Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2022 Aug 22;13(5):e02036-22. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02036-22

Microbial Analysis of Umbilical Cord Blood Reveals Novel Pathogens Associated with Stillbirth and Early Preterm Birth

Emilie L Vander Haar a,b,#, Guojun Wu c,#, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman a,d, Charlene Thomas e, Ronald J Wapner a, Uma M Reddy a, Liping Zhao c, Robert M Silver f, Robert L Goldenberg a, Yiping W Han a,g,h,i,
Editor: Qijing Zhangj
PMCID: PMC9600380  PMID: 35993728

ABSTRACT

Stillbirths account for half of all perinatal mortality, but the underlying cause of a significant portion of the cases remains unknown. We set out to test the potential role and extent of microbial infection in stillbirth through a case-control analysis of fetal cord blood collected from the multisite Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Cases (n = 60) were defined as stillbirths at >20 weeks of gestation, and controls (n = 176) were live births. The bacterial presence, abundance, and composition were analyzed by endpoint PCR of full-length 16S rRNA and the V4 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). The results demonstrate that bacterial prevalence and abundance were both significantly increased in stillbirth, even after adjusting for maternal age, race, body mass index, number of pregnancies, gestational age, and multiple gestations. Composition of bacterial communities in the cord blood also differed significantly. Using a group of 25 ASVs differentially abundant between the two groups, a Random Forest classification model achieved an accuracy score of 0.76 differentiating stillbirth and live birth, with Group B Streptococcus as the most enriched species in stillbirth. Positive PCR was also significantly associated with early preterm birth. A group of oral anaerobes, including Actinomyces, Campylobacter, Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, and Prevotella, were enriched in live early preterm birth, suggesting possible oral origin of infection. Our ASV-based microbiome analysis revealed specific candidate pathogens associated with infections in stillbirth and early preterm birth. The cord blood microbial signatures may be markers of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our study will help identify possible mechanism of infection and improve our ability to prevent stillbirth and early preterm birth.

KEYWORDS: stillbirth, preterm birth, cord blood, microbiome, 16S rRNA, amplicon sequence variants, oral bacteria, Streptococcus agalacticae, Fusobacterium, PCR, group B streptococcus, human microbiome

INTRODUCTION

Stillbirth accounts for half of all perinatal mortality. In the U.S. there are approximately 21,000 stillbirths per year, at a rate of 5.7 fetal deaths per 1,000 births (1). The cause for a significant portion of all stillbirths remains unknown (2, 3). Although maternal and fetal infections are believed to account for some cases, the true prevalence of microbial infection in stillbirth is unclear (4, 5). Currently, diagnosis of infection requires histologic examination of placenta, microbial culture, and fetal autopsy, which are not always performed (6). Even when fetal or placental cultures are performed, important infections may be missed, as not all microorganisms are easily identified by routine culturing methods. This is especially true for certain microorganisms, e.g., Fusobacterium nucleatum, a Gram-negative anaerobe that is difficult to detect by routine culture yet known to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth, stillbirth, and early-onset neonatal sepsis (710). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based culture-independent microbial detection methods have been validated in multiple studies and have been used to identify clinically relevant uncultivated and difficult-to-cultivate microbial species (7, 8, 10).

While the vaginal and placental microbiomes have been extensively studied, the cord blood microbiome has been mostly untapped. A previous study reported anecdotal detection of microbial species in umbilical cord blood in cases of preterm birth and early-onset neonatal sepsis (10), suggesting that this easily attainable biospecimen may be useful for detection of microbial infection associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Here, we report an extensive case-control analysis of umbilical cord blood samples using both endpoint PCR amplification of the full-length 16S rRNA gene and Illumina sequencing of the V4 region. We show that bacterial DNA presence and signature within cord blood are associated with stillbirth and early preterm birth and vary by gestational age.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics of live births and stillbirths.

There was no significant difference in baseline demographics between cases and controls, including maternal age, race, parity, body mass index, or education level. There were also no significant differences in the rates of diabetes, smoking, chronic hypertension, maternal illicit drug use, mode of delivery, presence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), antibiotics given prior to delivery, or fetal sex. The live birth group had higher rates of preterm labor and spontaneous labor than the stillbirth group. The stillborn infants were more likely to be born at an earlier gestational age, weighed less at birth, and had higher rates of meconium in the amniotic fluid (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Patient characteristicsa

Characteristics Stillbirth (n = 60) Liveborn (n = 176) P value
Demographic characteristics
 Maternal age (yrs; mean ± SD) 28 ± 6 27 ± 6 0.11
 Race 0.92
  Caucasian 24 (40%) 75 (43%)
  African American 4 (7%) 13 (7%)
  Hispanic 26 (43%) 75 (43%)
  Other 6 (10%) 13 (7%)
 Multiparity 35 (58%) 119 (68%) 0.19
 BMI 0.22
  <18.5 0 (0%) 6 (100%)
  18.5–24.9 27 (46%) 92 (54%)
  25–29.9 17 (29%) 39 (23%)
  30–34.9 10 (17%) 16 (9%)
  >35 5 (9%) 19 (11%)
 Education Level 0.49
  0–11 yrs 14 (25%) 49 (29%)
  12 yrs 11 (19%) 41 (24%)
  13+ yrs 32 (56%) 80 (47%)
 Multiple gestation 2 (3%) 16 (9%) 0.26
 Illicit drug use 19 (33%) 47 (28%) 0.46
 Diabetes 3 (5%) 6 (3%) 0.70
 Smoking 8 (14%) 18 (11%) 0.48
 Chronic hypertension 5 (8%) 11 (6%) 0.56
 Preeclampsia 3 (6%) 25 (15%) 0.08
Obstetric characteristics
 Antibiotics prior to delivery 17 (65%) 69 (74%) 0.38
 PPROM 9 (23%) 18 (19%) 0.61
 Preterm labor 8 (21%) 42 (45%) 0.01
 Spontaneous labor 18 (32%) 95 (54%) 0.001
 Vaginal delivery 45 (75%) 121 (70%) 0.42
 Meconium 15 (29%) 12 (8%) <0.0001
 Clinical chorioamnionitis 5 (14%) 5 (5%) 0.14
 Histologic chorioamnionitis 14 (27%) 23 (15%) 0.06
 Birthweight (grams; mean ± SD) 2076 ± 1279 2715 ± 1032 <0.0001
 Male sex 32 (53%) 101 (57%) 0.27
 Gestational age (wks; mean ± SD) 32 ± 7 35 ± 5 0.0006
a

Data are presented as n (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. PPROM, preterm premature rupture of membranes. P values <0.05 are boldfaced.

Both clinical and histologic chorioamnionitis were noted to be more prevalent in stillbirths, but the differences did not reach significance (Table 1). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, including maternal age, race, parity, BMI, gestational age, and multiple gestation, neither clinical chorioamnionitis nor histologic chorioamnionitis was significantly different between the two groups (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Association of measures of infection with stillbirth and early preterm birtha

Birth outcome groups Clinical chorioamnionitis Histologic chorioamnionitis PCR+ TRC
Stillbirth OR [95% CI] 2.8 [0.7–10.7] 2.0 [0.9–4.2] 7.0 [3.6–13.9] 1.5 [1.3–1.8]
P value 0.12 0.076 <0.001 <0.001
Stillbirth aOR [95% CI] 3.2 [0.7–14.8]b 1.3 [0.5–3.3]c 7.0 [3.3–15.2]b 1.6 [1.3–2.0]b
P value 0.13 0.58 <0.001 <0.001
Early PTB OR [95% CI] 4.7 [1.2–23.0] 10.3 [4.6–23.8] 2.6 [1.3–5.2] 1.3 [1.1–1.5]
P value 0.03 <0.001 0.005 0.002
Early PTB aOR [95% CI] 3.8 [1.0–18.7]d 9.5 [4.2–22.5]d 2.5 [1.2–5.1]e 1.3 [1.1–1.5]d
P value 0.067 <0.001 0.01 0.006
a

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; early PTB, preterm birth <32 weeks of gestation (live birth and stillbirth); TRC, total ASV read counts (log-transformed). P values <0.05 are boldfaced.

b

aOR adjusted for maternal age, race, BMI, parity, multifetal gestation, and gestational age.

c

aOR adjusted for maternal age, race, BMI, parity, and gestational age.

d

aOR adjusted for maternal age and parity.

e

aOR adjusted for maternal age, race, parity, and multifetal gestation.

Bacterial detection rate and abundance in umbilical cord blood are significantly higher in stillbirths and in early preterm birth.

End-point PCR amplification of the full-length 16S rRNA gene was performed to examine the presence of bacterial DNA. Detection of the 16S rRNA gene (hereafter, “PCR+”) was significantly higher in stillbirths than live births (Table 2). After adjusting for maternal age, race, parity, BMI, gestational age, and multiple gestation, the PCR+ rate was still significantly higher in stillbirths than live births. These results suggest that PCR analysis of bacterial DNA in umbilical cord blood may be used to detect possible fetal infections in cases of stillbirth, as opposed to histopathological or clinical diagnoses of intrauterine infection, which showed no difference between stillbirth and live birth (Table 2).

When the subjects were further divided according to gestational age into early preterm birth (<32 weeks of gestation), preterm birth (32–36 weeks), and term birth (>37 weeks), the PCR+ rate was significantly higher among stillbirths than live births in each gestational age group (Table 3). Furthermore, the PCR+ results were significantly associated with early preterm births of <32 weeks of gestation when stillbirths and live births were combined. After adjusting for available confounding factors including maternal age, race, parity, multiple gestation, and/or gestational age, PCR positivity remained significantly associated with early preterm birth (Table 2).

TABLE 3.

Presence and quantity of bacterial DNA are associated with stillbirth, even when stratified by gestational age

Birth outcome groups Stillbirths (n = 60) Live births (n = 176) P valuea
Positive rate of end-point PCR of full-length 16S rRNAb
 <32 wks 12 (60%) 7 (22%) 0.013
 32–36 wks 8 (50%) 5 (12%) 0.003
 ≥37 wks 10 (42%) 10 (10%) 0.001
Median total 16S read counts (log-transformed) of V4 regionc
 <32 wks 9.83 [7.30, 10.97] 6.90 [5.72, 8.61] 0.016
 32–36 wks 7.87 [6.63, 8.39] 6.33 [5.42, 7.32] 0.005
 ≥37 wks 7.71 [6.43, 10.16] 6.31 [5.65, 7.33] 0.001
a

P values <0.05 are boldfaced.

b

Data presented as n (%).

c

Data presented as median total read count [interquartile range].

To quantify the bacterial abundance and to characterize the microbial community in the umbilical cord blood, the V4 regions of 16S rRNA were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. In addition to the cord blood samples of stillbirths (cases) and live births (controls), we also included 12 blank buffer controls. A total of 4,651 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified after denoising by DADA2 (11). To remove ASVs artificially generated during PCR and sequencing, we applied a bootstrapping-based abundance filtering method (12) and removed 424 spurious ASVs with no more than 5 reads across all samples. For samples containing an overwhelming ratio of human to bacterial DNA, off-target amplification of human DNA by 16S rRNA gene primers has been reported (13). Thus, we aligned the 4,227 reliable ASVs against human genome and nr database using NCBI BLASTN to identify and remove 1,253 nonmicrobiota ASVs. Moreover, 76 ASVs of potential buffer contaminants were identified and removed using the decontam R package (14).

The total ASV read counts were significantly higher in stillbirths compared to live births (Table 2). The difference remained significant after adjusting for maternal age, race, BMI, parity, gestational age, and multiple gestations. Consistent with PCR results, the total read counts were significantly higher among stillbirths than live births in all three gestational groups (<32 weeks, 32–36 weeks, and ≥37 weeks; Table 3). Higher total read counts were also significantly associated with all early preterm births (live birth + stillbirth). After adjusting for possible confounders, the relationship remained significant (Table 2). These results indicate that the bacterial abundance in umbilical cord blood, and not just presence, is associated with stillbirth and varied by gestational age.

Microbial signature in umbilical cord blood is associated with stillbirth.

To compare the microbial composition between samples, we downsized each sample to 1,000 reads, which corresponded to 1,875 reliable microbial ASVs from 39 cases (stillbirth) and 66 control (live birth) samples in the subsequent analysis.

Compared to the live birth group, the microbiota in umbilical cord blood samples from the stillbirth group had significantly lower diversity, as evidenced by a reduced evenness (P = 0.039) (Fig. 1a). There was no difference in Shannon index and ASV numbers between the two groups (Fig. S1). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on the weighted UniFrac distance showed a significant difference in the overall umbilical cord microbiota structure between the case and control groups along PC2 (Fig. 1b–d, P = 0.0017), and a PERMANOVA test also showed a significant difference (P = 0.007, R2 = 0.025). A significant but smaller difference between the case and control groups was observed based on unweighted UniFrac distance as well (Fig. S2), as evidenced by a significant difference along PC1 in the PCoA plot (P = 0.021) and a significant PERMANOVA test result (P = 0.036, R2 = 0.014). At the ASV level, we found 30 ASVs with both different relative abundance (Mann-Whitney test) and prevalence (Fisher’s exact test) between the case and control groups (Fig. 2). While all 30 ASVs showed higher prevalence in the stillbirth group, 14 ASVs were detected exclusively in stillbirth, absent in live birth (Table 4). To explore if the 30 ASVs can be used as biomarkers to differentiate stillbirth and live births, we applied a Random Forest Classification model using the 30 ASVs as predicters. Based on a 10-fold cross-validation and feature selection process, the best classification model was obtained, with a maximum accuracy score of 0.76 based on 25 ASVs (Fig. 3). Notably, Streptococcus agalactiae ASV_3, detected in 20.51% cases and 1.52% controls, contributed most to the model, and its importance was much greater than the remaining 24 ASVs (Table 4). S. agalactiae, also known as group B Streptococcus (GBS), has been reported as a high-risk factor in stillbirth (15). The second contributor, Arthrobacter ASV_843, was detected in 7.69% cases and undetected in the controls. Arthrobacter has been reported in a case of intrauterine fetal death (16). Eight additional ASVs belong to taxa in which members have been previously detected in reproductive and other infections (Table 4). These findings support the validity of our model.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Different microbial composition of umbilical cord blood between stillbirth (case) and live birth (control). (a) Live birth had higher evenness than stillbirth. (b) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot based on weighted UnFirac distance. (c) PC1 of PCoA plot. (d) PC2 of PCoA plot. Mann-Whitney test (two-sided) was applied to compare cases (n = 39) and controls (n = 66). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Boxes show the medians and the interquartile ranges (IQRs), the whiskers denote the lowest and highest values that were within 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartiles, and outliers are shown as individual points.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Thirty differential ASVs between stillbirth (case) and live birth (control). (a) Heatmap of the relative abundance (square root transformed) of the 30 ASVs, which had significantly different relative abundance (Mann-Whitney test [two-sided], P < 0.05) and prevalence (Fisher’s exact test [two-sided], P < 0.05) between the case and control groups. The clustering of the ASVs is based on the Spearman correlations of the abundance and ward linkage. (b) Binary heatmap shows the presence (purple color) and absence (white color) of the 30 AVSs across case (n = 39) and control (n = 66) samples.

TABLE 4.

Detection of 25 ASVs used in the best prediction model in stillbirths and live birthsa

ASV (in order of importance) Detection in cases (%) Detection in controls (%) Previous implication in reproductive infections References
Streptococcus agalactiae ASV_3 20.51 1.52 Stillbirth Sealed et al. (5)
Arthrobacter ASV_843 7.69 Intrauterine fetal death Shigeta et al. (6)
Porphyromonas asaccharolytica ASV_85 17.95 1.52 Associated with infection Acuna-Amador et al. (7)
Lactobacillus ASV_139 10.26
Anaerococcus ASV_97 20.51 1.52 Bacterial vaginosis Africa et al. (8)
Lactobacillus ASV_17 15.38 3.03
Ruminococcaceae UCG-002 ASV_138 15.38 3.03
Novosphingobium ASV_483 10.26 In placenta of newborns with fetal macrosomia Zheng et al. (9),Salihu et al. (10)
Ruminococcus 1 ASV_413 10.26
Peptoniphilus sp. KHD5 ASV_120 25.64 4.55 Bacterial vaginosis Africa et al. (8)
Lactobacillus iners AB-1 ASV_593 7.69
Anaerococcus ASV_168 12.82 1.52 Bacterial vaginosis Africa et al. (8)
Porphyromonas ASV_388 10.26 Associated with infection Acuna-Amador et al. (7)
Faecalibacterium ASV_121 20.51 4.55
Lachnospiraceae ASV_474 7.69
Veillonella ASV_4 12.82 1.52
Ruminococcus torques group ASV_273 7.69
Sphingomonas ASV_300 7.69 Stillbirth Madhi et al. (28)
Anaerococcus ASV_665 7.69 Bacterial vaginosis Africa et al. (8)
Prevotella 6 ASV_491 7.69
Ruminococcaceae UCG-014 ASV_324 7.69
Actinomyces ASV_543 7.69
Blautia ASV_178 17.95 4.55
Lactobacillus iners AB-1 ASV_41 17.95 4.55
Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 ASV_323 7.69

a—, not detected. The ASVs were sorted in descending order of importance in the Random Forest model.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Microbiota-based model to predict stillbirth (case) and live birth (control). Classification model based on Random Forest algorithm by using the abundance of the 30 ASVs. (a) Number of variables and mean squared error of the corresponding model. (b) The Random Forest model assigns a mean error rate or feature-importance score to each feature; this value indicates the extent to which each predictor contributes to the accuracy of the model. This model achieves an accuracy score of 0.76.

FIG S1

Comparison of (a) Shannon index and (b) ASV number between stillbirth (case) and live birth (control). Mann-Whitney test (two-sided) was applied to compare cases (n = 39) and controls (n = 66). Boxes show the medians and the interquartile ranges (IQRs), the whiskers denote the lowest and highest values that were within 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartiles, and outliers are shown as individual points. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.03 MB (26.3KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Vander Haar et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Different microbial composition of umbilical cord blood between stillbirth (case) and live birth (control) based on unweighted UniFrac distance. (a) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot based on unweighted UnFirac distance. (b) PC1 of PCoA plot. (c) PC2 of PCoA plot. Mann-Whitney test (two-sided) was applied to compare case (n = 39) and control (n = 66). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Boxes show the medians and the interquartile ranges (IQRs), and the whiskers denote the lowest and highest values that were within 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartiles. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.03 MB (30.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Vander Haar et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Microbiome signature in umbilical cord blood varied by gestational age.

The case and control samples were stratified based on gestational age. In the stillbirth group, significantly decreased microbial diversity was observed in the early preterm group (<32 weeks), with both a lower Shannon index (P = 0.036 compared to 32–36 weeks, P = 0.023 compared to ≥37 weeks) (Fig. 4a) and a lower evenness (P = 0.026 compared to 32–36 weeks) (Fig. 4b). In the live birth group, there was no difference in microbial diversity between the three gestational age groups, measured by either Shannon index or evenness (Fig. 4a and b). Among early preterm and preterm groups, there was no difference in alpha diversity between stillbirth and live birth. However, for term births, the stillbirth group had a significantly higher ASV number than the live birth group (P = 0.033) (Fig. 4c). These results demonstrate that umbilical cord blood microbiome diversity varies by gestational age in stillbirth, but not in live birth.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Umbilical cord blood microbiome varies by gestational age. (a) Shannon Index. (b) Evenness Index. (c) ASV number. (d) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot based on weighted UnFirac distance. Each point in the PCoA plot represents the mean (± SEM) principal coordinate (PC) score of all individual subjects. (a–c) Boxes show the medians and the interquartile ranges (IQRs), the whiskers denote the lowest and highest values that were within 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartiles, and outliers are shown as individual points. Mann-Whitney test (two-sided) was applied to compare the case and control groups at different gestational age stage and compare different gestational age stages within the case and control groups. Cases (stillbirth): <32 weeks n = 15, 32–36 weeks n = 10, ≥37 weeks n = 14; controls (live birth): <32 weeks n = 16, 32–36 weeks n = 15, ≥37 weeks n = 35.

Analysis of the microbiome composition using PERMANOVA tests based on weighted UniFrac distance showed that gestational age was significantly correlated with the overall microbial structure across all samples (P = 0.011, R2 = 0.035). PCoA plot showed that the microbial structure in the stillbirth group changed along PC1 (<32 weeks versus ≥37 weeks: P = 0.010), while in live birth it changed along PC2 (<32 weeks versus 32–36 weeks: P = 0.037; <32 weeks versus ≥37 weeks: P = 0.063) (Fig. 4d). Significant separations between the stillbirth and live birth groups were observed along PC2 for 32–36 weeks (P = 0.048) and ≥37 weeks (P = 0.021) (Fig. 4d). Therefore, the umbilical cord blood microbiome composition differs not only between stillbirth and live birth, but also by gestational age.

Differences between stillbirth and live birth were detected at the ASV level at different gestational stages (Table 5). Among the early preterm births (<32 weeks), three ASVs showed significantly higher prevalence in the stillbirth group than the live birth group. The Random Forest Classification model based on 2 out of the 3 ASVs had an accuracy score of 0.74 to distinguish between the two groups (Fig. S3). For gestational age of 32–36 weeks, one differential ASV was identified. For the group at ≥37 weeks, 24 differential ASVs were detected. The Random Forest Classification model based on 19 out of 24 ASVs reached an accuracy score of 0.78 to distinguish between case and control (Fig. S4).

TABLE 5.

ASVs in umbilical cord blood differentially detected between cases (stillbirth) and controls (live birth) in different gestational age groups

ASVa Stillbirth (%)b Live birth (%)b P valuec
<32 wks
Burkholderiaceae ASV_14 40.00 6.25 0.04
Cloacibacterium ASV_35 26.67 0.04
Lactobacillus iners AB-1 ASV_41 26.67 0.04
32–36 wks
Peptoniphilus sp. KHD5 ASV_120 40.00 0.02
>37 wks
Anaerococcus ASV_665 21.43 0.02
Anaerococcus ASV_88 35.71 5.71 0.02
Anaerococcus ASV_97 28.57
Bacteroides ASV_221 28.57 5.71 0.05
Bacteroides ASV_46 35.71 8.57 0.03
Blautia ASV_163 28.57 5.71 0.05
Blautia ASV_178 50 5.71
Campylobacter ureolyticus ASV_79 28.57 2.86 0.02
Dialister ASV_96 42.86 8.57 0.01
Dorea ASV_118 35.71 8.57 0.03
Faecalibacterium ASV_121 42.86 5.71
Fastidiosipila ASV_403 21.43 0.02
Fenollaria timonensis ASV_23 50 14.29 0.02
Lachnospira ASV_488 21.43 0.02
Peptoniphilus ASV_54 50 11.43 0.01
Peptoniphilus sp. KHD5 ASV_120 28.57 2.86 0.02
Peptostreptococcus ASV_100 28.57
Prevotella 6 ASV_48 42.86 11.43 0.02
Prevotella bivia ASV_42 28.57 2.86 0.02
Prevotella disiens JCM 6334d 28.57 2.86 0.02
Ruminococcaceae UCG-002 ASV_161 21.43 0.02
Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 ASV_323 21.43 0.02
Ruminococcus 1 ASV_413 21.43 0.02
Ruminococcus 2 ASV_66 35.71 5.71 0.02
a

ASVs in bold overlap with those identified in the best classification model (see Table 4).

b

<32 weeks: stillbirth n = 15, live birth n =16; 32–36 weeks: stillbirth n = 10, live birth n = 15; >37 weeks: stillbirth n = 14, live birth n = 35. —, not detected.

c

Fisher’s exact test (two-sided) was used.

d

ATCC 29426 ASV_61.

FIG S3

Microbiota-based model to predict stillbirth (case) and live birth (control) in <32 weeks gestational age. Classification model based on Random Forest algorithm by using the abundance of the 3 ASVs. (a) Number of variables and mean squared error of the corresponding model. (b) The Random Forest model assigns a mean error rate or feature-importance score to each feature; this value indicates the extent to which each predictor contributes to the accuracy of the model. This model achieves an accuracy of 0.74. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.04 MB (37KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Vander Haar et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Microbiota-based model to predict stillbirth (case) and live birth (control) in ≥37 weeks gestational age. Classification model based on Random Forest algorithm by using the abundance of the 24 ASVs. (a) Number of variables and mean squared error of the corresponding model. (b) The Random Forest model assigns a mean error rate or feature-importance score to each feature; this value indicates the extent to which each predictor contributes to the accuracy of the model. This model achieves an accuracy of 0.78. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.04 MB (42.1KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Vander Haar et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Within stillbirth and live birth groups, respectively, significant differences were detected by gestational age as well (Tables 6 and 7). In the live birth group, a total of 13 ASVs detected in <32 weeks were either reduced or absent in >37 weeks. Four of these 13 ASVs belonged to Fusobacterium, with Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ATCC 51191 identified as the best hit for three of them based on NCBI BLASTN. This is consistent with a previous report that subsp. animalis was the most prevalent F. nucleatum detected in intrauterine infection (17). In addition to F. nucleatum, several common oral anaerobes were also found to be specifically enriched in live early preterm births, including Actinomyces, Campylobacter, Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, and Prevotella, suggesting a possible oral origin of infection (Table 7).

TABLE 6.

ASVs in umbilical cord blood differentially detected between different gestational age groups within stillbirth groups

Stillbirth (cases)a
ASV <32 wks (%) >37 wks (%) P valueb
Blautia ASV_163 28.57 0.04
Blautia ASV_178 50 0
Dorea ASV_118 35.71 0.02
Peptostreptococcus ASV_100 28.57 0.04
Ruminococcus 2 ASV_66 35.71 0.02
32–36 wks (%) >37 wks (%) P valueb
Bacteroides ASV_29 50 0.02
Blautia ASV_178 50 0.02
Faecalibacterium ASV_121 42.86 0.02
a

<32 weeks n = 15, 32–36 weeks n = 10, >37 weeks n = 14. —, not detected.

b

Fisher’s exact test (two-sided) was used.

TABLE 7.

ASVs in umbilical cord blood differentially detected between different gestational age groups within live births

Live birthsa
ASV <32 wks (%) >37 wks (%) P valueb
Actinomyces ASV_239 18.75 0.03
Campylobacter ureolyticus ASV_79 37.5 2.86 0
Corynebacterium 1 ASV_201 18.75 0.03
Ezakiella massiliensis ASV_222 25 0.01
Fenollaria timonensis ASV_189 18.75 0.03
Fusobacterium ASV_159 18.75 0.03
Fusobacterium ASV_27 18.75 0.03
Fusobacterium ASV_5 31.25 0
Fusobacterium ASV_72 25 0.01
Peptostreptococcus ASV_100 18.75 0.03
Porphyromonas ASV_110 25 2.86 0.03
Prevotella bivia ASV_34 25 0.01
Prevotella bivia ASV_42 25 2.86 0.03
a

<32 weeks n = 16, >37 weeks n = 35. —, not detected.

b

Fisher’s exact test (two-sided) was used.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrate that the presence, abundance, and composition of bacterial DNA in cord blood are associated with stillbirth and vary by gestational age. Prediction models were generated to differentiate stillbirth and live birth. We identified organisms not previously associated with stillbirth and suggests that cord blood microbial signatures may be markers of adverse outcomes. These findings may lead to new ways for risk evaluation and identification of targets for prevention.

Our study has several strengths, including the use of data from a large, prospective, population-based, multisite case-control study. The study collected multiple biospecimens, and both the collection processes and the analyses of these specimens were rigorous, reliable, and well documented (18, 19). Researchers were blinded to the primary outcome throughout the course of specimen processing and sequencing, eliminating measurement bias. Placental pathology was performed in the majority of cases and controls. Furthermore, we utilized two complementing culture-independent approaches to analyze the cord blood microbiome.

Analysis of cord blood microbiome is challenging due to the low biomass, which is prone to both false positive (due to contamination) and false negative (loss of true signals) results. As contamination is a serious concern in analyzing utero samples (20), we conducted endpoint PCR of the full-length 16S rRNA, which is a less sensitive approach, thus reducing the likelihood of detecting low-level contaminations. The flipside is that, also due to its limited sensitivity, this approach may generate false negative results. Next-generation sequencing complements this weakness with significantly increased sensitivity, which in turn may produce false positive results. We included 12 blank controls for detecting and removing possible contamination during DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing in our data set. As a retrospective study, we were unable to control for contamination that may have occurred during sample collection. Nevertheless, the observation that the PCR positive samples had significantly higher total read counts provides corroboration between these two methods, strengthening the veracity of our conclusion. The use of ASVs, instead of OTU (operational taxonomic units), provided improved resolution, down to the level of single-nucleotide differences (21), thus allowing discovery and tracking of potential pathogens. These approaches ensure identification of true signals associated with potential infections.

The current findings indicate that the bacterial infection rate in stillbirth may be severely underestimated in previous studies. Both the bacterial DNA prevalence and abundance were significantly increased in stillbirth than in live birth, indicating enhanced severity of infection in stillbirth. Among them, GBS was the major contributor. As GBS colonizes the maternal genital track, it likely invades into the intrauterine cavity via an ascending mechanism, although hematogenous infection cannot be ruled out. Although previous meta-analysis identified GBS as an important risk predictor of stillbirth, it was only attributed to 1% of stillbirths worldwide and 4% in Africa (19). Our results indicate that these numbers may be severely underestimated. GBS has been previously cultivated from neonatal blood of preterm infants, further confirming the validity of our findings in fetal blood (10).

Unique microbiome signatures were detected in stillbirth, as well as in live early preterm birth. The latter appeared to be dominated by oral anaerobes, suggesting a possible oral route of transmission. This is in support of previous finding of similarities between placental and oral microbiomes (22). F. nucleatum was detected as the most prevalent species in early preterm birth, consistent with the report that intrauterine infection of F. nucleatum is inversely related to gestational age (23). F. nucleatum has been implicated in a spectrum of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirth, preterm birth, as well as neonatal sepsis (7, 8, 10). Animal studies showed that oral F. nucleatum is capable of translocating hematogenously to the pregnant uterus, inducing TLR4-mediated maternal inflammatory responses leading to fetal demise (2426). This process requires a unique virulence factor, FadA, which exhibits amyloid-like properties under stress and disease conditions (27). Amyloid FadA serves as a molecular switch to convert the microorganism from a benign commensal to virulent pathogen (28). Detection of common oral anaerobes in early preterm birth suggests that oral-hematogenous translocation may play a significant role.

One limitation of the study is that only a subset of stillbirths had umbilical cord blood available, which are biased toward more recent deaths. The possibility exists that the increased microbial abundance and diversity may be the result rather than the cause of stillbirth. Microbial detection in cord blood in term live births may suggest the existence of a resident microbiome, similar as in other utero samples (20). Further study is required to confirm this finding.

In conclusion, our findings underscore the utility of complementing methods for detecting possible infections where low-biomass organisms may be present. The strong association we uncover between ASV-level microbial signatures in umbilical cord blood with stillbirth and early preterm birth lends credence to this approach. Analysis of cord blood will identify microbes capable of invading into deeper fetal-placental compartments and potentially improve our ability to prevent stillbirth and early preterm birth. Future study will be warranted to evaluate the potential source of infection, and in particular, the implication of oral-hematogenous translocation in early pregnancy complications. In addition, it was reported previously that placental infection and inflammation in mice could be suppressed by dietary supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids (26). It will be worth testing if omega-3 supplementation can reduce stillbirth and early preterm birth in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design.

This cross-sectional case-control study utilized umbilical cord blood specimens from the biospecimen repository of the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN), conducted from March 2006 to September 2008, with follow-up through December 2009, at 59 hospitals associated with five clinical sites (29). The cases were defined as stillbirths, and controls as liveborn infants. We included in our analyses all stillbirths (N = 60) and preterm live births (N = 75) from the original study for which umbilical cord blood specimens were available, as well as randomly selected live term births (gestational age >37 weeks; n = 101) (Fig. 5). The research protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. De-identified demographic data linked to the samples was obtained through the National Institute of Child Health and Development Data and Specimen Hub (DASH) following IRB approval. Laboratory data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tools hosted at Columbia University (30).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Flowchart showing breakdown of study population and number of samples in each category by gestational age.

Bacterial DNA extraction and detection.

Samples were processed in random order and without knowledge of clinical outcomes. An aliquot of 0.5 mL of de-identified cord blood specimens were spun at 13,000 g for 15 min. The pellets were used for DNA extraction using the QIAamp BiOstic Bacteremia DNA Kit (Qiagen). The full-length 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using universal primers A17F (GTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) and 1512R (TACCTTGTTACGACTT), which can detect the majority of eubacteria, as previously described (31). Negative controls using sterile PBS were included with each set of DNA extraction and PCR to control for contamination.

16S rRNA gene analysis.

Hypervariable region V4 of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the 515F and 806R primers (32) and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform with 2 × 250 mode at the Alkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research (CMMR) at Baylor College of Medicine. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were obtained by denoising using the DADA2 (11) denoise-paired command in QIIME 2 (33). Spurious ASVs were further removed by abundance filtering (12). All ASVs were compared with human genome and nr databases to remove sequences from nonprokaryotic sources. Buffer contaminants were identified in the blank controls using the decontam R package (14) and removed from all samples. The data were then rarified to 1,000 reads/sample for analyses. Samples with fewer reads than the rarefication depth were removed. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was performed by the R package “ape” (34). Random Forest analysis was performed and cross-validated using the R “RandomForest” package (35) and the “rfcv” function, respectively, to build the classification model. A phylogenetic tree of ASVs was built using the QIIME 2 commands alignment mafft, alignment mask, phylogeny fastree, and phylogeny midpoint-root. Taxonomy assignment of ASVs was performed by the q2-feature-classifier plugin in QIIME 2 based on the SILVA database (release 132) (36).

Statistical analyses.

Differences in baseline characteristics between cases and controls were analyzed by the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, for categorical variables, and the Student's t test for continuous variables. Non-Gaussian data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors of the birth outcomes of interest. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to evaluate the independent effect of those predictors while adjusting for demographic factors. In addition, as the total read count is highly skewed to the right, a log-transformation was used in all regression analyses. Models incorporating histologic chorioamnionitis did not include multiple gestations, as histopathologic data were not available for these samples. All analyses were performed in SAS Version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) and R Version 3.6.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Alpha- and beta-diversity metrics were calculated using QIIME2 (33), with significance of differences assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test and PERMANOVA test, respectively. Fisher’s exact test (two-sided) and Mann-Whitney test (two-sided) were used to compare the prevalence and abundance of the ASVs between different groups.

Data availability.

The raw sequencing data of 16S rRNA the gene V4 region has been deposited to the sequence read archive at NCBI under the BioProject ID PRJNA778571.

Scripts and command lines related to the current study are freely available from the corresponding author (Y.W.H.) upon request.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank participants in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network for contributions to this study and the Alkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research (CMMR) at Baylor College of Medicine for next-generation sequencing.

This study was supported in part by R01 grants DE023332, DE029532 and CA192111 to Y.W.H. E.L.V.H. acknowledges Columbia University Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows research fund.

Y.W.H. conceived and supervised the study, Y.W.H., R.L.G., and R.M.S. designed the study, E.L.V.H. conducted DNA extraction and PCR analyses, G.W. and L.Z. conducted bioinformatics analysis, C.G-B., C.T., and G.W. performed statistical analyses, R.J.W. and U.M.R. provided insightful comments, and E.L.V.H., G.W., and Y.W.H. wrote the manuscript.

We declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

This article is a direct contribution from Yiping W. Han, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Indira Mysorekar, Baylor College of Medicine, and Yong-Qun He, University of Michigan.

Contributor Information

Yiping W. Han, Email: ywh2102@cumc.columbia.edu.

Qijing Zhang, Iowa State University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gregory EC, Valenzuela CP, Hoyert DL. 2021. Fetal mortality: United States, 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep 70:1–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McClure EM, Saleem S, Pasha O, Goldenberg RL. 2009. Stillbirth in developing countries: a review of causes, risk factors and prevention strategies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22:183–190. doi: 10.1080/14767050802559129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. 2011. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA 306:2459–2468. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McClure EM, Dudley DJ, Reddy UM, Goldenberg RL. 2010. Infectious causes of stillbirth: a clinical perspective. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:635–645. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181eb6620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Silver RM, Varner MW, Reddy U, Goldenberg R, Pinar H, Conway D, Bukowski R, Carpenter M, Hogue C, Willinger M, Dudley D, Saade G, Stoll B. 2007. Work-up of stillbirth: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:433–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Korteweg FJ, Erwich JJ, Timmer A, van der Meer J, Ravise JM, Veeger NJ, Holm JP. 2012. Evaluation of 1025 fetal deaths: proposed diagnostic workup. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:53.e1–53.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Han YW, Fardini Y, Chen C, Iacampo KG, Peraino VA, Shamonki JM, Redline RW. 2010. Term stillbirth caused by oral Fusobacterium nucleatum. Obstet Gynecol 115:442–445. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cb9955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Han YW, Shen T, Chung P, Buhimschi IA, Buhimschi CS. 2009. Uncultivated bacteria as etiologic agents of intra-amniotic inflammation leading to preterm birth. J Clin Microbiol 47:38–47. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01206-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hill GB. 1998. Preterm birth: associations with genital and possibly oral microflora. Ann Periodontol 3:222–232. doi: 10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang X, Buhimschi CS, Temoin S, Bhandari V, Han YW, Buhimschi IA. 2013. Comparative microbial analysis of paired amniotic fluid and cord blood from pregnancies complicated by preterm birth and early-onset neonatal sepsis. PLoS One 8:e56131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang J, Zhang Q, Wu G, Zhang C, Zhang M, Zhao L. 2018. Minimizing spurious features in 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. PeerJ PrePrints 6:e26872v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26872v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Walker SP, Barrett M, Hogan G, Bueso YF, Claesson MJ, Tangney M. 2020. Non-specific amplification of human DNA is a major challenge for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Sci Rep 10:16356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73403-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Davis NM, Proctor DM, Holmes SP, Relman DA, Callahan BJ. 2018. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6:226. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seale AC, Koech AC, Sheppard AE, Barsosio HC, Langat J, Anyango E, Mwakio S, Mwarumba S, Morpeth SC, Anampiu K, Vaughan A, Giess A, Mogeni P, Walusuna L, Mwangudzah H, Mwanzui D, Salim M, Kemp B, Jones C, Mturi N, Tsofa B, Mumbo E, Mulewa D, Bandika V, Soita M, Owiti M, Onzere N, Walker AS, Schrag SJ, Kennedy SH, Fegan G, Crook DW, Berkley JA. 2016. Maternal colonization with Streptococcus agalactiae and associated stillbirth and neonatal disease in coastal Kenya. Nat Microbiol 1:16067. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shigeta N, Ozaki K, Hori K, Ito K, Nakayama M, Nakahira K, Yanagihara I. 2013. An Arthrobacter spp. bacteremia leading to fetal death and maternal disseminated intravascular coagulation. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 31:25–31. doi: 10.3109/15513815.2012.659413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han YW, Wang X. 2013. Mobile microbiome: oral bacteria in extra-oral infections and inflammation. J Dent Res 92:485–491. doi: 10.1177/0022034513487559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pinar H, Koch MA, Hawkins H, Heim-Hall J, Abramowsky CR, Thorsten VR, Carpenter MW, Zhou HH, Reddy UM, Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network . 2012. The stillbirth collaborative research network postmortem examination protocol. Am J Perinatol 29:187–202. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1284228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pinar H, Koch MA, Hawkins H, Heim-Hall J, Shehata B, Thorsten VR, Carpenter M, Lowichik A, Reddy UM. 2011. The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) placental and umbilical cord examination protocol. Am J Perinatol 28:781–792. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Silverstein RB, Mysorekar IU. 2021. Group therapy on in utero colonization: seeking common truths and a way forward. Microbiome 9:7. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00968-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. 2017. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J 11:2639–2643. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, Petrosino J, Versalovic J. 2014. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med 6:237ra65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chaim W, Mazor M. 1992. Intraamniotic infection with fusobacteria. Arch Gynecol Obstet 251:1. doi: 10.1007/BF02718272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Han YW, Redline RW, Li M, Yin L, Hill GB, McCormick TS. 2004. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces premature and term stillbirths in pregnant mice: implication of oral bacteria in preterm birth. Infect Immun 72:2272–2279. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2272-2279.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu H, Redline RW, Han YW. 2007. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces fetal death in mice via stimulation of TLR4-mediated placental inflammatory response. J Immunol 179:2501–2508. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Garcia-So J, Zhang X, Yang X, Rubinstein MR, Mao Y, Kitajewski J, Liu K, Han YW. 2019. Omega-3 fatty acids suppress Fusobacterium nucleatum-induced placental inflammation originating from maternal endothelial cells. JCI Insight 4:e125436. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.125436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ikegami A, Chung P, Han YW. 2009. Complementation of the fadA mutation in Fusobacterium nucleatum demonstrates that the surface-exposed adhesin promotes cellular invasion and placental colonization. Infect Immun 77:3075–3079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meng Q, Gao Q, Mehrazarin S, Tangwanichgapong K, Wang Y, Huang Y, Pan Y, Robinson S, Liu Z, Zangiabadi A, Lux R, Papapanou PN, Guo XE, Wang H, Berchowitz LE, Han YW. 2021. Fusobacterium nucleatum secretes amyloid-like FadA to enhance pathogenicity. EMBO Rep 22:e52891. doi: 10.15252/embr.202152891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Parker CB, Hogue CJ, Koch MA, Willinger M, Reddy UM, Thorsten VR, Dudley DJ, Silver RM, Coustan D, Saade GR, Conway D, Varner MW, Stoll B, Pinar H, Bukowski R, Carpenter M, Goldenberg R, Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network . 2011. Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network: design, methods and recruitment experience. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 25:425–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01218.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. 2009. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Han YW, Ikegami A, Bissada NF, Herbst M, Redline RW, Ashmead GG. 2006. Transmission of an uncultivated Bergeyella strain from the oral cavity to amniotic fluid in a case of preterm birth. J Clin Microbiol 44:1475–1483. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1475-1483.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R. 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4516–4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodriguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang LJ, Kaehler BD, Bin Kang K, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0252-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

Comparison of (a) Shannon index and (b) ASV number between stillbirth (case) and live birth (control). Mann-Whitney test (two-sided) was applied to compare cases (n = 39) and controls (n = 66). Boxes show the medians and the interquartile ranges (IQRs), the whiskers denote the lowest and highest values that were within 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartiles, and outliers are shown as individual points. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.03 MB (26.3KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Vander Haar et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Different microbial composition of umbilical cord blood between stillbirth (case) and live birth (control) based on unweighted UniFrac distance. (a) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot based on unweighted UnFirac distance. (b) PC1 of PCoA plot. (c) PC2 of PCoA plot. Mann-Whitney test (two-sided) was applied to compare case (n = 39) and control (n = 66). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Boxes show the medians and the interquartile ranges (IQRs), and the whiskers denote the lowest and highest values that were within 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartiles. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.03 MB (30.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Vander Haar et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Microbiota-based model to predict stillbirth (case) and live birth (control) in <32 weeks gestational age. Classification model based on Random Forest algorithm by using the abundance of the 3 ASVs. (a) Number of variables and mean squared error of the corresponding model. (b) The Random Forest model assigns a mean error rate or feature-importance score to each feature; this value indicates the extent to which each predictor contributes to the accuracy of the model. This model achieves an accuracy of 0.74. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.04 MB (37KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Vander Haar et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Microbiota-based model to predict stillbirth (case) and live birth (control) in ≥37 weeks gestational age. Classification model based on Random Forest algorithm by using the abundance of the 24 ASVs. (a) Number of variables and mean squared error of the corresponding model. (b) The Random Forest model assigns a mean error rate or feature-importance score to each feature; this value indicates the extent to which each predictor contributes to the accuracy of the model. This model achieves an accuracy of 0.78. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.04 MB (42.1KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Vander Haar et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequencing data of 16S rRNA the gene V4 region has been deposited to the sequence read archive at NCBI under the BioProject ID PRJNA778571.

Scripts and command lines related to the current study are freely available from the corresponding author (Y.W.H.) upon request.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES