Abstract
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been identified as a biomarker for predicting sepsis mortality. Although preclinical studies suggested that necroptosis could explain the mechanistic link of mtDNA in sepsis, this is not yet evident in patients with sepsis. This study evaluated the association between mtDNA and essential necroptosis mediators in prospectively enrolled patients with sepsis. Plasma mtDNA copy number was measured using quantitative PCR assay and necroptosis mediators, including receptor-interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3), mixed lineage domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL), and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), were measured by ELISA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive ability of mtDNA copy number as a predictor of hospital mortality. Among the 142 patients with sepsis, the mtDNA copy number was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (median, 4040 copies/µL vs. 2585 copies/µL; p < 0.001), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.82) for the relationship between mtDNA and hospital mortality. Furthermore, the correlation between mtDNA copy number and each necroptosis mediator was excellent (p < 0.001 for all): RIPK3 (r = 0.803), MLKL (r = 0.897), and HMGB1 (r = 0.603). The plasma mtDNA copy number was highly correlated with essential necroptosis mediators, suggesting that mtDNA propagates necroptosis and increases sepsis mortality.
Keywords: sepsis, biomarker, mitochondrial DNA, necroptosis, damage-associated molecular patterns
1. Introduction
Sepsis has been identified as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection [1]. Sepsis and septic shock are major healthcare problems, affecting millions of people worldwide each year and killing approximately 17–33% of affected patients [2,3]. Considering the high mortality in sepsis, accurately identifying high-risk patients with sepsis and focusing treatment on this population is deemed crucial. In this regard, there have been many biomarkers identified for predicting morbidity and mortality in sepsis in the critical care setting [4,5].
Plasma mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was assessed as a biomarker for predicting sepsis mortality [6]. Previous studies revealed that plasma mtDNA copy number is significantly higher in patients with sepsis or septic shock than in healthy controls [7,8,9]. Furthermore, mtDNA copy number has also been associated with mortality in patients with sepsis [9,10]. However, increasing evidence has shown that mtDNA is not only a marker for sepsis mortality but also a key player in organ dysfunction and mortality in patients with sepsis. This is because circulating mtDNA can trigger innate immunity through multiple mechanisms, such as activating the Toll-like receptor 9/NF-κB pathway or the NALP3 inflammasome [11,12]. Consequently, mtDNA may contribute to the persistent and dysregulated inflammatory response and amplify organ dysfunction in sepsis [10]. mtDNA serves as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that drive an immune or inflammatory response in sepsis [6]. The DAMPs are often released during extensive, infection-induced immune cell death, which is linked with multiple organ dysfunction [13].
Necroptosis is a type of cell death that combines apoptosis and necrosis. It is morphologically similar to necrosis, but it can also be regulated by underlying genetic programs [14]. Previous studies suggested that the necroptotic pathway and its regulatory proteins are crucial mediators of sepsis-induced organ injury [15,16,17]. Although a mouse study showed that mtDNA was translocated to the extracellular space by necroptosis [18], clinical studies exploring the association between mtDNA and necroptosis remain to be limited. Figure 1 schematically depicts the correlation between necroptosis and extracellular mtDNA.
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of a correlation between necroptosis and extracellular mitochondrial DNA. TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TNFR1, TNF receptor 1; TRADD, TNFR1-associated death domain; RIPK1, receptor-interacting protein kinase 1; RIPK3, receptor-interacting protein kinase 3; FADD, Fas-associated death domain; Casp8, caspase-8; cFLIP, cellular FLICE (FADD-like IL-1β-converting enzyme)-inhibitory protein; MLKL, mixed-lineage kinase domain-like; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA.
This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of mtDNA as a biomarker to predict mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis and to assess the association between plasma mtDNA levels and necroptosis mediators.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
The Samsung Medical Center Registry of Critical Illness (SMC-RoCI) is a prospective observational study conducted at the Samsung Medical Center (1989-bed, university-affiliated, tertiary referral hospital in Seoul, South Korea) [16]. This ongoing prospective study was initiated in April 2014 and aims to establish a human sample repository and develop new biological markers for critical illness [16]. The cohort profile was described previously [15,16,17,19]. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legally authorized representatives prior to enrollment.
All consecutive adult patients (aged ≥ 19 years) admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) were eligible for inclusion in this registry. The exclusion criteria from eligibility were as follows: (1) cognitive impairment, (2) inability to provide informed consent, (3) ICU admission for a simple procedure or postsurgical care, (4) transfer from other hospitals, (5) end-of-life decision or admission to facilitate palliative care, (6) hemoglobin < 8 g/dL upon admission or persistent bleeding, and (7) discharge within 24 h of ICU admission [16].
In total, 1367 patients were admitted to the medical ICU from April 2014 to August 2016. After excluding 1172 patients who met the exclusion criteria and 1 who missed screening (transferred to the general ward before the screening process), 194 were initially identified. After further excluding 46 patients who were not diagnosed with sepsis, 4 who withdrew consent, and 2 whose samples expired, 142 were ultimately included in the analysis (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Study flowchart.
2.2. Data Collection
Clinical data on patient demographics, the reason for ICU admission, the severity of illness score, and laboratory data were obtained at the time of enrollment. Illness severity was assessed using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) [20], Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) [21], and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores [22]. Sepsis was defined according to the third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [1]. Since the SMC-RoCI was initiated in April 2014, patients enrolled before the release of the new definition were reclassified using Sepsis-3.
2.3. Measurement of Plasma Mitochondrial DNA and Necroptosis-Related Markers
Blood samples were collected as 19 mL of whole blood within 48 h of study enrollment and centrifuged within 4 h of collection. Plasma was separated and stored at −80 °C for further analysis. In order to measure the mtDNA copy number, the plasma samples were pre-filtered using 0.8 µm syringe filters, and additional centrifugation was performed to eliminate residual cellular material. DNA was isolated from 1 mL of plasma using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acids kit (QIAGEN, Germany) and eluted in 50 µL of kit elution buffer. The mtDNA copy numbers were then assessed by measuring the NADH dehydrogenase 1 gene using quantitative real-time PCR with a PRISM 7300 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX, USA) with the following primers: human NADH dehydrogenase 1 gene (mtDNA): forward 5′-ATACCCATGGCCAACCTCCT-3′, reverse 5′-GGGCCTTTGCGTAGTTGTAT-3′; and human β-globin (nuclear DNA): forward 5′-GTGCACCTGACTCCTGAGGAGA-3′, reverse 5′-CCTTGATACCAACCTGCCCAG-3′ [23]. The thermal profile for detecting mtDNA was as follows: denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, 10 s at 58 °C, and 10 s at 72 °C. In each application, the samples were analyzed in duplicate, and the mean was used in the subsequent analysis.
The plasma levels of necroptosis-related markers (receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 [RIPK3], mixed lineage domain-like [MLKL], and high-mobility group box 1 [HMGB1]) were measured from stored aliquots using commercially available ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (RIPK3; CUSABIO, Wuhan, China) (MLKL; LifeSpan BioSciences, Seattle, DC, USA) (HMGB1; IBL-International, Hamburg, Germany) [15].
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, whereas continuous variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of mtDNA in predicting survival among critically ill patients with sepsis. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the association between plasma mtDNA copy numbers and necroptosis-related markers. All tests were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed using STATA version 16 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
Of the 142 critically ill patients with sepsis, 95 (66.9%) were male, and the median age of all patients was 67 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53–74 years). No significant intergroup differences were found in terms of age, sex, and comorbidities between non-survivors and survivors. Non-survivors received mechanical ventilation therapy more frequently than survivors (55.6% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.029). Although no significant intergroup differences were observed in C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate, non-survivors showed higher SAPS 3 (median, 57 vs. 52; p = 0.042) and APACHE II (median, 26 vs. 22; p = 0.004) scores than survivors (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of the study population. Data are presented as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range).
| Total (n = 142) | Non-Survivors (n = 36) | Survivors (n = 106) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 67 (53–74) | 67 (52–72) | 67 (54–75) | 0.429 |
| Male | 95 (66.9) | 27 (75.0) | 68 (64.2) | 0.232 |
| Comorbidities | ||||
| All malignancies | 75 (52.8) | 22 (61.1) | 53 (50.0) | 0.249 |
| Solid organ malignancies | 51 (35.9) | 16 (44.4) | 35 (33.0) | 0.217 |
| Hematologic malignancies | 25 (17.6) | 6 (16.7) | 19 (17.9) | 0.864 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 43 (30.3) | 12 (33.3) | 31 (29.3) | 0.645 |
| COPD | 11 (7.8) | 5 (13.9) | 6 (5.7) | 0.146 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 11 (7.8) | 2 (5.6) | 9 (8.5) | 0.730 |
| Myocardial infarction | 7 (4.9) | 2 (5.6) | 5 (4.7) | 1.0 |
| Congestive heart failure | 5 (3.5) | 2 (5.6) | 3 (2.8) | 0.601 |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 6 (4.2) | 2 (5.6) | 4 (3.8) | 0.643 |
| Chronic liver disease | 13 (9.2) | 6 (16.7) | 7 (6.6) | 0.070 |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | 2 (1–3) | 2 (2–3) | 2 (1–3) | 0.054 |
| Clinical status on | ||||
| ICU admission | ||||
| Mechanical ventilation | 57 (40.1) | 20 (55.6) | 37 (34.9) | 0.029 |
| Vasopressor support | 49 (34.5) | 17 (47.2) | 32 (30.2) | 0.063 |
| Laboratory findings | ||||
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio | 184 (126–281) | 161 (121–245) | 193 (127–285) | 0.178 |
| CRP, mg/dL | 12.9 (5.0–23.0) | 16.4 (7.7–25.0) | 12.4 (3.9–21.8) | 0.173 |
| Lactate, mg/dL | 2.7 (1.8–3.9) | 3.3 (1.8–5.2) | 2.7 (1.8–3.4) | 0.151 |
| Severity of illness | ||||
| SAPS 3 score | 53 (46–59) | 57 (48–71) | 52 (45–58) | 0.042 |
| APACHE II score | 23 (19–29) | 26 (21–33) | 22 (17–27) | 0.004 |
| SOFA score, initial | 9 (6–11) | 10 (7–12) | 8 (6–11) | 0.054 |
APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; ICU, intensive care unit; PaO2/FiO2 ratio, ratio of arterial oxygen pressure to fractional inspired oxygen; SAPS 3, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.
3.2. Plasma Mitochondrial DNA
The plasma mtDNA copy number was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in non-survivors (median, 4040 copies/µL; IQR, 3232–6288 copies/µL) than in survivors (median, 2585 copies/µL; IQR, 1867–3642 copies/µL) (Table 2). Figure 3 depicts the receiver operating curve of mtDNA for predicting in-hospital mortality of critically ill patients with sepsis. The area under the curve value was 0.727 (95% confidence interval, 0.635–0.818).
Table 2.
Plasma levels of mtDNA, RIPK3, MLKL, and HMGB in non-survivors versus survivors among critically ill patients with sepsis. Data are presented as median (interquartile range).
| Total (n = 142) | Non-Survivors (n = 36) | Survivors (n = 106) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mtDNA, copies/µL | 3090 (2015–4629) | 4040 (3232–6288) | 2585 (1867–3642) | <0.001 |
| Necroptosis-related markers | ||||
| RIPK3, pg/mL | 720 (259–1368) | 1104 (512–2515) | 536 (220–1197) | 0.002 |
| MLKL, ng/mL | 2.4 (2.1–3.7) | 3.2 (2.3–4.8) | 2.3 (2.0–3.2) | 0.004 |
| HMGB1, ng/mL | 5.0 (2.6–7.6) | 6.8 (3.1–9.6) | 4.5 (2.5–7.0) | 0.017 |
RIPK3, receptor-interacting protein kinase-3; MLKL, mixed lineage domain-like pseudokinase; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1.
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristic curve measuring the usefulness of mitochondrial DNA in predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. The area under the curve value was 0.727 (95% confidence interval, 0.635–0.818).
3.3. Association between Plasma Mitochondrial DNA and Necroptosis-Related Markers
The plasma levels of necroptosis-related markers were found to be significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (Table 2): RIPK3 (median, 1104 vs. 536 pg/mL; p = 0.002), MLKL (median, 3.2 vs. 2.3 ng/mL; p = 0.004), and HMGB1 (median, 6.8 vs. 4.5 pg/mL; p = 0.017). The correlation between plasma mtDNA copy numbers and each necroptosis-related marker was as follows: mtDNA and RIPK3 (Pearson’s r = 0.803), MLKL (r = 0.897), and HMGB1 (r = 0.603) (p < 0.001 for all) (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Correlations between mitochondrial DNA and necroptosis-related markers in critically ill patients with sepsis. (A) RIPK3, (B) MLKL, and (C) HMGB1. mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; RIPK3, receptor-interacting protein kinase-3; MLKL, mixed lineage kinase domain-like; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1.
4. Discussion
In this observational study, plasma mtDNA satisfactorily predicted in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. Furthermore, the mtDNA copy number showed excellent correlations with those of necroptosis mediators, including RIPK3, MLKL, and HMGB1, which implies a link between plasma mtDNA and necroptosis in sepsis.
This study revealed that the mtDNA copy number was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors among critically ill patients with sepsis, although no intergroup differences were noted in CRP and lactate levels. In agreement with our results, previous studies found that the mtDNA copy number was elevated in patients with sepsis [7,8,9] and was associated with mortality [9,10]. In this regard, plasma mtDNA may be a suitable biomarker for diagnosing sepsis and predicting mortality in patients with sepsis. However, mtDNA copy number was not significantly associated with mortality in some sepsis studies [8,24]. This discrepancy might be explained by differences in terms of the protocols used to measure mtDNA copy numbers across previous studies, thus warranting the standardization of mtDNA protocols to firmly establish the clinical usefulness of mtDNA in sepsis [25].
In order to serve as a DAMP driving the inflammatory response in sepsis, mtDNA needs to be released from the mitochondria into the cytosol and extracellular compartments [6]. The underlying mechanisms of the phenomenon include the generation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species [26,27] and destabilized mtDNA packaging [28]. In addition to these two potential mechanisms, necroptosis can translocate mtDNA to the extracellular space, which was then suggested in a mouse study [18]. Excellent correlations between mtDNA level and necroptosis mediators (RIPK3, MLKL, and HMGB1) in this study show that a large proportion of plasma mtDNA may be released by necroptosis in sepsis.
Necroptosis is often induced by specific ligand binding, including the binding of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) to several death receptors, including TNF receptor 1 and TRAIL receptors [29]. Subsequently, the necroptosis pathway is regulated by distinct proteins, such as RIPK1 and RIPK3, and downstream substrate MLKL [14,30]. The ruptured, dying cell induces the release of several necrosis-associated DAMPs, including HMGB1 [31,32]. Previous animal and clinical studies demonstrated the crucial role of necroptosis in driving mortality during sepsis [15,17,33,34]. In the same vein, this study also showed that plasma RIPK3, MLKL, and HMGB1 levels were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors among critically ill patients with sepsis. Furthermore, considering the correlation between plasma mtDNA and necroptosis mediators, mtDNA as a DAMP may propagate a proinflammatory response and consequent necroptosis pathway activation, which may be followed by mortality in patients with sepsis. Overall, mtDNA and necroptosis affect each other, and these interactions could increase mortality in patients with sepsis.
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, although excellent correlations were observed between plasma mtDNA copy number and necroptosis mediators, this study could not evaluate the causal relationships among them. Future studies are thus warranted to elucidate the mechanistic link between mtDNA and necroptosis. Second, no protocol for measuring mtDNA copy numbers was established. Hence, measuring the mtDNA copy number in serum, not in plasma, or using a different protocol might lead to different results. Third, this study was conducted at a single center in Korea, which might limit the generalization of our findings to other institutions or ethnic groups.
5. Conclusions
Plasma mtDNA copy number was determined to be a predictive factor of mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis and was strongly correlated with essential necroptosis mediators, suggesting that mtDNA propagates necroptosis and increases sepsis mortality.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.J. Methodology, H.C., H.Y., J.Y.L., and K.J. Formal analysis, H.C., H.Y., and K.J. Investigation, H.C., H.Y., J.Y.L., J.P., and K.J. Data curation, H.C., H.Y., J.Y.L., J.P., and K.J. Writing—original draft preparation, H.C., H.Y., and K.J. Writing—review and editing, H.C., H.Y., J.Y.L., J.P., and K.J. Supervision, K.J. Funding acquisition, H.Y. and K.J. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (application no. 2013-12-033).
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from patients or their legally authorized representatives prior to enrollment.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Future Medicine 20*30 Project of Samsung Medical Center (SMX1220081) and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1C1C1013557).
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., Bellomo R., Bernard G.R., Chiche J.D., Coopersmith C.M., et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fleischmann C., Scherag A., Adhikari N.K., Hartog C.S., Tsaganos T., Schlattmann P., Angus D.C., Reinhart K., International Forum of Acute Care T. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016;193:259–272. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fleischmann-Struzek C., Mellhammar L., Rose N., Cassini A., Rudd K.E., Schlattmann P., Allegranzi B., Reinhart K. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: Results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1552–1562. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marshall J.C., Reinhart K., International Sepsis F. Biomarkers of sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2009;37:2290–2298. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a02afc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yan H.P., Li M., Lu X.L., Zhu Y.M., Ou-Yang W.X., Xiao Z.H., Qiu J., Li S.J. Use of plasma mitochondrial DNA levels for determining disease severity and prognosis in pediatric sepsis: A case control study. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:267. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1239-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harrington J.S., Choi A.M.K., Nakahira K. Mitochondrial DNA in Sepsis. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2017;23:284–290. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bhagirath V.C., Dwivedi D.J., Liaw P.C. Comparison of the Proinflammatory and Procoagulant Properties of Nuclear, Mitochondrial, and Bacterial DNA. Shock. 2015;44:265–271. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Timmermans K., Kox M., Scheffer G.J., Pickkers P. Plasma Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Levels, and Markers of Inflammation, Shock, and Organ Damage in Patients with Septic Shock. Shock. 2016;45:607–612. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schafer S.T., Franken L., Adamzik M., Schumak B., Scherag A., Engler A., Schonborn N., Walden J., Koch S., Baba H.A., et al. Mitochondrial DNA: An Endogenous Trigger for Immune Paralysis. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:923–933. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mao J.Y., Li D.K., Zhang H.M., Wang X.T., Liu D.W. Plasma mitochondrial DNA levels are associated with acute lung injury and mortality in septic patients. BMC Pulm. Med. 2021;21:66. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01437-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.West A.P., Shadel G.S. Mitochondrial DNA in innate immune responses and inflammatory pathology. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017;17:363–375. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang Q., Raoof M., Chen Y., Sumi Y., Sursal T., Junger W., Brohi K., Itagaki K., Hauser C.J. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464:104–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cheng Z., Abrams S.T., Toh J., Wang S.S., Wang Z., Yu Q., Yu W., Toh C.H., Wang G. The Critical Roles and Mechanisms of Immune Cell Death in Sepsis. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1918. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Choi M.E., Price D.R., Ryter S.W., Choi A.M.K. Necroptosis: A crucial pathogenic mediator of human disease. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e128834. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.128834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yoo H., Im Y., Ko R.E., Lee J.Y., Park J., Jeon K. Association of plasma level of high-mobility group box-1 with necroptosis and sepsis outcomes. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:9512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88970-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yoo H., Lee J.Y., Park J., Yang J.H., Suh G.Y., Jeon K. Association of Plasma Level of TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand with Severity and Outcome of Sepsis. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:1661. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ma K.C., Schenck E.J., Siempos I.I., Cloonan S.M., Finkelsztein E.J., Pabon M.A., Oromendia C., Ballman K.V., Baron R.M., Fredenburgh L.E., et al. Circulating RIPK3 levels are associated with mortality and organ failure during critical illness. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e99692. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.99692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mangalmurti N., Qing D., Hotz M., Siegel D.L., Sondheimer N., Mangalmurti N.S. B97. Mitochondria Dysfunction in the Development of Lung Disease. American Thoracic Society; New York, NY, USA: 2016. Mitochondrial DNA Released Following Necroptosis Accumulates on RBCs; p. A4309. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park J., Pabon M., Choi A.M.K., Siempos I.I., Fredenburgh L.E., Baron R.M., Jeon K., Chung C.R., Yang J.H., Park C.M., et al. Plasma surfactant protein-D as a diagnostic biomarker for acute respiratory distress syndrome: Validation in US and Korean cohorts. BMC Pulm. Med. 2017;17:204. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0532-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Knaus W.A., Draper E.A., Wagner D.P., Zimmerman J.E. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit. Care Med. 1985;13:818–829. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moreno R.P., Metnitz P.G., Almeida E., Jordan B., Bauer P., Campos R.A., Iapichino G., Edbrooke D., Capuzzo M., Le Gall J.R., et al. SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1345–1355. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vincent J.L., Moreno R., Takala J., Willatts S., De Mendonca A., Bruining H., Reinhart C.K., Suter P.M., Thijs L.G. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–710. doi: 10.1007/BF01709751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nakahira K., Kyung S.Y., Rogers A.J., Gazourian L., Youn S., Massaro A.F., Quintana C., Osorio J.C., Wang Z., Zhao Y., et al. Circulating mitochondrial DNA in patients in the ICU as a marker of mortality: Derivation and validation. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Puskarich M.A., Shapiro N.I., Trzeciak S., Kline J.A., Jones A.E. Plasma levels of mitochondrial DNA in patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis. Shock. 2012;38:337–340. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318266a169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Harrington J.S., Huh J.W., Schenck E.J., Nakahira K., Siempos I.I., Choi A.M.K. Circulating Mitochondrial DNA as Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Chest. 2019;156:1120–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jung S.S., Moon J.S., Xu J.F., Ifedigbo E., Ryter S.W., Choi A.M., Nakahira K. Carbon monoxide negatively regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2015;308:L1058–1067. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00400.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Won J.H., Park S., Hong S., Son S., Yu J.W. Rotenone-induced Impairment of Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain Confers a Selective Priming Signal for NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:27425–27437. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.667063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.West A.P., Khoury-Hanold W., Staron M., Tal M.C., Pineda C.M., Lang S.M., Bestwick M., Duguay B.A., Raimundo N., MacDuff D.A., et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature. 2015;520:553–557. doi: 10.1038/nature14156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moreno-Gonzalez G., Vandenabeele P., Krysko D.V. Necroptosis: A Novel Cell Death Modality and Its Potential Relevance for Critical Care Medicine. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016;194:415–428. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201510-2106CI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Linkermann A., Green D.R. Necroptosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:455–465. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1310050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.He S., Wang X. RIP kinases as modulators of inflammation and immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19:912–922. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0188-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaczmarek A., Vandenabeele P., Krysko D.V. Necroptosis: The release of damage-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance. Immunity. 2013;38:209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaiser W.J., Sridharan H., Huang C., Mandal P., Upton J.W., Gough P.J., Sehon C.A., Marquis R.W., Bertin J., Mocarski E.S. Toll-like receptor 3-mediated necrosis via TRIF, RIP3, and MLKL. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:31268–31279. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.462341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Takaoka A., Wang Z., Choi M.K., Yanai H., Negishi H., Ban T., Lu Y., Miyagishi M., Kodama T., Honda K., et al. DAI (DLM-1/ZBP1) is a cytosolic DNA sensor and an activator of innate immune response. Nature. 2007;448:501–505. doi: 10.1038/nature06013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.





