Skip to main content
Biomolecules logoLink to Biomolecules
. 2022 Oct 11;12(10):1453. doi: 10.3390/biom12101453

Targeting Neuroinflammation in Osteoarthritis with Intra-Articular Adelmidrol

Francesca Guida 1, Monica Rocco 2,3, Livio Luongo 1,4, Pietro Persiani 5, Maria Chiara Vulpiani 2,6, Sveva Maria Nusca 2,6, Sabatino Maione 1,4, Flaminia Coluzzi 3,7,*
Editor: Rosalia Crupi
PMCID: PMC9599300  PMID: 36291664

Abstract

Neuroinflammation is an emerging therapeutic target in chronic degenerative and autoimmune diseases, such as osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis. Mast cells (MCs) play a key role in the homeostasis of joints and the activation of MCs induces the release of a huge number of mediators, which fuel the fire of neuroinflammation. Particularly, synovial MCs release substances which accelerate the degradation of the extra-cellular matrix causing morphological joint changes and cartilage damage and inducing the proliferation of synovial fibroblasts, angiogenesis, and the sprouting of sensory nerve fibers, which mediate chronic pain. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is a well-known MCs modulator, but in osteoarthritic joints, its levels are significantly reduced. Adelmidrol, a synthetic derivate of azelaic acid belonging to the ALIAmides family, is a PEA enhancer. Preclinical and clinical investigations showed that the intra-articular administration of Adelmidrol significantly reduced MC infiltration, pro-inflammatory cytokine release, and cartilage degeneration. The combination of 1% high molecular weight hyaluronic acid and 2% Adelmidrol has been effectively used for knee osteoarthritis and, a significant improvement in analgesia and functionality has been recorded.

Keywords: palmitoylethanolamide, adelmidrol, hyaluronic acid, visco-induction, osteoarthritis, neuroinflammation, mast cells, joint degeneration and pain

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of musculoskeletal chronic pain, affecting nearly 16% of the population, characterized by cartilage degeneration and stiffness. A mechanism-based approach to OA should include at least three targets: the peripheral mechanisms of inflammation, the central mechanisms of pain hypersensitivity, and the prevention of joint destruction [1]. In the last few years, mast cells (MCs) have been widely investigated as a possible target to be modulated for controlling peripheral and central nervous system inflammation [2,3].

Joints are a target of neuroinflammation in chronic degenerative and autoimmune diseases, such as OA and rheumatoid arthritis, and MC activation has been recognized as a prominent feature of the synovial tissue in patients with OA [4]. The aim of this review is to present preclinical and clinical evidence of a new intra-articular formulation containing Adelmidrol for targeting neuroinflammation in OA diseases.

2. Neuro-Immune Mechanisms Underlying OA

The pathogenesis of OA is correlated with different interrelated mechanisms including inflammation, neuroplasticity, cartilage disruption, and bone damage. Neuro-immune signaling may occur when innate immune cells produce algogenic factors that act on the pain pathway [5]. Indeed, during OA progression, the nociceptors innervating joints can be sensitized by locally generated mediators, such as inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, nerve growth factor (NGF) [6], and disease-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [7,8] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the main contribution of MCs to degenerative joint diseases. Hyperactivated synovial MCs trigger the inflammatory process increasing vascular permeability and angiogenesis, recalling circulating PMN cells at the lesion site and activating synovial fibroblasts. Moreover, synovial MCs degranulation releases a massive amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, MMPs, and aggrecanases responsible for ECM protein degradation and, cartilage and bone remodeling.

The pathogenesis of OA is largely determined by the disrupted balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators leading to a chronic low-grade inflammation which contributes to the associated pain condition.

The enhancement of proinflammatory cytokines causes the secretion of enzymes and other inflammatory factors involved in the pathogenesis of OA responsible for morphological joint changes, such as cartilage degeneration, osteophyte formation, and synovitis. One of the most important inflammatory mediators involved in this process is the interleukin (IL)-1β, a member of the IL-1 superfamily implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous neuroinflammatory diseases [9].

In OA, through the activation of the IL-1 receptor I (IL-1RI), IL-1β mediates cartilage destruction by inhibiting new formations of proteoglycans and degrading existing proteoglycans by stimulating degradative enzyme production. Widely distributed in different cells in the knee joint, IL-1RI has been shown to be upregulated in isolated human OA chondrocytes in vitro [10,11]. In OA synovium, a relative deficit in the production of natural antagonists of the IL-1 receptor (IL-1Ra) has been detected and it could possibly be related to the additional production of nitric oxide in OA tissues [12]. IL-1β activates several signaling pathways which overall contribute to the progression of OA. In particular, through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, IL-1β induces catabolic events including the cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation mediated by metalloproteinases (MMPs), such as MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-13, and aggrecanases such as ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5. Additionally, the IL-1β-mediated NF-κB pathway activation leads to the synthesis and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines [IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α], and chemokines [IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1 or CCL2), CCL5 (RANTES), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1a (MIP-1a)] [13]. In OA, higher concentrations of IL-6 in synovial fluid have been correlated with the pain experience of OA patients [14] and in an experimental study, de Hooge et al. [15] showed that IL-6 gene knock out mice developed more advanced OA, compared to control animals.

High concentrations of TNF-α have been observed in structures such as synovial fluid, synovial membrane, cartilage, and subchondral bone layer [16]. As with IL-1β, TNF-α, via its conjugate receptors (TNFR-1 and TNFR-2), promotes the activation of the JNK kinase and the transcription factor NF-κB [16], by leading to the degeneration of cartilage and morphological joint changes.

Chemokines contribute to the inflammatory processes, stimulating the chemotaxis of inflammatory cells that, in turn, secrete proinflammatory cytokines, by representing thus the major challenge in treating and slowing the progression of osteoarthritis [11]. Increased levels of CCL2 have been detected in the synovial fluid of patients with knee OA [17]. Borzi et al. [18] demonstrated that CCL2 induces MMP-3 expression enhancement, contributing to proteoglycan loss and the degradation of cartilaginous tissue. In an experimental study, Miller et al., [19] showed that both CCL2 and CCR2 were upregulated in the innervating dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of the knee 8 weeks after the surgical model of OA while the absence of CCL2 or CCR2 suppresses selective inflammatory genes in joints 6 h post-de-stabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) model, including arginase 1, prostaglandin synthase 2, nitric oxide synthase 2, IL-6, MMP-3, and the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, by delaying pain development. CCL3 and CCL5 levels have been shown to be elevated in OA synovial fluid when compared with controls [17,20]. IL-1β-incubated human chondrocytes showed a significant upregulation of CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5 [21].

Chemokines from the CXC family also participate in the pathogenesis of OA. CXCL8 (IL-8) has been shown to be upregulated in the serum and in the synovial fluid of OA patients [22], and the study conducted by Guo et al. [23] reported that CXCL12 levels in the synovial fluid were closely related to the radiographic severity of OA. Interestingly, experimental evidence suggests a role for fractalkine (CX3CL1) and its receptor (CX3CR1) in the development of chronic pain in OA. Indeed, after DMM surgery, fractalkine release by DRG neurons is upregulated in the late phase of the model and this timing correlates with the development of microgliosis in the dorsal horn, where microglial cells express CX3CR1 [24]. The involvement of fractalkine and its receptor CX3CR1 in several pre-clinical models of chronic and neuropathic pain has been previously described [25,26]. In particular, this pathway has been highlighted as one of the most important cross-talk pathways involved in neuron-microglia communication [27].

As a member of the neurotrophin family, NGF is essential for the development of nociceptive primary neurons. NGF can bind the general neurotrophin receptor p75, as well its high-affinity cognate receptor, tropomyosin-related kinase (Trk)-A [28], which are expressed by joint cells, including chondrocytes, and increased in OA cartilage [29]. Triggered by a proinflammatory environment, the NGF synthesis is highly correlated with the degree of OA cartilage degradation in humans [29]. The NGF/TrkA signaling activation induces the release of a variety of inflammatory mediators such as serotonin, histamine, and NGF itself, which are known to cause sensitization of nociceptors. The injection of an anti-NGF monoclonal antibody shortly after model induction (day 2) was able to reverse the deficits in burrowing one day later compared to saline [30]. Moreover, the effects of a long-term NGF blockade in rat meniscal surgery models have been reported [31]. The authors showed that therapeutic treatment (day 14–day 21) reversed weight-bearing asymmetry and mechanical allodynia of the hind paw, while no short-term effects on histologic cartilage degeneration were observed. Similar findings were reported using Tanuzemab in a 28-day rat medial meniscal tear (MMT) model [32], where the authors described a significant increase in tibial cartilage degeneration, subchondral bone sclerosis, and tibial osteophytes induced by the treatment.

Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are a group of molecules released from ECM to the joint cavity during cartilage degradation. Together with so-called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), DAMPs signal to the immune system a “dangerous state” requiring a protective response to a pathological state. Indeed, joint trauma results in the production of DAMPs and intracellular alarmins that signal through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which include Toll-like receptors (TLRs) on synovial macrophages, fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS), or chondrocytes to induce the local production of inflammatory mediators of various factors, like catabolic factors [matrix metalloproteinase, cytokines, chemokines cathepsins (B, K, and L)], and the complement cascade [7,33].

High levels of NGF, released by MCs, influence sensory nerve activity and its interaction with the high-affinity TrkA receptor (NGF/TrkA), and amplify inflammatory processes contributing to the development of a nerve sprouting of sensory pain fibers which mediate chronic pain maintenance.

3. Role of Mast Cells in OA

The important role of MCs in allergic reactions is well-known. Moreover, the involvement of MCs in physiological bone turnover and bone disorders has been described in detail [34,35]. MCs usually reside quietly within tissues throughout the body, whereas when they become activated, they secrete granules containing histamine and other inflammatory substances. The hyperactivation of MCs is often accompanied by pain syndromes [36]. Indeed, pain-like behaviors have been found to be MC-associated in several experimental models of pain [37].

In healthy joints, synovial tissue macrophages (STM) or MCs represent nearly 3% of the cellular population of the synovia and act as sentinels, monitoring possible pathogens and mediating the immune response [38]. In chronically inflamed joints, the synovial membrane becomes hypertrophic and the MC density significantly increases, as a result of the recruitment of circulating progenitors, the maturation of local MC precursors, the differentiation of local mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into MCs, and the release of neurotrophins as NGF that stimulate further MC proliferation. Farinelli et al. have recently shown, in hip and knee tissue from OA patients undergoing arthroplasty, a significant increase in the MCs and the vessel number, which significantly correlated with the synovitis score and disease severity [39]. The synovial MC infiltration has been associated with a variety of inflammatory changes which may play a role in the pathophysiology of OA [40,41]. The increased vascular permeability mediated by the histamine and prostaglandin D2 released by MCs, the recruitment of other circulating polymorphonuclear cells (PMN), such as leukocytes, and macrophage activation induced by cytokines and chemokines, contribute to the early phases of inflammatory arthritis [42]. Additionally, MCs may participate in joint destruction by the induction of MMPs from fibroblast-like synoviocytes, chondrocytes, and other cell types in the arthritic cartilage [42,43]. MCs have been detected even in osteophytes, where they play a role in accentuating the inflammatory pathology of OA [44]. Similarly, in the rheumatoid-arthritis (RA) joint, activated MCs release pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mediators (TNF-A, IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, histamine, heparin, tryptase) that induce angiogenesis, promote cartilage erosions, synoviocyte proliferation, and pain sensitization. Synovial MC concentration has been shown to correlate with the different stages of RA, particularly with the maintenance or lack thereof of the remission phase, suggesting a possible role as a biomarker to predict the severity and progression of the disease [45]. Cytokines and growth factors released during inflammation are the main mediators of the cross-talk between the subchondral bone, cartilage, and synovia. In vitro studies reveal that MCs synthesize and release NGF in response to antigen/IgE stimulation and it is involved in MCs maturation and degranulation [46]. High levels of NGF, released by MCs, induce the sprouting of sensory pain fibers and contribute to peripheral and central sensitization, which are the cornerstone of chronic pain maintenance [47]. The injection of complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) induces inflammation of the joint and sprouting of CGRP+ nerve fibers in the synovium. This sprouting is significantly attenuated by anti-NGF therapy [48]. NGF binds TrkA receptors on inflammatory cells inducing the release of inflammatory mediators, such as serotonin, histamine, and even further NGF [49]. A more recent study suggested that NGF released from MCs may be implicated in osteoarthritis pain [50]. The authors have indicated the NGF responsible for MCs-PGD2-mediated increased nociceptive signaling, suggesting the TrkA blockade in MCs as a potential target for OA pain. Finally, MCs seem to play a role in the metabolism of hyaluronic acid (HA), which is the main component of the ECM and play a key role in joint lubrification during movement. MCs influence HA synthesis and degradation through two mechanisms of action. Firstly, MCs release tryptases, which may accelerate HA destruction. Secondly, granules of synovial MCs contain heparin, which represents the preliminary stage in the synthesis of HA. In vitro studies showed that MC chymase and tryptase accelerated the degradation of HA in the synovial fluid [51]. Moreover, MCs express the hyaluronic-acid-binding isoform of CD44 [52]. These observations could explain why the modulation of MCs could be a key factor for reducing intra-articular inflammation and ensuring the physiological metabolism of HA, filling the unmet needs of the currently available intra-articular therapies.

4. Intra-Articular Adelmidrol: A New Therapeutic Option for OA

Intra-articular treatments in OA management are warranted as their effects are limited to damaged joints, without significant systemic adverse events. The most commonly used intra-articular treatments are high-molecular-weight HA, corticosteroids, leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP), leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP), bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), and adipose mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) [53]. Intra-articular steroids are widely used for their anti-inflammatory effect. However, they have a mild to moderate effect on pain severity [54] and their chronic use has been associated with a number of clinical concerns, the most relevant being the alteration of gene expression and immunomodulatory effects, which are associated with additional joint damage [55]. Furth more, corticosteroids may inhibit the anabolic activity of chondrocytes, decrease collagen expression, and, when chronically used, be chondrotoxic [56].

Recent evidence showed that in symptomatic patients with knee OA, a combination of PRP and HA induces a significantly greater improvement of pain and function compared with HA injections only [57]. PRP infiltration in OA allows for the modulation of inflammation and the induction of cartilage regeneration, while HA is a pure visco-supplementation therapy, and is thus prone to degradation by proinflammatory cytokines, free radicals, and proteinases [58]. Although commonly used, this treatment presents extreme variability during the preparations, often influenced by donor-specific factors or by processing methods. As conventional treatments provide limited therapeutic benefits, novel strategies for managing OA are required.

Adelmidrol has been recently investigated as a possible innovative intra-articular therapy for OA. Adelmidrol is a synthetic derivate of azelaic acid which works as a palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) enhancer increasing endogenous PEA levels [59]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that Adelmidrol is able to significantly increase the endogenous PEA level in the duodenum and colon of healthy mice in a dose/time-dependent and PPAR-γ-independent manner [60]. As with PEA, Adelmidrol belongs to the family of Autacoid Local Injury Antagonist Amides (ALIAmides) and its amphiphilic and amphipathic characteristics make Adelmidrol particularly soluble and suitable for topical [61,62] and intra-articular administration. In healthy synovia, an elevated amount of PEA is present, while its levels are significantly reduced in the synovial fluid of patients with OA and rheumatoid arthritis [63]. In OA joints, the reduction of endogenous PEA levels is responsible for MC hyperactivation, which, by triggering a cascade of neuroinflammatory events, alters the physiological functionality of nerve endings, chondrocytes, and joint synvioblasts. Hypertrophic synvioblasts become unable to produce basic components of cartilage, leading to the progression of joint damage [42,64,65]. Therefore, the restoration of normal endogenous PEA levels, necessary to ensure MC normo-reactivity, becomes essential for the maintenance of normal joint function. These findings suggest that Adelmidrol, due to its properties, could represent a valid therapeutic approach for all diseases characterized by a significant reduction in endogenous PEA levels.

5. Adelmidrol in OA: Preclinical Evidence

The anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of both PEA and Adelmidrol have been shown in numerous experimental studies [66,67]. Particularly, Adelmidrol has been shown to reduce acute inflammation in the carrageenan (CAR) model, when systemically injected [68]. In the same study, the beneficial effect of Adelmidrol was also proved in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), an animal model of rheumatoid arthritis. Adelmidrol was shown to reduce clinical signs of OA, such as periarticular erythema and paw edema. X-ray examinations have shown that Adelmidrol reduced bone erosions in the femoral growth plate, as well as in the tibiotarsal joints with a consequent reduction of pain and proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β). Interestingly, the significant presence of MCs, with an increased chymase and tryptase expression in the joint tissues after CIA induction, was also reduced [68]. Preclinical observations of the combination of Adelmidrol and HA are available in a rat model injected with monosodium-iodoacetate (MIA) to induce OA. Di Paola et al. demonstrated that the combination of Adelmidrol with HA in a dose/time-dependent manner reduced the plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-a and IL-1b), MMPs, and NGF production in the osteoarthritic knee of the rats. Moreover, the combination significantly reduced MC infiltration and histological alterations induced by intra-articular MIA injection [69]. Among animal models developed for the examination of OA pathophysiology [70], MIA represents the most used model to study chronic pain associated with OA [71]. Along with joint damage, MIA injections induce mechanical sensitivity in the ipsilateral hind paw and weight-bearing deficits. Di Paola et al. observed that mechanical allodynia and motor functioning along with the degeneration of articular cartilage were reduced by the combination of HA and Adelmidrol [69].

6. Intra-Articular Adelmidrol: Clinical Evidence

A new intra-articular medical device containing Adelmidrol has been recently introduced onto the market (Hyadrol®, 2 mL pre-loaded syringe for intra-articular injection, Epitech Group SpA, Milano, Italy). In this product, 2% Adelmidrol is administered together with 1% high-molecular-weight (from 1.3 to 2.0 × 106 dalton) HA, which physiologically binds the CD44+ receptor [72]. Intra-articular Adelmidrol is supposed to be a valid therapeutic option for normalizing MC function and ensuring the visco-induction of HA, through a dual mechanism of action. Firstly, Adelmidrol, by increasing PEA levels in the OA joint, might switch MCs from the hyperactivated to the physiological status; thus, it may reduce the HA degradation, by inhibiting the release by MCs of lytic enzymes, such as tryptases, hyaluronidases, and β-hexosaminidases. Secondly, Adelmidrol, by normalizing the MCs’ release of heparin, which is a precursor of HA, induces HA production, leading to a visco-inductive effect in the OA joint (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Visco-supplementation vs. Visco-induction. (A) Visco-supplementation: Exogenous HA is injected in the OA joints where activated MCs release tryptases, hyaluronidases, and β-hexosaminidases which in turn may accelerate HA degradation; (B) Visco-induction: Adelmidrol, by increasing endogenous PEA levels, downregulates MCs activation and shift them towards a physiological condition. Adelmidrol reduces the MCs degranulation, the release of lytic enzymes, and therefore the HA degradation, normalizing the physiological release of heparin, a HA precursor.

A multi-center clinical trial has been published on the use of this combination of Adelmidrol and HA for intra-articular injection in patients suffering from Kellgren and Lawrence grade II-III osteoarthritis of the knee [73]. Eligible patients were ≥40-year-old subjects suffering from pain for more than 6 months, with an average pain score > 20 on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index pain sub-scale, and must have performed a washout of at least 2 weeks from other analgesics and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The principal exclusion criteria were: (a) the presence of concomitant severe systemic inflammatory joint diseases; (b) the use of corticosteroids in the previous 3 months; (c) the use of chondroprotective drugs, visco-supplementation injections, or arthroscopies within 6 months. The Italian WOMAC version was used in its VAS format: all 24 items were rated by the subject on a 10 cm VAS ranging from 0 (indicating no pain, stiffness, or functional limitation) to 10 (indicating extreme pain, stiffness, or functional limitation). Ranges of the WOMAC scores were: pain (0–50); stiffness (0–20), and functional limitation (0–170) [74]. The enrolled patients received 4 weekly intra-articular injections of 1% high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid and 2% Adelmidrol in a 2 mL pre-loaded syringe. Patients were assessed using the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index, the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) for the quality of life, and the Likert Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). In total, 102 patients (female n 60, 58.8%), with a mean age of 63.2 ± 0.6 years were recruited in this study, and follow-ups were conducted for 4 weeks after the last intra-articular injection. Only 7 patients withdrew prematurely from the trial: 3 for accidental trauma not related to the treatment, 3 due to knee pain and/or swelling after infiltration, and 1 was lost at the follow-up stage.

The 95 patients included in the final evaluation 4 weeks after treatment showed a significant improvement in all 3 elements of the WOMAC subscale (pain, stiffness, and functional limitation) (Table 1). Furthermore, a significant improvement in the quality of life was recorded in both the mental and physical components of the SF-12 (Figure 3).

Table 1.

Changes in the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Adapted from [73].

T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Basal
(before 1st infiltration)
1st w 2nd ws 3rd ws 1st w after 4th infiltration 4th w after 4th infiltration
N patients 102 102 101 98 97 95
Pain 22.5 ± 0.76 16.8 ± 0.87 12.2 ± 0.81 9.4 ± 0.82 7.0 ± 0.76 5.2 ± 0.63
Stiffness 7.8 ± 0.49 6.3 ± 0.48 4.7 ± 0.43 3.6 ± 0.39 2.5 ± 0.33 1.9 ± 0.29
Articular function 67.3 ± 3.24 58.4 ± 3.10 46.3 ± 2.84 36.0 ± 2.83 28.1 ± 2.66 21.4 ± 2.13
Total WOMAC score 97.6 ± 4.11 81.5 ± 4.08 63.3 ± 3.78 49.1 ± 3.77 37.6 ± 3.53 28.5 ± 2.85

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Changes in the SF12. Adapted from [73].

Over 90% of the treated subjects reported a clinical improvement according to the PGIC subjective evaluation, among which 76.4% felt “very much” or “much” improved (Figure 4). Intra-articular injections of 1% high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid and 2% Adelmidrol were well tolerated. No severe adverse events were observed. Seven patients (7.4%) reported local pain at the site of injection, accompanied by swelling in 2 patients (2.1%), regarded as related to the infiltrative procedure. Other adverse events, such as diarrhea, headache, abdominal cramps, and trauma were observed in 10 patients judged by the investigators as not related to the treatment [73].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Patient Global Impression of Change. Adapted from [69].

Vulpiani et al. recently published the follow-up of the described clinical trial, limited to a group of patients enrolled in a single hospital (Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy), available for re-evaluation at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years following the last intra-articular infiltration [75]. Forty-seven patients (77% of those enrolled in the first trial in a single center) were evaluated using both the WOMAC scale and the SF-12 questionnaire. The results obtained after 4 infiltrations, as measured with the WOMAC score, have been maintained for the whole follow-up period, including the effects on functional limitation. Similarly, no statistically significant modifications of both the physical and mental components of SF-12 have been observed in the 2-year follow-up period. These results suggest a long-term effect of Adelmidrol infiltration, which is not common for other intra-articular therapies.

7. Conclusions

OA is a complex degenerative disease, which requires a multimodal approach [1]. Systemic analgesia plays a role in targeting recurrent episodes of acute inflammation, which, by definition, lasts only a few days. NSAIDs may be useful for mitigating the dangerous effects of the destructive enzymes, cytokines, and prostaglandins released in the inflamed synovial membrane, after leukocyte infiltration [76,77]. Central analgesics, such as acetaminophen, opioids, and adjuvants, may be used for targeting maladaptive neuronal plasticity [78,79] and central mechanisms of pain [80]. Intra-articular therapies may support systemic analgesia by affecting the progression of joint destruction. In the real-world experience, however, there are still many unmet needs in the currently available intra-articular treatments for OA, in terms of analgesic efficacy, duration, tolerability, anti-inflammatory effect, and the modulation of cartilage degeneration.

Adelmidrol represents an innovative intra-articular treatment, which targets neuroinflammation and provides “visco-induction” to OA joints. It is time to “think outside the box”: we can prevent endogenous HA degradation, rather than merely provide HA through exogenous administration. Traditional exogenous HA is intra-articularly administered in order to provide “visco-supplementation” and to improve joint lubrification. However, when considering the inflammatory environment where the HA is injected, it is not surprising that its efficacy can be invalidated by the huge number of substances locally released, including MC-released tryptases and chymase, hyaluronidases, and β-hexosaminidases. Furthermore, MCs have played a key role in joint homeostasis, and their degranulation induces neuroinflammation.

MC-released pro-inflammatory cytokines fuel the fire of inflammation, promoting cartilage damage, angiogenesis, nerve sprouting, and pain sensitization.

PEA is a well-known substance that physiologically down-regulates MC activation and in OA joints, its endogenous levels are significantly reduced. Therefore, one of the targets of OA treatment, alongside the prevention of the progression of cartilage damage, should be to extinguish the fire of joint neuroinflammation.

Adelmidrol, by increasing and normalizing PEA levels in the joints, could be the first innovative molecule for “visco-induction”, through two mechanisms of action: (a) by reducing degranulation of MCs and therefore improving the efficacy of HA; (b) by normalizing MC function and restoring the physiological production of heparin, a HA precursor.

Preclinical and clinical data available on Adelmidrol administered together with HA support these hypotheses, by showing a significant reduction in cartilage degeneration, MC infiltration, and pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine plasma levels, and by improving analgesia and the functionality of OA patients.

Unfortunately, there are still many limitations to this emerging evidence. Firstly, further studies are needed to address the exact molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of Adelmidrol in the inflamed joint, despite the expected results demonstrated both in animal and clinical studies. Secondly, nowadays, clinical experience is still limited to the reported multicenter clinical trial by Vulpiani et al. [73] and the subsequent follow-up study [75], which confirmed the long-term results of this treatment. Therefore, further studies are warranted to confirm these interesting preliminary results.

In conclusion, in the context of a multimodal approach to OA, where systemic analgesia plays a role in targeting recurrent acute inflammation and central neuroplasticity leading to chronic pain [1], intra-articular treatment with Adelmidrol can be considered a promising treatment for preventing the progression of joint degeneration and neuro-inflammatory processes.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank EPITECH Group SpA for the information support and Chiara Gomiero for the design and the realization of Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Author Contributions

All authors (F.G., M.R., L.L., P.P., M.C.V., S.M.N., S.M. and F.C.) designed the review, critically reviewed the contents, and contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

FC served as a consultant for EPITECH Group SpA.

Funding Statement

Fee for open access publication was unconditioned supported by Epitech Group S.pA. Milano (Italy).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Cohen E., Lee Y.C. A Mechanism-Based Approach to the Management of Osteoarthritis Pain. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2015;13:399–406. doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0291-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mittal A., Sagi V., Gupta M., Gupta K. Mast Cell Neural Interactions in Health and Disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019;13:110. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Miller R.J., Malfait A.-M., Miller R.E. The innate immune response as a mediator of osteoarthritis pain. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020;28:562–571. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buckley M.G., Gallagher P.J., Walls A.F. Mast cell subpopulations in the synovial tissue of patients with osteoarthritis: Selective increase in numbers of tryptase-positive, chymase-negative mast cells. J. Pathol. 1998;186:67–74. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199809)186:1<67::AID-PATH132>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yu H., Huang T., Lu W.W., Tong L., Chen D. Osteoarthritis Pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:4642. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seidel M.F., Hügle T., Morlion B., Koltzenburg M., Chapman V., MaassenVanDenBrink A., Lane N.E., Perrot S., Zieg-lgänsberger W. Neurogenic inflammation as a novel treatment target for chronic pain syndromes. Exp. Neurol. 2022;356:114108. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lambert C., Zappia J., Sanchez C., Florin A., Dubuc J.-E., Henrotin Y. The Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) as Potential Targets to Treat Osteoarthritis: Perspectives from a Review of the Literature. Front. Med. 2020;7:607186. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.607186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Terkawi M.A., Ebata T., Yokota S., Takahashi D., Endo T., Matsumae G., Shimizu T., Kadoya K., Iwasaki N. Low-Grade Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms and Strategies for Future Therapeutic Intervention. Biomedicines. 2022;10:1109. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dinarello C.A. Overview of the IL-1 family in innate inflammation and acquired immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2018;281:8–27. doi: 10.1111/imr.12621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martel-Pelletier J., McCollum R., DiBattista J., Faure M.P., Chin J.A., Fournier S., Sarfati M., Pelletier J.P. The interleukin-1 receptor in normal and osteoarthritic human articular chondrocytes. Identification as the type I receptor and analysis of binding kinetics and biologic function. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:530–540. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Molnar V., Matišić V., Kodvanj I., Bjelica R., Jeleč Ž., Hudetz D., Rod E., Čukelj F., Vrdoljak T., Vidović D., et al. Cytokines and Chemokines Involved in Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:9208. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fernandes J.C., Martel-Pelletier J., Pelletier J.-P. The role of cytokines in osteoarthritis pathophysiology. Biorheology. 2002;39:237–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chevalier X., Eymard F., Richette P. Biologic agents in osteoarthritis: Hopes and disappointments. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2013;9:400–410. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li L., Li Z., Li Y., Hu X., Zhang Y., Fan P. Profiling of inflammatory mediators in the synovial fluid related to pain in knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020;21:99. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3120-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De Hooge A.S.K., Van de Loo F.A.J., Bennink M.B., Arntz O.J., De Hooge P., Van den Berg W.B. Male IL-6 gene knock out mice developed more advanced osteoarthritis upon aging. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2005;13:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wojdasiewicz P., Poniatowski L.A., Szukiewicz D. The role of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014;2014:561459. doi: 10.1155/2014/561459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Monibi F., Roller B.L., Stoker A., Garner B., Bal S., Cook J.L. Identification of Synovial Fluid Biomarkers for Knee Osteo-arthritis and Correlation with Radiographic Assessment. J. Knee Surg. 2016;29:242–247. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Borzi R.M., Mazzetti I., Macor S., Silvestri T., Bassi A., Cattini L., Facchini A. Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular chemokines in chondrocytes in vivo: Constitutive expression and enhancement in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. FEBS Lett. 1999;455:238–242. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00886-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miller R.E., Tran P.B., Das R., Ghoreishi-Haack N., Ren D., Miller R.J., Malfait A.-M. CCR2 chemokine receptor signaling mediates pain in experimental osteoarthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:20602–20607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209294110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Beekhuizen M., Gierman L.M., Van Spil W.E., Van Osch G.J.V.M., Huizinga T.W.J., Saris D.B.F., Creemers L.B., Zuurmond A.-M. An explorative study comparing levels of soluble mediators in control and osteoarthritic synovial fluid. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2013;21:918–922. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sandell L.J., Xing X., Franz C., Davies S., Chang L.-W., Patra D. Exuberant expression of chemokine genes by adult human articular chondrocytes in response to IL-1beta. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2008;16:1560–1571. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koh S.M., Chan C.K., Teo S.H., Singh S., Merican A., Ng W.M., Abbas A., Kamarul T. Elevated plasma and synovial fluid interleukin-8 and interleukin-18 may be associated with the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis. Knee. 2020;27:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guo X., Xu T., Zheng J., Cui X., Li M., Wang K., Su M., Zhang H., Zheng K., Sun C., et al. Accumulation of synovial fluid CD19+CD24hiCD27+ B cells was associated with bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71362-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tran P.B., Miller R.E., Ishihara S., Miller R.J., Malfait A.M. Spinal microglial activation in a murine surgical model of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017;25:718–726. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Milligan E.D., Sloane E.M., Watkins L.R. Glia in pathological pain: A role for fractalkine. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008;198:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luongo L., Sajic M., Grist J., Clark A.K., Maione S., Malcangio M. Spinal changes associated with mechanical hypersensi-tivity in a model of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neurosci. Lett. 2008;437:98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Clark A.K., Grist J., Al-Kashi A., Perretti M., Malcangio M. Spinal cathepsin S and fractalkine contribute to chronic pain in the collagen-induced arthritis model. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2038–2047. doi: 10.1002/art.34351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miller R.E., Malfait A.-M., Block J.A. Current status of nerve growth factor antibodies for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2017;35((Suppl. S1)):85–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Iannone F., De Bari C., Dell’Accio F., Covelli M., Patella V., Lo Bianco G., Lapadula G. Increased expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) and high affinity NGF receptor (p140 TrkA) in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Rheumatology. 2002;41:1413–1418. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.12.1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bryden L.A., Nicholson J.R., Doods H., Pekcec A. Deficits in spontaneous burrowing behavior in the rat bilateral mono-sodium iodoacetate model of osteoarthritis: An objective measure of pain-related behavior and analgesic efficacy. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2015;23:1605–1612. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu L., Nwosu L.N., Burston J.J., Millns P.J., Sagar D.R., Mapp P.I., Meesawatsom P., Li L., Bennett A.J., Walsh D.A., et al. The anti-NGF antibody muMab 911 both prevents and reverses pain behaviour and subchondral osteoclast numbers in a rat model of osteoarthritis pain. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016;24:1587–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.LaBranche T.P., Bendele A.M., Omura B.C., Gropp K.E., Hurst S.I., Bagi C.M., Cummings T.R., Ii L.E.G., Shelton D.L., Zorbas M.A. Nerve growth factor inhibition with tanezumab influences weight-bearing and subsequent cartilage damage in the rat medial meniscal tear model. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:295–302. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sokolove J., Lepus C.M. Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: Latest findings and interpretations. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2013;5:77–94. doi: 10.1177/1759720X12467868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kroner J., Kovtun A., Kemmler J., Messmann J.J., Strauss G., Seitz S., Schinke T., Amling M., Kotrba J., Froebel J., et al. Mast Cells Are Critical Regulators of Bone Fracture-Induced Inflammation and Osteoclast Formation and Activity. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32:2431–2444. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ragipoglu D., Dudeck A., Haffner-Luntzer M., Voss M., Kroner J., Ignatius A., Fischer V. The Role of Mast Cells in Bone Metabolism and Bone Disorders. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:163. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Giannetti A., Filice E., Caffarelli C., Ricci G., Pession A. Mast Cell Activation Disorders. Medicina. 2021;57:124. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mai L., Liu Q., Huang F., He H., Fan W. Involvement of Mast Cells in the Pathophysiology of Pain. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021;15:665066. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.665066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sellam J., Berenbaum F. Is osteoarthritis a metabolic disease? Jt. Bone Spine. 2013;80:568–573. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Farinelli L., Aquili A., Mattioli-Belmonte M., Manzotti S., D’Angelo F., Ciccullo C., Gigante A. Synovial mast cells from knee and hip osteoarthritis: Histological study and clinical correlations. J. Exp. Orthop. 2022;9:13. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00446-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.De Lange-Brokaar B.J.E., Kloppenburg M., Andersen S.N., Dorjée A.L., Yusuf E., Herb-van Toorn L., Kroon H.M., Zuur-mond A.-M., Stojanovic-Susulic V., Bloem J.L., et al. Characterization of synovial mast cells in knee osteoarthritis: Association with clinical parameters. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016;24:664–671. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dan J., Izumi M., Habuchi H., Habuchi O., Takaya S., Kasai Y., Hayashi R., Aso K., Ushida T., Ikeuchi M. A novel mice model of acute flares in osteoarthritis elicited by intra-articular injection of cultured mast cells. J. Exp. Orthop. 2021;8:75. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00391-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nigrovic P.A., Lee D.M. Mast cells in inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2005;7:1–11. doi: 10.1186/ar1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Magarinos N.J., Bryant K.J., Fosang A.J., Adachi R., Stevens R.L., McNeil H.P. Mast cell-restricted, tetramer-forming tryptases induce aggrecanolysis in articular cartilage by activating matrix metalloproteinase-3 and -13 zymogens. J. Immunol. 2013;191:1404–1412. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kulkarni P., Harsulkar A., Märtson A., Suutre S., Märtson A., Koks S. Mast cells differentiated in synovial fluid and resident in osteophytes exalt the inflammatory pathology of osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:541. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rivellese F., Rossi F.W., Galdiero M.R., Pitzalis C., De Paulis A. Mast cells in early rheumatoid arthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;28:2040. doi: 10.3390/ijms20082040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Skaper S.D. Nerve growth factor: A neuroimmune crosstalk mediator for all seasons. Immunology. 2017;151:1–15. doi: 10.1111/imm.12717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jimenez-Andrade J.M., Mantyh P.W. Sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers undergo sprouting and neuroma formation in the painful arthritic joint of geriatric mice. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012;14:R101. doi: 10.1186/ar3826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ghilardi J.R., Freeman K.T., Jimenez-Andrade J.M., Coughlin K.A., Kaczmarska M.J., Castaneda-Corral G., Bloom A.P., Kuskowski M.A., Mantyh P.W. Neuroplasticity of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers in a mouse model of a painful ar-thritic joint. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2223–2232. doi: 10.1002/art.34385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barker P.A., Mantyh P., Arendt-Nielsen L., Viktrup L., Tive L. Nerve Growth Factor Signaling and Its Contribution to Pain. J. Pain Res. 2020;13:1223–1241. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S247472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sousa-Valente J., Calvo L., Vacca V., Simeoli R., Arévalo J.C., Malcangio M. Role of TrkA signalling and mast cells in the initiation of osteoarthritis pain in the monoiodoacetate model. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2018;26:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guo Y., Wei T., Hu N., Zhou X. Disrupted homeostasis of synovial hyaluronic acid and its associations with synovial mast cell proteases of rheumatoid arthritis patients and collagen-induced arthritis rats. Immunol. Res. 2021;69:584–593. doi: 10.1007/s12026-021-09231-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fukui M., Whittlesey K., Metcalfe D.D., Dastych J. Human mast cells express the hyaluronic-acid-binding isoform of CD44 and adhere to hyaluronic acid. Clin. Immunol. 2000;94:173–178. doi: 10.1006/clim.1999.4830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhao D., Pan J.-K., Yang W.-Y., Han Y.-H., Zeng L.-F., Liang G.-H., Liu J. Intra-Articular Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells, and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Associated with Better Outcomes Than Hyaluronic Acid and Saline in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 2021;37:2298–2314.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Saltychev M., Mattie R., McCormick Z., Laimi K. The Magnitude and Duration of the Effect of Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections on Pain Severity in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2020;99:617–625. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.McAlindon T.E., LaValley M.P., Harvey W.F., Price L.L., Driban J.B., Zhang M., Ward R.J. Effect of Intra-articular Tri-amcinolone vs. Saline on Knee Cartilage Volume and Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317:1967–1975. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hartmann K., Koenen M., Schauer S., Wittig-Blaich S., Ahmad M., Baschant U., Tuckermann J.P. Molecular Actions of Glucocorticoids in Cartilage and Bone During Health, Disease, and Steroid Therapy. Physiol. Rev. 2016;96:409–447. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Karasavvidis T., Totlis T., Gilat R., Cole B.J. Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined with Hyaluronic Acid Improves Pain and Function Compared with Hyaluronic Acid Alone in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 2021;37:1277–1287.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Webb D., Naidoo P. Viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis: A focus on Hylan G-F 20. Orthop. Res. Rev. 2018;10:73–81. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S174649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Petrosino S., Puigdemont A., Della Valle M.F., Fusco M., Verde R., Allarà M., Aveta T., Orlando P., Di Marzo V. Adelmidrol increases the endogenous concentrations of palmitoylethanolamide in canine keratinocytes and down-regulates an inflammatory reaction in an in vitro model of contact allergic dermatitis. Vet. J. 2016;207:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Del Re A., Palenca I., Seguella L., Pesce M., Corpetti C., Steardo L., Rurgo S., Sarnelli G., Esposito G. Oral Adelmidrol Administration Up-Regulates Palmitoylethanolamide Production in Mice Colon and Duodenum through a PPAR-γ Inde-pendent Action. Metabolites. 2022;12:457. doi: 10.3390/metabo12050457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.De Filippis D., D’Amico A., Cinelli M.P., Esposito G., Di Marzo V., Iuvone T. Adelmidrol, a palmitoylethanolamide analogue, reduces chronic inflammation in a carrageenin-granuloma model in rats. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2009;13:1086–1095. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00353.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cerrato S., Brazis P., Della Valle M.F., Miolo A., Puigdemont A. Inhibitory effect of topical adelmidrol on antigen-induced skin wheal and mast cell behavior in a canine model of allergic dermatitis. BMC Vet. Res. 2012;8:230. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Richardson D., Pearson R.G., Kurian N., Latif M.L., Garle M.J., Barrett D.A., Kendall D.A., Scammell B.E., Reeve A.J., Chapman V. Characterisation of the cannabinoid receptor system in synovial tissue and fluid in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2008;10:R43. doi: 10.1186/ar2401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Punzi L., Frigato M., Frallonardo P., Ramonda R. Inflammatory osteoarthritis of the hand. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2010;24:301–312. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Moon P.M., Beier F. Novel Insights into Osteoarthritis Joint Pathology from Studies in Mice. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2015;17:50. doi: 10.1007/s11926-015-0524-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Luongo L., Guida F., Boccella S., Bellini G., Gatta L., Rossi F., De Novellis V., Maione S. Palmitoylethanolamide reduces formalin-induced neuropathic-like behaviour through spinal glial/microglial phenotypical changes in mice. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2013;12:45–54. doi: 10.2174/1871527311312010009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Guida F., Boccella S., Iannotta M., De Gregorio D.D., Giordano C., Belardo C., Romano R., Palazzo E., Scafuro M.A., Serra N., et al. Palmitoylethanolamide reduces neuropsychiatric behaviors by restoring cortical electrophysiological activity in a mouse model of mild traumatic brain injury. Front. Pharmacol. 2017;8:95. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Impellizzeri D., Di Paola R., Cordaro M., Gugliandolo E., Casili G., Morittu V.M., Britti D., Esposito E., Cuzzocrea S. Adelmidrol, a palmitoylethanolamide analogue, as a new pharmacological treatment for the management of acute and chronic inflammation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016;119:27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Di Paola R., Fusco R., Impellizzeri D., Cordaro M., Britti D., Morittu V.M., Evangelista M., Cuzzocrea S. Adelmidrol, in combination with hyaluronic acid, displays increased anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects against monosodium iodo-acetate-induced osteoarthritis in rats. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016;18:291. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1189-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zaki S., Blaker C.L., Little C.B. OA foundations-experimental models of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2022;30:357–380. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Guzman R.E., Evans M.G., Bove S., Morenko B., Kilgore K. Mono-iodoacetate-induced histologic changes in subchondral bone and articular cartilage of rat femorotibial joints: An animal model of osteoarthritis. Toxicol. Pathol. 2003;31:619–624. doi: 10.1080/01926230390241800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Banerji S., Wright A.J., Noble M., Mahoney D.J., Campbell I.D., Day A.J., Jackson D.G. Structures of the Cd44-hyaluronan complex provide insight into a fundamental carbohydrate-protein interaction. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007;14:234–239. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Vulpiani M.C., Tucciarone A., Vetrano M., Trischitta D., Santoboni F., Nusca S.M., Godente L., Latini E., Ippolito E. [Il trattamento della gonartrosi mediante infiltrazioni intra-articolari con un’ associazione di acido ialuronico] Knee osteoarthritis treatment by intra-articular injections with a combination of hyaluronic acid and Adelmidrol (Hyadrol®) Giot. 2021;47:169–179. doi: 10.32050/0390-0134-315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Salaffi F., Leardini G., Canesi B., Mannoni A., Fioravanti A., Caporali R., Lapadula G., Punzi L. Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2003;11:551–560. doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00089-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Vulpiani M.C., Vetrano M., Trischitta D., Santoboni F., Nusca S.M., Latini E., Ippolito E. [Risultati a lungo termine del trattamento della gonartrosi mediante infiltrazioni intra-articolari di Hyadrol ®] Long-term results of knee osteoarthritis treated by intra-articular injections of Hyadrol®. Giot. 2022;48:100–106. doi: 10.32050/0390-0134-389. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Meissner W., Huygen F., Neugebauer E.A.M., Osterbrink J., Benhamou D., Betteridge N., Coluzzi F., De Andres J., Fawcett W., Fletcher D., et al. Management of acute pain in the postoperative setting: The importance of quality indicators. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2018;34:187–196. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1391081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ambrosio F., Finco G., Mattia C., Mediati R., Paoletti F., Coluzzi F., Piacevoli Q., Savoia G., Amantea B., Aurilio C., et al. SIAARTI recommendations for chronic noncancer pain. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006;72:859–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pergolizzi J.V., Jr., Varrassi G., Magnusson P., Breve F., Raffa R.B., Christo P.J., Chopra M., Paladini A., LeQuang J.A., Mitchell K., et al. Pharmacologic agents directed at the treatment of pain associated with maladaptive neuronal plasticity. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2022;23:105–116. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1970135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Morlion B., Coluzzi F., Aldington D., Kocot-Kepska M., Pergolizzi J., Mangas A.C., Ahlbeck K., Kalso E. Pain chronification: What should a non-pain medicine specialist know? Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2018;34:1169–1178. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1449738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Coluzzi F., Fornasari D., Pergolizzi J., Romualdi P. From acute to chronic pain: Tapentadol in the progressive stages of this disease entity. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017;21:1672–1683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Biomolecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES