ABSTRACT
Escherichia coli is a highly diverse bacterial species comprising both commensal and pathogenic strains. Here, we report complete genome sequences of 16 E. coli bacteriophages isolated from various environmental samples using the ECOR collection as isolation hosts.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Escherichia coli is a versatile and genetically diverse species inhabiting the gut of animals and humans as both commensal or pathogenic strains (1). Similarly, E. coli phages are highly diverse currently belonging to 11 different families and 100 different genera (2) and have been isolated from a variety of sources (3–7). Here, we report the complete genomes of 16 phages isolated from diverse environmental sources.
Phages were isolated using all of the 72 strains in the E. coli Reference Collection (ECOR) (8), representing the diversity of E. coli, as isolation hosts. Samples for phage isolation were collected from a variety of sources (i.e., wastewater, pond water, cow manure, and bird feces) in Copenhagen, Denmark, enriched overnight in the presence of ECOR hosts, serially diluted, and 3 drops of 10 μl were spotted on the same host (Table 1). Single plaques were isolated and plaque purified for at least three rounds as described elsewhere (9). Selected phage genomic DNA was isolated from 1 mL crude phage lysate by using the standard phenol-chlorophorm extraction followed by ethanol precipitation protocol (10). Genomic DNA libraries were prepared using Nextera XT kit and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq platform (250 bp paired end). The raw reads were trimmed and used for de novo genome assembly with CLC Genomics Workbench 9.5.3 (Qiagen, Århus). The assembled genomes were annotated using Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) (11). All tools were run with default parameters.
TABLE 1.
Properties of 16 Escherichia coli bacteriophage genomes
| Name | Isolation host | Isolation source | Family | Genus | Total read count | Avg coverage | Genome length (bp) | ORFsa | tRNA | G+C (%) | Accession | Closest relative | Coverage (%) | Identity (%) | Accession |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC120 | ECOR4 | Wastewater | Autographiviridae | Vectrevirus | 674959 | 3327 | 44544 | 55 | NDb | 44.9 | ON185580.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoS_FFH_1 | 90 | 96.09 | KJ190157.1 |
| EC100 | ECOR4 | Pond water | Demerecviridae | Tequintavirus | 222491 | 433 | 108723 | 155 | 19 | 39 | OK665835.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoS_FFH_1 | 90 | 96.09 | KJ190157.1 |
| EC104 | ECOR19 | Bird feces | Demerecviridae | Tequintavirus | 163981 | 382 | 108711 | 155 | 19 | 39 | ON185581.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoS_FFH_1 | 90 | 96.09 | KJ190157.1 |
| EC105 | ECOR20 | Bird feces | Demerecviridae | Tequintavirus | 150574 | 319 | 108732 | 155 | 19 | 39 | ON185582.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoS_FFH_1 | 90 | 96.08 | KJ190157.1 |
| EC122 | ECOR20 | Bird feces | Demerecviridae | Tequintavirus | 360008 | 636 | 108723 | 156 | 19 | 39 | ON185583.1 | Escherichia phage SP15 | 90 | 92.08 | NC_048627.1 |
| EC142 | ECOR4 | Bird feces | Demerecviridae | Tequintavirus | 123228 | 204 | 108723 | 155 | 19 | 39 | ON185584.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoS_FFH_1 | 90 | 96.09 | KJ190157.1 |
| EC148 | ECOR4 | Bird feces | Demerecviridae | Tequintavirus | 71380 | 187 | 107754 | 157 | 19 | 39 | ON185585.1 | Escherichia phage phiLLS | 92 | 92.49 | NC_047822.1 |
| EC125 | ECOR13 | Wastewater | Drexlerviridae | Warwickvirus | 534498 | 2617 | 50477 | 83 | ND | 44.6 | ON185586.1 | Escherichia phage tuinn | 97 | 98.72 | MN850606.1 |
| EC167 | ECOR20 | Wastewater | Drexlerviridae | Warwickvirus | 487226 | 1733 | 50988 | 82 | ND | 44.2 | ON185587.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoS-95 | 88 | 88.45 | NC_048132.1 |
| EC195 | ECOR34 | Pond water | Drexlerviridae | Warwickvirus | 171094 | 485 | 50477 | 83 | ND | 44.6 | ON185588.1 | Escherichia phage tuinn | 97 | 98.76 | MN850606.1 |
| EC147 | ECOR4 | Wastewater | Drexlerviridae | Hanrivervirus | 587499 | 3008 | 46060 | 77 | ND | 43.9 | ON185589.1 | Escherichia phage egaa | 95 | 95.98 | NC_049852.1 |
| EC101 | ECOR4 | Pond water | Straboviridae | Tequatrovirus | 201824 | 270 | 167718 | 264 | 10 | 35.4 | OL310488.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoM-G3F9 | 98 | 99.12 | MZ234037.1 |
| EC128 | ECOR20 | Pond water | Straboviridae | Tequatrovirus | 61340 | 83 | 171814 | 270 | 8 | 35.3 | ON210139.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoM_112 | 94 | 97.43 | KJ668714.2 |
| EC106 | ECOR4 | Wastewater | None | Felixounavirus | 27683 | 73 | 87829 | 128 | 20 | 39.1 | ON210138.1 | Escherichia phage tootiki | 91 | 96.94 | MN850647.1 |
| EC150 | ECOR36 | Cow manure | None | Wifcevirus | 601535 | 2148 | 68034 | 94 | ND | 46.1 | ON210137.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoM-Ro157lw | 96 | 97.53 | MH051335.1 |
| EC115 | ECOR20 | Cow manure | None | Dhillonvirus | 299207 | 1542 | 44909 | 63 | ND | 54.6 | ON210136.1 | Escherichia phage vB_EcoS_Over9000 | 98 | 94.33 | OK499985.1 |
ORFs, open reading frames.
ND, no tRNAs were identified by RAST annotation.
Phage genera were preliminary assigned by overall genome BLAST similarities to the closest related phage genome available at the NCBI and stated in Table 1. The most diverse phages were isolated from pond water and wastewater, representing four different families, with phages from more genera represented in the wastewater.
The genomes ranged in size from 44544 bp (EC120) to 171814 bp (EC128, EC150) encoding 55 to 271 predicted open reading frames (Table 1). The G+C content ranged from 35.3% (EC128) to 54.6% (EC115). Also, the number of predicted tRNAs varied between the phages (none to 20 tRNAs). The largest number of the predicted tRNAs was observed in phage EC106.
All isolated phages showed similarity to known E. coli phages, determined by whole-genome BLAST similarity search at the NCBI database and stated in Table 1. Phage EC167 was the least similar to other coliphages with 88% query coverage and 88.5% sequence identity to phage vB_EcoS-95 (NC_048132). Phage EC148 showed the highest sequence homology to phage T5_ev212 (99.97% sequence identity, 99% query coverage). For the remaining phages in the collection, closely related phages had between 90 and 96% sequence identity over 90 to 93% query coverage. In summary, while many of the E. coli phages in our collection were closely related to the known E. coli phages, a few phages showed limited sequence similarity, thus expanding the knowledge on diversity of E. coli phages.
Data availability.
The raw sequence reads are available at NCBI SRA database with accession number SRP394492 and GenBank accession numbers for the 16 phages are listed in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Danish AgriFish Agency of Ministry of Environment and Food (34009-14-0873) supported S.J.A. and M.G. and Promilleafgiftsfonden supported A.R.V. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Contributor Information
Lone Brøndsted, Email: lobr@sund.ku.dk.
Kenneth M. Stedman, Portland State University
REFERENCES
- 1.Tenaillon O, Picard B, Denamur E, Skurnik D. 2010. The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:207–217. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). (2020). https://ictv.global/msl.
- 3.Smith R, O'Hara M, Hobman JL, Millard AD. 2015. Draft genome sequences of 14 Escherichia coli phages isolated from cattle slurry. Gen Announcem (Washington, DC) 3. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01364-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Korf IHE, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Adriaenssens EM, Kropinski AM, Nimtz M, Rohde M, van Raaij MJ, Wittmann J. 2019. Still something to discover: novel insights into Escherichia coli phage diversity and taxonomy. Viruses 11:454. doi: 10.3390/v11050454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Olsen NS, Forero-Junco L, Kot W, Hansen LH. 2020. Exploring the remarkable diversity of culturable Escherichia coli phages in the Danish wastewater environment. Viruses 12:986. doi: 10.3390/v12090986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sørensen PE, Van Den Broeck W, Kiil K, Jasinskyte D, Moodley A, Garmyn A, Ingmer H, Butaye P. 2020. New insights into the biodiversity of coliphages in the intestine of poultry. Sci Rep 10:15220–15220. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72177-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maffei E, Shaidullina A, Burkolter M, Heyer Y, Estermann F, Druelle V, Sauer P, Willi L, Michaelis S, Hilbi H, Thaler DS, Harms A, Barr J. 2021. Systematic exploration of Escherichia coli phage-host interactions with the BASEL phage collection. PLoS Biol 19:e3001424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ochman H, Selander RK. 1984. Standard reference strains of Escherichia coli from natural populations. J Bacteriol 157:690–693. doi: 10.1128/jb.157.2.690-693.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gencay YE, Gambino M, Prüssing TF, Brøndsted L. 2019. The genera of bacteriophages and their receptors are the major determinants of host range. Environ Microbiol 21:2095–2111. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2006. Purification of nucleic acids by extraction with phenol:chloroform. CSH Protoc 2006. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot4455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best A, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards R, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman A, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75–90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequence reads are available at NCBI SRA database with accession number SRP394492 and GenBank accession numbers for the 16 phages are listed in Table 1.
