Summary
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disease of the large bowel which is characterised by dysregulated immunity and death to epithelial cells in the bowel, leading to prolonged inflammation. This can ultimately lead to surgery to remove the large bowel, with a risk of cancer developing if inflammation persists. Current therapies – which target the incoming immune cells or the cytokines they produce – are improving significantly but they are expensive and are immunosuppressive, leading to risk of infection. Here, we discuss a new trial which targets an early inducer of inflammation – the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by mitochondria. Previous work has shown that excessive mitochondrial ROS induces inflammatory signalling through the cGAS-STING pathway, leading to dysregulated immunity and death of epithelial cells. In this MARVEL trial (Mitochondrial Anti-oxidant therapy to Resolve Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis) individuals with an active UC flare-up will be given a mitochondrial anti-oxidant (MitoQ) or placebo tablet in addition to standard medical treatment, in order to suppress inflammation as it develops. This phase 2b trial will repurpose MitoQ, which has been previously tested in other large trials in different disease settings, and will measure clinical response and markers of inflammation over 24 weeks. It is hoped that this trial will develop a new target for UC through re-purposing a relatively cheap, non-toxic and well-characterised drug.
Keywords: colitis, mitochondria, DAMP, clinical trial
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disease of the large bowel that affects around 150 000 patients in the UK; prevalence continues to increase [1, 2]. Individuals with UC can suffer with bloody diarrhoea, uncontrollable bowel habit, dehydration, fever and malnutrition, often with a significant impact on their quality of life, ability to work, and emotional wellbeing. They are at a risk of requiring surgery to remove the large bowel if inflammation persists, and large bowel cancer if UC is poorly treated over time [3]. Dysregulated immunity, microbiota alterations, and epithelial damage combine during the establishment and persistence of UC. Infiltration of innate (neutrophils and macrophages) and adaptive (Th1 and Th17) immune cells into the bowel is critical for development of the disease.
Current therapies for UC have improved significantly in recent years, but they are long term and expensive [e.g. regular infusions of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF), anti-α4β7 to block immune cell migration into the bowel, or anti-IL23p40 to block Th17 cell differentiation] [4]. In addition, the current first-line therapies (combined anti-TNF and thiopurines) are effective in only 50% of patients with severe disease [5, 6], are immune-suppressive and have been linked to increased rates of opportunistic infections [7, 8]. Therefore, it is important that we continue to improve our therapeutic options. Exploring options away from downstream immunology to upstream drivers of inflammation – before they trigger the development of the damaging immune response – is an increasing focus of research.
Critical for the development of UC is colonic mucosal barrier dysfunction with increased epithelial death [9]. A persistent inflammatory environment is driven and maintained by a complex inflammatory milieu, with resulting inflammation and further development of damaging immunity [10–12]. Many factors contribute to this maladaptive response, including altered microbiome, genetic susceptibility, and diet, as well as the production of host damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Recently, a key role for mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial-released DAMPs (mtDAMPs) in the development of pathogenic bowel inflammation and epithelial death has been established [13, 14].
Release of DNA and reactive oxygen species (ROS) from mitochondria induces production of IL-8, IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF in responding immune cells, triggering the NLRP3 inflammasome and cGAS-STING axis [15]. This inflammation leads to differentiation of, and cytokine production by, other resident and infiltrating immune cells. Subsequent epithelial cell death also occurs. While blocking the latter production of cytokines is well established as a therapeutic option for a number of autoimmune conditions, in this trial, the effects of mtROS on the downstream impact on mtDAMPs will be blocked during an active flare-up of UC.
This trial will test the idea that blocking the effects of mtROS will be important to fully reduce pathogenic inflammation during a UC disease flare and to allow full resolution and complete healing of the inflamed gut mucosa. MitoQ is an antioxidant derivative of coenzyme Q10, which efficiently migrates into the mitrochondrial inner membrane and donates a hydrogen atom to combat the radical superoxide species. Previous work by the trial principal investigator Dr. Gwo-Tzer Ho has demonstrated that MitoQ reduces severity and delays onset of colitis in two mouse models: dextran-sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced disease and chronic spontaneous multidrug-resistant 1 (mdr1a-/-) deficient colitis [9, 10]. Other trials using MitoQ in Hepatitis C and Parkinson’s disease have established the drug to be tolerable [16, 17].
Now MARVEL, a randomised phase 2b double blind placebo-controlled multi-centre trial, is starting across participating hospitals in the UK in early 2021. The trial will test the efficacy of MitoQ given as an inflammation-dampening adjunct in addition to usual medical treatment that includes corticosteroids. This study will recruit around 200 adult participants and the participants will have a confirmed diagnosis of UC with a number of features such as blood in the stools which fulfils a set clinical criteria using the Mayo score that indicate active disease. Participants will receive the standard dose of oral prednisolone alongside either MitoQ or placebo for 24 weeks (daily dose). They will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks with direct examination of the affected colonic mucosa, assessment of their symptom scores and well-being, and with assessment of blood and stool inflammation via calprotectin ELISA. Primary and secondary endpoints of the trial are listed in Table 1. In addition, parallel mechanistic studies will be performed to provide further insights into this clinical intervention in UC. The combination of experimental studies in clinical trials especially in highly characterised patient cohorts is powerful and recently been endorsed by the NIHR [18].
Table 1.
Primary endpoint | Secondary endpoints |
---|---|
Clinical response at week 12 | Clinical remission at week 12 = complete Mayo score of ≤2 points and no individual subscore >1 point |
Defined by a decrease from baseline of Mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30%; | |
With accompanying decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding of at least 1 point or an absolute subscore of rectal bleeding of 0 or 1 | |
Clinical response and remission based on partial Mayo score at week 24 (Mayo score of 2 or less + no subscore >1 point | |
Mucosal healing – endoscopic Mayo score of 0 or 1 at week 12 | |
Normalisation of faecal calprotectin (<250 μg/ml) at week 12 and 24 compared to baseline | |
Normalisation of faecal haemoglobin (10 μg/g faeces) at week 12 and 24 compared to baseline | |
Quality of life at 12 and 24 weeks | |
Side effects/adverse outcomes | |
Drug concentration analyses and research into biomarkers and pharmacogenetics at 0, 12, and 24 weeks | |
Proportions of primary treatment failure within 24 weeks study period requiring escalation in medical treatment as below: | |
• Re-treatment with oral or intravenous corticosteroids | |
• Biologics (anti-TNF, anti-α4β7, anti-IL23 and oral Jak-inhibitors) | |
• Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine in participants who are currently not on a thiopurines | |
• Oral or intravenous ciclosporin |
A further study that is aimed at children with UC (MiniMARVEL) is also set to open in 2021. If the data are supportive, both adults and children may benefit from this. New treatments in children with IBD are often extrapolated from adult studies and there is often a lag period of 3–7 years before new approaches are applied in the younger group. It is uncommon for clinical trials for new treatment to be performed primarily in the younger patient group.
MARVEL aims to re-purpose an existing drug compound to potentially switch off a key factor in gut mucosal inflammation in UC during an active flare-up. There is a huge untapped medicine chest of generic drugs with unexploited uses. Development of new drugs de novo from molecule to clinical use is very expensive, has a high attrition rate and takes a long time (10–15 years). Investigating existing drug compounds in a clinical repurposing trial such as MARVEL will allow considerable saving of time and money.
As such, this approach, which is relatively cheap and non-toxic, may improve the lives of patients with UC. It will also spark further translational research into the role of mitochondria in complex immune-mediated diseases, how the mitochondria intersect with adaptive immunity during pathology; and in the broader sense, how researchers can creatively use drug-repurposing as a route to new treatment approaches. It is important to await the final results of the MARVEL study. This trial, however, provides encouragement and impetus to basic scientists to apply and seek clinical translation of their discoveries where possible.
Acknowledgement
The Editor-in-Chief and editorial team would like to thank the handling editor, Menno van Zelm, the reviewer, Arianne Theiss, and an anonymous reviewer for their contribution to the publication of this article.
Trials-at-a-glance
Drug: MitoQ (Mitoquinol mesylate)
Target: Mitochondria
Disease: Ulcerative colitis
Mechanism of action: MitoQ can block the effects of mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species (mROS). MitoQ is an antioxidant with a mitoquinol component which allows it to migrate to the inner mitochondrial membrane. Here, it can donate a hydrogen atom to reduce mROS and dampen inflammation. MitoQ reduces the leakage and oxidisation of mitochondrial DNA, promotes autophagy and influences energy metabolism, leading to reduced inflammation and improved healing of the gut.
Clinical trial ID number: NCT04276740
Key reference: Ho et al. Mucosal Immunol. (2018);11(1):120–130. doi: 10.1038/mi.2017.31
Lead Centre/Sponsor: The University of Edinburgh & Lothian Health Board ACCORD.
Contributor Information
Emily Gwyer Findlay, Centre for Inflammation Research, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Greg Sutton, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gwo-Tzer Ho, Centre for Inflammation Research, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Funding
None declared.
Author Contributions
E.G.F., G.S., and G.-T.H. all contributed to writing – original draft and EGF to writing – review and editing.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Data availability
No new data were generated or analysed in support of this research.
References
- 1. Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology 2012;142(1):46–54.e42; quiz e30. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Jones GR, Lyons M, Plevris N et al. IBD prevalence in Lothian, Scotland, derived by capture-recapture methodology. Gut 2019;68(11):1953–60. 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lakatos PL, Lakatos L. Risk for colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: changes, causes and management strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14(25):3937–47. 10.3748/wjg.14.3937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Danese S, Fiorino G, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Positioning therapies in ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18(6):1280–1290.e1. 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Colombel JF, Panaccione R, Bossuyt P et al. Effect of tight control management on Crohn’s disease (CALM): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018;390(10114):2779–89. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32641-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cholapranee A, Hazlewood GS, Kaplan GG et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of biologics for induction and maintenance of mucosal healing in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017;45(10):1291–302. 10.1111/apt.14030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Galloway JB, Hyrich KL, Mercer LK et al. Anti-TNF therapy is associated with an increased risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis especially in the first 6 months of treatment: updated results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register with special emphasis on risks in the elderly. Rheumatology 2011;50(1):124–31. 10.1093/rheumatology/keq242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kirchgesner J, Lemaitre M, Carrat F et al. Risk of serious and opportunistic infections associated with treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 2018;155(2):337–346.e10. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Di Sabatino A, Ciccocioppo R, Luinetti O et al. Increased enterocyte apoptosis in inflamed areas of Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46(11):1498–507. 10.1007/s10350-004-6802-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Friedrich M, Pohin M, Powrie F. Cytokine networks in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Immunity 2019;50(4):992–1006. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Parikh K, Antanaviciute A, Fawkner-Corbett D et al. Colonic epithelial cell diversity in health and inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2019;567(7746):49–55. 10.1038/s41586-019-0992-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Corridoni D, Antanaviciute A, Gupta T et al. Single-cell atlas of colonic CD8+ T cells in ulcerative colitis. Nat Med 2020;26(9):1480–90. 10.1038/s41591-020-1003-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ho GT, Aird RE, Liu B et al. MDR1 deficiency impairs mitochondrial homeostasis and promotes intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol 2018;11(1):120–30. 10.1038/mi.2017.31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Boyapati RK, Dorward DA, Tamborska A et al. Mitochondrial DNA is a pro-inflammatory damage-associated molecular pattern released during active IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018;24(10):2113–22. 10.1093/ibd/izy095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Riley JS, Tait SW. Mitochondrial DNA in inflammation and immunity. EMBO Rep 2020;21(4):e49799. 10.15252/embr.201949799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gane EJ, Weilert F, Orr DW et al. The mitochondria-targeted anti-oxidant mitoquinone decreases liver damage in a phase II study of hepatitis C patients. Liver Int 2010;30(7):1019–26. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02250.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Snow BJ, Rolfe FL, Lockhart MM et al. ; Protect Study Group. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ as a disease-modifying therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2010;25(11):1670–4. 10.1002/mds.23148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/explore-nihr/funding-programmes/efficacy-and-mechanism-evaluation.htm (13 September 2020, date last accessed).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were generated or analysed in support of this research.