Skip to main content
The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital logoLink to The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
. 2022 Sep 22;56(3):427–434. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.69851

Colistin Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Children: Caution Required for Nephrotoxicity

Gulnihan Ustundag 1,, Eda Karadag Oncel 1, Aslihan Sahin 1, Yildiz Ekemen Keles 1, Ahu Kara Aksay 1, Dilek Yilmaz Ciftdogan 1,2
PMCID: PMC9580973  PMID: 36304221

Abstract

Objectives

Colistin has come to the fore as a treatment option, especially with the occurrence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections across the world. However, the high nephrotoxic effects of colistin should be taken into consideration in children. The study’s primary outcome was to determine the clinical success of the colistin treatment, and the secondary outcome was to detect the side effects related to colistin.

Methods

The patients who received intravenous colistin in our hospital’s last 5 years were included in the study. In addition to the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, the clinical success of the colistin treatment, 28-day infection-related mortality of the patients, and side effects of colistin were recorded.

Results

A total of 37 patients received colistin therapy during 2015–2019. Four of these patients had colistin treatment twice a year, so we accepted them as separate cases in each infection attack. Therefore, 41 cases were included in the study. The median age of the cases was 26 months (IQR: 4.50–144.50) and 27 (65.9%) were male. Twenty-seven cases (65.9%) had sepsis. The median dose of colistin was 4.2 (IQR: 3–5) mg/kg/day. Among 44 cultures obtained from the patients, the most common microorganism was Acinetobacter baumannii, with 58.5%. The clinical success was detected in 18 patients (43.9%). While overall nephrotoxicity developed in 14 (34.1%) patients, only two of them needed dialysis.

Conclusion

Colistin should not be considered the first choice in treating Gram-negative infections but should be kept as salvage therapy in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections across the world. During the treatment process, close monitoring of renal function tests and urinary output were recommended due to the risk of developing nephrotoxicity.

Keywords: Children, colistin, multidrug-resistant gram-negative microorganism, nephrotoxicity


A worldwide increase in the incidence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections (MDR-GNIs) has driven clinicians to seek agents other than conventional antibiotics for treatment success. Polymyxin E (colistin), which is useful on many Gram-negative bacilli, including Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Yersinia spp., and Citrobacter spp., comes to mind at this stage.[1] The polymyxins were derived from a bacterium called Paenibacillus polymyxa and classified in polypeptide antibiotics.[2,3] Colistin was developed in the 1940s, but it was withdrawn from usage due to its high toxicity. However, it was reintroduced as a rescue therapy in infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacilli. The revival was not because of colistin improved side effect profile but because of the obligation to use it as a last resort.[4] Therefore, in severely ill patients, colistin high nephrotoxic and neurotoxic effects should be taken into consideration.[5]

This study aimed to determine colistin effect in pediatric patients infected with MDR Gram-negative bacteria. The study’s primary outcome was to determine the clinical success of the colistin treatment. The secondary outcome was to detect side effects related to colistin and analyze the clinical and laboratory findings of the patients who received intravenous colistin.

Methods

Study Population

In this study, 37 pediatric patients who received intravenous colistin between 2015 and 2019 in our hospital were included in the study. Four of these patients had colistin treatment twice a year, so we accepted them as separate cases in each infection attack. Therefore, 41 cases were included in the study. The statistical analyses were performed with the data of 41 cases. Having at least 14 days interim with negative culture results from the last dose of first colistin therapy to the initial dose of second colistin therapy in the same patient was accepted as the criteria of declaring as separate cases. Including criteria were being children aged from newborn to 18 years, and receiving colistin by intravenous route, whereas excluding criteria were receiving colistin <48 h and <2 doses. Demographic characteristics such as age and gender; diagnosis (sepsis, pneumonia, etc.) and underlying conditions such as trauma, cardiovascular disease, neurologic disease, medical devices (presence of a central venous catheter, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, external ventricular drain, tracheostomy, ileostomy-colostomy, and endotracheal tube), length of hospitalization, length and dose of colistin therapy, concurrent other antibiotic usage, concomitant nephrotoxic agent usage, microorganisms isolated from different body side’s culture and their antibiograms, the type of infection side, laboratory analyses of the patients, nephrotoxicity, and neurotoxicity due to colistin, clinical success, microbiological eradication status, and 28-day infection-related mortality of the patients were recorded retrospectively from the hospital records.

Definitions and Clinical Practices

MDR Gram-negative organism is defined as being resistant against at least three different types of antibiotics that have an intrinsic activity to Gram-negative bacteria.[6] The isolates were identified to species level using the MALDI TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics). Colistin susceptibility test was performed by broth microdilution test as recommended by the EUCAST. The patients’ diagnoses were determined according to the body sides (blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, cerebrospinal fluid [CSF], and wound culture swab), where a Gram-negative organism was obtained. We observed MDR-GNIs in the body sides, so we decided to initiate colistin treatment for documented MDR-GNIs. There was clinical worsening in some patients despite using conventional antibiotics with intrinsic activity to Gram-negative organisms, including carbapenems. We could not demonstrate a documented infection of those patients’ cultures; therefore, colistin was started empirically. The decision to initiate colistin was made after the pediatric infectious diseases’ consultation. Clinical success was assessed as patients’ survival in 28 days and microbiological eradication of the culprit agent within 7 days of the colistin initiation.[7] In patients who had the colistin treatment as empirically and absent control culture for determining the eradication, only survival situation was assessed to detect the clinical success. Patients were monitored in terms of renal functions, neurologic findings, and other laboratory parameters. Nephrotoxicity was defined according to RIFLE (acronym indicating Risk of renal dysfunction; Injury to the kidney; Failure of kidney function, Loss of kidney function and End-stage kidney disease) criteria. If a patient was consistent with the findings even at the first step of RIFLE criteria (risk of renal dysfunction; urinary output <0.5 mg/kg/h × 6 h, increased serum creatinine × 1.5, and GFR decrease >25%), it was accepted as nephrotoxicity, and colistin therapy was immediately discontinued.[8] Neurotoxicity may manifest itself as vertigo, dizziness, seizures, diplopia, ataxia, altered mental status, delirium, paresthesia, and neuromuscular blockade.[9]

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to represent the subjects’ baseline characteristics, depending on the normality of distribution. Values for continuous variables were provided either as mean-standard deviations (SD) or as medians (interquartile range). Frequencies of nominal variables were presented as percentages. Comparisons between groups for categorical variables were made using the Chi-square (χ2) test. For two-group comparisons of independent variables, the Student’s t-test was used as a parametric test, whereas the Mann–Whitney U-test was the preferred non-parametric test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) statistical package. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Ethical Considerations

Ethics committee approval was obtained for non-interventional clinical research on January 23, 2020, and with the 2020/1–14 protocol number at our hospital’s ethics committee. All investigational procedures conform to the Declaration of Helsinki guiding principles.

Results

The median age of the 41 cases included in the study was 26 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.50–144.50). Twenty-seven (65.9%) of the cases were male and 14 were female (34.1%). Almost all of the patients (97.5%) had an underlying disease or a facilitating factor. Diagnoses of the cases were evaluated; 27 of them (65.9%) had sepsis, 8 (19.5%) had pneumonia, 4 (9.8%) had central nervous system infection, and 2 (4.9%) had soft-tissue infection.

Twenty cases (48.8%) were hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), 5 (12.2%) in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 2 (4.8%) in neonatal surgical intensive care unit, and 1 (2.5%) in anesthesia intensive care unit. The other patients (n=13, 31.7%) were in pediatrics clinics and neurosurgical clinics. The mean hospitalization day was 78.17 (±52.38) days and the median treatment time was 14 days (IQR: 10–18). The median dose of colistin was 4.2 (IQR: 3–5) mg/kg/day.

The preferred combination antimicrobial therapies with colistin for synergistic impact were meropenem (51.2%), aminoglycosides (36.6%), and ceftazidime or sulbactam-ampicillin (12.2%). Other concomitant antimicrobials were antifungal agents (51.2%) and glycopeptides (43.9%). No resistance occurred during colistin treatment.

As for the usage of other nephrotoxic agents, 12 cases (29.2%) received ranitidine, 11 cases (26.8%) received levetiracetam, 10 cases (24.4%) received epinephrine, 4 cases (9.7%) had topiramate, 3 cases (7.3%) had caffeine, 3 cases (7.3%) had dexmedetomidine, and 2 cases had tacrolimus (4.8%). Acinetobacter baumannii was isolated in 58.5% of the patients, Klebsiella pneumoniae in 20%, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 12.2%. The agents were detected in 44 cultures; blood in 18 cultures (40.9%), and BAL fluid in 11 cultures (25%) preponderantly. Other cultures were obtained from urine, CSF, wound swap, catheter, and peritoneal fluid. Of 41 cases, 33 (80.5%) had at least one medical device. The 28-day infection-related mortality was found 29.3% in our study. Microbiological eradication was detected in 14 patients (34.1%), and clinical success was detected in 18 patients (43.9%). Clinical and bacteriologic characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical and bacteriologic characteristics of the patients

Case Diagnoses Site of infection Medical devices Underlying facilitating factor Microorganisms Nephrotoxicity Colistin dosage (mg/kg/day) Microbiological eradicationc Outcome Clinical success
1 Stump infection Wound swab None Arm amputation KP No 3.4 N/A Cured Yes
2 Septic shock Blood, urine, BAL CVC, ETT, thorax tube VSD, pulmonary hypertension KP, AB Yes N/A No Exitus No
3 VAP BAL CVC, ETT Down syndrome, AVDS AB Yes N/A No Exitus No
4 CNS infection - CVC, VP shunt, EVD Hydrocephalus - Yes 5 N/A Cured Yes
5 VAP BAL Tracheostomy Hypotonic infant AB No N/A No Cured No
6 VAP BAL CVC, tracheostomy, urinary catheter Motorcycle crash AB No N/A Yes Cured Yes
7 VAP BAL Tracheostomy Respiratory aspiration, asphyxia AB No 4.32 N/A Cured Yes
8 Urosepsis Urine None None KP, Acinetobacter spp. No N/A Yes Cured Yes
9 CNS infection, pneumonia BAL ETT, EVD Epilepsy, post-resuscitation KP No N/A N/A Exitus No
10 Sepsis Blood CVC, ETT ALL-HRG AB No N/A No Cured No
11 Sepsis Blood, catheter CVC, ETT ALL-HRG AB No N/A Yes Exitus No
12 Gastroenteritis, pneumonia Blood CVC, ETT Sequelae of HIE PA No 5 No Cured No
13 Gastroenteritis, pneumonia Blood None Sequelae of HIE AB No 3 Yes Cured Yes
14 Septic shock Blood CVC, ETT CP, epilepsy AB No N/A Yes Cured Yes
15 Urosepsis Urine CVC Short bowel syndrome, malnutrition PA No 5 No Cured No
16 Urosepsis Urine Clean intermittent catheterization MMC, hydrocephalus, neurogenic bladder AB No 2.5 No Cured No
17 VAP BAL CVC, ETT HLH, MOD AB Yes N/A No Exitus No
18 Sepsis Blood VP shunt Hydrocephalus AB No 4 Yes Cured Yes
19 Sepsis Blood CVC, ETT Prematurity AB No N/A Yes Cured Yes
20 VAP Catheter CVC, tracheostomy Hypotonic infant AB Yes 5 No Cured No
21 Sepsis CSF CVC, ETT, urinary catheter Motorcycle crash AB No 2x150 mg/day No Exitus No
22 Sepsis Blood None Hydronephrosis AB No N/A Yes Cured Yes
23 Convulsion - CVC, urinary catheter Foreign body aspiration, right lower lobectomy - No 4.8 N/A Cured Yes
24 Septic shock BAL CVC, ETT, PEG, urinary catheter Epilepsy, MMR AB No N/A No Exitus No
25 Septic shock Blood CVC, PEG Epilepsy, MMR AB No 3.1 No Exitus No
26 Septic shock BAL None Pulmonary tuberculosis AB Yes 4.6 N/A Cured Yes
27 Sepsis Blood Umbilical catheter, ETT Prematurity, SGA AB Yes 3 Yes Exitus No
28 Sepsis - CVC Short bowel syndrome - Yes 4 N/A Cured Yes
29 Sepsis Peritoneal fluid CVC, ETT, gastrostomy, urinary catheter Short bowel syndrome KP Yesa 5 No Cured No
30 Ventriculitis BOS CVC, ETT, thorax tube, EVD Hydrocephalus KP No 3 Yes Exitus No
31 Sepsis Blood None CP, epilepsy, truncus arteriosus PA Yes 0.6 No Cured No
32 Sepsis BAL, blood CVC, ETT PDA, TAPVR AB Yesb N/A No Exitus No
33 Urosepsis Blood, urine None Exstrophy vesicae AB No 5 Yes Cured Yes
34 Sepsis Blood ETT Intestinal perforation KP No 5 No Cured No
35 Sepsis BAL, blood CVC, ETT Sequelae of encephalitis, hydatid cysts AB No N/A No Cured No
36 Sepsis Blood CVC, ETT CP, epilepsy, hypertension PA Yes N/A No Cured No
37 Septic arthritis Tissue biopsy None Knee injury with a cutting tool PA No 3 N/A Cured Yes
38 CNS infection BOS VP shunt, EVD Hydrocephalus AB Yes 4 Yes Cured Yes
39 Sepsis Catheter Port catheter, ileostomy Intestinal pseudo-obstruction KP Yes 5 N/A Cured Yes
40 Sepsis Urine CVC, ETT Prematurity KP No 5 Yes Exitus No
41 Sepsis Blood CVC, tracheostomy SMA type I AB No 2.5 Yes Cured Yes
a

Case 29 needed hemodiafiltration (HDF) due to renal insufficiency. bCase 32 needed peritoneal dialysis due to renal insufficiency. cThe patients who had the colistin treatment as empirically or absent control culture were classified in N/A. VAP: Ventilator-associated pneumonia; CNS: Central nervous system; BAL: Bronchoalveolar lavage; CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid; CVC: Central venous catheter; ETT: Endotracheal tube; VP: Ventriculoperitoneal; EVD: External ventricular drain; PEG: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; VSD: Ventricular septal defect; AVSD: Atrioventricular septal defect; ALL: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; HRG: High-risk group; HIE: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; CP: Cerebral palsy; MMC: Meningomyelocele; HLH: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; MOD: Multiorgan dysfunction; MMR: Motor-mental retardation; SGA: Small for gestational age; PDA: Patent ductus arteriosus; TAPVR: Total anomalous pulmonary venous return; SMA: Spinal muscular atrophy; KP: Klebsiella pneumoniae; AB: Acinetobacter baumannii; PA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; N/A: Not applicable.

When the relationship of clinical and laboratory features on clinical success was evaluated, the mean platelet count was significantly lower (p=0.007), the median of the C-reactive protein was significantly higher (p=0.022), and the ICU admission was more frequent in those with clinical failure (p<0.001). Comparison laboratory analyses and intensive care unit hospitalization ratio in both groups are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Comparison laboratory analyses and intensive care unit hospitalization ratio between the patients with clinical success and failure

Clinical success (n=18) Clinical failure (n=23) p
Laboratory analyses
Hemoglobin (gr/dL)a 10.74 (2.63) 9.34 (1.30) 0.50
WBC (×103/uL)b 12.8 (10.0–16.8) 10.3 (7.7–15.4) 0.248
ANC (×103/uL)b 8.1 (4.7–11.6) 7.8 (5.1–9.7) 0.700
ALC (×103/uL)b 2.2 (1.9–4.9) 1.6 (1–2.7) 0.059
PLT (×103/uL)a 356 (220) 191 (147) 0.007*
CRP (mg/L)b 18.1 (2.5–64.3) 55.1 (22.9–124.1) 0.022*
PCT (µg/L)b 1.25 (0.37–19.8) 13.2 (1.5–36.0) 0.136
Overall intensive care unitsc 7 (38.9) 21 (91.3) <0.001*
Overall pediatric servicesc 11 (61.1) 2 (8.7)
a

Values were given as mean (SD); bvalues were given as median (IQR); cvalues were given as n (%); SD: Standard deviation; IQR: Interquartile range; WBC: White blood cell; ANC: Absolute neutrophil count; ALC: Absolute lymphocyte count; PLT: Platelets; CRP: C-reactive protein; PCT: Procalcitonin.

Nephrotoxicity developed in 14 of the patients (34.1%) and two of them needed dialysis. Nephrotoxicity and its relation with age, gender, and the ward where the patients were hospitalized, underlying conditions, dose of colistin, length of colistin treatment, and usage of concomitant nephrotoxic agents were analyzed. No statistical relation was found with age, gender, the ward, underlying condition, dose of colistin, length of colistin treatment, and concomitant nephrotoxic agent usage (p=0.173, p=0.123, p=0.308, p=0.466, p=0.542, p=0.609, and p=0.129, respectively). One patient (2.4%) had facial paralysis, which is counted in neurotoxicity.

Discussion

Colistin, which is used in treating many Gram-negative microorganisms, is preferred as a last resort, especially in infections caused by A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.[10-12] In particular, A. baumannii is of great concerning pathogen with mortality rates up to 72.7%, especially in central nervous system infections, and needs to be treated not only by intravenous antibiotics but also intraventricularly or intrathecally routes in certain patients.[13] Canturan et al. remarked that in the intensive care unit, among overall ventilator-associated pneumoniae in adults, 63% was caused by A. baumannii and that it was a growing concern in terms of rapidly gaining resistance against antimicrobial agents.[14] It was noted that over half of the patients (58.5%) had A. baumannii in our study, similar to the literature.

When the characteristics of the patients were evaluated, as in other studies, male gender was predominantly seen in our study (65.9%).[15-17] Most of them had an underlying disease, facilitating factor, or medical devices that might make our population vulnerable to infectious agents. We frequently encounter MDR-GNI due to carbapenems’ constant usage, especially in PICU and NICU in our hospital. In the study we conducted, a high ratio of ICU admission was noted, and the most common concurrent antibiotic was meropenem as well. The most common diagnosis was sepsis (65.9%) among the cases. In the study conducted by Karbuz et al. in 2014, ventilator-associated pneumonia was the most frequent diagnosis.[18]

The clinical success with colistin therapy was detected 43.9% in our study. In Sahbudak et al.’s study. the clinical response was found to be 76% colistin treatment courses and clinical success was assessed as clinical improvement of the patients, absence of radiologic deterioration, and negative culture.[10] In the study of Anne et al., in where the clinical response was evaluated in children with extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative urinary tract infection, patients who received combination therapy with colistin had a higher clinical success rate than the patients who were treated without colistin.[19]

Moreover, there are also adult studies regarding colistin treatment success. In Li and Abad CLR’s. study demonstrated that patients who had MDR-GNI and were treated with colistin, the clinical success rate was found to be 61.2%.[20] With a wide range of clinical success rates, this difference could be attributed to variations in clinical success’ criteria. The conclusion shared by different studies is that only clinical improvement or solely microbiological eradication should not be considered a reliable indicator of clinical success. In Paul et al.’s study that determined the effect of the meropenem and colistin combination therapy and colistin treatment alone on clinical success, no significant difference has found between both regimens.[21] None of the children in our study received colistin therapy alone. Therefore, the effect of combination or colistin treatment alone could not have been determined in our patients.

The 28-day infection-related mortality was found to be 29.3% in our study. Mortality was detected to be more frequent in those hospitalized in ICUs and those with thrombocytopenia. In the study of Karli et al., it was observed that the infection-related mortality rate was 14.6%.[22] In the study of Karageorgos et al., while the crude mortality rate was 29.5%, the infection-related mortality rate was reported as 16.6%.[23] The infection-related mortality ratio was the lowest (11%) in Ozsurekci et al.’s study and the second (11.5%) in Paksu et al.’s study among the articles published within 10 years.[11,15] The relatively high mortality rate of our study could be attributed to an underlying disease in most of our patients and the presence of medical devices that our patients had to use.

Since colistin is eliminated from the kidneys, the most common side effect, which may lead to the discontinuation of colistin treatment, is nephrotoxicity. However, since the drug’s first market introduction, a safer area of use has emerged thanks to purified colistin, colistin sulfate instead of colistimethate, determination of a more appropriate dosage schedule considering renal functions, and development of pediatric intensive care follow-up.[24] After intravenous administration of the prodrug colistimethate sodium, colistimethate sodium is hydrolyzed to the active drug colistin.[25] The colistin nephrotoxicity mechanism is considered damaging to renal tubular cells, probably due to the detergent effects on the cell membrane and increasing permeability.[26] In our study, we found the frequency of nephrotoxicity at 34.1%. While Sahbudak Bal et al. detected nephrotoxicity in 10.5%, Celebi et al. and Karbuz et al. reported in only 1 patient (5.8%).[10,18,27] Our high nephrotoxicity rate may be attributed to concomitant antibiotic usage, including aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, and antifungal agents. Concomitant nephrotoxic drugs that our patients used were ranitidine (29.2%), levetiracetam (26.8%), epinephrine (24.4%), topiramate (9.7%), caffeine (7.3%), dexmedetomidine (7.3%), and tacrolimus (4.8%) which might aggravate the renal injury. Although we did not find a statistically significant relation between nephrotoxicity and the usage of nephrotoxic agents, these agents may still contribute to renal injury that we did not prove through statistics because of our small sample size.

Similar studies mentioned above were conducted with critically ill patients admitted to ICUs as well, and the same risk factors for mortality and nephrotoxicity were in question. At this point, there needs to a rise in a comprehensive evaluation regarding the definitions of nephrotoxicity. In Karbuz et al.’s and Sahbudak Bal et al.’s study, nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase >50% of the baseline creatinine level compared with the value at treatment initiation or as a decline in renal function.[10,18] However, Celebi et al. defined it as an increase in serum creatinine at least 2-fold of the baseline or a 30% decrease of creatinine clearance.[27] On the other hand, we accepted oliguria alone (<0.5 mg/kg/h × 6 h) as nephrotoxicity according to RIFLE criteria. The diversity of definitions within research might affect the results.

The other reported adverse effect of colistin is neurotoxicity. The high lipid content of colistin is associated with the interaction of the neurologic structures.[28] Hypoxia, concurrent medication usage, and impaired renal function precipitate the occurrence of neurotoxicity.[24] Karageorgos et al. reported neurotoxicity due to colistin in two patients with tonic-clonic seizures on the 1st day of colistin. Neurotoxicity was detected in only 1 patient (2.4%) in our study.[23] The patient in question was diagnosed with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis but died soon after the newly developed facial paralysis on the 17th day of colistin without enlightened whether it is peripheral or central. Although the facial paralysis appeared late in the days after colistin had been administered, it was accepted as neurotoxicity since no other cause existed.

There are several limitations regarding our study. First, the sample size was relatively small and might be insufficient to determine the general population. Second, most of the patients were critically ill, having multiorgan failure, and multiple concomitant antibiotic usages, affecting the infection-related mortality and nephrotoxicity ratio. Third, the data obtained retrospectively from the hospital records were insufficient to detect the microbiological elimination. As a result, we could not determine the clinical improvement of the patients. Nevertheless, we think that the study would provide beneficial insights into using colistin in pediatric patients.

Conclusion

MDR-GNIs are related to high mortality, especially in intensive care units. Initializing colistin therapy can be considered as a means of treatment against these challenging microorganisms. Adverse effects, especially nephrotoxicity, may develop during colistin treatment, and it is vital to follow up on renal functions and daily urinary output. For those reasons, treating patients with MDR by colistin are like any port in a storm for clinicians.

Footnotes

Please cite this article as ”Ustundag G, Karadag Oncel E, Sahin A, Ekemen Keles Y, Kara Aksay A, Yilmaz Ciftdogan D. Colistin Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Children: Caution Required for Nephrotoxicity. Med Bull Sisli Etfal Hosp 2022;56(3):427–434”.

Disclosures

Ethics Committee Approval

Ethics committee approval was obtained for non-interventional clinical research on January 23, 2020, and with the 2020/1–14 protocol number at our hospital’s ethics committee. All investigational procedures conform to the Declaration of Helsinki guiding principles.

Peer-review

Externally peer-reviewed.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Authorship Contributions

Concept – E.K.O.; Design – E.K.O., G.U.; Supervision – D.Y.C., E.K.O., A.K.A.; Materials – E.K.O., G.U.; Data collection &/or processing – G.U., A.S., Y.E.K.; Analysis and/or interpretation – G.U.; Literature search – G.U., A.S., Y.E.K.; Writing – G.U.; Critical review – D.Y.C., A.K.A.

References

  • 1.Cai Y, Lee W, Kwa AL. Polymyxin B versus colistin: an update. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13:1481–97. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1093933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Storm DR, Rosenthal KS, Swanson PE. Polymyxin and related peptide antibiotics. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:723–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stansly PG, Shepherd RG, White HJ. Polymyxin: a new chemotherapeutic agent. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1947;81:43–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ortwine JK, Kaye KS, Li J, Pogue JM. Colistin: understanding and applying recent pharmacokinetic advances. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35:11–6. doi: 10.1002/phar.1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pastor M, Basas J, Vairo C, Gainza G, Moreno-Sastre M, Gomis X, et al. Safety and effectiveness of sodium colistimethate-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (SCM-NLC) against Paeruginosa: in vitro and in vivo studies following pulmonary and intramuscular administration. Nanomedicine. 2019;18:101–11. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Falagas ME, Karageorgopoulos DE. Pandrug resistance (PDR), extensive drug resistance (XDR), and multidrug resistance (MDR) among Gram-negative bacilli: need for international harmonization in terminology. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1121–2. doi: 10.1086/528867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Chen L, Press EG, Potoski BA, Marini RV, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam is superior to other treatment regimens against carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e.883–17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00883-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P, Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup Acute renal failure-definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–12. doi: 10.1186/cc2872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cheng CY, Sheng WH, Wang JT, Chen YC, Chang SC. Safety and efficacy of intravenous colistin (colistin methanesulphonate) for severe multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35:297–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sahbudak Bal Z, Kamit Can F, Yazici P, Berna Anil A, Duyu M, Yilmaz Ciftdogan D, et al. The evaluation of safety and efficacy of colistin use in pediatric intensive care unit: Results from two reference hospitals and review of literature. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24:370–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ozsurekci Y, Aykac K, Cengiz AB, Bayhan C, Sancak B, Karadag Oncel E, et al. Is colistin effective in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extremely drug-resistant (XDR) gram-negative microorganisms in children? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:233–8. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tamma PD, Newland JG, Pannaraj PS, Metjian TA, Banerjee R, Gerber JS, et al. The use of intravenous colistin among children in the United States: results from a multicenter, case series. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32:17–22. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182703790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mohammed N, Savardekar AR, Patra DP, Narayan V, Nanda A. The 21st-century challenge to neurocritical care: the rise of the superbug Acinetobacter baumannii. A meta-analysis of the role of intrathecal or intraventricular antimicrobial therapy in reduction of mortality. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43:E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Canturan SY, Yilmazer N, Sarikaya R, Avsar Z, Ertek M, Uyaner I. Retrospective assessment of ventilator-associated pneumonias due to Acinetobacter baumannii in an oncology hospital. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2021;55:193–6. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.01700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Paksu MS, Paksu S, Karadag A, Sensoy G, Asilioglu N, Yildizdas D, et al. Old agent, new experience: colistin use in the paediatric Intensive Care Unit--a multicentre study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;40:140–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Levin AS, Barone AA, Penço J, Santos MV, Marinho IS, Arruda EA, et al. Intravenous colistin as therapy for nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28:1008–11. doi: 10.1086/514732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lakshmi KS, Jayashree M, Singhi S, Ray P. Study of nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. J Trop Pediatr. 2007;53:87–92. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fml073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Karbuz A, Özdemir H, Yaman A, Kocabaş BA, Odek Ç, Güriz H, et al. The use of colistin in critically ill children in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33:e19–24. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Batalla-Bocaling CAP, Tanseco PVP, Chua ME. Treatment outcome and predictors of poor clinical response in extensively drug-resistant gram-negative urinary tract infection among children: A single-institution experience. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15:E148–52. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li KL, Abad CLR. The clinical profile and outcomes of adult patients given intravenous colistin for multidrug-resistant gram negative infections in a Philippine tertiary hospital. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;93:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paul M, Daikos GL, Durante-Mangoni E, Yahav D, Carmeli Y, Benattar YD, et al. Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:391–400. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30099-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Karli A, Paksu MS, Karadag A, Belet N, Paksu S, Guney AK, et al. Colistin use in pediatric intensive care unit for severe nosocomial infections: experience of an university hospital. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Karageorgos SA, Bassiri H, Siakallis G, Miligkos M, Tsioutis C. Intravenous colistin use for infections due to MDR Gram-negative bacilli in critically ill paediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:2497–506. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Spapen H, Jacobs R, Van Gorp V, Troubleyn J, Honoré PM. Renal and neurological side effects of colistin in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:14. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bergen PJ, Li J, Rayner CR, Nation RL. Colistin methanesulfonate is an inactive prodrug of colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:1953–8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00035-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK. Toxicity of polymyxins: a systematic review of the evidence from old and recent studies. Crit Care. 2006;10:R27. doi: 10.1186/cc3995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Celebi S, Hacimustafaoglu M, Koksal N, Ozkan H, Cetinkaya M. Colistimethate sodium therapy for multidrug-resistant isolates in pediatric patients. Pediatr Int. 2010;52:410–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.03015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Koch-Weser J, Sidel VW, Federman EB, Kanarek P, Finer DC, Eaton AE. Adverse effects of sodium colistimethate. Manifestations and specific reaction rates during 317 courses of therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1970;72:857–68. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-72-6-857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital are provided here courtesy of University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidye Etfal Training and Research Hospital

RESOURCES