Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2022 Oct 5;13:1014266. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1014266

Systematic and functional analysis of non-specific lipid transfer protein family genes in sugarcane under Xanthomonas albilineans infection and salicylic acid treatment

Juan Li 1, Jian-Ying Zhao 1, Yang Shi 1, Hua-Ying Fu 1, Mei-Ting Huang 1, Jian-Yu Meng 1, San-Ji Gao 1,*
PMCID: PMC9581186  PMID: 36275567

Abstract

Plant non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) are small basic proteins that play a significant regulatory role in a wide range of physiological processes. To date, no genome-wide survey and expression analysis of this gene family in sugarcane has been performed. In this study we identified the nsLTP gene family in Saccharum spontaneum and carried out expression profiling of nsLTPs in two sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) that have different resistance to leaf scald caused by Xanthomonas albilineans (Xa) infection. The effect of stress related to exogenous salicylic acid (SA) treatment was also examined. At a genome-wide level, S. spontaneum AP85-441 had 71 SsnsLTP genes including 66 alleles. Tandem (9 gene pairs) and segmental (36 gene pairs) duplication events contributed to SsnsLTP gene family expansion. Five SsnsLTP proteins were predicted to interact with five other proteins. Expression of ShnsLTPI.8/10/Gb.1 genes was significantly upregulated in LCP85-384 (resistant cultivar), but downregulated in ROC20 (susceptible cultivar), suggesting that these genes play a positive regulatory role in response of sugarcane to Xa infection. Conversely, ShnsLTPGa.4/Ge.3 appears to act as a negative regulator in response Xa infection. The majority (16/17) of tested genes were positively induced in LCP85-384 72 h after SA treatment. In both cultivars, but particularly in LCP85-384, ShnsLTPIV.3/VIII.1 genes were upregulated at all time-points, suggesting that the two genes might act as positive regulators under SA stress. Meanwhile, both cultivars showed downregulated ShnsLTPGb.1 gene expression, indicating its potential negative role in SA treatment responses. Notably, the ShnsLTPGb.1 gene had contrasting effects, with positive regulation of gene expression in response to Xa infection and negative regulation induced by SA stress. Together, our results provide valuable information for elucidating the function of ShnsLTP family members under two stressors and identified novel gene sources for development of sugarcane that are tolerant of environmental stimuli.

Keywords: sugarcane, nsLTP, expression analysis, defense response, Xanthomonas albilineans, salicylic acid

Introduction

Plant non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) have lipid binding activity that mediates transfer of various phospholipids, acyl groups, and fatty acids between biological membranes (Liu et al., 2015; Salminen et al., 2016; Missaoui et al., 2022). Plant nsLTPs are characterized by small molecular weight (6.5–10.5 kDa) and a backbone with an eight-cysteine motif (ECM: C-Xn-C-Xn-CC-Xn-CXC-Xn-C-Xn-C) (Wang et al., 2012; Salminen et al., 2016). Furthermore, nsLTPs have four α-helices and are stabilized by four conserved disulfide bridges (Salminen et al., 2016; Missaoui et al., 2022). The cysteine residues are engaged in these four disulfide bonds to stabilize the tertiary structure of the hydrophobic cavity and afford size plasticity that allows for binding of different lipids and hydrophobic compounds as documented in in vitro assays (Boutrot et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2015).

The classification and naming of LTPs has developed over the past two decades. Kader (1996) initially reported that plant nsLTPs could be classified into two major types, nsLTP1 (9 kDa) and nsLTP2 (7 kDa), based on the molecular size of the mature protein. Subsequently, Boutrot et al. (2008) categorized nsLTPs from three plant species into nine types (I–IX) based on sequence similarity and/or phylogenetic clustering. Edstam et al. (2011) modified this nsLTP classification system according to intron positions, presence of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) modification sites, Cys spacing in the ECM, and sequence similarity, which resulted in five major types (LTP1/2 and LTPc/d/g) and five minor types (LTPe/f/h/j/k). Salminen et al. (2016) developed a well-defined and informative naming system for LTPs and proposed classification of LTPs as conventional type (i.e., LTP1/2) and nine other types (i.e., LTPc/d/e/f/g/h/j/k/x). Recently, Fleury et al. (2019) developed an updated classification system of the nsLTP superfamily (Types I–VI, VIII, IX, and XI) in angiosperm, gymnosperm, lycophyte, and bryophyte species based on the length, composition, and structure of 797 nsLTP proteins.

Plant nsLTPs are pathogenesis-related proteins and mediate diverse biological functions such as seed development and germination, cutin and wax metabolism, and defense signal transduction, as well as stress response and regulation (Missaoui et al., 2022). Under biotic stress, plant nsLTPs play dual roles in defense responses. In wheat, TaDIR1-2 (nsLTP-Type II group) is negatively regulated in resistance to the fungal pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici that causes wheat stripe rust (Ahmed et al., 2017). Overexpression of AtLTP4.4 in transgenic wheat significantly increased resistance to blight caused by the fungus Fusarium graminearum (McLaughlin et al., 2021). The StLTP10 gene acts as a positive regulator for resistance of potato (Solanum tuberosum) to Phytophthora infestans (Wang et al., 2021). NbLTP1 from Nicotiana benthamiana promotes bamboo mosaic virus accumulation (Chiu et al., 2020) and StLTP6 from potato facilitated viral infection (Shang et al., 2022). GhnsLTPsA10 from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) positively enhanced resistance to fungi, but negatively mediates insect resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis and cotton with gene silencing (Chen et al., 2021). On the other hand, plant nsLTPs act as essential regulators against abiotic stressors. For example, TaDIR1-2 expression was significantly upregulated in wheat seedlings treated with salicylic acid (SA) or low temperature (Ahmed et al., 2017). Transgenic potato lines overexpressing StnsLTP1 displayed enhanced tolerance of heat, water-deficit, and salt stresses (Gangadhar et al., 2016). OsLTPL159 is associated with cold tolerance at the early seedling stage in japonica rice (Zhao et al., 2020). Transcriptome analysis showed that BnLTP genes were involved in Brassica napus responses to multiple abiotic stresses such as heat, drought, NaCl, cold, indoleacetic acid, and abscisic acid (ABA) (Xue et al., 2022).

In sugarcane, expression of a putative homolog of LTPs was differentially induced in a sugarcane genotype that is resistant to eyespot disease caused by Bipolaris sacchari infection (Borrás-Hidalgo et al., 2005). Expression levels of three nsLTP transcripts were increased in sugarcane plants under water stress induced by irrigation suppression (Rodrigues et al., 2011). A nsLTP gene isolated from a sugarcane cDNA library was upregulated in IBP8518 (resistant to brown rust), but not in B4362 (susceptible to brown rust) cultivars at 5–7 days after inoculation with Puccinia melanocephala (Oloriz et al., 2012). Meanwhile, ScNsLTP gene played an opposing role in sugarcane seedlings under SA and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments, but was positively upregulated under chilling and osmotic stress (Chen et al., 2017). Recently, a nsLTP (Cluster-4871.183445) from sugarcane was shown to act as a potentially positive regulator of the defense response to Xanthomonas albilineans (Xa), the bacterial pathogen of leaf scald (Meng et al., 2020). Furthermore, numerous nsLTP genes were identified in sugarcane in response to infection with beneficial bacteria (Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus) and Acidovorax avenae, the causative bacterial pathogen for red stripe disease, as well as water depletion (de Oliveira Silva et al., 2022). Apart from these observations, systematic identification and expression analysis of the nsLTP gene family in sugarcane under diverse environmental stress is poorly understood.

Leaf scald caused by the bacterial pathogen (Xa) is one of three main bacterial diseases of sugarcane, and causes substantial loss of yield (Lin et al., 2018). SA is recognized as a key plant hormone required for host resistance responses to many pathogens (Ding and Ding, 2020), although systematic and functional analyses of this gene family in sugarcane under Xa infection and SA treatment have not been carried out. The three objectives of the present study are to conduct: (i) genome-wide identification and characterization of nsLTP gene family members in Saccharum spontaneum AP85-441; (ii) systematic analysis of expression profiling of nsLTPs in two sugarcane cultivars having contrasting resistance to leaf scald under Xa infection and SA treatment; and (iii) molecular analyses to generate important gene resources for genetic improvement of stress tolerance in sugarcane.

Materials and methods

Genomic sequence retrieval and identification of non-specific lipid transfer protein gene family members

To identify candidate nsLTPs, the genomic sequence of the AP85-441 of S. spontaneum clone was retrieved from the online sequence made available by Dr. Ming’s Laboratory1 (Zhang et al., 2018) and the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile of plant lipid transfer proteins (PF00234) was retrieved from the Pfam database.2 The HMM profile PF00234 was used as a query to search against the AP85-441 protein database using default parameters of HMMER software (Finn et al., 2011) and a cut-off value of 1e–10. Published Arabidopsis nsLTP sequences were also retrieved and used as a query to identify S. spontaneum nsLTPs with BLASTp3 searches having a cutoff value of 1e–3. Then, the candidate nsLTP sequences were manually checked and proteins lacking an ECM domain were removed. To exclude possible grain storage proteins, a BLASTp search was carried out on the protein sequence of 2S-albumin (At2S1 to At2S4) (Guerche et al., 1990) and alpha-amylase inhibitor (RATI) (Strobl et al., 1998) within the candidate S. spontaneum nsLTP proteins (termed as SsnsLTPs). Lastly, SsnsLTPs identified in AP85-441 were named according to the convention proposed by Boutrot et al. (2008).

Phylogenetic analysis, chromosomal location, and gene duplication analysis

Multiple sequence alignment of nsLTP proteins from S. spontaneum was performed using the ClustalW program in MEGA 7.0 software (Kumar et al., 2016). The phylogenetic tree of aligned sequences was constructed using MEGA7.0 software with the neighbor-joining method and bootstraps of 1,000 replicates. MapChart4 was used to map the SsnsLTPs on AP85-441 chromosomes. TBtools (Toolbox for biologists) v0.6655 (Chen et al., 2020) was used to identify gene duplication events.

In silico sequence analysis

SsnsLTP protein isoelectric points were calculated using the ExPASy Proteomics Server.5 Sequence Manipulation Set6 was used to determine the molecular weights of the proteins. The ProtParam online analysis tool7 was used to determine the theoretical pI (isoelectric point), instability index (II), aliphatic index (AI), and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY). The exon-intron distribution pattern of SsnsLTPs was searched on GSDS 2.0.8 MEME5.4.19 was used to determine conserved motifs, followed by visualization with TBtools v0.6655. Prediction of protein–protein interactions among SsnsLTPs and with other sugarcane proteins was performed according to their orthologs in Sorghum bicolor using the STRING database.10

Plant materials

The two sugarcane cultivars, LCP85-384 and ROC20, which are resistant and susceptible to leaf scald, respectively, were grown in a sugarcane nursery in Fuzhou, China. Single buds cut from healthy plant stalks were immersed under flowing tap water overnight at room temperature and then were treated with hot water at 50°C for 2 h. The disinfected buds were cultured for germination and grown in commercial nutrient soil (Pindstrup Mosebrug A/S, Fabriksvej, Denmark) in an artificial incubator for 28 days at 28°C, relative humidity 60%, and a 16/8 h light/dark cycle.

Bacterial inoculation and salicylic acid treatment

Sugarcane plants were inoculated with bacterial suspension cells (108 CFU/ml) of Xa strain Xa-FJ1 (Zhang et al., 2020) using the cutting leaf method and samples were collected from the inoculated plants at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h post inoculation (hpi). Control plants were inoculated with sterile XAL medium (liquid XAS) (Davis et al., 1994). Additional plants were sprayed with exogenous SA (0.1 mmol/L SA containing 0.01% Tween-20) and samples were collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hour post treatment (hpt). Three biological replicates (six plants each) were used for the individual time points in both experiments. All treated plants were grown as described above.

Quantitative RT-PCR assay

Total RNA from leaves was extracted using a TRIzol reagent kit (Invitrogen, USA). The cDNA was synthesized using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix with a qPCR (+gDNA wiper) reverse transcription kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). The relative transcription level of nine selected nsLTP genes in the sugarcane cultivars (termed ShnsLTPs) was determined using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech). ShnsLTP gene sequences were collected from RNA-seq data, and gene-specific primers were designed using Primer Premier 6 software11 (Supplementary Table 1). The SYBR Green dye method was used for qPCR assays with 20 μl reaction volumes that included 0.4 μl of both forward and reverse primers (10 μM), 1 μl cDNA, 10 μl 2× ChamQ SYBR qPCR Master Mix, and 8.2 μl nuclease-free water. A qPCR standard program was conducted on a QuantStudio 3 fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) with initial denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 62°C for 30 s. Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were used for all samples. The housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a reference gene and ShnsLTP expression levels from different samples were normalized using the 2–ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

Statistical analysis

The relative expression levels of each gene were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the SNK (Student–Newman–Keuls) test was used to determine significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) among means. All analyses were carried out using SAS version 8.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Identification and properties of SsnsLTP proteins

Among 158 truncated candidate SsnsLTP sequences, 87 protein sequences were discarded including 63 protein sequences that had incomplete ECM domains or lacked signal peptides, as well as 12 proline-rich proteins, 6 α-amylase/trypsin inhibitors and 6 2S albumin storage proteins. A total of 71 SsnsLTP genes were obtained and classified into two categories according to sequence similarity and the presence or absence of a GPI-anchor. The 71 SsnsLTPs were also divided into 13 types (I–VIII and Ga-Ge) with varying numbers of genes in each type. Type I had the most genes (22) and Types VI and VIII each had only one gene (Supplementary Table 2).

The ECM structural features in the 71 identified SsnsLTP proteins are summarized in Figure 1. These SsnsLTP proteins possessed unique ECM structural features, while those within GPI-anchor sites had the conserved C4X12C5 motif except for proteins in class Gb, which had three kinds of motifs (C4X12C5, C4X12–14C5, and/or C4X14C5). SsnsLTP-I proteins had two conserved motifs: C4X19C5 and C7X13C8. SsnsLTP-Gb, –Ga, –IV, and –VIII class proteins contained the motif C7X19C8, and those in Class SsnsLTP-III, –VII, –GC, and –Gd classes possessed the C4X12C5 motif. SsnsLTPV contained the C1X14C2 motif and were clustered in type V (SsnsLTPV).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Characteristics of ECM structure for nsLTP family genes identified in S. spontaneum AP85-441. “X” represents any amino acid, and the Arabic number beside “X” represents the number of amino acid residues.

All identified SsnsLTP genes encoded proteins having varying numbers of amino acids, which ranged from 105 to 714. The protein molecular weights were between 10,895.75 and 76,418.3 Da. The isoelectric points (4.41–10.08), instability indexes (29.02–83.71), aliphatic indexes (73.24–107.19), and GRAVY (−0.02 to 0.64) also varied among the SsnsLTP proteins (Supplementary Table 2).

Phylogenetic relationships of SsnsLTPs

To better understand the evolutionary relationship among SsnsLTPs, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the 71 SsnsLTP protein sequences (Figure 2). The phylogenetic grouping of the SsnsLTP proteins was essentially identical to the classification based on ECM structural features. All 22 SsnsLTPs from class I (SsnsLTPI) clustered into a unique phylogenetic clade. Meanwhile, some SsnsLTPs from different classes clustered into the same phylogenetic clade. For example, 16 SsnsLTPs from four classes (SsnsLTPs-III, –VII, –GC, and –Gd), 19 SsnsLTPs from four classes (SsnsLTPs-IV, –VIII, –GB, and –Ga), and 14 SsnsLTPs from four classes (SsnsLTPs-II, –Ge, –V, and –VI) were grouped in three phylogenetic clades.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree of 71 SsnsLTP genes identified in S. spontaneum. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Genes shaded with the same color are the same type and black stars indicate G groups having a GPI gene.

Gene structure analysis of SsnsLTPs

Analysis of intron-exon structure and conserved motifs of all 71 SsnsLTPs showed that SsnsLTPGa.4/Gb.2/Gd.2, SsnsLTPI.4/5/7, SsnsLTPII.3/4, SsnsLTPIII.1/2, SsnsLTPIv.4/6, SsnsLTPv.1 had only one exon and lacked both introns and a UTR structure. Other SsnsLTPs had 1–2 introns, 1–3 exons, and UTR structures (Figure 3). SsnsLTPV.3 had the longest intron structure, followed by SsnsLTPV.5 and SsnsLTPGe.2. All SsnsLTP proteins had Motif 2, while Motif 1 was found in most SsnsLTPs except for four genes in SsnsLTPII and five genes in SsnsLTPV. Motif 4 was observed in all SsnsLTP types except for SsnsLTPI. Motif 8 was present in 13% (9/71) of SsnsLTPs. Notably, Motif 3 and 5 were present only in SsnsLTPI, while Motif 10 was present only in SsnsLTPII. The same motif often occurred two or three times in a gene, as seen for SsnsLTPV2/3 (double Motif 1, 2, and 4), SsLTPV.3 (double Motif 2 and 4), SsLTPVIII.1 (double Motif 1), and SsLTPV.5 (triple Motif 2, 4, and 6).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Gene structure (A) and conserved motifs (B) among 71 SsnsLTPs genes in S. spontaneum. (A) Exons and untranslated regions are indicated by yellow and green boxes, respectively, and thin gray lines represent introns. The scale bar at the bottom represents the number of nucleotides. (B) Conserved motifs (1–10) identified using the MEME online database are represented by different color boxes. The scale bar at the bottom represents the number of base pairs (bp).

Chromosome location and gene duplication analysis of SsnsLTPs

Among all 71 SsnsLTPs, 92.9% (66/71) were derived from 23 SsnsLTPs with 1–4 alleles, while five SsnsLTPs lacked alleles. These SsnsLTPs localized on 23 chromosomes of S. spontaneum AP85-441 and had an uneven distribution among the different chromosomes. Only one SsnsLTP gene was present on Chromosomes 5D, 6A, 6D, and 7D. Two SsnsLTP genes occurred on chromosomes 2A, 3D, 5A, 5B, 6B, and 6C. Three or more SsnsLTP genes appeared on the other 13 chromosomes (Supplementary Figure 1). Notably, 63% (45/71) of SsnsLTPs underwent gene duplication events, including nine tandem-duplicated gene pairs and 36 segmental-duplicated gene pairs (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Gene duplication relationships of SsnsLTPs in the S. spontaneum AP85-441 genome. Gray and red lines represent all genes and SsnsLTP, respectively, that were duplicated in the genome. Chromosome names are displayed in the outermost ring.

Protein–protein interaction network among SsnsLTPs

Five SsnsLTP proteins (SsnsLTPIV.3/IV.7/VIII.1/Ga.4/Ge.3) were predicted to interact with five different proteins including the multicopper oxidase family (MCOs) (Cluster-4871.429093), 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase-10 (KCS10) (Cluster-4871.251321), nucleobase-ascorbate transporter lpe1 (LPE1) (Cluster-4871.305132), N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase (AGPR) (Cluster-4871.162409), and peroxidase (POD) (Cluster-43374.0) (Figure 5). Additionally, SsnsLTPGe.3 interacted with SsnsLTPIV.3 and SsnsLTPIV.7. Among the ten interacting proteins, LPE1, POD, and MCOs likely played key roles in the protein-protein interaction network, as evidenced by their interactions with five SsnsLTP proteins each, including three SsnsLTPs (SsnsLTPIV.3/IV.7/Ga.4). Notably, MCOs and POD interacted with each other.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Prediction of interaction network among five SsnsLTPs according to their S. bicolor orthologs. Five SsnsLTPs and five interacting proteins are represented by gray and yellow nodes, respectively.

ShnsLTP expression patterns in response to Xanthomonas albilineans infection

Transcript expression profiling by RT-qPCR assay of 12 ShnsLTPs and five genes for the abovementioned interacting proteins were investigated in two sugarcane cultivars LCP85-384 (resistant to leaf scald) and ROC20 (susceptible to leaf scald) infected with Xa. In LCP85-384, 3 genes (ShnsLTPI.8/I.10/Gb.1) were significantly upregulated by 1.3–3.2-fold at all time points (particularly 72 hpi) relative to the control (0 hpi), whereas in ROC20 these same three genes were significantly downregulated. ShnsLTPIV.3, MCOs (Cluster-4871.429093), and POD (Cluster-43374.0) genes had variable expression patterns in LCP85-384, but were dramatically increased by 1.6–10.5-fold in ROC20 at all time points. Transcript levels of two genes (ShnsLTPGa.4/Ge.3) and the KCS10 gene (Cluster-4871.251321) decreased compared to the control (0 hpi) in both cultivars over 24–72 hpi. The ShnsLTPVIII.1 gene had fluctuating expression patterns in both cultivars after Xa infection (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

Transcript expression levels of 12 ShnsLTPs and 5 interacting protein genes in LCP85-384 (resistant to leaf scald) and ROC20 (susceptible to leaf scald) sugarcane cultivars after X. albilineans infection. The bars indicate mean ± SD (n = 9). The same letters indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05).

ShnsLTP expression patterns under salicylic acid treatment

Under SA treatment, all 17 ShnsLTPs except for ShnsLTPGb.1 were significantly upregulated with an increase of 1.2–6.6-fold in LCP85-384 at 72 hpt. Six ShnsLTPs (ShnsLTPI.8/I.9/I.10/I.18/IV.7/Ge.1) and MCOs gene (Cluster-4871.429093) were downregulated in LCP85-384 soon after treatment (24 and/or 48 h). ShnsLTPGb.1 expression was significantly depressed at 48 hpt, but was unchanged at 24 and 72 hpt. Notably, transcript levels for five ShnsLTPs (ShnsLTPI.20/IV.3/VIII.1/Ga.4/Ge.3) and the AGPR gene (Cluster-4871.162409) were continuously elevated with an increase ranging from 1.4- to 6.6-fold in LCP85-384 across all time points (Figure 7). On the other hand, five ShnsLTP genes (ShnsLTPI.10/IV.7/Ga.4/Gb.1/Ge.1) and two protein genes (MCOs, Cluster-4871.429093 and AGPR, Cluster-4871.162409) were significantly downregulated or showed no significant change, whereas two ShnsLTPs (ShnsLTPI.20/IV.3) and the KCS10 gene (Cluster-4871.251321) were upregulated with an increase from 1.5- to 3.3-fold in ROC20 across all time points. ShnsLTPIII.1/Ge.3 and LPE1 expression was upregulated at 48 hpt, but had no significant change at either 24 or 72 hpt. Meanwhile, ShnsLTPI.8/I.9/I.18 and POD gene exhibited fluctuating expression patterns in ROC20 at 24–72 hpt (Figure 7).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Open in a new tab

Transcript expression levels of 12 ShnsLTPs and 5 interacting protein genes in LCP85-384 (resistant to leaf scald) and ROC20 (susceptible to leaf scald) sugarcane cultivars after exogenous salicylic acid treatment. The bars indicate mean ± SD (n = 9). The same letters indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05).

Discussion

The nsLTPs are encoded by a complex of multigene families that have varying numbers of genes and carry out key biological functions in a wide of range of plants, such as Arabidopsis, Oryza sativa, and Triticum aestivum (Boutrot et al., 2008), S. bicolor and Zea mays (Wei and Zhong, 2014), G. hirsutum (Li et al., 2016), Sesamum indicum (Song et al., 2021), Nicotiana sylvestris and Nicotiana tomentosiformis (Yang et al., 2022), Nicotiana tabacum (Yang et al., 2022), and B. napus (Liang et al., 2022; Xue et al., 2022). The number of nsLTP family genes in plants varied from 13 VvnsLTPs in Vitis vinifera (Kobayashi et al., 2011) to 461 TansLTPs in T. aestivum (Kouidri et al., 2018; Fang et al., 2020). These genes were systematically identified at a genome-wide level. Highly variable numbers of nsLTPs were also present between plant genus members such as N. sylvestris (50) vs. N. tabacum (100) (Yang et al., 2022) and Brassica rapa (127) vs. B. napus (283). In this study, we identified 71 nsLTP genes with 66 alleles in S. spontaneum AP85-441; Type I had largest number of nsLTP genes (22). Recently, de Oliveira Silva et al. (2022) used 16 sequences of Type I LTPs from sorghum (S. bicolor L. Moench) (Wang et al., 2012) as bait to search for nsLTP members in S. spontaneum and identified 21 gene members of nsLTP Type I. High variability of nsLTP family members among different plant species might be due to different polyploidization or the duplication of entire genomes during plant evolution (Van de Peer et al., 2017). In addition, our data demonstrated that gene duplication, which is an important mechanism for acquiring new genes (Magadum et al., 2013; Liang et al., 2022), of these family genes was a common occurrence in the allopolyploid sugarcane.

Our results revealed that various ShnsLTPs played an opposing role in responses to X. albilineans infection. For example, ShnsLTPI.8/I.10 might act as positive regulators, whereas ShnsLTPGa.4/Ge.3 acted as negative regulators. Previous studies documented positive regulatory roles for different nsLTP family genes in different crops under pathogenic stress. The loss-of-function mutant atltpI-4 (homolog of ShnsLTPI.8/I.10) displayed reduced crown gall formation associated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens pathogenesis (Deeken et al., 2016). Significantly enhanced levels of transcripts for the nsLTP 2-like gene (homolog of ShnsLTPI.18) were seen in tomato infected with Cladosporium fulvum (Jia et al., 2019). Additionally, AtLTP4.4 (homolog of ShnsLtpII.2) positively modulated resistance of transgenic wheat to F. graminearum by inhibiting oxidative stress induced by deoxynivalenol (DON), a virulence factor produced by this fungus (McLaughlin et al., 2021). StLTP10 (homolog of ShnsLTPI.19) enhanced resistance of potato to P. infestans by enhancing expression of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging and defense-related genes (Wang et al., 2021). Overexpression of NtLTPI.4/III.11 in tobacco enhanced tolerance to Ralstonia solanacearum (Yang et al., 2022). Notably, expression of ShnsLTPI.8 (Sspon.07G0018180-2B) and ShnsLTPI.10 (Sspon.07G0018180-3C) was upregulated in sugarcane infected with A. avenae (de Oliveira Silva et al., 2022).

On the other hand, some nsLTP family genes were previously shown to be involved in negative modulation of biotic stress. For instance, NbLTP1 (homolog of ShnsLTPI.19) from N. benthamiana contributed to accumulation of bamboo mosaic virus that possibly resulted from the regulation of lipid-binding activity of NbLTP1 by calmodulin binding or phosphorylation (Chiu et al., 2020). In potato, StLTP6 (homolog of ShnsLTPI.20) promoted viral infection by potato virus Y and S by inhibiting expression of multiple genes involved in the RNA silencing pathway (Shang et al., 2022). Interestingly, GhnsLTPsA10 from cotton (G. hirsutum) negatively mediated insect (aphid and bollworm) resistance, yet positively enhanced resistance to fungi (Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum) in transgenic Arabidopsis and silenced cotton by modulating phenylpropanoid homeostasis and/or ROS accumulation (Chen et al., 2021). Recently, de Oliveira Silva et al. (2022) demonstrated that SsnsLtpI.3 (Sspon.03G0003670-4D) and SsnsLtpV.4 (Sspon.05G0025940-2C) play a negative regulatory role in response of sugarcane to A. avenae infection. Overall, functional redundancy and divergence within one gene family in plants, particularly sugarcane, which is a complex polyploidy crop, is frequent. Once polyploidy was established, the unique retention profile of duplicated genes might explain a general increase in biological complexity (Van de Peer et al., 2017).

Production of endogenous SA is induced after pathogen infection or exogenous SA application to plants. The corresponding SA signaling pathway is activated to induce expression of defense-related genes (Ding and Ding, 2020). Sufficient evidence indicated that nsLTPs are involved not only in resistance to biotic stresses but also actively respond to abiotic stresses such as SA treatment (Yang et al., 2022). Our findings showed that the majority of ShnsLTPs were upregulated in LCP85-384 at later stages (72 hpt) of SA stress, suggesting that they might play a positive role in SA-trigged responses. In particular, ShnsLTPIV.3 expression was dramatically upregulated across all time points in both sugarcane cultivars with exogenous SA treatment. Conversely, some ShnsLTPs (e.g., ShnsLTPI.10/Gb.1) might play negative regulators in sugarcane trigged by SA stress, which is consistent with previous findings that NtLTPI.1 (homolog of ShnsLTPI.19) (Jin et al., 2015) and NtLTPI.34/NtLTPVIII.1 (Yang et al., 2022) in tobacco are strongly induced by SA. In contrast, ScNsLTP (homolog of ShnsLtpII.1) in sugarcane was inhibited by exogenous SA and downregulated across all time points, as part of the antagonistic regulation involving the MeJA signaling molecule (Chen et al., 2021). In Arabidopsis, LTP3 (homolog of ShnsLTPI.20) expression is induced by pathogens and ABA and acts as a negative regulator in SA accumulation independently of ABA-independent manner (Gao et al., 2016). Additionally, the expression of key marker genes (PR1/2/5) associated with the SA signaling pathway was increased in StLTP10 (homolog of ShnsLTPI.19)-overexpressing plants compared with wild type and StLTP10-RNAi plants, indicating that this gene may participate in SA-mediated defense pathways (Wang et al., 2021). However, little is known about endogenous SA levels and signaling or SA-mediated defense responses in sugarcane trigged by Xa infection.

Conclusion

We systematically identified 71 SsnsLTP genes (66 alleles) in the AP85-441 S. spontaneum genome and demonstrated that these genes have diverse ECM structural features and can be classified into 13 nsLTP classes. Based on transcript expression patterns of 12 ShnsLTPs in Xa-infected plants as determined by RT-qPCR, we proposed that the ShnsLTPI.8/10/Gb.1 genes might play a positive regulatory role, whereas ShnsLTPGa.4/Ge.3 genes would act as a negative regulator during Xa-infection. In addition, following SA treatment ShnsLTPIV.3/VIII.1 genes might be positive regulators, whereas ShnsLTPGb.1 would be a negative regulator. However, the mechanisms by which these genes function in host defense responses to Xa infection, particularly those involving the ROS production-scavenging system, and during activation of the SA pathway require further exploration. To better understand the function of ShnsLTPs, genetic engineering can be applied to develop transgenic sugarcane that overexpress genes associated with tolerance or knockout of suspectable genes by gene editing techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Author contributions

JL and S-JG: conceptualization and writing—review and editing. JL and YS: writing—original draft preparation. JL and J-YM: bioinformatics analysis. J-YZ, H-YF, and M-TH: experiments and data reduction. S-JG: supervision, funding acquisition, and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Funding

This work was supported by the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (grant no. CARS-170302).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1014266/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (175.5KB, docx)

References

  1. Ahmed S. M., Liu P., Xue Q., Ji C., Qi T., Guo J., et al. (2017). TaDIR1-2, a wheat ortholog of lipid transfer protein AtDIR1 contributes to negative regulation of wheat resistance against Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Front. Plant Sci. 8:521. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borrás-Hidalgo O., Thomma B. P., Carmona E., Borroto C. J., Pujol M., Arencibia A., et al. (2005). Identification of sugarcane genes induced in disease-resistant somaclones upon inoculation with Ustilago scitaminea or Bipolaris sacchari. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 43 1115–1121. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boutrot F., Chantret N., Gautier M. F. (2008). Genome-wide analysis of the rice and Arabidopsis non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) gene families and identification of wheat nsLTP genes by EST data mining. BMC Genomics 9:86–105. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen B., Zhang Y., Sun Z., Liu Z., Zhang D., Yang J., et al. (2021). Tissue-specific expression of GhnsLTPs identified via GWAS sophisticatedly coordinates disease and insect resistance by regulating metabolic flux redirection in cotton. Plant J. 107 831–846. 10.1111/tpj.15349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen C., Chen H., Zhang Y., Thomas H. R., Frank M. H., He Y., et al. (2020). TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13 1194–1202. 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen Y., Ma J., Zhang X., Yang Y., Zhou D., Yu Q., et al. (2017). A novel non-specific lipid transfer protein gene from sugarcane (NsLTPs), obviously responded to abiotic stresses and signaling molecules of SA and MeJA. Sugar Tech. 19 17–25. 10.1007/s12355-016-0431-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiu L. Y., Chen I. H., Hsu Y. H., Tsai C. H. (2020). The lipid transfer protein 1 from Nicotiana benthamiana assists bamboo mosaic virus accumulation. Viruses 12:1361. 10.3390/v12121361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis M. J., Rott P., Baudin P., Dean J. L. (1994). Evaluation of selective media and immunoassays for detection of Xanthomonas albilineans, causal agent of sugarcane leaf scald disease. Plant Dis. 78 78–82. 10.1094/PD-78-0078 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. de Oliveira Silva L., da Silva Pereira L., Pereira J. L., Gomes V. M., Grativol C. (2022). Divergence and conservation of defensins and lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) from sugarcane wild species and modern cultivar genomes. Funct. Integr. Genomics 22 235–250. 10.1007/s10142-022-00832-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deeken R., Saupe S., Klinkenberg J., Riedel M., Leide J., Hedrich R., et al. (2016). The nonspecific lipid transfer protein AtLtpI-4 is involved in suberin formation of Arabidopsis thaliana crown galls. Plant Physiol. 172 1911–1927. 10.1104/pp.16.01486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ding P., Ding Y. (2020). Stories of salicylic acid: A plant defense hormone. Trends Plant Sci. 25 549–565. 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Edstam M. M., Viitanen L., Salminen T. A., Edqvist J. (2011). Evolutionary history of the non-specific lipid transfer proteins. Mol. Plant 4 947–964. 10.1093/mp/ssr019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fang Z. W., He Y. Q., Liu Y. K., Jiang W. Q., Song J. H., Wang S. P., et al. (2020). Bioinformatic identification and analyses of the non-specific lipid transfer proteins in wheat. J. Integr. Agr. 19 1170–1185. 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62776-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Finn R. D., Clements J., Eddy S. R. (2011). HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 39 29–37. 10.1093/nar/gkr367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fleury C., Gracy J., Gautier M. F., Pons J. L., Dufayard J. F., Labesse G., et al. (2019). Comprehensive classification of the plant non-specific lipid transfer protein superfamily towards its sequence-structure-function analysis. Peer J. 7:e7504. 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gangadhar B. H., Sajeesh K., Venkatesh J., Baskar V., Abhinandan K., Yu J. W., et al. (2016). Enhanced tolerance of transgenic potato plants over-expressing non-specific lipid transfer protein-1 (StnsLTP1) against multiple abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1228. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gao S., Guo W., Feng W., Liu L., Song X., Chen J. (2016). LTP3 contributes to disease susceptibility in Arabidopsis by enhancing abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17 412–426. 10.1111/mpp.12290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guerche P., Tire C., De Sa F. G., Clercq A. D., Krebbers M. E. (1990). Differential expression of the Arabidopsis 2s albumin genes and the effect of increasing gene family size. Plant Cell 2 469–478. 10.2307/3869096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jia Z., Shan H., Ting Z., Jing J., Jing L. (2019). Bioinformatics and expression pattern analysis of Tomato nsLTP 2-like cDNA full-length gene clone. J. Northeast Agric. Univ. (Engl. Ed.) 26 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jin D., Yang J., Li F., Wang R., Luo Z., Wu M., et al. (2015). Cloning and expression analysis of non-specific lipid transfer protein gene from Nicotiana tabacum. Tob. Sci. Technol. 000 12–20. 10.16135/j.issn1002-0861.20150103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kader J. C. (1996). Lipid-transfer proteins in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47 627–654. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kobayashi Y., Motose H., Iwamoto K., Fukuda H. (2011). Expression and genome-wide analysis of the xylogen-type gene family. Plant Cell Physiol. 52 1095–1106. 10.1093/pcp/pcr060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kouidri A., Whitford R., Suchecki R., Kalashyan E., Baumann U. (2018). Genome-wide identification and analysis of non-specific lipid transfer proteins in hexaploid wheat. Sci. Rep. 8:17087. 10.1038/s41598-018-35375-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. (2016). MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33:1870. 10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li F., Fan K., Ma F., Yue E., Bibi N., Wang M., et al. (2016). Genomic identification and comparative expansion analysis of the non-specific lipid transfer protein gene family in Gossypium. Sci. Rep. 6 1–15. 10.1038/srep38948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liang Y., Huang Y., Chen K., Kong X., Li M. (2022). Characterization of non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) gene families in the Brassica napus pangenome reveals abundance variation. BMC Plant Biol. 22:21. 10.1186/s12870-021-03408-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin L. H., Ntambo M. S., Rott P. C., Wang Q. N. (2018). Molecular detection and prevalence of Xanthomonas albilineans, the causal agent of sugarcane leaf scald, in China. Crop. Prot. 109 17–23. 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.02.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu F., Zhang X., Lu C., Zeng X. H. (2015). Non-specific lipid transfer proteins in plants: Presenting new advances and an integrated functional analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 66 5663–5681. 10.1093/jxb/erv313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCt Method. Methods 25 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Magadum S., Banerjee U., Murugan P., Gangapur D., Ravikesavan R. (2013). Gene duplication as a major force in evolution. J. Genet. 92 155–161. 10.1007/s12041-013-0212-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McLaughlin J. E., Darwish N. I., Garcia-Sanchez J., Tyagi N., Trick H. N., McCormick S., et al. (2021). A lipid transfer protein has antifungal and antioxidant activity and suppresses Fusarium head blight disease and DON accumulation in transgenic wheat. Phytopathology 111 671–683. 10.1094/PHYTO-04-20-0153-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meng J. Y., Ntambo M. S., Rott P. C., Fu H. Y., Gao S. J. (2020). Identification of differentially expressed proteins in sugarcane in response to infection by Xanthomonas albilineans using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. Microorganisms 8:76. 10.3390/microorganisms8010076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Missaoui K., Gonzalez K. Z., Pazos C. D., Hernandez R. G., Garrido A. M., Brini F., et al. (2022). Plant non-specific lipid transfer proteins: An overview. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 171 115–127. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Oloriz M., I, Gil V., Rojas L., Portal O., Izquierdo Y., Jiménez E., et al. (2012). Sugarcane genes differentially expressed in response to Puccinia melanocephala infection: Identification and transcript profiling. Plant Cell Rep. 31 955–969. 10.1007/s00299-011-1216-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rodrigues F. A., Graça J. P., Laia M. L., Nhani A., Jr., Galbiati J. A., Ferro M. I. T., et al. (2011). Sugarcane genes differentially expressed during water deficit. Biol. Plant 55 43–53. 10.1007/s10535-011-0006-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Salminen T. A., Blomqvist K., Edqvist J. (2016). Lipid transfer proteins: Classification, nomenclature, structure, and function. Planta 244 971–997. 10.1007/s00425-016-2585-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shang K., Xu Y., Cao W., Xie X., Zhang Y., Zhang J., et al. (2022). Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) non-specific lipid transfer protein StLTP6 promotes viral infection by inhibiting virus-induced RNA silencing. Planta 256:54. 10.1007/s00425-022-03948-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Song S., You J., Shi L., Sheng C., Zhou W., Dossou S. S. K., et al. (2021). Genome-wide analysis of nsLTP gene family and identification of SiLTPs contributing to high oil accumulation in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:5291. 10.3390/ijms22105291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Strobl S., Maskos K., Wiegand G., Huber R., Glockshuber R. (1998). A novel strategy for inhibition of alpha-amylases: Yellow meal worm alpha-amylase in complex with the Ragi bifunctional inhibitor at 2.5 A resolution. Structure 6 911–921. 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00092-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Van de Peer Y., Mizrachi E., Marchal K. (2017). The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18 411–424. 10.1038/nrg.2017.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang C., Gao H., Chu Z., Ji C., Xu Y., Cao W., et al. (2021). A nonspecific lipid transfer protein, StLTP10, mediates resistance to Phytophthora infestans in potato. Mol. Plant Patho. 22 48–63. 10.1111/mpp.13007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang H. W., Hwang S. G., Karuppanapandian T., Liu A., Kim W., Jang C. S. (2012). Insight into the molecular evolution of non-specific lipid transfer proteins via comparative analysis between rice and sorghum. DNA Res. 19 179–194. 10.1093/dnares/dss003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wei K., Zhong X. (2014). Non-specific lipid transfer proteins in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 14:281. 10.1186/s12870-014-0281-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xue Y., Zhang C., Shan R., Li X., Tseke Inkabanga A., Li L., et al. (2022). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of nsLTP gene family in rapeseed (Brassica Napus) reveals their critical roles in biotic and abiotic stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:8372. 10.3390/ijms23158372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang Y., Li P., Liu C., Wang P., Cao P., Ye X., et al. (2022). Systematic analysis of the non-specific lipid transfer protein gene family in Nicotiana tabacum reveal its potential roles in stress responses. Plant. Physiol. Bioch. 172 33–47. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang H. L., Ntambo M. S., Rott P. C., Chen G., Chen L. L., Huang M. T., et al. (2020). Complete genome sequence reveals evolutionary and comparative genomic features of Xanthomonas albilineans causing sugarcane leaf scald. Microorganisms 8:182. 10.3390/microorganisms8020182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang J., Zhang X., Tang H., Zhang Q., Ming R. (2018). Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat. Genet. 50 1565–1573. 10.1038/s41588-018-0237-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao J., Wang S., Qin J., Sun C., Liu F. (2020). The lipid transfer protein OsLTPL159 is involved in cold tolerance at the early seedling stage in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18 756–769. 10.1111/pbi.13243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (175.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES