Skip to main content
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 1999 Nov;6(6):906–911. doi: 10.1128/cdli.6.6.906-911.1999

Longitudinal Analysis of Lymphocyte Function and Numbers in the First Year of Life in Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (DiGeorge Syndrome/Velocardiofacial Syndrome)

Kathleen E Sullivan 1,*, Donna McDonald-McGinn 1, Deborah A Driscoll 1,2, Beverly S Emanuel 1, Elaine H Zackai 1, Abbas F Jawad 3
PMCID: PMC95796  PMID: 10548584

Abstract

Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is a common syndrome typically consisting of variable cardiac defects, hypoparathyroidism, developmental delay, and immunodeficiency. The hemizygous deletion has variable effects on the immune system even within the same kindred, and the extent of the immunodeficiency is difficult to predict. Some patients have shown improvement over time; however, this is the first prospective longitudinal study of the dynamic nature of the immunodeficiency. Nineteen patients were studied prospectively between 1994 and 1997. The results of the newborn immunologic studies in the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion group were significantly different from those of a group of newborns with cardiac disease due to other causes. Peripheral blood T-cell numbers were decreased in the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion group, although T-cell function was largely preserved. The group as a whole demonstrated few changes in the first year of life, but a subset of patients with markedly diminished T-cell numbers did demonstrate improvement. Therefore, improvement in peripheral blood T-cell counts is variable in chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The patients with the lowest T-cell counts improved the most in the first year of life.


Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is one of the most common primary immunodeficiencies, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 3,000 live births. In spite of this frequency, little is known about the natural history because of the difficulty in establishing the diagnosis until recently. Hemizygous deletions of chromosome 22 in association with this syndrome were originally described in 1981 (11, 20, 24, 29). Now it is estimated that 10 to 30% of patients with DiGeorge syndrome have a cytogenetically visible deletion and 95% have some deletion that encompasses the critical region (6, 14, 15, 40, 49). Furthermore, the same deletion has been described in the majority of patients with velocardiofacial syndrome and conotruncal anomaly face syndrome (5, 7, 30). In the past, patients were diagnosed on the basis of syndromic characteristics and were categorized as having DiGeorge syndrome if they had hypocalcemia, a hypoplastic thymus, and a conotruncal cardiac anomaly (9, 26). Patients were categorized as having velocardiofacial syndrome if they had dysmorphic facies and a conotruncal cardiac anomaly (33), and many patients were probably not diagnosed with a specific syndrome. The phenotypic diversity appears not to be determined by the deletion endpoints because over 90% of patients have the same deletion breakpoints (7). Furthermore, even within a single family, there can be various expressions of the syndrome (39). Because of the phenotypic diversity in this syndrome, it is more appropriate to use the chromosome deletion rather than syndromic characteristics as the defining feature. Several groups have proposed the nomenclature be changed to CATCH 22 or chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome to reflect this (48, 50). Adding to the confusion, there are patients with a clinical phenotype consistent with a diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome or velocardiofacial syndrome who do not have the characteristic chromosome deletion. Some of these patients have different chromosomal abnormalities or fetal exposure to alcohol or isotretinoin (17, 20, 32). Therefore, to delineate our study population, we elected to use the chromosome deletion as our defining feature.

The fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome was first used in 1992 and now has become widely available. Since the advent of widespread testing for chromosome 22q11.2 deletion in target populations, it has become clear that the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion and the immunodeficiency classically associated with DiGeorge syndrome may be seen in a variety of clinical settings (15, 19, 41, 47). The deletion is consistent in the majority of patients, regardless of the phenotypic manifestations, suggesting that it is more appropriate to consider this population as having a chromosome 22q11.2 deletion rather than distinct syndromic populations. As with the other phenotypic features, there is a broad range of immunologic defects in patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (3, 4, 34, 35, 43, 44, 47). Past longitudinal studies of small numbers of patients with clinically defined DiGeorge syndrome suggested that the immunologic defects could improve throughout childhood (3, 4). Additional cross-sectional studies of patients with DiGeorge syndrome also suggested that the immunodeficiency improves with age (43), although certain other studies have failed to demonstrate any improvement (23).

The characteristic immunodeficiency is a mild to moderate defect in T-cell production as a consequence of thymic hypoplasia (9, 26). These patients typically do not suffer from opportunistic infections characteristic of severe T-cell immunodeficiencies. A small fraction of patients have a more profound immunodeficiency with markedly impaired T-cell production and T-cell function (sometimes called complete DiGeorge syndrome), and some patients have normal immunologic function as determined by standard laboratory assays (3, 4, 27, 34). There can be variable secondary humoral defects (16, 31, 42, 45). We wished to analyze a cohort of patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome over the first year of life to define the frequency of significant immunodeficiency and to characterize the dynamic nature of the immunodeficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients.

Nineteen patients (17 Caucasian, 1 Hispanic, and 1 African-American) who were diagnosed between 1994 and 1997 with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in the first few days of life were evaluated. All patients were full-term infants and were hemodynamically stable at the time of analysis. The Oncor N25 probe was used to detect the hemizygous deletion (14, 15). All patients had a cardiac anomaly which led to their early diagnosis. Immunologic evaluations were performed prior to cardiac surgery and transfusion in 8 patients and 2 weeks after cardiac repair and any transfusion with irradiated blood in 11 patients. Seven patients had tetralogy of Fallot, six patients had interrupted aortic arch, two patients had simple ventricular septal defects, one patient had truncus arteriosus, and three patients had other cardiac defects. Eleven patients had sustained hypocalcemia, while eight patients had either hypocalcemia lasting less than 48 h after cardiac repair or no hypocalcemia. At the 1 year time point, immunologic evaluations were not performed if the child was felt to have an intercurrent illness or if the child had weight loss in the previous month. All immunologic evaluations were performed in the Clinical Immunology Laboratory at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The institutional review board at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia approved these studies.

Management of these patients was consistent. Because none of the patients had severe immunodeficiency, they were not placed in isolation. Prophylactic antimicrobials were not generally used. Reasonable precautions against infectious exposures were recommended. Blood products were irradiated. Prophylaxis for varicella exposure was given to two patients. Two patients transiently required trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for pneumocystis because they had markedly diminished T-cell numbers. Live viral vaccines were not administered in the first year of life. After the 1-year evaluation, live viral vaccines were allowed for those patients whose immunologic evaluations had normalized.

Immunologic evaluations.

At the time of diagnosis, two- or three-color flow cytometry was performed on a Coulter EPICS XL to define the following lymphocyte populations: CD3+, CD3/CD4+, CD3/CD8+, CD3/CD16/56+, CD19+, CD5/19+, and TCRγδ+. CD14 and CD45 were used to confirm the purity of the lymphocyte population. Proliferative responses to phytohemagglutinin (PHA), pokeweed mitogen (PWM), and concanavalin A (ConA) were measured in triplicate cultures of two dilutions of stimulus harvested 72 h after stimulation. A total of 105 peripheral blood mononuclear cells purified by Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) were used per well. PWM was used at final concentrations of 3 and 2.5 ng/ml. PHA was used at final concentrations of 12.5 and 10 ng/ml. ConA was used at final concentrations of 50 and 25 ng/ml. Incorporation of [3H]thymidine was determined for each well, and the average of each triplicate set was used for reporting the counts per minute (cpm). The stimulation index (SI) was determined by dividing the average cpm from the stimulated cells by the average cpm from the unstimulated cells. At 1 year of age, the same studies were repeated. Although we did not recruit age-matched healthy subjects as controls for this study, samples from adult controls were run on each day as controls for staining and flow cytometry. In addition, a few immunologic evaluations were obtained from patients with conotruncal cardiac defects who were thought to be likely to have the chromosome deletion but who later turned out to not have the deletion. These results for these patients are reported as cardiac control results. These samples also validate our use of published normative data for comparison (8).

Statistical analyses.

A paired Student t test was used to compare changes over time in the study population. The Student t test was used to compare the mean values between different groups. A correction for multiple comparisons was not performed.

RESULTS

Newborns with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome have significantly fewer cells of thymic lineage than newborns without the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion.

Nineteen infants who were diagnosed with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in the first few days of life constituted our study population. Eleven newborns with suspected chromosome 22q11.2 deletion who later turned out not to have the deletion were evaluated for the immunodeficiency associated with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. These children had cardiac lesions comparable to those of the study group (tetralogy of Fallot, three children; truncus arteriosus, two; other, three; minor cardiac lesions, three), and both groups had a median age of 17 days. To determine whether a cardiac lesion could be responsible for the immunodeficiency, we compared the mean values for lymphocyte subsets between the cardiac control group and the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion group. The lymphocyte subsets in the cardiac control group were comparable to the published normative data from a group of Dutch infants (8). The CD8 counts from the cardiac patients were slightly higher than those of the Dutch controls; however, CD8 counts have been reported to be in the same range (median, 1,420 cells/mm3; 95 to 5% range, 650 to 2,450 cells/mm3) in a study of American children of diverse ethnicities (12). The results for newborns with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were different from those for cardiac controls and the published normative data in that all of the thymic lineage cell types were decreased (Table 1). Specifically, the absolute lymphocyte count and the CD3, CD4, and CD8 counts were significantly lower in the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome group than in the cardiac controls. Similarly, the fraction of the peripheral blood lymphocyte pool comprised of thymus-dependent lineages was lower in the patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletions than in the cardiac controls. The percentage and absolute count of CD8 cells were the most abnormal findings. In contrast, lineages which do not require the thymus for maturation such as B cells (CD19), natural killer cells (CD16/56), and T cells bearing the γδ receptor were not significantly different between the two groups. CD5/19 B cells are a subgroup of B cells important in autoimmunity that have been found in thymic tissue, although it is not clear whether they require the thymus for maturation or whether they are passive residents (22, 36). This population was no different between the two groups, although for both groups it was slightly lower than that for published age-matched controls. Finally, proliferative responses as measured by responses to PHA were no different between the two groups, i.e., normal. These results suggest that the immunodeficiency associated with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is a specific result of the hemizygous chromosome 22q11.2 deletion and resulting thymic hypoplasia and not simply a result of the stress associated with significant cardiac defects.

TABLE 1.

Analyses of lymphocyte subsets in infants with cardiac anomalies with and without chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Determination Results for:
P value Values for healthy controls
Patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion (n = 19)
Cardiac controls (n = 11)
Mean 5–95% range Mean 5–95% range Mean 5–95% range
Absolute lymphocyte count (cells/mm3) 3,164 2,183–4,142 5,128 3,472–6,784 0.0254 6,700 3,500–13,100
CD3
 Cells/mm3 1,625 1,058–2,192 3,907 2,652–5,163 0.0003 4,600 2,300–7,000
 % 50.5 42–59 77.1 70–84 <0.0001 72 60–85
CD4
 Cells/mm3 1,117 753–1,482 2,749 1,865–3,633 0.0002 3,500 1,700–5,300
 % 35.4 29–41 55.1 48–62 0.0001 55 41–68
CD8
 Cells/mm3 480 290–670 1,412 894–1,930 0.0001 1,000 400–1,700
 % 14.4 12–17 20.6 17–24 0.0083 16 9–23
TCRγδ
 Cells/mm3 110 57–162 134 38–230 0.6084
 % 2.3 1–4 2.2 1–3 0.8818
CD5/19
 Cells/mm3 74 13–134 127 76–179 0.1642 600 300–1,100
 % 2.1 1–3 2.8 1–4 0.4021
CD19
 Cells/mm3 484 329–638 589 314–863 0.4402 1,000 600–1,900
 % 21.5 16–27 12.1 6–18 0.0208 15 4–26
CD16/56
 Cells/mm3 835 364–1,305 463 119–807 0.2269 500 200–1,400
 % 21.0 14–28 7.8 4–12 0.0112 5 1–38
PHAa
 SI 102 55–149 173 52–346 0.1984 587b 416–758
 cpm 52,867 31,826–73,908 53,055 35,509–70,601 0.9902 88,179b 54,064–122,294
a

n = 13 for the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion group; n = 6 for the cardiac control group. 

b

These represent results for samples from adult controls run simultaneously with the patient samples. 

Longitudinal analysis of lymphocyte subsets and lymphocyte function in infants with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

To define the dynamic nature of the immunodeficiency, we monitored 19 patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome over the first year of life. Previous studies had suggested that there could be significant improvement in immunologic function in the first year of life (3, 4, 35). This is the first longitudinal analysis in which the ages of the patients were controlled. Table 2 demonstrates that the population as a whole did not demonstrate significant improvement in peripheral blood T-cell numbers or in the lymphocyte fraction corresponding to thymus-dependent lineages over the first year of life. The patients’ lymphocyte subset values are closer to the published normative data at 1 year of age because T-cell counts in normal infants typically decrease in the first year of life (8). For example, 3 of 19 patients in the newborn period had normal numbers of lymphocytes, while 18 of 19 had normal numbers at 1 year of age. Similarly, 3 of 19 patients had normal numbers of CD3 T cells in the newborn period compared to 12 of 19 at 1 year of age. Three of 19 patients (the same three patients as before) had normal numbers of CD4 T cells in the newborn period compared to 12 of 19 at 1 year of age. Eight of nineteen patients had CD8 T cells in the normal range in the newborn period compared to 11 of 19 at 1 year of age.

TABLE 2.

Longitudinal analysis of lymphocyte subsets and function in patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in the first year of life

Determination Results for patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion
P valuea Values for 1-yr-old healthy controls
Newborns (n = 19)
1-yr-olds (n = 19)
Mean 5–95% range Mean 5–95% range Mean 5–95% range
Absolute lymphocyte count (cells/mm3) 3,164 2,183–4,142 4,631 3,563–5,700 0.041 5,500 2,600–10,400
CD3
 Cells/mm3 1,625 1,058–2,192 1,854 1,475–2,235 0.497 3,400 1,600–6,700
 % 50.5 42–59 42.6 37–48 0.028 65 54–76
CD4
 Cells/mm3 1,117 753–482 1,233 1,000–1,465 0.601 2,300 1,000–4,600
 % 35.4 29–41 28.2 25–31 0.006 44 31–54
CD8
 Cells/mm3 480 290–670 502 362–643 0.846 1,100 400–2,100
 % 14.4 12–17 11.5 9–14 0.068 18 12–28
TCRγδ
 Cells/mm3 110 49–171 227 24–429 0.199
 % 2.3 1–4 3.4 3–4 0.091
CD5/19
 Cells/mm3 74 13–134 278 154–402 0.011
 % 2.1 1–3 7.2 4–10 0.003
CD19
 Cells/mm3 484 329–638 1,832 1,260–2,403 <0.001 1,400 600–2,700
 % 21.5 16–27 39.4 34–45 <0.001 25 15–39
CD16/56
 Cells/mm3 835 364–1,305 785 407–1,163 0.781 400 200–1,200
 % 21.0 14–28 28.8 1–58 0.510 7 3–17
PHA (n = 13)
 cpm 52,867 31,826–73,908 82,594 67,579–97,609 0.002
 SI 107 55–160 373 277–468 <0.001
ConA (n = 13)
 cpm 54,005 31,724–76,286 62,084 44,550–79,617 0.541
 SI 98 60–136 319 197–441 0.004
PWM (n = 13)
 cpm 32,603 20,955–44,252 30,843 22,856–38,831 0.788
 SI 59 37–82 154 91–218 0.010
a

P values < 0.05 are boldfaced. 

Four immunologic evaluations changed significantly in the first year of life. The mean absolute lymphocyte count rose from 3,164 cells/mm3 in the newborn group to 4,631 cells/mm3 in the 1-year-old group. The CD19 B-cell count rose from 484 to 1,832 cells/mm3 in the 1-year-old group, while the B-cell fraction rose from 21.5 to 39.4%. The CD5/19 B-cell count rose from 74 to 278 cells/mm3, while the CD5/19 fraction rose from 2.1 to 7.2%. Mitogen proliferation, as measured by cpm, in response to PHA improved significantly, although responses to ConA and PWM were stable over time. Interestingly, the SIs corresponding to all three mitogens improved over the first year of life, but this was due in large part to decreasing spontaneous uptake of [3H]thymidine. The percentages of CD4 and CD8 cells both decreased slightly in the first year of life.

We hypothesized that patients with worse peripheral blood T-cell counts might have greater improvement in the first year of life than those less impaired. To test this, we selected 10 patients whose initial CD3 count was less than the median for the population, 1,344 cells/mm3. We reanalyzed the longitudinal data on these 10 patients with the paired Student t test (Table 3). These 10 patients demonstrated significant improvement in peripheral blood T-cell counts in the first year of life, as well as a significant rise in circulating B-cell numbers. Natural killer cell numbers and T cells bearing the TCRγδ receptor did not change significantly over the first year of life, suggesting that the findings do not represent global changes in lymphocyte production. Therefore, there is a subgroup of patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in which significant improvement in T-cell production occurs in the first year of life.

TABLE 3.

Longitudinal analysis of lymphocyte subsets and function in 10 patients with initial CD3 counts of <1,344 cell/mm3

Determination Results for patients with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion
Newborns (n = 10)
1-yr-olds (n = 10)
P valuea
Mean 5–95% range Mean 5–95% range
Absolute lymphocyte count (cells/mm3) 2,159 1,548–2,771 4,953 2,962–6,945 0.017
CD3
 Cells/mm3 808 530–1,086 1,862 1,119–2,605 0.019
 % 33.2 16–50 40.7 32–50 0.343
CD4
 Cells/mm3 590 380–800 1,271 808–1,734 0.021
 % 29.1 20–39 27.3 21–33 0.625
CD8
 Cells/mm3 218 131–305 489 229–748 0.058
 % 11.1 6–16 13.2 6–21 0.363
TCRγδ
 Cells/mm3 92 10–174 297 122–717 0.221
 % 1.6 0.4–3 2.8 1–4 0.046
CD5/19
 Cells/mm3 37 9–65 174 69–279 0.026
 % 2.2 0.3–5 5.9 2–10 0.062
CD19
 Cells/mm3 369 152–586 2,166 1,098–3,235 0.007
 % 19.5 9–29 42.8 37–49 <0.001
CD16/56
 Cells/mm3 591 125–1,058 845 140–1,550 0.281
 % 25.1 8–42 14.4 8–20 0.112
PHA
 cpm (n = 13) 59,035 25,345–92,725 32,494 60,260–104,730 0.053
 SI (n = 13) 123 39–206 357 262–451 0.009
a

P values < 0.05 are boldfaced. 

DISCUSSION

Two previous longitudinal studies of patients with DiGeorge syndrome (as clinically defined) revealed diverse outcomes. In one study, eight patients had CD4 counts measured in the first month of life and then repeated at various follow-up intervals ranging from 12 to 38 months. Four of the eight patients demonstrated improvement in their CD4 count, and four patients had fewer CD4 T cells on follow-up (4). A second longitudinal study evaluated five patients clinically defined as having DiGeorge syndrome. In this study, initial evaluations of total T-cell numbers were performed in the first 4 months of life and follow-up ranged from 3 months to 2 years. Four of the five patients demonstrated consistent improvement over time in total T-cell numbers. One patient had declining T-cell numbers (3). Several cross-sectional studies have addressed this question with conflicting results. The mean CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD19 cell counts progressively decreased for the 0- to 3-month, 2- to 6-year, and 6- to 18-year-old groups in one study (23). In a second study, the percentage of CD4 cells in a group of children less than 1 year of age (43%) was no different than the percentage of CD4 cells in the children over 1 year of age (42%) (34). Because of the uncertainty surrounding the natural history of the immunodeficiency in this syndrome, we undertook the current study.

This study demonstrates that the immunodeficiency is related to the chromosome deletion and is not simply due to the stress of the cardiac anomaly. The differences between the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome group and the cardiac control group were primarily in the thymus-derived lineages, which is consistent with the known pathophysiology of the immunodeficiency. A hemizygous deletion of chromosome 22q11.2 affects the immune system through its effects on thymic development. Although the thymus may be macroscopically absent, in most cases there are microscopic rests of thymic tissue in the neck, suggesting that migration is aberrant in this syndrome (2). The limitation of thymic tissue to support T-cell maturation underlies the immunodeficiency seen in this syndrome, and replacement of thymic tissue constitutes an important therapeutic intervention (10, 28). The T-cell immunodeficiency ranges from severe to nonexistent, with most patients exhibiting a mild to moderate defect in T-cell production (47). Significant defects in T-cell function are less common (3, 4, 27, 34), and there may be variable humoral dysfunction in a small subset of patients (16, 18, 23, 31, 42, 45). The prevalence of infection and autoimmune disease is higher in this population, suggesting that the immunodeficiency is clinically relevant (13, 16, 21, 23, 25, 31, 37, 38, 42, 45, 46). Although the immunodeficiency is clinically relevant, most patients do not suffer from opportunistic infections and they do not require isolation or other precautions used with patients with severe T-cell immunodeficiencies. It is believed that only 1% of patients with clinical DiGeorge syndrome or with the chromosome deletion have the serious immunodeficiency.

The paired newborn and 1-year immunologic evaluations allowed us to define the early natural history of the immunodeficiency in this syndrome. Within the whole group, there were few consistent changes over time. Notably, the absolute lymphocyte count and the B-cell count improved significantly over the first year of life. When we evaluated a subpopulation which presented with CD3 counts lower than 1,344 cells/mm3, it was clear that there could be significant improvement in thymus-derived cell lineages over the first year of life. All of the thymus-derived lineages improved in the first year of life in this subpopulation, and B-cell numbers improved as well. The consistent improvement in B-cell numbers may be due to improved T-cell help being available or to persisting defects in T cells which control B-cell proliferation. One study of patients with DiGeorge syndrome found that increased B-cell numbers correlated with a worse immunologic outcome (34).

Another notable finding from this study is that the CD8 T-cell subset appears to be more significantly affected than the CD4 T-cell compartment. The size of the CD4 and CD8 T-cell compartments is, at least in part, genetically controlled (1). The size of each compartment is determined by both positive and negative selection within the thymus as well as a commitment to either a CD4 or CD8 lineage. One potential explanation for the more marked effect on CD8 lineage T cells would be that the limited thymus epithelium has fewer developmental niches and thus restricts the commitment of CD8 T cells. Until the genetic control of T-cell homeostasis is better understood, it will be difficult to identify the mechanism underlying the decreased CD8 cell compartment in patients with this syndrome.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by MO1-RR00240 and The Wallace Chair.

We acknowledge the assistance of the families, residents, and fellows at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Footnotes

Dedicated to the memory of Justina Finkle Foley.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Amadori A, Zamarchi R, De Silvestro G, Forza G, Cavatton G, Danieli G A, Clementi M, Chieco-Bianchi L. Genetic control of the CD4/CD8 T cell ratio in humans. Nat Med. 1995;1:1279–1283. doi: 10.1038/nm1295-1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bale P M, Sotelo-Avila C. Maldescent of the thymus: 34 necropsy and 10 surgical cases, including 7 thymuses medial to the mandible. Pediatr Pathol. 1993;13:181–190. doi: 10.3109/15513819309048205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barrett D J, Ammann A J, Wara D W, Cowan M J, Fisher T J, Stiehm E R. Clinical and immunologic spectrum of the DiGeorge syndrome. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1981;6:1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bastian J, Law S, Vogler L, Lawton A, Herrod H, Anderson S, Horowitz S, Hong R. Prediction of persistent immunodeficiency in the DiGeorge anomaly. J Pediatr. 1989;115:391–396. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80837-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burn J, Takao A, Wilson D, Cross I, Momma K, Wadey R, Scambler P, Goodship J. Conotruncal anomaly face syndrome is associated with a deletion within chromosome 22q11. J Med Genet. 1993;30:822–824. doi: 10.1136/jmg.30.10.822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carey A H, Kelly D, Halford S, Wadey R, Wilson D, Goodship J, Burn J, Paul T, Sharkey A, Dumanski J, et al. Molecular genetic study of the frequency of monosomy 22q11 in DiGeorge syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51:964–970. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carlson C, Sirotkin H, Pandita R, Goldberg R, McKie J, Wadey R, Patanjali S R, Weissman S M, Anyane-Yeboa K, Warburton D, Scambler P, Shprintzen R, Kucherlapati R, Morrow B E. Molecular definition of 22q11 deletions in 151 velocardio-facial syndrome patients. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:620–629. doi: 10.1086/515508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Comans-Bitter W M, de Groot R, van Dongen J M. Immunophenotyping of blood lymphocytes in childhood. J Pediatr. 1996;130:388–393. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70200-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Conley M E, Beckwith J B, Mancer J F K, Tenckhoff L. The spectrum of DiGeorge syndrome. J Pediatr. 1979;94:883–890. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80207-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davis C M, McLaughlin T M, Watson T J, Buckley R H, Schiff S E, Hale L P, Haynes B F, Markert M L. Normalization of the peripheral blood T cell receptor V beta repertoire after cultured postnatal human thymic transplantation in DiGeorge syndrome. J Clin Immunol. 1997;17:167–175. doi: 10.1023/a:1027382600143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de la Chapelle A, Herva R, Koivisto M, Aula P. A deletion in chromosome 22 can cause DiGeorge syndrome. Hum Genet. 1981;57:253–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00278938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Denny T, Yogev R, Gelman R, Skuza C, Oleske J, Chadwick E, Cheng S-C, Connor E. Lymphocyte subsets in healthy children during the first five years of life. JAMA. 1992;267:1484–1488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.DiPiero A D, Lourie E M, Berman B W, Robin N H, Zinn A B, Hostoffer R W. Recurrent immune cytopenias in two patients with DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome. J Pediatr. 1997;131:484–486. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)80085-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Driscoll D A, Budarf M L, Emanuel B S. A genetic etiology for DiGeorge syndrome: consistent deletions and microdeletions of 22q11. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;50:924–933. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Driscoll D A, Salvin J, Sellinger B, Budarf M L, McDonald-McGinn D M, Zackai E H, Emanuel B S. Prevalence of 22q11 microdeletions in DiGeorge and velocardiofacial syndromes: implications for genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. J Med Genet. 1993;30:813–817. doi: 10.1136/jmg.30.10.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Etzioni A, Pollack S. Hypogammaglobulinemia in DiGeorge sequence. Eur J Pediatr. 1989;150:144–145. doi: 10.1007/BF01995869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fukushima Y, Ohashi H, Wakui K, Nishida T, Nakamura Y, Hoshino K, Ogawa K, Ohishi T. DiGeorge syndrome with del(4) (q21.3q25): possibility of the fourth chromosome region responsible for DiGeorge syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51:A80. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garcia Miranda J L, Otero Gomez A, Varela Ansedes H, Rancel Torres N, Gonzalez Espinosa C, Cortabarria C, Sanchez Salgado G. Monosomy 22 with humoral immunodeficiency: is there an immunoglobulin chain deficit? J Med Genet. 1983;20:69–72. doi: 10.1136/jmg.20.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Goldmuntz E, Driscoll D, Budarf M L, Zackai E H, McDonald-McGinn D M, Biegel J A, Emanuel B S. Microdeletions of chromosomal region 22q11 in patients with congenital conotruncal cardiac defects. J Med Genet. 1993;30:807–812. doi: 10.1136/jmg.30.10.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Greenberg F, Elder F F, Haffner P, Northrup H, Ledbetter D H. Cytogenetic findings in a prospective series of patients with DiGeorge anomaly. Am J Hum Genet. 1988;43:605–611. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ham Pong A J, Cavallo A, Holman G H, Goldman A S. DiGeorge syndrome: long term survival complicated by Graves disease. J Pediatr. 1985;106:619–620. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80087-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Isaacson P G, Norton A J, Addis B J. The human thymus contains a novel population of B lymphocytes. Lancet. 1987;ii:1488–1490. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92622-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Junker A K, Driscoll D A. Humoral immunity in DiGeorge syndrome. J Pediatr. 1995;127:231–237. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70300-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kelley R I, Zackai E H, Emanuel B S, Kistenmacher M, Greenberg F, Punnett H H. The association of the DiGeorge anomalad with partial monosomy of chromosome 22. J Pediatr. 1982;101:197–200. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80116-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Levy A, Michel G, Lemerrer M, Philip N. Idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura in two mothers of children with DiGeorge syndrome sequence: a new component manifestation of CATCH 22? Am J Med Genet. 1996;69:356–359. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970414)69:4<356::aid-ajmg4>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lischner H W, Huff D S. T-cell deficiency in DiGeorge syndrome. Birth Defects: Orig. Artic Ser. 1975;11:16–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Markert M L, Hummell D S, Rosenblatt H M, Schiff S E, Harville T O, Williams L W, Schiff R I, Buckley R H. Complete DiGeorge syndrome: persistence of profound immunodeficiency. J Pediatr. 1998;132:15–21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70478-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Markert M L, Kostyu D D, Ward F E, McLaughlin T M, Watson T J, Buckley R H, Schiff S E, Ungerleider R M, Gaynor J W, Oldham K T, Mahaffey S M, Ballow M, Driscoll D A, Hale L P, Haynes B F. Successful formation of a chimeric human thymus allograft following transplantation of cultured postnatal human thymus. J Immunol. 1997;158:998–1005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mascarello J T, Bastian J F, Jones M C. Interstitial deletion of chromosome 22 in a patient with the DiGeorge malformation sequence. Am J Med Genet. 1989;32:112–114. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320320124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Matsuoka R, Takao A, Kimura M, Imamura S, Kondo C, Joh-o K, Ikeda K, Nishibatake M, Ando M, Momma K. Confirmation that the conotruncal anomaly face syndrome is associated with a deletion within 22q11.2. Am J Med Genet. 1994;53:285–289. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320530314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mayumi M, Kimata H, Suehiro Y, Hosoi S, Ito S, Kuge Y, Shinomiya K, Mikawa H. DiGeorge syndrome with hypogammglobulinemia: a patient with excess suppressor T cell activity treated with fetal thymus transplantation. Eur J Pediatr. 1989;148:518–522. doi: 10.1007/BF00441546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Monaco G, Pignata C, Rossi E, Mascellaro O, Cocozza S, Ciccimarra F. DiGeorge anomaly associated with 10p deletion. Am J Med Genet. 1991;39:215–216. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320390220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Motzkin B, Marion R, Goldberg R, Shprintzen R, Saenger P. Variable phenotypes in velocardiofacial syndrome with chromosomal deletion. J Pediatr. 1993;123:406–410. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81740-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Muller W, Peter H H, Kallfelz H C, Franz A, Rieger C H. The DiGeorge sequence. II. Immunologic findings in partial and complete forms of the disorder. Eur J Pediatr. 1989;149:96–103. doi: 10.1007/BF01995856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Muller W, Peter H H, Wilken M, Juppner H, Kallfelz H C, Krohn H P, Miller K, Rieger C H. The DiGeorge syndrome. I. Clinical evaluation and course of partial and complete forms of the syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1988;147:496–502. doi: 10.1007/BF00441974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nango K I, Inaba M, Inaba K, Adachi Y, Than S, Ishida T, Kumamoto T, Uyama M, Ikehara S. Ontogeny of thymic B cells in normal mice. Cell Immunol. 1991;133:109–115. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(91)90183-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pinchas-Hamiel O, Engelberg S, Mandel M, Passwell J H. Immune hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and liver disease in a patient with DiGeorge syndrome. Isr J Med Sci. 1994;30:530–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rasmussen S A, Williams C A, Ayoub E M, Sleasman J W, Gray B A, Bent-Williams A, Stalker H J, Zori R T. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in velo-cardio-facial syndrome: coincidence or unusual complication. Am J Med Genet. 1996;64:546–550. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960906)64:4<546::AID-AJMG4>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ryan A K, Goodship J A, Wilson D I, Philip N, Levy A, Seidel H, Schuffenhauer S, Oechsler H, Belohradsky B, Prieur M, Aurias A, Raymond F L, Clayton-Smith J, Hatchwell E, McKeown C, Beemer F A, Dallapiccola B, Novelli G, Hurst J A, Ignatius J, Green A J, Winter R M, Brueton L, Brondum-Nielson K, Stewart F, Van Essen T, Patton M, Paterson J, Scambler P J. Spectrum of clinical features associated with interstitial chromosome 22q11 deletions: a European collaborative study. J Med Genet. 1997;34:798–804. doi: 10.1136/jmg.34.10.798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Scambler P J, Carey A H, Wyse R K, Roach S, Dumanski J P, Nordenskjold M, Williamson R. Microdeletions within 22q11 associated with sporadic and familial DiGeorge syndrome. Genomics. 1991;10:201–206. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90501-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Scambler P J, Kelly D, Lindsay E, Williamson R, Goldberg R, Shprintzen R, Wilson D I, Goodship J A, Cross I E, Burn J. Velo-cardio-facial syndrome associated with chromosome 22 deletions encompassing the DiGeorge locus. Lancet. 1992;339:1138–1139. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90734-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schubert M S, Moss R B. Selective polysaccharide antibody deficiency in familial DiGeorge syndrome. Ann Allerg. 1992;69:231–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sirianni M C, Businco L, Fiore L, Seminara R, Aiuti F. T-cell subsets and natural killer cells in DiGeorge and SCID patients. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1983;19:107–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sirianni M C, Businco L, Seminara R, Aiuti F. Severe combined immunodeficiencies, primary T-cell defects and DiGeorge syndrome in humans: characterization by monoclonal antibodies and natural killer cell activity. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1983;28:361–370. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(83)90103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Smith C A, Driscoll D A, Emanuel B S, McDonald-McGinn D M, Zackai E H, Sullivan K E. Increased prevalence of immunoglobulin A deficiency in patients with the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DiGeorge syndrome/velocardiofacial syndrome) Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998;5:415–417. doi: 10.1128/cdli.5.3.415-417.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sullivan K, McDonald-McGuinn D, Driscoll D, Reed L, Emanuel B S, Zackai E, Athreya B H, Keenan G. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-like polyarthritis in chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DiGeorge anomald/velocardiofacial syndrome/conotruncal anomaly face syndrome) Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:430–436. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sullivan K E, Jawad A F, Randall P, Driscoll D A, Emanuel B S, McDonald-McGinn D M, Zackai E H. Lack of correlation between impaired T cell production, immunodeficiency and other phenotypic features in chromosome 22q11.2 deletions syndrome (DiGeorge syndrome/velocardiofacial syndrome) Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1998;84:141–146. doi: 10.1006/clin.1997.4463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wilson D I, Burn J, Scambler P, Goodship J. DiGeorge syndrome: part of CATCH 22. J Med Genet. 1993;30:852–856. doi: 10.1136/jmg.30.10.852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wilson D I, Cross I E, Goodship J A, Brown J, Scambler P J, Bain H H, Taylor J F, Walsh K, Bankier A, Burn J, Wolstenholme J. A prospective cytogenetic study of 36 cases of DiGeorge syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51:957–963. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wulfsberg E A, Leana-Cox J, Neri G. What’s in a name? Chromosome 22q abnormalities and the DiGeorge, velocardiofacial, and conotruncal anomalies face syndromes. Am J Med Genet. 1996;65:317–319. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19961111)65:4<317::AID-AJMG13>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES