Skip to main content
BMC Immunology logoLink to BMC Immunology
. 2022 Oct 19;23:50. doi: 10.1186/s12865-022-00519-y

Modulation of immunological responses by aqueous extract of Datura stramonium L. seeds on cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in Wistar rats

Parker Elijah Joshua 1, Junaidu Yahaya 1,2, Daniel Emmanuel Ekpo 1,, Joyce Oloaigbe Ogidigo 1,3, Arome Solomon Odiba 4,5,6, Rita Onyekachukwu Asomadu 1, Samson Ayodeji Oka 1,7, Olasupo Stephen Adeniyi 8
PMCID: PMC9583546  PMID: 36261807

Abstract

Background

Datura stramonium L. (Solanaceae) is used traditionally in west Africa to treat asthma, epilepsy, rheumatoid arthritis, filariasis microbial infections and conjunctivitis. This study investigated the immunomodulatory effects of aqueous seed extract of D. stramonium L. (ASEDS) on Wistar rats.

Methods

Thirty Wistar albino rats (180–200 g) were randomized into 6 groups (n = 5). Group 1 received distilled water only. Rats in groups 2–6 were pretreated with 10 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) Cyclophosphamide orally for 27-days to induce immunosuppression. Thereafter, they received treatment orally for 28 days as follows: Group 2 (distilled water), group 3 (5 mg/kg b.w. Levamisole), groups 4–6 (60, 90 and 120 mg/kg b.w. ASEDS, respectively). HPLC was used to determine major compounds in ASEDS. The effects of ASEDS on immune cells, immunoglobulins A, G and M levels, lipoproteins, and antioxidant status of rats were evaluated.

Results

ASEDS indicated high content of Acutumine, Quinine, Catechin, Chlorogenic acid, Gallic acid, Quercetin, Vanillic acid, Luteolin, Formosanin C, Saponin, Cyanidin, Tannic acid, 3-Carene, Limonene and α-terpineol. Cyclophosphamide triggered significant (p < 0.05) reduction in total leucocyte count and differentials, IgA, IgG, high-density lipoproteins (HDL), catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, vitamins A, C and E levels of untreated rats. Administration of ASEDS led to significant (p < 0.05) improvement in immune cell counts, immunoglobulin synthesis, high-density lipoprotein concentration, and antioxidant status of rats in the treated groups.

Conclusions

The results obtained from the study showed the immunomodulatory activity of ASEDS, thereby indicating its potential in immunostimulatory drug discovery.

Keywords: Medicinal plants, Datura stramonium L., Immune system, Immunosuppression, Immunoglobulins, Cyclophosphamide, Wistar rats

Background

Immunosuppression is a reduction in the capacity of immune system to respond effectively to antigens including surface antigens on tumor cells. It can occur as a result of chronic infections, accumulation of toxic chemicals in the body and exposure to high doses of radiations [1]. According to Hutchinoson and Geissler [2] immunosuppression has been adopted deliberately as a means of treating autoimmune diseases and preventing acute graft rejection. Despite these benefits, prolonged immunosuppression would lead to infections, bone marrow suppression, cancer and infertility [3]. Cyclophosphamide is one of the potent immunosuppressive drugs belonging to the group known as oxazaphosporine [4], and has been widely investigated for its immunomodulatory effects [5]. The drug when ingested undergoes extensive metabolism in the liver via the cytochrome P-450 and produces phosphoramide as its active metabolite. Phosphoramide is an alkylating agent which inhibits DNA replication by irreversibly interacting with it at number seven atom of guanine base. This interaction causes cell death among resting and dividing leucocytes and thus leads to impair humoral and cellular immune responses [6].

Cyclophosphamide is a well-known chemotherapeutic and immune suppressive agent, and is widely in research to weaken the immune system of experimental animals [7]. The drug has been in clinical use for over 45 years, and is applied in the treatment of cancer and as an immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases. The immunosuppressive as well as immunomodulatory properties of cyclophosphamide is well documented [79].

Immuno-modulators are substances that can either enhance or suppress any component of immune system. Jantan et al. [10] defined natural immuno-modulators as natural products of herbal origin called phytochemicals. Therefore, plant-derived substances can be used to modulate an immunosuppressed system and these substances could be present in the extract of D. stramonium seeds. Examples of immuno-modulators include adjuvants, vitamins, cytokines and herbs. Some vitamins have been widely reported to have immune-modulatory properties. Skrobot et al. [11] reported the immune-modulatory role of vitamin D in a detailed review, while Mousavi et al. [12] reported the immune-modulatory and antimicrobial effects of vitamin C. Cytokines, some of which include; TNF, IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-12, chemokines, IFN-ɤ are a group of low-molecular-weight regulatory proteins secreted by the leukocytes and other cells in the body. They play important role in immune and inflammatory response, particularly interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and interleukin (IL)-1β [13, 14]. Certain herbs are also known to have immunomodulatory properties. Some of these include; Coriolus versicolor [15], Neem plant, ginger, Ponax ginseng, and Withania somnifera [16].

Medicinal plants are known to have great potential for treatment and management of certain diseases including those affecting different components of the immune system [17]. One of such plant is Datura Stramonium L. (Solanaceae), an annual plant that is native to Asia and Africa [18]. In Nigeria especially in Kogi State, it is found growing in abandoned farmlands and dumpsites. It is popularly known for its narcotic effect as a result called names such as Devil’s apple, Angel’s trumpet and Jimson weed but its indigenous names include Jegemi in Igala, Myaramwo in Igbo, Gegemu in Yoruba and Zakami in Hausa tribes of Nigeria. It is used traditionally to treat asthma, epilepsy, rheumatoid arthritis, filariasis and as antimicrobials, notably against Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus niger and conjunctival virus [19].

Rapid advances in human civilization have led to the increasing presence of various synthetic chemicals in the environment. Some of these chemicals and their products are immunotoxins which are capable of rendering hosts more susceptible to infectious diseases as a result of immunosuppression [20]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), most antibiotics would lose their antimicrobial action by the year, 2020 [21]. Consequently, immunomodulation becomes a reliable alternative in the treatment of diseases particularly those that are immune-mediated since its mechanism can enhance both specific and non-specific immunities [22].

The toxicity of D. stramonium L is well documented [2326]. Ogunmoyole et al. [26], and Joshua et al. [27] reported the multi-organ toxicity of Datura stramonium seed extracts. These studies investigated acute and subacute toxicities, as well as toxicities to liver, kidney, brain, heart tissues, and peroxidation of lipids. At the moment a dearth of information still exist as regards the effect of D. stramonium on the immune system. It therefor becomes imperative for us to investigate the effects of the seed extract of D. stramonium of some immune system indicators and cells.

Results

Percentage yield of ASEDS

Aqueous crude extraction of 257.6 g of powdered D. stramonium L. seeds yielded 20.35 g of ASEDS, representing 7.9% of the total quantity of the powdered plant material extracted.

Preliminary Phytochemical composition of ASEDS

Qualitative phytochemical screening of ASEDS indicated high content of phenols, alkaloids, and flavonoids, with moderate contents of glycosides, terpenoids and carbohydrates, whereas saponins, tannins and steroids were present in lower quantities Table 1.

Table 1.

Phytochemical composition of ASEDS

Phytochemicals Qualitative analysis (bioavailability) Quantitative analysis (mg/g)
Alkaloids +++ 269.05 ± 1.63
Carbohydrates ++ 52.59 ± 0.59
Flavonoids +++ 278.65 ± 0.63
Phenols +++ 396.06 ± 6.56
Glycosides ++ 148.71 ± 1.83
Saponins + 0.76 ± 0.07
Steroids + 2.06 ± 0.10
Tannins + 0.03 ± 0.00
Terpenoids ++ 72.04 ± 21.08

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, n = 3. Highly present (+++), moderately present (++), scanty (+). ASEDS: Aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium

Following HPLC analysis of ASEDS (Table 2) shows the presence of alkaloids such as, quinine in highest concentration, followed by Acutumine and Yohimbine respectively (Fig. 1). Catechin and chlorogenic acids were the dominant flavonoids identified (Figs. 2, 3, Table 3).

Table 2.

Alkaloid composition of aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium

Peak no Peak ID Ret. time Height Area Conc (mg/100 g)
1 Solvent font 0.107 687.514 7728.350 0.0151
2 Acutumine 3.907 649,950.750 24,404,468.000 47.6634
3 Quinine 4.115 643,816.625 26,735,024.000 52.2151
4 Yohimbine 10.048 47.022 54,515.801 0.1065

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

HPLC–UV chromatogram of alkaloids in ASEDS

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

HPLC–UV chromatogram of flavonoids in ASEDS

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

HPLC–UV chromatogram of phenolic compounds in ASEDS

Table 3.

Flavonoid composition of aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium

Peak no Peak ID Ret. time Height Area Conc (mg/100 g)
1 Solvent font 0.123 136.000 626.150 0.0081
2 Sinapic acid 1.148 123.360 3229.300 0.0419
3 Chlorogenic acid 5.465 36,552.203 3,154,933.250 40.9552
4 Catechin 5.515 36,395.387 4,544,595.000 58.9948

A vast majority of phytochemicals in ASEDS were phenolic compounds including; gallic acid which was identified in highest quantity, quercetin, vanillic acid, luteolin, benzoic acid, syringic acid, ferulic acid, ellagic acid, p-coumaric acid, and apigenin (Table 4).

Table 4.

Phenolic composition of aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium

Peak no. Peak ID Ret. time Height Area Conc (mg/100 g)
1 Solvent font 0.165 2548.520 10,710.100 0.0519
2 Gallic acid 0.648 269,477.750 9,916,016.000 48.0627
3 Syringic acid 1.565 91,027.008 316,475.156 1.5339
4 Vanillic acid 1.632 94,237.773 2,668,614.000 12.9347
5 Ellagic acid 2.207 59,821.496 205,782.844 0.9974
6 p-coumaric acid 2.265 59,539.539 205,195.594 0.9946
7 Ferulic acid 2.323 59,989.582 207,343.656 1.0050
8 Benzoic acid 2.507 72,019.438 697,476.750 3.3807
9 Luteolin 2.565 74,121.477 1,840,839.750 8.9225
10 Unidentified 3.032 51,701.832 178,699.016 0.8661
11 Quercetin 3.448 68,558.859 4,333,013.500 21.0020
12 Apigenin 5.298 2953.826 51,254.898 0.2484

Saponin and Formasanin C formed the major contents of saponins in ASEDS (Table 5, Fig. 4), whereas tannic acid and cyanidin constituted a vast majority of tannins identified in ASEDS by HPLC (Table 6, Fig. 5). The results also showed higher concentration of α-terpineol followed by limonene, 3-carene and α-pinene respectively (Fig. 6, Table 7).

Table 5.

Saponin composition of ASEDS

Peak no. Peak ID Ret. time Height Area Conc (mg/100 g)
1 Solvent font 0.123 3280.923 18,391.600 0.0052
2 Unidentified 0.273 284.348 1629.350 0.0005
3 Unidentified 0.548 929.680 7700.036 0.0022
4 Unidentified 1.190 87.330 10,357.414 0.0029
5 Unidentified 1.590 80.615 1044.800 0.0003
6 Formosanin C 5.948 880,484.250 110,008,360.000 31.0704
7 Unidentified 6.565 868,560.813 3,469,736.000 0.9800
8 Unidentified 6.815 874,428.313 15,676,592.000 4.4276
9 Saponin 8.215 937,310.750 224,868,064.000 63.5109

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

HPLC–UV chromatogram of saponins in AESDS

Table 6.

Tannin composition of aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium

Peak no. Peak ID Ret. time Height Area Conc (mg/100 g)
1 Unidentified 0.523 1311.143 2185.250 0.0029
2 Unidentified 0.590 2583.000 6291.150 0.0083
3 Unidentified 0.715 1621.000 6206.000 0.0082
4 Unidentified 0.782 1121.651 2753.759 0.0036
5 Unidentified 0.915 2372.123 12,199.299 0.0161
6 Unidentified 0.973 2719.642 7987.166 0.0105
7 Unidentified 1.032 2871.160 2871.160 0.0112
8 Unidentified 1.090 2896.679 8677.396 0.0114
9 Epicatechin 1.148 3018.198 8872.215 0.0117
10 Unidentified 1.207 2900.717 8468.930 0.0112
11 Unidentified 1.265 2738.236 7893.744 0.0104
12 Unidentified 1.323 2498.755 7120.963 0.0094
13 Unidentified 1.382 2195.274 6140.978 0.0081
14 Unidentified 1.440 1855.792 5030.093 0.0066
15 Unidentified 1.498 1490.311 3834.611 0.0051
16 Unidentified 1.557 1162.830 2742.026 0.0036
17 Unidentified 1.615 1006.349 2227.541 0.0029
18 Cyanidin 3.590 438,822.344 29,362,538.000 38.7257
19 Tannic acid 4.357 609,192.188 46,352,232.000 61.1330

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

HPLC–UV chromatogram of tannins in ASEDS

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

HPLC–UV chromatogram of terpenoids in ASEDS

Table 7.

Terpenoid composition of aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium

Peak no. Peak ID Ret. time Height Area Conc (mg/100 g)
1 Solvent font 0.057 4872.167 15,119.901 0.0051
2 α-Pinene 0.448 2675.000 15,923.700 0.0054
3 3-Carene 1.665 880,226.000 5.5048 5.5048
4 Limonene 1.940 1,021,213.250 48,736,156.000 16.4145
5 α-terpineol 8.948 593,944.000 231,797,312.000 78.0703

Effect of ASEDS on immune cells of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats

Table 8 shows the Total leucocyte count of the Negative control (group 2) to be significantly (p < 0.05) lower when compared to normal control and ASEDS treated groups. The normal control rats recorded significantly (p < 0.05) higher lymphocyte counts when compared to the negative control and the treated groups. Dose-dependent increases in leucocytes and lymphocytes count were observed in the ASEDS treat groups. We also observed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in neutrophils for the negative control relative to the normal control and the treated groups respectively. Immunosuppression also led to significant (p < 0.05) declines in monocytes and eosinophils of the negative control when compared to the normal control. Treatment with ASEDS and standard drug (Levamisole) improved the levels of monocytes and eosinophils in the test groups. Basophils where not present in the negative control rat group following cyclophosphamide pretreatment. However, treatment with ASEDS and Levamisole triggered significant (p < 0.05) increase in basophil count of the test groups.

Table 8.

Effect of ASEDS on immune cells of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats

Groups Total leukocyte count (× 109/L) Differential cell count (%)
Lymphocytes (%) Neutrophils (%) Monocytes (%) Eosinophils (%) Basophils (%)
1 9.98 ± 1.05a 75.88 ± 1.94a 18.02 ± 1.00a 3.38 ± 1.87a 2.12 ± 0.87a 0.60 ± 0.54a
2 2.30 ± 1.05b 61.60 ± 3.78b 34.00 ± 3.39b 2.20 ± 0.83b 2.20 ± 0.83a 0.00 ± 0.00a
3 9.90 ± 1.56a 31.60 ± 2.83c 31.40 ± 1.14b,c 13.40 ± 1.14c 22.80 ± 2.68b 1.40 ± 0.54b
4 16.12 ± 0.53c 29.20 ± 4.81c 57.20 ± 2.65d 9.60 ± 2.60d 2.40 ± 1.14a 1.00 ± 1.00b
5 18.74 ± 2.75c,d 38.00 ± 6.20d 39.20 ± 0.83e 8.48 ± 0.50d 2.36 ± 1.46a 0.40 ± 0.89c
6 21.40 ± 1.95d 55.86 ± 2.89e 28.86 ± 5.09c 17.04 ± 22.91e 7.24 ± 2.83d 1.00 ± 0.00b

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, n = 5. Mean values with different lowercase alphabets as superscripts when compared down the groups are significantly different at p < 0.05. ASEDS: Aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium. 1: Normal control; 2: Negative control; 3: Positive control; 4: Immunosuppressed + 60 mg/kg of extract; 5: Immunosuppressed + 90 mg/kg of extract; 6: Immunosuppressed + 120 mg/kg of extract

Effect of ASEDS on immunoglobulin A, G and M levels of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats

The effect of ASEDS on immunoglobulins A, G, and M levels of cyclophosphamide-immunosuppressed rats is shown in Fig. 7. The results indicated significant (p < 0.05) declines in IgA, IgG, and IgM levels of the negative control relative to the normal control rats. Treatment with graded doses of ASEDS resulted in significant (p < 0.05) elevation in IgA, IgM and IgG levels with group 4 rats, treated with 60 mg/kg b.w. ASEDS registering the highest levels of IgA (306.63 ± 9.23 mg/dl). Group 5 rats, treated with 90 mg/kg b.w. ASEDS recorded highest levels of IgG (259.94 ± 31.68 mg/dl) and IgM (1491.16 ± 26.35 mg/dl) synthesis post-ASEDS treatment.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Effect of ASEDS on immunoglobulin A, G and M levels of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats. Mean values with **** is significantly (p < 0.0001) different relative to the value obtained by the negative control rats. ASEDS Aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium, IgA Immunoglobulin A, IgG Immunoglobulin G, IgM Immunoglobulin M, IMSD Immunosuppressed, ns no significant difference

Effect of ASEDS on the activities of antioxidant enzymes of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats

Figure 8 shows the effect of ASEDS on the activities of antioxidant enzymes of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats. From the data obtained, we observed significant (p < 0.05) declines in the activities of serum CAT, SOD and GPX following immunosuppression. However, treatment with graded doses of ASEDS led to significant (p < 0.05) elevations in the activities of these antioxidant enzymes in all test groups when compared to the negative control.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Effect of ASEDS on the activities of antioxidant enzymes of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats. Mean values with * (p < 0.05), *** (p < 0.001), or **** (p < 0.0001), is significantly different relative to the value obtained by the negative control rats. ASEDS Aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium, SOD Superoxide dismutase, GPx Glutathione peroxidase, IMSD Immunosuppressed, Ns no significant difference

Effect of ASEDS on antioxidant vitamin concentrations of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats

The effect of ASEDS on antioxidant vitamin concentrations of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats is shown in Fig. 9. The results indicated significantly (P < 0.05) lover concentrations of vitamins A, C and E for the negative control following cyclophosphamide pre-treatment, relative to the normal control. Following administration of ASEDS at doses of 60, 90 and 120 mg/kg b.w., we observed significantly (P < 0.05) higher concentrations of the antioxidant vitamins in all ASEDS-treated groups and standard control relative to the negative control.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Effect of ASEDS on antioxidant vitamin concentrations of cyclophosphamide induced immunosuppression in rats. Mean values with *(p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), or **** (p < 0.0001), is significantly different relative to the value obtained by the negative control rats. ASEDS Aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium, IMSD immunosuppressed, Ns no significant difference

Effect of ASEDS on lipoprotein levels of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats

Figure 10 presents the effect of ASEDS on lipoprotein levels of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats. Down the groups, the results indicated significant (p < 0.05) increases in mean serum LDL and HDL concentrations of Groups 3, 4 and 5 rats when compared to the normal control and negative control. Across the groups, we observed significant (p < 0.05) increases in HDL concentration when compared to the corresponding LDL concentration.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Effect of ASEDS on lipoprotein levels of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats. Mean values with * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), or **** (p < 0.0001), is significantly different relative to the value obtained by the negative control rats. ASEDS Aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, ns no significant difference

Discussion

The use of plant extracts in traditional medicine continues to provide therapeutic needs of greater percentage of world’s population especially in developing countries [28, 29]. D. stramonium is one of such valuable plants with rich therapeutic properties, and has been subjected to myriads of uses and applications due to the presence of secondary metabolites the plant contains [30]. In the present study, the efficacy of ASEDS in modulation the effect of cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in Wistar rats was assessed. According to Farombi et al. [31] several plant-derived compounds have been identified over the years for their immunomodulatory characteristics. As a result, numerous illnesses can be alternatively treated via immunomodulation.

Preliminary qualitative phytochemical screening of ASEDS showed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, phenols, glycosides, tannins, terpenoids, steroids and carbohydrates. This agrees largely with the findings of Bano and Adeyemo [32] who reported that the ethanol seed extract of D. stramonium contains saponins, flavonoids, terpenoids, steroids, carbohydrates, alkaloids, phenols, tannins, fats and oils. The presence of these phytochemical constituents could be attributed to the geographical location where the plant material was collected, and solvent used for the extraction of the plant materials [33]. Quantitatively, phenols, alkaloids and flavonoids were of the highest concentration, while the least was tannins, steroids and saponins (Table 1). This conforms to the results obtained by Sharma and Sharma [34] in terms of degree of presence of these phytochemicals where they reported high presence of phenols, moderate contents of alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides and soluble carbohydrates, whereas steroids, saponins and tannins were present in low quantities. Some of these phytochemical constituents have been reported to exhibit stimulatory or inhibitory effect on various components of immune system. The antioxidant role of phenolic and flavonoids can confer anticancer property of the extract on the animals [30]. Tannin was reported by Haslam [35] to stimulate phagocytosis in macrophages and dendritic cells hence the extract could participate in both innate and adaptive immune responses. The relative high presence of alkaloids can confer antitumor activity and enhance immune response [36]. Dash et al. [37] stated the role of flavonoids increasing the activity of helper T-cells, cytokines (interleukin-2 and g-interferon), and macrophages, indicating their usefulness in the treatment of several diseases caused by immune dysfunction. According to Jorrossay and Thelen [38], steroids were the most important phytochemical constituent that can reinstate a balance the Th1 and Th2 cells, thus can determine the type of immune response of a system. Carbohydrates could also contribute the immunologic capability of the system [39], by enhancing the recognition of antigens when they presented. Terpenoids were reported to possess ability to modulate critical signaling pathways such as nuclear transcription factor kappa B which helps in prompt synthesis of cytokines [40].

The determination of total leucocyte and differential count are important markers of immune function. In this study, the total leukocyte counts of the ASED-treated groups significantly (p < 0.05) increased relative to the negative control (Table 8). This effect could be mediated by cytokines such as colony stimulating factor (CSF) 2, a monomeric glycoprotein secreted by macrophages, T-cells, mast cells, natural killer cells, endothelial cells and fibroblasts in response to the presence of xenobiotic. CSF 2 triggers proliferation of leucocytes by activation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). This shows the ability of ASEDS to stimulate leukocytosis. The result is consistent with the findings of Fatoba et al. [41] who stated that bucks treated with aqueous seed extract of D. stramonium recorded higher white blood cell counts than the control except at the highest extract dose. There was a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in total leucocyte count in the negative control relative to the standard and normal controls, thus validating the efficacy of cyclophosphamide has an immunosuppressive drug. Phosphoramide, an alkylating agent generated by the bio-activation of cyclophosphamide could be responsible for the death of leucocytes as observed in the negative control [42]. Leucocyte count of the standard control was observed to be similar to the that of the normal control which demonstrated efficacy of Levamisole as an immune-booster [43]. This agrees with finding of Undiandeye et al. [44] who reported an increase in leucocyte count following treatment of an immunocompromised goat. The increase in leucocyte counts increases the ability of the host to defend the body against invasion of foreign agents [45].

The lymphocyte counts of Groups 5 and 6 was observed to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher when compared to the standard control. It was observed that the effect of ASEDS on lymphocyte counts was dose-dependent (Table 8). This implies that extract has capacity to boost both antibody-dependent and cell-mediated immune responses since lymphocytes play dominate role in immune responses. However, the result is contrary to the findings of [41] who reported increase in lymphocyte counts with decreasing extract dosage. Neutrophil counts increased significantly (p < 0.05) in Group 4 compared to the control groups and other test groups; suggesting that the extract can stimulate cell mediated elimination of bacterial pathogens because major phagocytes mobilized during bacterial invasion are neutrophils. As observed, the effect had an inverse dose dependence on other test groups. In other words, low doses of the extract appeared to stimulate more synthesis of neutrophils than high doses. This also disagrees with the findings of Fatoba et al. [41] where high extract doses stimulated increase in the count of neutrophils. Monocyte counts in group 6 increased significantly (p < 0.05) compared to all control groups. The extract therefore can enhance cell-mediated immune responses via phagocytosis and antigen presentation. Monocyte can differentiate into active macrophages and dendritic cells [46]. Eosinophils count increased significantly (p < 0.05) in Group 5 compared to normal and negative controls respectively. However, the eosinophil counts in the test groups showed significantly (p < 0.05) decreased relative to the standard control. This implies that the mechanism by which Levamisole could have stimulated leucocyte differentiation to optimize eosinophil levels. This corroborates the findings of Undiandeye et al. [44] in which eosinophils count of the goat treated with Levamisole increased significantly compared with the normal control.

Sari et al. [47] attributed the heightened immunomodulatory action of areca nut extract to the presence of catechin and quercetin also identified in ASEDS, which increased the concentration of WBCs and improved the activity and capability of macrophages in rats infected with Staphylococcus aureus.

Polyphenols are known to regulate immunity via interference with immune cell regulation, proinflammatory cytokines' synthesis, and gene expression. They inactivate NF-κB, MAPk and arachidonic acids pathways. These compounds also inhibit PI3K/AkT, IKK/JNK, mTORC1 and JAK/STAT pathways [48]. The modulation of inflammatory cytokines remains one of many common mechanisms by which polyphenols exert their immunomodulatory effects. Polyphenols such as quercetin and catechins found in ASEDS (Table 4, Fig. 3) exert their immunomodulatory effects on the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines production. They enhance IL-10 release while inhibiting TNFα and IL-1β [49].

Kilani-Jaziri et al. [50], discovered that luteolin and apigenin, which were also found in ASEDS, significantly boosted humoral immune responses and increased lipopolysaccharide-stimulated splenocyte proliferation. Additionally, they markedly increased the activity of isolated murine splenocytes' cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and natural killer (NK) cells. Cardenas et al. [51] reported that Apigenin significantly modulated NF-κB activity in the lungs, indicating the ability of Apigenin to exert immune-regulatory activity in an organ-specific manner.

The immunomodulatory activity of gallic acid was reported by Shruthi et al., [52] as it improved antibody titer values and hematological indices of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin-induced immunosuppression in Swiss albino mice. Oral administration of Ferrulic acid reduced the levels of OVA-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IgG1 and enhanced IgG2a antibody production in mice serum [53].

Kilani-Jaziri et al. [54], reported that phenolic acids such as caffeic, ferulic, and p-coumaric acids also identified in ASEDS significantly enhanced the killing activity of isolated NK and CTL cells. Their report showed that the phenolic acids exhibited an immunomodulatory effect which could be ascribed to their cytoprotective effect via their antioxidant capacity. In another study, Singh et al. [55] documented the immunomodulatory potential of ferulic acid via carbon clearance test, delayed type hypersensitivity reaction, neutrophils adhesion test, effect on serum immunoglobulins and cyclophosphamide induced neutropenia.

Immunoglobulins A, G and M are useful markers of immune response. Following cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in rats, we observed significant (p < 0.05) decreases in the levels of immunoglobulins isotypes (IgA, IgG and IgM) of the negative control. Treatment with ASEDS resulted in significant (p < 0.05) elevations in IgA, IgG and IgM levels (Fig. 7). This effect could due to the ability of ASEDS to stimulate biosynthesis of interleukin-6 by T helper 2 cells which enhances B-lymphocytes differentiation into mature plasma cells that secret immunoglobulins. Thus, suggesting the potency of ASEDS to boost humoral immune responses [56]. Also observed was the fact that IgG level was highest among the determined immunoglobulin isotypes implying that ASEDS could enhance antibody dependent cytotoxicity [57]. A study by Bachhav et al. [58] showed that the alkaloid fraction of Trichopus zeylanicus stimulate defense system by modulating several immunological parameters. Analysis of ASEDS by HPLC indicated presence of alkaloids such as acutumine, quinine, and yohimbine (Table 2, Fig. 1).

Aqueous seed extract of D. Stramonium L. has been previously reported to restore altered antioxidant enzyme activities following cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative stress in rats [27]. In the present study, induction of immunosuppression following pre-treatment with cyclophosphamide led to significant (p < 0.05) declines in the activities of SOD, CAT and GPX (Fig. 8). Administration of ASEDS resulted in significant (p < 0.05) elevation of the antioxidant enzymes activities thereby restoring the normal antioxidant balance, thus, suggesting the ability of ASEDS to boost the first line of defense against reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from the bio-activation of cyclophosphamide. The results disagree with the report of Ogunmoyole et al. [26] who demonstrated that the activities of SOD, CAT and GPX were depleted by administration of seed extract of D. stramonium L. regardless of the solvent used for the extraction. Cyclophosphamide induction also resulted in significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the concentrations of vitamins A, C, and E (Fig. 9). This could be accrued to the increased levels of free radicals generated as a result of lipid peroxidation induced by acrolein [27]. The decrease in vitamins A, C and E concentration is consistent with the work of Joshua et al. [27]. Treatment with graded doses of ASEDS significantly (p < 0.05) increased the concentration of these antioxidant vitamins, which could scavenge free radicals generated by cyclophosphamide. The increased concentration of vitamin A following ASEDS treatment shows its ability to enhance innate immunity [59], while vitamins C and E can modulate both cellular and humoral immune responses [60, 61].

Flavonoids are known for their antioxidant activities via scavenging of free radicals and upregulation of antioxidant defense systems. Their immunomodulatory roles in living systems are also reported [62]. Sinapic acid found in ASEDS has been pharmacologically evaluated for its potent anti-cancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anxiolytic, hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, renoprotective, neuroprotective, anti-diabetic, and anti-bacterial activities [63]. A study also indicated the immuno-stimulatory activity of chlorogenic acid, also identified in HPLC, by enhancing the activity of human lymphocyte proliferation and secretion of IFN-gamma [64]. A recent study by Sunil et al. [65], indicated the immunomodulatory potential of catechin-rich butanol fraction of Acacia catechu L. Catechins were found in the highest concentration in ASEDS from HPLC analysis (Table 3, Fig. 2).

Cyclophosphamide induction led to reduction in the levels of HDL and LDL of the negative control (Fig. 10). Treatment with ASEDS led to improvements in altered lipid levels. Group 4 rats recorded significant (p < 0.05) increase in HDL concentration relative to the negative control and other test groups while Group 6 rats recorded significant reduction in LDL levels. This implies that the integrity of the lipid layer of the immune cell membrane is being varied as cholesterol component is being removed and added respectively by HDL and LDL as known transporters of cholesterol in animal body. Consequently, antigen presentation on the major Histocompatibility (MHC) II of the antigen presenting cells (APCs) and subsequent recognition by appropriate T-cells would be affected because lipid constitute a greater part of MHC, suggesting that ASEDS can modulate both cellular and adaptive responses [66]. It was also observed that HDL-C concentration in each group was significantly higher than the corresponding LDL-C concentration indicating the extract possesses athero-protective capacity. The results corroborate the findings of Ogunmoyole et al. [26] who revealed that the HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol significantly increased in serum, liver and heart homogenates after administration of aqueous extract of D. stramonium seeds.

Several saponins isolated from medicinal plants, have been discovered to possess significant immunomodulatory effects [67], and have also shown stimulatory effects on the components of specific immunity and on monocyte proliferation. [68, 69]. The saponin, Formosanin C (Table 5), a diosgenin identified in ASEDS is known to be a crucial immunomodulatory agent [70]. Triterpenoid saponins from eight Cephalaria species were shown to have immunomodulatory activity [71].

ASEDS indicated presence of Epicatechin (Table 6) which have been isolated and purified from the ethyl acetate fraction of Litchi chinensis Sonn by reverse-phase HPLC, and was shown to have strong immunostimulatory effect proliferation of mouse splenocytes [72]. Cyanidins identified also in ASEDS (Table 6) are known to have strong antioxidant and radical-scavenging activities [73]. Caulerpa lentillifera extract rich in gallic acid, catechin, tannic acid, rutin, isoquercetin, and quercetin stimulated the immune response by modulating the cell cycle regulators p27, p53, cyclin D2, and cyclin E2 [74].

Sandner et al. [75] highlighted some immunomodulatory activities of Eucalyptus essential oils (EEOs). These oils include; α-Pinene, 3-Carene, Limonene, α-terpineol were identified in ASEDS (Table 7, Fig. 6). These terpenoids have been found to stimulate the immune system by increasing the amount of circulating lymphocytes and enhancing their phagocytic activity, thus improving bacterial clearance [76]. They have also been reported to suppress responses involved in inflammation and decrease cytokine production by interfering with key mediators of inflammatory pathways [77].

14. Sparge S.G., Light M.E. and Staden J.V. (2004) Journal of.

Conclusions

This study confirmed the immunomodulatory effects of D. stramonium L. From the results obtained, ASEDS showed potent immunomodulatory effect which could be attributed to the presence of phytochemical constituents such as alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids and saponins which played key roles in normalizing altered antioxidant enzyme activities and vitamins levels as well as restoring alterations in lipoproteins levels, and stimulation of leukocytosis and increase in antibody synthesis, thus, serving as a potential candidate immunomodulatory agent.

Materials and methods

Materials

Procurement, identification and authentication of plant material

Approval was granted by the appropriate council for collection of the plant material. The plant material was collected in accordance with institutional best practices and as recommended by the IUCN Policy Statement on Research Involving Species at Risk of Extinction and the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Ripe seeds of Datura stramonium L. (Solanaceae) (Fig. 11), were collected from the plant habitat in Anyigba, Dekina Local Government Area, of Kogi State, North Central Nigeria, in July 2018. The plant sample was identified by Prof. M. Adukwu, of the Herbarium of the Department of Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Kogi State, Nigeria, with Herbarium number, PT-121. The identity and authenticity of the plant was also confirmed with the exact sample deposited in online databases of http://www.theplantlist.org/ and http://www.ipni.org/.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Datura stramonium L. plant, fruits and seeds

Preparation and processing

Seeds of ripe D. stramonium L. were carefully separated from the ripe plant fruits, freed from sand and debris, and air-dried to a constant weight. The dried seeds were pulverized into powdered form, stored in airtight bags prior to aqueous crude extraction.

Study rodents

A total of Thirty (30) healthy adult Wistar rats of both sexes (180–200 g), were procured from the Animal House of the Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kogi State University, Anyigba, and were be kept in well ventilated laboratory cages. They were acclimatized to the laboratory environment for a period of seven days under standard environmental conditions, with a 12 h light/dark cycle. The animals were fed with standard feed pellets and drinking water ad libitum, and were accorded humane care throughout the period of the experiment, in line with the regulations and ethical approval of the Ethics and Biosafety Committee of the Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Nigeria, with Reference No. UNN/FBS/EC/1046, and in accordance with the International ethical guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals [78]. The study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines available at https://arriveguidelines.org.

Drugs, chemicals and reagents

All chemicals and reagents used for the conduct of this study were of analytical grade. Drugs used were purchased from reputable pharmaceutical outlets in Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria. Freshly prepared phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 and normal saline were used for the study. Distilled and deionized water were obtained from the National Centre for Energy Research and Development (NCERD), University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Hydrogen peroxide (Interstate Chemical Co. Hermitage, PA), Bovine serum albumin (BioClot GmbH), Phosphotungstic acid (CDH Fine Chemicals, India). Orthophosphoric acid (Prime Chemicals, Gujarat, India). Ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, batophenanthroline, sodium hydroxide, iron (III) chloride, petroleum ether and ethyl acetate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). Chloroform, methanol, ethanol, sulfuric acid, and hydrochloric acid (British Drug House, England). Fehling’s solutions A and B (Sisco Research Lab., India). Xylene (Shantou, Guangdong, China). Cyclophosphamide was purchased from Cadila Healthcare Limited, Marketed by Zydus Oncosciences, Baxter Oncology, Frankfurt Germany. Levamisole (47.3 mg) was purchased from Ecomed Pharma Limited, Ogun State Nigeria. Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity assay kit was obtained ‘Ready to use’ from Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. The kits for High-density lipoprotein (HDL) and Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were products of Prestige diagnostics, Geigorim Co Antrim, United Kingdom. Catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) assay reagent kits were procured from Randox Laboratories Ltd., United Kingdom. Immunoglobulins A, G, and M ‘Ready to use’ assay kits were procured from Weiner’s Laboratory, California, U.S.A.

Methods

Aqueous extraction

Crude plant extraction was carried out according to the method of Sofowara [79] with slight modifications. A known weight, 257.6 g of the powdered seeds were soaked in 2567 mL liters of distilled water and allowed to stand for 48 h at room temperature. The mixture was then filtered using a vacuum pump, and the filtrate was lyophilized to yield 20.35 g of the aqueous seed extract of D. Stramonium L. (ASEDS). The percentage yield of ASEDS was determined using the formula given below.

Percentageyield=weightofextract(g)weightofpowderedseed(g)×1001

Phytochemical analyses

Preliminary phytochemical screening of ASEDS was carried out using the methods of Harborne [80], and Pearson [81].

HPLC–UV analysis of ASED

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed to identify and quantify different phytoconstituents in ASEDS. Hangzhou LC-8518 with a low-pressure gradient and solvent delivery pump with a high-pressure switching valve, a high-sensitivity ultraviolet (UV) detector (diode array), a micro syringe for sample injection, with column size of 150 × 4.6 mm, was used for the analysis.

Sample Preparation and Extraction: A known weight, 0.1 g of ASEDS was dissolved in 10 ml of 70% methanol and is allowed to stand for 1 to 2 h in a closed test tube. The extracted sample is then decanted, centrifuged and filtered using a cosmonice filter or micron filter into a 5 ml sample bottle.

Preparation of Standard Solutions: Stock solutions of the reference compounds were made by weighing 0.001 g of reference standards into a test tube and dissolving each standard with 10 ml of 70% methanol. Each standard was then agitated for 10 min using vortex mixer and then filtered using a cosmonice filter or micron filter into the sample bottle.

  1. Determination of alkaloids

Chemicals: Methanol (lichrosolv), acetonitrile (lichrosolv), nicotine, anatabine, cotinine, anabasine, and myosmine (analytical grades) reference standard.

Procedure: The mobile phase comprised of methanol/acetonitrile/water (70:20:10), with wavelength set at 260 nm. Column temperature was set to 40 °C, with run time set at 15 min. ASEDA volume of 40 µl was injected. The mobile phase was pumped-in, transferring the sample into the column. The chromatogram was obtained from the display system after the run time. The retention time of the standard is compared to that of the chromatogram obtained from the sample to determine the content of alkaloids in ASEDS.

  • (b)

    Determination of flavonoids

Chemicals: Formic acid (analytical grade), methanol (lichrosolv), acetonitrile (lichrosolv), analytical grades of rutin (95%), quercetin (95%), quercitrin (85%), kaempferol (90%) and isorhamnetin (99%) reference standards.

Procedure: Mobile phase, acetonitrile/water/formic acid (25:74:1) was prepared. The wavelength was set at 254 nm, with column temperature set to 40 °C. Run time was adjusted to 25 min. Sample volume of 40 µl was injected. The mobile phase was pumped-in which allowed the sample to be transferred into the column. The total ion chromatogram is obtained from the display system after the run time. The retention time of the standard was compared with that of the chromatogram obtained from the sample to determine the flavonoid content of ASEDS.

  • (iii)

    Determination of phenolics

Chemicals: Glacial acetic acid (analytical grade), methanol (lichrosolv), acetonitrile (lichrosolv), analytical grades of ascorbic acid, gallic acid, catechin, methy gallate, caffeic acid, syringic acid, ellagic acid, chlorogenic acid reference standards.

Procedure: Mobile phase was prepared by mixing acetonitrile, water and acetic acid (19:80:1). The wavelength was set at 272 nm, while column temperature was set to 40 °C. Run time is set at 25 min. Sample volume of 40 µl was injected. The mobile phase was pumped-in into the column. The chromatogram was obtained from the display system after the run time. The retention time of the standard was compared with that of the chromatogram obtained from the sample to determine the content of phenolic compounds in ASEDS.

  • (iv)

    Determination of saponins

Chemicals: Methanol (lichrosolv), acetonitrile (lichrosolv), diosgenin, gitogenin or hecogenin (analytical grades) reference standard.

Procedure: The mobile phase was prepared by mixing acetonitrile and water in the ratio of 70:30. The wavelength was set at 205 nm, with column temperature maintained at 40 °C. Run time was set at 14 min. A sample volume of 40 µl was injected, and the mobile phase was pumped-in which moved the sample into the column. The HPLC chromatogram was obtained from the display system after the run time. The retention time of the standard is compared with that of the chromatogram obtained for ASEDS to determine the saponin content.

  • (e)

    Determination of tannins

Chemicals: Methanol (lichrosolv), Tannic acid (analytical grade) reference standard.

Procedure: The mobile phase, methanol/water (50:50) was prepared. Wavelength was adjusted to 270 nm. Column temperature was kept at 40 °C. Run time was 6 min. Sample volume of 40 µl was injected into the instrument. The mobile phase transferred the sample into the column for analysis. The chromatogram obtained from the display system after the run time was compared with that of the standard to determine the tannin content of ASEDS.

  • (f)

    Determination of terpenoid

Chemicals: Formic acid (analytical grade), Methanol (lichrosolv), corosolic acid, betulin, betulinic acid, oleonolic acid, ursolic acid (analytical grades) reference standards.

Procedure: The mobile phase was prepared, methanol/water/formic acid in the ratio (90:9.9:0.1). Wavelength was set at 210 nm, with column temperature adjusted to 40 40 °C. The run time was set at 25 min. A sample volume of 40 µl was injected. The mobile phase is pump in which allowed the sample to be carried into the column. The chromatogram was obtained from the display system at end of experiment. The retention time of the standard was compared with that of the chromatogram obtained from ASEDS to determine its terpenoid content.

Induction of immunosuppression

Immunosuppression in Wistar rats was induced according to the protocol of Joshua et al. [27]. Accordingly, 10 mg/kg b.w. of Cyclophosphamide was administered orally for 27 days to induce immunosuppression in designated rat groups.

Experimental design

The experimental design of Kyakulaga et al. [82] as modified, was adopted. Thirty (30) rats were divided into six groups of 5 rats each. Group 1 served as normal control and received 1 mL/kg b.w. distilled water throughout the duration of the experiment. Group 2 served as negative control and was pretreated with 10 mg/kg b.w. Cyclophosphamide orally for 27 days followed by 1 mL/kg b.w. distilled water given orally for 28 days’ post treatment. Group 3 served as standard control, and were pretreated with 10 mg/kg b.w. Cyclophosphamide followed by 5 mg/kg b.w. of Levamisole [44]. Groups 4, 5 and 6 made up the ASEDS test groups. Rats in these groups were orally pre-treated with 10 mg/kg b.w. Cyclophosphamide for 27 days, followed by 60, 90, and 120 mg/kg b.w. of ASEDS respectively [83], administered orally for 28 days. Thereafter, the rats were fasted overnight, and euthanized by cervical dislocation prior to sacrifice on day 29 [84]. Fresh blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture and emptied into neatly labeled plain sample tubes for biochemical analysis, and EDTA-containing sample tubes for leukocyte count and differentials. The blood in plain tubes were subjected to centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min. Serum obtained were stored in the refrigerator for subsequent biochemical analysis.

Determination of biochemical indices

Total leucocytes and differential cell counts were determined using an automated hematology analyzer (URIT-330) based on Coulter’s method as described by Robinson [85] Serum catalase activity was assayed following to the method of Sinha [86]. Superoxide dismutase activity was assayed by the inhibiting of auto-oxidation of epinephrine, using the protocol of Pajovic et al. [87]. Glutathione peroxidase activity was assayed according to the method of Paglia and Valentine [88] as described by Ekpo et al. [84]. The concentration of serum Vitamin A was determined by the method of Rutkowski et al. [89]. Serum vitamin C concentration was determined using the method of Rutkowski et al. [90], while serum vitamin E concentration was determined according to the method of Rutkowski et al. [91]. High density lipoprotein concentration in serum was determined according to the method described by Kameswara et al. [92], while Low-density lipoprotein concentration was determined by the method of Arsman et al. [93], using an Auto-analyzer (URIT-810).

Determination of serum immunoglobulin A, G and M concentrations

Serum immunoglobulin A, G, and M concentrations were determined according to the method of Pressac et al. [94]. The method is based on the principle that immunoglobulin reacts with specific antigen to generate insoluble immune complexes. The turbidity of the complexes is directly proportional to the immunoglobulin concentration in the sample which can be measured using a spectrophotometer. Briefly, a calibration curve was drawn from serial dilutions of the calibrator protein in saline solution at 1:10, 1:20, 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160 using saline solution as zero point. 40 µL of diluted calibrator protein was mixed with 900 µL of Reagent A (buffered saline solution). The mixture was homogenized and the absorbance of the dilutions were measured at 340 nm as OD1, after calibrating the instrument to zero with distilled water as blank. An aliquot of 160 µL of Reagent B (antibody monospecific anti-IgA, IgG, or IgM) was then added to the mixture and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the reacting mixture (OD2) was measured against the blank. The difference in absorbance (OD2–OD1) for each calibrator protein dilution, including the zero point was calculated. A plot of calibrator protein concentrations in mg/dl against the differences in absorbance was plotted. For the sample, an aliquot of 10 µL was mixed with 100 µL of saline solution to achieve a 1:10 dilution. Thereafter, 40 µL of the diluted sample was mixed with 900 µL of Reagent A. The mixture was homogenized and the absorbance of the dilution was measured at 340 nm as OD1 using distilled water as blank. Thereafter, 160 µL of Reagent B was then added to the mixture and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture (OD2) was measured against the blank. The difference in absorbance was determined, and the concentration of immunoglobulin A, G, and M respectively, in the serum (mg/dl) was determined from the standard calibration plot.

Statistical analyses

The data obtained from the study were analyzed using IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) version 21.0 (Chicago, IL), and GraphPad Prism version 7.0. Significant differences in the means were established by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Dunett’s post hoc multiple comparison test). The results were presented as mean ± standard deviation of replicate measurements. Mean values with *(p ≤ 0.05) were significantly different.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Emeka Asogwa of the Central Research Laboratory, University of Ilorin, Ilorin Nigeria, for conducting the HPLC analysis of ASEDS. Authors are thankful to the technical staff of the Department of Biochemistry, University of Nigeria, Nigeria, for providing technical assistance, and to the University of Nigeria, and Kogi State University, for institutional support.

Abbreviations

ASEDS

Aqueous seed extract of Datura stramonium

HDL

High-density lipoprotein

LDL

Low-density lipoprotein

HPLC

High-performance liquid chromatography

CAT

Catalase

SOD

Superoxide dismutase

GPx

Glutathione peroxidase

CSF

Colony stimulating factor

WHO

World Health Organization

Author contributions

All authors made significant contributions to the conceptualization and design of the study. P.E.J.: Conceptualized and designed the work; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Supervised the work. J.Y. and O.S.A. Conceptualized and designed the work; Reviewed relevant literatures and methodology; Performed laboratory experiments. D.E.E. Analyzed and interpreted the data; Performed laboratory experiments; Wrote the draft and final versions of the manuscript, and coordinated the peer review process. J.O.O. and A.S.O. Reviewed relevant literatures and methodology; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the draft manuscript. R.O.A. and S.A.O. Reviewed relevant literatures and methodology; Analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for the conduct of this study.

Availability of data and materials

More data used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in line with the regulations and ethical approval of the Ethics and Biosafety Committee of the Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Nigeria, with Reference No. UNN/FBS/EC/1046, and in accordance with the International Guidelines for Handling of Laboratory Animals [95]. The study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines available at https://arriveguidelines.org.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Parker Elijah Joshua, Email: parker.joshua@unn.edu.ng.

Junaidu Yahaya, Email: yayajunaidu@gmail.com.

Daniel Emmanuel Ekpo, Email: ekpodaniele@gmail.com, Email: daniel.ekpo.pg67714@unn.edu.ng.

Joyce Oloaigbe Ogidigo, Email: jogidigo@yahoo.com.

Arome Solomon Odiba, Email: arome.odiba@unn.edu.ng.

Rita Onyekachukwu Asomadu, Email: rita.asomadu@unn.edu.ng.

Samson Ayodeji Oka, Email: samson.oa@ksu.edu.ng.

Olasupo Stephen Adeniyi, Email: supoadeniyi@yahoo.com.

References

  • 1.Odetola O, Ananthanarayanan V. Gastrointestinal presentations of common variable immunodeficiency: hiding in plain sight. Arc Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143:525–530. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0372-RS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hutchinoson JA, Geissler EK. Now or never? The case for cell-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2015;87(6):1116–1124. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fuehner T, Benden C, Gottlieb J. Initiating immunosuppression and managing rejection. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:388–390. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-05515-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wlodarczynska M, Ograczyk E, Kowalewicz M, Druszcynska M. Effect of cyclophosphamide treatment of central and effector memory T cells in mice. Int J Toxicol. 2018;37(3):1091–1111. doi: 10.1177/1091581818780128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heinhuis KM, Ros W, Kok M, Steeghs N, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM. Enhancing anti-tumour response by combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in solid tumours. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(2):219–235. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alhmann H, Hempel G. The effect of cyclophosphamide on the immune system: implications for clinical therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;78(4):661–671. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3152-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elazab MFA, Younes AM, Gaafar AY, Abu-Bryka AZ, Abdel-Daim MM. Immunosuppressive effect of cyclophosphamide in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:20784–20793. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11893-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huyan XH, Lin YP, Gao T, Chen RY, Fan YM. Immunosuppressive effect of cyclophosphamide on white blood cells and lymphocyte subpopulations from peripheral blood of Balb/c mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(9):1293–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ahlmann M, Hempel G. The effect of cyclophosphamide on the immune system: Implications for clinical cancer therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;78(4):661–671. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3152-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jantan I, Ahmad W, Bukharu S. Plant-derived immunomodulators: an insight on their pre-clinical evaluation and clinical trials. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1178–1194. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Skrobot A, Demkow U, Wachowska M. Immunomodulatory role of vitamin D: a review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1108:13–23. doi: 10.1007/5584_2018_246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mousavi S, Bereswill S, Heimesaat MM. Immunomodulatory and antimicrobial effects of vitamin C. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2019;9(3):73–79. doi: 10.1556/1886.2019.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Behm C, Blufstein A, Gahn J, Nemec M, Moritz A, Rausch-Fan X, et al. Cytokines differently define the immunomodulation of mesenchymal stem cells from the periodontal ligament. Cells. 2021;9(5):1222. doi: 10.3390/cells9051222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu R, Soland M, Liu G, Shi Y, Zhang C, Tang Y, et al. Functional characterization of the immunomodulatory properties of human urine-derived stem cells. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(9):3566–3578. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saleh MH, Rashedi I, Keating A. Immunomodulatory Properties of Coriolus versicolor: The role of polysaccharopeptide. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1087. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tiwari R, Latheef SK, Ahmed I, Iqbal HMN, Bule MH, Dhama K, et al. Herbal immunomodulators—a remedial panacea for designing and developing effective drugs and medicines: current scenario and future prospects. Curr Drug Metab. 2018;9(3):264–301. doi: 10.2174/1389200219666180129125436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parveen A, Vijula K, Avinash KV, Ravishankar M, Leeladhar DV. Medicinal values of Datura. A specific review. Int J Green Pharm. 2016;10(2):1–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Arowora KA, Imo C, Ezeonu CS, Muhammed ZI. Effects of ethanolic extracts of Datura metel on blood lipid profile of male albino rats. Int J Sci Rep. 2016;2(10):248–252. doi: 10.18203/issn.2454-2156.IntJSciRep20163395. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chavhan SA, Kadam SD, Shinde SA, Sapkal PN. Pharmacognostic review on Datura. Int J Pharmacogn Chin Med. 2018;2(4):145–149. doi: 10.23880/ipcm-16000145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dewitt JC, Blossom SJ, Schaider LA. Exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances lead to immunotoxicity: epidemiological and toxicological evidence. J Expo Sci Eviron Epidemiol. 2019;29(2):140–148. doi: 10.1038/s41370-018-0097-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.World Health Organization [WHO]. Communicable disease surveillance and response: WHO Global strategy for containment of antimicrobial resistance [Accessed: December 20, 2013]. Available online at: http://www.who.int/crs/resources/publications/drugresist/en/EGlobal.Strat.pdf. (2013).
  • 22.Abood WN. Immunomodulatory and natural immunomodulators. J Allerg Inflamm. 2017;2:99–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Benouadah Z, Mahdeb N, Bouzidi A. Evaluation of acute and sub-acute toxicity of alkaloids from Datura stramonium sp. in mice. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem Res. 2016;8(11):1759–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Trancă SD, Szabo R, Cocis M. Acute poisoning due to ingestion of Datura stramonium—a case report. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017;24(1):65–8. doi: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.241.szb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Korkmaz MF, Bostanc M, Onur H, Cagan E. Datura stramonium poisoning: a case report and review of the literature. Eur Res J. 2019;5(1):186–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ogunmoyole T, Adeyeye RI, Olatilu BO, Akande AO, Agunbiade OJ. Multiple organ toxicity of Datura stramonium seed extracts. Toxicol Rep. 2019;6:983–989. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Joshua PE, Asomadu RO, Eze CS, Nnamani IV, Kingsley CO, Nweje-Anyalow CP, et al. Effect Datura stramonium on cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative stress in albino rats. Int J Pharmacol. 2019;15(8):926–932. doi: 10.3923/ijp.2019.926.932. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cordell GA. Plants in drug discovery-creating a new vision. In: Tan BK, Bay BH, Zhu YZ, editors. Novel compounds from natural products in the new millennium potential and challenges. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 2004. pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Abo KA, Fred J, Jaiyesimi AE. Ethnobotanical studies of medicinal plants used in the management of diabetes mellitus in South Western Nigeria. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;115(3):67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Soni P, Siddiqui AA, Dwivedi J, Soni V. Pharmacological properties of Datura stramonium L. as a potential medicinal tree. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(12):1002–08. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60014-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Farombi E, Nwankwo J, Emerole G. Effect of methanolic extract of browned yam flour diet on 7, 12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) and 3-methylcholanthrene (3-Mc) induced toxicity in the rat. Proc Fed Afr Soc Biochem Mol Biol. 1998;1:5–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bano A, Adeyemo S. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial assessment of Abutilon mauritianum, Bacopa monnifera and Datura stramonium. Int J Med Pharmacol. 2006;18(1):39–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Adesina GO, Okeke CE, Osuagwu NO, Ehinmidu JO. Preliminary in-vitro antibacterial activities of ethanolic extracts of Ficussycomorus Linn and Ficusplatyphylla Del (Moraceae) Afr J Microbiol Res. 2010;4(8):598–01. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sharma MC, Sharma S. Phytochemical, preliminary pharmacognostical and antimicrobial activity of combined crude aqueous extracts. Int J Microbiol Res. 2013;1(3):166–170. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Haslam E. Natural polyphenols (vegetable tannis) as drugs; possible mode of action. J Nat Prod. 1996;59:205–215. doi: 10.1021/np960040+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Okwu DE, Okwu ME. Chemical compositions of Spondias mormbia plant parts. J Sustain Agric Environ. 2004;6:140–147. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dash S, Nath LK, Bhise S, Kar P, Bhattacharya S. Stimulation of immune functional activity by the alcoholic root extract of Heracleum napalense D. Don Indian J Pharmacol. 2006;38(5):336–340. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.27701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jorrossay D, Thelen M. Immune response: steroids drive dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:424–426. doi: 10.1038/ni.2589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Avci FX, Li X, Tsuji M, Kasper DL. Carbohydrates and T-cells: a sweet twosome. Semin Immunol. 2013;25:146–151. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.De Las HB, Hortelano S. Molecular basis of the anti-inflammatory effects of terpernoids. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2009;8(1):28–39. doi: 10.2174/187152809787582534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fatoba TA, Adeloye AA, Soladoye AO. Effect of Datura stramonium seed extract on hematological parameters of West Africa Dwarf (WAD) bucks. Eur J Exp Biol. 2013;3(4):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chighizola C, Ong VH, Christopher PD. Cyclophosphamide as a disease modifying therapy for sclerodema. Int J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;6(2):219–230. doi: 10.2217/ijr.10.112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mohri M, Seifis HA, Zmani SH. Effects of oral administration of levamisole on non-specific immunity, serum proteins and health in normal colostrum-fed neonatal dairy calves. Comp Clin Pathol. 2005;13(3):132–136. doi: 10.1007/s00580-004-0528-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Undiandeye UT, Oderinde BS, El-Yuguda A, Baba SS. Immunostimulatory effect of levamisole on the immune response of goats to peste des petits ruminants (PPR) vaccination. World J Vaccines. 2014;4:88–95. doi: 10.4236/wjv.2014.42011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stock W, Hoffman R. White blood cells 1: non-malignant disorders. Lancet. 2006;355:1351–1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02125-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Auffray C, Fogg D, Garfar M, Elain G, Join-Lambert O, Kayal S, et al. Monitoring of blood vessel and tissues by a population of monocytes with patrolling behaviour. Science. 2007;317(5838):666–670. doi: 10.1126/science.1142883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sari LM, Hakim RF, Mubarak Z, Andriyanto A. Analysis of phenolic compounds and immunomodulatory activity of areca nut extract from Aceh, Indonesia, against Staphylococcus aureus infection in Sprague–Dawley rats. Vet World. 2020;13(1):134–140. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.134-140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yahfoufi N, Alsadi A, Jambi M, Matar C. The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory role of polyphenols. Nutrients. 2018;10(11):1618. doi: 10.3390/nu10111618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Comalada M, Ballester I, Bailon E, Sierra S, Xaus J, de Medina F, Zarzuelo A. Inhibition of pro-inflammatory markers in primary bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages by naturally occurring flavonoids: analysis of the structure-activity relationship. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;72:1010–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kilani-Jaziri S, Mustapha N, Mokdad-Bzeouich I, El Gueder D, Ghedira K, Ghedira-Chekir L. Flavones induce immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects by activating cellular anti-oxidant activity: a structure-activity relationship study. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:6571–6579. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4541-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cardenas H, Arango D, Nicholas C, Duarte S, Nuovo GJ, He W, et al. Dietary apigenin exerts immune-regulatory activity in vivo by reducing NF-κB activity, halting leukocyte infiltration and restoring normal metabolic function. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:323. doi: 10.3390/ijms17030323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shruthi S, Vijayalaxmi KK, Shenoy KB. Immunomodulatory effects of gallic acid against cyclophosphamide- and cisplatin-induced immunosuppression in Swiss albino mice. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2018;80(1):150–160. doi: 10.4172/pharmaceutical-sciences.1000340. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lee CC, Wang CC, Huang HM, Lin CL, Leu SJ, Lee YL. Ferulic acid induces Th1 responses by modulating the function of dendritic cells and ameliorates Th2-mediated allergic airway inflammation in mice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:678487. doi: 10.1155/2015/678487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kilani-Jaziri S, Mokdad-Bzeouich I, Krifa M, Nasr N, Ghedira K, Chekir-Ghedira L. Immunomodulatory and cellular anti-oxidant activities of caffeic, ferulic, and p-coumaric phenolic acids: a structure-activity relationship study. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2017;40(4):416–424. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2016.1252919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Singh MK, Das BK, Trivedi R. In vivo evaluation of immunomodulatory potential of ferulic acid. Int Res J Pharm. 2016;7(3):12–17. doi: 10.7897/2230-8407.07321. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Degn SE, Theil S. Humoral pattern recognition and the implement system. Scand J Immunol. 2013;78(2):181–193. doi: 10.1111/sji.12070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Racine R, McLaughlin M, Jones DD. IgM production by bone marrow plasmablasts contributes to long-term protection against intracellular bacterial infection. J Immunol. 2011;186(2):1011–1021. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bachhav RS, Sambathkumar R. Evaluation of immunomodulatory activity of the alkaloid fraction of Trichopus zeylanicus Gaertn on experimental animals. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2016;78(1):161–166. doi: 10.4103/0250-474x.180240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stephensen CB. Vitamin A, infection, and immune functions. Ann Rev Nutr. 2001;21:167–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Moriguchi S, Murage M. Vitamin E and immunity: a review. Vitam Horm. 2000;59:305–336. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(00)59011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Padayatty SJ, Katz A, Wang Y, Eck P, Kwon O, Lee JH, et al. Vitamin C as an antioxidant: evaluation of its role in disease prevention. J Am Col Nutr. 2003;22(1):182–195. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2003.10719272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hosseinzade A, Sadeghi O, Naghdipour Biregani A, Soukhtehzari S, Brandt GS, Esmaillzadeh A. Immunomodulatory effects of flavonoids: possible induction of T CD4+ regulatory cells through suppression of mTOR pathway signaling activity. Front Immunol. 2019;10:51. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pandi A, Kalappan VM. Pharmacological and therapeutic applications of Sinapic acid—an updated review. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48:3733–3745. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06367-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chiang LC, Lean TN, Chiang W, Chang MY, Lin CC. Monoterpenoids, triterpenoids, iridoid glycosides and phenolic compounds of plantago species. Planta Med. 2003;69:600–604. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sunil MA, Sunitha VS, Ashitha A, Sahadevan N, Sebastian JM, Radhakrishnan EK, et al. Catechin-rich butanol fraction extracted from Acacia catechu L. (a thirst quencher) exhibits immunostimulatory potential. J Food Drug Anal. 2019;27(1):195–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhou X, Hansson GK. Immunomodulation and vaccination for atherosclerosis. Opin Biol Ther. 2004;4:599–612. doi: 10.1517/14712598.4.4.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sparg SG, Light ME, van Staden J. Biological activities and distribution of plant saponins. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;94(2–3):219–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Iqbal RZ, Song-hua CX, Ariji AG. Adjuvant effects of saponins on animal immune responses. J of Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007;8(3):153–161. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Khajuria A, Gupta A, Garai S, Wakhloo BP. Immunomodulatory effects of two sapogenins 1 and 2 isolated from Luffa cylindrica in Balb/C mice. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;17:1608–1612. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.12.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wu RT, Chiang HC, Fu WC, Chien KY, Chung YM, Horng LY. Formosanin-C, an immunomodulator with antitumor activity. Int J Immunopharmacol. 1990;12(7):777–786. doi: 10.1016/0192-0561(90)90042-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sarikahya NB, Nalbantsoy A, Top H, Gokturk RS, Sumbul H, Kirmizigul S. Immunomodulatory, hemolytic and cytotoxic activity potentials of triterpenoid saponins from eight Cephalaria species. Phytomedicine. 2018;38:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2017.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhao M, Yang B, Wang J, Liu Y, Yu L, Jiang Y. Immunomodulatory and anticancer activities of flavonoids extracted from litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn) pericarp. Int Immunopharmacol. 2007;7(2):162–166. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Singh D, Kumari K, Ahmed S. Natural herbal products for cancer therapy. In: Jain B, Pandey S, editors. Understanding Cancer: From Basics to Therapeutics. New York: Academic Press; 2022. pp. 257–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yoojam S, Ontawong A, Lailerd N, Mengamphan K, Amornlerdpison D. The enhancing immune response and anti-inflammatory effects of Caulerpa lentillifera extract in RAW 264.7 cells. Molecules. 2021;26(19):5734. doi: 10.3390/molecules26195734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sandner G, Heckmann M, Weghuber J. Immunomodulatory activities of selected essential oils. Biomolecules. 2020;10(8):1139. doi: 10.3390/biom10081139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sonnenberg GF, Hepworth MR. Functional interactions between innate lymphoid cells and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:599–613. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0194-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nogueira MNM, Aquino SG, Rossa JC, Spolidorio DMP. Terpinen-4-ol and alpha-terpineol (tea tree oil components) inhibit the production of IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 on human macrophages. Inflamm Res. 2014;63:769–778. doi: 10.1007/s00011-014-0749-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.National Academy of Sciences [NAS]. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th ed. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences. 2011.
  • 79.Sofowara A. Medicinal plants and traditional medicine in Africa. Hoboken: Wiley; 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Harborne J. Phytochemical methods: a guide to modern technology of plant analysis. 3. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1998. pp. 88–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pearson D. Chemical Analysis of Food, 7thEdn, Church-hill Livingston, Edinburgh, 1976; pp. 10–5.
  • 82.Kyakulaga AH, Ogwang PE, Obua C, Nakabonge G, Mwavu EN. Immunomodulatory effects of aqueous extracts of Auricularia sp and Pleurotus sp mushrooms in cyclophosphamide-immunosuppressed Wistar rats. J Pharm Res Int. 2013;3(4):662–670. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Khare CP. Indian medicinal plants. An illustrated Dictionary. New Delhi: Springer (Indian) Press Ltd; 2007. p. 203. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ekpo DE, Joshua PE, Odiba AS, Nwodo OFC. Flavonoid-rich fraction of Lasianthera africana leaves alleviates hepatotoxicity induced by carbon tetrachloride in Wistar rats. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2021. 10.108001480545.2021.1892957 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 85.Robinson JP, Wallace H. Coulter: decades of invention and discovery. Cytometry. 2013;1:83–88. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Sinha AK. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem. 1972;4(2):389–394. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90132-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pajovic S, Pejic S, Kasaporic J, Radojac M, Borojevic N. Role of superoxide dismutase in industrialization of breast cancer radiation therapy protocol. Arc Oncol. 2003;11(3):191–192. doi: 10.2298/AOO0303191P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med. 1967;70(1):158–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Rutkowski M, Grzegorczyk K, Kędziora J. Laboratory convenient modification of Bessey method for vitamin A determination in blood plasma. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006;57:221–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Rutkowski M, Grzegorczyk K, Greger J. Adaptation of the phosphotungstate method to determine reduced and oxidized vitamin C in blood plasma. Zeitschr Naturforsch. 2004;59:762–767. doi: 10.1515/znc-2004-9-1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rutkowski M, Grzegorczyk K, Paradowski MT. Colorimetric determination of total vitamin E concentration in plasma—own modification of Tsen’s method. Diagn Lab. 2005;41:375–385. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kameswara RB, Kesavulu MM, Giri CH. Anti-diabetic and hypolipidemic effects of Momordica cymbalania hook fruit powder in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;67:103–109. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Arsman G, Jabs HU, Kuhnert U, Nolte W, Schriewer H. LDL-cholesterol, polyvinyl sulphate method. Clin Chem Acta. 1884;140:77–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Pressac M, Huisse F, Aymard P. Adaptation of IgG, IgA and IgM determination on the Ismat: a turbidemetric method. Ann J Clin Biol. 1983;41(5):315–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Derrell C. Guide for care and use of laboratory animals. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

More data used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Immunology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES