Significance
How does the brain maintain memories that long outlast the proteins that encoded them? Francis Crick in 1984 proposed a model consisting of a multimeric protein whose subunits can phosphorylate each other and that naive unactive subunits can exchange into the active multimeric protein. An alternative model is that active holoenzymes can directly transfer activity to unactive holoenzymes, maintaining the integrity of the holoenzymes. Recent biochemical findings indicate that active Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) can propagate activity to unactive CaMKII. Here, we demonstrate that hippocampal synapses contain a CaMKII memory trace acquired prior to slice culture preparation, which remains intact well after the complete turnover of CaMKII protein (2 weeks). We conclude that the synaptic memory (active CaMKII) can be transferred to naive newly synthesized CaMKII, thus sustaining the memory in the face of protein turnover.
Keywords: CaMKII, synapse, memory
Abstract
Activation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) plays a critical role in long-term potentiation (LTP), a long accepted cellular model for learning and memory. However, how LTP and memories survive the turnover of synaptic proteins, particularly CaMKII, remains a mystery. Here, we take advantage of the finding that constitutive Ca2+-independent CaMKII activity, acquired prior to slice preparation, provides a lasting memory trace at synapses. In slice culture, this persistent CaMKII activity, in the absence of Ca2+ stimulation, remains stable over a 2-wk period, well beyond the turnover of CaMKII protein. We propose that the nascent CaMKII protein present at 2 wk acquired its activity from preexisting active CaMKII molecules, which transferred their activity to newly synthesized CaMKII molecules and thus maintain the memory in the face of protein turnover.
A key question in the field of neuroscience is how memories are stored and how these memories outlast the lifetime of the molecules that encode them. For instance, long-term potentiation (LTP), a well-established cellular model for learning and memory can last at least 150 d (1), well beyond the life-time of most synaptic proteins, which generally have median half-life times of 2–5 d (2–5). This issue was initially addressed at a theoretical level with a two-step model (6, 7). The first step requires a multimeric protein with subunits that can phosphorylate each other. The second step requires that the protein undergoes subunit exchange such that naïve subunits can be exchanged into the active complex and be phosphorylated. Indeed, Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) satisfies the first step (8–10). CaMKII is a dodecamer in which Ca2+/CaM binding initiates both intra- and intersubunit phosphorylation within a holoenzyme. Remarkably it was shown that following a transient Ca2+ signal the kinase remained active (8, 10), a state referred to as autonomy. Thus, these results establish that CaMKII can convert a transient Ca2+ signal into one that can outlast the initiating stimulus. At about the same time, it was shown that CaMKII is required for the induction of LTP (11–13) and also mimics LTP (14–16). More recently, it has been found that CaMKII is required for maintaining LTP, at least during the first hour (17, 18), thus linking the first step of CaMKII autonomy to LTP.
Might CaMKII also satisfy the second step in which active CaMKII can transfer its activity to unactive CaMKII? Recent biochemical evidence suggests that this may be the case. Using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to track single molecules of CaMKII labeled with fluorescent markers, it was found that activation of CaMKII holoenzymes triggers colocalization of subunits between holoenzymes (19–22), including unactivated ones, resulting in the Ca2+-independent phosphorylation of new subunits (19). An additional/alternative mechanism for propagating CaMKII activity has recently been proposed (23). The authors show that in the presence of Ca2+/CaM, mixing wild-type holoenzymes with a kinase dead holoenzyme result in phosphorylation of the kinase dead CaMKII and this exchange still occurred when subunits were restrained to their parent holoenzyme by crosslinking the hub domains. Regardless of the specific mechanism, these studies establish that CaMKII can transfer its activity to naive CaMKII. Might this propagation of activity serve as a mechanism to maintain CaMKII activity and synaptic potentiation in the face of protein turnover? Interestingly, although the problem of memory stability and protein turnover was addressed in the mid-1980s, there has been no little physiological evidence that such a mechanism is operative.
CaMKII is known to turn over rapidly with a half-life of 2–4 d (2–4). Deleting CaMKII with CRISPR results in the complete loss of CaMKII protein, measured by Western blots and immunocytochemistry, within 2 wk (15). We have recently reported that synaptic transmission is maintained by Ca2+-independent constitutively active CaMKII, most likely reflecting a lasting memory trace induced by LTP prior to slice preparation (15, 18). Can constitutively active CaMKII remain active beyond 2 wk? To address this question, we have turned to hippocampal slice culture, which can be maintained for many weeks. In the presence of the NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonist APV and the Ca2+ channel antagonist nifedipine to prevent Ca2+ stimulation, we find that CaMKII activity once silenced remains inactive for two-weeks. This finding indicates that CaMKII cannot be reactivated under the resting conditions of our experiment. Second, we show that the constitutively active CaMKII remains unaltered throughout the 2-wk of slice culture. Given that CaMKII protein completely turns over within 2 wk, we propose that the CaMKII activity recorded at 2 wk in culture is generated by CaMKII that was not present at the beginning of the experiment, indicating the transfer of activity from old to new CaMKII protein.
Results
Our previous studies have shown that ∼50% of synaptic transmission is maintained by Ca2+-independent constitutive CaMKII activity, presumably acquired by prior LTP when the animal was alive (15, 18). In addition, we found that CaMKII protein, as measured by Western blotting and immunocytochemistry, is undetectable within 2 wk of CRISPR deletion of CaMKII (15). This loss of protein closely parallels the depression in synaptic transmission, indicating that these protein assays are an accurate reflection of the functional pool of CaMKII. Furthermore, the depression at 4 wk was no greater than at 2 wk (15). To address the impact of protein turnover on CaMKII activity, we have turned to hippocampal slice culture, which can be maintained for weeks in vitro. We first tested whether the CaMKII activity in slice culture is dependent on spontaneous Ca2+ transients by acutely applying the NMDAR antagonist APV (100 μM) and the Ca2+ channel antagonist nifedipine (20 μM). These inhibitors had no effect on the depression of synaptic transmission following CRISPR deletion of CaMKII in slice culture (SI Appendix, Fig. S1), indicating that the turnover of CaMKII was unaltered in the presence of these antagonists. We found that bath application of the membrane permeable CaMKII peptide inhibitor myr-CN27 (Fig. 1A) caused a roughly 50% depression of synaptic transmission, similar to that reported in the absence of inhibitors (15). We next transfected cells with paAIP2 (Fig. 1B), a novel light-inducible and reversible inhibitor of CaMKII (24). Light activation of paAIP2 also depressed synaptic transmission (Fig. 1C), indicating that, at least acutely, CaMKII activity is independent of Ca2+ influx through NMDARs or Ca2+ channels.
Given that CaMKII protein completely turns over within 2 wk, we assayed constitutive CaMKII activity in slice culture over this time period (Fig. 2A). Is the constitutive activity lost as the active CaMKII is degraded (Fig. 2B1), or is the activity maintained by the transfer of the activity to newly synthesized CaMKII (Fig. 2B2)? To address this question, we assayed CaMKII activity over time with the CaMKII inhibitory peptide myr-CN27 (18) (see Fig. 1A). We found that CaMKII activity remained unaltered 2–3 d in culture (Fig. 2C), as well as 7 d (Fig. 2D) and, finally, 2 wk in culture (Fig. 2E). We conclude that, since the CaMKII has fully turned over by 2 wk, the CaMKII activity recorded at 2 wk has been acquired from preexisting active CaMKII before the onset of the APV and nifedipine treatment.
One concern with these findings is that, although we have prevented spontaneous Ca2+ entry through NMDARs and Ca2+ channels, we cannot be certain that intracellular Ca2+ over the 2-wk period might activate the newly synthesized CaMKII. To address this alternative, we turned to paAIP2 (see Fig. 1B) and paired recording from control and transfected cells (Fig. 3A). Blue light rapidly exposes the AIP2 peptide, which then returns to its closed inactive conformation in ∼40 s following light exposure (24). After slices were exposed to the blue light protocol (Fig. 3B), they were returned to the incubator and maintained in media containing APV and nifedipine. To monitor the depression over prolonged time periods, we compared the size of EPSCs in a transfected cell to that in a neighboring control cell (Fig. 3A). With this assay, CaMKII remained silent, not only for the first day following the exposure to blue light (Fig. 3C), but throughout the 2-wk period (Fig. 3D). These findings indicate that in the presence of APV and nifedipine, once silenced, CaMKII remains silent. There is no reactivation. Thus, we conclude that the CaMKII activity recorded at 2 wk (Fig. 2E) must have been transferred from preexisting active CaMKII. As an aside, the fact that CaMKII is not activated by non-NMDAR sources of Ca2+ during the 2 wk is important, because if this were to occur it would degrade the synapse specificity and Hebbian nature of LTP.
Discussion
In the present study, we have addressed the long-standing problem of molecular storage in the face of protein turnover (6, 7). To address this problem, we have taken advantage of previous findings that synaptic transmission is maintained by the ongoing Ca2+/CaM-independent constitutive action of CaMKII (15, 17, 18). We have argued that this activity reflects an LTP memory trace acquired prior to slice preparation (18). However, it is important to emphasize that the origin of this activity is irrelevant for the question addressed in this study, which is whether this constitutive CaMKII activity remains following the complete turnover of CaMKII protein.
We find that in slices, cultured in the presence of the NMDAR antagonist APV and the Ca2+ channel blocker nifedipine, CaMKII, once silenced, remains silent for 2 wk. There is no reactivation under our conditions. However, we report that the constitutive action of CaMKII recorded shortly after slice culturing remains unaltered over this 2-wk period. There are two models that can explain the persistent action of CaMKII. First, an active holoenzyme could phosphorylate an unactive holoenzyme (Fig. 4A). While previous biochemical evidence has argued against this model (19, 25, 26), a recent study has proposed such a mechanism (23). This model runs the risk of uncontrolled runaway phosphorylation of unactive holoenzymes and the loss of synapse specificity, a feature of LTP. Presumably, the high levels of the phosphatase PP2A in the spine cytoplasm (27, 28), would limit the spread of active CaMKII. The second mechanism (Fig. 4B) involves the exchange of subunits in which a phosphorylated subunit in a holoenzyme is replaced by an unphosphorylated subunit, as originally postulated theoretically (6, 7, 9) and more recently biochemically (19, 20, 22). It is well accepted that CaMKII mRNA is localized and translated in dendrites, providing a local source for CaMKII replenishment (29–31). The attractiveness of the subunit exchange model is that it confines the propagation of the signal to those holoenzymes that were originally activated. It is important to emphasize that our results are agnostic regarding the mechanism by which CaMKII activity is propagated during protein turnover.
It is generally accepted that for CaMKII to enhance synaptic transmission, it must be bound to the C-tail of the GluN2B subunit of the NMDAR (15, 32, 33). This raises two additional intriguing questions. First, how does the binding of CaMKII to GluN2B interact with the propagation of CaMKII activity, be it either by subunit exchange or by interholoenzyme phosphorylation? Second, how does the CaMKII memory survive the turnover of NMDARs which is also complete within 2 wk (34)? Can activated CaMKII bound to one NMDAR bind to a new NMDAR? Answers to these questions will be of considerable interest.
A final consideration is the comparison of the present results to the sequence of events that are proposed to occur late after the induction of LTP. LTP is associated with a long-lasting increase in spine size (35, 36). This includes a late increase in the size of the PSD (37–40) and additionally a slow increase in the size of the presynaptic bouton (38, 39), resulting in the “matching” of pre- and postsynaptic structures following LTP. It is also proposed that protein synthesis is required for “late” LTP (37, 41, 42). One might expect that these late changes would be more stable, resisting reversal, and, perhaps, ultimately independent of CaMKII signaling. Our results indicate that at least for 2 wk, the magnitude and reversibility of CaMKII signaling remains unaltered. It is important to keep in mind that modeling mnemonic processes demonstrate that irreversible changes in synaptic weight are unstable and will quickly saturated (43–48). The interplay between constitutive CaMKII signaling and the associated synaptic structural changes remain to be explored.
Materials and Methods
Animals.
All the experimental procedures on animals were approved by the UCSF Animal Care and Use Committee. We usually used 5–7 animals to obtain a complete dataset.
Experimental constructs and chemical agents.
The paAIP2 plasmid was obtained from Dr. Ryohei Yasuda (24). myr-CN27 was purchased from Calbiochem (catalog #208921).
Slice culture and biolistic transfection.
For hippocampal slices, cultured 6 to 8-d-old rats were used (49). A helio gene gun with 1 μm DNA-coated gold particles (Bio-Rad) was used to biolistically transfect slices 1 d after sectioning. Slices were maintained at 34 °C and the medium was changed every 2 d. When experiments began, the slice media had APV and nifedipine added to it to concentrations of 100 μM and 20 μM.
Photostimulation.
A 473-nm blue DPSS laser (Shanghai Laser & Optics Century, BL473T8-300FC) was used to deliver blue light pulses (0.1 Hz, 1 s, 20 mW/cm2). An optical patch cable connected to the optical fibers was used to deliver the blue light from the laser. A Master-8 (A.M.P. I) controlled the light pulses. When illuminating slices, they were superfused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) and either recorded from acutely or placed back into the slice culture dish and returned to the incubator.
Electrophysiological recording.
Wild-type cells or fluorescent transfected pyramidal cells in CA1 region of hippocampus were recorded with patch electrodes (50). Dual recordings were made from control and transfected cells where noted. All recordings were made at 20–25 °C. Internal solution (in mM): 135 CsMeSO4, 8 NaCl, 10 Hepes, 5 QX314-Cl, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, 0.3 EGTA, and 0.1 spermine. Osmolarity was adjusted to 290–295 mOm and pH was buffered at 7.3–7.4. External solution (mM): 119 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 4 CaCl2, 4 MgCl2, 1 NaH2PO4, 26.2 NaHCO3, and 11 glucose, bubbled continuously with 95% O2/5% CO2. For most of the recordings, APV and nifedipine were also present in the external ACSF at concentrations of 100 μM and 20 μM, respectively. Synaptic currents were evoked every 10 s with bipolar stimulating electrodes placed in s. radiatum. To record EPSCs, picrotoxin (100 µM) was added to the external solution; for recording of AMPAR EPSCs, the cell membrane was held at −70 mV. A Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Axon Instruments), filtered at 2 kHz and digitized at 10 kHz, was used to record current responses. Cells with series resistance larger than 20 MOhm were excluded from analysis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Eric Dang for preparation of the slice cultures and members of the Nicoll lab for comments on the manuscript. We thank Dr. R. Yasuda for the paAIP2 construct. We thank Drs. Mingjie Zhang, Howard Schulman, Massimo Scanziani, and the reviewers of this manuscript for their insightful input. This research was funded by NIH (R01MH117139).
Footnotes
Reviewers: M.M.S., University of Massachusetts, Amherst; and R.M., University of California, San Diego.
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2211572119/-/DCSupplemental.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.
References
- 1.Abraham W. C., How long will long-term potentiation last? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358, 735–744 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cohen L. D., et al. , Metabolic turnover of synaptic proteins: Kinetics, interdependencies and implications for synaptic maintenance. PLoS One 8, e63191 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ehlers M. D., Activity level controls postsynaptic composition and signaling via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 231–242 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dörrbaum A. R., Kochen L., Langer J. D., Schuman E. M., Local and global influences on protein turnover in neurons and glia. eLife 7, e34202 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mathieson T., et al. , Systematic analysis of protein turnover in primary cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 689 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Crick F., Memory and molecular turnover. Nature 312, 101 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lisman J. E., A mechanism for memory storage insensitive to molecular turnover: A bistable autophosphorylating kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 3055–3057 (1985). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miller S. G., Kennedy M. B., Regulation of brain type II Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase by autophosphorylation: A Ca2+-triggered molecular switch. Cell 44, 861–870 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lisman J. E., Goldring M. A., Feasibility of long-term storage of graded information by the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase molecules of the postsynaptic density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 5320–5324 (1988). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Saitoh T., Schwartz J. H., Phosphorylation-dependent subcellular translocation of a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase produces an autonomous enzyme in Aplysia neurons. J. Cell Biol. 100, 835–842 (1985). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Silva A. J., Stevens C. F., Tonegawa S., Wang Y., Deficient hippocampal long-term potentiation in alpha-calcium-calmodulin kinase II mutant mice. Science 257, 201–206 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Malenka R. C., et al. , An essential role for postsynaptic calmodulin and protein kinase activity in long-term potentiation. Nature 340, 554–557 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malinow R., Schulman H., Tsien R. W., Inhibition of postsynaptic PKC or CaMKII blocks induction but not expression of LTP. Science 245, 862–866 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pettit D. L., Perlman S., Malinow R., Potentiated transmission and prevention of further LTP by increased CaMKII activity in postsynaptic hippocampal slice neurons. Science 266, 1881–1885 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Incontro S., et al. , The CaMKII/NMDA receptor complex controls hippocampal synaptic transmission by kinase-dependent and independent mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 9, 2069 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lledo P. M., et al. , Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II and long-term potentiation enhance synaptic transmission by the same mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 11175–11179 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sanhueza M., et al. , Role of the CaMKII/NMDA receptor complex in the maintenance of synaptic strength. J. Neurosci. 31, 9170–9178 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tao W., et al. , Synaptic memory requires CaMKII. eLife 10, e60360 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stratton M., et al. , Activation-triggered subunit exchange between CaMKII holoenzymes facilitates the spread of kinase activity. eLife 3, e01610 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bhattacharyya M., Karandur D., Kuriyan J., Structural insights into the regulation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII). Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 12, a035147 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhattacharyya M., et al. , Molecular mechanism of activation-triggered subunit exchange in Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. eLife 5, e13405 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karandur D., et al. , Breakage of the oligomeric CaMKII hub by the regulatory segment of the kinase. eLife 9, e57784 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Iva Lučić L. H., Jiang P.-L., Alejandro G., Scalise C., Wang C., Franz A., Wahl M., Liu F., Plested A. J. R., CaMKII activity spreads by inter-holoenzyme phosphorylation bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.07.09.196154; (2022). [DOI]
- 24.Murakoshi H., et al. , Kinetics of endogenous CaMKII required for synaptic plasticity revealed by optogenetic kinase inhibitor. Neuron 94, 690 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hanson P. I., Meyer T., Stryer L., Schulman H., Dual role of calmodulin in autophosphorylation of multifunctional CaM kinase may underlie decoding of calcium signals. Neuron 12, 943–956 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rich R. C., Schulman H., Substrate-directed function of calmodulin in autophosphorylation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28424–28429 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Strack S., Barban M. A., Wadzinski B. E., Colbran R. J., Differential inactivation of postsynaptic density-associated and soluble Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II by protein phosphatases 1 and 2A. J. Neurochem. 68, 2119–2128 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lisman J., Schulman H., Cline H., The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 175–190 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ouyang Y., Rosenstein A., Kreiman G., Schuman E. M., Kennedy M. B., Tetanic stimulation leads to increased accumulation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II via dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 19, 7823–7833 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Burgin K. E., et al. , In situ hybridization histochemistry of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in developing rat brain. J. Neurosci. 10, 1788–1798 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mayford M., Baranes D., Podsypanina K., Kandel E. R., The 3′-untranslated region of CaMKII alpha is a cis-acting signal for the localization and translation of mRNA in dendrites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 13250–13255 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Halt A. R., et al. , CaMKII binding to GluN2B is critical during memory consolidation. EMBO J. 31, 1203–1216 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Barria A., Malinow R., NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptic plasticity by regulating binding to CaMKII. Neuron 48, 289–301 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Incontro S., Asensio C. S., Edwards R. H., Nicoll R. A., Efficient, complete deletion of synaptic proteins using CRISPR. Neuron 83, 1051–1057 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Matsuzaki M., Honkura N., Ellis-Davies G. C., Kasai H., Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature 429, 761–766 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tonnesen J., Katona G., Rozsa B., Nagerl U. V., Spine neck plasticity regulates compartmentalization of synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 678 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bosch M., et al. , Structural and molecular remodeling of dendritic spine substructures during long-term potentiation. Neuron 82, 444–459 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meyer D., Bonhoeffer T., Scheuss V., Balance and stability of synaptic structures during synaptic plasticity. Neuron 82, 430–443 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bell M. E., et al. , Dynamics of nascent and active zone ultrastructure as synapses enlarge during long-term potentiation in mature hippocampus. J. Comp. Neurol. 522, 3861–3884 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sun Y., Smirnov M., Kamasawa N., Yasuda R., Rapid Ultrastructural Changes in the PSD and Surrounding Membrane after Induction of Structural LTP in Single Dendritic Spines. J. Neurosci. 41, 7003–7014 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tanaka J., et al. , Protein synthesis and neurotrophin-dependent structural plasticity of single dendritic spines. Science 319, 1683–1687 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Govindarajan A., Israely I., Huang S. Y., Tonegawa S., The dendritic branch is the preferred integrative unit for protein synthesis-dependent LTP. Neuron 69, 132–146 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cooper L. N., Bear M. F., The BCM theory of synapse modification at 30: Interaction of theory with experiment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 798–810 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bienenstock E. L., Cooper L. N., Munro P. W., Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: Orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2, 32–48 (1982). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Turrigiano G. G., The self-tuning neuron: Synaptic scaling of excitatory synapses. Cell 135, 422–435 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fusi S., Drew P. J., Abbott L. F., Cascade models of synaptically stored memories. Neuron 45, 599–611 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Toyoizumi T., Kaneko M., Stryker M. P., Miller K. D., Modeling the dynamic interaction of Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity. Neuron 84, 497–510 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Morrison A., Diesmann M., Gerstner W., Phenomenological models of synaptic plasticity based on spike timing. Biol. Cybern. 98, 459–478 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stoppini L., Buchs P. A., Muller D., A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. J. Neurosci. Methods 37, 173–182 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schnell E., et al. , Direct interactions between PSD-95 and stargazin control synaptic AMPA receptor number. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 13902–13907 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hosokawa T., et al. , CaMKII activation persistently segregates postsynaptic proteins via liquid phase separation. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 777–785 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chang J. Y., et al. , CaMKII autophosphorylation is necessary for optimal integration of Ca2+ signals during LTP induction, but not maintenance. Neuron 94, 800–808.e4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.