Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2022 Oct 10;119(42):e2207558119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2207558119

SWEET13 transport of sucrose, but not gibberellin, restores male fertility in Arabidopsis sweet13;14

Reika Isoda a,1, Zoltan Palmai a,1, Akira Yoshinari a, Li-Qing Chen b, Florence Tama a,c,d, Wolf B Frommer a,e,2, Masayoshi Nakamura a,2
PMCID: PMC9586311  PMID: 36215460

Significance

Enzymes and transporters are not 100% selective but interact with myriad substrates, of which only few are physiologically relevant. Biochemical and physiological studies have shown SWEETs play important roles in plant growth and development as hexose/sucrose uniporters. Recent studies revealed SWEETs can also transport gibberellin (GA), raising the question of which substrate is physiologically relevant. Structure-guided mutagenesis enabled a shift in selectivity of SWEET13 and showed that sucrose is physiologically relevant for fertility. We surmise that during evolution of transporters, activity of the physiological substrate was optimized and, in the absence of negative impact, side activities were accepted, while detrimental side activities are counterselected. These findings improve our understanding of the multiple activities of transporters and enzymes, including drug discovery.

Keywords: sucrose, gibberellin, transporter, promiscuity, male sterility

Abstract

SWEET sucrose transporters play important roles in the allocation of sucrose in plants. Some SWEETs were shown to also mediate transport of the plant growth regulator gibberellin (GA). The close physiological relationship between sucrose and GA raised the questions of whether there is a functional connection and whether one or both of the substrates are physiologically relevant. To dissect these two activities, molecular dynamics were used to map the binding sites of sucrose and GA in the pore of SWEET13 and predicted binding interactions that might be selective for sucrose or GA. Transport assays confirmed these predictions. In transport assays, the N76Q mutant had 7x higher relative GA3 activity, and the S142N mutant only transported sucrose. The impaired pollen viability and germination in sweet13;14 double mutants were complemented by the sucrose-selective SWEET13S142N, but not by the SWEET13N76Q mutant, indicating that sucrose is the physiologically relevant substrate and that GA transport capacity is dispensable in the context of male fertility. Therefore, GA supplementation to counter male sterility may act indirectly via stimulating sucrose supply in male sterile mutants. These findings are also relevant in the context of the role of SWEETs in pathogen susceptibility.


We typically assign binary substrate-enzyme or substrate-transporter relationships. Transporters and enzymes are named based on a single assay or on selectivity toward a small number of related compounds. This concept is mainly based on limited test capacity. However, it is now widely accepted that enzymes (and likely transporters) are promiscuous and can act on a much wider spectrum of substrates (1), likely many more than we currently conceive. Promiscuity is likely of importance for the efficacy of drugs and is relevant in the context of evolution. One may hypothesize that several substrates may be physiologically relevant, while many others may not currently be important for the function of the organism, making them irrelevant side activities. The relationship of kinetic properties and physiological concentrations of the substrates determine which substrate is effectively converted or transported.

Transporters are proteins that mediate the movement of solutes across the cell membrane, facilitating nutrition, signal transduction, cell-to-cell communication, and drug uptake and efflux. Highly sensitive assays have been able to identify plant amino acid transporters including NTR1, which in heterologous assays had a weak activity (2). Shortly afterward, the first oligopeptide transporters were identified in yeast and mammals, which were strikingly similar to NTR1 (35). Functional assays validated that NTR1 functions as an oligopeptide transporter, indicating that amino acids most likely represent a nonrelevant side activity (6). It was surprising that this peptide transporter was closely related to the plant nitrate transporters, with highly diverse substrate sizes. Notably, human PepT oligopeptide transporters are highly promiscuous and transport a wide spectrum of xenobiotic compounds, i.e., drugs (7). In plants, it was found that individual transporters in the nitrate/peptide transporter family have distinct, complex, overlapping activities for nitrate, chloride, oligopeptides, and glucosinolates, as well as most phytohormones, including auxin, indole-3-butyric acid, abscisic acid, gibberellin (GA), and jasmonic acid conjugates (8, 9).

SWEETs represent a relatively recently described class of small transporters that mediate uniport (facilitated diffusion) of sugars (10, 11). The selectivity of SWEETs for sucrose and hexoses is correlated with phylogeny; for instance, clade 3 SWEETs mediate transport of sucrose. Physiologically, SWEETs fulfill key functions in nectar secretion, phloem loading, pollen nutrition, and seed filling that, at first sight, all appear to be consistent with sugar transport by SWEETs. However, clade 3 SWEETs from Arabidopsis were shown to also mediate GA3 and GA4 uptake in a GA-dependent yeast three-hybrid (Y3H) assay (12). Surprisingly, GA transport capability was not conserved in clade 3 SWEETs of rice (13). The use of stronger promoters allowed us to detect possibly a very weak GA-transport activity for OsSWEET11a in Y3H assays (14). SWEET13/Ruptured Pollen Grain (RPG)2 is, together with SWEET8/RPG1, essential for male fertility in Arabidopsis (15). SWEET13 and SWEET14 double mutants were also male sterile (12) and have been hypothesized to transport GA during anther dehiscence and subsequent seed formation. The restoration of male sterility by external application of GA was interpreted as strong evidence for a physiological role of the GA transport activity of SWEETs (12). However, GA and sugars are tightly interconnected: GA affects growth and is apparently a key form for transport of reduced carbon and energy, and GA and sugars have synergistic effects in affecting anther dehiscence and the release of viable pollen grains (16, 17). Therefore, the relative role of GA and sucrose transport activities could not be disentangled unambiguously. Notably, male sterility observed for the rice ossweet11a;b double mutant could not be rescued by GA supplementation (14). Therefore, it remains unknown if the dual selectivity of SWEETs is physiologically relevant and how it can mechanistically explain the parallel transport of such diverse compounds that also have different roles. In particular, phytohormone transport needs to be controlled tightly.

While GA3 and GA4 are very similar, differing only in the presence or absence of a hydroxyl group at position 13, the sucrose molecule, to our naïve eyes, appears structurally very different. The finding of complex, multisubstrate recognition in transporters raises many questions: Are there multiple binding pockets and/or transport routes? How exactly are two apparently very diverse substrates recognized? What is the transport mechanism and directionality if one substrate (sucrose) is uncharged while the other substrate carries a charge (GA anion)? Are mutant phenotypes due to defects in sucrose, GA transport deficiencies, or both?

A key question was therefore whether one or both of the transport activities of the SWEETs are physiologically relevant. The most effective way to evaluate the relative roles of sucrose and GA transport activities would be to alter the relative selectivity of the SWEET and to test whether more selective SWEETs are able to restore phenotypes of sweet knockout mutants. The availability of high-resolution structures of SWEET13 [Protein Data Bank (PDB) accession no. 5XPD] (18) and site-directed mutagenesis, in combination with transport assays, enabled validation of the predictions. Notably, a more sucrose-selective transporter was able to restore pollen viability and germination defects of a sweet13;14 double-knockout mutants, while the more GA-selective variant was unable to correct either of the defects.

Results

Prediction of Sucrose and GA Interactions with SWEET13.

The capability of SWEET13 to transport both sucrose and GA had been demonstrated by different assays using yeast and animal cells (11, 12). As a first step for determining the relative role of the two transport activities, ligand binding was predicted using molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations based on the crystal structure of SWEET13 (PDB accession no. 5XPD) (18). Since the 5XPD structure was obtained with a SWEET13 variant that was made more thermostable by mutagenesis, molecular dockings of sucrose and GA3 were performed using a homology model in which the stabilizing mutations in SWEET13 were reverted to the native sequence. The fused rubredoxin and the substrate analog 2′-deoxycytidine 5′-monophosphate (dCMP) in 5XPD were removed in the model (SI Appendix). Docking sites of sucrose and GA3 were assumed to be similar to the binding site for dCMP in 5XPD. Then, 150 independent docking runs were carried out using the Lamarckian genetic algorithm, with a maximum number of 27 million energy evaluations, a maximum number of 27,000 generations, and a population size of 300 for each ligand. Docking poses of each ligand were ranked by binding free-energy estimations and population numbers of resulting clusters. Docking poses with the lowest binding free energies in the most populated clusters were selected as final conformations and served as input structures for MD simulations (SI Appendix, Fig. S1).

The 2,100-ns-long, all-atom MD simulations were performed for AtSWEET13 complexed with either sucrose or GA3 using a CHARMM-36 force field. Both ligands remained well anchored in their binding pockets throughout the simulations. Conformational clusterings for the ensemble of the ligand and its binding sites were carried out to obtain details of the protein-ligand recognition. The clusterings were based on root-mean-square distance with a cutoff of 2 Å after fitting on the binding site and ligand atoms of the first structure of the production run in each case. The conformations of the ensemble of sucrose and its binding sites were grouped into three main clusters, while for the ensemble of GA3 and its binding site, only a single stable cluster was observed, which notably overlapped with cluster 3 for sucrose (Fig. 1 A and B). The conformational subspace exploited by sucrose was thus substantially larger compared to GA3. In the most populated cluster, cluster 1, sucrose occupied a vertical position along the channel axis (Fig. 1A and Table 1). The fructosyl moiety pointed toward the extracellular gate, making hydrogen bonds with Asn76 and Asn196 and hydrophobic contacts with Trp58 and Trp180. The glucosyl moiety pointed toward the intracellular gate, having hydrophobic interactions with Trp58, Trp180, Val23, and Val145. In cluster 2, sucrose is oriented horizontally relative to the channel axis. The fructosyl unit made hydrophobic contacts with Trp58 and Trp180. The hydrogen of the glucosyl moiety bonded to Ser54 and Asn196 and made hydrophobic interactions with Trp58, Trp180, and Val145 (Fig. 1A and Table 1). The representative conformation of sucrose in the least populated cluster 3 was vertical, as in cluster 1, with the glucosyl and fructosyl subunits pointing in- and outward, respectively (Fig. 1A and Table 1). The major difference between cluster 1 and cluster 3 was a 180° rotation of the glucosyl moiety around the glycosidic linkage. The fructosyl unit hydrogen bonded with Asn196 and made hydrophobic contacts with Trp58 and Trp180, while the glucosyl unit hydrogen bonded with Asn76 and had hydrophobic contacts with Trp58, Trp180, and Val23.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular modeling of sucrose and GA3 in SWEET13. Clusters of binding pocket conformations for SWEET13*Suc and SWEET13*GA3. Representative conformations of sucrose binding mode for (A) clusters 1, 2, and 3 and (B) the binding mode for GA3. The color pink was used to indicate amino acids that provide hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts with sucrose and GA3 (Table 1). (C) Minimum distance between sucrose and surrounding residues as a function of time. (D) Minimum distance between GA3 and surrounding residues as a function of time.

Table 1.

Predicted interactions of SWEET13 binding pore amino acids with sucrose and GA3

Side chain Contact sucrose cluster 1 Contact sucrose cluster 2 Contact sucrose cluster 3 Sucrose transport* Contact GA3 Mutagenesis in this study
S20 S20A, S20N, S20Q
V23 x x V23L: ∼50% x V23A
S54 x S54A
W58 x x x W58A: ∼50% x
N76 x S76A: ∼10% x N76Q
S142 S142A: ∼85% S142A, S142L, S142N
V145 x x V145A: ∼50%
V145M: ∼10%
x V145A, V145L
W180 x x x W180A: ∼10% x
N196 x x x x N196A, N196Q

*Data from (18).

The sole primary binding position of GA3 was vertical and established hydrogen bonds to Asn76 and Asn196 and hydrophobic contacts with Val23, Trp58, Val145, and Trp180 (Fig. 1B and Table 1). The conformational flexibility of sucrose relative to GA3 may be explained merely by ligand topology. In the case of sucrose, the possibility of torsional rotations around the glycosidic linkage likely allows for a greater number of binding modes. GA3 lacks a torsional linkage and is a larger molecule, which might explain the tightly packed GA3 binding mode.

To gain more precise knowledge of the ligand interactions, the minimal distances between the ligands and proposed binding residues were analyzed over time throughout the simulations. Sucrose maintained stable hydrogen bonds with Asn196, Asn76, and Ser20 and its hydrophobic contacts with Trp58 and Trp180 (Fig. 1C). In addition, labile interactions between sucrose and Ser142, Ser54, Val23, and Val145 were detected. Sucrose did not appear to interact with Ser176. In comparison, GA3 made tight and stable contacts with all residues involved in sucrose binding, except for Val23 and Ser54. GA3 was well anchored and rigidly held in place by its putative residues, establishing one primary binding mode, in contrast with the floppier positioning of sucrose in the binding pocket (Fig. 1D). Based on the simulation, we hypothesize that GA3 forms more stable interactions with Ser142 and Val145 relative to sucrose. These observations are consistent with the relatively low affinity of SWEETs for sucrose (in the millimolar range) and indicate that sucrose and GA transport will be competitive. Together, the docking models predicted that while multiple side-chain interactions are shared by sucrose and GA3, Ser142/Val145 and Val23/Ser54 show preference for GA3 and sucrose, respectively, and may be targeted for mutagenesis to shift the relative selectivity for the two substrates (Table 1). Alanine substitution of Trp58, Asn76, Val145, Ser176, and Trp180 had previously been shown to be important for sucrose transport, and four residues, Val23, Ser54, Val145, and Ser176, were shown to be responsible for substrate selectivity between sucrose and glucose (11, 18). Of note, the substrate analog dCMP, which had been observed in the crystal structure of the thermostabilized SWEET13, takes the same vertical binding mode in cluster 1 as sucrose and GA3 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2).

Change in Relative Selectivity of SWEET13 by Mutagenesis.

To validate the predicted substrate interactions and the effect of individual side chains of SWEET13 on the relative selectivity toward sucrose and GA transport activities, 13 mutations were introduced into SWEET13 by site-directed mutagenesis (Table 1). Sucrose and GA transport activities were quantified for each mutant using transport assays. Sucrose transport activity was quantified by coexpressing SWEET13 with the sucrose sensor FLIPsuc-90µΔ1 in mammalian HEK293T cells (11). Substitutions at N76, V145, and N196 to bulky residues (N76Q, V145L, and N196Q) caused substantially reduced sucrose transport activities (Fig. 2 A and B). Likewise, when S20 and S142 were replaced with bulky residues (S20N and S142L), sucrose transport activity was significantly reduced (Fig. 2 A and B). To exclude that the reduced transport activity was caused by mislocalization of mutated SWEET13 proteins, confocal fluorescent microscopy was used to determine the localization of SWEET13 in transfected cell lines by immunostaining. SWEET13 protein localized to the HEK293T cell membrane, and the mutations did not alter the localization (Fig. 2C). Although similarly bulky, S142N did not show a significant inhibition of sucrose transport. Replacing S20, V23, S54, S142, V145, and N196 with alanine did not substantially inhibit sucrose transport activity (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). The results indicate that bulky side chains in the binding pocket block the accessibility for sucrose, implicating both size and shape of the binding pocket in sucrose transport.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Sucrose and GA3 uptake assays of SWEET13 with mutations in proposed substrate binding sites. (A) Sucrose uptake activity in HEK293T cells expressing sucrose biosensor FLIPsuc-90µΔ1. Adding 10 mM sucrose led to negative ratio changes, consistent with sucrose accumulation in cells. In the absence of SWEET13 (empty vector), no significant change in the ratio was observed. Mutations in the binding sites of SWEET13 were tested (mean, SEM; n ≥ 14 cells). (B) Boxplot of average emission ratios from 125 to 150 s after addition of sucrose from the data in A. The asterisk indicates a significant difference compared to empty vector (**P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test; n.s. indicates no significant difference). In the boxplots, the box represents the range from the 25th to 75th percentile, each horizontal line marks the median value, and the whiskers represent the range from the 2.5 to 97.5 percentile. (C) Detection of V5-tagged SWEET13 variants in HEK293T cells by immunostaining with V5-tag antibody (yellow). Cell nuclei were stained by DAPI (cyan). Wild-type and mutant SWEET13 proteins were detected at the plasma membrane. (D) Serial dilution assay using yeast carrying both pDEST22-GID1a and pDEST32-GAI and pDRf1-SWEET13, pDRf1-SWEET13 with mutations (S20N, N76Q, S142L, S142N, S145L, and N196Q), or empty vector (negative control). Yeast cells were grown on SD (−Leu, −Trp, and −Ura) or selective SD (−Leu, −Trp, −Ura, and −His) medium, containing 3 mM 3-AT and 0.001% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as mock or 0.1 µM GA3, for 3 days at 30 °C. Comparable results were obtained in three independent replicates. (E) Cellular localization of mYFP-fused wild-type and mutant SWEET13 proteins in yeast. mYFP fluorescence was detected at plasma membranes. (F) Sucrose and GA3 transport efficiency of SWEET mutants. The transporter activities for sucrose and GA3 were calculated from uptake assay results, as indicated by the YFP/CFP ratio, using HEK293T cells in Fig. 2B and SI Appendix, Fig. S4, respectively (SI Appendix, Figs. S3 and S5). Ratio* is the ratio of the quantified sucrose transport activity over that of GA3 transport activity. Scale bars: 10 µm in C and 2 µm in E.

Two independent transport assay systems, namely, a GA-dependent Y3H assay and the GA biosensor GPS1 in human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) cells, were used to measure GA transport activity of coexpressed SWEET13 variants (13, 19). In the presence of GA3, yeast expressing SWEET13S142N/L grew less compared with wild-type SWEET13, while SWEET13N76Q or SWEET13N196Q restored the growth of yeast on the selection media (−His+GA3) (Fig. 2D). V145L did not show substantial GA or sucrose transport activity (Fig. 2B). The plasma membrane localization of SWEET13 variants in yeast was verified using monomeric yellow fluorescent protein (mYFP) fusions (Fig. 2E). It had been suggested that GA1, a bioactive form of GA, might severe as the predominant substrate for SWEET13 and SWEET14 (12). We therefore tested the mutants for transport activity. The selectivity for GA1 was similar to that for GA3 (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). To independently validate the GA transport activity, SWEET13 variants were expressed in HEK293T cells expressing the sensor GPS1. The YFP/cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) fluorescence ratio of GPS1 before and 3 h after application of 1 µM GA3 was significantly higher in the presence of SWEET13. Mutants S20N/Q, S142A/L/N, V145L, and N196A showed significantly lower GA transport activity relative to wild-type SWEET13 (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). Together, these results showed that SWEET13N76Q and SWEET13N196Q preferentially transport GA3 over sucrose, whereas SWEET13S142N preferentially transports sucrose over GA3 (Fig. 2F). Since the substitution of N196Q reduced GA transport activity of SWEET13 relative to N76Q, we used SWEET13N76Q to validate the effect of a SWEET transporter with increased GA selectivity.

Male Fertility Depends on the Sucrose Transport Activity of SWEET13.

The sweet13; sweet14 mutants have reduced fertility and fewer seeds in siliques compared to wild type, consistent with the combined role of SWEET13 and SWEET14 in male fertility (12). Since GA3 application can restore fertility, one could hypothesize that only SWEET13N76Q, which retained GA3 transport but had reduced sucrose transport activity, might rescue male fertility of sweet13; sweet14 mutants, while SWEET13S142N, which has reduced GA transport activity but retained sucrose transport activity, would not. Complementation of the sweet13; sweet14 mutant phenotype by SWEET13N76Q and SWEET13S142N was tested; wild-type SWEET13 served as a positive control. Pollen viability was evaluated by double staining with fluorescent diacetate (FDA; stains viable pollen with intact cell membranes) and propidium iodide (PI; stains pollen with compromised cell membranes) (20). In wild-type Arabidopsis, 97% of pollen grains were FDA positive, but only 8% of sweet13; sweet14 pollen grains were stained (Fig. 3 A and B). Surprisingly, complementation with SWEET13S142N (without GA transport) fully restored pollen viability of sweet13; sweet14 mutants to the same level as wild-type SWEET13 (80%). In contrast, SWEET13N76Q (without sucrose transport) did not lead to a significant increase in pollen viability of the sweet13; sweet14 mutant (P = 0.215, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test). As an independent validation of pollen viability, pollen germination was analyzed and found to be consistent with the results of pollen viability tests (Fig. 3 C and D). These observations intimate that the sucrose transport activity of SWEET13, but not its GA transport activity, is required for pollen viability and thus male fertility.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Restoration of pollen viability by the sucrose-selective SWEET13S142N variant. (A) Representative images of FDA/PI-stained pollen from wild-type (Col-0), sweet13; sweet14, and sweet13; sweet14 lines complemented with either SWEET13-GFP, SWEET13N76Q-GFP, or SWEET13S142N-GFP. Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) Quantification of the frequency of FDA-positive pollen in the respective lines. Data represent mean + SE from at least three independent assays, with ≥100 pollen grains scored each time. (C) Representative images of pollen germination from the same lines. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Quantification of pollen germination frequency. Data represent mean + SE from at least three independent assay with ≥100 pollen grains each. P values shown from one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. n.s., no significant difference.

SWEET13 Is Produced in Anther Epidermis and Endothecium.

Recently, we discovered that clade 3 SWEET members are involved in sugar transport-dependent male fertility in rice (14). OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET11b accumulated in complementary sections of the vasculature of filament and anther, respectively (14). In contrast, SWEET13 and SWEET14 promoter-β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter fusions did not appear active in the vasculature but were in nonvascular tissues of the anther (12). To identify where the SWEET13 protein is expressed in Arabidopsis anthers, translational full-gene green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions were investigated at different flower development stages. The GFP-tagged SWEET13 driven by the native SWEET13 promoter (SWEET13-GFP) rescued the fertility of the sweet13; sweet14 mutants (SI Appendix and Fig. 3). GFP fluorescence was detectable only at late stages of anther development in the epidermis, endothecium, and connective tissue in flowers at stages 13, thus emerging at a time just preceding dehiscence (Fig. 4 AE and SI Appendix, Fig. S6). SWEET13 accumulation coincided with the third and highest wave of starch accumulation in anthers, in particular in the endothecium (21). SWEET13 was detected neither in the loculus nor in pollen grains (Fig. 4 C and D). No substantial accumulation of SWEET13-GFP was found in anthers at the earlier stages, indicating that SWEET13 plays a specific role at late stages of anther development and pollen maturation. The data for protein accumulation shown here are consistent with the late accumulation of SWEET13 and SWEET14 transcripts found in public microarray data (SI Appendix, Fig. S7). GFP fusions carrying the N76Q and S142N substitutions did not impact SWEET13 protein accumulation and subcellular localization (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). SWEET13-GFP, SWEET13N76Q-GFP, and SWEET13S142N-GFP proteins accumulated to similar levels in anthers.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

SWEET13 protein localization in Arabidopsis anthers. Confocal images of stage 13 anthers expressing SWEET13-GFP (yellow) in sweet13; sweet14 at the (A) surface of the anther, (B) epidermal cell surface, and (C) middle section of the anther. (D) Enlarged view of the boxed area in C. (E) Optical x/z section of stage 13 anther treated with ClearSee for 2 wk, and poststaining of the cell wall with calcofluor white (magenta). Cyan: autofluorescence. Ep, epidermis; En, endothecium; C, connective tissue; V, vasculature. Scale bars: 100 µm in A and C, 5 µm in B, and 20 µm in D and E.

Discussion

Transporters, enzymes, and receptors are not absolutely specific but can interact with multiple ligands, including xenobiotics. The interaction with xenobiotics is exploited for drug and pesticide development. The ability of transporters to recognize such compounds is relevant in the context of absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination, and toxicity (ADME/Tox)(22). Recent studies had found that members of two plant transporter families—the nitrate transporter/peptide transporters (NRT/PTR) (also called the NPF family, homologs of the mammalian PepT peptide transporter family; SLC15) and the SWEET sugar transporters—can also transport various plant hormones (8, 9, 12, 23). The promiscuity of PepTs is well established. Therefore, it is not surprising that the plant homologs can transport a wide range of substrates. The physiological relevance of the ability to transport such a wide range of hormones remains to be elucidated. Here we tried to dissect the functional relevance of the sucrose and GA transport capabilities of the sucrose transporter SWEET13 in vivo.

Molecular docking performed here revealed that SWEET13 utilizes essentially the same cavity and binding pocket for GA3 and sucrose transport. Both substrates are predicted to hydrogen-bond with N76 and N196 (sucrose only in cluster 1). When considering only the hydrogen bonds, both substrates could be similarly impacted by mutation. However, N76Q showed a more severe effect on sucrose transport activity, while GA transport was only slightly reduced. SWEET13N76Q retained about 75% of its GA transport activity, while sucrose transport was reduced to 10%. As one may have expected from the smaller distance between GA and Ser142, SWEET13S142N retained almost 90% of its sucrose transport activity, while GA transport activity was not detectable. The introduction of bulky side chains may result in steric hindrance of the tightly packed GA3 but not of the more flexible sucrose. These two mutants were thus used to evaluate the relative contribution of GA and sucrose to fertility. The full restoration of fertility by the sucrose transporting SWEET13S142N, but not by SWEET13N76Q, intimates that the GA transport function is dispensable for fertility.

By dissecting the selectivity of SWEET13 for sucrose and GA, we found that the sucrose transport activity, but not the GA transport activity, is critical for pollen development and consequently male fertility. Physiological studies and localization analyses using GFP-fused SWEET13 indicated that SWEET13 functions in sucrose translocation from connective tissue to pollen grains. The sucrose transport by SWEET13 localized at the connective tissue and the epidermis and endothecium cells might therefore be important for pollen development.

GA application had been shown to compensate for the male fertility defect in sweet13;14 double-mutant plants (12). One potential explanation of the compensatory effect of external GA is the induction of metabolic processes that compensate for sucrose transport deficiency, either by altering SWEET gene expression or by induction of cell wall invertases by GA, which has been observed (24). Alternatively, sucrose transport deficiency could be responsible for lower GA levels, and spraying GA circumvents this deficiency or the need for sucrose. We also tried to evaluate the restoration of the dehiscence defect of sweet13;14 double mutants; however, the phenotype was highly variable, precluding reliable interpretation of the results.

The sucrose-transporting SWEETs show functional redundancy for male fertility in rice. An ossweet11a;11b double-knockout mutant was found to be male sterile (14). Mutant pollen was deficient in starch accumulation of pollen grains. Double ossweet11a;11b mutants thus have a similar phenotype to that of atsweet13;14 mutants, which may be ascribed to orthologous functions at first sight. Of note, the nomenclature of the SWEETs was based on phylogenetic analyses; however, clade 3 SWEETs of Arabidopsis and rice do form separate subclades and thus were amplified after the ancestral split. OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET11b are thus not orthologous to SWEET13 and SWEET14 from Arabidopsis from a phylogenetic perspective. Moreover, OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET11b proteins were detected in the veins of the anther, with perfectly complementary localization in the peduncle of the anther (OsSWEET11a), and the adjacent veins that enter the axis of the anther (OsSWEET11b) (14). This pattern is distinct from that of SWEET13 and SWEET14 in Arabidopsis, as described here for GFP and GUS fusions (12). At present, we cannot exclude that additional clade 3 SWEETs are fulfilling the orthologous functions. Another major difference from Arabidopsis is that the external application of GA3 did not restore male fertility in rice (14).

A number of SWEETs that transport GAs have been identified here and in previous studies (12, 13). The study here found that replacing Ser142 of SWEET13 with Asn interfered with GA transport activity. Amino acid sequence alignment of Arabidopsis and rice SWEETs revealed that SWEETs determined to be GA transporters, such as clade 3 family members and OsSWEET3a, predominantly have Ser142, and OsSWEETs unable to transport GAs have Gly, rather than Ser, in the site (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). SWEET13S142A also showed reduced GA transport activity, indicating that this amino acid is of importance for GA transport. Other untested SWEETs with Ser142 amino acids, such as SWEET1 and SWEET3 in Arabidopsis, may also have GA transport capacity. Val145 was also conserved in SWEET proteins that transport GAs; however, V145 is known to be an amino acid that confers selectivity for sucrose and hexose (18). Replacing this Val145 amino acid with Leu reduced sucrose transport activity, as well as GA transport activity (Fig. 2D), indicating that V145 is responsible for both sucrose and GA transport activities of SWEETs.

Besides being able to transport sucrose, SWEET13 had been shown to be able to transport glucose when expressed in human cells (10, 18). We tested the effects of mutations in SWEET13 on glucose transport activity using yeast and mammalian cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S10). However, SWEET13 was not able to complement the glucose uptake deficiency of the yeast mutant EBY.VW4000, indicating that the glucose transport activity of SWEET13 is rather weak. In mammalian cells equipped with a glucose sensor, SWEET13 showed glucose transport activity similar to that of SWEET1, as previously reported (10). The glucose transport activity was reduced to a similar level in N76Q and S142N mutants (40.1 and 55.5%, respectively; SI Appendix, Fig. S10). The similarity in glucose transport activity of the mutants intimates that the difference between SWEET13S142N and SWEET13N76Q in complementing the fertility defect is due to the difference in sucrose, not glucose transport activity.

Contribution of SWEET13 in Sucrose Flow from Anther to Pollen.

The link between pollen viability and sucrose supply to developing anthers via the phloem appears obvious. However, the process seems to be highly complex, involving SWEET and SUT/SUC transporters in the vasculature of the stamen, as well as the different cell types of the anthers and the microspores/pollen grains during multiple phases. There are three consecutive starch accumulation/degradation phases during anther and pollen development (21). Starch first accumulates in filaments and connective tissue, but not in the microspores (floral stages 5 to 8). While microspore development proceeds to pollen mitosis I, a second wave of starch accumulation is initiated in anthers and pollen (floral stages 10 to 12). Starch deposits become visible in the bicellular pollen grains and anther simultaneously. The pollen grains undergoing pollen mitosis II reach maximal starch accumulation, while starch is rapidly degraded in the anther. Soon afterward, a third wave of starch accumulation occurs in the endothecium and connective tissue (floral stages 12 to 13). SUC1 and SUC2 H+/sucrose symporters are produced in these stages (floral stage 12 to 13) in the connective tissue and the filament, respectively (17, 25). Accumulation of SWEET13 protein in both epidermis and endothecium coincides with the third wave of starch accumulation in the anthers (floral stage 13). Sucrose is delivered by the phloem to the anthers. GFP, expressed using the AtSUC2 promoter, is confined to the phloem of the filament and symplasmically unloads sucrose into the anther connective tissue, from where it must be transported toward the anther locules (25). Sequential cycles of sucrose hydrolysis, starch biosynthesis, and starch mobilization then enable efficient and temporally controlled sugar supply to the locule prior to feeding of pollen grains. SUC1 and SUC2, as secondary active sucrose transporters in stages 12 to 13, and SWEET13/14, in stage 13, thus contribute to specific cellular import and export steps. Amylolysis during the third wave may cause an increase in endothecium sucrose concentrations, leading to cellular sucrose efflux to the apoplasm by SWEET13 down a concentration gradient into the locule. Involvement of hexose transporting SWEETs, such as SWEET8/RPG1, indicates that there are additional steps involving apoplasmic invertases and the transport of hexoses, as in the case of maize kernel filling (26, 27).

GA and sucrose functions are tightly interrelated, and both are required for growth; therefore, one may hypothesize that GA supplementation rescued the fertility of the sweet13;14 double mutant, though it was an indirect effect. Of note, many physiological studies have implied that clade 3 SWEETs function in sucrose transport processes, and in all cases, starch levels were impacted, including phloem loading in Arabidopsis and maize, seed filling in Arabidopsis and rice, and notably, nectar secretion in Arabidopsis (2832). In the case of phloem loading, the presence of SWEET11, SWEET12, and SWEET13 in the phloem parenchyma—the cell predicted to supply sucrose to the adjacent sieve element companion cell complex, which imports sucrose via the SUT H+/sucrose symporter—provides additional support for the physiological function in sucrose transport (33). Since clade 3 SWEETs are hijacked by the rice blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), it has been proposed that SWEET-mediated release of sucrose supports effective reproduction and thus virulence of Xoo in the xylem (34, 35). The recently revealed role of the sucrose utilization gene cluster in virulence may provide another piece of evidence showing that sucrose is the relevant substrate (36).

This work may also provide a roadmap for dissecting how nitrate, oligopeptides, and plant growth regulators are transported by members of the nitrate/peptide transporter family, e.g., auxin by NTR1;1 or ABA, GA, and JA by AIT1 and AIT3 (8, 9, 23, 37), and what this transport influences. This work also may aid in development of pesticides and antimicrobials for crop protection.

Materials and Methods

Sucrose Transport Assay in Mammalian Cells.

For sucrose transport assays, HEK293T cells were cotransfected with constructs carrying the sucrose sensor FLIPsuc-90µΔ1 (38) and SWEET13 variants. Experimental details are described in SI Appendix.

GA Transport Assays in a Y3H System.

GA transport assays using a Y3H system (13, 14) are described in SI Appendix.

Plant Materials.

The sweet13;14 double mutant was obtained by crossing sweet13 (SALK_087791) with sweet14 (SALK_010224), the same mutants described by Kanno et al. (12). Vector constructs for SWEET13-GFP, plant growth conditions, and confocal imaging are described in SI Appendix.

Pollen Viability and In Vitro Pollen Germination Assays.

PI-FDA assays for pollen viability and in vitro pollen germination assays were performed as described (20, 39). Experimental details are provided in SI Appendix.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Michael Wudick and Ji-Yun Kim for valuable advice. We are particularly grateful for the outstanding technical assistance by Yukie Kawase. We also thank Dr. Shoji Segami for the pGWB441m plasmid. This research was supported by grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (EXC-2048/1) Project 390686111, the Alexander von Humboldt Professorship (to W.B.F.), and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants 19H00932 and 22H00360 (to W.B.F.). The Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules is supported by the World Premier Institute Center Initiative, Japan.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2207558119/-/DCSupplemental.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

The docking models of SWEET13 with sucrose and GA3 in Fig. 1A and B have been deposited as ma-pbv4r (40), ma-qgh8w (41), ma-f58ct (42), and ma-7wq5n (43) at ModelArchive(https://www.modelarchive.org/). All other study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.

References

  • 1.Khersonsky O., Tawfik D. S., Enzyme promiscuity: A mechanistic and evolutionary perspective. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 471–505 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Frommer W. B., Hummel S., Rentsch D., Cloning of an Arabidopsis histidine transporting protein related to nitrate and peptide transporters. FEBS Lett. 347, 185–189 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boll M., et al. , Expression cloning of a cDNA from rabbit small intestine related to proton-coupled transport of peptides, beta-lactam antibiotics and ACE-inhibitors. Pflugers Arch. 429, 146–149 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fei Y. J., et al. , Expression cloning of a mammalian proton-coupled oligopeptide transporter. Nature 368, 563–566 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Perry J. R., Basrai M. A., Steiner H. Y., Naider F., Becker J. M., Isolation and characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae peptide transport gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 104–115 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rentsch D., et al. , NTR1 encodes a high affinity oligopeptide transporter in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett. 370, 264–268 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Killer M., Wald J., Pieprzyk J., Marlovits T. C., Löw C., Structural snapshots of human PepT1 and PepT2 reveal mechanistic insights into substrate and drug transport across epithelial membranes. Sci. Adv. 7, eabk3259 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jørgensen M. E., et al. , Origin and evolution of transporter substrate specificity within the NPF family. eLife 6, 29931 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chiba Y., et al. , Identification of Arabidopsis thaliana NRT1/PTR FAMILY (NPF) proteins capable of transporting plant hormones. J. Plant Res. 128, 679–686 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen L.-Q., et al. , Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 468, 527–532 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen L.-Q., et al. , Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science 335, 207–211 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kanno Y., et al. , AtSWEET13 and AtSWEET14 regulate gibberellin-mediated physiological processes. Nat. Commun. 7, 13245 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morii M., et al. , The dual function of OsSWEET3a as a gibberellin and glucose transporter ts important for young shoot development in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 61, 1935–1945 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu L.-B., et al. , OsSWEET11b, a potential sixth leaf blight susceptibility gene involved in sugar transport-dependent male fertility. New Phytol. 234, 975–989 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun M.-X., Huang X.-Y., Yang J., Guan Y.-F., Yang Z.-N., Arabidopsis RPG1 is important for primexine deposition and functions redundantly with RPG2 for plant fertility at the late reproductive stage. Plant Reprod. 26, 83–91 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chhun T., et al. , Gibberellin regulates pollen viability and pollen tube growth in rice. Plant Cell 19, 3876–3888 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stadler R., Truernit E., Gahrtz M., Sauer N., The AtSUC1 sucrose carrier may represent the osmotic driving force for anther dehiscence and pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 19, 269–278 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Han L., et al. , Molecular mechanism of substrate recognition and transport by the AtSWEET13 sugar transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 10089–10094 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rizza A., Walia A., Lanquar V., Frommer W. B., Jones A. M., In vivo gibberellin gradients visualized in rapidly elongating tissues. Nat. Plants 3, 803–813 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou X., et al. , SYP72 interacts with the mechanosensitive channel MSL8 to protect pollen from hypoosmotic shock during hydration. Nat. Commun. 13, 73–14 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hedhly A., et al. , Starch turnover and metabolism during flower and early embryo development. Plant Physiol. 172, 2388–2402 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Keogh J., Hagenbuch B., Rynn C., Stieger B., Nicholls G., “Membrane transporters: Fundamentals, function and their role in ADME” in Drug Transporters: Volume 1: Role and Importance in ADME and Drug Development, Nicholls G., Youdim K., Eds. (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2016), pp. 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kanno Y., et al. , Identification of an abscisic acid transporter by functional screening using the receptor complex as a sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 9653–9658 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Proels R. K., González M.-C., Roitsch T., Gibberellin-dependent induction of tomato extracellular invertase Lin7 is required for pollen development. Funct. Plant Biol. 33, 547–554 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Imlau A., Truernit E., Sauer N., Cell-to-cell and long-distance trafficking of the green fluorescent protein in the phloem and symplastic unloading of the protein into sink tissues. Plant Cell 11, 309–322 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun L., et al. , Sugar homeostasis mediated by cell wall invertase GRAIN INCOMPLETE FILLING 1 (GIF1) plays a role in pre-existing and induced defence in rice. Mol. Plant Pathol. 15, 161–173 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sosso D., et al. , Seed filling in domesticated maize and rice depends on SWEET-mediated hexose transport. Nat. Genet. 47, 1489–1493 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang C., et al. , Two evolutionarily duplicated domains individually and post-transcriptionally control SWEET expression for phloem transport. New Phytol. 232, 1793–1807 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lin I. W., et al. , Nectar secretion requires sucrose phosphate synthases and the sugar transporter SWEET9. Nature 508, 546–549 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bezrutczyk M., et al. , Impaired phloem loading in zmsweet13a,b,c sucrose transporter triple knock-out mutants in Zea mays. New Phytol. 218, 594–603 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang J., Luo D., Yang B., Frommer W. B., Eom J.-S., SWEET11 and 15 as key players in seed filling in rice. New Phytol. 218, 604–615 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ma L., et al. , Essential role of sugar transporter OsSWEET11 during the early stage of rice grain filling. Plant Cell Physiol. 58, 863–873 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim J.-Y., et al. , Distinct identities of leaf phloem cells revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Plant Cell 33, 511–530 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Oliva R., et al. , Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1344–1350 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Eom J.-S., et al. , Diagnostic kit for rice blight resistance. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1372–1379 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sadoine M., et al. , Sucrose-dependence of sugar uptake, quorum sensing and virulence of the rice blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2022).
  • 37.Krouk G., et al. , Nitrate-regulated auxin transport by NRT1.1 defines a mechanism for nutrient sensing in plants. Dev. Cell 18, 927–937 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lager I., Looger L. L., Hilpert M., Lalonde S., Frommer W. B., Conversion of a putative Agrobacterium sugar-binding protein into a FRET sensor with high selectivity for sucrose. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 30875–30883 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Muro K., et al. , ANTH domain-containing proteins are required for the pollen tube plasma membrane integrity via recycling ANXUR kinases. Commun. Biol. 1, 152 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Palmai Z., AtSWEET13 complexed with sucrose 1. MpdelArchive. https://www.modelarchive.org/doi/10.5452/ma-pbv4r. Deposited 5 May 2022.
  • 41.Palmai Z., AtSWEET13 complexed with sucrose 2. ModelArchive. https://www.modelarchive.org/doi/10.5452/ma-qgh8w. Deposited 5 May 2022.
  • 42.Palmai Z., AtSWEET13 complexed with sucrose 3. ModelArchive. https://www.modelarchive.org/doi/10.5452/ma-f58ct. Deposited 5 May 2022.
  • 43.Palmai Z., AtSWEET13 complexed with GA3. ModelArchive. https://www.modelarchive.org/doi/10.5452/ma-7wq5n. Deposited 5 May 2022.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Data Availability Statement

The docking models of SWEET13 with sucrose and GA3 in Fig. 1A and B have been deposited as ma-pbv4r (40), ma-qgh8w (41), ma-f58ct (42), and ma-7wq5n (43) at ModelArchive(https://www.modelarchive.org/). All other study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES