Dear Editor
We read the recent article published by Dogru and colleagues with great interest.1) We would like to commend the authors for this study which is prepared as a detailed literature review. However, we would like to emphasize several points regarding the present study.
The authors have stated that the patients have received 10 mcg/kg/day albendazole during the follow-up. The albendazole dose should be corrected as 10 mg/kg/day. Also, the duration of the adjuvant therapy is reported as 6–9 months. Current literature recommends that adjuvant albendazole treatment following surgery for pulmonary hydatid cyst disease (PHCD) should be given 1–6 months following the operation in a cyclic manner with a dose of 10–15 mg/kg/day. Liver function test should be regularly checked during the treatment period.2–6)
The necessity of postoperative routine albendazole therapy also needs clarification. The authors stated that 24.7% of the patients with PHCD received a radical operation. Studies on PHCD recommend that adjuvant albendazole treatment is not indicated in situations where there is no probability of remnant disease such as surgery after uncomplicated cysts, solitary cysts, in patients who received radical surgery.2)
Neoadjuvant albendazole treatment in PHCD is a matter of debate. There are studies recommending neoadjuvant albendazole treatment in cysts with small diameter, multiple cysts and in cysts with a high risk of intraoperative spread.5,7) On the contrary, various studies state that there is a high risk of rupture following neoadjuvant therapy and it should be avoided in PHCD.8) The authors should clarify why they have not given neoadjuvant albendazole treatment.
The authors stated that they have used Student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Kruskal–Wallis test for comparison of the continuous variables. Since there are no three or more groups for comparison, Kruskal–Wallis test could not have been performed. Furthermore, the mean and standard deviation is very close to each other for the continuous variables which means they are not distributing normally. For this reason, Student’s t-test cannot be used and the continuous variables should be expressed as median (min-max) or median (interquartile range [IQR]). In the first sentence of the results section, the authors stated that “a total of 382 patients (145 females and 138 males) were included in the study.” Instead of 382, it should be corrected as “283 patients.”
In the results section, the authors stated that “postoperative recurrence occurred in eight patients (2.8%), all of whom had undergone thoracotomy. Recurrence was attributed to continued exposure to animals.” The main factor that causes a recurrence is remnant germinant membrane due to inadequate surgery. Therefore, this statement is not compatible with current literature. The authors should provide the studies that they have used to support their statement.
The major point regarding the present study is related with the discordance between the title and the evaluation of the data of the study cohort. The title clearly states that “factors affecting mortality and morbidity” which requires the use of multivariate logistic regression analysis for evaluation of the independent risk factors for any given clinical condition. Since mortality was observed in only one patient, a risk factor analysis is not possible. However, morbidity was observed in 29 patients and a multivariate analysis could have been performed.
The authors have used univariate analysis in the study but have not evaluated these results in the article text. This is a high-volume study and the readers would have benefitted from such an analysis. In Tables 1 and 2, it is seen that the two groups that are formed according to the diameter of the cysts (>10 cm vs <10 cm) had significant difference in terms of age (p = 0.009), symptoms (p <0.001), management of the cysts (p = 0.004), and the type of operation (p = 0.008). We used the MedCalc program to evaluate the correlation between the diameter and the symptoms of the patients from the data presented by the authors in Tables 1 and 2. The frequency of symptomatic patients with a cystic diameter >10 cm was 4.96 times higher than the patients with a cystic diameter <10 cm (OR = 4.96, p = 0.0011 95% CI = 1.9–12.9). This suggests a correlation between the diameter of the cyst and the symptoms of the patients. For this reason, the authors could have performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to calculate the cutoff diameter of the cyst in relation to the symptomatic state of the patients. Analysis of Table 1 shows that video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) was used in cysts <10 cm. In cysts >10 cm, conservative treatment was used more frequently than radical procedures.
In Table 2, it is seen that in patients with and without morbidity, the diameter of the cyst is the only parameter that showed a significant difference and clinical parameters such as Charlson comorbidity index, the type of operation showed no difference among these groups. A ROC curve analysis could have been performed to determine the optimal cutoff value for the development of postoperative morbidity. Nevertheless, we analyzed the relationship between the cystic diameter and development of postoperative morbidity using the MedCalc program. The risk of postoperative morbidity development in patients with a cyst >10 cm was 2.32 times higher than patients with a cyst diameter <10 cm (OR = 2.32, p = 0.046 95% CI = 1.01–5.31). These results obtained from the univariate analysis could have been analyzed using multivariate analysis which would have shown the independent risk factors that were related with development of postoperative morbidity.
Humans are accidental hosts in the life cycle of echinococcus, this is an accidental infection by ingestion of the eggs of the parasite. The eggs penetrate the intestinal wall and is carried to the liver by the portal circulation where it settles in the hepatic sinusoids. Larvae that are smaller than 0.3 mm pass through the sinusoidal filter system (the first Lemman’s filter) and reach the lungs. In the lungs, the larvae pass through the second capillary filter system (The second Leman’s filter) and some of the parasites are stuck in the pulmonary capillaries.9) These two filter systems explain the mechanism behind the observations that the liver is the most frequent site of echinococcal disease which is followed by the lungs. In the present study, majority of the patients have concomitant hydatid disease in the liver. The main point that needs clarification is the use of neoadjuvant anthelminthic therapy in these patients. This is a clinical dilemma that we also encounter.
The authors have stated that they have performed indirect hemagglutination test in 201 patients; however, they have not stated the positive test rate among these patients. If the authors can share their results, an analysis including the differences in the rate of test positivity in patients with lung-only versus combined lung and liver hydatid disease could have been performed. The later analysis would provide valuable information.
Disclosure Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article.
References
- 1). Dogru MV, Sezen CB, Aker C, et al. Evaluating giant hydatid cysts: factors affecting mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 27: 164–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2). Kuzucu A, Ulutas H, Reha Celik M, et al. Hydatid cysts of the lung: lesion size in relation to clinical presentation and therapeutic approach. Surg Today 2014; 44: 131–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3). Rawat S, Kumar R, Raja J, et al. Pulmonary hydatid cyst: review of literature. J Family Med Prim Care 2019; 8: 2774–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4). Haberal MA, Akar E, Dikis OS, et al. Surgical treatment of childhood pulmonary hydatidosis: an analysis of 25 cases. Tanaffos 2018; 17: 280–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5). Usluer O, Ceylan KC, Kaya S, et al. Surgical management of pulmonary hydatid cysts: is size an important prognostic indicator? Tex Heart Inst J 2010; 37: 429–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6). Aydin Y, Altuntas B, Kaya A, et al. The availability of echinococcus IgG ELISA for diagnosing pulmonary hydatid cysts. Eurasian J Med 2018; 50: 144–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7). Burgos R, Varela A, Castedo E, et al. Pulmonary hydatidosis: surgical treatment and follow-up of 240 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16: 628–34; discussion 634-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8). Usluer O, Kaya SO, Samancilar O, et al. The effect of preoperative albendazole treatment on the cuticular membranes of pulmonary hydatid cysts: should it be administered preoperatively? Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol 2014; 11: 26–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9). Akbulut S, Yavuz R, Sogutcu N, et al. Hydatid cyst of the pancreas: report of an undiagnosed case of pancreatic hydatid cyst and brief literature review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6: 190–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
