Abstract
Whereas it is appreciated that cancer cells rewire lipid metabolism to survive and propagate, the roles of lipid metabolism in metastasis remain largely unknown. In this study, using esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as a pulmonary metastasis model, we find that the enzyme fatty acid 2-hydroxylase (FA2H), which catalyzes the hydroxylation of free fatty acids (FAs), is enriched in a subpopulation of ESCC cells with high metastatic potential, and that FA2H knockdown markedly mitigates metastatic lesions. Moreover, increased FA2H expression is positively associated with poor survival in patients with ESCC. Lipidomics analysis identifies that two dihydroceramides—Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1)—are increased in FA2H-depleted metastasizing ESCC cells. Upon administration, Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1) impair the formation of overt metastases in a mouse experimental metastasis model. Then, forkhead box protein C2 (FOXC2) and FA2H are found to be co-upregulated in metastatic ESCC cell populations and ESCC specimens, and FA2H expression is further experimentally verified to be transcriptionally induced by FOXC2, which is boosted per se by tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα), a critical pro-metastasis cytokine in the tumour microenvironment, in metastasizing cells. Together, these results demonstrate that TNFα-FOXC2-FA2H is a novel signaling axis to promote metastasis, and its downstream dihydroceramide products could be promising drugs to intervene in metastasis.
Subject terms: Drug development, Cancer metabolism, Metastasis, Gastrointestinal cancer, Oncogenes
Introduction
Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. As metastasis involves diverse hostile microenvironments, these disseminated cells exploit various mechanisms to survive en route to and thrive in a distant organ.1,2 An emerging mechanism is that cancer cells efficiently adjust their metabolic programs during a harsh metastatic cascade.3 Several critical metabolites, such as lactate, pyruvate, glutamine, serine, alanine, proline, as well as asparagine, have been identified to play pro-metastasis roles in distinct cancer settings.3
Since metastases are of metabolic dependence, intervening in the functions of dysfunctional proteins in critical metabolic processes could prevent and/or treat metastasis in cell-line-derived or patient-derived xenograft models.3 Recent studies reported that monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1), which transports extracellular lactate into the tumour cells, increased melanoma cells in circulation to promote the formation of metastatic lesions.4 When MCT1 inhibitor AZD3965 was administrated in mouse, and patient-derived melanoma models, the metastatic potential of melanoma cells was markedly impaired without affecting subcutaneous growth at primary sites.4 Despite the growing evidence highlighting the unique metabolic properties in metastatic cancer cells, the links between metabolism and metastatic formation are not yet fully understood.
Lipids are generally classified as fatty acids (FAs), triacylglycerols, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, and steroids, which are essential for building bio-membranes, storing energy, and relaying signals, respectively. Dysfunctional lipid metabolism in tumour initiation and progression has drawn growing attention in recent years.5,6 Key enzymes in uptake, de novo synthesis, and catabolic metabolism of lipids were aberrantly overexpressed or hyperactivated in distinct cancer types, accordingly sustaining growth, invasion, and metastasis in neoplastic cells.5,6 CD36 (also known as FAs translocase) delivers polyunsaturated fatty acids into cells, and its increased expression was indicative of poor prognosis in patients with cancers.5 Mechanistically, CD36 was enriched in a population of metastasis-initiating cells, and high-fat diets promoted the metastatic potential of CD36high cells.7 Intriguingly, the neutralizing antibody blocking CD36 remarkably mitigated metastasis in melanoma and breast cancer.7 With respect to the biogenesis of FAs, adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase (ACLY), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), and fatty acid synthase (FASN) are three critical enzymes catalyzing the production of lipids, and their pro-metastasis functions were reported in multiple cancer settings.6 Three phase II clinical trials are currently in progress to evaluate the FASN inhibitor TVB-2640, as a single agent, in non-small cell lung cancer harboring KRAS mutations (NCT03808558), or synergistic with paclitaxel and trastuzumab to treat patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer (NCT03179904), as well as combinatorial administration of TVB-2640 and bevacizumab in patients with first relapsed astrocytoma (NCT03032484).5 The catabolism of lipids was also involved in metastasis. Monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), which catalyzes the lysis of monoacylglycerols (MGs) to free FAs, was demonstrated to accelerate aggressive cellular traits, including metastasis. The catalytic site of MAGL was irreversibly blocked by JZL184, leading to the impairment of metastatic potential in lung, breast, and prostate cancer cells.8–10 These discoveries underline that metastatic cancer cells heavily rely on specific intracellular lipids, thereby prompting us to further investigate how rewired lipid metabolism contributes to metastasis.
As the lung is susceptible to metastatic lesions, we established two populations of cells with high potential for pulmonary metastasis—namely K30LM3 and K450LM2, respectively—from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cell line KYSE30 and KYSE450 (named after K30P and K450P, respectively). Among the differentially expressed genes between the parental (K30P and K450P) and the metastasizing (K30LM3 and K450LM2) cells, the fatty acid 2-hydroxylase (FA2H) displayed increased expression in the latter populations. FA2H is responsible for adding a hydroxyl group to the C-2 position of free FAs to yield 2-hydroxy FAs, the products of which are further converted to a subset of sphingolipids and glycosphingolipids.11,12 FA2H and its catalytic products play vital roles in the epidermis and nervous system under physiological conditions, as exemplified by the observation that mutations in FA2H are implicated in spastic paraparesis and leukodystrophy.13 In recent years, it is becoming increasingly evident that FA2H also functions in several cancer types. FA2H was implicated in cAMP-induced cell cycle withdrawal in Schwannoma cell line D6P2T.14 Silencing of FA2H accelerated proliferation in gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer cells.15–17 Additionally, increased FA2H attenuated the resistance to cisplatin treatment in gastric cancer cells and rendered human cancer cells less refractory to antitumor drug PM02734.15,18 Moreover, FA2H is highly expressed in lung adenocarcinoma tissues compared with squamous and neuroendocrine carcinoma tissues, thereby leading to the accumulation of 2-hydroxy HexCers.19 FA2H was also reported to promote the migration in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 in vitro.20 These results indicate that FA2H is probably a key enzyme controlling the survival of cancer cells; however, the functions and the regulatory mechanisms of FA2H in cancer biology, especially in metastasis, remain largely unexplored. Hereafter, we investigated how FA2H regulated ESCC metastasis and identified TNFα activated FOXC2-FA2H axis as a novel signal axis to promote metastasis of ESCC cells.
Results
ESCC cells with high metastatic potential are enriched via in vivo selection
In vivo selection enabled the enrichment of cancer cell subpopulations with enhanced metastatic potential.21 Accordingly, we first exploited a similar strategy to select highly metastatic ESCC cell sublines. Briefly, luciferase-expressing parental KYSE30 (K30P) and KYSE450 (K450P) cells were injected into the tail veins of SCID/Beige mice, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1a, we obtained highly metastatic KYSE30 (K30LM3) and KYSE450 (K450LM2) cell populations upon completing in vivo selection and in vitro propagation. Notably, K30LM3 and K450LM2 cells displayed both enhanced migration and invasiveness compared to the parental cells (Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). We next compared the lung metastasis potential between LM cells and parental cells, finding that LM cells yielded more extensive pulmonary lesions (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1c–e). Interestingly, pulmonary metastatic loci occurred within only one month in mice injected with LM cells, while it took ~3 months for parental populations to form overt metastases (Data not shown).
To elucidate molecular mechanisms governing metastatic spread of LM cells to the lung, we performed RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis to characterize DEGs between LM and parental cells, revealing remarkable genetic differences based on unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 2a). In total, K30LM3 and K450LM2 cells shared 52 upregulated and 32 downregulated genes, among which some genes were answerable for enhanced metastatic potential (Fig. 1f). Geneset enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that a subset of DEGs in common were significantly enriched in EMT gene signature (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis validated the upregulation of Slug, Twist, Snail, and Vimentin in LM cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Moreover, Gene Ontology (GO) and genetic network analysis revealed that DEGs were significantly enriched in key pro-metastasis processes, including cell motility, resistance to anoikis, integrin-mediated cell adhesion and TGFβ signaling (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 2d). Together, we preferentially enriched the lung metastatic subpopulations harboring essential molecular traits required for metastasis.
FA2H promotes ESCC metastasis
Intriguingly, disease pathway analysis highlighted that a subset of DEGs was significantly enriched in four metabolic gene signatures, such as “Sphingolipidoses” (Fig. 2a). We then analyzed these enriched metabolism-related gene signatures in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) esophageal cohort. Interestingly, only ‘Sphingolipidoses’ gene signature was markedly increased in tumour samples, suggesting sphingolipid metabolism may be associated with esophageal cancer progression (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3a–c). The metabolism gene signature, consisting of four shared metabolic hub genes (i.e., FA2H, ICAM1, F3, and CYBA), was further identified to be remarkably elevated in TCGA esophageal cancer tissues compared with combined normal tissues from both TCGA and GTEx dataset. (Supplementary Fig. 3d, e). Importantly, the individual expression of FA2H, ICAM1, F3, and CYBA genes were further analyzed by retrieving ESCC samples or esophageal mucosa tissues from TCGA or GTEx datasets, respectively, confirming that their expressions were remarkably increased in ESCC compared with matched normal tissues (Supplementary Fig. 3f). Of note, cox hazards ratio analysis indicated higher expression of FA2H indicated an increased risk of esophageal cancer in the survival analysis than other three metabolic genes, strongly suggesting that predominant role of FA2H in esophageal cancer progression (Fig. 2c).
We further consolidated the clinical relevance of FA2H expression via immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a commercially available ESCC tissue microarray (#HEso-Squ150CS-02), containing ESCC (n = 170) and adjacent normal mucosa tissues (n = 170). The intensity of FA2H staining in ESCC tissues was markedly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 3g). Notably, FA2H staining was increased when patients were diagnosed at advanced stages (III + IV vs. I + II) or with metastatic lesions (N > 0 vs. N = 0) (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 3h). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis further demonstrated that higher FA2H expression indicated unfavorable overall survival (OS) (n = 306, P = 0.0125; Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 3i) and disease-free survival (DFS) (n = 306, P = 0.0209; Fig. 2g) in patients with ESCC.
In consistent with RNA-seq data, qRT-PCR showed that both the mRNA and protein level of FA2H were increased in LM cells, compared with parental cells (Fig. 2h and Supplementary Fig. 3j). By using lentiviruses encoding short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), we depleted the expression of endogenous FA2H in LM cells, finding that FA2H depletion strikingly attenuated migration and invasion in vitro as well as lung metastasis in vivo (Fig. 2i–k and Supplementary Fig. 3k–n). Conversely, ectopically overexpression of FA2H in K30P cells significantly promoted cellular motility in vitro (Fig. 2l, m). Since metabolic enzymes display noncanonical functions in tumour initiation and progression,22 we asked if the pro-metastasis function of FA2H was dependent on its enzyme activity. We delivered FA2Hmut with reduced enzymatic activity or FA2Hwt, respectively, into K30LM3 cells in the absence of endogenous FA2H (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b).23 We found that FA2Hmut markedly impaired the pro-motility capacity of this enzyme in cells, as compared with FA2Hwt (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Altogether, our data highlighted that FA2H, as an important gene in sphingolipidoses, exerted pro-metastasis function in ESCC.
Silencing of FA2H reprograms ceramide metabolism to inhibit metastasis in LM cells
It has been well-documented that FA2H catalyzes the biogenesis of 2-hydroxy FAs that are used to build hFA-sphingolipids and hFA-glycosphingolipids in mammalian cells.13,24 To investigate whether FA2H-catalyzed lipid metabolism plays a role in metastasis, we performed a lipidomic analysis in FA2H-depleted and control K30LM3 cells. A total of 2516 unique lipids, belonging to 34 lipid species, were identified through the integration of positive and negative electrospray ionization tandem MS, demonstrating that FA2H modulated the metabolic changes of downstream lipid species in K30LM3 cells (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 5a). Notably, FA2H ablation significantly increased the abundance of intracellular ceramides (Cer) and glucosylceramides (CerG1) on average, and three Cer and one CerG1 were simultaneously identified in two independently FA2H-depleted K30LM3 cell populations (FC > 2, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3b–d). Ceramide signaling has been shown to induce cell death through various mechanisms, yet its roles in metastasis remain less understood.25 As the levels of ceramides significantly increased in FA2H-depleted K30LM3 cells, it would be reasonable to speculate that specific ceramides were against the pro-metastasis function of FA2H. As expected, treatment of Cer (d18:0/24:0) or Cer (d18:0/24:1), two commercially available dihydroceramides, markedly impaired the motile potential and weakened the proliferation of K30LM3 cells (Fig. 3e, f and Supplementary Fig. 5b, c).
The desaturation of dihydroceramides to ceramides is mediated by dihydroceramide desaturase (DES).26 Pharmacological inhibition of DES activity with fenretinide has been demonstrated to increase the accumulation of endogenous dihydroceramides.27 Fenretinide has shown strong antitumor effects in various cancer settings and is currently tested in clinical trials.28–30 We supposed that fenretinide treatment phenocopied Cer (d18:0/24:0) or Cer (d18:0/24:1). As expected, fenretinide potently suppressed cell motility, and inhibited proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion (Supplementary Fig. 5d–f). Energy metabolism undergoes changes in cancer cells to support metastasis.31,32 We observed enhanced oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in LM cells, reflecting that metastasis required increasing energy input (Supplementary Fig. 5g–j). Additionally, It has been reported that ceramides species are implicated to modulate mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis in a variety of cell types.33,34 Interestingly, Cer (d18:0/24:0), Cer (d18:0/24:1), or fenretinide treatment markedly reduced OCR and ECAR levels relative to LM cells, respectively, suggesting dihydroceramides suppress the metastatic ability of LM cells by disrupting their dependency on energetic metabolism. These results suggested that FA2H-mediated ceramide metabolism conferred metastatic advantages to LM cells.
Cer (d18:0/24:0) and Cer (d18:0/24:1) are promising agents to interrupt metastasis
Next, we employed an experimental lung metastatic model to test the translational value of Cer (d18:0/24:0) and Cer (d18:0/24:1). Upon injection of K30LM3 cells, male SCID/Beige mice were randomly divided into four groups. Each group was treated with Cer(d18:0/24:0), Cer(d18:0/24:1), fenretinide, and solvent (Vehicle group) by gavage, respectively. Intragastric administration was performed three times per week (Fig. 4a).35 As compared to the Vehicle group, Cer(d18:0/24:0), Cer(d18:0/24:1), or fenretinide treatment significantly attenuated lung metastases, as demonstrated by markedly reduced radiance intensity of luciferase and lung weights with metastatic lesions (Fig. 4b–d and Supplementary Fig. 6a). Importantly, mice from the treated groups were well-tolerated, as no weight loss and no significant histopathological changes in hearts, kidneys, and livers were observed during treatment course (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 6b). Together, these preclinical findings provided a novel therapeutic strategy to inhibit lung metastasis with low toxicity profile.
FA2H is transcriptionally increased by FOXC2
Transcription factors (TFs) play essential roles in tumour progression and metastasis, and individual TF has been identified in each step of the metastasis cascade.36 We thereby tried to identify the TF that directly regulated FA2H expression in this model, finding four TFs (FOXC2, NPAS2, NKX2-5, and ELL3) based on pathway analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Among these TFs, the increased FOXC2 expression was positively correlated with FA2H in both K30LM3 and K450LM2 cells relative to parental cells (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). In addition, co-amplification of FOXC2 and FA2H was observed in 185 patients with esophageal cancer from TCGA cohort, whereas no prominent correlation was found between FA2H and the other three TFs (Fig. 5a, b). These findings suggested that FA2H was positively associated with FOXC2 at both genomic and transcriptional levels.
To ascertain FOXC2 regulated FA2H transcription, we first measured FOXC2 and FA2H mRNA levels, showing that both were upregulated in LM cells relative to parental cells (Supplementary Fig. 7c, d). Consistently, the protein abundance of these two genes was also increased in two LM cells (Fig. 5c). Depletion of FOXC2 dramatically decreased FA2H expression in both LM cells (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 7e–g). There are three putative binding sites of FOXC2 in FA2H promoter, as predicted from JASPAR database (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 7h, i). The occupancy of FOXC2 on FA2H promoter was then validated by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 7j). Additionally, dual-luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that overexpression of FOXC2 in parental cells remarkably enhanced the activity of FA2H promoter, and mutation in every single binding site of FOXC2 dramatically blunted the transcriptional activity of FA2H promoter (Fig. 5g and Supplementary Fig. 7k), suggesting that integrity of all the three cis-elements and coordination between each other were indispensable for FOXC2-mediated transactivation of FA2H.
Previous studies have reported that FOXC2 promotes cancer metastasis.37,38 In line with this, silencing of FOXC2 in LM cells decreased migratory and invasive potential in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 7l–n). We restored FA2H expression in stable FOXC2-depleted K30LM3 cells and evaluated the metastatic ability of K30LM3 cells. We found that FA2H reintroduction markedly attenuated the inhibitory effect of FOXC2 depletion on the motility in vitro and the metastasis in vivo (Fig. 5h–j and Supplementary Fig. 8a–d). Conversely, knockdown of FA2H in FOXC2-overexpressing K30P cells weakened the pro-motility roles of FOXC2 in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 8e–g). Collectively, these data demonstrated that the regulation of FA2H level by FOXC2 is functionally significant during metastasis.
To investigate the clinical relevance of FOXC2-directed FA2H transcription in ESCC, we examined FOXC2 protein level in 75 pairs of ESCC and adjacent normal mucosa tissues, finding that FOXC2 protein was significantly increased in ESCC tissues and the staining intensity of FOXC2 was positively correlated with FA2H (Fig. 5k–m and Supplementary Fig. 8h). Higher FOXC2 expression was indicative of poorer survival in patients with ESCC (n = 306) (Supplementary Fig. 8i–k). More importantly, patients with concurrently high FOXC2 and FA2H expression had much worse OS and DFS (Fig. 5n, o).
TNFα activates FOXC2-FA2H axis to boost metastasis
Extracellular factors are imperative to support the colonization and outgrowth of metastasizing tumour cells.39 Inflammatory cytokines or chemo-attractants have been reported to pre-determine and maintain metastasis in a variety of tumour models.40,41 In LM cells, GSEA analysis of DEGs showed that cytokine signaling, particularly TNFα-NF-κB signaling, was activated (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 9a–g), indicating that TNFα probably facilitated metastasis of LM cells. Additionally, these TNFα signaling signature genes were also ectopically overexpressed in TCGA esophageal cancer tissues (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 9h). Previous studies demonstrated that TNFα stimulated experimental pulmonary metastasis in melanoma and fibrosarcoma mouse models.42,43 Similarly, treatment of TNFα increased the migration and invasion in both LM and parental cells (Supplementary Fig. 9i, j).
TNFα promotes tumor progression through different mechanisms, including enhancing EMT, cell survival, and cancer stem cell (CSC) expansion.41 In differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes, TNFα induced FOXC2 expression via PI3K and ERK 1/2 signaling pathways;44 however, there is no evidence to demonstrate that TNFα directly regulates FOXC2 expression in cancer cells. One previous study showed that NF-κB enhanced lung cancer cell motility by inducing FOXC2 expression.45 Whereas TNFα activates NF-κB signaling pathway under most conditions, we thereby examined whether TNFα treatment affected FOXC2 level and subsequent FA2H transcription in ESCC, finding that TNFα elicited co-upregulation of FOXC2 and FA2H in both LM and parental cells (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig. 9k–r). The occupancy of FOXC2 on FA2H promoter was also increased upon TNFα treatment (Fig. 6d). Meanwhile, TNFα-activated FOXC2-FA2H axis was partially diminished by depleting FOXC2 or FA2H, leading to impaired motile potential in vitro (Fig. 6e, f and Supplementary Fig. 10a, b).
Finally, we sought to determine whether FA2H-catalyzed ceramide metabolism blocked TNFα-activated proliferation and invasion. TNFα conferred parental cells with higher proliferative and invasive ability, which was sufficiently abrogated by either Cer (d18:0/24:0) or Cer (d18:0/24:1) treatment in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 6g and Supplementary Fig. 10c–h). Taken together, these findings demonstrated that TNFα signaling governed metastasis of LM cells through activating FOXC2-FA2H axis, which resulted in dysregulated ceramide metabolism that can be potentially exploited as a novel and promising therapeutic strategy to intervene in such processes.
Discussion
Metastasis is a tough journey, during which tumour cells confront various exogenous and endogenous insults. However, few metastasis-specific gene mutations have been identified in a pan-cancer analysis of metastatic tumors.46 Additionally, whereas aberrant alterations in oncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes confer growth advantages to transformed cells in primary sites, they are not always sufficient to facilitate colonization in distal sites. An emerging paradigm is that tumor cells exploit metabolic machinery to respond to constantly changing microenvironments and boost final metastatic growth since metabolism is highly dynamic and is intertwined with (epi-)genetic landscape.47,48 In this study, a subset of DEGs between parental and LM populations are enriched in metabolic processes such as sphingolipidoses. Interestingly, sphingolipidoses gene signature is markedly increased in ESCA samples relative to normal esophageal tissues. FA2H, as a critical enzyme in sphingolipid metabolism, is highly expressed in LM populations and then defined to promote metastasis via loss/gain-of-function approaches. More importantly, FA2H is indicative of metastasis and poor outcome in patients with ESCC. Whereas FA2H plays the pro-metastasis role in ESCC cells, it is of note that FA2H functions in an opposite manner in gastric and colorectal cancer.15,16 FA2H was highly expressed in normal gastric and colorectal tissues, and (R)-2-hydroxy palmitic acid, one direct metabolite of FA2H, markedly mitigated the growth and invasiveness of gastric and colorectal cancer cells.15,16 On the other hand, significantly changed lipids from FA2H-depleted ESCC cells were distinct from those described in gastric and colorectal cancer cells with enforced FA2H expression. Thus, the various functions of FA2H may result from its expression and catalytic products, which are determined by distinct tissue contexts.
Ceramides, belonging to sphingolipids, cooperated with glycosylceramides and cholesterol to generate signaling platforms and influence tumour progression.25 Besides the well-defined roles of ceramides in cell death,49 its functions in metastasis have been uncovered recently. CerS4-derived ceramides inhibited metastasis by promoting the binding between TβRI and its inhibitor Smad7, hence preventing TβRI from localizing in primary cilia to activate the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway.50 In this study, Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1), which were significantly increased in the FA2H-knockdown LM cells, markedly attenuated spread to the lung and suppressed growth to some extent. The anti-metastasis function of Cer(d18:0/24:1) is in accord with the most recent finding that it mitigated the motile potential of SKOV3 cells by impairing lamellipodia formation.51 However, Cer(d18:0/24:0) promoted proliferation and metastasis in gallbladder cancer via activating mTOR signaling pathway.52 These discrepant findings reflect that the functions of distinct ceramides are largely determined by their different lengths of acyl chains and diverse cancer settings.25 We also tested the translational value of Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1) in an experimental metastasis model, showing that they reduced pulmonary metastasis without obviously damaging major organs of recipient nude mice. Therefore, Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1) hold promises as novel anti-metastasis agents in ESCC.
We then found that FOXC2 knockdown transcriptionally reduced FA2H level and hence suppressed pulmonary metastases of K30LM3 and K450LM2 cells. Two major mechanisms whereby FOXC2 promotes metastasis have been unveiled. It has been reported FOXC2 elicited EMT via increasing ZEB1 expression.53 Additionally, FOXC2 also facilitated angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis.54,55 Notably, FOXC2 is implicated in lipid metabolism, as FOXC2 sustained survival of preadipocytes via Akt/mTORC1 signaling pathway in mice and increased oxidation of FAs in mouse adipose.56,57 However, direct evidence supporting that FOXC2 assists metastasis via regulating lipid metabolism remains sparse. Here, we provide a paradigm to support a novel pro-metastasis mechanism of FOXC2.
Moreover, we explored environmental cues to increase FOXC2 expression, and TNFα came to the forefront largely because several DEGs were enriched in TNFα-NF-κB signaling pathway. As expected, administration of TNFα markedly increased FOXC2 expression and its subsequent binding to FA2H promoter. FOXC2 is likely to be a novel downstream effector of TNFα, as strongly suggested by our findings and the evidence that TNFα-NF-κB directly increased FOXC2 transcription.45 This study highlights an emerging mechanism that TNFα promotes metastasis by modulating lipid metabolism. Together, these results demonstrate that TNFα-FOXC2-FA2H axis promotes lung metastasis in ESCC.
There are still some limitations to this study. First, we did not examine the role of each increased cytokine, such as IL6, in FOXC2/FA2H-mediated metastasis; instead, TNFα was used as a representative to show FOXC2 expression was upregulated in response to extracellular stimuli. In our opinion, regulation of FOXC2 expression could be multifactorial, thereby detailed clarification warrants further investigations. Second, we did not discriminate the anti-metastasis mechanisms of Cer(d18:0/24:0) from that of Cer(d18:0/24:1), and it is not clear how they blunted mitochondrial respiration. While Sun et al. showed a possible link between FA2H and glucose metabolism,16 this question is still open. Moreover, we did not track exactly each step of synthesis of Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1), so it is not clear how these two dihydroceramides increased upon silencing of FA2H. De novo synthesis and salvage pathway function synergistically to maintain intracellular homeostasis of ceramide pool by producing and converting distinct ceramide species,25 thus increased levels of Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1) are probably the outcome of complex interactions between the two pathways. Nevertheless, this study unveils that TNFα-FOXC2-FA2H axis rewires lipid metabolism to potentiate pulmonary metastasis, and nominates the potential of Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1) as anti-metastasis drugs (Fig. 6h).
Material and methods
Cell culture
The human ESCC cell lines KYSE30 and KYSE450 were generously provided by Dr. Y. Shimada (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) and maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone, South Logan, UT, USA). HEK293T were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone, South Logan, UT, USA). For in vivo selection and bioluminescent imaging, KYSE30 and KYSE450 cells were infected with lentivirus expressing firefly luciferase and selected with G418 (200 µg/mL) for two weeks.
Antibodies and reagents
Antibodies used in this study were as follows: Anti-FOXC2 (PA524588, Invitrogen), Anti-FA2H (15452-1-AP, Proteintech), Anti-GAPDH (2118, Cell Signaling Technology). Secondary antibodies included HRP Goat Anti-Mouse (926-80010, LI-COR) and HRP Goat Anti-Rabbit (926-80011, LI-COR). Cer(d18:0/24:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:1) were purchased from Avanti Lipids Polar. Fenretinide was purchased from MedChemExpress (HY-15373), and TNFα was purchased from Novus (#210-TA).
Animal study
All procedures and experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Hospital.
For the establishment of highly lung metastatic ESCC cell lines, in vivo selection was followed as previously described.21 Briefly, 1 × 106 K30P and K450P cells were intravenously injected into SCID/Beige mice. For the first round selection, lung metastatic lesions were observed after 3 months for both cells. Mice were then sacrificed, and metastatic nodules were dissected and dissociated into pieces, and grown in the culture dishes. G418 were used to select and differentiate tumor cells from fibroblast and other stromal cells. These G418-resistant tumor cells were denoted as the first generation of lung metastatic derivatives (LM1). Similarly, LM1 cells were subjected to another round of in vivo selection by injecting them into the SCID/Beige mice, which gave rise to lung metastatic nodes and the second generation of lung metastatic derivatives (LM2). Accordingly, K30P or K450P were subjected to three or two rounds of in vivo selection, namely K30LM3 and K450LM2, respectively.
For experimental lung metastasis assay, 6-week-old male SCID/Beige mice were purchased from Vital River (Beijing, China). 1 × 106 K30LM3 cells with stable FOXC2/FA2H depletion or FOXC2-depleted K30LM3 cells with additional FA2H overexpression and control cells were established and injected into the lateral tail veins of SCID/Beige mice. The pulmonary colonization of tumor cells was monitored by bioluminescent imaging after 40 days.
For dihydroceramides-based antimetastasis therapy, 1 × 106 K30LM3 cells were first intravenously injected. After one week, vehicle, Cer(d18:0/24:0) or Cer(d18:0/24:1) was administered three times a week by oral gavage with a dose of 10.26 mg/kg/day. Fenretinide (120 mg/kg/day) were treated as positive control. Mice body weights in each group were measured during each treatment.
For bioluminescent imaging, mice were anesthetized and injected with 10 µL/g of D-luciferin (PerkinElmer) in DPBS intraperitoneally. After 15 min, bioluminescence (BLI) was captured via Xenogen Optical in vivo Imaging System (IVIS; Xenogen). BLI was normalized to a background value, which was defined from luciferin-injected mice without tumor cells.21
To evaluate the toxicity of Cer(d18:0/24:0), Cer(d18:0/24:1), and Fenretinide treatment, the mice organs, including hearts, livers, and kidneys, were harvested and paraffin-embedded followed by H&E staining. Histological examinations were performed to analyze the treatment-related morphological changes.
Plasmids and lentivirus packaging
FOXC2 and FA2H cDNA clones were subcloned into the pLVX-puro plasmid. shRNA oligos targeting FOXC2 or FA2H and a nontargeting oligo control were engineered into pSIH-puro plasmid. For pLVX-puro lentivirus production, the packaging plasmids Δ8.9, pLP2 were used. For pSIH-puro lentivirus production, the packaging plasmids vSVG, pLP1 and pLP2 were used. The indicated packaging plasmids and lentiviral vectors were co-transfected into HEK293T cells. After 48 h transfection, the supernatant containing lentivirus particles were collected and stored in aliquots at −80 °C. For lentivirus infection, cells were first treated with polybrene (5 µg/mL) (TR-1003, Sigma), then infected with the indicated lentivirus. Stable cell populations were established by selecting puromycin (2 μg/mL) (540222, Sigma) for 2 weeks.
Transwell assay
Parental KYSE30 (6 × 104 per insert) or KYSE450 cells (2 × 105 per insert), as well as LM cells with indicated treatment, were suspended in FBS-free RPMI 1640 and seeded into the upper chambers with or without precoated matrigel (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The bottom chambers were added with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS. After 24 h incubation, the migratory or invasive cells were methanol-fixed and stained with crystal violet. Cells in three randomly selected fields were photographed and statistically analyzed.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cDNAs were obtained using Quantscript RT kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time RT-PCR was performed by using SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II (TaKaRa, Japan) on Step-one plus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
RNA-seq and data analysis
RNA-seq analysis was performed as previously described.58 For comparison of gene expression profiles between parental K30P, K450P cells, and metastatic K30LM3, K450LM2 cells, cells were collected with three biological replicated in each group. Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For library preparation, Poly(A) + mRNA was isolated and enriched using NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module. The mRNA was then recovered for library generation with NEBNext ® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, E7420S), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA libraries were sequenced at WuXiNextCODE. FastQC was used to examine the quality of the raw reads. Read alignment was conducted using STAR (v2.5.1b), R package edgeR (v3.8.5) was used to determine relative transcript abundances and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between sample pair. The DEGs (Fold-change > 2-fold or 1.5, P < 0.05) are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Lipidomics analysis
Total lipids were extracted from 1 × 107 FA2H-depleted K30LM3 cells and control cells with six biological replicates in each group.59 Briefly, cell pellets were mixed well with 200 µL ultra-pure water. Following the addition of 240 µL methanol to the mixture, samples were vortexed and added with MTBE, and vortexed again. After being placed at room temperature for 20 min, samples were centrifuged at 8000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting lipid fraction was carefully collected and dried with nitrogen gas. Dried samples can be stored at −80 °C. Before LC/MS, the samples were redissolved with isopropanol, vortexed then centrifuged at 8000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was then subjected to UHPLC Nexera LC-30A for analysis. LipidSearch software version 4.1(Thermo Scientific™) was applied for peak recognition, peak alignment and lipid characterization, and quantitative processing with the following parameters (5 ppm precursor tolerance, 5% product ion threshold, and deletion of lipid molecules with a RSD > 30%). LipidSearch data was further normalized by total peak area normalization, and lipid molecules with the missing value >50% in each group were deleted. After the process of Pareto-scaling, SIMPCA-P 14.1 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) software was applied for multivariate statistical analysis, including principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), as well as orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Identification of differentially expressed lipid species was based on the VIP (Variable Importance for the Projection) values from OPLS-DA model. The lipids with the threshold of VIP > 1, P < 0.05 in the univariate statistical analysis (Student’s t-test) were considered statistically significant. The results of Lipidomics were listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was quantified by CCK-8 assays. K30P, K450P, 30LM3, and 450LM2 with indicated treatment were seeded into 96-well plates (2 × 104 cells/mL; 100 µL/well). Cell Proliferation Reagent CCK-8 (#CK04, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Japan) was used for measuring cell proliferation. After 1 h of incubation at 37 °C, absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek).
Immunohistochemistry assay
Tissue microarrays were stained with anti-FOXC2 (PA524588, Invitrogen) and anti-FA2H (15452-1-AP, Proteintech) antibodies. The representative images of IHC staining were captured by Aperio ScanScope (Leica, Nussloch, Germany).
Western blotting
Western blot was performed according to the standard protocol. Briefly, cells were harvested and lysed in RIPA buffer (1% NP-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM (EDTA), 1× proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) for 30 min on ice. The proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore). The membranes were blocked with 5% milk powder solution, then incubated with specific antibodies at 4 °C overnight. Following incubation with secondary antibodies, immunoblots were visualized using the ImageQuant LAS-4000 System (GE). Antibodies for western blotting are listed in ‘Antibodies and reagents’.
ChIP assay
ChIP assay was performed as previously described.60 Briefly, indicated cells were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, and cell pellets were collected and subjected to sonication. The sheared chromatin was then diluted, followed by immune clearance for 1 h at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitation was performed by adding 4 µg of specific antibodies and incubated at 4 °C overnight. Next, protein A-Sepharose beads were added and incubated for at least 1 h with rotation. The beads were then washed sequentially for 10 min each in TSE I, TSE II, and buffer III and finally twice with TE buffer. Chromatin complexes were eluted with elution buffer (1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3), and crosslinking was reversed at 65 °C overnight. DNA fragments were purified with the QIAquick PCR purification kit (28104, Qiagen) and used for quantitative PCR reactions with Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix reagent (Applied Biosystems). Primers used for ChIP are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Seahorse metabolic assay
For all assays, cells were pretreated with 4 mg/mL BSA, 100 μM Cer(d18:0/24:0), 100 μM Cer(d18:0/24:1), and 2.5 μM fenretinide for 24 h and then 5 × 103 treated K30LM3 or 6 × 103 treated K450LM2 cells were seeded in XF96 cell culture plates incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C overnight.
For Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test, OCR was measured using the Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test Kit (103015-100, Agilent Technologies, America) on an XFe96 Analyzer. Final concentrations of 2.5 μM oligomycin, 2 μM Carbonyl cyanide-4 (trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP) and 0.5 μM Rotenone/antimycin A (Rot/AA) were used for all conditions. Basal respiration, maximal respiration, and ATP production were calculated as follows:
For Seahorse XF Glycolysis Stress Test, ECAR was measured using the Seahorse XF Glycolysis Stress Test Kit (103020-100, Agilent Technologies, America) on an XFe96 Analyzer. Final concentrations of 10 mM glucose, 1 μM oligomycin, and 50 mM 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) were used for all conditions. Glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, and glycolytic reserve were calculated as follows:
Luciferase reporter assay
The FA2H promoter sequence was synthesized and cloned into pGL3-basic plasmid at Synbio Tech. The mutant FA2H promoter plasmids were constructed based on the binding motifs of FOXC2 from JASPAR database (http://jaspar.genereg.net/). Cells were seeded in 96-well plates, and transiently co-transfected with a mixture of FA2H promoter-Luc (wild or mutant type), pGL3-Luc, FOXC2 expressing vector, negative control vector (LV105), and Renilla luciferase (RL) reporter vectors (pRL-TK) as indicated. A site-directed mutagenesis kit (SBS, Shanghai, SDM-15) was used to generate mutant constructs for FA2H promoter. The Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) was used to detect luciferase activities 48 hours after transfection. Details of luciferase reporter assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and transfection efficiency was normalized by pRL-TK Renilla luciferase reporter.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism (Version 7). Statistical significance was determined by using two-sided Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. ANOVA or Friedman test was performed in multiple experimental groups. For the functional assays in vitro, experiments were independently performed at least three times. The correlation between the expression of FOXC2 and FA2H was determined by Spearman’s Rank Correlation test. For TCGA dataset analysis, the mRNA expression of indicated genes in normal esophageal mucosa tissues from the GTEx dataset was incorporated for statistical analysis. The data were reported as mean ± S.D. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by funding from the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC2501000, 2020YFA0803300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030089, 82188102), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-1-I2M-018, 2021-I2M-1-067), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M700007), the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (No.SZSM201812062), and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2019B030302012).
Author contributions
X.Z., F.H., and G.M. contributed equally to this work. Z.L. and N.W. conceived the ideas and supervised the research. X.Z. and F.H. performed most of the experiments. X.Z., F.H., G.M., and W.W. contributed to the analysis of the data. X.Z., F.H., and G.M. discussed the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the article.
Data availability
RNA-seq data have been deposited in the GEO database under the access code GSE182090. GEO reviewer token (wfsxgyigpdkfjyr) can be used for reviewers to review record GSE182090. The raw data of lipidomic profiling in FA2H-depleted cells and control cells were available from authors upon request. The ESCA data were derived from the TCGA Research Network (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/), which was further analyzed by UCSC Xena Browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/) and GEPIA2 tool (http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics statements
A commercial human ESCC tissue microarray was purchased from Outdo Biotech Company (#HEso-Squ150CS-02, Shanghai, China). Additionally, human ESCC tissue samples were obtained from patients receiving operations at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, China). All patients did not undergo neoadjuvant therapy. Informed consent was obtained from each enrolled patient. All human specimens were used in IHC experiments. This study was approved by the ethical committee of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Hospital (Beijing, China). Six-week-old male SCID/Beige mice were purchased from Vital River Laboratories (Beijing, China). All mice used in this study were housed under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions. All procedures and experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Hospital (Beijing, China).
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Xuantong Zhou, Furong Huang, Gang Ma
Contributor Information
Nan Wu, Email: nanwu@bjmu.edu.cn.
Zhihua Liu, Email: liuzh@cicams.ac.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41392-022-01199-1.
References
- 1.Suhail Y, et al. Systems biology of cancer metastasis. Cell Syst. 2019;9:109–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wan L, Pantel K, Kang Y. Tumor metastasis: moving new biological insights into the clinic. Nat. Med. 2013;19:1450–1464. doi: 10.1038/nm.3391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bergers G, Fendt SM. The metabolism of cancer cells during metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2021;21:162–180. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00320-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tasdogan A, et al. Metabolic heterogeneity confers differences in melanoma metastatic potential. Nature. 2020;577:115–120. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1847-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bian X, et al. Lipid metabolism and cancer. J. Exp. Med. 2021;218:e20201606. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Luo X, et al. Emerging roles of lipid metabolism in cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:76. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0646-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pascual G, et al. Targeting metastasis-initiating cells through the fatty acid receptor CD36. Nature. 2017;541:41–45. doi: 10.1038/nature20791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nomura DK, et al. Monoacylglycerol lipase regulates a fatty acid network that promotes cancer pathogenesis. Cell. 2010;140:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marino S, et al. Paradoxical effects of JZL184, an inhibitor of monoacylglycerol lipase, on bone remodelling in healthy and cancer-bearing mice. EBioMedicine. 2019;44:452–466. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.05.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pruser JL, et al. The monoacylglycerol lipase inhibitor JZL184 inhibits lung cancer cell invasion and metastasis via the CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2021;20:787–802. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alderson NL, et al. The human FA2H gene encodes a fatty acid 2-hydroxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:48562–48568. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406649200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Uchida Y, et al. Fatty acid 2-hydroxylase, encoded by FA2H, accounts for differentiation-associated increase in 2-OH ceramides during keratinocyte differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:13211–13219. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611562200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hama H. Fatty acid 2-Hydroxylation in mammalian sphingolipid biology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1801:405–414. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alderson NL, Hama H. Fatty acid 2-hydroxylase regulates cAMP-induced cell cycle exit in D6P2T schwannoma cells. J. Lipid Res. 2009;50:1203–1208. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800666-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yao Y, et al. Fatty acid 2-hydroxylation inhibits tumor growth and increases sensitivity to cisplatin in gastric cancer. EBioMedicine. 2019;41:256–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sun L, et al. 2-Hydroxylation of fatty acids represses colorectal tumorigenesis and metastasis via the YAP transcriptional axis. Cancer Res. 2021;81:289–302. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dai X, et al. FA2H exhibits tumor suppressive roles on breast cancers via cancer stemness control. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:1089. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Herrero AB, et al. Levels of SCS7/FA2H-mediated fatty acid 2-hydroxylation determine the sensitivity of cells to antitumor PM02734. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9779–9787. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lemay AM, et al. High FA2H and UGT8 transcript levels predict hydroxylated hexosylceramide accumulation in lung adenocarcinoma. J. Lipid Res. 2019;60:1776–1786. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M093955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hirao-Suzuki M, et al. Fatty acid 2-hydroxylase (FA2H) as a stimulatory molecule responsible for breast cancer cell migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;531:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Minn AJ, et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature. 2005;436:518–524. doi: 10.1038/nature03799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pan C, Li B, Simon MC. Moonlighting functions of metabolic enzymes and metabolites in cancer. Mol. Cell. 2021;81:3760–3774. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dick KJ, et al. Mutation of FA2H underlies a complicated form of hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG35) Hum. Mutat. 2010;31:E1251–E1260. doi: 10.1002/humu.21205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guo L, Zhang X, Zhou D, Okunade AL, Su X. Stereospecificity of fatty acid 2-hydroxylase and differential functions of 2-hydroxy fatty acid enantiomers. J. Lipid Res. 2012;53:1327–1335. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M025742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morad SA, Cabot MC. Ceramide-orchestrated signalling in cancer cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2013;13:51–65. doi: 10.1038/nrc3398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ogretmen B. Sphingolipid metabolism in cancer signalling and therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:33–50. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rahmaniyan M, Curley RW, Jr., Obeid LM, Hannun YA, Kraveka JM. Identification of dihydroceramide desaturase as a direct in vitro target for fenretinide. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:24754–24764. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.250779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ribatti D, et al. Fenretinide as an anti-angiogenic agent in neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2003;197:181–184. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Messner MC, Cabot MC. Cytotoxic responses to N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2011;68:477–487. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1504-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Okuda T, et al. Enhanced in vivo antitumor efficacy of fenretinide encapsulated in polymeric micelles. Int. J. Pharm. 2009;373:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wei Q, Qian Y, Yu J, Wong CC. Metabolic rewiring in the promotion of cancer metastasis: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Oncogene. 2020;39:6139–6156. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01432-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lehuede C, Dupuy F, Rabinovitch R, Jones RG, Siegel PM. Metabolic plasticity as a determinant of tumor growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2016;76:5201–5208. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu R, et al. C16:0 ceramide effect on melanoma malignant behavior and glycolysis depends on its intracellular or exogenous location. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020;12:1123–1135. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gudz TI, Tserng KY, Hoppel CL. Direct inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex III by cell-permeable ceramide. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:24154–24158. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lin L, et al. Functional lipidomics: palmitic acid impairs hepatocellular carcinoma development by modulating membrane fluidity and glucose metabolism. Hepatology. 2017;66:432–448. doi: 10.1002/hep.29033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ell B, Kang Y. Transcriptional control of cancer metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2013;23:603–611. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Agnihotri NS, Astekar M. The role of novel prognostic markers PROX1 and FOXC2 in carcinogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Exp. Ther. Oncol. 2018;12:171–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kwon OJ, et al. Notch promotes tumor metastasis in a prostate-specific Pten-null mouse model. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:2626–2641. doi: 10.1172/JCI84637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Altorki NK, et al. The lung microenvironment: an important regulator of tumour growth and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2019;19:9–31. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0081-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hiratsuka S, Watanabe A, Aburatani H, Maru Y. Tumour-mediated upregulation of chemoattractants and recruitment of myeloid cells predetermines lung metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006;8:1369–1375. doi: 10.1038/ncb1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yao M, Brummer G, Acevedo D, Cheng N. Cytokine regulation of metastasis and tumorigenicity. Adv. Cancer Res. 2016;132:265–367. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Orosz P, et al. Enhancement of experimental metastasis by tumor necrosis factor. J. Exp. Med. 1993;177:1391–1398. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.5.1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Okahara H, Yagita H, Miyake K, Okumura K. Involvement of very late activation antigen 4 (VLA-4) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) in tumor necrosis factor alpha enhancement of experimental metastasis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:3233–3236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gronning LM, Cederberg A, Miura N, Enerback S, Tasken K. Insulin and TNF alpha induce expression of the forkhead transcription factor gene Foxc2 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes via PI3K and ERK 1/2-dependent pathways. Mol. Endocrinol. 2002;16:873–883. doi: 10.1210/mend.16.4.0803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yu YH, et al. MiR-520h-mediated FOXC2 regulation is critical for inhibition of lung cancer progression by resveratrol. Oncogene. 2013;32:431–443. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Robinson DR, et al. Integrative clinical genomics of metastatic cancer. Nature. 2017;548:297–303. doi: 10.1038/nature23306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Birkbak NJ, McGranahan N. Cancer genome evolutionary trajectories in metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:8–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chatterjee A, Rodger EJ, Eccles MR. Epigenetic drivers of tumourigenesis and cancer metastasis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018;51:149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nganga R, Oleinik N, Ogretmen B. Mechanisms of ceramide-dependent cancer cell death. Adv. Cancer Res. 2018;140:1–25. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gencer S, et al. TGF-beta receptor I/II trafficking and signaling at primary cilia are inhibited by ceramide to attenuate cell migration and tumor metastasis. Sci. Signaling. 2017;10:eaam7464. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam7464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang X, et al. Ceramide synthase 2-C24:1 -ceramide axis limits the metastatic potential of ovarian cancer cells. FASEB J. 2021;35:e21287. doi: 10.1096/fj.202001504RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang Y, et al. C24-ceramide drives gallbladder cancer progression through directly targeting phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinase type-2 gamma to facilitate mammalian target of rapamycin signaling activation. Hepatology. 2021;73:692–712. doi: 10.1002/hep.31304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Werden SJ, et al. Phosphorylation of serine 367 of FOXC2 by p38 regulates ZEB1 and breast cancer metastasis, without impacting primary tumor growth. Oncogene. 2016;35:5977–5988. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bi Y, et al. Decreased ZNF750 promotes angiogenesis in a paracrine manner via activating DANCR/miR-4707-3p/FOXC2 axis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:296. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2492-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fatima A, et al. Foxc1 and Foxc2 deletion causes abnormal lymphangiogenesis and correlates with ERK hyperactivation. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:2437–2451. doi: 10.1172/JCI80465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gan L, Liu Z, Jin W, Zhou Z, Sun C. Foxc2 enhances proliferation and inhibits apoptosis through activating Akt/mTORC1 signaling pathway in mouse preadipocytes. J. Lipid Res. 2015;56:1471–1480. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M057679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gan L, et al. alpha-MSH and Foxc2 promote fatty acid oxidation through C/EBPbeta negative transcription in mice adipose tissue. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36661. doi: 10.1038/srep36661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li X, et al. A S100A14-CCL2/CXCL5 signaling axis drives breast cancer metastasis. Theranostics. 2020;10:5687–5703. doi: 10.7150/thno.42087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cantor JR, et al. Physiologic medium rewires cellular metabolism and reveals uric acid as an endogenous inhibitor of UMP synthase. Cell. 2017;169:258–272. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang Q, et al. A hierarchical network of transcription factors governs androgen receptor-dependent prostate cancer growth. Mol. Cell. 2007;27:380–392. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
RNA-seq data have been deposited in the GEO database under the access code GSE182090. GEO reviewer token (wfsxgyigpdkfjyr) can be used for reviewers to review record GSE182090. The raw data of lipidomic profiling in FA2H-depleted cells and control cells were available from authors upon request. The ESCA data were derived from the TCGA Research Network (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/), which was further analyzed by UCSC Xena Browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/) and GEPIA2 tool (http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/).