Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2022 Oct 21;15(10):e252067. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-252067

Synovial chondromatosis of the flexor hallucis longus tendon sheath

Conor B Garry 1,2, Andrew Ernst 2, Galen Sanderson 2, Andrew W Wilson 1,
PMCID: PMC9594586  PMID: 36270739

Abstract

This case report discusses a rare case of secondary tenosynovial chondromatosis of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL). Synovial chrondomatosis is a rare, benign proliferative cartilaginous lesion arising from the synovial tissue or bursal lining of or near joints. When it is extra-articular, it is considered tenosynovial chondromatosis. The diagnosis is often delayed given the rarity of presentation and non-specific symptoms. The case was highly unusual in that hindfoot pain was caused by several centimetre-sized osteochondral bodies within the FHL tendon sheath. Anterior cheilectomy was performed. The patient returned to full activity following surgery without recurrence of the disease. The condition can be successfully treated operatively.

Keywords: Orthopaedic and trauma surgery, Ankle instability, Sports and exercise medicine, Orthopaedics

Background

Synovial chrondomatosis is a rare, benign proliferative cartilaginous lesion arising from the synovial tissue or bursal lining of or near joints. When it is extra-articular, it is considered tenosynovial chondromatosis. The lesions can often be ossified depending on their chronicity. Synovial chondromatosis is found all over the body, with the most common joint being the elbow, although many others have been described.1 2 This article describes a relatively rare case of secondary tenosynovial chondromatosis of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon in a male patient who was successfully treated with open excision, as well as a review of the literature. The authors received the patient’s informed consent for publication.

Case presentation

A male patient in his 40s presented to the foot and ankle clinic after sustaining an inversion injury to the left ankle 2 weeks prior. Since that time, he had been in a controlled-ankle motion (CAM) boot. He complained of pain primarily around the lateral malleolus. He had a prior history of ankle trauma, to include two ankle dislocations, one 24 years prior and one 11 years prior. He had ankle surgery 11 years ago, which was aborted intraoperatively secondary to an intact anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and loose bodies that were unobtainable. He was otherwise healthy with no contributory medical, surgical or family history.

On examination, he had both anterior and posterior impingement signs as well as a positive anterior drawer and inversion test, which suggested an incompetent ATFL and calcaneofibular ligament. He was point tender behind the malleoli bilaterally and anterior to the Achilles tendon.

Differential diagnosis

Plain radiographs demonstrated significant anterior tibiotalar and anterior syndesmotic osteophytes as well as four ossified loose bodies in the posterior ankle (figure 1). CT scan demonstrated similar findings plus additional non-ossified loose bodies likely within the sheath or substance of the FHL (figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Preoperative AP and lateral radiographs four ossified loose bodies in the posterior ankle.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sagittal images from a preoperative CT scan again demonstrating ossified loose bodies with additional non-ossified loose bodies as well.

Treatment

Given his injury pattern, long-standing instability and likely post-traumatic osteoarthritis including loose bodies recalcitrant to non-operative management, the patient was indicated for operative treatment. In the operating room, we made a 4-cm incision over the pre-existing posteromedial surgical scar from his prior debridement attempt and dissected down to the FHL. We noted six palpable nodules just beneath the outer layer of the tendon sheath just proximal to the musculotendinous junction. Using tenotomy scissors to open the sheath, we extracted the loose bodies, which were round and about 1–1.5 cm in size. They were sent to histopathological examination. Next, we made a lateral approach to the ankle and performed both an anterior cheilectomy and Brostrom repair of the lateral ankle ligaments to restore lateral ankle stability without complication.

Outcome and follow-up

Postoperatively, he was placed in a plaster splint and made non-weight bearing for 2 weeks. We then converted to a CAM boot with heal lifts, allowed weight bearing and began physical therapy. His surgical specimens from the FHL were sent for histopathological examination, where they were interpreted as benign trabecular bone and soft tissue with degenerative changes, consistent with a final diagnosis of osteochondral loose bodies. At 6-month follow-up, he was active without limitations. His radiographs demonstrate interval removal of the loose bodies (figure 3). To assess his overall function, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot scale was used. This tool measures the overall function of the ankle in terms of pain, function and alignment.3 Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles scoring 100 points. The patient’s 6-month AOFAS score was 86, which was an improvement from 42 at initial presentation. At 24-month follow-up, his AOFAS improved to 90. He is back to high-intensity workouts and running multiple miles without pain.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

AP and lateral radiographs taken 6 months after surgery demonstrate interval removal of loose bodies without recurrence.

Discussion

We present a unique case of a highly physically active man with a long history of ankle trauma, pain and instability. He presented to our clinic with osteochondral loose bodies within the tendon sheath of his FHL. After surgical intervention to include removal of osteochondral loose bodies from his FHL tendon sheath, he reported significant improvement in his pain, stability and function of his ankle. His clinical presentation, imaging, intraoperative findings and pathological evaluation are consistent with tenosynovial chondromatosis.

Tenosynovial chondromatosis is a rare condition characterised by the formation of multiple cartilaginous nodules in the synovium of the tendon sheath. It is thought to be a benign chondrogenic metaplasia of extra-articular synovial tissue. Radiographs usually demonstrate multiple soft tissue nodules in the distribution of a tendon. Gross inspection demonstrates multilobulated synovium with multiple white/bluish nodules that are composed of hyaline cartilage. On histology, there is metaplastic synovium demonstrating cartilaginous nodules beneath the surface lining of the synovial membrane.

We hypothesise that this case is likely secondary tenosynovial chondromatosis, rather than primary, based on the patient’s long history of trauma. His trauma may have caused a metaplastic transformation of the tenosynovium, especially given the communication between the joint space and the FHL in about 20% of patients.4 This condition is rarely discussed in publicly available literature, with even fewer reports in the FHL.5 Lui reports a case from zone 2 FHL, which is different from our zone 1 case.6 Oakley et al were the first to report on tenosynovial osteochondromatosis in the FHL in 2010.7 Thomsen et al report on a similar case in 2015, the first of its kind in a collegiate athlete.8 Lui reports a case series of three patients treated by tendonoscopy.9 Otherwise, the discussion in the literature is sparse. This case adds to the growing body of evidence that tenosynovial osteochondromatosis should be considered as a rare but possible differential diagnosis for subacute or chronic posterior ankle pain.

Learning points.

  • Tenosynovial chondromatosis is a rare condition characterised by the formation of multiple cartilaginous nodules in the synovium of the tendon sheath.

  • Patient had a long history of ankle trauma which may have caused a metaplastic transformation of the tenosynovium.

  • Significant improvement in pain, stability and function was reported after surgical intervention.

  • Tenosynovial osteochondromatosis should be considered as a rare but possible differential diagnosis for subacute or chronic posterior ankle pain.

Footnotes

Contributors: GS: Author, Care. AE: Author, Care, patient consent. CBG: Author, Care. AWW: Author, editor.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this case report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

Copyright Statement: We are military service members. This work was prepared as part of our official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 E.S.C. 101 defines a United States Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties.

Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Consent obtained directly from patient(s).

References

  • 1.Ho YY, Choueka J. Synovial chondromatosis of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:804–10. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.01.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fetsch JF, Vinh TN, Remotti F, et al. Tenosynovial (extraarticular) chondromatosis: an analysis of 37 cases of an underrecognized clinicopathologic entity with a strong predilection for the hands and feet and a high local recurrence rate. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:1260–8. 10.1097/00000478-200309000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:349–53. 10.1177/107110079401500701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lo LD, Schweitzer ME, Fan JK, et al. MR imaging findings of entrapment of the flexor hallucis longus tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1145–8. 10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Winters NI, Thomson AB, Flores RR, et al. Tenosynovial chondromatosis of the flexor hallucis longus in a 17-year-old girl. Pediatr Radiol 2015;45:1874–7. 10.1007/s00247-015-3383-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lui TH. Endoscopic loose body removal from zone 2 flexor Hallucis longus tendon sheath. Arthrosc Tech 2016;5:e465–9. 10.1016/j.eats.2016.01.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Oakley J, Yewlett A, Makwana N. Tenosynovial osteochondromatosis of the flexor hallucis longus tendon. Foot Ankle Surg 2010;16:148–50. 10.1016/j.fas.2008.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thomsen TW, Hogrefe CP, Hall MM, et al. Tenosynovial Osteochondromatosis of the flexor Hallucis longus in a division I tennis player. Clin J Sport Med 2015;25:e74–6. 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lui TH. Tenosynovial Osteochondromatosis of the flexor Hallucis longus tendon treated by Tendoscopy. J Foot Ankle Surg 2015;54:758–64. 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES