Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 13;185(21):3931–3949.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.025

Figure S3.

Figure S3

mUnc5A and mUnc5C binding results, protein co-expression analysis, related to Figure 3

(A) SPR results show binding of hGPC3core protein to mouse Unc5A and C ectodomain. The apparent KD (KDcalc) for the wild type protein interaction was calculated using a 1:1 binding model and is indicative only. Bmax, R2 and the units of ligand immobilised on the flowcell surface are indicated. The N241Q mutant protein (hGPC3coreUG) does not show binding.

(B) We used a cell-based assay to show that hGPC3core, but not the mutant, binds to mUnc5C expressed on cells.

(C) SPR results show no binding of hGPC3core protein to Unc5(A)–(D)GU mutant proteins. Corresponding binding curves using wild type Unc5 proteins are shown in Figure S1D.

(D) Western blot analysis using anti-HA to visualise HA-tagged Unc5 constructs expressed in cell aggregation assays.

(E) Same samples as in panel D, but here visualising Flag-GPC3.

(F) Same as panel D, but using anti-actin control.

(G) Cell-surface staining using anti-HA and anti-Flag was performed to complement the total protein expression analysis shown in panels (D)–(F), and to include additional conditions. Representative images are shown. Scale bars = 30 μm.

(H) Quantification of the experiments shown in panel F.