-2 (200), and may also contribute to vascular maturation by synthesizing and secreting PDGF-BB (134).
MACROPHAGES IN THE REMODELING NONINFARCTED HEART
As the infarct heals, the surviving remote myocardium remodels, exhibiting compensatory hypertrophic changes, accompanied by interstitial fibrosis. Moreover, the infarct border zone exhibits changes in the biochemical characteristics of the matrix, associated with denaturation of the collagenous network, which may reflect increased mechanical stress in the interface between viable myocardium and noncontractile scar (189). Thus, macrophages in the remodeling noninfarcted myocardium may exhibit phenotypic alterations similar to the changes noted in pressure or volume overload models of noninfarctive heart failure. Unfortunately, the information on the fate and functional role of macrophages in viable noninfarcted segments is very limited. Experiments in a mouse model demonstrated that 8 wk after myocardial infarction, the macrophage population in remote remodeling myocardial segments is increased (201); the local expansion of macrophages was attributed to both increased proliferation and monocyte recruitment (201). It is plausible to hypothesize that activation of macrophages in the remote remodeling myocardium may reflect the increased wall stress in these segments. Experiments in a model of nonischemic heart failure suggested that macrophages sense mechanical stress through mechanosensitive ion channels, such as transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) 4, and become activated, expressing and secreting growth factors (202). However, whether similar mechanosensitive pathways activate macrophages populating the viable remodeling myocardial segments of the infarcted ventricle has not been investigated. Another mechanosensitive ion channel, TRPV2 was found to be overexpressed in macrophages infiltrating the peri-infarct zone (203). Although studies in a model of global germline loss suggested that TRPV2 may promote inflammatory injury after myocardial infarction (204), cell-specific studies examining the role of TRPV2 in regulation of infarct macrophage phenotype are lacking.
MACROPHAGES AND POSTINFARCTION ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
Experimental evidence has implicated macrophages in the pathogenesis of infarct-related arrhythmias. Descriptive and associative studies have suggested that macrophages form gap junctions with cardiomyocytes in the infarct border zone and that M1 macrophages may activate KCa3.1 in cardiomyocytes, thus facilitating arrhythmia generation (205). A recent study in a mouse model of myocardial infarction combined with hypokalemia (to stimulate arrhythmogenesis) showed that depletion of monocyte-derived macrophages in CCR2 KO mice, or of all macrophages (in mice receiving a CSF1R inhibitor) promote electrical storm, suggesting a protective role for macrophages in postinfarction arrhythmogenesis (206). Whether these protective effects involve primary actions on cardiomyocyte electrophysiologic properties, or simply reflect the consequences of perturbed clearance of dead cardiomyocytes and impaired repair (54, 151) in macrophage-deficient infarcts is unclear.
SEX-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN MACROPHAGE PHENOTYPE AND THEIR ROLE IN POSTINFARCTION REMODELING
Sex is a significant modulator of the immune response to myocardial infarction and may affect prognosis and the development of chronic heart failure. Although the reduced incidence of myocardial infarction in women is well documented, convincing clinical evidence on sex-specific patterns of postinfarction remodeling is lacking (207). In a small clinical study male sex was associated with worse early and late remodeling after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (208). In contrast, in a larger study of STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) and optimal pharmacotherapy, men and women had comparable remodeling patterns (209). Because sex also affects the prevalence of several other comorbid conditions that affect the remodeling response (such as diabetes, hypertension, smoking, etc.), identification of sex-specific patterns of adverse remodeling in clinical studies is challenging.
In animal models, most experimental studies have demonstrated that males develop worse postinfarction remodeling than females, in response to comparable initial ischemic insults (210, 211). Moreover, in mice male, sex is associated with a higher incidence of left ventricular free wall rupture after nonreperfused infarction (212). Increased rupture and accentuated remodeling in male animals may be due to sex-related differences in macrophage phenotype (213). However, the evidence supporting this notion is associative and has generated conflicting results. Some studies have suggested that female mice have more infiltrating macrophages in the infarct, with a higher abundance of reparative monocytes (210, 211). In contrast, other investigations failed to detect significant differences in the inflammatory gene expression profile of myeloid cells harvested from male versusfemale mouse infarcts (212).
AGING-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGE PERTURBATIONS IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF POSTINFARCTION REMODELING
Patients aged 65 yr and over account for the majority of hospital admissions and deaths from acute myocardial infarction (214) and exhibit an increased incidence of adverse remodeling and postinfarction heart failure (215). Worse prognosis in older patients cannot be attributed only to increased susceptibility of senescent cardiomyocytes to ischemia, resulting in larger infarcts (216), but may also involve dysregulation of inflammatory and reparative responses (217, 218). Senescent mice have reduced and delayed macrophage infiltration in the infarct, associated with perturbed removal of dead cardiomyocytes, impaired resolution of inflammation and attenuated activation of reparative fibroblasts (219). Several macrophage-dependent mechanisms may explain the reparative impairment and accentuated adverse remodeling in senescent subjects. First, aging is associated with perturbations in the normal resident cardiac macrophage population, leading to progressive replacement of resident embryonic origin macrophages with monocyte-derived cells (220) that may exhibit attenuated reparative capacity. Second, aging results in overactive baseline inflammatory gene expression in macrophages, accompanied by diminished oxidative responses to activating signals (221). Thus, in older subjects macrophages may exhibit decreased phagocytic activity (222) that may delay removal of dead cardiomyocytes from the healing infarct, leading to a prolonged inflammatory response. Third, in models of tissue repair, aging is associated with reduced macrophage-derived expression of reparative and angiogenic growth factors (223). Attenuated activation of reparative fibroblasts and impaired infarct angiogenesis may disrupt repair, increasing dilative remodeling of the infarcted ventricle.
TARGETING MONOCYTE-DERIVED MACROPHAGES IN MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Experimental evidence suggests that macrophages have both deleterious and reparative functions in the infarcted heart. Several studies in mouse models support the notion that newly recruited CCR2+ monocyte-derived macrophages may accentuate inflammation, extending injury following infarction, whereas resident CCR2− macrophages may exert protective actions (39, 54, 158). Pharmacologic interventions targeting proinflammatory CCR2+ monocytes and macrophages were found to have beneficial effects in animal models of myocardial infarction. CCR2 targeting using a nanoparticle-based siRNA approach was reported to reduce recruitment of proinflammatory leukocytes in a broad range of pathologic conditions and was suggested to reduce injury in myocardial infarction (224). Treatment with a CCL2 inhibitor attenuated dysfunction in a model of reperfused myocardial infarction (95). Administration of lipid micelles loaded with a CCR2 inhibitor and surface decorated with anti-CCR2 antibody to specifically target proinflammatory CCR2+ macrophages, attenuated inflammation in a model of myocardial infarction; these anti-inflammatory effects were associated with a trend towards attenuated dysfunction (98). Treatment with the chemokine-binding protein evasin-4 selectively inhibited CC chemokine effects and was found to attenuate injury in a model of myocardial infarction (99). Although these findings suggest therapeutic promise of strategies inhibiting CC chemokine-driven macrophage activation in myocardial infarction, implementation in patients poses several major challenges. First, the effects of proinflammatory macrophages are not uniformly detrimental. Myocardial infarction requires induction of chemokine-mediated inflammation to clear the infarct from dead cells and to initiate the reparative response (54). Thus, overzealous inhibition of macrophage-mediated inflammation may perturb repair. Second, studies in young adult mice with robust inflammatory responses may not accurately reflect the effects of targeting proinflammatory signals in elderly subjects suffering myocardial infarction. Senescence is associated with suppressed and prolonged inflammatory responses after myocardial injury (219). Thus, in elderly subjects with myocardial infarction acute inhibition of inflammatory signaling may perturb repair; instead approaches attenuating chronic inflammation and restoring normal patterns of resolution of the inflammatory response may be more effective in protection from adverse remodeling. Third, no animal model can recapitulate the pathophysiologic heterogeneity of postinfarction remodeling in human patients. In animal models, a reductionist approach is typically used, which is optimal for dissection of mechanistic pathways (225). Healthy, sex-, and age-matched animals with identical genetic backgrounds are studied in a well-standardized model of cardiac injury, and in the absence of other therapeutic interventions. In contrast, patients suffering myocardial infarction are highly heterogeneous, exhibiting differences in remodeling responses, due to genetic variability, the presence or absence of comorbidities, or distinct atherothrombotic and myocardial disease patterns. These differences greatly affect the characteristics of the postinfarction inflammatory and reparative response. A subset of patients may exhibit perturbed suppression and resolution of the postinfarction inflammatory response, leading to excessive protease-driven matrix degradation, dilative remodeling, and systolic heart failure. Other patients may have accentuated fibrogenic pathways, resulting in excessive collagen deposition, increased myocardial stiffness and development of heart failure due to diastolic dysfunction. Biomarkers and imaging strategies are needed for pahophysiologically driven stratification of patients with myocardial infarction to identify those likely to benefit from targeted anti-inflammatory approaches (226, 227).
DO MACROPHAGES HOLD THE KEY FOR CARDIAC REGENERATION?
Adult human hearts exhibit a very limited capacity for self-renewal (228), that is overwhelmed by the massive loss of hundreds of millions of cardiomyocytes following myocardial infarction. Despite intense efforts, no therapeutic strategy has shown consistent regenerative effects in adult mammalian hearts. It has been suggested that macrophages may hold the key for cardiac regeneration; however, supporting evidence is predominantly derived from experimental studies in models of cardiac regeneration in fish, amphibians, or neonatal mice. In zebrafish, macrophage subpopulations have been suggested to play a central role in resolution of the scar, an essential step in remuscularization of the injured myocardium (229). Moreover, a subset of macrophages expressing Wilms tumor 1B (WT1b) was implicated in stimulating proliferation of zebrafish cardiomyocytes following injury (230). In the salamander, macrophages were required for myocardial regeneration following cryoinjury; however, their effects were not related to activation of a proliferative program in cardiomyocytes, but rather to effects on fibroblasts and the extracellular matrix that lead to resorption of the provisional matrix network and protect from permanent scarring (231). In neonatal mice, a unique profile of resident macrophages may explain the regenerative capacity of neonatal hearts following myocardial infarction (155, 156). Macrophage depletion experiments suggested that the proregenerative effects of neonatal macrophages may be due to their enhanced angiogenic actions and may not involve direct effects on cardiomyocyte proliferation (155). In contrast, other studies suggested that neonatal macrophages may activate a proliferative program in cardiomyocytes by secreting oncostatin M, thus activating gp130 pathways (232). Considering that oncostatin M (233) and other gp130 cytokines (234) are markedly upregulated in adult infarcted hearts in the absence of regeneration, macrophage-derived cytokines are unlikely to be sufficient to activate a regenerative program in the injured adult myocardium. Myocardial regeneration in neonatal mammals likely requires plasticity and unique phenotypes of several different myocardial cell types.
Conclusions
Macrophages are critically implicated in injury, repair, and remodeling of the infarcted heart. Over the last 20 yr, emerging concepts in fundamental immunology and the availability of genetic models to study macrophage phenotype and function in myocardial disease have greatly advanced our understanding on the fate, mechanisms of expansion and role of macrophages in the infarcted and remodeling heart. Single cell transcriptomic studies have revealed a remarkable heterogeneity of macrophages in the healing infarct (134, 235). Development of new therapies to improve repair and attenuate adverse remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction is dependent on a deeper understanding of the role of macrophage subpopulations in the reparative response and in heart failure progression. The role of specific macrophage subpopulations needs to be dissected by studying the functional role of clusters with distinct transcriptomic signatures. The identity and role of macrophage-derived molecular signals needs to be studied. Moreover, translation into therapy will also require characterization of the changes in macrophage phenotype in human patients with myocardial infarction and pathophysiologic stratification of infarction patients into subgroups with distinct inflammatory and reparative responses.
GRANTS
Dr Frangogiannis’ laboratory is supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 HL76246, R01 HL85440, and R01 HL149407 and by US Department of Defense grants PR181464 and PR211352. Dr Kubota is supported by the Japan Heart Foundation.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
A.K. prepared figures; A.K. and N.G.F. drafted manuscript; A.K. and N.G.F. edited and revised manuscript; A.K. and N.G.F. approved final version of manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1. Gordon S. Phagocytosis: the legacy of Metchnikoff. Cell 166: 1065–1068, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wynn TA, Chawla A, Pollard JW. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature 496: 445–455, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nature12034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Azzawi M, Hasleton PS, Kan SW, Hillier VF, Quigley A, Hutchinson IV. Distribution of myocardial macrophages in the normal human heart. J Anatomy 191: 417–423, 1997. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19130417.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Nag AC. Study of non-muscle cells of the adult mammalian heart: a fine structural analysis and distribution. Cytobios 28: 41–61, 1980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mallory GK, White PD, Salcedo-Salgar J. The speed of healing of myocardial infarction. A study of the pathologic anatomy in seventy-two cases. Am Heart J 18: 647–671, 1939. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(39)90845-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mylonas KJ, Jenkins SJ, Castellan RFP, Ruckerl D, McGregor K, Phythian-Adams AT, Hewitson JP, Campbell SM, MacDonald AS, Allen JE, Gray GA. The adult murine heart has a sparse, phagocytically active macrophage population that expands through monocyte recruitment and adopts an ‘M2’ phenotype in response to Th2 immunologic challenge. Immunobiology 220: 924–933, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gersch C, Dewald O, Zoerlein M, Michael LH, Entman ML, Frangogiannis NG. Mast cells and macrophages in normal C57/BL/6 mice. Histochem Cell Biol 118: 41–49, 2002. doi: 10.1007/s00418-002-0425-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pinto AR, Paolicelli R, Salimova E, Gospocic J, Slonimsky E, Bilbao-Cortes D, Godwin JW, Rosenthal NA. An abundant tissue macrophage population in the adult murine heart with a distinct alternatively-activated macrophage profile. PLoS One 7: e36814, 2012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Heidt T, Courties G, Dutta P, Sager HB, Sebas M, Iwamoto Y, Sun Y, Da Silva N, Panizzi P, van der Laan AM, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf M. Differential contribution of monocytes to heart macrophages in steady-state and after myocardial infarction. Circ Res 115: 284–295, 2014. [Erratum in Circ Res 115: e95, 2014. van der Lahn, Anja M [corrected to van der Laan, Anja M]]. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pinto AR, Ilinykh A, Ivey MJ, Kuwabara JT, D’Antoni ML, Debuque R, Chandran A, Wang L, Arora K, Rosenthal NA, Tallquist MD. Revisiting cardiac cellular composition. Circ Res 118: 400–409, 2016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Litviňuková M, Talavera-López C, Maatz H, Reichart D, Worth CL, Lindberg EL, Kanda M, Polanski K, Heinig M, Lee M, Nadelmann ER, Roberts K, Tuck L, Fasouli ES, DeLaughter DM, McDonough B, Wakimoto H, Gorham JM, Samari S, Mahbubani KT, Saeb-Parsy K, Patone G, Boyle JJ, Zhang H, Zhang H, Viveiros A, Oudit GY, Bayraktar OA, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Noseda M, Hubner N, Teichmann SA. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588: 466–472, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2797-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Beaudin AE, Sojka DK, Carrero JA, Calderon B, Brija T, Gautier EL, Ivanov S, Satpathy AT, Schilling JD, Schwendener R, Sergin I, Razani B, Forsberg EC, Yokoyama WM, Unanue ER, Colonna M, Randolph GJ, Mann DL. Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity 40: 91–104, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Randolph GJ. Origin and functions of tissue macrophages. Immunity 41: 21–35, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bajpai G, Schneider C, Wong N, Bredemeyer A, Hulsmans M, Nahrendorf M, Epelman S, Kreisel D, Liu Y, Itoh A, Shankar TS, Selzman CH, Drakos SG, Lavine KJ. The human heart contains distinct macrophage subsets with divergent origins and functions. Nat Med 24: 1234–1245, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0059-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Leid J, Carrelha J, Boukarabila H, Epelman S, Jacobsen SE, Lavine KJ. Primitive embryonic macrophages are required for coronary development and maturation. Circ Res 118: 1498–1511, 2016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.308270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Nicolás-Ávila JA, Lechuga-Vieco AV, Esteban-Martínez L, Sánchez-Díaz M, Sánchez-Díaz E, Santiago DJ, et al. A network of macrophages supports mitochondrial homeostasis in the heart. Cell 183: 94–109.e23, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hulsmans M, Clauss S, Xiao L, Aguirre AD, King KR, Hanley A, Hucker WJ, Wülfers EM, Seemann G, Courties G, Iwamoto Y, Sun Y, Savol AJ, Sager HB, Lavine KJ, Fishbein GA, Capen DE, Da Silva N, Miquerol L, Wakimoto H, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Sadreyev RI, Naxerova K, Mitchell RN, Brown D, Libby P, Weissleder R, Swirski FK, Kohl P. Macrophages facilitate electrical conduction in the heart. Cell 169: 510–522.e20, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Cahill TJ, Sun X, Ravaud C, Villa del Campo C, Klaourakis K, Lupu I-E, Lord AM, Browne C, Jacobsen SEW, Greaves DR, Jackson DG, Cowley SA, James W, Choudhury RP, Vieira JM, Riley PR. Tissue-resident macrophages regulate lymphatic vessel growth and patterning in the developing heart. Development 148: dev194563, 2021. doi: 10.1242/dev.194563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Galis ZS, Sukhova GK, Kranzhöfer R, Clark S, Libby P. Macrophage foam cells from experimental atheroma constitutively produce matrix-degrading proteinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 402–406, 1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.2.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Shah PK, Falk E, Badimon JJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Mailhac A, Villareal-Levy G, et al. Human monocyte-derived macrophages induce collagen breakdown in fibrous caps of atherosclerotic plaques. Potential role of matrix-degrading metalloproteinases and implications for plaque rupture. Circulation 92: 1565–1569, 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Moore KJ, Tabas I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell 145: 341–355, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Bäck M, Yurdagul A Jr, Tabas I, Öörni K, Kovanen PT. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol 16: 389–406, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0169-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Barrett TJ. Macrophages in atherosclerosis regression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 40: 20–33, 2020. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tabas I, Bornfeldt KE. Macrophage phenotype and function in different stages of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 118: 653–667, 2016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Libby P, Pasterkamp G, Crea F, Jang IK. Reassessing the mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes. Circ Res 124: 150–160, 2019. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Frangogiannis NG. The immune system and the remodeling infarcted heart: cell biological insights and therapeutic opportunities. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 63: 185–195, 2014. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jennings RB, Murry CE, Steenbergen C Jr, Reimer KA. Development of cell injury in sustained acute ischemia. Circulation 82, Suppl 3: II2–II12, 1990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Frangogiannis NG. Pathophysiology of myocardial infarction. Compr Physiol 5: 1841–1875, 2015. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c150006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 56: 786–794, 1977. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.56.5.786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Andrassy M, Volz HC, Igwe JC, Funke B, Eichberger SN, Kaya Z, Buss S, Autschbach F, Pleger ST, Lukic IK, Bea F, Hardt SE, Humpert PM, Bianchi ME, Mairbäurl H, Nawroth PP, Remppis A, Katus HA, Bierhaus A. High-mobility group box-1 in ischemia-reperfusion injury of the heart. Circulation 117: 3216–3226, 2008. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.769331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rohde D, Schön C, Boerries M, Didrihsone I, Ritterhoff J, Kubatzky KF, Völkers M, Herzog N, Mähler M, Tsoporis JN, Parker TG, Linke B, Giannitsis E, Gao E, Peppel K, Katus HA, Most P. S100A1 is released from ischemic cardiomyocytes and signals myocardial damage via Toll-like receptor 4. EMBO Mol Med 6: 778–794, 2014. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201303498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tian J, Guo X, Liu X-M, Liu L, Weng Q-F, Dong S-J, Knowlton AA, Yuan W-J, Lin L. Extracellular HSP60 induces inflammation through activating and up-regulating TLRs in cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res 98: 391–401, 2013. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kono H, Rock KL. How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 279–289, 2008. doi: 10.1038/nri2215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Jaén RI, Val-Blasco A, Prieto P, Gil-Fernández M, Smani T, López-Sendón JL, Delgado C, Boscá L, Fernández-Velasco M. Innate immune receptors, key actors in cardiovascular diseases. JACC Basic Transl Sci 5: 735–749, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Arslan F, de Kleijn DP, Pasterkamp G. Innate immune signaling in cardiac ischemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 8: 292–300, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Frangogiannis NG, Lindsey ML, Michael LH, Youker KA, Bressler RB, Mendoza LH, Spengler RN, Smith CW, Entman ML. Resident cardiac mast cells degranulate and release preformed TNF-alpha, initiating the cytokine cascade in experimental canine myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Circulation 98: 699–710, 1998. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.7.699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Singh MV, Swaminathan PD, Luczak ED, Kutschke W, Weiss RM, Anderson ME. MyD88 mediated inflammatory signaling leads to CaMKII oxidation, cardiac hypertrophy and death after myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol 52: 1135–1144, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Favre J, Musette P, Douin-Echinard V, Laude K, Henry J-P, Arnal J-F, Thuillez C, Richard V. Toll-like receptors 2-deficient mice are protected against postischemic coronary endothelial dysfunction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27: 1064–1071, 2007. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.140723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bajpai G, Bredemeyer A, Li W, Zaitsev K, Koenig AL, Lokshina I, Mohan J, Ivey B, Hsiao H-M, Weinheimer C, Kovacs A, Epelman S, Artyomov M, Kreisel D, Lavine KJ. Tissue resident CCR2- and CCR2+ cardiac macrophages differentially orchestrate monocyte recruitment and fate specification following myocardial injury. Circ Res 124: 263–278, 2019. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. King KR, Aguirre AD, Ye Y-X, Sun Y, Roh JD, Ng RP, Kohler RH, Arlauckas SP, Iwamoto Y, Savol A, Sadreyev RI, Kelly M, Fitzgibbons TP, Fitzgerald KA, Mitchison T, Libby P, Nahrendorf M, Weissleder R Jr.. IRF3 and type I interferons fuel a fatal response to myocardial infarction. Nat Med 23: 1481–1487, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nm.4428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Cao DJ, Schiattarella GG, Villalobos E, Jiang N, May HI, Li T, Chen ZJ, Gillette TG, Hill JA. Cytosolic DNA sensing promotes macrophage transformation and governs myocardial ischemic injury. Circulation 137: 2613–2634, 2018. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Konstantinidis K, Whelan RS, Kitsis RN. Mechanisms of cell death in heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32: 1552–1562, 2012. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.224915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Frangogiannis NG, Mendoza LH, Ren G, Akrivakis S, Jackson PL, Michael LH, Smith CW, Entman ML. MCSF expression is induced in healing myocardial infarcts and may regulate monocyte and endothelial cell phenotype. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285: H483–H492, 2003. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01016.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Stanley ER, Chen DM, Lin HS. Induction of macrophage production and proliferation by a purified colony stimulating factor. Nature 274: 168–170, 1978. doi: 10.1038/274168a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Mentkowski KI, Euscher LM, Patel A, Alevriadou BR, Lang JK. Monocyte recruitment and fate specification after myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 319: C797–C806, 2020. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00330.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Dutta P, Nahrendorf M. Monocytes in myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 35: 1066–1070, 2015. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M, Etzrodt M, Wildgruber M, Cortez-Retamozo V, Panizzi P, Figueiredo J-L, Kohler RH, Chudnovskiy A, Waterman P, Aikawa E, Mempel TR, Libby P, Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. Identification of splenic reservoir monocytes and their deployment to inflammatory sites. Science 325: 612–616, 2009. doi: 10.1126/science.1175202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Narasimhan PB, Marcovecchio P, Hamers AAJ, Hedrick CC. Nonclassical monocytes in health and disease. Annu Rev Immunol 37: 439–456, 2019. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wolf AA, Yanez A, Barman PK, Goodridge HS. The ontogeny of monocyte subsets. Front Immunol 10: 1642, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK, Aikawa E, Stangenberg L, Wurdinger T, Figueiredo J-L, Libby P, Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. The healing myocardium sequentially mobilizes two monocyte subsets with divergent and complementary functions. J Exp Med 204: 3037–3047, 2007. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hilgendorf I, Gerhardt LMS, Tan TC, Winter C, Holderried TAW, Chousterman BG, Iwamoto Y, Liao R, Zirlik A, Scherer-Crosbie M, Hedrick CC, Libby P, Nahrendorf M, Weissleder R, Swirski FK. Ly-6Chigh monocytes depend on Nr4a1 to balance both inflammatory and reparative phases in the infarcted myocardium. Circ Res 114: 1611–1622, 2014. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Deniset JF, Belke D, Lee W-Y, Jorch SK, Deppermann C, Hassanabad AF, Turnbull JD, Teng G, Rozich I, Hudspeth K, Kanno Y, Brooks SR, Hadjantonakis A-K, O’Shea JJ, Weber GF, Fedak PWM, Kubes P. Gata6+ pericardial cavity macrophages relocate to the injured heart and prevent cardiac fibrosis. Immunity 51: 131–140.e5, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Jin H, Liu K, Huang X, Huo H, Mou J, Qiao Z, He B, Zhou B. Genetic lineage tracing of pericardial cavity macrophages in the injured heart. Circ Res 130: 1682–1697, 2022. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.320567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Dewald O, Zymek P, Winkelmann K, Koerting A, Ren G, Abou-Khamis T, Michael LH, Rollins BJ, Entman ML, Frangogiannis NG. CCL2/monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 regulates inflammatory responses critical to healing myocardial infarcts. Circ Res 96: 881–889, 2005. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000163017.13772.3a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Kaikita K, Hayasaki T, Okuma T, Kuziel WA, Ogawa H, Takeya M. Targeted deletion of CC chemokine receptor 2 attenuates left ventricular remodeling after experimental myocardial infarction. Am J Pathol 165: 439–447, 2004. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63309-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hayasaki T, Kaikita K, Okuma T, Yamamoto E, Kuziel WA, Ogawa H, Takeya M. CC chemokine receptor-2 deficiency attenuates oxidative stress and infarct size caused by myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in mice. Circ J 70: 342–351, 2006. doi: 10.1253/circj.70.342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Hayashidani S, Tsutsui H, Shiomi T, Ikeuchi M, Matsusaka H, Suematsu N, Wen J, Egashira K, Takeshita A. Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy attenuates left ventricular remodeling and failure after experimental myocardial infarction. Circulation 108: 2134–2140, 2003. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000092890.29552.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Kumar AG, Ballantyne CM, Michael LH, Kukielka GL, Youker KA, Lindsey ML, Hawkins HK, Birdsall HH, MacKay CR, LaRosa GJ, Rossen RD, Smith CW, Entman ML. Induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the small veins of the ischemic and reperfused canine myocardium. Circulation 95: 693–700, 1997. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.3.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Birdsall HH, Green DM, Trial J, Youker KA, Burns AR, MacKay CR, LaRosa GJ, Hawkins HK, Smith CW, Michael LH, Entman ML, Rossen RD. Complement C5a, TGF-β1, and MCP-1, in sequence, induce migration of monocytes into ischemic canine myocardium within the first one to five hours after reperfusion. Circulation 95: 684–692, 1997. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.3.684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Dobaczewski M, Xia Y, Bujak M, Gonzalez-Quesada C, Frangogiannis NG. CCR5 signaling suppresses inflammation and reduces adverse remodeling of the infarcted heart, mediating recruitment of regulatory T cells. Am J Pathol 176: 2177–2187, 2010. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Zamilpa R, Kanakia R, Cigarroa J 4th, Dai Q, Escobar GP, Martinez H, Jimenez F, Ahuja SS, Lindsey ML. CC chemokine receptor 5 deletion impairs macrophage activation and induces adverse remodeling following myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 300: H1418–H1426, 2011. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01002.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Montecucco F, Braunersreuther V, Lenglet S, Delattre BMA, Pelli G, Buatois V, Guilhot F, Galan K, Vuilleumier N, Ferlin W, Fischer N, Vallée J-P, Kosco-Vilbois M, Mach F. CC chemokine CCL5 plays a central role impacting infarct size and post-infarction heart failure in mice. Eur Heart J 33: 1964–1974, 2012. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Alard J-E, Ortega-Gomez A, Wichapong K, Bongiovanni D, Horckmans M, Megens RTA, Leoni G, Ferraro B, Rossaint J, Paulin N, Ng J, Ippel H, Suylen D, Hinkel R, Blanchet X, Gaillard F, D'Amico M, von Hundelshausen P, Zarbock A, Scheiermann C, Hackeng TM, Steffens S, Kupatt C, Nicolaes GAF, Weber C, Soehnlein O. Recruitment of classical monocytes can be inhibited by disturbing heteromers of neutrophil HNP1 and platelet CCL5. Sci Transl Med 7: 317ra196, 2015. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Zouggari Y, Ait-Oufella H, Bonnin P, Simon T, Sage AP, Guérin C, Vilar J, Caligiuri G, Tsiantoulas D, Laurans L, Dumeau E, Kotti S, Bruneval P, Charo IF, Binder CJ, Danchin N, Tedgui A, Tedder TF, Silvestre J-S, Mallat Z. B lymphocytes trigger monocyte mobilization and impair heart function after acute myocardial infarction. Nat Med 19: 1273–1280, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nm.3284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Sun Y, Pinto C, Camus S, Duval V, Alayrac P, Zlatanova I, Loyer X, Vilar J, Lemitre M, Levoye A, Nus M, Ait-Oufella H, Mallat Z, Silvestre J-S. Splenic marginal zone B lymphocytes regulate cardiac remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in mice. J Am Coll Cardiol 79: 632–647, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Jiang Y, Bai J, Tang L, Zhang P, Pu J. Anti-CCL21 antibody attenuates infarct size and improves cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. Cell Physiol Biochem 37: 979–990, 2015. doi: 10.1159/000430224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Huang Y, Wang D, Wang X, Zhang Y, Liu T, Chen Y, Tang Y, Wang T, Hu D, Huang C. Abrogation of CC chemokine receptor 9 ameliorates ventricular remodeling in mice after myocardial infarction. Sci Rep 6: 32660, 2016. doi: 10.1038/srep32660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Xuan W, Liao Y, Chen B, Huang Q, Xu D, Liu Y, Bin J, Kitakaze M. Detrimental effect of fractalkine on myocardial ischaemia and heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 92: 385–393, 2011. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Gu X, Xu J, Yang XP, Peterson E, Harding P. Fractalkine neutralization improves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Exp Physiol 100: 805–817, 2015. doi: 10.1113/EP085104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Lugrin J, Parapanov R, Rosenblatt-Velin N, Rignault-Clerc S, Feihl F, Waeber B, Müller O, Vergely C, Zeller M, Tardivel A, Schneider P, Pacher P, Liaudet L. Cutting edge: IL-1α is a crucial danger signal triggering acute myocardial inflammation during myocardial infarction. J Immunol 194: 499–503, 2015. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Bujak M, Dobaczewski M, Chatila K, Mendoza LH, Li N, Reddy A, Frangogiannis NG. Interleukin-1 receptor type I signaling critically regulates infarct healing and cardiac remodeling. Am J Pathol 173: 57–67, 2008. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Saxena A, Chen W, Su Y, Rai V, Uche OU, Li N, Frangogiannis NG. IL-1 induces proinflammatory leukocyte infiltration and regulates fibroblast phenotype in the infarcted myocardium. J Immunol 191: 4838–4848, 2013. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Sager HB, Heidt T, Hulsmans M, Dutta P, Courties G, Sebas M, Wojtkiewicz GR, Tricot B, Iwamoto Y, Sun Y, Weissleder R, Libby P, Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M. Targeting interleukin-1β reduces leukocyte production after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 132: 1880–1890, 2015. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Christia P, Bujak M, Gonzalez-Quesada C, Chen W, Dobaczewski M, Reddy A, Frangogiannis NG. Systematic characterization of myocardial inflammation, repair, and remodeling in a mouse model of reperfused myocardial infarction. J Histochem Cytochem 61: 555–570, 2013. doi: 10.1369/0022155413493912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Maekawa N, Wada H, Kanda T, Niwa T, Yamada Y, Saito K, Fujiwara H, Sekikawa K, Seishima M. Improved myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice lacking tumor necrosis factor-α. J Am Coll Cardiol 39: 1229–1235, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01738-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kapadia SR, Oral H, Lee J, Nakano M, Taffet GE, Mann DL. Hemodynamic regulation of tumor necrosis factor-α gene and protein expression in adult feline myocardium. Circ Res 81: 187–195, 1997. doi: 10.1161/01.res.81.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Chen B, Huang S, Su Y, Wu Y-J, Hanna A, Brickshawana A, Graff J, Frangogiannis NG. Macrophage Smad3 protects the infarcted heart, stimulating phagocytosis and regulating inflammation. Circ Res 125: 55–70, 2019. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Chen B, Li R, Hernandez SC, Hanna A, Su K, Shinde AV, Frangogiannis NG. Differential effects of Smad2 and Smad3 in regulation of macrophage phenotype and function in the infarcted myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol 171: 1–15, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2022.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Anzai A, Choi JL, He S, Fenn AM, Nairz M, Rattik S, McAlpine CS, Mindur JE, Chan CT, Iwamoto Y, Tricot B, Wojtkiewicz GR, Weissleder R, Libby P, Nahrendorf M, Stone JR, Becher B, Swirski FK. The infarcted myocardium solicits GM-CSF for the detrimental oversupply of inflammatory leukocytes. J Exp Med 214: 3293–3310, 2017. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Wu JMF, Cheng YY, Tang TWH, Shih C, Chen JH, Hsieh PCH. Prostaglandin E2 receptor 2 modulates macrophage activity for cardiac repair. J Am Heart Assoc 7: e009216, 2018. [Erratum in J Am Heart Assoc 7: e002261, 2018]. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Tang J, Shen Y, Chen G, Wan Q, Wang K, Zhang J, Qin J, Liu G, Zuo S, Tao B, Yu Y, Wang J, Lazarus M, Yu Y. Activation of E-prostanoid 3 receptor in macrophages facilitates cardiac healing after myocardial infarction. Nat Commun 8: 14656, 2017. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Degousee N, Fazel S, Angoulvant D, Stefanski E, Pawelzik S-C, Korotkova M, Arab S, Liu P, Lindsay TF, Zhuo S, Butany J, Li R-K, Audoly L, Schmidt R, Angioni C, Geisslinger G, Jakobsson P-J, Rubin BB. Microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase-1 deletion leads to adverse left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Circulation 117: 1701–1710, 2008. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.749739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Blömer N, Pachel C, Hofmann U, Nordbeck P, Bauer W, Mathes D, Frey A, Bayer B, Vogel B, Ertl G, Bauersachs J, Frantz S. 5-Lipoxygenase facilitates healing after myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 108: 367, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s00395-013-0367-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. De Hoog VC, Timmers L, Van Duijvenvoorde A, De Jager SCA, Van Middelaar BJ, Smeets MB, Woodruff TM, Doevendans PA, Pasterkamp G, Hack CE, De Kleijn DPV. Leucocyte expression of complement C5a receptors exacerbates infarct size after myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 103: 521–529, 2014. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Mueller M, Herzog C, Larmann J, Schmitz M, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Gessner JE, Theilmeier G. The receptor for activated complement factor 5 (C5aR) conveys myocardial ischemic damage by mediating neutrophil transmigration. Immunobiology 218: 1131–1138, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2013.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Lörchner H, Pöling J, Gajawada P, Hou Y, Polyakova V, Kostin S, Adrian-Segarra JM, Boettger T, Wietelmann A, Warnecke H, Richter M, Kubin T, Braun T. Myocardial healing requires Reg3β-dependent accumulation of macrophages in the ischemic heart. Nat Med 21: 353–362, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nm.3816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Lörchner H, Hou Y, Adrian-Segarra JM, Kulhei J, Detzer J, Günther S, Gajawada P, Warnecke H, Niessen HW, Pöling J, Braun T. Reg proteins direct accumulation of functionally distinct macrophage subsets after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 114: 1667–1679, 2018. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Chen B, Frangogiannis NG. Chemokines in myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 14: 35–52, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12265-020-10006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Webb LM, Ehrengruber MU, Clark-Lewis I, Baggiolini M, Rot A. Binding to heparan sulfate or heparin enhances neutrophil responses to interleukin 8. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 7158–7162, 1993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Gerhardt T, Ley K. Monocyte trafficking across the vessel wall. Cardiovasc Res 107: 321–330, 2015. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvv147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Ono K, Matsumori A, Furukawa Y, Igata H, Shioi T, Matsushima K, Sasayama S. Prevention of myocardial reperfusion injury in rats by an antibody against monocyte chemotactic and activating factor/monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Lab Invest 79: 195–203, 1999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Kakio T, Matsumori A, Ono K, Ito H, Matsushima K, Sasayama S. Roles and relationship of macrophages and monocyte chemotactic and activating factor/monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the ischemic and reperfused rat heart. Lab Invest 80: 1127–1136, 2000. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Tarzami ST, Cheng R, Miao W, Kitsis RN, Berman JW. Chemokine expression in myocardial ischemia: MIP-2 dependent MCP-1 expression protects cardiomyocytes from cell death. J Mol Cell Cardiol 34: 209–221, 2002. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2001.1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Dewald O, Ren G, Duerr GD, Zoerlein M, Klemm C, Gersch C, Tincey S, Michael LH, Entman ML, Frangogiannis NG. Of mice and dogs: species-specific differences in the inflammatory response following myocardial infarction. Am J Pathol 164: 665–677, 2004. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63154-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Liehn EA, Piccinini A-M, Koenen RR, Soehnlein O, Adage T, Fatu R, Curaj A, Popescu A, Zernecke A, Kungl AJ, Weber C. A new monocyte chemotactic protein-1/chemokine CC motif ligand-2 competitor limiting neointima formation and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. J Am Coll Cardiol 56: 1847–1857, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Al-Amran FG, Manson MZ, Hanley TK, Hainz DL. Blockade of the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 receptor pathway ameliorates myocardial injury in animal models of ischemia and reperfusion. Pharmacology 93: 296–302, 2014. doi: 10.1159/000363657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Grisanti LA, Traynham CJ, Repas AA, Gao E, Koch WJ, Tilley DG. β2-Adrenergic receptor-dependent chemokine receptor 2 expression regulates leukocyte recruitment to the heart following acute injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: 15126–15131, 2016. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611023114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Wang J, Seo MJ, Deci MB, Weil BR, Canty JM, Nguyen J. Effect of CCR2 inhibitor-loaded lipid micelles on inflammatory cell migration and cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Int J Nanomedicine 13: 6441–6451, 2018. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S178650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Braunersreuther V, Montecucco F, Pelli G, Galan K, Proudfoot AE, Belin A, Vuilleumier N, Burger F, Lenglet S, Caffa I, Soncini D, Nencioni A, Vallée J-P, Mach F. Treatment with the CC chemokine-binding protein Evasin-4 improves post-infarction myocardial injury and survival in mice. Thromb Haemost 110: 807–825, 2013. doi: 10.1160/TH13-04-0297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Liehn EA, Merx MW, Postea O, Becher S, Djalali-Talab Y, Shagdarsuren E, Kelm M, Zernecke A, Weber C. Ccr1 deficiency reduces inflammatory remodelling and preserves left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. J Cellular Mol Med 12: 496–506, 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00194.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Chen B, Li R, Kubota A, Alex L, Frangogiannis NG. Identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies. Sci Rep 12: 4542, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08278-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Takahashi M, Masuyama J, Ikeda U, Kasahara T, Kitagawa S, Takahashi Y, Shimada K, Kano S. Induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 synthesis in human monocytes during transendothelial migration in vitro. Circ Res 76: 750–757, 1995. doi: 10.1161/01.res.76.5.750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Schunk SJ, Triem S, Schmit D, Zewinger S, Sarakpi T, Becker E, Hütter G, Wrublewsky S, Küting F, Hohl M, Alansary D, Prates Roma L, Lipp P, Möllmann J, Lehrke M, Laschke MW, Menger MD, Kramann R, Boor P, Jahnen-Dechent W, März W, Böhm M, Laufs U, Niemeyer BA, Fliser D, Ampofo E, Speer T. Interleukin-1α is a central regulator of leukocyte-endothelial adhesion in myocardial infarction and in chronic kidney disease. Circulation 144: 893–908, 2021. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Chuluyan HE, Issekutz AC. VLA-4 integrin can mediate CD11/CD18-independent transendothelial migration of human monocytes. J Clin Invest 92: 2768–2777, 1993. doi: 10.1172/JCI116895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Zhang Y, McCluskey K, Fujii K, Wahl LM. Differential regulation of monocyte matrix metalloproteinase and TIMP-1 production by TNF-alpha, granulocyte-macrophage CSF, and IL-1 beta through prostaglandin-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J Immunol 161: 3071–3076, 1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Hamid T, Gu Y, Ortines RV, Bhattacharya C, Wang G, Xuan Y-T, Prabhu SD. Divergent tumor necrosis factor receptor-related remodeling responses in heart failure: role of nuclear factor-κB and inflammatory activation. Circulation 119: 1386–1397, 2009. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.802918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Wajant H, Siegmund D. TNFR1 and TNFR2 in the control of the life and death balance of macrophages. Front Cell Dev Biol 7: 91, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Rose-John S. Interleukin-6 family cytokines. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10: a028415, 2018. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. George MJ, Jasmin NH, Cummings VT, Richard-Loendt A, Launchbury F, Woollard K, Turner-Stokes T, Garcia Diaz AI, Lythgoe M, Stuckey DJ, Hingorani AD, Gilroy DW. Selective interleukin-6 trans-signaling blockade is more effective than panantagonism in reperfused myocardial infarction. JACC Basic Transl Sci 6: 431–443, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Dreyer WJ, Michael LH, Nguyen T, Smith CW, Anderson DC, Entman ML, Rossen RD. Kinetics of C5a release in cardiac lymph of dogs experiencing coronary artery ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circ Res 71: 1518–1524, 1992. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.71.6.1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Rossen RD, Michael LH, Kagiyama A, Savage HE, Hanson G, Reisberg MA, Moake JN, Kim SH, Self D, Weakley S. Mechanism of complement activation after coronary artery occlusion: evidence that myocardial ischemia in dogs causes release of constituents of myocardial subcellular origin that complex with human C1q in vivo. Circ Res 62: 572–584, 1988. doi: 10.1161/01.res.62.3.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Hill JH, Ward PA. The phlogistic role of C3 leukotactic fragments in myocardial infarcts of rats. J Exp Med 133: 885–900, 1971. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.4.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Yasojima K, Schwab C, McGeer EG, McGeer PL. Human heart generates complement proteins that are upregulated and activated after myocardial infarction. Circ Res 83: 860–869, 1998. doi: 10.1161/01.res.83.8.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Laudes IJ, Chu JC, Huber-Lang M, Guo R-F, Riedemann NC, Sarma JV, Mahdi F, Murphy HS, Speyer C, Lu KT, Lambris JD, Zetoune FS, Ward PA. Expression and function of C5a receptor in mouse microvascular endothelial cells. J Immunol 169: 5962–5970, 2002. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.10.5962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Niyonzima N, Rahman J, Kunz N, West EE, Freiwald T, Desai JV, Merle NS, Gidon A, Sporsheim B, Lionakis MS, Evensen K, Lindberg B, Skagen K, Skjelland M, Singh P, Haug M, Ruseva MM, Kolev M, Bibby J, Marshall O, O’Brien B, Deeks N, Afzali B, Clark RJ, Woodruff TM, Pryor M, Yang Z-H, Remaley AT, Mollnes TE, Hewitt SM. Mitochondrial C5aR1 activity in macrophages controls IL-1β production underlying sterile inflammation. Sci Immunol 6: eabf2489, 2021. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abf2489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Wan E, Yeap XY, Dehn S, Terry R, Novak M, Zhang S, Iwata S, Han X, Homma S, Drosatos K, Lomasney J, Engman DM, Miller SD, Vaughan DE, Morrow JP, Kishore R, Thorp EB. Enhanced efferocytosis of apoptotic cardiomyocytes through myeloid-epithelial-reproductive tyrosine kinase links acute inflammation resolution to cardiac repair after infarction. Circ Res 113: 1004–1012, 2013. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Jia D, Chen S, Bai P, Luo C, Liu J, Sun A, Ge J. Cardiac resident macrophage-derived legumain improves cardiac repair by promoting clearance and degradation of apoptotic cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction. Circulation 145: 1542–1556, 2022. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Nakaya M, Watari K, Tajima M, Nakaya T, Matsuda S, Ohara H, Nishihara H, Yamaguchi H, Hashimoto A, Nishida M, Nagasaka A, Horii Y, Ono H, Iribe G, Inoue R, Tsuda M, Inoue K, Tanaka A, Kuroda M, Nagata S, Kurose H. Cardiac myofibroblast engulfment of dead cells facilitates recovery after myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 127: 383–401, 2017. doi: 10.1172/JCI83822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Lemke G. How macrophages deal with death. Nat Rev Immunol 19: 539–549, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0167-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. DeBerge M, Yeap XY, Dehn S, Zhang S, Grigoryeva L, Misener S, Procissi D, Zhou X, Lee DC, Muller WA, Luo X, Rothlin C, Tabas I, Thorp EB. MerTK cleavage on resident cardiac macrophages compromises repair after myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. Circ Res 121: 930–940, 2017. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Howangyin K-Y, Zlatanova I, Pinto C, Ngkelo A, Cochain C, Rouanet M, Vilar J, Lemitre M, Stockmann C, Fleischmann BK, Mallat Z, Silvestre J-S. Myeloid-epithelial-reproductive receptor tyrosine kinase and milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8 coordinately improve remodeling after myocardial infarction via local delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor. Circulation 133: 826–839, 2016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Shirakawa K, Endo J, Kataoka M, Katsumata Y, Anzai A, Moriyama H, Kitakata H, Hiraide T, Ko S, Goto S, Ichihara G, Fukuda K, Minamino T, Sano M. MerTK expression and ERK activation are essential for the functional maturation of osteopontin-producing reparative macrophages after myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc 9: e017071, 2020. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Thorp E, Vaisar T, Subramanian M, Mautner L, Blobel C, Tabas I. Shedding of the Mer tyrosine kinase receptor is mediated by ADAM17 protein through a pathway involving reactive oxygen species, protein kinase Cδ, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). J Biol Chem 286: 33335–33344, 2011. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.263020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Zheng DY, Zhao J, Yang JM, Wang M, Zhang XT. Enhanced ADAM17 expression is associated with cardiac remodeling in rats with acute myocardial infarction. Life Sci 151: 61–69, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. DeBerge M, Glinton K, Subramanian M, Wilsbacher LD, Rothlin CV, Tabas I, Thorp EB. Macrophage AXL receptor tyrosine kinase inflames the heart after reperfused myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 131: e139576, 2021. doi: 10.1172/JCI139576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Savill J, Hogg N, Ren Y, Haslett C. Thrombospondin cooperates with CD36 and the vitronectin receptor in macrophage recognition of neutrophils undergoing apoptosis. J Clin Invest 90: 1513–1522, 1992. doi: 10.1172/JCI116019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Dehn S, Thorp EB. Myeloid receptor CD36 is required for early phagocytosis of myocardial infarcts and induction of Nr4a1-dependent mechanisms of cardiac repair. FASEB J 32: 254–264, 2018. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700450R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Jaiswal S, Jamieson CHM, Pang WW, Park CY, Chao MP, Majeti R, Traver D, van Rooijen N, Weissman IL. CD47 is upregulated on circulating hematopoietic stem cells and leukemia cells to avoid phagocytosis. Cell 138: 271–285, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Zhang S, Yeap X-Y, DeBerge M, Naresh NK, Wang K, Jiang Z, Wilcox JE, White SM, Morrow JP, Burridge PW, Procissi D, Scott EA, Frazier W, Thorp EB. Acute CD47 blockade during ischemic myocardial reperfusion enhances phagocytosis-associated cardiac repair. JACC Basic Transl Sci 2: 386–397, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Isenberg JS, Qin Y, Maxhimer JB, Sipes JM, Despres D, Schnermann J, Frazier WA, Roberts DD. Thrombospondin-1 and CD47 regulate blood pressure and cardiac responses to vasoactive stress. Matrix Biol 28: 110–119, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Mouton AJ, DeLeon-Pennell KY, Rivera Gonzalez OJ, Flynn ER, Freeman TC, Saucerman JJ, Garrett MR, Ma Y, Harmancey R, Lindsey ML. Mapping macrophage polarization over the myocardial infarction time continuum. Basic Res Cardiol 113: 26, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00395-018-0686-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Mantovani A, Sica A, Locati M. Macrophage polarization comes of age. Immunity 23: 344–346, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Yan X, Anzai A, Katsumata Y, Matsuhashi T, Ito K, Endo J, Yamamoto T, Takeshima A, Shinmura K, Shen W, Fukuda K, Sano M. Temporal dynamics of cardiac immune cell accumulation following acute myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol 62: 24–35, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Farbehi N, Patrick R, Dorison A, Xaymardan M, Janbandhu V, Wystub-Lis K, Ho JW, Nordon RE, Harvey RP. Single-cell expression profiling reveals dynamic flux of cardiac stromal, vascular and immune cells in health and injury. eLife 8: e43882, 2019. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Frangogiannis NG, Mendoza LH, Lindsey ML, Ballantyne CM, Michael LH, Smith CW, Entman ML. IL-10 is induced in the reperfused myocardium and may modulate the reaction to injury. J Immunol 165: 2798–2808, 2000. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Horckmans M, Ring L, Duchene J, Santovito D, Schloss MJ, Drechsler M, Weber C, Soehnlein O, Steffens S. Neutrophils orchestrate post-myocardial infarction healing by polarizing macrophages towards a reparative phenotype. Eur Heart J 38: 187–197, 2017. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Saxena A, Dobaczewski M, Rai V, Haque Z, Chen W, Li N, Frangogiannis NG. Regulatory T cells are recruited in the infarcted mouse myocardium and may modulate fibroblast phenotype and function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 307: H1233–H1242, 2014. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00328.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Weirather J, Hofmann UDW, Beyersdorf N, Ramos GC, Vogel B, Frey A, Ertl G, Kerkau T, Frantz S. Foxp3+ CD4+ T cells improve healing after myocardial infarction by modulating monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Circ Res 115: 55–67, 2014. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Tang T-T, Yuan J, Zhu Z-F, Zhang W-C, Xiao H, Xia N, Yan X-X, Nie S-F, Liu J, Zhou S-F, Li J-J, Yao R, Liao M-Y, Tu X, Liao Y-H, Cheng X. Regulatory T cells ameliorate cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 107: 232, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00395-011-0232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Chen W, Saxena A, Li N, Sun J, Gupta A, Lee D-W, Tian Q, Dobaczewski M, Frangogiannis NG. Endogenous IRAK-M attenuates postinfarction remodeling through effects on macrophages and fibroblasts. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32: 2598–2608, 2012. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Song J, Frieler RA, Whitesall SE, Chung Y, Vigil TM, Muir LA, Ma J, Brombacher F, Goonewardena SN, Lumeng CN, Goldstein DR, Mortensen RM. Myeloid interleukin-4 receptor α is essential in postmyocardial infarction healing by regulating inflammation and fibrotic remodeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 320: H323–H337, 2021. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00251.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Frangogiannis NG, Ren G, Dewald O, Zymek P, Haudek S, Koerting A, Winkelmann K, Michael LH, Lawler J, Entman ML. The critical role of endogenous thrombospondin (TSP)-1 in preventing expansion of healing myocardial infarcts. Circulation 111: 2935–2942, 2005. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.510354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Gong D, Shi W, Yi SJ, Chen H, Groffen J, Heisterkamp N. TGFβ signaling plays a critical role in promoting alternative macrophage activation. BMC Immunol 13: 31, 2012. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-13-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Frangogiannis NG. Transforming growth factor-β in myocardial disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 19: 435–455, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00646-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Li J, Li R, Tuleta I, Hernandez SC, Humeres C, Hanna A, Chen B, Frangogiannis NG. The role of endogenous Smad7 in regulating macrophage phenotype following myocardial infarction. FASEB J 36: e22400, 2022. doi: 10.1096/fj.202101956RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Taniguchi T, Ogasawara K, Takaoka A, Tanaka N. IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annu Rev Immunol 19: 623–655, 2001. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Courties G, Heidt T, Sebas M, Iwamoto Y, Jeon D, Truelove J, Tricot B, Wojtkiewicz G, Dutta P, Sager HB, Borodovsky A, Novobrantseva T, Klebanov B, Fitzgerald K, Anderson DG, Libby P, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf M. In vivo silencing of the transcription factor IRF5 reprograms the macrophage phenotype and improves infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol 63: 1556–1566, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Tang D, Cao F, Yan C, Fang K, Ma J, Gao L, Sun B, Wang G. Extracellular vesicle/macrophage axis: potential targets for inflammatory disease intervention. Front Immunol 13: 705472, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.705472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. de Couto G, Liu W, Tseliou E, Sun B, Makkar N, Kanazawa H, Arditi M, Marbán E. Macrophages mediate cardioprotective cellular postconditioning in acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 125: 3147–3162, 2015. doi: 10.1172/JCI81321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Mentkowski KI, Mursleen A, Snitzer JD, Euscher LM, Lang JK. CDC-derived extracellular vesicles reprogram inflammatory macrophages to an arginase 1-dependent proangiogenic phenotype. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 318: H1447–H1460, 2020. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00155.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. van Amerongen MJ, Harmsen MC, van Rooijen N, Petersen AH, van Luyn MJ. Macrophage depletion impairs wound healing and increases left ventricular remodeling after myocardial injury in mice. Am J Pathol 170: 818–829, 2007. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Wernli G, Hasan W, Bhattacherjee A, van Rooijen N, Smith PG. Macrophage depletion suppresses sympathetic hyperinnervation following myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 104: 681–693, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s00395-009-0033-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Ben-Mordechai T, Holbova R, Landa-Rouben N, Harel-Adar T, Feinberg MS, Abd Elrahman I, Blum G, Epstein FH, Silman Z, Cohen S, Leor J. Macrophage subpopulations are essential for infarct repair with and without stem cell therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 62: 1890–1901, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Frantz S, Hofmann U, Fraccarollo D, Schäfer A, Kranepuhl S, Hagedorn I, Nieswandt B, Nahrendorf M, Wagner H, Bayer B, Pachel C, Schön MP, Kneitz S, Bobinger T, Weidemann F, Ertl G, Bauersachs J. Monocytes/macrophages prevent healing defects and left ventricular thrombus formation after myocardial infarction. FASEB J 27: 871–881, 2013. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-214049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Aurora AB, Porrello ER, Tan W, Mahmoud AI, Hill JA, Bassel-Duby R, Sadek HA, Olson EN. Macrophages are required for neonatal heart regeneration. J Clin Invest 124: 1382–1392, 2014. doi: 10.1172/JCI72181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Lavine KJ, Epelman S, Uchida K, Weber KJ, Nichols CG, Schilling JD, Ornitz DM, Randolph GJ, Mann DL. Distinct macrophage lineages contribute to disparate patterns of cardiac recovery and remodeling in the neonatal and adult heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 16029–16034, 2014. [Erratum in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: E1414, 2016]. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406508111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Halade GV, Norris PC, Kain V, Serhan CN, Ingle KA. Splenic leukocytes define the resolution of inflammation in heart failure. Sci Signal 11: eaao1818, 2018. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aao1818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Dick SA, Macklin JA, Nejat S, Momen A, Clemente-Casares X, Althagafi MG, Chen J, Kantores C, Hosseinzadeh S, Aronoff L, Wong A, Zaman R, Barbu I, Besla R, Lavine KJ, Razani B, Ginhoux F, Husain M, Cybulsky MI, Robbins CS, Epelman S. Self-renewing resident cardiac macrophages limit adverse remodeling following myocardial infarction. Nat Immunol 20: 29–39, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0272-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Satoh T, Kidoya H, Naito H, Yamamoto M, Takemura N, Nakagawa K, Yoshioka Y, Morii E, Takakura N, Takeuchi O, Akira S. Critical role of Trib1 in differentiation of tissue-resident M2-like macrophages. Nature 495: 524–528, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nature11930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Shiraishi M, Shintani Y, Shintani Y, Ishida H, Saba R, Yamaguchi A, Adachi H, Yashiro K, Suzuki K. Alternatively activated macrophages determine repair of the infarcted adult murine heart. J Clin Invest 126: 2151–2166, 2016. doi: 10.1172/JCI85782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Leblond A-L, Klinkert K, Martin K, Turner EC, Kumar AH, Browne T, Caplice NM. Systemic and cardiac depletion of M2 macrophage through CSF-1R signaling inhibition alters cardiac function post myocardial infarction. PLoS One 10: e0137515, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Zlatanova I, Pinto C, Bonnin P, Mathieu JRR, Bakker W, Vilar J, Lemitre M, Voehringer D, Vaulont S, Peyssonnaux C, Silvestre J-S. Iron regulator hepcidin impairs macrophage-dependent cardiac repair after injury. Circulation 139: 1530–1547, 2019. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Glinton KE, Ma W, Lantz C, Grigoryeva LS, DeBerge M, Liu X, Febbraio M, Kahn M, Oliver G, Thorp EB. Macrophage-produced VEGFC is induced by efferocytosis to ameliorate cardiac injury and inflammation. J Clin Invest 132: e140685, 2022. doi: 10.1172/JCI140685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Heinen A, Nederlof R, Panjwani P, Spychala A, Tschaidse T, Reffelt H, Boy J, Raupach A, Gödecke S, Petzsch P, Köhrer K, Grandoch M, Petz A, Fischer JW, Alter C, Vasilevska J, Lang P, Gödecke A. IGF1 treatment improves cardiac remodeling after infarction by targeting myeloid cells. Mol Ther 27: 46–58, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Zaman R, Hamidzada H, Kantores C, Wong A, Dick SA, Wang Y, Momen A, Aronoff L, Lin J, Razani B, Mital S, Billia F, Lavine KJ, Nejat S, Epelman S. Selective loss of resident macrophage-derived insulin-like growth factor-1 abolishes adaptive cardiac growth to stress. Immunity 54: 2057–2071.e6, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Halade GV, Kain V, Serhan CN. Immune responsive resolvin D1 programs myocardial infarction-induced cardiorenal syndrome in heart failure. FASEB J 32: 3717–3729, 2018. doi: 10.1096/fj.201701173RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Serhan CN, Levy BD. Resolvins in inflammation: emergence of the pro-resolving superfamily of mediators. J Clin Invest 128: 2657–2669, 2018. doi: 10.1172/JCI97943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Cleutjens JP, Verluyten MJ, Smiths JF, Daemen MJ. Collagen remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat heart. Am J Pathol 147: 325–338, 1995. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Kong P, Shinde AV, Su Y, Russo I, Chen B, Saxena A, Conway SJ, Graff JM, Frangogiannis NG. Opposing actions of fibroblast and cardiomyocyte Smad3 signaling in the infarcted myocardium. Circulation 137: 707–724, 2018. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Dobaczewski M, Bujak M, Li N, Gonzalez-Quesada C, Mendoza LH, Wang X-F, Frangogiannis NG. Smad3 signaling critically regulates fibroblast phenotype and function in healing myocardial infarction. Circ Res 107: 418–428, 2010. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.216101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Zhao W, Zhao T, Huang V, Chen Y, Ahokas RA, Sun Y. Platelet-derived growth factor involvement in myocardial remodeling following infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol 51: 830–838, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Shiraishi M, Yamaguchi A, Suzuki K. Nrg1/ErbB signaling-mediated regulation of fibrosis after myocardial infarction. FASEB J 36: e22150, 2022. doi: 10.1096/fj.202101428RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Sezaki S, Hirohata S, Iwabu A, Nakamura K, Toeda K, Miyoshi T, Yamawaki H, Demircan K, Kusachi S, Shiratori Y, Ninomiya Y. Thrombospondin-1 is induced in rat myocardial infarction and its induction is accelerated by ischemia/reperfusion. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 230: 621–630, 2005. doi: 10.1177/153537020523000904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Riley HJ, Kelly RR, Van Laer AO, Neff LS, Dasgupta S, Baicu CF, McDonald LT, LaRue AC, Zile MR, Bradshaw AD. SPARC production by bone marrow-derived cells contributes to myocardial fibrosis in pressure overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 320: H604–H612, 2021. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00552.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Murry CE, Giachelli CM, Schwartz SM, Vracko R. Macrophages express osteopontin during repair of myocardial necrosis. Am J Pathol 145: 1450–1462, 1994. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Dobaczewski M, Bujak M, Zymek P, Ren G, Entman ML, Frangogiannis NG. Extracellular matrix remodeling in canine and mouse myocardial infarcts. Cell Tissue Res 324: 475–488, 2006. doi: 10.1007/s00441-005-0144-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Frangogiannis NG. Matricellular proteins in cardiac adaptation and disease. Physiol Rev 92: 635–688, 2012. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00008.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Frangogiannis NG, Kovacic JC. Extracellular matrix in ischemic heart disease, Part 4/4: JACC Focus Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol 75: 2219–2235, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Wang C, Zhang C, Liu L, A X, Chen B, Li Y, Du J. Macrophage-derived mir-155-containing exosomes suppress fibroblast proliferation and promote fibroblast inflammation during cardiac injury. Mol Ther 25: 192–204, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Wen H, Peng L, Chen Y. The effect of immune cell-derived exosomes in the cardiac tissue repair after myocardial infarction: molecular mechanisms and pre-clinical evidence. J Cell Mol Med 25: 6500–6510, 2021. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Simões FC, Cahill TJ, Kenyon A, Gavriouchkina D, Vieira JM, Sun X, Pezzolla D, Ravaud C, Masmanian E, Weinberger M, Mayes S, Lemieux ME, Barnette DN, Gunadasa-Rohling M, Williams RM, Greaves DR, Trinh LA, Fraser SE, Dallas SL, Choudhury RP, Sauka-Spengler T, Riley PR. Macrophages directly contribute collagen to scar formation during zebrafish heart regeneration and mouse heart repair. Nat Commun 11: 600, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14263-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Haider N, Boscá L, Zandbergen HR, Kovacic JC, Narula N, González-Ramos S, Fernandez-Velasco M, Agrawal S, Paz-García M, Gupta S, DeLeon-Pennell K, Fuster V, Ibañez B, Narula J. Transition of macrophages to fibroblast-like cells in healing myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 74: 3124–3135, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Kanisicak O, Khalil H, Ivey MJ, Karch J, Maliken BD, Correll RN, Brody MJ, J Lin S-C, Aronow BJ, Tallquist MD, Molkentin JD. Genetic lineage tracing defines myofibroblast origin and function in the injured heart. Nat Commun 7: 12260, 2016. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Moore-Morris T, Cattaneo P, Guimarães-Camboa N, Bogomolovas J, Cedenilla M, Banerjee I, Ricote M, Kisseleva T, Zhang L, Gu Y, Dalton ND, Peterson KL, Chen J, Pucéat M, Evans SM. Infarct fibroblasts do not derive from bone marrow lineages. Circ Res 122: 583–590, 2018. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Tao ZY, Cavasin MA, Yang F, Liu YH, Yang XP. Temporal changes in matrix metalloproteinase expression and inflammatory response associated with cardiac rupture after myocardial infarction in mice. Life Sci 74: 1561–1572, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Lindsey ML, Escobar GP, Mukherjee R, Goshorn DK, Sheats NJ, Bruce JA, Mains IM, Hendrick JK, Hewett KW, Gourdie RG, Matrisian LM, Spinale FG. Matrix metalloproteinase-7 affects connexin-43 levels, electrical conduction, and survival after myocardial infarction. Circulation 113: 2919–2928, 2006. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.612960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Kaminski AR, Moore ET, Daseke MJ 2nd, Valerio FM, Flynn ER, Lindsey ML. The compendium of matrix metalloproteinase expression in the left ventricle of mice following myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 318: H706–H714, 2020. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00679.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Kubota A, Suto A, Suzuki K, Kobayashi Y, Nakajima H. Matrix metalloproteinase-12 produced by Ly6C(low) macrophages prolongs the survival after myocardial infarction by preventing neutrophil influx. J Mol Cell Cardiol 131: 41–52, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Hanna A, Shinde AV, Li R, Alex L, Humeres C, Balasubramanian P, Frangogiannis NG. Collagen denaturation in the infarcted myocardium involves temporally distinct effects of MT1-MMP-dependent proteolysis and mechanical tension. Matrix Biol 99: 18–42, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2021.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Ma Y, Halade GV, Zhang J, Ramirez TA, Levin D, Voorhees A, Jin Y-F, Han H-C, Manicone AM, Lindsey ML. Matrix metalloproteinase-28 deletion exacerbates cardiac dysfunction and rupture after myocardial infarction in mice by inhibiting M2 macrophage activation. Circ Res 112: 675–688, 2013. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Kandasamy AD, Chow AK, Ali MA, Schulz R. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and myocardial oxidative stress injury: beyond the matrix. Cardiovasc Res 85: 413–423, 2010. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Bellac CL, Dufour A, Krisinger MJ, Loonchanta A, Starr AE, Auf Dem Keller U, Lange PF, Goebeler V, Kappelhoff R, Butler GS, Burtnick LD, Conway EM, Roberts CR, Overall CM. Macrophage matrix metalloproteinase-12 dampens inflammation and neutrophil influx in arthritis. Cell Rep 9: 618–632, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Wu X, Reboll MR, Korf-Klingebiel M, Wollert KC. Angiogenesis after acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 117: 1257–1273, 2021. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Ferraro B, Leoni G, Hinkel R, Ormanns S, Paulin N, Ortega-Gomez A, Viola JR, de Jong R, Bongiovanni D, Bozoglu T, Maas SL, D'Amico M, Kessler T, Zeller T, Hristov M, Reutelingsperger C, Sager HB, Döring Y, Nahrendorf M, Kupatt C, Soehnlein O. Pro-angiogenic macrophage phenotype to promote myocardial repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 73: 2990–3002, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Fu X, Khalil H, Kanisicak O, Boyer JG, Vagnozzi RJ, Maliken BD, Sargent MA, Prasad V, Valiente-Alandi I, Blaxall BC, Molkentin JD. Specialized fibroblast differentiated states underlie scar formation in the infarcted mouse heart. J Clin Invest 128: 2127–2143, 2018. doi: 10.1172/JCI98215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Ren G, Michael LH, Entman ML, Frangogiannis NG. Morphological characteristics of the microvasculature in healing myocardial infarcts. J Histochem Cytochem 50: 71–79, 2002. doi: 10.1177/002215540205000108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Dobaczewski M, Akrivakis S, Nasser K, Michael LH, Entman ML, Frangogiannis NG. Vascular mural cells in healing canine myocardial infarcts. J Histochem Cytochem 52: 1019–1029, 2004. doi: 10.1369/jhc.3A6210.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Zymek P, Bujak M, Chatila K, Cieslak A, Thakker G, Entman ML, Frangogiannis NG. The role of platelet-derived growth factor signaling in healing myocardial infarcts. J Am Coll Cardiol 48: 2315–2323, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Takemoto R, Kamiya T, Atobe T, Hara H, Adachi T. Regulation of lysyl oxidase expression in THP-1 cell-derived M2-like macrophages. J Cell Biochem 122: 777–786, 2021. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Martinez FO, Helming L, Milde R, Varin A, Melgert BN, Draijer C, Thomas B, Fabbri M, Crawshaw A, Ho LP, Ten Hacken NH, Cobos Jiménez V, Kootstra NA, Hamann J, Greaves DR, Locati M, Mantovani A, Gordon S. Genetic programs expressed in resting and IL-4 alternatively activated mouse and human macrophages: similarities and differences. Blood 121: e57–e69, 2013. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-06-436212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Sager HB, Hulsmans M, Lavine KJ, Moreira MB, Heidt T, Courties G, Sun Y, Iwamoto Y, Tricot B, Khan OF, Dahlman JE, Borodovsky A, Fitzgerald K, Anderson DG, Weissleder R, Libby P, Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M. Proliferation and recruitment contribute to myocardial macrophage expansion in chronic heart failure. Circ Res 119: 853–864, 2016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Wong NR, Mohan J, Kopecky BJ, Guo S, Du L, Leid J, Feng G, Lokshina I, Dmytrenko O, Luehmann H, Bajpai G, Ewald L, Bell L, Patel N, Bredemeyer A, Weinheimer CJ, Nigro JM, Kovacs A, Morimoto S, Bayguinov PO, Fisher MR, Stump WT, Greenberg M, Fitzpatrick JAJ, Epelman S, Kreisel D, Sah R, Liu Y, Hu H, Lavine KJ. Resident cardiac macrophages mediate adaptive myocardial remodeling. Immunity 54: 2072–2088.e7, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Entin-Meer M, Levy R, Goryainov P, Landa N, Barshack I, Avivi C, Semo J, Keren G. The transient receptor potential vanilloid 2 cation channel is abundant in macrophages accumulating at the peri-infarct zone and may enhance their migration capacity towards injured cardiomyocytes following myocardial infarction. PLoS One 9: e105055, 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Entin-Meer M, Cohen L, Hertzberg-Bigelman E, Levy R, Ben-Shoshan J, Keren G. TRPV2 knockout mice demonstrate an improved cardiac performance following myocardial infarction due to attenuated activity of peri-infarct macrophages. PLoS One 12: e0177132, 2017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Fei Y-D, Wang Q, Hou J-W, Li W, Cai X-X, Yang Y-L, Zhang L-H, Wei Z-X, Chen T-Z, Wang Y-P, Li Y-G. Macrophages facilitate post myocardial infarction arrhythmias: roles of gap junction and KCa3.1. Theranostics 9: 6396–6411, 2019. doi: 10.7150/thno.34801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Grune J, Lewis AJM, Yamazoe M, Hulsmans M, Rohde D, Xiao L, Zhang S, Ott C, Calcagno DM, Zhou Y, Timm K, Shanmuganathan M, Pulous FE, Schloss MJ, Foy BH, Capen D, Vinegoni C, Wojtkiewicz GR, Iwamoto Y, Grune T, Brown D, Higgins J, Ferreira VM, Herring N, Channon KM, Neubauer S, Sosnovik DE, Milan DJ, Swirski FK, King KR, Aguirre AD, Ellinor PT, Nahrendorf M; Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction (OxAMI) Study. Neutrophils incite and macrophages avert electrical storm after myocardial infarction. Nat Cardiovasc Res 1: 649–664, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s44161-022-00094-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Aimo A, Panichella G, Barison A, Maffei S, Cameli M, Coiro S, D'Ascenzi F, Di Mario C, Liga R, Marcucci R, Morrone D, Olivotto I, Tritto I, Emdin M. Sex-related differences in ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 339: 62–69, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Garber L, McAndrew TC, Chung ES, Stancak B, Svendsen JH, Monteiro J, Fischer TM, Kueffer F, Ryan T, Bax J, Leon AR, Stone GW. Predictors of left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in patients with a patent infarct related coronary artery after percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Post-Myocardial Infarction Remodeling Prevention Therapy [PRomPT] Trial). Am J Cardiol 121: 1293–1298, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. van der Bijl P, Abou R, Goedemans L, Gersh BJ, Holmes DR Jr, Ajmone Marsan N, Delgado V, Bax JJ. Left ventricular remodelling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: sex differences and prognosis. ESC Heart Fail 7: 474–481, 2020. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Pullen AB, Kain V, Serhan CN, Halade GV. Molecular and cellular differences in cardiac repair of male and female mice. J Am Heart Assoc 9: e015672, 2020. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Cavasin MA, Tao Z, Menon S, Yang XP. Gender differences in cardiac function during early remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in mice. Life Sci 75: 2181–2192, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Hanna A, Shinde AV, Frangogiannis NG. Validation of diagnostic criteria and histopathological characterization of cardiac rupture in the mouse model of nonreperfused myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 319: H948–H964, 2020. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00318.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Puhl SL, Steffens S. Neutrophils in post-myocardial infarction inflammation: damage vs. resolution? Front Cardiovasc Med 6: 25, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Ertl G, Frantz S. Healing after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 66: 22–32, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Carrabba N, Parodi G, Valenti R, Migliorini A, Antoniucci D. Comparison of effects of primary coronary angioplasty on left ventricular remodeling and heart failure in patients <70 versus > or =70 years with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 104: 926–931, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Maggioni AP, Maseri A, Fresco C, Franzosi MG, Mauri F, Santoro E, Tognoni G. Age-related increase in mortality among patients with first myocardial infarctions treated with thrombolysis. The investigators of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-2). N Engl J Med 329: 1442–1448, 1993. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199311113292002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Biernacka A, Frangogiannis NG. Aging and cardiac fibrosis. Aging Dis 2: 158–173, 2011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Ma Y, Mouton AJ, Lindsey ML. Cardiac macrophage biology in the steady-state heart, the aging heart, and following myocardial infarction. Transl Res 191: 15–28, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Bujak M, Kweon HJ, Chatila K, Li N, Taffet G, Frangogiannis NG. Aging-related defects are associated with adverse cardiac remodeling in a mouse model of reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 51: 1384–1392, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Molawi K, Wolf Y, Kandalla PK, Favret J, Hagemeyer N, Frenzel K, Pinto AR, Klapproth K, Henri S, Malissen B, Rodewald H-R, Rosenthal NA, Bajenoff M, Prinz M, Jung S, Sieweke MH. Progressive replacement of embryo-derived cardiac macrophages with age. J Exp Med 211: 2151–2158, 2014. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Ding A, Hwang S, Schwab R. Effect of aging on murine macrophages. Diminished response to IFN-gamma for enhanced oxidative metabolism. J Immunol 153: 2146–2152, 1994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Swift ME, Burns AL, Gray KL, DiPietro LA. Age-related alterations in the inflammatory response to dermal injury. J Invest Dermatol 117: 1027–1035, 2001. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Löffler J, Sass FA, Filter S, Rose A, Ellinghaus A, Duda GN, Dienelt A. Compromised bone healing in aged rats is associated with impaired M2 macrophage function. Front Immunol 10: 2443, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Leuschner F, Dutta P, Gorbatov R, Novobrantseva TI, Donahoe JS, Courties G, Lee KM, Kim JI, Markmann JF, Marinelli B, Panizzi P, Lee WW, Iwamoto Y, Milstein S, Epstein-Barash H, Cantley W, Wong J, Cortez-Retamozo V, Newton A, Love K, Libby P, Pittet MJ, Swirski FK, Koteliansky V, Langer R, Weissleder R, Anderson DG, Nahrendorf M. Therapeutic siRNA silencing in inflammatory monocytes in mice. Nat Biotechnol 29: 1005–1010, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225. Frangogiannis NG. Why animal model studies are lost in translation. J Cardiovasc Aging 2: 22, 2022. doi: 10.20517/jca.2022.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Frangogiannis NG. The inflammatory response in myocardial injury, repair, and remodelling. Nat Rev Cardiol 11: 255–265, 2014. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Huang S, Frangogiannis NG. Anti-inflammatory therapies in myocardial infarction: failures, hopes and challenges. Br J Pharmacol 175: 1377–1400, 2018. doi: 10.1111/bph.14155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Bergmann O, Bhardwaj RD, Bernard S, Zdunek S, Barnabé-Heider F, Walsh S, Zupicich J, Alkass K, Buchholz BA, Druid H, Jovinge S, Frisén J. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science 324: 98–102, 2009. doi: 10.1126/science.1164680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Bevan L, Lim ZW, Venkatesh B, Riley PR, Martin P, Richardson RJ. Specific macrophage populations promote both cardiac scar deposition and subsequent resolution in adult zebrafish. Cardiovasc Res 116: 1357–1371, 2020. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Sanz-Morejón A, García-Redondo AB, Reuter H, Marques IJ, Bates T, Galardi-Castilla M, Große A, Manig S, Langa X, Ernst A, Piragyte I, Botos M-A, González-Rosa JM, Ruiz-Ortega M, Briones AM, Salaices M, Englert C, Mercader N. Wilms tumor 1b expression defines a pro-regenerative macrophage subtype and is required for organ regeneration in the zebrafish. Cell Rep 28: 1296–1306.e6, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Godwin JW, Debuque R, Salimova E, Rosenthal NA. Heart regeneration in the salamander relies on macrophage-mediated control of fibroblast activation and the extracellular landscape. NPJ Regen Med 2: 22, 2017. doi: 10.1038/s41536-017-0027-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Li Y, Feng J, Song S, Li H, Yang H, Zhou B, Li Y, Yue Z, Lian H, Liu L, Hu S, Nie Y. gp130 Controls cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration. Circulation 142: 967–982, 2020. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Gwechenberger M, Moertl D, Pacher R, Huelsmann M. Oncostatin-M in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury may regulate tissue repair. Croat Med J 45: 149–157, 2004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Fischer P, Hilfiker-Kleiner D. Role of gp130-mediated signalling pathways in the heart and its impact on potential therapeutic aspects. Br J Pharmacol 153, Suppl 1: S414–S427, 2008. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Rizzo G, Gropper J, Piollet M, Vafadarnejad E, Rizakou A, Bandi SR, Arampatzi P, Krammer T, DiFabion N, Dietrich O, Arias-Loza AP, Prinz M, Mack M, Schlepckow K, Haass C, Silvestre JS, Zernecke A, Saliba AE, Cochain C. Dynamics of monocyte-derived macrophage diversity in experimental myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 11: cvac113, 2022. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


