ABSTRACT
Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans exhibit strong cariogenicity through cross-kingdom biofilm formation during the pathogenesis of dental caries. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), a natural compound, has potential antimicrobial effects on each species individually, but there are no reports of its effect on this dual-species biofilm. This study aimed to explore the effects of CAPE on cariogenic biofilm formation by S. mutans and C. albicans and the related mechanisms. The effect of CAPE on planktonic cell growth was investigated, and crystal violet staining, the anthrone-sulfuric acid assay and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to evaluate biofilm formation. The structures of the formed biofilms were observed using scanning electron microscopy. To explain the antimicrobial effect of CAPE, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT–PCR) was applied to monitor the relative expression levels of cariogenic genes. Finally, the biocompatibility of CAPE in human oral keratinocytes (HOKs) was evaluated using the CCK-8 assay. The results showed that CAPE suppressed the growth, biofilm formation and extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) synthesis of C. albicans and S. mutans in the coculture system of the two species. The expression of the gtf gene was also suppressed by CAPE. The efficacy of CAPE was concentration dependent, and the compound exhibited acceptable biocompatibility. Our research lays the foundation for further study of the application of the natural compound CAPE as a potential antimicrobial agent to control dental caries-associated cross-kingdom biofilms.
IMPORTANCE Severe dental caries is a multimicrobial infectious disease that is strongly induced by the cross-kingdom biofilm formed by S. mutans and C. albicans. This study aimed to investigate the potential of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) as a natural product in the prevention of severe caries. This study clarified the inhibitory effect of CAPE on cariogenic biofilm formation and the control of cariogenic genes. It deepens our understanding of the synergistic cariogenic effect of S. mutans and C. albicans and provides a new perspective for the prevention and control of dental caries with CAPE. These findings may contribute to the development of CAPE as a promising antimicrobial agent targeting this caries-related cross-kingdom biofilm.
KEYWORDS: caffeic acid phenethyl ester, Candida albicans, Streptococcus mutans, cross-kingdom biofilm, dental caries
INTRODUCTION
Dental caries is one of the most common tooth diseases in the worldwide; the majority of adults and 60–90% of children suffer from dental caries, according to the WHO (1). Caries is a kind of chronic processive devastation of dental hard tissue caused by microbe-associated factors. The typical characteristic of caries is the cariogenic biofilm (dental plaque) formed on tooth surfaces via the aggregation of cariogenic pathogens, the bacteria in which metabolize carbohydrates to produce acids, leading to demineralization of dental hard tissue (2, 3). Considered a key pathogen, Streptococcus mutans is involved in the occurrence and advancement of caries. Via the action of a secreted glycosyltransferase (Gtf), S. mutans ferments sugar to produce water-insoluble extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), mediating the adhesion of planktonic bacteria and promoting biofilm formation, which plays an essential role in caries progression (4, 5).
Studies at the transcriptional level have indicated that the assembly and maturation of microbial communities in biofilms are complex (6). Interestingly, coinfection characterized by bacterial-fungal symbiosis in biofilms has offered a deeper understanding of the progression of dental caries (7, 8). According to some reports, Candida albicans can synergistically enhance the infection caused by S. mutans (9–11). Specifically, C. albicans promotes the synthesis of EPS, contributing to increasing the biomass of S. mutans biofilms and the formation of cross-kingdom biofilms (8), which aggravates oral infections, especially in early childhood caries (ECC) (7, 12). Therefore, inhibition of cross-kingdom biofilm formation is likely an effective method for the intervention of dental caries.
However, most traditional clinical drugs are based on individual antibacterial or antifungal agents (13). Studies have shown that the intervention of cross-kingdom biofilms produced by C. albicans and S. mutans is challenging (7). The application of various antimicrobial agents in currently used clinical drugs have led to the emergence of bacterial resistance (14, 15). Some of these compounds, including chlorhexidine (CHX), even cause homeostatic imbalance in the oral microenvironment, resulting in the recurrence of dental caries (16). Cytotoxicity and dental staining also cause issues in the use of some antimicrobial agents for routine oral hygiene (17). To overcome these limitations of traditional antimicrobials, it is of great significance to develop an alternative product that enables efficient inhibition of cariogenicity as well as enhances the oral microecological balance.
Natural compounds, as a novel and more attractive option with good biocompatibility, are considered to have preventive potential for dental caries (18–20). Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), a natural compound extracted from propolis, has been recognized for its biological and pharmacological properties, including its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, immunomodulatory, anticancer, and wound healing and repair properties (21, 22).
Based on the pleiotropic effects of CAPE, its potential utility in the prevention of oral diseases has been described in some reports, in which it displayed antibacterial activity against S. mutans (5) and antifungal activity against C. albicans (23, 24). Although related studies have independently expressed the antimicrobial effect and associated mechanism of action of CAPE against S. mutans and C. albicans, there has been no exploration of the inhibitory effect on the state of both species. In general, the effects of CAPE on the cariogenic virulence of cross-kingdom biofilms formed by C. albicans and S. mutans are still unclear, which prompted us to study this topic further.
In our research, S. mutans and C. albicans were applied to construct single- or multispecies biofilm models, and the influence of CAPE on pathogenic biofilm formation was measured. The results of our study provide evidence for the promising application of CAPE as an innovative antibiofilm agent in the prevention and control of dental caries.
RESULTS
CAPE inhibits planktonic growth of S. mutans and C. albicans.
Based on the susceptibility assay, the MIC of CAPE for the S. mutans UA159 strain was 160 μg/mL. Simultaneously, CAPE suppressed the growth of the C. albicans SC5314 strain at concentrations ranging from 80 to 160 μg/mL. The MIC of CAPE for C. albicans was determined to be 80 μg/mL in accordance with the definition. DMSO at 5% (vol/vol) as the solvent control had no effect on bacterial and fungal growth. The MIC of CHX ranged from 4 × 103 to 8 × 103 mg/mL for both strains as the positive control, which was significantly higher than the MIC of CAPE. Thus, 20, 40, 80, and 160 μg/mL CAPE were selected as the experimental groups, and the solvent group was selected as the control group in the present study.
In further experimental confirmation, CAPE at increasing concentrations displayed a significant bacteriostatic influence on S. mutans, C. albicans and coculture strains (Fig. 1A). To examine the corresponding variations of colony numbers in S. mutans and C. albicans under inhibition by CAPE, the CFU of the planktonic cultures were determined (Fig. 1B and C). Similarly, the numbers of planktonic cells of both species declined with increasing CAPE concentration. Furthermore, CAPE showed observable inhibitory activity on the microbial growth patterns of S. mutans and C. albicans (Fig. 1D). At 40 μg/mL (1/4 MIC), CAPE caused an approximately 2-fold reduction in the OD600 of S. mutans. With regard to the growth of C. albicans, the optical density in the system indicated that C. albicans hardly proliferated and grew sluggishly with 1/2 MIC CAPE. The growth and proliferation of both species were suppressed with CAPE treatment.
FIG 1.
Inhibitory effects of CAPE on the planktonic growth of S. mutans and C. albicans. (A) Images of the plate coating assay applied to supplement the MIC measurement. (B) Images of CFU counts for S. mutans and C. albicans colonies. (C) Quantitative measurement of colony numbers in CFU counting images. (D) Growth curves based on absorbance measurement for CAPE in S. mutans and C. albicans. The values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for at least three independent trials (*, P < 0.05).
CAPE inhibits formation of S. mutans, C. albicans and dual-species biofilms.
The results of the crystal violet staining assay exhibited an effective reduction in the biomass of biofilms in all CAPE-treated groups (Fig. 2A). The higher the concentration of CAPE was, the stronger the inhibitory effect on single-species and cross-kingdom biofilm formation. As observed in all groups, S. mutans promoted C. albicans biofilm formation, and vice versa. Furthermore, the colony numbers of the biofilms are displayed in Fig. 2B. The bacterial and fungal cell counts decreased in the presence of CAPE with the same trend both in single-species and cross-kingdom biofilms. Compared with single-species biofilms, the colonies formed in cross-kingdom biofilms showed a slight increase in all groups, which was consistent with the outcomes of CFU counting. This result suggested a synergistic effect between C. albicans and S. mutans in cross-kingdom biofilm formation that was affected by CAPE.
FIG 2.
Inhibitory effects of CAPE against biofilm formation. (A) Effect of CAPE on biofilm formation, as determined by the crystal violet staining assay. (B) Results of CFU counting to measure biofilm formation. (C) Surface morphology of biofilms produced on glass coverslips affected by CAPE. The microimages were taken at ×1,000, ×5,000 and ×20,000 magnifications by scanning electron microscopy. The red arrows indicate the formation of C. albicans as yeast or hyphae in the cross-kingdom biofilms. The values represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent trials (*, P < 0.05).
The SEM photographs of biofilms are presented in Fig. 2C. The distribution of C. albicans and S. mutans cells inside single-species and cross-kingdom biofilms is shown. For S. mutans biofilms, clusters of bacterial cells were covered with a high density of the water-insoluble EPS in the control group, while the CAPE-treated groups showed some collapse of the biofilm, with fewer cells and fewer structured stacks. For C. albicans, thinner structured biofilms were formed with CAPE compared with the control group. Moreover, 40 μg/mL CAPE led to morphological deformation in the C. albicans biofilm. For the cross-kingdom biofilms, it was obvious that C. albicans colonies were closely surrounded by S. mutans biofilms that gathered into stacks in the absence of CAPE. With CAPE treatment, only a few C. albicans cells were attached to the cross-kingdom biofilms, which had a lower density of S. mutans cells and lower EPS levels.
CLSM shows inhibitor effect of CAPE on growth and biofilm formation.
The live/dead bacterial viability assays performed using CLSM showed a marked decrease in S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms, as shown in Fig. 3. The SYTO-9 dye stained the live bacteria green, and PI stained the dead bacteria red.
FIG 3.
Bacterial viability in S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms with CAPE treatment. (A, C) Images of the live/dead staining of S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms. The green color (SYTO-9) and the red color (PI) represent live and dead bacteria, respectively. (B, D) Biomass of live and dead bacteria in S. mutans and the cross-kingdom biofilms presented as the relative fluorescence intensity. Statistical data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from at least three independent experiments (*, P < 0.05).
Among the S. mutans biofilms exhibited in Fig. 3A, the biofilms in the 0 μg/mL CAPE group (the control group) were mostly green and thick. However, in the other groups, the thickness of biofilms and the green area gradually declined with increasing concentrations of CAPE, while the red area constantly increased. As shown in the graph of the fluorescence intensity (Fig. 3B), the biomass of S. mutans biofilms, indicated by the green fluorescence intensity, gradually decreased from 0 μg/mL to 80 μg/mL CAPE, whereas the red fluorescence intensity increased, except for 80 μg/mL CAPE. Since there was less biofilm formation at a CAPE concentration of 80 μg/mL, the proportion of dead bacteria from biofilms in the 40 μg/mL group was significantly higher than that at 80 μg/mL, which is consistent with the result of the biofilm formation assay.
Similarly, for the cross-kingdom biofilms shown in Fig. 3C, it is clear that the observable reduction in biofilm accumulation correlated with increasing CAPE concentrations. The increasing concentration of CAPE also resulted in a reduced proportion of living bacteria and an increased proportion of dead bacteria, as shown in Fig. 3D, and the red fluorescence intensity at a CAPE concentration of 80 μg/mL was lower than that at 40 μg/mL for the same reason. Specifically, CAPE could destroy and lyse biofilms to eliminate dead bacteria.
The thickness of S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms affected by CAPE is displayed in Fig. 4. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the biofilm architecture indicated that the thickness reduced with the increase in CAPE concentration. The biofilms generated in the control group were approximately 20 μm on glass coverslips without antimicrobial treatment. With the penetration of CAPE, the biofilm integrity was destroyed, so that both S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms significantly became thinner. Furthermore, as S. mutans and C. albicans were inactived and eliminated, the penetration depth of CAPE into biofilms deepened. Generally speaking, the effectiveness of CAPE is closely related to the inhibition of microbial growth and the penetration of biofilms.
FIG 4.
Effect of CAPE on the reduction of S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms thickness. (A, C) Images of stained biofilms with CAPE treatment obtained by CLSM. The green color (SYTO-9) indicates live biofilms. (B, D) Evaluation of biofilm thickness of S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms with CAPE penetration. Statistical data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from at least three independent experiments (*, P < 0.05).
CAPE suppresses EPS synthesis in single-species and cross-kingdom biofilms.
CLSM photographs of the cross-kingdom biofilms formed on glass coverslips with EPS synthesis are shown in Fig. 5A. The dyes SYTO-9 and Alexa Fluor 647 stained the live bacteria green and the EPS red, respectively. The images were processed as three-dimensional reconstructions. In the absence of CAPE, the aggregates of species in the biofilms exhibited high density and compactness, while the aggregates gradually became sparse as the concentration of CAPE increased. The EPS surrounding the species also became less abundant with CAPE treatment. Furthermore, the aggregates and EPS distributed in every layer of the biofilms were analyzed, as shown in Fig. 5B. The whole biomass of bacteria (Fig. 5C) and EPS (Fig. 5D) in the cross-kingdom biofilms was determined for statistical analysis. All of the images and results illustrated that CAPE had inhibitory effects on bacterial proliferation and EPS production, causing decreased accumulation of biofilms.
FIG 5.
EPS synthesis in biofilms under CAPE treatment. (A) Images of the cross-kingdom biofilms constructed on glass coverslips with double labeling via confocal laser scanning microscopy. The green color (SYTO-9) and the red color (Alexa Fluor 647) indicate bacteria and EPS in biofilms, respectively. (B) Quantitative distribution of bacteria and EPS in each scanned layer of cross-kingdom biofilms. (C, D) Total biomass of EPS and bacteria in cross-kingdom biofilms of each group. (E) Amount of EPS synthesis in biofilms. Statistical data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for at least three independent experiments (*, P < 0.05).
The amount of water-insoluble EPS production in biofilms detected by the anthrone-sulfuric acid assay is presented in Fig. 5E. The absorbance at 625 nm was markedly decreased at all CAPE concentrations compared with the control, which revealed concentration-dependent effects. This illustrated that CAPE with an increasing concentration gradient had an increasing inhibitory effect influence on EPS synthesis in C. albicans, S. mutans and dual-species biofilms. In addition, in terms of EPS synthesis, the dual-species biofilm demonstrated a cooperative effect in all of the tested groups compared with each single-species biofilm.
CAPE inhibits EPS synthesis by suppressing S. mutans gtf gene expression.
Gtfs, as enzymes that ferment sugar, catalyzing the transformation of glucosyl groups, contribute to the synthesis of EPS by S. mutans. The expression level of gtf genes is closely related to EPS synthesis. The results of the qRT–PCR assay showed the relative expression levels of the gtf genes after CAPE treatment (Fig. 6). For S. mutans biofilms, CAPE significantly downregulated the gene expression levels of gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD (Fig. 6A). Similarly, the relative gene expression of gtfB, gtfC and gtfD also decreased with increasing CAPE concentration despite the influence of C. albicans in the cross-kingdom biofilm (Fig. 6B). Generally, the statistical results revealed the inhibitory effect of CAPE on the expression of gtf genes (gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD) in S. mutans.
FIG 6.
Inhibitory effects of CAPE on the relative expression of virulence genes in S. mutans. Expression of S. mutans EPS-related genes (gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD) in S. mutans (A) and cross-kingdom (B) biofilms. The relative expression levels of genes were measured by qRT–PCR, and S. mutans UA159 16S rRNA was used as the control. Statistical data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from at least three independent experiments (*, P < 0.05).
The biocompatibility of CAPE.
As shown in Fig. 7, the results of the CCK-8 assay demonstrated the biocompatibility of CAPE in the HOK cell line. The results showed a slight decrease in cell viability in the CAPE-treated groups compared with the control group. The 40 μg/mL and 80 μg/mL CAPE groups exhibited no significant difference in cell viability. In general, the proliferation of HOK cells could be slightly inhibited with the tested concentrations of CAPE. The viability of HOK cells was above 80% with 40 μg/mL and 80 μg/mL CAPE and above 90% on average with a CAPE concentration of 20 μg/mL. Compared with CHX, which exhibited obvious cytotoxicity (see the Discussion section), the biocompatibility of CAPE is acceptable.
FIG 7.

Viability of HOK cells affected by CAPE. The results of the CCK-8 assay showed the biocompatibility of CAPE at varying concentrations. The statistical data are presented as the means ± standard deviations (SD) from at least three independent experiments (*, P < 0.05; ns, not significant).
DISCUSSION
In this study, we identified the antibacterial and antifungal effects of CAPE on S. mutans and C. albicans, respectively. The concentrations selected depended on the susceptibility assay results. The results demonstrated that CAPE significantly inhibited both of these strains at MICs ranging from 80 to 160 μg/mL, which is consistent with a previous report (5). Because of the hydrophobicity of the tested CAPE, high concentrations might affect the absorbance, so the experimental results were further verified. Therefore, gradient concentrations of CAPE were applied to explore the influence on biofilm formation, EPS production, and cariogenic gene expression.
Considering the important role of dental caries as a global public health problem (1), more effective control targeting its pathogenesis has long been a research hot spot. In recent years, given the synergistic pathogenicity of multimicrobial communities (2, 25), it has been confirmed that cross-kingdom biofilms of S. mutans and C. albicans play an essential biological role in severe infection of dental caries (8). In other words, cross-kingdom biofilms are more likely to accelerate the severe demineralization of dental hard tissue, especially in severe ECC (7, 8). There is increasing evidence that bacterial-fungal interactions are key contributors to the cariogenic virulence and drug resistance of biofilms (7, 11, 26). However, current traditional approaches toward biofilm-associated infections still focus on individual bacterial or fungal components, thus limiting their efficacy (13). Similarly, although CAPE has been applied to interfere with caries infection caused by single pathogenic bacteria (5), the use of this natural product remains to be explored for preventing cross-kingdom biofilms with synergistic interactions of S. mutans and C. albicans.
Therefore, we constructed a cross-kingdom biofilm model of C. albicans and S. mutans in vitro. Inspired by previous studies on the pathogenesis of caries (27), the effects of CAPE on biofilm formation, synthesis of water-insoluble EPS and the expression of related genes have been investigated and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Our study shows that CAPE inhibits biofilm production and EPS synthesis, thereby reducing the biomass of biofilms. Despite CAPE treatment, the presence of C. albicans results in an increased number of S. mutans colonies in the cross-kingdom biofilm. Our statistical data further support the synergistic promotion effects of S. mutans and C. albicans, which is consistent with current research (26, 28). Similarly, the increased synthesis of EPS provides more binding sites and stronger adhesion for S. mutans, which in turn aggregates with C. albicans cells and contributes to increased biomass in biofilms (11, 29). The results also provide convincing evidence that CAPE impedes the secretion of EPS and the adherence of microbial communities in biofilms. Consequently, we showed the potential of CAPE to significantly reduce the virulence of the cross-kingdom biofilm.
The effect of CAPE on coaggregation with S. mutans and C. albicans was further evaluated through observation and analysis of biofilm morphology. C. albicans cells existed in the cross-kingdom biofilm in hyphal form, being enveloped by the extracellular matrix of the S. mutans biofilm. The hyphal forms are also regarded as a key virulence factor that promotes the production of C. albicans biofilms (24). We found that CAPE not only destroyed the tightness of the biofilms but also deformed the hyphal forms, which in turn led to the reduction in biofilm biomass and structural disruption in cross-kingdom biofilms. Studies have shown that the adhesion between S. mutans and C. albicans depends on the production of extracellular polymers, especially water-insoluble EPS, contributing to the construction of the extracellular matrix in cariogenic biofilms (8, 30). It is difficult to remove the microbial cells in the mature biofilms encased in the extracellular matrix, as described in a previous report (5). Furthermore, we inspected the influence of CAPE on established mature biofilms with fluorescence staining. The amount of dead bacteria showed an obvious increase in biofilms treated with CAPE. The effect of CAPE in reducing the thickness of biofilms was concentration dependent. Our results revealed that CAPE could devastate and crack the structure of biofilms through penetration of the extracellular matrix. Therefore, the data suggest that CAPE presents a promising advantage for the removal of cross-kingdom biofilms.
Because of the activity of Gtf, EPS form and adhere to biofilms abundantly in cariogenic bacteria. Based on the outcomes of the qRT–PCR assay, we speculate that the inhibitory effect of CAPE on the biofilm and EPS is probably achieved by reducing the expression level of gtf genes, including gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD. Notably, the expression of gtfB contributes to the adhesion of S. mutans and C. albicans (11, 26, 31). As shown in other studies in vitro, C. albicans increased the formation of the extracellular matrix of S. mutans by upregulating the expression levels of gtfB and gtfC in the cross-kingdom biofilm with symbiosis of these two species (26, 32). Therefore, CAPE downregulated the relative expression of the gtf gene, providing a theoretical basis for the application of CAPE to suppress severe dental caries caused by S. mutans and C. albicans.
Our target drug, CAPE, is a novel natural product derived from propolis. Natural products have been a prominent source for discovering new drugs, especially for overcoming the crucial threat posed by antibiotic resistance (18, 33). Some of the natural products discovered have been widely used to prevent and control oral diseases. For example, polyphenols, flavonoids, cinnamaldehyde, cinnamol, and other natural compounds extracted from various plants have been indicated to be effective antibacterial agents against S. mutans (17, 34, 35). Moreover, it has been determined that the main bioactive components of propolis can prevent dental caries (5). Studies have indicated that the antimicrobial activity of propolis from different sources could be attributed to the effects of CAPE, the most abundant polyphenolic compound in propolis (5, 36). On this basis, studies have indicated the antimicrobial activity of CAPE. Niu et al. (5) found strong anticariogenic activity of CAPE against pathogenic bacteria, especially S. mutans. De Barros et al. (24) discovered that CAPE had antifungal activity against C. albicans isolated from oral flora, and similar inhibition of C. albicans biofilms was observed in vitro. The efficacy of CAPE against oral candidiasis was also detected subsequently in an animal model (24). Our research proved that CAPE exhibited prominent inhibitory activity against the cross-kingdom biofilm formed by S. mutans and C. albicans, which are considered mutual pathogenic factors.
The biocompatibility of CAPE has been reported by previous studies (21). In our research, CAPE showed slight cytotoxicity to human oral keratinocytes (HOKs), according to the classification (37), which rates extracts as having severe, moderate, or slight cytotoxicity when the viability relative to the control groups is <30%, between 30 and 60%, or >60%, respectively. It is worth noting that CHX is currently considered one of the most common antiseptics in dentistry and the gold standard agent for the application of oral rinses, in particular, the clinical concentration of 0.12% CHX is used to remove plaque biofilm (5, 38, 39). However, its cytotoxicity has been widely reported, especially the obvious reduction of CHX against HOKs and fibroblast cell numbers in a short time (40). Barbara Azzimonti et al. (41) also emphasized that a low concentration of CHX (0.05%) resulted in less than 40% mucosal keratinocytes viability. Thus, our research suggested that the biocompatibility of CAPE is acceptable and has application potential.
The poor water solubility of CAPE has led to a lack of research evidence for drug delivery in vivo (42). It also limits the development of CAPE for clinical intervention. Recent studies have proposed the application of nanocarriers for CAPE and other hydrophobic materials to improve bioavailability (43). It has been reported that the application of polymer nanoparticles improves the biocompatibility of propolis, strengthens its antimicrobial activity and allows more efficient drug release in vivo (22). In view of the immunoregulatory activity of CAPE, alleviating the inflammatory responses induced by microbial infection (21), more in-depth in vivo and in vitro research is needed, including its combination with biomaterials to improve its application potential.
In conclusion, we found that the natural compound CAPE exhibited significant antimicrobial activity by interfering with the synergistic toxicity of S. mutans and C. albicans. The specific biomechanisms include inhibitory effects on cross-kingdom biofilm formation and adhesion, EPS synthesis and cariogenic gene expression. The inhibitory effect of CAPE on the cross-kingdom biofilm may contribute to the positive intervention of bacterial-fungal coinfections. CAPE also exhibited acceptable biocompatibility, but more extensive research for clinical safety assessment and efficient application is still warranted. Therefore, CAPE, as a promising natural compound, has the potential to be a new antimicrobial agent to prevent and control dental caries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
CAPE preparation.
CAPE (>97% purity, powder) was purchased from MACKLIN (Shanghai, China). As described in a previous report (5), 50% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) was utilized to prepare the CAPE stock solution at a concentration of 12.8 mg/mL.
Bacterial and fungal strains and growth conditions.
S. mutans strain UA159 (ATCC 700610) and C. albicans strain SC5314 (ATCC 10691) were acquired from the State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. The C. albicans and S. mutans strains were incubated in YPD medium and brain heart infusion (BHI) medium, respectively, for overnight precultivation at 37°C under anaerobic conditions with 5% CO2 for recovery (44, 45). The two strains were cocultured in YNBB medium for biofilm formation (28, 29).
Bacterial and fungal susceptibility assay.
The susceptibility and resistance of microbial strains to specific antibiotics can be described in terms of the MIC (46). The MIC of CAPE for S. mutans and C. albicans was tested in a 96-well cell culture plate with a modified microdilution method (5). The CAPE stock solution, prepared with 50% DMSO, was added to the corresponding medium with the overnight diluent suspensions (2 × 106 CFU/mL for S. mutans and 2 × 104 CFU/mL for C. albicans). Therefore, each well finally contained CAPE at concentrations ranging from 10 μg/mL to 1,280 μg/mL in 5% DMSO. In addition, 5% DMSO and the corresponding medium alone were used as the solvent and blank controls, respectively. As the positive control, CHX (Sigma–Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) replaced CAPE in microcells at concentrations ranging from 1.0 × 103 to 128.0 × 103 mg/mL according to reported protocols (5). The microplates were cultivated anaerobically with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 46–48 h. The optical density of each microwell at 600 nm (OD600) was estimated in a microplate spectrophotometer (Powerwave XS2, Bio-Tek, USA). Considering the turbidity of high-concentration solutions of CAPE, the plate coating method was applied to subsequently complement operations. Thus, the determined MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of CAPE in the system whose OD600 values did not differ from those of the blank medium group (47).
CFU counting for planktonic S. mutans and C. albicans influenced by CAPE.
The CFU counting assay was utilized to quantify the inhibitory effect of CAPE on the planktonic growth of C. albicans and S. mutans strains by counting the number of live microbial colonies on agar medium plates. In brief, overnight diluent suspensions of each strain were added to a 96-well cell culture plate with the corresponding medium and CAPE. The final concentration of CAPE was adjusted to 20, 40, 80, or 160 μg/mL. The control group was treated with the solvent rather than CAPE. After incubation for 24 h, the mixed suspensions were diluted 1:106 (for counting S. mutans) and 1:104 (for counting C. albicans) with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in accordance with the reported study (29). Then, C. albicans and S. mutans were incubated on YPD agar medium plates and BHI agar medium plates, respectively, under anaerobic conditions with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 48 h. The colonies formed on the plates were then counted.
Growth curves.
Based on the measurement of absorbance, growth curve patterns are generally used for examining the growth and proliferation of microbes over time. This assay was applied to illustrate the short-term inhibitory impact of CAPE against S. mutans and C. albicans (23, 48). The growth curves of planktonic C. albicans and S. mutans treated with CAPE were plotted as previously reported (17, 49). In brief, the concentrations of the overnight diluent suspensions of each strain were adjusted to 105 CFU/mL for S. mutans in BHI medium and 103 CFU/mL for C. albicans in YPD medium, and these were added into a 96-well cell culture plate with CAPE. The final concentrations of CAPE were set at 20 and 40 μg/mL. The control group was treated with the solvent. The plates were subsequently incubated under anaerobic conditions with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 12 h, and then, the OD600 of each microwell was measured every 30 min using a microplate spectrophotometer.
Crystal violet staining for biofilm biomass determination.
The crystal violet staining assay was adopted to analyze the effect of CAPE on C. albicans, S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilm formation as previously described (50). In brief, the single-species and cross-kingdom biofilms were cultured in 96-well plates as previously described (5) with CAPE at a final concentration of 20, 40, 80, or 160 μg/mL. The control group was treated with the solvent as described above. After incubation for 24 h, the excess medium in the plates was removed, and every well was washed gently using sterile PBS. After fixation with 100% methanol for 15 min, the adherent biofilms were stained with 0.1% (wt/vol) crystal violet-glacial acetic acid solution for 8 min. After discarding the excess solution and washing three times with PBS again, 95% (vol/vol) ethanol was utilized to extract the crystal violet. Finally, a microplate spectrophotometer was employed to measure the absorbance at 575 nm of each extract in a new 96-well plate.
CFU counting for quantification of biofilm biomass affected by CAPE.
The CFU counting assay was utilized to quantify the impact of CAPE on the production and formation of C. albicans, S. mutans, and cross-kingdom biofilms by counting the colonies of live microbes on agar medium plates. In brief, single-species and cross-kingdom biofilms were formed as described above with CAPE at a final concentration of 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL or 80 μg/mL. The control group was treated with the solvent. After cultivation in 24-well plates for 24 h, the biofilms were carefully washed with sterile PBS to eliminate planktonic cells. The adherent biofilms were then removed from the floor of each microwell and thoroughly mixed by vortexing with 200 μL of sterile PBS. After resuspension, each sample was diluted 106-fold to count S. mutans colonies and 104-fold to count C. albicans colonies. Colonies were counted following incubation on BHI agar medium for S. mutans and on YPD agar medium for C. albicans (17, 29, 51).
SEM for biofilm morphology analysis.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to investigate the surface morphology of C. albicans, S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms treated with CAPE. Briefly, glass coverslips were placed into 24-well plates with suspensions of S. mutans, C. albicans, and both species. These strains were incubated in YNBB medium to final concentrations of 1.0 × 106 CFU/mL and 1.0 × 104 CFU/mL, and CAPE was added at a concentration of 20 or 40 μg/mL. A control group was also prepared. Following incubation for 24 h, the supernatants was discarded, and the biofilms were fixed with 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde at 4°C for 10 h, followed by gentle resuspension with PBS. Then, the biofilms were dehydrated in a series of ethanol concentrations (30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, vol/vol) every 15 min. Finally, the coverslips were dried. After gold spraying, the samples were examined with a scanning electron microscope (Inspect F, FEI, Netherlands) (5, 17). Three points were selected at random in every sample for investigation at three magnifications (×1,000, ×5,000, ×20,000).
Live/dead bacterial viability assay for microscopy and quantitative assays of biofilms.
The live/dead bacterial viability assay was applied to conveniently examine the microstructure of biofilms and monitor the viability of bacterial colonies by measuring the maintenance of membrane integrity. The molecular probes SYTO 9 and propidium iodide (Invitrogen, USA) were adopted to label live bacteria and dead bacteria, respectively. Both dyes were diluted 50-fold with 0.3% (vol/vol) DMSO and then evenly mixed for further use. Specifically, S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms were formed on glass coverslips in 24-well plates with a CAPE concentration of 20 , 40 , or 80 μg/mL, and the control group was prepared as described above. The adherent biofilms were washed with PBS after discarding the excess medium and planktonic cells. After drying, the treated coverslips were stained with the mixed dyes following the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; Olympus FV3000, Japan) was then employed to detect the biofilms. Double-channel scanning was performed with the green channel (at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm) and the red channel (at an excitation wavelength of 561 nm) (52). Three points were randomly selected for the inspection of every specimen, the quantified statistical results of fluorescence intensity and the biofilm thickness of the three-dimensional reconstruction images were assessed using ImageJ COMSTAT software (53, 54).
Anthrone-sulfuric acid assay for quantitative estimation of EPS.
The anthrone-sulfuric acid assay was applied to verify the inhibitory effect of CAPE treatment on the synthesis of the water-insoluble EPS by S. mutans, C. albicans, and both species in accordance with reported protocols (5). S. mutans, C. albicans, and the cross-kingdom biofilms were constructed on the bottom of 24-well plates with a final CAPE concentration of 20, 40, or 80 μg/mL, and a control group was also prepared. The adherent biofilms were washed carefully using PBS after removing excess solutions, and each was completely collected with 1 mL of PBS in a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube (Corning). Then, the precipitate was obtained by centrifuging at 6,000 × g and 4°C for 10 min. After washing again, the precipitate was resuspended in 0.4 M NaOH with constant agitation at 37°C for 2 h. Then, 3 volumes of anthrone-sulfuric acid reagent was added and further mixed with the supernatant, followed by heating in a water bath at 95°C for 6 min until the reaction was completed. Finally, equal volumes of each sample were delivered to 96-well plates to measure the absorbance at 625 nm with a microplate spectrophotometer.
CLSM for EPS and bacteria in biofilms.
CLSM was utilized to conveniently observe biofilm formation and quantify the relationship between bacteria and water-insoluble EPS in biofilms. The molecular probes Alexa Fluor 647 and SYTO 9 (Invitrogen, USA) were applied to mark the EPS and live bacteria, respectively. First, S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms were formed with the same method and simultaneously mixed with the fluorochrome Alexa Fluor 647. Then, adherent biofilms were washed carefully with PBS without the excess solutions and stained with the fluorochrome SYTO 9 for 5 min. After washing again, the coverslips were observed using CLSM (Olympus FV3000, Japan). Double-channel scanning inspections were performed with the green channel (at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm) and the red channel (at an excitation wavelength of 561 nm). Three random points were selected for the investigation of each sample, and the quantified fluorescence intensity was assessed with ImageJ COMSTAT software (53).
qRT–PCR analysis of cariogenic gene expression in biofilms.
The relative expression levels of cariogenic virulence genes, including gtfB, gtfC and gtfD, were analyzed with a c assay in S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms under CAPE treatment. In brief, S. mutans and cross-kingdom biofilms were cultured in YNBB medium with CAPE at a final concentration of 20, 40, or 80 μg/mL, with sterile PBS serving as the control group, for 24 h. The adherent biofilms were collected using the same experimental method. The total RNA of S. mutans UA159 was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). After that, RNA reverse transcription was performed with the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (TaKaRa, Japan). The relative expression levels of gtfB, gtfC and gtfD mRNA were determined using the qRT–PCR assay, with S. mutans UA159 16S rRNA used as the reference. The primers were synthesized by TsingKe Biotechnology, and the sequences are presented in Table 1. In general, the quantitative PCR conditions and procedures were similar to those used in a previous study (17). The 2−ΔΔCT method was utilized to calculate the relative mRNA expression levels of S. mutans gtf genes (55). The assay was independently performed in triplicate according to the qRT–PCR procedures and experimental conditions.
TABLE 1.
Sequences of the primers for qPCR
| Primers | Sequences |
|---|---|
| 16S rRNA | Forward: 5′-CCATGTGTAGCGGTGAAATGC-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-TCATCGTTTACGGCGTGGAC-3′ | |
| gtfB | Forward: 5′-AGCCGAAAGTTGGTATCGTCC-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-TGACGCTGTGTTTCTTGGCTC-3′ | |
| gtfC | Forward: 5′-TTCCGTCCCTTATTGATGACATG-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-AATTGAAGCGGACTGGTTGCT-3′ | |
| gtfD | Forward: 5′-TTGACGGTGTTCGTGTTGAT-3′ |
| Reverse: 5′-AAAGCGATAGGCGCAGTTTA-3′ |
CCK-8 assay for biocompatibility.
The biocompatibility of CAPE on human oral keratinocytes (HOKs) was detected by the Cell-Counting-Kit 8 (CCK-8) assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.). The HOK cell line was acquired from the State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. The cells were incubated in 100 U/mL penicillin supplemented with DMEM (Gibco) and 100 mg/mL streptomycin supplemented with 20% FBS (Gibco) in a volume of 100 μL per well in a 96-well cell plate with a final CAPE concentration of 20, 40, 80, or 160 μg/mL, the control group was prepared as described above. After incubation for 24 h, the cells were resuspended gently with sterile PBS, and 10 μL of CCK-8 reagent was mixed in every well. After another 4 h of cultivation, the absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate spectrophotometer.
Statistical analysis.
All experiments were carried out independently three times, with reliable data obtained from repeat wells for each concentration. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics 25, USA). The statistical results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance and a post hoc t test were applied to analyze the difference between the experimental groups and the control group. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by Research Funding for Talent Development, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (RCDWJS2021-6) and Research and Development Funding, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (RD-02-202009).
We declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Contributor Information
Xuedong Zhou, Email: zhouxd@scu.edu.cn.
Derong Yin, Email: derongyin@scu.edu.cn.
Xiaoyu Tang, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory.
Jonathon Baker, J. Craig Venter Institute.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, Tagami J, Twetman S, Tsakos G, Ismail A. 2017. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17030. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lamont RJ, Koo H, Hajishengallis G. 2018. The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:745–759. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0089-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marsh PD, Zaura E. 2017. Dental biofilm: ecological interactions in health and disease. J Clin Periodontol 44 Suppl 18:S12–S22. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bowen WH, Burne RA, Wu H, Koo H. 2018. Oral biofilms: pathogens, matrix, and polymicrobial interactions in microenvironments. Trends Microbiol 26:229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Niu Y, Wang K, Zheng S, Wang Y, Ren Q, Li H, Ding L, Li W, Zhang L. 2020. Antibacterial effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on cariogenic bacteria and Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00251-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00251-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Edlund A, Yang Y, Yooseph S, He X, Shi W, McLean JS. 2018. Uncovering complex microbiome activities via metatranscriptomics during 24 hours of oral biofilm assembly and maturation. Microbiome 6:217. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0591-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim D, Liu Y, Benhamou RI, Sanchez H, Simon-Soro A, Li Y, Hwang G, Fridman M, Andes DR, Koo H. 2018. Bacterial-derived exopolysaccharides enhance antifungal drug tolerance in a cross-kingdom oral biofilm. ISME J 12:1427–1442. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0113-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim HE, Dhall A, Liu Y, Bawazir M, Koo H, Hwang G. 2021. Intervening in symbiotic cross-kingdom biofilm interactions: a binding mechanism-based nonmicrobicidal approach. mBio 12:e00651-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00651-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hajishengallis E, Parsaei Y, Klein MI, Koo H. 2017. Advances in the microbial etiology and pathogenesis of early childhood caries. Mol Oral Microbiol 32:24–34. doi: 10.1111/omi.12152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tanner ACR, Kressirer CA, Rothmiller S, Johansson I, Chalmers NI. 2018. The caries microbiome: implications for reversing dysbiosis. Adv Dent Res 29:78–85. doi: 10.1177/0022034517736496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hwang G, Liu Y, Kim D, Li Y, Krysan DJ, Koo H. 2017. Candida albicans mannans mediate Streptococcus mutans exoenzyme GtfB binding to modulate cross-kingdom biofilm development in vivo. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006407. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li X, Yin L, Ramage G, Li B, Tao Y, Zhi Q, Lin H, Zhou Y. 2019. Assessing the impact of curcumin on dual-species biofilms formed by Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Microbiologyopen 8:e937. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Koo H, Allan RN, Howlin RP, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L. 2017. Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:740–755. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Marc G, Araniciu C, Oniga S, Vlase L, Pîrnău A, Duma M, Măruțescu L, Chifiriuc M, Oniga O. 2018. New N-(oxazolylmethyl)-thiazolidinedione active against Candida albicans biofilm: potential als proteins inhibitors. Molecules 23:2522. doi: 10.3390/molecules23102522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang S, Wang H, Ren B, Li H, Weir MD, Zhou X, Oates TW, Cheng L, Xu HHK. 2017. Do quaternary ammonium monomers induce drug resistance in cariogenic, endodontic and periodontal bacterial species? Dent Mater 33:1127–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shino B, Peedikayil FC, Jaiprakash SR, Ahmed Bijapur G, Kottayi S, Jose D. 2016. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine, coconut oil, probiotics, and ketoconazole on Candida albicans isolated in children with early childhood caries: an in vitro study. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016:7061587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang Z, Liu Y, Lu M, Lyu X, Gong T, Tang B, Wang L, Zeng J, Li Y. 2020. Rhodiola rosea extract inhibits the biofilm formation and the expression of virulence genes of cariogenic oral pathogen Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 116:104762. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nijampatnam B, Zhang H, Cai X, Michalek SM, Wu H, Velu SE. 2018. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilms by the natural stilbene piceatannol through the inhibition of glucosyltransferases. ACS Omega 3:8378–8385. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Scorzoni L, Fuchs BB, Junqueira JC, Mylonakis E. 2021. Current and promising pharmacotherapeutic options for candidiasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 22:867–887. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1873951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ferreira EDS, Rosalen PL, Benso B, de Cassia Orlandi Sardi J, Denny C, Alves de Sousa S, Queiroga Sarmento Guerra F, de Oliveira Lima E, Almeida Freires I, Dias de Castro R. 2021. The use of essential oils and their isolated compounds for the treatment of oral candidiasis: a literature review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2021:1059274. doi: 10.1155/2021/1059274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Olgierd B, Kamila Z, Anna B, Emilia M. 2021. The pluripotent activities of caffeic acid phenethyl ester. Molecules 26:1335. doi: 10.3390/molecules26051335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Abdel Raheem IA, Abdul Razek A, Elgendy AA, Saleh NM, Shaaban MI, Abd El-Hady FK. 2019. Design, evaluation and antimicrobial activity of egyptian propolis-loaded nanoparticles: intrinsic role as a novel and naturally based root canal nanosealer. Int J Nanomedicine (Lond) 14:8379–8398. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S219577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sun L, Liao K, Hang C. 2018. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester synergistically enhances the antifungal activity of fluconazole against resistant Candida albicans. Phytomedicine 40:55–58. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2017.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Barros PP, Rossoni RD, Garcia MT, Kaminski VL, Loures FV, Fuchs BB, Mylonakis E, Junqueira JC. 2021. The anti-biofilm efficacy of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) in vitro and a murine model of oral candidiasis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:700305. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.700305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shokeen B, Dinis MDB, Haghighi F, Tran NC, Lux R. 2021. Omics and interspecies interaction. Periodontol 2000 85:101–111. doi: 10.1111/prd.12354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Falsetta ML, Klein MI, Colonne PM, Scott-Anne K, Gregoire S, Pai CH, Gonzalez-Begne M, Watson G, Krysan DJ, Bowen WH, Koo H. 2014. Symbiotic relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans synergizes virulence of plaque biofilms in vivo. Infect Immun 82:1968–1981. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00087-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Krzyściak W, Jurczak A, Kościelniak D, Bystrowska B, Skalniak A. 2014. The virulence of Streptococcus mutans and the ability to form biofilms. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33:499–515. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1993-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sztajer H, Szafranski SP, Tomasch J, Reck M, Nimtz M, Rohde M, Wagner-Dobler I. 2014. Cross-feeding and interkingdom communication in dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. ISME J 8:2256–2271. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu S, Qiu W, Zhang K, Zhou X, Ren B, He J, Xu X, Cheng L, Li M. 2017. Nicotine Enhances Interspecies Relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Biomed Res Int 2017:1–1. doi: 10.1155/2017/7953920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wan SX, Tian J, Liu Y, Dhall A, Koo H, Hwang G. 2021. Cross-kingdom cell-to-cell interactions in cariogenic biofilm initiation. J Dent Res 100:74–81. doi: 10.1177/0022034520950286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ellepola K, Liu Y, Cao T, Koo H, Seneviratne CJ. 2017. Bacterial GtfB augments Candida albicans accumulation in cross-kingdom biofilms. J Dent Res 96:1129–1135. doi: 10.1177/0022034517714414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gregoire S, Xiao J, Silva BB, Gonzalez I, Agidi PS, Klein MI, Ambatipudi KS, Rosalen PL, Bauserman R, Waugh RE, Koo H. 2011. Role of glucosyltransferase B in interactions of Candida albicans with Streptococcus mutans and with an experimental pellicle on hydroxyapatite surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:6357–6367. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05203-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Townsley L, Shank EA. 2017. Natural-product antibiotics: cues for modulating bacterial biofilm formation. Trends Microbiol 25:1016–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chiang HM, Chen HC, Wu CS, Wu PY, Wen KC. 2015. Rhodiola plants: chemistry and biological activity. J Food Drug Anal 23:359–369. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2015.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.He Z, Huang Z, Jiang W, Zhou W. 2019. Antimicrobial activity of cinnamaldehyde on Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Front Microbiol 10:2241. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Barrientos L, Herrera CL, Montenegro G, Ortega X, Veloz J, Alvear M, Cuevas A, Saavedra N, Salazar LA. 2013. Chemical and botanical characterization of Chilean propolis and biological activity on cariogenic bacteria Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Braz J Microbiol 44:577–585. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822013000200038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sletten GB, Dahl JE. 1999. Cytotoxic effects of extracts of compomers. Acta Odontol Scand 57:316–322. doi: 10.1080/000163599428544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Karpinski TM, Szkaradkiewicz AK. 2015. Chlorhexidine–pharmaco-biological activity and application. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19:1321–1326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oliveira MAC, Borges AC, Brighenti FL, Salvador MJ, Gontijo AVL, Koga-Ito CY. 2017. Cymbopogon citratus essential oil: effect on polymicrobial caries-related biofilm with low cytotoxicity. Braz Oral Res 31:e89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Balloni S, Locci P, Lumare A, Marinucci L. 2016. Cytotoxicity of three commercial mouthrinses on extracellular matrix metabolism and human gingival cell behaviour. Toxicol in Vitro 34:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Azzimonti B, Cochis A, Beyrouthy ME, Iriti M, Uberti F, Sorrentino R, Landini MM, Rimondini L, Varoni EM. 2015. Essential oil from berries of Lebanese Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb displays similar antibacterial activity to chlorhexidine but higher cytocompatibility with human oral primary cells. Molecules 20:9344–9357. doi: 10.3390/molecules20059344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Garrido E, Cerqueira AS, Chavarria D, Silva T, Borges F, Garrido J. 2018. Microencapsulation of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and caffeic acid phenethyl amide by inclusion in hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Food Chem 254:260–265. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kaya S, Yilmaz DE, Akmayan I, Egri O, Arasoglu T, Derman S. 2022. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester loaded electrospun nanofibers for wound dressing application. J Pharm Sci 111:734–742. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Qiu W, Zheng X, Wei Y, Zhou X, Zhang K, Wang S, Cheng L, Li Y, Ren B, Xu X, Li Y, Li M. 2016. d-Alanine metabolism is essential for growth and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. Mol Oral Microbiol 31:435–444. doi: 10.1111/omi.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mahto KK, Singh A, Khandelwal NK, Bhardwaj N, Jha J, Prasad R. 2014. An assessment of growth media enrichment on lipid metabolome and the concurrent phenotypic properties of Candida albicans. PLoS One 9:e113664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kowalska-Krochmal B, Dudek-Wicher R. 2021. The minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotics: methods, interpretation, clinical relevance. Pathogens 10:165. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Song J, Choi B, Jin EJ, Yoon Y, Choi KH. 2012. Curcumin suppresses Streptococcus mutans adherence to human tooth surfaces and extracellular matrix proteins. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:1347–1352. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1448-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li F, Weir MD, Fouad AF, Xu HH. 2013. Time-kill behaviour against eight bacterial species and cytotoxicity of antibacterial monomers. J Dent 41:881–891. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zwietering MH, Jongenburger I, Rombouts FM, van 't Riet K. 1990. Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1875–1881. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1875-1881.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ommen P, Zobek N, Meyer RL. 2017. Quantification of biofilm biomass by staining: non-toxic safranin can replace the popular crystal violet. J Microbiol Methods 141:87–89. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang N, Chen C, Melo MA, Bai YX, Cheng L, Xu HH. 2015. A novel protein-repellent dental composite containing 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine. Int J Oral Sci 7:103–109. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tawakoli PN, Al-Ahmad A, Hoth-Hannig W, Hannig M, Hannig C. 2013. Comparison of different live/dead stainings for detection and quantification of adherent microorganisms in the initial oral biofilm. Clin Oral Invest 17:841–850. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0792-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Morris AJ, Li A, Jackson L, Yau YCW, Waters V. 2020. Quantifying the effects of antimicrobials on in vitro biofilm architecture using COMSTAT software. J Vis Exp [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Veloz JJ, Alvear M, Salazar LA. 2019. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity against Streptococcus mutans of individual and mixtures of the main polyphenolic compounds found in Chilean propolis. Biomed Res Int 2019:7602343. doi: 10.1155/2019/7602343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Decker EM, Klein C, Schwindt D, von Ohle C. 2014. Metabolic activity of Streptococcus mutans biofilms and gene expression during exposure to xylitol and sucrose. Int J Oral Sci 6:195–204. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






